found out by Libertines deliver from the wrath to come had not Princes need be on better grounds then Apocryphall notions such distinctions of which God in his Word never gave any foundation but besides the Apocryphalnesse of this notion that these Kings reformed Religion not meerly quae Types but as Kings and Princes over subjects may be proved thus First because Magistrates before them and Magistrates of other Common-wealths did so as is largely shown in the twelfth Thâ—sis Secondly Types were not ordained by the Politicall or Morall Law as Magistrates and their authority but by the Ceremoniall Law Thirdly for that which they say the Kings of Israel the Iews and their Land were Types of and that which by their Kings punishing Idolaters and Seducers was typified namely spiritual censures under the Gospel of Excommâ—nication and casting out of the wicked from the Churches of the Gospel 't is denied they were Types of the Christian Church in respect of the Civill State but of the Spirituall and Ecclesiasticall Government by Church Officers so the Land of Canaan was a Type of heaven not as it contained the Civill State but the Church it being a Type of Heaven before they had possession of it or their Civill State and Government set up and yet no Type of Heaven till the people of God had a promise of it 〈◊〉 is evident by laying the Scriptures of the Old and New Testament together And as for those punishments inflicted by Kings typifying the censures under the Gospel we must know that all the Spiritual Censures of Admonition Suspension Excommunication were under the Old Testament in the time of the Kings of Iudah and that not only for Ceremoniall uncleannesses but for morall and scandalous finâ— all which is fully proved by Master Gillaspie at large in his Aâ—rous Rod blossoming 2 Book 4 5 6 7 8 9 10. 12. chapters Fourthly granting what these Libertines say that the Kings of Judah were Types of Christ and in what they did they aypified Christs kingly Office yet this cannot enervate the examples of these Kings unlesse doing things as a Type and as a Morall example could not stand in one and the same person which is not so Some particular persons may be intended by God Types of Christ the highest kind of Type and their action intended to typifie speciall works of Christ and yet those very actionâ— may be Morall and binding all in such relations whose persons nor actions can in no kind be judged typicall and the reason of it is because God may serve himself of a person or office doing things commanded in the Moral law to make a type of â—nd though God intends such a man by such and such actions to make him a Type yet the man may not know so much nor intend any such thing in such actions but do all by vertue of a Morall command and for the better understanding of this let the Reader consider that in some persons the same actions may be both Typicall and Morall extraordinary in regard of the maâ—â—er and some circumstances and ordinary in regard of the matter and substance typicall as typifying Christ and what he should do and yet Moâ—all duties which he ought to do and all others also in such relations so that though some persons be Types and the things they do typicall yet they may be Morall too and so binding which though as they were typicall they may be taken away yet as they were Morall may be in full force As for example Christ was figured in Joseph Ioseph was an eminent Type of Christ in the first â—ank of Types as a singular person typifying him not as a rank or order of men by office only as those kings of Iudah spoken of and among other things he was a Type in feeding his Father and his Brethren that when advanced in the kingdome he provided for and nourished his Fathers house which typified Iesus Christ feeding the Family of God and preserving the Church alive Now though Ioseph in this action was a Type of Christ and did it typically yet not only typically but did this morally and naturally too by vertue of the fifth Commandement and sixth Commandement of childrens duty to their Parents and of preserving life and by vertue of this example of Ioseph every man in high place and rich is bound to send for and provide for Father and Brethren in a necessitous condition and suppose now a man in Iosephs condition should have Father and Brethren in want whom he should neglect and being pressed by Iosephs example to provide for them he should answer Iosephs practise was nothing to him for he was a Type of Christ and typified Christs feeding of his Church not with temporall food only but with the Manna from Heaven the word and Sacraments I aske of those who plead this Argument of typicalnesse whether this were a good Answer and if not neither is theirs against the practise of the kings of Iudah from being Types of Christ and I wish the Pleaders for Toleration would serious consider of and resolve this Question though Ioseph was a speciall Type of Christ and in this action of preserving his Father and Brethren a Type of Christs preserving his Church yet whether this action of his to his Father Brethren and their children do not bind now in the dayes of the Gospel children to their Fathers c. or whether the typicalnesse of it hath caused it to cease and in the resolution of this case the ingenuous Reader may see what to judge of the typicalnesse of the kings of Iudah and that typicalnesse of persons and actions does not presently make all such persons and actions that they cannot be examples or rules to others who are not typicall The Prophets and Propheticall office were Types of Christ as well as the kings of Iudah and yet actions they did that were some way typicall and extraordinary bind Christians under the Gospel for the substance and matter and are set before them for example as Eliâ—â— a Type and in his Prayer a Type yea somewhat in it extraordinary is by Iames propounded in prayer as a patterne and a proof of effectuall servent prayer to righteous men under the Gospel Iames 5. 16 17 18. In Hebrews 11. many are named who in their persons were undoubted Types of Christ as Noah Isaac Joseph Moses Samson David and others who if not Types in their persons yet were in an extraordinary way as Abraham Iacob Gideon Iephtah c. Now in the point of faith and patience though Types or extraordinary persons are set down for examples and patterns to Christians under the New Testament Hebrews 12. verse 1 2. I could give many more instances of Types and extraordinary persons whom in Morall practicall things matters of faith holinesse righteousnes though they did such things extraordinarily and as Types of Christ either personally or officially Christians in an ordinary way are commanded to follow
of that knowne axiome A particulari ad universale non valet consequentia and therefore though that particular reason be ceased although I haue fully shown that never was any reason of those Laws under the old Testament for punishing of false Prophets but a meer device and a fancie t is no good consequence all the other reasons yea and the commands themselves should cease also Seventhly to that Hagiomastix saith that the punishments enjoyned by God then under the Law to be inflicted in his Church upon delinquents were more bodily and afflictive to the outward man then the punishments enjoyned under the Gospel and consequently were not only carnall or bodily but typicall also and prefignificative of those greater and more spirituall under the Gospel cutting off from his people then as of casting out from his people now cutting off under the Gospel being no where found to be used but in a metaphorical and allusive sense also to what Minus Celsus Senensis writes that that corporall punishment in Deut. 13. was a Type of eternall damnation and therefore that Law with all the rest given for the future signification of things by the comming of Christ ceased I answer as followes First I deny the punishments enjoyned by God under the Law to be inflicted in his Church upon delinquents to be bodily or afflictive at all to the outward man as by donfiscation of goods or by death but they were spirituall and inflicted upon the soules by suspension excommunication and such like spirituall censures as well as now under the Gospel T is true there were bodily outward punishments in the Civill Iudicatories inflicted then on the bodies of false Prophets Idolaters c but by the Magistrates the Civil Governors and not by the Priests the Ecclesiastical Governors in the Church of the Iewes For under the Law the Jewish Church and Common-wealth the Civil Government and Ecclesiastical the censures and punishments of Church and State were formally distinct as Master Gillespie hath fully and excellently proved in his Aarons rod blossoming in many places particularly 1. Book cap. 2. 3 4 5 and the Church of the Iewes proceeded then against false Prophets only with the sword of the Spirit and spirituall weapons and the State with the materiall Sword and bodily punishments Which truth is fully acknowledged also by Master Cotton however differing from Presbyterians about a National Church in his Answer to Master Williams Bloudy Tenet saying I should think mine eye not only obscured but the fight of it utterly put out if I should conceave as he doth that the National Church State of the Jewes did necessarily call for such weapons a speaking of a Sword of Iron or Steel to punish Hereticks more then the Congregetional State of particular Churches doth call for the same now in the dayes of the new Testament For was not the National Church of the Iewes as compleatly furnished with spirituall Armor to defend it selfe and to offend men and Divels as the particular Churches of the new Testament be Had they not power to convince false Prophets as Eliah did the Prophets of Baal Had they not power to seperate all evil doers from the fellowship of the Congregation what power have our particular Churches now which their National Church wanted or what efficacie is there found in the exercise of our power which was wanting to them It is therefore a Sophistical imagination of mans Braine to make a mans selfe or the world believe that the National Church State of the Iewes required a Civil Sword whereas the particular State of the Gospel needs no such helpe And was not the National Church of Israel as powerfully able by the same spirit to doe the same surely it was both spoken and meant of the National Church of the Jewes not by might nor by Power but my Spirit saith the Lord of Hosts Zach. 4. 6. So that by what I have already said Hagiomastix must either I suppose recall what he hath written of carnal bodily punishments enjoyned by God then to be inflicted in his Church upon delinquents or else must joyne with the Erastians in holding the Iewish Church and Common-wealth their Governement and Censures all one and the same Secondly The foundation upon which Hagiomastix rears this building of outward punishments under the old Testament being typical of spiritual under the new viz the Land of Canaan with the external happinesse and peace there being typical and therefore reasons a comparaâ—is and from the Analogie is sandie and unsound for the Land of Canaan with the external happinesse and long life in it whatsoever it was typical of was from what God had put into the Land being a Land healthful pleasant flowing with milke and honey abounding in excellent precious fruits the immediate blessings of God upon it and not from what came to it by the Magistrates Laws and their good Government for further satisfaction of which I wish Master Goodwin to resolve me this question whether the Land of Canaan were not typical as well in times of wars and troubles and under bad Princes as in dayes of peace and under good Princes and so to reason a comparatis to use his owne Phrase and adidem if temporall threatnings and bodily punishments inflicted upon delinquents under the old Testament were typicall and Praesignificative of greater under the Gospel they must be threatnings and bodily punishments inflicted from God upon false Prophets c not thoe executed by the Magistrates on them Thirdly Granting both Hagiomastixs foundation and the building reared upon it to be good yet they no whit prove bodily and outward punishments to be wholly taken away under the new Testament for suppose the temporal happinesse and the temporal punishments had typified more spiritual happinesse and lesse of the earth more spiritual judgements and lesse of outward or bodily sufferings under the Gospel yet it followes not they take away all outward happinesse and blessings and all outward bodily punishments there may be greater or lesser degrees of things under the old and new Testament suitable to some difference in the manner of Administration betweene the old and the new and yet not the substance of the things taken away These are knowne axioms Gradus non tollunt substantiam Magis Minus non variant speciem T is apparent by sense and experience that how much soever spirituall blessings and spiritual judgements in the dayes of the Gospel abound above the times under the Law yet they take not away all temporal outward blessings nor all temporal outward judgements but God for all that gives many outward blessings and sends many temporal judgements on the earth So supposing God should inflict more spiritual judgements on the soules of men under the new Testament and the Church greater spiritual censures then under the old it no way followes the Magistrates may inflict none at all especially when all spiritual judgements on the soule are slited and with a high hand
coercive power with a high hand scourging and driving out of the Temple those that sold Oxen c. and this he is said to doe out of zeale the zeale of thine House hath eaten me up and though this be not recorded for Ministers to use a materiall whip yet certainly this was an act of righteousnesse that should have been done by the Magistrates of that time it had been a glorious action if they had done it and however there might be something heroical in it yet doubtlesse t is an act of righteousnesse and zeal that ought to be done by some in their ordinary calling viz. by Magistrates 3. Rom. 13. 4. Magistrates beare not the sword in vaiue for them that doe evill and they are revengers to execute wrath upon them that doe evill Now Blasphemers Hereticks false Teachers doe evill and are evill workers Phil. 3. 2. 2 Epistle of John v. 11. Revel 2. 2. and non distinguendum est ubi Scriptura non distinguit upon which place Master Bilson writes thus Princes in the new Testament be Gods Ministers to revenge malefactors as they were in the old and the greater the wickednesse the rather to be punished ergo the greatest as Heresies Idolatries and Blasphemies are soonest of all other vices to be repressed by Christian Magistrates whose zeale for Christs glory must not decrease Christs care for their Scepters being increased 4. 1 Cor. 12. 10. 29. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Apostle showes us that when Christian Magistrates were wanting besides miracles gifts of healing c. Christ gave a speciall gift to the Church of restraining Seducers and obstinate Hereticks by corporall punishment There were some that had a speciall gift of coercing ungodly men this Paul exercised upon Elymâ—n the false Prophet and Seducer Acts 13. 11. upon which place Peter Martyr writes fully The Church then had not the Sword of the Magistrate by which offences might be restrained therefore a power was given of punishing them corporally The best Interpreters Ancient and Modern as Chrysostome Oecumenius Calvin Beza Peter Martyr Pareus and divers others doe understand by Powers those who had such a Gift upon which place I intended to have insisted largely by comparing other Scriptures with it and to have demonstrated from it the necessity and lawfulnesse of a power of punishing corporally obstinate Hereticks and Seducers but I must take off 5. Gal. 5. 12. Paul wishes that false Teachers and troublers of the Church were cut off which place I intended to have enlarged upon to prove it meant of bodily cutting off but cannot now 6. 1 Tim. 2. 2. Paul showes Kings and those that are in Authoritie are to be prayed for that we may lead a quiet and a peaceable life in all godlinesse and honesty in all godlinesse as well as honesty This is the end of prayers to be made for Magistrates Now that which is the end of Prayers poured out for Magistrates ought to be the end propounded by the Magistrate in his duty but the Apostle commands prayers to be made for Magistrates for that end ergo it lyes upon the Magistrate to see to it of which the Reader may see more in Meisner Polit. de Magistratu and t is confessed by Master Thomas Goodwin in his Returne of Prayers this was a command to pray that God would give Christian Magistrates to the Church the Answer of which was in giving Constantine a Christian Emperor who as the Ecclesiastical Histories show did by Lawes and Edicts command the Christian Religion as also establish the â—icenâ— Creed touching the Faith of one Substance banishing by his Edict Arius and his adherentâ— 7. Revel 17 16. John prophecies and speaks of it as an acceptable work to God for Christian Kings and States by their Civil temporal power to destroy the Romish Religion Now if the Romish Seducers and corrupters of Religion upon that ground cald the Whore may be punished by Civil Magistrates and dealt with by other weapons then preaching admonition excommunication then such as are certinly worse then they as Antiâ—rinitariaâ—s Socâ—nians Libertins may be also by Magistrates restrained Master Robinson writing against the Anabaptists one Helwisse who interprets this place of Spirituall weapons answers him this is a prophecie of Kings and Magistrates whose weapons and power are other besides that of prayers which is common to all Christians t is spoken what they shal doe as Kings Besides t is contrary to the cleare meaning of the Holy-Ghost which is that Kings should first use their Civill power for the Beast and Whore and after against them to their destruction they shall give their power to the Lamb as they before gave it against the Lamb Now we know they used their Civil power under Poperie as a means by which to suppresse the true Religion and therefore Princes and States shall establish the true by that means and destroy the false of which I had thought to have enlarged further as also upon the other New Testament quotations to have answered the evasions brought against them especially of Hagiomastix against Rom. 13. 4. and to have proved it cannot be restrained only against evils of the Second Table but is to be understood of evil against the First but I must reserve these things and divers more to another opportunitie and for a Second Part. If God wil. To God only wise be glory through Jesus Christ Amen FINIS GOod Reader among many other Errata of the Presse upon running over the Book in hast since printed not having time to read and weigh every page much lesse sentence or line I finde these following ERRATA PAge 32 line 12 after ought to be r. also punished p. 30. l. 13 for they r. these p. 33 l. 28 r. four and five fold p. 55 l. 4. for latter r. letter The figures of the pages which should be 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64. are misprinted p. 64. l. 6. for mens r. means p. 78. l. 23. for others r. other Divines p. 167. l. 12. after put r. upon and. Margin Notes p. 14. for diga r. digna p. 61. for Egyptis r. Egyptii bones r. boves p. 130. r. c. 9 quae 4. p. 189. for equas r. equus p. 214. r. praceptorum for Prophetam r. Prophetarum for plâ—nisquâ— r. plerisque p. 216. r. after peccata r. coercerentur Numb 33. 52 5. â— King 20. 42. Revel 2. 20. * Aug. contra Petil. l. 2. c. 83. Noli dicere inquit Petiliano Augustinus Absit absit à conscientia nostra ut ad nostram fidem aliquem compellamus facitis enim ubi potestis ubi autem non facitis non potâ—stis sive legum sive invidiae timâ—re sive resistentium multitudine * Luther epist ad Wences Lin cum Christus meus vivit regnat ego vivam regnabo ☞ ☞ * Zanch. in quartum praceptum Chemnitii loci Commun De lege Dei in quartum praecept * Vide Master Cheynels
