Selected quad for the lemma: state_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
state_n	beast_n	head_n	roman_a	1,343	5	9.0797	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A56144	Canterburies doome, or, The first part of a compleat history of the commitment, charge, tryall, condemnation, execution of William Laud, late Arch-bishop of Canterbury containing the severall orders, articles, proceedings in Parliament against him, from his first accusation therein, till his tryall : together with the various evidences and proofs produced against him at the Lords Bar ... : wherein this Arch-prelates manifold trayterous artifices to usher in popery by degrees, are cleerly detected, and the ecclesiasticall history of our church-affaires, during his pontificall domination, faithfully presented to the publike view of the world / by William Prynne, of Lincolns Inne, Esquire ...	Prynne, William, 1600-1669.	1646 (1646)	Wing P3917; ESTC R19620	792,548	593

in heaven in this verse and in John 20. 23. Remist Annot. John 20. 23. These places are not so to be understood as though God were bound to ratifie every decree of men upon earth For First this power is given to all lawfull Pastors who maintaine and hold the Apostolike faith and not to idolatrous ignorant and blasphemous Priests such as most if not all the popish Priests are Secondly they must decree in the earth according to Gods will and therefore John 20. 22. out Saviour dotb first breath his Spirit upon his Apostles and then giveth them their Commission signifying thereby that they must execute this power as they shall be directed by Gods Spirit yea hence Matth. 18. 20. it followeth that they must be assembled in the name of Christ that is according to Christs rule and the direction of his Word they must bind and loose and not at their owne discretion There are divers other purgations of this nature which brevity enforceth as to omit 5. Clauses against adoring the Eucharist and consecrated Bread in the Sacrament expunged MAster Ward in his Comentary on Matthew had this memorable clause against Papists adoring the Eucharist purged out by the Licenser Object The Eucharist is to be adored because Christ is very God Answ He should have assumed the Eucharist is very God which is blasphemy to say and therefore not to be uttered by any but by Babylons brood unto whose Prince and head is given the name of Blasphemy Revel 13. 1. yea a mouth speaketh blasphemies verse 5. even against the most high God verse 6. and therefore we leave this opinion to the Papists to whom properly it belongs The Licenser it seems would have Protestants embrace this opinion as well as Papists and therefore purged out this clause as heterodox Doctor Jones in his Comentary on the Hebrewes had the like purgation page 20. Then how sharply are the Papists to be reproved that worship a peece of bread in the Sacrament Strange that such a passage should be deleted but that our bowing to and toward the Altar because there 't is hoc est corpus meum tended to introduce the selfe same adoration of the Eucharisticall Bread among us by degrees 6. Passages expunged averring That the Pope is Antichrist of which see Section 2. before YOU have already heard of sundry purgations of this nature in the premises we shall present you with others not formerly remembred Doctor Clerke in his sixth Sermon of the Nativity page 53. line ult had this clause But the Pops is the Antichrist which the Licenser thus transformes but one is Anchrinst easing the Pope of this title Master Ward in his Comentary upon Matthew page 303. had this whole discourse concerning Antichrist expunged by the Licenser How many wayes is this name Antichrist taken in the Scriptures that our Saviour saith many shall come in his name affirming that they are Christs First it is taken somtimes commonly and thus his name Antichrist belongeth to all who are enemies to Christ and these are either 1. open professed enemies as the Iews Turks and Infidels in which sense the word is not used in Scripture or 2. covert and close enemies who professe themselves christians and under the name and profession of Christ oppugne Christ and his truth and thus it is taken either 1. more largely to signifie the whole body of hereticks as 1 John 2. 18. 22. or 2. more strictly and so it signifies the society of them who having made an Apostacy from Christ have received the marke of the Beast and these we hold to be the Apostaticall Church of Rome Secondly this name Antichrist is sometimes taken properly or rather peculiarly and so it belongeth to the man of sinne and the sonne of perdirion a Thes 2. 3. who after a more generall manner is the head of all hereticks and more specially of that society which hath the mark number and the name of the Beast Revel 13. 