all or some of these Propositions following 1. That I King James am not the lawful King of this Kingdom and of all other my Dominions 2. That the Pope by his own Authority many depose me If not by his own Authority yet by some other Authority of the Church or of the See of Rome If not by some other Authority of the Church and See of Rome yet by other means with others help he may depose me 3. That the Pope may dispose of my Kingdoms and Dominions 4. That the Pope may give Authority to some Foreign Prince to invade my Dominions 5. That the Pope may discharge my Subjects of their Obedience and Allegiance to me 6. That the Pope may give Licence to one or more of my Subjects to bear Arms against me 7. That the Pope may give leave to my Subjects to offer Violence to my Person or to my Government or to some of my Subjects 8. That if the Pope shall by Sentence excommunicate or depose me my Subjects are not to bear Faith and Allegiance to me 9. If the Pope shall by Sentence excommunicate or depose me my Subjects are not bound to defend with all their power my Person and Crown 10. If the Pope shall give out any Sentence of Excommunication or Deprivation against me my Subjects by reason of that Sentence are not bound to reveal all Conspiracies and Treasons against me which shall come to their Hearing and Knowledg 11. That it is not heretical and detestable to hold that Princes being excommunicated by the Pope may be either deposed or killed by their Subjects or any other 12. That the Pope hath Power to absolve my Subjects from this Oath or from some par thereof 13. That this Oath is not administred to my Subjects by a full and lawful Authority 14. That this Oath is to be taken with Equivocation mental Evasion or secret Reservation and not with the Heart and good Will sincerely in the Faith of a Christian Man These are the true and natural Branches of the Body of this Oath The CONTENTS CHAP. I. THe Occasion of this Oath various Form and Alteration of it Interpretations of this Oath given in our Laws and Writers of note The nature of our Assent and Stipulation CHAP. II. What is ment by Things and Persons Spiritual or Ecclesiastical in the proper as also in the vulgar use of these Terms CHAP. III. Of Power its rise and original Two sorts of Power in Ecclesiastical or Spiritual Things their Agreement and Difference CHAP. IV. Of the necessity and usefulness of a Jurisdiction over Persons and in Causes Ecclesiastical besides what is in Churches and Church-men This Power is placed in Kings and such as are the supream Governours in a Common-wealth CHAP. V. The Government of particular Churches hath Affinity with Families Cities and the like lesser Bodies more than with the Government of Empires and Kingdoms confirmed in six Instances A Digression Of Independency Name and Thing its consistency with the King's Supreamacy CHAP. VI. Of the Jurisdiction over particular Churches placed in Ecclesiastical Persons as it is 1. Exercised with us in this Nation 2. As it is in other Reformed Churches herein Of Appeals that are properly such in Ecclesiastical Matters these are always to be to the Supream Civil Magistrate only or to such as are appointed by him A Post-script giving some account of the congregational way from such Principles of it as are laid down in this Treatis THE LAWFULNES OF THE Oath of Supremacy c. THE Supremacy of the Kings of England being eclipsed by the Bishop of Rome in both parts of it the State thought fit to enjoin a Provision of equal extension In relation to the Civil Rights of the Crown is the Oath of Allegiance and against the Encroachments upon the Ecclesiastical this of the Supremacy which being first enjoined containeth in a manner both This Oath hath given the Papists such a Blow as they could not but strike again and have poured out a Flood of Arguments and Absurdities against submitting to it which hath been a long time scattered and stick in the Minds of divers of his Majesty's Loyal Subjects who tho otherwise well affected yet by reason of some Doubts and Tenderness are at a stand to this day and scruple the taking of this Oath For whose satisfaction and clearing the Lawfulness of this Supremacy is the ensuing D. scourse CHAP. I. § 1. The Oath it self as now enjoined § 2. The Occasion of this Oath § 3. Various Forms of it and Alterations about it § 4. Interpretations given of it in our Laws and Writers of Note § 5. The Nature of our Assent and Stipulation The Oath of Supremacy I A. B. do utterly testify and declare in my Conscience that the King's Highness is the only Supreme Governor of this Realm and of all other his Highness's Dominions and Countries as well in all Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Things or Causes as Temporal And that no Foreign Prince Person Prelate State or Potentate hath or ought to have any Iurisdiction Power Superiority Preeminence or Authority Ecclesiastical or Spiritual within this Realm And therefore I do utterly renounce and forsake all Foreign Iurisdictions Powers Superiorities and Authorities and do promise that from henceforth I shall bear Faith