God for it p. 12 13 Magistrates and Judges before Moses time before the Judiciall Lawes or Levitical Priesthood did punish for matters of Religion and command men under their power to worship God p. 13 14 Other Kings besides those of Israel and Iudah used their Power for the worship of God against Idolaters Blasphemers c p. 14 15 16 That objection against the Kings of Israel and Iudahs power in matters of Religion that they were tipes of Christ and that Land typical answered at large in eight distinct Answers where divers things are opened concerning Types and of those Kings being Types and how actions may be Typical and yet morall from p. 16 to 27 Idolatry and Idolaters not the adaequate object of the Magistrates coercive power under the old Testament but the whole worship and truth of God from p. 27 to 34 The 17. of Deut. 18. 19. opened and proved to give Magistrates the care of Religion p. 34 35 36 37 Vnder the Father in the fourth commandement and under sanctifying the Sabbath the Magistrates dutie to see the publick worship of God observed by his subjects proved p. 34 40. 41 The Magistrates dutie qua Magistrate in matters of Religion proved and yet with a difference of the Christian and Heathen Magistrates power in such matters p. 42 43 44 The commands in the Old Testament for Magistrates punishing in matters of the first Table as Exod. 22. 13. Deut. 13. 1 2 5. Deut. 17. 1. 2 3 4 5. Levit. 24. 16. Deut 18 20. 22. with divers others laid down p. 44 45 46 Reasons laid down to prove these commands for punishing Idolaters false Prophets c. Morall of common reason and equity given to all Nations and for all Ages from p. 46. to 53. Of Judiciall lawes under the Old Testament being in force under the New how far and in what respects with the reasons thereof from p. 53. to 58. The Magistrates punishing of sinnes immediately against God as Blasphemy Apostasie c. is of the light of nature p. 58 59 60 61 72 73 The Magistrates coercive power in matters of Religion as necessary under the Gospel for the glory of God salvation of mens soules peace of Church and State as under the Old yea more reasons for it under the Gospel then under the Law p. 62 63 64 The Magistrates punishing false Prophets c. is an act of our love to God and our Brethren p. 66 67 68 69 70 71 The reasons of those commands in 13. and 17. chap. of Deut. concerning putting to death false Prophets Apostates have been were and are stil the same of a like nature and force both before the commands given by Moses in Moses time and now under the Gospel p. 76 77 78 An Answer to that objection that if Moses laws bind now then Moses is alive under the new Testament p. 79 80 A full Answer to that objection If the Law in Deut. 13. be in force now t is in force in all the particulars for the manner of the punishment for a whole City not only al the Inhabitants but the cattell also c. in which answer many things are opened and cleared what 's morall in that Deut. 13. and what ceremoniall and that the law concerning the destroying of a city cattell c. is no part of the command spoken of in the first part of the 13. chap of Deut. p. 81 82 83 84 85 86 87. 173 174 175. 195 196 An answer to that obiection If Moses lawes bind under the New Testament then every person in an idolatrous State is bound to seek the death one of another yea the Magistrate bound to sentence to death all his subiects practising idolatry without exception p. 90 91 92 93 A full answer to that Evasion of Hagiomastix against the Old Testament lawes that the reason why the Magistrates did then punish false Prophets Blasphemers c. was because the Jewes to whom these laws were given in all difficult cases about matters of Religion had the opportunity of immediate consultation with God who did infallibly declare his mind to them in which answer many questions are discussed and cleared severall texts opened as whether God gave answers by Vrim and Thummim in difficulties arising about morall transgressionâ— against the first Table or rather whether those answers were not concerning the events of future things as about the successe of war c. as whether Infallibility or Fallibility be the proper grounds and reasons of punishing or not punishing in matters of faith and morall transgressions as whether there be not and how far and by what means an infallibility and certainty in matters of Religion now as well as under the Law as whether that Deut. 17. 8 9 10 11 12. be any proof for God giving answers by Vrim and Thummim or only a ground in difficult cases to go from lower Courts to higher and the highest of all who by reason of their number and abilities were more able from the law of God to resolve difficult cases then the inferior Courts with divers other particulars usefull to be known in these times from p. 95 to 165 A full answer to that Evasion brought by Hagiomastix and other Patrons of Toleration that the punishments under the Law were more bodily and afflictive to the outward man then under the Gospel and consequently were typicall Cutting off of Casting out now and typicall of eternall damnation and therefore by the comming of Christ ceased p. 165 166 167 168 169 170 A full answer to that objection That supposing all those lawes in Deut. 13. c. were morall and in force yet they could not reach to Hereticks and false Teachers among us as not being those false Prophets Idolaters Blasphemers spoken of in those lawes from p. 171 to 190 An answer to that objection That the Sadduces Herodians Pharises were tolerated by the Jewes and that Christ did never charge that Church and State with sin for not punishing them p. 29 30 compared with 190 191 192 193 194 Severall Reasons laid down to prove that if there were no commands nor examples in the New Testament to prove the Magistrates power of punishing Hereticks false Teachers yet the proofs of the Old Testament were binding p. 199 to 211 Besides all the Old Testament proofs some places of Scripture speaking of the dayes under the New Testament brought for Magistrates power in Religion and punishing false Teachers p. 212 213 214 215 Seven grounds from places of Scripture recorded in the New Testament proving Magistrates coercive power against false Teachers annd Hereticks laid down and cleared p 215 216 217 218. Published by Authority A TREATISE against the Magistrates Toleration And Permission of a Promiscuous use and Profession of all Religions Sects and Heresies and a partiall limited Toleration of some few Sects or of any one Sect way of Worship Church Government different from the true Religion established and setled HAving in my Preface and Prolegomena both
very uncertain doubtfull other things absurd and untrue As first that to be a Type of Christ is a sufficient ground of a Politicall Civill power over the Church and that typicalnesse qua typicalnesse gives those persoâ—s a power who otherwise have none the contrary unto which is in severall Reasons proved by Doctor Stewart in the second part of his Duply to M. S. page 22. and never yet answered by M. S. or any other though M. S. and many of his Brethren have written upon that argument since Secondly that he who was Head of the State was Head also of the Church in a typicall way whereas many great Divines are of another judgement and show that the Kings of Judah and the civill judicatures were formally distinct from the Ecclesiasticall and that he who was cheif in the State over civill matters was not cheif Iudge and Officer in the Church in an Ecclesiasticall and Spirituall notion of which point Master Râ—â—herford and Master Gilâ—espie having written so fully lately I shall spare to speak any thing and referre the Reader to their learned Books entiâ—uled The Divine Right of Church Government Aarons Rod Blossoming Thirdly that the people of the Iewes were interchangably a Church and a Nation so that whoever was a member of the Church was a member of the Common-wealth and vice versa of which see the Book entituled The Antient Bounds or Liberty of Conscience seated page 60. Now Master Gillespie in his Aarons Rod blossoming Book 1. chap. 2. proves strongly that the Iewish Church was formally distinct from the Iewish State and that in seven particulars as in respect of distinct Lawes distinct Acts distinct Officers so in respect of distinct Members there being Members of the Church among them who had the name of Proselyti Iustitiae and were initiated into the Iewish Religion by Circumcision Sacrifice c. that neverthelesse were restrained and secluded from Dignities Government and Preferment in the Iewish Common-wealth and from divers matriages which were free to the Israelites Master SELDEN also in that learned Book of his De Jure Natur. Gentium lib. 2. cap. 4. lib. 5. cap. 20. speaks as much of those Proselytes Proselytus justitiae utcunque novato patriae nomine Iudaeuâ— diceretur non tam quidem ciâ— is Iudaicus simpliciter censendus esset quam peregrinus sempeâ— cui jura quamplurima inter cives Secondly how do they prove that Iehu Ioash Manasseh Asa Hezekiah Iebosophat Iosiah were Types of Christ and did execuâ—e typically the kingly office of Christ in his Church were Kings in an Ecclesiasticall notion an extraordinary way not ruling only for the Church but in the Church and over it as they say Moses Ioshua David Solomon were in their persons places and actions expresse types of Iesus Christ as 't is evident in the New Testament Pen-men also of Scripture besides Prophets as well as Magistrates and so were extraordinary men that every thing they did in Religion is not a binding example to Magistrates now as many Reformed Divines have showen against the Arminians and Erastians but that Asa Iosiah Hezekiah Iehosaphat were is gratis dictum not yet proved neither were these Pen-men of holy Scripture or Prophets extraordinarily inspired but these foure great Reformers as Kings were stirred up enquiring after and directed by Prophets as the Reader may finde clearly in the stories of them in the Chronicles and Kings Besides I finde not among Divines who have written of the Types of Christ or who grant Moses David Solomon to be expresse Types that they make Asa Iosiah c. to be Types Again of Types of Christ as Divines distinguish there are particular persons types of him as Adam Noah Isaac Joseph Moses Joshua Samson David Solomon Jonah and there are such rancks and orders of men as the First-born Kings Prophets c. Now though all of the first sort are speciall particular Types of him so that the speciall things done by them do typifie and set forth Christ in many particulars of his person actions and sufferings yet the rancks and orders of men as the First-born Kings Prophets may not be typicall in all the particular persons of those ranks and orders at least to the particular acts they do in those ranks and orders but 't is enough for many in those orders to agree in common as in being Kings and Prophets as Christ was there being some in all those orders and ranks appointed of God especially and peculiarly to be the Types which others are not and for whose sakes in those orders and ranks such orders of men were instituted by God to be Types of which many instances might be given with the Reasons thereof in some of the First-born Kings c. but I shall reserve the further handling of that to a second part upon this Subject Lastly supposing Asa Josiah and those godly Kings to be Types of Christ may it not be doubted whether Jehu Ieboash Ammon Ieroboam c. were Types of Christ and did execute his kingly office who yet were commended viz. the two firâ—t for destroying false worship and reproved for not doing it constantly besides could those Kings of Israel and Iudah who yet were lawfull Kings that apostatised from all the whole worship of God the Ceremoniall Law that ordained the Types that destroyed Gods service and the Priesthood made Priests of the lowest of the people be Types of Christ and I desire to be resolved or M. S. the Author of the Antient bounds of Liberty of Conscience stated whether any wicked men were speciall Types of Christ and whether all persons who were Types of Christ were not saved Thirdly suppose these Kings of Iudah were Types of Christ in setting on the Thron of David and ruling over Iudah in Christ the King of his Church coming out of their loines yet they were temporall Kings had Civill authority Now how does it appear that what they did in punishing idolatrous Priests commâ—nding their subjects to the true worship of God they did only as Types by vertue of that Notion and not as they were temporall Kings which must be proved before their examples can be made null and I am sure the Scripture no where faith that the Kings of Iudah and Israel in what they commanded in matters of Religion they did as Types of Christ and not as Civill Magistrates 'T is one thing to be a Type and another thing to doe such things meerly qua Types and what if Christian Magistrates leaning upon this broken staffe suffering all Herefies Blasphemies and Idolatries in their Kingdomes Christ at the last day when they stand before the judgement feat they objecting for themselves the Kings of Israel and Iudah were Types of Christ and all they did was by vertue of their typicall notion shal tell them no but as Magistrates entrusted by God with a power and authority how will they be then confounded will this distinction and notion
