Selected quad for the lemma: state_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
state_n bishop_n church_n presbyter_n 1,153 5 10.3687 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
B13858 Episcopacie by divine right. Asserted, by Jos. Hall, B. of Exon Hall, Joseph, 1574-1656. 1640 (1640) STC 12661.5; ESTC S103631 116,193 288

There are 10 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

the poor yet all these agreed in one Common Service which was the propagation of the Gospel and the sounding of Gods Church and soon after the very terms were contra-distinguished both by the substance of their charge and by the property of their Titles insomuch as blessed Ignatius that holy Martyr who lived many yeers within the times of the Apostles in every of his Epistles as we shall see in the sequel makes expresse mention of three distinct orders of Government Bishops Presbyters Deacons Now we take Episcopacie as it is thus punctually differenced in an eminence from the two inferior orders of Presbyter and Deacon so as to define it Episcopacie is no other than an holy order of Church-Governours appointed for the Administration of the Church Or more fully thus Episcopacie is an eminent order of sacred function appointed by the Holy Ghost in the Evangelicall Church for the governing and overseeing thereof and for that purpose besides the Administration of the Word and Sacraments indued with power of imposition of hands and perpetuity of Iurisdiction Wherein we finde that we shall meet with two sorts of Adversaries The one are furiously and impetuously fierce crying down Episcopacy for an unlawfull and Antichristian state not to be suffered in a truely Evangelicall Church having no words in their mouthes but the same which the cruell Edomites used concerning Ierusalem Downe with it down with it even to the ground And such are the frantick Separatists and Semi-separatists of our time and Nation who are only swayed with meer passion and wilfully blinded with unjust prejudice These are Reformers of the new Cut which if Calvin or Beza were alive to see they would spit at and wonder whence such an off-spring should come Men that defend and teach there is no higher Ecclesiasticall government in the world than that of a Parish that a Parochiall Minister though but of the blindest village in a Country is utterly independant and absolute a perfect Bishop within himselfe and hath no superiour in the Church upon earth and doth no lesse inveigh even against the over-ruling power of Classes Synods c. than of Bishops you are not perhaps of this straine for we conceive that our Northern neighbors desire and affect to conforme unto the Genevian or French discipline Honoratiss Do. Glanico Cancellario Scotiae respon ad sex quaestiones for which we find Beza's directions although both your act of a brenunciation and some speeches let fall in the assembly of Glasco and of the plea of Covenanters fetching Episcopacy within the compasse of things abjured might seem to intimate some danger of inclination this way our charity bids us hope the best which is that you hate the frenzeys of these our wilde Countrey-men abroad for whom no answer is indeed fit but darke lodgings and Ellebore The other is more milde and gentle and lesse unreasonable not disallowing Episcopacy in it selfe but holding it to be lawfull usefull ancient yet such as was by meer humane device upon wise and politick Considerations brought into the Church and so continued and therefore upon the like grounds alterable with both these we must have to do But since it is wind ill lost to talke reason to a mad-man it shall be more than sufficient to confute the former of them in giving satisfaction to the latter for if wee shall make it appeare that Episcopacy is not onely lawfull and ancient but of no lesse than divine institution those raving and black mouthes are fully stopped and those more easie and moderate opposites at once convinced But before we offer to deal blows on either side it is fit we should know how far we are friends and upon what points this quarrell stands It is yielded by the wiser fautors of Discipline that there is a certain Polity necessary for the retention of the Churches peace That this Polity requires that there must be severall Congregations or flocks of Christians and that every flock should have his own Shepherd That since those guides of Gods people are subject to error in Doctrine and exorbitance in manners which may need correction and reformation and many doubtfull cases may fall out which will need decision it is requisite there should be some further aid given by the counsell and assistance of other Pastors That those Pastors met together in Classes and Synodes are fit arbiters in differences and censurers of errors and disorders That in Synodes thus assembled there must be due order kept That order cannot be kept where there is an absolute equality of all persons convened That it is therefore necessary that there should be an head President or Governour of the assembly who shall marshall all the affairs of those meetings propound the Cases gather the voyces pronounce the Sentences and judgements but in the mean while he having but lent his tongue for the time to the use of the Assembly when the businesse is ended returnes to his own place without any personall inequality A lively image whereof we have in our lower house of Convocation the Clerks whereof are chosen by the Clergy of the severall Diocesses They all having equall power of voyces assemble together choose their Prolocutor He cals the house receives petitions or complaints proposes the businesses asks and gathers the suffrages dismisses the Sessions and the action once ended takes his former station forgetting his late superiority This is the thing challenged by the Patrons of Discipline who do not willingly heare of an upper house consisting of the Peeres of the Church whose grave authority gives life to the motions of that lower body They can be content there should be a prime Presbyter and that this Presbyter shall be called Bishop and that Bishop shall moderate for the time the publike affairs of the Church but without all innate and fixed superiority without all though never so moderate Iurisdiction Calvin in this case shall speak for all who writing of the state of the Clergie in the Primitive times hath thus Calv. Instit l. 4. c. 4. Quibus ergo docendi munus c. Those therefore which had the charge of teaching injoined unto them they named Presbyters These Presbyters out of their number in every city chose one to whom they especially gave the title of Bishop lest from equality as it commonly fals out discords should arise Neither was the Bishop so superiour to the rest in honour and dignity as that he had any rule over his Colleagues but the same office and part which the Consul had in the Senate to report of businesse to be done to ask the votes advising admonishing exhorting to go before the rest to rule the whole action by his authority and to execute that which by the common Councell was decreed The same office did the Bishop sustain in the assembly of the Presbyters Thus he and to the same purpose Beza in his Treatise of the degrees of the ministery Moulin Chamier others So as we easily see how
