moneths and 13. daies But herein he is much deceiued The most doe giue vnto Nero 14. yeares but not complete the reason of this vncertentie is because it is not certainly knowne when Nero died Onuphrius thinketh he died about the 10. day of Iune and he beganne to raigne about the 13. day of October when Claudius died so that by this account he should raigne but 13. yeares 7. moneths and 28. daies ex Perer. but because the most doe allow vnto him 14. yeares we will follow the vsuall and common reckoning And this shall suffice to haue beene inserted here concerning the yeares of the raigne of the Emperours see more of the yeares of the Emperours Hexapl. in Dan. c. 9. qu. 75. where the account somewhat differeth from this in certaine moneths because there Eusebius computation is followed 7. Quest. In which yeare after the passion of Christ Paul was conuerted It followeth now that such matters be briefly touched which concerne this holy Apopostle after he was conuerted to the faith of Christ and first of the time of his conuersion 1. Whereas it is most euident that S. Stephen was stoned to death after the most glorious ascension of Christ and that S. Pauls conuersion followed after that blessed Martyrs death some doe thinke that Stephen was put to death 7. yeares after Christs ascension and so consequently S. Pauls conuersion happened likewise 7. yeares after this opinion Nicephorus lib. 2. c. 3. ascribeth to Euodius the successor of S. Peter in Antioch But there is no probabilitie of this opinion for it is not like that the Church had rest without persecution so long that is 7. yeares after Christs ascension And the coniecture of some is that 7. yeares are put for 7. moneths by some corruption and fault in the copies for so many moneths there are betweene the ascension of Christ and the martyrdome of S. Stephen 2. Some thinke that Paul was conuerted in the first yeare after the passion of our blessed Sauiour vpon the 25. day of Ianuarie so Eusebius and Beda But because S. Stephen is held to haue suffered vpon the 26. day of Ianuarie in the first yeare after Christs passion from which day to the 25. day of Ianuarie when S. Paul according to the receiued opinion was conuerted is not aboue a moneth in which time all those things could not be fulfilled which are recorded by S. Luke Act. c. 8. S. Pauls conuersion could not fall out in the first yeare after the passion of Christ. This matter is not helped by the author of the scholasticall historie vpon the Acts of the Apostles c. 46. who thus distinguisheth that if the first yeare of Christs passion be reckoned according to the vsuall account that is from Ianuarie when the Romane yeare beganne then S. Paul was conuerted in the second yeare but if from the time of Christs passion then it was in the first yeare for still the same doubt remaineth that in this reckoning there was but one moneth betweene the martyrdome of S. Stephen and the conuersion of S. Paul 3. Wherefore the opinion of Oecumenius vpon the last chapter of the Acts of the Apostles is more probable that S. Paul was indeede conuerted in the second yeare counting from the time of Christs passion so that from the most holy death of our blessed Sauiour vnto the conuersion of Saint Paul which is held by a generall receiued opinion to haue beene vpon the 25. day of Ianuarie there was runne one whole yeare and tenne moneths 8. Quest. At what age S. Paul was conuerted 1. Ambrose and Theodoret vpon the 7. chapter of the 1. epistle to the Corinthians thinke that S. Paul at the time of his conuersion was so young a man that he was not meete for mariage so that in their opinion he could not then be aboue 20. yeares old this their opinion may seeme to be grounded vpon this reason because Act. 7.58 Saint Luke speaking of Saint Paul saith that the witnesses laide downe their garments at the feete 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of a young man called Saul But that word hath not so much respect vnto his age and youth as to his courage and fiercenesse as the word signifieth as Budeus sheweth whereupon Euripides calleth bold and insolent speach 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And that Saint Paul was not so very a young man appeareth because he is tearmed by an other word Ananias saith chap. 9.13 We haue heard by many 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of this man 2. And further that S. Paul was not so young a man at the time of his conversion