acquiesce till then we are justly to be excused and I hope you will not blame us if we prefer the universal judgment of the Primitive Church touching the Church Government by Bishops before particular and late dreams They were nearer the Apostles times than Calvin whom for his other great pains and Abilities for the good of Christ's Flock I do much honour who broached not his new Church Polity until about Anno 1500. Was it possible I appeal to your selves that all the Churches of Christ dispersed far and near over the face of the Earth should at one time and that immediately after the last surviving Apostle and as it were Momento temporis joyn or jump in one and the self same Government Episcopal had it not been delivered and setled by the Apostles and their Disciples that converted the World We construe the Apostles Writings by their doings others measure the Scriptures by their own humours first framing Churches to their fancies and then conceit that the Scriptures answer and favour their Chimaera's and by their so doing come within the Verge of the Paroenesis If Bishops claim or usurp more than is their due or abuse the power which Gods Law or the favour of Princes justly alloweth to them and Pastors in Nomine Dei spare them not let the world know it but do not attempt to put out the lights of our Firmament because Phanatics and Men intoxicated stumble or miss their way whilst they shine § Gods promise to his People is Dabo vobis Pastores juxta cor meum 3 Jer. 41. pascent vos scientia doctrina It is evident that the firm of all Pastoral charge consisteth in preaching of the Gospel in administration of Sacraments and by mistake according to some in the punishment of such offences as absolutely exclude us out of the Kingdom of God These being the main things which Christ recommended to his Apostles committing them to their charge the which things only were practised by them as also by their immediate Successors and I hope our Bishops will not be found insufficient for these great Mysteries nor will be found to have warped or swerved from them though we have not wanted Coblers of Glocester the vanity of the present Churches and many other Ichabods heavily complaining § Besides for great and just reasons of State Concerning Innovators in general prudent Magistrates ought to be very circumspect and jealous and to fear the sequels of Church Innovations and Combinations even beyond all apparent cause of fear for that they who believe the Attempts for new Discipline without the licence of Civil Powers are lawful as most Innovators and Men given to change do and that not without some design as well to remove some persons out of the Saddle that themselves might be therein seated as to reform some errors will easily dispute what may be attempted against Superiors which will not have the Scepter of their new Discipline to rule over them For they that will not stick to affirm Amat â—ai ranam ranam nuit else Dianam That the Discipline which they say they have and we want is one of the essential parts of Gods Worship and therefore the better to introduce a good opinion of their own Diana they have not stuck andaciter calumniari and to style Episcopal Regiment Antichristian will as little scruple to affirm withal That the People themselves upon peril of Salvation without staying for the Magistrate may gather themselves into it always having in a readiness to say that they never found that God ever made any Precept or Command which to perform we must needs have leave of another § Moreover as every order of Religious men so every Form of Church-Government that only excepted which Christ instituted besits not every Civil Government nor Kingdom nor every State and therefore the Kingdom of France and renowned State of Venice for great reasons of State banished the Jesuits And we have an excellent example of this in the famous Government of the Kings of Castilia where without the Kings licence no new Religious Order and of such nature is every differing Church-Discipline from the Discipline by Law established could have entrance into those Kingdoms and therefore the Capuchin Friers could not be admitted thither The Foundations of these and the like Decrees are no less equal reasonable and lawful than most necessary and most antient For Cicero in oratione pro domo sua sheweth that no man could consecrate an Altar injussu populi so that the equity of such Laws hath time out of mind been apparently known unto the World And Mecoenas his counsel to Augustus in Dione was very prudent Eos qui in divinis aliquid innovant odio habe coerce non Deorum solum causa sed quia nova numina hi tales introducentes multos impellunt ad mutationem rerum unde conjurationes seditiones conciliabula existunt res profecto minime conducibilis-principatui legibus quoque expressum est quod in religionem committitur in omnium sertur injuriam For it would not in any wise be permitted to a great Number of a strange State and such are all Papists having sworn obedience to another Head contrary to their customs of life and divers ends from those of the present Governments to enter into the state of such a Common-wealth Gather themselves together into one or divers places to make amongst them one or more Heads or Governors and in secret to practise with the Princes Subjects seeing this would be presently accounted as one or more Conventicles of very dangerous consequence and accordingly would be prohibited and interrupted so under the pretext of some new Church Polity be it Popish Presbyterian or Quaking all alike as to the thing in question not by that State established many very many not only of the same but of other Nations also may frequently assemble and gather together under one or more Heads Presbyters or Teachers contrary in Customs and Affections to the established Church-Discipline and perhaps unto true Doctrine also and the many opportunities they have through Confessions Meetings Sermons and other spiritual Conferences insinuating with the Princes Subjects they may by such secret vast diffused scarcely to be discerned and powerful means and opportunities corrupt them in their sidelity and withdraw them from their Allegiances of which we are not without sad experience of elder and later days both from Papists and others not a few of several perswasions And the danger of union in an united confederacy or conspiracy is to be avoided for that it prevails more than number besides discontented minds in the beginning of tumults when any happen occasioned by themselves or others will easily agree though their ends be divers each one hoping thereby to get uppermost or to turn up that Trump that they have most mind to follow and so endanger the State For these many excellent causes all Church Congregations ought very diligently and narrowly to be
I abhor the thoughts of it as will appear hereafter there being a Vast difference between such a Tolleration of Idolatry Superstition crying sins and therefore absolutely unlawful and a Remission only of some few severities in some Acts Canons and Injunctions which relate only to Formalities that tho in construction of Law may be exacted yet may be dispensed withal without prejudice to sound Doctrine or good Conversation and without which the Worship of God would be as pure and sincere Indeed all Acts Canons and Injunctions whether they relate unto Uniformity or not ought according to their own Nature to be sincere and free from all Traps and Covert designs to exclude any that Profess the same Faith and Worship tho many cannot perhaps thro meer tenderness of Conscience submit to every thing therein enjoyned In Concerns of this Nature Scripture in a more especial manner ought to be the Rule of Resolutions and that abstractly and purely without mixing and bringing with them Interest Usurpation or Artifices of men else what were it but by Edicts to lay Snares in Mispah and spread Nets upon Tabor to use Laws Menaces and subtleties to keep Gods People from his Court and Sanctuary and Confine them to State-Religion and to Walk after the Mode of the Commands of men Those Non-conformists Non-assenters that have received Order which they could not have had but permissu superiorum by the Licence and under the Authority of the King in our Laws expressed For no Man hath Power to give himself either Orders to be a Priest or Institution to a Pastoral Charge but must depend upon another Power who by Acts Canons and Edicts long since published and extant hath directed the qualifications of the Persons to be Ordained the manner and Form how the Persons who ought to Ordain them c. and they could not be ignorant that the Liturgy and enjoyned Ceremonies were by the Imperative Constitutive Government of this Church and State to be Countenanced and used in publick Churches by the Bishops Presbyters and Pastors either they consulted their Consciences when they entered on the Ministery by taking Holy Orders whether they could Comply and Submit unto the whole Frame of Government and Polity of this Church Constituted by Act of Parliament from whom they were to receive Authority and Licence to Exercise their Function Gifts and Talents or they did not If they did not they are inexcusable for entring on so Sacred a Calling Stamped with an Indelible Character so rashly so unadvisedly without perspect or foresight of Consequences and yet if they were so pur-blind as not to see one step before them yet their neglect herein cannot be Pleaded in their Excuse it being their own Fault in Common Justice no Court will permit any man to take Advantage of his own misdemeanors or failings Besides hath not every Minister that hath receiv'd Pastoral Charge twice or thrice if not oftner witnessed his allowance of all and singular the 39 Articles of our Church once at his Ordination before the Bishop then at his Institution into his Benefice before his Ordinary and both these by Subscription under his own hand and afterwards upon his Induction before his own Flock and that by verbal Approbation he hath not only acknowledged in the Church the Power of Ordaining Rites and Ceremonies 20 Articles But he hath after a sort bound himself openly to rebuke such as willingly and purposely break the Traditions and Ceremonies of the Church as Offenders of the Common Order of the Church and Wounders of the Consciences of the weak Brethren and hurters of the Authority of the Magistrate Artic. 