Selected quad for the lemma: state_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
state_n	church_n	civil_a	punish_v	1,086	5	8.9722	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A77236	Several treatises of vvorship & ceremonies, by the Reverend Mr. William Bradshaw, one of the first Fellows of Sydney Colledge in Cambridge; afterward minister of Chattam in Kent, 1601. Known by his learned treatise De justificatione. 1. A consideration of certain positions archiepiscopal. 2. A treatise of divine worship, tending to prove the ceremonies, imposed on the ministers of the Gospel in England, in present controversie, are in their use unlawful. Printed 1604. 3. A treatise of the nature and use of things indifferent. 1605. 4. English Puritanism, containing the main opinions of the ridgedest sort of those called Puritans in the realm of England. 1604. 5. Twelve general arguments, proving the ceremonies unlawful. 1605. 6. A proposition concerning kneeling in the very act of receiving, 1605. 7. A protestation of the Kings supremacy, made in the name of the afflicted ministers, and oposed to the shameful calumniations of the prelates. 1605. 8. A short treatise of the cross in baptism.	Bradshaw, William, 1571-1618.	1660 (1660)	Wing B4161; Thomason E1044_5; ESTC R20875	92,680	129

deprived of their Ministry and Service 9. They hold that though one Church is not to differ from another in any Spiritual Ecclesiastical or Religious matters whatsoever but are to be equal and alike yet that they may differ and one excel another in outward Civil Circumstances of place time Person c. So that although they hold that those Congregations of which Kings and Nobles make themselves members ought to have the same Ecclesiastical Officers Ministry worship Sacraments Ceremonies and Forme of Divine Worship that the basest Congregation in the Country hath and no other yet they hold also That as their Persons in civil respects excel so in the Exercises of Religion in civil matters they may excel other Assemblies Their Chappels and Seats may be gorgeously set forth with rich Arras and Tapestry their Fonts may be of Silver their Communion Tables of Ivory and if they will covered with gold the Cup out of which they drink the Sacramental blood of Christ may be of beaten gold set about with Diamonds their Ministers may be clothed in silk and velvet so themselves will maintain them in that manner otherwise they think it absurd and against common reason that other base and Inferior Congregations must by Ecclesiastical Tithes and Oblations maintain the silken and velvet suits and Lordly retinue of the Ministers and Ecclesiastical Officers of Princes and Nobles 10. They hold that the Lawes Orders and Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction of the visible Churches of Christ if they be lawfull and warrantable by the Word of God are no wayes repugnant to any Civil State whatsoever whether Monarchical Aristocratical or Democratical but do tend to the further establishing and advancing of the Rights and Prerogatives of all and every of them And they renounce and abhor from their soules all such Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction or Policy that is any way repugnant and derogatory to any of them especially to the Monarchical State which they acknowledg to be the best kind of Civil Government for this Kingdome 11. They hold and bel●eve that the equality in Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and authority of Churches and Church-Ministers is no more derogatory and repugnant to the State and glory of a Monarch than the Paritie or equality of Schoolmasters of several Schools Captains of several Camps Shepherds of several flocks of sheep or Masters of several Families yea they hold the clean contrary that inequality of Churches and Church-Officers in Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and Authority was that principally that advanced Antichrist unto his throne and brought the Kings and Princes of the earth unto such vassallage under him and that the Civil Authority and glory of Secular Princes and States hath ever decayed and withered the more that the Ecclesiastical Officers of the Church have been advanced and lifted up in authority beyond the limits and confines that Christ in his word hath prescribed unto them CHAP. III. Concerning the Ministers of the Word 1. THey hold that the Pastors of particular Congregations are or ought to be the highest Spiritual Officers in the Church over whom by any Divine Ordinance there is no superiour Pastor but only Jesus Christ And that they are led by the spirit of Antichrist that arrogate or take upon themselves to be Pastors of Pastors 2. They hold that there are not by any Divine Institution in the word any ordinary National Provincial or Diocesan Pastors or Ministers under which the Pastors of particular Congregations are to be subject as Inferior Officers And that if there were any such that then the Word of God would have set them down more distinctly and precisely than any of the rest For the higher place that one occupieth in the Church of the more necessity he is unto the Church of the more necessity he is to the Church the more carefully would Christ the head of the Church have been in pointing him out and distinguishing him from other Hence in the Old Testament the High Priest his Title Office Function and special Administration and Jurisdiction is more particularly and precisely set down than the Office of any of the Inferior Priests and Levites Also in the New Testament the Office of a Pastor is more distinctly and more precisely set down than of a Doctor or any other inferior Church-Officer So that a man may as well call into question the whole New Testament as doubt whether there ought to be a Pastor in every Congregation or doubt of his proper Office and Function And if by Gods Ordinance there should be an ordinary Ecclesiastical Officer above the Pastors of particular congregations than Christ out of all question would with that special care and cost have set it forth by Titles