the Church Paracles l. 1. c. 4 and her Governours in the second their practice prescribes her government although as he adds without booke not without the Churches owne consultation and consent which if it be granted makes the more for us who ever since we were a Church have consented to the Apostles practice and constantly used the same What do I stand upon this They are the words of Cartwright himselfe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the example of the Apostles and generall practice of the Churches under their government draweth a necessitie §. 9. The third ground That the formes ordained by the Apostles were for universall and perpetuall use THirdly it is no lesse evident that the form which the Apostles set and ordained for the governing of the Church was not intended by them for that present time or place onely but for continuance and succession for ever For no man I suppose can be so weak Praecepta ipsa disciplinae omnibus in futurum Ecclesiis dictante Sp. Sancto tradiderunt Sco. Wy Paracles l. 1. c. 4 as to thinke that the rules of the Apostles were personall locall temporary as some Dials or Almanacks that are made for some speciall Meridians but as their office and charge so their rules were universall to the whole world as farre and as long as the world lasteth For what reason is there that Crete or Ephesus should be otherwise provided for than all the world besides Or what possibility to think that those first planters of the Gospell should leave all the rest of Christs Church as the Ostrich doth her eggs in the dust without any farther care The extent and duration of any rule will best be measured as by the intention of the Authour so by the nature and use of it S. Paul's intention is clearely expressed for a continuance untill the appearing of our Lord Iesus Christ 1 Tim. 6.14 As for the nature of the severall directions they carry perpetuity and universality of use in the face of them there being the same reason of their observation by all persons concerned and in all times and places why should not every Bishop be as unreproveable as a Cretian or an Ephesian Why should an accusation be received against an Elder upon more slender evidence in one place than another Why should there not bee the same courses taken for Ordination and Censure in all ages and Churches since the same things must of necessity bee done every where in all ages and Churches But why should I strive for a granted Truth For it is plaine that the Isle of Crete and Ephesus were but the patternes of other Churches and Timothie and Titus of other faithfull Overseers If therefore it shall appeare that Episcopacie so stated as we have expressed was in these persons and Churches ordered and setled by Apostolicall direction it must necessarily be yeelded to be of Apostolike and therefore Divine Institution §. 10. The fourth ground That the universall practice of the Church immediately succeeding the Apostolike times is a sure Commentary upon the practice of the Apostles and our best direction FOurthly I must challenge it for a no lesse undoubted Truth That the universall practice of the Church immediately succeeding the Apostles is the best Commentary upon the practice of the Apostles and withall that the universall practice of Gods Church in all ages and places is next unto Gods Word the best guide and direction for our carriages and formes of Administration The Copartners and immediate Successors of those blessed men could best tell what they next before them did for who can better tell a mans way or pace than he that followes him close at the heeles And if particular men or Churches may mistake yet that the whole Church of Christian men should at once mistake that which was in their eye it is farre more than utterly improbable A truth which it is a wonder any sober Christian should bogle at yet such there are to our griefe and to the shame of this late giddy age even the great guides of their faction Polit. Eccles l. 2. cap. 7. Falsum est c. Our mis-learned countriman Parker the second Ignis fatuus of our poore mis-led brethren and some Seconds of his stand peremptorily and highly upon the Deniall It is false saith he that the universall practice of the Church is sufficient to prove any thing to be of Apostolike Originall And jeeringly soone after Vniversa Ecclesiae praxis consensus patrum unica Hierarchicorum Helena est The universall practice of the Church and consent of Fathers saith he is the onely dearling of the abettors of the Hierarchy But the practice of the Church immediatly after the Apostles is no evidence Heare now I beseech you my deare brethren all ye who would pretend to any Christian ingenuity and consider whether you have not reason to distrust such a leader as would perswade you to slight and reject the testimony and practice of the whole Church of God upon earth from the first plantation of it to this present age and to cast your selves upon the private opinions of himselfe and some few other men of yesterday surely in very matter of doctrine this could be no other than deeply suspicious than foulely odious If no man before Luther and Calvin had excepted against those points wherein we differ from Rome I should have hated to follow them how much more must this needs hold in matter of fact Iudge what a shame it is to heare a Christian Divine carelesly shaking off all arguments drawne from Antiquity Continuance Perpetuall Succession in and from Apostolike Churches unanimous consent universall practice of the Church immediate practice of all the Churches succeeding the Apostles as either Popish or nothing And all these are acknowledged for our Grounds and are not Popish For me I professe I could not without blushing and astonishment read such stuffe as confounded in my selfe to see that any sonne of the Church should be not onely so rebelliously unnaturall to his holy mother as to broach so putrid a Doctrine to her utter disparagement but so contumelious also to the Spirit of God in his providence for the deare Spouse of his Saviour here upon earth Holy Jrenaeus Iren. l. 4. contr haeres I am sure was of another minde Agnitio vera saith he The true acknowledgement is the doctrine of the Apostles antiquus Ecclesiae status and the ancient state of the Church in the whole world by the Succession of Bishops to whom the Apostles delivered the Church which is in every place And then whiles we have both these the doctrine of the Apostles seconded by the ancient state of the Church who can out-face us What meanes then this wilfull and peevish stupidity Nihil pro Apostolico habendum Ibid. l. 2. c. 7. Nothing saith Parker is to be held for Apostolike but that which is found recorded in the writings of the Apostles Nothing Was all
saw and conversed with the Apostles Irenaeus saw Polycarpus by their hands was he ordained Bishop constantly lived and dyed a Martyr in that holy function Tertullian was not much below Irenaeus in age not at all below him in the clearnesse of his suffrage Edant origines Ecclesiarum suarum evolant ordinem Episcoporum suorum ita par successiones ab initio decurrentem ut primus ille Episcopus aliquem ex Apostolis aut Apostolicis viris habuerit authorem antecessorem c. Tertull. de praescription advers haer Edant origines c. Let them saith he set forth the Originals of their Churches Let them reckon upon the Order of their Bishops so running down by their successions from the beginning as that their first Bishop had one of the Apostles or Apostolicall men for his author and predecessor Thus do the Apostolicall Churches bring in their accounts as the Church of Smyrna h● ving Polycarpus placed there by St. John the Church of Rome showeth Clement ordained by St. Peter and so the rest of the Churches show what sprouts they have of the Apostolike seed Even those which were first placed in their Episcopacie by the Apostles What can be spoken more fully for the Apostolike institution of Episcopacy This is more than enough to shew the state of the first ages of the Church under and after the Apostles And therein the superiority and Jurisdiction of Bishops received from their sacred hands Now if we think good to descend with the times which way soever we shall cast our eyes upon Ecclesiasticall histories upon Fathers upon Councels I speak it knowingly we shall meet with no other relation Should I undertake to gather in some proofs which are every where scattered in their undeniable records one Tome would not be enough and you might well aske the meaning of such waste I shall content my self to glean out some few Eares out of a large and plentifull field §. 14. The confessed Superiority of Bishops from severall arguments out of Antiquity ANd here in the first place it is well worthy to weigh much with us that all antiquity makes Bishops the successors of the Apostles The testimonies of Irenaeus Vide Bils loco citato Tertullian Cyprian Basil Theodoret Hierome Ambrose Augustine Sidonius and others are so familiarly quoted by all Writers that I shall not need to urge them In the next those titles of superiority and Jurisdiction which are giuen by all antiquity to Bishops above Presbyters Ambros in Ephes 4 idea Optatus l 1. contra Parmē Hieron in Ep. 60.17 Hierarch Ecles c. 5. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Epiphan in haeres 75. Conc. Carthag c. 68. Conc. Sardic c. 10. Sidon Apoll. l 9 Ep. 4. may well settle our assurance in it They are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 rulers in Ignatius Principes sacerdotum in Ambrose the same with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Dionysius An order generative of other Fathers as Epiphanius They have an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 given them by the Councell of Carthage Excelsiorem gradum by Jerome 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by the Councell of Constantinople eminence of oversight by the Councell of Sardica Incomparably eminent Apostleship by Sidonius Apollinaris Excellent dignity and authority by the Councell of Constantinople in Trullo 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Concil Antioch c. 25. It were easie to be tedious in this kinde If now the Bishops of this Island challenge no more than is given to those Church-governours of the Primitive times certainly either they must be condemned or not justified In the third place it will easily be made to appear that in all the passages of Fathers and Councels the Presbyters are called the Bishops Presbyters Indeed how should it be otherwise Winton Epist ad Molin For as our learned Bishop of Winchester of old the Presbyters were as it were of the family of the Bishop and lived upon those distributions which were laid down as at the feet of the Apostles first so now at theirs untill the division of severall Parishes infoeffed them in a setled maintenance from their peculiar charges Thus as Doctor Downham instances Arrius is said to have been Alexander's Presbyter Petrus and Iraenaeus Timotheus and Macarius to have been Athanasius his Presbyters by the same token that Timotheus a grave and reverend personage as the history reports wittily and justly took off a foul aspersion from his innocent and honoured Diocesan The Deputies of Silvester in the Councell of Nice were his Presbyters Thus Crispio is named Epiphanius his Arch-deacon Heraclides to have been Chrysostome's Deacon It were easie to fill up pages out of Eusebius alone with such instances §. 15. Power of Ordination only in Bishops BUt in the fourth place the severall acts that were appropriated to the Bishops alone by the universall consent of all times do more than sufficiently evince their acknowledged superiority wherein even those Testimonies which are wont to be alleadged against us do directly plead for us Hierome himself can say Excepta ordinatione and Chrysostome who is cited for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 can yet adde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Only in laying on of hands Bishops go beyond them Homil. 11 in 1 Tim. 3 Neither is this any sleight difference or despicable priviledge but such as implyes a manifest Superiority as Ambrose justly inferreth and a clear distinction of Order Hands were imposed in the Church of old for more than one purpose In absolution for the penitent's reconciliation to God and the Church In Confirmation for the increase of Grace upon the baptized In Ordination for the blessing Conc. Carthag 4. c. 3. Benedicente eum Episcopo manum super caput ejus imponente and hallowing of the Ordained The first of these as incident and annexed to the holy Order of Priest-hood may be common to a Presbyter within his own compasse but the other two have been ever held so intrinsecall to Episcopacy that I would fain see where it can be showed that any extremity of necessity was by the Catholike Church of Christ ever yet acknowledged for a warrant sufficient to diffuse them into other hands It was to Timothy and Titus by the consent of all Antiquity Bishops of their severall Dioceses and not to any Ordinary Presbyter that St. Paul gives that charge of imposition of hands That Presbyter had been a monster among Christians that would have dared to usurpe it and the Church of those first ages observed it so Curiously that besides those strict Lawes which they made for the prevention of any such insolence restraining even one kinde of Chorepiscopi Rurall Bishops from this power for there was another sort which were in the nature and quality of suffraganes furnished with Episcopall right they have left unto us memorable records of their severe proceedings against such presumptions I may not forget two or three remarkable histories to this purpose 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Colluthus a Presbyter of
is laid by Christ and whose fabricke is raised by the Apostles is of divine institution Page 28 § 8 The second ground The practice and recommendation of the Apostles is sufficient warrant for an Apostolicall Institution Page 30 § 9 The third ground That the formes ordained for the Churches Administration by the Apostles were for universal and perpetuall use Page 32 § 10 The fourth ground That the universall practice of the Church immediately succeeding the Apostolike times is a sure Commentary upon the practice of the Apostles and our best direction Page 35 § 11 The two famous rules of Tertullian and S. Augustine to this purpose asserted Page 39 § 12 The fifth ground That the Primitive Saints and Fathers neither would nor durst set up another forme of government different from that they received of the Apostles Page 50 § 13 The sixth ground That if the next successors would have innovated the forme of government yet they could not in so short space have diffused it through the whole Christian world Page 56 § 14 The seventh ground That the ancientest Histories of the Church and writings of the first Fathers are rather to be believed in the report of the Primitive state of the Church than the latest Authors Page 59 § 15 The eight ground That those whom the ancient Church of God and all the holy Fathers of the Church since have condemned for Hereticks are no fit guids for us to follow in that their judgement of the government for which they were so condemned Page 64 § 16 The ninth ground That the accession of honourable Titles and Compatible priviledges makes no difference in the substance of a lawfull and holy calling Page 66 § 17 The tenth ground That those Scriptures whereon a new and different forme of government is raised had need to be more evident and unquestionable than those which are alledged for the former that is rejected Page 69 § 18 The eleventh ground That if Christ had left this pretended order of government it would have ere this time been agreed upon what that forme is and how to be managed Page 71 § 19 The twelfth ground That if this which is challenged be the Kingdome of Christ then those Churches which want any essentiall part of it are mainly defective and that there is scarce any at all entire Page 72 § 20 The thirteenth ground That true Christian policie requires not any thing absurd or impossible to be done Page 74 § 21 The fourteenth ground That new pretences of truths never before heard of especially in maine points carry just cause of suspicion Page 76 § 22 The fifteenth ground That to depart from the judgement and practice of the universall Church of Christ ever since the Apostles times and to betake our selves to a new invention cannot but be beside the danger extremely scandalous Page 78 The Second Part. § 1 THe Termes and state of the Question setled and agreed upon Page 1 § 2 Church government begun by our Saviour in a manifest imparity Page 11 § 3 The execution of this Apostolicall power after our Saviours ascent into Heaven Page 16 § 4 The derivation of this power and majoritie from the Apostles to the succeeding Bishops Page 19 § 5 The cleare testimonies of Scripture for this majoitie especially those out of the Epistles to Timothy and Titus urged Page 26 § 6 Some elusions of these Scriptures met with and answered Page 35 § 7 The testimonie of S. John in his Revelation pressed Pag. 41 § 8 The estate and order of Episcopacie deduced from the Apostles to the Primitive Bishops Page 49 § 9 The testimony and assent of Bucer and some famous French Divines Page 54 § 10 The superiority and jurisdiction of Bishops proved by the testimonie of the first Fathers and Apostolicall men and first of Clemens the partner of the Apostles Page 59 § 11 The pregnant and full testimonies of the holy Saint and Martyr Ignatius urged Page 65 § 12 The testimonie of the ancient Canons called the Apostles Page 79 § 13 The state and historie of the next age Page 84 § 14 Proofes of the confessed superiority of Bishops from severall forceable arguments out of antiquitie Page 88 § 15 Power of Ordination only in Bishops Page 90 § 16 Power of jurisdiction appropriated to Bishops from the first Page 95 § 17 Exceptions against our Episcopacie answered and particularly of the dissimilitude of our Bishops to the Primitive in their Pompe and perpetuity Page 99 § 18 The practice of the whole Christian Church in all times and places is for this government by Bishops Page 110 § 19 