34. and is it not enacted 1º Eliz. c. 2. that they shall be punished pro ut in the Act that shall Preach declare or speak any thing in derogation or depraving our Liturgy c. Are not then such Dissenters obliged both in Conscience and by virtue of their own Voluntary Acts and Subscriptions to be constant to their own Hands and Tongues if they would be accounted Faithful in Gods House as was Moses And is it reasonable then to hearken unto such Pleading against their own Voluntary Acts and Subscriptions their own Hands and Tongues Besides quo jure with what Face or Conscience can they expect Temples maintenance protection and all things requisite for their Ministery from that Law and Government that they will not Protect Countenance nor submit unto § Indeed it seems to me an old piece of Conscientiousness if not Impiety to enter the Holy Ministerial Function to day when they are sure without Conformity to be silenced to morrow Besides it is Nicety and Indiscretion to exact an express Rule of Scripture or Faith for the Cross in Baptism for standing at the Creed Kneeling at the Lords Beard for Habits in Divine Service the usual sear-Crows of scrupulous men In these cases consent of the Church or Tradition may suffice so there be no express Law of Command to the contrary He that exacts in these Points as express Rules of Faith or Warrant of Scripture for his Obedience to Ecclesiastical Government as he would or as every man ought to do for adventuring upon Worshipping of Images Invocation of Saints c. doth make his Brain or Fancy the chief Seat of his Religion which should be seated in the Heart and Intitles God to the Fancies and Chymaeraes of their own Brains Thus to disobey the Church in these Cases wherein it hath Authority to Command Obedience is to disobey those Mandates of God which give the Body of the Church Authority to make Laws to Govern it self by in things indifferent neither expresly Forbidden nor expresly Commanded by the Law of God I know the Apostles Rule is let every man be fully persâ—â—ded in his own mind 14 Rom. 5. And this full perswasion or assurance of Faith is in the Cases there mentioned necessary because whatsoever is not of Faith is Sin v. 23. This last Maxim is undoubtedly true and the former Precept most exactly to be observed in such Causes as the Apostle there speaks of that is where the positive Practise unless our Warrant be Authentick in it self and evident to us is very dangerous or deadly whereas on the contrary the forbearance of such Practise is either safe or not prejudicial to our Souls but to our Bodies only or State temporal such Ceremonies as be neither against Faith nor adverse to good manners in the Judgment of St. Austin ep 11.8 go for indifferent and may be Born in Christian Unity without Offence or Confusion If God hath left things indifferent what Authority can make them necessary Let them be so still and their nature not changed by any Injunction and Unity will necessarily ensue Quodam modo it may be true that in Ordination there is something which they receive thereby from God Independent of the King or any Civil Power viz. Authority to Tâ—â—ch Baptize and Administer Sacraments by Virtue of Ordination And â—â— is as true that
own Sabbath were ordained for men and not men for the Sabbath nor yet for Popes that what Powers soever of Right belongs unto them they are given unto them for the good and benefit of Christians and not to Tyrannize or Lord it over Gods Heritage 2. That God hath not given unto Popes any greater Authority in the Government of their Dominions whether of Church or State than unto other Princes and Bishops to whom God hath also confirmed and ratified all Power that is necessary for the good of the Governed And as it appertaineth not to other Emperors and Kings to govern Romish Church or State so it doth as little appertain to Popes to Govern either Church or State of other Kingdoms 3. That no people were or ever will be contented with a Government which tends more to the benefit grandeur pomp and pride of life of those that Govern than to the good and comfort of those that are governed it being the natural and fundamental right of the governed to apply and devolve as much of their own power without divesting themselves thereof as they please to one or more Persons subject nevertheless to the trusts reposed in them to be alwayes imployed and improved to the behoof and benefit of the governed 4. That all people do with some contentedness endure a reasonable Bond but from an excessive one every one doth naturally endeavor by all means tho indirect to free themselves The Antient History of Nodus Gordianus which because Alexander could not unty he cut in pieces whereby Oraculi sortem vel elusit vel imâ—â—evit is applicable to all Humane tyes and Obligations not excepting Governments Ecclesiastick or Civil which if of such a Nature that those that are unjustly or too hard bound may free themselves by ordinary way of Justice then they are endured with some patience But if there be no ordinary means to relieve themselves then they ever have had and I fear ever will have recourse to means extraordinary tho Indirect as Seditions and the like Wherefore it is undoubtedly doing God the best Service to keep every Government within its due bounds which is absolutely necessary for the preserving and propagating of Religion and for keeping the State in quiet temperament and that to grant Ecclesiasticks exorbitant Authority thinking it to be a favoring of Religion as heretofore they did perswade some Emperors with design to get their power into their own hands is an undiscreet Zeal prone to end in the dishonour of God damage of Religion and in publick confusion As God himself without respect to Persons made the Earth by his Power established the World by his Wisdom stretched out the Heavens by his understanding Jer. 51.15 so he never made Kingdoms and Nations for Popes or Princes but both the one and the other for the Comfort and Solace of the governed Think you that if his Vicars or Ambassadors or Vice Royes govern otherwise than according to his own Rules and Precepts who will measure all by his own Line and righteousness by his own Plummet that they shall go unpunished I tell you nay but except they repent they shall all likewise perish His Holiness himself not excepted according unto Jer. 23.1 2. Wo to the Pastors that destroy and scatter the Sheep of my Pasture Therefore thus saith the Lord ye have scattered my Flocks and driven them away and have not visited them behold I will visit upon you the evil of your doings I say again is it reasonable to believe that ever God who created light and darkness Heaven and Earth the Sea and all things that are therein and created and formed all Mankind in general a little lower than the Angels out of one and the same Clay in his own likeness and after his own Image without respect to these or those Persons Popes or others and gave unto Mankind in General Dominion over the Fish of the Sea and over the Foul of the Air and over the Cattel and over all the Earth and over every living thing that moveth upon the Earth and all this for the good and comfort of all men in general should yet subject all Mankind Emperors Kings and Temporal Princes not excepted to the will and pleasure of one Pope or one Vicar or one Ambassador or one Vice-Roy as Vniversal Monarch to be governed and guided by the Will and pleasure of these men because they stile themselves Gods Vicars nay Gods on Earth whereby one Mans will may become all mens misery No! God made all Governors in the World for the good and happiness of the governed and not the governed to be subject to the Will Lusts and Pleasures of the Governors he never gave Precepts nor Commands relating to Government and Governors but what conduced to the good of the governed and alwayes rebuked and punished all such Governors as well those that he anointed and set up himself as severely as those whom the People did choose that walked and governed contrary to his Rules and Precepts Did God think you send his own Son out of his own bosom to take on him the form of a Servant and was made in the likeness of men and being found in fashion as a man humble himself and became obedient to that