prerogatives peculiar Offices Functions and Gifts that the Churches and people of God should have reason rather ●o doubt of any Office or Jurisdiction than of the peculiar office or Jurisdiction of the Primates Metropolitanes Arch-Bishops and Prelates of the world 3. They h●ld that if there were a supream National Eccles●astical Minister or Pastor that should be the Prince of many thousand Pastors that then also Christ as he did in the Jewish Church would have appointed a solemn National or Provincial Liturgy or worship unto which at sometimes of the year the whole body of the people should ascend and that unto the Metropolitan City as unto a Jerusalem and that he would as he did in the Jewish Church more precisely and particularly have set down the manner of solemnization thereof than of his parochial worship Forasmuch therefore as they cannot read in the New Testament of any higher or more solemn worship than of that which is to be performed in a particular Congregation they cannot be perswaded that God hath appointed any higher Ministers of his service and worship under the New Testament than the elect Ministers of particular Congregations 4. They hold that the High Priest of the Jews was typically and in a figure the supream head of the whole Catholique Church which though it were visible only in the Province and Nation of Jury yet those of other Nations and Countries as appears by the History of Acts even though they were Ethiopians were under this High Priest and acknowledged homage unto him So that he was not a Provincial Metropolitane but in very deed an Oecumenical and universal Bishop of the whole world And therefore they hold this being the best ground in the word for Metropolitane and Provincial Pastors or Bishops that the Pope of Rome who alone maketh claim unto and is in possession of the like universal Supremacy hath more warrant in the Word of God to the same than any Metropolitane or Diocesan not dependant upon him hath or can have So that they hold that by the Word of God either there must be no Metropolitanes and Diocesans or else there must be a Pope 5. They hold That no Pastor ought to exercise or accept of any Civil publique Jurisdiction and authority but ought to be wholly imployed in spiritual Offices

even for the Divine Calling and Ordinance sake CHAP. V. Concerning the Censures of the Church 1. THey hold that the spiritual keyes of the Church are by Christ committed to the aforesaid spiritual Officers and Governors and unto none other which keyes they hold that they are not to be put to this use to lock up the Crowns Swords or Scepters of Princes and Civil States or the Civil Rights Prerogatives and Immunities of Civil Subjects in the things of this Life or to use them as picklocks to open withal mens Treasuries and Coffers or as keyes of Prisons to shut up the bodies of men for they think that such a Power and Authority Ecclesiastical is fit only for the Antichrist of Rome and the consecrated Governours of his Synagogues who having no Word of God which is the Sword of the Spirit to defend his and their usurped Jurisdiction over the Christian World doth unlawfully usurp the lawful Civil Sword and Power of the Monarchs and Princes of the Earth thereby forcing men to subject themselves to his spiritual vassalage and Service and abusing thereby the spiritual Keyes and Jurisdiction of the Church 2. They hold that by vertue of these Keyes they are not to make any curious Inquisitions into the secret or hidden vices or crimes of men extorting from them a confession of those faults that are concealed from themselves and others or to proceed to molest any man upon secret suggestions private suspition or uncertain fame or for such crimes as are in question whether they be crimes or no But they are to proceed only against evident and apparent crimes such as are either granted to be such of all civil honest men or of all true Christians or at least such as they are able by evidence of the Word of God to convince to be sins to the conscience of the Offender As also such as have been either publikely committed or having been committed in secret are by some good means brought to light and which the delinquent denying they are able by honest and sufficient testimony to prove against him 3. They hold that when he that hath committed a scandalous crime cometh before them and is convinced of the same they ought not after the manner of our Ecclesiastical Courts scorn deride taunt and revile him with odious and contumelious speeches eye him with big and stern looks procure Proctors to make Personal Invectives against him make him dance attendance from Court day to Court day and from Term to Term frowning at him in presence and laughing at him behind his back but they are though he be never so obstinate and perverse to use him brotherly not giving the least personal reproaches or threats but laying open unto him the nature of his sin by the light of Gods Word are only by donouncing the judgements of God against him to terrifie him and so to move him to repentance 4. They hold that if the party offending be their civil Superiour that then they are to use even throughout the whole carriage of their Censure all civil Complements Offices and Reverence due unto him That they are not to presume to convent him before them but are themselves to go in all civil and humble manner unto him to stand bare before him to bow unto him to give him all civil Titles belonging unto him and if he be a King and Supream Ruler they are to kneel down before him and in the humblest manner to censure his faults so that he may see apparently that they are not carried with the least spice of malice against his Person but only with zeal of the health and salvation of his soul 5. They hold that the Ecclesiastical Officers laying to the charge of any man any Errour Heresie or false Opinion whatsoever do stand bound themselves first to prove that he holdeth such an errour or heresie and secondly to prove directly unto him that it is an errour by the Word of God and that it deserveth