called came who to say the truth of the matters within contained being chosen tried and sworn say upon their Oath That the said Humphry Morley did buy of the said John Slade the within written Wheat and Rye in eares upon the within written Close as is said before growing being for 16. pound of good and lawful mony of England To be paid to the said Iohn Slade in the Feast of St. Iohn the Baptist then next following as in the Declaration within written is within specified And further The said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That betwixt the said Iohn Slade and the said Humphry Morley There was no promise or taking upon him besides the bargain aforesaid But whether upon the whole matter aforesaid by the said Jurors in form aforesaid found The said Humphry Morley did take upon him in manner and form as in the Declaration within written within specified or no the said Jurors are altogether ignorant and thereof they ask the Advice and Consideration of the Court here c. And if upon the whole matter aforesaid by the said Jurors in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Justices of the Court here That the said Humphry Morley did take upon him in manner and form in the Declaration within specified Then the said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Humphry Morley did take upon him in manner and form as the aforesaid Iohn Slade within against him complaineth And then they do assesse the damages of the said Iohn Slade by occasion of not performance of his promise and taking upon him within written besides his charges and his costs by him in the sute aforesaid by him expended to Sixteen pounds And for those charges and costs by Twenty Shillings And if upon the whole matter by the said Jurors in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the said Justices and Court here That the said Humphry Morley did not take upon him in manner and form in the Declaration within specified Then the said Jurors say upon their Oath That the said Humphry did not take upon him in manner and form as the said Humphry hath within alleged And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of their judgement of and upon the premises to be given is not yet avised Day is given to the parties aforesaid in State as now it is before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Monday next after 15. dayes of the Holy Trinity to hear their judgement of and upon the premises Because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. And so from Term to Term untill Saturday next after 8. dayes of St. Michael to hear their judgement of and upon the premises Because the Court of the Lady the Queen here not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid came the parties aforesaid in their proper persons Upon which seen and by the Court of the Lady the Queen all and singular the premises fully understood and mature deliberation being thereupon had For that it seemeth to the Court of the said Lady the Queen now here That the said Humphry did take upon him in manner and form in the Declaration aforesaid above specified It is granted That the aforesaid John Slade shall recover against the said Humphry Morley his damages and costs aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid assessed As also Nine pounds for his charges and costs aforesaid to the said John Slade by the Court of the said Lady the Queen here by his assènt of encease adjudged which damages in the whole do amount to Twenty and six pounds And the said Humphry Morley in mercy c. Hillary Term. 8. Jacobi Rott 1112. William Banes Case C. 9. part fol. 91. a. Mâ—morandum That at another time that is to say In the Term of St. Michael last past before the King at Westminster cometh William Banes by Thomas Ferrer his Attorny and brought here in the Court before the said Lord the King that now is his Bill against Edward Paine and Mary his Wife in the Custody of the Marshal of a Plea of Trespass upon the Case And are Pledges of Sute that is to say John Doo and Richard Roo Which Bill followeth in these words ss Willam Banes complaineth of Edward Paine and Mary his Wife in the Custody of the Marshall of the Marshalsey of the Lord the King before the King himself being for that is to say That whereas one William Havert in his life time the late Husband of the aforesaid Mary That is to say the first day of March in the year of the Reign of the Lord James that now is King of England the 6th at London that is to say in the Parish of the blessed Mary of Bow in the Ward of Cheap London was indebted to the said William Banes in 77. pounds of lawful Money of England for divers summs of Mony to him the said William Havert by the aforesaid William Banes give to loan and lent And so being endebted the said William Havert afterwards that is to say the 6th day of April in the year of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is of England the 7th at London in the Parish and Ward aforesaid lying sick earnestly required the said Mary then his Wife to pay to the said William Banes after the death of the said William Havert the said 77. pounds And then and there the said William Havert made his Testament and last Will and made and constituted the said Mary Executrix of his said last Will then there dyed After whose death the said Mary took opon her the burthen of Execution of the Testament aforesaid And whereas the aforesaid Mary after the death of the said William Havert by colour of the last Will aforesaid was possessed of the interest of a Term for divers years then and yet to come Of and in certain Gardens and a Bowling-Ally scituate and being in Morefield that is to say in the Parish of St. Leonard in Shordich in the County of Midd. And the said Mary when she was single perceiving that the aforesaid William Banes intented to trouble and sue the said Mary for the aforesaid 77. pounds because that the said Mary the said 77. pounds to the said William Banes after the death of the aâ—oresaid William Havert her Husband deceased had not paid the said Mary whilest she was single afterwards that is to say 25th day of June in the year of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is of Engl. the 7th aforesaid At London aforesaid in the Parish and Ward aforesaid In consideration that the said William Banes at the instance and especial request of the said Mary should not trouble or sue the said Mary for the said 77. pounds but would forbear the payment thereof until the next Quarter that is to say until the Feast of St. Michael the Archangel then next following Promised unto the said
at Westminster in the County of Midd. was holden at Westminster aforesaid unto the Castle of the Lady the Queen c. is adjorned c. and their holden c. Afterwards the said Lady the Queen By other Letters Patents Constituted John Clench and Francis Rodes one of her Serjants at Law Justices to Assizes in the a-aforesaid County of York c. And the said Justices by virtue of the said Lett. Patents Afterward that is to say Monday in the 4th week of Lent in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 25th At the Castle of York came before whom then and there come the aforesaid Thomas Dowman and Elizabeth by their Attorney aforesaid and pray a Writ of Reattachment to the aforesaid Edward George Richard Coats c. that they be before the Justices of the Lady the Queen at the next Assizes in her County of York to be taken assigned to be holdē at the afores Castle of York to hear the Record and their Judgement of the Assize aforesaid w hc was in the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is at the Castle aforesaid so that that Assize then be here in the State as it was in the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is before the aforesaid John Clench and Francis Gawdy Justices to Assizes c. At the aforesaid Castle of York the aforesaid Monday the 6th day of August in the year of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 24th in which day the Assize aforesaid was adjorned before the said John Clench and Francis Gawdy then Justices c. from the aforesaid Castle of York unto the aforesaid Inn of the Justices in Chancery Lane London untill the aforesaid Saturday next after the aforesaid morrow of All Souls then next following c. At which next Assizes holden at the Castle of York aforesaid Monday the 29th day of July in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 25th before the aforesaid John Clench and Francis Gawdy then Justices to Assizes c. came as well the aforesaid Thomas Dowman and Elizabeth by their Attorny aforesaid as the aforesaid Edward George Richard Coats Iohn William Robert and Robert by the aforesaid Thomas Hill their Attorny And the Sheriff that is to say Thomas Wentworth Esq now sent That the aforesaid Edward Vavasor George Richard Coats Iohn William Robert and Robert c. And upon this day is given to them before the Justices of the said Lady the Queen that now is of the Bench in the Bench at Westminster in the morrow of All Souls next comming to hear and receive what to the said Justices should seem in this behalf because the said Iohn Clench and Francis Rodes Justices to Assizes c. thereof not yet c. And the Assize aforesaid with all touching the same to the said Justices of the Bench is sent c. The Warrant of Attorny followes and the Writ of Resummons in the Roll and the Tenor of the Writ of Reattachment and Retorn of the said Writ Elizabeth c. To the Sherriffs of York greeting Reattach Edward Vavasor Esq George Richard Coats Iohn William Robert and Robert or their Bailiffs if they shall not be found before our Justices to Assizes in your County to be taken assigned at the Castle of York in your County upon Monday the 22d. day of Iuly then next to come to hear the Record and Judgement of the Assize of Novel disseisin which was in our Court at the Castle aforesaid which Assize Thomas Dowman Esq and Elizabeth his Wife there arraigned against them of 6. Messuages 300. Acres of Land 100. Acres of Meadow and 200. