in the true worship of God but that he urged them generally to circumcision being not of the seed of Abraham to whom that ceremonie appertained is not like Mercer 4. Ioseph is said v. 56. to breake to the Egyptians that is to sell them food for so the word shabar signifieth either because it breaketh famine or because it is broken and ground to make bread of or rather because they made their bread in thin cakes and so used to breake not to cut it Mercer 4 Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. God only the disposer and foreteller of things to come Vers. 25. GOd hath shewed Pharaoh what he is about to doe God therefore is not an idle beholde or foreteller of things to come but a doer and disposer of them which overthroweth the opinion of the heathen that ascribe the actions of men some to fatall necessity as the Stoikes some to fortune or chance as the Epicures but the Scripture telleth us that whatsoever pleaseth God be doth in heaven and earth Psal. 135.6 Further we see that onely God that worketh in the world can foretell the things that are done in the world as the Prophet joyneth them both together Shew the things that are to come hereafter c. doe good or evill c. 41.21 therefore neither spirits nor any other creatures that are not able to dispose things done in the world have the foresight or knowledge of things to come 2. Doct. Repetitions of the same thing in Scripture not vaine Vers. 32. THe dreame was doubled because the thing is established with God c. Hence then it is evident that repetitions in the Scripture are not vaine tautologies and superfluous battâ—logies but that they are set downe for more certaintie for which cause this dreame was doubled to Pharaoh Mercer like as Saint Paul saith Philip. 3.1 It grieveth me not to write the same things unto you and for you it is a sure thing 3. Doct. The holy Ghost proved to be God Vers. 38. CAn we finde such a man as this in whom the spirit of God is Augustine noteth this to be the third place in Genesis where mention is made of the spirit of God the first is Gen. 1 2. The spirit of God moved upon the waters the second Genes 6.3 My spirit shall not alwaies strive with man the third in this place quaest 134. in Gen. 4. Doct. The mutability and change of time Vers. 54. THen began the seven yeares of famine to come c. After the yeares of plenty follow the yeares of famine so after peace commeth warre after health sicknesse nothing is permanent or of long continuance here Muscul. as the wise man saith There is a time for every purpose under heaven c. a time to weepe a time to laugh a time to mourne a time to dance Eccles. 3.14 5. Doct. Of the lawfulnesse of rich apparell and other ornaments in men of honourable place and calling Vers. 42. PHaraoh tooke off his ring Ioseph commeth forth adorned with these complements of honour a ring gold chaine fine linnen riding in the second charriot So that such ornaments are not to be condemned in men of honourable place and condition if these two rules be observed that neither such things be ambitiously sought and desired as here this great honour was offered to Ioseph by Pharaoh of him not begged and that they be not used to ostentation and vaine glory And for the lawfulnesse of rich apparell and ornaments of gold in men of high place to shew their authority and the more to keepe the people in feare and obedience the testimonie of our Saviour may suffice Mat. 62.9 Salomon in all his glory was not arayed like one of these 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Against superstitious shaving Vers. 14. ANd he shaved him c. Ioseph was shaved not only to cleanse himselfe from the filthinesse and smell of the prison but because it was not the fashion of that country to comâ— before the king with long and disordered haire Mercer This was a civill use of shaving they placed no religion in it as the Popelings of Rome doe 2. Confut. The vulgar Latine not wholly Hieromes translation Vers. 43. THey cryed before him Abrech This Hierome taketh to signifie a tender or young father of Abh father and rech tender delicate tradition in Gen. yet the Latine translation under Hieromes name readeth otherwise They cried before him that all should bow their knees whence it is evident that the vulgar Latin was not wholly of Hieromes doing beside it is very corrupt in divers places as vers 54. for in all the land of Egypt was bread the Latine hath in all the land of Egypt was famine 3. Confut. Against the popish prohibition of the marriage of Ministers Vers. 50. HE gave him to wife Asenah daughter of Potipherah prince or priest of On. The word cohen signifieth both a priest and a prince the Chalde readeth prince others the priest H.S. But because the priests were in great authority in Egypt and as from the Philosophers they chose Priests so out of the priests they made princes Mercer I thinke he was both priest and prince that is the chiefe and principall priest This sheweth that among the Egyptians their priests were married and had children so also was it lawfull in the old testament for the priests and in the new for the Apostles to be married and never forbidden in the Church of God till Antichrist began to set in his foot and his adherents to teach the doctrine of devils c. forbidding to marry and commanding to abstaine from meats as the Apostle saith 1 Tim. 4.1 3. 4. Confut. Against the superstitious restraine of marriage among Hebrews and Romanists Vers. 50. NOw unto Ioseph were borne two sonnes before the yeares of famine came The Hebrews note from hence that all the time of famine Ioseph abstained from the company of his wife because his children were borne before the famine came and that it is unlawfull for the man and wife to come together in the time of famine or any other common calamitie as they would gather out of Ioel 2.16 Let the Bride-groome goe forth of his chamber and the Bride out of her bride-chamber c. Contra. 1. It followeth not because Ioseph had no children borne in the time of the famine that therefore he came not to his wife all that time as though it is to be imagined that the Patriarkes when they had no children borne abstained from their wives 2. True it is that the man and wife according to the counsell of the Apostle should sometime sequester themselves for fasting and prayer but it must bee onely for a time and with consent lest Satan tempt them for their incontinency 1 Cor. 7.5 they must not then defraud one another for many moneths or many yeares Not much unlike to this Jewish conceit is the Popish restraint of marriage in the time of Lent for the holinesse
the naturall burning of certaine mountaines as of Aetna in Cicilia Vesuvius in Campania It is found by experience that certaine things putrifie not as the flesh of a Peacoke as Augustine saith and coales upon the which for the same cause Chersiphron founded the temple of Diana lime boyleth with water and is quenched with oile the adamant is so hard that it cannot bee broken upon a smithes anvill the Agrigentine salt melteth in the fire and sparkleth in the water there is said to bee a fountaine among the Garamants that boileth in the night and freezeth in the day the stone Asbestus burneth continually being once set on fire and is never extinct the wood of a certaine figge tree in Egypt sinketh in the water in the Isle Tilo the trees cast no leaves in the Temple of Venus there was a lampe that no tempest could put out and Lodovicus Vives there reporteth that a certaine lampe was found in a grave that had burned above 1050. yeeres At Alexandria in the Temple of Serapis a certaine image of iron did hang in the top by reason of a certaine loadstone which was inclosed in the roofe These and other such like strange things in nature Augustine remembreth Some wee have knowledge of but many secrets of nature are hid from us but knowne unto the spirits who by this meanes doe worke wonders only producing extraordinarie effects of nature 4. Augustine further in another place sheweth the reason thereof in this manner Sunt occulta quaedam semina arborum plantarum c. in elementis c. There are certaine hid seeds of trees plants in the elements for as there are visible seeds so there are hid seeds which give unto the other their vertue like as then the husbandman doth not create corne but bringeth it out by his labour so the evill Angels doe not create things but only doe draw forth those seeds which are unknowne to us but well knowne to them As Iacob did not create that variety of colour in the sheep but by applying of particoloured rods brought it forth sicut ergo matres gravidae sunt foetibus itâ— mundus gravidus est causis seminibus nascentium Then as mothers that are great with child so the world is full of such seeds and causes of the beginning of things which causes they better knowing then we doe worke wonders yea wee see that men by the pounding of certaine herbes and by such like meanes can cause wormes and other like small creatures to come forth To this purpose Augustine QUEST XVI What workes in naturall things are forbidden unto spirits to doe IT followeth now to shew as wee have seene what things are possible to bee done by spirits so what things are out of their reach and beyond their power 1. Touching the immediate action of spirits which is by locall motion the Devill cannot destroy the world or any principall part thereof nor subvert the order and course of nature he cannot change the course of the heavens or put the starres out of their place neither although he may work some alteration in some part of the earth the whole he cannot remove these and such great workes he cannot doe Perer. ex Aquinat the reason is this because this were to crosse the Creator who by his providence as by his power hee created the world and all that is therein so he preserveth the same in that order which he hath appointed as the Psalmist saith The earth is the Lords and all that therein is hee hath founded it upon the sea and established it upon the flouds Psalm 24.1 2. Secondly concerning the other mediate action of spirits by the instrument and mediation of the creatures these things are denied unto spirits 1. They cannot create any thing of nothing for that argueth an infinite power and is peculiar unto God 2. The Devill being himselfe spirituall and without a bodily substance cannot immediatly change or transforme any materiall or corporall substance without some other naturall cause comming betweene 3. Neither can these spirits change any naturall thing into an other naturall thing immediatly without that subordination of nature and preparation and disposition of the matter which is observed in the generation of things therefore hee cannot bring forth a beast without seed nor a perfect beast all at once because naturally both the generation of such things is by seed and they receive their increase and growth not all at once but by degrees and in time therefore when by the operation of Satan lions and beares and such like creatures have beene made to appeare either they were but phantasies and no such things indeed or were transported from some other place and by this reason he cannot restore dead bodies to life because the body being void of naturall heat and spirits is not fit to entertaine the soule 4. Neither can Satan hinder the operation of naturall things if nothing be wanting which is necessâ—ry for their working And generally whatsoever alteration may be made by naturall causes as wormes and frogs and such like may come of pâ—â—refaction these things may be atchieved and compassed by spirits but such changes and transmutations as cannot be done by naturall meanes as to turne a man into a beast are not within the limits of Devils power But when such things seeme to be done they are in shew rather than truth which may be done two wayes either by so binding and blinding the inward phantasie and sense as that may seeme to be which is not or by fashioning some such shape and forme outwardly and objecting it to the sense Perer. Ex Aquinat QUEST XVII Whether Satan can raise the spirits and soules of the dead AMong other things which exceed the power of spirits it is affirmed before that they cannot raise the soules of men departed as Necromancers doe take upon them to talke with the dead 1. Let us see the vaine opinion of the heathen of this devilish Necromancy Porphyrius writeth that the soules of wicked men are turned into Devils and doe appeare in divers shapes and the soules of them that want buriall doe wander about their bodies and sometimes are compelled to resume their bodies Likewise Hosthanes did professe and promise to raise what dead soever and to bring them to talke with the living as Plinie writeth lib. 30. cap. 2. who in the same place reporteth a farre more strange or rather fabulous thing that Appion the Grammarian should tell of a certaine herb called Cynocephalia and of the Egyptians Osirites which hath power to raise the dead and that thereby he called Homers ghost to inquire of him touching his countrie and parents There were among the Gentiles certaine places famous for Necromancie where they received oracles from the dead as they were made to beleeve such was the Cymmerian oracle at the lake Avernam in Campania such was Ericthone the Thessalian that raised up the dead to declare to Sextus Pompeius the successe
c. So taking away the pure religion of keeping Gods commandements and granting unto them the blood of sacrifices c. And this assertion he groundeth upon that place of Ieremie chap. 7 2â— I spake not to your fathers c. when I brought them out of the land of Egypt concerning burnt offerings and sacrifices but this thing I commanded them saying obey my voice c. QUEST XXV 〈…〉 QUEST XXVI 〈…〉 QUEST XXVII What is 〈◊〉 here by the finger of God WRitten with the finger of God 1. By the finger of God Augustine understands the Spirit of God which he proveth by comparing of those two places together in the Gospell that where the one Evangelist writeth that Christ should say If I by the Spirit of God doe cast out devils another saith If I by the finger of God cast out c. which signified that as the law was written by the finger and power of God in tables of stone so is it written in our hearts by the Spirit of grace Gregorie by the Spirit signified by Gods finger understandeth spiritualem intelligentiam legis the spirituall sense and meaning of the law Theophylact thereupon concludeth that the Spirit is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of one substance with the Father as the finger is to the hand So Ambrose saith Ad formaâ—â—â—itatis non ad distinctionem potestatis referendem digiti nuncupationem That the terme of finger is to be referred to the forme of unitie not to the distinction of power But this may seeme somewhat curious 2. These reasons therefore may rather be given of this phrase and terme 1. It is said By the finger of God that is opere Dei by the worke of God because the fingers are instruments of working Tostat. qu. 13. 2. Gallasius referreth it to the paucitie and fewnesse of the precepts Ita ut in digitis 〈◊〉 possent which were not so many but might be numbred upon the fingers 3. This is added also to shew a difference betweene the first tables of stone which were both made and prepared and written by the finger of God so were not the second which Moses made like unto the first they were prepared by Moses but written upon by God chap. 34.1 Iun. 4. And further though God have no hands nor fingers neither is like in bodilie shape unto man yet this may have a speciall reference to Christ who was become verie man with hands and feet like unto us as Borrhaius noteth Digitus humanâ—â— Deo assingitur in Christo vero Deo homine c. The finger of man is attributed to God in Christ who was true God and man QUEST XXVIII Whether Moses did write upon the tables Vers. 2. OF God It will be here objected that Exod. 34.28 it is said that Moses wrote in the tables how then were they written by the finger of God 1. Augustine thinketh that the first tables were written by the Lord the second by Moses But it is otherwise affirmed chap. 34.1 that God also did write upon the second tables 2. Lyranus thus reconcileth thâ—se places 〈…〉 Moses ministerialiter That God did write because he endited and it was done by his authoritie and Moses did write them as the penman and instrument And he hath another concâ—iâ— beside that Moses seemed to put his hand to the tables and yet the Lord might miraculously 〈…〉 that Moses did nothing at all to the first tables they were delivered 〈…〉 only prepare the second tables for the Lord to write upon 3. 〈…〉 saith it is a phrase only he did 〈…〉 QUEST XXIX How the law is said to have 〈…〉 by Angels 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. Gods speciall and particular providence toward his children Vers. 2. BEhold I have called by name Bezaleel This sheweth the singular care that God hath of his elected and chosen vessels in that he knew them by name as the Lord called unto Samuel by name 1. Sam. 3. Like as among men it is counted a great grace and favour if any be knowne unto the Prince by name And in the Athenian and Romane Commonwealth such as were popular would labour to call the most of the citizens by their names God hath not then a generall care only over his children but his particular providence watcheth over them Simler 2. Doct. Mechanicall arts Gods gifts Vers. 3. WHom I have filled with the Spirit of God c. Bezaleel was inspired of God with the knowledge of artes whereby we learne that manuall trades and mechanicall arts doe proceed from Gods Spirit and they are his gifts Marbach B. Babing For every good gift is from above Iam. 1.17 3. Doct. Even works tending to charity and pietie are not to be done ordinarilie upon the Lords day Vers. 13. NOtwithstanding keepe yee my Sabbaths c. If it were not lawfull for the Israelites no not to worke in the building of the Sanctuarie upon the Sabbath then no other servile works are to be done then intuitu pietatis c. with the pretense of pietie as to make garments to cloath the poore to go a fishing to redeeme captives Oleaster Which workes of charitie where necessitie constraineth may be done upon the Lords day but not to make an ordinarie practice of it 5. Places of Controversie 1. Confut. Against those that despise handicrafts as base â—nd contemptible Vers. 2. WHom I have filled with the Spirit of God in wisdome c. If then handicraftsmen have a portion of Gods Spirit and are endued with wisdome from heaven to worke skilfully in their mysteries that assertion of Cicero is to be misliked who thus writeth of these mechanicall arts Opifices omnes in arte sordida versantur nec enim quicquam ingenuum habere potest officina c. All tradesmen are occupied in base arts neither can any ingenuous thing be found in an artisans shop c. True it is that handy-crafts may be counted base and illiberall in comparison of liberall sciences but yet in themselves they are commendable and not to be despised Marbach Our blessed Saviour wrought carpenters worke and therefore is called a carpenter Mark 6.3 and S. Paul was a tent-maker and laboured with his hands which he saith ministered to his necessities Act. 20.34 2. Confut. Against free will I Have filled with wisdome c. Hereupon Calvin giveth this note Vitiosa est ergo illa partitio c. That there is a 〈◊〉 and evill partition whereby men doe ascribe all the helps which they use partly to nature and Gods gift partly to mans 〈◊〉 whereas their industrie it selfe is the gift of God Therefore we are hereby taught that the honour of everie good thing must be given unto God And if humane arts proceed from Gods Spirit how much more hath man no activitie at all in divine things 〈…〉 by grace This then evidently overthroweth free will in divine and spirituall thingâ— as our blessed Saviour saith Without me yee can do nothing Ioh. 15.5 3.