may be shewed by these reasons 1. S. Paul himselfe saith Act. 26.6 As touching my life from my youth and what it was from the beginning among mine owne nation at Ierusalem know all the Iewes it seemeth then that he spent his youth among the Iewes before his conuersion 2. Those things which S. Paul reporteth to haue beene done by him before his conuersion agree not vnto S. Pauls youth Act. 26.9 I also verily thought in my selfe that I ought to doe many contrarie things against the name of Iesus c. many of the Saints I put in prison hauing receiued authoritie of the high Priests and when they were put to death I gaue sentence this iudgement of S. Paul and authoritie committed vnto him were not incident vnto a very youth 3. If S. Paul were but about 20. yeares of age when he was conuerted it would follow that he exceeded not 46. yeares in the 4. yeare of Nero when he is thought to haue written his Epistle to Philemon but then he called himselfe aged Paul for from the 20. yeare of Tiberius which was the 2. yeare after Christs passion when Paul was conuerted vnto the 4. of Nero are but 25. or 26. yeares It would follow also hereupon that S. Paul suffering as Hierome thinketh in the 37. yeare after the passion of Christ was not aboue 55. yeare old whereas Chrysostome thinketh that he was aboue 68. yeares when he suffered so that by this account he will be found to haue beene more then 30. yeares of age when he was conuerted 9. Quest. How long S. Paul after his conuersion was rauished in spirit and taken vp into Paradise 1. Some are of opinion that in the space of those three daies while Paul continued blind after Iesus had spoken to him by the way Act. 9.9 that he then was taken vp into the third heauen and heard such things as were not to be vttered of which his rauishing in the spirit S. Paul writeth 2. Corinth 12. of this opinion are Thomas Lyranus Carthusianus vpon that place Ioannes Driedo lib. 1. de scriptur c. 2. But this opinion is easily refuted for the Apostle saith that thing happened vnto him 14. yeares before he writ that epistle now this second epistle to the Corinthians he is held to haue written in the beginning of the raigne of Nero from thence counting 14. yeares we still come to
to euerie one that beleeueth then it followeth that euerie one that beleeueth is saued where els were the power of God to saluation if it were not effectuall to saue if then this power be in faith to saluation if it could not saue without the supply of other helpes this power should be turned into weakenesse that which is powerfull to saluation is sufficient to saluation Gods power worketh perfectly it hath no want nor requireth any helpe but in faith is the power of God to saluation Ergo c. Controv. 18. Of the difference between the Lawe and the Gospel v. 18. The wrath of God is reuealed from heauen against all vngodlines Bellarmine hence inferreth that comminations and terrors are as proper and peculiar to the Gospell as to the lawe lib. 4. de iustificat c. 2. Contra. True it is that the Gospel also hath many comminations against sinners and as by the Gospel the righteousnesse of God is reuealed from faith to faith v. 17. so the wrath of God is also reuealed thereby against all vnrighteousnesse but this is not the proper effect of the Gospel but accidentally for the Gospell by the vnthankfulnesse of them which beleeue it not beeing ordained for their saluation is turned vnto their condemnation And whereas the Lawe in generall condemneth all infidelitie and vnbeleefe the Gospell peculiarly condemneth vnbeleefe in Christ Pareus See further hereof Synops. Centur. 4. er 60. Controv. 19. Whether by naturall meanes the Gentiles might haue attained to the knowledge of the onely true God without the speciall assistance of Gods grace 1. Bellarmine affirmeth the contrarie Deum esse vnum esse cognosci posse lumine rationis absque speciali gratiae auxilio that it may be knowne that God is and that he is but one by the light of nature without the speciall helpe of grace and he insisteth vpon this place of the Apostle v. 20. thereout vrging these two arguments 1. because the Apostle saith the invisible things of the world are seene not by reuelation but by creation 2. and seeing the Gentiles are hereby made inexcusable because they notwithstanding this naturall knowledge of God committed idolatrie it sheweth that they knew God by the creatures or els they might haue excused themselues by pretense of their ignorance Bel. lib. 4. de grat c. 2. Contra. 