teach his Body the Church all things and should continue with them unto the end of the World § For soon after his Ascention the Apostles together with the rest of the Body being met together in a great Assembly and after they had prayed the place was shaken where they were assembled together and they were all filled with the Holy Ghost and great Grace was upon them all 4. Act. 31.32.33 and accordingly the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every Man to profit withal to one the Word of Wisdome to another the Word of Knowledge to another faith c. and all by the same Spirit 1. Cor. 12.7.8 and all these for the edifying of the Body of Christ 4. Eph. 12 For though the Body be one yet hath it many Members and all the Members of that one Body being many are one Body whereof Christ is the head 1. Cor. 12.12 In the visible Government of the Church Christ appointed and instituted a Priesthood in which likewise it is dissimilar to all temporal Governments which quodam sensuis Independent of the Church though touching the application of the Authority to the Person it is elective and depending of the Body of the Church under this Priesthood is comprehended Bishops and Presbiters now what their Authority and Powers are vide their Commission 28. Mat. 19.20 go teach all Nations Baptizing them in the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you and loe I am with you always unto the end of the world other Powers besides these and laying on of hands especially coercive I know none derived unto them by any text of Scripture These Bishops these Presbiters these Ministers or Pastors are not Lords and Masters as in the Roman Church but are Servants to the Body of the Church For we preach not our selves but Christ Jesus the Lord and our selves your Servants for Jesus sake 2. Cor. 4.5 and these Authorities are not coercive but are given them to exhort reprove rebuke beseech intreat for Christs sake and by the mercies of God c. 12. Rom. 3. chap. 15.30 1 Thes 4.1 according to the Doctrines Precepts Rules and Commands set down in Scripture which are able to make us wise unto Salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus and which is profitable for Doctrine for reproof for Correction for instruction in righteousness that the Man of God may be perfected throughly furnished to all good works 2 Tim. 3.16.17 These and such like only are all the Powers that belong unto the Priesthood by any Law of God and there is no need of any other for what concerns punishment for Sins or the breach of moral Duties or municipal laws the Body hath Power to make laws and ordain punishments for any of its Members § I know that they have a long time hooked in by Head and shoulders a kind of coercive Power Excommunication by usurping to themselves the Power of Excommunication a thing I must confess that hath made a great noise and buzz in the world but in truth a magnificum nihil a meer ignis fatuus there being no such thing in the whole new Testament as now used and that which Pope and Presbiter would have to be it is as much in the Power of the Laicks against them as in them against the Laicks and most truly in the Body of the Church In the Romish Church the Bishop or his Vicar excommunicateth without the advice or participation of any many times also the Register only and that which is most important by Authority deligated a Clark of the first Tonsure deputed Comissary in some slight Cause doth excommunicate a Priest Yea Leo. 10. in the Council of Lateran in the 11. Session by a perpetual constitution of his hath granted faculty to a secular person to excommunicate the very Bishops and that which doth more import Navar saith c. 27 no. 11. that if any man shall obtain an excommunication of some Prelate if the obtainer shall not have an intent that the party be excommunicated he shall not be excommunicated moreover he saith ch 23. num 104. that the excommunication pronounced by the Law it self against him that payeth not a Pension for example sake on the Vigil of the Nativity is not incurred by him that payeth it not no not in many month's and years after if the Creditor thereof would not have it incurred But if on the other side after many Month's or Years he would have it incurred it is reputed to have been incurred from the day of the debt from the Vigil of the Nativity and so is the stile of the Court but the Council of Trent hath now expresly provided otherwise Ses 25. c. 3 forbidding secular Princes that they hinder not Prelates to excommunicate nor command that any excommunication be revoked considering that this is no part of their Office by this you may in little see what a nose of wax is made of excommunication and all this and much more grounded and occasioned from wrong Glosses put upon plain Texts But of this more fully hereafter § Though the Congregational men have not fully modelled out unto us the Platform of their Government and Discipline as the Presbyterians have done yet in general they do affirm Independency and Church-Government that to each gathered Church Christ hath given all Power and Authority requisite unto that Order and Discipline which he hath instituted for them to observe and to execute the same with Commands and Rules as before And negatively that there is not instituted by Christ any person or Church more extensive or Catholick entrusted with Power over other Churches and that each particular Church consists of Officers and Members which Members they call Brethren and the Officers they stile Pastors Teachers Elders and Deacons and that there are no stated Synods in a fixed combination of Churches nor any Synods appointed by Christ in any way of sub-ordination to one another nor no one Church to have Power of Censures but of inspection only over other Churches and Members thereof that Counsel and Advice might mutually be communicated That it was so in the days of the Apostles and continued so for some Generations after every Individual gathered Church every Christian Societie as it is natural to all Societies as well Christian as Civil governing it self by its own Laws and Constitutions whithout being obliged to any other superintendency hapily is so manifest that it would not be gainsaid But when the Church became planted and spread its Branches and took root in divers Nations and whole Common-wealths became Christian and Kings and Queens and other Civil Governments became Nursing-Fathers and Mothers of the Church then of necessity for the quiet state of the whole the case came to be altered it being then impossible that every individual Member or Brother of any Christian Kingdom or Common-wealth should personally meet to make Laws
not the most antient § With all wise and sober-minded persons Custome and Usage obtaineth that reverence and esteem as to yield a just ground for deliberation before it be altered or abrogated though not of absolute direction and adherency All Constitutions and ordinances concern the Church or State be they never so pure in their first institution may corrupt and degenerate and why the Civil State should be purged and reformed by new Laws devising remedies as fast as times breed and discover inconveniences and mischiefs And the Ecclesiastical State of this or that Kingdom should still continue on its lees or dreggs without refining or purifying by new Canons and Constitutions is beyond the comprehension of all sober minds and reason H. Grotius makes this observation on the 2 Kings 18.14 He removed the High places and brake the Images cut down the Groves and brake in pieces the Brazen Serpent that Moses had made Nota quem secerat Moses Egregium Regibus documentum ut quamvis bene instituta sed non necessaria ubi 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 male usurpanturè conspectu tollant ne parant offendiculum caecis This H. Grotius notes as an excellent document for Kings that things never so well never so lawfully instituted as the Brazen Serpent was by Moses himself if not necessary and grow to be abused ought to be taken away as King Hezekiah did the Serpent least they prove a Snare and an offence unto the weaker Brethren Moreover if an absolute necessity be laid upon all men to subscribe and conform to the present established Religion and Worship by the very self same reason the next year he may be obliged to subscribe and conform to the contrary and so unto all Religions in the world successively § As a perverse and a morose retaining of Customes and Usages may be as prejudicial to right Reformation as Innovations so to remove Abuses nay Customs or Rights that may be spared without prejudice unto true Worship and the Doctrine of Faith doth not impeach good Orders nor lawful Authority but ratify and establish them Gods Church is compared to a Vineyard and a good Husband who is ever pruning therein not unseasonably not unskilfully but lightly and prudently he findeth ever somewhat to do If men were peaceably minded methinks it were not hard to agree in this That every Church be it of England France Sweden c. do that which is convenient for the State of it self and of the Common-wealth The antient and true bounds of Unity being one Faith one Baptism and not one Ceremony one Policy suppose another were a better form yet not always that which is best but of good things that which is best and may be had with least prejudice is to be embraced Our Church is not now to plant it is settled and established In Civil States suppose a Republick in the opinion of some to be a better policy than a Kingdom yet God forbid that lawful Kingdoms should be obliged to innovate and make alterations as often as men given to change desire or plead for it Gods Providence is to be consulted as well as his Word There are Schismatical Customs as well as Schismatical Doctrines and Opinions So as the Civil Magistrate take care that the general Rules be observed viz. That Christs Flock be duly fed that there be authentick Ordination a Succession in Bishops and Ministers that there be a due and reverend use of the Keys a due Administration of the Sacraments that those that preach the Gospel do live by the Gospel that all things tend to Edification and that all things be done in order and with decency the rest may be left to the discretion and prudence of inferiour Labourers and we ought to acquiesce The President of that City is very severe which permitteth none to propound new Laws that had not a cord about their Necks ready for vengeance if it were found unprofitable but by their leaves all Innovations are not to be rejected for divine Plato teacheth us in all Common-wealths on just grounds there ought to be some changes and that States-men therein ought to imitate skilful Musicians Qui artem Musices non mutant sed Musices modum And it is not unworthy our observation that even evil forms of Policy have been sometimes well ordered and rectified by good Governours and Commanders and so the State of Boetia flourished once under Epaminondas and Pelopidas and yet it owed this Prosperity not to the Government of the City for that was ill constituted but to the Governours for they were wise and virtuous The contrary also happened to Lacedemon for that fared ill sometimes and suffered much distempers because though its fundamental Laws were good yet its Kings and Ephori were many times tyrannous and unjust § More particularly the Congregational Government though ab initio it were in use and may be again if the National Church thought it convenient And I do not know but that it will suit now with any Government as well as when Christ did institute it but the truth is it hath been quite of date and doors as they would now set it up ever since whole Cities Commonwealths and Kingdoms became Christian and have been mutually incorporated and interwoven one with the other however the Doctrine and Tenet thereof is as sound and as practicable now as ever The Arguments which the Independents bring to prove the consistency of their Congregational way with our Kingly and Civil Government are only prudential and probable which I shall not go about to contradict or examin but exmantissa grant not only their Consistency with our Government but that also the Civil Magistrates may so govern if they please they submitting to Indubitable Ordination as I take Episcopal to be for it is not sit that any Ordinance so very essential to the very making and perpetuating of a Gospel Ministry should be left upon a Moot point as it would be if either Presbyterian or Independent Ordination should take place But then I hope the Congregational men will be as ingenuous and confess that the Ecclesiastical Discipline and Government already established is as consistent with our Civil Laws and Government and that the legislative power may continue the same Government or alter it to any other form so it be of force to suppress Vice and to maintain true Faith and Religion even to that Gallintaufrey Platform establishing Presbytery which is but a minced or cantonized Papacy in point of Rule and Domination by order and ordinance of that demy-parliament 29. August 1648. which hath no good foundation in Scripture no ground in Reason no Authority beyond Jo. Calvin to make it good But Christian Common-wealths and Civil Magistrates may establish what Government so qualified they please the thing I contend for It s true that the Priests of divers perswasions will highly caress Majesty in words But if the Civil Magistrate offer to impose but a Cap a Surplice a cross in
Church nor the Lords Supper were instituted All which are capable of a very short Answer viz. It is certain and without dispute evident by the very Texts themselves Mat. 18.1 Mark 9.32 Luke 9.46 that Christ spake these words in a House in Capernaum unto his Disciples applying himself to them in particular but what Jews were there let the Texts be Judge But be it that a mixt multitude of Jews Gentiles and others for they all slockt after him and he ordinarily taught them even in the Temples and Synagogues though forbidden by the Jewish Magistracy to all which Christs Precept of Dic Ecclesiae was very applicable and by them very practicable though more especially and particularly directed to his own Church and be it that the Sacraments were not then instituted nor a Local or Formal Church constituted Christ being then in the Flesh governing it by his own sic dico sic jubeo yet without all peradventure converted Jews and Gentiles were at the very moment of their Conversion incorporated into Christs Body the Church though not yet Baptized which their Baptism did afterwards declare and manifest to all the World their open admission into Christs Church and their open Profession of the Gospel That Christ in the days of his Flesh and his Disciples were under the Legal Oeconomy is very true as to their Persons and Civil Concerns but then it is as true that his Gospel Precepts and Doctrines were not subject to that Legal Oeconomy but the contrary if otherwise the Gospel had never been preached unto them by Christ nor his Apostles nor ever could have been preached unto the utmost ends of the Earth as was foretold and promised Though neither Episcopal Presbyterian nor bid pendent Churches were then established yet Christ had his Church then in being though not so distinguished and to that Church he sent his Disciples and Auditors so to do when he said Tell the Church as best beseeming the Professors of him and his Gospel As to the consideration of Actions of Trespass only be it so that the Matters of Trespass only were in that Mandate of Christ to be considered yet even in those Christ would have all his Members so to govern and demean themselves as he there prescribes but if still the Offenders will be refractory and not submit to those Rules what then Then let him be to thee as a Heathen or a Publican i.e. pursue him in the Civil Courts of Judicature as if he were separated from your Company which is all the Excommunication that I know of and not a Brother in Christ be it the Sanhedrim or the Consessus viginti-trium-viralis or the Consessus trium-viralis to which all both Jews Gentiles and Christians were to yield Obedience § Notwithstanding all these plausible and various Interpretations of these plain Texts of Scripture devised purposely to obscure and to put false Glosses on plain Texts rather than to illustrate and give the Natural and Genuine meaning of them The Words in truth are a plain very plain Direction to the Church Christian i.e. the Congregation of Believers not excluding Jew or Gentile Publican or Heathen who were to observe the same when converted which though it was not so setled in Jury as it is now setled in Romish or Presbyterian Governments with all its Trinkets and Trappings yet sure it will never be denied but that wherever Christ taught and converted and so the Apostles after him that there was a Church of Christ and such a Church as was very easily capable and sufficient to execute and put in practice these Powers Documents and Directions set down Mat. 18.15 16. which were so very easie and familiar that the least esteemed in the Church might execute them under any Government throughout the whole Universe without the least clashing or enterfeering therewith viz. Christ spake these words in a House in Capernaum to his Disciples Mat. 18.1 Mark 9.33 Luke 9.46 where happily there might be a mixt multitude of Jews and Gentiles to all which Christs Precept of Dic Ecclesiae was very applicable though more especially and immediately to his own Church If thy Brother transgress against thee What then Goe and tell him his Fault between thee and him alone if he shall hear thee thou hast gained thy Brother but if he will not hear thee What then then take with thee one or two more that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established and if he shall neglect to hear them What then Tell it to the Church i.e. to that whole congregated Church or Assembly whereof thou and he are Members What then If he neglect to hear them let him be to thee as an Heathen or Publican i.e. Put him out or let him be no longer of your Congregation or Church and account him not as a Brother in Christ but let him be to thee as an Heathen or Publican i.e. Pursue him in the Courts of Civil Judicature as thou wouldst do any other that is not a Christian i.e. as a Publican or Heathen or as any other wrong-doer whereby it plainly appears that Christ by Dic Ecclesiae sends them to his own Congregated Church not Judicially to determine Differences but amicably and charitably to reconcile dissenting Brethren but if neither by themselves nor yet by the help and advice of two or three Brethren nor yet by the interposition or mediation of the whole Parish or Congregated Church Reconciliation cannot be obtained What then then implead him in Westminster-Hall in any Civil Courts of Judicature All which rightly considered makes not the least for Excommunication but rather shews that there was no necessity of introducing any other Government into the Church Christian the rest all belonging to the Civil Governments of Princes and States I am not ignorant what work what strange work Romish Hectors make of these two Words viz. Dic Ecclesiae i.e. Tell the Church i.e. Praelatis Ecclesiae i.e. to the Prelates of the Church according to many Popish Writers but till of late years no one understood it of the Pope alone or of any one single Person which is so demonstrable not only by the Text it self but by their old and antient Breviaries that it cannot be denied And therefore they would oblige us very much if they would satisfie us why in that Gospel which is read on the Tuesday after the Third Sunday in Lent where it was written in the old Breviaries Respiciens Jesus in Discipulos suos dixit Simoni Petro si peccaverit in te frater tuus vade corripe eum intor te ipsum solum c. Jesus looking upon his Disciples said unto Simon Peter if your Brother trespass against thee go and tell him his fault c. It was so read in the Antient Breviaries Breviar Rom. impress Par. 1492. per Joh. de Prato and in Breviar impress 1534. And why they have in their Breviaries Printed of late years viz. Breviar Clem. 8. Jussu recog
sent it by Stephanus and others signifying unto them that though he were absent in Body but present in Spirit had already judged as present him that had so done and therefore advised them in the Name of the Lord Jesus Christ that being gathered together and his Spirit with the vertue of the Lord Jesus Christ to deliver such a one unto Sathan Now it is observable that when St. Paul wrote this Epistle he was absent at Philippi a City of Macedonia and directed it not to any one single person Pope or other but unto the Church of God which was at Corinth and to them that were sanctified in Christ Jesus called to be Saints with all that in every place call upon the Name of Jesus Christ our Lord both theirs and ours He did not according to Romish Custom write by his Breves I excommunicate such a one and in one Scrap of Paper send as much as in him lieth Kings and Queens and Emperors nay whole Kingdoms and States to the Devil but he wrote to the Church a Collective Body that being gathered together with his Spirit they should deliver that Incestuous person to Sathan And again when he wrote his Second Epistle he directed it also unto the Church of God which was at Corinth with all the Saints which are in all Achaia declaring it sufficient to such a Man is this Punishment which was inflicted of many admonishing them to forgive and comfort him lest perhaps he should be swallowed up with overmuch sorrow whereby it is plain and not to be gainsaid that the Delivering of him unto Sathan be the Punishment be the Censure what it will it was inflicted by many 2 Cor. 2.6 Now if Paul an Apostle would not excommunicate or deliver unto Sathan at his own will and pleasure but would consult the Church that the Matter being transacted by common Authority and Approbation the Censure the Punishment might be performed by Common Consent It being most just and equal and of Moral Right that they who to morrow must deliver such a one to Sathan whom to day they account as a Brother dear in Christ should be fully satisfied why and wherefore Now how came Signore Papa alone to be entituled to exercise Powers greater than the Apostle Paul would use What hath he to do with it more than the rest of his Brethren If so interrogated I can make no other Answer but Ignoramus Moreover hath the practice of Christ's Vicars at Rome been correspondent to that of Paul the Apostle of such esteem and prevalency is publick consent with God himself even in the Affairs of the Church that though in his secret Decree Paul and Barnabas were to be set apart for the Work of the Ministry yet by God's own appointment were they separated after Fasting and Prayer to the same by the Church which was at Antioch Acts 13.2 Thereby teaching us not to despise the Office of the Church i.e. of the Multitude of Brethren where it may be had By these very small Hints it is easily discernable what a Nose of Wax the Papalins make both of Scripture and Tradition and Excommunication their great and terrible Thunderbolt even against Kings and Kingdoms not considering the little efficacy it hath What was the State of Venice and her Duke or Queen Elizabeth and her Dominions the worse for Romish Excommunications and Interdicts or what the worse the Kings of Spain for being excommunicated every Maunday Thursday And indeed what the worse his Holiness at Rome for being solemnly excommunicated every year by the Muscovite Fops § Some indeed of later days have intimated a great and just dislike of those who have hitherto endeavoured to hang Excommunication on some doubtful Places of Scripture but yet endeavour to settle it on another Basis viz. on the Nature and Constitution of the Church Christian as a Society Instituted by Jesus Christ whereby they say it is manifest that if Excommunication cannot be established upon some better and other Bottom than what hath hitherto been laid by their Predecessors on some doubtful places of Scripture it must necessarily decay and fall to the ground moreover they most ingenuously confess themselves unsatisfied as to any convincing Argument whereby it can be proved that any were denied Admission unto the Lords Supper who were admitted to all other parts of Church-Society and owned as Members in them § Though I have said enough already sparsim that if rightly applied doth demolish this Fabrick of Fundamental Right yet I will add a little and but a little more viz. that if by the Word Church in these Positions be meant only the Clergy met or not met in Councils Synods Consistories Convocations or Assemblies as the Representatives of the Church Assembled by their own power as by a Fundamental Right grounded on Christs Institution then to say no more is hereby justified Robert Bruce David Blake and those seventeen Scottish Ministers before-mentioned and their Tenets denying the King and his Council to have any Authority in Matters Ecclesiastical For certainly if God hath given them power of themselves to Assemble and Consult and make Laws and hath not withal given them Force and Power to put them in execution they have only a mock and ridiculous Authority which God never instituted nor ordained And if it be not so meant then they either say nothing to the purpose or equivocate But if herein by the Word * By the word Church may be meant either all Believers holding saving Truth in general of what condition or quality soever or else more striftly the collective Body of the Clergy for if we speak right of the Church Universal or this or that Particular Church as of Spain France England c. this Term may be taken in either of those two Sences Church be meant the Civil Power and Laity together with the Clergy then we are Friends and that Fundamental Right arising from the Constitution of the Church derived from Christ himself of Right belongs to the Commonwealth if Christian and to every congregated Number of Believers gathered in any Gentile State or People and united into one Society and not only to the Clergy thereof and the Laity are as capable and have as much Right to be of such Councils and Synods as the Ecclesiasticks Or that the Church be not semper and perpetuo a peculiar Society separate and distinct from the Commonwealth as certainly it is not or that the Officers thereof as limited by these Positions unto Teachers and Pastors injuriously enough if they pretend beyond Teachings Administrations of Sacraments Imposition of hands for Ordination and the publick use of the Keys are not only inflicters or executioners of Church-Censures as certainly they are not then the very Foundation of this Fabrick for the Support and Justification of Excommunication must necessarily fall to the ground It is true that every Church is a Society or Body Politick though every Society or Body Politick is not a Church every
because the Apostles Gifted and Spirited in that abundant measure as they were used no Liturgies nor stinted Forms therefore we that are neither infallible as they were nor yet have the Spirit in the same measure as they had should use none May not we rather and with much more Evidence of Reason from the Nature of the thing varied conclude the contrary to be absolutely warranted and for that very reason affirm Liturgies and stinted Forms to be much more justifiable now and rather to be used by us in these days than by them in those days Certainly if they cannot lay most undoubted claim unto the same in-being Principles and unto the same measure which was in them this their Goliah-Argument hath its Head cut off with his own Sword O! but in the Purer Times next and nearest to the days of the Apostles the Fathers who neither were Infallible nor yet had the Spirit in the same measure as the Apostles had never used them whether they did or did not use them we neither certainly know nor yet why they did or did not and if we did yet that could be no infallible demonstration for us to do just as they did without consideration had of the disferent posture of Affairs between these and those times But be it so that they did not use them what then may not a succeeding Generation sind out a necessary remedy or convenient preservative to defend the pure Worship of God from Taint and Infection of Idolatry or Superstition that a former Age two or three have not used Such kind of Negative Allegations Arguments they cannot be may induce to deliberate and consider whether sit to be appointed or used or not but can never rationally conclude that therefore we can use nothing that those Purer Times did not The Condition and Posture of Christian Affairs are now altered In the Primitive Times next unto the days of the Apostles every Pastor had care only of his own gathered Church and every Bishop with his Presbiters of this or that City and so in that respect there being then no Civil Protectors but all professed Enemies of the Gospel no need then of Liturgies though happily as lawful then though not so necessary as now when whole Kingdoms and Common-wealths are become Christian and consequently the care of their Spiritual State is become much more extensive stretching over great Kingdoms is now devolved by Divine Right on the Civil Christian Magistrate who may no doubt impose a wholesom Form of sound Words by way of Lyturgy for that without it or something equivalent to it it is not possible for a Prince to have that due inspection and oversight over his vastly-extended Flock as a Shepherd may have of his Fold in one Parish or one City § But to sum up his Discourse in as narow a compass as I can f. 22. It treats about Christs Institutions of Gospel-Worship in his publick Assemblies The chief Acts whereof he refers to three Heads 1. Preaching of the Word 2. Administration of the Sacraments 3. The Exercise of Discipline of which he says little or nothing all to be performed with Prayer and Thanksgiving For the Administration of these so far as they are purely of his Institution Christ gave Rules to his Disciples and appointed Persons 1. Pastors and Teachers for the regular Administration of them which was to be performed and executed two ways fo 12.1 Either by such Spiritual Abilities for the discharge and performance of this whole Work as will answer the Mind of Christ therein and so serve for the End proposed 2. Or by the Prescription of a Form of Words whose reading and pronuntiation in these Administrations should outwardly serve as to all the Ends of Prayer and Thanksgiving required in them which they do contain Against the second way only he disputes and argues stifly averring 1. That Christ not in any thing or by any Act of his did intimate the necessity or lawful use of any such Liturgies as these which we are inquiring after or prescribed or limited Forms of Prayer or Praises to be used or read in the publick Administration of Evangelical Institutions but made provision rendring all such Prescriptions useless and because they cannot be made use of but by rejection of the Provision by himself made unlawful Fo. 29.2 No Liturgies used or prescribed or their usefulness intimated by the Apostles nor by the Churches of their Plantation Fo. 20 21 38. It 's but reasonable to allow unto the Ministers of the Gospel that liberty in the Worship of God which was confessedly left unto them by Christ and his Apostles fo 24. and therefore unreasonable to impose Forms on others whom they undertake to inform 32. and who desire to stand fast in the Liberty with which Christ hath made them free averring That they must have a great considence in their own wisdom and sufficiency who will undertake to appoint and impose on others the observation of things in the Worship of God which neither the Lord Jesus nor his Apostles did appoint or impose 22. and withal deploring That Liturgies should be made the Hinge whereon the whole exercise of the Ministry must turn Fo. 31 40. All such Imposition being destitute of any Plea or Pretence from Scripture or Antiquity f. 31. in his 7th Ch. he declares That he doth not in especial intend the Liturgy now in use in England any farther than to make it an Instance of such imposed Liturgies whereof we treat and therefore will not at all enquire what footing it hath in the Law how nor when established nor what particular failings are pleaded to be in it nor what conformity it bears with the Roman Offices c. nor doth he oppose the directive part of this Liturgy as to the reading of the Scripture the Administration of the Ordinances by Christ appointed nor the Composition of Forms of Prayer suited to the Nature of Institutions to which they relate so they be not imposed on the Administrators of them to be read precisely as prescribed But the thing alone which he would be thought to oppose is The composing of Forms of Prayer in the Worship of God in all Gospel-Administrations to be used by the Ministers of the Churches in all publick Assemblies by a precise reading of the Words prescribed unto them with Commands for the reading of other things which they are not to omit upon the Penalty contained in the Sanction of the whole Service and the several parts of it fo 42. It is only about its Imposition and the necessity of its observance by vertue of that Imposition that he discourseth f. 44. § If the Author of this Discourse had only pursued what he here intimates in these last words and bent his Force only against the composing and imposing of Forms of Prayer c. i.e. Liturgies in general he had dealt much more candidly and saved himself and me some labour But because he seems to look one way whilst he
and false accusers and that this is reinforced with a strong Debet stampt upon it viz. this they ought to do for the Lords sake and this they might do as free without the least abridgement of their Christian Liberty and freedom and that as they had not their Christian Liberty so they should not use it for a Cloak of malitiousness A Garment very ill becoming Professors of the Gospel but as the Servants of God should Honour all Men Love the Brother-hood Fear God Honour the King and so proceed to the Subjection of Servants towards their Master c. this I conceive to be the natural and no forced Scope of that part of the Chapter whence the sixteenth Verse was taken in which construction it more probably rather concludes against than for our Discourser as being Diametrically opposite to the end for which our Author quoted this Apostle However sit lector Judex His next and last Fortress and Refuge is Acts 15. which is also brought to Justifie not only Freedom from Mosaical Institutions but also from any succeeding Impositions of Men our Liberty equally respecting them both yet he grants there may be yea that de facto there ought to be an Abridgement made of our Liberty as to the performance of some things at some times which in general we are made free unto where the performance in the use and exercise of our Liberty would prove an hindrance to Edification the great thing whereunto all things are subservient But then the case must be so stated Antecedent to any Imposition that Abridgements of the Liberty of the Disciples of Christ by Impositions on them of things which he hath not appointed nor made necessary by circumstances Antecedent unto such Impositions are plain Vsurpations on the Consciences of the Disciples of Christ destructive of the liberty which he hath purchased for them and which if it be their duty to walk according to Gospel Rule is sinful to submit unto and then concludes that of this nature is the Imposition of a Liturgy contended about is evident It having no Institution or appointment by Jesus Christ it being wholly of men there being nothing Antecedent to its Imposition that should make it necessary to be Imposed A necessity of its observation is induced upon and by its Imposition which is directly obstructive to our liberty in Jesus Christ f. 70 71. All which and much more to the same purpose I must confess our Author hath very peremptorily and very Magisterially delivered as if as true as Gospel it self but whether in truth they are so sound that they cannot be condemned and that both my self and others that are of contrary Judgments may be ashamed I must crave leave to bring this Portion also of Scripture Acts 15.28 f. 25.70 to the Test as I have done the others and leave the Readers to Judge he himself having only by quoting of it bid it Euge and Vale only giving it a Salute and a Farewel in one and the same breath viz. For it seemed good to the Holy Ghost and to us to lay upon you no greater burthen than these necessary things viz. That ye abstain from Meats offered to Idols from Blood and from things strangled and from Fornication v. 28 29. Ergo what Ergo the Civil Magistrates ought not to impose a Liturgy containing a wholsome form of sound words and Worship for of such I must be always understood It must conclude so much or it concludes nothing against the use or Imposition of such Liturgies and whether such premises will yield that Conclusion I leave the Reader to Judge Nay what if this place doth rather conclude for Imposition than otherwise and that out of his own reasoning For he confesseth f. 15. that the things there mentioned and imposed were not necessary in their own nature but in the posture of things in the Churches necessary to the avoidance of Scandal whereby the observation of that Injunction was to be regulated which reason for ought appears to me may more rationally yield this conclusion Ergo the Civil Christian Magistrate which Collectively is as well representative of the Church as of the Civil State may impose Liturgies not absolutely necessary in their own Nature but necessary for the sake of Order Uniformity Peace and Coveniency of the Church Testimony of Obedience to the Magistrate Civil and Ecclesiastick avoiding of Scandal preventing of sundry evils that otherwise would ensue But be it that this Text will Logically yield neither the one Conclusion nor the other yet let us examine the occasion of this meeting and of this resolution and let the Reader Judge how much or how little it makes for or against the Liberty the Discourser layes claim unto thereby The true State of the Question which the Apostles met to decide at Jerusalem was whether the Gentiles which believed in Christ were to be Circumcised or not and consequently bound or not bound to keep the whole Law It was this to resolve That whereas all such as embraced the Worship of God of Israel conformed to one of the kinds of Proselytes Faederis or Januae unto whether of them the Gentiles which had or should receive the Gospel of Christ were to conform themselves St. Peter demonstrates it to the Council to be the will of God that they should conform to the latter and not to the former because that Cornelius the first Christned Gentile to whom he was sent was no Circumcised Proselyte but a Proselyte of the Gate yet received he no Commission to Circumcise him Yea the Holy Ghost as he was Preaching fell on him and his Houshold being Uncircumcised as it did upon those of the Circumcision whereby it appeared that God would have the rest of the Gentiles which embraced the Faith to be after the Pattern of Cornelius and to have no more imposed upon them than he had And accordingly the Council defined that no greater Burthen should be laid upon them than these necessary things mentioned v. 28 29. If it seemed good to the Apostles themselves the Holy Ghost himself directing them to impose things as necessary that were not so in their own Nature as our Author confesseth surely then the more natural and Logical deduction from the Fifteenth of Acts is that for the same or other sound reason and as the posture of things may so stand some things not in their own Nature necessary may by Lawful Authority be imposed for some Important considerations Here by the way it is fit to be intimated that in this discourse the terms Necessary and Necessity be rightly understood viz. that by Necessity is to be understood not a Doctrinal but an Obediential Necessity not an absolute Necessity but a Necessity ex Hypothesi or Necessitas convenientiae so that by necessary is to be understood very commendable very expedient very Behooful for the weale of Church or State This done I return to the Fifteenth of Acts Jewish Ordinances had some things natural in them
