Selected quad for the lemma: state_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
state_n body_n soul_n union_n 1,547 5 9.5555 5 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A61626 Sermons preached on several occasions to which a discourse is annexed concerning the true reason of the sufferings of Christ : wherein Crellius his answer to Grotius is considered / by Edward Stillingfleet ...; Sermons. Selections Stillingfleet, Edward, 1635-1699. 1673 (1673) Wing S5666; ESTC R14142 389,972 404

There are 5 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

Brutes immortal as well as those of men and those could not be imagined to have any great force on the lives of men which would equally hold for such creatures which were not capable of rewards and punishments in another life But therein lies the great excellency of the doctrine of the souls immortality as it is discovered in the Gospel not only that it comes from him who best understands the nature of souls but is delivered in such a manner as is most effectual for the reformation of mankind For the fullest account herein given of it is by the rewards and punishments of another life and those not Poetically described by fictions and Romances but delivered with the plainess of truth the gravity of a Law the severity of a Judge the authority of a Lawgiver the Majesty of a Prince and the wisdom of a Deity Wherein the happiness described is such as the most excellent minds think it most desireable and the misery so great as all that consider it must think it most intolerable And both these are set forth with so close a respect to the actions of this life that every one must expect in another world according to what he doth in this How is it then possible that the doctrine of the souls being in another state could be recommended with greater advantage to mankind than it is in the Gospel and what is there can be imagined to take off the force of this but the proving an absolute incapacity in the soul of subsisting after death It is true indeed in the state of this intimate union and conjunction between the soul and body they do suffer mutually from each other But if the souls suffering on the account of the body as in diseases of the brain be sufficient to prove there is no soul why may not the bodies suffering on the account of the soul as in violent passions of the mind as well prove that there is no body It is not enough then to prove that the soul doth in some things suffer from the body for so doth the Child in the Mothers womb from the distempers of its Mother yet very capable of living when separated from her but it must be shewed that the soul is not distinct from the body to prove it uncapable of being without it But on the other side I shall now shew that there is nothing unreasonable in what the Scripture delivers concerning the immortal state of the Souls of men as to future rewards and punishments because there are those things now in them considered as distinct from their bodies which make them capable of either of them And those are 1. That they are capable of pleasure and pain distinct from the body 2. That they have power of determining their own actions 1. That the souls of men are capable of pleasure and pain distinct from the pleasure and pain of the body Whereever pleasure and pain may be there must be a capacity of rewards and punishments for a reward is nothing but the heightning of pleasure and punishment an increase of pain And if there be both these in men of which no account can be given from their bodies there must be a nobler principle within which we call the Soul which is both the cause and the subject of them We may as easily imagine that a Fox should leave his prey to find out a demonstration in Euclid or a Serpent attempt the squaring of the circle in the dust or all the Fables of A●sop become real histories and the Birds and Beasts turn Wits and Polititians as be able to give an account of those we call pleasures of the mind from the affections of the body The transport of joy which Archimedes was in at the finding out his desired Problem was a more certain evidence of the real pleasures of the mind than the finding it was of the greatness of his wit Could we ever think that men who understood themselves would spend so much time in lines and numbers and figures and examining Problems and Demonstrations which depend upon them if they found not a great delight and satisfaction in the doing of it But whence doth this pleasure arise not from seeing the figures or meer drawing the lines or calculating the numbers but by deducing the just and necessary consequences of one thing from another which would afford no more pleasure to a man without his soul than a book of Geometry would give to a herd of Swine It is the Soul alone which takes pleasure in the search and finding out such Truths which can have no kind of respect to the body it is that which can put the body out of order with its own pleasures by spending so much time in contemplation as may exhaust the spirits abate the vigor of the body and hasten its decay And while that droops and sinks under the burden the soul may be as vigorous and active in such a consumptive state of the body as ever it was before the understanding as clear the memory as strong the entertainments of the mind as great as if the body were in perfect health It is a greater and more manly pleasure which some men take in searching into the nature of these things in the world than others can take in