But it seemeth that this great defection was about the seventh age for then Lamech of Cains race tooke unto him two wives then the Lord tooke away righteous Henoch that he should bee no longer grieved with the wickednesse of the world Then the world being replenished with great multitudes which are ring-leaders for the most part unto evill as it is written thou shalt not follow a multitude to doe evill began to give themselves to all kinde of wickednesse adultery oppression cruelty multiplicity of wives unlawfull lust even against nature and to fill the earth with uncleannesse 3. And although in this seventh age iniquity was come to the full height yet it began long before even in the dayes of Enos when as the righteous abhorring the great wickednesse of Cains posterity separated themselves and a part beganne to call upon the name of God Iun. 4. The Hebrewes note that at the beginning women were not so multiplied as afterward by whom they tooke occasion to sinne and therefore it is added there were daughters borne unto them c. vers 1. but this clause sheweth not a more speciall multiplying of that kinde but that when the world began to be stored both with men and women then they gave themselves to wantonnesse QVEST. III. The particular sin of the old world here noted Vers. 2. THey saw the daughters of men that they were faire c. 1. Their fault was not onely in that they of the righteous seed matched into Cains stocke Calvin 2. Or that they respected onely beauty having no regard to their piety and vertue Marlorat 3. But they by violence tooke unto them not to their wives but women for so with Mercerus and Iunius I rather interpret the word nashim from all men whatsoever as Iunius readeth both virgines and wives they cared not whom 4. Some Hebrewes here understand also the filthy sinne of buggery that they tooke all they liked even from among the bruit beasts but Moses speaketh onely of the daughters of men QVEST. IV. Who were these sonnes of God Vers. THen the sonnes of God 1. These sonnes of God were not the Angels which some have supposed to have fallen for their intemperancie with women and to have begotten of them spirits as Ioseph Philo Iustine Clemens Alexandrinus Tertullian conjectured who so expoundeth that place of S. Paul that women should be covered because of the Angels lest they should bee tempted with their beauty This opinion is easily confuted 1. Because the world was punished and God was angry not for the sinne of Angels but of men vers 3. My spirit shall not alway strive with man 2. Chrysostome urgeth that place Matth. 22. in the resurrection they neither marry nor are married but are the Angels Ergo Angels are not subject to carnall affections as men are 3. If Angels fell first for the love of women then they sinned not for 1000. yeares after the creation whereas the Scripture sheweth that the Devill was a murtherer and a liar from the beginning Ioh. 8.44 QVEST. V. Devils not corporall nor mortall IT is also absurd and improbable that these were devils which did company with women and of them came Gyants as thinketh Franciscus Georgius who affirmeth devils to have bodies and a generative faculty and to company with women Of the like opinion is Psellus that the devils have bodies and they are nourished by sucking and attraction as spunges and that they are males and females at their pleasures some are of a fiery some ayrie some a watery some of a terrene nature But these are fables and fictions fit rather to be laughed at than worthy to be confuted 1. The Devils are of a spirituall not corporall nature it appeareth by that story Luk. 8. where we reade that in one man there was a legion that is six thousand Devils how could so many spirits if they were corporall be included in one body 2. If they were of a fierie watery or earthly so of an elementall nature they should bee subject to corruption mutability and mortality and so some have imagined also as Plutarch writeth of the death of the great Pan a famous Devill among the Pagans and Cardane reporteth that he heard his Father say who was above thirty years familiar with the Devils that he learned of them that they doe die decay revive againe but this fancie is contrary to the Scripture which testifieth that the Devill hath beene a murtherer from the beginning of the world Ioh. 8 44 Ergo he hath continued from the beginning of the world and how should the soule of man be immortall if these spirits which are of a more subtill nature were mortall 3. Though it were granted that Devills have a kinde of airie bodies yet could they not ingender for the power of generation agreeth onely to perfect bodies which have their materiall and distinct parts and receive nourishment 4. And they being as they say male and female should ingender among themselves in their owne kinde 5. Or if they did company with women they could not beget men but multiply their owne kinde or at the least a mixt kinde as the mule is engendred of an horse and an asse and so some likewise have conceited that the Faunes and Satyres were the off-spring of such generation As Hierom in the life of Antonie reporteth that such an one appeared unto him in the wildernesse with goats feet long crooked nailes and hornes upon his head and spake unto Antonie but either this may be held to be a fable foisted under Hieromes name or if there were any such thing it might be some monster of the wildernesse which the Devill used as his trunke to speake out of QVEST. VI. Spirits doe not generate BUt much more absurd is the opinion of Paulus Burgensis that thinketh these which companied with the daughters of men were spirits called Incubi which doe assume bodies of the aire for a time representing the shape sometime of men sometime of women in the act of generation and then they are called Succubi and thus saith he were the Giants engendred and Tostatus approoving this conceit of Incubi and Succubi seemeth to give credit to that report of Merlin that he was begotten by a spirit In these assertions and uncertaine conjectures of men some what is true some part false 1. True it is that the Devill may appeare in the shape of man or woman and dissemble and counterfeit the act proper to both not that the spirits have any delight in such carnall acts having no true but assumed and counterfeit bodies but they doe it more strongly to delude men and women and entice them to that abominable sinne of the flesh which they know hath corrupted the hearts of many excellent men as of David Salomon 2. Though spirits can take upon them the shape of bodies yet they are but so to the eye they are not true bodies being easily
discerned by the feeling and therefore our Saviour saith feele and see a spirit hath not flesh and bones as yee see mee to have And some have reported that they have felt such bodies assumed by spirits as colde as yce and of a divers substance from humane flesh as Alexander ab Alexandro so writeth of another to whom a spirit appeared and Cardanus of himselfe If any man object that Abraham washed the Angels feet and yet discerned them not I will not answer with Pererius whose judgement I refuse not in the rest that Abrahams intent upon other things regarded it not But I note a difference betweene the operation of good and bad Angels that these never appeared with true bodies and therefore were called Phantasmata visions fansies Marke 6.49 But unto the other God gave the use of true bodies for a time during that ministerie or service as appeareth in that they did eat and drinke were lodged had their feet washed c. 3. But howsoever spirits may assume bodies they are not such as can be instruments of generation by conveying of humane seed as some have imagined because the scripture saith children are the inheritance of the Lord Psal. 127.3 And Evah confesseth when Cain was borne that she had obtained a son of God Gen. 4.1 and if that were true which is fabled of Merlin such kind of birth should be oftner seene in the world Wherefore by the sonnes of God in this place 1. Neither doe wee understand Angels good or bad 2. Neither men of tall and great stature as such things as are excellent in their kind are so called as high and tall trees are said to be the trees of God Psal. 104.16.3 Nor yet the sonnes of Princes and great men as the Chalde readeth to whom Mercerus subscribeth which are called Gods in scripture Psal. 82.6 I said ye are Gods c 4. Neither yet are they so called because they came of Seeth who as Suidas thinketh was in respect of his religion and great knowledge saluted as a God in earth 5. But they are here named the sonnes of God that were of the righteous seed and worshippers of the true God as the wicked are called the sonnes of the Devil and he their father Iohn 8.44 ye are of your father the Devill who although they were not indeed the sonnes of God in his eternall election yet were they so in respect of their externall calling QVEST. VII The meaning of these words My spirit shall not alwaies strive c. 4. Vers. 3. MY spirit shall not alwaies strive c. 1. Not as the latine text is My spirit shall not alwaies remaine which some expound of Gods wrath some of his providence some of the holy Ghost some of the soule and spirit of man inspired of God and then the sense to bee that Gods wrath shall not alwaies continue but he will punish them at once or he will no more protect them or take care for them neither his spirit shall be with them or he will take away their life and spirit from them For this variety of interpretation ariseth of the mistaking of the word which signifieth to contend or judge not to remaine 2 Neither is Pagmines interpretation so apt my spirit shall not alwaies bee sheathed as a sword in a scabbard and so hee would derive the word jadon of neden which signifieth a sheath 3. The meaning then of these words my spirit shall not alwaies judge or contend is neither as Hierom expoundeth non eos ad â—ternos servabo cruciatus I will not punish them for ever but render unto them here that which they deserve For S. Peter sheweth that their soules are now in the prison of hell and so everlastingly punished 1 Peter 3.19 Neither as Cajetane that God would no more punish them spiritually as hee had done by taking his grace and spirit from them but now he would inflict a corporall punishment upon them for God had not yet punished them giving them the space of 120. yeares to repent But either wee may understand these words with Oleaster that God would no longer strive with them in reprooving and admonishing them which they regarded not or with Iunius God would no longer consult or dispute the matter as it were with himselfe what to doe with them but if they amended not within that space set he would certainly destroy them QVEST. VIII What these Giants were 5. Vers. 4. THese were Giants c. Some thinke that these were called Giants not for their greatnesse of stature but their cruell and beastly conditions so thinke Philo Ioseph Damas. Cyril with others so also Iunius 2. But beside their fierce and cruell nature it is most probable that they were of huge and great stature Mercer for such there were also after the floud as the sonnes of Anak in comparison of whom the Israelites seemed as grashoppers Num. 13.34 such were the Emmims and Zaâ—zummims Deut. 2.10 17. and Og the King of Basan whose bed was of iron being nine cubits in length and foure in breadth Deut. 3.11 and of this judgement are Ambrose Augustine Theodoret. 3. And these Giants huge in stature men of great strength as is shewed after in this verse did most abound before the floud and such also was the off-spring of this unlawfull copulation betweene the sonnes of God and daughters of men 4. And they were men of renowne that is famous over all the world because they did tyrannize over their neighbours and brought them in subjection of whom Berosius writeth that they had a City called Enos about the mountaine Libanus which ruled over all the world they did eat mans flesh and had unlawfull company with their mothers daughters with mules and bruit beasts 5. Some as Rasi doe referre this generation of Giants to the times of Enos further affirming that the Lord sent the Ocean Sea which destroyed the generation of these Giants and the third part of the world but the Giants which succeeded them were as wicked as they But of this inundation of the Ocean no mention is made in Scripture neither is it like that the generation of Giants began so soone in the world neither with Aben Ezra doe we understand this of the generation of Giants after the floud of whom came Og and the rest as though any of the Giants had escaped the floud to beget Giants afterward and that Noe and his sonnes were Giants it is not to be thought Mercer Neither were these Giants onely in Noahs time but when this violent rage of lust beganne to reigne in the world then this off-spring of Giants came in which continued till the time of Noah 6. Neither were these Giants onely of Seths race as some thinke nor yet onely of Cain as R. Sel. but in both families there were Giants after they thus coupled together with out the feare of God Mercer Calvin 7. So that the Nephilim here spoken of so named of Naphal which
usuall food before the floud as it is now as seemeth to thinke Dominicus à Soto a Popish Writer for when as yet the earth and plants were not corrupted by the floud but retained their naturall force and vigour they yeelded more sufficient nourishment so that the eating of flesh was not then so necessary and as the more delicate use of some plants as the use of Wine by Noah was brought in afterward so much flesh of fowles and beasts did grow in request after the floud which was not covered before 5. Wherefore the sounder opinion is that not onely the eating of flesh was permitted before the floud but used not onely among the prophane race but with the faithfull though with greater moderation Our reasons are these 1. Because there is made no new grant neither in this nor in the rest as of multiplying and bearing dominion c. but onely the ancient privileges granted to man confirmed 2. The distinction of cleane beasts which it was lawfull for them to eat and the uncleane whereof they might not eat Levit. 13.8.3 It is evident by the oblation of Abel who offered the first fruit of his sheepe and the faâ— of them but it had beene no praise to Abel to offer the fatlings if he used not to eat of them it had beene all one to God whether to offer leane or fat but herein Abel is commended because he preferred the service of God before his owne private use and therefore Iustinus well collecteth Si anâ—e posuit Abel utilitatisâ—a Deum non dubium quia solitus fit ex labore suo utilitatem percipere If Abel did preferre God before his profit certainly he did reape profit of his labour and to the same purpose he alleageth that saying of the Apostle Who feedeth a flocke and eateth not of the milke thereof 1 Cor. 9.7 and by the same reason also of the flesh thereof 4. In that expresse mention is here first made of eating of flesh it is not as one well resolveth quantum ad usum in respect of the use sed quantum ad necessitatem in regard of the necessity The food of flesh beganne now to be more necessary because the plants and herbs had lost the first naturall vigour and strength QVEST. IIII. Whaâ— the meaning is of eating the flesh with the life or bloud 4. BVt flesh with the life thereof that is the bloud c. 1. This word anima in Hebrew nephesh translated life is taken foure wayes in Scripture first for man as the soule that sinneth shall die Ezek. 18. Secondly for the reasonable soule feare not those that can kill the body but cannot kill the soule Matth. 10. Thirdly it is taken for the inferiour part of the soule that is the affection as thou shalt love the Lord with all thy heart and soule Matth. 22. Fourthly it is taken for the life as a good shepherd will lay downe his life for his sheepe Ioh. 10. and so it is taken in this place for the bloud is the seat and chariot of the life and vitall spirics 2. These words are neither figuratively taken as Eugubinus thinketh for the shedding of mans bloud because he that killeth a man seemeth to devour his flesh for in this sense the words should have no coherence at all with the former verse and where words may be taken in their proper sense without any inconvenience a figure is not to be enforced neither is it all one to eat flesh with the bloud thereof and to eat things strangled as Chrysostome collecteth for the Apstoles distinctly speake of bloud and things strangled Act. 15. Neither is the eating of live flesh here onely prohibited as Cajetanus conjectureth or of hot bloud as Mercer for from this bruitish kinde of food the very nature of man abhorreth and therefore it needed not so especially to be provided for by precept But here generally the eating of the bloud with the flesh is forbidden whether together with the flesh alive or dead or separated from the flesh as to drinke it or to eat it as now the use is in confected meats QVEST. V. Wherefore the eating of bloud was prohibited NOw whereas the eating of bloud was forbidden both before the Law and under the Law Levit. 17. and after the Law in the beginning of the Gospell Act. 15. it shall be profitable to consider the causes of this prohibition First it was forbidden before the Law 1. Not so much for decencie and comelinesse or for that bloud is a grosse and heavy food 2. But either that aforehand by these ceremoniall precepts mens minds might be prepared the better to beare the yoke of the Law which afterward should be promulgated 3. Or rather that by this precept of abstaining from bloud men might be the more terrified from the shedding of mans bloud sic Chrysost. Secondly this law was revived Levit. 17.11 12. whereof two reasons are given one civill because the life of the flesh is the bloud that they should forbeare from all shew of cruelty and so much the more detest the shedding of mans bloud the other religious because I have given the bloud to offer at the Altar the bloud the organ of life is holy unto God the Author of life and therefore they should not pollute or prophane it by devouring thereof Thirdly the Apostles did forbid the eating of things strangled and bloud 1. Not because among the Gentiles suffocated things were held to be the food of evill spirits as Origen writeth for it is not like that the Apostles would ground their decree upon such heathenish fantasies 2. Neither by bloud is homicide forbidden and by things suffocated uncleane as some thinke for the Apostles would not use obscure and mysticall tearmes in their decree and these things were already provided for by law among the Gentiles 3. Neither did the Apostles forbid these things onely to restraine intemperancie for many kinds of food are more delicate and to be defiâ—ed than these 4. But Augustine sheweth the true cause of this prohibition Quâ—dideo fâ—ctum est quia elâ— gere voluerunt Apostoli pro tempore rem facilem c. This was decreed because the Apostles for a while would chuse some easie thing not burdensome to the observers which the Gentiles might observe in common with the Iewes c. Thus Augustine disputing against Faustus This the Apostles did onely for a time lest the beleeving Jewes who could hardly all at once be removed from the legall rites might have beene offended at the libertie of the Gentiles but now this cause being removed and there being no such feare this decree also is expired QVEST. VI. How this prohibition dependeth of the former verse Vers. 5. FOr surely I will require your bloud c. 1. Which words are neither an exposition of the former verse as Eugubinus who by the eating of flesh with the bloud understandeth figuratively the shedding of mans bloud 2. Neither is the