such a censure before they do proceed against him 6. They hold that the Governours of the Church ought with all patience and quietness hear what every Offender can possibly say for himself either for Qualification Defence Apology or Justification of any supposed crime or errour whatsoever and they ought not to proceed to censure the grossest offence that is untill the Offender have said as much for himself in his defence as he possibly is able And they hold it an evident Character of a corrupt Ecclesiastical Government where the parties convented may not have full liberty to speak for themselves considering that the more liberty is granted to speak in a bad cause especially before those that are in Authority and of judgment the more the iniquity of it will appear and the more the Justice of their Sentence will shine 7. They hold that the Oath ex officio whereby Popish and English Ecclesiastical Governours either upon some secret informations or suggestions or private suspitions go about to bind mens consciences to accuse themselves and their friends of such crimes or imputations as cannot by any direct course of Law be proved against them and whereby they are drawn to be instruments of many heavy crosses upon themselves and their friends and that often for those Actions that they are perswaded in their consciences are good and holy I say that they hold that such an Oath on the urgers part is most damnable and tyrannous against the very Law of Nature devised by Antichrist through the inspiration of the devil that by means thereof the professors and practizers of the true Religion might either in their weakness by per jury damn their own souls or be drawn to reveal to the Enemies of Christianity those secret religious acts and deeds that being in the perswasion of their consciences for the advancement of the Gospel will be a means of heavy sentences of condemnation against themselves and their dearest friends 8. They hold that Ecclesiastical Officers have no power to proceed in Censure against any Crime of any Person after that he shall freely acknowledge the same and profess his hearty penitency for it And that they may not for any crime whatsoever lay any bodily or pecuniary mulct upon them or impose upon them any Ceremonial Mark or Note of shame such as is the white sheet or any such like or take any fees for any cause whatsoever but are to accept of as a sufficient satisfaction a private submission and acknowledgment if the Crime be private and a publike if the crime be publike and notorious 9. They hold that if a Member of the Church be obstinate and shew no signs and tokens of repentance of that crime that they by evidence of Scripture have convinced to be a crime that then by their Ecclesiastical Authority they are to deny unto him the Sacrament of the Supper And if the suspension from it will not humble him then though not without humbling themselves in prayer fasting and great demonstration

in controversie are either all or the greatest part of them such Ergo They are parts of Divine Worship and Service The Proposition cannot with any modest face be denied For else how could a sole Divine ratification of the present use of them make them parts of his true Worship If they were not used as parts of his Worship before The Assumption is as manifest For if Christ should by some Revelation from heaven signifie That it is his will that a Minister in Divine Service should wear a white linnen garment in Baptism make the sign of a Cross to these ends and purposes that are expressed in the Service Book then certainly they should be essential parts of his Divine Worship else the Jewish Rites and Ceremonies and our Sacraments are no parts thereof The second part of the Assumption of the first Syllogism That they are imposed only upon the pleasure and will of man This is evident For those things that God leaves as indifferent to the will and discretion of man to do or leave undone being imposed by man upon man are imposed only upon the will and pleasure of man The third part of the Assumption is That they are of necessity to be done in Divine Service Which is also out of all doubt For a Minister stands bound to do them upon pain of suspension and deprivation And God must have no solemn Worship in England except it be administred in the same Upon all this it follows That to use these Ceremonies in manner and form prescribed is to use such Ceremonies as are parts of Divine Worship imposed only by the will of Man c. The Second Argument It is a sin against God for him that is by way of Excellency a servant of Jesus Christ without a precise and direct warrant from him at any time especially in the Solemn Worship of God to give special honour to Antichrist and his members But to use these Ceremonies is in that manner aforesaid to give special honour to Antichrist and his members Ergo It is a sin against God to use them THE Proposition is manifest and clear to any that have an eye of Reason and any light of Divinity shining in it For what is a sin if this be not That a Servant of Jesus Christ even then when he is in the Service of Christ should perform special honour and service to Antichrist or any of his Limbs The Assumption is proved if our Adversaries will grant it that the Pope is Antichrist and that all the visible members of his Church acknowledging him their supream head are members of him by this reason Such a Conformity to Antichrist and his members in the Ceremonies of Religion and Form of Divine Worship as is not only besides the Word of God but in a special manner derogatory to all reformed Churches that have departed from the Synagogue of Rome is a special honour to Antichrist and his members But to use these Ceremonies in Divine Worship is such a Conformity to Antichrist and his members Ergo. To use these Ceremonies in that manner aforesaid is to give special honour to Antichrist and his Members The Proposition is without exception For if it should be a special honour to the Bishops of England and their conformed Cleargy for the Churches of Scotland voluntarily