Of the suppression of contrary Records and of the sole opposition of the heretick Aerius Page 117 § 20 The vindication of those Fathers which are pretended to second Aerius his opinion Page 120 § 21 The practice of the Waldenses and Albigenses in allowance of Episcopall government Page 125 § 22 The government by Bishops both universall and unalterable Page 129 The Third Part. § 1 THe appellation of Lay-Elders and the state of the Question concerning them Page 1 § 2 No Lay-Elder ever mentioned or heard of in the times of the Gospell in all the world till this present age the texts of Scripture particularized in pretence of the contrary Page 7 § 3 Lay-eldership a meere stranger to all antiquitie which acknowledgeth no Presbyters but Divines Page 15 § 4 S. Ambrose's testimonie urged commonly for Lay-Elders answered Page 19 § 5 The utter disagreement and irresolution of the pretenders to the new Discipline concerning the particular state of their desired government Page 24 § 6 The imperfections and defects which must needs be yeelded to follow upon the discipline pretended and the necessary inconveniences that must attend it in a kingdome otherwise setled Page 30 § 7 The knowne newnesse of this invention and the quality of the late authors of it Page 36 § 8 A recapitulation of the severall heads and a vehement exhortation to all Readers and first to our Northerne brethren Page 42 § 9 An exhortatorie conclusion to our brethren at home Page 53 EPISCOPACIE BY DIVINE RIGHT §. 1. An expostulatorie entrance into the Question GOod God! what is this that I have lived to heare That a Bishop in a Christian Assembly should renounce his Episcopall function and crie mercy for his now-abandoned calling Brother that was who ever you be I must have leave a while to contest seriously with you the act was yours the concernment the whole Churches You could not think so foule a deed could escape unquestioned The world never heard of such a Penance you cannot blame us if we receive it both with wonder and expostulation and tell you it had beene much better to have been unborn than to live to give so hainous a scandal to Gods Church and so deep a wound to his holy truth and Ordinance If Tweed that runs betweene us were an Ocean it could not either drown or wash off
and that in the Character of it it much resembles that to the Hebrews This noble monument that you may not doubt how it came so late to our hands was by Cyrill the late worthy Patriarch of Constantinople sent out of his Library of Alexandria whence he removed to our gracious Soveraign of Great Brittain for a precious Present as that which was by the hand of S. Tecla her self transcribed and placed at the end of the old and new Testament fairely by her written in the same Character A Present worth too much Gold And if any man do yet misdoubt his eyes may informe him by the view of it in so well his Majesties Library where it is kept and out of a desire of more publique good was lately set forth by the learned searcher of Antiquities Mr. Patrick Yong the worthy Keeper of his Majesties Library But if any man shall hope to elude this Testimony by taking advantage of the only mention of Presbyters and Deacons in the foregoing passages let him know this was onely according to the occasion of the writing of that Epistle and withall let him consider who wrote it Even Clement Bishop of Rome whether the first as some of the ancient or the third as others after Saint Peter a difference not hard to be reconciled and therefore how little danger there is of his favouring a parity in that sacred Administration §. 11. The pregnant and full testimonies of the holy Saint and Martyr Ignatius urged AFter him what better and more convincing authority can we appeal unto than that of holy Ignatius the famous Martyr of Christ whose memory is justly precious to the whole Church of God to this very present age that Miracle of Martyrs who called his fetters Christ's chains of Spirituall pearls who when he was to be throwne to the wilde beasts for the profession of Christ could boast 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Hier. Catalog Script Eccles that he should set to the world as the Sunne that he might rise to God and when he heard the Lyons rooring I am said he Christ's Wheat Oh let me be ground with the teeth of wilde beasts that may be found pure bread for my God make much of these wilde beasts that they may become my Sepulcher that nothing my be left of my body c. I had rather dye for Christ then raigne over the whole world This blessded Saint in all those confessedly-genuine Epistles which he wrote Seaven in number still so beats upon this point as if religion depended upon it Reverence and Obedience to their Bishops This man lived in the dayes of the Apostles conversed with them and in likely-hood saw Christ in the flesh being martyred in the Eleventh yeere of Trajan according to Baronius and therefore throughly acquainted with the state of Gods Church in the Apostles time and his own and should in this name be more to us then a thousand witnesses Eevery word of his is worthy to carry our hearts along with him Heare then what he saith in his Epistle ad Trallianos Be subject to your Bishop Ignat. Epist ad Trall 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as to the Lord for he watcheth for your soules And streight Necessary it is that whatsoever ye doe ye should doe nothing without your Bishop But be ye subject also to your Priests as to the Apostles of Christ See what a distance here is whereas other of the Fathers compare the Bishops to the Apostles Presbyters to the 70 disciples this man advanceth his patterne higher requiring obedience to Bishops as to Christ to Presbyters as to the Apostles And what proportion is there betwixt the respects we owe to God and to man And a while after yet higher The Bishop saith he Ibid. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. bears the resemblance of God the Father of all things The Priests are as the bench of his Apostles c. And lest any man should construe these words to sound onely of a generality of reverent respects without yeelding of any power of command Soone after he speaks home for what other saith he is a Bishop then he that is superiour to all principality and power Pag. 9. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. and as far as a mans power may reach made an Imitator of the Christ of God And what is the Presbytery or Priest-hood but an holy company the the Counsellors and Assessors of the Bishop and what the Deacons but the Imitators of the Angelicall powers which give him pure and unblameable attendance What say ye now to this ye Patrons of Paritie in Church-government How do yee think your opinion consorts with this blessed Saint the holy partner of the Apostles Here ye have the three distinct Orders of Bishops Priests or Presbyters and Deacons Here you have a cleare and constant Superiority of Bishops above Priests with no lesse difference then betweene a Prince and his Councell-bord above Deacons no lesse then betweene a Prince and his attendants And this delivered according to the received judgement and practise of the Primitive Church The testimony is too pregnant to be eluded And yet wel-fare a friend in a corner Nico Vedelius because he sees the witnesse so cleare that he cannot be shifted off charge him with corruption and subordination pretending that sure these words are foysted in he knows not how into the Text we are yet beholding to him for asserting the truth and legitimation of these seven Epistles of our Martyr which Coke and Parker and Antitilenus being netled with their unavoydable evidences durst cry downe for bastardy whom I leave to be throughly Schooled by Chamier Rivitus Crit Secr. Vedel Apol. exercit Videlius By whom out of all antiquity they are sufficiently vindicated to the shame of the injurious accusers It is out of my way to follow this Chase but herein Videlius playes his part that those passages which he finds in these confessedly Authentique Epistles most convictive for our purpose He would faine challenge to be corrupted And why so Surely saith he these words of Principality and power ascribed to Bishops doe not savour of that golden age of the Apostles wherein Ignatius lived when Episcopacy was not Imperium potestas a rule and power but a service rather And why not both As if excellency of dignity could not consist with humility of Officiousnesse What else doth our Saviour imply in his charge he that is greatest amongst you let him be your servant their glory like as their Saviours Kingdome was not of this world Spirituall greatnesse may well agree with outward lowlinesse 1 Cor. 2.3 4. 1 Thess 1.5 St. Paul matcheth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 weakenesse and power and even whiles he was Tent-making could speak of his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And why should this phrase be here seized upon suspition rather then in other passages of holy Ignatius where