by his holinesse goodnesse c. doth pledge them that unlesse that be which he saith he will lose them and swearing by himselfe he bindeth his Godhead for the performance as though he should say in effect If this be not let me be no more God Calvin QVEST. XXI Why the Lord tooke an oath BUt further it will be asked what need God had to take an oath seeing the word of God is certaine of it selfe and need no confirmation and an oath is used in doubtfull cases but to God nothing is doubtfull or uncertaine an oath is used when the party cannot be credited without an oath but Abraham did beleeve God The answer then is this 1. The Lord sweareth not to any such end as though any more credit and certainty by his oath might bee wonne unto his promise 2. And yet wee take not this to bee a metaphoricall speech onely with Cajetan that God is said to sweare by himselfe 3. But the Lord taketh an oath ad ampliorem confirmationem fidei nostra for the better confirmation of our faith and hee doth it the Apostle saith ex abundanti more abundantly to shew the stablenesse of his counsell Heb. 6.17 Calvin 4. Where we may note the differences betweene this oath and other oathes 1. God taketh this oath willingly not forced thereto of any necessity 2. He sweareth by himselfe as having not a greater to sweare by and Philo sheweth the reason Solus de seipso asseverare potest quia solus ipse suam novit naturam He only can beare witnesse of himselfe because he only knoweth his owne nature 3. He also further saith Sententiae nostra ex juramento fides accedit ipsi juramento ex ipso Deo fides astruitur Our sentence is credited because of our oath but this oath is beleeved because of God that taketh it QUEST XXII Whether the promises here made are new or the old renewed Vers. 18. IN thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed 1. It is of all hands confessed that the other three promises were made unto Abraham before 1. That Abraham should be blessed Genes 12.2 2. That his seed should be multiplied as the starres and as the sand of the sea Genes 13.16 3. That his seed should possesse the gate of his enemies which is in effect the same with that Genes 13.12 all this land will I give thee c. God promised Abraham the land of the Canaanites which were his enemies 2. But Ambrose thinketh that this was a new blessing containing a promise of the Messiah lib. 1. de Abraham c. 8. Paulus Burgensis confirmeth the same by these reasons because Saint Paul rehearseth this as a speciall blessing concerning Christ urging these words in thy seed which are onely found here and the Lord confirmeth this by an oath as Zachary in his song maketh mention of this oath which hee sware to our father Abraham Luke 1.73 3. But these reasons are easily answered 1. Saint Paul citeth rather that promise made Genes 12.3 in thee shall all the Gentiles be blessed Galath 3.8 for hee speaketh of that promise which was made 430. yeares before the law which must needs be that former given to Abraham at the 75. yeare of his age but there will want 50. yeares of that summe if the account should begin at this time when Abraham was 125. yeares old And whereas Saint Paul also alludeth unto this place v. 16. and thy seed and so expoundeth one place by another he sheweth that in effect they are both but one promise 2. The adding of the oath maketh it not a new promise but confirmeth onely the former otherwise by this reason all these promises should be newly made seeing the oath goeth before them all and indeed not onely this promise of the Messiah but the other also concerning the possessing of the land of Canaan was ratified by an oath Exod. 13.5 Perer. 4. Wherefore here is no other promise made to Abraham but such as he had heard before but the same more amply and fully confirmed by an oath and againe renued both to Abraham and Isaack in which two respects this promise is more excellent than the former Calvin QUEST XXIII How Saint Paul applieth this word Seed only to Christ. 3 to the Galath HEre by the way it shall not be amisse to explane that place of Saint Paul Galath 3.16 where the Apostle presseth the word seed shewing that because he saith seed not seeds it must bee referred to one namely Christ. The Jewes doe make two principall objections against this place 1. They urge that this word metaphorically taken for the of-spring of men is a nowne collective never used in the plurall number but put in the singular only signifieth a multitude as likewise doth the word populus vulgus people commonalty c. Answer 1. True it is that the word Zeraugh in the singular number doth often signifie a multitude but sometime in Scripture it is restrained to one as Gen. 4.25 the name of seed is given to Seth the Lord hath appointed me another seed for Habel Genes 21.13 Ismael is called Abrahams seed Wherefore it is not enough to say that this word in the singular is sometime taken for a multitude unlesse they could shew it so to be used here Beza 2. The Apostle then being not ignorant of the phrase and usage of the Hebrew tongue doth not contend about the word but the sense that the word seed in this place is not taken for seeds that is many but for seed that is one specially Perer. 21. They object further that whereas it is said In thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed this is but a forme of blessing by way of comparison like to that Gen. 48.20 God make thee as Ephraim c. Ans. 1. If this speech did onely shew a forme not the cause of blessing it need not have beene said in thy seed but in thee that is Abraham God make thee like Abraham 2. Where such formes of blessing are used they are restrained to Israel as in the place alleaged Gen. 48. In thee Israel shall blesse but here all nations shall bee blessed how should it come to passe that all nations should not blesse themselves but bee blessed but in being called to the knowledge of God which is by Christ wherefore these words shew the cause of blessing not the forme Calvin Now then their objections being thus answered I will shew the right meaning of the Apostle 1. I first reject Hieromes collection reproved by Erasmus Paulum hoc argumento abusum apud crassos Galataâ— that Paul abuseth this argument having to doe with the dull Galathians for it becommeth us not so to think of so grave an Apostle writing by the Spirit of God 2. Neither is it enough to say that Paul by the same Spirit whereby Moses did write did understand him to speake of Christ Cajetan in 3. ad Galat. for Paul having to
or write all after one manner of purpose but in some variety of order and words were directed by the Spirit to write one truth Other rules also may be propounded for the reconciling of places of Scripture which seeme at the first sight to be repugnant in respect of the divers computation of time 1. When as one writer doth inclusively account the time which another doth exclusively as Luke c. 9.29 saying that Christ about an 8. dayes after was transfigured includeth in this number both primum ultimum the first and last day Matthew saying after 6. dayes doth exclude these two dayes making mention of those six that came betweene sic Augustin lib. de consens Evang. c. 56. 2. Sometime the principall part of the time is rehearsed and the small or odde numbers omitted as 1 King 2.11 David is said to have reigned 40. yeares over Israel 7. yeares in Hebron and 33. yeares in Jerusalem whereas the precise account of his reigne in Hebron was 7. yeares 6. moneths and in Jerusalem 33. yeares which make in all 40. yeares 6. moneths 2 Sam. 5.5 3. Sometime the yeares of a Kings reigne are reckoned which he reigned alone sometime those wherein he reigned with another so Iotham reigned 16. yeares alone but twenty yeares counting those wherein he governed under his Father 2 Kings 15.5.30.33 Perer. QUEST XX. Why Abrahams servant refused to eat or drinke Vers. 33. THey set before him to eat but he said I will not eat 1. Hee neither refused to eat because unusuall meat was set before him such as hee was not accustomed unto in Abrahams house as some Hebrewes thinke 2. Neither doth he deferre till he had spoken his words that is said grace as some interpret for though it is not to bee doubted but that they used in Abrahams house to receive their meat with thanksgiving yet hee meaneth the delivering of his message 3. But that is a meere fable that hee would not eat because they set poyson before him to have his goods which poyson was returned upon Bethuel who thereupon died and this fable the Hebrewes would build upon the word sam poyson answerable to the word sume here used which signifieth to place or set for neither were they so poore that they needed Abrahams goods nor so unhonest so to deale with their nearest kinsmans servant nor yet is there any affinity betweene those two words the one beginning with samech the other with shin Mercer 4. Neither doth he refraine from eating and drinking fearing lest afterward hee should not tell a sober tale 5. But his diligence is commended who preferreth his masters businesse before his meat and drinke QUEST XXI Perswasions used by Abrahams servant to further the mariage Ver. 35. THe Lord hath blessed my master c. 1. The servant beginneth to use perswasions to make a way for the mariage intended 1. That hee was rich and not by evill meanes but by Gods blessing Muscul. 2. That Isaack was borne of Sarai in her old age and so not without a miracle as a man ordained of God for some great matter Calvin 3. And lest they might object why being so rich he tooke not a wife neare hand he addeth that his master gave him speciall charge not to take a wife of the daughters of Canaan Mercer QUEST XXII Certaine fabulous conceits of the Hebrewes refused IT shall not bee amisse to note certaine fabulous collections of the Hebrewes 1. Vers. 39. They thinke that Eliezar secretly insinuated that if hee could not otherwise provide a wife for Isaack hee would offer his owne daughter but that Abraham absolutely refused because he was of the Canaanites But yet they say that this Eliezar for his faithfull service was taken alive into Paradise as Isaack came alive from thence 2. Vers. 42. Where he saith I came this day to the well the Hebrewes thinke that he came from Hebron to Charras in a day which is noted to be seventeene dayes journey and this day noteth the time not of his departure from home but of his comming thither Mercer 3. V. 47. They note that he put the jewels so upon her face that he touched not her flesh whereas the meaning is that hee gave her them rather to put them on her selfe QUEST XXIII Whether Abrahams servant gave the gifts before he knew who she was Vers. 47. WHereas before v. 22. he first brought forth the jewels before hee asked her whose daughter she was whereas here he first is said to aske her 1. Neither is it like that he asked her before he brought them forth as Iun. Perer. 2. Neither doth he here report it otherwise than it was done lest they might have accused him of levity to give jewels to one whom he knew not as Rasi 3. But first he brought them forth and then asked her the question and after gave them Mercer QUEST XXIV Why Laban is set before Bethuel Vers. 50. THen answered Laban and Bethuel 1. Neither was this Bethuel the brother of Laban as Lyran 2. Neither was Bethuel Rebeccahs father dead as Iosephus 3. Neither is Labans impiety noted who taketh upon him to speake before his father as Rasi 4. Nor yet is Laban first named as more excellent in wisdome than his father as Aben Ezra 5. But for that his father being old or sickly had committed his houshold government to Laban Iun. Mercer QUEST XXV The space of ten dayes for Rebeccahs abode how to be understood Vers. 55. LEt the maid abide with us at the least ten dayes 1. She meaneth not that is Rebeccahs mother to have her stay a yeare or at the least ten moneths as the Hebrewes and Onkelâ—s for this had bin an unreasonable request seeing the man made such haste 2. Neither the words standing thus let her abide dayes at the least ten by dayes are understood seven dayes of mourning for Bethuel whom they supposed to have beene dead for then they would not have requested for seven dayes first and then for ten but have begun with the greater request first 3. Neither is the vulgar reading the best to joyne the words together at the least ten dayes for in the originall dayes goe before 4. The best reading then is let her abide dayes that is certaine or at the least ten Iun. QUEST XXVI Of the willingnesse of Rebecca Vers. 58. I Will goe c. 1. Not that she said in effect I will goe though you will not as Rasi for this thought or speech had noâ— become the modesty of the maid 2. but rather her obedience to her parents appeareth to whom she consenteth Calvin 3. and her will was no doubt directed by the Spirit of God Muscul. QUEST XXVII How Isaack dwelled in Beersheba Abraham remaining in Hebron Vers 6â— ISaack came from the way of Beer-lahai-roi c. 1. Not that Isaack went thither to fetch Hagar to be Abrahams wife after Sarahs death as some Hebrewes for she was not Keturah as shall appeare afterward 2.
was the sonne of seventeene yeares now he cannot be the sonne or birth of so many yeares before they are expired the father must be before the sonne so is this phrase used Gen. 17.25 where Ismael is said to bee the sonne of thirteene yeares that is so many complete when Abraham was 99. yeare old for Ismael was borne when Abraham was 86. yeares old Gen. 16.16 And bee it granted that the Latine might agree in sense with the Hebrew yet it is too great boldnesse in a translator to change the number to put downe 16. for 17. 2. Now to say that the Latine interpreter did this not without the instinct of the spirit is in effect to say that the Hebrew writer had not the instinct of the spirit or that the instinct of the spirit is contrary to it selfe if both he that writeth sixteene and he that numbreth seventeene years in the same place and of the same person were moved by the same spirit But the Latine translator was led by the same spirit to write here 16. for 17. which moved him Gen. 8.4 for the 17. day of the moneth to write the 27. day which is a manifest errour and so is this here Hence then appeareth the grosse blindnesse of the Tridentine chapter which maketh the Latine translation authenticall without acception 2. Confut. A concubine not simply or properly a wife Vers. 2. WHereas Zilpah and Bilha are here said to be Iacobs wives Pererius noteth that Iacobs concubines were simply his wives though not his principall wives as Rachel Leah were Perer. in Gen. 37. nume 9. Contr. The Scripture maketh a manifest difference between a wise a concubiner for the concubine was still under the government of the wife as Hugar after she was given to Abraham is still called Sarahs maid Gen. 16. and the sonne of the concubine did not inherit as the sonne of the wife yet sometime she that was properly a concubine is called improperly a wife as Zilpah and Bilha here either because the principall wives being dead they succeeded in their place or for that their sonnes were privileged to be co-heires with the sonnes of Lâ—ah and Rachel which was not usuall but onely for the sonnes of the principall wives to inherit See more of this quaest 8. in Gen. 25. 3. Confut. Against free-will Vers. 4. THey could not speake peaceably unto him So our Saviour saith to the Pharises How can you speake good things seeing you are evill Matth. 12.34 Hence is confuted the popish doctrine of free-will that a man of his owne power is apt to chuse that which is good Iacobs sonnes abounding with malice could not speake peaceably to Ioseph nor the Pharises being a generation of vipers could speake well of Christ for an evill tree cannot bring forth good fruit Matth. 7.18 Muscul. 4. Confut. Our election unto life not by works Vers. 6. HEare this dreame c. Ioseph obtained this great favour with God to have the preeminence over his brethren not by any merit or worthinesse in himselfe but of Gods meere grace and favour toward him for as yet Ioseph had not shewed his faithfullnesse and chastity in Potiphars house The purpose of God then to exalt Ioseph revealed in these dreames went before any merit of Iosephs part Calvin So also Gods free and gracious election in setting us apart to everlasting salvation is without all respect of works in us as the Apostle teacheth That the purpose of God might remaine according to election not by works c. Rom. 9.11 5. Confut. Against the Sadduces of the immortality of the soule Vers. 21. LEt us not kill him or verbatim smite his soule Hence the Sadduces did inferre that the soule is not immortall because it may be smitten and killed But Augustine answereth this objection That here by the word soule the life is understood the effect by the efficient as in Iob where Satan is forbidden to touch his soule that is his life for otherwise concerning the nature and substance of the soule it cannot be killed according to the words of our Saviour Feare not those which after they have killed the body cannot kill the soule Matth. 12. 6. Confut. Sheol in this place not taken for hell Vers. 35. I Will goo downe into the grave mourning c. 1. The word sheol here used is neither to bee translated gehenna hell the place of torment after this life as the Chalde and some Hebrewes for Iacob did not suppose that Ioseph was in hell or that he should goe thither 2. Neither is it taken here for Limbus patrum the dungeon of darknesse where the soules of the fathers remained till Christs comming as Perer. and other popish writers for that place of rest and joy where Lazarus was in Abrahams bosome could be no part or member of hell where there is no joy to be found 3. Wherefore it is better translated the grave and cannot be otherwise in this place understood as even now shall appeare But because Pererius here fighteth with his owne shadow and goeth about to prove that sheol in the Scripture is not alwayes taken for the grave but sometime for hell properly as though the protestants so affirmed that the word was never found used for hell I will first set downe the divers acceptations of the word sheol in Scripture I find therefore that this word is used in foure severall senses 1. It is taken for hell metaphorically that is for the deepe plunging in extreme sorrow misery and danger as Psal. 86.13 Thou hast delivered my soule from the nethermost hell 2. It is taken for the locall place of hell properly as Proverbs 15. Hell and destruction are before the Lord. 3. It signifieth the grave Prov. 30.16 The grave and the barren wombe are reckoned among those things that are never satisfied where Pererius will have the word taken for hell not the grave for the grave saith he is soone filled and satisfied ' it holdeth not above one body Contr. 1. This is a very childish answer seeing the Wise man speaketh not of any one particular grave but of the condition of the grave in generall which is never satisfied with dead bodies but receiveth more still as in the same place saying The earth cannot be satisfied with water he meaneth not any severall peece or lumpe of earth which may be soone drenched with water but of the quality nature of the earth in generall 2. So that in this sense the grave is rather sheol than hell because it is more craving for to hell goe none but the wicked but the grave receiveth the bodies of all both good and bad 4. Sheol is taken to signifie the lower deepe and remote parts of the earth as without any relation to the place of punishment as Psal. 139.8 If I ascend into heaven thou art there if I lie downe in hell thou art there also sic Mercer 7. Confut. Against Pererius exposition of that place Psal. 16.10 FUrther whereas
Ioseph with Calvin 2. Neither with some excuse this fact and say it was iocosum mendacium a pleasant lie or in sport 3. Much lesse was it a purposed lie as though Ioseph should sweare to it by the life of Pharaoh for by that oath hee affirmeth not that they are spies but bindeth them to bring their brother Benjamin 4. Wherefore I thinke rather that Ioseph used here no lie at all 1. But not in that sense as R Salomon taketh it as though Ioseph had called them spies one way because they searched the next way into the land of Egypt out of Canaan and that they understood Ioseph another way for Ioseph expoundeth himselfe that he meaneth spies properly that they came to see the weakenesse of the land 2. Neither doth he speake in the opinion of others that they are counted spies but this thrice urging of that word sheweth that he spake as from his owne judgement 3. Neither doth he speake figuratively turning his finger to himselfe and that they spied out his weakenesse and abused his youth and simplicity when they sold him to the Ismaelites as Rupertus 4. But I rather thinke that Ioseph thrice spake not assertive by way of assertion or affirmation but probative and tentative by way of question to trie them which was no lie nor dissimulation at all as neither was that in our Saviour that to make triall of his disciples humanity made shew as though he would have gone further Luke 24. QUEST VIII Whether Ioseph had before forgotten his dreames Vers. 9. ANd Ioseph remembred the dreames which he dreamed of them 1. Not that Ioseph had either made small account before of his dreames seeing the contrary event in his imprisonment and other afflictions 2. Or that prosperity had made him to forget his former visions 3. But now when he saw his dreames to take effect he doth more lively remember them better understandeth them than before as it is said of the disciples that they understood not those things which were said of Christ at the first but after hee was glorified then they remembred that they were written of him Iohn 12.16 Calvin QUEST IX Whether Ioseph sweareth by the life of Pharaoh or therein did wel Vers. 15. BY the life of Pharaoh you shall not goe hence First some excuse Ioseph here admitting this to be an oath 1. Because in effect he did sweare by God who was the author of Pharaohs health and life 2. Some againe doe extenuate his oath that he sware in effect by nothing as Socrates used to sweare by a goose or dog Zeno by the Caper tree to shew the vanity of the heathen that used to sweare by their Gods but it is not like that Iosâ—ph set so light by the health of Pharaoh as Augustine well noteth an bono fideli servo vilis fuerit salus Pharaonis 3. Some would excuse it because Iâ—sâ—ph was not in good earnest but did all this in a friendly kind of dissimulation but as it is not lawfull to lie in jest so much lesse to sweare in jest Secondly they that denie this to have beene an oath 1. Some say it was but a vehement kind of obtestation as Moses calleth heaven and earth to witnesse Deut. 30.19 and as a man may contest by his faith by his head and such like Calvin But yet this will not helpe for our Saviour condemneth whatsoever in our speech is used beside yea or nay Math. 5. that out of Deut. is a patheticall compellation of the creatures to be witnesse against the people of their ingratitude and disobedience which is much unlike this case here 2. Some hold this speech of Ioseph to be an execration as if he should say he wished Pharaoh no otherwise to live than he would doe as he said Thom. Aquinas But Ioseph was more reverent and respective of Pharaohs health and life 3. Iunius saith it is a constant kinde of affirmation used both among Christians and others and will have it like to those asseverations 1 Sam. 2 2â— O my Lord Anna saith to Eli as thy soule liveth and Abner saith to Saul as thy soule liveth O king I cannot tell 1 Sam. 17.55 and as the use was to sweare by the soule of the Emperour as he alleageth out of Vlpianus But herein I cannot consent unto that learned man for in those phrases they alwayes either protested by themselves in the first person as 2 King 6.31 God do so to mee and more also or by those to whom they speake in the second person as in the examples given in instance and therefore the case is not all one with this And concerning that use to protest by the Emperous soule though it continued under Christian Emperors yet it is certaine that it was taken up before in the time of Idolatry when they ascribed divine honours to their Emperors 4. Wherefore I rather incline to thinke that this kind of speech to say by the life of Pharaoh was used commonly in Egypt as an oath partly of flattery partly of superstition in ascribing too much to their Kings which use they seeme to have derived from the Hebrewes that as they used to sweare vivit dominus the Lord liveth so they Pharaoh liveth and the Hebrewes write that to this day it is a law among the Egyptians that he which falsly sweareth by the kings head in a pecuniarie matter shall be put to death Perer. yea and the imperiall law is that he which did commit perjury swearing per genium Imperatoris by the soule or spirit of the Emperour should be beaten with clubs and it should be written over his head 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sweare not rashly Iun. ex Vlpian But yet Ioseph in this place of purpose sweareth not but by the common use and custome spake as the rest did as it appeareth by his twice using of the same words together like as in our English tongue many suddenly will say Mary having no intent to sweare which notwithstanding at the first I thinke was taken up as an oath by the name of Marie And beside Ioseph doth conforme himselfe of purpose to the Egyptian phrase that his brethren should not suspect him to be an Hebrew which they might easily have done if he had said as the Lord liveth Therefore although Ioseph may be somewhat herein excused yet can he not be cleared or justified but that living among a superstitious people he was somewhat polluted also by their manners Mercer Genevens annot in the great Bible and so Iosephs brethren did take it that he charged them with an oath QUEST X. Whether Ioseph did forsweare himselfe Vers. 16. BY the life of Pharaoh yee are but spies It might seeme that Ioseph here did forsweare himselfe because they were indeed no spies 1. It doth not satisfie to say he did not forsweare because there is no mention made directly of God for though we ought onely to sweare by the name of God yet he that sweareth faâ—sly by any