this Nature which concern chiefly if not meerly Polity and Regulations Rites and Ceremonies ought to be so Charitable one towards another as to believe that they all holding fast as they all do the main Principles and Doctrines of the Gospel that they err only by misconstruction and that each others Errors are not concerning Fundamentals but Discipline only and those also purae negationis and not pravae dispositionis and therefore may live peacibly and holily here under either Government and may hereafter meet in the presence of God and see his Face with Comfort whosoever should submit to other § Consider again that those Churches which were Founded and Governed by the Apostles themselves and where they Preached and Resided were not exempt from Imperfections perhaps as great if not greater than those now in the Church of England whereof the Epistle to the Gal. gives a clear Testimony but more clearly 1 Cor. 1.12 and 1 Cor. 3.4 5. As to their Charity they are Taxed that some of them adhered to Paul some to Cephas others to Apollos with a Schism and express Renting of the Seamless Coat of Christ. And as for Opinions and Doctrines there were some that denyed the Resurrection 1 Cor. 15.12 As for Peace and Concord they drew their Pleadings and Differences before the Tribunals of Insidels 1 Cor. 11.8.9 1 Cor. 6. As for manners they had Fornication among them and such as was not so much as named amongst the Gentiles 1 Cor. 5.12 As for Customs the Supper of the Lord was converted into Banquets where some were Drunk and others Hungry nay there were Heresies and Schisms among them also 1 Cor. 11.20 21. c. And all this while the Apostle acknowledgeth them to be a true Church and a Body of Christ and did not silence himself but continued labouring by his Preachments Fastings and Prayers to amend them and yet he lived under a Government Averse even to Christianity it self How ought we then to stand fast and comply and dispence with some irregularities in the Church where God by his singular Grace hath setled us altho in the Government thereof there have been and still are Imperfections and Abuses which are also by tract of time converted into marvellous grievances For reason of State and of good Government its good to be observant of all established Sanctions and tho many Novelties of Reformations do arise yet to accommodate our selves with readiness unto them howbeit we do not much approve of them because things of Custom have their Remedies but Innovations are never without their mischiefs against which it is very hard to find a Remedy § Edification in the Indisputable truths of Faith and in the Indispensable duties of Life being the main end and Objects of Church Government and Discipline its Honour enough for Episcopal Government to enforce Gods Commandements only there being no necessity of enjoyning more than what the Apostles did in plain and perspicuous terms without making use of obscure Allegorical and Metaphorical Expressions for Exorbitant Powers for Excommunication Censures and God knows what Yet Be it as some Dissenters would have it that all Men professing the Gospel of Jesus Christ have an undoubted Right and Priviledge to Assemble and Associate together to Pray Preach and Perform Gospel Ordinances without Assenting or Consenting nay contrary to the Approbation and Commands of the Civil Magistrate nay and that by a Paramount Power derived even from Christ himself and all this not without the Warrant of this Demonstration that except it had been and were still so the Gospel could never have been Preached to all Nations then mortal Enemies to Christ and his Gospel nor could yet be Preached where the unknown God is only Worshipped Be it so as in truth it is so that the Preachers of the Word of Salvation and the Administrators of the Sacraments being things Commanded them by God ought not to be forbidden by men and are so far exempt from Humane Law that the Prohibition of them is of no Force or Virtue it being in such Cases better to obey God than Men. 5 Act. 22. and for that no Mans right ought to be denyed him either in things Civil or Spiritual for fear they should abuse it for that then no mans right shall be preserved safe unto him Be it so I say even as they would have it yet as surely and as undoubtedly the Caesars have their Patent their Charter and Charge from the same Paramount Power for the Countenancing and Propagating the Gospel and supervising the Professors thereof and they have a Pastorship to give an Account of as well as those of the Clergy and therefore they ought to be as scrupulously careful and as Zealously watchful as themselves Was it not Prophesied of David a King 34 Ezek. 23. I will set up one Shepherd over them and he shall Feed them even my Servant David he shall Feed them and he shall be their Shepherd and I the Lord will be their God and my Servant David a Prince among them v. 24. and was he not taken accordingly from the Sheepfold to Feed Jacob his People and Israel his Inheritance and he Fed them according to the Integrity of his Heart and guided them by the Skilfulness of his Hands 78 Psal 70.71 72. Besides were this Objection of greater Force than in truth it is yet it hath no place in this Kingdom for that such Liberty of Assembling is not only not denyed but permitted Countenanced nay Commanded and Churches separated for that very end and purpose only that what Talents what Light soever the Complainants may have they may not hide them under a Bushel or in a Conventicle but may manifest them publickly to all Commers But if under this their great Gospel Priviledge and under the Shelter of indiscreet Niceties they will meet in Private and thereby give a jealous State great Cause only to suspect that they do it that thereby they may the more opportunely Foster and Foment a Party Averse to present Established Constitutions of Church and State then certainly Caesar hath as undoubted a Gospel Power and right to Prevent Inhibit and punish Transgressors If their Doctrine be sound and good why should they not have Churches if not why should they be permitted in Corners Look but a little back and consider if the late times have not given too great cause of fears and jealousies to a Wise and Christian State to use all just endeavours to prevent the like for the Future Consider also what moved our fore-fathers to make severe and Sanguinary Laws against Papists was it not because they were troublers of our Israel working like Moles under Ground endeavouring the Ruin of our Church and State If some may be suffered tho but by Connivence to break thro small Laws both themselves and others will thereby be encouraged to set the greater at nought Herein I desire to be rightly understood not as if I Pleaded for a general Tolleration nothing less
Civil Magistrate to be Custos utriusque tabulae unless be meant by Keeper the Defender only And averrs That it is a false and deceivable Maxime not to be defended or maintained by any Proof or Argument which hath not in that his Treatise been first or last refuted Therein also averring That there can be no place left for the Magistrate or his Force in the settlement of Religion by appointing either what we shall believe in divine or practice in religious things And that to compel but outward Profession is to compel Hypocrisie not to advance Religion And that Christian Liberty sets us free not only from the Bondage of Ceremonies but also from the forcible Imposition of Circumstances of Place and Time in the Worship of God though imposed with a confident perswasion of morality in them which he holds to be impossible in Place and Time And that the settlement of Religion belongs only to each particular Church by perswasive and spiritual means within it self And that the defence of things religious setled in the Churches within themselves and the repressing of their Contraries determinable by the common light of Nature only belongs to the Magistrate All which he endeavours to make good by four Spiritual Reasons as he calls them as on a firm square 1st That Protestants have no other Divine Rule or Authority from without them warrantable to one another as a common ground but the Scripture and no other within them but the illumination of the Spirit so interpreting that Scripture as warrantable only to our selves and to such whose Consciences we can so perswade can have no other ground in matter of Religion but only from the Scriptures And these being not possible to be understood without the Divine Illumination which no man can know at all times to be in himself much less to be at any time for certain in any other it must follow That no Man or Body of Men can be the infallible Judges or Determiners in matters of Religion to any other Mens Consciences but their own f. 6. Wherefore if we count it a crime for Papists to believe only as the Church believes how much greater crime will it be for a Protestant to believe as the State believes And it being the general consent of all Protestant Writers That neither Traditions nor Councils nor Canons of any visible Church much less any Edicts of any Magistrate or Civil Session but the Scripture only can be the sinal Judge or Rule in matters of Religion f. 7. and that only in the Conscience of every Christian to himself which Protestation made by the first publick Reformers of our Religion against the Imperial Edicts of Charles the 5th imposing Church-Traditions without Scripture gave first beginning to the Name of Protestant And therefore the Conscience not being the Magistrates Province he ought not to force or impose because he hath no right to judge and yet when he comes to the Toleration of Popery he seems to be of another mind averring § But as for Popery and Idolatry why they also may not hence plead to be tolerated I have much less to say For that their Religion the more considered the less can be acknowledged a Religion but a Roman Principality rather he might have said an entire Apostacy from the Apostolick Faith endeavouring to keep up her old universal Dominion under a new Name and meer Shadow of Catholick Religion being more rightly named a Catholick Heresie against the Scripture supported mainly by a Civil and except in Rome by a Forreign Power Justly therefore to be suspected not tolerated by the Magistrate of another Country besides of an implicit Faith which they profess the Conscience also becomes implicit and so by voluntary servitude to Mans Law doth forfeit her Christian Liberty who then can plead for such a Conscience as being implicitly enthralled to Man in stead of God almost becomes no Conscience as the Will not free becomes no Will Nevertheless if they ought not to be tolerated it is for just reason of State more than of Religion which they who force though professing to be Protestants deserve as little to be tolerated themselves being no less guilty of Popery in the most Popish Point And for Idolatry who knows it not to be evident against all Scripture Old and New and therefore a true Heresie or rather Impiety wherein a right Conscience can have nought to do and the work thereof so manifest that a Magistrate can hardly err in prohibiting and quite removing at least the publick and scandalous use thereof The Second Scriptural Reason is If we should grant the Civil Magistrate were able to judge in those things yet as a Civil Magistrate he hath no right because Christ hath a Government of his own sufficient of it self to all its ends and purposes in governing his Church and is much different from that of the Civil Magistrate 1st Because it deals only with the Inward Man and his Actions which are all Spiritual and to outward force not liable 2dly To shew us the Divine Excellency of his Spiritual Kingdom able without worldly force to subdue all the Powers and Kingdoms of this World which are upheld by outward force only That the Inward Man is nothing else but the Inward part of Man his Understanding and his Will and that his Actions thence proceeding yet not simply thence but from the Work of Divine Grace upon them are the whole matter of Religion under the Gospel The Third Scriptural Reason is from the wrong the Civil Power doth with its Force or Imposition by violating the Fundamental Priviledge of the Gospel the new birth-right of every true Believers Christian Liberty The Fourth Scriptural Reason is from the consideration of all those ends which the Magistrate can pretend to the interposing of his force therein which can hardly be other than 1st The Glory of God 2dly The Spiritual good of them whom he forceth or 3dly The Temporal punishment of their scandal to others § Mr. P. N. in his Treatise of the same Subject P. N. his Opinion P. 22. with the other of J. M. is far more ingenious herein not only asserting the Supremacy and Authority of all Kings and Civil Magistrates in general over all persons and things Ecclesiastical both by Scripture Reason and Authentick Authors but also of our Kings in particular most pertinently and particularly out of our own Municipal Laws and Constitutions to boot He doth therein also as strongly assert Independency which rightly stated and rightly understood is without doubt the Tenent and Practice of our Church both by Scripture and by the Opinion of sound Judicious and Orthodox Divines very great Friends unto and Contenders for Episcopacy as Bishop Bilson Dr. Jackson Mr. Hooker and others But the Independency of Churches which these Men and others as Orthodox as themselves plead for is not altogether the same with that which P. N. and other his Associates do contend for These Men maintain that
one place 1 Cor. 11.20 If therefore the whole Church he come together in one place 1 Cor. 14.23 Paul gave it in charge to the Elders of every particular Church as was that of Ephesus 20. Acts 17 28. That ye take heed unto all the Flock whereof the Holy Ghost hath made you Overseers to feed the Church of God which he hath purchased with his own Blood Paul doth entitle the particular Congregation which was at Corinth and which properly and immediately he did instruct and admonish to the Body of Christ 1 Cor. 12.27 To be the Temple of God 2 Cor. 16. And to be one Virgine spoused to one Husband Christ 2 Cor. 11.2 We may not therefore saith he under pretence of Antiquity Unity humane Prudence or any Colour whatsoever remove the Ancient Bounds of the visible and ministerial Church which our first and right Fathers to wit Apostles have set in comparison of whom the most ancient of those which are so called are but Infants and beardless There is indeed one Church one Body one Spirit one Hope of our Calling one Lord one Faith one Baptism i. e. of one Kind and Nature not one in number as one Sea Neither was the Church of Rome in the Apostles days more one with the Church of Corinth than was the Baptism of Peter one with Pauls Baptism or than Peter and Paul were one neither was Peter or Paul more one whole intire perfect Man consisting of their Parts Essential and Integral without relation to other Men than is a particular Congregation rightly instituted and ordered A whole intire and perfect Church immediately and independently in respect of other Churches under Christ since the Pastor is not a Minister of some part of a Church but of the whole particular Church 20. Acts 28. If the Ministers Office be to be confined within the circle of a particular Congregation then also the Ministerial Church it self Now the Pastors Office is either circumscribed within these Bounds or else the Angel of the Church of Ephesus was also the Angel of the Church of Smyrna and so the Pastor of this Church is the Pastor of that and by consequence of all every Pastor is an universal Bishop or Pope by Office if not for execution yet for power according to which Power we are to judge of the Office § Before I proceed to return any answer I must make a general Paraenesis Paraenesis and lay it down as a general Precaution relating to the Applicacation of Texts of Scripture to which the Reader is to have respect throughout this Book in treating and handling of all Opinions which are divers and not few viz. It stands not with the Wisdom and Learning no nor yet with the sincerity of Ecclesiasticks how great soever how illuminated or how sincere soever they would be thought to be to alledge in favour of their Opinions Places and Texts of Scripture in a forreign or uncouth if not contrary sence to their own most natural meaning by urging some ambiguous or doubtful terms or Texts of Scripture that possibly may have a double meaning and accordingly setling a Position on some portion of Scripture in the one sense which is true and thereby purchasing some Credit and assent in the Readers minds by such Scripture Allegations and then in the Close conclude in another sense which is not true or contrary or at best not applicable to the Premisses or Positions first laid down It is I take it a received Axiome amongst Divines that that sense of Scripture which agreeth best with the literal words thereof is most genuine and most especially to be embrac'd and that which is farther fetcht as most forreign so least to be relyed on God be thanked this latter Generation is now come ex ephebis out of its minority and wardship wherein it hath been long held Captive by blind obedience and Romish Tyranny and begins now to relish and judge of Spiritual Viands not by the quality or condition or tast of them that cook it or serve it up unto us but by the savoury tast it hath of its own Indeed it is observable that an inordinate affection to find fault or to bring over others that are of a different perswasion to their own Opinions Volendi valde quicquid volunt of which they are so singularly fond that they on all occasions scruple not to intitle God and his Word to the patronage of them doth oftentimes transport Men yea zealous pious Men no less than any other affection whatsoever Hence is the Shop of transforming Texts of Scripture Ita veritatem amant ut velint vera esse quaecunque amant August Such lovers they are of truth that they wish all may be true which they love And vehement desires often reiterated are often metamorphosed into perswasions And therefore I heartily wish that Persons thus opinionated would consider that it is neither sound nor convenient no nor yet peaceable with a few ambiguous terms or with School quiddities or with Places of Scripture wrested or transformed to plant a Doctrine or introduce an opinion in the Church that will pervert or subvert the present setled state thereof Persons of great Learning and Reputation in the World ought above others to be so just as not to urge Scripture Allegations purposely to amuze or seduce the Readers but to look back unto the very Spring and Fountain wherefore they were recorded by the Prophets and Apostles and then to urge them in the truest understanding and intent thereof ☞ out of which no Writers with sincerity should dare with Sophistical Schoolies to seek or endeavour to carry them lest otherwise their Readers much biassed with the Abilities and Integrity of their Persons be thereby blindly led into errors by other Mens Passions and Interest So to handle Scripture is no new Artifice it was a trick even in our Saviours days and practised upon himself the putting of a wrong gloss upon Christs Word 14. Mark 58. made an evil ingredient towards his Condemnation The Pharises were most excellently gifted in this Art one while when Paul manifested Christs appearance unto them once in the way to Damascus and afterwards in the Temple commanding them to preach his Resurrection to the Gentiles they then with great indignation cryed Away with such a fellow from the Earth for it is not sit that he should live 22. Acts 8.17.18.22 Another while to serve their own turns and party against the Saduces who deny all Apparition of Spirit or Angel or hope of Resurrection from the dead which the Pharises confess Pauls conformity with the Pharises in manifesti g and proving the Resurrection from the dead doth relish so well with them that his other particular differences or dissentions from them no way displeases them For he giving express Testimony that Christ whom they had crucified did appear unto him did so please their humour that the Scribes which were on the Pharises part acquitted him by Proclamation viz.
private resolutions can abrogate the Laws of a Nation wherein he lives For as Civil Law being the Act of a whol Body Politick doth therefore overrule each several part of the same Body so there is no reason that any one Common-wealth it self should to the prejudice of another annul that whereupon the whole world hath agreed Now as there is great cause of Communion and consequently of Laws for the maintenance of communion amongst Nations so amongst Nations Christian the like in regard even of Christianity hath been always adjudged needful And in this kind of correspondence amongst Nations the force of General Councils doth stand For as one and the same Law divine is unto all Christian Churches a rule for the chiefest things by means whereof they all in that respect make one Church as having all but one Lord and Lawgiver Christ one Faith one Baptism Jam. 4.12 Eph. 4.5 So th◠urgent necessities of mutual communion for propagation of the Gospel and for preservation of unity in these things as also for order in some other things convenient to be every where uniformily kept maketh it requisite that the Church of God here on earth have her Laws also of spiritual commerce between Christian Nations Laws by vertue whereof all Churches may enjoy freely the use of those reverend religious and sacred consultations which are termed Councils General a thing whereof Gods own blessed Spirit was the Author a thing practised by the holy Apostles themselves a thing always afterwards kept and observed throughout the world a thing never otherwise than highly esteemed of till pride ambition and tyranny began by factions and vile endeavours to abuse that divine Invention unto the furtherance of wicked purposes But as the just Authority of Civil Courts and Parliaments is not therefore to be abolished because sometimes there is cunning used to frame them according to the private intents and interests of men over-potent in the Common-wealth so the grievous abuse which hath been of Councils should rather cause men to study how so gracious a thing may again be reduced to the first perfection than in regard of the stains and blemishes sithence growing be held for ever in extreme disgrace What hath been here affirmed of the Laws of Nations in general and of General Councils to make the thing we treat of more evident and reasonable the same reasons are as applicable and adequate to all intents and purposes of every particular Kingdom and Government and runs parallel throughout all Laws both of Church and State made by every particulat Church and Nation and it cannot be otherwise without shaking and hazarding the very foundation of all peaceable and good Governments in the World For should it be in the power of any small or greater numbers less than the whol to confederat and avowedly to act contrary to publick established Sanctions either of Church or State what issue could be expected but abominable disorder and confusion and every man to do what seems best in his own eyes as once in Israel when there was no King for as the Civil Laws of every Nation so of England are made for the whole Kingdom primarily and to the particular Divisions and Fraternities secondarily and obedience is yielded unto them not as Eastern or as Western Northern or Southern men but as Subjects of the same Kingdom So the Laws of Christ are given to the whole Church primarily and yet they oblige every particular Church to the observation of them but not because in such a particular congregated Brotherhood but because Subjects of Christs visible ministerial Church I am verily perswaded that it cannot demonstratively be made appear by any that every congregated Church in the best and purest times after the days of the Apostles was a Plenipotentiary Church unto it self to all intents and purposes I must confess that they would very much have obliged us if they had at any time given us any one instance of such a Church but they having not yet done it I take it for granted that it is not to be done though if such an instance could be made yet the posture of Ecclesiastical persons and affairs being so much different now from what it was then may quite alter the case I must confess it cannot reasonably be imagined that it could then be otherwise because in those days all Kingdoms and Governments were so far from being friends to Christianity or Christian Churches that they were all Persecutors thereof and therefore not possible that there should be any National Churches and happily were none till the lays of Constantine the first Christian Emperor § Their Maxim or Position is this viz. 1. That they who are called out of the world by the ministry of the Gospel as all Christians are have power given them by Christ being a competent number to gather themselves together in his name 2. That a Church so gathered becomes a Body or spiritual Corporation and being joyned thus by mutual assent of each person have power one over another as in all Fraternities and liberty from Christ to choose their Officers censure Offenders make Canons and Orders in Circumstantials for the regulating of their affairs § Unto the first part of their Position I can so far subscribe that it is tru that where but two or three whether with or without a Priest are gathered together in Christs Name the presence of Christs Spirit is by promise annexed unto them Matth. 18.20 and the particular Assemblies of Christians were thereby intended and approved by Christ viz. to have communion in the publick exercise of holy duties mentioned Act. 2.42 46. viz. breaking of bread and prayer But that it doth describe or purport a mutual agreement which doth formally constitute them a Church Independent without any regard had to the National Church wherein they live is not so very clear the Text not warranting the same in the least if it do then every Family by the same Text might claim Independency § As unto the other part of the Position I can by no means submit without very great qualifications But if the second part of their Position be tru of every particular Assembly it must necessarily be much more tru of the whole or National Church for which they were primarily given and ordained and unto other Churches under the same Government but secondarily and subordinat Moreover consider the Original Commission for gathering of Churches Go teach all Nations and baptize them in the Name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost Matth. 28.19 which Commission was before the Church was cantonized into divisions and subdivisions by publick Authority or the Independent Congregational Fraternities set up by any particular men The distinction of Churches fell out naturally and necessarily as this or that City or Nation was here or there converted by some one or other of the Apostles and their Successors and so division of Churches came secondarily for convenient administration of Ordinances and communication of
and Orders for the better reglement of the whole as they did whilst the Churches were in small particular Congregations or Cities in a Jewish or Gentile State And yet all Laws are presumed to be made by universal and common consent in which regard the Churches have been enforced to have as well Churches as Bodies Politick Representative and in as much when partly by the Supineness and inadvertency of the Brethren without foresight of any Peril or Incroachment upon their Rights and Powers by the Clergy and partly by the dexterity and usurpation of the then degenerating Clergy designing to advance themselves by ingrossing all Powers and Revenues to themselves not by any right derived to them by any Gospel precept the practise and custome injuriously enough to the Laity and consequently to the Church of God in the truest sence began soon to admit none but Clergy and Church men only as Members of the Body ecclesiastick or Church representative The name of the Church hath by such their wiles been in a manner appropriated and monopolized to the Clergy or Church-men only when in truth the Church in its truest and Scripture sence consisting of Laity and Clergy can have no representative of both which only makes the Church compleat except both have their peculiar Representatives in Councils Synods Convocations c. whether Provincial National or Oecumenical This Doctrine of which more hereafter though never so demonstrable and obvious to every understanding was so bitter a Pill that it could by no means be swallowed at Trent and therefore in the Consults and Discourses concerning the very title of that Council concerning which there were very great Debates and Disputes the Bishop of Feltre would not have it Christened Ecumenical and general least the Protestants should from thence argumentize that some of every Order of the universal Church ought to be present which because it consists of Clergy and Laity it cannot intirely and compleatly be represented if the Laity be excluded But on the contrary the Bishop of St. Mark did as erroneously as magisterially affirm that the Laicks were most improperly called the Church and that for that very reason it was very requisite to use the title that the Synod representeth the Church universal to make the Laity be understood that they are not the Church but ought to hearken unto and obey the Church which in Romish dialect is nought else but the Pope by which it is apparent that if packt Synods canonize us out of the Church to day they may canonize us out of our Christian names to morrow and out of our Christianity the next day But of this more hereafter when the Clergy and Laity shall be more fully discoursed Yet by the favour of the great Bishop of St. Mark nay by the favour of the Council of Trent it self in the beginning it was no so for in the Council of the Apostles and a more early and more Authentick could not be and which ought to be a Rule and Pattern the decree was not made by the Apostles alone but the Epistle was entituled with the names of the 3 degrees assisting in that Congregation viz. Apostles Elders and Brothers and Peter esteemed and stiled by the Romanists Princeps Apostolorum by the Popes good leave was included in the first without Prerogative though not always Sans reprimand by which it is apparent that the assembling of a whole Church to handle the Name of God the Disputes about Doctrine and Discipline is a thing most profitable used by the Holy Apostles in the choice of Matthias and the 7 Deacons with which the Diocesan Councils have great resemblance But of the meeting of Christians from many remote places to consult together the forementioned place 15. Act. is a famous example when Paul and Barnab as with others of Syria met with the Apostles and other Disciples in Jerusalem who were assembled about the question of keeping the Law By all which it is manifest that in the beginning of Christianity the Churches were Democratically Governed by a kind of Common Council as St. Jerome and others do confess but as the Ecclesiasticks by insensible gradations got Reputation and Power so they endeavoured a Monarchical Regiment which in tract of time they instituted and got to be established giving all the Superintendency to the Bishops whom all Orders of the Church did obey The neighbouring Bishops whose Churches were under one jurisdiction had likewise their commerce and communion and did govern themselves also as it were in common by Synods attributing much to the Bishop of the most Principal City ordaining him as it were the Head or Governour of that Body and in process of time by a more ample communion which all the Provinces of one Jurisdiction or larger Government held together the Bishop of the City where the Prince did reside gained a kind of Superiority or rather Priority by custom not by any right The more chief Jurisdictions were the imperial City of Rome with its neighbouring Cities Alexandria which governed Aegypt Lybia and Pentapolis Antioch for Syria and other Provinces of the East There were other lesser Jurisdictions wherein the same was observed This Government being at first meerly prudential introduced and approved only by Custom was afterwards established by the first Council of Nice Can. 6. under Constantine and ordained by a Canon that it should continue yet withal it did ordain that those many Honorable preheminences which the Bishop of Hierusalem had should be continued unto him Cant. 7. yet so that nothing should be taken from the dignity of the Metropolitan then Bishop of Caesaria This Government which hath been ever held in all the Churches of the East was altered in the Latine not without great endeavours to make all other Churches stoop to the Lure and submit to the Will and Pleasure of the Bishop of Rome After that it pleased God to give peace to the Christians and that the Roman Emperors received the Holy Faith there then happening more difficulties in Doctrine and Discipline which did disturb the publick Peace and quiet another sort of Episcopal Assemblies had beginning congregated by Princes or their Lieutenants to remedy their troubles these Assemblies were guided and governed by those Princes and Magistrates yet so that the decision of the principal matters for which the Council was congregated was left to the common opinion of the Assembly After the Eastern and Western Empires were divided there remained still in the West some Marks of the Antient Councils and many were celebrated in France and Germany under the Posterity of Charles the Great and not a few in Spain under the Kings of the Gothes At last Princes being absolutely debarred to intermeddle in Ecclesiastical matters that kind of Council grew in disuse and that alone remained which was called by the Ecclesiasticks themselves the Convocation of which Provincial Councils was almost wholly ingrossed and usurped by the Pope by intruding and sending his Legats to be Presidents
the whole body politick whereof if the Presbyter or Independent judge themselves to be any part then is the Law even their own deed also as being made by the representatives of the whole wherein they are included as having their most proper representatives in our Parliaments and Convocations the undoubted Legislative Power of this Kingdom And is it reasonable in things of this nature and consequence to give men audience pleading for the overthrow of that which as it were their own very deed hath ratified Laws that have been approved both in Church and State may be no man doubteth again repealed and to that end also disputed against by the same Authority But this most properly is when the whole doth deliberate what Laws each part shall observe and not when a few run counter the Laws which the whole hath made in a full and free Parliament and lawfull Convocation Be it that some reasons induce some persons to be otherwise minded if those reasons be demonstrative and absolutely necessary such I confess discharge consciences and setteth them at full liberty but if probable only what thing was there ever set down so agreeable to sound reason but some probable shew against it may be made Is it meet that when Acts of Parliaments and Canons have been publickly received and long practised that general obedience thereunto should cease to be exacted in case some few led by some probable conceits should make open protestation of their dissatisfaction Certainly in such cases they are obliged to suspend their judgments for that in otherwise doing they offend against God by troubling his Church without any just or necessary cause For until the Civil Christian Magistrate whose power it is that I contend for doth otherwise order and determine obedience is to be given to the Laws Ecclesiastical and Civil if not contrary to the word of God Turpis est pars quae universo non congruit suo Out of which premises and of what will follow more particularly I shall take the liberty to assert and conclude that the Church of England in general is undeniably Independent and hath intrinsick power within it self without any forraign aid or dependency or any subordination to any other Person Church or Council to govern it self and that every Parish or Congregation thereof is not so Independent but rather that every particular doth depend upon the whole for that all ought to govern the whole and every particular thereof and every one ought to imploy himself most in that which is most particularly recommended to him and that the true Representatives of this Church of England and of all other National Churches is the Legislative Power thereof and that the King is the chief Governor thereof according to the constituted Laws and Canons thereof § And this Legislative Power hath lawful Authority to constitute all Qualifications unto all publick Ecclesiastical preferments so that they which will not submit to such qualifications shall be uncapable of such publick Benefices and Preferments But neither this nor any other Power throughout the whole Vniverse hath any lawful Authority to forbid the gathering of Churches or stop the mouths of any Bishop or Presbyter to preach the Gospel nor to forbid the solemn assembling together of the Saints or of the Brethren according to their several Commissions viz. go teach all Nations c. 28. Matth. 19.20 And let us consider one another to provoke unto love and to good works not forsaking the Assembling of our selves together as the manner of some is but exhort one another 10. Hebr. 24.25 if this had not been good Doctrine and practised even by Christ himself his Apostles and their followers maugre all the Interdicts of Jewish and Gentile States and Princes cursed Tyrants the Gospel had never been spread In such Cases where commands of Governments are contrary to commands of God it is undoubtedly better to obey God than Man I have dwelt the longer on this subject of Indepency for that though in truth it the be elder Brother unto Presbyterian Government by 1600 years yet it seems unto most to be but my Lord Musshrome and of yesterdays extract and very little understood by Vulgar Capacities In the Treaty whereof I have taken occasion in some measure to trace both the wayes of the Church and the wiles of the Church-Men from its very Infancy and shall pursue it farther when I come to shew what and who are meant by the term Church so that if possible the Government of the Church may be made easie and intelligible to every understanding Plain dealing is best and truth like beauty is most beautiful when stark naked stript of all paints and School-tricks and Glosses by which truth is more often confounded and defaced than brought unto light in its pure and natural colours § I shall now proceed and say something of the Presbyterian way but shall not meddle with their Model at all it being done and done to my hand it hangs on every Hedg and is decyphered and refelled in an Iliad of Pamphlets and is as perfectly disliked and disgusted as known and therefore I think we may bid them defiance set it up and establish it if they can especially if excommunication the main prop and pillar thereof were taken away without which it must necessarily fall to the ground and which is of no use in any Christian State and which in truth is a nemo scit utterly unknown to Scripture it self as now used especially And yet so fond are they of it and so wedded unto it and such is the selfishness of the Clergy of all perswasions and so great a Biass is their interest and love of domination that the very thought of parting with it doth cut them to the heart and it cannot be got from them without rending and tearing as if it were as perverse as an unclean spirit and though in truth it makes no return considerable unto any of them but what redounds unto their dishonour and reproach I shall only shew some of their tenets and practises by which you may the better judge of them and I shall not go far to fetch them and declare that now to erect and establish that Government here or in any other Christian Common-wealth were to erect Regnum in Regno and then in short process of time upon every difference and dispute as it happened in the State of Venice 1610. where Father Avaraldo a Capuchin being demanded by the Inquisitors at Rome for a certain opinion concerning Anti-Christ and from that Inquisition the process being sent to Bressia where the Father was the Inquisition at Bressia proceeded in the Cause without the Civil Assistants and answered them not without a design to cajole the Civil Magistrate out of his just right by a nice distinction viz. that they ought not to assist but only in causes which were begun at the proper Tribunal but not when the Denuntiation was given at Rome so in a very short time as
it is possible so it is very probable that both the Independent and Presbyterian Government would incroach and intrench on the Civil Powers so natural is it for every power to incroach upon another and either jostle it quite out of doors or make the Civil subservient to the ecclesiastical Power the sad effects of which hath been manifested in Scotland already where the Presbytery when they will speak out plainly claim to be coordinate at least with the Civil Jurisdiction and if we consult their practises we shall find them Paramount § According to Sa. Rutherford there is a mutual and reciprocal subjection of Magistrate and Pastor Pastors as subject in a Civil Relation and Magistrates as they have Souls and stand in need to be led to Heaven are under Pastors and Elders For if they hear not the Church and commit incest they are to be cast out of the Church 18. Matth. 1. Cor. 5.16 Rom. 17.1 1. Thes 3.14.15 that God respecteth not the Persons of Kings and we find them not excepted If the Preachers of the Gospel be to all believers over them in the Lord 1. Thes 5.12 1. Tim. 5.17 they have some Authority over the Christian Magistrate Divine Right of Church Government and Excommunication Presbytery displayed printed 1644. and reprinted 1663. together with the forms of Church Policy claimed and presented to the Convention at Edenburgh in January 1560 drawn up by Knox and to the Parliament of Scotland and sitting in Striveling 1578. by Mr. Andrew Melvil and together with their particular proceedings justifying their Arguments by their Facts truly related by King Charles the first in his large Declaration concerning the late tumults in Scotland printed 1639. do abundantly make it appear that their Maxims relating to Church and State Policy are the same with the Jesuits their Sermons delivered according to the Dialogue of Becanus Scippius and Eudaeman Johannes and their Arguments to be taken out of Bellarmine and Suarez as may also appear by King James his monitory Preface and his Apologia for the Oath of Allegiance and by the Books written in Defence of them both To this Assertion also give Testimony the Writings of Buchanan and Knox c. of old and Sa. Rutherford in his Lex Rex printed 1644. and his Plea for Presbytery printed 1642. and his Divine Right of Church Government and excommunication printed 1646. and a 100 more Pamphlets of later days § If we examine their practises in particulars most notoriously known we shall find them answerable to their Positions Upon the return of Angus Arrol and Huntley Popish Lords Fugitives for some Rebellious designs into Scotland Anno. 1596. K. I. and convention meeting in August at Falkland intended to shew some favour to them which being ratified at another convention of the States at Dunfermling in Septemb. the Church forsooth took pet at it and thereupon entred into a Combination to cross and prevent it K. J. for the better preservation of his Realm in peace and setled quietness consulted with much kindness Mr. Robert Bruce as one for whom the King had a particular kindness and the most leading man amongst them who was very willing that Angus and Arrol should return on the conditions proposed but by no means would admit that Huntley should return though he marryed the Kings Cousin whom he accounted as his own Daughter and offered to satisfie the Church and fulfil the conditions required and one who had the greatest power amongst them and therefore his Interest most likely to do the K. most service or most prejudice whereupon Bruce most insolently replyed I see Sir that your resolution is to take Huntly into favour which if you do I will oppose and you shall choose whether you will lose Huntley or me for us both you cannot keep There 's your Presbiter in his right Colours This done the Commissioners of the Church which Stile they most wrongfully assume and monopolize to themselves only as if the King his Council and Parliament I might say the meanest of their Congregations were not as much of the Church as themselves assembled at Edenburgh where they ordained to acquaint all the Presbiteries with what had been done and passed finding great fault with the Conditions granted to Huntly and the rest by the King and the Conventions as bringing a manifest hazard both to Church and State and therefore was desired to inform their flocks and both by publick Doctrine and private Conference to stir up the Country people to apprehend the danger to be in readiness to resist the same Oh brave Sheba's Trumpeters of Sedition and Commotion a speedy way to set a whole Kingdom against the King in a trice they proceeded yet farther by proclaiming a day of Humiliation through the whole Country to be on the first Sunday mark that in December that in Nomine Domini they might with the better grace fast for strife and debate and to smite with the fist of Wickedness and the cause assigned was the return of the excommunicated Lords whereby danger was threatned to Religion mostly made a Dequoy to intice heady and highminded men and despisers of Government not modeled by themselves to Rebellion and therefore the Presbyteries should call before them their Entertainers Resetters and such as keep company with them and proceed summarily with the censures of the Church una citatione quia periclitatur salus ecclesiae Reipublicae I wonder where this Jure Divino Power is to be found that they assumed this Prerogative to Cite Summon c. any for causes of Rebellion or censure by excommunication A meer device of their own which they can never make clearly out either what it is or of what extent or if there be any such thing that they only have power to execute it or that they can delegate it Nor rested they here but ordained that a number of Commissioners selected out of all the quarters of the Country should reside at Edenburgh to receive advertisements as should be sent from other places and take advice upon the most expedient in every case and in every business that occurred by direction of this Council which by a new name was now forsooth called the Council of the Church And was not this to erect Regnum in Regno If the punishment and pardon of Rebels be not a civil affair I do not see what is But rather than they will have their power docked they will by their Inordine ad Spiritualia their Pastoral Sheep-hook hook even Crowns and Diadems within the verge of their mitered Caps and Powers Whilst these things were agitated divers conferences passed between the King and them wherein the King and his Council made many prudent and gracious Offers and condescentions with great respect to the priviledges of the Church but no reasonings prevailing with them the King was forced to express and said that there could be no agreement so long as the marches of the two Jurisdictions were not distinguished that in their