1. Though we consent not to their opinion who hold that nothing at all can be knowen of God without his speciall assistance as Petrus ab Aliaco affirmeth in 1. sent qu. 3. which opinion see before confuted qu. 54. for many things touching the Godhead as his goodnesse wisedome power are seene in the creation 2. yet it cannot be prooued that the Gentiles did or could attaine vnto such a manifest knowledge of the onely true God onely by the light of nature without Gods further assistance And this is an euident argument hereof because neuer any of the Gentiles de facto in fact did attaine vnto such knowledge of God by the light of nature 3. And concerning the reasons vrged S. Paul sheweth that the invisible things of God were to be seene in the Creatures not that the Gentiles did therein see them but they might haue seene them if they had not bin wilfully blind and they were made inexcusable because they could not pleade simple ignorance but their owne wilfulnesse was the cause of their ignorance which tooke from them all excuse see hereof before qu. 52.54.57 So that Augustines resolution is good that the creatures doe indeede crie with a loud voice ipse fecit nos God made vs sed surdis canere c. but they thus speake vnto deafe men vnlesse God shew further mercie see further Synops Centur. 4. err 38. Controv. 20. Against some Philosophers that the world is not eternall v. 20. The invisible things of God to wit his eternall power and Godhead are seene c. If Gods eternitie is seene by the workes which he made then that which is made is not eternall 1. that which is made must haue one by whom it was made he then that made the world was before the world then as by the things made the maker is found to be eternall so the things made which had a beginning are concluded not to be eternall 2. beside where things are contrarie one vnto another there is no eternitie now in the world there are things contrarie as actions passions generation corruption seeing then the world consisteth of corruptible partes the whole must be also subiect to corruption Then is the opinion of Aristotle vaine and false that held the world to be eternall and of Plinie which calleth the world God and of Hermeas the Stoike that imagined a coeternitie of matter with God whereof he made the world ex Faio Controv. 21. Against the adoration and setting vp of images in Churches and places of prayer ver 23. they turned the glorie of the incorruptible God to the sâ—imilitude of an image Though the vse generally of all images be not condemned among Christians as the Turkes hold it vnlawfull to make the similitude of any thing for there may be a ciuill and historicall vse of pictures and images yet it is dangerous to set them vp in the publike places of Gods seruice either to fall downe and worship before them as the Romanists doe or to retaine them for a supposed ornament as the Lutherans The reasons against all such publike vse of imagerie are these 1. It is the direct commandement of God that he would haue no image made to represent him by Deut. 4.15 Take heede that ye corrupt not your selues or make you a grauen image or representation of any figure whether it be male or female the likenesse of any beast or the likenesse of any feathered foule c. the same prohibition is expressed in the second commandement of the Morall Law which is perpetuall and bindeth for euer Pare 2. Herein pseudo-Christians doe conforme themselues to the Gentiles by whom imagerie was brought in and herein they doe oppose themselues to the decision of the Turkes and Iewes for as the Gentiles did vse the pictures and images of beasts which they ioyned to their idols so is it among the Romanists as they make Iohn Baptist with a lambe in his lappe Vendeline with oxen Antonie with hogges Eustachius with buckes and dogs Gallus with a beare Gertrude with mise Martine and George vpon horsebacke These were the verie superstitious fashions of the heathen Gualter 3. Nay the verie Gentiles at the first did a long time forbeare the superstitious vse of images Plutarke writeth in the life of Numa Pompilius that he would suffer no images to be in Churches because he thought it not fit to make God like vnto man or any other thing who is an invisible spirit and so the Romanes continued without images for the space 170. yeares Varro also thus writeth hereof that they which first brought in images metum ciuitatibus ademerunt errorem addiderunt did take