holyes Our Martyr goes on In his Epistle to those of Smyrna he is Ignat ad Smyr 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Pag 16 11 if it be possible more punctuall Follow your Bishop saith he as Christ did his Father and the Colledge of Priests as his Apostles reverence your Deacons as ministring according to the command of God Let no man without the Bishop do any of those things which appertains to the Church Let that Eucharist be held right and unquestionable which is done by the Bishop or by such an one as he shall allow Where the Bishop shall appear there let the multitude assemble as where Christ is there all the heavenly hoast stands by him c. It is not lawfull without the Bishop to baptize nor to offer c. And soon after 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Honour God as the Author and Lord of all things and your Bishop as the chief Priest bearing the image of God of God I say as chief and of Christ as Priest c. Neither is there any thing greater in the Church than the Bishop who is consecrated to God for the salvation of the world neither is there any among the Princes like to the King who procures peace and equity to his subjects c. And anone Let all your things be done in decent order in Christ Let your Laicks be subject to the Deacons Pag. 48. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ● the Deacons to the Priests or Presbyters the Presbyters to the Bishop the Bishop to Christ as he to his Father Could he speak plainer Lo saith Vedelius and our Scotus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 this savours not of the age of Ignatius in whose time no such distinction as of the Clergie and Laity was on foot Weakly suggested Had they but read our Clement Clem. ad Corinth in his fore-recited Epistle to the Corinthians they had soon eaten this word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith he to the Priests their proper place is assigned The Laickes have their services 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 A Lay-man is bound to lay Ordinances But I may not so far hinder my way as to make excursions to meet with Cavills if any man be disposed to accept I am ready to give him full satisfaction in a meet season 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 In his Epistle to Polycarpus he requires that no man should so much as marry without the Bishops consent and soon after Pag. 208. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Let all things saith he be done to the honour of God give regard to your Bishop as God to you 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. My soul for theirs who obey their Bishop Presbyters and Deacons In his Epistle to the Ephesians magnifying their Bishop Onesimus he charges them to give all respects to him and addes Ye ought to look upon your Bishop as upon God himself since he waits upon the Lord and serves him And towards the end Following the holy Ghost for your guide obeying your Bishop and the company of Presbyters with an intire heart c. What shall we think of all this was not St. Ignatius see'd to speak on the Bishops side Or how would these words have sounded in the late Assemblies of Glasco and Edinborough Are we more holy than he Is the truth the same it was or is the alteration on our part All these have been large and full Testimonies of the acknowledged superiority of Bishops and of the high respects that are and were ever due to these prime governours of the Church But if any man think these came not yet home to the point let him cast his eye back upon the first Epistle ad Trallianos and mark well what he saith where having reckoned up the three so oft mentioned Orders of Bishops Presbyters and Deacons he addes Without these Pag. 5. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. there is no elect Church without these no holy Congregation no assembly of Saints And I perswade my self that you also are of the same minde Lo here words which no Vedelius can carp at as interpolated imposing such a necessity of the being of these three severall Orders in Gods Church that it cannot be right without them I see and pity his shuffling Append. Nota●rum Crit. but would be glad to see a satisfactory answer from any hands Epist ad P Molin In the mean time I wish with learned Bishop Andrews those Churches where they are missing that happinesse which now to our grief and I hope theirs they are forced to want I have dwelt long with blessed Ignatius where could I be better That one Author is in stead of many why should I not boldly say if besides the divine Scriptures there were no other testimony but this one Saints it were abundantly enough to carry this Cause and I must wonder at any man who confessing Ignatius to have been so holy a Bishop so faithfull a Martyr so true a Saint can stick at a Truth so often so confidently so zealously recommended by him to the world For me let my soul go with his let his faith be mine and let me rather trust one Ignatius than ten thousand Cartwrights Parkers Ameses or any other their ignorant and Male-contented followers Tell me now my dear brethren tell me in good eanest Do you not think this Ignatius a likely man to build up the kingdome of Antichrist were not these shoulders fit for the supportation of that man of sin Away with these absurd and wicked fancies and if this charge of his were holy and Apostolicall wherein he requires us to honour our Bishops as the Lord himself whom they serve and represent what doom do you suppose would he have passed upon those who as such abhorre them and eject them as Devills I cannot without horrour think of either the act or the issue §. 12. The testimony of the Ancient Canons called the Apostles YEt perhaps if Ignatius went alone he might herein incurre some suspicion now all antiquity is with him never any ancient Author said otherwise We will begin with those Canons which are instyled 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the holy and most venerable Apostles Surely if not theirs yet of some Apostolicall men near to their times worthy even for their age and authority to be reverenced of all Christians as the most credible witnesses of the state of those Primitive times In them besides the note of professed distance betwixt the Bishops and Presbyters proclaimed in every Chapter there are those which do imply a power and Iurisdiction as Can 15. Can. 15. If any Presbyter or Deacon 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or any of the number of Clerks leaving his division or Parish shall go to another 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and without the leave or allowance of his own Bishop abide in another Parish or charge we forbid him further to Minister especially if when his own Bishop calls him back he