found to make for the defence and preservation of the obedience of the Decalogue 3. If appear as usefull and necessary now for the glory of God the salvation of mens soules the peace safety of the Church and State as then Now all these do most clearly appear in punishments of sins immediately against God as Apostasie Idolatry Blasphemy c. For first these commands are of the light of nature thaâ— he who is in place and power should forbid and punish the speaking evill of God This sentence as Melancton writes is preacht to all men yea to all reasonable creatures every one in his place ought to forbid and hinder the manifest reproaches and dishonours of God And therefore Magistrates ought to forbid and punish Epicurean speeches worships of Idols profession of wicked doctrines Many Common-wealths among the Heathens have made Lawes against Epicures and Atheistâ— who have openly held there was no God or that there was no providence of God Peter Martyr in his Common Placeâ— that Heathen Princes used to care for Religion and have punished men even to death for the matters of Religion Thus Socrates was condemned at Athens for no other cause but for teaching of new gods I and for with drawing the youth from their old worship of the gods Zanchius on the fourth Commandement writes that by the Law of nature all Princes among the Heathen judged that the care of Religion belonged to them The Athenians judged so the Romans also and thereupon made Lawes and punished for violation of religion Beza gives three instances of punishments inflicted by heathen Magistrates upon three cheif Philosophers for matters of Religion Socrates Theodorus Protagoras the last of which was by the Athenians banished out of their Territories and his books burnt for writing contemptuously of the gods in these words De diis neque ut sint neque ut non sint habeo dicere Musculus in his Common Places speaking of Magistrates having the care of Religion saith the wise men among the Heathen acknowledged it and that the truth of this opinion was so manifest as that it could not lie hid from the Heathen it was jus gentium dictated by the light of nature and therefore ought to be much more acknowledged and embraced by us who in the knowledge of God go farre beyond not only the Gentiles but the Iewes Master Selden in divers places of that learned Book De Jure Naturali Gentium proves that those commands De Cultu Extraneo and De Maledictione Nominis sanctissimi seu Numinis were Jus Naturalis common to all men were indeed the cheif and first Heads of the Law of Nature and that in those precepts viz. for the negative part all the Gentiles who lived or but passed through the Land of Judea were punished by the Magistrate for Idolatry and blasphemy as well as the Iewes and that from Lawes common to the Iewes with the Gentiles though the kinds of the punishments viz. this or that as whether stoning c. were not of the same nature but more proper to the Iewes yea he showes it was an opinion held by some learned men that it was not lawfull for any Gentile to speak evill of and blaspheme his God which hee worshipped as the God of his Countrey and saith it was founded upon those words Levit. 24. 15. Whosoever curseth his god shall heare his sinne the blaspheming the name of the Lord being spoken of after in the 16. verse as if it were distinct from that in the 15. verse In which forme of speech divers learned men both Rabbins Fathers and others would have forbidden to all the sonnes of men not only speaking evill evill of the most holy and only God but also the speaking of those gods which they had chosen to themselves So as none of the Gentiles might blaspheme their false God which yet they had not renounced without the violation of that Law Whosoever curseth his god shall beare his sinne Master Burroughs in his Irenicum though he be for a Toleration in a great measure as in things controversall and doubtfull amongst godly and peaceable men and that with a liberty of declaration of difference of judgement and some different practise page 55. yea brings such Arguments for that Toleration that if they prove any thing they prove a generall Toleration yet confesses page 23. of that Book T is the dictate of nature that Magistrates should have some power in matters of Religion The generality of all people have ever thought it equall It hath ever been challenged of all Nations and Common-wealths The Heathens would never suffer their gods to be blasphemed but punished such as were guilty thereof by the power of the Magistrate Socrates was put to death for blaspheming their multiplicity of gods And Master Burroughs in page 19. of the same book affirmes that Principle That Magistrates have nothing to doe with matters of Religion is abhorring to nature Is it not an abhorring thing to any mans heart in the world that men suffer that God to be blasphemed whom they honour and that nothing should be done for the restraining any but to aske them why they doe so and perswade them to doe otherwise There hath ever been as great a contestation amongst people about Religion as about any thing Exod. 8. 25 26. Pharaoh hade Moses sacrifice in the Land But Moses said it is not meete so to doe for we shall sacrifice the abomination of the Egyptians Lo shall we sacrifice the abomination of the Egyptians before their eyes and will they not stone us Though they had leave of the King yet the people would not endure it By which place of Scripture 't is evident that the Egyptians who were heathens by the light of nature would not endure the dishonour of their gods to see those creatures they worshipped for gods to be killed as Oxen and Sheep the principall sacrifices of the Hebrewes but they would kill the Israelites for so doing And lastly Master Prynne in that late Book of his The sword of Christian Magistrates supported doth largely and excellently show that by the light of nature in all ages Heathen Magistrates have made Lawes against and punished such whom they esteemed Atheists Hereticks Blasphemers of their Gods or oppugners of their established Religion and that with no lesse then Capitall punishments unto which Book from page 14. to 19. I referre the Reader where he shall finde many examples of Heathen Kings and Nations recited and shall conclude this with that saying of Seneca De Benefic lib. 3. cap. 6. Violatarum Religionum aliubi atque aliubi diversa pâ—na est Sed vbique Aliqua as well as of homicide paricide poysoning Secondly the Magistrates sword in matters of Religion in punishing Blasphemies Idolatries Heresies hath been found by good experience in all ages to make greatly for the defence and preservation of the first Table to stirre men
same reason the Decalogue the whole ten commandements are overthrown too for both in Moses his giving the moral Law and in the commands themselves with the preface from the second verse of the 20. of Exod. to verse 18. there are divers particulars typical and figurative of things under the Gospel temporall corporall things of spiritual and heavenly of which I having spoken before in this Book pag. 24. 25 83 85. and many learned Divines giving instances in this kind * as Zepperus Rivitus Master Burgesse I shall inlarge no further but referre the Reader to those Books Having laid downe divers reasons to prove the commands under the old Law for Magistrates punishing false Prophets Apostates Blasphemers to be of common reason and equity given to all Nations and for all Ages and having answered the most materiall grounds brought by the Patrons of Toleration to make void those commands as not binding under the new Testament I come in the third place to answer those evasions and shifts brought by Iacobus Acontius Minus Celsus Senensis and Hagiomastix `that if it should be granted that all and every the Lawes contested about as well that for putting to death the false Prophet as those for inflicting punishment upon the Idolater and Blasphemer were moral and still in force under the Gospel yet these could not reach unto Hereticks and false Teachers among us at not being those false Prophets Idolaters Blasphemers spoken of in the old Law If it can be proved that Hereticks are those Blasphemers false Prophets Apostates which Moses commands to be killed then it shall be acknowledged Hereticks are to be killed but there is a large difference between a Heretick and such a false Prophet or Apostate as the Presbyterians in their owne definition of Hereticks make A Heretick does not deny God the Creator of heaven and earth neither doth he teach that other gods are to be worshipped a Heretick does not deny the name of Christ a Heretick does not deny the word of God which an Apostate does So that the word of God may be used as a weapon against Hereticks which against an Apostate cannot A Heretick therefore is not mentioned nor touched in any one word of these Lawes But if any will go about to draw these Lawes unto an Heretick that cannot be done by the proper force of the words but as the Lawyers speake per extensionem latamque interpretationem by stretching of them and far fetched interpreation And it would first be well considered of whether every Law does admit of such extensions and if not every one which of them then does admit and wherfore and whether in this Law there are those things for which an extension is to be made By the false Prophet who was commanded to be put to death Deut. 13. 5. was not meant every Heretick or erroneous person nor yet those who taught or published any false Doctrine though of dangerous consequence but only those who endeavoured to perswade men to the worship of a false god that by affirming that they spake by the inspiration of some deitie and that their sayings were to be esteemed Oracles What Doctrine it was which made the Prophet or Teacher of it guilty of death is expresly determined in the Law it selfe and asserted to be this Let us goe after other gods which thou hast not known and let us serve them And that the Law of God made against false Prophets and worshippers of false Gods was not intended against those who otherwise held that the Law of God was to be kept but were infected with some other error is sufficiently evident from hence because in former times among the Iewes who were affected with a vehement love and zeale towards their law Hereticks notwithstanding were tolerated and particularly the Sadduces These although the greatest part of the people and the Rulers beleeved them to erre exceedingly neverthelesse they were not expelled the Citie neither exempted from being Magistrates or bearing any other Civill office yea they were not hindred from coming to the Temple or the Synagogues The Scribes and Pharisees also both held and taught many most dangerous and erroneous Doctrines yet were they also in great honor and esteeme in this Church and state And though our Saviour upon occasion reasoned against yea and reproved them all for holding and teaching these errors and gave warning to take heed of them yet did he never charge this Church or State or those that bare office in either with sin or unfaithfulnesse in their places for not proceeding against them in regard of their errors either by imprisonment or death And yet we know that the Zeale of his Fathers House did eat him up and that he attempted a reformation amongst them yea Christ did teach and presse upon men all and all manner of duties from judgement mercy and faith even to the paying tithe of Mint Annise and Cummin Now unto these and other such like besides some hints I have already given upon the 14. Thesis which may serve in part for satisfaction to some of these evasions I desire the Reader to mind these following Answers First there are other places of Scripture both of commands or else examples approved by God concerning the punishing with death or restraining by Civil power the last of which makes good the point in hand against Hagiomastix and other Libertines as well as that of death for other faults in matters of Religion besides Blasphemie Apostasie and false Prophecying in the sense now alledged by Hagiomastix and his Compeers which these following instances prove First in Deut. 13. 6 7 8 9 10 that very chapter verse 5. brought by Hagiomastix to prove only those were to be put to death who endeavoured to perswade men to the worship of a false God and that by affirming that they spake by the inspiration of some deitie and that their sayings were to be esteemed by Oracles the Holy Ghost layes downe the contrary giving a distinct Precept and command from that of the false Prophet or dreamer of dreams who publickly and openly sollicites to Apostasie concerning the killing of such who in a hidden and clancular way seduce T is observed by learned Junius in his Analytical explication on Deut. 13. that there are two sorts of Seducers to Apostasie commanded to be put to death the one of such who publickly and boldly sollicite who are spoken of in the 5 first verses the other of such who secretly intice in verse 6. and the five following Now however the false Prophet or dreamer of dreames might pretend to speak by the inspiration of some deitie for which the 5 verse of the 13. is quoted by Hagiomastix yet the private enticers to Apostasie as the daughter the wife of the bosome the Son besides that they are made a different sort from the Prophet and dreamer of dreams and those six verses from the sixt to the twelfth containe a distinct command from the five first
verses about false Prophets neither doe they give out signs or wonders to confirme their calling the parties instanced in the text being of daughters to Fathers Wifes to Husbands c were not likely so much as to pretend to them the name of Prophets speaking by inspiration of some deitie but rather drawing by their neernesse of relation intimatenesse of affection opportunities of private and constant converse which many phrases in those verses the wife of the bosome thy friend which is as thy owne soule entise thee secretly thou shalt not censent unto him neither shall thine eye pity and such like imply and yet these are commanded to be put to death as well as those Prophets who openly and bodily gave out signs and wonders to confirme their being Prophets of which the Reader may be further satisfied by reading Junius his Analytical explication on Deut. 13. And as Moses in that former part of the chapter showes plainly contrary to the affirmation of Hagiomastix and other Libertines that others who perswade men to the worship of a false god besides those who pretend themselves Prophets are to be killed so in the latter part of this chapter from v. 13. he layes downe how they are to be put to death also that are guilty of Apostasie that have suffered themselves to be drawn away from the true worship of God to other gods who are so far from comming under the notion of false Prophets endeavouring to perswade men to the worship of a false God and that by affirming they spake by the inspiration of some deitie as that they fal not under the Title of Seducers at all but the seduced and therefore Iunius writing upon this Deut. 13. analyzes the whole chap. concerning Apostasies into two First the Authors entising to Apostasie in the first 11. verses Secondly those who are guilty of Apostasie who suffer themselves to be withdrawn from the worship of God in the latter part of the chapter and he showes this is another part of the chap. in which Moses speaks not of those seducing false Prophets nor the clandestine Seducers but of those who yielded to their Seducements particularly of those who publickly to the view of all are Seduced and being in publick Order as a City rest in that Apostasie by the publick authoritie of men falling from God and openly defending that impietie So Deut. 17. from verse 2. to verse 8. sets downe a Law for putting to death those who are Idolaters and Apostates simply though they never went about to entice others Iunius upon this 17. c. observes that this Law differs from that in the 13 chapt the eleven first verses because there Moses speaks of Apostates who are Dogmatists and enticers to Apostasie but here of Idolaters simply In Deut. 17. from verse 8. to verse 13. there is a Law that in ecclesiastical cases in matters of Religion as well as Civil upon going from the lower Iudicatories to the supreme to the high Priest with the Colledge of Priests the man that would doe presumptuously and would not hearken unto the Priest even that man should die which was in other cases then Blasphemie Apostasie Prophecying falsly for it appears by the scope of that place and the stream of all interpreters that in too hard matters for inferior Courts they should goe to the High Ecclesiastical Synedrion and whoever presumptuously disobeyed their sentence according to the Law though in other things then the forenamed Blasphemie c as appears by this place verse 11. 12. speaking of the Law indefinitely with that 2 Chr. 19. 8 9 10 11. compared together mentioning what cause soever shal come to you of your brethren that dwell in their Cities between Law and commandement statutes and judgements should be put to death the ground of which putting to death here commanded was not only from the nature of these sins against the first Table of the highest forme as Apostasie Blasphemie and such like but for other sinnes in points of Religion though lesser when the sentence and resolution of the high Priest with his Colledges was presumptuously disobeyed so that the punishing of wilful scorneful contempt of supreme Ecclesiasticall Government determining doubts and Controversies according to the word of God though in other cases then Apostasie Blasphemie Prophecying falsly is here commanded But having spoken so much of this Deut. 17. already in p. 101. 102 103 104 105 135 159 160. I shal not enlarge further only I shal take my leave of this Scripture by adding a passage out of Master Cottons late Book against Mr. Williams in way of answer to an evasion of his that the capital punishment prescribed against the presumptuous rejection of the sentence of the highest Court in Israel was a figure of excommunication in the Church of Christ Unto which Master Cotton replyes That Law is of moral equity in all Nations and in all Ages Hee that shall presumptuously appeale from or rise up against the cheifest or highest Court in a free state is guilty laesae Majestatis publicae and therefore as a capital offender to be censured in any free common-wealth And certainly if that part of the Law in Deut. 17. of presumptuously appealing from or rising against the sentence of the cheifest and highest Court in a free State being punished with death be of universal and perpetual equitie then punishing so far at least as to restraine those who presumptuously rise up and contemn the sentence of the highest Ecclesiastical Iudicature in a Church going according to the word of God is of universall and perpetual equitie too and the command of God in that text for punishing is against the man that will not hearken unto the Priest as well as he that will not hearken unto the Judge Deut. 18. 20. sets downe a Law that the * Prophet which shal presume to speake a word in Gods name which he commanded him not to speak shal die as well as hee that shall speake in the name of other gods which place of Scripture proves expresly against Hagiomastix that other Prophets besides those that came in the name of false gods and with other false Doctrine then that let us goe after other gods which thou hast not known and let us serve them were to be put to death The command is indefinite concerning speaking any word in Gods name which he commanded not to speak which must needs extend further then a Prophet prophecying only of turning to another God for there were many false Doctrines and false worships against the Jewish Religion besides that of Apostasie to other gods Again the scope of the words and several phrases as if the thing follow not nor come to passe thou shalt not be afraid of him show t is meant of other Doctrine then saying let us goe after other gods namely of Doctrine foretelling of some things to come whereas enticing to goe and serve other gods is de praesenti Learned * Iunius writing