and true Allegiance to the King's Highness his Heirs and lawful Successors and to my power shall assist and defend all Iurisdictions Privileges Preeminences and Authorities granted or belonging to the King's Highness his Heirs and Successors as united and annexed to the Imperial Crown of this Realm § 2. For many Years there hath been a Contest about Jurisdiction and Supremacy in Ecclesiastical Matters between the Bishop of Rome and the Kings of England who hath got ground herein according as our Princes were found more weak necessitous or devoted to his Holiness Rome was not built in a Day By William the Conqueror Legates from the Pope to hear and determine Ecclesiastical Causes were admitted Henry the First after much Contest yields to the Pope the Patronages and Donations of Bishopricks and all other Ecclesiastical Benefices it being decreed at Rome that no Lay-Person should give any Ecclesiastical Charge King Stephen grants that Appeals be made to the Court of Rome In Henry the Second's Days the Pope gets the Clergy and Spiritual Persons exempted from Secular Powers The Bishop of Rome is now over all Ecclesiastical Persons and Causes even in these Dominions Supreme Head And having upon the matter made Conquest over more than half the Kingdom in the Times of King John and Henry the Third sets on for the whole and obtains of King John an absolute Surrender of England and Ireland unto his Holiness which were granted back again by him to the King to hold of the Church of Rome in Fee-farm and Vassalage Being now absolute and immediate Lord over all he endeavours to convert the Profits of both Kingdoms to his own Use so that Prince and People were hereby reduced
consisting of their Parish-Bishop and his Elders they do ascribe that sufficient immediate and independent Authority for Ecclesiastical Government for every proper visible Church That Independency of Churches was asserted by those learned men of a former Age in relation only to a superior Church-power properly spiritual and such as is claimed jure divino and not in relation to that Ecclesiastical Power which is in or exercised from the Civil Magistrate Some of them have thus described a particular Church It 's a Body Politick spiritually independent or independent in relation to a spiritual Superiority which is expressed fully by him that wrote Church-Government with the Peoples consent pag. 115. Though we affirm the Church-Government is independent and immediately derived from Christ yet we affirm also that the Civil Magistrate is even therein that is in Ecclesiastical Matters Supreme Governor civilly And though nothing may be imposed on the Christian Churches against their Will by any spiritual Authority for so only we intend yet we affirm withall that the Civil Magistrate may impose on them spiritual Matters by Civil Power yea whether they like or dislike if it be good in his Eyes that is if he judge it within his Commission from God And such an Independency hath been pleaded for also and argued by them to be much more consistent with His Majesties Supremacy than a DEPENDENCY or Subordination of Churches to any spiritual Power And it was their professed Judgments That no External Power ought to be exercised in spiritual Matters any where within that space betwixt a particular Congregation instituted by Christ and the Catholick Visible Church by any person but the Civil Magistrate or by his Appointment Take their own Words They that make claim Jure Divino of Power and Jurisdiction to meddle with other Churches than that one Congregation of which they are Members do usurp upon the Supremacy of the Civil Magistrate who alone hath and ought to have a power of Jurisdiction over the several Congregations in his Dominions c. A Protestation of the King's Supremacy made and published in Anno 1605. § 27. and in § 28. The King himself is to be General Overseer of all the Churches within his Dominions and ought o employ under him fit persons to oversee the Churches in their several Divisions visiting them and punishing whatsoever is amiss in any of them Mr. Bradshew in the Vnreasonableness of Separation against Johnson writes thus It 's their principal Honour speaking of Archbishops and Bishops to be Commissioners and Visitors in Causes Ecclesiastical under the King over the Pastors and Churches of Provinces and Diocesses In his Answer to Johnson's first Reason And in his Answer to his second He questions him thus 1. Whether the Supreme Magistrate hath not Power to oversee and govern all the several Churches within his Dominion yea whether he be not bound so to do 2. Whether for his further help and assistance herein he may not make choice of grave learned and reverent men to assist him in the same Government 3 Whether by vertue of his Power these persons thus called to assist the Supreme Magistrate may not lawfully try the Gifts of Ministers within his Dominions convent them before them examine how they have behaved themselves in their places and punish the blame-worthy In a Petition also to King James for Tolleration That your Highness would afford us and