that Augustine was then a Manichee and we denie not but by this and the like meanes one may be at the first mooued and induced but the firme beleefe of this point is a worke of the spirit See further Synops. Centur. 1. err 5. Controv. 5. Against the invocation of Saints v. 13. Now the God of hope fill you c. The Apostle teacheth vs onely to put our trust in God in calling him the God of hope and so the Prophet Ieremie saith c. 17.5 Cursed is the man that trusteth in man and maketh flesh his arme and in that he wisheth God to fill them with ioy we also learne onely to direct our prayers to God who is the author of all grace hence then is refelled the Popish invocation of Saints which both doth derogate from the honour of God who biddeth vs to call vpon him in the daie of trouble Psal. 50.15 and it deceiueth them with vaine hope that place any confidence in such prayers for Saints cannot helpe vs nor furnish vs with graces necessarie as here ioy peace faith hope are ascribed vnto God as his peculiar gifts it is then in vaine to pray O Saint Paul or Saint Peter helpe mee and haue mercie vpon mee as Papists vse to pray See further of this point Synops. Centur. 2. err 30. Controv. 6. Of the certaintie of saluation against the Popish diffidence and doubtfulnesse v. 13. That yee may abound in hope c. This word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to abound sheweth a fulnes and certaintie of hope which is nothing else but beeing armed with a costant and assured hope to continue vnto the end and out of this place we haue three speciall arguments for this certaintie of hope and assurance of saluation 1. The Apostle saith the God of hope fill you with all ioy but where is doubtfulnesse of mind and perplexitie of conscience there is no assured hope but such vncertaintie rather bringeth anxietie feare and greefe so Origen saith he which beleeueth and is armed by the vertue of the spirit certum est quod plenitudinem gaudij semper habet it is certaine that he hath alwaies fulnes of ioy where then there is fulnes of ioy there is abounding also in hope but by faith we haue fulnes of ioy therefore also fulnes of hope 2. the word here vsed to abcund in hope sheweth a certaintie of hope as Haymo well interpreteth that by the vertue of the holy Ghost plenam habeatis spem aeternae remunerationis yee may haue full hope of the eternall reward so also the ordinarie glosse which Gorrhan followeth vt per ista habita certiores sitis de aeterna beatitudine that by these things beeing once had yee may be certaine of eternall happines 3. the prayers of the faithfull cannot be in vaine but are effectuall to obtaine things appertaining to saluation but the Apostle here prayeth for abundance of hope and perseuerance to the end therefore the faithfull are sure so to abound and to perseuere see further also hereof Synops. Pap. Centur. 4. err 25. Controv. 7. Against the power of free will in spirituall things v. 13. The God of peace c. in that the Apostle prayeth vnto God to fill them with ioy and peace in beleeuing an argument may be framed against that old Pelagian heresie touching the power of mans free-will in things belonging to eternall life which argument is much vrged by Augustine against the Pelagians for if it were in mans power to attaine vnto these graces as faith hope then it were superfluous assidiuis precibus à Deo emendicare to begge them of God by continuall prayer Martyr See further hereof Synops. Cen. 4. err 43. Controv. 8. Whether the Apostles excusing of himselfe doe derogate from the authoritie of this epistle v. 16. I haue somewhat boldly after a sort written this may seeme to extenuate the authoritie of this Epistle for he which excuseth himselfe confesseth a fault but in the Canonicall writings no fault or error at all is to be admitted And yet if this excuse made by the Apostle doe not extenuate the authoritie of this Epistle no more can that excuse of the author of the booke of Macchabees preiudice the authoritie thereof 2. Maccha 15.39 where the Author saith thus If I haue done well and as the storie required it is the thing that I desired but if I haue spoken slenderly and barely it is that I could what doth this our Author say more then Saint Paul 2. Cor. 11.6 If I be rude in speach yet am I not rude in knowledge to this purpose Bellarm. lib. 1. de verb. c. 15. Contra. 