to leave conformity to the Churches of the Low Countries France and Germany and to conform themselves in Ceremonies and Form of Divine Worship to the Prelatical Clergy of England It must needs be a special honour to Antichrist and his Members for any to do the like to them The Assumption is thus proved For a Minister of Jesus Christ to conforme himself in such peculiar Rites Ceremonies and Formes of Divine Service to Antichrist and his members as other reformed Churches have rejected for vain foolish and superstitious is in a special manner derogatory to all other reformed Churches But to use these Ceremonies in controversie is in that manner to conforme himself Ergo It is in a special manner derogatory to all other Reformed Churches Both parts of the Syllogisme are such as may easily be proved if they be denyed The 3. Argument All Worship more than Civill performed to any besides God is a sin To use these Ceremonies in manner and forme prescribed is to performe a more than civil honour even a Religious only to a humane Power and Authority Ergo To use these Ceremonies is to sin THe Proposition needs no proof For there is no middle Honor between Civil and Divine and therefore that which is more than Civil is Divine Now Divine Honor is to be given only to God who will not have his Glory given unto another The Assumption is thus proved If these Ceremonies be Religious Ceremonies and all Religious Ceremonies be a part of Divine worship performed to that authority that instituteth and commandeth them If also the authority that instituteth and commandeth them is but meerly humane Then the Assumption is true But the first is true Ergo The latter is true also The Proposition cannot be denyed of any reasonable creature The Assumption hath three Parts I. That these Ceremonies are Religious Ceremonies This needs no proof For what shall we make to be Religious Ceremonies if those Ceremonies be not that are prescribed by the Church to the Church only tied to Religion only and Religious Functions Offices and Persons to be acted and performed only in Exercises of Religion and Divine Worship and are mystical shadowes and types of Religious Doctrine II. That all Religious Ceremonies are parts of Divine Worship This neither should need any proof If those that are adversaries unto us in this cause did not too much presume of the weakness of our Discourse and the strength of their own wit For there being an external Divine Worship which properly consists in the outward Rites and Ceremonies of Religion What Ceremonies can be called parts thereof if such Religious Ceremonies as these be not For if bowing the knee c. in Divine Worship though it be used also in Civil Worship be a part of Divine Worship much more are those Ceremonies that are peculiarly appropriated to Divine Service and Worship and wherein part of the forme thereof is made to consist But it may for further satisfying of men be thus proved All meer and immediate Actions of Religion are parts of Divine Worship All Religious Ceremonies are meer and immediate Actions of Religion Ergo They are parts of Divine Worship Further How can a man imagine that a meer Religious Ecclesiastical Act done by a Servant of God in the solemn Service and Worship of God by precise Canon of the Church should be no part of Divine Worship sith all the solemn Rites and Ceremonies that are used in the solemn Services of Civil States especially such as are done in their presence have been ever reputed parts of civil Honor and Worship Lastly Considering that God in his Divine Worship doth require the whole heart

from the Civil Communion of men so ought the Congregation of which he is a Member cut him off from all spiritual Communion with them If any one of the Ecclesiastical Officers themselves shall sin he is subject to the censures of the rest as any other member of the congregation If they shall all sin scandalously either in the execution of their Office or in any other ordinarie manner Then the Congregation that chose them freely hath as free power to depose them and to place others in their room If the Congregation shall erre either in choosing or deposing of her spiritual Officers Then hath the Civil Magistrate alone power and authority to punish them for their fault co compel them to make better choise or to defend against them those Officers that without just causes they shall depose or deprive 27. We hold that those Ecclesiastical Persons that make claim to greater power and authority then this Especially they that make claim Iure Divino of power and Iurisdiction to meddle with other Churches then that one Congregation of which they are or ought to be members Do usurp upon the Supremacy of the Civil Magistrate who alone hath and ought to have as we hold and maintain a power over the several Congregations in his Dominions and who alone ought by his authority not only to prescribe common Laws and Canons of uniformity and consent in Religion and worship of God unto them all But also to punish the offences of the several Congregations that they shall commit against the laws of God the policy of the Realm and the Ecclesiastical Constitutions enacted by his authority 28. We hold that the King ought not to give this authority away or to commit it to any Ecclesiastical Person or Persons whatsoever But ought himself to be as it were Archbishop and general overseer of all the Churches within his Dominions and ought to imploy under him his honourable Counsel his Iudges Leiftenants Iustices Constables and such like to oversee the Churches in the several divisions of their civil Regiments visiting them and punishing by their civil power whatsoever they shall see amiss in any of them Especially in the Rulers and Governers 29. For as much as no people are more hated persecuted and wronged of the wicked world then the true Churches of Christ We hold that no people in the Earth stand in more need of the civil Magistrate then they And that it is the greatest outward blessing they can injoy in this life to live under the Protection of their Swords