to punish for Murther Adulterery Theft more then for Idolatrie Blasphemie Hereâ—ie 2. Hagiomastix brings in the Church again as well as the State surely he is for a Toleration of all Heresies Blasphemies c in the Church as well as the State to have no man punished for his religion with any censure of Admonition Excommunication or Non-Communion In his M. S. he was for spiritual censures but in these 3. yeers last past the man is well improved belike to reason against any Church censure as well as State Punishment And by the way I desire the Reader to observe whatever reason in the wisedome of God there might be that nothing is set down in the Gospels of Christs charging the State with sin for not proceeding against the Sadduces c that cannot be the reason to show the unlawfulnes of Magistrates punishing Hereticks because Hagiom confesses the same of the Church that Christ charged not the Church nor the Officers with sin for not proceeding against the Sadduces and yet I suppose Hagiomastix will not openly professe t is a good Argument that no Church censures may be used against any Heretick however I am sure many of his Compeers in handling the question distinguish of a Toleration and censures granting Ecclesiastical censures though denying Civil And I am sure if Christs never charging the church nor those that bore office in her with sin for not proceeding against the Sadduces be no good argument to take away all Church censures neither is it to lay wast all Magistrates punishing in such cases 3. Christ did to the Scribes Pharisees Sadduces speak and reason against their errors yea reproved and threatned them for those errors which also is granted by Hagiomastix in doing of which he did equivalently and really presse upon them the suppressing and punishing of Heresies in persons under their power whilst he spake to men in Authoritie and denounced the judgements of God because of them He that preaches to a Prince against Idolatrie and showes the evils that will come upon a King and his Kingdome for it preaches to him to restraine Idolatrie though he doe not particularly in expresse words call upon him not to suffer any man to practice Idolatrie and therefore Christ speaking to the Scribes and Pharisees the Rulers and Elders that knew the Laws of God how Magistrates in Israel were to punish false Teachers in speaking so against false Prophets Hereticks and Sectaries as Sadduces c that was a charging them such a thing being spoken to such men to doe their duties against them which by the Law was more then if private persons and being spoken to qua such as Scribes c was a commanding them according to their places to proceed against them For t is a rule among Divines that in many things recorded in Scriptures which are delivered only in common and in general they are to be taken by every one according to their relations and places by the Magistrates according to their relation the Ministers according to theirs and the People according to their Sphere of which many instances may be given in the new Testament 4. Supposing it could be proved Christ never reproved the Jewish Church and State for suffering the Sadduces c yet it followes not Magistrates therefore should tolerate Hereticks and Sectaries and that both because Gods declaration of his mind in other parts of Scripture though not in the Gospel is a sufficient as also because there might be some particular reasons proper to the Iewish State as that Christ saw the Iewish State and Magistracie it selfe that then was to be leavened and corrupted with those errors and opinions to be either Sadduces Pharisees Scribes Herodians and such like so that to have spoken against Toleration and for punishing Sadduces c had been to have spoken to the State not to have suffered it selfe as if one should preach to the Parliament now not to tolerate but to punish themselves So was it for Christ to have urged those commands in Deut. 13. c and those examples of Iosiah Nehemiah c upon the Iewish State then 2. That in the times of Christs preaching the Civil Power of the Common-Wealth of the Jewes was much weakned if not wholly taken away from them by the Romans of which I have spoken something before page 30. and doe now adde that the Iewes had no power at all of capitall punishments then and therefore to what end should Christ charge them with those Lawes of putting false Prophets c to death for full prooâ—e of which I refer the Reader to Master Gillespies Aarons rod blossoming Book 1. chapt 3. page 29. 30 31 32 33 34 35. who learnedly proves that point both from Scripture and the Testimonies of many learned writers who have written of the Iewish Antiquities and Customes and Answers the contrary objections 3. Christ knew that Church and Common-wealth were to be certainly shortly dissolved the Christian Church to be set up and though he warned the People of those errors and wayes and denounced the judgements of God against them yet because he knew the purpose of God was to destroy the Iewish Common-wealth he might not speake for that and the other Reasons forenamed to the Magistrates as otherwise he would of which the Reader may read more in pag. 30. of this present Book And now for putting a Period to this 17. Thesis and to all the Answers given by me to those evasions brought against â—hose old Testament Lawes of Deut. 13. Deut. 17. and the rest I shall briefly adde 3 things First To cleare a little further some passages of Deut. 13. Secondly show the slightnesse and weaknesse of Hagiomast exceptions against those old Testament Laws Thirdly Show the excessive pride and folly of the man in boasting and glorying in such poor weak things as he brings against the Vindicator of the Ordinance for preventing the groth and spreading of Heresies in Sect. 34. 35 36 37 38 39 40 41. First As I shall adde two places more out of Moses Law before omitted in the beginning of the 17. Thesis to prove the Magistrates power of punishing in matters of the first Table viz Deut. 19. 16 17 18 19. and Numb 15. 30 31. the former in case of Apostaâ—ie the latter in case of blaspheming God so to all I have said of Deut. 13. I desire the Reader to observe that God having in the former chapter commanded the worshipping of the ture God and forbidden that of Idols which unquestionably is morall this 13. chap. is fitly added to it as an appendix in which God gives direction for removing the impediments opposite to his worship commanded particularly he commands the Authors of Apostasie not to be hearkned unto nor tolerated but to be punished with death and for that end that such who are obstinaâ—e and will not be amended nor regard their own salvation may be hindred at least from being an impediment to the salvation of
THE CASTING DOWN of the last and strongest hold of Satan OR A TREATISE Against Toleration And pretended Liberty of Conscience Wherein by Scripture sound Reason Fathers Schoolmen Casuists Protestant Divines of all Nations Confessions of Faith of the Reformed Churches Ecclesiastical Histories and constant practise of the most pious and wisest Emperours Princes States the best Writers of Politicks the experience of all Ages yea by divers Principles Testimonies and Proceedings of Sectaries themselves as Donatists Anabaptists Brownists Independents the unlawfulnesse and mischeif in Christian Common-wealths and Kingdoms both of a Vniversal Toleration of all Religions and Consciences and of a limited and bounded of some Sects only are clearly proved and demonstrated with all the materiall Grounds and Reasons brought for such Tolerations fully answered By THOMAS EDVVARDS Minister of the Gospel The First Part. 2 Chron 34. 32 33. And Josiah took away all the abominations out of all the Con 〈…〉 that pertained to the childreâ— of Israel and made all that were present in Israel to serve even to sâ—ve the Lord their God And caused all that were present in Jerusalem and Beniamin iâ—stand to it London Printed by T. R. and E. M. for George Calvert and are to be sold at the golden Fleece in the Old-Change 1647. To the Christian Reader GOod Reader I fully intended and accordingly had provided that this first Part of Anti-Toleration should have come into thy hands more compleat and perfect then it does for the present I prepared an Epistle Dedicatory to the Honourable Houses of Parliament sutable to the nature of Toleration and the Times as also a Preface and Introduction to that Argument and Subject wherein laying down the Prolegomena Praecognita of this Noble and famous Question of Liberty of Conscience as certain Distinctions about Magistrates and their Power of Errors and Opinions of Persons holding them of Toleration and Liberty as some Concessa some Negata certain mistakes and misrepresentations of the state of the Question with divers other Particulars I drew up the true state of the Question both Theologically and Politically it being a mixt question besides I purposed to have added to this Part further proofs out of the New Testament against Toleration and for the Magistrates power But these Preparatives and Additionals amounting to about some â—en sheets the reviewing perfecting and printing whereof would take up at least twenty dayes and not knowing what a Day might bring forth the Storm comming on so fast I thought it best for fear this Book might be suppressed at the Presse and never see the Sun to send it forth as it was that the Church of God at home and abroad might have the benefit of it and to reserve the rest for a second Part if God spare life and liberty In this present Tractate is handled the Scripturall part of Anti-Toleration the best foundation and only ground-work to build on wherein there are not only the Scriptures produced for proof but made good by severall reasons from the text and context with all the evasions to clude and put them off fully answered The subject matter of this Book is the great Controversie of the times Toleration being that very thing for which God hath a controversie with the Parliament and Land having most justly however t is most unjust on their part raised up that Generation not to suffer them because they have against the councel of God yea against all sense and reason let them alone and suffered them to grow to this Head I remember what God said to his people Israel that if they did not drive out the Canaanites and destroy their pictures c. they should be pricks in their eyes and thorns in their sides and should vex them with their wiles What of the King of Israel because that he let go out of his hand a man appointed to destruction therefore his life should go for his life and his people for that people as also what of the Angel of Thyatira that Christ had a quarrell with him for suffering that woman Jezabel to teach and to seduce his servants And we may see how God hath now fulfilled this upon the Parliament Ministry City Kingdome vexing us and threatning heavy things against us by the Sectaries punishing us wherein we have offended In all ages and histories of the Church we shall find that Hereticks and Sectaries however whilst weak and few have pleaded for Toleration and Liberty yet when they have come to grow strong and to have power in their hands they never would suffer the Orthodox but have been the greatest tyrants and persecutors as the Arrians Donatists Anabaptists Arminians It was the observation of Augustine many hundred yeers ago and his answer to Petilian That the Donatists however they pleaded far be it from them to compell any one to their Tenets where they had power used to force the Orthodox violently and where they did not it was not for want of will but because they could not for fear of the laws or the multitude of refusers yea if any of their own party left them and came to the Orthodox they would fall upon them and beat them yea kill them and that Sect of the Donatists which was strongest would implore the help of the Magistrate against their Schismaticks the Maximinianistae and Rogatistae all which Austin shows But for a conclusion I shall turn my prayers unto God that he would give us to see and know our sin in our punishment and to give him glory in saying Righteous art thou O Lord and just are thy judgements And for the time to come to give Magistrates Ministers and his People more zeal and wisdome then to tolerate and suffer Errors Heresies and Schismes And so commending these labours to the blessing of Christ who yet lives and raigns as Luther speaks and will raign till he hath made all his enemies his footstool I remain Yours in Christ THOMAS EDWARDS The TABLE containing some of the principall Heads of this Book AVniversall Toleration is against the whole current scope and sense of all Scripture and sets up the polluted defiled consciences of men above the Scriptures p. 4 5 What God commands Persons for themselves and their own Practise he commands to them being in Power and Authoritie for all under them p. 6 7 There can be no reason given why all other persons in Authoritie as Fathers Masters c should be bound to have a care in matters of Religion over children Servants and Magistrates should have none p. 7 8 The godly Magistrates spoken of in Scripture did de facto make use of their Power to suppresse false Doctrine Seducers c 8 9 10 11 They did not only doe it de facto but de jure were approved of and rewarded by God for so doing p. 11 12 Those Magistrates who were good that out of any carnall respects forbore to use their power were sharply reproved and punished by
and therefore in the present case the vindicating of and promoting of the glory of God the punishing of evill doers which Blasphemers Hereticks and Scismaticks are the commanding good being Morall-practicall things of perpetuall reason and equity bind all those in authority and government according to their places though they be no Types nor extraordinary persons Fifthly if this evasion of the kings of Israel and Iudah about Typicalnesse be good by the same reason it may hold against Magistrates punishing under the Gospel for matters of the second Table murther adultery c. for may not the Socinians and Anabaptists who deny Christian Magistrates may punish capitally for murther treason c. say the same thing against all the examples of Magistrates and kings under the old Law punishing with death for such offences that they were Types and that people and Land typicall which no Magistrate nor people are now and what ever can be said upon this ground against Princes meddling in matters of Religion may as well be said against their punishing in Civill matters and Anabaptists and Socinians may as well say those Kings were Types of Christ in respect of their power over the State as over the Church and if they should affirm it how would it be disproved And the Bloudy â—Teneâ— pag. 209. grants that in the Land of Israel all things their civils morals and naturals were carried on in Types as well as their Spirituals and Ecclesiasticals yea by this ground what ever shall be brought out of the Old Testament to show the duty of Magistrates or the qualifications of them as that they that rule over men must be just fearing God hating covetousnesse courageous c. it may be answered that was required of those who were typicall and their people typicall but it concerns not Magistrates now and yet higher by this evasion men may reason against all instances out of the Old Testament brought from Fathers Masters to bring up their children in the feare of God c. because the first-borne such Fathers and Masters of families were typicall and their children typicall which Fathers are not under the Gospel Sixthly if this answer of typicalnesse may hold all those Kings and Princes actions and practises in other things of Morall particular duties as prayer mourning for sinne giving God thanks for deliverances c. are taken away from binding now as well as their acts of power and authority and when Ministers bring these examples of David Iosiah Hezekiah c. in such things it may be said they were Types of Christ and did them as Types of something to come the Antinomian may upon this ground answer the example of Davids praying so often and constantly and of mourning for his sinnes by saying David was a Type of Christ Seventhly by this Answer all the Scriptures of the Old Testament Moses Psalms Prophets with whatever of any duty coÌ„manded or sin spoken against in any of these are at once made void for it may be said the Pen-men were Types and given to a typicall people written in a typicall Land It may be said of the whole Morall Law that as Moses in his person was a Type of Christ in many particulars so in delivering the Law he shadowed Christ the Mediatour Moses being a mediator betweene God and his people in giving the Law Galat. 3. 