the most voluptuous enjoyment of them the one can only satisfie a bruitish appetite while it may be something within is very unquiet and troublesom but the other brings a solid pleasure to the mind without any regret or disturbance from the body By this we see that setting aside the consideration of Religion the mind of man is capable of such pleasures peculiar to it self of which no account could be given if there were not a spiritual and therefore immortal Being within us not only distinct from the body but very far above it But the very capacity of Religion in mankind doth yet further evidence the truth of it I would fain understand how men ever came to be abused with the notion of Religion as some men are willing to think they are if there were not some faculties in them above those of sense and imagination For where we find nothing else but these we see an utter incapacity of any such thing as Religion is in some brute creatures we find great subtilty and strange imitations of reason but we can find nothing like Religion among them How should it come to be otherwise among men if imagination were the highest facultie in man since the main principles of Religion are as remote from the power of imagination as may be What can be thought more repugnant to all the conceptions we take in by our senses than the conception of a Deity and the future State of Souls is How then come the impressions of these things to sink so deep into humane nature that all the art and violence in the world can never take them out The strongest impressions upon
all his evil actions which is the liberty we are now speaking of as any persons assert or contend for we cannot suppose that he should have a greater experience of it than now he hath So that either it is impossible for man to know when his choice is free or if it may be known the constant experience of all evil men in the world will testifie that it is so now Is it possible for the most intemperate person to believe when the most pleasing temptations to lust or gluttony are presented to him that no consideration whatever could restrain his appetite or keep him from the satisfaction of his bruitish inclinations Will not the sudden though groundless apprehension of poyson in the Cup make the Drunkards heart to ake and hand to tremble and to let fall the supposed fatal mixture in the midst of all his jollity and excess How often have persons who have designed the greatest mischief to the lives and fortunes of others when all opportunities have fallen out beyond their expectation for accomplishing their ends through some sudden thoughts which have surprized them almost in the very act been diverted from their intended purposes Did ever any yet imagine that the charms of beauty and allurements of lust were so irresistible that if men knew before hand they should surely dye in the embraces of an adulterous bed they could not yet withstand the temptations to it If then some considerations which are quite of another nature from all the objects which are presented to him may quite hinder the force and efficacy of them upon the mind of man as we see in Iosephs resisting the importunate Caresses of his Mistress what reason can there be to imagine that man is a meer machine moved only as outward objects determine him And if the considerations of present fear and danger may divert men from the practice of evil actions shall not the far more weighty considerations of eternity have at least an equal if not a far greater power and efficacy upon mens minds to keep them from everlasting misery Is an immortal soul and the eternal happiness of it so mean a thing in our esteem and value that we will not deny our selves those sensual pleasures for the sake of that which we would renounce for some present danger Are the flames of another world such painted fires that they deserve only to be laughed at and not seriously considered by us Fond man art thou only free to ruine and destroy thy self a strange fatality indeed when nothing but what is mean and trivial shall determine thy choice when matters of the highest moment are therefore less regarded because they are such Hast thou no other plea for thy self but that thy sins were fatal thou hast no reason then to believe but that thy misery shall be so too But if thou ownest a God and Providence assure thy self that justice and righteousness are not meer Titles of his Honour but the real properties of his nature And he who hath appointed the rewards and punishments of the great day will then call the sinner to account not only for all his other sins but for offering to lay the imputation of them upon himself For if the greatest abhorrency of mens evil ways the rigour of his Laws the severity of his judgements the exactness of his justice the greatest care used to reclaim men from their sins and the highest assurance that he is not the cause of their ruine may be any vindication of the holiness of God now and his justice in the life to come we have the greatest reason to lay the blame of all our evil actions upon our selves as to attribute the glory of all our good unto himself alone 2. The frailty of humane Nature those who find themselves to be free enough to do their souls mischief and yet continue still in the doing of it find nothing more ready to plead for themselves than the unhappiness of mans composition and the degenerate state of the world If God had designed they are ready to say that man should lead a life free from sin why did he confine the soul