Selected quad for the lemma: state_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
state_n bishop_n sir_n william_n 1,383 5 9.1663 5 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A71223 The compleat History of independencie Upon the Parliament begun 1640. By Clem. Walker, Esq; Continued till this present year 1660. which fourth part was never before published.; History of independency. Walker, Clement, 1595-1651.; Theodorus Verax. aut; T. M., lover of his king and country. aut 1661 (1661) Wing W324B; ESTC R220805 504,530 690

There are 3 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

scrutiny and search into the lives and actions of the Presbyterian Party that sate in Parliament doing their duty when the engaged Party fled to the Army and brought them up in hostile manner against them The unreasonableness of this way of proceeding was much urged and farther alleged 47. Debate upon passing the Committee of Secret examinations that it was neither consonant to the customes of the House nor unto common reason that a Sub-committee should be chosen out of the Grand Committee of Examinations with more power then the Grand Committee it self had and excluding the rest of the Committee under the pretence of Secrecie Besides it was against the privilege of the House of Commons that the Lords should nominate the Commons in that Sub-committee as well as their own Members But the Independent Grandees would have it pass Breach of Privilege and all other considerations are easily swallowed when they are subservient to their present designs 48. The manner of prosecution proceeding upon the Tumult The party engaged were resolved to be Examiners Informers and Witnesses as well as Parties so active was their malice and had so well packed their Cards that eight or nine Schismatical Lords engaged likewise with them and the Army should be Judges of the Presbyterian Party that sate in absence of the two Speakers the better to give the two Houses a through Purge and make them of the same complexion with the Army without which they had no hopes to divide the power and profit of the Land between themselves by 10000 l. 20000 l. in a morning shared amongst the Godly and to make the whole Kingdom to be Gibeonites hewers of wood and drawers of water to the faithfull 49. Miles Corbet makes report of Examinations taken at the Close Committee First against the Committee of Safety In order to the playing of this game Miles Corbet Interpreter to the State-puppet play behind the curtain commonly called The Close Committee of Examinations upon the 3. September stood up and began his Report from that Inquisition saying He would begin with the Committee of Safety wherein many Members were concerned and it was necessary to purge the Houses first But further said he would suppress the names of many of his Witnesses because the Depositions he should report were but preparatory Examinations and it would be for service of the State to conceal their names He first produced many Warrants signed at the Committee of Safety by the Earls of Pembroke Suffolk Middlesex Lincoln Lord Willoughby of Parham Maynard Mr. Hollis Sir Phi. Stapleton Sir Will. Waller Mr. Long Mr. Nichols Sir William Lewis Mr. Baynton Against Master Baynton Next Corbet reported he had a Witness who deposed that a Gentleman with a Red head had signed many Warrants supposed to be Master Edward Baynton at length after much wyer-drawing of the business one Warrant was shewn to Master Baynton which he confessed to be his hand And presently Haslerig moved that Master Baynton might forthwith Answer against which was objected That since these were but preparatory Examinations not legal proofs no man was bound to Answer them otherwise a man shall be but to as many several answers as several new matters of Charge come in against him and shall day by day be liable to new vexations and never know when he hath cleared himself But Corbet who of an examiner was now become the Kings Solicitor or Advocate Criminal moved to proceed to Judgement against him but first to aske him some preparatory questions But it was answered that it was illegal to squeese examinations out of a mans own mouth neither was a man bound to answer where his words may condemn but not absolve him for so much as depends upon the testimony of Witnesses against this Gentleman you cannot proceed unless he be by and have liberty to put cross questions to the Witnesses It is alleged Warrants were signed and all done in relation to a new War It is answered it was done in order to Self-defence allowed by the Laws Long before this occasion when the Army first mutinied and threatned to march up to London and use such extraordinary means against the Parliament and City as God had put into their hands you then in a full and free Parliament appointed a Committee of Safety for your defence who sate and acted This Committee was but the same revived and upon the like or worse threats and menaces as by the many printed papers from the Army will appear you have no Testimony against this Gentleman by name but only a character of his Hair and for signing the Warrant confessed by himself