19. the Law was delivered in the hand of a Mediator that is Moses Acts 7. 38. and therefore not binding to Christians And so it may be pretended of all things written in the Psalms Prophets and the other Books that they were viz. the Oracles of God committed to the Jewes and the Circumcision Rom. 3. 2. Rom. 9. 4. which people and Nation of Israel were typicall of the true Israel the Israel of God Galat. 6. 16. So the Land of Canaan was typicall of rest from 〈◊〉 and of true rest and the heavenly inheritance Hebr. 4. 1 2 3 8 9 10 11. vers And indeed what was not typicall some way or other in the Jewish Church and State as the first-borne the Priests Kings Prophets the Land the people their worships with many more particulars so that if this Answer stand good all the Scriptures of the Old Testament are overthrown and all Hereticks whatsoever Socinians Antinomians Familists c. may evade any Scripture brought from thence as well as the pleaders for Toleration the examples of the Kings of Israel and Judah 8ly All the actions and practises done by persons and things typicall are so farre from nothing concerning them who live under the Gospel that the Scriptures of the New Testament tell us that many things under the Old Testament were made Figures and Typeâ— for the admonitions and example of those in like cases under the New and did teach to the uttermost as the 1 Cor. 10. from the sixth verse to the twelfth and that clause of promise in the fifth Commandement That thy dayes may be long upon the Land which the Lord thy God giveth thee is meant of the Land of Canaan a typicall Land which yet did teach Christians under the New Testament that obedience to their Parents would bring a being well with them and living long upon the earth though they had not the Land of Canaan as Ephes 6. 1 2. 3. fully showes Saint Paul also tells us Rom. 15. 4. that whatsoever things were written 〈◊〉 were written for our learning and so those Magistrates and Princes of Israel and Judah how ever they might typifie Christs Kingdome they were such Types spoken of in 1 Cor. 10. viz. examples to Christian Magistrates to teach them to do so likewise as Fathers then were to teach Fathers now to instruct their children and therefore though such an order of men as Kings in Israel might be intended to typifie Christs Kingdom yet that no way hinders but what they did as Kings in ruling and ordering of their subjects they performed as the proper works of their places common to them with other Princes without any reference to their being Types or doing them as Types God in Scripture recording all along what they did as going upon common morall grounds and speaking nothing of them in their Reformations as in a figurative typicall notion And in the close of my Answer to this evasion of the instances of the Kings of Judah I shall hint to the Reader to consider some notes of distinction between actions meerly typicall and fulfilled in the Antitype done only to represent and shadow forth what Christ was to do and mixt actions morall and typicall too or at least the actions of one who by person or order is a Type and upon search it will be found that all the notes of actions morall not meerly typicall will be found in the practises of those Ks of Judah and Israel before named As first when their practises and wayes are not barely related but commended and praised by God wheras actions meerly typical are only related and set down as
men that were put to the sword the Seducers and the Ringleaders he burned the Calfe ground it to pouder strowed it upon the water and made the children of Israel drink of it causing the Idol to passe from them among their excrements So 2 Chron. 15. 13. They that would not seek the Lord God of Israel whether small or great the little ones who could not be inâ—iâ—ers of Idolatry were to be punished Deut. 13. When one of the Cities of Israel was withdrawn to serve other gods then the inhabitants of the City the children as well as the grown men who could not withdraw from God were to be smitten And we shall finde it all along in the Book of the Kings and Chronicles among the Idolaters and false worshippers that there 's no such distinction made but some of whom no such thing expressed are removed and punished as those who may be supposed were inticers to Idolatry Fourthly As for that the Kings of Judah Asa Iosia c. never punished Pharisees Herodians or any other Sect in the profession of the Jewish Religion the reason is manifest because there was none such till many hundred of yeeres after these Kings for these Sects of Pharisees c. began very late not long before the coming of Christ and as for Herodianâ— they sprung up after Herod was King which showes the great ignorance of M. S. speaking as if there had beene Herodians in the dayes of Asa Hâ—zâ—kiah c. but by the way if M. S. â—lias Cretinsis can prove there were such in the dayes of those good Kings I will undertake to prove that they used their coâ—rcive power towards them as well as towards Idolaâ—ers and â—ndeed 't is evident by many passages that all kind of corruption and declination from the way of God was the object of Josiahâ— and other Magistrates Reformation and had there beene Sadduces Herodians c. viz. men that had held those Errors and wayes in those Kings times they could not have escaped their hands and this is thus proved because the high places not of Idolatry but of will-worship where they sacrificed to the Lord only as t is 2 Chron 33. 17. were put down and the worshippers and Priests suppressed and those good Kings who did not are upon record blamed which kind of worshipping was not so bad as the Herodians and Sadduces who held Herod for the Messias and denied Angels and Spirits and that I may come up yet more close to M. S. objection who saith nothing was done against Sectaries or Scismaticks I conceive they were to the Church of the Jewes as Sectaries and Scismaticks are now and their worship a Scisme worshipping the true God in a separated way apart from the publike place and Assemblies of Gods people as our Sectaries do now Fifthly the true reasons why when the Herodians Sadduces c. sprung up among the Jewes they were not suppressed not punished First in regard Religion was then mightily corrupted all things were out of order the Church of the Jewes did then hasten to their destruction and so no wonder if Heresies and false Doctrines were suffered in such a State as well as other things Secondly the Jewes were not then a free people neither had they the Civill power absolutely in their hands they had no truly Iewish King who cared for those things but Herod the Idumean and the High Priest then could do nothing Thirdly God permitted Iury to abound with diversity of Sects in the dayes of Herod as the Sadduces Essenes the Pharisees the Herodians because he had a purpose to destroy the Iewish Common-wealth and to bring all into subjection to Christ and the Toleration of divers Religions among them was the forerunner and preparer of the way for the ruine of the Iewish State as it hath beene of many States 6ly supposing the Kings of Iudaâ— and Israel de facto had never exercised any coercive power on any other objects but Idolaters and Idolatry and that all the commands in the Old Testament given to the Iewish Magistrates had beene in the letter of the text onely against Idolaters and Idolatry which is not true yet by vertue of those very commands and examples Magistrates might exercise a coercive power against evills of the like kind though not in the letter specified and the reason is this because the commands of God and the examples of good men accordingly recorded in Scripture might in the letter at least for the generality be expressed only against those evills and that kind and sort of them which were most in use in that age and time when they were given and yet other kinds of those sins or other sinnes as bad or worse which should arise afterwards were by just Analogie common equity by a Synecdoche usuall in such commands forbidden also As for example the second Commandement forbids only in the letter and by name graven Image and the likenesse of any thing and yet in that command all mediums of worships invented by men though not graven Images nor likenesse are forbidden under the title of graven Images and likenesse and that by a Synecdoche common in the Decalogue which because in those times of Moses they were the chiefe inventions of mâ—n corrupting the worship of God they are fitly put in the place of all humane inventions brought into the worship of God of which the Reader may finde more in Doctor Ames Medul Theolog. 2. Booke 13. chap. De Cultu Instituto So because Idolatry and Idolatry with Apostafie to serve strange Gods the Gods of those Nations whom God had cast out of the Land of Canaan there being many Cananites c. among them were the corruptions the Israelites were most in danger of the Idolatries most in use in those times and by the Nations round about them when they should come to Canaan as is evident by many places of Deutr. and the false Prophets and Seducers then went most about to seduce men in that way therefore God in the letter as it was most needfull spoke by name against such Prophets and such Idolatry as were most stirring in those times under which commands are forbidden by a Synecdoche and by Analogie other depravations of Gods worship and name that might arise in after ages for by the rules of Interpretation of Scripture given by Divines where a thing is forbid there all of that nature and sort are forbidden also as for example greater sinnes of that kinde then those expressed in the letter must needs be forbidden and so lesser also Now certainly where God hath given a command to Magistrates in the letter to punish such offences if his subjects commit greater and higher against God and his worship by the equity of this command he is to punish them if none in the letter for those as if there had been no command but against Idolatry of such Nations yet worshipping the Devill offering up children to Moloch blaspheming God and his worship with
up to obedience and deterre them from the contempt and violation thereof whereas on the contrary for the want of this all Blasphemies Heresies and Errors have abounded of which I could give many instances but shall referre them to the more proper place of handling viz. to the Reasons for Magistrates punishing men for Idolatries Blasphemies Heresies Schismes only for the present shall hint that God himselfe saith twice once in Deut. 13. 11. the other Deut. 17. 13. the Magistrates punishing in such a case shall cause all the people to heare feare and to do no more presumptuously the Lord gives this blessing unto the punishment of such offendors that others not only which see but heare of them have the bridle of feare put upon them whereby kept from the like Thirdly and lastly this coercive power of the Magistrate will be found every whit as usefull and necessary now for the glory of God salvation of mens soules peace of Church and State as it was then yea and in some respectâ— more necessary there being in our dayes not only the same reasons and causes for that power of the Magistrate but others also Were there under the Law many incorrigible presumptuous offendors against God and his worship that could not be otherwise reclaimed and are there not such now were there then many grosse ways of false worship and Religion destroying foundations broacht among the people were they then infectious drawing away and seducing many soules were they then provoking the wrath of God causing it to waxe hot against his people Ought the glory and Name of God to bee then dear to Magistrates Why behold under the Gospel there are as incorrigible desperate persons broaching all kind of damnable Heresies making it their work to lay wast all Religion whom no Admonitions Church Censures can do any good upon Heresies and Errors now are as infectious spreading subverting whole houses eating as a Gaâ—grene and so in the rest Master Burroughs in his Irenicum page 23. confesses there is a necessity of the Magistrates power in matters of Religion 〈◊〉 truth now as there was then and showes though we cannot argue the being of spirituall Ordinances from our need of them but from their institution yet in naturall and civill things this way of arguing is strong enough there is need of such a help and therefore we should seeke to have it And the necessity of the Magistrates coercive power under the Gospel he sets down as follows Now sure the need we have of such a power is exceeding great we were in a most miserable condition if we had no externall civill power to restraine from any kind of Blasphemies and Seducements The condition of the Jewes O how happy was it in comparison of ours if this were denied us for if any of theirs did blaspheme God or seeke to seduce any from him they knew what to doe with him besides perswading of him to the contrary but if any should seeke to seduce the wives of our bosomes children of our bodies friends as deare to us as our owne lives into those wayes that wee thinke in our consciences will undâ—e their soules to all eternity yet we must only desire them they would not doe so we must only admonish or seeke to convince them or remove them but restraine them we cannet If the deliverance of us from the Pedagogy of the Law hath brought us into this condition our burden is greater in this thing then any that the Law laid upon our forefathers Hath Christ delivered us from one burden to lay a greater upon us Must we now see those who are dearest to us drawne into the way of eternall destruction and stand and looks on but no way left to help them or our selves unlesse we can perswade to the contrary Surely our condition is very sad Have we not cause to say Lord let any burden of the Ceremoniall Law be laid upon our necks rather then this If there were a company of mad men running up and downe the streets with knives and swords in their hands endeavouring to mischeif and kill all they meet with and we must doe nothing to restraine them if we could perswade them to doe otherwise well and good but that is all we can doe for helpe what a dangerous thing were this The case is the same when those who are mad with damnable Heresies run from place to place seeking to draw all they can from the truth If we have no meanes of helpe but 〈◊〉 it is ill with us Surely God hath not put his people â—â—to such a sad condition or this is be hath provided better for his people then thus And I appeale to the consciences and experience of men whether this power of the Magistrate of punishing Blasphemies and Heresies be not found to be usefull and necessary both for the honour of God the safety of other mens soules the peace of Church and State and whether all other mens without this when this might have beene had have made good these ends or whether this coming upon other means as Admonitions Instructions Synods Church Censures hath not suppressed Heresies Schisms vindicated the honor and truth of God recovered many souls setled the peace of Churches and States as among the Donatists of old and the Arminians in Holland of late Any mans reason yea sense may tell him that in this sinfull corrupted condition of man there is in coercive power a naturalnesse and sutablenesse to work upon the outward man for the furtherance of spirituall good and that when no other means can this power removes outward things that hindered keeps from outward evils applies outward means And yet further besides the same reasons and grounds now of the necessity of the Magistrates coercive power as well as under the Old Testament there seemes to be new reasons under the Gospel over and above that plead for the necessity of this power As that under the Gospel so many outward visible judgementâ— are not inflicted by God upon offenders as were under the Law whereupon Master Cartwright speaks Certainly if ever there had beene any time wherein the Magistrates sword might have rested in the sheath the time of the Law had of all beene fittest when the Lord did so visibly sit in his judgement seat and himselfe in proper person held the Assise and Gaile delivery For as the Lord doth not now by outward blessings give so plentifull testimony to the obedience of the Gospel as the Law so doth he not with so many and so severe punishments revenge the breach of it as in the time of the Law for in these outward punishments the dispensation of God under the Law is divers from that under the Gospel in that be did more terribly revenge disobedience and therefore God not striking now so often immediately Blasphemers Seducers false Prophets Schismaticks as under the Law the Magistrates have the more need not to beare the sword in vaine lest Hereticks and