acquiesce till then we are justly to be excused and I hope you will not blame us if we prefer the universal judgment of the Primitive Church touching the Church Government by Bishops before particular and late dreams They were nearer the Apostles times than Calvin whom for his other great pains and Abilities for the good of Christ's Flock I do much honour who broached not his new Church Polity until about Anno 1500. Was it possible I appeal to your selves that all the Churches of Christ dispersed far and near over the face of the Earth should at one time and that immediately after the last surviving Apostle and as it were Momento temporis joyn or jump in one and the self same Government Episcopal had it not been delivered and setled by the Apostles and their Disciples that converted the World We construe the Apostles Writings by their doings others measure the Scriptures by their own humours first framing Churches to their fancies and then conceit that the Scriptures answer and favour their Chimaera's and by their so doing come within the Verge of the Paroenesis If Bishops claim or usurp more than is their due or abuse the power which Gods Law or the favour of Princes justly alloweth to them and Pastors in Nomine Dei spare them not let the world know it but do not attempt to put out the lights of our Firmament because Phanatics and Men intoxicated stumble or miss their way whilst they shine § Gods promise to his People is Dabo vobis Pastores juxta cor meum 3 Jer. 41. pascent vos scientia doctrina It is evident that the firm of all Pastoral charge consisteth in preaching of the Gospel in administration of Sacraments and by mistake according to some in the punishment of such offences as absolutely exclude us out of the Kingdom of God These being the main things which Christ recommended to his Apostles committing them to their charge the which things only were practised by them as also by their immediate Successors and I hope our Bishops will not be found insufficient for these great Mysteries nor will be found to have warped or swerved from them though we have not wanted Coblers of Glocester the vanity of the present Churches and many other Ichabods heavily complaining § Besides for great and just reasons of State Concerning Innovators in general prudent Magistrates ought to be very circumspect and jealous and to fear the sequels of Church Innovations and Combinations even beyond all apparent cause of fear for that they who believe the Attempts for new Discipline without the licence of Civil Powers are lawful as most Innovators and Men given to change do and that not without some design as well to remove some persons out of the Saddle that themselves might be therein seated as to reform some errors will easily dispute what may be attempted against Superiors which will not have the Scepter of their new Discipline to rule over them For they that will not stick to affirm Amat â—ai ranam ranam nuit else Dianam That the Discipline which they say they have and we want is one of the essential parts of Gods Worship and therefore the better to introduce a good opinion of their own Diana they have not stuck andaciter calumniari and to style Episcopal Regiment Antichristian will as little scruple to affirm withal That the People themselves upon peril of Salvation without staying for the Magistrate may gather themselves into it always having in a readiness to say that they never found that God ever made any Precept or Command which to perform we must needs have leave of another § Moreover as every order of Religious men so every Form of Church-Government that only excepted which Christ instituted besits not every Civil Government nor Kingdom nor every State and therefore the Kingdom of France and renowned State of Venice for great reasons of State banished the Jesuits And we have an excellent example of this in the famous Government of the Kings of Castilia where without the Kings licence no new Religious Order and of such nature is every differing Church-Discipline from the Discipline by Law established could have entrance into those Kingdoms and therefore the Capuchin Friers could not be admitted thither The Foundations of these and the like Decrees are no less equal reasonable and lawful than most necessary and most antient For Cicero in oratione pro domo sua sheweth that no man could consecrate an Altar injussu populi so that the equity of such Laws hath time out of mind been apparently known unto the World And Mecoenas his counsel to Augustus in Dione was very prudent Eos qui in divinis aliquid innovant odio habe coerce non Deorum solum causa sed quia nova numina hi tales introducentes multos impellunt ad mutationem rerum unde conjurationes seditiones conciliabula existunt res profecto minime conducibilis-principatui legibus quoque expressum est quod in religionem committitur in omnium sertur injuriam For it would not in any wise be permitted to a great Number of a strange State and such are all Papists having sworn obedience to another Head contrary to their customs of life and divers ends from those of the present Governments to enter into the state of such a Common-wealth Gather themselves together into one or divers places to make amongst them one or more Heads or Governors and in secret to practise with the Princes Subjects seeing this would be presently accounted as one or more Conventicles of very dangerous consequence and accordingly would be prohibited and interrupted so under the pretext of some new Church Polity be it Popish Presbyterian or Quaking all alike as to the thing in question not by that State established many very many not only of the same but of other Nations also may frequently assemble and gather together under one or more Heads Presbyters or Teachers contrary in Customs and Affections to the established Church-Discipline and perhaps unto true Doctrine also and the many opportunities they have through Confessions Meetings Sermons and other spiritual Conferences insinuating with the Princes Subjects they may by such secret vast diffused scarcely to be discerned and powerful means and opportunities corrupt them in their sidelity and withdraw them from their Allegiances of which we are not without sad experience of elder and later days both from Papists and others not a few of several perswasions And the danger of union in an united confederacy or conspiracy is to be avoided for that it prevails more than number besides discontented minds in the beginning of tumults when any happen occasioned by themselves or others will easily agree though their ends be divers each one hoping thereby to get uppermost or to turn up that Trump that they have most mind to follow and so endanger the State For these many excellent causes all Church Congregations ought very diligently and narrowly to be
perfectly 18 Acts 24 25 26. For he knew only the Baptism of John So that it is possible that some Doctrines and some Truths may be revealed or revealed more perfectly to Auditors and sitters by than to the Priests themselves tho qualified as Apollos was besides the practice of former times even in the days of the Apostles and times of persecution nothing more common witness 20 John 19.26 Then the same day at Evening being the first day of the week when the doors were shut ergo private when the Disciples were assembled for fear of the Jews c. And after 8 days again his Disciples were within and Thomas with them then came Jesus the doors being shut c. V. 26. The Rulers of the Jews being offended at Peters Sermon for that thousands were converted thereat did imprison him and John and commanded them to preach no more in that Name adding also threatnings but Peter and John boldly answered whether it be right in the sight of God to hearken unto you more than unto God judg ye for we cannot but speak the things we have heard and seen whereupon they being farther threatned and let go they did not desist but went to their own company and having prayed the place was shaken where they were assembled together and they were all filled with the Holy Ghost and they spake the Word of God with boldness 4 Acts 1.2.17.19.20.23.31 And it came to pass that a whol year they assembled themselves with the Church and taught much People 11. Acts 26. K. Herod having persecuted the Christians killed James and imprisoned Peter whom an Angel delivered on the prayers of the Church assembled in the House of Mary the Mother of John where many were gathered together praying 12. Acts 2.3.12 Upon the first day of the week when the Disciples came together to break bread Paul preached unto them continuing his speech until Midnight there being many lights in the upper Chamber whereby it is apparent that Paul did not only teach publickly in the Temple but also from House to House not ceasing to warn every one night and day with tears 20 Acts. 7.8.20.31 Paul having escaped shipwrack and being upon Melita many came to him unto his Lodging to whom he expounded and testified the Kingdom of God c. and Paul dwelt two whol years in his own hired house and received all that came in unto him preaching the Kingdom of God and teaching those things which concern the Lord Jesus Christ with all confidence no man forbidding him 28. Acts 1.23.30.31 The application is easie and obvious without a Comment times of persecution can be no objection here nor alter the case if lawful then under Perscutors and Enemies of the Gospel nay a duty injoyned certainly much more lawful now under the Nursing Fathers and Mothers of the Church Reasons of State only can have room here either pro or con Conventicles of such nature being so far from being against Scripture that they are warranted thereby both by Precept and Example of Christ and his Apostles and of the most pure and primitive times which may be a Document at least and caution to all in Authority that they do not hand over head and without due consideration suppress all Conventicles promiscuously as if Conventicles and Schism and Conspiracy were termini convertibiles least by mistake or inadvertency they act over again the Priests of old the Captain of the Temple and the Sadduces or those lewd fellows of the baser sort who upon such like occasions being grieved that the Apostles taught the People and preached through Jesus the resurrection of the dead accusing them for turning the world upside down by acting contrary to the decrees of Caesar came upon them laid hands on them put them in prison and commanded them not to speak at all nor teach in the Name of Jesus But Peter filled with the Holy Ghost and John answered them boldly saying whether it be right in the sight of God to hearken unto you more than unto God judg ye 4. Acts 18.19 And being let go no fault having been found in them for so congregating and so preaching they went to their own Company and after report made of all that the Chief Priests and Elders had said unto them they lift up their voices with one accord and applied and said with David Why did the Heathen rage and the People imagine vain things the Kings of the Earth stood up and the Rulers were gathered together against the Lord and against his Christ V. 25.26 When many signs and wonders were wrought among the People by the Apostles few men daring to joyn themselves to them the temper and complexion of many in these our days I doubt but the People magnified them the High Priest with his Sect of Sadduces being filled with indignation imprisoned them whom the Angel of the Lord delivered miraculously by night the doors being shut with command to stand and speak in the Temple to the People all the words of this life and they were sound so teaching when by the command of the High Priest that the Captain of the Temple with his Officers seized them in the Temple and brought them without violence for they feared the People least they should have been stoned before the Council who tho cut to the heart at the stout and resolute answers and deportment of the Apostles yet waved the counsel given to slay them and followed the advice of Gamaliel a Pharisee a Doctor of Law had in reputation among all the People who cautioned them to take heed what they did to these Men invited thereunto by the example of Theudas and Judas of Galilee who advised to refrain from these Men and let them alone upon this grand reason because if this counsel or this work be of Men it will come to nought but if it be of God ye cannot overthrow it least happily ye be found even to fight against God to whom they all agreed yet not without beating and commanding them that they should not speak in the Name of Jesus and yet they ceased not to teach and preach Jesus Christ in the Temple and in every House 5. Acts 12.42 When Christ was ascending up to Jerusalem and being come even at the descent of the Mount of Olives the whole multitude of Disciples rejoyced and praised God with a loud voice for all the mighty works that they had seen whereat the Pharisees being offended said Master rebuke thy Disciples but instead of silencing them he rebuked the Pharisees and said unto them I tell you that if these should hold their peace the stones would immediately cry out 19. Luke 37.40 If our Separatists our Schismaticks falsly so miscalled do so assemble contrary to Decrees of Caesar yet it is not without strict Precepts and great Examples of Christ the Lord Paramount and of his Apostles If Paul that great Apostle 1. Rom. 11.12 did long to see the Romans that he might be comforted together with
Christians have to study each others good to endeavour the conversion and confirming of one another Tu autem conversus confirma fratres It is a general Command to all and consequently a duty perpetually obliging to desire earnestly spiritual gifts but rather that they may prophesie according to 1 Cor. 1.14 in which Chapter by Prophets is not meant the Clergy only as it is generally so misunderstood but all Christians in general and by Prophesying is meant speaking unto men to edification and exhortation and comfort V. 3. the duty of every individual And I do not know but that a solemn private Assembly of Christians met in these our days in the name and fear of God exercising holy duties and Ordinances is as true a Church in Gospel understanding as the like number so congregated in the days of Christ and his Apostles according to Matth. 18. These things rightly considered I cannot but wonder and that not without some astonishment with what face or shew of conscience any especially of our Protestant Clergy for in our Alternate changes they have been all some way or other this way culpable whether Prelate Presbyter or Independent all striving to set up themselves can countenance advise or any way consent to forbid such Assembling is it not enough that submission to the present Established Government of Church and State be the qualification to all Ecclesiastical Livings and Preferments for those that can and will submit and conform thereto but they must silence dissenters as truly worshipping and serving God in truth as themselves tho happily not so modishly nor yet so Ceremoniously I pray God forgive them and that the Character of Whited wall given to the High Priest by St. Paul may never be their doom § In things indifferent and good so they be liberal and free it may so happen that an error may be committed against the Princes command but for those duties that are expresly commanded by God the 5. Acts 29. It s better to obey God than Man must take place Consider the contrary if a Prince command lawful things must we notwithstanding have license from another to obey him and without it is it a Non licet And shall not Gods Commands be lawfully obeyed without license from another Nature in all her sinal drifts giveth also such faculties and powers as are requisite and necessary for attaining the same and shall God prescribe an end and Commandments and shall they not be obeyed and put in practice without the favour and license of men Absit its too absurd and inconvenient I have been the freer herein because I have been so far from frequenting or countenancing such Assemblies by my presence that I have been but once at any one of them above these 20 years nor do I converse with any of them Happily I can conform with better satisfaction to conscience than they can that so congregate It is hard kicking against the Pricks Acts 26.14 and ill offending little ones a heavy doom lyes at the doors of such for their Angels do alwayes behold the face of God in Heaven Mat. 18.10 you know the charge was given to Kings themselves saying touch not mine anointed and do my Prophets no harm 105 Psal 14.15 stopping such mouths is injurious to God and man Doth the Law judge any man before it hear him and know what he doth 9 John 51. The sum then is that as all Men and Doctrines condemning sin and wicked lives are to be tollerated nay encouraged So to stop the Mouths and Pens of such is to hinder them from doing their duty and from obeying the Laws and Commands of God Now if such should in truth prove to be the very case of our Conventiclers and that their solemn meetings together be in good earnest for the better and not for the worse to wrestle with God with strong and importunate prayers for the Welfare of King and Kingdom of Church and State and to mourn not only for their own personal Sins but for all the abominations that are done in the midst of the Land and to preach Jesus Christ and him Crucified only and that he would make a high way of Holiness through the Land that way-faring-men tho fools may not err therein 35 Esay 8. To stir up the gifts and spirits that are in them by fruitful and seasonable conferences each borrowing light from his Brothers Candle If such should prove to be the truth of their case as they and their Auditors most solemnly aver it to be and it hath not yet judicially appeared to have been otherwise will not then the Oppugners of such Christian liberty Gospel precepts and Apostolick practices be accounted to have laid Snares in Mispah and spread Nets upon Tabor to have used Laws Menaces and Subtilties to keep Gods people from his Court and Sanctuary and to confine and oblige them to Worship after the modes of men And will not such obligations come within the lash and verge of the Woe denounced by Isaiah against those that make a Man an Offender for a word and lay a Snare for them that reprove in the Gate and turn aside the Just for a thing of naught 29.21 Nay will it not look like that old Machivilian trick Audacter calumniari the better to bring about ends and purposes little conducing to the power and encrease of Godliness It is an undoubted Gospel truth that no Power hath lawful Right and Authority to forbid Christians assembling together to Preach the Gospel and to perform Spiritual duties When God sent his own Son out of his own Bosom to take on him the form of a Servant and to become obedient to the death of the Cross for us Men and for our Salvation he gave him the Heathen for his Inheritance and the uttermost parts of the Earth for his Possession 2 Psal 8. and anoynted him with the Oyl of gladness above his fellows whereby he became King of Kings and Lord of Lords whose Throne was to endure for ever and ever and the Scepter of Righteousness to be the Scepter of his Kingdom 1 Heb. 8.9 who whilst in the dayes of his flesh did gather a Church a Kingdom out of Jews and Gentiles peculiar to himself and established the Government thereof sufficient to all its ends and purposes by his own Laws and Precepts far different and distinct from all other Governments in the World to which all other Kings and Governments in the World were to conform and submit and to become nursing Fathers and Mothers thereof and that under a severe prophetical Menace of being else broken with a rod of Iron and dasht in pieces like a Potters vessel 2. Psal 9. and therefore Christs Worship and Government being Independent and subject to no other Laws or Jurisdictions but his own which no Nation how great soever hath so Righteous 4 Deut. 8. no other Power or Principality can Lawfully forbid any Assemblies or Congregations to meet and worship him according to
his own sanctions and to publish and teach his truths or to contradict impede or alter any of his Laws which are so Righteous and just that they may be exercised and practised under any worldly Government without clashing with it or interrupting it the Subjects of whose Kingdom being true to the Principles of Christian Religion viz. to love one another even their Enemies and their neighbours as themselves to do justly to love mercy to obey Kings and all that are in Authority in all civil and moral affairs and to pray for them and pay tribute c. can never fairly be accounted as seditious Separatists Schismatical or Trayterous or that they worshipping God innocently according as Christ himself hath instituted can be justly liable to Bonds Mulcts Imprisonments or can come under any other Jurisdiction as to their Worship and Service of God It is true the Jews did hate him de facto the chief Priests Sadduces Scribes and Pharisees being the chief Inquisitors and Instigators did by Menaces Prohibitions Prisons Dungeons Beatings Stonings what not Forbid him his Apostles and Disciples to publish his Gospel or teach in his Name Nay they did not use force only but craft also and yet all would not do They took Counsel how they might intangle him in his talk and sent unto him some of their own Disciples to catch him about paying of Tribute to Caesar 22 Mat. 15.12 Mark 13 14. Accused him of Blasphemy 14 Mark 64. and of perverting the Nation and for forbidding to give Tribute to Caesar for stirring up the people teaching throughout all Jury 23 Luke 2.5 And if we let him alone all men will believe on him and the Romans shall come and will take away our place and Nation 11 Joh. 48. And yet for all this and more when some of the Pharisees spake to Christ to rebuke his Disciples for praising God for all the mighty works they had seen answered that if these should hold their peace the Stones would immediately cry out 19 Luk. 37.40 Did his Apostles and Disciples speed better than their Master I trow not They falsly accused Steven of Blasphemy and stoned him 7 Acts. The High Priest with the sect of the Sadduces put the Apostles in Prison for Preaching the Gospel but God sent an Angel by Night who opened the Prison doors and brought them forth and maugre all their rage against them commanded them to go stand and speak in the Temple to the People all the words of this Life and they accordingly without dread of farther Persecution and without asking leave of any Authority entred into the Temple early in the Morning and taught and when the Captain of the Temple had found them so teaching brought them again before the High Priest who strictly charged them that they should not teach in the Name of Jesus Christ for that they had filled Jerusalem with his Doctrine intending to bring his Blood upon them As high and as home a charge I confess as can be laid against any now What answer made they we ought to obey God rather then man Though they were cut to the heart at this convincing and unanswerable repartie and took Council to slay them Yet when Gamaliel had advised them that it was hard sighting against God they followed his advice and did refrain from them and let them alone on this grand reason for if this Council or this work be of Men it will come to naught but if it be of God ye cannot overthrow it least happily ye be found to sight against God And to him they agreed yet beat them and commandâ—d that they should not speak in the Name of Jesus and let them go and they departed from the Council but yet ceased not to teach and preach Jesus Christ daily in the Temple and in every house 5 Acts 17.42 I 'le trouble you with no Applications or Reflections do but turn the Tables awhile and consider that if all the Reproaches Calumnies Lies and Slanders cast on our worthy Prelates and Priests of late should be taken for truth and they thereupon silenced and deprived without being impleaded or convicted would they not think themselves very hardly dealt withal And was not such their case fresh yet in our own memories And was it unjust then in them And is it just now in others because the Scene is altered and the Tables turned Doth God pervert Judgment Or doth the Almighty pervert Justice 8 Job 3. And shall we follow such examples of Men vile Men perverting all Judgment and Justice Absit It is unbeseeming no See episcopal no not that of Rome it self nor indeed any of that most reverend Coat high or low to become Servants unto all that they may gain the more nor to be made all things to all Men that by all means they might save some nor yet to humble themselves to all wayes and means conducing to the gaining of Souls to Jesus Christ no nor to warn every one night and day in Church or Conventicle with tears and from House to House 20 Acts 20. Cura animarum being undoubtedly the main duty and glory both of Priest and Prelate and to be apt to teach to be instant in season out of season to reprove rebuke and exhort with all long suffering and doctrine 2 Tim. 4.1.2 For hereunto most especially if not only they are called as was Aaron and if not called to this duty they are called unto none as I know of by any Patent or Commission from Heaven Salvation and Damnation of Souls is of everlasting consequence and of the highest concern in the World to every Individual and is it not reasonable then that every Man should have Liberty and free Access to that Ministry whether Publick or private under which he can profit most Moreover if causeless fears and jealousies that Conventicles may Nurse and nuzzle up a faction averse to present Constitutions and to preserve a party in animosity against the establisht Government of Church and State and that their Pastors will abuse their callings to the subversion of Church and State if such reasonings may prevail happily all the Orders of the Church and all the Ordinances of God nay Scripture it self may be forbidden as in the Church of Rome by the very same Logick For if a thing Lawful in it self may be forbidden out of causeless fears and jealousies only of being abused no Man can be assured of the exercise and enjoyment of his calling whether Priestly or Prelatical though never so Warrantable never so strictly commanded by the word of God It is not unworthy of consideration whether a Divine Precept so Solemnly binding conscience with a VVo attending the non-performance of the duty enjoyned can Lawfully be superseded by any humane Law for fear only that evil may ensue Besides this liberty is indulged to them in some Popish Countries as in France Poland Germany and even by Mahumetans and is it not bitter then to be wounded in the house of
Friends the one to persecute the other for slight pretences about things owned to be indifferent Were it not better and more secure to allow them publick places only I do not say preferments that all the World might hear their Doctrines and Preachments and punish or not punish accordingly if Papalins their Doctrines Tenets and Vows of Obedience to another Head and forreign Power being publickly known to all the World and as publickly professed and avowed by them for sound and true though in truth salse and erroneous Doctrines render them uncapable of Toleration because in their own very Nature they are destructive unto our Government King and Nation unto our Laws Liberties Religion and Worship and what were it else but to establish Idolatry and Superstition by a Law Besides the Pope pretends Right and Title to our very Church and Kingdoms In the dayes of Henry 8. the Earl of Desmond profered Ireland to the French K. the Instrument whereof yet remains on Record in the Court of Paris and the Pope afterwards transferred the Title of all our Dominions unto Charles 5th which by new grants was confirmed unto his Son Philip in the time of Queen Elizabeth with a resolution to settle this Crown on the Spanish Infanta c. and when times serve makes no bones by his Bulls and his Assassinates as much as in him lies to Crown and Vncrown our Kings and Queens and absolve their Subjects of their Obedience to them and to exhaust our Treasury as part of his own Patrimony to maintain the pride and luxury of his Court and Prelates And since we have in great part shaken off his Antichristian Yoak and Usurpations he yet continues to keep his Agitators and Spies here even at our charge and hath not ceased by his Bulls Jesuits Assasinates and Emissaries at once to destroy both King and Parliament and by the bold and impudent Impostures of his Priests and Jesuits perpetually to seduce corrupt and pervert from the right wayes of the Lord as many as they can of our Nobility Gentry and Pesantry not sparing the Royal Family making them turn Tenants for their Lives and Souls which they hold only at the will and pleasure of their Lord God the Pope and Tributary for their estates Whether therefore it be fit or reasonable to tollerate Men thus desperately set and Principl'd against this Church and State I submit to the wisdome of King and Parliament who are best able to provide for their own and the publick safety of our King and Kingdom As to that they nick-name and miscal their Catholick Religion more justly the most Catholick Heresie in the World it is such a piece of Linseywolsey-stuff interwoven with so many ridiculous Ceremonies borrowed from Jews Turks Heathens peculiar Absurdities Blasphemies Superstitions and Idolatries imposing not only on our Understandings but on our very Senses V. les Conformitez des Ceremonies c. A Leyde 1667. Traite des Anciennes Ceremonies c. 1 is 73. in owning the Scriptures to be the word of God and yet denying the free and common use thereof commanding to believe very Bread and Wine to be Flesh and Blood attributing infallibility to his Holiness by vertue whereof he may take away the Bread in the Eucharist from the Laity as well as he hath already deprived and cheated them of the Wine may make lying with other mens Wives no Adultery Robbing no Theft Killing Innocent men even Kings and Queens under pretence of Heresie no Murder whereof we have had sad experience even in these our dayes in sum who ever submits to the Popes infallibility renders himself Captive to be led into all Heresie and even to Hell it self as if the Scripture in good earnest had come from Heaven meerly to make the Pope optimum maximum et supremum numen in terris that he is sole Interpreter of all Scriptures and Judge of all Controversies and that his Tribunal and Gods are all one and 1000 more absurdities which in effect is to renounce Christianity and to yield blind obedience and implicite Faith to his ipsedixit and to become Antichristians For by their own Doctrines of Intention they have given us just cause to question their very Christianity for if they hold true to that Doctrine it 's impossible they should infallibly know that they have either true Pope true Bishop true Priest or that they are true Christians and therefore they may thank themselves and their own Doctrines if we allow them at best to be but Mungril Christians like those of Samaria who feared God yet served Idols and like those of Israel who swore by the Lord and Melcom And therefore not worthy to be called a Religion at least Christian unless by way of Complement and civility they Exalting the Pope above all that is called God endeavouring by the impudent impostures of Baals Priests to enslave whole Nations to his vile ends and purposes quo jure quâve injuriâ and all this under the Vizard of his false Religion All which considered I humbly conceive that no Tolleration is to be allowed Papists whether we respect either Church or State policy tho there are those among our selves for what good ends is past my understanding except to make us as very Mungrils as the Papists that would lead and wheedle us into a fair way of reconciliation by a School-trick of distinguishing between the Court and Church of Rome What Is it possible that Righteousness can have fellowship with Unrighteousness Can light have Communion with darkness Can Christ and Belial agree together What agreement can the Temple of God have with Idols Can we joyn our bodies to the very Mother of Harlots and not be one body with her From such we are commanded to come out and seperate not tollerate 52 Esay 11.31 Jerem. 1. 1 Cor. 6.16 2 Cor. 6.14.15 16 17 18. And then God will be a Father unto us and we shall be his Sons a d Daughters We are seperate we are come out for shame then let us not hanker after nor talk of returning to Onyons and Garlick nor with the Dog to his Vomit we are washed and cleansed from the dregs and silth of Rome and therefore never to return with the nasty and beastly Sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire If Quakers they are as little to be indulged for reasons diametrically opposite for that the very Scriptures are not heartily and throughly owned by them nor are they a Rule of Faith unto them Indeed they have no known Rules no established Principles no Doctrine infallible to be Governed by the light within them being only the Rule and Guide of their Consciences which may be Hosanna to day and Crucifige tomorrow no Connivence no Tolleration due to those Religions whose Principles are unknown or destroy our Government If Presbyter or Independents the case as to them is far different they owning the same Scriptures for their Rule and Guide professing the same Articles of
Faith the same Doctrines and Worship and the providence of God having called and sixed them here as if to this great work of Preaching the Gospel designed their Mouths cannot justly be stopt but upon some politick Accounts and reasons of State only Prudence not Conscience is then to be the guide of Councils For Example If a Presbyter hath swallowed a solemn League and Covenant so solemnly that he cannot nor will not renounce it what should the Government do Indulge those that will not protect that It portends a dangerous Reserve a sower Leaven Tinder in the Bosom apt to take sire apt to relapse into the same prodigious mischiefs Is it not much more agreeable to sound reason that the Royal Son should pare the Nails of those that cannot disgorge themselves of that fatal Covenant which introduced those Premises which yielded that sanguinary Conclusion which made the Father a Glorious King by bringing of him to the Block Conscience of factious Priests or of Covenanters in such cases is not adust in any measure Adaequate in the Ballance against the safety peace and quiet of Crowns and Kingdoms for that we have no Lydius lapis no infallible touch-stone to discover whether Consciences are truly weak or only pretended to be so the searcher of hearts only knows that insallibly And if pretence may be a just excuse to warrant disobedience unto established Sanctions Laws would then be no Laws at all for he that would might and he that would not might choose whether he would obey or no for that no Man can distinguish between real and pretended Scrupulosities That some should be indulged and others not ought to be no cause of complaint neither for that every thing is n t convenient for every Body nor for every Sect and State the same Legislators that have power to Indulge some may by the same right forbid others and indeed make any Laws convenient For the Common-wealth ought to be always kept in a quiet and peaceable temper even ad pondus if possible enough This only by way of Hint and Caution that there be great waryness and circumspection in granting and denying Indulgences If Priests otherwise Orthodox and worthy be silenced for such or the like reasons this ariseth not from the discipline of the Church nor from the Nature of Lyturgies but from the Government of the State What Must there then be no relief for scrupulous and tender Consciences that cannot renounce Covenants or comply with Innocent Ceremonies and Commands yes if they are truly so and do not enter-sere with the Established Government of Church and State 1. Consciences really and truly Scrupulous and tender if they break not out into overt act are not within the Magistrates Province but if rashly without consideration of obtaining or foresight of peril or perturbation of the Church or State they will adventure to take Solemn Leagues and Covenants to introduce a separate Mode or Government in Church or State contrary to that already established by the Magistrate then they most properly come within his verge and cognizance 2. Consciences ought generally not to be forced nay cannot whilst they are in their proper circle but are to be gained and reduced by dint of Argument and force of Truth by moderate connivence and by the use of good Instruction and perswasion 3. Consciences when they rove and become excentrick moving beyond their proper circle and bounds and being out of their proper Sphear tend and prove to be matter of Faction loose their proper Nature and forfeit their just Priviledges and Prerogatives then and not till then the civil Magistrate may take notice and justly restrain or punish their undue practises and contempts if such though guilded most speciously with pretences of Conscience and Religion § As happily their opinion is not so infallibly orthodox who affirm that all Church Discipline and Reformation must be after one Platform and that they which will perfectly reform must bring and reduce the form unto the State which it was at in the days of the Apostles A thing in the opinion of Judicious Hooker neither possible nor certain nor yet absolutely convenient For that which was used in their dayes the Scripture he saith doth not fully declare so that making those times the Rule and Canon of Church Government they make a Rule which not being possible to be fully known is as impossible to be fully kept so happily their opinion is as little Orthodox and as little convenient who deem it no good policy to alter or innovate any thing in Church affairs or to endeavour to reduce it to that State wherein it stood in the dayes of the Apostles the one opinion conducing to bring Reformation to Anullity the other to an Impossibility In elder times soon after the dayes of the Apostles and more especially after Constantines dayes there were imperfections no doubt and warpings from the Apostolical Rules and practises and happily in some things greater than in the present Antiquity therefore ought not so to be revered and adored as that something in these latter Ages may not be reputed better and more convenient there being no necessity that the same publick things should be always ordered in one and the self same manner but as times have mutations so it may be sit to alter or change the Government of Church or State It is possible that the Antient manner of Governing may not be profitable except the Antient state of the Church do return also But if Antiquity must be so revered as not to admit of the least Innovation then without all peradventure that Government which Christ and his Apostles instituted and lest unto his Church must necessarily be the most Antient and have the fairest pretence unto Jus divinum for its justification and then for those very reasons ought to remain unto this very day unalterable and all other Modes and Forms can be but Prudential only and at the discretion of the Church rightly so called And there can be no doubt but that Christ left such a Government to his Church as might be exercised in any Kingdom Christian or other without enterfering or clashing with the Civil Government of any Nation or Kingdom wheresoever the Apostles and their Successors in all Ages and Countries should preach the Gospel and gather Churches And that the self-same Government is plainly set down in the new Testament and that it was instituted by the Apostles and that the Antient Fathers after their example did prosecute the same for about 250 years after Christ with great success and increase of Converts unto Christianity And such Government being practicable then notwithstanding the great enmity that all Nations and Governments had even unto Christianity it self there can be no doubt and no reason can evince but it may be as practicable now which is the opinion of very many and those not Phanaticks And then Independents will have very fair and antient Records to shew for their Congregational way if