1. Euery one which vseth excuse doth not acknowledge a fault but he that so excuseth as that he craueth pardon for his fault But so doth not Paul here he maketh an excuse to preuent an obiection as if he should haue said it may seeme vnto you that I haue written somewhat boldly but indeed I haue not I haue onely vsed that boldnes which became mine office according to the grace giuen vnto mee he therefore doth not craue pardon of a fault but defendeth and iustifieth that which might seeme to haue beene a fault 2. But the author of the bookes of the Macchabees doth excuse himselfe farre otherwise for he doubteth whether he haue well written or not as he ought and he craueth pardon if he faile saying it is that I could as if he should say he were worthie to be pardoned because he did it as well as he could this sheweth that he writ not by a diuine spirit for the spirit of God vseth not to craue pardon of any thing done amisse 3. And beside other arguments there are which doe make against the authoritie of this booke as 1. because all the Canonicall Scriptures were written by Prophets but in the Macchabees time there was no Prophet 2. Eusebius and Hierome thinke that Iosephus was the writer of those bookes but his writings are not canonicall 3. the author saith that he did epitomise the worke of Iason the Cyrenian but the spirit of God vseth not the help of others writings 4. this booke was not receiued into the Canon of the Iewes to whom all the oracles of God were committed 5. and it containeth diuerse things contrarie to the Canonicall Scriptures as is shewed else where Synops. Centur. 1. p. 15. 4. S. Paul in that place to the Corinthians excuseth not the slendernes of his writing as though he had written otherwise then he should but he iustifieth the simplicitie of his stile as his aduersaries did take it because he would not by humane eloquence obscure the vertue of the crosse of Christ which consisted not in the vaine shew of words but in the power and euidence of the spirit 1. Cor. 2.4 Controv. 9. That the Scriptures are perfect and absolute conteining whatsoeuer is necessarie to saluation both touching doctrine and manners v. 15. I haue written to you after a sort to put you in remembrance
the Syrian translatour placeth them so by nature must be ioyned to vncircumcision not to keeping the lawe and it is a description of the Gentiles which haue vncircumcision by nature Pareus 2. Obiect The words of the Apostle are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 consummans as the Latine interpreter readeth perfecting the law which phrase Origen thus distinguisheth from the former word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to keepe the lawe which the Apostle vseth v. 26. he that liueth according to the letter of the lawe is said to keepe it but he that keepeth it according to the spirituall sense is said to perfect or accomplish it Contra. But Beza here well obserueth that both these are here taken for one that the perfect keeping of the lawe is not here opposed to the imperfect keeping but the keeping and obseruing of the lawe is set against the not hauing care to keepe it but to rest onely in the outward signe and ceremonie Quest. 44. Of the explanation of certaine termes here vsed by the Apostle and of the letter and the spirit 1. v. 26. Where the Apostle saith if vncircumcision keepe the lawe by a Metonimie he vnderstandeth the vncircumcised the signe is taken for the thing signified but afterward it is taken for the signe it selfe 2. His vncircumcision shall be counted for circumcision that is it shall be as no circumcision Chrysostome readeth it shall be turned into circumcision it shall be all one as if he were circumcised 3. By the ordinances of the lawe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 some vnderstand the ceremonies and rites of the law But rather the morall duties of the lawe are thereby signified which the Gentiles performed hauing not the written lawe otherwise the rites and ceremonies of the lawe they could not obserue without the knowledge of the written lawe 4. Shall iudge thee To iudge is taken three wayes 1. Personally as it is said the Saints shall iudge the world 1. Cor. 6. shall personally stand against them in iudgement 2. actually as to iudge may be taken to accuse or testifie against as it is said v. 15. their thoughts accusing them 3. or by example as it is said the Ninevites and the Queene of the South shall iudge the Israelites so is it taken here the Gentiles going beyond the Iewes in example of life