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in Spaldington VVillytoft and Southcone So as they that Assize then be there in the same state as it was in our Court before Iohn Clench third Baron of our Exchequer and Francis Gawdy one of our Serjants at Law our Justices to Assizes in your County to be taken assigned At the aforesaid Castle of York Monday the 6th day of August last past which day the assize aforesaid for certain causes was from thence adjorned before the same our Justices unto the Inn of the Justices in Chancery Lane London Untill Saturday next after the morrow of All Souls then next following And have here the names of the Pledges and this Writ Iohn Clench at the Castle of York the 11th day of March in the yeer of our Reign the 25th Frankland Cresly The within named Edward Vavasor George Richard Coats Iohn VVilliam Robert and Robert hath not any thing nor any of them have any thing in my Baliwick by which they can be attached or any of them can be attached nor have they nor any of them hath a Bailiff or Bailiffs nor are they or any of them to be found in the same Thomas VVentworth Esq Sheriff And now here that is to say at VVestminster aforesaid at this day that is to say at the aforesaid morrow of All Souls came as well the aforesaid Thomas Dowman and Elizabeth by the aforesaid Henry Cressy their Attorny as the aforesaid Edward Vavasor George Richard Coats Iohn VVilliam Robert and Robert by Tho. Algar their Attony And because the Justices of the Bench here will avise themselves of and upon the premses before they give their Judgement thereof day is given to the parties here until 8. dayes of St. Hillary and so it is continued in 8. dayes of St. Hillary the yeer following At which day here come as well the aforesaid Thomas Dowman and Elizabeth as the aforesaid Edward Vavasor George Richard Coats Iohn VVilliam Robert and Robert by their Attornies aforesaid and upon this The premises being seen and by the Justices here fully understood It seemeth to the said Justices here That the aforesaid Indenture by the aforesaid Peter Vavasor Esq after the aforesaid Recovery in form aforesaid made and had was good and sufficient in the Law to lead the uses of the Recovery aforesaid of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenunces so that the same Recovery of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in the view of the Recognitors of the Assize aforesaid put and in the Plaint aforesaid specified by the aforesaid Andrew VVindsor VVilliam Vavasor Peter Vavasor the younger and John Laundere against the aforesaid Peter Vavasor Esq in form aforesaid had was to those uses in the aforesaid barr of the aforesaid Edward above specified in manner and form as the said Edward in his bar aforesaid above alleged Therefore it is considered That the aforesaid Thomas Dowman and Elizabeth take nothing by their Writ aforesaid but in mercy for their false clamour c. And the aforesaid Edward Vavasor George Richard Coats Iohn VVilliam Robert and Robert go thereof without day c. Audita Querela Easter Term Anno 80. of King JAMES Doctor Druries Case C. 8. part Fol. 139. a. AT another time as appeareth in
the Queen that the re-entry of the aforesaid William Ambry into the aforesaid 10 Acres of Land with the appurtenances in and upon the possession of the said Richard Hynde be or in Law ought to be adjudged a good and Lawfull re-entry then the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath that the said William Ambry is not guilty of the Trespass and Ejectment of the farm aforesaid as he before for himself hath alleged And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement further of and upon the premises is not yet avised day thereof is given to the parties aforesaid in the state that now it is before the Lady the Queen at Westminster untill thursday next after 8 dayes of Saint Hillary to heare their Judgement thereof because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet have avised c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid and because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised further day thereof is given to the parties aforesaid in the state it now is before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until wednesday next after 15 dayes of Easter to hear their Judgement thereof c. because c. And so from Term to Term until the plaint aforesaid was farther adjroned by another writ of the said Lady the Queen of Common adjournment before the Queen until the morrow of All Souls at the Castle of Hartford in the County of Hartford at which day before the Lady the Queen at the Castle of Hartford came the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Court of the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof is farther given to the parties aforesaid in state as it is now before the Lady the Queen at the Castle of Hartford until Tuesday next after 3 dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement c. because c. Before which day the plaint aforesaid was adjorned by a writ of the Lady the Queen of common adjornement before the said Lady the Queen untill 8 dayes of Saint Hillary at Westminster at which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgment of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day is further given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster untill VVednesday next after 15 dayes of Easter to hear their Judgement thereof c. because c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid Upon which seen by the Court of the Lady the Queen here and the premises diligently looked into and thereof mature deliberation being thereof had Because it seemeth to the Court of the said Lady the Queen here that the entrie of the aforesaid VVilliliam Ambry above specified into the aforesaid 10 Acres of Land with the appurtenances in and upon the possession of the aforesaid Richard Hynde was a good and lawfull re-entry therefore It is granted that the aforesaid Richard Hynde take nothing by his Bill aforesaid but that he for his false clamour be taken c. and the aforesaid VVilliam Ambry be thereof without damage c. Ejectione Firme Hillary Terme 36. Eliz. Rott 440. in the Kings Bench. Sir George Browns Case C. 3. part fo 45. WIlliam Spencer late of Swindon in the County aforesaid Yeoman and Thomas Spencer late of Swindon in the County aforesaid Yeoman were attached to answer to James Linche of a plea wherefore with force and armes one Messuage one Barn 80 Acres of Land 80 Acres of Meadow and 80 Acres of Pasture with the appurtenances in Swindon which George Brown Knight to the aforesaid James demised for a Term which is not yet ended they entred and him from his Farm aforesaid did eject and other harms did unto him to the grievous damage of the said James and against the peace of the Lady the Queen that now is c. and whereupon the said James by Thomas Cooper his Attourny Complaineth That whereas the aforesaid George Brown the 22 th day of October in the year of the Reign of the Queen that now is the 35 th at Swindon aforesaid had demised to the said James the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to have and to hold the same Tenements with the appurtenances to the said James and his assigns from the Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel then last past until the end and Term of 4 years from thence next ensuing and fully to be compleated By virtue of which demise the said James into the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed and so thereof being possessed the aforesaid William and Thomas afterwards that is to say the 22 th day of October aforesaid in the 35 th year aforesaid with force and armes c. the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances which the said George Brown to the said James in form aforesaid demised for the term aforesaid which is not yet ended entred and him the said James from his Farm aforesaid held out and other harms c. To the grievous damage c. and against the peace c. whereupon he saith that he is the worse and hath damage to the value of 20 pound and thereof bringeth sute c. And the aforesaid William and Thomas by John Paxton their Attorney come and defend the force and injury when c. And say that they in nothing are guilty of the Trespass and Ejectment aforesaid as the aforesaid James above against them complaineth and of this put themselves upon the Country and the aforesaid James likewise c. Therefore it is commanded to the Sheriff that he have here in 8 dayes of the Purification of the blessed Lady 12 good and Lawfull men c. by whom the truth c. and who neither c. Because aswell c. afterward the process between the parties aforesaid was continued of the plea aforesaid by Jurors put between them put in respite here until this day that is to say in 8 dayes of Saint Michael in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 37 th Unless the Justices of the Lady the Queen for Assises in the County aforesaid to be taken assigned by the form of the statute upon Thursday the 17 day of July last past at New Sarad in the County aforesaid first came And now here at this day come as well the aforesaid James Linche as the aforesaid William Spencer and Thomas Spencer by their Attorneys aforesaid and the aforesaid Justices of Assise before whom c. sent here their Record in these words Afterwards the day and place within contained before Thomas Walmesley one
the appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed and so being thereof possessed The same Alice before the time in which c. that is to say the 4th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the late Queen Mary the First at London in the Parish and Ward aforesaid took to Husband one Thomas Wilcox by which the said Thomas and Alice in the right of the said Alice were of all that the aforesaid Key and Wharf and of other the premises with their appurtenances possessed And so thereof being possessed The said Thomas Wilcox and Alice before the time in which that is to say the 16th day of November in the yeers of the Reign of the Lord Philip and the Lady Mary late King and Queen of England the First and Second at London in the Parish and Ward aforesaid by their Writing sealed with their seals and here into Court brought whose Date is the same Day and Yeer Gave and Granted all their Right Title Interest and Term of Yeers which they the said Thomas and Alice then had to come of and in all that the aforesaid Key and Wharf and the rest of the premises aforesaid with their appurtenances by reason of the execution of the Testament of the aforesaid Bartholmew Gibbs aforesaid to one Iohn Haynes By virtue of which Gift and Grant The same John Haynes before the time in which c. into all that the aforesaid Key and Wharf and other the premises with the appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed so being thereof possessed the said I. Haynes before the time in which c. that is say the 21. Day of Decem. in the Yeer of our Lord 1559. at Lond. aforesaid in the Parish aforesaid made his Test Last Will in Writing by the same devised and bequeathed the premises to one Joice then his Wife and thereof made and constituted c. Joice then his Wife his Executrix and afterwards the same Day and Yeer there of all the aforesaid Key and Wharf and other the premises with the appurtenances dyed possessed After whose Death and before the time in which c. the aforesaid Joice taking upon her the Charge of Execution of the Testament and will of the aforesaid John Haynes into all the aforesaid Key and Wharf and other the premises with the appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed by virtue of Execution of the same Testament and Last Will of the aforesaid Iohn Haynes and so being thereof possessed the said