Scepters the greatest cause of mourning when the same shall be bent against them And we hold those Churches to be no true Churches of Jesus Christ that living in any Country shall refuse subjection to the civil Regents and Governers of the same be they in respect of Religion never such Paganish Infidells 30. We hold it utterly unlawfull for any Christian Churches whatsoever by any armed force or power against the will of the civil magistracy and State under which they live To erect and set up in publique the true worship and service of God or to beat down or suppress any superstition or Idolatry that shall be countenanced and maintained by the same Only Every man is to look to himself that he communicate not with the evils of the times induring what it shall please the State to inflict and seeking by all honest and peaceable means all reformation of publick abuses onely at the hands of civil publicke persons and all practises contrarie to these we condemn as seditious and sinfull 31. All that we crave of his Majestie and the State is that by his and their permission and under their protection and approbation it may be lawfull for us to serve and worship God in all things according to his revealed will and the manner of all other reformed Protestant Churches that have made separation from Rome that we may not be forced against our consciences to stain and pollute the simple and syncere worship of God prescribed in his word with any humane Traditions and Rites whatsoever but that in Divine worship we may be actors only of those things that may for matter or manner either ingeneral or special be concluded out of the word of God Also to this end that it may be lawfull for us to exhibite unto them and unto their Censure a true and syncere Confession of our faith containing the main Grounds of our Religion unto which all other doctrines are to be consonant as also a Form of Divine worship and Ecclesiastical Government in like manner warranted by the word and to be observed of us all under any civil punishment that it shall please the said Majestie and state to inflict under whose authority alone we desire to exercise the same and unto whose punishment alone we desire to be subject if we shall offend against any of those Lawes and Canons that themselves shall approve in manner aforesaid and our desire is Not to worship God in dark corners but in such publick places and at such convenient times as it shall please them to assigne to the intent that they and their officers may the better take notice of our offences if any such shall be committed in our Congregations and assemblies that they may punish the same accordingly And we desire we may be subject to no other Spiritual Lords but unto Christ nor unto any other Temporal Lords but unto themselves whom alone in this Earth we desire to make our Judges and supreame Governers and Overseers in all causes Ecclesiastical whatsoever renouncing as Antichristian all such Ecclesiastical powers as arrogate and assume unto themselves under any pretence of the Law of God or man the said power which we acknowledge to be due only to the Civil Magistrate 32. So long as it shall please the King and civil State though to the great derogation of their own authority as we may have occasion hereafter to prove to maintain in this Kingdom the State of the Hierarchy or Prelacie We can in Honour to his Majestie and the State and in desire of peace be content without envy to suffer them to injoy their state and dignity and to live as brethren amongst those ministers that shall acknowlege spiritual homage unto their spiritual Lordships paying unto them all temporal duties of tenths and such like yea and joyning with them in the service and worship of God so far as we may do it without our own particular communicating with them in those humane Traditions and rites that in our consciences we judge to be unlawfull Only we crave in all dutifull manner that which the very Law of Nature yeeldeth unto us that for as much as they are most malicious enemies unto us and do apparently thirst either after our blood or shipwrack of our faith and consciences that they may not hence forth be our judges in these causes but that we may both of us stand as parties at the bar of

forbear or to do according to the Civil Laws of Magistrates do is a depriving of men of that liberty that God hath granted unto them and therefore such a Law is neither good nor indifferent but evil to the soul of him that enacteth it though not of him that obeyeth it For it is no indifferency in any man to take that away from a man that God hath freely given unto him 21. All moral actions of men that are good or evill are either private or common and publike The common and publike are either Domestical Political or Ecclesiastical Actions also in their Indifferency may vary according to their divers references to these 22. A private good or evil action is that which affecteth with good or evill only a mans own person that doth it and which spreadeth not to the good or hurt of any other except secondarily and by accident as he that eateth and drinketh doth himself only good properly Though secondarily and by accident he may in that strength he receiveth thereby do his Family or the Common-wealth good 23. That action is indifferent in respect of a mans private self that doth his own private Person any good or hurt 24. Those Domestical Political Ecclesiastical actions are good or evil that tend to the good or hurt of a Family Commonwealth or Church and those are indifferent that being done do bring neither good nor hurt or as much good as hurt unto any of the said Societies 25. That may be good evil or indifferent to a private person as he is a private person that is not so unto a Family Common-wealth or Church or unto him as he is a member of all or any of them 26. That may be Indifferent to be done by a Family or the Commonwealth as it is such That is evil and not indifferent to be done by a Church That may be indifferent to one member of a House Church or Commonwealth that is not indifferent