assign to us some persons qualified with Wisdom Learning and Vertue to be under your Highness our Overseers for our more peaceable orderly and dutiful carriage of our selves both in our worshiping God and in all other our Affairs at your pleasure To whom with all Readiness and Subjection we are willing to be accomptable and answerable always The opinions of learned men about Church Matters Government especially were collected together in a Treatise which was put into Latin by Dr. Ames and in an Epistle of his prefixed avouched by him who was a man much studied in those Controversies to be the Judgment of Cartwright Fenner Fulk Whitaker Rainolds Perkins Brightman and those that were more Ancient As Wichliff Tyndal Rogers Bradford Gilby Fox Moore Dearing Noel Greenham Dogmata ista c. These Tenents saith he were either their Principles or so conjunct with them as not to be denied theirs Christ Jesus saith the Author hath not subjected any Church or Congregation of his to any other Superior Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction than unto that which is within it self the Civil Magistrate alone upon Earth hath power to punish a whole Church or Congregation Cap. 2. § 3. and more fully in § 12. They hold and believe saith he that the Equality in Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and Authority of Churches and Church Ministers is no more derogatory and repugnant to the State and Glory of a Monarch than the parity or equality of School-masters of several Schools or Masters of several Families Yea they hold the clean contrary that Inequality of Churches and Church Officers in Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and Authority was that principally that advanced Antichrist unto his Throne and brought the Kings and Princes of the Earth unto such vassalage under him And that the Civil Authority and Glory of Secular Princes and States hath ever decayed and withered the more that Ecclesiastical Officers of the Church have been advanced and set up in Authority beyond the limits and confines that Christ in his Word hath prescribed unto them And in Cap. 6. § 6. They are said to deny a principal part of the Kings Supremacy that hold any Jurisdiction or Offices over Churches jure divino 〈…〉 will and pleasure of the King and Civil States of the 〈◊〉 And from what is said cap. 5. § 12. It is 〈◊〉 that this way is as little prejudicial to the Subjects 〈…〉 expresly there said If any Member of a Congregation 〈…〉 crime shall of himself forsake Communion with the Church that then the Ecclesiastical Officers have no authority or jurisdiction over him but only the Civil Magistrate Parents or Masters c. So that as persons are free otherwise than from conscience of duty to joyn with these Assemblies so also to leave them remaining always under the Magistrates Ecclesiasticul power and care I have made this Digression not only for the matters sake which is very sutable to our present Subject but also to vindicate the Congregational way 1. That it is not such a Novelty as is pretended This of the equality of Churches and thence an Independency from which we are reproachfully surnamed seems to be the worst of our Tenents Yet it appears to be no other but what the reverend and learned of a former age have asserted Nor do I know any other of their opinions or practices but may as easily be remonstrated to be the assertions of those holy men Nor secondly inconsistent with civil Magistracy or with their Power in Ecclesiastical Affairs And as a further Testimony hereof they take the Oaths both of Allegeance and Supremacy
Professedly assent also to All the Articles of Religion which concern only the Confession of the true Christian Faith and the Doctrin of the Sacraments comprised in a Book entituled Articles whereupon it was agreed by the Arch-bishops and Bishops of both Provinces and the whole Clergy in the Convocation Anno 1562. for the avoiding of diversity of Opinions and for the establishing of consent touching true Religion as is required by Stat. 13 Eliz. cap. 12. And do humbly hope living peaceably under his Majesties Government they shall obtain their share in that Indulgence his Majesty graciously purposed to shew to such persons as through want of full satisfaction differ in smaller matters from the present Establishment A fourth Particular which ariseth from the former 4 Instance is this Families being not subordinate one to another they cannot associate or unite into any large or great Body and therefore do and may more conveniently retain their Government though it be peculiar and distinct in any Common-wealth of what form soever without prejudice to the Peace and Welfare of it So is it with Churches their State and Government as it is appointed by Christ is such as is consistent with and no prejudice unto any civil Powers under whom they are situated And that upon this account principally Having no Dependency in Respect of Power or Jurisdiction one on another they cannot in their own Sphere enlarge themselves by Subordinations to a political Body of any such Extension and Greatness as