shall condemne them that is shewe them to be worthie of iudgement for their euill life Mart. Calvin Pareus 5. What is meant by the letter and spirit there are diuerse expositions 1. Sometime Augustine by the letter vnderstandeth the litterall sense of the lawe by the spirit the spirituall sense exposit in epist. ad Roman so also Origen he transgresseth the lawe qui spiritualem eius non tenet sensum who keepeth not the spirituall sense but euen the spirituall sense of the lawe if it were apprehended onely and the heart not thereby circumcised and reformed was in the Apostles sense but literall 2. some by the letter vnderstand legem scriptam the lawe written as separate from the grace of Christ as the Syrian interpreter readeth scripturam the Scripture which is so called because it was written in tables of stone gloss interlin 3. But it is better here more specially applyed to circumcision so that the letter and circumcision are here taken pro literali circumcisione for litterall circumcision Calvin Pareus that is the externall signe and ceremonie of circumcision onely according to the letter of the lawe which was made literalibus cultris with literall that is externall knifes Gorrhan and by the spirit is not vnderstood the soule as Tolet following Chrysostome but the efficacie of grace wrought in the soule by the spirit of God and so Augustine taketh it els where thus describing the circumcision of the heart quam facit non litera legis docent minans sed spiritus Dei sanans adiuvans which not the letter of the law teaching and threatning but the spirit of God worketh healing and helping lib. de spirit liter c. 8. so then there is no difference quoad rem in respect of the thing which is propounded betweene the spirit and the letter sed quoad animi affectum but in respect of the affection of the mind and the inward operation of the spirit Mart. for euen he that heareth the Gospell but beleeueth it not may be said to be a Gospeller according to the letter not after the spirit 6. By transgressing the lawe is meant the voluntarie breaking thereof not the fayling therein thorough ignorance or infirmitie Mart. as Origen noteth Paul himselfe did not alwaies keepe the lawe non tamen fuit praevaricator legis yet he was not a prevaricator or transgressor of the lawe 7. v. 28. He is not a Iewe which is a Iewe outward here must be vnderstood the word onely he was not a Iewe indeed that was onely so outwardly And in this sense the Apostle saith els where he was not sent to baptize that is onely Martyr Quest. 45. Of two kinds of Iewes and two kinds of circumcision v. 28. v. 28. He is not a Iewe which is one outwardly c. 1. The Apostle here maketh a double comparison both of the persons setting a circumcised Iewe not keeping the lawe against an vncircumcised Gentile keeping of the lawe and of the things betweene inward circumcision of the heart and outward in the flesh onely Mart. 2. And here there is a fowrefold antithesis or exposition 1. From the formes the one is within the other without in outward appearance onely 2. from the subiect one is in the heart the other in the flesh 3. from the efficient one is wrought by the spirit the other is in the letter it consisteth in literall and ceremoniall observations 4. from the ende the one hath praise of God the other is commended onely of men Gryneus 3. Hence the Apostle prooueth by three arguments that the spirituall circumcision is better then the carnall 1. That is best which is in secret and in truth then that which is openly and in shewe onely 2. and that which is wrought by the spirit is more excellent then that which is in the letter 3. and that hath the preheminence whose praise is of God 4. This distinction of spirituall and morall circumcision S. Paul hath out of Moses Deut. 10.16 Circumcise the foreskinne of your heart Deut. 30.6 The Lord thy God will circumcise thine heart which the Apostle further describeth thus Coloss. 2.11 In whom yee are also circumcised with circumcision made without hands by putting off the sinfull bodie of the flesh thorough the circumcision of Christ. And as there are two kinds of circumcision so there is also a twofold vncircumcision as Burgens noteth addition 1. out of the Prophet Ieremie c. 9.26 All the nations are vncircumcised and all the house of Israel are vncircumcised in the heart there is then an vncircumcision of the heart and an other of the flesh 5. Yet this must not be so vnderstood as though there were