Joice before the time in which c. that is to say the 6th day of October in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 31. at London in the Parish and Ward aforesaid took to Husband the aforesaid John Porter By which the said John Porter was and yet is thereof possessed By Colour of which the same John Porter in his own Right and the aforesaid Henry Cockain as Servant of the said Iohn and by his Commandment unto all the aforesaid Key and Wharf and other the premises with the appurtenances in the said Information specified the said time in which c. Entred and the Issues and Profits thereof by the whole time in the said Information specified took and had and do yet take and have as to them it was and is lawful Without that that the said Iohn Porter in and upon the possession of the said Lady the Queen of the aforesaid Key and Wharf with the appurtenances in the said Information mentioned or any part thereof intruded or either of them did intrude in manner and form as in the said Information above is supposed And without that that the aforesaid Key and Wharf and other the premises with the appurtenances in the said Information mentioned or any parcel thereof the said 26th Day of Ianuary in the Yeer 34th aforesaid in the same Information mentioned or ever before or after stood or were or was in the Hands and possession of the said Lady the Queen that now is in manner and form as in the said Information is before supposed And also without that that there is any Record Roul or Remembrance in the Court of the Exchequer here besides the Record of the Information aforesaid by which it may appear the aforesaid Key and Wharf and other the premises or any parcel thereof with the appurtenances to be or of Right to be in the hands and possession of the said Lady the Queen that now is All and singular which the said John Porter and Henry Cockain are ready to aver as the Court here c. Whereupon they pray Judgement and that they as to the premises from this Court be dismissed c. and each of them be dismissed And because the Court will avise of the Plea aforesaid until further c. Day is given here to the aforesaid John Porter and Henry Cockain in the same state as now it is until to 15. Dayes of Faster at which Day the aforesaid Iohn and Henry came here as before And the aforesaid Iohn Popham Esquire Attorny General of the Lady the Queen that now is and who followes for the said Lady the Queen present here in Court the same Day in his proper Person By Protestation not acknowleging any thing in the Plea of the said Iohn Porter and Henry Cockain by them before pleaded to be true in manner and form as the said Iohn Porter and Henry Cockain in the Plea of the said Iohn Porter and Henry Cockain by them above pleaded to be true in manner and form as the said Iohn Porter and Henry Cockain in their Plea aforesaid above have pleaded Yet for Replication The same Attorny of the said Lady the Queen that now is for the said Lady the Queen saith as he formerly said That the aforesaid Iohn Porter and Henry Cockain in and upon the possession of the said Lady the Queen that now is in the aforesaid Key and Wharf called the Old Woolkey and other the premises in the Information aforesaid specified entred intruded and made entry in manner and form as in the Information aforesaid above it is alleged And of this The Attorny of the said Lady the Queen for the said Lady the Queen prayeth that it may be inquired of the Country And the said Desendants say as before and pray likewise Therefore that inquiry be made thereof c. And it is commanded to the Sherifs of London that they do not omit c. And that they cause to be here from Easter in one Moneth the same Term 12. free and lawful men of our Balywick of the Neighbourhood of the Parish of All Saints Barking in the City of London aforesaid c. whereof each c. by whom c. and who neither c. And the same Day is given here to the said Iohn Porter and Henry Cockain at which day the said Iohn and Henry come here as before and the Sherifs that is to say William Rider and Benedict Burnham returned the Writ aforesaid together
advise of the said Court of Exchequer here c. And if upon the whole matter aforesaid by them the Jurors in form aforesaid â—ound It shall seem to the said Barons and Court here That the aforesaid Entry of the aforesaid John Porter and Henry into the Wharf and Tenements with the appurtenances be and ought to be adjudged an Intrusion upon the possession of the said Lady the Queen Then the said Jurors say upon their Oath That the aforesaid John Porter and Henry in and upon the possession of the said Lady the Queen that now is of the aforesaid Key and Wharf called the Old Woolkey and other the premises in the Information above alleged entred intruded and made ingresse in manner form as in the Information aforesaid above is alleged And if upon the whole matter aforesaid by them the Jurors in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Barons and Court here That the aforesaid Entry of the aforesaid John Porter and Henry into the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances be not nor ought to be adjudged an intrusion upon the possession of the said Lady the Queen of the aforesaid Wharf and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances Then the same Jurors say upon their Oath That the said John Porter and Henry in and upon the possession of the said Lady the Queen that now is of the aforesaid Key and Wharf called the Old Wolkey and other the premises in the said Information above alleged did not intrude and make Entry in manner and form as in the Information aforesaid above is alleged And because the Court here will avise of the premises before further c. Day is given here to the said John Porter and Henry Cockain in the same state that now is until 8. dayes of St. Michael before which day that is to say in the Morrow of St. Michael in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the processe aforesaid with all things touching the same by the Writ of the Lady the Queen of Common Adjournment under her great Seal of England bearing date at VVestminster the 23d Day of September in the Yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 34th aforesaid to the aforesaid Treasurer and Barons of the Exchequer directed which is inrouled elâ—ewhere in the Remembrances of this Exchequer of the aforesaid 34th yeer of the Queen that now is amongst the Records of this Exchequer of the Term of St. Michael Rott On the part of this Remembrancer until a Moneth of St. Michael then next following At which Day the said Processe aforesaid with all things touching the same by another like Writ of Common Adjournment bearing Date at Hampton Court the 25th Day of October in the 34th yeer aforesaid and amongst the Records of the said Term of St. Michael in the Roul aforesaid with the part of the Remembrancer aforesaid likewise Inrouled are further adjourned until the Morrow of All Souls at Westminster aforesaid unto the Castle of the Lady the Queen of Hartford in the County of Hartford And the same Day is given here to the aforesaid John Porter and Henry Cockain At which Day the said John and Henry come here as before And the Verdict aforesaid being seen and the other premises by the Barons here and the mature deliberation thereof amongst them being had Because upon the whole matter aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid found It seemes to the Barons here That the entry of the aforesaid John Porter and Henry Cockain in the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances is an Intruâ—â—on upon the possession of the said Lady the Queen of the Wharf and Tenements aforesaid Therefore it is granted by the same Barons That the aforesaid John Porter and Henry Cockain of the aforesaid Entry Intrusion and Ingress in and upon the possession of the said Lady the Queen of the aforesaid Key and Wharf and other the premises be convicted and either of them be convicted And that the aforesaid Wharf and Tenements with the appurtenances into the Hands of the said Lady the Queen that now is be taken c. And that the said John Porter and H. Cockain be Attached by their Bodies wheresoever c. to make a Fine for the contempt aforesaid c. And further to do what to the Court c. And it is commanded to the Sheriffs of London that they attach them in form aforesaid so that c. in 8. Day of St. Hillary Before which Day that is to say The 28th Day of November in the yeer 35th of the Queen that now is the Process aforesaid together with all things touching the premises were further adjourned by another Writ of Common Adjournment under the great Seal of England to the Treasurer and Barons of this Exchequer directed which is inâ—ouled elsewhere in the Remembrances of this Exchequer of the 34th yeer of the Queen that now is ended and the 35th began with the said Remembrancer from the aforesaid Castle of Hartford unto Westminster aforesaid At which Day the said John Porter and Henry Cockain at Westminster aforesaid come here as before And the Sheriffs did not return the Writ Yet the aforesaid John Porter and Henry Cockain at the same time come here as before And for the premises submitted themselves to the favour of the Court And that they might not be further in the premises troubled prayed with the favour of the Court to be admitted to make a reasonable Fine with the Lady the Queen in the premises which by the Court here is granted to them And upon this by colour of a Writ of the said Lady the Queen of her privy Seal To the Treasurer Chancellor and Barons and other Officers of this Court of Exchequer of the second yeer of this Queen that is to say amongst the Writs directed to the Barons and in the Term of Easter in this Exchequer inrouled remaining with the Remembrancer of the Queen of Persons to be admitted by the aforesaid Treasurer Chancellor Barons and other Officers of this Exchequer according to their discretions they are admitted to make such Fine c. according to the Tenor of the aforesaid Writ and made a Fine in the premises as is contained in these Remembrances that is to say amongst the Fines of this Term one the part remaining of the Remembrancer of the Queen By Colour of which Fine It is granted to the Barons here That against the aforesaid John Porter and Henry Cockain for the Contempt aforesaid there he not here further Execution made c. Information Trinity Term Anno 37º Eliz. Rot. 199. in the Exchequer The Case of Alton Woods Co. 1. parâ— fo 26. MEmorandum that it is found in the Remembrances of this Exchequer in the 37th year of Queen Elizabeth that is â—o say amongst the Records of this Term of Holy Trinity with the part of the Queens Remembrancer in these words That is to say Worcester ss