may render their Obedience or Compliance more doubtful or uncertain It is matter of Jealousie with Princes and States when there is in their Dominions a Body large and extensive firmly joyned and compact in it self of an interest peculiar and not holding of them Particular Churches are of a small compass sometimes comprehended in One ordinarily but of a few Families So that in this respect though their Interest and Government be peculiar they may retain it and for substance the same as Families do throughout the World Which will further appear in the following Considerations 1. It is granted on all hands That the Lord hath limited his Church to a Government which is perpetual and for substance to be the same in all places As also that the Nations from their Civil Government variously and as they judge most prudent 2. Since the Wall of partition by Christs Death was broken down The Gospel and Christian Churches were by Christs commission to be planted in all parts of the World It stands therefore with common reason that the Church Government Christ hath left us is of that Nature as without any substantial Alteration may comply with and not be prejudicial to any Civil Government 3. If particular Churches by Union become one body for extention as large as the Civil State There will hardly be a due and peaceable accord and each enjoy its priviledge and Liberties without prejudice to the other unless these two great bodies be moulded and formed one with respect unto the other The policy therefore of the Nation and the National Church of the Jewes were both respectively formed by the Lord himself 4. Hence this opinion of States-men that there is no form of Church Government left by Christ or his Apostles but to be moulded by the wisdom and discretion of Christian Magistrates as may best sute and joynt in with the Civil Government And of others the contrary The Commonwealth saith one must be made to agree with the Church and the Government thereof with her Government for as the House is before the Hangings therefore the Hangings which came after must be framed to the House which was before so the Church being before there was any Commonwealth and the Commonwealth coming after must be fashioned and made suitable to the Church We need none of these extteams The middle way is this Let not the Churches claim to be National or Provincial Jure divino but leave such disposements to the civil Magistrate and be numbred with those lesser Societies Families Cities Colledges c. For these do retain in themselves much the same form of Government and Freedom therein throughout the World 5. It is not so much a different Form of Government For in each Republick there are contained lesser Societies of all Forms but their Extention and Potency in numerousness of Persons by which they are made up Nor from this Principallity but the nature of their Vnion and Incorporation begets the Jealousies If particular Churches become Diocesan Provincial or National by Union from the Law or Direction of the Civil Magistrate for the better exercise of that Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction the Lord hath intrusted him with and conveniency of such persons as he shall appoint to inspect the Churches in such a case the Greatness of Churches cannot be disturbent to the Civil Government being so directly under its cognizance Holy Common-wealth R. B. p. 2. 220. The Common-wealth saith one containeth all the people in a whole Nation or more united in one Soveraign but particular Churches distinct from the universal united in Christ have no general Ecclesiastical Officers in whom a Nation must Unite as one Church How then become they to be termed a National Church Ans As several Corporations in one Kingdom or as so many Schools that have a peculiar form of Government but such only as is under and united in the Magistrates Government in its kind If this should be claimed as the Law or Priviledge of each Family that the Governors be it the Father or Husband or Master are thereby invested by Nature with the same Power in respect to all Families in a Nation and by several Correspondencies and Subordinations raise and Vnite themselves at last into a general Assembly or Representative And by Vertue of that Enconomical Authority give Laws to the whole Nation though not as their Subjects yet to the same persons under another notion that is as Wives Children Servants There is no well Governed State could entertain such a spreading interest as this without great doubtfulness lest their Authority and Supremacy should hereby be much Ecclipsed 6. But a particular Church consisting only of a few persons in it self and independent on others is necessitated to depend under God upon the Magistrate for protection Which if they should not obtain but be opposed and persecuted yet have no ability to resist being as a Family single and alone not able to defend it self or molest others Nor if they were able is it lawful for a Church to compel by the Sword more than the Magistrate may by the Keyes 2 Chron. 26. Matth. 16.19 with 24 25. or what is peculiar to the sacred Function Vzza erred in the latter and Peter in the former The primitive rule and practice was this being persecuted in one City to fly into another and pray that their flight may not be in the Winter Matth. 10.23.24.20 No nor do we judg that these spiritual weapons the Keyes