shameful death the death of the Cross for us Men and our Salvation in General And can we then be so sottish as to believe that all Mankind were made to be Slaves and Vassals unto one Compito one Vicar General made Governor by themselves by delegating their own Power without divesting themselves thereof upon this or that man for their own good and benefit and for the better Government of their whole body either explicitely or implicitely alwayes implyed and alwayes so to be understood undoubtedly all Governors in the World whether Ecclesiastick or Civil be their Power what it will never so absolute never so Arbitrary yet by the Law of God they ought to govern no otherwise than Christ himself would govern were he come in glory to Reign on Earth and to square their Actions according to the Dictates and Laws of God delivered unto us by the Prophets and Apostles And tho so to govern be a happiness and a favour indeed unto the Subjects yet it is an absolute duty unto God and Man and of which he will certainly one day exact an Account The reason is demonstrable for that no man living Paternal Government excepted nor any number of men whatsoever can have any compleat lawful Authority over any Politick Society of men but he must have it either by consent of Parties or immediate appointment of God Hooker 70. Notwithstanding this natural right of publick Societies I appeal to all Story if ever it were Recorded that ever any Pope quitted his pretensions to his Supremacy or to his pretended power over any Temporal Prince that was at variance with him since the day that they first took them up unless he were Cudgelled into better manners and better obedience
by avowing that the spirit of the Prophets must be subject only to the Prophets What Rule have these Presbyters to judg by what Logick what way of Ratiocination that the Laity have not and know not and understand not as well as they what Infallibility above Kings and other the Laity have these men I must confess I never found them writing in terminis for this Infallibility But if we may guess at their meaning by their mumping their Actions and their Arguments are premisses which to some may seem to yield such conclusions that they would fain have their Doctrines though treasonable to be embraced as Oracles Are not these Doctrines purely Romish surely yes St. Paul was certainly more infallible than they and yet he submitted his Preachments to his Auditory in general not exclusive the Laity Judg ye what I say Nay the Layity as well as Priests are commanded to search the Scriptures and try Spirits and shall not the King and his Sages Judg of Doctrines because delivered in a Pulpit which may concern the bene esse nay perhaps the very esse quiet state and weal of a Kingdom If I were put to it I should not doubt but to make it out that there is as good warrant in Scripture for the infallibility of Kings as there is for either Pope or Presbyter though I must profess there is no sound ground no nor yet probable appearance for either If the Presbiter will have his Doctrines received without controulment and contradiction he must shew better warrant than the Pope because he pretends to judg what I think the Pope doth not even Affections Spotsw Hist Mr. Andrew Melvil in his form of Church Policy presented by him to the Parliament sitting in Striveling Anno 1578. hath this head The Magistrate commands in external things only and actions done before Men But the Spiritual Ruler such as Mr. Melvil and his fellow Presbyters are judgeth both the Assections and the external Actions in respect of conscience by the word of God In which form there are other dangerous heads sutable to what Mr. Blake and the Presbyteries so sharply contended for in his cause and what tumults c. ensued thereupon in the Contest for that desperate form Histories do abundantly shew but I forbear But seeing they make so desperate ill use of 1 Cor. 14.32 by perverting very plain texts I am resolved though no Presbyter to try if I can hit the true and natural sense and meaning thereof seeing they have not and perhaps will not it not being for their interest and prerogatives § It s true the Spirit of the Prophets is subject to the Prophets 1 Cor. 14.32 but what doth this avail Pope or Presbyters surely they will not say that the Prophets of the New Testament since the Apostles days are so authentick and infallible as those of the Old Besides what if the terms Prophet and Prophesying are in some senses and places and happily in this as applicable to the Laity as to the Clergy nay what if in this very Text by Prophets is meant in general all Believers those within the Pale of the Church excluding those only without as unfit to judg such matters Mark the Contest First Prophesying in general serveth not for them that believe not but for them which believe v. 22. Secondly If therefore the whole Church not Priests only come together in one place and all speak c. v. 23. and All prophesy v. 24. And every one of you hath a Psalm hath a Doctrine c. 26. If any man speak v. 27. Let the Prophets speak two or three and let the other judg v. 29. If any thing be revealed to Another that sitteth by let the first hold his peace v. 30. For ye may all prophesie one by one that all may learn and all may be comforted v. 31. And the spirits of the Prophets are subject to the Prophets v. 32. Let the Women keep silence c. v. 31. wherefore Brethren covet to prophesy v. 39. Now if the words or terms of Whole Church All Every one Any man The other Another Brethren be words and terms of universality and differencing then certainly the words Prophets and Prophesying are in this Chapter more especially applicable to the Auditory the Brethren than to the Presbyters themselves and is an admonition and warrant to the faithful to assemble and speak to edification besides the commanding of the Women silence is a pregnant presumption if not an affirmation That all the Brethren might speak so likewise is the command to the Brethren to covet to prophesy But be it as they would have it that by Prophets are meant Presbyters only which is impossible in true construction but the contrary yet those Presbyters by the command of the same Apostle v. 29. are to be judged by the other that are not Presbyters which is a better warrant to the King and his Council and Judges to judg them than they can shew to Judg King and Council and to usurp Judgment to themselves only Besides the very command in the very first verse is to all to follow Charity to desire Spiritual gifts but rather that they may prophesy and by prophesying by the scope of this Chapter is clearly meant speaking to edification and exhortation and comfort that our words might minister Grace to the Hearers which certainly is the duty of every man and which if Mr. Blake had observed he had never been called in question Now tell me how much less doth the Presbyter claim than the Pope who pretends that every Clergy or Church-man both they and their Family nay the very Concubines of Priests are exempt from all Jurisdiction Temporal and that jure divino and that from the same Apostle Paul 2 Cor. 2.15 He that is spiritual judgeth all things yet he himself is judged of no man The same Scripture is as strong for the Presbyter as the Pope and it is to be feared that if he were as fast in the Saddle as the Pope is that he would claim it as peremptorily and therefore sit to be prevented by the wisdom of Princes But were the Allegations true and pertinent either there should be no Spiritual man besides the Pope or Presbyter and so the subject of the Proposition should be homo singularis one man only or if there be more Spiritual men they should all of them be Popes or Presbyters to judg all others and be judged of none no not of the Pope of Rome himself unless he be no body For those are convertible he that saith all excepteth none and he that saith none excepteth all Touching the Prophesy we hold saith J. Robinson f. 45 46. the very same that the Synod held at Embden 1571. hath declared Harm Synod Belg. p. 21 22. viz. 1o. In all Churches whether but springing up or grown to some ripeness let the order of Prophesy be observed according to Pauls institution 2.o. Into the Fellowship of this work are to be admitted not