p. 170 171. Beza De Haeretiâ—is a Magistratuâ— puniendiâ— p. 152. 154 155. and by Zepperus in his explanation of the mosaicall judiciall laws first Book c. 10. page 72. and 4. Book chapt 2. p. 243. where hee makes the lawes against the false Prophet teaching publikely the private Seducer the publike defection of the whole City c to bee appendixes of the first command and of common right and particularly in the third chapter of that fourth Book proves by severall Reasons the punishing of false Teachers Hereticks Blasphemers ought to bee perpetuall which learned Authors notwithstanding grant the kinds of punishments the particular forms of those lawes and as they were given of Moses to bee constitutive of the Jewes pollicy to be changeable and not binding The kinds of punishments are taken away Christ would not have the Gentile Magistrate to be bound to those lawes for the kind of punishments which were given to the Jewish Magistrates but notwithstanding punishments in generall are not taken away but commanded In the constituting the kind of punishment there seems a peculiar reason to have been had of that Nation There were certaine peculiar things in those lawes that doe not now belong to us which particulars being taken away there are two things by vertue of those lawes remaine First that defection from the true Religion and seducing to tha defection should be punished by the Magistrate noâ— Secondly that Capitall punishment should be inflicted according to the greatnes of the Blasphemy and wickednesse upon factious and seditions Apostates For of such account ought the Majesty of God to be among all men in all ages of the world that whosoever shall despise and mock at that be who speakes evill of the Author of life is most worthy to have his life taken away So Zanchius De Magistratu Quaest secunda page 170. 171 172 and Beza De Haereticis a Magistratâ— pâ—niendis page 154 155. speake and therfore according to that three-fold distinction laid down page 53 54 55. of this Treatise this law in Deut. 13. may be in force 1. according to the substance and equity of it according as there is a common right in it common to other Nations with the Jewâ— and secondly as it contains a Doctrine made known by God for punishing such offences though wee Christians are not tied to the particular formes of that command according to the Mosaicall law or politie nor as it was given by Moses to one people nor to the utmost vigor and severity of it expressed in every particular which being in force under the Gospel but in this sense thus far fully makes good that which t is brought for the Magistrates coercive power under the new Testament to punish false Prophets Apostates c neither does the abating somewhat of the rigor of the Law sutable to the Mosaical Paedagogie or the relesiang of the particular forms of that Law the kind and manner of punishing abrogate all punishment and restraint For we may easily conceive and wee often see it in experience the rigor and utmost severity of a Law in regard of some circumstances abated and yet not all punishment neither the substance of it taken away and indeed if wee consider what the judiciall Law concerning punishing in criminall matters is as t is laid downe by divers learned men Beza Zepperus Amesius viz. that law which doth peculiarly explicate that part of righteousnesse and equitie concerning executing justice and judgement or the most accurate determination and fit application of the naturall right according to the speciall and singular condition of that people it must needs follow that though those circumstances which were proper to that speciall estate of the Jewes are ceased as of necessity they must the State of the Jewes being changed yet the things themselves as abstracted from their relation to the Jewish Church and state cannot be abolished as being naturalis juris which still doe hold forth to us the best determination of naturall right as Amesius speaks as the changing of the fashion forme and proportion of a mans clothing and apparell cannot alter a mans substance and person so neither can the forms and manner of the judiciall Law by which it was fitted for the Jewes condition as a garment is to a mans body take away the Law it selfe so that judicias being â—othing else but naturals and morals clothed for a time after such a manner to fit the nature and manners of such a people that time and people being passed away the substance viz. what 's naturall and morall must needs remaine Fifthly as to those other inferences added by Hagiomastix page 50. 51 52. to the former that if the obligation of the Mosaicall Law for putting Blasphemers Idolaters c to death was intended by God to continue under the new Testament why was the Apostle Paul so farre from enjoyning a beleeving brother to detect or to put to death his Idolatrous wife that hee doth not permit him so much as to put her away from him if the Law in question was to continue in force under the Gospel then was every person in an Idolatrous state and kingdome whilst it remained Idolatrous bound to seeke the death one of another yea to destroy one another with their own hands Yea the civil Magistrate was bound to sentence all his subjects that practised Idolatry to death without exception and to make a bloudy desolation throughout all his dominions then were beleevers in Idolatrous states and kingdomes upon their respective Conversions to the Christian faith bound to accuse their neighbours being Idolaters and Blasphemers round about them before the Magistrate especially if hee were a Christian and to require the execution of this Law of God upon them to have them put to death I answer M. Goodwins Ifâ— Thens proceed either out of the grosse ignorance of the state of the question of Toleration and scope of Deut. 13. or elsefrom a designe to delude and abuse the people with a show of some reason which though hee knowes in his conscience very well hath no waight at all yet he thinks will serve to mislead his followers who takes shadowes for men For whereas the question about punishing men with death or other severe punishments in cases of Idolatry and false Doctrine is understood by all Divines who write of the Controversie in case of Apostasie and defection meant of those who have once known and received the Christian faith and not of Jewes Turks and Pagans of Magistrates also in their owne jurisdiction and Territories not others and when it may bee with the safety and for the good of a Nation and Kingdome not to the manifest destruction and ruine of a Kingdome as he may find in the writings of many learned men who have writ upon the Question Calvin Beza Zanchius Bullinger Danaeus Musculus Gerardus Baldwins cases of conscience Zepperus Videlius Voetius Master Rutherfurd c and is evident
men of very fallible judgements and every way obnoxious unto error and mistake Yea the wisest and most learned of them are not able cleerly or demonstratively to informe now what the Government of the Church was in the Apostles dayes what the duties of a Minister are to the People as how oft he must preach so that upon Hagiomastixs cleere reason in his 36. Section against the old Testament Law for Magistrates punishing Blasphemers Idolaters c whatsoever can be brought out of the old or new Testament in matters of dutie may be evaded and it may be said this or that was commanded or forbidden because then they had the high Preists Prophets and Apostles who were infallible and could determine all difficulties In a word if some dissimilitude that may be shown either under the old Testament or the new in the times or state of things there when those Commands and Rules were given from the times and state of things now may be a sufficient reason of the Rules and Commands themselves being now not in force then it will follow that all morall duties laid down both in the Law and the Gospel bind not us because the same dissimilitude or as great may be shown in whatsoever dutie upon any Ordinance of Christ or relation among men is propounded Upon this ground the Sacrament of Baptisme shall not be perpetuall not universall in the Church because of some differences between that time when Christ instituted it and the times now as Socinus thereupon held Baptisme an indifferent thing belonging only to the infancie of the Church in which out of a rude people and accustomed to ceremonies a Church was gathered to Christ So neither an outward calling and Ordination of Ministers shall be perpetuall because then there were Apostles and other extraordinary men who in ordaining them could conferr the gifts of the Holy Ghost and had the gift of discerning of spirits So all the commands given by Paul and Peter of servants obeying their Masters and being subject to their Masters with all feare may be evaded and they may say they concerne not us because the servants in those times were their slaves bought with their money at their dispose but wee are borne free as well as our Masters and then those servants in any commands doubtfull had Apostles or other infallible men to go to to be resolved which wee have not they being long since ceased and so I might goe over all examples and commands both in the old or new Testament Fifthly This cleere reason of Hagiomastix in his 36. Section and 130. page why Magistrates under the old Law might exercise coercive Power upon false Prophets Blasphemers c because in all difficult cases of Religion the Iewes to whom this Law was given had the opportunitie of enquiring by Vrim and Thummim of immediate consultation with the mouth of God himselfe by the high Priest seems not to be any reason upon these grounds First that reason is never expressed in those commands or examples for putting to death false Prophets Blasphemers Idolaters c. but other reasons are alledged viz. from the nature of the sinnes drawing away from God the putting away of the evill and that others may feare and do no more so with other such like all reasons of a common nature to the times now as well as then Secondly before there was a high Priest and holy garments made for him particularly the brest plate of judgement the Vrim and Thummim Exod. 28. 15. 30. the Law was given for putting to death Idolaters Exod. 22. 20. and in Jobs time long before the high Priest and in a Land where the high Priest was not enquired by Idolatry was an iniquity worthy to be punished by the Iudges 3. Those who were Heathens strangers in the Land of Judea that beleeved not in the God of Israel nor understood not what the judgement of Vrim was and the sentence thereof yet the Iewish Magistrates would not suffer such whilst staid among them to blaspheme God to worship strange Gods or to offer their children to Molech as appears in Levit 20. 2. and in page 49. 50. of this Treatise Fourthly the Magistrates exercised their coercive Power in matters of Religion as freely after Vrim and Thummim were lost and that judgement ceased as they did before which cleerly showes the enquiring by Vrim under the old Law was not the cause of those Lawes concerning punishing Idolaters and false Prophets being in force It is the judgement of most of the learned writers both Robbins and others that the oraculous consultation with the Breast-plate continued no longer then to the captivitie of Babylon Vrim and Thummim being lost at the captivitie of Babylon and wanting at the Peoples returne as these Scriptures show Ezra 2 63. Nehem. 7. 65 neither do we find that ever God gave Answer by them any more divers learned men who write of the Iewish Church and State and of the first and second Temple of Hag gai 1. 8. Haggai 2. 9. The glory of this latter House shall be greater then of the former show the want of five things in the second Temple which had been in the first 1. The Aâ—ke with the mercy seat and Cherubims Secondly the fire from Heaven Thirdly the Majesty or divine presence Fourthly the holy Ghost Fifthly And the Vrim and Thummim of which the Reader may see fully in Ainsworths Annot. on Exod. 28. 30. Now that after the Captivitie of Babylon Princes and Magistrates used a coercive Power for offences against the first Table is plaine by those instances Ezra 10. 7 8. of making Proclamation that all who had taken strange wives of the People of the Land should come unto Jerusalem for the putting them away and such as were borne of them and that whosoever would not come within three dayes according to the Councell of the Princes and the Elders all his substance should be forfeited c Nehem. 9. 38. Nehem. 10. and 13. chapters Nehemiab and other Rulers entring into Covenant for Reformation in the matter of the Sabbath strange wives maintenance for the service of the House of God and Nehemiah commanding and contending to have matters reformed in the worship and house of God yea restraining and hindring the Prophanation of the Sabbaâ—h and smiting some for marrying wives of Ashdod of Ammon and of Moah Yea the want of a Priest standing up with Vrim and Thummim by whom the Magistrates might enquire was so far from hindring Magistrates in punishing about matters of Religion that the quite contrary is expressed both in Ezra and Nehemiah Ezra 2. 63. Nehem. 7. 65. some Priests being put from the Priesthood and forbidden by the Governor to eat of the most holy things till their stood up a Priest with Vrim and with Thummim that is for want of Vrim and Thummim by which God might be consulted with and his mind known herein Zerubbabel the Tirshatha is commonly said to be
that is handled is Politicall or Ecclesiasticall The Politicall is Criminall or Civill but the Ecclesiasticall is Ceremoniall So Lyra understands between blood and blood when one part of the Judges say that this shedding of blood is to be punished with death as being voluntary murder the other part sayes no it is but casuall Master Gillespie in his Aarous rod blossoming Book 1. chapt 3. showes t is agreed upon both by Jewish and Christian Expositors that this place holds forth a supreme Civill Court of Judges and that this text holds forth two sorts of causes some forenâ—icall betweene blood and blood some ceremoniall between stroak and stroake Now this Scripture speaking how that man shall die that will do presumptuously and will not hearken unto the Judge as well as he that will not hearken unto the Priest and speaking of matters of the second Table as well as of the first and the sentence of death here spoken of if immediate and infallible by Vrim extending equally to difficult cases in Civill matters as in matters of Religion or rather more there being divers particular instances in Scripture of Answers in Civill matters as of war and foretelling of some events in Civill affairs but none in matters of Religion if then the Magistrate because of his immediatenesse of consultation with God might punish in matters of Religion but not now that immediatenesse being ceased it will also follow he might then punish for bloud c because by Vrim hee might certainly know whether it was wilfull or voluntary but now he may not because t is possible and probable in doubtfull and difficult cases about mans life meum and tuum he may run into errors and mistake Sixthly this cleer Reason of Hagiomastixs making infallibility the ground of coercive Power and Fallibility a being subject to error and mistake the ground of the deniall of such a power is a fundamentall falsity and a grand mistake overthrowing equally all spirituall censures and punishments in cases of false Doctrines and Hereticks and all bodily outward punishments in Criminall Civill matters and so at once making void all the Civill Power of the Magistrate and all the Ecclesiasticall power of the Church For the Magistrate is not infallible absolutely free from all possibility of error and mistake in his judgement in matters of the second Table many Magistrates in those matters have and doe daily grosly mistake many innocent persons have suffered and doe daily and many guilty persons have and doe escape who does not see in Civill matters what mistakes there are and may bee both in point of law and matter of fact how Lawyers and Iudges are divided in their Opinions what controversies and difficulties arise upon cases what doubts and Scruples grow upon witnesses testifying quite contrary and other circumstances so that what Iudge can say hee is infallible and certaine that hee is not mistaken that hee saw such a fact committed that the accusers and witnesses have deposed nothing but truth I could Instance in a hundred particulars both in regard of the Law-Makers the Lawes the Jewry Witnesses the accused partie the Iudges themselves c wherein Magistrates are as fallible and as obnoxious unto error in matters of the second Table as in the first yea and in divers respects more but I must refer this to the second part of this subject where the Grounds for Toleration particularly that of no man being infallible in our dayes is to be answered Deut. 17. 8 9 10 11 12. showes us there are difficultcases and Controversies in matters of the second Table between blood and blood c and that among the Iudges themselves so that higher Courts are appointed to go unto and the highest of all the Councell of Seventie at Jerusalem Who sees not in Kingdomes about their Lawes and Civill Rights as high and great Controversies and Contestations as in matters of Religion each partie having great Lawyers and able men on their side So the Church with the best Councels and Synods are not infallible but may mistake and erre and in in some things have mistaken as many learned Protestants have shown against the Papists upon that question whether the Church may erre And therefore by this cleer reason of Master Goodwin it should not be only unlawfull for the Magistrates to punish for Idolatrie Blasphemie Heresie Scisme but for Murder Theft Polygamie Adulterie c yea as unlawfull for the Church to admonish and excommunicate for Idolatrie Heresie Blasphemie c as for the Magistrates to punish corporally But now M. S. Hagiomastix Ancient Bounds or Liberty of Conscieuce stated with divers of our Sectaries who write of this question yeeld the Magistrates power in matters of the second Table answering that of Rom. 13. 4. to be understood in things concerning the second Table and the Churches power in censuring for Heresies evading that of Revel 2. 20. to be meant of Ministers not Magistrates and of spirituall censures not Civill who yet are alike fallible and subject to error and mistake the Magistrates in Civill judgements and Ministers in spirituall as they are in punishing corporally in matters of Idolatrie Heresie and indeed considering the state of the question of Magistrates coercive Power in matters of Religion as I have laid it downe in the Prolegomena and so is to be understood viz. that the Magistrate is to doe it upon advice and after advice in all difficult doubtfull cases with the ablest Godliest Ministers in the Church by the advice of Synods with Solemne Prayers after meant of instruction and conviction used to the parties which means and helps being not in Civill causes nor in the censures of particular Churches are more liable to error and mistake then Magistrates So that if Magistrates and Churches may punish the one corporally in matters of the second Table the other spiritually in cases of both as is confessed by our grand Patrons of Toleration notwithstanding their fallibilitie and possibilitie of mistake then in difficult doubtfull cases Magistrates may punish in matters of the first Table notwithstanding they are men of very fallible judgements or in case the want of the Magistrates infallibilitie puts a supersedeas to his coercive Power in matters of Religion the same want deprives him of Power in Civill things and Ministers in Ecclesiastical because of their Possibilitie of erring in both By all which the Reader may see t is a very rotten foundation both to build upon or to take away the Power of censuring evill and erroneous persons upon the infallibilitie or fallibilitie of those who have Authoritie from God no certainly this Power and dutie of those who are in place both in Church and State are founded on the Ordinance and Institution of God in appointing such Offices and in the nature of the Crimes and offences and on the ends of vindicating Gods Glory and Name and preserving others from being ruined c but never on that that the persons who should