over many Churches much more over whole Kingdoms and Provinces of Churches Dr. Bilson speaks much to this purpose Of Supremacy pag. 238. Tho saith he Bishops may be called Governors in respect of the Soul yet only Princes be Governors of Realms Pastors have Flocks and Bishops have Diocesses Realms Dominions and Countries none have but Princes and Magistrates And so the Stile Governor of this Realm belongeth only to the Prince and not to the Priest and importeth a Publick and Princely Regiment The Common-Wealth saith Mr. Baxter containeth all the People in a whole Nation Holy Common-wealth pag. 220. or more as united in one Sovereign But particular Churches have no general Ecclesiastical Officers in whom a Nation must unite as one Church but are as several Corporations in one Kingdom c. We see saith Sir Fr. Bacon in all Laws in the World Considerations about Church-Affairs Offices of Confidence and Skill cannot be exercised by Delegation all such Trust is personal and inherent and may not be transported and delegated as that of Kings which for the most part is hereditary and rather an Office of Interest than Confidence 2. In respect to Causes the Church-Power extends its Censures to no Causes but such as the other may as to Popery Heresy c. But in many Cases the Civil Magistrate extends his Care and Authority where Church-Power moddles not As to Jews and Pagans and such as are not Members of the Church some things may be done by the Magistrate even for these being Members of his Common-Wealth that may conduce to their spiritual Good The Church-Power is limited as 1 Cor. 5.12 So likewise whether the Crime committed be private or publick Matter of Scandal or not or the Person penitent or otherwise these Powers are at liberty to punish or pardon alike and as they shall judg it expedient to be severe or merciful accordingly They may form or reform the Laws and Statutes by which they govern 1 Eliz. cap 1. with 35 Hen 8. making the same Fault Treason in one Age that in the next not so much as Imprisonment But Church-Power is limited the same Crime the same Punishment ever not being in the Power of this Republick to vary in their Process in respect of lesser or greater Censures if the Crime be she same 5. In their Constitution or Tenure Licet omnis Potestas saith Carbo tum Ecclesiastica tum Civilis Carbo de Leg. iib. 2. cap. 8. sit à Deo tamen non eodem modo nam politica licet universe sit jure Divino in particulari est jure Gentium Ecclesiastica omni modo est jure divino à Deo Government in general is of Divine Right but whether in this or that particular Form as in one or a few representing the rest this is humane and hath its Original from Man That Power which is termed an Ordinance of God in Rom. 13. is called an Ordinance of Man in 1 Pet. 2. Church-Power and Government being spiritual hath all particulars for substance both in respect of Persons and Administrations for matter and manner appointed by Jesus Christ and in all Nations to be the same Civil Power even in Ecclesiastical Matters in many things for substance is left to the Prudence of the State in which it is exercised and in the Forms of it various according to the manner of the Nation As for Instance Inspection into Religious Assemblies visiting and observing their Demeanour receiving Complaints by reason of Wrongs Disorders c. These things may be done by the Civil Magistrate in his own Person or by Persons authorized from him these Persons may be many or but one in a Division these Divisions of larger or less Compass And for the manner of Procedure it 's various as Ecclesiastical Courts differ in their manner of Process from Civil or of a Method or Way of handling Causes different from each be established by Law it is equally warrantable There are particular Directions left by Christ according to which the Officers and Persons more especially entrusted with this Power are designed to and invested in their Places and Charge as Election Ordination c. with Fasting and Prayer The other Powers are setled upon and claimed in such ways as the respective Law of Nations design as by Birth Lot Victory Donation or the like as well as Election insomuch as a Woman or Child may have a rightful Claim to this Supreme Trust and the Management of it by themselves or others as shall be appointed CHAP. IV. § 1. Of the Necessity and Vsefulness of a Jurisdiction over Persons and in Causes Ecclesiastical besides what is in Churches § 2. This Power is placed in Kings and such as are the Supreme Governors in a Common-Wealth § 1. FOr the second we shall shew how necessary and useful Civil Power is even in Ecclesiastical or Spiritual Matters notwithstanding the other It is not to be denied that Souls were converted and Churches established and kept up when there was no Assistance but rather