refuses to return continuing still perverse And again in the next If any Bishop with whom such a Clerk shall stay shall there keep him against this decreed Cessation Let him as a master of disorder be barred from Communion And Can 32. If any Presbyter contemning his own Bishop shall hold Conventicles apart and shall erect an other Altar when he hath no just exception against his Bishop in matter of Religion or Justice Let him be deposed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as a man that affects to rule for he is a Tyran And Can 33. If any Presbyter or Deacon shall by his own Bishop be put from his place it is not lawfull that he be received by any other but only of him that formerly discharged him except perhaps the Bishop that put him out be deceased And because it was so early perceived that even amongst the Bishops themselves an equality might breed confusion It is enacted in the 35 Canon That the Bishops of all nations should know him that was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the prime amongst them and esteem him as their head and do nothing without him Shortly Can 39 it is ordained That the Bishop should take the charge and care of all the affairs belonging to the Church and dispence them as in the presence and view of God Almighty and in the 40 Canon Let the Presbyters and Deacons do nothing besides the liking and allowance of their Bishop for the people of God are committed to him and an account must be required of him for their souls Hear this now ye that pretend there is so much difference betwixt the state of our Bishops and the Primitive What do we challenge more than the Apostolike Canons injoyn what do they prescribe lesse than we challenge There is a power over the Clergie a power of disposing them to generall stations a power of deposing or sequestring them upon just demerits from those charges a power not to over-see only but to regulate their Clergie a power to manage all Ecclesiasticall affairs and if this be no rule no Jurisdiction we claim none Certainly no wit of man can devise any Evasion here but by exception at the credit of the Evidence Loud clamours are raised of their Counterfaysance Rather than fail Pope Gelasius himself is brought in to disprove these Canons as Apocryphall And they that do most eagarly cry the Pope down for the Antichrist are readiest to plead his authority against their brethren Not considering the Pope herein Vafer Afer as Fregevill justly calls him drave his own Plough for nothing could more cut him in the affectation of his Supremacy than those Canons which therefore it is no marvell if he disparage The truth is whereas there are 85 of those Canons in more than one Edition 50 of them are most ancient and legitimate the other 35 later and Superious With this distinction Binius answers the censure of his Pope The 50 first saith he are received as authenticall by the ancient Popes Councels Fathers as containing Orthodox doctrine The other later are condemned by Gelasius Indeed such age and worth plead for the first ranke Isidor praefat ad Collect. Canonn that as Isidorus truly The holy Fathers confirmed their acts by Synodall authority and placed them amongst Canonicall Constitutions If any man desire full information concerning the antiquity and authentiquenesse of these Canons I remit him to Fregivillaeus Fregivil palma Christiana where he shall finde how many of these Canons were transferred into and approved and cited by the Councels of Nice Gangra and Antioch not without the very Appellation of Apostolicall The like afterwards done by the Councels of Constantinople Ephesus Chalcedon Orleans Cabilon There he shall finde them cited for such with approbation of Eusebius Socrates Theodoret Sozomen There he shall finde that Aurelius Bishop of Carthage made use of these Canons as the Test whereby to examine the Roman Popes decrees that by these the African Fathers repelled the Popes Tyrannicall Usurpation but what shall I need to urge these Attestations when Calvin himself and Chamier Calvin Valde antiqui testes moris Ecclesiae Instit l. 4. c. 4. and every ingenuous Writer confesse them to be of very great and therefore very reverend Antiquity §. 13 The state and History of the next age AS touching the state of this truth in the age next succeeding how easie were it to accumulate histories to make it good Citat a D. Bilsen perpet regim Eccl. c●p 13. as that of Methodius in Marianus Scotus who tells us That the Apostle Peter directed Eucharius one of the 70 with Valerius and Maternus to preach the Gospel in Germany and France And that Eucharius planting a Church in Treners held the Bishoprick of that City 23 yeers Traverie● Eccles culmina c. and then left the Episcopacy of that Church to Valerius who after 15 yeers sitting there left it to Maternus he to Auspicius c. Agesip apud Euseb 4. c. 22. And that of Egesippus in Eusebius who travelling to Rome under Amicetus conferred with Primus Bishop of Corinth and divers other Bishops as he went and found them in every succession and in every City constantly observing the truth c. And the Church of Corinth held on in the right way unto the time of Primus Bishop there With these whom can I more fitly match than holy Irenaeus the famous Bishop of Lyons neer bordering upon this age whose testimony may be a clear Commentary upon the former passages Habemus enumerare eos qui ab Apostolis c. we can Iren. l. 3. advers haeres c. 3. saith he reckon up those who by the Apostles were made Bishops in the Churches and their successors even unto our times c. The blessed Apostles viz. Peter and Paul founding and furnishing the Church of Rome delivered the Episcopacy of the Government of that Church to Linus Of this Linus Paul makes mention in those Epistles he wrote to Timothy Anacletus succeeded him In the third place Clemens after him took that Bishoprick who both saw the Apostles themselves and had Conference with them c. After this Clement succeeded Evaristus after Evaristus Alexander and after him Sixtus was made the sixth Bishop from the Apostles and after him Telesphorus who most gloriously suffered Martyrdome after him Higinus then Pius and after him Amicetus and after that Soter had succeeded Amicetus now in the twelfth place from the Apostles Eleutherius possesseth the Bishoprick And soon after he addeth a passage which I cannot pretermit And Polycarpus saith he was not only taught by the Apostles and conversed with many of them who saw our Lord Christ but also was by the Apostles made Bishop in Asia in that Church which is at Smyrna whom we our selves saw in our yonger age for he lasted long and being very old he most nobly and gloriously suffering Martyrdome passed out of this life Lo here was but one ages difference Polycapus
to be tedious in particularities the ancient Canon of Apostles 32 to this purpose is recited and ratified by two Councels Concil Antioch 1. c. 9. the one of Antioch the other of Chalcedon and there applauded by the acclamation of a just rule and the rule of the Fathers And now say reader what is Superiority and Jurisdiction over all Subordinates if this be not If any Bishop of this Island have challenged and usurped more than the written word of God seconded by the ancient Canons of the Primitive Church and holy Fathers thereof do allow let him bear his own burden but certainly if the holy Synode of England should at any time be required to publish any Canon for the determining the Latitude of Episcopall power and the due exercise thereof they could hardly devise to expresse it in more full tearms than the ancient Councell of Antioch hath done Concil Antioch sub Iulio c. 9. Unusquisque Episcopus habeat suae paroechiae potestatem c. Let every Bishop saith it have authority of his own See both to governe it according to the fear of God which is before his eyes and to have a provident care of the whole Countrey which is under his City as also to ordain Presbyters and Deacons and to governe all things with Judgement Upon all this which hath been said I wonder how the Opposers of Episcopacy can read these so plain proofs of the Judgement and practise of the ancient Church of God and not be ashamed of their palpable innovation Hitherto we have clearly deduced the superiority of Bishops above the other Clergie and the power of their Jurisdiction from Christ and his Apostles and conveyed it through the constant practise of the Primitive Church since which time no adversary doubteth of it §. 