he is acquitted by the Proviso of the Ordinance 20 August last which excepted only such as acted upon the force but when the Committee of Safety was revived the Parliament was freer from force than it is now Mr. Baynton notwithstanding was adjudged to be suspended the House during pleasure of the House which is as much as to say So long as the Tyranny of this Domineering Faction lasteth The 4 of Sept. Corbet reported he had a Witness but named him not Against Mr. Walker because they were but preparatory examinations who deposed that an elderly Gentleman of low stature in a Gray suit with a little stick in his hand came forth of the House into the Lobby when the tumult was at the Parliament door and whispered some of the Apprentices in the ear and encouraged them supposed to be Mr. Walker Mr. Walker denyed he spake then with any man in the Lobby or saw any face that he knew there and so neglected the business as a thing not considerable But the next day Corbet moved that Mr. Walker might be ordered to put on his Gray suit again and appear before the Close Committee and the Witness who saith he knoweth him again if he see him I hear Mr. Walker desired to know seeing the Witness had not named him by what Authority the examiners should take such a Deposition and make application thereof to him And seeing there were many Gentlemen in the House that day with whom that Character agreed as well as with himself why the Reporter did not move that all to whom that Character was appliable might be put to that test as well as himself but single him out for a mark to shoot at complaining that he was not ignorant out of what quiver this Arrow came he had been threatned with a revenge by some of that Close Committee and had other Enemies amongst them that could bite without barking He told them that yesterday Mr. Corbet reported that the supposed old man whispered c. but desired those that were then in the House to call to mind that the noise was then so great in the Lobby that no whisper nay the loudest words he was able to speak could not be heard Then Corbet changed his Tale saying the words were What you do do quickly and were spoken aloud and said the
Speaker of the House of Commons worth 2000 l. per an besides rewards for courtesies not to say Bribes Master of the Rolls worth 3000 l. per an beside the sale of Offices Chamberlain of Chester in the Earl of Darbies place And until of late Chancellor of the Dutchey of Lancaster worth 1230 l. per an and one of the Commissioners of their great Seal worth 1500 l. per an and had 6000 l. given him at one time by the House 2. Bulstrode Whitlock Commissioner of the great Seal worth 1500 l. per an and had 2000 l. given him out of Mr George Minn's estate 3. Edmund Prideaux formerly a Commissioner for the great Seal worth 1500 l. per an Now by Ordinance practices within the Bar as one of the Kings Councel worth 500 l. per an and is Postmaster for all Inland Letters worth 100 l. every Tuesday night beside his supper and it was thus got The Lord Stanhop the Postmasters and Carriers of England complained in Parliament against Mr. Witherings and others touching the carrying of Letters whereupon the benefit of forein Letters were given to the Earl of Warwick worth 5000 l. per an and the Inland Letters to Mr. Prideaux good Parliament Justice 4. Roger Hill a Barrester of the Temple in no practice nor of a considerable estate till this Parliament hath now from the House the Bishop of Winchesters Mannor of Taunton Dean being the best of England and worth 1200 l. per an when the estates for lives determine 5. Humphrey Salway the Kings Remembrancer in Mr. Fanshaw's place worth 200 l. per an 6. Francis Rous Provost of Eaton in Dr. Stewards place worth 600 l. per annum and hath got a College Lease worth 600 l. per annum 7. John Lisle Barrester of the Temple Master of St. Crosses in Dr. Lewes his place being a place for a Divine and worth 800 l. per annum 8. Oliver St. John by Ordinance both Attorney and Solicitor to the King worth what he please to make it and hath the passing of all Pardons upon Commissions worth 40000 l. 9. Sir William Allison Alderman of York Clerk of the Hamper worth 1000 per an he hath Crabb-Castle worth 600 l. per an Sometimes the Bishop of Yorks in York-shire 10. Thomas Hoile Alderman of York Treasurers Remembrancer in the Exchequer in Sir Peter Osburn's place worth 1200 l. per annum 11. Thomas Pury Senior first a Weaver in Glocester then an ignorant Countrey Solicitor had 3000 l. given him and Mr. Gerrards place in the Petty-bag worth 400 l. per an 12. Thomas Pury Junior Son to the Elder Receiver of the Kings Rents in Glocester and Wilts Clerk of the Peace of Glocester-shire worth 200 l. per an and Captain of Foot and Horse the first year of this Parliament servant to Mr. Towneshead an Attorney of Staple Inne 13. William Ellis Steward of Stepney worth 200 l. per an and by him sold to one of the Temple 14. Miles Corbet at the beginning of the Parliament 3000 l. in debt for himself and his Mother more than he was worth now one of the Registers in Chancery worth 700 l. per an besides Chair-man for scandalous Ministers worth 1000 