as God is to have the chiefe glorie being the author of this counsell and the onely revealer of secrets so your Highnesse is to be honoured as the instrument whose cogitation the Lord directed as a light to search out the mysterie of darknesse and as a cunning Pilot to guide the ship beside the rocks and sands Now is fulfilled that saying of the Wise-man A King that sitteth in the throne of judgement chaseth away all evill with his eyes It was David not the sons of Zerviah Ioab and Abishai his Counsellors that found out by consulting with God the treacherie of the men of Keilah intended against him And Pharaoh himselfe had the instinct by dreame to foresee the calamitie of Egypt by the future famine And the King of Nineveh gave the advice how to prevent the destruction of the Citie by repentance Like as Ambrose doth celebrate the memorie of the Emperour Valentinian who sitting in his Consistorie assisted with his Nobles when they all gave counsell to restore unto the Romans their Idoll Temples Solus velut Daniel excitato in se Dei spiritu Gentilibus obviabat He onely as another Daniel the spirit of God moving him resisted the Gentiles request The Seraphims in Isaiah which Hierome was taught by an Hebrew Rabbine to understand of the Kings and state of Iudea had six wings with two they covered their face with two their feet and with two they did flie so while the face of the men of State was as it were blinded and the feet and inferiour parts had their counsell darkned thanks bee to God that your Majesties wings of judgement were not pinioned but did flie aloft with the Eagle to espie what was working below And so as he well saith Necesse erat ut qui potentior cunctis fuerat prudentior fieret universis It was fit that hee which was beyond all in power should exceed the rest in prudence But now may it please your Majestie to the glorie of God and for eternall memorie to bee transmitted to posteritie to give mee leave in few words to describe this worke of darknesse and to bring it to the light whereby this Cockatrice brood consulting with infernall spirits in the earth thought at once to have undermined and subverted both the Civill and Ecclesiasticall State of this land Wicked Abimelech slew upon one stone seventie of Gedeons sonnes yet Iotham escaped but here none within danger could have beene delivered Adonibezeks crueltie is noted that cut off the thumbs of hand and feet of seventie Kings but in this mischievous plot both the heads and hands of many honourable persons should have beene miserably rent from their bodies Cruell Saul in one day commanded fourescore and five Priests to bee murthered yet Abiathar the sonne of the high Priest was delivered but in this bloudie exploit all our Reverend Fathers were appointed to the slaughter Ambitious Athaliah destroyed all the Kings seed yet Ioash the Kings sonne was preserved but here no not the heire of the Crowne should have beene spared Savage Caligula was not more barbarous who wished that all the Senatours of Rome had but one necke that hee might smite it off at a blow Nor yet Hannibal who when he saw a pit filled with humane bloud cried out O formosum spectaculum O goodly sight Or Valesus Proconsul of Asia under Augustus Caesar who having put to death three hundred men walked and vaunted himselfe among the dead bodies saying O rem regiam O Kingly act Sylâ—a was not so bloudie who commanded seven thousand Citizens to be killed whose crie was heard to the Senate house where Sylla with the Senatours was assembled for hee did forbeare the Senate house nor that King of Persia which commanded the people of Syria to have their â—oses cut off or irefull Cambyâ—es who in his expedition against the Aethiopians caused every tenth man to be tithed out for food his armie being almost famished But here scarce one man of ten that feared God and loved the truth should have beene left alive yea the very infants could not have beene exempted from this generall massacre but as Hierom speaketh of the crueltie of the Hunnes Cogerentur mori qui nondum vivere coeperant nescientes malum suum inter hostium manus â—ela riderent They should have beene forced to die that yet begun not to live and not knowing their doome should have smiled under the bloudie hand of the enemie Blessed be God therefore who hath in his great mercie and love to his Church disappointed their wicked imaginations in this snare which they laid for others is their owne foot taken and they are sunke into the pit that they made for others the stone which they would have rolled upon us is fallen upon their owne head And as Ambrose writeth of the Bees Apes quae non obtempera verint legibus regis immoriuntur aculei sui vulneri That they which disobey the order of their King amongst them die upon their owne stings So that engine wherewith the Romanists thought to have gored others hath wounded themselves As they with Abimelech sought to have fired the tower of Sichem so their owne parts have justly felt the fire and as with Sathan that used the winds to overwhelme the house upon Iobs sonnes they attempted with a sulphureous spirit to have blowne up that honourable house so now most worthily their owne members are exposed to the winde and aire and their wicked acts leave a sulphureous smell behind them This I write not God is my record as rejoycing in their confusion but grieving rather at the cause thereof pitying their persons but hating their actions ut probem me as he saith non homines odisse sed erroâ—es To shew that I hate not the men but their manners They with Dathan and Abiram are gone downe into the pit whose mouth they opened to swallow others as they laboured in the earth to worke iniquitie so their names are written in the earth to blot out their memorie they which wickedly imagined to deprive others of buriall with Iehoiakim are themselves buried as an asse is buried and cast forth without the gates of Ierusalem Now nothing remaineth most Christian King but that we give due thanks unto our gracious God who hath wrought this glorious deliverance In which action of thanksgiving the Church of God hath used to performe three duties To give solemne praise unto God to send presents one to another in signe of joy and to give gifts to the poore In the first your Majestie hath given us example who in the same place where the danger was devised and deliverance received publiquely with godly Iehoshaphat blessed God and this honourable Parliament concurring with your Christian Majestie hath well seconded your princely example in decreeing an annuall commemoration to bee kept of that day no lesse worthie to bee remembred than the Iewes feast of
Such things as went before as The occasion which was their grievous oppression in Egypt chap. 1. The preparation of the instruments of their deliverance of Moses chap. 2 3 4. and Aaron chap. 4. with their message to Pharaoh chap. 5 6. The meanes procuring their deliverance those ten severall plagues which were sent upon Egypt described from chap. 7. to chap. 12. 2. Their deliverance it selfe consisting of their Departure out of Egypt with the manner thereof and institution of the Passeover chap. 12. and their going forward in their journey c. 13. Their passing thorow the red sea with the destruction of the Egyptians chap. 14. Their thanksgiving chap. 15. â— In the constitution of the Church is set forth 1. The provision of things necessarie for them as 1. Their foode chap. 16. and water for their thirst chap. 17. 2. Defence from their enemies as the Amalekites chap. 17. 3. A politike order set for government c. 18. 2. The prescription and promulgation of lawes Morall chap. 20. with the preparation thereunto chap. 19. Judiciall belonging to the policie of the Common-wealth chap. 21. to 24. Ceremoniall touching The sacred things of the Tabernacle chap. 25.27.30 The Tabernacle it selfe c. 26.27 The Ministers of the holy things the Priests and Levites Their institution with their holie garments chap. 28. Consecration ch 29. The workmen and instruments chap. 30. 3. The execution and practice of their people partly in Their disobedience to the Morall law in their apostasie and idolatrie chap. 32. with their reconciliation chap. 33.34 Their obedience concerning the ceremonials Of the people in bringing stuffe to make the Tabernacle and other holy things chap. 35.36 Of the workmen in making all things according to the patterne chap. 36. to 39. Moses in approving the worke chap. 39. and disposing it chap. 40. 3. Certaine generall questions out of the whole booke explaned QUEST I. Concerning the inscription of the booke THis booke is called in Hebrew of the first words velle shemoth that is and these are the names of the Greekes it is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Exodus of the miraculous going of the Israelites out of Egypt Simler The inscription of the bookes of Scripture is of three sorts for it is taken either from the persons that wrote them as the bookes of Esay Ierem. c. or whereof they be written either in generall as the bookes of Ioshuah and of the Judges or in part as the bookes of Samuel or else from the things entreated of as the booke of Leviticus Numbers c. or of the first words of the booke as Genesis is called of the Hebrewes beresheth in the beginning Leviticus veâ—â—kra and he called c. which are the first words of the text and so also is this booke named as is said before Iun. and the reason of it may be this because where the writer of any booke of Scripture left it without name they of elder time for reverence and religion sake did forbeare to give it any title Simler QVEST. II. Of the computation of yeeres comprehended in the storie of Exodus COncerning the continuance of time and number of yeeres which are comprehended in this booke they are found to be 142. as may bee thus gathered From the death of Ioseph to the birth of Moses are yeeres 60. from the birth of Moses unto the departure of Israel out of Egypt are yeeres 80. chap. 7.7 from the departure of Israel thence unto the Tabernacle erected was one yeere chap. 40.17 Iun. These two latter numbers are certainly gathered out of the Scripture only the first may be doubted of which is thus also warranted all the time of the peregrination of Abraham and his seed in Egypt and Canaan maketh 430. yeeres Exod. 22.40 this time beginneth when Abraham was called out of his countrie and 30. yeeres was run at the birth of Isaack who at 60. begat Iacob Gen. 25.26 who at an 130. went downe into Egypt unto Ioseph Gen. 47.9 who being then 39. yeeres old and dying at an 110. Gen. 50.26 lived after that yeeres 71. then put hereunto 80. yeeres of Moses age all maketh joyning the summes of 30.60.130.71.80 together yeeres 371 there remaineth then the summe of 59. yeeres or 60. to make up the whole summe of 430. yeeres QUEST III. Whether Moses were the writer of this booke NOw that Moses was the pen-man and writer of this booke the spirit of God being the author and inspirer thereof it is diversly evident 1. for Moses testifieth of himselfe that he wrote all the words of the Lord Exod. 24.4 which are contained in this booke 2. The Scripture so divideth the bookes of the old Testament that they were written either by Moses or some other of the Prophets Luk. 16.31 3. Our Saviour alleaging a certaine place out of this booke doth call it the booke of Moses Mark 12. 26. Have you not read in the booke of Moses so also Luk. 20.37 And that the dead shall rise againe even Moses shewed it beside the bush when he said c. QUEST IV. Whether Moses Iudiciall lawes do now necessarily bind the Civill Magistrate BUt whereas in this booke divers both morall ceremoniall and Judiciall lawes are prescribed whereof the two first there is no question but that the one doth bind us still and the other is abrogated only concerning the Judicials of Moses it is controverted whether Christian Magistrates are bound to observe them which Judicials being of three sorts either such which are annexed to the Morall law as the punishment of adulterie and murther and disobedience to parents with death and such like or such as were appendant to the Ceremoniall law as the punishment of those that touched any dead thing or that came neere a woman in her monethly course and such like or such as belonged to the peculiar policie and state of that Common-wealth as concerning the yeere of Jubile the raising up of seed to the brother departed in marying his wife and such like of the two latter there is no doubt made but that the one is abrogated together with the ceremonies whereon they attended the other as proper to that government are now determined only the third kinde of Judicials remaineth about the which great question is made how farre Christian governours are obliged to the same For the discussing of which question 1. I neither am of their opinion which thinke that the Judiciall law is left to the libertie of the Christian Magistrate to adde to it and take from it and to alter it as shall â—e thought fit for the time and manner of the countrey for this were 1. to be wiser than God to leave altogether those directions and rules of justice which he hath set downe and the Apostle saith the foolishnesse of God is wiser than men 1. Cor. 1.25 that which seemeth to be meanest of the Divine orders is farre beyond the wisest humane inventions 2. And there is but one Law-giver that
delivered to the Egyptians the grounds of these artes who yet is more likely to have beene the inventor of husbandrie and other such profitable trades than of the mysticall arts and sciences 4. Therefore the more probable opinion is that by whomsoever the first seeds of this mysticall profession were sowne among the Egyptians it is not to be doubted but that by Iacobs comming downe but especially Iosephs long time of government their knowledge was much increased the scripture bearing witnesse hereunto Psalm 105.21 He made him Lord over his house to teach his Senators wisdome and by the cohabiting of the Hebrewes 215. yeeres in Egypt the Egyptians might profit more in the profession of wisdome which that superstitious people might with their gentilismes and superstitions intermingled change and alter And for the truth hereof that the Egyptians learned many things of the Hebrewes this may serve as an evidence that in Herodotus Diodorus Siculus and other waiting of the ancient Egyptians many things are found having some conformity with the doctrine law and usages of the Hebrewes ex Pererio QUEST XVI Why it pleased God that Moses should be instructed in the Egyptian learning NOw it pleased God that Moses should be thus trained up in the wisdome of the Egyptians and have a courtly bringing up that by this meanes he might bee instructed in the government of the Common-wealth and be prepared for that publike function which he should afterward be called unto So David was taken from the flocke and brought up in Saules court to learne the discipline of the Kingdome Though it pleased God to use the ordinary meanes for Moses instruction yet he alwayes doth not so and especially in the new Testament the Apostles were extraordinarily inspired being in humane learning altogether unexpert for there was more abundance of spirit and grace in the new Testament under Christ than in the old under the Law Simler 2. Beside Moses by this meanes became famous and got himselfe great authoritie among the Egyptians that there might be greater respect had unto his message afterward and being fully instructed in the knowledge of the Egyptians he was the better able to discerne the errors and superstitions both to convince the Egyptians and to containe the Israelites in the obedience and profession of the truth ex Perer. QUEST XVII Why Moses had this name given him Vers. 10. SHe called his name Moses 1. Concerning the imposition of the name of Moses neither is the opinion of Philo and Clemens Alexandrinus probable that it is an Egyptian name derived of Mos which signifieth water and Iosephus will have it compounded of Mos water and Ises saved for the etymon of the name is not from the water but because he was drawne and taken out as the reason is here expressed 2. Neither yet is it like that Moses was in the Egyptian language called Mueves as Iun. out of Diodâ—r Siculus or Movion as Pererius out of Aben Ezra being of the same signification which Moses is in Hebrew that is drawne out for then it is like the Egyptian name would have beene expressed as Iosephs is Gen. 41.45 and Daniels Chalde name Dan. 4.5 3. Nor yet is it probable that Pharaohs daughter having learned the Hebrew tongue of her maids did give an Hebrew name unto Moses as Eugubinus Lippom. Thostatus for seeing the Hebrewes were an abomination to the Egyptianâ— it may be thought also that they abhorred their names 4. Therefore I rather incline to thinke with Simlerus and Osiander that this word whereof Moses is derived is Massah to draw out as it is taken Psal. 18.17 Thou hast drawne me out of the waters might be common both to the Hebrewes and to the Egyptians as some words are common to divers languages both alike in sound and signification or it might be translated or transposed out of the Egyptian tongue into the Hebrew 5. But as for other names that Moses should be called by as at his circumcision Ioachim which signifieth established and afterward Melchi my King as Clemens Alexandrinus writeth wee reject them as having no ground in Scripture seeing hee is perpetually called by the name of Moses which name was by Gods providence imposed wherein is set forth the principall part of his calling to draw the Israelites out of the waters and troubles of Egypt and to lead them through the red sea and so indeed historically to draw them out of the waters QUEST XVIII Of Moses visiting his brethren Vers. 11. ANd in those daies when Moses was growne hee went forth to his brethren 1. Very little mention is made of Moses time spent in the court till he was fortie yeere old for then as S. Stephâ—n sheweth Act. 7. he began to visit his brethren like as little is expressed of the doings of Christ while he lived privately till he was thirtie yeere old Pellican 2. Iosephus writeth how in this time he warred against the Ethiopians and while he besieged Saba the King of Ethiopia his daughter fell in love with him and was married to him whom the author of historia scholast saith was Zipporah But the Scripture sheweth that she was the daughter of the Prince of Midian Perer. 3. He was now growne not onely in stature of body but in the grace and gifts of the spirit Pellican And as it seemeth having neglected and forgotten his brethren hitherto being now especially stirred up called of God he goeth to visit his brethren he did it not onely of a naturall instinct as Hilary seemeth to write 4. And this the Apostle sheweth to have beene an excellent worke of faith For 1. he refuseth to be called Pharaohs daughters sonne He renounceth his courtly life and he pleasures of Egypt 3. He preferreth the afflictions of Gods people before the pleasures of Egypt 4. He looketh unto the reward Heb. 11. Ferus But if it be asked why Ioseph did not so likewise to leave the court as Moses did I answere first that some thinke that Ioseph did in his old age leave Pharaohs court and went and dwelt with his brethren in the land of Goshen beside the case betweene Ioseph and Moses is farre divers for in Iosephs time Pharaoh was a friend to Israel now an enemy then the people were in happy case now the state is miserable Iosephs calling was to be a feeder of Israel in Egypt Moses to bring them out of Egypt Simler QUEST XIX Whether it were lawfull for Moses to kill the Egyptian Vers. 12. WHen he saw no man hee slew the Egyptian Concerning the fact of Moses in killing the Egyptian we are farre off from accusing or blaming the same which was at the first the opinion of Augustine who thus writeth against Faustus Consulta aeterna lege reperio non debuisse hominem à Mose qui nullam ordinariam potestatem habebat quamvis improbium ocâ—idi I finde in the eternall law that Moses having no ordinary power ought not to have killed no not a wicked man