Apostles and Prophets in those Primitive times were infallible and immediately inspired of whose immediate infallibilitie how farre and in what way whether only in penning the holy Scriptures or how else whether ex hubituali asseâ—â—entia Spiritus or only de particulere assistantia Spiritus I shall speake at large in the second part of my Anti-Toleration in answering that Objection we have now no externall infallible Iudge yet all those they wâ—â—t unto in their Epistles every particular beleever man and woman were not neither are infallible not the Elect Lady and her children not all the beleeving Romans nor all those Christians to whom the Epistle generall of Iohn and Iude were written nor those Angels of the Churches of Pergamus and Thyatira nor Christians in our times to whom those commands and Rules are written and given by the Apostles as well as those who then lived for the Epistles did not concerne the times and the particular Churches and persons only to whom they were written as some wickedly affirme and yet these are commanded to stand fast in the Faith to avoid those who cause divisions contrary to the Doctrine which they have learned to prove al things are reproved found fault with by the Spirit of God for not censuring of Heresie false Doctrine c. which fully proves true Doctrine may be known from false false Teachers may be discovered and censured by persons not infallible and so the judging of what is Heresie Scism and who is a Heretick or a Scismatick and the punishing or not punishing of them depends not upon infallibilitie or fallibilitie of Spirit infallibilitie is not the ground of censure nor fallibilitie of non censure Thirdly The Apostles who were infallibly and immediately inspired yet in cases of Controversie arising in the Church and in censures and determinations thereupon did not act from infallibility and immediatenes of Answers from God but from Scripture grounds by way of reasoning and disputation deduced and in a Synodical way by the joint common resolution of Elders as well as themselves as is evident by Acts 15. Acts 21. 18 19 20 21. In that dissention that Paul and Barnabas had with certainemen that came downe from Judea about circumcision Paul and Barnabas were able to have determined it without their and others going up to Jerusalem to the Apostles and Elders Paul by his Apostolicall infallible Spirit could have determined as in Gal. 5. 2. Behold I Paul say unto you that if you be circumcised Christ shall profit you nothing but the whole businesse is debated decreed and the decrees sent forth by Synodicall Authoritie determined according to the word of God and not by extraordinary immediate infallible inspiration of the Spirit the proofe of which seing the Reader may find so fully and largely in many learned Authors I shall spare to write anything of it So upon Pauls comming to Hierusalem Acts 21. and the offence that many thousands of the Iewes which beleeved and were zealous of the Law took at him Paul went not upon his own infallibilitie of Spirit or immediate Revelation but upon the joint councell and direction of Iames and all the Elders verse 18. 20 21 23 24 25 26. Now if the Apostles in judging of false Doctrine and Scisme censuring the Authors of these and imposing upon the Churches their Decrees to be kept all which are spoken of in Aâ—ts 15. proceeded not in the way of infallible immediate Revelation from God laid it aside as it were but in an ordinary way by Scripture reason experience upon and after much debate as is apparent from verse 6. to verse 30. then t is evident that immediatnesse of Revelation with infallibilitie of Spirit is not the sole judge of Heresies and Errors and the only just reason of inflicting punishments upon Hereticks and Scismaticks Seventhly besides the other false Suppositions laid down by Hagiomastix in his 36. Sect. as the enquiring by Vrim and Thummim in cases of Idolatrie Blasphemie as that Inallibilitie is the ground of coercive power c this also is false that he supposeth under the new Testament there is no Infallibilitie nor certaintie to be had in difficult doubtfull matters of Religion but that in those things we walk at midnight in comparison of those under the old Law who walked at noon day which assertion of the uncertaintie and darkenesse of the Church in points of Religion under the new Testament compared with the old is contrary to these grounds First to many prophecies of the state of the Church after Christs comming which speak that then the earth shall be filled with the knowledge of the glory of the Lord as the waters cover the Sea and the light of the Moon shall bee as the light of the Sunne and the light of the Sun shall be seven sold as the light of seven dayes and unto the manner of the Administration of the Covenant of Grace under the new Testament which however for substance was but one and the same under the Law and the Gospel yet for manner of Dispensation and Application differed and is various as many Divines show and one of the main differences between them in manner of Administration stands in this that the Covenant of Grace under the new differs from the old in Cleernesse and Evidence in that the Doctrine of grace and salvation by Christ and of faith in him together with the Appendixes is more distinct and expresse then before it was not being now under a vaile but beheld with open face 2 Cor. 3. 12 13 17 18. Secondly then the Church of Christ under the new Testament should be in a far worse condition then the Iewes were under the old for whereas they were sure and certaine in their Religion and had an infallible way of being resolved in all doubts Christians now should be in continuall doubts and uncertainties in matters of faith not knowing what to doe or whether to turne themselves which must needs be a most miserable condition and the Iewes case in the time before Christs comming in the flesh was to be much preferred before ours for the burden of being under the Pedagogy of the Law with a certaintie and infallibilitie of knowing what to hold and beleeve is a light burden in comparison of being freed from the Ceremoniall Law and in the meane time to be without all certaintie and assurance in points of faith and worship Who would not chuse rather to undergoe some burden with an infallibilitie and certaintie of Religion then to enjoy a Libertie from a Yoake with an uncertaintie and continuall feares Is not the bondage of feare worse then a bondage of ceremonies and many outward Legal observations If the deliverance of us from the Pedagogie of the Law hath brought us into this condition out burden is greater in this thing then any that the Law laid upon the Iewes Hath Christ delivered us from one burden to lay a greater upon us Have wee
Oxe or Asse and giving money to the Owner of them did not bind as much if a Horse or a Sheep fell into it and yet the words of the Law are only the Oxe or the Asse and not a Horse or Sheep Whether that command concerning the putting to death those children that did curse or strike their Parents though it expressed not in the letter death for killing of them did not include much more death upon those who killed their Parents and so I might instance in many more particulars But for a conclusion of this fourth Answer I shall end with a passage out of Maccovius in a Disputation of his De Lege judiciali that the perfection of the judicial Laws require that we should hold no case can fal out which cannot from the analogie of the Law for of like there is the same judgement be determined From the analogie and similitude of things t is easie to understand that the same Law and Right is to be observed referring the Reader for more satisfaction to page 31. 32 33. of this present Tractate Fifthly as to that brought by Hagiomastix and the rest that the Law of God made against false Prophets and worshippers of false Gods was not intended against those who otherwise held the Law of God was to be kept but were infected with some error because in former times among the Jewes who were affected with a vebement love and zeale towards their Law Hereticks notwithstanding were tolerated and particularly the Sadduces these were not exempted from being Magistrates The Scribes and Pharisees also that taught many dangerous errors yet were in great honor in this Church and State I answer 1. Hagiomastixs foundation upon which he raises this argument is unfound for the Scribes Pheriâ—ees and others in place in the time of tolerating the Sadduces Herodians and other Hereticks which was in Christs time were not zealous of the Law of God as is evident by many of Christs Sermons reproving them for want of love and zeale to the Law and the true worship of God Matth. 5. from the 19. verse to the end of the chapter Matth. 15. from verse 3. to the 10. Matth. 23. from verse 3. to the 29. verse They were zealous indeed of the traditions of the Elders and of their owne Superstitions and Devices but not of the Law of God they corrupted and transgressed the Lawes of God by their traditions and hypocrisies but had no true love nor zeale to the Law nor the Jewish Religion and therefore no wonder they tolerated Sadduces Herodians c but of this point how religion was then mightily corrupted and all things out of order I have spoken before in p. 30. of this Treatise and so wil not tautologize 2. Can Hagiomastix upon second thoughts think the Practise of the Rulers of the Jewes and the people that followed them in a time so desparately corrupt as that was when Church and State hastened to destruction and all things were amisse a safe Ground for Christian Magistrates to walke by and not rather judge they did amisse in that as well as in other things and that their Practice is not a probable Rule to be followed I shall mind him of one particular instanced in by himselfe viz their not hindring the Sadduces and other Hereticks from coming to the Temple or the Synagogues which if it were well done t is by this argument as unlawful for the Church to censure her members with Ecclesiasticall censures for any Hereticall Tenets as for the Civil Magistrate to punish and so all Church Censures for Heresies and false Doctrines are overthrown as well as civil whereas I took it for granted Church censures in matters of Religion had been Lawfull viz. A spiritual weapon suitable by their owne confession for a spirituall evill Heresie and M. S. a good Friend of Hagiomastixs in answer to that Argument against Toleration Revel 2. 20. yeelds it saying that 's meant of Church censures but not of bodily outward punishment by the Magistrate and therefore I think the practise of the People and their Rulers suffering Sadduces and all other Hereticks to be no better argument for Justification of a Toleration then their practise of crucifying Christ a Justification of that 3. Besides that all may see what you and your party aime at in speaking of the Pharisees and Saduces being in honour in the Jewish State Magistrates and bearing civill offices not a bare Toleration of your consciences but that you may be in places of honour government and profit This gives us a cleare reason of the Toleration of Errors in those times namely that Scribes Pharisees and Saduces were in places of power and government had a great interest in Church and State and therefore no wonder if they would tolerate themselves and their owne Opinions can you think it a good argument that Adulterers and theeves ought to be tolerated because Adulterers and Theeves having power suffer such to goe unpunished Or can you thinke it reason to say many Papists Anabaptists being in places of Government suffered Papists Anabaptints therefore t is the duty of the godly Magistrate to suffer them and all other Hereticks Pray Master Hagiomastix resolve me this question seeing Scribes Pharisees and such like were Magistrates and in places of power and honour who should punish Pharisees and Saduces for their Errors and dangerous Opinions Sixthly as to that last clause that Christ did never charge this Church or State or those that bore office in either with â—in or unfaithfulnesse for not proceeding against the Sadduces Pharisees c. in regard of their Errors either by imprisonment or death and yet Christ did teach and presse upon men all and all manner of duties I answer First how is that proved he never did Can the Patrons of Toleration Minus Celsus Senensis Hagiomastix c make it follow by saying t is no where written in the Gospels and therefore he never reproved them can they reason from the Scriptures negatively in matters of fact such things never were because theâ— are not spoken of what thinkâ— they of that Axiome Anon dicto ad non factâ—â— noâ— valet consequentia were not there many things that Christ did which were not written Iohn 21. the last verse But if they will reply yes in some things but not in matters of judgement righteouâ—nesse such a weighty matter as this is made to be I rejoyne that in many weighty matters of the Law and justice Christ either spoke not particularly of them or if he did they are not written neither can be found in the Gospels more then this of punishing Sadduces and other Hereticks in matter of Religion I might instance in many things unquestionably forbidden or commanded by God in the Morall Law that are not particularly spoken of in the Gospels which yet from hence to reason against them wery vere bad Divinity What instances can be given of Christs giving any commands to those in place