17. and this we hold to be the Pope of Rome as is abundantly proved by Davaeus Bishop Downame and Master Squire and that not onely because he is the head of the Antichristian body but also because he being in profession the Vicar of Christ is indeede Aemulus Christi i. e. an enemy opposed to Christ in emulation of like honour as if we should say a counter-Christ as the word Antichrist doth also signifie How doth it appeare that there are many Antichrists for although Christ saith here that many shall come in his name yet many deny this affirming that the Antichrist shall be but one particular person and consequently that there shall not be many Antichrists but one onely That Antichrist is not one singular man but a whole state and succession of men and consequently that there shall be many Antichrists pecularly or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so called will appeare by these Arguments First if Antichrist were in the Apostles time and was to remaine untill the second comming of Christ then Antichrist is not one singular man but a succession of men but Antichrist was in the Apostles time and is to continue untill the second comming of Christ as both Saint Paul 2 Thes 2. and John 1 cap. 2. 18. 4. 3. 2 John 7. testifie Therefore Antichrist is not one singular man but a succession of men Secondly that in the 7. and 11. of Daniel and in 13. and 17. of the Revelations is described under the name and figure of a Beast is not one singular thing or person but a whole state or succession But Antichrist in these places is described under the name and figure of a Beast Therefore Antichrist is not one singular person but a whole state or succession Thirdly the seven heads of that Beast which signifieth the Roman state are not so many persons but so many heads or states of Government whereby the Common-wealth of the Romans hath been at divers times governed the sixth head was the state of Emperours the seventh Antichrist as the Papists confesse the eighth which is also one of the seventh the state of Emperours revived whereby it evidently appeareth not onely that Antichrist is not one man but also that the Pope who is the seventh head is Antichrist if the Reader would see the two former Arguments enlarged and another added not here mentioned then let him read Bishop Downame de Antichristo lib. 2. cap. 20. to 32. Page 16. this clause is deleted Ob. Antichrists name shall not be knowne untill he come c. Answ 2. Secondly Antichrist is already come yea the Pope of Rome is this Antichrist as is abundantly proved by many of our Divines and therefore his rise seat and name are knowne well enough page 14. Ob. 5. Whosoever shall put away his wife the Pope is called the adversary or he who opposeth himselfe against Christ 2 Thes 2. 11. and is justly so called because he and his Divines doe maintaine assertions directly contrary to

his Consecrating of Churches and Chappels after the popish manner wherein the case stands briefly thus The Pope his Romish Prelates had in times of ignorance superstition for their own proper lucre introduced solemn consecrations of Churches Chappels with all furniture belonging to them appropriated these Fopperies to Bishops as a jurisdiction peculiar to them alone though we reade in Scripture that the Tabernacle all the furniture thereto belonging was consecrated only by Moses and the Temple at Jerusalem by King Solomon the chief temporall Magistrates not by Aaron or the High Priests as they were among the Romans by the Senate These formes of consecrations full of Ethnicall ridiculous superstitions exorcismes conjurations were contained only in Roman Pontificals Missals Ceremonials which were wholly abolished upon the reformation of Religion in King Edwards daies by the expresse statutes of 3 4 E. 6. cap. 1. 5. 5 6 E. 6. cap. 1. and after that by the statute of 1 Eliz. cap. 2. 8 Eliz. cap. 1. which abrogited all rites ceremonies and consecrations whatsoever but those comprised in the Books of Common Prayer and Ordination of Ministers where there is not one syllable to be found touching consecration of Churches or Chappels or Church-yards nor any forme of such consecrations reteined or prescribed which by these Acts were wholly discontinued abolished in our Church till this Papish Prelate to renue them and to assume a Papall power of making Churches Chappels Altars and their furniture holier then other places by his solemne consecrations of them as if the meere sequestring of them from a common or prophane to a sacred use were not a sufficient consecration of them without a Bishops Benediction and exercising of those creatures suspended thereunto We shall begin first with his consecration of Churches next of Chappels Anno 1630. St. Katherines Creed-church in London being repaired only by the parishioners not new built from the ground when Mountain was Bishop of London and the Church thought holy enough by him without any new consecration not requisite in such a case by the very Canon law this popish Prelate succeeding Mountaiue in the Bishoprick of London suspended this new repaired Church for a time from all Divine service Sermons and Sacraments till it was re-consecrated by himself of which he writ down this speciall memoriall with his own hand in his Diary read in the Lords House in manner following January 16. 