of man to a body so apt to taint and pollute it But who art thou O man that thus findest fault with thy Maker Was not his kindness the greater in not only giving thee a soul capable of enjoying himself but such an habitation for it here which by the curiosity of its contrivance the number and usefulness of its parts might be a perpetual and domestick testimony of the wisdom of its Maker Was not such a conjunction of soul and body necessary for the exercise of that dominion which God designed man for over the creatures endued only with sense and motion And if we suppose this life to be a state of tryal in order to a better as in all reason we ought to do what can be imagined more proper to such a state than to have the soul constantly employed in the government of those sensual inclinations which arise from the body In the doing of which the proper exercise of that vertue consists which is made the condition of future happiness Had it not been for such a composition the difference could never have been seen between good and bad men i. e. between those who maintain the Empire of reason assisted by the motives of Religion over all the inferiour faculties and such who dethrone their souls and make them slaves to every lust that will command them And if men willingly subject themselves to that which they were born to rule they have none to blame but themselves for it Neither is it any excuse at all that this through the degeneracy of mankind is grown the common custom of the world unless that be in it self so great a Tyrant that there is no resisting the power of it If God had commanded us to comply with all the customs of the world and at the same time to be sober righteous and good we must have lived in another age than we live in to have excused these two commands from a palpable contradiction But instead of this he hath forewarned us of the danger of being led aside by the soft and easie compliances of the world and if we are sensible of our own infirmities as we have all reason to be he hath offered us the assistance of his Grace and of that Spirit of his which is greater than the Spirit that is the World He hath promised us those weapons whereby we may withstand the torrent of wickedness in the world with far greater success than the old Gauls were wont to do in the inundations of their Country whose custom was to be drowned with their arms in their hands But it will be the greater folly in us to be so because we have not only sufficient means of resistance but we understand the danger before hand If we once forsake the strict
dens who seemed to be designed rather to destroy than to conquer So sudden so numerous so irresistible in most places were the incursions they made But what was it which gave them so strange success was it their long practice and skill in military affairs No they were rude and unexperienced was it their mighty courage No they were despised by the Romans as great cowards and begged for peace when it was denyed them But as Salvian tells us who lived in those times and knew the manners of both sides the Goths and Vandals were of a very severe chastity among whom fornication was punished sharply and adultery a crime scarce heard of whereas all manner of uncleanness and licentiousness did abound among the Romans who yet were then called Christians The Goths were devout and pious acknowledging divine providence making their solemn supplications to God before their victories and returning him the praise of them afterwards but the Romans were fallen into that degree of irreligion and Atheism that nothing was more common among them than to droll upon Religion A nostris omnia fermè religiosa ridentur as Salvian speaks they thought all things managed by chance or fate and ascribed very little to God And where these sins abounded most they were carried up and down as by a divine instinct as they confessed themselves and where they conquered as he particularly speaks of the Vandals in Africa they purged all the stews of uncleanness and made so great a reformation by the severity of their Laws that even the Romans themselves were chast among them Thus we see how those great and mighty Empires have been broken to pieces by the weight of their impieties falling upon them May the consideration then of these things move us in time to a reformation of our lives before our iniquities grow full and ripe for vengeance We have seen many revolutions and God knows how many more we may see if that should be true of us which the same Author saith of the Romans in the midst of all their changes Sola tantum vitia perdurant their vices remained the same still Thanks be to God that things have a fairer appearance at present than they have had and never so good a time to amend as now but if men flatter themselves with present security and their sins increase as their fears abate the clouds which seem dispersed may soon gather again and the face of the Heavens will change if we do not And if it be not in our power to reclaim others from their sins let us endeavour to preserve the honour of our Church by amending our own and convince our enemies by living better than they And give me leave to say and so I conclude that among all the expedients which have been thought of for the peace of this Church and Nation that of leaving off our sins and leading vertuous and exemplary lives will at last prove to be the most successful SERMON XI Preached at WHITE HALL MRRCH 27. 