Baptism or the like then they stiffly cry out where is your Rule your Warrant in Scripture for them And may not the Magistrate with as good Logick demand of Presbyter and Independent their express Warrant and Rule of Scripture for their Governments for receiving the Communion sitting or for their altering the time of taking of it or their Preaching in their Caps in a Cloak or Buff Coats as lately they did If men were humble and not wedded to their own fancies they might see the right Independency already established in this Kingdom and with no great difference from that of the Independents who would have only Churches voluntarily gathered and submitted unto whereby those that would might be of Peters or of Pauls or of any Ministers Congregation and those that would not might refuse to be of either or indeed of any so that in effect they having no power to compel the whole Kingdom might be either Atheists or Papists Quakers or Fanaticks nay Jews or Ranters or indeed what not if no better care were taken But the great wisdom of our Princes armed with the Sword and with Power to Command and Compel from on High well knowing it a duty incumbent upon them as it was once upon Paul to take care of all the persons and Churches within their Dominions and that they were to be accomptable to God for their good or evil Government in Church and State have divided this whole Nation into Precincts Parishes or Congregations call them what you will and hath allotted to every Parish a Church to which all are enjoyned to resort and frequent and a Minister endowed with maintenance who is to execute his Pastoral Office over them and his Parishoners are compellable by by the Laws Canons and Edicts of the Prince to receive their spiritual Food and Bread of Life at his hand and mouth and it is not left to them to come or not to come to the Church of God and hear the Law and the Gospel of Jesus Christ at their pleasure But care hath been and is still taken that the Ministers and Pastors shall not be without their Flocks nor the Flocks without their Pastors who are licenced and enjoyned to Pray Preach Baptize Now what is the difference The Congregational way is voluntary unlimited and unprescribed the Parochial is quodam modo compulsory bounded and circumscribed and so it ought to be or else how can Princes rationally give any good Accompt to God of their care of his Churches if they should leave every man to do herein what seemeth best in his own eyes as once in Israel when there was no King And if Princes have no Power to Prescribe Compel and Punish why should they be blamed and punished for the Idolatrous and otherwise erronious Worship of others And if they have power why do the Non-conformists quarrel at the use thereof one Parish is as little dependant on another as the Congregational men would have their Congregations to be and yet both Parishes and Congregations are properly and rather homogenial parts of Englands Church than so many distinct Churches though Quodam Modo they may be stiled Churches as Paul did Families in Houses in his time § Both Presbyters and Independents willingly oblige themselves to no form being against all set forms but leaving themselves at large in all their Administrations Our Supream Governours as in duty bound prescribe and enjoyn as in our Liturgy the daily teaching of the Fundamentals of Christianity that all his Subjects may be sure to have them sincerely dispenced unto them If there be no form for dispencing of them how can the Prince be sure that they are rightly dispenced and taught nay how can he be sure that they are taught at all and if not certain thereof how can he give to God a good and sure account that they were sincerely taught or that the Alcoran Talmude or Trent Creed were not taught instead thereof If our Liturgy be daily used the very solemn days which by Antient Institution of the Church are to be celebrated for the Commemoration of the Blessed Trinity Advent of our Saviour his Nativity Circumcision Passion Resurrection and Assention will so preserve these things among the Common People that is scarcely imaginable that they should be so grosly ignorant as not to have explicite knowledge of those mysteries of Christ so publickly and frequently solemnized in the Church The want of which Liturgy hath in these late times ushered in much ignorance even of the necessary fundamentals and made a wide Gap for ignorance nay Atheism not only to creep but to leap in amongst us How many Congregations or Parishes wanted the Holy Communion for the greater part of twenty years together in the late times now who was to blame or responsible to God for so hainous a sin as the keeping back the Bread of Life the Incumbent or the Civil Magistrate or both and who was in fault when it was afterwards given yet to those only that would sit and take it at a long Table denying it to others that desired to receive it in the most reverend manner by kneeling the Incumbent or the Magistrate that might have ruled it otherwaies thereby excommunicating in their sence at least with exclusion a Sacris all the Parish at one breath save a few What could his Imperial Infallible Holiness at Rome have done more imperiously then to deny the Bread of Life to those that would not submit to their ipse dixit The hainousness of this crime of robbing whole Parishes of the Lords own Supper Table Cup Body and Blood for so many years together in our late times is abundantly set forth attested and proved to be from Popish Principles in a Book entituled A new Discovery of some Romish Emissaries c. The sum then of the Contest will be between Prince and Priest whether Presbyterian Independant or Popish matters not much They being in the point of Domination not much different only the Independant is most moderate and the Pope most exorbitant extending his Supremacy and Jurisdiction over forrain Princes and beyond his own Territories even to the Excommunication nay Deposition of Kings and how much less the Presbyter claims Sa. Rutherford in the forenamed Book and his if I may call it his Book called Lex Rex do speak and as the Arguments are the same so the same Answer will reach them all § The Priests conceive by their mandate viz. Go teach all Nations Baptizing c. received from Christ Independant of any earthly Power that they have by vertue thereof Authority to put in execution that Mandate 1o. In their opinion to preach and pray what when and where they please Administer the Sacraments after what form and manner seems best unto every of them though never so different one from the other use any form of Discipline excommunicate whom and when they please and all this without being accomptable to any earthly power or having any Superior over them §
The Prince on the other side though he pretend not to Preach Baptise impose hands administer Sacraments use the Keys or the like yet deems it more particularly and more especially within his Province to take care of these Priests and Priestly things to see that the Persons be able and well quallified and that they execute the Mandat according to the Doctrine of Faith and of the Gospel of Jesus Christ And as to countenance and maintain these that do perform their Function accordingly so to silence and punish those that do not else why should he be blamed for giving liberty to a Popish Priest or Phanatick Quaker more than unto an Independant or Presbyterian § A King is he that Ruleth others and the relation of the Word doth teach us that there can be no King but in respect of his Subjects and his duty towards them is to direct to command and punish in all things needful Where God chargeth the King to keep and observe all the words of the Law keeping and observing are not there referred to his private Actions as a Man but to his publick Functions as a King and therefore the Kings in these words received the charg and oversight of the whole Law that is an express command from God to see the Law kept and every part thereof observed of all men within his Dominions and the breakers of it Prophets Priests and People to be punished Now the Law contained all things that any way touched the true Service and Worship of God and therefore the Kings had one and the self same power to command and punish as well in the Precepts of Piâ—ty as other points of Policy neither did God favour or prosper any of the Kings of Israel or Judah but such as chiefly respected and carefully maintained the Ordinances of Religion prescribed unto them in Moses Law This Power is granted to belong to Princes even by some Papists themselves witness that moderate and learned Servite Padre Paolo throughout his History of the Inquisition where he complains and avers that amongst the perverse opinions of which this our unhappy Age is full this also is preached that the care of Religion doth not belong to the Prince that in other times Holy Bishops did not preach nor recommend any thing more to Princes than the care of Religion they warned them of nothing nor modestly rebuked them for any thing more than for their carelesness in it And now nothing is more preached than that to the Prince belongeth not the charge of Divine things though contrariwise the Holy Scripture be full of places wherein Religion is commended to the protection of Princes by the Divine Majesty which also promiseth Peace and Prosperity to those States where Piety is savoured and Desolation and Destruction threatned to those States wherein Divine things are held as Alien David though being entred into a Kingdom out of Order both internally and externally and being very busie both in Wars and framing a politick Government yet did set his chief care on matters of Religion Solomon entring into a quiet and exceeding well ordered Kingdom regarded also Religion more than any other part of the Government The Princes most applauded in former Ages as Constantine Theodosius Charlemain St. Lewis and others made it their chief care and travail to protect and rule the Affairs of the Church It is a great deceit to set forth this part as a thing of less moment since the neglect of this doth provoke the divine wrath experience tells that a State cannot stand untroubled where change of Religion cometh for that true Religion is the foundation of States He that ruleth over Men must be just ruling in the fear of God 2 Sam. 23.3 It is an abomination to Kings to commit wickedness for the Throne is established by righteousness 16. Prov. 12.14 It were a great absurdity to leave the total care of it to others under pretence that they are spiritual where temporal Authority will not reach or that a Prince hath any greater charge or imployment than this § As it is manifest that the Prince is not Pretor nor Prefect nor Proveditore no nor Priest nor Bishop So it is as true that he is to oversee and cause them to do their duties both the one and the other And here lieth the deceit that the particular care of Religion is proper to the Officers of the Church as the Civil Government is to the Prince who ought to do neither the one nor the other but is to direct all and to take heed that none do fail in his Office This being the Princes charge as well in matters of Religion as in any other part of the Government And as in other matters the Prince is to be informed of all occurrences so ought he to be particularly advertised of all that happeneth in matters of Religion And I conceive that therefore a Prince is more bound than a private Subject to fear and to serve God to be both zealous and jealous of his holy Faith to honour cherish and defend Gods true Church that he as Pope Eleutherius writ to King Lucius being Christs Vicar in his own Dominions should discharge Christs Place and Commands and also more bound to avoid Hypocrisie Superstition and all open and scandalous sins to preserve his Dignity and maintain his State and Royalty in the exercise of Religion Because Regis exemplum in numerabiles populos catervatim secum ducit and least that happen to his People which sometime fell out to the Jews through Moses long absence who thinking that in him they were deprived of the true God made themselves one of Gold § It is agreed by all That God hath not left humane Nature destitute of such remedies as are necessary to its conservation and that Rule and Dominion being necessary to the conservation where that Rule and Dominion is granted there all things necessary for the support of that Rule and Dominion are granted also It is farther granted also that supreme power ought to be entire and undivided and cannot else be sufficient for the protection of all if it do not extend over all without any other equal power to controul or diminish it and that therefore the supreme Temporal Magistrate ought to command Ecclesiastical persons as well as Civil Look back a little into the old Testament and consider the Jewish Church and Republick of which the Lord himself doth testify 4. Deut. 7.8 That his people hath Statutes and Laws so just and wise that the Institutes of no people that the Sanctions of no Republick that no Ordinances howsoever wisely constitute were able to compare with them therefore methinks that the Church and State should be most divinely and wisely ordered that cometh as near as the circumstances of the present matter will permit to the Constitution of the Jewish Church and State in which matters were so ordered by God that we find not any where two diverse Judicatories concerning manners the one
Politick the other Ecclesiastick what then hindereth that the Church now also on whom God hath bestowed a Christian Magistrate should be less content with one Government To me it seemeth monstrous to place two heads upon one body of a visible Church whose Commands Decrees and Government are divers so that the rule of one is not subject to the care of the other For the Ecclesiastical Senate or Presbytery would have the Supream Power of Punishing Vices even in Magistrates themselves though not with Corporal Punishment yet with Excommunication and debatring them from the Sacraments whereas one Magistrate appointed by God may now as well bridle all transgressions as he could of old was it not so in the Kingdom of Solomon which was as it were a Type of Christs Church reigning on this Earth And I do not find either under Moses or under the Judges or Kings or under the Government of those which were called Rulers such two discrepant Judicatories Nature denies saith Musculus two Authentick Governments in the same People whereof one is not subject to the other It is manifest that David did dispose of all Offices and Ministers of the Church 1 Ch. 22.27 Afterwards Solomon did not only build but consecrate the Temple and not a Priest Hitherto belongeth that famous History of Jehosaphat in the 2 Chr. 19. which doth perfectly clear this cause as also doth the History of Ezekias and indeed the whole Old Testament It is too well known that though Papists and Presbyters do allow something to secular Magistrates in the Rule of the Church yet the Supremacy of Power they do utterly and in very terms deny And having obtained possession of power in the Church and that as they hold out by Christs own institution they are very loath to resign the same again at the demand and into the hands of Princes It is true that when our Saviour first gave Commission to his Disciples to Preach Baptize and Propogate the true Faith in the World secular Authority being universally averse thereunto he was of necessity to commit for the present both Doctrines and Discipline to the charge of his Apostles yet not without a promise That Kings should be their Nursing Fathers and Queens the Nursing Mothers of his Church who though now they are come in and become friendly to Religion and willing to advance the spiritual prosperity of the Church as well as of the Temporal of the State yet both Papists and Presbyters having got possession are loath to be disquietted dreaming of a Spiritual Empire belonging to Priests more worthy and Sacred than that of the Emperors and so secretly preferring the Crosier before the Crown § Power and Government are things most awful and honourable and the truest owners thereof next under God are Princes whom the true legitimat Church ever looked upon as Cods immediate Vicegerents Deputies and Governours thereof St. Peter 1.2 Writing to the Church in the time of a Heathen and Impious Emperor commandeth every Soul to be Subject to the higher Powers He acknowlegeth power in a very Nero and that to be the higher Power And to that Power of that Nero he subjects every soul Christian and Heathen Priest and Layman and it may not seem strange that meer Power and Rule in an unbeliever and wicked Prince should be so sacred and inviolable We must take notice that the wickedness of Princes in ill Commands though it discharge us as to those ill Commands yet it doth not discharge their power or Rule either in those or any other For when Princes rule well they are to be obeyed when ill they are to be endured and this very endurance is an effect of obedience and subjection The violence of this or that Nero may be Tyrannous but the lawful Authority whereby the same violence is done is not Tyranny Neither is the Office of Kings the less Glorious because they can use force nor yet that of Ministers the more Glorious because they may use none but perswasive Motives and Allurements For Power it self being a Glorious Divine thing it must be most honourable to use it in Gods Cause and his Glory and the advance and increase of his Flock and Kingdom and therefore we see Iosiah and other good Kings are commended for using compulsion and on the contrary other Kings which used it not for the suppressing of Idolatry removing the high places and the like did draw curses on themselves and their subjects And whereas it is objected by I. M. and others that Force and Compulsion restrain only from the act of sin but not the Will from the liking thereof and that to compel outward profession is to compel Hypocrisy not to advance Religion But we see common experience teacheth us better effects thereof For Scotland Holland Denmark Sweden Bohemia England c. suffered great changes of Religion in a short space and these changes were wrought by the force of Civil Magistrates and could never else without strange Miracles from Heaven have been so soon compassed and these Changes have not proved the less sincere because Civil Authority wrought them as the Samaritan first believed Christ on the Womans word but then for his own sake so those that were compelled to the Wedding so many Papists in Queen Elizabeths dayes which came to our Churches first to save their Purses afterwards came out of liking of which the Pope being advertised forbad it and made it a Signum Distinctivum It s a shrewd sign that that Babe is spurious which the Mother is ashamed to bring to light and that is Falshood and Dross not Truth and Gold which dares not abide any Test and that those Masses are not of a Divine Origine that must be celebrated in an unknown Tongue and trusted only with the Priests who are parties to the Cheat. Besides the means used in all Laws of God and man to induce obedience are rewards and punishments both which may occasion Hypocrisie Corrupted man is as inclinable to dissemble Religion which he believes not as well for hope of reward as for fear of punishment which is vitio personae non praemii vel poenae else God would not have appointed them as mounds of his laws and motives of obedience The pious example of a good King is of mervelous inducement towards Religion yet one may hypocritically dissemble his Religion to please his Prince Example is so powerful a motive that it is said to compel 2 Gal. 14. Peccant magistratus cum minis paenis alios peccare non prohibent 13 Nehem. 17.21.22 If Nebuchadnezar erect his prodigious Idol and upon pain of a Fiery Furnace require all to worship it all People Nations and Languages are presently upon their faces If persecution be but threatned Demas-like we presently forsake the fellowship of Saints and imbrace this present world On the other side rewards of honour and preferment will cause some Balaam-like to run and ride and become more sensless of Gods wrath and indignation than
then had nothing to do with the Revenues but to govern them and consign them to another In progress of Time the Commendataries not without divers pretences of Honesty and Necessity made use of the Fruits and to enjoy them the longer sought means to hinder the Provision For remedy whereof Order was taken that the Commenda should not last longer than six Months but the Popes by the plenitude of their Power did pass these Limits and commended for a longer time and at length for the Life of the Commendataries giving him power to use the Fruits besides the necessary Charges This good Invention so degenerated was used in the corrupted times for a Cloak of Pluralities observing the words of the Law to give but one Benefice to one Man contrary to the Sence in regard that a Commendatary for Life is the same in reality with the Titular Great Exorbitancies were committed in the number of the Benefices Commended so that after the Lutheran Stirs began and all men demanded Reformation Clement the Seventh in the Year 1534. was not ashamed to commend unto his Nephew Hippolitus Cardinal de Medicis all the Benefices of the World Secular and Regular Dignities and Parsonages simple and with cure being vacant for Six Months to begin from the first day of his possession with power to dispose of and convert to his use all the Fruits This exorbitancy was the height of all which in former times the Court did not use though it gave in Commenda a very great number unto one Therefore the Union formerly invented and used for a good end was now made use of to palliate Plurality This was practised when a Church was destroyed or the Revenues usurped that little which remained together with the Charge being transferred to the next and all made one Benefice the Industry of the Courtier found out that besides these respects Benefices might be united so that by Collation thereof Plurality was wholly covered though in favour of some Cardinal or great Person 30 or 40 in divers places of Christendom were united But an Inconvenience did arise because a number of Benesices did decrease and the favour done to one was afterwards done to many without merit or demand to the great dammage of the Court and Channery And this was remedied with a subtle and witty Invention to unite as many Benesices as pleased the Pope only during the Life of him on whom they were conferred by whose death the Vnion was understood to be dissolved ipso sacte and the Benefices returned to the first state so they shewed the world their excellent Inventions conferring a Benesice which was but one in shew but many indeed Hist. Coun. Fr. Pâ—iro Soave Polano Trattato delle Benesiciare These things thus premised it is obvious to all even to those of the smallest understandings that it hath not been without grand Reason of State-Ecclesiastick that the Clergy have thus Magisterially Monopolized unto themselves the Name and Goods and Estate of the Church All which considered it is demonstrable that the Popish Clergy have under pretence of Piety cleverly cheated their Laity of their proper Goods Rights and Prerogatives for which their so doing they are more properly to be accounted Sacrilegious than H. 8. for retaking Abbeys and other which they called Church-Lands into his own and his Parliaments disposal to whom of just Right they did more properly belong than unto Popes and Popish Clergy I have examined all the most considerable Places or Texts of Scripture 〈…〉 wherein the Word Church is mentioned and I cannot understand that any one of them no not that famous and so much magnified and so much insisted upon place Matth. 18.15 20. whereof by wresting it from its genuine Sence so much ill use hath been made ought to be construed or restrained to the Pope no nor yet unto the Clergy only nay so far from it that most of them do strongly seem to intimate the whole Congregation of Believers distinct though not exclusive the Clergy to be the Church and yet such hath been the Pride and Ambition of Popes as to impose the scornful Name of Laity upon those that are not of the Clergy To use the Terms of Laity and Clergy as Terms distinguishing the Pastors from the Flock is acceptable and useful but when they will make so ill use thereof by affixing and thereby appropriating the Title of the Church and power thereof to themselves only that certainly is neither in the Text nor yet in their Commission but is very injurious to the rest of Gods Heritage it being manfest that the Popish Clergy having by Insinuations Tricks and Cheats devested the Church i.e. the Body of the Brethren of their primitive Right and Power it is evident to all the world what abominable abuses they have brought thereby into the Church whereas the Clergy in Apostolical sense are more truly they whom they call the Laity the Word Clerus being observed to be but only once used in the New Testament and there in that very sense and signification 1 Pet. 5.3 Where he admonisheth the Priests neque ut dominantes Cleris sed ut qui sitis exemplaria gregis viz. That they should not be as Lords over Clerum Domini i.e. Gods Heritage not Priests whereby is meant all the faithful flock of Christ as it follows but be examples of the Flock Now having once robb'd them of the Title it was but very convenient and sutable to their ambitious ends and purposes to strip them also of their Power for without peradventure all the Churches Power is vested in and doth of just Right belong to the Body of the Church to the Congregation of the Faithful Moreover in the very Ordination of Priests and Bishops it will be marvellous difficult clearly to prove whether the laying on of the Bishops hands or the lifting up of the hands of the Congregation conferred most for certainly in the most pure times they were jointly used Bellarmine indeed saith that the Holy Scripture doth no where give the Church power over the Pastors much less over the Supreme Pastor But Gerson affirmeth that Christ sent St. Peter to the Church when he said unto him Die Ecclesiae and he was as Learned as Bellarmine and if they cannot agree among themselves what shall their Flocks do or whom shall they believe It is confest that Christ hath given great powers to his Church truly so called and instituted Pastors to feed them with Knowledge and Vnderstanding and they are so well taught that they understand very well that Christ hath no where exempted Bellarmines Supreme Pastor our Supreme Vsurper from the Obedience of his Church but hath subjected him to the Censures of the Church § As to the Text it self Mat. 18.15 16 20. If there were no more in it than this that the Expositors themselves do much disser about the true Sence and Meaning thereof acknowledging it to be very hard to hit by reason that the state of
the Jewish Church is not so well known in our days as when our Saviour spake the words we may justly be excused if we plead and demur thereunto Take Text and Context together Moreover if thy Brother shall trespass against thee go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone if he shall hear thee thou hast gained thy Brother v. 15. But if he will not hear thee then take with thee one or two more that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established v. 16. And if he neglect to hear them tell it unto the Church but if he neglect to hear the Church let him be unto thee as a Heathen man and Publican v. 17. Verily I say unto you whatsoever ye shall bind on earth shall be bound on Heaven and whatsoever ye shall loose on Earth shall be loosed in Heaven v. 18. Again I say unto you if two of you shall agree on Earth as touching any thing that they shall ask it shall be done for them of my Father which is in Heaven v. 19. For where two or three are gathered together in my Name there am I in the midst of them v. 20. What is here meant by the Church whether the Church of Christ then only in fieri not yet planted as some would have it or the Jewish Church then planted and setled or the Civil Assemblies that God ordained in the Commonwealth to govern his People and determine their Quarrels breeds great Questions amongst Divines themselves which alone is some Justification to us if we make further Enquiry and try Spirits especially having a Command so to do and to beware of false Prophets The Reason that prevails with some to believe that the Church of Christ is not by these words meant are 1. This was a Direction to the Jews serving them for their present State and Time 2. Christ had then no Church in Jewry to which they might address themselves and complain for he ever preached in the Synagogues and Temple whither all that would resorted John 18.20 Much less did he gather Churches sapart from the Jews to receive and consider and redress the Complaint and Injuries of their Brethren and if he did yet is there not one Syllable in the Text to induce us to believe that such Church or Assembly was constituted only of Ecclesiasticks of Popes or of Presbyters or that it was to continue and remain in force for ever in the Church 3. The Matters to becomplained of are of that nature as Priests of Christ may not challenge Judicially and Authoritatively to hear and determine Private Wrongs and Offences betwixt man and man must be redressed by compromise or judicially by Laws and consequently belongs to the Civil Magistrate The Church of Christ quatenus a Church hath no Warrant to make Laws or give Judgment in Civil or Private Wrongs and Trespasses and therefore I suppose that no Clergy except the Romish will pretend to this Christ himself when he was desired to make peace to end a Strife about parting an Inheritance answered Man who made me a Judge or Divider among you Luke 12.13 14. What Christ refused as no part of his Calling the Bishops Pastors and Presbyters of his Church must not challenge as annexed to their Commission and Vocation The Disciple is not above his Master Luke 6.40 Mat. 10.24 As his Father sent him so sent he them John 20. â—1 but not with a farther or larger Commission 4. That Church is here spoken of which abhorred Ethnicks as unclean persons and shunned all Society with Publicans but neither Christ nor his Church did ever so therefore the Church of Christ is not probably meant by these words Let him be to thee as an Heathen and a Publican for they never refused nor declined to converse with either To the Baptism of John came the Publicans Luke 3.12 and were received of him Our Saviour was accounted a friend unto them Mark 11.19 Matthew the Apostle was chosen sitting at the Receipt of Custom Mat. 9.9 Zackeus a chief Publican was the Child of Abraham Luke 19.9 The Publican that prayed in the Temple was justisied before the Pharisee Luke 18.14 and told by Christ that they should go into Heaven before the Scribes and Elders that despised them Mat. 21.21 The Publicans then were Members of Christs Church and Inheritors of his Kingdom and therefore by slying and sorsaking the Fellowship of Publicans the Church of Christ could not be described nor thereby meant The like may be said of Ethnicks and Gentiles who though they were Strangers to the Commonwealth of Israel when as yet they knew no God yet never were they persons excommunicated and since the Incarnation of Christ they became partakers of this Promises and true Members of hiâ— Catholick Church so that this can be no Rule for Christs Church to ground Excommunication upon nor yet to measure persons excommunicated by Gentiles and Publicans seeing that amongst the Jews Publicans believed and entred the Kingdom of God and after the Rejection of that Nation the Church of Christ consisted chiefly if not wholly of Gentiles and Ethnicks converted Others argue thus 1. They were Jews to whom Christ spake 2. Bidding them tell it to the Church he sends them to some Judge or Judicature to which they could go and were bound to obey 3. It is certain the Mosaical Judicial Law was then in being and to them obligatory and stood so till Christs Death he and his Apostles living under the Obligation of it 4. They say for certain the Christian Church was not then Constituted so that it is irrational if not ridiculous to say that he sends them when he bids them tell it to the Church to any Episcopal Presbyterian or Independent Judges when there were no such things in the World 5. It is then evident that he sends them there to some Jewish Judges to whom they could go and were bound to obey And the Jews had then as also before and after three Courts of Judicature 1. The Supreme the Sanhedrim which sate only in Jerusalem 2. The Consessus-viginti-trium-viralis which consisted of 23 persons in greater Towns and Cities 3. Consessus trium-viralis wherein the Judges were only three and such a Judicature they had in all lesser Towns and every one of those Courts was usually called Ecclesia a Church so that to those so opinionated it seems certain that the Persons and the Cause an Action of Trespass only considered it was the Consessus triumviralis he sends them unto The Christian Church say they cannot for the Reasons above-said be meant in those Words Tell it to the Church though with the same Breath they cannot deny but acknowledge that wherever Christ taught and converted men there was a Christian Church yet say that while he lived it was under the Legal Oeconomy and not that of the Gospel for that when our Saviour spake that the Sacrament of Baptism which only makes a Member of the Christian
p. 369. taken away these words is no Riddle their Excuse is ready at hand viz. That they are not in the New Testament but of many other words which are found in the Breviaries and not in the New Testament it is said they come ex Traditione Apostolicâ and so they will tell us that however the Evangelists do not affirm it yet it comes by Tradition that old and bold Imposture that these words were directed to Peter Now then here ought to be some distinction by which there may appear a difference between this Tradition and the others which when it is made yet all will be too little to excuse that for many hundred years it was not so read and consequently so believed of all Catholicks for so many Ages that it was spoken particularly to Peter Dic Ecclesiae So that they must needs equivocate in the Noun Church and interpret it Dic tibi ipsi i.e. Tell it to thy self To this purpose we have a more signal corruption not of their Breviary but of the Gospel it self For in the Gospel Translated into Persian by Xauerius it is added after Dic Ecclesiae and if he refuse to hear the Church then tell it Romano Pontisici to the Pope of Rome and if he refuse to hear him let him be an Heathen c. yea yet farther it will be a Sence so palpably wrested to understand by the Church one sole Person and that not so much because the Noun it self cannot bear it as for that Christ himself interpreting it in the words immediately following saith Vbi sunt duo vel tres Where there are two or three gathered together c. So that it is apparently cleared that he understood by the Church a Congregation of two or three at the least assembled in his Name But grant them what they vehemently contend for viz. That Christ said to Peter himself Tell the Church yet for that very reason Peter himself was sent unto some other persons constituting a Church and therefore by the Term Church Peter could not possibly be meant or intended § It is objected out of John 9.12 That the Scribes and Pharisees did in Christs time thrust such as they deemed Offenders out of their Synagogue which they will needs have to be Excommunication and that the same power was bequeathed unto the Church Christian is Mat. 15.20 That they did so may be true but that they had good warrant so to do out of Moses I find not A Separation of the Leper from the Company of men and of the unclean from coming near the Holy Places are things Moses prescribeth but Excommunication no where that I know of A Bastard might not enter into the Congregation of the Lord unto the Tenth Generation Deut. 23.2 Nor yet the Ammonites or Moabites v. 23. But the Children of the Edomites and Egyptians were received in the Third Generation v. 8. Aliens were not admitted to be of the Number of the Lords People and any Uncleanness of the Flesh did separate for a season the Jews themselves from approaching near to the Congregation or Tabernacle of God but neither of these is Excommunication The Strangers which were not yet admitted could not be rejected the Natural Insirmities and Uncleanness of the Body as Leprosie Pollution Touching of the Dead c. are made Remembrances of our Corruption not Causes of Excommunication For greater Sins committed God appointed Corporal punishments for Wrongs he required Recompence for smaller Matters he accepted Sacrifices of Confession and Repentance other Censures in Moses I know none at least that will amount unto Excommunication The casting of Men out of their Synagogues was first devised by the Pharisees to serve their proud and aspiring humor for that the chiefest power of the Sword was translated unto Strangers and the highest Dignity remained unto the Sadduces Jos Antiq. lib. 18. c. 20. and though sharply pursued by them against Christ and his Disciples yet was it no spiritual course but rather a temporal loss of all such Honours Offices Priviledges and Freedoms as the parties had in Church or State where they lived and a plain adjudging them to imprisonment Scourging and such other Chastisements as the Synedrion by their Laws might and did inflict unto which I presume no Ministers of the Gospel will pretend or lay any claim St. John reports c. 19. v 38. That Joseph of Arimathea was Christs Disciple but secretly for fear of the Jews And c. 12.42 That many of the chief Rulers believed on him but because of the Pharisees they did not confess him lest they should be cast out of their Synagogue now Believers in Christ could be in no dread or fear of the Spiritual Curse and Excommunication of the Pharisees for that they excommunicated themselves when they forsook the Jewish Church and became Christians they better understood their Interest in Christ than so wherefore this casting out of the Synagogue if not wholly Civil yet at least was intermixed with the Civil Regiment and the terror thereof wholly proceeded from the power of the Sword confirmed by God to the Council and Elders of that Commonwealth which the Pastors of Christs Church may not usurp nor challenge unless the Civil Magistrate do Counsel and Authorize their Doings and if so yet questioned by some As for that other Phrase viz. He shall be cut off from the midst of his People so often used in the Law and so often and strongly insisted upon by some to express a kind of Excommunication and Anathematization I must take leave to dissent from them also that are so perswaded of the Sence of this Exposition Moses himself not the Rabbins is the best Expositor and out of him not out of them Proofs are to be sought In Levit. 18. God threatning Incest Adultery Sodomy Buggary and Offering Children unto Moloch concludeth v. 29 that whosoever shall commit any of these Abominations shall be cut off from among the People i.e. shall die the death as is expressed Levit. 20.3 4 17. Whoever shall give his Children unto Moloch shall die the death the People of the Land shall stone him to death and if the People of the Land kill him not then will I set my face against that Man and his Family and cut him off So for Incest they shall be cut off in the sight of their People i.e. openly put to death So likewise for any wilful breach of Gods Law The person that doth ought presumptuously c. therefore shall he be cut off from among his People i.e. suffer death When this kind of Speech is referred to the Magistrate then Execution is enjoyned when to God then it is a Commination denounced that he will plague and root them out and their Remembrances from the People of God Nahum 3. Jer. 11.22 23. Ezek. 14.8 13 21. Ezek. 21.28 The Separation mentioned Ezra 10.8 11 12. And Nehemiah's chasing away some that married strange Wives Nehem. 13. were joyned with Forfeitures of all their Goods
vel indignos recusandi quod ipsam videmusde divina Authoritate descendere ut sacerdos plebe praesente sub omnium oculis deligatur c. whereby it appears that the supream Power of choosing such Priests as are worthy and refusing unworthy doth principally rest in the People And he speaketh of Bishops particularly although in the words alledged he mentioneth Priests and withal it is not only St. Cyprians Epistle but the Epistle of thirty six Bishops and written to the Common People of Leon Asturia and Emerita Vide his 14. Epist of his 3. Lib. such Authorities we may alledge but not mystical and enforced Explications nor yet wrong Conclusions from right Premisses The Faithful Flock of Christ ought to resemble Sheep indeed in humility and innocency yet ought they not to be so sheepish or sottish as to decline the Authority which Christ their great Shepherd hath bestowed on them either of choosing them a Good or of judging a Wicked Shepherd St. Austin proves unanswerably that Doctrines are to be grounded on the Literal Sense of the Scripture and not on any Mystical Interpretation In this equivocating Art of Sophistry Bellarmine hath shewed both in this Subject as in others his great dexterity first to settle with the Reader the Relation which the Holy Church hath towards the Divine Majesty and then to conclude on the Relation towards the Pope such false Sophistry such disingenuity becomes not so great a Prince so great a Scholar as himself but the Parisians no Protestants conclude that God hath called the Church to the Faith and his Worship and that he hath placed Christ over it for an Head for ever who first himself did govern it on Earth in the days of his Flesh but being ascended into Heaven doth rule it with inward influence and assistance invisible unto the end of the World It is true that the Church is not a Common-wealth as Venice or as Geneva which give as much Authority as themselves please to their Dukes and Princes nor a Kingdom which may change the manner of governing it neither invisibly nor visibly because that Christ hath prescribed the manner much less is it such a Kingdom as England which hath a Blood-Royal where the Kings succeed by Birth neither as some other by Testament but as touching the Inward Government and meerly Spiritual it is not like unto any because it hath a perpetual Immortal and Eternal King who only knows the Heart and tries the Reins In the visible Government it hath a Ministry whose Authority was instituted by Christ and independing of the Church but as concerning the Application of this Authority unto this or that Person it is elective or depending of it Wherefore when he alledgeth I am constituted a King by him Our Lord God shall give him a Kingdom Luke 1.32 and 12.32 You chose not me but I have chosen you John 15.16 Thou hast made us to our God a Kingdom All these places and such like others are meant of the Invisible Spiritual and Interior Kingdom where the Pope hath no regiment nor influence at all but Christ is all in all governing by his Spirit and according to the Council of his own Will Thus he having laid down and proposed to use a Proposition or Doctrine quodammodo and in some sense true and having Validity under the Covert of an Universal yet having applied it to wrong Particulars it hath lost its Energy and Effort and its fallacy is discovered A piece of Artifice and Skill that runs through the Veins and Lines of most Popish Writers in the Controversies between us and them and what else is this but to make Lies their refuge and under Falshood to shelter themselves If Popes may now excommunicate as they pretend yet this concludes not that they may excommunicate Princes or Magistrates or whole Common-wealths The Primitives of old did use excommunication very sparingly and moderately and with great prudence and policy and with great respect to the good of the Church And therefore be the Power what or where it will St. Augustine holds an Excommunication against a Multitude though it were for some notorious and manifest sin too sacrilegious pernicious impious and insolent Lib. 3. contra Ep. Permen 23.4.4 c. non potest And Thomas putteth a Question whether any generality may be excommunicated and he answereth himself No and produceth Reasons for the same concluding that the Church appointeth with great Providence that no Community might be excommunicated And all other Divines with one accord determine the same And also Pope Innocent the 4th in the Chap. Rom. saith In Vniversitatem vel Collegium proferri sententiam Excommunicationis penitus prohibere de Sentent excom in 6. We must know that it is of worse consequence and example where â—t is used against Princes than divers other Bodies and Societies in as much as one Prince is of more consequence and power than thousands of other Lay-men We know also that in all Judgments there is a necessity of a Legal Trial to precede Conviction And that great Multitudes may be convented examined sentenced and punished with less disturbance of Peace less violation of Majesty than those that sway the Ball-Imperial Besides if the condemnation of Princes might be upon due Trials without violence yet the execution of the Sentence would produce more monstrous events in them than in private Men for how shall the People honour obey and reverence him in the State as Gods Lieutenant whom they see accursed cut off and abhorred in the Church as the Devils Vassal upon the excommunication of Princes whole Nations have been interdicted witness England Venice and other in the times of several Popes whole States subjected to ruine the Innocent with the Obstinate the Princes with the People all have have been sacrificed to Blood-thirsty-Popish-Priests under pretence of obedience to the Holy Catholick Church In what Code of the Ancient Church can it be found where any such strange kind of punishment was ever instituted as that for the offence of a few many Millions of Souls should be accursed cast out of the Church and in Popish construction damned How can they call that Power Apostolical that punisheth in this manner seeing the Apostolical Power was given for edification and not for destruction And yet so precipitate have some Popes been as to excommunicate whole States and Kingdoms Surely therefore we ought not so tamely to acquiesce on the bare ipse dixit of the Clergy pleading in their own Cause and for themselves only exclusive the Laity Certainly it is too small a security for so great a concern therefore let us a little examine what they urge for this exorbitant Power § If Kings be not this way punishable then they are no other way which is mischievous in the Church Sol. The Jewish Kings were as great and scandalous sinners as Kings-Christian now are yet God assigned no Rulers Spiritual for their Castigation and we must suppose that if it had