the nature of those commands and examples recorded in the old Testament and indeed considering how clearly largely and importunately the Magistrates power and dutie in punishing in matters of Religion is set down and pressed by the Holy-Ghost in the old Testament it had been no wonder if nothing had been said of the new the abundant urging in the old serving for a reason of silence in the new But because this rule is so fully and judiciously handled in a late Book cald Sabbatum Rediviâ—â—um viz. A Law instituted in the old Testament not abrogated in the new is of perpetuall obligation though it have not expresse â—atification in the Gospel I shall referre the Reader thither where he shall find many grounds brought to prove it extracting only one passge out of the Book Whatsoever Law in once delivered to the Church and accordingly recorded in the Law Booke the holy Scriptures even of the old Testament whosoever would claim exemption from it whether particular Person or Church must produce some what to prove that that Law is now under the Gospel repealed or at least expired more then bare saying that it is no longer in force It is so in the statute Law of our Kingdome and of all Kingdomes if a man can alledge for himselfe in point of Right or Priviledge or the Kings Councell for the Kings Rights and Pâ—erogatives any statute that was once made it stands good for all purposes unlesse they who would gainsay it can alledge and prove that such a Statute is out of date by expiration or repeale So that the proofe lies originally upon the refuser of the Law and they that would maintaine it and urge it need plead nothing more then the enacting of it once till the abrogation of it can be verified and if it be so in the Statutes of men and the positive Lawes of Kingdomes much more in those of God whose Authority in unquestionably more absolute and whose wisedome Holinesse Justice and Goodnesse is infinitely beyond that of all Princes and States in the world 3. T is granted Princes and Magistrates under the old Law before Christs comming had a coercive power in matters of Religion and did punish Blasphemers c Now 1. seeing they long had it can any proofe be brought how and upon what occasion it was taken from them can any man shew any text out of the new Testament where Christ and his Apostles took away this power from Princes or declared that however under the old Seducers and false Prophets were to be dealt with by the Civil powers yet not under the new but only with the word of God Bullinger in his fifth Book against the Anabaptists chapter 3. page 169. pleading for Magistrates power in matters of Religion speaks thus to them Are Princes and Magistrates of the new Testament endorred with lesse Spirit and power then those of the old Or in what place have Christ and his Apostles removed Christians Princes from this power of Magistrates Whatever reasons or grounds any way or in any kind there were under the old for this power of Magistrates the very same remaine now were errors and Heresies then deadly and damnable so they are now were they then spreading as a Gangrene and corrupting many so they do now were they then hateful to God so they are still were false Teachers in those times unreasonable perverse obstinate not to be convinced by words behold they are as froward and desparate in these were Princes and Magistrates then to be zealous of Gods honor and to serve the Lord not only as private persons but as Magistrates so they ought to be now and t is by the Spirit of God foretold they should Now where there is the selfe same reason there is ever the selfe same Law and Equity both under the Law and Gospel for the further proofe of which the Reader may consult Master Prynnâ— Sword of Christian Magistracy supported pag. 21. 22 23 2. It cannot seem reasonable that all other relations Parents Masters Husbands should have the same authority over their children servants wives under the Gospel as they had under the Law and that in spiritual things and the Christian Magistrate should not nay that the Power of Parents Masters Husbands should be confirmed strengthned and more largely set forth Ephes 5. 22 23 33. Ephes 6. from verse 1. to 10. Col. 3. from verse 18. to 23. 1 Pet. 2. 18 19. and the Power of Magistrates only taken away Musculus in his common places De Magistratibus speaking of the power that Fathers have over their children in matters of Religion reasons from thence that to the Magistrate the supreme Father of all his subjects whose Power is far greater then that of a Father the care of religion more belongs then to Fathers In Magistrates there is an Authoritie of supereminencie excelling all then which there cannot be a greater on earth Therefore shall not that be lawfull for such an Authority and Power which is lawfull for every Father in his owne House yea by that divine command is it not required that that should belong to the greater which belongs to the lesse that to the publick Father of the people which belongs to the private 3. God under the new Testament allowes and approves of the calling of Princes and Magistrates giving many expresse commands to Christians of subjection and obedience to them Rom. 13. from verse 1. to 6. Tit. 3. 1. 1 Pet. 2. 13 14 17. 1 Tim. 2. 1 2 3. the ends and uses also for which Magistrates were instituted are the same under the new Testament and old besides there is not any one text in the new Testament limiting or restraining the Power given them by God in the old and therefore their calling and Power must needs be the same Learned Bilson in his true Difference between Christian subjection and unchristian Rebellion proving the Princes power and charge by Gods Law of Deut. 17. 18 19. and by the example of the godly Kings of Israel and Judah reaching as well unto matters of Religion as other things that the sword is given them to provide that as well true Religion be maintained in their Realms as civill justice ministred that they forbid prevent and punish in all their subjects not only murders thefts and such like breaches of the second Table but also Schismes Hereâ—ies Idolatries and other offences against the first Table pertaining only to the service of God and matters of Religion answers thus the Jesuits objection the very same evasion the Sectaries have now This charge concerned none but the Kings of Israel and Iudah That refuge doth rather manifest your folly then satisfie my reason Did I pray you Sir the comming of Christ abolish the Vocation of Princes I trow not Then their office remaining as before per consequens both the same precept of God to them still dureth and also the like power to force their subjects to serve
of your Ruling Elders the necessity of Widowes as Officers in the Church the absolute necessity of one and the same governmant or Discipline in all particulars whatsoever for all Churchès in all times and places a full and peremptory determination of all things whatsoever appertaining to the worship of God with divers such like positions which are the very life soule and substance of your way I am at perfect peace in my thoughts that you will never be able to demonstrate or prove from the Scriptures to any sober minded or confidering man Master Goodwins Appendix in his Preface to the Reader If the soules and consciences of men have any cause at all to blesse me it is because I have clothed them with strength and confidence of the royall parentage and descent of the Scriptures and subdued their fears and jealousies of any subornation in that kind under their feet Nay did I not verily beleeve the Scriptures to be the word of God I would not for their sakes expose my selfe as now I doe But that beleif I speak of which hath reigned in me and over me hitherto and hath blessed me with such an abundance of peace of comfort in sufferings for it will not c. An Apologeticall Account of some Brethren of the Church whereof Master Goodwin is Pastour pag. 5. 6. The Doctrines of the Father and of the Sonne the involving whereof in the clouds of uncertainty the said Vindication most falsely and malâ—tiously charges upon him hath he brought into so cleare and open view that we have seen the peace and everlasting salvation of our soules in them Every one of those fundan entail Principeâ— of Christian Religion which this gangren'd pen would perswade the world he denies or doubts of hath he not only asserted in our hearing againe and againe but proved them with such evidence and demonstration of the spirit that our consciences were forced to fall flat before them and to confesse that of a truth God was in them * Anonymi Dissertatio De pace Concordia Ecclesiâ—e pag. 91 92. Apologia pro Socinianis Fallunt falluntur qui ad florentis istius aetatis exemplum nostra tempora exiguut Non iisdem remediis nunc afflicta Ecclesiae valetudo restitui potest quibus olim poterâ—â— aegritudo submoveri Cum sanam esset ac robusta Ecclesia in primo illo aetatis store ApostoloruÌ„ choro superstite etiam violentis utiremediis ob vigorem suum par erat Nunc morbis ac senio confecta debilis superanti jam aegritudini pene succumbit â—ec magis unquam periclitatur quam cum in crudeles medicos incidit Vide ibi plura * Gerard. Joh. Vossii Theses Theolog. De necessi Baptismi Thes 4. contra Fâ—ustâ—Ì„ SocinuÌ„ Praeterea etsi concederetur Christum de Baptismo de disse praeceptuÌ„ censet illud tantùm pertinuisse ad initia quibus exrudi populo ceremoniis assueto Ecclesia Christo colligebatur Denique eo etiam concesso ut perpetuo debeat in Ecclesia obtinere negat tamen universale esse nam cum aquae Baptismus nihil aliud sit quam publicaâ— solennis quaedam professio nominis Christi minime hunc iis necessarium esse ait qui ex Christianis id est Christum profitentibus nascuntur aut qui in Christiana fide sunt educati * But some commands that in regard of their manner some degrees and adjuncts may not bind yet in respect of their substance and the things themselves are perpetuall of which I have spoken before p. 81 82 83 84. whoever does but consider the difference between the essence of a thing and the adjunct of a thing how the essence is one thing and the adjunct another and how some change may be in an adjunct when not in the essence at all will be satisfied a Vid. Jun. Annot. in Ezr. 1. 65. and Eng. Annet * Calvin Refut Eâ—â—orum Serveti p. 598. Hujus rei illustre nobis exemplum spiritus Dei proponit in Nebuchad Nam ejus edictum celebrat Daniel quo capitalem paenam denunciat siquis in Deum Israel blasphemus fuerit Honor profecto non vulgaris crudeli tyranno habetur quum Prophetam suum Dominus ad publicandas quaet tulit leges qua si praeconem assignat leges ipsas in acta sua refert sacrisque suis oraculis annumerat Quid an spiritus saâ—cti Prophetae elogio laudatur Nebuchadnezer qui veri Dei gloriam pro imperio tutandam suscepit ut ad impiam ejus prophanationem connivâ—ant sancti Magistratus an non potius his dominus sub profani regis persona quid agere ipsos deceat praescribit Et câ—rte quid magis praeposterum quam in Ecclesiae sinu impune foveri fcelestas in Deum câ—ntâ—elias quae in Babylone paena capitali sanitae fuerunt ☞ * Bulling adversus Anabaptistas l. 4. c. 5. c. 6. Osiandri Enchiridion c. 2. Qust 41. De Magistratu Politico * The Errors and Controversies in matters of the second Table upon the 5 6 7 8 and 9. Commandements are the most exactly summed up by Danaeus in his Book De Haeresibus of any Author in that kind that ever I met with Indexâ— Tertius de Decalog Legis De quinto Praecepto Magistratum damnant tollunt Manichai Anabaptistae Magistratus â—utoritatem in negotiis religionis negant Dâ—nâ—tistae Judicia capitalia à Christianâ— homine exerâ—â—i posse negant Tertullianissâ— De sexto precepto seipsos occiacre putant licere hominibus Patriciani Circumcelliones De septimo Praecepto Vxores communes promiscuas ess debere dâ—cent Simoniani Nicolaitae Carpocratiani Incestus admittunt probant Catapâ—â—yges De octavo praecepto Propria quaedam à Christianis possâ—deri posse negant Apostolici Jesuitae Anabaptistae De nono praecepto mentiri homini Christiano licere putant Messaliani Priscillianistae ☜ * Whites way to the Church pag. 81. 83 84 85. Neither can the Jesuite assigne any Company or State of men whereby the Church may be supposed to manifest her teaching but the same may be subject to error and in experience hath erred as wee see in Councels Doctors and all other meanes which she hath used in teaching us except that of the Scriptures only Willets second Generall Controversie concerning the Church second question whether the Church may erre pag. 69 70 71. Amesii Bellarm. Enervat Tom. secâ—nd cap. 2. De Eccles visibilit quaest 4. An Ecclesiaâ— possit errare Rivet Catholic Orthodox Tractat. 2. Quaest 3. An Ecclesia possit errare Cameron Praelect de Eccles De Eccles Infallibilit 281 282 c. ☞ * Chamier Panstrat Cathol De Canon summa Regula Fidei Apostoli fuerunt infallibiles ex particulari assistentia spiritus habuerunt particularem non habitualem assistentiam spiritus Lutherus spirtus Sanctus non semper tangit corda Prophetaâ—um * Whitak Controv 3. quaest 6 An Assertion of the Government of the Church of
are appointed and therefore seeing the judicialls prescribe the equity of judgements which is a part of the Decalogue we must be bound to that as we are to the rest of the Decalogue viz. so farre as they containe a generall equity though we are not tied to the formes of the Mosaicall politie Now Christ saith Matth. 5. 17. he came not to destroy the Law but to fulfill it which words are comprehensive of the Judiciall Law as for the substance a part of the Moral Law the Iudicial being indeed an Appendix and a more particular explication of that part of the Morall Law concerning matters of Iustice and judgement and therefore must be understood by Christ to be established 2. Though there be many pregnant proofs in the New Testament for abolishing the Ceremoniall Law yet we nowhere read in the New Testament of making void the Iudiciall Law concerning the punishing of sinnes against the Morall Law in the number of which are Idolatry Heresie Blasphemy Now these Iudiciall Lawes being the Lawes of God and by his revealed will once settled they must needs so farre forth remaine as they appeare not by his will to be repealed They who hold the Magistrate under the Gospel is not bound to punish for such sinnes must prove from the Scripture those Lawes of God revoked and cancel'd which none of the Patrons of Toleration have ever yet done 3. The substance and equity of the Iudiciall Law remains in that Christ and his Apostles make use of transfer and prove by some Iudicial laws divers things under the New Testament Christ makes use of a Iudiciall Law concerning punishment Matth. 5. 38 39. An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth viz. that of poena talionis Exod. 21. 24. and frees it from the false glosse and interpretation of the Pharisees in which he teaches the Iudiciall Lawes of Moses understood in their right sense are to be observed in the New Testament For if Christ in that Sermon of which this is a part would teach the Decalogue belonged to Christians by his vindicating it from the false interpretations of the Scribes and Pharisees then it followes hee meant to teach the Iudiciall Lawes of Moses concerning the punishment of Morall transgressions belonged to them also because he vindicated also one of them of which particular with the proof of the consequence the Reader may finde more in Piscators Appendix to Exodus The Apostle Paul 1 Cor. 9. 9. 1 Tim. 5. 18. among other proofs brought by him from fimilitudes fetched from the common use of men that the Minister of the Gospel ought to be maintained of the Churches charge whereas they might object those were but humane reasons he alleadgeth as the eternall Law of God one of the Iudiciall Lawes of Moses which was that a man should not muzle the mouth of the Oxe which treadeth out the corne where 't is manifest he doubteth not to bind the conscience of the Churches unto the equity of that Law which was judiciall likewise from the 13. verse of those that minister about holy things and wait at the Altar living of the things of the Temple and being partakers of the Altar hee concludes that they which preach the Gospell should live of it Now this maintainance of the Priests albeit in the manner of provision it be held by many ceremoniall yet as it was a reward of their service due by men as the punishments also if they failed in their duties was meerly judiciall So the equity of that judiciall Law Exod. 22. 2. Of the smiting of a theife in the night that he dye is approved by Christ Matth. 24. 43. So Christ and Paul both transferre that judiciall Law of having two or three witnesses in judgement Deut. 19. verse 15. to bind Christians in their Ecclesiasticall censures and judgements Matthew 18. verse 16. 2 Cor. 13. verse 1. 1 Tim. 5. verse 19. By which instances and some other particulars that might bee given 't is evident that in those judicialls to all the circumstances whereof we are not bound wee are notwithstanding bound to the equity of which the Reader may read more in Cartwrights second Reply to Doctor Whitgifts second Answer pag. 98 99 100. 4. That God appointed under the Law Blasphemie Apostasie Idolatry Prophecying lies in thename of the Lord to bee punished by the Magistrate proceeded from Gods holinesse justice infinite hatred of such sinnes and from their nature being so contrary to his nature so derogatory to his honour and glory high treason against the Supreme Majesty so destructive to the precious soules of men so dangerous to Common-wealths and Kingdomes as the Scriptures in divers places where these Lawes of punishing are set down assignes these causes and reasons Now I would know of the Patrons of Toleration whether under the Gospel these finnes of Blasphemy Apostasie c. be not as much against Gods holinesse justice glory as pernicious and damnable as they were under the Law yea and in some respects more as being against the Declarations of the Sonne of God Hebr. 2. 2 3. and a treading under foot the Sonne of God and counting the bloud of the Covenant an unboly thing which being granted punishment by the Magistrate must needs continue The rule of just and unjust in God and in his Law is alwayes the same and immutable It is as equally just to punish evill things as to forbid evill things and therefore the right and Law of punishments is also immutable Where and of what things the causes are perpetuall there also the right is eternall and immutable but the grounds and causes why such offences were punished as Gods justice holinesse glory c. are perpetuall and eternal God is alwayes like to himselfe the morall transgressions of men doe alike at all times displease him no good reason can be given why the Majesty of God should be of lesse account with us then heretofore among the Iewes and therefore by the like reason to be punished now as well as then But the further proof of this the Reader may finde in some learned Divines Beza de Haereticis à Magistratu punieâ—â—â— 155. and in Tremellius and Juniâ—â— Preface before the Books of Moses 5. The Iudiciall Law concerning the punishments of â—iâ—kednesse for the substance viz. that it should be punished remains under the Gospel because it comes within the nature of the Morall Law and was prescribed to the Iewes not quae Iewes or a people peculiarly taken into Covenant but qua men subject to the Law of nature as other Nations were For the proof of which besides the judgement of divers learned Divines Philip Melanctoâ— Peter Martyr Zanchius Aâ—tingius the reason of common right from the proper peculiar right of the Iewes is known and distinguished by these following particulars 1. If the same things have beene also found to be concluded and by civill sanction established by other Law-givers from the light of nature 2. If