1672. II CORINTH V. II. Knowing therefore the terrour of the Lord we perswade men IF ever any Religion was in all respects accomplished for so noble a design as the reformation of mankind it was the Christian whether we consider the Authority of those who first delivered it or the weight of the arguments contained in it and their agreeableness to the most prevailing passions of humane nature Although the world was strangely degenerated before the coming of Christ yet not to see great a degree but that there were some who not only saw the necessity of a cure but offered their assistance in order to it whose attemps proved the more vain and fruitless because they laboured under the same distempers themselves which they offered t●… cure in others or the method they prescribed was mean and trivial doub●ful and uncertain or else too nice and subtle to do any great good upon the world But Ch●istianity had not only a mighty advantage by the great holiness of tho●e who preached it but by the clearness and evidence the strength and efficacy of those arguments which they used to perswade men The nature of them is such that none who understand them can deny them to be great their clearne●s such that none that hear them can choo●e but understand them the manner of recommending them such as all who understood themselves could not but desire to hear them No arguments can be more proper to mankind than those which work upon their reason and consideration no motives can stir up mo●e to the exercise of this than their own happiness and misery no happinoss and misery can deserve to be so much considered as that which is eternal And this eternal state is that which above all other things the Christian Religion delivers with the greatest plainnes confirms with the strongest evidence and enforces upon the consciences of men with the most powerful and perswasive Rhetorick I need not go beyond my text for the proof of this wherein we see that the Apostles sesign was to perswade men i. e. to convince their judgements to gain their affections to reform their lives that the argument they u●ed for this end was no less than the terrour of the Lord not the frowns of the world nor the fear of men nor the malice of Devils but the terrour of the Almighty whose Majesty makes even the Devils tremble whose power is irresisistible and whose wrath is insupportable But it is not the terrour of the Lord in this world which he here speaks of although that be great enough to make us as miserable as we can be in this State but the terrour of the Lord which sha●l appear at the dreadful day of judgement of which he peaks in the verse before the text For we must all appear before the judgement seat of Christ that every one may receive the things done in his body according to that he hath done whether it be good or bad This is the terrour here meant which relates to our final and eternal State in another world wh●n we must appear before the judgement seat of Christ c. And of this he speaks not out of Poetical Fables ancient traditions uncertain conjectures or probable arguments but from full assu●ance of the truth of what he delivers Knowing therefore the terrour of the Lord we perswade men In which words we shall consider these particulars 1. The argument which the Apostle makes choice of to perswade men which is the terrour of the Lord. 2. The great assurance he expresseth of the truth of it knowing therefore the terrour of the Lord. 3. The efficacy of it in order to the convincing and reforming mankind knowing therefore c. we perswade men 1. The argument the Apostle makes choice of to perswade men by viz. the terror of the Lord. In the Gospel we find a mixture of the highest
value upon them But Gods justice was not to be bribed his wrath against sin was not to be appeased by the greatest riches of this World nothing but the inestimable blood of Christ would be accepted for the purchase of souls and when they are so dearly bought must they be cast away upon such trifles as the riches and honours of this world are in comparison with them These are men who lose their souls upon design but there are others so prodigal of them that they can play and sport them away or lose them only because it is the custom to do so With whom all the reasons and arguments in the world cannot prevail to leave off their sins if it once be accounted a fashion to commit them Yea so dangerous things are fashionable vices that some will seem to be worse than they are although few continue long Hypocritical in that way that they might not be out of the fashion and some will be sure to follow it if not out-do it though to the eternal ruin of their souls But although all damn'd persons at the great day will be confounded and ashamed yet none will be more ridiculously miserable than such who go to Hell for fashion sake What a strange account would this be at the dreadful day of judgement for any to plead for themselves that they knew that chastity temperance sobriety and devotion were things more pleasing to God but it was grown a Mode to be vicious and they had rather be damned than be out of the fashion The most charitable opinion we can have of such persons now is that they do not think they have any souls at all for it is prodigious folly for men to believe they have souls that are immortal and yet be so regardless of them Yet these who are vicious out of complyance are not the only persons who shew so little care of their souls what shall we say to those who enjoying the good things of this life scarce ever do so much as think of another Who are