Opposition from the Princes of the Earth as in the Apostolick and Primitive Times The Benefit we have now by Christian Mgistrates was then more abundantly supplied the Infancy of Christianity requiring more by the Miracles wrought and the constant Direction and Care of Apostolick and extraordinary Persons who were gifted by Christ for that purpose All the ordinary Helps that now we have by external and more sensual or carnal Means contributing any thing to these great Works is only a pious and Christian Magistracy where a Nation is blessed with it The Benefit hereof is much in a spiritual respect both to the World as likewise to the Church 1. It is tho remote a great Help to bring Men out of their natural Condition unto Life and Salvation We are exhorted to pray for Kings and such as are in Authority 1 Tim. 2. The reason v. 4. For God will have all men to be saved and to come to the knowledg of the Truth As the Knowledg of the Truth is a means to bring a Soul into a saving State so is the Magistrate being enlightned himself a great Means to bring us to the knowledg of the Truth Those Men were in a great Distance from God in a Rage against Christ and Religion Psal 2.1 they did combine against the strict Ways of the Gospel these poor Heathens being notwithstanding given to Christ by Election v. 8. David useth a twofold Method for reducing them The first is a representing their wretched and miscrable Condition while in this State of Enmity ver 9. Then 2. deals with their Princes and Rulers to be forthwith instructed and serve the Lord i.e. as Kings and Magistrates in their publick Capacity But must not the People be instructed also Such Magistrates will speedily provide and take care for their People that they may be brought to the knowledg of the Truth and therefore it needs not to be mentioned The Magistratical
no Invention of Man that by contriving Pipes or any other Artifice can make Water freely and naturally run higher than the Spring-Head Tho that Jurisdiction which hath its rise in a particular Church be pumped up into a Classis or Synod it is but the same it was before Synods saith Parker out of Chamier Polit lib. 3. cap. 13 § 9. Disp de Polit. Eccles p. 5. nullam habeant Authoritatem c. They have no Authority but what is derived from particular Churches So Voetius There seems to be a great Emphasis in those Particles of Propriety Children obey your Parents 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so to Servants 1 phes 6.1 And speaking of the Relation of Husbands and Wives by which is set forth our Obedience to Christ and his Officers it is more appropriate Ephes 5.24 As the Church is subject to Christ so let the Wives be to their own Husbands it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 propriis viris not only theirs but their own Husbands It is said 1 Tim. 3.4 One that ruleth well his own House 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 So of Ministers Know them that labour among you 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and are ever you in the Lord 1 Thess 5.12 and in Heb. 13.17 it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Duces vestri your Captains Officers in Churches being as exactly limited as in an Army There is no Power in a Superior to command where no Obligation upon the Inferior to obey And therefore the Lord seems by these Expressions to limit both Church and Family-Power within their own Walls This is the Judgment of the Learned of each Persuasion Bishop Davenant Nota est Jurisconsultorum regula c. It is a known Rule of Lawyers A Sentence given by him that is not his Judg is void in Law But particular Churches are not the Judges of private Persons that are of other Churches how much less then over the Churches themselves such Sentences were to be slighted and contemned as of a Judg that presumeth to make Laws out of the bounds of his own Jurisdiction Nec potest De judice cont cap. 16. p. 90. nec debet saith the same Author elsewhere particularis una Ecclesia judiciaria authoritate aliam sibi non subjectam a Catholica abscindere quaelibet enim Ecclesia filios suos ad consensionem in Doctrina publicè stabilita censuris adigit Sed fratres Ecclesiarum externarum monet pro officio charitatis non punit pro imperio potestatis Dr. Field Of the Church lib 5. as a common Resolution of Divines tells us That if a Bishop ventures to do any Act of Jurisdiction out of his own Diocess that is his particular Church so cap. 30. as to excommunicate or absolve or the like all such Acts are utterly void and of no force The same thing saith Dr. Crakanthorp cont Spal cap. 28. pag. 177. Jue divinum Regim p. 230. Every Congregation say our Brethren hath equal Power one as much as another according to the trite and known Axiom Par in parem non habet imperium An Equal hath no Power over an Equal Ecclesiae institutae parochiales integrae sunt Disp de Polit. Eccles p. 3. inter se collaterales potestate Ecclesiastica aequales saith Voetius Which you may English out of the English Puritanism thus Particular Churches are in all Matters equal and are entrusted