17. Exceptions against our Episcopacy answered and particularly of the dissimilitude of our Bishops from the Primitive especially in their pomp and perpetuity BUt two main exceptions are taken at our Episcopacy wherein it is pretended there is an utter dissimilitude betwixt the anciently acknowledged superiority and ours The one is perpetuity the other Lordlinesse In both which regards Parker according to his loud langua●e sayes there is as much likenesse betwixt the English Episcopacy and the ancient as betwixt light and darknesse For both these briefly That there is and must needs be a superiority of some Pastors aboue others Beza himself cannot deny who makes the 7 Angels 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 neither indeed can there be any government without it Bez in Apoc 2.1 but this presidence saith he is not perpetuall but only for the time and vicissitudinary Vid● Bez. Saraviam in resp ad triplicatum Episcopatum De gradibus Minist c. 23. There can be no Church without a Ministery Those Ministers are divided into Presbyteries Those Presbyters must have an head that head is to over-rule the body for his turne And this saith he is that Regency which was in the Primitive times and is now renewed in some Churches wherein the president takes his chair moderates the assembly hath Majority of rule during his presidency and is for the present ●efut of Mr. D●●● ham the governour of his brethren the action ended and his course finished returnes to his old forme with a sumus ergo pares And was this the inequality of the Church-governours in the Primitive times Was this the forme of the Regiment and Presidency of the Primitive Bishops Blessed God! Where was this monster of opinion formed Who ever read or heard of such a course of Administration from the beginning of Gods Church upon earth untill this present age And yet these men the better to guilde their upstart fancies to the eyes of the vulgar dare thus confidently obtrude it upon the Primitive times Did not James Ignatius Polycarpus and all those noted Successors in their severall charges live and die Bishops there Do not all the Subscriptions of Councels all histories that ever were in the Church testifie so much was there ever any Writer but any one that hath given intimation but bare intimation of any such shifting of Church-governours for that mistaken allegation of St. Ambrose is justly hissed out of all Countenance Did ever the man fall into any kinde of mention that once practis'd it And shall grave Divines give themselves liberty to dream of such strange Chimaericall devices and then meerly to get glory to themselves and strength to their own fancie● so boldly obtrude them upon Gods Church for good Law and as highly tending to Gods glory If we do not finde among the ancient so direct contradictions to this conceit we must impute it to this that they did not suppose so impossible a fancy could have fallen into any wise heads C●●r l. 4. Epist 2. Yet that of blessed Cyprian is clear enough where a Bishop is once lawfully ordained whosoever would now moreover be made a Bishop in that See it is necessary that he should be forthwith put out of the Church and that he have not the Churches Ordination who doth not hold the Unity of the Church Vid supra Epist Clementis ad Corinthios c. And soon after Forasmuch as after the first Bishop viz. during his life there cannot be a second whosoever after that one who ought to be alone is made he is not a second but none at all Thus he But what need I urge this when the very word of Ordination strikes it dead For what Ordination to that their In-and-out Office have these succeeding and Momentary Presidents And what Bishop was ever in the Church without Ordination So as I must have leave to wonder at this uncouth Novelty and to say that I cannot tell how to resemble it better than to that old abusive sport which was cryed down in the Councell of Salisbury called Ep. tus puor practised also in the Popish times here in England Binius Anno 1274. Episcopatus puerorum upon St. Clements night and on St. Nicholas wherein boys and youths dressed up after the manner of Episcopall habits took upon them to act the Bishops sacred actions and after the pastime ended disroabed themselves and returned to their wonted trade Both these I confidently say are the meer mockeries of Episcopacie and if that other sport pleased but children and fools it is a wonder how this could please wise men As for the state and Lordlinesse which is usually objected to our Episcopacy it is indeed a common eye-sore to our envious detractors This is it that fills the world with Clamour and Pamphlets with spightfull invectives Quis furor O Cives As for the title first alas how poor a quarrell it is Certainly if there were that true piety and those gracious dispositions in the hearts of men professing the Gospell towards Gods Ambassadors and Agents which there ought to be they would not they could not grudge them any styles of Eminence their very feet would be beautifull
equality from which if as we plead they afterwards ascended to this imparity which we now contend for why is it not as safe say you for us to take up that their first form as this latter Admitting all this our answer is the readier we like well to make those holy men of God our choosers They thought fit to alter to this and therefore we think fit to hold to it They tryed both and left this to be continued The truth is the Church of God at the very first was only in framing and not all of a suddain framed In framing thereof as the equality among themselves by the fulnesse of Grace which they all had conduced to that work so all that while for the better promoting of the same work they themselves maintained their own superiority and power over other Presbyters So then the change being made by the Apostles themselves and not by other they being infallibly guided by the Spirit of God though they changed we may not Nay because they changed we may not the holy Ghost led them unto it and therefore we unlesse we will oppose the ordinance of the holy Ghost must not detrect to continue it Otherwise why may I not urge the same argument in the instanced Sabbath The Apostles had duly kept the seaventh day according to the Law they after fell to the observation of the first day What shall any man now infer why not the Jewish Seaventh which was first kept rather than the Evangelicall first which was last taken up However then as it is usually upbrayded to us out of our reverend Whitgift there may be some appendances and formalities of government alterable by the wisedome and discretion of the Church yet for the main substance it is now utterly indispensable and must so continue to the worlds end Indispensable by any voluntary act what inevitable necessity may do in such a case we now dispute not necessity hath dispenced with some immediately Divine Laws Nisi coegerit dura necessitas cui nulla sex esst posita Hadr. Sarav resp ad Bez. de gradi● c. Where then that may be justly pleaded we shall not be wanting both in our pity and in our Prayers The Third Part. § 1. The appellation of Lay-Elders and the state of the question concerning them THE question concerning the lay-lay-Presbyter is not easily stated the thing it selfe is so new that we are not yet agreed of the name Presbyter we know in the Greek as also Zachen in the Hebrew whence the use of it is borrowed is a word importing age and signifies a man elder in yeares Now for that yeares should and doe commonly bring knowledge and experience and carry gravity and authority therefore it is traduced from that naturall sence and used to signifie a man of some eminence in place and government so we have in the Old Testament Elders of the house Gen. 50.7 Elders of the Congregation Levit. 4.15 Elders of the City Deut. 19.12 Elders of the land Gen. 50.7 Elders of the people Mat. 21.23 and these sometimes marched with the hi●hest offices so we have Elders and Iudges Deut. 21.2 Princes and Elders Ezra 10.8 Priests and Elders Lam. 1 10. And all these were titles of civil authority But when we come to the daies of the Gospell under the New Testament now we finde the Elders of the Church Acts 20.17 Acts 11.30 and 14.23 A name which comprehended all those sacred persons who were imployed in the promulgation of the Gospell as Calvin well observes whether Apostles Prophets Evangelist Pastors and Doctors and indeed none but them and in vaine shall we seeke for any other Presby ers or Elders in the Acts or Epistles of the blessed Apostles or in all following antiquity What to make therefore of those Elders or Presbyters which are now in question which saith Travers if you will speake properly are onely them that rule he were wise that could tell meerely civill they would not be for they take upon them Ecclesiasticall charges Meerly sacred and sprituall they are not for they are neither Bishops Priests nor Deacons Meerly Laik they would not be Bez. Resp ad S rav negat ●sse Laicos Clergimen they deny to be Those of old that served at the Altar were wont to be described by their Linnen vestures other men by wollen these are neither of both but a mixture of both a Linsey-wolsey contexture a composition which as God in type of what I now say not forbad under the Law so he never had use of it never acknowledged it under the Gospell How therefore in this fagge-end of the world they should come to have any new being in the Church it is enough for me to wonder if they affect to be seniores populi we would not grudge them this title but if seniores or Presbyteri Ecclesiae they have no more right to that than we Bishops have to Crownes and Scepters least any doubt should seeme ungrounded Beza who will not yeeld these Elders Laicks to grace them the more ubi