very solicitous about every little mode of attire for their bodies and think no time long enough to be spent in the grand affairs of dressing and adorning their out sides but from one end of the year to the other never spend one serious thought about eternity or the future State of their souls Their utmost contrivances are how to pass away their days with the greatest ease and pleasure to themselves and never consider what will become of their souls when they come to die Alas poor immortal souls are they become the only contemptible things men have about them All care is little enough with some for the body for the pampering and indulging of that and making provision for the flesh to fulfil the lusts thereof but any cure is thought too much for the soul and no time passes so heavily away as the hours of devotion do The very shew of Religion is looked on as a burden what then do they think of the practice of it The Devil himself shews a greater esteem of the souls of men than such persons do for he hath been always very active and industrious in seeking their ruin but is ready enough to comply with all the inclinations of the body or mens designs in this world nay he makes the greatest use of these as the most powerful temptations for the ruin of their souls by all which it is evident that being our greatest enemy he aims only at the ruin of that which is of greatest value and consideration and that is the thing so much despised by wicked men viz. the soul. These do in effect tell the Devil he may spare his pains in tempting them they can do his work fast enough themselves and destroy their own souls without any help from him And if all men were so bent upon their own ruin the Devil would have so little to do that he must find out some other imployment besides that of tempting to divert himself with unless it be the greatest diversion of all to him to see men turned Devils to themselves But are the temptations of this world so infatuating that no reason or consideration can bring men to any care of or regard to their souls we have no ground to think so since there have been and I hope still are such who can despise the glittering vanities the riches and honours the pleasures and delights of this world when they stand in competition with the eternal happiness of their souls in a better world And that not out of a sullen humour or a morose temper or a discontented mind but from the most prudent weighing and ballancing the gain of this world and the loss of the soul together For what is a man profited if he gain the whole world and lose his own soul or what shall he give in exchange for his soul 3. Which is the last particular to represent the folly of losing the soul though it were for the gain of the whole world Which will appear by comparing the gain and the loss with each other in these 4. things 1. The gain here proposed is at the best but possible to one but the hazard of losing the soul is certain to all And what folly is it for men to run themselves upon so great and certain danger for so uncertain gain which never any man yet attained to or are ever like to do it our Saviour knew how hard a matter it was so set any bounds to the ambitious thoughts or the covetous designs of men every step the ambitious man takes higher gives him the fairer prospect before him it raises his thoughts enlarges his desires puts new projects into his mind which like the circles of water spread still farther and farther till his honour and he be both laid in the dust together The covetous person is never satisfied with what he enjoys the more he gets still the more he hopes for and like the grave whither he is going is always devouring and always craving Yet neither of these can be thought so vain as to propose no less to themselves than the Empire or riches of the whole world But our Saviour allows them the utmost that ever can be supposed as to mens designs for this world let men be never so ambitious or covetous they could desire no more than all the world though they would have all this yet this all would never make amends for the loss of the soul. It is a thing possible that one person might by degrees bring the whole world in subjection to him but it is possible in so remote a degree that no man in his wits can be thought to design it How small a part of the inhabited world have the greatest Conquerours been able to subdue and if the Macedonian Prince was ever so vain to weep that he had no more worlds to conquer he gave others a just occasion to laugh at so
punishment and afterwards when Grotius urgeth that though it be essential to punishment that it be inflicted for sin yet it is not that it be inflicted upon him who hath himself sinned which he shews by the similitude of rewards which though necessary to be given in consideration of service may yet be given to others besides the person himself upon his account All this Crellius acknowledgeth who saith They do not make it necessary to the nature but to the justice of punishment that it be inflicted upon none but the person who hath offended So by his own Confession it is not against the nature of punishment that one man suffer for anothers faults From whence it follows that all Socinus his arguments signifie nothing which are drawn from the impossibility of the thing that one man should be punished for anothers faults for Crellius grants the thing to be possible but denies it to be just yet not absolutely neither but with some restrictions and limitations For 6. It is not but