appear rather to be taken than given as this Author suggests Certainly this great Cloud of Witnesses will cure our Author of this his fear and set him and all others right as to Matter of Fact in this Point and so I leave it § Other Objections he makes against Liturgies if imposed as that they occasion neglect and disabilities that they hinder the due Exercise and Improvement of Spiritual Gifts and that they are an unwarrantable Abridgement of that Liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free and therefore sin in the Vse and Imposition thereof These I take to be rather Libels than just Objections for that there is no property belonging unto a good Pastor but what is very consistent with the true Nature and Use of sound Liturgies as hath been shewed already But if there be any such Watch-men that are blind ignorant dumb Dogs that cannot bark sleeping lying down loving to slumber greedy Dogs which can never have enough lazy idle Shepherds that cannot understand Isa 56.10 11. that will take occasion from the Imposition of Liturgies to neglect to feed their Flocks to strengthen the Diseased to heal the Sick to bind up that which is broken and to seek that which is lost yet this cannot without slander be imputed unto the Nature and Condition of Liturgies or their Imposition but unto the Shepherds themselves who will exact their due but neglect their Duty who take the hire of Labourers but live as Loiterers who love Pride fulness of Bread and abundance of Idleness and to feed themselves and not the Lords Flock Ezek. 34.3 looking to their own ways every one for his gain from his Quarter saying We will fetch Wine and fill our selves with Strong Drink and to morrow shall be as this day and much more abundant Isa 56.10 11 12. the more shame for those that ordain such and put such into Preferments and no doubt but God will in his due time require his Flock at the Hands of such Pastors and feed them with judgment causing their Habitation to mourn and themselves to howl for that God will spoil their Glory Zech. 11.3 for indeed I know no power that Gospel-Ministers can undoubtedly challenge by their Charter from Heaven but to preach in season out of season to teach their Flock and duly to Administer Gods Ordinances and Sacraments And if this should be denied them by vertue of the Imposition of Liturgies or that Liturgies were really exclusive of that Provision of Means that Christ hath ordained for the Edification of his Church as this Author seems to brand them it were better that both Liturgies and my self were tied to a Mil-stone and both cast into the midst of the Sea than that I should thus plead for them but being clearly convinced of the contrary I shall go to that which is last to be touched viz. § That Liturgies if imposed are against Christian Liberty § Christian Liberty I must confess is a specious and glorious term a most precious and most excellent thing an inestimable Blessing purchased by the death of the Son of God Jesus Christ blessed for ever and therefore ought not to be infringed or impeached by any and let him be Anathema that would willingly and knowingly endeavour it And as it is a thing of very high concern to all Christians so it is very apt to be highly wrested and abused contrary to the holy Ghost by Christians of divers perswasions every man Writing and shaping it to his own humor and fancying to themselves liberty in such and such things and then wresting places to favour their fancies which were never so intended by the Holy Ghost which crime is chiefly charged and falls most heavily upon the Anabaptists who do embrace an opinion very Licentious Extravagant and even destructive to all Government holding that a Christian Mans Liberty is lost and the Soul which Christ hath Redeemed unto himself injuriously drawn into Servitude under the Yoak of Humane power if any Law be now imposed besides the Gospel of Jesus Christ in obedience whereunto the Spirit of God and not the constraint of Men is to lead us according to that of the Blessed Apostle such as are lead by the Spirit of God they are the Sons of God Rom. 8.14 and not such as live in Thraldom unto Men therefore their Judgment is that amongst Christians there must be no Magistrates for if there must be Magistrates they must have Power to make Laws besides the Laws of God but this Power they have not because Christians have a free use of all the Creatures of God by Christian Liberty Next unto the Anabaptists it falls heavy I wish I could say not Justly upon some scrupulous Non-conformists that under pretence of Christian Liberty wherein they say they ought to stand fast and so no doubt they ought they often deny obedience to the Lawful Commands of the Magistrate in the business of the Lord and so use or rather abuse their Liberty for a Cloak to cover their malitiousness I will not say but their misunderstandings and not as the Servants of God 1 Pet. 2.16 There are others of the like Synagogue of Libertines as Phanaticks Quakers Ranters Adamites others But because they are Persons having no Principles no Mediums whereon to Ground and Regulate Discourses or Disputations I shall wave and a little look into the true nature of Christian Liberty which according to Calvin contains some higher thing than the Liberty in the use of Ceremonies and which I take to be a Spiritual Right or Condition in all the parts of it because it pertains to Conscience Be the extent of this Liberty what it will in it self it is inwardly in the Conscience But the publick use of it being in outward things and Actions is therefore under the Order of Humane Laws because Liberty is in Conscience and the Magistrates Authority pertains to the Body § For to make all restraint of the Outward Man in matters indifferent Confer at Hamp Court 70 71. an Impeachment of Christian Liberty what were it else but even to bring Flat Anabaptism and Anarchy into Church and State and to overthrow all bounds of Subjection and Obedience to lawful Authority For wherein can the immediate Power and Authority of Rulers consist or the due obedience of Inferiours be shown if not in indifferent and Arbitrary things For things absolutely necessary and commanded by God we are bound to do whether Humane Authority required them or no and things absolutely unlawful as Prohibited by God we are bound not to do whether Humane Authority forbid them or no there are no other things left then wherein to express properly the obedience due to Superiour Authority than indifferent things In rebus mediis lex posita est obedientiae Bern. Ep. if any retort as some have done that if we are obliged to do things absolutely necessary and commanded by God and obliged not to do things absolutely unlawful and forbidden by God without the Interposition
which come not in our Verge at this time and some things positive some whereof by the coming of Christ were necessary to be abolished and othersome indifferent to be kept or not of the former kind were Circumcision and Sacrifice The Apostle notwithstanding did not so teach the present and utter Abolition no not of those things which were necessarily to cease but that even the Jews becoming Christians might for a time continue in them and therefore in Jerusalem the first Bishops even till the overthrow thereof were Circumcised And as for those positive things which might either cease or continue prout the present posture or State of the Church should require the Apostles thought it necessary to bind even the Gentiles for a time to abstain as the Jews did from things offered unto Idols c. In other matters where the Gentiles were free and the Jews in their own Judgment still oblidged the Apostles Precept unto the Jews Condemn not the Gentiles unto the Gentiles despise not the Jews Rom. 14.10 the one sort they warned to take heed that Nicity and Scrupulosity did not make them rigorous in giving unadvised sentence against their Brethren which were free the other that they did not become scandalous by abusing their Liberty and Freedom to the Offence of their weak Brethren which were scrupulous whereby it is evident that the Apostle did impose upon the Churches of the Gentiles some things only in respect of conveniency and fitness for the present State of the Church as it then stood the words of the Councils decree are It seemed good unto the Holy Ghost and to us to lay upon you no greater burthen than these necessary things viz. That ye abstain from meats offered to Idols c. 28 29. Indeed to have commanded the Gentiles to have been conformable to the Jews in those things which were necessarily to cease at the coming of Christ had been to have continued a Yoak upon the Disciples which neither their Forefathers nor they were able to bear Acts 15.10 And indeed to impose the like things upon us now were to bring us again into such Bondage in respect of the Royal and perfect Law of Liberty James 1.25 and 28. as were insupportable to bring us back to Onions and Garlick and to leave the Land flowing with Milk and Honey But to conclude from hence the unlawfulness of imposing Liturgies as our Author here doth is such a deduction such a peace of Scholastick Divinity as is quite past my understanding Notwithstanding all these Texts of Scripture by the Author alledged I humbly conceive that all the Christian Liberty that can be meant by these Texts is fully allowed to our Dissenters and is not in the least impeached thereby § There is one Subterfuge yet more left which is drawn from the example of this very Council viz. If Imposition be lawful yet the Scandal the Offence or Inconvenience ought to be Antecedent to the Imposition And then with much confidence and very little truth as I humbly conceive avers that there is no thing Antecedent unto its thereby meaning the Liturgy Imposition that should make it necessary to be Imposed either I understand not his meaning or this is a very strange Doctrine contrary to the very attributes of God contrary to the very grounds of all Arts and Sciences and Governments in the World contrary to the very nature of Wisdom for what is it else but to deny even Gods Providence his foresight his preventing Workings and Graces and to deny in men the use of their Prudence their Reason their Foresight and their Forecast Must the Old good Axiomes made Venerable by the Universal Acceptations of all Ages all the World over be now thrust out of doors and be accounted Foolish and Invalid nay unlawful Venienti occurrere morbo turpius ejicitur quam non admittitur hostis to prevent Diseases to keep out an Enemy rather than beat him out are now grown absolete Of Old this Axiome was held good that he that is suddenly surprised is half Conquered and he that is forewarned is half Armed nay its two against one a Wise man in Peace prepares for War a Wise Marriner prepares in his Haven against Leakes and Batteries of Enemies and violent Storms and Tempests It was wont to go for currant that it is too late to provide against an Evil when it is come and that they are Fools and ill advised that say had I wist or who would have thought it But now it seems Evils at least in the Church must be Antecedent and consequently cast out not prevented though foreseen so that that which hath been approved Wisdom all the World over is according to this new light these new Doctrines esteemed Folly as a thing of naught nay unlawful to be used However let no man deceive himself by thinking there may be some difference in these Axiomes or in the persons Executing or Practising them as they may relate to Church or State to Civil or to Ecclesiastical concerns For in this the same wisdom and Foresight is equal indifferently respecting both concerns and the power of Superiours for restraint prevention or Imposition equal in both and the necessity of obedience in Inferiors equal in both And as no Man hitherto hath been so I think no Man ever will be able to shew a real and substantial difference between them to make an inequality But as Civil Magistrates may for just reason of State prohibite and Impose concerning some things and persons So Church Governors may upon as good and just reasons impose Liturgies either for preventing or removing Idolatry Superstition Scandal Inconveniences nay be it only for the sake of order or Conformity Wherefore I do conclude that it is much greater prudence to prevent evils and inconveniencies than to amend and Reform them when they happen But what do I trouble my self about this for that it will not appear to be our case Scandal and offence did precede the Imposition of our Liturgy if our Author be found Tardy in matter of Fact as I presume he will for he saith expresly that there is nothing Antecedent to its imposition to make it necessary to be imposed In which I will joyn Issue with him and let our Church History be Judge between us Whoever knows but little of Church History knows that long before we ever had a Reformed Liturgie established in England the first of that nature and also the second was in the Minority of Edw. 6. there was a Liturgie a Popish Breviary and a Mass Book long used and established in England as full of Idolatrous and superstitious Doctrines Ceremonies and Worship as Leaves which had so poysoned and infected all the Kings Dominions that it had run into the veins of every Parish Against this Poyson our Josiah-like Prince and Minor by the advice of his Spiritual Physitians and Councellors ordains several Antidotes both to expel that which was Corrupt and Venemous and to Ordain and
that in many places it was irreverently used and cast out of the Church and many other Enormities committed which they seconded by oppugning the established Ceremonies and it is not improbable but that if the Liberty here pleaded for were granted but that the same disorders and confusions would also return and therefore for these also amongst many other reasons Antecedent also as for avoiding diversities of Formes and Opinions and for establishing Consent touching true Religion and Worship and for removing of some Offences taken by Calvin and his followers whose design it was to have this as well as other Churches to depend on his direction It was thought fit by our Learned and prudent Governors both of Church and State the better to settle peace and truth and to keep out Error and Superstition to Establish a Liturgy and Rubrick As Reformation was a Work most glorious so it was a work most difficult because it was to Null and cancel such Customs and usages in Divine Worship as tract of time Age after Age for many Generations had made so habitual and had taken such deep root and Impressions in the Hearts and Souls of the People of all sorts from Father to Son that in humane reason it appeared almost impossible And therefore a Work not to be undertaken by blew-Apron or Tradesmen nor yet by giddy Phanatick Multitude nor indeed by any but by the Supream Magistrate and therefore a Work fit only for a King and such a King only as was fit for such a Work fit to match the Empress of Abominations and of the World and such a King proved Henry the 8th Having great courage and great understanding and great resolution without which requisites he could never have done what he did § As our Author in his sixth Chapter hath given us his Account of the Reformation and of the Introduction of our Liturgy not without some unbeseeming reflections on so great so good a Work to make the better way for the design of his Book so I shall take leave to give you also a short account thereof for the better Justification of our Liturgy and leave the Reader to Judge and favour which he please Tho Henry the 8th from his Cradle lived in an Antichristian Age and Church so that he suckt in the very Milk of the Mother of Harlots and Abominations and tho he made great havock of the Blood of Saints and Martyrs scourging them to Death with his Six knotted-Whip of Articles And tho he made great havock of the Popes Power and Patrimony wrongfully so called and not excrescences For indeed Monasteries c. That he destroyed and took away were for the most part exempt from Episcopal Jurisdiction and wholly depended on the Pope who was not so much the rightful Head of the Church then as was this Henry the 8th and therefore were not so essentially belonging to the Church as were the Bishops and their Patrimony yet it cannot be denied but that he left the Officers and Fathers of the Church that were more truly so the Bishops in many respects in a better condition then he found it both in respect of the Polity and the Endowments of it and also in order to a Reformation of Doctrine and Worship the Polity was mended in that he banished the Power of the Pope and setled it on himself to whom it did more rightfully belong and on his Bishops moderated the extream Severity of the Six Articles abolished the superstitious usages observed on St. Nichola's day all which may abundantly be seen in the Church History and by his Proclamation of Sept. 19. 1530. by a Publick instrument of the Convocation dated March 22. after acknowledging him to be Supream Head of the Church of England as also by several Acts of Parliament viz. H. 24.8 c. 12.25 H. 8. c. 1.20 21. and 28. H. 8. c. 10. In Order to a Reformation H. 8. first permitted the Bible to be Translated by Mr. Tyndall Anno 1530. afterwards Martyr But some Bishops having ill Characterized him to the King it was afterwards suppressed But the Popes Authority declining about the year 1536. the King issued out an Order for a New Translation indulging in the Interim the use of a Bible then passing under a feigned Name of Mathews Bible not much differing from Tyndalls which came forth Anno 1540. which was called the great Bible and sometimes Coverdales Bible or Translation the publick uses thereof and of all other Translations was interdicted 1542. and so continued without leave of the King or Ordinary first had until Edward 6. repealed that Statute and introduced the publick use thereof again according to Miles Coverdales Translation which doth not much differ from Tyndalls from this Translation doth our Liturgy derive the Translations of the Psalms and other Portions of Canonical Scripture since which time we have had two other more exact and refined Translations one in Queen Elizabeth her time called the Bishops Bible another in King James's time that the Psalms and other Portions of Scripture in our Liturgy were not altered in Queen Elizabeths days according to the best Translation then extant was because it could not be done without altering the whole Frame of the Liturgy which the Sages of those times thought not prudent to endeavour by reason of the different temper of those Parliaments in which it had always some potent Enemies but why they were not lately altered with our Liturgy and as the Scotch Liturgy before had been I can give no account If the last Translation be the most perfect why were they not made Conformable to that and so compiled if it be not the best why is it commanded to be used at all H. 8. by his Injunctions 1536 and 1538. abolished Church Holy dayes and Holy dayes in Harvest time he banished the Popes Supremacy and asserted his own he forbade Images and Pilgrimages commanded Prayers in the Mother-tongue and every Parish to provide a Bible in English and to place it in the Quire for every Man to Read therein and no Man to be discouraged from it but to be exhorted thereunto the Lords Prayer to be Learned in English Sermons to be made Quarterly at least with Instructions not to trust in Works divised by Mens fantasies besides Scripture as in wandring to Pilgrimages offering of Money Candles or Tapers to feigned Reliques or Images or Kissing or Licking the same saying over a number of Beads not understood or such like Superstition and therefore all such Images to be pulled down that that most detestable offence of Idolatry may be avoided the commemoration of Tho. Becket to be quite omitted Fox 1247 1250. In farther Order to a Reformation in points of Doctrine he first caused his Convocation Anno 1537. to Compose a Book expounding the Creed the Lords Prayer the ten Commandments the Avy Mary and the seven Sacraments more agreeable to the truth then formerly and it was called the Institution of a Christian Man But this Book lay
snug and played least in sight as long as the six Articles were in force and afterwards was Corrected by the Kings own Hand and approved by the Convocation Assembled 1543. and published under the Title of a necessary Doctrine and Erudition for any Christian Man He likewise commanded all Curates to teach the Lords Prayer the Creed Avy Mary and the ten Commandments in English and also the Bible in English to be placed in every Parish Church by his Injunctions Anno 1536 1541. Then by his Injunctions May 6. 1546. he caused an Extract to be drawn out of the Latine Service containing many of the best and most edifying Prayers which with the Letany he caused to be made English that the People might the better understand the Prayers of the Church which was called his Primer so far and farther did this great Spirited Prince proceed towards Reformation sweeping away some of those many Romish Rubbish and Corruptions wherewith Religion was then Tainted with a fierce Beesom of Destruction which none durst to have attempted or gone about as the posture of things then stood at home and abroad but a Prince able to match the very Mother and Mrs. of those very Abominations in sierceness and haughtiness of Spirit of whom it is storied that he never spared Man in his Anger nor Woman in his Lust And thus did God by fomenting an evil spirit between two such fierce Enemies unto the truth and purity of his Church and worship turn the malice and mischief of his Churches Enemies unto his own Glory and his Churches use and advantage and by his providence and disposal made use both of their Persons and Purposes even against their own wills to his own most Righteous and wonderful ends secretly and mightily directed their wicked designs and Machinations to the Comfort of his Church and chosen in the Accomplishing whereof he shall ever be admired by all those that Believe that they who in succeeding Ages shall gather themselves against Syon and say let her be defiled and let our eyes see it may themselves fear and tremble to be gathered as Sheaves into the Floor and the Daughter of Syon to arise and thrash them with Horns of Iron and Hoofs of Brass Henry 8. Having by thus breaking the Ice made some way towards Reformation tho happily not Intentionally unto what followed marched of the Stage of this World unto the Generation of his Fathers to give an Account unto the King of Kings and Lord of Lords as all his Predecessors had before done and all his Successors must do of all the things he had done in the Flesh whether they were good or whether they were evil his Son Edw. 6. Ascends the Throne Inheriting his Fathers Crown but not his Vices who Josiah-like both in Minority and Piety took care in Cunabulis in the very Infancy of his Reign that his Council should consult and use all their endeavours to make a more Gospel-like and through Reformation in which he did not patrizare as his Sister Queen Mary did after him march furiously with Fire and Faggot nor yet according to the advice that Calvin who fond of his own Chymara and Pettish at all Princes that in Reformation would not tread in his Steps gave to the Protector viz. to go on without fear or wit but proceeded therein pacatè and consultò well knowing that his Father by the rough handling of his Wives of the Pope and of other great Princes and Persons provoked and lest many great and bitter Enemies to his Crown and that more he should raise against himself on the score of his intended Reformation but he considered withal that Dimidium facti qui bene coepit habet that Alterations begun and founded in Wisdom and prosecuted with care would continue firm and durable Therefore he and his Grave sages were not as some of more puny dayes were for the violent pulling up of root and branch plant and build who would and who could but they took all things into consideration As that tho Reformation ought to be yet could not be without the Alteration of long received and Established Laws and Orders Rites and Ceremonies such as had been from Generation to Generation an Impediment unto Piety and true Gospel Worship and unto which the generality of the People were wedded having been Trained up therein from their Cradles that as the change of all Laws and more especially of such as related to Religion ought very circumspectly to be proceeded in Laws as all other sublunary things being subject to Imperfection and many times grounded and made on Sandy and unsure Foundations and wrong Suggestions that many times tho they be enacted as behooful yet in Experiment and Practise prove very Inconvenient and dangerous if continued that Experience daily finds just reason to abrogate many Laws tho of long standing and Laws that are expedient for one Age not to be so for another that sometimes alteration of Laws tho from the worse to the better which was the case of our Reformers and Reformation is many times attended with Inconveniences and those very considerable and therefore wise Legislators do not always choose nor enact that nor all which is most behooful but that which is most behooful and may be practised with least disturbance to the quiet State of the Church or Kingdom David knew many things fit to be done in his Kingdom yet for great reasons of State would not do them himself but when he lay on his Death Bed left them in Charge with his Son to do saying thou art a wise Man do thou according to thy wisdom 1 King 2.6.9 Therefore our prudent and pious Josiah did as early as he could abolish such things as might be abolished and establish others as might be received with least disturbance and most approbation of the Peoples minds and without danger leaving other some to be cancelled and abrogated by himself if God had lent him longer life and sit opportunities or by his Successors if God so pleased or by disusage through tract of time Did not Christ and his Apostles Steer the same moderate course when they introduced Gospel Worship whilst they dispensed for a season with Circumcision and other Ceremonies in the Proselites of the Gate which afterwards became absolete meerly through tract of time and disusage Did not Circumcision continue in the Church for the Succession of 15 Bishops next Succeeding the Apostles having been all Circumcised And might not our Reformers for the same reasons justly retain such Innocent Ceremonies as they did declaring as they did declare might not Naaman the Syrian go Innocently into the House of Rimon the Idol Temple not to VVorship but to do his Master service declaring publickly as he did I know that there is no God in all the Earth but in Israel thy Servant from henceforth will offer neither burnt Offering nor Sacrifice unto other Gods but only to the Lord. 2 King 5.15.17 This most excellent Prince tho he were
earnestly but inconsiderately pleaded for again But what did this Liberty produce but Factions Schisms and variety of Fashions and Modes in Celebrating the common Service and Administration of the Sacraments and other Rights and Ceremonies of the Church nay it is observed as intimated before in the Register of Petworth that many at this time affirmed the most blessed Sacrament to be of little regard that in many places it was irreverently used and cast out of the Church and many other great enormities committed nay many of the Licensed Preachers appear'd as Active against the Kings proceedings as any of the unlicensed Preachers had been found to be now what security can this our Author give to our Prince that if the like Liberty should now be Indulged to him and others that it shall not be abused nor produce the like or worse effects All which together with the Insurrections in Cornwall Devon Norfolk Suffolk and other Counties springing therefrom the King and his Council seeing the dangerous consequence thereof concluded that Uniformity was the best remedy against Schisme Heresie Faction and for the quiet State and Weal of the Kingdom and therefore gave Order to the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury and other Learned and Pious Men rather than to use Severity against his Subjects that a publick Liturgy should be drawn and Confirmed by Parliament with several Penalties to be Inflicted on all those who should not readily conform to the Rules and appointments of it and accordingly it was so signified unto the Kingdom by Proclamation Queen Elizabeth who was not unacquainted with such Sollicitations nor with the Consequences of them gave that reason in her time for not suffering any deviation from the established Form viz. that the English Angli beliâ— intrepidi as they were Zealous in their Religion so they were a Stout and Warlike Nation and the difference in Rites and Worship would unavoidably beget words and disputes which would certainly beget Animosities and consequently Blows and Insurrections the experience whereof she had seen in the first years of her Brothers Reformation for the Commissioners attending the Kings Injunctions met in many places with Scorn and Reproach and Railing and the farther they went from London the worse they were handled in somuch that as one of them was pulling down Images in Cornwall was Stabbed by a Priest who tho Hanged in Smithfield which quieted all matters for a time yet the next year the Storm arose more violently than before not only in the Western parts but in a manner all the Kingdom over which great Commotions the Council foreseeing as the most probable consequence of such Alterations especially when they are sudden and pressed too fast did let the People understand that there was no Intention to abolish their Antient Ceremonies which might consist with Piety or the Peace or Prosit of the Nation and therefore the King both by his Proclamation dated in Jan. 1548. commanded a strict observance of Lent and also pursued it by his own observance thereof in his Court by which and other like Innocent complyances did the King make good and established his most happy Reformation and yet is he and his work and his prudent Innocent Complyances evil spoken of by some Boarnarges hot and fiery spirits because forsooth there were some that had a Beam of Light of equal Lustre that would have had it otherwise The most eminent whereof were Bonner Calvin John Alasco and Hooper the very first Anti-Liturgists Pardon I beseech you that I name that Sanguinary Bonner the same day with those Pious Men. John Alâ—sco and Hooper having suffered very much for the truth and Bonner having made the truth highly to suffer and Calvin who setting aside the fondness of his own Brat the Chimera of his own Invention his Church discipline and also his rigid opinions concerning Election and Reprobation now even in this our Age become the Darling arguments of our Atheists or which is as bad of all those that live as it were without God in the World who tho they profess God with their Mouths yet in their Works do deny him was both as wise a Man and as orthodox in points of Doctrine as any as that age did afford and did Write so much yet so it is that the Beam of light which Bonner and his Gang enjoyed led him and his Complices as much to make the Liturgy a Bone of Contention to them in that it took away so much and retained so little as the Beam of Light of the others did make it a Bone of Contention to them because it took away no more and retained so much For Bonner did still suffer sundry Idolatrous private Masses of peculiar Names as the Apostles Mass the Ladies Mass and the like to be daily solemnly sung within certain particular Chappels of St. Paul cloaking them with the Names of the Apostles Communion and our Ladies Communion not once finding any fault therewith until commanded by the Council and that by several Letters 1265. Tho I am far from thinking that any Person or any Reformation can be too pure when God hath commanded us to be Holy as he is Holy and perfect as our Heavenly Father is perfect it can then be but an accursed modesty even next unto Atheism to believe that any Man or any Reformation can have a Nimis of Purity and Piety yet I can no more renounce moderation reason and Prudence in guiding and Governing Church than State Assairs nor yet subscribe unto Calvins Counsel unto Bucer viz. to take heed of his old fault viz. of running a moderate course in his Reformations nor yet his Advice to the Protector Advising him to take away all Ceremonies and to Reform the Church without regard unto peace at home or Correspondency abroad such considerations being only to be had in Civil matters but not in matters of the Church wherein not any thing is to be exacted which is not warranted by the Word and in managing whereof there is not any thing more distastsul in the eyes of God than Worldly Wisdom either in moderating cutting off or going backwards but meerly as we are directed by his Will revealed Ep. ad Protect More particularly for example sake see the ill Fruits and Effects of such Liberty as our Discourser Pleads for being granted unto John Alasco A Polonian born and unto his Congregation of Germans and other Strangers by Edw. 6th about the year 1550. who being persecuted in their own Country for the same Religion which was then here professed fled hither for Succour to whom the King by the Advice of his Council out of great Zeal to the propagation of the true Religion and out of most wonderful Commiserations unto those that were persecuted for the profession and exercise thereof most graciously afforded them Favour Entertainment and Protection and did assign them the West part of the Church then lately belonging unto the Augustine Fryers for their Exercising of Religious Duties and made them a
having no other design herein then to manifest to the World how some kind of Men can take and leave object and refuse at pleasure more I fear to gratifie Humors Parties and Interest then in truth induced thereunto by sound reason Are we bound to these and the like Ceremonies still I say not so but I say that as they are to blame that would oblige us to all Ceremonious Traditions and Practises of Apostles according to the Letter allowing no Church Liberty to swerve therefrom be the Governments or posture of Affairs how different or variable soever So they are to blame and infringers of Church Liberty that will not allow the Church Power to innovate or impose some things in their Judgments necessary and behooful for the better regulating thereof tho there be no express Precept nor Practise of Christ or of his Apostles to Warrant the same Let the Church of God even in the dayes of our Saviour serve us for Example In their Domestical Celebration of the Passover which Supper they divided as it were into two Courses what Scripture did give Command them that between the 1st and the 2d he that was chief should put off the residue of his Garments and keeping on his Feast-Robe only to wash the Feet of them that were with him what Scripture did Command them never to list up their hands unwasht in Prayer unto God which custome Aristaeus de coenatori nuptialio sheweth wherefore they did so religiously observe what Scripture did Command the Jews every Festival day to fast till the sixth hour what Commandment had the Gileadites to erect that Alter which was spoken of in the Book of Joshua what Commandment had the Women of Israel to mourn yearly and lament in the memory of Jephtha's Daughter what Commandment had the Jews to Celebrate their Feast of Dedication never spoken of in the Law yet solemnised even by Christ himself what Commandment had they for the Ceremony of Odours used about the Bodies of the Dead after which Custom Christ was contented that his own precious Body should be Imbalmed In the Church of the Jews is it not granted that That appointment for the hour for daily Sacrifices the building of Synagogues throughout the Land to Pray and Preach in when they came not up to Jerusalem the erecting of Pulpits and Chairs to Preach in the Order of Burial the Rights of Marriage with such like being matters appertaining to the Church yet are not any where prescribed in the Law but were by the Churches discretion instituted The Conclusion § When I Consider through how difficult a Chapter Conclusion through what Contrarieties of Opinions what Contradictions of Men of different Tempers Principles Ends and Interests through how many Enemies both Forreign and Domestick and those of the highest Potency this Reformation did attain its accomplishment I cannot but wonder how any that seemed or thought themselves to have a Beam of Light of equal Lustre c. Should yet to add unto the other difficulties Injicere scrupulum cast in their bones also of Contention by speaking or Writing in derogation of that Reformation and that Liturgy contrary to the very Acts of Parliament made 2 Edw. 6.1 1º Eliz. c. 1. under several penalties which the Wisdom and Zeal to Gods Truth and Glory of that Age was endeavouring to accomplish which could never have been brought to that perfection it was brought unto had not God miraculously Blessed their endeavours by giving them a just ballance and a just weight of all considerations relating both to Church and State and also of moderation For the Parliament conveened in Nov. 1547. consisted of members disagreeing in Religion tho probably they agreed to serve the present time and preserve themselves for tho many both of the Nobility and Gentry stood well affected to the Church of Rome yet consented to all such Acts as were made against it not improbably out of a fear of loosing such Church-Lands and booty as they had got in case that Religion should prevail and get up again and for the rest who were either to make or improve their Fortunes they happily did promote a Reformation for their particular ends and interests § That at the time of Reformation and framing of a Liturgy others besides the Reformers were enlightned with a Beam of Truth of an equal Lustre and Brightness with that which shined in the minds of their Brethren I cannot gainsay nor will deny But by any thing that hath been yet Written it doth not in the least appear that those that then did or since have made the Liturgy a bone of Contention had a more clear beam of Truth in so disparaging that blessed Reformation and Liturgy and therefore more shame for such the Sons of the Church to vilifie and set at nought the Constitution of their Mother who Travailed so long with them and brought them forth with great so very great and exquisite difficulties Probrosa Ales quae Proprium nidum polluit If the Brethren of that Age then had or this Author now hath a new Light a new and clear Beam of Truth it would certainly make evident for the very nature of light is to make manifest 5 Eph. 8.13 But seeing no reasons demonstrative are brought to make good such positions is it not both prudence and duty in us rather to rely on our own Judgments being backt and reinforced with the Judgment of so many Learned Pious Reformers Liturgists that gave Testimony thereunto with their blood and of the Kings Privy Council and also of his great Council of Parliament both of those times and of the succeeding Generations all concurring in the Approbation and Imposition of the Liturgy rather then to follow the Fancy and Opinion of one or of a very few either of that or the Succeeding Ages that pretend indeed more light but in truth have less for ought that hitherto hath been Demonstrated But enough of this Subject I shall only leave all those of the Synagogue of the Libertines seriously to consider if ever such Liberty as is desired by all sorts of men of different perswasions were ever given under any Christian Government and yet if it hath been given if every Sect of them in their several alternate Courses and turns as they have happily got successively the Power and been uppermost have not endeavoured their utmost to depress and keep under all other Sects differing from themselves These things thus premised and well weighed I deem I may conclude without the imputation of much Arrogancy that Christ having Commanded Rem tho not formam Liturgiarum the Subject matter tho not the very Form and Words of our Liturgies that tho neither Christ nor his Apostles did ever Practise or intimate any such thing nor yet the Church of Christ for some Centuries of years next after Christ that they may still be imposed without the least desert of the Scandalous Imputation of being an unwarrantable Abridgment or Infringement of Christian Liberty