to another that may be lawful or indifferent for the Church to do in one place and at some one time that is unlawful in another place and at another time 27. All which premises or the most of them being granted it will easily appear to any that can rightly apply these principles and general assertions that the Ceremonies in present controversie in our Church are not as is pretended by the forcers of them meerly indifferent but either excellent parts of our Religion or notorious parts of Superstition FINIS Summa Summae The Prelates to the afflicted Ministers in this Realm Let them prove this assumption but by one Argument and we will yield But it is to be noted That the Prelates still take all things contained therein as granted and without question whereas we have proved and offer to prove the contrary ALL those that wilfully refuse to obey the King in things indifferent and to conform themselves to the Orders of the Church authorized by him not contrary to the Word of God are Schismaticks enemies to the Kings Supremacy and State and not to be tolerated in Church or Commonwealth But you do wilfully refuse to obey the King in things indifferent and to conform your selves to the Orders of the Church authorized by him not contrary to the Word of God Ergo You are Schismaticks Enemies to the Kings Supremacy and the State and not to be tolerated in Church or Commonwealth The afflicted Ministers to the Prelates ALL those that freely and willingly perform unto the King and State all Obedience not only in things necessary but Indifferent commanded by Law And that have been alwaies ready to conform themselves to every Order of the Church authorized by him not contrary to the Word of God are free from all Schism Friends to the Kings Supremacy and to the State and unworthy in this manner to be molested in Church or Commonwealth But e This Treatise and other books lately written and exhibited to authority do prove the Assumption there is none of us that is deprived or suspended from our Ministry but hath ever been ready freely and willingly to perform unto the King and State all obedience not only in things necessary but Indifferent required by Law and to conform our selves to every Order of the Church authorized by him not contrary to the Word of God Ergo We are all free from Schism Friends to the Kings Supremacy and the State and most unworthy of such molestation in Church and Commonwealth as now we sustain English Puritanism CONTAINING THE MAIN OPINIONS of the rigidest sort of those that are called PURITANS in the Realm of ENGLAND Acts 24.14 But this I confesse unto thee that after the way which they call heresie so worship I the God of my Fathers believing all things which are written in the Law and the Prophets Acts 28.22 But we will hear of thee what thou thinkest for as concerning this sect we know that every where it is spoken against Printed in the Year 1660. To the Indifferent Reader IT cannot be unknown to them that know any thing that those Christians in this Realm which are called by the odious and vile name of Puritans are accused by the Prelates to the Kings Majesty and the State to maintain many absurd erroneous Schismatical and Heretical Opinious concerning Religion Church-Government and the Civil Magistracy Which hath moved me to collect as near as I could the chiefest of them and to send them naked to the view of all men that they may see what is the worst that the worst of them hold It is not my part to prove and justifie them Those that accuse and condemn them must in all reason and equity prove their accusation or else bear the name of unchristian Slanderers I am not ignorant that they lay other Opinions yea some clean contradictory to these to the charge of these men the falshood whereof we shall it is to be doubted have more and more occasion to detect In the mean time all Enemies of Divine Truth shall find that to obscure the same with Calumniations and untruths is but to hid● a fire with laying dry straw or tow upon it But thou mayst herein observe what a terrible Popedome and Primacy these rigid Presbyterians desire and with what painted bug-bears and Scare-Crows the Prelates go about to fright the States of this Kingdome withall who will no doubt one day see how their wisdoms are abused Farewell English Puritanism CHAP. I. Concerning Religion or the worship of God in general IMprimis They hold and maintain That the Word of God contained in the writings of the Prophets and Apostles is of absolute perfection given by Christ the head of the Church to be unto the same th● sole Canon and rule of all matters of Religion and the worship and service of God whatsoever And that whatsoever done in the same service and worship cannot be justified by the said word is unlawfull And therefore that it is a sin to force any Christian to

and Duties to that Congregation over which he is set And that those Civil Magistrates weaken their own Supremacy that shall suffer any Ecclesiastical Pastor to exercise any Civil Jurisdiction within their Realms Dominions or Seigniories 6. They hold that the highest and supream Office and authority of the Pastor is to preach the Gospel solemnly and publickly to the Congregation by interpreting the written Word of God and applying the same by exhortation and reproof unto them They hold that this was the greatest work that Christ and his Apostles did and that whosoever is thought worthy and fit to exercise this authority cannot be thought unfit and unworthy to exercise any other spiritual or Ecclesiastical authority whatsoever 7. They hold that the Pastor or Minister of the Word is not to reach any Doctrine unto the Church grounded upon his own judgment or opinion or upon the Judgment or opinion of any or all the men in the world but only that truth that he is able to demonstrate and prove evidently and apparently by the Word of God soundly interpreted and that the people are not bound to believe any Doctrine of Religion or Divinity whatsoever upon any ground whatsoever except it be apparently justified by the Word or by