in law that he might be more willing to let them goe Simler QUEST XVII Of Moses wife and children and of his provision for his journey Vers. 20. THen Moses tooke his wife and his sonnes and put them on an asse 1. Here mention is made of Moses children in the plurall whereas onely Gershom is spoken of before chap. 2. Pellican But Eleazar also was now borne which is the child that Zipporah afterward circumcised the story therefore of the birth of both his children must bee supplied out of the 18. chapter 2. Moses substance was not great nor yet his companie that one asse could suffice to carry his wife and children it seemeth that his abilitie was not such as to provide Camels thus the Lord would use weake instruments Moses commeth not with power honour and riches to deliver Israel but in the name of God as the Prophet Zacharie prophesieth of Christ Behold thy King commeth c. poore and riding upon an asse 3. Moses taketh his wife with him as the Apostles carried about their wives 1. Cor. 9.5 because men are to forsake father and mother to cleave to their wives Sâ—mlerus and Moses would have them also joyned to the people of God Ferus 4. Yet at this time Moses wife and children went not forward into Egypt but by reason of that which fell out by the way about Moses childe his wife being thereby offended Moses sent them backe unto his father in law who bringeth them unto him Exod. 18. Iunius QUEST XVIII Why Moses staffe is called the rod of God Vers. 20. MOses tooke the rod of God in his hand 1. It is called the rod of God not as the Hebrewes imagine because it was foure square the foure letters of the name of God Iehovah being written upon it or because it grew in Iethros orchard and none could pull it up but Moses or because it was sent from heaven but it was so called because the Lord commanded Moses to take it in his hand Pererius and for that thereby the Lord would have Moses to worke miracles Iunius yet not by any vertue in the rod but by the power of God Pellican 2. It was also called Aarons rod because he was the minister but God was the author and worker of the miracles Simler This rod also was a signe of the divine authority of Moses like as Magistrates have their ensignes of office carried before them Pellic. 3. Thus it pleased God who could have wrought by wonders without any visible signes that Moses should use the rod for the more visible demonstration of the power of God yet the Lord useth such meanes which have no power of themselves or likelihood to effect that which is wrought as Naaman was bid to wash himselfe in Jordan our Saviour used spittle and clay to anoint the eyes of the blind David goeth with a staffe against Goliah And this the Lord doth that the worke should not be ascribed to the meanes Simler 4. And hereby also the high spirit and pride of Pharaoh might bee abated and confounded when hee saw so great workes to bee wrought by the contemptible staffe of a shepheard Simlerus QUEST XIX How God is said to harden Pharaohs heart Vers. 21. I Will harden his heart 1. Some thinke that God is said to harden the heart when he deferreth his punishments and so men abusing Gods patience and long suffering are hardened but seeing the hardning of mans heart is one of the greatest punishments that can fall upon man whereas Gods long suffering proceedeth from his mercie and is a great benefit these two cannot agree together that the same thing should be both a punishment and a benefit Simlerus 2. Neither doth it satisfie that God hardeneth by permission and sufferance for if God permitteth either unwillingly then should he not be omnipotent or willingly so should he be accessarie to sinne if permission therefore be opposed to Gods will as though hee should suffer only things to be done and bee as an idle beholder and no doer this distinction cannot be admitted If permitting be taken for not approving or not assisting with his grace so the Lord may be said to permit but then he rather permitteth or suffereth the heart to be hardened than hardeneth it Simlerus 3 Wherefore thus the Lord may bee said to harden the heart 1. By the deniall or withholding his grace as he tooke his good spirit from Saul and the Lord is not debtor to any hee may give his grace to whom it pleaseth him and withhold it at his pleasure 2. God may leave a man to himselfe and give him over unto Satan who worketh upon the corruption of mans owne heart and hardeneth it so an evill and a lying spirit was sent upon Ahabs Prophets 3. The generall power of moving and working is of God but the evilnesse of the action is of mans owne corruption as when the Rider doth cause a lame horse to goe hee is the cause of his going but the horses evill and uneven going proceedeth of his owne lamenesse Simler And like as a good workman using a bad instrument so the Lord worketh by the wicked Borrh. 4. The occasions whereby the heart is hardened through mans corruption doe proceed oft from God as the miracles which Moses wrought whereby Pharaoh became more indurate and obstinate 5. God is to be considered here as a just Judge who punisheth mens former sinnes by their hardnesse of heart as here Pharaoh is judged so the hardning of the heart is of God as it is poena a penalty not as it is culpa faulty Ferus 6. Likewise God is said to harden the heart dispositivè because he disposeth of it and turneth it to such end as shall bee most to his glorie as the Lord ordered the envie of Iosephs brethren in selling their brother and the treachery of Iudas in betraying his Master to the good of his Church and his owne glorie Simler So some things are done in the world simply and absolutely according to the will of God and by it all such good actions Some things are not done absolutely according to Gods will but in respect of a further end for the which the Lord permitteth them to be done as Gods will was that Pharaohs heart should be hardened that God might declare his power in him Exod. â— 16 Borrh. 7. Thus God hardeneth not onely by permitting but in withdrawing his grace and ordering and disposing even mens evill actions to the end which the Lord hath propounded to himselfe and in using the meanes which the corruption of mans heart apprehendeth and perverteth to his destruction so God is the cause of the action of hardning but man is the cause of the sinne Iunius So God hardeneth Satan hardeneth and man hardeneth his owne heart man as the instrument Satan as the worker and efficient God as the supreme Judge overruling every action and disposing of it unto good Borrh. As in a ship man is as the mariner
that worketh the evill spirit as the winde and weather that tempteth and moveth God as the sternes man that directeth and guideth all So Augustines resolution is Deus voluntatem ejus proprio suo vitio malum in hoc peccatum judicio suo justo occulto inclinavit God by his just and secret judgement inclined his will being evill by his owne corruption into this sinne De liber arbit cap. 20. Hee there speaketh of Shemei whom David saith God bid curse him the like may bee said of Pharaoh who is properly said to have hardened his owne heart Exod. 8.15 as the next and immediate worker of it but God hardened it concurring as a just Judge in punishing Pharaohs sinne by obstinacie and hardnesse of heart See more of this question before chap. 1. doct 1. QUEST XX. How Israel is called the first borne sonne of God Vers. 22. ISrael is my sonne even my first borne 1. Israel is called the Lords first borne not only in respect of eternall election as Pellican for the election of God doth not hinder terrene government they might be eternally elected of God and yet bee Pharaohs servants still 2. Neither is this spoken only comparatively because they were the first nation that publikely professed the worship of God and had the prioritie of the Gentiles who were as the younger brother Ferus 3. Nor yet is it spoken only by way of similâ—tude that they were as deere unto God as the first borne Piscator 4. But they were the first borne people by a peculiar election whereby the Lord had set them apart from all other people to whom he would give his lawes and therefore Pharaoh was not to keepe them in servitude belonging to another Lord Simler Therefore to them did belong the right and preeminence of the first borne as dignity authority Borrh. And they were beloved of God in the right of the Messiah the first borne of all creatures and the only begotten sonne of God Iun. who was to bee borne of that nation according to the flesh Osiander 5. Therefore God will slay the first borne of Egypt both of man and beast because of the injurie offered to his first borne and this being the last judgement which was shewed upon Egypt it is like that God revealed to Moses aforehand all those severall plagues which afterward were sent upon Pharaoh QUEST XXI Who smot Moses in the Iune and how Vers. 24. THe Lord met him and would have killed him 1. In the Hebrew it is said Iehovah met him the Latin and Septuagint read the Angell of Iehovah giving the sense rather than the word for Iehovah by his Angell smote Moses the Angels of God are found in Scripture to bee the Ministers of Gods judgements Pellican Iun. 2. Tertullian thinketh that Moses sonne that was uncircumcised was in danger rather than Moses himselfe but that is not like for then Moses himselfe rather if he had beene in case would have circumcised the child rather than his wife 3. For the manner of punishment inflicted upon Moses that is a ridiculous fable of R. Salomon that the Angell appeared in likenesse of a Dragon and swallowed up Moses past the middle to the place of his circumcision and then when Zipporah in haste had circumcised the child hee let him goe againe Theodoret thinketh that the Angell appeared with a drawne sword threatning Moses but Moses was more than threatned for hee was so weake that hee was not able to circumcise his child therefore the common opinion of the Hebrewes is that Moses was smitten with some sudden disease as may appeare in that his wife was faine to cut off her sonnes foreskinne and yet it is like that whether the Angell appeared in a visible humane shape or otherwise came upon Moses thar by some visible and evident signe hee and his wife perceived that it was for neglect of circumcision Iun. QUEST XXII For what sinne the Lord would have killed Moses NOw concerning the cause why the Lord laid his heavy hand upon Moses 1. It was neither because he carried his wife and children with him which were a cumber unto him and therefore hee sent them bake as Augustine and Eusebius Emisenus for seeing Moses had no speciall commandement to leave them behind he was therein to follow the common order and duty required in matrimony to take care of his wife and children Simler And he could not have left his wife behinde without offence to his father in law who might have thought hee had neglected her and would take him another wife in Egypt 2. Neither was his feare the cause because he was afraid to goe unto Pharaoh as Theodoret for he was now in his journey and was resolved to goe forward 3. Therefore the cause indeed was for the neglect of the circumcision of the child as David Kimhi Rupertus Thostatus with others Ex Pereriâ— as it may appeare because that as soone as the child was circumcised Moses was presently delivered from the danger therefore some Hebrewes conjecture that God punished him for making so long stay in the â—ane is frivilous and without ground Simler QUEST XXIII Whether the Israelites transgressed in omitting circumcision 40. yeeres in the wildernesse BUt it will be further questioned why the Lord was angry with Moses for deferring of circumcision and yeâ— he did tolerate it in the Israelites which were not circumcised in the desert by the space of forty yeeres as is evident Iosh. 5. Some therefore thinke that the Israelites were dispensed with for being not circumcised in the wildernesse because it was not so needfull in that place seeing the people were separated from all other nations and lived apart by themselves and therefore circumcision was not so necessarie there the speciall end whereof was to distinguish the Israelites from all other people but when they came over Jordane among other nations then they received circumcision the badge or cognisance of their profession so Theodoret Damascen Contra. But this was not the principall end of circumcision to make difference betweene the Israelites and other people the chiefe scope thereof was to bee a seale of the covenant betweene God and his people and therefore ought not in any place to have beene neglected 2. Some therefore excuse this omission of circumcision in the desert by the continuall journeying of the Israelites they were still to follow the direction of the cloud whether by day or night but they could not travell immediatly upon their circumcision Perer. Who further addeth that if it had beene a fault in them Moses would not have suffered such a great breach of the law seeing the man that gathered stickes upon the Sabbath was punished Contra. 1. The continuall travell of the Israelites could not bee the chiefe or onely cause of such omission seeing they stayed many yeeres in one place as in Kadesh barnea Deut. 1.46 and when they were circumcised in Gilgal they were presently also to goe forward in expedition
and Antypathies their qualities and operations he can apply and temper the causes together and so is able to worke wonders though not true miracles which are beside the order and course of nature which Satan cannot invert As to put this for an example the small fish which is called Echinus or Remora is able by applying himselfe to the ship to stay it though it bee under saile and have both the sea and winde with it which Plinie sheweth to have beene found by experience how that Antonius his ship at one time and Caius at another were stayed by this fish Now if a Magitian should secretly apply this fish to a ship hee might bee thought to worke a great wonder and yet it should bee naturall The other reason is that beside the knowledge of nature Satan is skilfull of all humane arts and sciences by the benefit whereof even men doe worke wonders as Archimedes was able to stirre a ship with his hand by certaine engines which he had prepared which a great number of men by strength could not doe He also devised such kinde of instruments when Marcellus the Romane Captaine besieged Syracusa whereby they so annoyed their enimies and made such havock and slaughter of the Romanes that Marcellus himselfe said they fought not against men but against the Gods Architas the Pythagorean by Mechanick art made a dove of wood to flie Severinus Boetius made serpentes of brasse to hisse and birdâ— of brasse to sing If men can make such admirable things by art it need not seeme strange if by the power of Satan wonderfull matters are sometime compassed Ex Perer. QUEST XII What things are permitted unto Satan to doe THe next point to be shewed here is what things which seeme to us to be miraculous the Devill may doe by himselfe or his ministers the Magitians First in generall wee are here to consider a twofold action of spirits the one is immediate as they can themselves passe speedily from place to place as Iob. 1. Satan came from compassing the whole earth for if the Sunne being of a bodily substance can compasse the heavens of such a huge circuit many hundred thousand miles about in the space of 24. houres the spirits can doe it with greater agility they have also power to transport bodies from place to place aâ— our Saviour yeelded his body to be transported of Satan to the tempters further confusion The other action is mediate as Satan can transport and bring together the causes of things which being tempered and qualified may bring forth divers naturall effects which are wrought immediatly by those naturall causeâ— yet mediately by Satan which bringeth them together Secondly in particular these things are permitted to Satans power he can transport bodies and carry them from place to place as thâ— Ecclesiasticall stories make mention how Simon Magus was lift up on high in the aire by the 〈◊〉 of Satan but by the prayer of Peter was violently throwne downe so sometime serpents and 〈◊〉 have beene seene flie in the aire Albertus Magnus saith that oxen have rained and fallen out of the aire all which may be wrought by the conveyance of Satan 2. The Devill can suddenly convey things out of ones sight as Apollonius from the presence of Domitian Thus it may be that Gyges if that report be true not by the vertue of a ring but by the power of Satan became invisible 3. They can make images to speake and walke as before wee heard of Apollonius brasen butlers and the image of Memnon so the image of Iuno Moneta being asked if she would remove to Rome answered se velle that she would and the image of fortune being set up said ritè me consecrastis yee have consecrated mee aright Valer. Maxim lib. 1. cap. ultim de simulachris But the Devill cannot give power unto these things being dead to performe any action of life but that hee moveth and speaketh in them as the Angell caused Balaams Asse to speake 4. The Devill can cause divers shapes and formes to appeare as of men Lions and other things in the aire or on the ground as in the life of Antonie the Devill appeared unto him in the shape of terrible beasts 5. And as he can counterfeit the shape of living things so also of other things both naturall as of gold silver meat and artificiall as of pots glasses cuppes for if cunning artificers by their skill can make things so lively as that they can hardly bee discerned from that which they resemble as Plinie writeth of Zeuxis grapes lib. 35. cap. 11. much more can Satan coyne such formes and figures as Philostratus lib. 4. of the life of Appolonius maketh mention how a certaine Lamia pretending marriage to one Menippus a young man shewed him a banquet furnished with all kinde of meat and precious vessels and ornaments which Appolonius discovered to be but imaginarie things and shee confessed her selfe to bee a Lamia 6. The Devill by his subtile nature can so affect the sensitive spirits and imaginary faculty as that they shall represent unto the inward sense the phantasie of some things past or to come and cause them to appeare to the outward sense as wee see that franticke persons imagine many times that they see things which are not and there is no doubt but that the Devill can effect that which a naturall disease worketh 7. Hee can also conforme the fantasies of those that are asleep to represent unto them things which the Devill knoweth shall come to passe and by this meanes to bring credit unto dreames 8. In some things the Devill can interpose himselfe and helpe forward those superstitious meanes which are used to prognosticate as the Augurs by the flying and chirping of birds by looking into the intrals of beasts by casting of lots tooke upon them to divine and the Devill by his mysticall operation concurred with them more strongly to deceive 9. The Devill can stirre up in naturall men the affections of love anger hatred feare and such like as he entred into the heart of Iudas Iohn 13.1 and this he doth two wayes either by propounding such externall objects as helpe to inflame and set on fire such affections and by conforming the inward phantasie to apprehend them Hierome in the life of Hilerius sheweth how a certaine virgin by Magicall enchâ—ntments was so ravished with the love of a young man that shee was mad therewith QUEST XIII How divers wayes Satans power is limited THese things before recited Satan by his spirituall power is able to doe yet with this limitation that his power is restrained of God that he cannot doe what he would but sometime the Lord letteth him loose and permitteth him to worke either for the triall and probation of his faithfull servants as is evident in Iob or for the punishment of the wicked as hee was a lying spirit in the mouthes of Ahabs false Prophets for if Satan had free libertie to
miracle is in that out of the which a thing is made or brought forth as to make a thing of nothing to give fight unto a man that is borne blind and such like and this is the next degree of miracles 3. Or the miracle is seene in the manner as a Physitian may heale a man but not of a sudden or without mâ—dicine so the spirits may bring forth Serpents or other vermine out of wood but not immediatly Now the wonders wrought by Magicians are not properly of any of these sorts of miracles but they are either cousening and counterfeit trickes or procured by naturall meanes Ex Pererio QUEST XX. Of the difference betweene true miracles and false FOr the second true miracles differ from false these five wayes 1. In respect of the power whereby they are wrought for true miracles are wrought by the power of God in whose name the Prophets and Apostles and other servants of God did shew forth signes but Magicians doe bring forth their wonders either by the force of naturall things or by the helpe of Satan 2. They differ in the qualitie of their persons that are the agents and ministers for they which worke in Gods name are holy and vertuous men and if any of them doe sometime effect any miraculous thing they doe it for the confirming of the faith or to some other good end but Magicians and Sorcerers are most wicked and impure men 3. The third difference is in the worke it selfe for the signes and wonders of Magicians are either counterfeit or unprofitable but true miracles are done in truth and upon great necessity and utility 4. They differ in the manner of working for true miracles are done by lawfull holy and godly meanes as by fasting prayer invocation of the name of God but Magicians worke by inchantment by words and signes and other superstitious rites 5. The end also is divers for Sorcerers worke wonders either for their profit and honour to make the people seeke unto them as Simon Magus did in Samaria Acts 8. or to confirme the people in errour and superstition but the end of true miracles is to seeke the glory of God the edifying of his Church and the propagation of the faith Ex Perer. 6. Hereunto may be added the sentence and judgement of Augustine Aliter miracula faciunt magi aliter boni Christiani aliter mali Christiani Magi per privatos quosdam contractus boni Christiani per publicam justitiam mali Christiani per signa publicae justitiae c. Magicians doe worke miracles one way good Christians another and evill Christians another Magicians by private contracts with the spirits good Christians by publike justice that is by the power and authority of God evill Christians by the signes of publike justice As divers that followed not Christ nor yet beleeved in him yet in the name of Christ wrought miracles as evill and disordered and discarded souldiers may use the ensignes and banner of the Captaine to terrifie their enemies QUEST XXI Whether the sorcerers brought forth true serpents IT followeth now to shew whether these serpents which the Magicians made were true serpents or only counterfeited for the time 1. Some thinke that it was a true and reall conversion of the Magicians rods into serpents and that it was done by the power of God and that Satan did craftily challenge unto himselfe Gods worke Simler but the text is against this conjecture they are said to doe the like by their enchantments vers 11. but the power of God giveth no place to enchantments 2. Others thinke that they were true serpents so converted by the power of Satan so August lib. 3. de Trinitat cap. 7. and in other places and Theodoret quaest 18. in Exod. Thom. Aquin. Lyranus Thostatus Burgens Cajetane of the same opinion seemeth Philo to be lib. de vita Moses their reasons are these 1. Because the Magicians are said to doe in like manner with their rods and in the same phrase their rods are said to be turned into serpents as Aarons rod is 2. And againe afterward the Sorcerers could not bring out lice as they had serpents and frogs before their impotencie was not in not shewing shapes or shewes but in not being able to bring forth the things themselves sic Cajetan and Moses serpents devoured their serpents they were therefore true serpents if they had beene otherwise it is like Moses would have discovered their counterfeit dealing sic Perer. Contra. 1. They did the like in outward shew and appearance and the same phrase is used of both because to the sight and view they were so changed and the Scripture useth to speake of things as they appeare not as they are as he that appeared unto the witch at Endor is called Samuel yet being the Devill in his likenesse and habit 1. Sam. 28. and Daniel saith the man Gabriel chap. 9. because hee appeared in the shape of a man 2. The Sorcerers were restrained in their counterfeit dealing that they should not be able any more to deceive by their phantasticall and imaginary shapes 3. Rupertus doth gather the contrary that the devouring of the Sorcerers serpents by Aarons serpent sheweth that they were but counterfeit devorari ergo devorare non poâ—nerunt because they could not devoure but were devoured 4. And in this sufficiently Moses discovereth their sleights in that his serpent devoureth theirs Now further against this opinion this speciall argument may be urged that God only hath power to change and convert one substance into another especially a dead thing into a living body a peece of wood into a serpent as it was decreed in the Avansicane Councell in this manner Quisquis credit aliquid posse fieri aut aliam creaturam in melius aut deterius mutari aut transformari in aliam speciem vel similitudinem nisi ab ipso creatore qui omnia fecit proculdubio infidelis est pagano deterior Whosoever beleeveth that any thing can be made or any creature to be changed into the better or worse or transformed into any shape or likenesse but by the creator which hath made all things is undoubtedly an infidell and worse than a Pagan To this argument divers answers are framed 1. Cajetane saith that the Devill might use some naturall meanes secretly by the which serpents might be made out of those rods and all the time while the Sorcerers were called together Satan made a way for that worke and prepared the matter Contra. There is no naturall meanes to make a rod a serpent immediatly and especially to bring forth serpents at once of perfect bignesse neither was there any such preparation of matter for they were rods in the Sorcerers hands not changed into any other preparative matter fit to engender serpents 2. Cajetane answereth againe that although the rod of it selfe was no fit matter for such a worke yet by the excellencie of the agent and worker which were the spirits it might bring