or of the Rules which Christ gave to his Pastors and Teachers for the Regular Administration of his Word and Worship or of any spiritual Abilities given or promised to be continued to them for the discharge and performance of the whole Work of the Ministry and will answer the mind of Christ and will much very much conduce unto the main end proposed viz. Edification And that they are but mistaken Averments to affirm that Liturgies or prescribed or limited Forms of Prayer and Praises to be used or Read in the publick Administration of Evangelical Institutions cannot be made use of but by rejection of the Provision made by Christ. And that the Imposition of them doth impose on others the observation of things in the Worship of God which neither the Lord Jesus nor his Apostles did appoint or impose And that all such Imposition is destitute of any Plea or Pretence from Scripture or Antiquity And that Liturgies are an Humane Invention contrary to the mind of Christ I could now wish that this our Author seeing Liturgies do not please would so far have obliged this whole Church and State as to have prescribed us some better and more Adaequate mean for the supplying of the defects of Liturgies and for the more easie and Familiar teaching and keeping our fundamentals pure and clean and for the keeping out of Popery Idolatry Superstition and indeed all kind of Trash and Trumpery that like a Torrent hath overspread this Nation since these dayes of Liberty and decrying Liturgies from Ranters Quakers Adamites Enthusiasts Phanaticks Seekers Antitrinitarians Antisabatarians Famulists and indeed from an Iliad more of others ejusdem farinae 〈…〉 si quid novisti rectius Candidus Imperti si non his utere meâ—um It were done but like a Man in Buss to make here a proud Challenge to all our new and brightest Luminaries to give us any one Machin or Paralel so excellent or equal in all respects to that of Liturgies for the ends mentioned but I forbear and shall only crave Liberty most humbly to recommend unto all parties viz. Prelates Presbiters Independents c. that Admonition which St. Paul gave to the Phillippians which concern these times as much as those wherein he Wrote and the maintainers of true Religion most of all and it were most happy for Christianity if all Christians could in very good earnest embrace it viz. let nothing be done through strife or vain Glory but in lowliness of mind let each esteem other better then themselves 2 c. 3. And that other Precept also of the same Apostle viz. to study to be quiet 1 Thes 4.11 Duties without doubt with all our might to be endeavoured and in no Age or Church more necessary to be pressed and urged then our own abounding with so many busie Spirits and rest-less male-contents Athens it self not more mad upon News and Novelties then our English Nation not only in vain things but in matters of far greater concern our love of change and that Israelitish humor revived in us even in Church Government to be like other Nations Tho we have seen Gods blessing on our Ministery to the envy of Adversaries and admiration of neighbour Churches and have demonstrated our Discipline to suit with the Primitive and Apostolick State of the Church this yet seems wanting that we have not experimented Forreign Formes nor shaped our Alter according to the fashion fetcht us from Damascus 2 King 16.10 11. from Geneva or other Forreign Countries I could wish our Tumultuous and almost mutinous stirrings and Sallies in that kind had not made us a Reproach among Papists and a scandal amongst the Enemies of the Gospel my Prayer to God shall be to settle us in unity of mind and affections that we may speak and think one thing Studying the things that concern Peace and wherewith we may edifie one another 1 Cor. 1.10 I shall now conclude the discourse concerning Liturgies with this observation that in using a Liturgy we have followed all the Churches in the World even the most Antientest of St. Chrysostome and Basil that never any Church in the World but had its set Formes of Prayer especially for the Publick And because our Discourser doth so peremptorily aver f. 3. that there were no Liturgies in the purest times next and nearest to the dayes of the Apostles and that the Fathers never used any All Negatives and which he can never prove I shall here give you a small Catalogue of some few of many Liturgies and Rituals which if the Legitimate Issue of their reputed Fathers then without all doubt and Controversie they were in use in the Apostles dayes and purest times But at worst if but Spurious and Illegitimate yet if such in truth they at least prove their own Antiquity and Universality to be very early and very general because used in divers Countries as appears by the divers Languages they are in viz. Hebrew Greek Latine Arabick Syriack Gothick Aethiopick c. viz. Liturgiae Grecae nomen Preferentes Jacobi Petri Marci Clementis Basilij Chrysostomi Gregorij Rom. Liturgia Ecclesiae Constantinopolitan Novum Anthologium Basilij Anaphora Syriaca Missa Angamallencis Christianorum St. Thomae Graecorum Euchologium Menaea Octoechum Anastasimum Pentecostarium Armenor Liturgia Missa Ambrosiana Liturg. Aegyptia Basilij Gregorij Nazianzini Cyrilli Alexandrini Gregorij Antiphonarium Sacramentarium Officium Muzarabum in Hispania Missale Gothicum Ordo Romanus Antiquus Missa Latina Antiqua Liturgia Ecclesiae Graecae lingua Prosica Officia Arabica Consider 1o. That in the Jewish Church they had set Formes 10 Numb 35 36. Moses prescribed a set Form of Prayer for the going out and coming in of the Ark. 68 Psal 1 2. The Lord prescribes 6 Numb 23. A set Form of Blessing Confession is prescribed every time they offered the Oblation they should use this Form 102 Psal was Penned for an afflicted Soul and 92 the Title 1 Chr. 16.7 2 Chr. 7 6. Christ taught his Prayer twice which is both a Prayer and Form of Prayer when we Pray this Prayer it is a most sure and excellent Comfort to us that we know that what we ask it is according to his Will 1 Joh. 22. 2o. In the Christian Church set Forms were used even in the dayes of Christ and his Apostles Christ gave his Disciples a set Form 6 Mat. 9. he uses a set Form himself 26 Mat. 44. The same Word 3o. He and his Apostles had their Hymn 26 Mat. 30. 4º Such Psalms and Hymns perpetually in the Apostles times and by their Command 3 Collossans 16.5 Eph. 19. 3o. Davids Psalms which contain Prayers Praises Thanksgiving c. which are the matter of all Liturgies have been Read and Sung in the Church in all Ages And our Non-Conformists who deny set Forms did in Olivers time when the Liturgy was taken away Sing Psalms in the Church many of which are Prayers and set Forms both as to the matter and Form 4o. For the
Administration of Sacraments Christ prescribed set Forms which all Christian Churches in all Ages have used and they and we ex precepto Christi bound to use them 28 Mat. 19. Go and Baptize in the name of the Father Son and Holy-Ghost So in the Lords Supper take eat this is my Body c. 5o. Justin Martyr in Apologia pro Christianis expresly tells us that in their publick Assemblies they had 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Common Prayers no Directory and among other things Singing of Psalmes 6o. Missa Latina Antiqua published first by Flac. Illiricus afterwards by Card. Bona was in use in the 6th Century and is the freest from all Popish Errors and Superstition of any extant 7o. the Antient Liturgies of James Chrysostome Ambrose c. have been Interpolated and Corrupted is evident and that they had such Liturgies may be as evident from the Words of Cyril of Jerusalem for the Liturgy of James Chrysostome Ambrose others What more sure or sollid Foundation for the Building up Propagating and Establishing of Religion in these our Kingdoms even amongst those of meanest Capacities could be laid than this already laid in our Liturgy by the Fathers of our Church And yet so perverse and froward have many of her Sons been that they have even scorned to Build thereon which frowardness of theirs together with the Idleness and Insufficiency of other Conformists and Non-Conformists conspiring with the Frozen Zeal of the People and together with the open Prophanation of the Sabbath and not putting the Laws in Execution against open and scandalous sins against which there can be no excuse and countenance given to Sin and Sinners either by Sinful Examples or not discountenancing them and a temporising fearfulness in others and out of a cursed modesty not daring to call Vices by their proper names a shrewd sign as one observes of their Raign and Commonness and that great Persons whom it is not safe nor prudent to anger are Infected therewith have very much prejudiced and impeded the growth and spreading of the purity of Religion and Piety within these Realms and Dominions as well as in others for with what considence can we rebuke others for sins that we are Guilty of our selves or Perswade Invite or draw others to our Church If we cannot agree where and how to lay our Foundations and make superstructures § Of old it was the Imputation of Brownists that our Church held it a Piaculum not to wear a Surplice and a Venial Sin to be a Lewd-lived Minister and many late Ichabods and Coblers of Glocester and naked truths make many heavy Complaints against our Clergy Immerito I hope of Jehosaphat it is said that when he went to plant Religion among the People and to prevent Idolatry he sent Levites abroad into Cities of Judah to teach and instruct the People in the ways of the Lord 2 Chr. 17.8.9 The like have our Kings done by their Laws and Bishops yet if notwithstanding all the care to make Laws against Sin and Sinners none do execute them and to furnish his People with able and Laborious Pastors that may feed them with knowledge and understanding the present store of able well-lived-Conformists serve not may I not in compassion to the Churches necessity and to stop the Mouths of all Jchabods modestly wish the removal of some Injunctions that may be spared without prejudice to pure Faith and Worship and some Connivence granted to those that dissent from the Conformers in Judgment for matters of Circumstance and Ceremony whilst yet they Preach true Doctrine and carry themselves peacibly in the Church The Lord would not have the Canaanites at once cast out least the Wild Beasts should increase upon his People Exod. 23.29 Suffer me then having thus totis viribus asserted Liturgies to Plead for Israelites Scrupulous Conscientious Israelites indeed that it may suffice them to lack Livings and the Churches not be deprived of their pains at least let them help to bear part of the Burthen and draw Water for the People out of the Wells of Salvation let them be as Priscilla and Aquilla and Vrbane to Paul Rom. 16. Helpers in Christ Jesus or as Gaius to John who thought himself bound in duty 3 Joh. 8. To receive him and such like that they might be fellow-helpers to the truth And what inconvenience can insue by such Permission or Connivence I cannot foresee so that they Preach in Publick and that Conformity be still reserved as the Qualification to all Publick Ecclesiastical Prefermonts § In the great differences between the Romanists and the Lutherans which began about the beginning of the 16th Century about 1517. It seemed good to the Emperor about 1532. to settle a Peace of Religion called the Interim which was the first tho very small Liberty of Religion which those that adhered to Luthers Confession called the Augustine obtained by Publick Decree for which the Emperor was reproved at Rome as putting his Sickle as they said into another mans Harvest every Prince being obliged by the strictest Bond of Censures to the extirpation of those that were Condemned by the Pope as Luther and his Adherents were by Leo the 10th and also by the Emperor 1520 1521 wherein they ought to spend their Goods Estates and Lives and the Emperors much more because they do so Solemnly Swear unto it but others Commended the Piety and Wisdom of the Emperor for his so doing thereby securing the Lutherans unto him by granting some small Indulgences to them who were Christians tho dissenting from them in some particulars being tolerable differences lest they might have crossed him in his other great Concernments and Wars They said also that the Maxime so renowned in Rome viz. That it is more meet to Prosecute Hereticks Lutherans then Infidels was well fitted to the Popes Dominion and Meridian but not to the benefit of Christendome Alleadging also that Kingdoms and Principalities ought not to be Governed by the Laws and Interests of Priests who are partial for their own Greatness and Profits but according to the exigence of the Publick good of Church and State which requireth now and then some Connivence and Toleration of some defects Moreover that it was the duty of every Christian Prince to endeavour equally that his Subjects and every Bishop his Flock do maintain the true Faith as also that they observe all the Commandments there being no greater Obligation to punish Hereticks or Dissenters than Fornicators and Drunkards or Swearers which all Nations abhor and make Laws against And the Inconveniences by giving some Indulgences to some that do not defend or hold all our Opinions cannot be great but they may be very great by denying them some convenient Liberties and Priviledges thereby keeping up a considerable Party in Animosity that cannot Religiously Conform to every Minute particular § Let us look a little back and abroad and consider what other States even where the Pope and Inquisition do Domine have done
when differences about Doctrine and Worship have been broached and disorders in Church and State have ensued § About the year 1548. Paul 3. when the Emperor Charles the 5th had by â—is own Authority Published a Reformation of the Clergy which contained about 130 Precepts so just and Equitable that scarce any former Reformation was more exact or less partial without Subtilties or Snares to inâ—rap the unadvised and which might have been acceptable to Rome her self except in a point or two but being made by the Emperor it seemed more insupportable than the Interim which Rome could by no means indure it being a fundamental maxime of that Court that the Seculars of what degree or honesty soever cannot give Laws to the Clergy tho to a good end and because the Pope and his Conclave were not able to endure such an affront or Tyranny as they called it nor yet able to resist it he presently so for humbled himself to Heresie as that he quickly dispatch't Nuncio after Nuncio into Germany first the Bishop of Fano and then the Bishop of Verona and Terentino for his Nuncij with a Bull of large Faculties and Pâ—â—â—â—rs dated the last of August to Pardon and Embrace all to remit some things of the old Discipline giving them faculty fully to absolve in both Courts all secular Persons tho Kings or Princes Regulars Câ—llâ—â—ges and Communities from all Excommunications and Censures even from Temporal Punishments incurred for matter of Heresie tho relapsed 〈◊〉 to diâ—â—ence with Irregularities in what case soever even for Bigamy to restore them to Fame Honour and Dignity to remit every abjuration and Penance due to absolve from Oaths and Homages made and Perjuries committed and to absolve the Regulars from Apostacy giving them Power to wear the Regular Habit under the Habit of a Secular Priest to give leave to every Person tho Ecclesiastick to eat flesh and forbidden Meats in Lent and fasting dayâ—s to moderate the number of Feasts to grant the use of the Chalice indeed any thing rather than to approve of a Reformation made by the Emperor or any Secular Prince tho never so Potent and conducing to the saving of Souls To descant upon the Absurdities and Contradictions of this Bull in taking upon him to restore Kings and Princes to Honours Fame and Dignity to absolve from unlawful Oaths which need none and from just Oaths which no Man can obsolve to absolve the Friars which forsook their Cloysters to wear the Habit covered as if the Kingdom of God did consist in a Colâ—â—r or vestment which not being worn in shew yet it was necessary to have it in secret is not to my purpose but it is observable and remarkable to shew that if Rome her self that proud Imperious Usurper of Powers Omnipotent could so far humble her self even to her Hereticks and Heresies as to dispence with so much of her old Discipline and to grant such Liberties to them rather than to admit of a Reformation made by a Secular Prince may it not suffice England and be Honourable just and becoming her Protestant self to Reform things which are a shame to the Church and a scandal to the People and that having Power over the Goods and Lives of Nonconformists and of Dissenters Hereticks Schismaticks Separatists names not justly applycable either to them or to their Opposites each equally differing one from the other but neither one from the other in Doctrines fundamental but in things indifferent and Ceremonial only which neither Conformists nor yet Non conformists can Infallibly know who Infallibly hath or hath not the truth on their side and therefore ought to bear with each other the stronger with the Infirmities of the weaker not accounting and reviling each other as Enemies but admonishing each other as Brethren those Ignominious separating terms of Schismaticks Separatists c. more properly belonging to Papists who err not in Ceremonials Circumstantials and Superstructures only but in Doctrines Fundamental and therefore may justly separate from such to let them make publick Profession of the same Gospel the same Religion with the Church of England to avoid suspicion by Private Conventicles or Assemblies and to suffer their Consciences to be free and to belong to God and themselves only who desire only to save Souls the most precious thing that ever God Created § About the year 1559. the Duke of Savoy sent one expresly to desire Pope Pius the 4th that by his favour he might make a Colloquy of Religion within his own Dominions to instruct his People of the Vallies who were generally Alienated from the Old Religion of Rome these were a part of those Waldenses who 400 years before forsook the Church of Rome and in regard of their persecutions fled into Polonia Germany Puglia Provence and some of them into the Valleys of Montesenis Lâ—cernia Angrovia Perosa and St. Martin but the Pope answered that he would by no means consent thereunto but offered to send a Legate with Divines to instruct and Authority to absolve his Subjects when Converted yet said withal that he had little hope to Convert them because the Hereticks were obstinate and whatsoever is done to exhort them to acknowledge their fault they expound to be a want of force to Compel them that it cannot be remembred that any good was ever done by moderation and that experience hath taught that the sooner Justice is used and force of Arms when the other is not sufficient so much the better the Success is and if he would proceed to Arms he would send him assistance Your Servant Sir Ghostly Council I wot more becoming a Wolf or an Hireling than a good Shepherd and it is a shrewd sign that he never entred into Christs Sheepfold by the Door which is Christ but climbed up some other way to Steal and to Kill and to Destroy 10 of John 1.10 But the Duke not liking at all the sending of a Legate because it would have provoked his Subjects the more and forced him to have proceeded according to the Interests of others thinking it better to take Arms which the Pope Commended more and promised Assistance wherefore the Duke resolving to make them receive the Catholick Religion rectius Heresy he caused many to be Burned and to be put to death by other means and to be condemned to the Gallies being more especially instigated thereunto by Inquisitor Thomaso Jacamello a Dominican Fryer which strange Persecution forced them * Here note that in the Church of Rome the Popes were the first Preachers of Force and Violence and that St. Dominick was one of the first that Preached the Doctrine of Death and Tortures for Opinions in Religion he was the Founder of the begging Orders of Friers Preachers and therefore in honour of him the Inquisition is intrusted only to the Friers of his Order And if their own Legends speak truth his own Mother the Night before he was born Dreamed that she was brought to Bed of a great
Dog with a fire Brand in his Mouth the signification and application whereof I leave to every Reader to make Only his deportment towards the Albigenses is storied to be rabying against whom he so Preached adeo quidem ut câ—ntum haereticorum millia uh octo Millibus catholicorum fusa intersercta fuisse perhibeantur saith one of him and of those who became Captives 180 were Burnt to Death the first Example that I find in the Church of Rome of putting Dissenting Bretheren to Death Of this order was this precious Inquisitor Jacomello to Arms alleadging for their Justification that Magistrates were set over them by God and themselves for the good and behoof of the Governed and not the Governed Ordained for the Lusts of Magistrates to be destroyed and killed at pleasure that their Condition being desperate they might use Arms in their own Defence and that in their Condition their appeal unto Arms was not so much against the Prince as against the Pope who usurped more Authority than did Dejure belong unto him and did also abuse the Authority of their Prince by subtle and crafty seducements for his own sinister ends Hence there were War all this year and part of the next And the Duke having made more than a years tryal to reduce them by Wars and Punishments being therein assisted with Money from the Pope and at last after many Skirmishes an Appeal being made unto the Lord of Hoasts by a formal pitcht Battel the Duke lost 7000 men slew but 14 of his Enemies and tho he did often recruit his Army yet had he always the worst Therefore the Duke wisely considering that he did thereby only make his Subjects the more Warlike and teach and inure them more Stoutly to Offend him Consume his own Country and VVast his Treasury he resolved to receive them into favour and made an agreement with them 5º Junij in which he pardoned all past faults gave them Liberty of Conscience appointed them places where they might meet gave leave to those that were Fled to return and restitution of Goods to those that were Banished Which Agreement very much distasted the Pope that an Italian Prince who had been Assisted by him and might have more need of him should yet permit Hereticks to Live freely in his Territories and for that the example would be urged by greater Princes when they inclined to permit another Religion whereof he bitterly complained in the Consistory comparing the Ministers of the most Catholick King with the Duke who having about the same time discovered 3000 Lutherans who went out of Cosenza and retired themselves to the Mountains to Live according to their Doctrine did Hang some Burn others and put the rest into the Gallies but the Duke justifying his Cause with such Reasons which the Pope not being able to answer did Acquiesce And are not such Councils such Advisocs greater marks of an Hireling or a Butcher than Obedience to the Pope a true Mark of the Church Appello ad Caesarem Deum Deorum Dominum Dominorum qui non accipit personam neque recipit munus 10 of Deut. 17. § About the same time there were great Troubles and Disorders in France for cause of Religion Multitudes disdaining to see poor Innocent Christians drawn every day to the Stake to be Burned Guilty of nothing but of Zeal to Worship God to keep a more intimate near and dear Communion with their God and to fave their own Souls These Humors were not Purged nor yet allaied neither by Punishments nor Pardons proferred and Proclaimed but that greater Tumults were raised in Province Languedoc and Poicton whether the Preachers of Geneva were called and came willingly by whose Sermons the number of the Protestants did daily increase examples of great fear being always joyned with others of equal boldness for the quieting of which Humors Francis the 2d the 11º Aprilis 1559. intimated a National Synod as a proper Remedy But the same Hireling Pius the 4th as before in the cause of the Duke of Savoy did most severely complain that the King had Pardoned Hereticks and Errors committed against Religion wherein none had Power but himself and that he would not by any means Consent to an Assembly of Prelates either in France or elsewhere for that a National Council of that or of any other Kingdom would be a kind of Schism from the universal Church give bad example to other Nations and make Prelates proud assuming greater Authority with Diminution of his own and that to consent to a National Synod was to consent that the Axe should be laid to the Root of the Papacy and that by consequence it was an Alienation from the Apostolick See As if God had not given to every National Church and State all things necessary to Govern themselves by but that they must all run to Rome and Romish Priests for redress nay this good Shepherd commanded his Nuntio to intimate farther to the King that if he would resolve to compel his Subjects by force that he would assist him with all his Power and Labour that the King of Spain and Princes of Italy should do the like But if he refused to compel his Subjects by force then his Nuntio was to insinuate to him that all the mischief and Poyson came from Geneva that the extirpation of that root would take away great part of the nourishments of the Evils that disquieted his Dominions § Dissentions and Troubles Fears and Jealousies still increasing in France the King maugre all the Popes Arguments and Interests called a great Assembly at Fountain Bleau 21 Aug. 1560. who being Petitioned by the Reformatists desired nothing but a moderation of their cruel Punishments and that they might make publick profession of their Religion to avoid suspition which might arise by Conventicles or private Assemblies John Monluc the Bishop of Valence did therein complain that Provision had not been made against them because the Popes had no other aim but to hold the Princes in Wars and the Princes thinking to suppress the Evil with Racks and Tortures having not attained their desired end nor the Magistrates and Bishops justly performed their Duty the principal Remedy was to fly unto God to assemble Godly Men to find a way to root out the Vices of the Clergy to forbid Infamous and Immodest Songs and instead of them to Command the Singing of Psalms and Holy Hymns in the Vulgar Tongue And farther shewed that they did grievously erre who troubled the Publick with Arms upon pretence of Religion and that their error was as great who Condemned to Death those that adhered to the New Doctrine only for the Opinion of Piety During these disorders Francis the first Dying the 5th of Dec. 1560. and Charles the 9th Aged 10 years Succeeding he more like the good Shepherd than he that Styled himself Pius by the mature advice of his Council after Solemn and great Consultations and deliberations about the Troubles and Disorders in
their desires tho but modest will give the party encouragement to believe that they were deservedly desired nay perhaps that they were enforced which opinion alone tho not true but believed to be so might endanger the quiet State of the Church or at least might be a great abetting to their party and obstinacy and keep others from Assenting and Consenting which say some amongst us ought not to be imposed affirming full Assent and Consent in respect of Veracity to be due not to the Scriptures themselves but as they are expressed in their first Original Tongues which opinion if true yet is it no just objection with us for that full Assent and Consent is not required by the Ast of Parliament establishing our Liturgy to the veracity of every thing contained therein but only to the use of it in general § On the contrary in Ballance to these it is averred that it is a Rule in Christian Actions that as evil is not to be done that good may follow so no good of obligation is to be omitted or forbidden for fear that evil may ensue And that the great Wisdom of Experience both of Elder and more puny dayes hath sufficiently taught Posterity that it is sometimes most necessary for the quiet and welfare both of Church and State to yield to the infirmities and scrupulous imperfections of others and to apply and accommodate themselves to that remedy which tho in rigor is not due yet in prudence and equity is convenient and may with good Conscience be tollerated for all Laws ought to be fitted to times and Persons as they alter and change most assuredly the using of some remission in yielding unto the desires of the People in matters which are de jure positivo or Pontisicio of humane sanction only may conduce to the quiet State of the Church but cannot disturb it what else is the whole Regiment or Brigade of things Adiaphorous wherein truth may be on either side without being dissimular to her self If no liberty allowed what availeth the blotting out the hand Writing of ordinances and the Nailing of it to the Cross 2 Col. 14.20 to what end is the purchase of Christian Liberty St. Paul so often boasts of his Doctrine is that he that eats all things or eateth Herbs only or he that esteems one day above another or he that esteems every day alike may do either to the Lord and Eat or not Eat regard or not regard a day Conform or not Conform use or not use Liturgies all may be done to the Lord and why should we then judge one another in the use or disuse of any of these the Kingdom of God is not Meat nor Drink nor Lawn Sleeves nor Surplice nor Capes nor Miter but Righteousness and Peace and Joy in the Holy Ghost 14. Rom. How many things of an indifferent nature might be tollerated in peace and left to Conscience only were it not for great thoughts of heart or for testy Spirits and had we instead thereof but pure Love and Charity and were it not for some secret Hypocrisie that prompts to be ever judging one another saying stand by thy self come not near me for I am Holyer than thou 65 Isay 5. contrary to the Apostolical precept 14 of Rom. 13. let us not therefore judge one another any more but judge this rather that no Man put a slumbling Block or an occasion to fall in his Brothers way to impose more things as necessary than ever God made or imposed as necessary and that under severities what is it less than to create stumbling Blocks or contrive occasions for our Brethren to stumble and fall by It cannot be expected that all Man and things in a Church should be Gold and Silver and Precious Stones there will be some Wood some Hay some Stubble Wheat and Tares good and bad humane Ordinances must grow till the Harvest it is the Angels Ministery not ours that must sever them I intend not here that Superstitions Idolatry or Popery should be tollerated or countenanced which as it self extirpates all pure Religion and undefiled and all civil Supremacies to boot so it self ought utterly to be destroyed Root and Branch yet not by Fire and Faggot not by Crusadoes and cursed Inquisitions but by wholsome Laws and discountenances and other mild means that likewise which is absolutely evil either against Faith or manners as Popery is no Law can possibly Tollerate that intends not to unlaw it self but those bordering indifferent things whether of some point of Doctrine not fundamental or of Discipline which tho they may be many yet may be held without the violation or interruption of the unity of the Spirit or of the bond of Peace and may be permitted I appeal to their respective Judgments who they think in the day of their Account will rather be justified they that are instrumental to Impose or Command things that may be spared in the Worship of God or they that Conscientiously tho Erroneously cannot submit unto the use of such things tho in their own and true nature but indifferent Who made the Schisme between Rome and us Rome imposing or we refusing § The Counsel tho but of a poor Woman of Abel being sollowed saved the City and may not I tho the least in the Church of the New Testament Pleading thus impartially pro and con Dissenters now also intreat that Dissenting Brethren in point of Liturgies and Ceremonies imposed that seeing Atheism Apostacy and squinting toward Rome and the countenancing of sin and sinners is so much feared by them that they would be well advised how they forsake their Mother in this her necessity and not so wholly indulge and please themselves in their own fancies and opinions and thereby adventure rather to Sacrifice Church and State to Schism War and Ruine than forsake their Humors I counsel no Man to do ought no not in things in different with a doubting Conscience Fearful are the Examples of such as are unresolved yield to Practice Notwithstanding give me leave with a Worthy and Reverend Divine to propound as a matter not unworthy their Consideration and Deliberation whether this should not be a Ministers resolution viz. To lay down his Ministery for nothing for which also he ought not to lay down his Life and whether with Comfort may Ministers especially after their allowing of our Liturgy and Ceremonies at the time of their Ordination and by their several Subscriptions and otherwise having thus put their hands to the Plough look back and leave their Calling rather than use the Liturgy and enjoyned Ceremonies in our Church teaching as she doth and practising Gods pure Worship detesting all Idolatry and Superstition and urging Ceremonies Innocent Ceremonies not for Ornament much less for necessity of Gods Service but for decency order and policy only and as means to testifie Subscription to the Lawful Power of the Magistrate I appeal to your selves do you in good earnest think that Paul who accounted
himself a fool for Christs sake became weak despised endured Hunger Thirst Nakedness Buffeting Fighting with Beasts at Ephesus working with his own hands being defamed and made the silth of the World and the Off-scowring of all things who made himself Servant unto all unto the Jews a Jew to them that are under the Law as under the Law to them that are without Law as without Law to the weak as weak who became all things to all Men that he might by all means save some and all this for the Gospells sake 1 Cor. 4.10 11 12 13. c. 9.19 20 21 22. And that he that rejoyced that Christ was Preached in season and out of season tho out of envy and strife tho not sincerely tho but in pretence not in truth would ever have scrupled to have used the Ceremonies the Innocent Ceremonies of our Church or that he would have silenced himself or looked back rather than have Preached in a Cap and Hood in Lawn Sleeves or Surplice in Cowl or Miter or indeed in any habit tho unbeseeming It were vain so to imagine It is rather to be presumed that he would as in 1 of Phil. 18. have answered what then notwithstanding every way whether in pretence or in truth Christ is Preached and I therein do rejoyce yea and will rejoyce Is it then reasonably to be Imagined that he that gloried that Christ was Preached every way tho out of envy and strife tho not sincerely would not have rejoyced to have him Preached in a Linnen decency or any habit yea tho happily not well beseeming On the other side it were not imprudent nor yet below nor Priest nor Prelate to consider whether Paul so complacent to all tempers and all strengths and infirmities as it is manifest that he was and all to gain Souls would ever have promoted or contributed the least towards the imposing of things not necessary on his Brethren or fellow Labourers I trow not seeing not only he but the Council met at Jerusalem together with the holy Ghost then and there assisting them and greater assistance none on Earth can pretend unto having already declared that to impose things not necessary is burthensom For it seemed good unto the Holy Ghost and to us to lay upon you no greater Burthen than things necessary 15 of Acts 28. and therefore would not do it and his Precept is what you have seen in me that do Phil. 4.8 Take therefore the example of Paul and his Doctrine for your Pattern and consider well your charge and Indelible Character the necessity laid upon you that have put your hands to the Plough by having had hands laid on you and the Wo denounced against you if you look back and silence your selves by your non-conformity unto Liturgy and Ceremonies so Innocent Consider also that your Consciences can have no place here for that it is out of the Ken of Mortals to discover whether real or pretended only and therefore cannot be the least dust in the Ballance to weigh any thing against the solemn and weighty Charge and necessity laid upon you and the Wo denounced against the non-performance of your duty nor yet to weigh any thing against the peace and quiet of Church and State when ever they come in Competition and are involved in such disputes what if all or any of our enjoyned Ceremonies or Habits or Liturgy are needless sinful they can never be proved what if the Worship be as pure without them nay what if the Imposition be sinful which can never be proved neither what do all or any of these concern you the Imposers not you must account for that to their and your Master and must stand or fall according as they have done well or ill therein It is not to be doubted but that some Commands may be sinful and yet the performance of such Commands not so However most assuredly Salvation and Damnation do not depend on things indifferent but the peace or disturbance of a Commonwealth may for the diversity of opinions in such things do more affect publick peace than Religion or Faith salvisical Christian Princes and Magistrates have Consciences and an account to give of them as well as their Subjects and it is their greatest wisdom nay a duty incumbent upon them as to consider the Interests of their Dominions so more especially to consider the Interests of Christianity and Religion in the propagation of the Gospel and in the increase of Godliness the greatest interests of all States and Kingdoms of the World maugre the black mouths of all Atheists to the contrary And it is to be presumed that all Laws are because they ought to be made with such respect and regard I Appeal to your selves is it reasonable that any Generation of Men whether Papists or Protestants Quakers or Phanaticks Jews or Gentiles indeed any kind of Men of any perswasion whatsoever upon pretence of Conscience unto which all mankind without possibility of being confuted may pretend and lay claim as well as they should lege jam constituta be tollerated to disobey it Were not this to take away the obliging part of the Law and in good earnest to make it null and void and to make the Law to obey the Men and not the Men the Law and in the conclusion to destroy all Government and to bring all to Anarchy and confusion § The Lutherans were not all of one mind concerning the aforementioned Interim and therefore some of them about the year 1548. did in part yield to Caesar alleadging for their Justification that the things done by them were indifferent and by consequence that they did not concern their Salvation to reprove or allow to receive or reject them and that it was Lawful nay necessary to suffer some servitude some infringements of Liberty when no impiety was joyned with it and therefore in these the Emperor was to be obeyed which practise I hope our Dissenters will on better thoughts think sit to follow especially considering that in the cause of Religion every subdivision gives many advantages and much strength to our common adversary the Papists it being much more advantagious to the whole Body of the Church that the Members thereof tho infirm and crazy should be still continued members than that they should be utterly rejected or cut off from the Body by any Interdict or Censure of those that bear Rule over them or by any frivolous scruples or frowardness of their own even Members whilst crazy may contribute some strength some advantage to the whole Body but when dismembred they can add no strength to the whole but may diminish and trouble the quiet State of the whole besides cutting off and rejecting often causeth despair and makes desperate but if they be still carryed in the Bosom of the Church and like Lambs in the Arms hereof such gentle means may reclaim them without giving any trouble to the peace of Church or State what if the Abatement of some rigors