visited and looked into for the Iic preservation and Peace of the State for that they being of such different minds and tempers cannot assemble together without eminent and notable danger if the Prince be not always made privy with what passeth among them in their Assemblies and Congregations and therefore they ought to be treated according to the danger that necessarily attendeth such Innovations § Cautilousness is the sinews of wisdom Farilior cautio est ubi manifesta formido And nothing is more dangerous than to be secure in matters of State In some Forreign Countries every Hoast is bound to bring his travelling guest before an Officer there to certifie his Name with the occasion of his coming and intended time of aboad in those parts And in case he stay longer he must again renew his Licence so curious and vigilant also are they to keep their City from Infection that without a Certificate witnessing their coming from wholsom places they may not escape the Lazaretto How more watchful ought Magistrates to be to prevent the Contagion of the Souls of their Subjects and therefore in prudence they ought to inspect and supervise all Pastors and Teachers High and Low that no mischief or disturbance to the quiet State of the Realm be contrived hatched or fomented by their Doctrine or Discipline § In Tuscany when Pius the 4th attempted to give the Office of Inquisition to the Friers of St. Dominic Cosmo the great Duke would not consent why Because those of that Order took part with the Enemies of the House of Medices when they were driven out of Florence Anno. 1494. The same reason and example holds with us and do shew that there ought an Account to be made to the King of all such as are recommended to him either for Orders or Preserments that he may be fully satisfied that their Piety and Duty towards their Prince and Religion the Christian life of the People and the Devotion of the Ecclesiasticks themselves towards their natural Prince and Country may not be prejudicial to their quiet State § Besides these grand reasons of State against Conventicles the 32 Canon of those stiled Apostolical doth Ordain Si quis Presbyter c. deponatur quasi principatus amator existens est enim tyrannus c. Canon 32. That if any Presbyter contemning his Bishop shall colligate a part and erect another Altar of which nature Conventicles are Deponatur as a lover of Empire for he is a Tyrant All which reasons do perswade that Common-wealth Christian or not Christian may for good and sound reasons suppress Conventicles of a dangerous consequence that are really and truly so but not out of fears and jealousies that they will prove so For holy Writ seems very much to favour and warrant Meetings or Conventicles of the Brethren Subjects of any Kingdom solemnly meeting in the name and fear of God either with or without a Priest to the end that their mutual edification among themselves and quickening one another to zeal and constancy in true Faith Piety and Religion and the preserving themselves against Apostacy may thereby be advanced and reinforced No doubt but that many excellent advantages may accrew thereby as provoking one another to love and to good works mutual observance and communicating of each others dispositions tempers gifts experiences vertues failings that they may the better sit themselves to do one another good or to receive comfort and consolation one of another in such Christian Conversation Let us consider one another to provoke unto love and unto good works not forsaking the assembling of our selves together as the manner of some is by which expression he seems to rebuke those that did forsake such Meetings but exhort one another and so much the more as you see the day approaching 10 Heb. 24 25. which place together with the practice of the Apostles doth not warrant Publick Assemblies only but also the Private Meetings of Christians for mutual conference and exhorting one another which are not to be neglected nor forsaken but to be used for preserving unity in the Church but not to foster Schism Separation Treason Rebellion or to hinder the more publick Assemblies More fully to the same purport is 1 Cor. 14.23.24.25 to 33. whosoever seriously considers first that this Epistle is wrirten to the Church of God in general and not to Priests which is at Corinth and to them that are sanctified in Christ Jesus called to be Saints with all that in every place call upon the Name of Jesus Christ our Lord both theirs and ours and then that all the Documents Doctrines and Intimations in that Chapter specified relating to spiritual gifts to prophesying and speaking with tongues are directed to the Brethren and Church in general if therefore the whole Church be come together into some place and all speak c. V. 23. may with good consequence and deduction conclude that all solemn Conventicles and Meetings tending to edification whether 5 or 5000 or whether with or without a Priest are thereby warranted and that it is a fundamental right due to all Christians and a duty incumbent on them all so to congregate and so to glorify God and edify one another and the very order deportment and decency of such Assemblies is therein described and pourtraied out These being the Commandments of God V. 37. with what good conscience then can any discountenance or speak against such Congregations when the same duty is certainly as incumbent upon them that discountenance and speak against them as upon those that countenance or frequent them Is it because they are afraid of the breath of fools to be accounted Puritanical Presbyterian or Independent or that because they think every man in Hell that is worse than themselves or those that are better but in a fools Paradise or that by so frequenting they should crush Arts of compliance plausibility ambition and preferments or that they are afraid of being righteous overmuch what is this else but Demas-like to forsake the fellowship of Saints and to embrace this present World making the Souls of men the most precious thing that ever God created subordinate to their lusts and risings and Balaam-like for hope of honour or preferment become more senseless of Gods Command than was his dumb Ass and like Micha's Levite for a little better reward swallow down Theft and Idolatry flatter profaneness betray the truth of the Gospel and smother and dissemble the strictness and purity of Gods most holy ways § Consider that all Instruction and Edification is not from Priests nor out of Pulpits only Apollos Minister of Caesarea and of Iconia was an eloquent man mighty in the Scriptures instructed in the way of the Lord fervent in the spirit who spake and taught diligently the things of the Lord and spake boldly in the Synagogue and yet Aquila and Priscilla his Wife Tent-makers when they heard him took him home and expounded unto him the way of God more
Faith the same Doctrines and Worship and the providence of God having called and sixed them here as if to this great work of Preaching the Gospel designed their Mouths cannot justly be stopt but upon some politick Accounts and reasons of State only Prudence not Conscience is then to be the guide of Councils For Example If a Presbyter hath swallowed a solemn League and Covenant so solemnly that he cannot nor will not renounce it what should the Government do Indulge those that will not protect that It portends a dangerous Reserve a sower Leaven Tinder in the Bosom apt to take sire apt to relapse into the same prodigious mischiefs Is it not much more agreeable to sound reason that the Royal Son should pare the Nails of those that cannot disgorge themselves of that fatal Covenant which introduced those Premises which yielded that sanguinary Conclusion which made the Father a Glorious King by bringing of him to the Block Conscience of factious Priests or of Covenanters in such cases is not adust in any measure Adaequate in the Ballance against the safety peace and quiet of Crowns and Kingdoms for that we have no Lydius lapis no infallible touch-stone to discover whether Consciences are truly weak or only pretended to be so the searcher of hearts only knows that insallibly And if pretence may be a just excuse to warrant disobedience unto established Sanctions Laws would then be no Laws at all for he that would might and he that would not might choose whether he would obey or no for that no Man can distinguish between real and pretended Scrupulosities That some should be indulged and others not ought to be no cause of complaint neither for that every thing is n t convenient for every Body nor for every Sect and State the same Legislators that have power to Indulge some may by the same right forbid others and indeed make any Laws convenient For the Common-wealth ought to be always kept in a quiet and peaceable temper even ad pondus if possible enough This only by way of Hint and Caution that there be great waryness and circumspection in granting and denying Indulgences If Priests otherwise Orthodox and worthy be silenced for such or the like reasons this ariseth not from the discipline of the Church nor from the Nature of Lyturgies but from the Government of the State What Must there then be no relief for scrupulous and tender Consciences that cannot renounce Covenants or comply with Innocent Ceremonies and Commands yes if they are truly so and do not enter-sere with the Established Government of Church and State 1. Consciences really and truly Scrupulous and tender if they break not out into overt act are not within the Magistrates Province but if rashly without consideration of obtaining or foresight of peril or perturbation of the Church or State they will adventure to take Solemn Leagues and Covenants to introduce a separate Mode or Government in Church or State contrary to that already established by the Magistrate then they most properly come within his verge and cognizance 2. Consciences ought generally not to be forced nay cannot whilst they are in their proper circle but are to be gained and reduced by dint of Argument and force of Truth by moderate connivence and by the use of good Instruction and perswasion 3. Consciences when they rove and become excentrick moving beyond their proper circle and bounds and being out of their proper Sphear tend and prove to be matter of Faction loose their proper Nature and forfeit their just Priviledges and Prerogatives then and not till then the civil