said Indenture The said Earl of Warwick his Heirs and Assigns and every of them should stand and be seised of and in the Wood aforesaid with the appurtenances amongst other things by the names of Alton Woods otherwise Alvington Woods with the appurtenances siâ—uâ—te and being within the Parish of Rock or elsewhere within the several Counties of Worcester and Salop or any or either of them to the uses 〈…〉 nts and purposes afterwards in the said Indenture expressed and declared that is to say To the use of him the said Ambrose Earl of Warwick for the Term of his life without impeachment of any wast and after the decease of him the said Earl of Warwick to the use of the aforesaid Ann Countess of Warwick in the Information aforesaid named by the name of the Lady Ann Countess of Warwick wife of him the said Earl of Warwick and the right Heirs of the said Ann for ever By colour of which Covenant and Grant aforesaid and by force of a certain Act of transferring of uses into possessions in the Parliament of the aforesaid Lord Henry late King of England the 8th Father of the said Lady the Queen that now is at Westminster aforesaid the 4th day of February in the year of his Reign the 27th holden made and provided The aforesaid Ambrose Earl of Warwick was seised of the Wood aforesaid with the appurtenances amongst other things in his demesn as of Freehold during his life without impeachment of waste the remainder thereof after the decease of him the said Earl of Warwick to the aforesaid Ann late Countess of Warwick and her Heirs expectant And the said Ambrose Earl of Warwick so thereof being seised the remainder thereof in form aforesaâ—d expectant The said Eaâ—l afterwards that is to say the aforesaid 21th day of February in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 32th aforesaid at Abbottesley aforesaid dyed after whose death the said Ann now Countess of Warwick into the Wood aforesaid with the appurtenances entred and was and yet is thereof seised in her demesn as of Fee by colour and force of the premises By which the said Richard Bushopp as servant unto the aforesaid Ann now Countess of Warwick and by her Command the aforesaid 21th day of February in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 32th aforesaid and the dayes and times aforesaid betwixt the same 21th day of February in the year 32th aforesaid and the day of the exhibiting of the Information aforesaid into the Wood aforesaid with the appurtenances entred and the Issues and Profits thereof by that time arising to the use of the said Ann now Countess of Warwick took and had and doth yet take and have as it was and is lawful for him to do And the aforesaid Richard further saith That the aforesaid William Walshe yet over-liveth and is in full life that is to say at Abbottesly aforesaid without that that the Wood aforesaid with the appurtenances or any parcel thereof in the Hands and Possession of the said Lady the Queen that now is is or before this was or of Right ought to be in manner and form as in by the Information aforesaid it is supposed And without that that the said Richard Bushopp in or upon the possession of the said Lady the Queen that now is of the Wood aforesaid with the appurtenances or any part thereof Entred Intruded or made Ingresse in manner and form as by the Information aforesaid it is supposed and without that that there is any Record Roll or Remembrance besides the Record of the Information aforesaid by which it may appear that the Wood aforesaid with the appurtenances in the Information above specified or any parcel thereof in the Hands and Possession of the said Lady the Queen that now is or standeth or of Right ought to be or stand in manner and form as in the Information aforesaid above is supposed All and singular which the said Richard Bushopp is ready to aver as unto the Court c. Whereupon he prayeth Judgement and that he as to the premises from this Court be dismissed And because the Court here â—â— avise of the Plea aforesaid before that further c. Day is given unto the â—fores Rich. Bushopp in state as now until 8. dayes of St. Michael At which day the said Richard Bushopp came here as before And the said Attorny General of the said Lady the Queen that now is who for the said Lady the Queen prosecutes present here in Court in his proper person for his said Lady the Queen by Protestation not acknowledging any thing in the Plea aforesaid of the said Richard Bushopp by him above pleaded to be true in manner and form as the said Richard in his Plea aforesaid above hath pleaded Yet for Reply the said Attorny of the said Lady the Queen for the same Lady the Queen saith That the Plea of the Richard Bushopp as to the Entry Intrusion and ingresse aforesaid in the aforesaid Wood by him the said Richard in the Information aforesaid to be done supposed is not sufficient in Law to discharge the said Richard of the said Entry Intrusion and ingresse whereupon for default of sufficient Answer in this behalf The said Attorny of the Lady the Queen for the said Lady the Queen prayeth Judgement And that the aforesaid Richard of the same Entry Intrusion and Ingresse by the aforesaid Richard thereof supposed to be done be convicted And the said Richard saith That he sufficient matter in Law to barr the said Lady the Queen that now is from the possession of the aforesaid Wood in the said Information specified and of every parcel thereof above in barr and exclusion of the Information hath alleged which he is ready to averr as unto the Court c. Which matter aforesaid The Attorny of the Lady the Queen for the same Queen doth not deny nor to the same any wayes for the said Lady the Queen Answereth but the Averment aforesaid to admit altogether doth refuse Wherefore as before the said Richard demandeth Judgement and that he as to the Premises from this Court be dismissed c. And because the Barons here will avise themselves of upon the Premises whereof the aforesaid Richard hath above put himself in Judgement of the Court before that they give Juâ—gement thereof Further day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushopp here until in 8. dayes of St. Hillary to hear their Judgement thereof because the said Barons thereof not yet c. And as to the Tryal of the Issue aforesaid by the Country to be tryed above joyned It is commanded to the Sherif of the aforesaid County of Worcester that he do not omit c. And that he cause to be here at the said 8. dayes of St. Michael 12. good and lawful Men of the Neighbourhood of Alton otherwise Alvington and Rock in the said County whereof each c
aforesaid are utterly Ignorant And thereof pray the Advise of the Justices aforesaid and of the Court here c. And if upon the whole matter aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the same Justices and Court here c. That the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father dyed seised of the Manors Tenements in the Monstrans de droit within written specified in his demesn as of Fee or of any part thereof with the Appurtenances Then the Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father dyed seised of the Manors and Tenements with the Appurtenances in the Monstrans de droit specified or of so much thereof as to the same Justices shall â—eem the same Christopher so dyed seised in his demesn as of Fee as the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Son the aforesaid Edward Digges within pleading have alleged And if upon the whole mâ—ttâ—r aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid sound It shall seem to the same Justices and Court here c. That the aforesaid Chrâ—stopher Digges the Father dyed not seised of the Manors and Tenements with tâ—e appurtenances in the Monstrans de droit within written specified or of any parcel thereof in his demesn as of Fee Then the said Juror say upon ther Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father dyed not seised of the Manors and Tenements with the Appurtenances in the Monstrans de droit within written specified or of so much thereof as to the said Justices aforesaid shall seem the same Christopher so not to dye seised of â—n his demesn as of Fee in his demesn as of Fee as the said Thomas Palmer and Margaret within pleading have alleged And because the Court of the Lady the Queen hereof giving their Judgement of and upon the premises are not yet avisâ—d day thereof is further given to the parties aforesaid in state is now before the Lady the Queen untill the morrow of the Holy Trinity wheresoever c. to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises c. because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof are not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come as well the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Son and Edward Digges by their Attorney aforesaid as the aforesaid Thomas Palmer and Margaret in their proper persons And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Jugement of and upon the premises are not yet avised further day is given to the parties aforesaid in sute as now before the Lady the Queen untill in 8. dayes of Saint Michael wheresoever c. to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court or the Lady the Queen here thereof are not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come aâ—well the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Son and the said Edward Digges by their Attorney aforesaid as the aforesaid Thomas Palmer and Margaret in their proper persons and because the Court of the said Lady the Queen here oâ— giving their Judgement of and upon the premises are not yet avised day thereof is given to the parties aforesaâ—d before the Lady the Queen untill in 8. dayes of Saint Hillary wheresoever e. for to hear their Judgâ—ment thereof c. because the Court of the Lady the Queen here are not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Son and Edward Digges by their Attorney aforesaid as the said Thomas and Margaret in their proper persons and because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises are not yet avised further day is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen untill from Easter day in 15. dayes wheresoever to hear their Judgement thereof c. because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof are not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Son and Edward Digges by their Attorney aforesaid as the aforesaid Thomas Palmer and Margaret in their proper persons And because the Court of the Lady the Queen of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises are not yet avised further day is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster untill the morrow of the Holy Trinity wheresoever c. to hear their Judgement hereof because the Court of the Lady the Queen here are not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come as well the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Son and Edward Digges by their Attorney aforesaid as the aforesaid Thomas Palmer and Margaret in their proper persons Upon