1630. Sunday I consecrated S. Katherine Creed-church in London In what a popish ridiculous bedlam manner was thus attested upon oath by M. Willingham a parishioner there who then took special Notes of all the passages in short-writing thinking some good use might be made thereof in after-times the particulars whereof he thus expressed That the Archbishop then of London on the 16 of January 1630. being the Lords day came in the morning about nine of the clock in a pompous manner to Creed-church accompanied with Sir Henry Martin Dr. Rive Dr. Duck and many other High-commissioners and Civillians there being a very great concourse of people to behold this novelty the Church doores were garded with many Halberders at the Bishops approaching near the West door of the Church the hangbies of the Bishop cryed out with a loud voyce Open open ye everlasting doores that the King of glory may enter in and presently as by miracle the doores flew open and the Bishop with three or four great Doctors and many other principall men entred in and as soon as they were in the Church the Bishop fell down upon his knees with his eyes lifted up and his hands and armes spread abroad uttering many words and saying This place is holy and this ground is holy In the name of the Father the Sonne and the Holy Ghost I pronounce it holy and then he took up some of the earth or dust and threw it up into the aire as the frantick perseenting Jewes did when they were raging mad against Paul this was done in the great middle Isle several times as they came up Eastwards towards the Chancel which Chancel was then paved when they approached near to the Rayle and Lords Table unto which was an ascent of two or three steps the Bishop lowly ducked and bowed towards it some five or six times and returning went round about the Church in Procession on the inside thereof they saying the 100 Psalme and after that the 90 Psalme prescribed in the Roman Pontificall for this purpose p. 262. and then this Prayer Lord Jesu Christ who art the eternall Word of thy eternall Father God Almighty to be blessed for ever and diddest at first in the beginning of time create man out of the dust of the earth to restore and repair in him the ruine and fall of Angels and when as he by transgression had lost his originall state diddest according to thy threatning returne him againe unto his dust but so that he should not perish everlastingly but should in due time by an omnipotent power be raised againe out of the earth and therefore in assurance of the resurrection the bodies of men the work of thine own hands are in this place to be deposited in their sepulchres graves or vaults as in a repository or resting place untill the end of all things when that mighty Arch-angell shall sound his last Trumpet with Rise ye dead and come to judgement accept we beseech thee this our holy service who doe give and consecrate this beautifull Church unto thee and we separate it unto thee and thy Church AS HOLY GROVND not to be prophaned any more to common use this we beseech thee to accept at our hands for Christ Jesus sake c. Then was read aloud the 23 chapter of Genesis which being read then followed another prayer taken almost verbatim out of the Roman Pontificall beginning thus Merciful God the resurrection and the life of all that trust in thee wee most humbly intreat thee to vouchsafe us of thy grace that all those thy servants who from hence forth shall come into or be intered within the Circuit of this holy and sacred place now by our service HALLOWED unto thee may so lead their lives in thy feare that they may leave them in thy favour and that their bodies resting in their Sepulchres in this Church in peace untill thy comming unto Iudgment may rise again unto immortall life and live with thee for ever in those glorious mantions of eternity Heare us O Saviour for thy passion sake heare us O Father for thy Christs sake heare us O Sanctifying Spirit for thy comforts sake who livest and reignest one God c. Then The peace of God followed c. After all this the Bishop betook himselfe to sit under a cloath of State in an Isle of the chancell neare the Communion Table and taking a written book in his hand in imitation of the Roman Pontificall and the Councell of Trents Decrees therein cited pag. 247 c.

1624. His Appello Caesarem London 1625. His Originum Ecclesiasticarum Pars prior Londini 1636. and Pars Posterior Londini 1640. His Anti-Diatribae Londini 1625 and Visitation Articles Printed at Cambridge and London 1638. Master Iohn Cosens his Houres of Prayer London 1627. Edmund Reeves Communion Catechisme expounded London 1635. Henry Cholmly His State of the Now Roman Church London 1629. Master Butterfield His Maschil London 1629. Doctor Iohn Pocklington his Sunday No Sabbath licensed by Doctor Bray the Arch-Bishops Chaplaine 24. Febru 1635. and his Altare Christianum licensed by the same Doctor Bray 7. March 1636. both printed at London Ann 1636. and 1637. Doctor Peter Heylyns History of Saint George London 1630. His Coale from the Altar London 1636. His Antidotum Lincolniense with His Moderate Reply to Henry Burton London 1637. and History of the Sabbath London 1636. Francis Sales A Popish Prelate his Introduction to a devout life licensed by the Archbishops Chaplaine Doctor Haywood 3. Febr. 1636. An Epistle or Exhortatory Letter from Jesus Christ for every faithfull Soule devoutly affected written by a Friar and licensed by Doctor Weekes both his and the Bishop of Londons Chaplain 3. Febr. 1636. The Female Glory by Anthony Stafford London 1635. Master Yates his Tract of the Honour of Gods House London 1637. Sparrowes Sermon of Confession London 1637. The Churches Authority asserted by Samuell Hoard Lond. 1637. Mortification Apostolicall by William Watts London 1637. Doctor Thomas Laurence his Sermon preached before the King at White-Hall London 1637. Iohn Elborow his Evodias and Syntyche London 1637. Robert Shelford his five Treatises Cantabrigiae 