Magistrate may take notice and justly restrain or punish their undue practises and contempts if such though guilded most speciously with pretences of Conscience and Religion § As happily their opinion is not so infallibly orthodox who affirm that all Church Discipline and Reformation must be after one Platform and that they which will perfectly reform must bring and reduce the form unto the State which it was at in the days of the Apostles A thing in the opinion of Judicious Hooker neither possible nor certain nor yet absolutely convenient For that which was used in their dayes the Scripture he saith doth not fully declare so that making those times the Rule and Canon of Church Government they make a Rule which not being possible to be fully known is as impossible to be fully kept so happily their opinion is as little Orthodox and as little convenient who deem it no good policy to alter or innovate any thing in Church affairs or to endeavour to reduce it to that State wherein it stood in the dayes of the Apostles the one opinion conducing to bring Reformation to Anullity the other to an Impossibility In elder times soon after the dayes of the Apostles and more especially after Constantines dayes there were imperfections no doubt and warpings from the Apostolical Rules and practises and happily in some things greater than in the present Antiquity therefore ought not so to be revered and adored as that something in these latter Ages may not be reputed better and more convenient there being no necessity that the same publick things should be always ordered in one and the self same manner but as times have mutations so it may be sit to alter or change the Government of Church or State It is possible that the Antient manner of Governing may not be profitable except the Antient state of the Church do return also But if Antiquity must be so revered as not to admit of the least Innovation then without all peradventure that Government which Christ and his Apostles instituted and lest unto his Church must necessarily be the most Antient and have the fairest pretence unto Jus divinum for its justification and then for those very reasons ought to remain unto this very day unalterable and all other Modes and Forms can be but Prudential only and at the discretion of the Church rightly so called And there can be no doubt but that Christ left such a Government to his Church as might be exercised in any Kingdom Christian or other without enterfering or clashing with the Civil Government of any Nation or Kingdom wheresoever the Apostles and their Successors in all Ages and Countries should preach the Gospel and gather Churches And that the self-same Government is plainly set down in the new Testament and that it was instituted by the Apostles and that the Antient Fathers after their example did prosecute the same for about 250 years after Christ with great success and increase of Converts unto Christianity And such Government being practicable then notwithstanding the great enmity that all Nations and Governments had even unto Christianity it self there can be no doubt and no reason can evince but it may be as practicable now which is the opinion of very many and those not Phanaticks And then Independents will have very fair and antient Records to shew for their Congregational way if
Politick the other Ecclesiastick what then hindereth that the Church now also on whom God hath bestowed a Christian Magistrate should be less content with one Government To me it seemeth monstrous to place two heads upon one body of a visible Church whose Commands Decrees and Government are divers so that the rule of one is not subject to the care of the other For the Ecclesiastical Senate or Presbytery would have the Supream Power of Punishing Vices even in Magistrates themselves though not with Corporal Punishment yet with Excommunication and debatring them from the Sacraments whereas one Magistrate appointed by God may now as well bridle all transgressions as he could of old was it not so in the Kingdom of Solomon which was as it were a Type of Christs Church reigning on this Earth And I do not find either under Moses or under the Judges or Kings or under the Government of those which were called Rulers such two discrepant Judicatories Nature denies saith Musculus two Authentick Governments in the same People whereof one is not subject to the other It is manifest that David did dispose of all Offices and Ministers of the Church 1 Ch. 22.27 Afterwards Solomon did not only build but consecrate the Temple and not a Priest Hitherto belongeth that famous History of Jehosaphat in the 2 Chr. 19. which doth perfectly clear this cause as also doth the History of Ezekias and indeed the whole Old Testament It is too well known that though Papists and Presbyters do allow something to secular Magistrates in the Rule of the Church yet the Supremacy of Power they do utterly and in very terms deny And having obtained possession of power in the Church and that as they hold out by Christs own institution they are very loath to resign the same again at the demand and into the hands of Princes It is true that when our Saviour first gave Commission to his Disciples to Preach Baptize and Propogate the true Faith in the World secular Authority being universally averse thereunto he was of necessity to commit for the present both Doctrines and Discipline to the charge of his Apostles yet not without a promise That Kings should be their Nursing Fathers and Queens the Nursing Mothers of his Church who though now they are come in and become friendly to Religion and willing to advance the spiritual prosperity of the Church as well as of the Temporal of the State yet both Papists and Presbyters having got possession are loath to be disquietted dreaming of a Spiritual Empire belonging to Priests more worthy and Sacred than that of the Emperors and so secretly preferring the Crosier before the Crown § Power and Government are things most awful and honourable and the truest owners thereof next under God are Princes whom the true legitimat Church ever looked upon as Cods immediate Vicegerents Deputies and Governours thereof St. Peter 1.2 Writing to the Church in the time of a Heathen and Impious Emperor commandeth every Soul to be Subject to the higher Powers He acknowlegeth power in a very Nero and that to be the higher Power And to that Power of that Nero he subjects every soul Christian and Heathen Priest and Layman and it may not seem strange that meer Power and Rule in an unbeliever and wicked Prince should be so sacred and inviolable We must take notice that the wickedness of Princes in ill Commands though it discharge us as to those ill Commands yet it doth not discharge their power or Rule either in those or any other For when Princes rule well they are to be obeyed when ill they are to be endured and this very endurance is an effect of obedience and subjection The violence of this or that Nero may be Tyrannous but the lawful Authority whereby the same violence is done is not Tyranny Neither is the Office of Kings the less Glorious because they can use force nor yet that of Ministers the more Glorious because they may use none but perswasive Motives and Allurements For Power it self being a Glorious Divine thing it must be most honourable to use it in Gods Cause and his Glory and the advance and increase of his Flock and Kingdom and therefore we see Iosiah and other good Kings are commended for using compulsion and on the contrary other Kings which used it not for the suppressing of Idolatry removing the high places and the like did draw curses on themselves and their subjects And whereas it is objected by I. M. and others that Force and Compulsion restrain only from the act of sin but not the Will from the liking thereof and that to compel outward profession is to compel Hypocrisy not to advance Religion But we see common experience teacheth us better effects thereof For Scotland Holland Denmark Sweden Bohemia England c. suffered great changes of Religion in a short space and these changes were wrought by the force of Civil Magistrates and could never else without strange Miracles from Heaven have been so soon compassed and these Changes have not proved the less sincere because Civil Authority wrought them as the Samaritan first believed Christ on the Womans word but then for his own sake so those that were compelled to the Wedding so many Papists in Queen Elizabeths dayes which came to our Churches first to save their Purses afterwards came out of liking of which the Pope being advertised forbad it and made it a Signum Distinctivum It s a shrewd sign that that Babe is spurious which the Mother is ashamed to bring to light and that is Falshood and Dross not Truth and Gold which dares not abide any Test and that those Masses are not of a Divine Origine that must be celebrated in an unknown Tongue and trusted only with the Priests who are parties to the Cheat. Besides the means used in all Laws of God and man to induce obedience are rewards and punishments both which may occasion Hypocrisie Corrupted man is as inclinable to dissemble Religion which he believes not as well for hope of reward as for fear of punishment which is vitio personae non praemii vel poenae else God would not have appointed them as mounds of his laws and motives of obedience The pious example of a good King is of mervelous inducement towards Religion yet one may hypocritically dissemble his Religion to please his Prince Example is so powerful a motive that it is said to compel 2 Gal. 14. Peccant magistratus cum minis paenis alios peccare non prohibent 13 Nehem. 17.21.22 If Nebuchadnezar erect his prodigious Idol and upon pain of a Fiery Furnace require all to worship it all People Nations and Languages are presently upon their faces If persecution be but threatned Demas-like we presently forsake the fellowship of Saints and imbrace this present world On the other side rewards of honour and preferment will cause some Balaam-like to run and ride and become more sensless of Gods wrath and indignation than