which seen and by the Court of the Lady the Queen here all singular the premises here fully understood and mature deliberation thereof being had Because it seems to the Court of the Lady the Queen that now is here That the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father dyed not seised of the Manors and Tenements with the Appurtenances in the Monstrans de droit aforesaid above specified or of any parcel thereof in his demesn as of Fee It is granted that the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Son and Edward Digges take nothing by their Writ aforesaid but for their false clamor thereof be in mercy c. And the aforesaid Thomas Palmer and Margaret go thereof without day c. Prohibition and Attachment upon Prohibition Easter Term Anno 38. Eliz. Rott 628. in the Kings Bench Co. 2. part The Bishop of Winchesters Case MEmorandum that at another time that is to say Michael Term last past before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come Robert Wright by Thomas VVebb the younger and brought here in the Court of the said Lady the Queen then and there his Bill against John VVright Executor of the Testament and last Will of Nicholas VVright late whilest he lived Farmer as he affirmed of the Rectory of the Parish Church of Eastmeon otherwise called Eastmeam in the Diocesse of VVinchester in the Province of Canterbury in the Custody of the Marshalsea c. in a Plea of Trespass and Contempt against those who prosecuted in the Spiritual Court against the Queens Prohibition to the contrary thereof directed and delivered And are Pledges of sute John Doo Richard Roo which Bill followeth in these words ss South That is to say Robert Wright who as well for the Lady the Queen as for himself prosecuteth complaineth of John Wright Executor of the Testament and last Will of Nicholas â—â—ight deceased late whil'st he lived as he affirmed of the Rectory of the Parish Church of Eastmeon otherwise called Eastmeam in the Diocess of Winchester in the Province of Canterbury in the Custody of the Marshal of the Marshalsey of the Lady the Queen before the Queen her self being why he sueth
sworn therein and many years served the place Thus much being on my own knowledge to be true at his humble and earnest sute I thought good to advertise your Lordships and so do bid your Lordships farewell from the Court the 21th day of May 1579. your Lordships loving Friend R. Leicester And the Jurors further say That the aforesaid Augustine Steward brother of him the said Mark the 6th day of January in the 11th year abovesaid at Hampton Court in the County of Middlesex by the said Lady the Queen was admitted ordained and constituted to attend in the place and room of him the said Mark his brother upon Nicholas Bacon Knight then being Lord Keeper of the Great Seal of England and to the said Office for in the place and room of him the said Mark well and faithfully to exercise and execute then and there in the presence of the said Lady the Queen was sworn as by the Deposition of the said Augustine Steward which followeth in these words we finde to be true After Christmass and before Hillary Term in the 11th year of her Highness Reign on a Sunday or Holiday her Majesty coming from the Closet at Hampton Court was moved by the Right Honourable deceased Earl of Pembroke for the instituting of Augustine Steward Sergeant at Arms to attend upon the Lord Keeper To whom her Majesty answered My Lord he is not to have his brothers Office but is to be appointed only to attend in his place for him at such time as his brother shall be absent her Majesty making then relation of her favourable License already granted to Mark Steward to abide in the Country and to absent himself from her service at his pleasure until he should by her Majesty be called again to his attendance upon the said Lord Keeper And then the said Augustine was sworn to attend as is above specified By colour of which the said Augustine Steward in the absence of him the said Mark Steward his brother the aforesaid Office of Sergeant at Arms attendant upon the Chancellor of England from thence until the 20th day of June in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 18th used and executed But whether the said Lady the Queen by word only without Writing sealed can give sufficient License in Law to the said Mark Steward to absent himself from the exercising of his Office aforesaid the Jurors aforesaid are utterly ignorant and thereof pray the ayd and advise of the Court here in the premises And if upon the whole matter aforesaid it shall seem to the Court of the Lady and Queen here That the said Lady the Queen that now is can by word only without her writing sealed give sufficient License in Law to the said Mark to absent himself from the exercising of his Office aforesaid Then the said Jurors say That the said Lady the Queen that now is gave Licence to the said Mark Steward to absent himself from the exercise of his Office aforesaid during the pleasure of him the said Mark until he should be commanded by the said Lady the Queen to serve in his Office aforesaid in manner and form as the said Mark above in pleading alledged And if upon the whole matter aforesaid It shall seem to the Court of the Lady the Queen here That the said Lady the Quâ—en cannot by word only without her Writing sealed give sufficient license in Law to the said Mark to absent himself from the exercising of his Office aforesaid Then the Jurors aforesaid say That the said Lady the Queen did not give license to the said Mark to absent himself from the exercising of his Office aforesaid during the pleasure of him the said Mark until he should be commanded by the said Lady the Queen to serve in his Office aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement thereof is not yet avised c. Therefore day thereof is given as well to the aforesaid Gilbert Gerrard who prosecutes c. as to the aforesaid Mark Steward until in 8. dayes of Saint Michael before the Lady the Queen wheresoever c. in state as now c. to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which 15. dayes from Saint Michael before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster come as well the aforesaid Gilbert Gerrard who prosecutes c. as the aforesaid Mark by his Attorny aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement thereof are not yet avised c. Therefore further day thereof is given as well to the aforesaid Gilbert Gerrard who prosecutes c. as to the aforesaid Mark Steward until from the day of Saint Martin 15. dayes before the Lady the Queen wheresoever c. in state as now c. to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which 15. dayes from Saint Martin before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come as well the aforesaid Gilbert Gerrard who prosecutes c. as the said Mark Steward by his Attorny aforesaid Upon which all and singular the premises being seen and fully understood by the Court here and mature deliberation being had thereof the Queens Serjeant at Law and the Attorny General of the said Queen being called to it and present It was awarded That the said Office of Serjeant at Arms holden in the Hands of the said Lady the Queen be restored to the said Mark And that the said Mark Steward to the exercising and holding of his Office aforesaid from which he was amoved together with the Wages and Fees thereof to the said Office due and belonging from the time of his amoving from the exercising of his Office aforesaid hitherto received and with-holden be restored c. Saving the Right of the Queen if any c. TRESPAS Hillary Term Anno 41. Elizabeth Rott 1049. in the COMMON-PLEAS C. â— part Corbets Case fol. 77. b. ROwland Corbet late of Stokefaston in the County aforesaid Esquire was Leicest attached to answer to Arthur Corbet Gentleman of a Plea wherefore with force and Arms the Close of the said Arthur at Stokefaston aforesaid he broke and his Grasse there to the value of 10. pound growing with certain Cattel Fedd Trod and Consumed and other harms to him did to the great damage of the said Arthur and against the Peace of the Lady the Queen that now is c. And whereupon the said Arthur by Lawrence Lyter his Attorny complaineth That the said Rowland the 20th day of June in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 40th with Force and Arms c. the Close of him the said Arthur at Strokefaston broke and his Grasse there to the value c. there then growing with certain Cattel that is to say with Horses Cows Hoggs and Sheep fed trod and consumed and other harms c. to the great damage c. and against the Peace c. Whereupon he saith that he
That the aforesaid Entry of the aforesaid John â—rayne into the Close within written with the Appurtenances in which c. in and upon the possession of the aforesaid VVilliam Dillon thereof be a good and lawful Entry in Law Then the said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid John Frayne is not guilty of the Trespasse within written as the aforesaid John Frayne within hath alleged And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet a vised Day is given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Fryday next after 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof is further given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Monday next after one Moneth of Easter to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof further is given to the parties aforesaid here in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Fryday next after the Morrow of the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of their Judgement thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised day is given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Monday next after three Weeks of Saint Michael to hear their judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof is further given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Saturday next after 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof is further given to the parties in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Saturday next afer 15. dayes of Easter to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day is given to the parties in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Saturday next after 8. dayes of the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen hereof giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof further is given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Thursday in the Feast of St. Martin to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised further day is given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Tuesday next after the Morrow of the Purification of the blessed Mary to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Further day is given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Wednesday next after 15. dayes of Easter to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof is further given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Fryday next after the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Q. at West come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen of giving their Judgement of upon the premises is not yet avised Day is given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Que. at Westminster until Monday next after 8. dayes of Saint Michael to hear their Judgement thereof because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. Before which day the Plea aforesaid was adjorned by the Writ of the said Lady the Queen of Common Adjornment before the Lady the Queen until from the day of Saint Michael in one Moneth then next following wheresoever c. At which day the Plea aforesaid was further adjorned by another Writ of the said Lady the Queen of Common Adjornment before the said