supra ascribes to them some kinde of spirituall cure Abrah Henri thes Genev. The adminitration of the Word is given to the Elders but to another end c U●judicius Ecclesiaticis praecuntibus pastoribus praesunt they feed the flock by governing they are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and preach after a sort in the reproofe of sin in their Consistory and yet he is faine to contra-distinguish them from teaching Elders and their stile forsooth is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 governments But tell me I beseech you deare brethren you that are so apt to affect and receive a forraigne discipline tell me in good earnest can you think this to be the feeding of the flock of Christ which S Paul requires of the Elders at Ephesus Acts 20. can you thinke these men to bee such as the Apostle there speakes of In quo Dominus vos constituit Episcopos enchargingthem with the flocke over which Christ hath made them Bishops Was ever any lay Elder stiled by that name Doth not Calvin himselfe confesse at the Presbyters both there mentioned and Titus 1.5 are no other Doctors and Teachers because in both places they are●st led bishops And was there ever heard of a Lay-Bishop in the world Those sacrile● ious excepted in some parts of Germany who retaine nothing of that divine order but lands and name Yea my brethren why are ye willing to be deceived who ever spake or heard of a Lay-Presbyter in all the Church of God till this age Take the terme as it is We are forced upon this epithete for distinction sake not out of any scornefull intent of discouraging Gods people we know that in a generall acception they are all the Lords inheritance but because there is a necessary difference to bee put betwixt them whom God hath separated to his owne immediate service in the Ministerie and those Christians which are under them in their
double honour construes those Elders for boni dispensatores ac fideles and because you may thinke this may well enough fit Laick Presbyters he adds Evangelizantes regnum Dei those that preach the Kingdome of God And againe Adversus Presbyterum c. Against a Presbyter receive not an accusation c. Because saith he Ordinis hujus sublimis est honor the honour of this order is high for they are the Vicars of Christ and therefore an accusation of this person is not easily to be admitted for it ought to seeme incredible to us that this man who is Gods Priest should live criminously Thus he so as this Ambrose's Presbyters are no other in his sens● than Gods Priests and Christs Vicars If our Lay-presbyters then have a minde to be or to be called Priests and Vicars their Ambrose is for them else he is not worthy of his fee for what hee hath said If all antiquity have yeelded any other witnesse worth the producing how gladly should we heare him out and returne him a satisfactory answer but the truth is never any man thought of such a project and therefore if any authour have let fall some favourable word that might seeme to bolster it it must be against his will neither did any living mam before some Burgesses of Geneva in our age took it upon them ever claime or manage such an office since Christ was upon the earth §. 5. The uter disagrement and irresolution of the pretenders to the new discipline concerning the particurlar state of the desired government ALl this considered I cannot but wonder and grieve to heare a man of such worth as Beza was so transported as to say that this Presbyter of their device is the Tribunall of Christ a Tribunall erected aboue fifteene hundred yeares after his departure from us an invisible Tribunall to all the rest of Gods Church besides a Tribunall not knowne nor resolved of by those that call it so Surely our blessed Saviour was never ashamed to owne his ordinance neither was he ever so reserved as not to show his owne Crowne and Scepter to all his good subjects he never cared for an outward glorious magnificence but that spirituall port which he would have kept in his government he was farre from concealing and smothering in a suspitious secrecy If this then be or were Christs Tribunall where when how in whom wherefore was it set up Who sees not that the wood whereof it is framed is so green that it warpes every way Plainely the sworne men to this exoticall government are not agreed of their verdict An exquisite forme they would faine have but what it was or what it should be they accord not Even amongst our own in the Admonition to the Parliament An● o 1572. a perfect platforme is tendred not so perfect yet but two yeares after it is altered nine yeares after that Anno 1583. a new draught fit for the English Meridian is published yet that not so exact but that Travers must have a new essay to it 29. Eliz. And after all this a world of doubts yet arise which were in 1588. debated at Coventry Cambridge elsewhere And yet still when all is done the fraternity is as far to seek in very many points for resolution as at the first day yea at this very houre faine would I know whether they can ring this peale without jarres It is not long agoe I am sure that they found every parcell of their government litigious Cartwright is for a Presbytery in every Parish wheresoever a Pastour is and his late clients make every village a Church absolute and independent the Genevian fashion is otherwise neither doth Danaeus think it to be Christs institution to have every Parish thus furnished and governed Our late humorists give power of excommunication and other censures to every Parish-Presbytery The Belgick Churches allow it not to every particular congregation without the councell and assent of the generall Consistory There are that hold the Elders should be perpetuall There are others for a Trienniall others for a bienniall Eldership others hold them fit to be changed so oft as their liveries once a yeare The Elders sayes T. C. are joyntly to execute with their Pastour the election and abdication of all their Ecclesiasticall officers Not so Io. Calv. l. 4. Inst c. 3. saith I.C. Soli pastores onely the Pastours must doe it And good reason what a monster of opinions it is that lay-men should lay on hands to the ordination of Ministers I wonder these men feare not Vzzah's death or Vzziah's leprosie There are that doubt whether there should be Doctors in every Church and I am deceived if in Scotland you do not hold your Consistories perfect without them There are that hold them so necessary a member of this body of Christs ordinance that it is utterly maimed and unperfect without them And indeed what to make of their Doctors neither themselves know nor any for them To make them a distinct office from Pastors as it is an uncouth conceit and quite besides the Text which tels of some Evangelists some Prophets some Pastours and Doctors and not some Pastours and some Doctors so it is guilty of much errour and wildnesse of consequence For how is it possible that spirituall food and teaching should be severed Who can fe● d the soule and not instruct it Or who can teach wholsome doctrine and not feed the soule This is as if every child should have two nurses one to give it the bib another the brest one to hold the dish and the other to put in the spoone Now if Doctors must be whether in every Parish one whether admitted to sit and vote in the Presbyterie and to have their hand in censures or not or whether they bee Lay-men or of the Clergie whether as Academicall Readers or as rurall Catechists are things so utterly undetermined that they are indeed altogether undecidable As for Deacons there is if it may be yet more uncertainty amongst them whether they bee necessary in the constitution of the Church or whether members of the Consistory or not whether they should be onely imployed in matter of the purse or in the matters of God or if so how farre interessed whether fixed or moveable and if so in what circle And least there sould be any passage of this admired government free from doubt even the very widdowes have their brawles These to some are as essentiall as the best to others like to some ceremonies of which Iunius his judgement was Si adsint non recuso si absint non desidero not to be refused where they are and not to be missed where they are not however I see not why the good women should not put in for a share and chide with the Elders to be shut out These which I have abstracted from our judicious surveyer and an hundred other doubts concerning the extent and managing of the new Consistory are enough to let an ingenuous