for Supremacy over Causes and Persons Ecclesiastical and Civil but let them accompt it their most Supreme Service to attend on that Supremacy so shall more honour and sanctity pass from Pope and Presbyter to Kings and Emperors and more efficacy and vertue from Kings to Ministers more Grace and happiness from both to the People § Excommunication The main Argument used both by Pope and Presbyter to raise the Miter and Consistory above the Crown is drawn from the power of the Church in Excommunication which Sword Church men only claim and wherewith they think they may as freely strike Princes as Princes may strike them with their Temporal Sword of both which a word in general and also in particular as it relates to Princes Excommunication that great Popish and Presbyterian Thunderboult and Diana of their Discipline claimed to be their due Jure Divino and so highly exalted by them that it is not more monopolized nor advanced higher at Rome than it would be here by them within their Precincts if not curbed by the Civil Magistrate so apt it is to be tyrannically abused by Pope and Presbyter for experience tells us that if they might have their Will they would by virtue thereof put such a Spiritual Pad-lock upon the Temporal Sword and by their In ordine ad Spiritualia take such fast hold of it themselves that if they and Christian Princes should chance to differ they may be sure so long as their Doctrine concerning it will be believed to have the drawing of it themselves and leave poor Christian Princes to whom the Sword of Right more antient than Papacy or John Calvins Presbytery more properly belongs to defend themselves with the Scabbard for which several of them have paid dear witness amongst others those 17 Scotish Ministers who being convented before the Council of Scotland for holding a solemn Assembly at Aberdeen without the Kings leave 2. July 1605. utterly denied the Authority both of King and Council in that behalf affirming that in matters Ecclesiastical they neither ow nor ought to acknowledge themselves in any subjection either to the King or to his Council and that all spiritual differences should be tryed and determined by the Church meaning thereby themselves the Clergy for which cause and for denying the Kings Supremacy 6 of the chief of them were arraigned and condemned at Blackness in Scotland January 10. 1605. and how insolently some of the same Tribe vsed King James more than once he himself hath published in Print and their imperious exhorbitances may be read as in several other Books so in Presbytery Displayed printed 1644. and how they used King Charles the first I. M. hath demonstrated in his Tenure of Kings therein manifesting that they founded the Premises that enabled the Phanaticks to conclude that sanguinary and unparalled Catastrophe And that their good deeds also may be remembred we do recount them to have been very instrumental in the restoration of the Son which is some kind of expiation for their injuries done unto the Father Some and those of no small esteem in the Church are of opinion that the exercise of Excommunication was then only needful when no visible Church had any legal or civil remedy to preserve its unity or purge it self of gross Offenders or that the right or power of Excommunication which the Apostles and immediate Successors had did utterly expire when once whole Cities and Common-wealths became Christian and were enabled from the Supreme Civil Magistrate to punish Offenders and to enact coercive and penal Laws and other means necessary for the spreading and promulgating of the Gospel Sure I am that experience hath made it more than probable that after the Church and Common-wealths were so linked and interwoven together that every Member of the Common-wealth was enforced to become a Member of the Church and to be so admitted by the Church Governours the edge of this spiritual Sword was very much abated and the force of former spiritual Ordinances became stifled with the multitude of those persons against whom they were directed whether the defect be in the power it self or in such as have but to do not use it as they ought certain it is that this branch of discipline is not in our days so effectual as in former times it hath been The meer spiritual Power with which alone the Apostles and their Immediate Successors were endued was of greater efficacy than both the remainder of the like spiritual Power in Dermier Bishops and Pastors and all the strength of secular Civil Power wherewith Princes States or Kingdoms since the mutual incorporation of Common-wealths and Churches have as they were in conscience and Jure Divino bound assisted Prelates and Church Governours of this nature seems to be the Apostolical Rod. 1. Cor. 4.21 wherewith Paul threatneth the Corinthians whereby is meant as he explains himself 2. Cor. 13.10 ch 10.16 ch 13.2 To use sharpness to revenge all unrighteousness not to spare all which are expressions of a certain miraculous vertue of impossing punishment Thus Annanias and Saphira fell down dead 14. Acts 13. Elymas was smitten with blindness 1. Tim. 1.2 Himeneus Alexander and the Incestuous Corinthian were delivered to Sathan 1. Cor. 55. § To deliver to Sathan was plainly a point of miraculous Power which inflicted torment on the Body such as Saul in former times felt after his departure from God as Chrisostome and other Fathers interpret This is certain when the earthly powers used not their right of punishing God had given them to purge and defend the Church what was wanting in human aid God himself supplied by divine assistance After the Emperors took on them the Patronage of the Church whose office was to punish them that troubled the Church without or within the forenamed divine punishment expired And most properly that divine execution of revenge was the jurisdiction of God not of Men because the whole work was Gods not the Apostles God that he might give testimony to the truth of the Gospel preached as at the Apostles Prayers or presence or touch he healed diseases and cast out Divils so at their imprecation commanded men to be vexed with Diseases and seized by Divils Nor did Paul more by delivering men to Satan than did Peter and John by curing the lame man who say they did nothing by their own Power Acts 12. and ascribe the whole effect to God At the Prayers also of the Church did God often shew the like signs of his displeasure therefore are the Corinthians 1. Cor. 5.2 blamed that they mourned not to the end the Incestuous person might be taken away from among them And to the same effect is that wish not command of the Apostles to the Galatians 5.12 would they were cut off that trouble you This kind of Excommunication if it may be so called was a Corporal punishment and there is no appearance of any internal obduration by the binding power of Pope or Presbyter and
these are executed by the power of the Judge who enforceth submission so those only by the will of the Guilty to receive them who refusing them the Ecclesiastical Judge remaineth without execution and hath no power to enforce but to foreshew the Judgment of God which will follow in this Life or the next This kind of Proceedings and this kind of Judicature was according unto Christ's Institution and would not enterfeer with any Civil Government Christian or not Christian and unto which the Apostles did conform and which lasted some Centuries of years in the Church and was esteemed by the Saints of those more pure times the Judgment of Charity not of Jurisdiction because they did thereby charitably not judicially or magisterially reconcile the persons compose the differences and rebuke the Sins and Vices of the Believing Brethren and did thereby prevent the Scandal and Reproaches that otherwise they and their Religion would have been exposed and liable unto from Unbelievers This kind of Judicature was so far from being essential or peculiar unto the Bishops and Presbyters as that the least esteemed in the Church were as capable of it as the greatest indeed any that were wise and able to judge between the Brethren rather than to suffer them to go to Law before the Vnbelievers 1 Cor. 6.4 5 6. The Apostles who had greater Abilities and understood their Commission better than ever any Pope did refused to take this Charge upon themselves as being not fit for Preachers of the Gospel to take any Civil Employment that might any way impede the main End and Design which was to give themselves continually to Prayer and to the Ministry of the Word and by reason whereof they could not serve God in that