Lady the Queen until the Morrow of All Souls then next following At the Castle of Hertford At which day before the Lady the Queen at the Castle of Hertford come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof is further given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at the Castle of Hertford until Tuesday next after 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. Before which day the Plea aforesaid was adjorned by the Writ of the Lady the Queen of Common Adjornment before the Lady the Queen in 8. dayes of Saint Hillary at Westminster At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of upon the premises is not yet avised further day is given to the parties in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Wednesday next after 15. dayes of Easter to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised further day is given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Fryday next after the Morrow of Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised further day is given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at VVestminstrr until Tuesday next after 8. dayes of Saint Michael to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. Before which day The Plea aforesaid was adjorned by the Writ of the Lady the Queen of Cōmon Adjornment before the Lady the Queen until the day from Saint Michael in one Moneth then next following At the Town of Saint Alban in the County of Hertford At which day the Plea aforesaid by another Writ of the said Lady the Queen of Common Adjornment was adjorned before the said Lady the Queen until the Morrow of All Souls then next following at the aforesaid Town of St. Alban At wch day before the Lady the Q. at the aforesaid Town of St. Alban come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of upon the premises is not avised further day is given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at the aforesaid Town of Saint Alban until Wednesday next after 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement of upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here therof not yet c. Before which day the Plea aforesaid was adjorned by another Writ of Common Adjornment before the Lady the Queen from the aforesaid Town of Saint Alban until the said 8. dayes of Saint Hillary at Westminster aforesaid At which day before the Lady the Queen at VVestmin come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised further day thereof is given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until VVednesday next after 15. dayes of Easter to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day further is given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster until Fryday next after the Morrow of Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westmin come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Que. here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised further day is given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the said Lady the Queen at VVestminster until Tuesday next after 8. dayes of Saint Michael to hear their Judgement of and upon the premises because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised day thereof is further given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster until Thursday next after 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement thereof c. because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid Upon which all singular the premises being seen by the Court of the Lady the Queen here well understood and diligently looked into mature deliberation being thereof had because it seemeth to the Court of the Lady the Queen that now is here That the aforesaid Entry of the aforesaid John Frayne into the Close within written with the Appurtenances in which c. in and upon the possession of the aforesaid William Dillon thereof is a good and lawfull Entry It is granted That the aforesaid William Dillon take nothing by his Bill aforesaid but for his false clamour be in mercy c. And the aforesaid John Frayne thereof go without day c. TRESPAS Trinity Term Anno 24. ELIZABETH Rot. 928. in the COMMON-PLEAS Co. 2. part Thoroughgoods Case Fol. 5. b. WIlliam Cole late of Great Paringdon in the County aforesaid Gent. Essex was attached to answer to William Thoroughgood of a Plea wherefore with force and arms the Close and House of him the said William Thoroughgood at great Paringdon he brake and his grass there
as before is said shall happen that from thence it shall be well Lawfull to the aforesaid William Purfrey and his heirs aforesaid into all the Tenements aforesaid Rents and Services with the reversions and all their appurtenances to enter as in his Remainder aforesaid and the same to hold without any contradiction and that from thence the estate of the said John Somerton and his Heirs aforesaid in all the Tenements aforesaid altogether to cease and be of no value And if it happen the said William Purfrey and his Heirs aforesaid in fulfilling all and singular the charges aforesaid to make default or the same not to repair or all the aforesaid Tenements not sufficiently to uphold and repair or the same to alien or demise as above is said or they be negligent to enter if cause as before is said shall happen That then the state of the said William Purfrey and his Heirs altogether cease and be of no value And that from thence It be lawful to the said Master of the House of the Holy Martyr of Acon London and his Brethren of the same House and their Successors into all the aforesaid Tenements Rents and Services with the Reversions and all their appurtenances to enter and in the Remainder of their Term aforesaid To be holden in form aforesaid And if it shall happen the said Master and Brethren of the House of St. Thomas aforesaid or their Successors aforesaid in doing and fulfilling all and singular the charges above specified to make default or the same not to fulfil Or all the Tenements aforesaid as above is said not sufficiently to uphold and repair or they be negligent to enter if cause shall happens as before is said That from thence It shall be lawful to the Master of the Hospital of St. Bartholmew aforesaid and the Brethren of the said Hospital and their Successors into all the aforesaid Tenements Rents and Services with the Reversions and all their appurtenances to enter as in the Remainder of their Term aforesaid and that then the estate of the said Master of the House of St. Thomas aforesaid to cease And if it happen the said Master and Brethren of the Hospital of St. Bartholmew aforesaid in doing and fulfilling all and singular the charges above declared to make default or the same not to perform or all the Tenements aforesaid not sufficiently to uphold or repair That then it shall be lawful to my right Heirs unto all the aforesaid Tenements Rents and Services with the Reversions and all and singular their appurtenances to enter and the same to hold without any contradiction whatsoever for ever supporting all the charges aforesaid as above is said as they will for me and them before the most high Judge Answer And because this my last Will was made and ordained for the good of the Souls of my Father and Mother and of my own Soul and the Souls of my Brothers and Sisters Friends and Benefactors I pray and charge the said John my Brother as for me and himself he will answer it that all his life time he oversee the government of the Chauntry aforesaid land that the charges aforesaid in this my last Will and Testament declared be inviolably fulfilled and kept And that he give notice to all those who in manner aforesaid shall have any estate in the said Tenements Rents and Services with the Reversions and all their appurtenances that they know the Tenor of this my last Will and Testament And I will that my Feoffees of the Tenements with the appurtenances which my poor men now dwell in because the same is not dividable that they make such estate after my death to all those above named as they have of my bequest of and in Tenements in Buckingham aforesaid to the use of the said Poor their dwelling upholding the Reparations of the said Tenement of the aforesaid Pâ—or as often as need shall require And because I doubt lest the Tenements aforesaid be sufficient to uphold all the abovesaid charges by reason of the great charge of repairing thereof I will that my Feoffees presently after my death make such estate to all those above named of all those my Lands and Tenements in the Towns of Barton Moreton Gravecase with the Prebend of Lemburgh Thornborough Hillesden Waterstratford Shatdeston and Foycale in the County of Buckingham And of all those Lands with the Appurtenances in the Fields of Buckingham As also of my Lands and Tenements in Worton in the County of Oxford and of my one Tenement in the Town of Oxford in which the Feoffees shall have as they have of my gift of and in the Tenements of Buckingham aforesaid so as they may sufficiently uphold all the charges aforesaid and receive and take what is reasonable for their labour and pains Item I will that my Executors or one of them according to their Assignment upon the Good-fryday next after my death cause him who shall preach at the Cross in the Church-yard of the Cathedral Church of St. Paul London to the prayers there of the people recommend my Soul to the Congregation there assembled For which recommendation and that he pray for my Soul I will that the Preacher have 40. pence Item I will that the Three Preachers who in the Church-yard of the New Hospital of the blessed Lady without Bishops gate London in the 3. dayes in the Week of Easter next after my death shall preach recommend my Soul to the Prayers of the faithful People there assembled and that every one of the said Three Preachers for the same recommendation of my Soul and that they pray for my Soul have 40. pence And I will that my Executors during one whole year next after my decease every Lords-day cause the Preacher at the Cross in the Church-yard of the Cathedral Church of St. Paul aforesaid Preaching specially recommend my Soul to the prayers of the people there assembled for which Recommendation every of the said Preachers have 4. pence Item I give to Mr. Robert Forset my Chaplain of London 10. pound That the said Robert specially celebrate for my Soul and pray for it for 8. years next following my decease taking yearly for his sallary 100. shillings if he so long live And if he shall dye within the said Term of 8. years that then the said Robert make the residue which thereof shall remain to be distributed unto pious uses for my Soul and the Soul of the said Robert Item I give to Margaret my Sister 100. shillings and a silver Cup with a cover belonging to it Item I give to Isabel my Sister 100. shillings and a silver Cup with a cover belonging to it that the said Margaret and Isabel pray for my Soul And to this Testament containing my last Will well and truly and faithfully to be performed and inviolably to be fulfilled I ordain and appoint my Executors John Barton my Brother and Alexander Sprot Citizen and Cloath worker of London and the said Robert