that there may be sufficient causes assigned in some particular cases wherein it may be just for God to punish some for the sins of others For Crellius himself hath assigned divers When there is such a neer conjunction between them that one may be said to be punished in the punishment of another as Parents in their Children and Posterity Kings in their Subjects or the body of a State in its Members either in the most or the most principal though the fewest but we are to consider how far he doth extend this way of punishment of some in others 1. At the greatest distance of time if they have been of the same Nation for he extends it to the utmost degree of Gods patience towards a people For saith he God doth not presently punish as soon as they have sinned but spares for a great while and forbears iu expectation of their repentance in the mean while a great many guilty persons die and seem to have escaped punishment But at last the time of Gods patience being past he punisheth their Posterity by exacting the fu l punishment of their sins upon them and by this means punisheth their Ancestors t●o and punisheth their sins in their punishment for saith he all that people are reckoned for one one man of several Ages and that punishment which is taken of the last may be for the sins of the first for the conjunction and succession of them of which we have an example saith he in the destructiof Hierusalem By which we see a very remote conjunction and a meer similitude in comparing a succession of Ages in a people with those in a man may when occasion serves be made use of to justifie Gods punishing one Generation of men for the sins of others that have been long before 2. When sins are more secret or less remarkable which God might not punish unless an occasion were given from others sins impelling him to it but because God would punish one very near them he therefore punisheth them that in their punishment he might punish the other Or in case sins spread through a Family or a people or they are committed by divers persons at sundry times which God dot● 〈◊〉 severally punish but sometimes then when the Head of a People or Family hath done something which remarkably deserves punishment whom he will punish in those he is related to and therefore generally punisheth the whole Family or People 3. That which may be a meer exercise of dominion as to some may be a proper punishment to others as in the case of Infants being taken away for their Parents sins For God as to the Children he saith useth only an act of dominion but the punishment only redounds to the Parents who lose them and though this be done for the very end of punishment yet he denies that it hath the nature of Punishment in any but the Parents 4. That punishment may be intended for those who can have no sense at all of it as Crellius asserts in the case of Sauls sons 2 Sam. 21. 8 14. that the punishment was mainly intended for Saul who was aheady dead From these concessions of Crellius in this case we may take notice 1. That a remote conjunction may be sufficient for a translation of penalty viz. from one Generation to another 2. That sins may be truly said to be punished in others when the offenders themselves may escape punishment thus the sins of Parents in their Children and Princes in their Subjects 3. That an act of dominion in some may be designed as a proper punishment to others 4. That the nature of punishment is not to be measured by the sense of it Now upon these concessions though our Adversaries will not grant that Christ was properly punished for our sins yet they cannot deny but that we may very properly be said to be punished for our sins in Christ and if they will yield us this the other may be a strife about words For surely there may be easily imagined as great a conjunction between Christ and us as between the several Generations of the Iews and that last which was punished in the destruction of Hierusalem and though we escape that punishment which Christ did undergo yet we might have our sins punished in him as well as Princes theirs in their Subjects when they escape themselves or rather as Subjects in an innocent Prince who may suffer for the faults of his people if it be said that these are acts of meer dominion as to such a one that nothing hinders but granting it yet our sins may be said to be punished in him as well as Parents sins are punished properly in meer acts of dominion upon their Children if it be laid that can be no punishment where there is no sense at all of it that is fully taken off by Crellius for surely we have as great a sense of the sufferings of Christ as the first Generation of the Iews had of the suffering of the last before the fatal destruction of the City or as Saul had of the punishment of his Sons after his death So that from Crellius his own concessions we have proved that our sins may very properly be said to be punished in Christ although he will not say that Christ could be properly punished for our sins nay he and the rest of our Adversaries not only deny it but earnestly contend that it is very unjust to suppose it and repugnant to the rectitude of Gods nature to do it And so we come to consider the mighty arguments that are insisted on for the proof of this which may be reduced to these three viz. 1. That there can be no punishment but what is deserved but no man can deserve that another should be punished 2. That punishment flows from revenge but there can be no revenge where there hath been no fault 3. That