do thwart the designs and interest of some that never think they have Domination enough must there not therefore be a slacking of some severities when for want thereof the peace of the Church is thereby endangered Indeed Pope Adrian the 6th in his Letter dated 25 of Nov. 1552. to the Dyet at Noremberg by his Nuntio advised sar otherwise in the cause of Luther exhorting them to proceed unto sharp and fiery Remedies to cut the dead Members from the Body as Antiently was done to Dathan and Abiram to Ananias and Saphira to Jovinian and Vigilantius and as their Predecessors did to John Husse and Jerom of Praghe in the Council of Constance whose example in his esteem they ought to follow He Wrote Letters also almost to all the Princes of the same purport and tenour terming Martin a Phanatick or Frantick Man The same Council did his Nuntio most vehemently reinforce unto them by 7 mighty reasons as he thought mentioned in his instructions But when he endeavoured to give them satisfaction as to Reformation of the Centum gravamina of the scandals and grievances of the Church and Court of Rome Preached against by Luther and spoken against by all the Empire He was then of another mind and then forsooth the Disease being inveterate and multiplyed it was necessary to proceed slowly in the Cure and to begin from things of greater weight to avoid confounding of all by desiring to do all together and the Court of Rome only was to reform them and they were to rest content with promises only so that Centum gravamina were but gently to be touched not to be rooted out no need of quick and sharp Remedies for the extirpating of them but the Dyel well observing that the Nuntio took wrong measures of good and evil only as they had relation to the Profit Honour and Power of the Court of Rome and not to the necessities of Germany and to the advancement of true Religion and Piety and deeming that the conservation of the peace of Church and State ought rather to incite to do the good that is easie to be executed than to support the evil that is hard to be indured they resused to use such Keen Remedies and that for most weighty and urgent reasons § The plain and demonstrative truth and medium is that as whatsoever is absolutely necessary for real advance and propagation of the Gospel or for the Establishing or well Governing of the Church of the New Testament ought strictly to be asserted so about things indifferent or that are of a middle nature between sit and necessary and not absolutely so there ought to be no Strife no Contention no Crusadoes no Inquisitions no unreasonable severities used considering that Non-Assenters are Heirs of the same Common Salvation and who otherwise do agree in the Fundamentals of the same Common Faith in one Kingdom there being no Reasons that the Consciences of Men sound in Doctrine and Holy in Life and Conversation and willing to Conform tho not to every petit Ceremony yet without any scandalous difference should be Rackt and Ensnar'd by Oaths and Subscriptions unto things doubtful not absolutely good nor yet absolutely necessary and without which the Doctrine would be as pure and the Polity as Excellent as now it is Imposition of such severities for such things where Episcopal Government bears Sway seems to me to disparage and debase even that most Excellent Regiment it self as if that could not Subsist or Flourish except the Mouths of some other Learned and Painful Labourers and Husband-men in Gods Vineyard be Sealed up by Wiles and Snares Certainly Episcopal Government stands not upon such Lame Crutches as that the abatement of some few Rigors in things at best but Indifferent should endanger thereby the overthrow thereof it needs not Certainly it needs no such Artifices for its Establishment it being no more for the Support and Honour of Episcopal Government to have Men Preaching the sincere Word of Truth and living accordingly to be silenced and accounted their Opposites Than it is to have some Conformists to assert it with their Tongues and with their Pens and yet be a reproach to it by being Dumb by their Non-residency by their Lives and Conversations or that it is for others to Drink Swear and Prophane to avoid the Name and Censure of being Puritanical or Presbyterian and that they may be reputed Prelatical But be it a great sin in the Governors and Fathers of our Church to be instrumental to stop the Mouths and hinder the use of Gospel Talents in many of the Inferior Pastors upon slight and slender occasions yet it is a greater Crime for such Inferior Pastors to deprive themselves and their Flocks of the same Gospel Priviledges upon the same or like niceties for that they ought to be more unwilling to separate themselves from the Communion of the Church to which they are called by stopping their own Mouths than to be cut off from the Commonwealth wherein they live It is impossible but that Offences must come 17 of Luk. 1.18 of Mat. 7. and therefore it is impossible that all visible Ministerial Churches or the Polity of them should be pure and uncorrupt or that all should be Israel that are of Israel and therefore some unworthiness in Members and some Corruptions in Officers and some Offices in the Church tho not absolutely necessary may with good Conscience be born withal and that some Errors at least in the Discipline and External Rites may be tollerated seeing there may be the Temple of God tho Prophaned A Holy City without a Wall A Field of the Lord tho the Enemy Sow Tares Look back and Consider that the Jewish Church was stained with almost all Enormities of a higher Nature both for Manners and Faith and yet unto the same all Israelites and Jews whatsoever without difference were Compelled by King Josiah and others when the People of God Worshipped the Calf in the Wilderness when they Adored the Brazen Serpent when they served the Gods of Nations when they Bowed themselves to Baal when they Burnt Incense and Sacrificed unto Idols and for which Gods Wrath was Kindled against them and the Prophets justly Condemned them yet there was pure Corn tho mingled with Tares A Church of some sound tho mingled with some unsound Members which will be unto the Harvest untill the end of the World till the Angells the Reapers come and gather the Tares to be Burned with unquencheable Fire Therefore all Parties and Men of different perswasions ought seriously to Consider that the best Men are but Men at the best alike Subject to Passions and Frailties to have their Affections misperswaded and their Judgments misguided some to have knowledge without Zeal others to have Zeal without knowledge that the greatest Clerks are not always the Wisest men and therefore that both they that have and they that have not the truth or best Pollity on their side in Differences and Disputes of
I abhor the thoughts of it as will appear hereafter there being a Vast difference between such a Tolleration of Idolatry Superstition crying sins and therefore absolutely unlawful and a Remission only of some few severities in some Acts Canons and Injunctions which relate only to Formalities that tho in construction of Law may be exacted yet may be dispensed withal without prejudice to sound Doctrine or good Conversation and without which the Worship of God would be as pure and sincere Indeed all Acts Canons and Injunctions whether they relate unto Uniformity or not ought according to their own Nature to be sincere and free from all Traps and Covert designs to exclude any that Profess the same Faith and Worship tho many cannot perhaps thro meer tenderness of Conscience submit to every thing therein enjoyned In Concerns of this Nature Scripture in a more especial manner ought to be the Rule of Resolutions and that abstractly and purely without mixing and bringing with them Interest Usurpation or Artifices of men else what were it but by Edicts to lay Snares in Mispah and spread Nets upon Tabor to use Laws Menaces and subtleties to keep Gods People from his Court and Sanctuary and Confine them to State-Religion and to Walk after the Mode of the Commands of men Those Non-conformists Non-assenters that have received Order which they could not have had but permissu superiorum by the Licence and under the Authority of the King in our Laws expressed For no Man hath Power to give himself either Orders to be a Priest or Institution to a Pastoral Charge but must depend upon another Power who by Acts Canons and Edicts long since published and extant hath directed the qualifications of the Persons to be Ordained the manner and Form how the Persons who ought to Ordain them c. and they could not be ignorant that the Liturgy and enjoyned Ceremonies were by the Imperative Constitutive Government of this Church and State to be Countenanced and used in publick Churches by the Bishops Presbyters and Pastors either they consulted their Consciences when they entered on the Ministery by taking Holy Orders whether they could Comply and Submit unto the whole Frame of Government and Polity of this Church Constituted by Act of Parliament from whom they were to receive Authority and Licence to Exercise their Function Gifts and Talents or they did not If they did not they are inexcusable for entring on so Sacred a Calling Stamped with an Indelible Character so rashly so unadvisedly without perspect or foresight of Consequences and yet if they were so pur-blind as not to see one step before them yet their neglect herein cannot be Pleaded in their Excuse it being their own Fault in Common Justice no Court will permit any man to take Advantage of his own misdemeanors or failings Besides hath not every Minister that hath receiv'd Pastoral Charge twice or thrice if not oftner witnessed his allowance of all and singular the 39 Articles of our Church once at his Ordination before the Bishop then at his Institution into his Benefice before his Ordinary and both these by Subscription under his own hand and afterwards upon his Induction before his own Flock and that by verbal Approbation he hath not only acknowledged in the Church the Power of Ordaining Rites and Ceremonies 20 Articles But he hath after a sort bound himself openly to rebuke such as willingly and purposely break the Traditions and Ceremonies of the Church as Offenders of the Common Order of the Church and Wounders of the Consciences of the weak Brethren and hurters of the Authority of the Magistrate Artic. 34. and is it not enacted 1º Eliz. c. 2. that they shall be punished pro ut in the Act that shall Preach declare or speak any thing in derogation or depraving our Liturgy c. Are not then such Dissenters obliged both in Conscience and by virtue of their own Voluntary Acts and Subscriptions to be constant to their own Hands and Tongues if they would be accounted Faithful in Gods House as was Moses And is it reasonable then to hearken unto such Pleading against their own Voluntary Acts and Subscriptions their own Hands and Tongues Besides quo jure with what Face or Conscience can they expect Temples maintenance protection and all things requisite for their Ministery from that Law and Government that they will not Protect Countenance nor submit unto § Indeed it seems to me an old piece of Conscientiousness if not Impiety to enter the Holy Ministerial Function to day when they are sure without Conformity to be silenced to morrow Besides it is Nicety and Indiscretion to exact an express Rule of Scripture or Faith for the Cross in Baptism for standing at the Creed Kneeling at the Lords Beard for Habits in Divine Service the usual sear-Crows of scrupulous men In these cases consent of the Church or Tradition may suffice so there be no express Law of Command to the contrary He that exacts in these Points as express Rules of Faith or Warrant of Scripture for his Obedience to Ecclesiastical Government as he would or as every man ought to do for adventuring upon Worshipping of Images Invocation of Saints c. doth make his Brain or Fancy the chief Seat of his Religion which should be seated in the Heart and Intitles God to the Fancies and Chymaeraes of their own Brains Thus to disobey the Church in these Cases wherein it hath Authority to Command Obedience is to disobey those Mandates of God which give the Body of the Church Authority to make Laws to Govern it self by in things indifferent neither expresly Forbidden nor expresly Commanded by the Law of God I know the Apostles Rule is let every man be fully persâ—â—ded in his own mind 14 Rom. 5. And this full perswasion or assurance of Faith is in the Cases there mentioned necessary because whatsoever is not of Faith is Sin v. 23. This last Maxim is undoubtedly true and the former Precept most exactly to be observed in such Causes as the Apostle there speaks of that is where the positive Practise unless our Warrant be Authentick in it self and evident to us is very dangerous or deadly whereas on the contrary the forbearance of such Practise is either safe or not prejudicial to our Souls but to our Bodies only or State temporal such Ceremonies as be neither against Faith nor adverse to good manners in the Judgment of St. Austin ep 11.8 go for indifferent and may be Born in Christian Unity without Offence or Confusion If God hath left things indifferent what Authority can make them necessary Let them be so still and their nature not changed by any Injunction and Unity will necessarily ensue Quodam modo it may be true that in Ordination there is something which they receive thereby from God Independent of the King or any Civil Power viz. Authority to Tâ—â—ch Baptize and Administer Sacraments by Virtue of Ordination And â—â— is as true that
latter years Cardinal Bellarmine set forth a Book wherein he is so bold as to labour to make Princes subject to the Pope in Causes Temporal and most impudently dares to treat them all as Hereticks which say that the Prince in Temporal Affairs hath no Superior but God only thereby preferring the Ambitious ends of the Court of Rome before the Publick ends of Gods Holy Truth and of his Vice-gerents He pretends therein to write against Barclay but his main drift and design is to advance the Popes Power to the Zenith and top of omnipotency it self In this Book he treats of nothing but of the Popes Power over Princes wherein it is more than five and twenty times inculcated viz. That when the Pope judgeth a Prince for faults or unfitness unworthy to Govern or that he knows that it is profitable for the Church he may deprive him of his Government And he sundry times affirms therein That when the Pope commands that Obedience be not given to a Prince that is deprived by him that then he is no more a Prince but a private Person Nay he is so bold as to affirm That the Pope if he shall deem it expedient may dispose of all the goods of any Christian whatsoever and all must go for nothing if he only say it is his opinion Nay farther averrs That it is an Article of the Catholick Faith viz. that he is a Heretick that doth not believe the same and all this with strange impudence scarce to be parallel'd This Book was written by Bellarmine presently after the Murther of Henry the Great of France before whose death such Doctrines were but whispered and covertly broached but soon after his death they vomited them out most impudently leading Princes then as it were in Triumph as that they might be Excommunicated by the Pope deprived of their Kingdoms for unskilful Governing weakness of strength or any other cause or ineptitude that His Holiness shall deem just This Book was so offensive to some of the Roman Catholicks themselves not only because of those false Doctrines so broached but because he asserted those Doctrines to be the Doctrines and Faith of the Catholick Church and pronounceth all those that did think otherwise to be temerarious and scandalous Hereticks Parasites of Princes Ethnicks and Publicans Notwithstanding all these bold Averments the wise State of Venice fore-seeing the evil consequences of such Doctrines might follow to the disturbance of the Peace of a Nation they presently forbid the coming in of that Book into their Dominions lest their Subjects thereby should be seduced into the same errors Whoever shall wisely consider that Murder perpetrated by Ravillac 1610. throw the Instigation of the Jesuits and the Decree of the Sorbon clearing themselves and laying all the guilt thereof and of all Assassinating Doctrines and Principles on the Jesuits and shall also consider Anti-cotton's Refutation of Father Cotton a Jesuit and Confessor to the said Henry the Fourth who had highly oblidged him and the Society by giving them his House at La Flesche for a Colledge with 1000 Crowns yearly Pension for Twenty years and had otherwise marvellously obliged them by many favors thereby hoping to secure his Life but all in vain his Declaratory Letter to the Queen and shall also consider the Discourse to the Lords of Parliament at Paris touching the said Murther all manifestly proving the Jesuits to be the Plotters and Actors in that horrible Murther all printed soon after that detestable stroak viz. 1610. and shall also consider that the said Book of Bellarmine was the very same year Printed at Rome under the Popes Nose with an Imprimatur by Fr. Ludovicus Ystelli Magistri Sacri Palatii Apostolici And shall also consider the Popes silence and calmness in all these great concerns may well conclude that if the Pope were not Particeps Criminis yet he seemed to be accessory by his silence and to be content and very well pleased and that there was a right understanding between him and the Jesuits About this time also viz. 1610. as if Hell-hounds had been breaking loose the Jesuits were so insolent fierce and zealous to make His Holiness Almighty on Earth that there being in Rome a very great number above 150 Catchpoles Serjeants or Bayliffs whom they perceiving to be men of dissolute lives of profligated honesty and living very little like Christians the fitter for their turns they designed to erect in their Church a Society of them only pretending to teach them Christian Doctrine and to exercise them in frequent Confessions which the Governor and Court of Rome understanding and suspecting so strict a Practice of the Jesuits with such their Ministers they complained with the Pontiff Wherefore the Bishop of who had advanced them 30000 Crowns in order thereunto being near to death and died soon after then the Apostolick Chamber not approving the Donation took the Money as a Booty and applied it as they thought fit § That Reverence which is due and deservedly given to Religion hath been the cause that many abuses which came under the Vmbrage of that Sacred Canopy have had such easie admittance whereby the evil designs that have lain couchant under that pretence and the true ends of the designers have not appeared until time hath made a discovery when â—â— hath been too late to remedy them without great disturbances The Covetous desire of inlarging Phylacteries Wealth and Authority doth so naturally blind men even Ecclesiasticks that without any respect to plainness and sincerity of Gods own Holy Writ they betake themselves to Cavils only pittiful Blasphemous Cavils Averring that if God doth punish and hath punished Sinners the Pope and Inquisitors his delegates may and ought also to punish them Certainly to say no worse to draw Arguments from the Divine Omnipotency to Humane Authority agrees in no proportion with the Reverence due to the Divine Majesty Nothing more frequent and ordinary than for Judges whose Jurisdictions and Powers are limited by Paramount Authority to seek the enlargement thereof tho by the disabling of the General Jurisdiction as well Civil as Ecclesiastick And this proceedeth as well from the natural Inclination which all men have to command in chief as also from the profit and Grandeur which necessarily attends Soveraignty But if such Ecclesiasticks or others do seek enlargement of their Power beyond their Commission and natural duty the Supream Civil Magistrate is most to blame if he suffer it tho sometimes with good intent and success for that it can never be with Wisdom Therefore if Ecclesiastical persons shall fail in their duties the power will return to that Body who gave it without depriving it self of it Wherefore it is no wonder if the secular person ought to be an Overseer of him that exerciseth a charge which he himself hath given him The old and true Legitimate Romanists for the first 300 years and more whose Faith and Doctrine the Protestants at this day both own and defend
this Life and in that which is to come meer Vassals they and their Subjects likewise in no better condition than the Sheep in Demosthenes where the Dogs were to be banished and the Wolves to be their Guardians for they endeavor to make the World believe that they have power over their Souls and Bodies at their pleasure both in this Life and after Death These have been the Collections and Observations of Fra. Paolo and other learned and faithful Writers and eye-witnesses The best is Ab initio non fuit sie there are no such Doctrines in Bibliis Sacris but the contrary And our Doctrines concerning these points and indeed our Religion is the same which is contained in the Scriptures in General Councils and in the Fathers of the First Three I might say Five Ages which have not been purified in their Purgatory their Indices expurg and agrees with the Articles of Faith and only differs in those which they have lately invented and added which he that examines them one by one shall find that none of them make for the Glory of God but all for the Increase of the Grandeur Wealth worldly Power and Jurisdiction of the Ecclesiastical Order so that in truth the true Roman Religion such as it was in the dayes of the Apostles and some Centuries next succeeding is insensibly but manifestly Bastardized and become spurious at Rome and all reduced to a new fashioned Religion which chiefly if not only makes for the pomp and Interest of the Court of Rome So that in truth these latter Popes are no more nor otherwise the true Possessors or Successors of St. Peter's Doctrines at Rome than the Grand Signior is of the Doctrines of St. James's at Jerusalem or of St. Paul's in those famous Churches of Asia In the dayes of Sixtus Quintus that Great Prince there lived in Italy that famous Alchymist and Impostor Nick-named Mamugna who was verily believed that he could make Gold not by the Vulgar only but by Cardinals Princes nay by the Pope himself One more wise and more merry than the rest habiting himself like this famous Alchymist went up and down the City of Venice in a Gondelo well fraught with a Cargo of fire Bellows Crucible Glasses c. crying Al Magmugna A tre lire il soldo del loro sino who buyes a shillings worth of pure Gold for nine pence which being told the Turkish Chiaus made this short answer Il gran signore dumque verra a servirlo if he can make Gold the Great Turk shall come to be his Servant I shall make no other Application or inference of this Mountebank Story than what is natural qui vult decipi decipiatur if Princes will be content to let false and base Coin go for currant be it so But in truth all the Papalins were not of the same mind and opinions with those famous Cardinals and Jesuits the Popes Partisans nor with the Court of Rome but Books were Printed Pro and Con by Papalins themselves in great numbers For besides the Papalins within the State of Venice the Sorbonists were very Orthodox and maintained the Defence of the lawful Secular Power opposing themselves against the Usurpations of Rome and maintaining the Liberty of the Gallican Church for that Kingdom holds it for a matter most certain and apparent that Popes have no power over Princes and that they ought not to proceed by Censures against them or their Officers in things which concern the State And as soon as the King knew of the publication of the Monitory at Rome he complained greatly of the too hasty proceedings of the Pope and sent a dispatch to him with speed requesting him to accommodate the differences The King of Polonia absolutely denyed the publishing of the Popes Monitory for that it did not stand with reason to govern themselves after another fashion towards that Republick of Venice whose Cause was common with his own Kingdom The Catholick King of Spain on whom the Pope relyed for Succors for that he had sometime before made liberal offers unto His Holiness from which he retreated in time of necessity and advised him to neglect his own private Interests for the universal good of Christendom and said that it did not beseem the Father of all Christendom to ground a War so cruel and pernitious to Christian People upon a King so pious and that His Holiness would abase the Apostolick Dignity if he sustained by humane means the Authority which God had given him Quarrels of Paul the Fifth pag. 374 375 376. Thus you see Rome it self divided the Pope and Court of Rome differing in this their greatest point and Diana Jurisdiction both from the old and from the more Novel Church of Rome as well as from that of the Church of the Protestants And thus you may perceive the unquiet and uncertain State that all Princes are like to be in and their Condition never like to be better whilst such monstrous State-destroying-Principles are held for Gospel at Rome For it matters not whether these Doctrines are true or false or received and believed by others or no nor yet whether Protestants or Papists it is all a case so long as so believed at Rome You see the State of Venice a Popish Republick no more safe nor quiet than England a Protestant Kingdom Had the Popes Swords been keen and powerful enough no doubt but that they would have brought both those States in their respective differences and quarrels as once Frederick Barbarossa the Emperor to that Brute Alexander the Third creeping on their knees to obtain Absolution from their Sentences of Excommunication or as Henry the Fourth whom Hildebrand would not release from his Excommunication till he came bare-foot to Canusium in a bitter cold Winter waiting three dayes before the Popes Palace for his Absolution which he hardly obtained by the Intercession of the Dutchess Matilda The Pope besides that he is the Head of Romish Religion is also a Prince who hath for more than 600 years by past aspired to the Monarchy of all Italy at least I might say at an universal Monarchy Temporal and Spiritual which he hath been some time so near to obtain that it is a wonder that he hath misled of it seeing he leaves no stone unturned quacunque arte to enlarge his Jurisdiction He hath three great charges upon him 1. That of Religion 2. That of Ecclesiastical affairs 3. The Temporalty of his Estate The care of all which I shall not grudge him as of right belonging unto him in one or other of his Capacities so he kept within his own Dominions and Territories tho happily all of the Romish Religion will not allow him so much for that all Bishops ought to be governed by the Canons and in which both Pope and all Bishops antiently in the best and purest dayes did acknowledge the Supream power to be to which they all submitted and not by the Pope alone there being also three kinds of
own Sabbath were ordained for men and not men for the Sabbath nor yet for Popes that what Powers soever of Right belongs unto them they are given unto them for the good and benefit of Christians and not to Tyrannize or Lord it over Gods Heritage 2. That God hath not given unto Popes any greater Authority in the Government of their Dominions whether of Church or State than unto other Princes and Bishops to whom God hath also confirmed and ratified all Power that is necessary for the good of the Governed And as it appertaineth not to other Emperors and Kings to govern Romish Church or State so it doth as little appertain to Popes to Govern either Church or State of other Kingdoms 3. That no people were or ever will be contented with a Government which tends more to the benefit grandeur pomp and pride of life of those that Govern than to the good and comfort of those that are governed it being the natural and fundamental right of the governed to apply and devolve as much of their own power without divesting themselves thereof as they please to one or more Persons subject nevertheless to the trusts reposed in them to be alwayes imployed and improved to the behoof and benefit of the governed 4. That all people do with some contentedness endure a reasonable Bond but from an excessive one every one doth naturally endeavor by all means tho indirect to free themselves The Antient History of Nodus Gordianus which because Alexander could not unty he cut in pieces whereby Oraculi sortem vel elusit vel imâ—â—evit is applicable to all Humane tyes and Obligations not excepting Governments Ecclesiastick or Civil which if of such a Nature that those that are unjustly or too hard bound may free themselves by ordinary way of Justice then they are endured with some patience But if there be no ordinary means to relieve themselves then they ever have had and I fear ever will have recourse to means extraordinary tho Indirect as Seditions and the like Wherefore it is undoubtedly doing God the best Service to keep every Government within its due bounds which is absolutely necessary for the preserving and propagating of Religion and for keeping the State in quiet temperament and that to grant Ecclesiasticks exorbitant Authority thinking it to be a favoring of Religion as heretofore they did perswade some Emperors with design to get their power into their own hands is an undiscreet Zeal prone to end in the dishonour of God damage of Religion and in publick confusion As God himself without respect to Persons made the Earth by his Power established the World by his Wisdom stretched out the Heavens by his understanding Jer. 51.15 so he never made Kingdoms and Nations for Popes or Princes but both the one and the other for the Comfort and Solace of the governed Think you that if his Vicars or Ambassadors or Vice Royes govern otherwise than according to his own Rules and Precepts who will measure all by his own Line and righteousness by his own Plummet that they shall go unpunished I tell you nay but except they repent they shall all likewise perish His Holiness himself not excepted according unto Jer. 23.1 2. Wo to the Pastors that destroy and scatter the Sheep of my Pasture Therefore thus saith the Lord ye have scattered my Flocks and driven them away and have not visited them behold I will visit upon you the evil of your doings I say again is it reasonable to believe that ever God who created light and darkness Heaven and Earth the Sea and all things that are therein and created and formed all Mankind in general a little lower than the Angels out of one and the same Clay in his own likeness and after his own Image without respect to these or those Persons Popes or others and gave unto Mankind in General Dominion over the Fish of the Sea and over the Foul of the Air and over the Cattel and over all the Earth and over every living thing that moveth upon the Earth and all this for the good and comfort of all men in general should yet subject all Mankind Emperors Kings and Temporal Princes not excepted to the will and pleasure of one Pope or one Vicar or one Ambassador or one Vice-Roy as Vniversal Monarch to be governed and guided by the Will and pleasure of these men because they stile themselves Gods Vicars nay Gods on Earth whereby one Mans will may become all mens misery No! God made all Governors in the World for the good and happiness of the governed and not the governed to be subject to the Will Lusts and Pleasures of the Governors he never gave Precepts nor Commands relating to Government and Governors but what conduced to the good of the governed and alwayes rebuked and punished all such Governors as well those that he anointed and set up himself as severely as those whom the People did choose that walked and governed contrary to his Rules and Precepts Did God think you send his own Son out of his own bosom to take on him the form of a Servant and was made in the likeness of men and being found in fashion as a man humble himself and became obedient to that shameful death the death of the Cross for us Men and our Salvation in General And can we then be so sottish as to believe that all Mankind were made to be Slaves and Vassals unto one Compito one Vicar General made Governor by themselves by delegating their own Power without divesting themselves thereof upon this or that man for their own good and benefit and for the better Government of their whole body either explicitely or implicitely alwayes implyed and alwayes so to be understood undoubtedly all Governors in the World whether Ecclesiastick or Civil be their Power what it will never so absolute never so Arbitrary yet by the Law of God they ought to govern no otherwise than Christ himself would govern were he come in glory to Reign on Earth and to square their Actions according to the Dictates and Laws of God delivered unto us by the Prophets and Apostles And tho so to govern be a happiness and a favour indeed unto the Subjects yet it is an absolute duty unto God and Man and of which he will certainly one day exact an Account The reason is demonstrable for that no man living Paternal Government excepted nor any number of men whatsoever can have any compleat lawful Authority over any Politick Society of men but he must have it either by consent of Parties or immediate appointment of God Hooker 70. Notwithstanding this natural right of publick Societies I appeal to all Story if ever it were Recorded that ever any Pope quitted his pretensions to his Supremacy or to his pretended power over any Temporal Prince that was at variance with him since the day that they first took them up unless he were Cudgelled into better manners and better obedience
Bellarmine doth this Proposition viz. that the Pope may judge of all sins they are forced to except the greater part of particular sins Besides a Prince may sin by breaking his own Laws as the same St. Thomas proves 1.2 quaest 96. Art 5. yet of this sin he cannot be judged of any but God alone as Cajetane in that place declareth shewing that in foro Poenitentiae and in the sight of God is all one in sence Certes to affirm that a Prince transgressing his own Laws should be therein subject to the Censures of the Pope were wholly to take away the Power and Authority of Princes And to affirm that he should be subject to them in other Crimes and not in that were to overthrow the very ground of the reason presupposed in that infamous Chapter Novit Moreover it is very necessary well to observe the very words of Innocent the Third Intendimus decernere de peccato cujus ad nos pertinet sine dubitatione Censura quam in quemlibet exercere possumus debemus And a little after Ad officium nostrum spectat de quocunque peccato mortali corripere quemlibet Christianum which Bellarmine Translates le tutti di Principi del mundo All the Princes of the World by which it is plain he had more than an ordinary Pique at Kings and Princes Now if he be bound by the duty of his place quia potestas nostra non est ex homine sed ex Deo to denounce censures against every mortal sin and against every Christian so offending surely if he do it not he sins and endangers damnation to himself And yet we do not find that the Pope sends out any Censures against the Curtizans the Concubines of Priests and profest Harlots who yet abide and persist notoriously in their sins Besides if by quemlibet Christianum be understood all the Princes of the World as Bellarmine hath rendred it it belongs to him to Excommunicate the Turk the King of Persia the Tartar cum multis aliis And St. Peter's Successor must accuse St. Paul of false Doctrine who said 1 Cor. 1.5.12 quid mihi de his qui foris sunt judicare what have I to do to Judge them that are without § I have insisted the longer on this Chapter Novit because it was designed purposely under pretence of favor to make an Ass of England and her King it being made use of to that very end and also against the French King as appears by the Story And trow you Contrives she not Complots she not at this very day to make England once more to carry the Saddle If ever the like Fate betides us or if ever it be again the Stile of England I cannot say less than Not the Pope only but the Devil rides us § His next recourse is unto another Buckram Decretal Extravagant Vnam Sanctam examined rightly stiled Extravagant called unam Sanctam I must confess I could wish that before he had made any use thereof that he had first reconciled it with another of Pope Clement the Fifth who succeeded him not long after which begins thus Meruit de privilegiis cap. 2. extravag com where Clement saith that he determineth and declareth that by the said Extravagant Vnam Sanctam Meruit charissimi filil nostri Philippi Regis Francorum Illustris sincerae affectionis ad nos Ecclesiam Rom. integritas progenitorum suorum praeclara merita meruerunt Meruit insuper Regnicolarum puritas ac devotionis sinceritas ut tam regem quam regnum favore benevolo prosequamur Hinc est quod nos Regi Regno per definitionem declarationâ—m banae memoriae Bonisacii Papae Octavi Praedecessoris viri quae incipit Unam Sanctam Nullum volumus vel Intendimus praejudicium generari nec quo id per illam Rex Regnum Regnicolae praelibati amplius Ecclesiae sint subjecti Romanae quam antea existebant sed omnia intelligantur in eodem esse statu quo erant ante definitionem praefaram tam quantum ad Ecclesiam quam etiam ad Regem Regnum Regnieolas superius nominatos there shall be no prejudice or injury done to the King and Kingdom of France nor that the said King and Kingdom shall be any more or otherwise subject to the Church of Rome than they were before but that all things shall continue in the State they were in before that Extravagant Now it had not been unworthy so great an Ecclesiastick as my Lord Cardinal Bellarmine was to have dealt so ingenuously as to have declared whether Boniface in this Extravagant Vnam Sanctam did make a Declaration of Jus Divinum in this point i.e. expound and declare that Jurisdiction which the Pope hath de Jure Divino over Princes or whether he did thereby impose a new subjection over Princes in some matters wherein God had not made them subject before unto the Popes Be it which His Eminency pleaseth it will avail him nought if Boniface meant the latter then it was an Innovation after the year 1294. A meer Extravagant after English Construction a void Decree an Vsurpation an Incroachment and an abuse of the Power given them by God by enlarging it beyond its just bounds Besides by what reason Scriptural or other could Clement declare or mean that France alone should be exempted from that Extravagant and not all other Princes and Kingdoms Neither was it a matter or favor to be yielded as in recompence of the good deserts of that King and Kingdom but a thing due unto them of right and Justice Now if Boniface intended it as a Declaration of Jus Divinum it were worthy our knowledge to know by what right Clement could free the King and Kingdom of France from that subjection which God had appointed them unto the case being very clear according to their own Doctrine that the Pope cannot exempt any man from his own Power and Jurisdiction which he holds de Jure Divino so it undeniably follows that if Boniface were in the right Clement was in the wrong and è contra Pope against Pope no news at all Besides that which Boniface saith in that Extravagant viz. si deviat terrena potestas judicabitur à potestate spirituali that the Authority Temporal when it erreth ought to be corrected and rectified by the Spiritual be a Declaration of the Law of God yet then according to as wise honest and learned of your own Fraternity as ever writ in your defence it ought to be understood only for so much as concerns the Salvation of their Souls and that only in foro Dei and Abstract from all Temporal Power of that kind which the Lawyers term Coactive and that all the Ecclesiastical Power over Princes is therefore only Spiritual And herein we shall not need to have recourse to Signior Papa our Lord the Pope for that this kind of Authority is in every Bishop and Priest how Heretical soever it be esteemed by some
others very likely persons in whom the Spirit of the living God should dwell Silvester the Second Gregory the Seventh Poysoners and otherwise Murderers of all that stood in their way to the Popedom One Hildebrand in Thirteen years thus Devilishly made away Clement the Seventh Damasus the Second Leo the Ninth Benedict the Tenth Nicholas the Second Alexander the Second Prophane even to horror Hildebrand angry at his breaden God as before Luxurious to Incest Sodomy Bestiality John the Twelfth gave Orders in his Stable amongst his Horses abused his Fathers Concubine made his Palace a Stews put out his Ghostly Fathers Eyes Gelded one of his Cardinals drank Healths to the Devil ran about in Armes to Fire Houses and at Dice called for help of Jupiter and Venus and good reason for Jupiter's Dice alwayes ran luckily But why rake we in this Dunghil when Bellarmine who thus pleads for such Divine Attributes to belong to Popes without any Inconvenience confesseth these and many others amongst Popes to have been so tainted as Stories describe them and that of Fifty Popes together there was not one virtuous person very probable persons indeed and very likely above all other Priests and Bishops to be endued with power from on high to remove all Impediments which the World or the Devil can lay in the way with all their Subtilty men of such might are they Alack Alack they have no more such power than the rest of their Neighbors mortal weights all subject to passions and Infirmities Preces Lachrymae the only such means and Authority one or the other have and the Popes themselves have as much need of our Prayers as we of theirs the true Doctrine hereof is that God hath not only not given the Pope Authority to remove all Impediments which the World or the Devil can lay in the way with all their Subtilty but hath thought it fit for the good of his Church and his own glory to permit many of them quorsum tunc whither then tend all those struglings even to enlarge that power which God hath given to this High Priest beyond its just bounds within which God hath limited and restrained it the pest and bane of all peace and good Government in the World both in Church and State Bellarmine will not yet acquiesce but will make Scripture speak for him whilst he saith that whoso fears not Gods Vicar fears not God himself because he hath said to his Vicars he which heareth you heareth me Luke 10.16 Now Bellarmine could not be ignorant of the whole Scope of that Chapter where there is not the least mention of any Vicars or Supream Bishops but of the Preachers of Gods word who if they shall preach purely the Doctrine of Christ without humane erroneous mixtures who so heareth them heareth Christ and he that despisesh them despiseth Christ Luke 10. but if they Preach any other Gospel let them be accursed not hearkned unto not obeyed Gal. 1.8 for Christ appointed other seventy in the same Chapter that they should go before him into all places whether he was to go and he teacheth them how they should go and what they should Preach and what they should do when they were not received nor hearkned unto and in the conclusion of all he adds he which heareth you heareth me whereby it is plainly apparent not to School-men and great Clerks only but unto every indifferent understanding that Christ speaketh here as a Preacher to all other Preachers and so not exclusive the Pope of Rome Quatenus a Bishop but that Impropriety of Speech is not to be allowed as to say Christ saith to his Vicars he which heareth you heareth me For it will not follow as Bellarmine would have it that who so fears not God's Vicars fears not God himself because he saith to his Vicars he which heareth you c. As if to say that indiscreet and unrighteous commands and censures are not to be feared were as much as to say that God is not to be feared nor his Vicar and that he that will fear God must stand bound to subject himself even to the Indiscretion and errors of Prelates to whom God hath given no power at all farther than it shall be accompanied with discretion and be suitable and agreeing to his own just commands thus to Traverse plain Texts of Scripture and prevaricate with them proceedeth it not from minds corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ What is it less than to Preach another Jesus another Spirit another Gospel than whatever Christ or his Apostles did teach or deliver Is not this to make lyes their refuge and under falshood to hide themselves Gerson in the same Treatise Che quando il Prelato abusa la potesta della chiaui piu sprezza egli lechiaui piu gravemente pecca che non fa il suddito quando non obedisce al suo Praelato di qui si raccoglie che sia opera meritoria in simili casi resistere in faccia al Prelato come fece san Paolo à Pietro that when a Prelate abuseth the power of the Keys he doth more disparage the Keys and offends more grievously than doth any Man subject to his Jurisdiction when he obeyeth not his Prelate and hence it is gathered that it is a meritorious work in such like to resist the Prelate to his face as Paul did Peter Bellarmine on the other side saith Che la dottrina del Gersone pare poco sicura mene fundato le consideriamo solamente l'usar male la potesta il non valere obedire alla potesta maggiore peccato è non volere obedire che usar male la potesta perche chi usar male la potesta sa un peccato al' ingiustitia offende un huomo suo suddito ma chi non uuole obbedire al Prelato che giustamente comande dispregia la sua scommunica sa un peccato di rebelliâ—ne ossende la divina maestia nel suo vicario cosi disse Christo qui vos spernit me spernit Lue. 10.16 Apostolo nella 1 Thess 4.8 qui haec spernit non hominem spernit sed deum questo dispregiare Dio nel suo Vicario st chiama da Samuel Proseta nel 1. Samuel 15.22 23. una sorte d' Idolatriae that Gerson's Doctrine seems scarcely safe and less grounded and if we shall simply consider the misusing of this power and the disobeying of this power it is a greater sin willfully not to obey than it is to use this power amiss because he that abuseth this power commits but a sin of Injustice and offends a man subject to him but he that will not obey the Prelate that commands justly and despiseth his Excommunication commits a sin of Rebellion and offends God's Divine Majesty in his Vicar and so saith Christ He which despiseth you despiseth me Luke 10.16 and the Apostle Thess 4.8 qui haec spernit non hominem spernit sed Deum he