by Christ with the same Ecclesiastical Power and Authority Cap. 2. § 3. Jewel Reynolds Whitaker and most of our Divines against the Papists are large in their Disputes for a parity of Churches and Mr. Parker hath written a whole Chapter de paritate Ecclesiarum De Polit lib 3. cap. 21. Some make a particular Church to be of larger Extension as a Diocess a Province c. but that altereth not the State of the Question A DIGRESSION 1. Of Independentism Name and Thing 2. It s consistency with the Kings Supremacy THis State of a particular Church namely their equality in respect of Jurisdiction or coercive Power one over another was wont to be expressed by INDEPENDENCY which though now it be a term of Raproach yet formerly made use of by good Authors as very fit and significant to set forth this Priviledge of each particular Church compleat and intire namely their not Dependency or Subjection to the Jurisdiction of another Church as their Head and Superior Dr. Jackson in his learned Treatise of the Church Cap. 15. Cap. 119. useth this term frequently Unity saith he in one place of Discipline or of INDEPENDENT Judicature is essential and necessary to the Church as visible Hence there be as many distinct visible Churches as there be INDEPENDENT Judicatures Ecclesiastick Dr. Sibbs thus Gospel-anointings pag. 94. Particular visible Churches are now God's Tabernacle The Church of the Jews was a National Church but now God hath erected particular Tabernacles Every particular Church under one Pastor is the Church of God a several Church INDEPENDENT The Church of England saith the same Author is called a particular Church from other Nations because it is under a Government Civil which is not dependent on any other Foreign Prince Each Church saith Voctius Desp Cau. Pap. lib. 3. § 3. c. 4. as it hath its proper Form of an Ecclesiastical Body or Society so it s endued with its proper Government and Jurisdiction which it exerciseth DEPENDENTLY upon Christ his Word and Spirit but INDEPENDENTLY in respect of all other Churches Mr. Bates One Company of Men assembled Treatise printed Anno 1613. hath no Authority to impose things upon many Churches 1. None now have Apostolick Authority 2. Each Congregation is a Body INDEPENDENT of any Ecclesiastical Power There is no Ordinance of God for this saith Mr. Banes that Churches within a circuit should be tyed to a certain Head-Church for Government pag. 8. and pag. 13. We affirm that no such Head-Church was ordained either vertually or actually but that all Churches were single Congregations equal INDEPENDENT each of other in regard of Subjection Every true Church saith one now is an INDEPENDENT Congregation A Collection of sundry matters Anno 1601. and in another place The Congregational Body Politick spiritually INDEPENDENT is Christ's Divine Ordinance in the Gospel One ordinary Congregation of Christians is a spiritual Body Politick INDEPENDENT That is it hath the Right and Power of spiritual Administration and Government in it self Confession of Faith p. Anno 1601. and over it self by the common and free consent of the People INDEPENDENTLY and immediately under Christ This was the Opinion generally of N. Conformists as is observed by one of themselves in the Name of the rest as also by B. Downam Sermon at Lambeth p. 5. They that is the N. C. say that every Parish by Right hath sufficient Authority within it self immediately derived from Christ for the Government of it self in all Causes Ecclesiastical To the Parishional Presbytery
or Censures may lawfully by a Church or any Ecclesiastical Assembly be threatned or drawn forth against a whole Nation and the chief Governors thereof to urge or compel especially in State concernment as the Pope and some others have done though it be truly in ordine ad spiritualia The fifth Instance or particular is this The 5. Instance A Family of all Corporations or Societies is the lowest species or kind it 's Consociatio simplex prima and hath the least of pomp or state in the Government of it Cottages are built low Palaces with many stories one above another Those great and extensive Bodies Empires and Kingdoms represent in their Government more adequatly the mystical Church in respect to Jesus Christ who is their King and Lawgiver whose Kingdom is with Power and Glory a Power that is truly Imperial and Princely having Officers under him his Kingdom reaching to the utmost ends of the Earth who in his name command reward and punish But Particular Churches as Governed by his Ministers have their porportion rather with the meanest and lowest Societies of men The Scripture seems to point at more than a similitude and likeness betwixt a Family and Church in the managing of affairs I mean in the general and what is it not determined by express Institution Paul speaking to Timothy about Church affairs mentioneth their expertness in Governing a Family as a good preparative or qualification for Church administrations And this is not only Negatively 1 Tim. 3.5 if a man know not how to rule his own house how shall he take care over the Church of God But