l. per an And hath money in his purse 15. John Goodwyne the other Register in Chancery worth 700 l. per annum 16. Sir Thomas Widdrington a Commissioner of the great Seal worth 1500 l. per. an 17. Edward Bishe Garter Herauld in Sir Edward Walkers place worth 600 l. per an 18. * Walter Strickland Agent in Holland for the two Houses of Parliament worth to him 5000 l. 19. Nicholas Love Mr. Speakers Chamber-fellow one of the six Clerks in Chancery in Mr. Penruddocks place worth 2000 l. per annum 20. Sir Gilbert Gerrard much in debt before the Parliament pay-master to the Army and had 3d. per pound allowed besides Gratuities worth 60000 l. and now Chancellor of the Dutchey worth 1200. per an 21. Gilbert Gerrard his second son Clerk of the Dutchey and for whose benefit the Clerk-ship of the Assize in Norfolk is granted to Mr. Edward Garret his Cozen by the procurement of Sir Gilbert and is worth 500 l. per an 22. John Selden had given him 5000 l. of which he received 2500 l. pound 23. * John Bond Son to Dennis Bond a Parliament man made Master of Trinity-Hall in Cambridge which Mr. Selden refused to accept of 24. Sir Benjamin Rudiard given him 5000 l. And hath he not deserved it 25. * Lucas Hodges Customer of Bristol 26. Sir John Hipsley hath the keeping of three of the Kings Parks Mary-bone-Park that was Mr. Carewes Hampton-Park and Bushy-Park and given him 2000 l. in Money 27. Sir Thomas Walsingham the Honour of Eltham that was the Earl of Dorsets the middle-Park and house which was Master Whines and hath cut down 4000. Timber Trees 28. Benjamine Valentine given him 5000 l. 29. * Sir Henry Heyman given him 5000 l. 30. Denzell Hollis given him 5000 l. 31 * Nath. Bacon given him 3000 l. 32. * John Steevens given him out of the Lord Astley's Composition 1000 l. 33. * Henry Smith made one of the six Clerks worth 2000 l. per annum 34. Robert Renolds had 2000 l. given him Besides Abingdon-Hall and the Lands worth 400 l. per annum Hath bought a good penny-worth of Bishops Lands hath 20000 l. beyond Sea as he made appear upon his Mariage 35. Sir John Clotworthy Treasurer for Ireland and by the Army charged with defrauding of the State of 40000 l. which may be one reason the King could never get an Account of the monies rai●ed for the Irish though he desired it 36 ●ohn Ashe given him out of Mr. John Coventry's Composition 4●00 l. out of Sir Edward Mosely's 1000 l. out of Mr. Edw. Ph●●'s 1200 l. out of Sir John Powel's estate 8000 l. And which is w●●ll this is the great Chairman at Goldsmiths Hall Is not this better than cloathing 37. * John Lenthall son to the Speaker made one of the six Clerks worth 2000 l. per annum 38. * Francis Allen a poor Goldsmith at St. Danstans in Fleetstreet now made a Customer for London In honour of whom clipped moneys are called Allens 39. Giles Green the Reciver of York-shire being put out of his place got it for his Son-in-Law is Chair-man for the Navy and for Sir Thomas Daws his estate and what it was worth to him Sir Thomas Daws his Creditors will tell you for they got nothing 40. Francis Pierpoint hath the Arch-bishop of York's Lands lying in Nottingham-shire 41. William Pierpoint hath 7000 l. given him and all the Earl of Kingston's personal Estate worth 40000 l. 42. * John Palmer Mr. of All-Souls in Oxford in Doctor Shelden's place a Divine 43. * John Blackeston a poor shop-keeper in New Castle was Executor to the Executor of Sir John Fenner trusted with 6000 l. for Charitable uses and was sued in Chancery to perform the trust but got himself returned a
Houses Propositions See Mr. Pryn's said Speech in the House 2 Decemb. 1648. more at large and the Kings Answers and see whether the King did not grant all those Propositions in which the main security of the Kingdom resteth He granted the first Proposition for taking off all Declarations as was desired And the third Proposition for the Militia as was desired He assented to the Proposition for Ireland limiting the time of the Parliaments disposing Officers there to 20 years He consented to such Acts for publique Debts and Publique Uses as should be presented within 2. years and incurred within that time He granted the Proposition concerning Peers as was desired He granted the Disposing Offices in England to the Parliament for 20. years He granted the taking away the Court of Wards having 100000 l. per ann in lieu thereof to be raised as the Parliament should think fit He granted to declare against the Marquess of Ormond's power and proceedings after an Agreement with the Parliament The onely difference therefore remained upon two Propositions 1. Delinquents 2. The Church For Delinquents though He doth not grant all His Majesty consented they shall submit to moderate Compositions according to such Proportions as they and the two Houses shall agree 2. He disableth them to bear Offices of publike Trust and removes them from the Kings Queens and Princes Court 3. For such as the Houses propounded to proceed capitally against He leaves them to a Legal Tryal and declares He will not interpose to hinder it which satisfies the main complaint of the Parliament which was in the beginning of the War That the