could punish them by so small a creature they might thinke that if God armed the greater creatures against them they should not endure it Simler QUEST XIV Why the Lord by the stretching out of Aarons rod brought forth lice Vers. 17. AAron stretched out his hand with his rod. It was not Aarons rod or hand that of it selfe could doe any such thing God needed not any of these meanes but thus it pleased him that this plague should bee wrought 1. To shew his great power that is able to doe great things by weake and small meanes 2. And that not only he hath power in himselfe to doe whatsoever it pleaseth him but that hee can give power unto his creatures to execute his vengeance so the Lord is able by himselfe and by others to bring forth his judgements 3. This hee did also to shew how much hee setteth by his elect to whom hee giveth such great power and to countenance the ministry and calling of these his servants Ferus QUEST XV. Why the Sorcerers could not bring forth lice Vers. 17. NOw the Enchanters assayed likewise with their enchantments to bring forth lice c. 1. The Sorcerers could not bring forth lice not as the Hebrewes imagine as Lyranus and Thostatus report of them because they cannot bring forth any creature lesse than a barly corne for if they could produce to the sight greater creatures they might more easily have compassed the lesse whose generation is not so perfect but commeth out of corruption Indeed in artificiall workes it is harder to worke upon a small substance and therefore Pliniâ— commendeth the curious devices of certaine workemen for their smalnesse as Cicero telleth of the Iliades of Homer written so small that they might bee put into a small nutshell Callicrates made antes of Ivory so little that the partes thereof could not be perceived Mirâ—ecides made a ship that a Bee might cover it with her wings But in naturall workes the reason is contrary the lesse workes are more easily perfected for the force of nature worketh from within but the artifices applieth his instruments without and cannot therefore worke upon every small substance 2. Rupertus hath this conceit that the Sorcerers did indeed bring forth lice as they did frogs before but because they did not sting and bite as the true lice which Aaron caused their fraude was discovered but this is contrarie to the text which saith they endevoured or wrought to bring forth lice but could not 3. Cajetanus thinketh that the Sorcerers did erre in their worke and did not applie their enchantments aright and so failed But it proceeded not from any vertue of their enchantments that they did counterfeit the three signes before but of the will and power of Satan who is not tied to these enchantments which are but a signe and ceremonie of their covenant and league with the devill therefore though they had failed in some circumstance the devill would not have forsaken them seeing they wrought under him and for him if it had been in their power 4. Augustine maketh this the reason why the Magicians were confounded in this third plague but it was the fourth signe counting the turning of the rods into serpents for the first to signifie that the heathen Philosophers some of them had knowledge of the Father and Sonne but erred concerning the holy Ghost But beside that some of the philosophers did see as in a cloud the mysterie of the Trinitie as both Cyrillus Eusebius Theodoret witnesse Plato in his writings maketh mention of God the Father the Word and the Minde this is rather a mysticall than historicall reason And if to seeke the cause thereof we neede flie unto mysteries it rather signifieth thus much that many of the philosophers did know divers things concerning God and his creatures but they were ignorant altogether of the Trinitie Perer. 5. The sorcerers then were hindred by the power of God who suffered them hitherto to deceive by their Satanicall illusions but now by a superiour commaunding power he controlleth the power of darkenes Simler Pererius Pellican Cajetan Ferus And Satan is hindred in his working two waâ—es either altogether that he cannot do what he would as in this place or when he is permitted to doe any thing yet the Lord so disposeth as that he cannot atchieve that end which he intendeth as appeareth in the temptation of Iob Borrh. And the Lord confoundeth them in this small and base creature for their greater confusion when their mysticall working by the operation of Satan is there restrained where they thought most easily to have prevailed Ferus QUEST XVI What the sorcerers understand by the finger of God Vers. 19. THis is the finger of God 1. Some by finger understand the plague it selfe as the Chalde Paraphrast as though in effect the sorcerers should confesse thus much that this plague was of God and they could not resist it so Iob saith the hand of God hath touched me cap 19.21 2. Augustine by the finger of God understandeth the spirit of God whereras Saint Luke saith that Christ cast out devils by the finger of God cap. 11. Saint Matthew saith by the spirit of God and fitly is the spirit compared to the fingers that as the fingers proceed from the hand and arme the arme from the bodie so the spirit proceedeth from the Father and the Sonne and as there are ten fingers upon both the hands so there are divers gifts of the spirit and here are tenne plagues answering to the number of the fingers So also Ierom saith that the arme and strength of God is the Sonne and the Spirit is the fingers and with this finger did the Lord write the tenne Commandements in the Tables of stone But this collection seemeth to be somewhat curious neither is it like that the Sorcerers had any such knowledge of the mysterie of the Trinitie 3. Therefore Rupertus thinketh that the sorcerers did onely meane by this phrase the power of God but that unwittingly also by a divine instinct they doe give an evident testimony of the holy spirit the third person of the Trinitie as Caiphas did ignorantly prophesie of Christ. But it seemeth that these sorcerers being professed servants of Satan and possessed with his spirit were not fit vessels to receive any such divine instinct 4. Pererius thinketh that by the finger of God they understand a great invincible power as the Scripture saith the Cedars of God a man of God for the tall cedars and for an excellent man But in this sense they could not denie but that the other works were also excellent more admirable than this 5. Liranus will have them by the finger of God to understand the power of some superiour devill that staied the working of the inferiors But this is an insolent speech by the name of God to understand the devill and by this meanes Satan should strive against Satan and the kingdome of
darkenes should be divided which argument our Saviour useth in the Gospell to shew that he did not cast out devils by the power of Satan 6. Wherefore the best interpretation is that by the finger of God they understood the power of God as the heavens in the Psalme are said to be the worke of his fingers sic Thostatus Lippoman So also is the hand of God taken 1 Sam. 6.9 And hereby is insinuated the great power of God if these horrible plagues were but the worke of his fingers that is an effect of his smallest power what are the workes of his arme and handes when hee sheweth his mightie power for so that which one doth easily or with small labour he is said to doe with his finger as the phrase is used of the Pharises in the Gospell that they laid heavy burdens upon others and would not themselves stirre them with their finger And indeede these plagues of Egypt if they be compared with Gods great workes as the universall floud brought upon all the world the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrha they will appeare to be but workes of Gods fingers in comparison of his whole hand Simler Perer. QUEST XVII Whether the sorcerers had any feeling of Gods power BUt now it will further be inquired whether these sorcerers thus spake as having any knowledge of God or feeling of his power 1. Some thinke that they used this pretence of words to satisfie Pharaoh that was angrie with them because they could not doe now as before and to excuse their want of power Cajetane But it seemeth rather seeing the Sorcerers were indeede hindred and controlled that they spake as they thought 2. Lyranus thinketh that they had no thought at all of God but that they understood the power of some superiour devill And his reason is that if they had in truth confessed and acknowledged the power of God they would not afterward have resisted Moses as it appeareth they did for they were smitten with botches and biles in the sixt plague cap. 9. Contra. But this is a weake argument for though they had at this present some sense of Gods power yet they might afterward returne to their former obstinacie as Pharaoh himselfe would one while seeme to relent and eftsoone be hardned againe and Nebuchadnezzar who upon the interpretation of his dreame by Daniel acknowledged the true God Dan. 2. yet presently after setteth up Idolatrie Perer. 3. Some as is shewed in the former question did thinke that the Magicians had some knowledge and speciall revelation not only of the power of God but of his spirit and so consequently of the Trinitie but such a particular knowledge cannot be ascribed unto them 4. Therefore I thinke rather that for a time they seeing their power hindred did indeede and as they thought acknowledge Gods power that Pharaoh might thereby be left inexcusable Iun. but this knowledge was soone againe obscured by the malice and obstinacie of their heart QUEST XVIII By what power Sorcerers do worke NOw whereas they confesse that Moses wrought by the finger of God they therein evidently bewray that they themselves did not worke by God This therefore shall briefly be made plaine and maniâ—est that Magicians and Sorcerers doe not worke wonders by any divine humane or naturall or Angelicall power I meane the good Angels but Satanicall and Diabolicall 1. These spirits whom they confederate with do require of them divine worship and that affectation of divine honour which they began in heaven and obtained it not being cast downe from thence they seeke to compasse in earth but good Angels refuse to be adored and worshipped as the Angell that appeared to Iohn Revel 22. 2. Sorcerers are men of an impure and wicked life and they use their enchantments to wicked purposes as to theft adulterie murther but good Angels do neither favour wicked men neither will bee assistant in any wicked worke 3. Magicians use to threaten the spirits to enjoyne them certaine impossible things if they come not when they are called but men can exercise no power neither can have any command over the good Angels 4. if it bee objected that Magicians doe often cast out devils but Satan doth not cast out Satan as our Saviour saith for then his kingdome should be divided and could not long stand To this it is answered that our Saviour speaketh of such casting out of devils as is done with power when Satan is violently dispossessed not of such when hee giveth way of himselfe by some compact and contract with the Conjurer And as Augustine saith our Saviour meaneth the perfect ejection of Satan when hee is cast both out of the bodie ad soule But when any seemeth to be cast out by a Satanicall power he goeth out of the bodie that he may more strongly possesse the soule which is indeede no casting out 5. That Sorcerers doe worke by the power of Satan themselves are the best witnesses for Porphyrius who was a great Magician as Eusebius noteth him doth confesse that the devils themselves whom he calleth gods doe signifie unto men quibus rebus dij cogantur qua illis offerendâ— sunt c. with what things the devils are forced and what is to be offered unto them what daies they should chuse what signes and images thâ—y should make and such like And Eusebius further setteth downe to the same purpose an epistle written by Porphyrius to Aâ—ebonus the Egyptian wherein he propoundeth nine inexplicable doubts as he calleth them about Magicall practices 1. How Magicians doe invocate the spirits as their superiours when they command them as their inferiours 2. Why the spirits of Magicians bid men to be just when as they being called upon and sent doe many wicked things 3. They will not heare the Conjâ—rer unlesse hee abstaine from venerie and yet they being sent doe inflame to venerie and unlawfull lust 4. They prescribe their disciples when they are about invocation to abstaine from eating of flesh and yet themselves delight in the smell and bloud of sacrifices 5. They will not have him that hath touched any dead thing to use any Magicall practice and yet many magicall enchantments are practised with dead things both beasts and men 6. They doe terrifie the spirits in their invocations with threats as if they answere not they will reveale the mysteries of Isis and deliver Osiris members to Typhan but how can spirits be feared with threats 7. They use ridiculous invocations as thus they call upon their spirits Thou which camest forth of the slâ—â—e of the earth which hast thy seate in the lake which canst change thy shape every houre which kind of prayers spirits should seeme not to regard 8. They use barbarous and strange words as though the spirits understood only the Scythian or some other barbarous tongue 9. Seeing spirits are insensible and incorporeall how then can they be allured with sensible and corporall things These are Porphyries doubts by the
which it is evident that Sorcerers work by the devill and that from him they have their directions And Augustine also confirmeth the same Neque potuit nisi primis ipsis docentibus disci quâ—d quisque illorum appetat quid exhorreat Neither could it be learned but by their teaching what everie one of them desireth and what they abhorre QUEST XIX Why spirits prescribe constellations to be observed and delight in corporall and externall usages BUt yet concerning some of those doubts a solution may be found out As why the devils will not come being called but under certaine constellations the reason thereof may be to make men beleeve that there is some divine vertue in the starres and so they should be brought to adore and worship them or because they many times worke by naturall causes it may be they are helped by such observations and sometime they concurre in their worke with the planets as Lunatickes are most vexed in the increase of the moone that men might lay the imputation upon the starres as though they were evill Againe why spirits being of no bodily substance yet are allured with hearbes and stones and perfumes and such like Augustine giveth the reason hereof because these things are offered unto them as signes of the divine honour which is given unto them and therefore they delight in them Ex Perer. QUEST XX. Whether it be ordinary for lice to breede out of the slime of Nilus BUt concerning this third plague of lice it will be objected that it is an ordinary thing in Egypt after the inundation of Nilus that divers small creatures as lice frogs and such like do breed in great abundance out of the slime of the earth which Nilus leaveth behind as Herodotus Diodorus Siculus and Solinus do write how then was this such a miraculous worke The answere is this that there is great difference betweene this swarming of lice and that annuall breed of vermine in Egypt 1. They come of the slime of the earth these out of the dust 2. They by the overflowing of Nilus these at the stretching forth of Aarons rod 3. Those swarmes are of divers sorts of small vermine these were lice 4. They are not bred in the signes of Aquarius or Pisces as these were but after the sunne is entred into Virgo for under the signe Leo Nilus increaseth and in the signe Virgo it abateth and returneth Sic Iun. The sunne entreth into Leo about the middest of Iune and into Virgo about the middle of Iuly and into the signe Aquarius in Ianuarie and into Pisces in Februarie which was about a moneth before the Israelites went out of Egypt as is before shewed quaest 29. in cap. 7. QUEST XXI Why Moses is bid to meete Pharoah by the water Vers. 20 STand before Pharaoh he will come forth to the water 1. Because Moses had no accesse unto Pharaohs presence in his palace he is bid to watch him at his comming forth and so he that refused to heare Moses privatly is forced to heare to his shame abroad Ferus 2. Pharaoh used in the morning to come forth to the water either for his health as in the morning it is wholesome to go forth unto rivers or rather of a superstitious minde because they attributed divine honour unto Nilus Simler QUEST XXII Why there is no mention made in this miracle of Moses rod. IN this fourth wonder no mention is made of Moses rod as in the former nor of any other thing used as ashes in the sixth plague God sometime useth such meanes to shew that all things are directed by his will and by these props to raise us up to consider of an higher power than can be in such weake instruments to effect such great things Sometime he worketh without any such meanes to teach vs that he needeth not any such instruments The like difference of working is observed in the miracles of our Saviour Christ in the Gospell who sometime used externall and visible signes as when he tempered clay to heale the blind man sometime he used no such but only healed by his Word Simler QUEST XXIII What manner of swarmes were sent in the fourth plague Vers. 21. I will send mingled swarmes 1. Not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the Septuagint the dogge flie which Philo would have so called because this kind of flie doth boldly light upon men and beasts as the dog is noted to be among other beasts most hardie and bold and cannot be chased away till he hath fetched bloud some call it a dog flie because it lighteth most upon dogs about the eares and nose and draweth bloud but the word ghereb signifying a mingled companie sheweth that there was more than of one sort 2. Hierom therefore would have it read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 all kind of flies as Aquilas also readeth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the Latine muscam omnis generis flies of all sorts But it seemeth they were not only flies for the earth was not only corrupted by them vers 24. but the Egyptians also themselves devoured and consumed Psalm 78 45. 3. Neither yet is it like that there were no flies at all in these swarmes as Cajetane thinketh because the Scripture maketh not any mention of any hurt they did to any man but only annoyed their grounds and houses but flies are most noysome unto men but herein Cajetane is deceived for it is said in the Psalme before alleaged that they devoured them that is the Egyptians 4. Some thinke they were all kind of wild beasts as Lions Beares Tigres and such like unto which opinion Iosephus seemeth to incline and Aben Ezra and Pagnin But because it is said that their houses should bee full of these swarmes it is not like they were those huge wild beasts and if they had been assaulted in their houses with ravenous beasts none of them should have escaped And beside it seemeth that the ground was covered with this kind of vermine but so many wild beasts as should cover the earth would have soone devoured all the inhabitans 5. Therefore it is more like that these swarmes were a mixture of divers kinds of noisome creatures both flying as hornets waspes and creeping as vipers scorpions and such like Siâ— Vatab. Rabbi Salomon Pellican QUEST XXIV Of the name of Baalzebub the god of flies IT may seeme probable that upon this and the like plague of flies and other vermine the Egyptians and the Philistims following them as out of whose countrey they came did erect the abominable Idoll of Baalzebub which signifieth the god of flies he was the God of Acearon one of the chiefest cities of the Philistims first some thinke the Idoll was so called of the abundance of flies which were engendred of the bloud of the beasts which were sacrificed Vatab. Or because the Idoll being sprinkled with much bloud did sticke full of flies Perer. 2. But rather it had the name because they supposed this Idoll