affirmatively These things I writ that thou mayest know how thou oughtest to behave thy self in the house of God which is the Church of the living God The sence is full in those words vers 15. the Church of the living God yet it is added the house of God purposed as it were to carry the Eye back to what was written ver 5. which sheweth that there is a great affinity betwixt our Houses and the Houshold of God In a Fathers Governing his Children saith one there is a lively resemblance of such Duties of Government which he is to dispence towards the Church There is nothing enjoyned the Minister as a Father of Children which belongeth not to him as he is a spiritual Father of the Children of God On the other hand it may be observed this question being amongst the Apostles Matth. 18.1 who or which of us shall be the greatest in the Kingdom of Heaven upon supposition the Church being termed a Kingdom there would be places of State and higher dignity in it as are in the Kingdoms of the World Christ Answers There shall be no such thing no primacy in one Apostle over another no the greatest of you shall be the least and the first shall be the last Though a Jurisdiction and power truly Imperial absolute and equal to any of the Kings of the Gentiles belongs to me and I exercise it in those spiritual administrations yet no such dignity may be assumed by you 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Luke 22.25 1. When the Scripture speaks of a particular Church under the notion of a Family or Houshold Government or Ruling is mentioned as that wherein the similitude or proportion is most perspicuous and clear as hath been shewed But speaking here of a Church under this expression a Kingdom how purposely are we cautioned against an imitation in Rule and Authority 2. We may further observe that Ambition after greatness in those that manage these great things Hos 8.12 1 Pet. 1.4 is an infirmity almost unavoidable For if 1. Such persons the holiest men on the earth they who had forsaken all to follow Christ 2. And these so often relapse into this folly after they had been reduced from it by Christ 3. And at such times immediatly after Christ had minded them of his Death Matth. 20.19 20. Luke 22.21 24. 19. with 24. and that one of them should betray him when also they had newly been at the Communion with him What great cause is there that every man be very jealous of his own heart 3. It is not unevident also from the Disciples often Disputes about their greatness that most of our controversies and contentions about Church-Government if traced home will be found to arise from hence namely The having our Eye fixed so much upon the lofty state of a Kingdom as our pattern in such managements rather than that familiar and humble way of a Family For indeed this was the only breach and contest that we read of amongst those holy Men the Disciples of Christ 4. And where such differences are a Reconcilement will be found more difficult because where the mind is bent on worldly greatness we are very dull and slow in understanding whatsoever shall be spoken though from Christ himself that seems to cross those thoughts as appears also in that story Mark 9.32 A Parent or Master would not easily have been tempted into such an Error or make this question who or which of us shall be the greatest that is have a paternal power over other Parents and their Families c. And had the Disciples looked upon Ministerial power under so low and humble a notion as what is Economical James and John would never have thought it congruous that they should have an Apostolical power over the other Apostles Hoc Papatum fefellit c. saith Cartw. This deceived the Papacy which governs throughout after the form of worldly * Plurimorum consensu Ecclesia à repub formam illam magna parte mutuata est Eilesac Empires The Pope he is as the Emperor himself the Cardinals as his Deligates or Representative the Arch-Bishops as the Governors of Provinces c. Hence John calls the Church of Rome the Image of the Beast the Vizard of the Roman Empire For further confirmation of this fifth particular or Instance let it be considered how seldom and sparingly a particular Church in the N. T. is termed a Kingdom Although 1. It s Government be derived as a Branch of Christs Kingly Office 2. Church Ordinances are the most effectual means by which he exerciseth his spiritual Soveraignty in each mans soul 3. His Mystical Kingdom on earth thus by parcels comes to be wholly under an external spiritual regiment and 4. His Church when National was managed in the Glory and State of a Kingdom Yet notwithstanding all these leading occasions how sparingly and not without special Caution is a particular Church thus termed Whereas not only the Society but the Government Officers Ordinances Censures and other Church matters are universally and frequently delivered unto us by Christ and his Apostles in terms apt to mind us of this low and humble policy To give some Instances thereof 1. A particular Church or the Society it self is represented unto us as the House of the living God 1 Tim. 3. His