And whereupon then they said That they themselves were seised oâ— the Mannors Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances in their Demesn as of Fee and Right in the time of peace in the time of the said late King Edward the 4th taking thereof the profits to the value c. And the aforesaid Robert Tenant by his warranty aforesaid defended the right of the said Richard Danvers Alured Nicholas and William when c. And their seisin of which seisin c. as of Fee and Right and all c. And chiefly of the Mannors Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances in the said Writ of Right specified And then put himself on the grand Assize of the said late King Edward the 4th and then demanded Recognition to be made whether he more right then had to hold the Mannors Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances to him and his Heirs as Tenant thereof by his warranty as he then held or the aforesaid Richard Danvers Alured Nicholas and VVilliam to have the Mannors Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances in the said Writ of Right specified as they above them demanded c. And the aforesaid Richard Danvers Alured Nicholas and VVilliam then returned back in the same Court the same very Term of Holy Trinity in the year of the Reign of the said late King Edward the 4th after the Conquest the 11th by their then Attorny aforesaid And the aforesaid Robert sollemnly called did not come back but departed in despite of Court and made default wherefore it was then granted by the same Court That the aforesaid Richard Danvers Alured Nicholas and VVilliam should recover their seisin against the aforesaid Chamberlain of the Mannors Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances in the said Writ of Right specified To hold to them and their Heirs quietly from the aforesaid Richard Chamberlain and his Heirs And that the aforesaid Richard Chamberlain then should have of the Lands of the said Robert to the value c. And that the said Robert should then be in mercy c. as by the Record and Processe thereof here in Court remaining it manifestly appeareth Which Recovery in form aforesaid had was had to the use and intent that the aforesaid Alured Richard Danvers Nicholas Stathum and VVilliam Collow should give the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances to the aforesaid Richard Chamberlain and Sibil and the Heirs Males of the Body of the said Richard Chamberlain issuing By Colour of which Recovery the aforesaid Alured Richard Danvers Nicholas and VVilliam Collow into the Mannors and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances entred and were thereof seised in their Demesn as of Fee to the use and intent aforesaid And so thereof to the use and intent aforesaid being seised The said Alured Richard Danvers William Stathum and Willam Collow give the aforesaid Mannors with the appurtenances to the aforesaid Richard Chamberlain and Sibil By the names of Richard Chamberlain Esq and Sibil Fowler and the Heirs Males of the Body of the said Richard Chamberlain issuing as the said Robert Chamberlain by his Writ and Declaration aforesaid above supposeth By which gift the aforesaid Richard Chamberlain and Sibil were seised of the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances that is to say the said Richard Chamberlain in his Demesn as of Fee Tail that is to say to him and the Heirs Males of his Body issuing and the aforesaid Sibil in her Demesn as of Free hold for the term of her life by the form of the gift aforesaid And afterwards the said Richard Chamberlain at Pettesho aforesaid took to Wife the aforesaid Sibil Great Grandmother of the aforesaid Robert Chamberlain and had issue male of his Body issuing the aforesaid Edward Chamberlain and afterwards the said Richard Chamberlain at Pettesho aforesaid dyed and the aforesaid Sibil him overlived and held her self in the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances and was thereof sole seised in her Demesn as of Free hold for the Term of her life by right of Survivor c. by the form of the gift aforesaid And afterwards the said Sibil by her aforesaid Writing of Release Remised and released to the aforesaid Richard Lyster Martin Linsey John Cottesford John Clayton and VVilliam Hogeson and Robert Taylor all her Right Claim Title State Use Interest and demand of and in the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances in manner and form as in the aforesaid Bar above is specified And that afterwards the said Sibil at Pettesho aforesaid dyed And from the aforesaid Richard the right descended by the form c. to the aforesaid Edward as Son and Heir c. And from the said Edward the right descended by the form c. to the aforesaid Leonard as Son and Heir c. And from the aforesaid Leonard the right descended by the form c. to the aforesaid Francis as Son and Heir c. And from the said Francis the right descended by the form c. to the said Robert who now demandeth as Son Heir c. as he by his Writ and Declaration aforesaid supposeth And this he is ready to averr wherefore for as much as by force of a certain Act of Parlament in the Parliament of the late Lord King Henry the 7 th at VVestminster aforesaid in the County aforesaid in the yeer of his Reign the 11 th holden made The aforesaid Warranty of the aforesaid Sibil in form aforesaid made is altogether void he demandeth Judgement and his seisin of the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances to be to him adjudged And the aforesaid Warden or Rector and Scholars say That by the aforesaid Act in the aforesaid Parliament of the late King Henry the 7 th â—t VVestminster aforesaid in the yeer of his Reign the 11 th abovesaid holden made It is provided That the Act aforesaid should not extend to any such Recovery or discontinuance in which the Heirs next inheritable to such Woman or where he or they who next after the death of the said Woman had or should have the estate of Inheritance in the said Mannors Lands and Tenements should be assenting or agreeing to the aforesaid Recoveries where the same assent or agreements are of Record or inrolled as by the said Act amongst other things it appeareth And the said Warden or Rector and Scholars further say That before the making of the said Writing of Release of the aforesaid Sibil and after the death of the aforesaid Richard Chamberlain Nicholas Evan Clerk and Thomas Hartop Clerk the Second Day of June in the yeer of the Reign of the said late King Henry the 8th after the Conquest the 4th out of the Court of the Chaâ—cery of the said late King then being at Westminster aforesaid sued forth an Original Writ of the said late King of Entry upon Disseisin in the Post against the aforesaid Edward Chamberlain of the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances to the then Sherifs of the County of Buckingham directed
the said Edward then being Tenant of the Freehold of the said Mannors with the appurtenances By which Writ the said late King commanded the said Sherif That the said Sherif should command the said Edward Chamberlain by the name of Edward Chamberlain Esquire that justly and without delay he render to the aforesaid Nicholas Evan and Thomas Hartop Clerk The Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances amongst other by the names of the Mannors of Pettesho and Eckney with the appurtenances and of 6. Messuages 200. Acres of Land 20. Acres of Meadow 200. Acres of Pasture and 100. shillings of Rent with the appurtenances in Pettesho Eckney and Emberton which the said Nicholas and Thomas then claimed to be their Right and Inheritance and into which the said Edward Chamberlain had not entry but after the disseisin which Hugh Hunt thereof unjustly and without Judgement did to the aforesaid Nicholas Evan and Thomas Hartop after the first passage of the Lord King Henry Son of King John into Gascoign as they said and whereupon they complained the said Edward Chamberlain did them disseise And if the aforesaid Nicholas and Thomas Hartop secure him the said Sherif to prosecute their Claim Then he summon by good summoners the aforesaid Edward Chamberlain that he should be before the Justices of the said late King Henry the 8th here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid in the Morrow of St. John the Baptist then next following to shew why he did not do it And that he have then here the summons and that Writ At which Morrow of St. John the Baptist before Robert Read Kt. and his Companions then Justices of the said late King Henry the 8th of the Bench here that is to say at VVestminster aforesaid came aswell the aforesaid Nicholas Evan and Thomas Hartop by John Cowper then their Attorny as the aforesaid Edward Chamberlain by Thomas Palmer then his Attorny And the Sherif that is to say Ralph Verney Esq then returned here the Writ aforesaid in all things served and executed that is to say that the aforesaid Nicholas and Thomas found to the then Sherif sureties to prosecute his Sute aforesaid that is to say John Doo and Richard Roo And that the aforesaid Edward Chamberlain was summoned by John Den and Richard Fen And upon this the said Nicholas Evan and Thomas Hartop by declaring against the said Edward Chamberlain upon the Writ aforesaid Demanded against the said Edward Chamberlain The Mannors Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances as their Right and Inheritance and in which the said Edward Chamberlain had not Entry but after the first passage of the Lord King Henry Son of King John into Gascoign c. And whereupon then they said that they themselves were seised of the Mannors Tenements and Rents aforesaid in their Demesn as of Fee and Right in the time of Peace in the time of