necessary consequent deduced from the same 8. They hold that in interpreting the Scriptures and opening the sence of them he ought to follow those Rules only that are followed in finding out the meaning of other writings to wit by weighing the propriety of the tongue wherein they are written by weighing the Circumstance of the place by comparing one place with another and by considering what is properly spoken and what tropically or figuratively And they hold it unlawfull for the Pastor to obtrude upon his people a sence of any part of the Divine Word for which he hath no other ground but the bare testimonies of men and that it is better for the people to be content to be ignorant of the meaning of such difficult places than to hang their Faith in any matter in this case upon the bare Testimony of man 9. They hold that the people of God ought not to acknowledge any such for their Pastors as are not able by Preaching to interpret and apply the Word of God unto them in manner and forme aforesaid And therefore that no ignorant and sole reading Priests are to be reputed the Ministers of Jesus Christ who sendeth none into his Ministry and service but such as he adorneth in some measure with spiritual gifts And they cannot be perswaded that the faculty of reading in ones Mother tongue the Scriptures c. which any ordinary Turk or Infidel hath can be called in any congruity of speech a Ministerial gift of Christ 10. They hold that in the Assembly of the Church the Pastor only is to be the mouth of the Congregation to God in Prayer and that the people are only to testifie their assent by the word Amen And that it is a Babilonian cofusion for the Pastor to say one piece of a Prayer and the people with mingled voices to say another except in singing which by the very ordinance and instinct of nature is more delightfull and effectual the more voices there are joyned and mingled together in harmony and consent 11. They hold that the Church hath no authority to impose upon her Pastors or any other of her Officers any other ministerial Duties Offices Functions Actions or Ceremonies ei●her in Divine worship or out of the same then what Christ himself in the Scriptures hath imposed upon them or what they might lawfully impose upon Christ himself if he were in person upon the earth and did exercise a Ministerial Office in some Church 12. They hold that it is as great an injury to force a Congregation or Church to maintain as their Pastor with Tithes and such like Donations that person that either is not able to instruct them or that refuseth in his own person ordinarily to do it as to force a man to maintain one for his wife that either is not a woman or that refuseth in her own person to do the duties of a wife unto him 13. They hold that by Gods Ordinance there should be also in every Church a Doctor whose special office should be to instruct by way of Catechizing the Ignorant of the Congregation and that particularly in the main grounds and Principles of Religion CHAP. IV. Concerning the Elders 1. FOrasmuch as through the malice of Sathan there are and will be in the best Churches many disorders and scandalls committed that redound to the reproach of the Gospel and are a stumbling block to many both without and within the Church and sith they judge it repugnant to the Word of God that any Minister should be a sole Ruler and as it were a Pope so much as in one Parish much more that he should be one over a whole Diocesse Province or Nation they hold that by Gods Ordinance the Congrega●ion should make choice of other Officers as Assistants unto the Ministers in the spiritual regiment of the Congregation who are by office jointly with the Ministers of the Word to be as Monitors and Overseers of the manners and conversation of all the Congregation and one of another that so every one may be more wary of their wayes and that the Pastors and Doctors may better attend to Prayer and Doctrine and by their means may be made better acquainted with the estate of the people when others eyes besides there own shall wake and watch over them 2. They hold that such only are to be chosen to this Office as are the gravest honestest discreetest best grounded in Religion and the ancientest Professors thereof in the Congregation such as the whole Congregation do approve of and respect for their wisdome holinesse and honesty and such also if it be possible as are of civil note and respect in the world and able without any burden to the Church to maintain themselves either by their Lands or any other honest Civil Trade of life Neither do they think it so much disgrace to the policy of the Church that Tradesmen and Artificers endowed with such qualities as are above specified should be admitted to be Overseers of the Church as it is that persons both ignorant of Religion and all good letters and in all respects for person quality and state as base and vile as the basest in the Congregation should be admitted to be Pastors and Teachers of a Congregation And if it be apparent that God who alwaies blesseth his own Ordinances doth often even in the eyes of Kings and Nobles make honourable the Ministers and Pastors of his Churches upon which he hath bestowed spiritual Gifts and Graces though for birth education presence outward estate and maintenance they be most base and contemptible so he will as well in the eyes of all holy men make this Office which is many degrees inferior to the other precious and Honourable