hurt to their father but it so fell out The wicked are said to hate their owne soules and to procure unto themselves eternall death whereas simply they hate not their soules neither would be damned but upon their committing of sinne it so falleth out that their soules perish by their meanes as if they hated them unruly patients that will not obey their Physitians whereupon followeth death are said â—o seeke their owne death and yet they desire to live but upon their unruly and disordered behaviour death followeth So God is said to harden Pharaohs heart by the like figurative speech because the hardning of their heart ensueth upon the abuse of those things which God intendeth not to that end but they pervert them to their owne hurt Ex Perer. All this may safely bee received and acknowledged and yet somewhat more is to be added as shall afterward appeare QUEST XXIII How diversly in Scripture these termes of blinding and hardning are taken BUt by the way this word to blind to harden though it signifie an action proceeding from him that hardneth yet is it not alwayes so taken therefore we shall find that foure wayes in Scripture a thing is said to blinde and consequently to harden 1. Giftes are said to blind the â—â—es Deut. 16. Not that they being a dead thing can corrupt the judgement but mans corrupt heart taketh occasion and is thereby enticed to pervert justice 2. The Devill is said to blinde the mindes of the wicked â— Cor. 4.4 3. The malice of a mans owne heart is said to blinde and harden as Pharaoh hardned his owne heart 4. God is said to blind the eyes Esay 6.10 and to harden Pharaohs heart gifts doe blinde occasionaliter by way of occasion the malice of mans heart blindeth meritâ—â—â—â— by way of desert and meritoriously because it deserveth to be further blinded and hardned the Devill blindeth incitando by inciting and provoking unto sinne And God as is before shewed by withdrawing his grace and inflicting the punishment of induration upon them QUEST XXIV How divers wayes the Lord forsaketh those which are hardned FUrther God is said to harden mans hart in his diverse leaving and forsaking of them 1. Hee suffereth them to follow their owne lusts and desires not giving them power or grace to restraine them as Rom. 1 24. he gave them up to their hearts lusts 2. He giveth them ease abundance prosperity whereby they are intangled therefore the Prophet prayeth Give me not riches lest I be full and forget thee Prov. 3. 3. He denieth them the benefit of wholsome corrections and afflictions whereby they should learne to know themselves as the Apostle saith the Lord receiveth no child whom hee doth not chastise 4 God forbiddeth his servants to pray for such and so they want the benefit of their prayers as Ieremie is forbidden to pray for the people chap. 7.16 5. God in his justice depriveth them of such as should travell for their soules and bring them unto God as the Apostles left the obstinate and wilfull Jewes and shooke off the dust of their feet against them Acts 13. 6. God taketh away from them the preaching and knowledge of his word as the Lord threatneth by his Prophet Amos to send upon them a famine not of bread or water but of hearing his word Amos 8.11 7. God suffereth them to be deceived by flatterers and unfaithfull counsellers as â—eboboâ—â— was by his young men 8. And the more strongly to delude them the Lord permitteth sometimes false Prophets to shew signes and wonders 〈◊〉 the Apostle saith of the false Prophet Antichrist whose comming is by the working of Satan with all power and signes and lying wonders 2. Thes. 2.9 9. The Lord permitteth Satan to invade them and to worke upon them at his pleasure as the evill spirit was sent of the Lord upon Saul and a lying spirit was in the mouth of Baals false Prophets to deceive Achab. 10. God taketh away from them all helpes whereby they should be defended against the assaults of Satan as the Lord threatneth to doe to his unfruitfull vineyard I will take away the hedge thereof and it shall be â—aten up I will breake downe the wall thereof and it shall be troden downe Isai. 5.4 11. But the Lord doth not thus forsake any till they have first forsaken God as Chrysostome saith Quod autem Deus non derelinquat nos nisi fuerit à nobis derelictus apertè ostendit Isaias That God forsaketh not us till wee have forsaken him I say sheweth chap. 59.2 Your iniquities have separated betweene you and your God Ex Perer. QUEST XXV God hardneth otherwise than by foreseeing BEside these divers interpretations of the hardning of Pharaohs heart by the Lord which I have abridged out of Pererius there are three other which I will briefly set downe first some thinke that this in that God is said to harden Pharaohs heart is to be understood of Gods prescience that he is said to harden it because he foresaw it should be hardned by their owne malice This seemeth sometime to be the opinion of Augustine in that God is said to harden Pharaohs heart Non ad operationem Dei sed ad prascientiam pertinere monstratur it is shewed to appertaine not to Gods operation or working but to his prescience But this cannot bâ— the meaning for by this reason whereas God foreseeth all the sinnes of men which are committed in the world God might be said himselfe to kill steale doe wrong because he foreseeth that such things shall be done in the world QUEST XXVI Whether God may be said to doe those things which he disposeth of to a good end SEcondly God may be said to harden Pharaohs heart because he disposeth thereof and directeth it to such an end as he himselfe propounded because thereby the Lord did take occasion to worke his miracles as he saith to Moses I have hardned Pharaohs heart that I might worke these my miracles Exod. 10.1 So as God ordained the end he may be said also in some sort to doe those things which helpe unto that end as Act. 2.23 Christ is said to bee delivered by the determinate councell of God yet was hee betrayed and delivered by Iudas whose act is said in some respect to be the Lords because God disposed of it to effect and accomplish his glorious councell in redeeming the world by the death of his Sonne But neither can this be safely affirmed that the Lord should bee said to doe those things which hee ordereth and disposeth for God so disposed of that spirituall combate which S. Paul found in his flesh that it tended further to Gods glory and the manifestation of his power as the Lord saith My grace is sufficienâ— for thee my power is made perfect through weakenesse yet God was not the worker of that temptation but the Apostle imputeth it to Satan 2. Cor. 12.7 And like as in the creation God made light but made not
of us to be worshipped Ergo the Father Sonne and holy Ghost are that one God Simler So our Saviour saith Yee beleeve in God beleeve also in mee Ioh. 14.1 Christ the Sonne of God is God because he is to be beleeved upon And againe This is life eternall that they know thee to be the only very God and whom thou hast sent Iesus Christ Ioh. 17.3 God the Father then and Christ his Sonne are the only very God And that the Sonne of God is to be worshipped with the Father the Prophet David sheweth Psal. 2. 11 12. Serve Iehovah in feare c. Kisse the Sonne lest he be angry In the former verse whom hee calleth Sonne here he nameth Jehovah So wee reade in the words of the Prophet Agur Prov 30.4 Who hath established all the ends of the world what is his name and what is his Sonnes name if thou canst tell Further that the Spirit of God is also one God with the Father and Sonne to be worshipped and glorified beside plentifull evidence out of the new Testament which shall not need to be inserted here because we are in hand with the law of the old Testament sufficient testimony may be taken from the law and Prophets as Gen. 1.1 The Spirit of God moved upon the waters But God only created the world So likewise the renovation of the heart is onely the worke of God because it is a new creation as David saith Create in me a new heart Psal. 50.10 but this is also the worke of the Spirit Take not thine holy Spirit from me ibid. vers 11. Likewise it is only Gods worke to teach us his will and to bring us to life eternall but this is wrought by the Spirit Psal. 143.10 Teach mee to doe thy will for thou art my God leâ— thy good Spirit lead me unto the land of righteousnesse Ambrose very fitly proveth the Spirit to be God by that place Iudg. 14.5 where it is said That the Spirit of the Lord came upon Sampson But Iud. 16.20 after his lockes were polled it is also said Hee knew not that the Lord was departed from him Hee which came upon him before was the same that departed from him now there called the Spirit of the Lord and here the Lord and Jehovah therefore the holy Spirit is Lord and Jehovah Ambros. lib. 2. de Spirit cap. 2. Damâ—scen doth thus excellently prove the Trinity by this demonstration Vnus Deus non sine Verbâ— est God being but one is never without the Word but this Word hee hath in himselfe begotten of his owne substance not like unto our word which hath no substance but vanisheth in the aire because the condition of our nature is temporall But like as our word proceeding from the mind neque per totum menti idem est c. is neither the same with the mind nor yet altogether divers from it So is the Sonne unto the Father which is his Word the same in substance but divers in subsistence Oportet autem Verbum Spiritum habere nam verbum nostrum nequaquam spiritus est expers But the Word also must have a Spirit for neither is our word without a spirit but here is the difference our spirit is not of the same substance with us but the drawing in of the aire for wee are of a compound nature but the Spirit of the Word is of the same substance with the Word To this effect Damascen lib. 1. de fide orthodox cap. 6.7 And in the same place he useth another demonstration Impossible est Deum destitutum esse nativae foecunditatis c. It is impossible that God should bee destitute of naturall fecundity The Lord therefore must needs beget Sed ex propriâ— substantia generat but he begetteth out of his owne substance and that from all eternity for if the Sonne had not beene from the beginning coexistent with him of whom hee was begotten we shall bring in a change of his substance Nam cùm non esset Pater postea factus est Pater for so when he was yet no Father he afterward should become a Father c. Damascen ibid. Thus out of the first Commandement both the unity of the Godhead and the Trinity is concluded as Bernard thus elegantly inferreth Quid sibi vult iste ut ita loquar â—ine numero numerus si tria quomodo non numerus si unum ubi numerus What meaneth this number without a number if there be three how can there be but a number if one where is the number But here I have what I may number and what I may not number there is one substance and three persons c. Bernard lib. de consideraâ— Thus by the unity of nature the errour of the Gentiles is abolished and by the joyning of the Word and the Spirit to the Father the Jewish opinion is overthrowne Et ex utraque secta nobis accedit utilitas ex Iâ—daica opinione naturae unitas ex Gentilitia sola personarum discretio So by either sect wee receive some profit by the Iewes opinion the unity of nature by the Gentiles the discerning and difference of the persons only Damasc. ibid. Transgressors then of this Commandement concerning the unity of the Deity and Trinity of the persons are 1. They which affirme and hold one God but deny the three persons as the Montanists and Marcellians in times past and the Turkes and Jewes now 2. They which hold not the distinction of three persons only but the division also of substance as the Tritheists The Arrians and Eunomians are of the same sect qui filium Deum confitentur sed conditum asseverant which confesse the Sonne to bee God but yet affirme him to be made So they bring in another God contrary to this precept Thou shalt have no other Gods c. Theodoret. 3. They which brought in a quaternian of persons as Anastasius the Emperour and the Apollinarians 4. They also which affirme the three persons to be but three names given unto God in Scripture and therefore they say that the Father became man and suffered for us which are therefore called Patripassians 3. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. That justifying faith is not contained or commanded in the law 1. BUt although to beleeve in the Trinity be commanded in the first precept to adore and worship the Father Sonne and holy Ghost as the only God yet it followeth not that justifying faith which properly belongeth to the Gospell whereby we apprehend Christ and his merits should be contained and included in the law therefore we mislike that assertion of Bellarmine concurring therein with other Romanists That the Gospell differeth from the law as a perfect thing from an imperfect and that the Gospell is contained and included in the law as the tree in the seed Bellarm. de justif lib. 4. cap. 4. Some Protestants also come somewhat neere this opinion as Marbachius saith that they offend against this precept Qui Christi
cognitione carent quae cognitio non alia re quà m fide in Christum constet Which want the knowledge of Christ which knowledge consisteth in nothing else than in faith in Christ. Marbach Commentar in hunc locum Against this opinion that faith in Christ is not commanded in the Morall law the reasons follow afterward but first the question must further be explaned 1. First then we are to distinguish of faith which is of foure kindes or sorts 1. There is fides initialis or fundamentalis the faith of beginnings or the fundamentall faith whereof the Apostle speaketh Hebr. 11.6 That he which commeth unto God must beleeve that God is c. And this kinde of faith toward God the Apostle referreth to the doctrine of beginnings Heb. 6. 1. This faith apprehendeth onely the being and essence of God to know him to be the only Lord. 2. There is another faith called fides miraculorum the faith of miracles touched by the Apostle 1. Cor 13.2 If I had all faith so that I could remove mountaines 3. There is fides historica an historicall faith which beleeveth all things to bee true that are written in the Scriptures in which sense S Iames saith The Devils beleeve and tremble they beleeve there is a God and that all is true which the Scripture speaketh of God of his justice power punishing of sinners rewarding of the righteous 4. There is beside these a justifying faith whereof S. Paul maketh mention In that I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Sonne of God who hath loved me and given himselfe for me Galath 2.20 This faith is the life of the soule whereby hee which beleeveth is able in particular to apply unto himselfe the merits of Christs death Now this is the difference betweene these foure kindes of faith the first apprehendeth the essence and being of God the second the faith of miracles his power the third which is the historicall faith his truth the fourth namely the justifying faith his mercie The three first to beleeve God to be to beleeve him to bee omnipotent to beleeve him to be just and true are included in the first precept Thou shalt have no other Gods c. but not the last wherein is the errour of the Romanists that make all these kindes of faith the same in substance differing only in property which if it were true then it were possible for them that have the one faith to have the other and so Devils also which in some sort doe beleeve should also be capable of justifying faith But this matter that all these kindes of faith are not the same in substance nor of like nature with the justifying faith is shewed elsewhere whither I referre the Reader 2. Further we are to distinguish of the law for it is taken sometime more largely either for all the Scriptures of the old Testament as Luk 16.17 It is more easie that heaven and earth should passe away than that one title of the law should fall So Ioh. 15.25 It is written in their law they have hated mee without a cause which testimony is found in the Psalmes Psal. 35.19 or else the law is taken for all the bookes of Moses and so the Law and Prophets are named together Matth. 7.12 This is the Law and the Prophets But the law is sometime taken more strictly for the Morall law whereof the Apostle speaketh Rom. 7. I knew not sinne but by the law and so S. Paul opposeth the law of workes to the law of faith Rom. 3.27 Now as the law is taken generally either for all the old Scriptures written by the Prophets or for the writings of Moses it cannot be denied but that faith in Jesus Christ is in this sense both contained and commanded in the law for of Christ the Lord spake by the mouth of his Prophets Luk. 1.70 And Moses wrote of Christ as our Saviour saith Had yee beleeved Moses yee would have beleeved me for Moses wrote of mee Ioh. 5.45 But as the law is taken strictly for the Morall law the law of workes which containeth only the ten words or Commandements so we deny this justifying faith to bee commanded in the law 3. Indirectly or by way of consequent it will not bee denied but that this faith also is implied in the law because we are bound by the law to beleeve the Scriptures and the whole word of God for this is a part of Gods worship to beleeve his word to be true and so some define faith Est certa persuafio qua assentimur omni verbo Dei nobis tradita It is a certaine perswasion whereby wee give assent to all the word of God Vrsin And so by this precept wee are bound to receive all the promises and doctrines concerning Christ delivered in the old and new Testament But directly as a part and branch and so a worke of the law wee deny justifying faith to be in this precept or any other prescribed or commanded The reasons are these 1. The Morall law and the Gospell differ in the very nature and substance for the one is naturally imprinted in the heart of man the other is revealed and wrought by grace The first the Apostle testifieth where he saith The Gentiles which have not the law do by nature the things contained in the law Rom. 2.14 The other also is witnessed by the same Apostle Rom. 2.24 We are justified freely by his grace The argument then may be framed thus The morall law is graft in the heart of man by nature but faith in Christ is not by nature but by grace above nature for if it were naturall all men should have faith which the Apostle denieth 2. Thessal 3.2 Faith then in Christ belongeth not to the law Therefore it is strange that Bellarmine confessing in another place that pracepta decalogi sunt explicationes juris natura that the precepts of the decalogue are the explications of the law of nature Lib. 2. de Imaginib Sanctor cap. 7. could not inferre hereupon that the precepts of faith and of the Gospell are no explications of the law of nature and therefore have no dependance of the morall law Ambrose useth this very argument Nemo sub lâ—ge fidem constituat lex enim intra mensuram ultra mensuram gratia Let no man place faith in the law for the law is within the measure and compasse of nature but grace is beyond measure Ambros. in 12. Luc. 2. The effects of the law of works and the law of faith are divers for the one worketh feare the other love and peace as the Apostle saith Ye have not received the spirit of bondage to feare againe but yee have received the spirit of adoption whereby we crie Abba Father Rom. 8.17 Againe the Apostle saith The letter killeth the Spirit giveth life 2 Cor. 2.6 Thus then the argument standeth the same thing cannot bee the instrument of contrary things of life and death peace