the said late King Henry the 8th taking thereof the Profits to the value c. And unto which c. And thereof then they brought sute c. And the aforesaid Edward Chamberlain by the aforesaid Thomas Palmer his Attorny then defended his right when c. And then vouched thereof to warranty Thomas Fish who was then present in Court in his proper person and willingly the Mannors Tenements and Rents aforesaid to him did warrant and thereupon the said Nicholas Evan and Thomas Hartop demanded against him the said Thomas Fish then Tenant by his Warranty The Mannors Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances in form aforesaid c. And whereupon they then said That they were sâ—ised of the Mannors Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances amongst other things in their Demesn as of Fee and Right in the time of Peace in the time of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th taking the profits thereof to the value c. And the aforesaid Thomas Fish Tenant by his Warranty aforesaid then defended his Right when c. And then prayed licence thereof to imparl and had it c. And afterwards the very same Term the aforesaid Nicholas Evan and Thomas Hartop returned back here into the Court aforesaid of the said late King Henry the 8th by their Attorny aforesaid and the aforesaid Thomas Fish Tenant by his warranty aforesaid did not come back but in despite of Court departed and made default Therefore then it was granted by the aforesaid Court here That the aforesaid Nicholas Evan and Thomas Hartop should recover their seisin against the said Edward Chamberlain of the Mannors Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances and that the said Edward should have of the Lands of the aforesaid Thomas Fish to the value and that the said Thomas Fish should be in mercy c. as by the Record and Processe thereof here in Court remaining more fully appeareth Which Recovery in form aforesaid had was had to the use and to the intent That the aforesaid Nicholas Evan and Thomas Hartop of the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances should enfeoff the aforesaid Richard Lyster Martiâ— John Cottesford John Clayton William Hogeson and Robert Taylor To have and to hold to them and their Heirs for ever By Colour of which Recovery The aforesaid Nicholas Evan and Thomas Hartop into the Mannors aforesaid with their appurtenances entred and were thereof seised in their Demesn as Fee and so being thereof seised The said Nicholas and Thomas Hartop of the said Mannors with the appurtenances did 〈…〉 off the aforesaid Richard Lyster Martin Liâ—sâ—y John Cottesford John Clayton William Hogeson and Robert Taylor To have and to hold to them and their Heirs for ever By virtue of which Fâ—â—ffment the said Richard Lyster Martin John Cottesford John Clayton VVilliam Hogeson and Robert Taylor were seised of the same Mannors with the appurtenances in their Demesn as of Fee and so thereof being seised The aforesaid Sibil in the life of the said Edw. for the better security of the said Richard Lyster Martin John Cottesford John Clayton William Hogeson and Robert Taylor in the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances according to Agreement between the same Edward and Sibil first before the aforesaid Recovery had by her Writing aforesaid of Release Remised and Released to the aforesaid Richard Lyster Martin John Cottesford John Clayton William Hogeson and Robert Taylor all her Right Claim Title State Use Interest and demand of and in the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances in 〈…〉 ner and form as they above have alleged And this they are ready to aver Whereupon they demand Judgement And that the said Robert Chamberlain from having his Action aforesaid against them â—e baâ—â—ed And the aforesaid Robert Chamberlain â—y Protestation taking it That the Recovery aforesaid was not had to the use and intent That the aforesaid Nicholas Evan and Thomas Hartop should infeoff the said Richard Lyster Martin John Cottesford John Clayton William Hogeson and Robert Taylor of the Mannors aforesaid with the Appurtenances By Protestation also that
of England who should be Inheritable to the Kingdom of England should be Duke of Cornwall and that the Dutchy of Cornwall should be from thenceforth to the Eldest Son of the Kings of England who should be next Heir of the aforesaid Kingdom And that the aforesaid Eldest Son of the Kings of England should have and enjoy towards their Maintenance and support of their Princely State All the whole Dutchy of Cornwall and all Castles Honours Lordships Manors Lands Tenements and all and singular Hereditaments to the said Dutchy belonging or appertaining or reputed or taken to be part parcel or member of the same Dutchy And whereas the said late King Edward the 3d. in the aforesaid Parliament in the yeer of his Reign the 11th aforesaid by his certain Charter with the common Assent and Counsel of the Prelates Earls Barons others of the said Knigs Council in the said Parliament called together And by Authority of the said Parliament had given to Edward then Earl of Chester his Eldest Son the name and Honour of Duke of Cornwall and him in the Dutchy of Cornwall established And by the same his Charter with the common Assent and Counsel aforesaid gave and granted to the said his Son in the name of the Dutchy aforesaid and under the name and Honour of Duke of the said place amongst other things The Castle of Wallingford with its Hamblets and members and the yeerly Farm of the Town of Wallingford with the Honours of Wallingford of St. Walerico with the Appurtenances in the County of Oxford and other Counties wheresoever the said Honors were To have and to hold to the same Duke and of him and his Heirs Kings of England Eldest Sons of the same place Dukes in the Kingdom of England inheritable successively together with Knights Fees Advowsons of Churches Abbies Priories Hospitals Chapels and with Hundreds Fishings Forrests Chases Parks Warrens Fairs Markets Liberties Free Customs Wards Reliefs Escheats and Services of Tenants as well free as villains and all other things to the aforesaid Castles Towns Honors Lands and Tenements howsoever belonging or appertaining of the aforesaid King Edward the 3d. and his Heirs for ever And the said late King Edward the 3d. by his Charter aforesaid in Parliament aforesaid with the common Consent aforesaid and by Authority of that Parliament the aforesaid Castle of Wallingford and other the premises with their Appurtenances amongst other things to the said Dutchy annexed and united to remain to the said Durchy for ever So as from the said Dutchy at any time by no means they be separated nor to any other or others then to the Dukes of the same place by the aforesaid late King or his Heirs should be given or any wayes granted so also that to the aforesaid Duke other Dukes of the same place derasing and to the Son or Sons to whom the aforesaid Dutchy by colour of the Grants aforesaid it should belong not appearing the said Dutchy with the aforesaid Castle and other the premises being granted to the aforesaid late King or his Heirs Kings of England should retorn in the Hands of him the said late King and of his Heirs Kings of England to be holden until any of such Son or Sons of the said Kingdom of England Heirs successive should appear as is aforesaid to whom successively the said Dutchy with the Appurtenances the aforesaid late King for him and his Heirs granted and would to be delivered to be holden of the said King and his Heirs for ever And whereas likewise By a certain Act made in Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th holden at Westminster aforesaid that is to say in the second Session of the same Parliament begun and holden the 12th day of April in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord late King Henry the 8th the 31th and by diverse Prorogations continued until the 25th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the said late King Henry the 8th the 32th and from thence holden and continued until the dissolution of the said Parliament the 24th day of July in the 32th yeer aforesaid Reciting That whereas in the Parliament holden in the 11th yeer of the Reign of the late King of famous Memory King Edward the 3d. amongst other things established It was Enacted and Ordained That the Eldest Son of the King of England who should be Inheritable to this Kingdom of England should be Duke of Cornwall and that the same Dutchy of Cornwall should ever be to the Eldest Son of the King of England who should be next Heir of the said Kingdom And that he should have and enjoy towards the Mainteinance and support of his Princely Estate the whole Dutchy of Cornwall and all Honours Dominions Manors Lands Tenements and all other Hereditaments belonging or appertaining to the said Dutchy or reputed or taken to be part parcel or Member of the said Dutchy And for that The Honour and Castle of Wallingford in the County of Berks then was long time had been part and parcel of the Inheritance and Possessions of the said Duke of Cornwall and reputed and taken to be a member of the said Dutchy Which Manor and Castle lay neer to the Manor of the said late King Henry the 8th of Newelm otherwise Ewelm in the County of Oxford and was very commodious decent and pleasant of the said late King Henry the 8th In consideration whereof and for other urgent causes the said late King Henry the 8th especially moving It was Enacted and Ordained by the Authory of the same Parliament of the said late King Henry the 8th That the said Honour and Castle of Wallingford and all Dominions Manors Land Tenements and Hereditaments whatsoever they should be being parts parcels or members of the said Honour and Castle or appendant or belonging to the said Honour and Castle or to any Lordship or Manor to the same appertaining or reputed or taken to be part or parcel of the said Honor and Castle or any member thereof should be from thenceforth for ever by authority of the said Parliament severed disannexed and dismembred from the said Dutchy of Cornwall and should not be in any manner from thence after reputed called accepted or taken by the name of the Honour of Wallingford nor be any part parcel or member of the said Dutchy of Cornwall And that the aforesaid Manor of the said King of Newelm otherwise Ewelm from thence for ever after should be named called accepted and be reputed and adjudged to be the Honour of Newelm otherwise Ewelm And that the said late King Henry the 8th should have and enjoy the like Liberties Franchises Privileges Royalties and Jurisdictions as well in the aforesaid honour of Newelm otherwise Ewelm as in the aforesaid Mannors Castle Lands Tenements and Hereditaments being part parcel or member of the said Honor of Wallingford to all intents purposes as were in any manner belonging apertaining or used in or to the