Whereas it shall appear that no Christians in the world give more unto the same then we and that in very truth the cause that we maintain is for the King and Civil State against an Ecclesiasticall State that secretly and in a Mystery as we may hereafter have occasion to prove opposeth it selfe against the same If this protestation shall in any measure satisfie you Then we desire your Honourable Mediations for us to the highest If not That then we may know wherein it is defective and we shall be found ready to give all satisfaction CHAP. I. A PROTESTATION of the Kings Supremacy WE hold and maintain the same Authority and Supremacy in all causes and over all persons Civil and Ecclesiasticall granted by Statute to Queen Elizabeth and expressed and declared in the book of Advertisements and Injunctions and in Mr. Bilson against the Jesuites to be due in full and ample mannner without any limitation or qualification to the King and his Heirs and Successours for ever Neither is their to our knowledge any one of us but is and ever hath been most willing to subscribe and swear unto the same according to form of Statute And we desire that those that shall refuse the same may bear their own iniquity 2. We are so far from judging the said Supremacy to be unlawful that we are perswaded that the King should sin highly against God if he should not assume the same unto himself and that the Churches within his Dominions should sin damnably if they should deny to yield the same unto him yea though the Statutes of the Kingdom should deny it unto him 3. We hold it plain Antichristianism for any Church or Church Officers whatsoever either to arrogate or assume unto themselves any part or parcel thereof utterly unlawful for the King to give away or alienate the same from his own Crown and dignity to any spiritual potentates or rulers whatsoever within or without his dominions 3. We hold that though the Kings of this Realm were no Members of the Church but very Infidels yea persecutors of the truth that yet those Churches that shall be gathered together within these Dominions ought to acknowledge and yeild the said supremacy unto them And that the same is not tyed to their faith and Christianity but to their very Crown from which no subject or subjects have power to separate or disjoyne it 5. We hold that neither King nor civil estate are bound in matter of Religion to be subject and obedient to any Ecclesiastical person or persons whatsoever no further then they shall be able to convince their consciences of the truth thereof out of the Word of God Yea we think they should sin against God if they should ground their Religion or any part or parcel thereof upon the bare Testimony or Judgment of any man or of all the men in the world 6. We hold that no Churches or Church-Officers have power for any crime whatsoever to deprive the King of the least of his Royal Prerogatives whatsoeer much less to deprive him of his Supremacy wherein the Height of his Royal Dignity consists 7. We hold that in all things concerning this life whatsoever the Civil Jurisdiction of Kings and Civill States excelleth and ought to have preheminence over the Ecclesiasticall and that the Ecclesiasticall neither hath nor ought to have any power in the least degree over the bodies lives goods or liberty of any person whatsoever much lesse of the Kings and Rulers of the Earth 8. We hold that Kings by virtue of their supremacy have power yea also that they stand bound by the Law of God to make Laws Ecclesiastical such as shall tend to the good ordering of the Churches in their Dominions And that the Churches ought not to be disobedient to any of their Lawes so far as in obedience unto them they do not that which is contrary to the Word of God 9. We hold that though the King shall command any thing contrary to the Word unto the Churches that yet they ought not to resist him therein but onely peaceably to forbear Obedience and sue unto him for grace and mercy and where that cannot be obtained meekely to submit themselves to the punishment 10. We hold that the King hath power by virtue of his supremacy to remove out of the Churches whatsoever he shall discern to be practised therein not agreeable to the Word of God And if he shall see any defect either in the Worship of God or in the Ecclesiastical Discipline he ought by his royal Authority and power to procure and force the redress thereof yea though it be without the consent and against the will of the Ecclesiastical Governers themselves 11. We hold that the King hath as much Authority over the Body Goods and Affaires of Ecclesiastical Persons as of any other of his Subjects whatsoever And that by his Authority he may force them not onely to all civil duties belonging unto them but also unto Ecclesiastical afflicting as great punishment upon them for the neglect thereof as upon any other of his Subjects 12. We hold that he hath power to remove out of the Churches all Scandalous Schismatical and Heretical Teachers and by all due severity of Lawes to repress them 13. We hold that all Ecclesiastical Lawes made by the King not repugnant to the Word of God do in some sort bind the consciences of his Subjects and that no subject ought to refuse obedience to any such Law 14. We hold that the King onely hath power within his Dominions to convene Synods or general Assemblies of Ministers and by his Authority Royal to ratifie and give life and strength to their Canons and Constitutions without whose ratification no man can force any subject to yeild any Obedience unto the same 15. We hold that though the King may force the Churches to be subject and obedient unto him and to be Members of the Common-wealth yet that the Churches severally or joyntly have no power to force him or any Subject against their will to any service unto them or to any religions duty whatsoever No nor to be so much as a Member of any Church 16. We hold that the King ought not to be subject to the Ecclesiastical Censures of any Churches Church Officers or Synods whatsoever but onely to that Church and those Officers of his own Court and Houshold unto whom in reverence of their Religion and of the spiritual Graces of God he sees shining in them he shall of his own free will subject and commit the Regiment of his Soul in whom there can be no suspition nor fear of any partiality or unjust or rigorous dealing against him 17. We hold that if any Ecclesiastical Governours call them by what name you will shall abuse their Ecclesiastical Authority in the execution of their censures upon any man whosoever That the King and Civil States under him have power to punish them severely for it much more if they