King protected Delinquents from justice And all that the House desired in the Propositions presented to him at Oxford Febr. 1642. was That His Majesty would leave Delinquents to a Legal Tryal and judgement of Parliament But that his Majestie should joyn in an Act for taking away the Lives or Estates of any that have adhered to Him He truly professeth He cannot with Justice and Honour agree thereto 4. Nor do we see how Delinquents being left to the Law can escape justice the King having granted the 1. proemial Proposition and so by a Law acknowledged the Parliaments Cause and War to be just For the Church The Houses propound the utter abolishing of Archbishops Bishops c. The sale of their Lands that Reformation of Religion be setled by Act of Parliament as both Houses have or shall agree The Kings Answer takes away Church-Government by Arch-bishops Bishops c. by taking away their Courts and Officers and so far takes away their power of Ordination that it can never be revived again but by Act of Parliament so that Episcopacy is divested of any actual being by the Law of the Land and instead thereof the Presbyterian Government setled for three years by a Law which is for so long a time as the Houses formerly in their Ordinances presented to Him at New-castle did themselves think fit to settle it For the Sale of Bishops Lands upon the publike F●ith Every cheating Saint of the Faction must have the Publike Faith exactly kept though he bought the Lands but at 2 or 3. years just value and with such monies as he had formerly cheated the State of when other men who have lost the best part of their Estates by and for the Pa li●ment for compensation whereof they have the publike Faith engaged by Ordinances are consumed by Taxes and repaied with reproaches onely we say That although the Purchasers might well have afforded to have given the same rates for their Purchases which they now give if they might have had them assured by Act of Parliament for 99 years and such moderate Rents reserved as the King intimates in his Answer yet in His Answer he expresseth a farther satisfaction to be given them upon which we should have insis●ed n●●with● anding the said Vote 5. Decemb. 1648. We farther alledge That the King having granted the rest of the Propositions ●●d ●o much in these 2. Delinquents and the Church the Natio●●l Covenant doth not oblige us to make War upon this poi●● nothing can make Presbytery nor the Purchasers of Bishops L●● is more odious nor endanger them more than to make them the sole obstacle of Peace nor could any thing more work the King to comply with our desires herein than for us to draw a little neerer Him The Considerations leading us to pass the said Vote 5 Dec. 1648. come next to be considered 1. The saving of Ireland 2. The regaining the revolted Navy and freedom of the Seas 3. The support of the Ancient Government of the Kingdome 4. The putting the people into a secure possession of their Laws and Liberties 5. The avoiding such evill consequences as were apparently to follow a breach with the King As 1. the Deposing the King if not the depriving Him of life Return to Sect. 71. whereupon floods of misery will follow and scandal to the Protestant Religion which we from our hearts detest and abhor See the many Declarations of Parliament against it 2. The necessitating of the Prince to cast himself into the Armes of Forreign Popish Princes and embrace Popish Alliances for his succour 3. It may beget a change of Government and a laying aside of Monarchy here and so a Breach with Scotland and this Kingdome being the more rich likely to be the Seat of the War 4. The vast Debts of this Kingdom upon the publike Faith will never be paid in War but increased and multiplied multitudes of Sufferers by and for the Parliament like to be repayed onely with new sufferings and every years War destroies more Families and makes more Malignants through discontenting pressures until at last the Souldier seeing no hope of pay the People no hope of peace and ease fall together into a general and desperate tumultuousness the power of the Sword apparently threatning a dissolution of Government both in Church and Common-wealth To that scandalous Objection which saith The corrupt majority will not l●nd an ear to admit a thought towards the laying down their own power or rendring it back to the People from whom they received it We say this Objection is unreasonable from men who endeavour to perpetuate an Army upon the Kingdome nor is the continuance of this Parliament singly objected but that they will not render it back to the People Viz. To a new Representative invented and made by the Army that is We will not render our power into the hands of the Army Another Objection is That whatsoever the King granted He might plead Force to break it and spoil us by policy This Objection might have been made against all our Treaties If there be any Force it is from the Army for spoiling us by policy The Kings of this Land could never encroach upon our good Laws but by corrupt Judges and Ministers who though they could not abrogate the Law made it speak against it self and the intended good of the