whereunto they were chiefly called without distraction and therefore for the same reason would not serve Tables but would have such Duties devolved upon others Acts 6.2 3 4. Nay Paul most solemnly professeth that Christ sent him not to Baptize but to Preach the Gospel 1 Cor. 1.17 So wholly did he devote his Service to the exact performance of his Commission Of the same Opinion was the Bishop of Aiace in the Council of Trent who in the Debate of Residence which he held to be Jure Divino complained that the cause of their Non-Residence was that the Bishops did busie themselves in the Courts of Princes and in the Affairs of the World being Judges Chancellors Secretaries Councellors Treasurers there being few Offices of State into which Bishops have not insinuated themselves though forbid by St. Paul 2 Tim. 2.4 who thought it necessary that a Souldier of the Church should not entangle himself with the Affairs of this Life that he may please him who hath chosen him to be a Souldier therefore he moved that the Council would constitute that it should not be lawful for Bishops or others who have Cure of Souls to exercise any Secular Office or Charge In the Ecclesiastical Laws there is a whole Title to this effect Ne Clerici vel Monachi Secularibus negotiis se immisceant And St. Chrysostom hath a long Discourse In Decretal in Mat. Hom. 26. Consid 1.24 complaining of Clergy-men leaving the Care of Souls become Proctors Economists c. practising things unbeseeming the Ministry Though the Papalins cannot deny these to be great Truths yet in this as in divers other Cases they please themselves with false Glosses upon plain Texts of Scripture asserting most Magisterially for their Justification the Popes Authority to dispense not only with Humane but Divine Laws that in Humane Laws his Authority is absolute and unlimited because he is superior to them all and therefore when he doth dispense though without any cause the Dispensation notwithstanding was to be held for good and that in Divine Laws he had power to dispense but not without a Cause alledging St. Paul for their justifications 1 Cor. 4.1 Who saith that the Ministers of Christ are the Dispensers of the Mysteries of God and that to him the Apostle the Dispensation of the Gospel had been committed 1 Cor. 9.17 And that howsoever the Popes Dispensation concerning the Divine Law be not of force yet every one ought to captivate his Vnderstanding and believe that he hath granted it for a lawful Cause and that it is Temerity to call it into question Hist Conc. Trent 675. Bonny Glosses I must confess and well calculated for the Zenith of the Popes Altitudes and Authorities but they are quite contrary to Apostolick Doctrine and the Conclusion drawn hath no warrant at all from the Text for the Text doth not prove a power of Dispensation to be in the Bishop of Rome i.e. a Disobligation from the Law and Commandments of God and the Gospel as the Popes would have us believe but only a power to dispense i.e. to publish and declare the Divine Mysteries and Word of God which is perpetual and remaineth inviolable for ever according to Eph. 3.2 8 9. Eph. 6.19 Col. 1.26 c. 4.3 What is this but to wrest and pervert the very Words and Sense of Scripture and as much as in them lieth to make a new Gospel as they made a new Creed at Trent In Human Laws happily a Dispensation may lie for that the Law-makers are subject to infirmities and fallibility and unable to foresee all Cases and future Accidents and Occurrences which when they come to be discovered and known may justly admit of some Exceptions and Dispensations But where God is the Law-giver from whose all-seeing Eye nothing is concealed and by whom no Accident is not foreseen the Law can have no Exception no Dispensation for that by such Dispensation the strength of all Gods Laws is taken away made null and in truth escheated into the Breast and Power of the Popes Holiness From such corrupt Glosses it is that there are few or no Cardinals without many Bishopricks how incompatible soever they are together Hence also the Use of Commendaes and Vnions for Life Administrations at first invented probably for good ends by which against all Laws many Benesices were given to one person alone really with appearance that he had but one only Therefore the Law of God and Nature ought not to be esteemed as a common written Law which in some Cases happily may be dispensed withal and made more gentle for that all his Laws are even Equity and Justice it self Besides the Pope who takes himself to be the great Dispenser Paramount cannot in any case free him that is bound Paul was obliged to preach the Gospel as being called thereunto and so was Peter and all the rest of the Apostles and all the Bishops and Priests are no otherwise sent and called than to preach the Gospel and feed Christ's Flock as all the Apostles were which includes the Pope himself if he be Peters Successor yea a necessity was laid upon him yea wo unto him if he did not preach the Gospel 1 Cor. 9.16 And therefore he most earnestly desires
Year 1484. the King of Spain admitted it into his Dominions yet so cautionate and jealous was he as he reserved himself to be Lord paramount thereof of choosing the Inquisitor General whom the Pope confirms And for the rest the Court of Rome was not admitted to intermeddle any farther so that though the King seemed willing to gratifie the See Apostolick yet did he reserve his Supremacy of Power over all Causes and Persons Ecclesiastical to himself and so doth the State of Venice by their Coadjutors and Inspectors of the Tribunals Inquisitory In which Republick the Inquisition doth not depend on the Court of Rome but properly belongs to the Republick Independent set up and constituted by the same and established by contract and agreement with Pope Nicholas the fourth prout in his Bull of 28. Aug. 1289. wherein is inserted the very determination of the greater Council made the fourth of the same Month. And therefore as they ought are to be governed by their own Customs and Ordinances without being obliged to receive Orders from the Pope And indeed before the admittance of the Inquisition there was in effect the same Office though meerly Secular to which Noble-men were raised to enquire after Hereticks and this the Republick made good afterwards against the See-Apostolick in the Years 1289. 1301. 1605. 1606. and 1607. upon Disputes maintaining their Civil Authority in Ecclesiasticis to be their undoubted Right and cannot be taken away by any Bull or Decree made in any manner by any Pope to whom soever Hist. Inquisit § By all which it appears that neither Monarchs nor Free States would be juggled out of their just Right of Commanding over Persons and Causes Ecclesiastical and that those Condescentions of the Civil Magistrates were only to gratifie some Popes out of special favour to them and not for any just Right the Popes had unto them For let Pope or Presbyter pretend what they please to the contrary they do as much as in them lies endeavour to erect Regnum in Regno by giving Temporal Monarchy only an imperfect broken Right in some things but controlable and defeasible by the Spiritual Monarchy in other things And the World hath had a long and sad experience of this whilst Kings had the Popes and Presbiters their Superiors in any thing they remained Supream in nothing whilst their Rule in Popish Countries was by Division diminished in some things they found it insufficient in all things so that they did command joyntly with the Pope but were commanded wholly unless by force they extricated themselves out of their snares So Calvin and his Followers complain and grumble much at the Power that the Civil Magistrate assumes in England France and Germany over Causes and Persons Ecclesiastical holding Princes incompetent for Spiritual Regency accounting the intermedling of Princes therein as an Abolition or Prophanation of the same § But let us not doubt to submit all things under one Supream on Earth submitting and recommending him by our Prayers unto his Supream in Heaven for it is no small thing in such a Case to be left to the searching Judgment of God nor need we doubt or hold our selves utterly remediless whilst we can truly say Omne sub Regno graviore Regnum est And let us not mistake our Supream on Earth for if God had intended to have left us a Spiritual Sword or miraculous Judicatory never before known or useful to the World and that to be of perpetual necessity sans doubt he would have left us some clear command in Scripture and not have involved and mantled his meaning in Metaphors so intricate and ambiguous But to let pass this Theam of Excommunication so unpleasant to Popish and Presbyterian Ears let us examine the Magistrates Power as it relates to Religion in commanding Liturgies and concerning Toleration Compulsion and Government c. § All just Dominion and Empire is founded on true Religion and Piety i. e all Governours and Governments were ordained for the good of the Governed and they are obliged by the Law of God to govern according to Rules of Religion and Piety no Nation under Heaven having Statutes and Judgments so just and righteous as are prescribed by God himself and who act not according to them an Iliad of Curses will attend them and their Plagues shall be wonderful Deut. 28.58 It is