all these horrid Acts and Doctrines whereby it is manifest what influences they have upon Princes when once admitted to be their Consessors Deus Bone To what an incredible prodigious excess of wickedness are these men arrived unto and which is yet more detestable and formidable they are Implacable Incorrigible Indefatigable and persevering in their King-killing Principles and designs tho all Nations as well Papal as other abhor them make Laws against them nay banish them erect Pillars with Inscriptions to their perpetual Infamy to which bear witness the Parisians Almaignes Hungarians Venetians as unworthy to live under any honest Laws or any Civil Government and by express Decrees determined never to recall them and yet prevail they do and so they furiously drive on as if they designed to make Treason to stand in the first rank of Christian virtues and Marthering of Princes to be esteemed the fairest and shortest way to Heaven without ever coming to Purgatory To which purpose have they not Written Books â—râ—â—ted Schools wherein they teach the Method and manner of King-killing and reduced this horrid practice into an Art yea into a Kabala of that old Mahumetan of the Mountain of Saracen Progeny and Race of Moors used to confirm and resolve those that are his to kill Christian Princes in the Holy Land § These things in good earnest considered it is no time to Court compliance with or plead for Indulgence for them who will allow none to others but to abandon them and their Errors Superstitions Idolatries Deeds of darkness owned and justified by those men of sin the Sons of Perdition who oppose and exalt themselves above all that is called God or that is worshipped so that they as God sit in the Temple of God St. Peter's Chair shewing themselves that they are God Infallible working after the manner of Sathan with all power and signs and Lying Wonders Opt. Max. supr numen in terris with all deceivableness of unrighteousness and will not receive the love of the truth that they might be saved but have brought in damnable Heresies and boast themselves of Idols and take pleasure in unrighteousness 2 Thess 2 3 4. c. Mentior If I do not believe that so many demonstrable Characters of St. Paâ—l's men of sin Sons of Perdition can be so justly fastned on an Church in the World as on Rome's Church if they can then write that Church Antichristian and let Rome stand Candidate for Saint-ship Shall we then be Wheedled into Compliance and to trick it with Rome by a Jesuitical slight of contriving differences and enmity between Papists and Papists Divide impera distinguishing the Court of Rome from the Church of Rome between true Catholicks and State Catholicks i. e. the Jesuits from the rest of the Orders i. e. from all other Papists God forbid Can they be more divided than they are Or is there ever a Barrel better Herring of them Can there be greater enmity than there is already between the Jansenists and the Molinists between the Jacobins and the Jesuits between the Dominicans and Franciscans and indeed between the Jesuits and all their other Orders But to pass by all their differences of another nature between them let us bring it home in particular to our own doors and to our own concerns When Mary afterwards Queen of England desired of her Brother Edward the Sixth to have the free use of the Mass in her Family alledging her conscience that her House was her Flock c. The King by his Council answered that she should have her House or Flock but not exempt from the Kings Laws and Orders Religion Law and Reason forbidding it Policy abhorring it and Her Grace may not require it If we come to Queen Elizabeths dayes did not Herring-men in her dayes complain and bitterly rail against Fisher-men Clodius accuset Maechos Catilina Cethegum Be their differences and enmities one towards another in all other things what they will yet in this they all consent and agree and that by most solemn Oaths to set up their Lord God their Pope and to Plot and contrive the ruine and destruction of Protestants and Protestant Kings and Kingdoms quacunque arte Was ever more bitterness exprest by Tongue and Pen than was in her dayes exprest by the one against the other Jesuits against Seculars and Regulars and they against Jesuits and yet all plotted against the Queen and her Religion even whilst most highly courted by the writings both of the one and the other magnifying her Clemency and justifying her proceedings But the Queen and her Council would not be so wheedled but wisely considering that long before Jesuitism was spawned the Papists did universally incline and take part with the Popes against their Temporal Princes and therefore would not conside in them but banished both the one and the other and by wholsome Laws inflicting moderate punishments and Mulcts provided for their own safety against the one and the other And it is observable that some of those very Seculars viz. Watson and Clark that magnified the Queen to the skies in their Books were the very first that came to the Gallows for Treason against her and it is farther observed by the Lord Burleigh that tho the Seculars railed most bitterly against the Jesuits yet they never discovered any one Treason against her tho scarce four years passed all her Reign without a Treason Did not King James declare to his Parliament V. His works p. 494 495. May 19. 1603. that the Pope did not only claim to be Spiritual Head of all Christians but also to have an Imperial civil power over all Kings and Emperors dethroning and decrowning Princes with his Foot at pleasure c. And farther to clear himself before his Privy Council and Nobles in the Star-Chamber from favouring of Popery solemnly pray that before any of his Issue should maintain any other Religion than what he truly professed and maintained that God would take them out of the World V. Sir Geo. Crock's Report Part 2. Ter. 2. Jacobi Regis in Banco Regis And good reason King James had to be steady to Protestanism for in the very life time of Queen Elizabeth the common voice among the Jesuits was that if King James would turn Catholick they would follow him but if not they would all dye against him Watson Quodlibets p. 150. and Clement the Eighth by two Breves endeavored to exclude him from this Crown unless he would take an Oath to promote the Roman Catholick Interest And in a Book dedicated to Essex under the Counterfeit name of Dolman in which Book despising the right of Birth it is projected that the Antient Laws of the Land concerning Hereditary Succession to the Crown of England are to be altered that new Laws are to be brought in concerning Election that no man but a Roman Catholick of what blood soever they be is to be admitted King Are not now the same Principles as much
in vogue and as prevalent amongst them as ever And is it now time a day to plead for favors connivences and Indulgences for such a Generation of such Hellish-minded and Principled men after so many more fresh diabolical contrivances and plottings now in agitation against King and Kingdom Laws Liberties Religion what not And suffer our selves to be wheedled into compliance and association with them upon what C. H. H. and E. C. write or what Rome dreads men famous indeed in their Generation the one for Antient Noble Birth the other for plotting his own and the King and Kingdoms ruine but he was snared by the work of his own hands and in the Net that he made was his own foot taken and so let all the implacable and irreconcileable Enemies of God and the King be snared Very pretty a very fine whim to make all England as very Mungril-Christians as Rome it self like those of Samaria who feared God yet served Idols and like those of Israel who swear by the Lord and Melcom their right hand of Fellowship being but the right hand of falsehood Psalm 144.8 11. that they may be snares and traps unto us Is this the way for the Sons of God to purifie themselves even â—s he is pure and to be perfect as our Heavenly Father is perfect 1 John 3.3 Is it not rather to toss us to and fro like Children and to carry us about with every wind of Doctrine by the slight of men and cunning craftiness whereby they lye in wait to deceive Eph. c. 14. is it not rather to pervert the right wayes of the Lord and to invite us to joyn in Abominations with other men Is this the right way and method to hold the Mystery of Faith 〈…〉 consciences And to keep our selves unspotted of the world 1 Tim. â— â— 2 James 15 16 17. and pure by not pertaking of other mens sins 2 Timothy 5.22 Whence is this wisdom which is not pure but Sensual Earthly Devillish No better than Jeroboam's Politick device of setting up two Calves in Dan and Bethel The narrow rules of the Apostles viz. to abstain from all 〈◊〉 of evel to resist unto blood striving against sin will not allow 〈◊〉 dâ—â—bing with such untempered Morter 〈◊〉 the ill consequences and fruits of this wisdom this Politick 〈…〉 First We hazzard our selves and Posterity to Infection 〈…〉 5 6 13. A little Leaven leaveneth the whole lump 2. Unto the â—â—ath of God Come out of her my People that ye be not partakers of her â—â—ns and that ye receive not of her Plagues Apoc. 18.4 3. We hazard and encourage even the Papalins themselves to obstinate Impiety 4. We blemish our own sincerity and heavenly-mindedness 5. Quantum in nobis we encourage others to the like Linsey-wolsey-medly-mongril-worship Saints of old were more scrupulous more wary David would not sit with vain Persons neither would he go in with Dissemblers but hated the Congregation of evil doers and would not sit with the wicked Psalm 26.4 5. so Jeremy sate not in the Assembly of Mockers nor rejoyced Jer. 15.17 The Lord himself commanded that if any Person Son Brother Daughter the Wife of thy bosom or thy Friend which is as thy own soul shall intice to Idolatry as by sad experience we know they dayly do Importunately Indefatigably or any City shall set up a new Worship the one shall he killed the other destroyed Deut. 13.6.9.13.15 and the undoubted Precept is to separate the pretious from the vile and let them return unto thee but return thou not to them Jer. 15.19 the Gospel confirms the same is it possible that righteousness can have Fellowship with unrighteousness or that light should have communion with darkness Or can Christ have concord with Belial Or can the Temple of God have Agreement with Idols 2 Cor. 6.15 which Temple we are wherefore come out from among them and be separate v. 16.17 And in truth what is it less or other than to have Fellowship with Devils 1 Cor. 10.20 David expelled not courted the Idolatrous Jebusites out of Jerusalem 2 Sam. 5.8 Asa put Maacha his Mother from her Regiment because she was an Idolatress and brake down her Idols 2 Chron. 15.16 the Law was Thou shalt make no Covenant with them nor with their Gods they shall not dwell in thy Land lest they make thee sin against me Exod. 23.32 33. Deut. 7.2 3 4. Where Gods Ark is there Dagon shall be thrust out of his place and fall down before it Sam. 1.5 To Conclude this point having treated more fully of this Subject elsewhere Have we not had above an hundred years experience of their incessant evil Machinations and deportments towards us and our Religion Have they ever been quiet Was Queen Elizabeth ever five years without a design against her Life Was King James free from their Conspiracies either here or in Scotland Do they not boast at this very day that notwithstanding all that hath been done discovered and executed that still their Plot drives on and boast that it is so deeply laid that it cannot be discovered nor prevented Besides what security can they possibly give for their peaceable deportment They are Devotees sworn to another Forreign Head and Oaths made to us are not of any force to oblige them according to their own Maxim Nulla Fides servanda cum Haereticis and therefore we have no reason to confide in them but to secure our selves Do they not compass Sea and Land and dayly pervert the right wayes of the Lord by making divers Proselytes and them thereby two fold more the Children of Hell than they were before Have they changed their Principles Or are their Contrivances and Plottings against Church and State even at this very day less numerous or less dangerous than at any time heretofore Can we be so blind as not to see not to perceive that they are playing their old Games over again and that they will Iterate and Reiterate them again and again as from Age to Age they have hitherto successively done And is it not then profound reason of State in us and pure Religion to boot to give this Crudele genus these unreasonable blood-thirsty men more Countenance more freedom more power amongst us by nourishing them in our bosoms qui vult decipi decipiatur my Prayer shall be from this ill kind of men Libera nos Domine and I do not doubt but that all true and sincere English Protestants having Souls Bodies and Estates to save loving God their King and their Country will think themselves highly oblidged by all these obligations and Tenures to the best of their power and knowledge to maintain the true Protestant Established Religion which stands Diametrically opposite to all the forementioned abominable Errors and will not hazard their Temporal Estates much less the Eternal wellfare of their immortal Souls by a sinful compliance and Kings and Princes least of all for that there is no Prince nor Nation that
his Cause that he prohibited a Treatise of Gerson's that had been printed above 100 years before and many other Books by Name then printed and all other Writings which should be made against his Interdict against the Venetians O! much many ways First It had the Fate of all such dishonourable and disingenuous Practices Effects contrary to expectation viz. that the most understanding persons did from such a practice conclude that Reason could not stand nor be on their side who would not suffer the Reasons on both sides to be made manifest and come to the Lydius lapis the Test of right Reason It was also judged marvellous strange that all Writings which might be made were prohibited which was to prejudge before they knew or could understand as if endued with the Spirit of Pithon or of Prophecy they did foresee that men could write nothing on their side that could abide the touch or the light or else that they were such Plenipotentiaries as that they had full Authority to extinguish indifferently the good with the evil Preposterous ways and therefore that wise Republick deem'd it more for their honour and justification and advantage not to imitate his Holiness nor the Advisoes of his sacred Conclave in that which they reprehended in them and therefore they permitted to print and read who would that thereby appealing unto all the World all the World might see on their part that nothing was palliated or disguised and that they did not distrust the judgment of the Universe on what they had done and this was done like a State full of Gravity and full of Wisdom Full contrary did those magnificent Cardinals Bellarmine Baronius and Colonna act whilst they imployed all their Wits and Learning not only to blot out those Hand-writings that were and would have made against them but by pitiful Sophistry and Querks to raise a dust or mist in the minds of their Readers by their own Writings to disguise and obscure the Truth that it might not be discovered nor ever come clearly to the Test and what honour they atchieved thereby Historians are full and such Fates commonly attend such pitiful Policies and Practices The truth is every Government is or ought to be such as to be above all little dirty Intrigues and this is no great one Nitimur in vetitum Books like Poma Adami the more forbidden the more desired it being ever suspected in such Cases that some Truths lye therein hidden which if discovered would fly in the faces of such Opponents as subtlely endeavour to trample them under foot besides such licensed Books are but the language of the present Times and have their Vicissitudes and alternate Fates We have experienced it in our own days and times when Episcopacy was to be pulled up root and branch then forsooth all Presses ought to be open and free it was the Peoples Birth-right and priviledge and the dawning of the day of Truth appearing after the Sun had gone down upon our Prophets and the day had been dark over them for some years past But no sooner had they unmitred the Prelates and minced Episcopacy as small as Herbs to the Pot that every Priest might be a Prelate in his several Parish under another title and vizard but that the old Acts were new broacht and trumpt up again March 2. 1642. and the freedom of the Press must be beleagured with a Committee forsooth of Examinations and a Commission of twenty and learning to her old Barnacles again This device was first set on foot by Antichristian mystery and design to smother Light and Truth that the Contrivers might the more cleverly set up the Kingdom of Antichrist in Cimerian darkness of ignorance and if it were possible to hinder all reformations of their Lives and Doctrines and to insinuate and establish Falshood Turkish policy To uphold their Aleoran they prohibit Learning and Printing worthy of Romish not Protestant Imitation Protestants need it not Truth which is their Shield and Buckler is as strong as the Almighty Magna enim veritas praevalebit Who ever knew her put to the worse Let Truth and Error enter like fair Combatants and Wrestlers into the Lists confuting by dint of Reason is the only Cornish Hug that can lay flat It is Error not Truth that stands in need of such lame Crutches write that write will Licensing or not Licensing may make Truth more or less visible or diffusive but not less victorious Contraria juxta se posita magis elucescunt Rectum est Index sui obliqui the crookedness of Error will the more appear if once brought to the light and true Rule Why are we then so be-Jesuited seeing by locking up the Press Truth is much more likely to be supprest then Falshood and Error The great and usual Clamour and Out-cry against the Liberty of the Press is that it encourageth Libellers against Kingdoms States and men in Authority If they characterize and represent falsly it is then a Libel and a Crime to be and may be punished by the Judges If they despise Dominion and wrong fully speak evil of Dignities quā tales it is a Crime of the same nature But if publication or declaration of Truths shall be esteemed Libels there 's no Law no Logick nor yet Divinity for that Nay it is derogatory even to the God of Truth Go tell Judah of her sins and Israel of her transgression If Ahab and his Fathers house trouble Israel it 's no crime for Elijah to tell him so nor in Nathan to say unto David Thou art the man And the prophane Prophets of Israel must be prophesied against All Governments were instituted by God for the good of the governed and it is not Libelling to tell them so Forbidding publication of Books without an Imprimatur first obtained is to make the Licensers Judges of all Truths and Opinions and it's odds that they will let nothing pass but what is calculated and fitted to their own Interest and the Interest and Genius of the present Times And is not this a Crime of the same nature with the Indices expurgatorii which all honest wise and pious men abhor It is at best but an oblique Art servant only to Times Parties and Interests destructive to Learning and Ingenuity to suppress Monuments of Reason used by their Adversaries on whose side happily Truth is The more noble and warrantable way is to abandon all such little and disingenuous Tricks and Devices and labour by all holy means and endeavours to suppress Vice To punish and discountenance sin and sinners is more glorious before God and man then to padlock Presses it being a shrewd sign that Truth is not on their side that suppress the adverse Reasons Truth is able to justifie it self and acquire its own glory and reward of Ingenuity and Christian Simplicity when suppressing or expunging betrays that we either distrust God for the maintenance of his own Truths or that we distrust the Cause or our selves
or our Abilities It is one thing to stifle Books in the womb before ever they are permitted to see light or that before they are either known or understood and that perhaps by one single person who happily may be much less learned honest or orthodox then the Author and another thing to condemn both Author and Book when examined and found faulty and erroneous For it is most just and reasonable that all and every State should consider how Books as well as men do behave themselves and punish or not punish accordingly accordingly one Carter a Printer suffered in Queen Elizabeths days § Consider matter of Fact by looking a little back Although it was early foretold that Antichrist would come nay that many Antichrists were already come yet until after the 800th year about which time the Eastern Empire divided from the Western there were not many Hereticks found in the Western parts for 300 years after But after the year 1100. by reason of the continual Jars which for 50 years before had been between the Popes and the Emperors which continued unto the year 1200. with frequent Wars there did arise many Hereticks as the Popes were pleased to call them by as good Logick as the Lion is fabled to call the Foxes Ears Horns whose most common Heresies were against the Pope's usurped Authorities over Clergie and Laity This moved the Popes and their Conclaves for Ends not good to establish the two Religious Orders of St. Francis and St. Dominick pure Fanaticks which were soon filled with the most zealous and learned Persons that that Age could afford altogether devoted to the maintaining of the Court of Rome and the Authority of the Pope to which two Orders the care of the Inquisition newly erected was committed and what hath followed since is obvious to every intelligent man which soon spawned the first sanguinary Law against Hereticks by the help of the Emperor Frederick the 2d 1244. imposing fire on Hereticks § But before this we had no Charm nor Lock upon the Press no Purgatory for Books no Limbus Patrum for their Authors we had no proper real and propitiatory Sacrifice in the Mass for the living and the dead nor dry or demi-Communions no Conventicle at Trent no new Creed with 12 new Articles either of Trent or of Johannes Baptista Posa a Spanish Jesuit never heard of before newly printed newly come forth no blotting out of the second Commandment no dividing of the tenth Commandment into two to amuse and cheat the People no Doctrine of Infallibility nor yet of Probability no Penance Sacramental no Satisfaction no Sacramental Confession as now used no Hurtado no Filliucius no Bauny no Lessius no Escobar no Jesuits Morals no power to depose Kings no dissolving Oaths of Allegiance no Gunpowder-Treasons and an Iliad more of such damnable Errors and Heresies I conclude therefore that it bears no shew that forbidding men to write tends to any good end but really to the end to conceal the Truth and to shew it to the World only under a Mask or some deceitful Light I shall conclude with this Observation concerning Printing it self That in the days of Luther and Troubles of Germany about Religion and Vices of the Clergie it was suggested unto Clement the 7th that the occasion of them all was from the new Invention of Printing By Faust and Guttenburg scarce 80 years found out and now not possible to be suppressed which though it had brought to light many Books and much Learning yet they found that in this short time it had made a great discovery of their Arcana Imperii their jugling Arts and Legerdemains much to their prejudice which whilst the Laity were kept ignorant of all went for currant on their side and imputed thereto all the Troubles of Germany about those Centum gravamina then complained of for that now men being better enlightned by printed Books began to call in question the present Faith and Tenets of the Church of Rome and to examine how far Religion was departed from its primitive Institution and Purity Among which one great Crime was that the Laity and vulgar sort of men were taught and exhorted to read the Scriptures and pray every one in their own native Language A great Crime I confess and much to be dreaded for if this were permitted to pass for currant Doctrine the Vulgar would quickly discover their Cheats and Usurpations and believe that the Clergie had abused and cheated them hitherto For if men were once perswaded that they could make their own way and court to God by their own prayers and addresses in their own Tongues which they understood and that they would be heard and be more prevalent in Heaven than mumbled in Latin without understanding what they prayed for it would certainly bring Contempt on the Mass and Mass-Priests on Pardons and Pardon-mongers on auricular Confession and Confessors and on the power of the Keys and in sum would impeach all Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction which by sinister Artifices had been got and kept secret by the Clergie for many generations For without all doubt the keeping of these and the like Mysteries rather of Iniquity than of Religion wickedly obtained and as wickedly kept in the hands of Priests only participes Criminis parties to their Cheats have given that esteem the Priests now have amongst the Romanists through many Ages to this very day Now since Printing hath made such Discoveries of such Mysteries of Iniquity and brought to light the more pure Word and Doctrine so that their Traditions their Indulgences their false Glosses and their other like Trumperies could not prevail as formerly Romish Craft sought out other pestilent Inventions to maintain their Impieties whereof padlocking the Press was not the least to keep the Laity ignorant And though they could not wholly suppress Printing yet in Romish Territories they ordained that no Book should be printed without an Imprimatur first obtained from some Inquisitor or some such like Myrmidon digging deep to hide their Counsels from all the Laity and to stifle any Light or Truth that was not suitable to their deeds of Darkness hence hath proceeded the obstructions of many Truths fit to be made common but have not been able to appear in the light but by stealth Instead thereof they now set up heathen Philosophy and Metaphysicks against Scripture to make good their mysterious Juglings disputing and reasoning more out of them than out of holy Writ Thus they set up Learning or rather quirks of Learning against Learning and old musty Traditions of former Times and such obscure passages as needed their Interpretations and Explanations and all to keep the Laity in suspence between fear and controversal Juglings and Equivocations Nay they rather have recourse to Tropes and Allegories where none are needful if not to Cabala it self than allow that all the parts of Religious Worship tho' never so clear and plain to every Understanding as to fall easily within common Understandings should be without their Explications or Expositions so that they cannot monopolize the Mysteries of their Church-Government so closely and wholly within their Ecclesiastick Circle but discoveries are made of their Cheats These things well weighed and considered the Conclusion is natural that it bears no shew that forbidding men to write tends to any good end but really to the end to conceal the Truth and to shew it to the World in Mascarata or some deceitful Light only ERRATA PAG. 1. l. 20. for Spiritual r. Scriptural p. 2. l. 9. for neiter r. neither p. 17. for pro r. per in the Margin p. 20. l. 37. after Christians r. to Bethphage John 12. p. 29. l. 9. in the Margin dele Deo p. 78. in the Margin for Soozm r. Sozom. p. 98. Margin for satisfactoriis r. satisfactionis ut p. 146. l. 8. for peace r. piece l. 29 for absolete r. obsolete p. 151. l. 7. dele p. 152. l. 44. for absolete r. obsolete p. 153. l. 34. for ramanded r. remanded p. 160. l. 4. 8. for St. r. Sir p. 163. l. 7. for coenatori nuptialio r. coenatorio nuptiali p 166. l. 18. for Prosica r. persica p. 171. l. 5. for were r. was p. 173. l. 24. for no. r. any p. 183. l. 6. for perspect r. prospect p. 217. l. penult for thing r. think p. 219. l. 18. for pare r. pari l. 37. after Jupiter r. and Venus their p. 234. l. 6. for Alieno r. Aheno l. 9. for dignity r. divinity p. 236. l. 17. for hariretur r. hauriretur l. 37. for Apello r. Apella p. 239. l. 8. for and r. c. l. 13. next unto to r. be
Preachings they did censure the affairs of the State and Council convocate general Assemblies without his Licence conclude what they thought good not once desiring his Allowance and Approbation and in their Synods Presbyteries and particular Sessions meddle with every thing upon colour of scandal Besides divers other disorders which at an other time he would propound and have reformed else it was vain to think of any agreement or that the same being made could stand and continue any while Whilest these conferences lasted these just complaints of the King were verifyed and made good by all the Presbyteries in the person of Mr. David Blake one of the Ministers of St. Andrews with whom they sided and whom they defended to their utmost This David Blake in a Sermon uttered divers spightful speeches against the King and Queen the Lords of the Council and Session and had called the Queen of England an Atheist a Woman of no Religion of which her Ambassador complaining to the King he was cited to appear before the Council 10. Novemb. Mr. Andrew Melvil accompanying him to Edenburgh did labour to make this a common cause giving out that the same was done only as a preparative against the Ministers to bring their Doctrine under the censure and controulment of the King and Council and so far he prevailed with the Commissioners of the Church as they sent certain of their number to entreat the deserting of the Diet saying it would be ill taken to draw Ministers in question upon trifling delations very trifling matters as you will see by the Articles against him when as the enemies of the truth were spared and overseen Proud Presbyters Paul himself submitted his doctrines to the Test and judgment of his Auditory Judge ye what I say and yet these insolent Priests may defame Princes Councils Parliaments and say and do what they please impune No man must say why do ye so a shrewd sign their Coyn is not currant when it will not abide the Touch-stone They farther gave out that the Ministers were troubled for the free rebuke of sin and sinners and the Scepter of Christs Kingdom sought to be overthrown The process they said intended against Mr. Blake was but a Policy to divert the Ministers from prosecuting their Suit against Popish Earles and if he should submit his doctrine to the tryal of the Council the liberties of the Church and spiritual Government of the House of God would be quite subverted and therefore they concluded that in any case a Declinator should be used and protestation made against these proceedings whereupon a Declinator was framed and presented by Blake viz. that seeing he was brought thither to be judged by his Majesty and Council for his doctrine and that his answering to the pretended accusation might import a Prejudice to the liberties of the Church and be taken for an acknowledgment of his Majesties Jurisdiction in matters meerly spiritual He was constrained in all Humility to decline that Judicatory because the Lord Jesus of whom he had the grace of his calling had given him his Word for a Rule for his Preaching and that he could not fall in the reverence of any Civil Law but in so far as he should be tryed to have passed his instructions which Tryal belonged only to the Prophets and Pastors the spirit of the Prophets being subject to them alone For this and other reasons in the said Declinator alledged He for himself and in the name of the Commissioners of the general Assembly who had subscribed the same Declinator by which it appears that Blake was not herein a single but a publick person and that these desperate Tenets were the Tenets of the whole Presbytery and not of Blake singly did humbly beseech his Majesty not to infringe the liberty of the Church but manifest his care in maintaining the same i. e. in words at length and not in figures that his Majesty would subject his Regality to their Presbytery and be to them a King indeed but yet no otherwise then the stump of Wood was to the Frogs in the Fable a quiet and tame Idol whom every Frog every waspish Presbyter may play upon and securely dance about Now let us see his Peccadilloes not only charged but strongly proved against him viz. 1o. That he affirmed in Pulpit that the popish Lords were returned into the Country with his Majesties knowledge and on his Assurance and said that in so doing he had detected the Treachery of his Heart 2ly that he had called all Kings the Devils Barnes adding that the Devil was in the Court and in the Guiders of it 3ly In his Prayer for the Queen he had used these words We must pray for her for the Fashion but we have not cause for she will never do us good so that we have little reason to pray for her 4ly That he had called the Queen of England an Atheist 5ly That he had discuss'd a suspention granted by the Lords of the Session in Pulpit and called them Miscreants and Bribers 6ly That speaking of the Nobility he said they were degenerated Godless Dissemblers and Enemies to the Church likewise speaking of the Council he called them Holy-glasses Cormorants men of no Religion 7ly That he had convocated divers Noblemen Barons and other within St. Andrews in June 1594. caused them to take Armes and divide themselves in Troops of Horse and Foot and had thereby usurped the Power of the King and Civil Magistrate The Summons being read he desired to be remitted to his own Ordinary hereby meaning the Presbytery where the Doctrine was taught contending that speeches delivered in Pulpit all be it alledged to be Treasonable could not be judged by the King till the Church by which term they always mean themselves first took cognisance thereof and thereupon delivered the Declinator The King notwithstanding in favour of him deferred farther proceedings herein till the last of November In the mean time the Commissioners for the Church took advantage of his favour and sent a Copy of the Declinator with a Letter to all the Presbyteries requiring them to subscribe the same and to commend the cause in hand in their publick and private Prayers to God using their best credit with their flocks and employing all their labours for the maintenance thereof This their stirring up of Subjects against their King extorted from the King by the advice of his Council a Proclamation discharging the said Commission as unlawful in it self and more unlawfully executed by the said Commissioners commanding six of them to depart to their several Flocks within 24 hours and not to return to act therein under pain of Rebellion Upon notice of this intended Proclamation the Commissioners resolved that since they were convened by the Warrant of Christ in a most needful and dangerous time to see unto the good of the Church ne quid ecclesia detrimenti caperet they should obey God rather than Man notwithstanding any charge that should be given
visited and looked into for the Iic preservation and Peace of the State for that they being of such different minds and tempers cannot assemble together without eminent and notable danger if the Prince be not always made privy with what passeth among them in their Assemblies and Congregations and therefore they ought to be treated according to the danger that necessarily attendeth such Innovations § Cautilousness is the sinews of wisdom Farilior cautio est ubi manifesta formido And nothing is more dangerous than to be secure in matters of State In some Forreign Countries every Hoast is bound to bring his travelling guest before an Officer there to certifie his Name with the occasion of his coming and intended time of aboad in those parts And in case he stay longer he must again renew his Licence so curious and vigilant also are they to keep their City from Infection that without a Certificate witnessing their coming from wholsom places they may not escape the Lazaretto How more watchful ought Magistrates to be to prevent the Contagion of the Souls of their Subjects and therefore in prudence they ought to inspect and supervise all Pastors and Teachers High and Low that no mischief or disturbance to the quiet State of the Realm be contrived hatched or fomented by their Doctrine or Discipline § In Tuscany when Pius the 4th attempted to give the Office of Inquisition to the Friers of St. Dominic Cosmo the great Duke would not consent why Because those of that Order took part with the Enemies of the House of Medices when they were driven out of Florence Anno. 1494. The same reason and example holds with us and do shew that there ought an Account to be made to the King of all such as are recommended to him either for Orders or Preserments that he may be fully satisfied that their Piety and Duty towards their Prince and Religion the Christian life of the People and the Devotion of the Ecclesiasticks themselves towards their natural Prince and Country may not be prejudicial to their quiet State § Besides these grand reasons of State against Conventicles the 32 Canon of those stiled Apostolical doth Ordain Si quis Presbyter c. deponatur quasi principatus amator existens est enim tyrannus c. Canon 32. That if any Presbyter contemning his Bishop shall colligate a part and erect another Altar of which nature Conventicles are Deponatur as a lover of Empire for he is a Tyrant All which reasons do perswade that Common-wealth Christian or not Christian may for good and sound reasons suppress Conventicles of a dangerous consequence that are really and truly so but not out of fears and jealousies that they will prove so For holy Writ seems very much to favour and warrant Meetings or Conventicles of the Brethren Subjects of any Kingdom solemnly meeting in the name and fear of God either with or without a Priest to the end that their mutual edification among themselves and quickening one another to zeal and constancy in true Faith Piety and Religion and the preserving themselves against Apostacy may thereby be advanced and reinforced No doubt but that many excellent advantages may accrew thereby as provoking one another to love and to good works mutual observance and communicating of each others dispositions tempers gifts experiences vertues failings that they may the better sit themselves to do one another good or to receive comfort and consolation one of another in such Christian Conversation Let us consider one another to provoke unto love and unto good works not forsaking the assembling of our selves together as the manner of some is by which expression he seems to rebuke those that did forsake such Meetings but exhort one another and so much the more as you see the day approaching 10 Heb. 24 25. which place together with the practice of the Apostles doth not warrant Publick Assemblies only but also the Private Meetings of Christians for mutual conference and exhorting one another which are not to be neglected nor forsaken but to be used for preserving unity in the Church but not to foster Schism Separation Treason Rebellion or to hinder the more publick Assemblies More fully to the same purport is 1 Cor. 14.23.24.25 to 33. whosoever seriously considers first that this Epistle is wrirten to the Church of God in general and not to Priests which is at Corinth and to them that are sanctified in Christ Jesus called to be Saints with all that in every place call upon the Name of Jesus Christ our Lord both theirs and ours and then that all the Documents Doctrines and Intimations in that Chapter specified relating to spiritual gifts to prophesying and speaking with tongues are directed to the Brethren and Church in general if therefore the whole Church be come together into some place and all speak c. V. 23. may with good consequence and deduction conclude that all solemn Conventicles and Meetings tending to edification whether 5 or 5000 or whether with or without a Priest are thereby warranted and that it is a fundamental right due to all Christians and a duty incumbent on them all so to congregate and so to glorify God and edify one another and the very order deportment and decency of such Assemblies is therein described and pourtraied out These being the Commandments of God V. 37. with what good conscience then can any discountenance or speak against such Congregations when the same duty is certainly as incumbent upon them that discountenance and speak against them as upon those that countenance or frequent them Is it because they are afraid of the breath of fools to be accounted Puritanical Presbyterian or Independent or that because they think every man in Hell that is worse than themselves or those that are better but in a fools Paradise or that by so frequenting they should crush Arts of compliance plausibility ambition and preferments or that they are afraid of being righteous overmuch what is this else but Demas-like to forsake the fellowship of Saints and to embrace this present World making the Souls of men the most precious thing that ever God created subordinate to their lusts and risings and Balaam-like for hope of honour or preferment become more senseless of Gods Command than was his dumb Ass and like Micha's Levite for a little better reward swallow down Theft and Idolatry flatter profaneness betray the truth of the Gospel and smother and dissemble the strictness and purity of Gods most holy ways § Consider that all Instruction and Edification is not from Priests nor out of Pulpits only Apollos Minister of Caesarea and of Iconia was an eloquent man mighty in the Scriptures instructed in the way of the Lord fervent in the spirit who spake and taught diligently the things of the Lord and spake boldly in the Synagogue and yet Aquila and Priscilla his Wife Tent-makers when they heard him took him home and expounded unto him the way of God more