1635. Richard Tedder his Sermon preached at Wimondham Anno 1637. Collectiones Theologicae by Chunaus London 1634. Christopher Dow against Master Henry Burton London 1637. Iohn Browning concerning publike Prayer and the Fasts of the Church London 1636. Sir Thomas Ridleys his Review of the Civill Law Oxford 1634. Iohn Swan his Redde debitum London 1640. Bishop Halls Reconciler his Episcopy by Divine Right with infinite other Books Sermons and Treatises of this kinde which we pretermit Before wee proceed any further in this subject we must acquaint Your Lordships with one memorable Passage concerning the Licencing and printing of Francis Sales his Introduction to a devout life and Christs Epistle to a devout Soule The first of these Bookes being written by a Popish Prelate having many Doctrinall and Practicall points of Popery interlarded with good meditations and Devotions comprised in it was translated into English by J. Y. a Priest and Jesuite dedicated by him to Mistres Anne Roper a Popish Recusant and twice printed by Papists in forraigne parts in the yeares 1617. and 1622. with all the Popery in it about which time it was likewise translated into English by a Protestant who lest out all the Popery and superstition couched therein reteining only what was Orthodox and Pious which was licenced for the Presse and printed by Nicholas Oakes On the 3. of February 1636. Doctor Hayward the Archbishops Chaplain at the instigation of some Popish persons licensed the very Popish Translation of this Booke by I Y the Iesuite for the Presse most likely by the Archbishops approbation who had one of these Bookes formerly printed in his Study produced by Master Prynne endorsed with his owne hand which was forthwith entered in Stationers Hall for one W. Brookes a Popish Stationer and presently sent to the Presse to be printed One part of it comming to Nicholas Oakes his House to be printed he perceiving divers dangerous Popish Passages in it and among others one touching the Popes supremacy repaired to Doctor Hayward who licensed it and acquainted him therewith desiring him to purg out these Popish Passages else he durst not proceed to print it Whereupon the Doctor checking him for making such a scruple bid him go on and say nothing and he would beare him out and save him harmlesse from any danger that might befall him for printing it adding that he himself would preach as much as that he complained off before the King and therefore he needed not feare to proceed Whereupon Oakes went on and the Book with the Epistle Dedicatory to Mrs. Anne Roper a Papist was printed published about Easter 1637. neare the time the Archbishop caused an Information to be Exhibited in Star-chamber by Sir John Banks his Majesties Atturney Generall against D. Bastwick Mr. Burton and Mr. Prynne one of the Copies whereof comming to Mr. Pryns hands he finding it full of Popery superstition and the very same with the old English Popish Edition and being informed by Oakes others of Dr. Haywards words to Oakes when he complained to him of it he inserted the Licensing and printing of this Popish Booke among others into his Crosse Bill in Starre Chamber against the Archbishop his Chaplaines and others his Popish Confederates which Bill he tendring to the Lord KEEPER Coventry to admit the Archbishop getting possession of it upon view thereof and some complaints at Court against this Popish Booke by the Right honourable Earle of Pembrook and other well-affected Courteours thereupon to colour his owne and his Chaplaines practicall knavery in Licensing and promoting this Booke by laying all the blame and punishment upon others and the poor Printer Ooaks who complained against it and would have stopped it at the Presse to give som shew of satisfaction to the people much offended at the printing of this Popish Booke especially in that nick of time when he had brought Dr. Bastwick Mr. Burton Mr. Pryn into the Star-chamber for charging him with introducing Popish Doctrines and Innovations into our Church caused his Majesty to publish this following Proclamation for calling in and burning the said book wherein he falsly suggested to his Majesty and his Subjects that his Chaplaine purged out diverse Passages therein tending to Popery which the Stationer and Translater afterwards inserted againe when as there was no such thing but his Chaplaine licensed all of them at first and would not purge them out at last when Oakes complained of them The Proclamation was this By the King A Proclamation for calling in a Booke entituled An Introduction to a Devout life and that the same be publikely burnt VVHereas a Booke entituled AN INTRODVCTION TO A DEVOVT LIFE was lately printed by Nicholas Oakes of London and many of them published and dispersed throughout the Realme the Copy of which Booke being brought to the Chaplaine of the Lord Archbishop of Canterbury for Licence and allowance was by him upon diligens perusall in sundry places expunged and purged of divers passages therein tending to Popery Neverthelesse the same Book after it was so amended and allowed to be printed was corrupted and falsified by the Translater and Stationer who betweene them inserted againe the same Popish and unsound passages And the Stationer is now apprehended and the Translator sought for to be proceeded against according to Justice His Majesty out of His pious and