Righteousness and Judgment that is the Establishment of Thrones A Kingdom is translated from one People to another for unrighteousness Eccles 10.8 And The King that faithfully judgeth the Poor his Throne shall be established for ever Prov. 29.14 If I am not much mistaken the necessity of a Liturgy and the warrantableness of establishing the use thereof is easily deducible nay doth naturally flow from the Charge and Right of Government which Kings have in the Government of the Church and granted unto them by their great Charter from Heaven their Command from God For Kings and all other just Governments being granted to be Custodes utriusque Tabulae it must necessarily follow that the Government of the Church is their Duty and consequently ought to be their chief Care And that they be so what need we other Proof or Argument than that through the whole Scripture Kings have been charged therewith and according to their countenancing or discountenancing Idolatry and other sins or abetting and supporting Gods true Religion or establishing or but conniving at Idolatry or other Impieties so they received from God by his Messengers the Prophets praise or dispraise reward or punishment accordingly and those of no less concern than the establishment or deprivations of their Kingdoms And it will as naturally follow that if the care of the Church be the Duty of Kings that then they both may and ought to set up and establish a publick Standard and Test within their Dominions to measure and try all Mens Religion by as to the outward profession thereof and outward conformity thereunto and to appoint and allow publick consecrated or to speak more inoffensively to all Parties seperated Places or Churches for publick Divine Worship and Service and administration of Gods Holy Sacraments and Ordinances to the frequenting of which they may make strict Laws or else how is it possible for the Magistrate to have cognisance of them and of their Religions and why else should the Magistrate be blamed for the Idolatry or other sins of his Subjects if he have no power to inspect take cognisance and to restrain from sinful practises nor yet to force unto the reading of the Law and the Prophets and the Gospel nor to the frequenting of Gods Holy Ordinances Now this Standard or Test I call a Liturgy without which or something equivalent how is it possible for Kings to give a good account to God of their Care and well-governing of the Church within their respective Dominions which Liturgy in general ought to contain so many Fundamentals of Christian Religion to the Belief of which if Christians joyn
which come not in our Verge at this time and some things positive some whereof by the coming of Christ were necessary to be abolished and othersome indifferent to be kept or not of the former kind were Circumcision and Sacrifice The Apostle notwithstanding did not so teach the present and utter Abolition no not of those things which were necessarily to cease but that even the Jews becoming Christians might for a time continue in them and therefore in Jerusalem the first Bishops even till the overthrow thereof were Circumcised And as for those positive things which might either cease or continue prout the present posture or State of the Church should require the Apostles thought it necessary to bind even the Gentiles for a time to abstain as the Jews did from things offered unto Idols c. In other matters where the Gentiles were free and the Jews in their own Judgment still oblidged the Apostles Precept unto the Jews Condemn not the Gentiles unto the Gentiles despise not the Jews Rom. 14.10 the one sort they warned to take heed that Nicity and Scrupulosity did not make them rigorous in giving unadvised sentence against their Brethren which were free the other that they did not become scandalous by abusing their Liberty and Freedom to the Offence of their weak Brethren which were scrupulous whereby it is evident that the Apostle did impose upon the Churches of the Gentiles some things only in respect of conveniency and fitness for the present State of the Church as it then stood the words of the Councils decree are It seemed good unto the Holy Ghost and to us to lay upon you no greater burthen than these necessary things viz. That ye abstain from meats offered to Idols c. 28 29. Indeed to have commanded the Gentiles to have been conformable to the Jews in those things which were necessarily to cease at the coming of Christ had been to have continued a Yoak upon the Disciples which neither their Forefathers nor they were able to bear Acts 15.10 And indeed to impose the like things upon us now were to bring us again into such Bondage in respect of the Royal and perfect Law of Liberty James 1.25 and 28. as were insupportable to bring us back to Onions and Garlick and to leave the Land flowing with Milk and Honey But to conclude from hence the unlawfulness of imposing Liturgies as our Author here doth is such a deduction such a peace of Scholastick Divinity as is quite past my understanding Notwithstanding all these Texts of Scripture by the Author alledged I humbly conceive that all the Christian Liberty that can be meant by these Texts is fully allowed to our Dissenters and is not in the least impeached thereby § There is one Subterfuge yet more left which is drawn from the example of this very Council viz. If Imposition be lawful yet the Scandal the Offence or Inconvenience ought to be Antecedent to the Imposition And then with much confidence and very little truth as I humbly conceive avers that there is no thing Antecedent unto its thereby meaning the Liturgy Imposition that should make it necessary to be Imposed either I understand not his meaning or this is a very strange Doctrine contrary to the very attributes of God contrary to the very grounds of all Arts and Sciences and Governments in the World contrary to the very nature of Wisdom for what is it else but to deny even Gods Providence his foresight his preventing Workings and Graces and to deny in men the use of their Prudence their Reason their Foresight and their Forecast Must the Old good Axiomes made Venerable by the Universal Acceptations of all Ages all the World over be now thrust out of doors and be accounted Foolish and Invalid nay unlawful Venienti occurrere morbo turpius ejicitur quam non admittitur hostis to prevent Diseases to keep out an Enemy rather than beat him out are now grown absolete Of Old this Axiome was held good that he that is suddenly surprised is half Conquered and he that is forewarned is half Armed nay its two against one a Wise man in Peace prepares for War a Wise Marriner prepares in his Haven against Leakes and Batteries of Enemies and violent Storms and Tempests It was wont to go for currant that it is too late to provide against an Evil when it is come and that they are Fools and ill advised that say had I wist or who would have thought it But now it seems Evils at least in the Church must be Antecedent and consequently cast out not prevented though foreseen so that that which hath been approved Wisdom all the World over is according to this new light these new Doctrines esteemed Folly as a thing of naught nay unlawful to be used However let no man deceive himself by thinking there may be some difference in these Axiomes or in the persons Executing or Practising them as they may relate to Church or State to Civil or to Ecclesiastical concerns For in this the same wisdom and Foresight is equal indifferently respecting both concerns and the power of Superiours for restraint prevention or Imposition equal in both and the necessity of obedience in Inferiors equal in both And as no Man hitherto hath been so I think no Man ever will be able to shew a real and substantial difference between them to make an inequality But as Civil Magistrates may for just reason of State prohibite and Impose concerning some things and persons So Church Governors may upon as good and just reasons impose Liturgies either for preventing or removing Idolatry Superstition Scandal Inconveniences nay be it only for the sake of order or Conformity Wherefore I do conclude that it is much greater prudence to prevent evils and inconveniencies than to amend and Reform them when they happen But what do I trouble my self about this for that it will not appear to be our case Scandal and offence did precede the Imposition of our Liturgy if our Author be found Tardy in matter of Fact as I presume he will for he saith expresly that there is nothing Antecedent to its imposition to make it necessary to be imposed In which I will joyn Issue with him and let our Church History be Judge between us Whoever knows but little of Church History knows that long before we ever had a Reformed Liturgie established in England the first of that nature and also the second was in the Minority of Edw. 6. there was a Liturgie a Popish Breviary and a Mass Book long used and established in England as full of Idolatrous and superstitious Doctrines Ceremonies and Worship as Leaves which had so poysoned and infected all the Kings Dominions that it had run into the veins of every Parish Against this Poyson our Josiah-like Prince and Minor by the advice of his Spiritual Physitians and Councellors ordains several Antidotes both to expel that which was Corrupt and Venemous and to Ordain and