Therefore the Lords day must be warranted by the word before it can be sanctified and set apart to holy uses 5. And seeing the Jewes Sabbath is warranted by the word it must also be changed by the word there must bee the same authority in the alteration of it which was in the first institution The Lords day then was not appointed by the ordinary authority of the Church for then the Church by the same authority might constitute another day if there were cause which cannot be admitted but as Vrsinus saith Apostolica Ecclesiae pro libertate sibi à Christo donata c. The Apostolike Church according to the liberty given them of Christ did make choice of the first day for the seventh The Church then by the extraordinary power of the Apostles directed specially thereunto by the Spirit of God did alter the day and Tostatus saith well Tota Ecclesia Spiritu sancto ducta hunc deem instituit The whole Church being led by the holy Ghost did institute this day quaest 11. 7. Conf. Of the preeminence of the Lords day beyond other festivals ANother errour of the Romanists is that they require sanctification and necessary keeping of all holy dayes as making a necessity of keeping all alike Rhemist annot Galath 4. sect 5. Contra. 1. The same difference that was betweene the legall Sabbath and other their festivals remaineth still betweene the Lords day observed among Christians and other holy dayes but the Sabbath day was more strictly observed than the greatest festivals besides for on their Sabbath it was not lawfull to kindle a fire Exod. 35.3 nor to dresse their meat Exod. 16.23 but on other festivals they were not forbidden to doe such works as were to bee done about their meat Exod. 12.16 they were onely restrained from doing servile works Levit. 23.7 but the works about their meat and drinke were not servile 2. The observation of the Lords day doth simply binde every Christian in conscience though there were no positive Law of the Church for it that wheresoever a Christian liveth in any part of the world it is his dutie in remembrance of the resurrection of our blessed Saviour to sanctifie the Lords day but other festivals of Saints a man is not bound in conscience simply to keepe but as hee is bound in generall to yeeld obedience to the superiour authoritie in lawfull things for onely Gods immediate Commandements doe simply bind in conscience in respect of the thing commanded as the Apostle saith There is one lawgiver that is able to save and destroy Iam. 4.12 and no more but he alone therefore by this reason the Lords day hath a preeminence before other festivals 3. Hereunto I will adde Tostatus reason Sabbatum vel una quaecunque esset dies in hebdomada observanda videbatur dependere à ratione naturali The Sabbath or what other day is to be kept in the weeke seemeth to depend upon naturall reason as is shewed before quest 5. Caetera observationes sunt magis ex voluntate legislatoris Other observations depend rather of the will of the lawmaker Tostat. qu. 13. So our Lords day succeeding the Jewish Sabbath is grounded in part even upon the law of nature but other festivities depend ab arbitrio Ecclesiae of the determination of the Church So then to conclude this point as Augustine saith Quomodo Maria virgo mater Domini inter omnes mulieres principatum tenet sic inter caeteros dies haec omnium dierum mater est As the Virgin Marie the mother of our Lord is the principall among women so among other dayes this day is as the mother of the rest Sermon de temper 36. 8. Controv. To commit any sinne upon the Lords day is a double transgression THe Romanists here have another erroneous assertion that the internall act of religion pertaineth not to the keeping of the Sabbath but the externall and so consequently they denie that any sinne committed upon the Sabbath is thereby the greater Bellar. de cult sanctor lib. 3. cap. 10. prop. 4. Contra. 1. But the contrarie is evident out of Scripture that it belongeth to the rest of the Sabbath to abstaine from the works of sinne ut vacantes à pravis actionibus c. that being vacant or ceasing from evill actions they might suffer God to worke in them by his Spirit therefore the Lord saith speaking of his Sabbath It is a signe betweene me and you in your generations that I the Lord doe sanctifie you Exod. 31.13 And to the same purpose Ezechiel chap. 20.12 I have given them also my Sabbath to be a signe betweene me and them that they might know that I am the Lord that doe sanctifie them These places are urged to this purpose by Pelargus Bastingius 2. So the Fathers expound that precept of doing no servile worke upon the Sabbath Ne nos voluptas corporis libido succendant That the pleasure and lust of the bodie should not inflame us upon this day qui enim facit peccatum est servus peccati for he that committeth sinne is the servant of sinne So Hierome in Esaiam cap. 59. Likewise Augustine thus writeth Spiritualiter observat sabbatum Christianus abstinens se ab opere servili c. A Christian man doth spiritually observe the Sabbath in abstaining from servile worke what is this from servile worke from sinne Tractat. 4. in Ioann So also Thomas Est triplex servitus una qua homo servit peccato c. There is a threefold service one when a man serveth sinne altera qua homo servit homini c. another when man serveth man and this service is according to the bodie not in the minde tertia est servetus Dei the third is the service of God If we understand servile worke this last way it is not forbidden upon the Sabbath day sed alia opera servilia primo vel secundo modo c. but other servile works the first or second way are contrary to the keeping of the Sabbath Sic Thomas 2.2 quaest 122. art 4. addit 3. 3. Hereunto I will adde Tostatus reason Hence it followeth that hee which committeth adulterie killeth or is drunken upon the Lords day magis peccat quà m si aliis diebus idem ageret sinneth more than if he should doe the same thing upon other dayes quia sic est transgressor duplicis praecepti because he so transgresseth two Commandements that precept Thou shalt not commit adulterie thou shalt not kill or any other and this of sanctifying the Sabbath Tostat. qu. 12. See more of this question elsewhere Synops. Centur. 2. err 70. 4. Morall observations 1. Observ. Against hypocrisie and vaine glorie Vers. 8. REmember the Sabbath day to sanctifie it c. Rupertus applieth this text against the doing of any thing for vaine glorie or to bee seene of men but wee should referre all to the praise of God In omnibus operibus tuis Deiretributionem attende c. In all thy works wait for
for all offer up himselfe in sacrifice for us and still continueth our Mediatour Borrh. 4. Now the inferiour Priests garments are fitly applied to set forth the qualities and conditions of the faithfull which are the members of Christ as the other did shadow forth Christ our head 1. Beda by the linen garment interpreteth decorem castitatis the comelinesse of chastitie by the girdle vigilantem mentis custodiam the diligent watchfulnesse of the minde to keepe the same by the bonnets visus anditus gustus custodiam the diligent keeping of the sight hearing taste and of all the senses 2. Thomas maketh a more generall use Castitas significatur per femoralia c. Chastitie is signified by the breeches Puritas vita per lineam tunicam Puritie of life by the linen garment Moderatio discretionis per cingulum Moderate discretion by the girdle Rectitudo intentionis pertiaram And a right intention by the bonnet 3. But this application is more fit The linen garment signifieth our innocencie and righteousnesse which we receive in the lavacre of regeneration being cloathed with Christs righteousnesse as the Apostle saith All yee that are baptized unto Christ have put on Christ the girdle signifieth constancie in the truth as S. Paul saith Stand therefore your loines girded about with veritie Tiara protectionis divinae signa erant The bonnets were signes of the divine protection the linen breeches shew what care should be had of comelinesse and what reverence is to be used in the service of God Pelarg. Marbach Who addeth this further that as we put more comelinesse upon our uncomely parts as the Apostle saith 1 Cor. 2.23 So our Saviour hath respect unto the vile and abject members of the Church such as are despised and counted base in the world 4. And like as we use three kinde of garments some for necessitie to cover our naked parts some for ornament and comelinesse and some for defence as militarie garments as here the Priests had their linen breeches of the first sort their linen coat of the second and their girdle of the third So unto a Christian are necessarie three kinde of spirituall garments the first is the garment of faith whereby our sins are covered secondly the ornaments of the soule are requisite whereby Christians must be adorned in the sanctitie and integritie of life thirdly they must put on their spirituall armour and take the sword of the Spirit the word of God whereby they may fight against Satan Simler Borrhaius 4. Places of Doctrine 1 Doct. None must intrude themselves into the callings of the Church Vers. 1. CAuse thou thy brother Aaron to come In that Aaron intruded not himselfe into the Priests office but was thereunto called Procopius giveth this note Qui temerario ansu ad se trahere sacerdotium c. He that will rashly draw unto himselfe the Priesthood shall suffer punishment So also Oleaster So the Apostle observeth upon this very example of Aaron No man taketh this honour to himselfe but he that is called of God as Aaron Heb. 5.4 2. Doct. The agreement which ought to be betweene the Civill and Ecclesiasticall state OLeaster noteth here further in that Moses who was the chiefe Magistrate called Aaron to the Priesthood the concord and amitie that ought to be betweene the Civill and Ecclesiasticall state is commended that as Ioash prospered while hee followed the direction of Iehoiadah so both the Ecclesiasticall state should imitate Iehoiadah to give holy counsell and direction unto the Magistrate and the Magistrate to be like Ioash in following the same 3. Doct. Profitable arts are the gift of God Vers. 3. SPeake unto all cunning men whom I have filled with the Spirit of wisdome c. Gallasius hereupon thus writeth Omnem artem industriam c. Dei donum agnosco Every art and industrie which bringeth utilitie unto man I acknowledge to be the gift of God as the Prophet Isaiah saith that God instructeth the husbandman to have discretion Isa. 28.26 Men therefore to whom God hath given the knowledge of profitable and commendable arts should have a care to employ them to Gods glorie and not to abuse them to wantonnesse 4. Doct. Whatsoever is instituted in Gods service must proceed from his wisdome Vers. 3. SPeake unto all cunning men in the Hebrew wise in heart Whatsoever is instituted in the service of God à sapientia Dei proficisci debet must proceed from the wisdome of God no humane device must have place or bee admitted there Simler Sauls policie in transgressing Gods Commandement in saving the best things of the Amalekites though hee thought hee did therein well and wisely yet was displeasing unto God 5. Doct. The sound of the Word in the Gospell exceedeth the sound of Aarons bels under the law Vers. 35. HIs sound shall be heard c. Herein as Lippoman well observeth appeareth the excellencie of the Gospell beyond the Law they heard then but the sound of Aarons bels Nunc audimus clarum sonitum Evangelii Now we heare the cleere sound of the Gospell c And as the understanding of a man exceedeth the capacitie of a childe and the cleere day the dawning so the cleere light of the Gospell excelleth the shadowes of the Law God providing better things for us as the Apostle saith that they without us should not be perfect Heb. 11.40 6. Doct. There ought to be order among the Ministers of the Church Vers. 40. THou shalt make for Aarons sons coats In that Aaron the high Priests coats were made more costly and glorious than his sons the inferiour Priests therein commendatur ordo inter Ecclesiae ministros is commended order among the Ministers of the Church that although Christ doe forbid bid his Disciples Luk. 22. to exercise dominion one over another as the Princes of the world doe Neutiquam tamen ordinem abrogat Yet he doth not abrogate order seeing he hath not onely distinguished them himselfe in gifts but in offices as the Apostle saith Ephes. 4. He hath given some to be Apostles some Prophets some Evangelists some Pastors and Doctors c. Marbach 5. Places of Controversie 1. Controv. Against the superstitious apparell of the Romish Priests Vers. 4. THou shalt make a breast-plate an Ephod and a robe and a broidered coat These Priestly garments being ceremoniall and typicall are now abolished Christ the true high Priest being come with his ornaments Therefore the Romanists doe plainly Iudaize in bringing againe into the Priestly order such varietie of garments as the Pall the Miter the Crozier staffe the Albe the Chimere the gray amice the Stoale with such like Their Priests come forth as though Aaron addressed himselfe with his attire to sacrifice at the Altar S. Paul hath given us a rule concerning these things which are but a shadow of things to come but the bodie is in Christ Coloss. 2.17 But it will bee here further asked if it bee not lawfull now for the
remaine 140. But Tostatus buildeth upon uncertaine suppositions for these might as well beget at fortie or fiftie yeeres as at 25. For it is directly expressed of Hezron that he had a child at 60. yeeres after hee had married his third wife 1 Chron. 2.21 And he had Caleb by his second wife Ephoach he had another wife Azubah before 1 Chron. 2.19 he may therefore bee supposed to have begotten Caleb at 60. yeeres or thereabout and Caleb likewise his sonne at the same yeeres or more wee may allow unto them both 120. yeeres that they at 60. had those children so that Hur should not be in this account above 95 yeere old And it is not necessarie to suppose him to bee so old seeing he is in the same degree from Ezrom of the tribe of Iudah that came downe with his father into Egypt which Moses was in from Kohath of Levi that likewise descended into Egypt with his father Gen. 46.11 for Ezron begat Caleb and Caleb Hur so Kohath begat Amram and Amram Moses Hur was in the third generation or degree from Ezron and so was Moses from Kohath and the Hebrewes hold that Amram begat Moses at 77. yeeres By this comparing of these two lines it is not necessarie to make Hur much elder than Moses Therefore whether he were the same Hur or not Tostatus reason inforceth not the contrarie but that in respect of his age this Hur might bee the same before mentioned QUEST IIII. Of the age of Bezaleel 2. FUrther Tostatus according to the same computation maketh Bezaleel to be elder than Moses 91. or 92. yeers old But it is not like that the Lord would have chosen so aged a man to worke with his hands in the worke of the Tabernacle for hee as well wrought himselfe as taught and gave direction to others as is here expressed vers 4. especially seeing the Levites were at fiftie yeeres discharged from the service of the Tabernacle Then supposing his grandfather Hur to have been now 90. yeere old or thereabout his grandchild Bezaleel might be thirtie or fortie yeeres old which was a fit age both for ripenes of understanding and for agilitie and strength in working Both these supputations then of Tostatus are but weakly grounded concerning the age of Hur and Bazaleel QUEST V. Of the difference betweene the gifts of wisdome understanding and knowledge Vers. 3. I Have filled with the Spirit of God in wisedome and understanding and in knowledge 1. Some by these three doe understand the same thing and thinke that nothing else is here expressed but the same thing in divers words that God had indued them with singular skill and dexteritie to make the workes of the Tabernacle Ex. Tostat. qu. 2. But it is not like that so many words are set downe without speciall use and signification the rehearsall of the same thing in divers words without some difference would have seemed superfluous 2. Augustines opinion is hoc significativâ— dictum esse that these things are spoken in another signification that these three the spirit of wisedome understanding and knowledge must be referred to those things which are hereby signified But the text it self sheweth that this wisedome understanding and knowledge are referred to the skill of working in all manner of workes for the Tabernacle as vers 4. to finde out curious workes to worke in gold in silver and in brasse c. 3. R Salomon thus distinguisheth them he taketh wisdome for that cunning which is infused of God understanding for that skill which a man findeth out of himselfe and knowledge for that which he learneth by the instruction and teaching of another But seeing the Spirit of God was their teacher it is not like that they learned of any other And they taught others chap. 35.34 they were not taught of others 4. Tostatus thus doth interpret them By wisedome hee understandeth the habit of skill infused of God by understanding their naturall subtiltie of wit by knowledge the cunning which they had learned by instruction and experience And of the habits infused some were totally and wholly given them some were augmented and increased only And all these three are wrought by Gods Spirit though not in the same degree and manner the wisedome which is the infused skill was only wrought by God the naturall aptnes of wit was given them by God but yet by natural meanes nothing at all by their own industrie the knowledge obtained by instruction was also the gift of God but by their owne labour and diligence Contra. But this may be misliked in Tostatus interpretation that hee thinketh they had the knowledge of Arts gotten by experience for whence should they have this experience in Egypt they were only occupied in servile workes in working in clay and making of bricke therefore it is not like that these were aforehand practised in any such curious Arts Simler 5. Oleaster therefore maketh this difference betweene these three by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 chocmah wisedome or cunning he understandeth the internall conceit and knowledge out of the which one proceedeth to worke prudently by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 tebunah discretion to applie and direct that inward apprehension and by daghath an experimentall knowledge to know saith he is sensu vel intellectu experiri to take triall by sense or understanding as Lot saith he had two daughters which knew no man that is had no expeâ—â—â—â—â—tall knowledge But what experience could these have of working in all manner of metall and wood and needle worke there being no such occasion of triall given them before 6. Thus then are these three gifts better distinguished That whereas these workmen are said to have done three things to finde out or invent curious works themselves vers 4. and to teach others chap. 35.34 and to worke also with their hands vers 5. to worke in all manner of workmanship these three gifts may be applied thus to these three faculties they had wisedome given them to conceive and apprehend how to worke themselves which is called the finding out or excogitating of worke their understanding served to shew and teach others therefore the other workmen are said only to be wise hearted vers 6. because they were taught and teached not and their knowledge guided their hand to be appliable to expresse that in their working which they conceived in their understanding These three may be reduced also to these two faculties 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the gift power or skill and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the practice Simler the skill was either in their owne apprehension or in the instruction of others their practice was in the agilitie of their hands and expedition of the worke QUEST VI. Whether all the kinds of workes are rehearsed here which were necessarie for the Tabernacle Vers. 5. ANd in the art to set stones c. 1. The Latine translater addeth to worke marmore in marble which is not in the Hebrew but only in working of stones But
tables neither more nor fewer THe two tables c. The reasons why there were two tables were these 1. Because if all the Commandements had beene written in one table of stone it would have beene too large and so too heavie and cumbersome for Moses to beare whereas being now divided in two they need not bee so great in thicknesse or bredth and so were more portable for Moses that he might carrie them without a miracle which some Hebrewes vnnecessarily conceive for they being tables of stone in forme and fashion made like unto writing tables but larger not thicke or grosse but plaine and of no great thicknesse but so much as might suffice for the depth of the letters might well bee taken up and borne in Moses hand 2. But the speciall reason of this division of the tables into two is to distinguish the Commandements which concerned our dutie toward God and the other towards our neighbour The first being written in one table and the other in the second Tostat. qu. 23. QUEST XLIII How the tables were written on both sides Vers. 15. THey were written on both sides 1. R. Salomon thinketh that each table was so written that the letters might appeare on both sides and so be read indifferently on each side But this opinion is improbable for two unlikely things are here presupposed one that the stone whereof the tables were made was transparent that what was on the one side written might be discerned on the other and beside whereas the letters appearing on the backside must be read backward these letters by another miraculous worke must on both sides appeare all one 2. Lyran. Tostatus and Lippoman thinke that the tables were written each on both sides as in the first table there might be the three first Commandements which Tostatus maketh but two graven on the one side and the fourth on the other so in the second foure on the one side and two on the other which he divideth into three or he thinketh that the same Commandements might be written on the inside and repeated againe on the outside So also Gallasius aversa adversa parte scriptas fuisse that they were written on the neare and ofward side both of them such writing the Greekes call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 written behinde and before But the words of the text will not beare this sense for thus the tables should have been written on their foure sides whereas it is said they were written mishene on the two sides 3. Therefore the meaning is no other but this that these tables were written on the two sides namely the two inward or foresides And so Oleaster noteth by the signification of the word gheber which he pronounceth without any asperation at all eber which signifieth properly not the side but the forepart because so the word ghabar or abar signifieth to goe over or passe on before So also Vatabluâ— translateth ab utraque faecie on both the foresides And thus the writing might better be preserved one table lapping over another like unto a booke Oleaster But this further may be gathered that these tables were written full within that no spare place was left which signified that the Law of God was perfect Et nullum locum nobis relictum aliquid addendi That no place was left for us to adde any thing to his Law Simler QUEST XLIV Why the tables are called the worke of God Vers. 16. ANd these tables were the worke of God and this writing was the writing of God 1. Some Hebrewes thinke because it is said before vers 15. that they were written and here againe mention is made of the writing that the first writing was of the Commandements only the second was the exposition of the Commandements But that there was no such exposition is shewed before quest 41. 2. But in that the tables are said both to be the worke of God and writing of God to signifie that God both prepared those tables and was the writer also he was both artifex tabularum scriptor the workman of the tables and the writer Cajetan The second tables were factâ— opere Mosis made by Moses workmanship and written onely by God Tostat. qu. 23. 3. And whereas they are said to be Gods worke we are not to thinke with some that these tables of stone were of purpose now created of God anew Vocatur factio Dei non creatio sed delatio The worke of God is not said to bee the creation but the fashioning and preparing of them Tostat. 4. And this was not done by the worke of Angels as Tostatus thinketh aut scalpello non calamo or was graven with a knife not written with a pen Cajetan For the Lord needed no such instruments but it was written with the finger of God chap. 31.8 that it as Ambrose expoundeth Spiritu suo dedit legem He gave his Law by his Spirit whereby it is written in the fleshie tables of our hearts See more chap. 31. vers 18. QUEST XLV How many precepts each table contained COncerning the order observed in the writing of the Commandements in the tables there are divers opinions 1. Some thinke that the negative precepts were written in one table and the affirmative in another But this cannot be admitted for these causes 1. There are but two affirmative precepts the fourth concerning the Sabbath and the fifth Honour thy father and mother so it would follow that two precepts should onely be in one table and eight in another and so the one table must needs be very large â—he other very little 2. Thus also the precepts which concerne our dutie toward God and the other belonging to our neighbour should bee mingled together 3. And the greatest inconvenience of all is that the order of the Commandements should be inverted and that they were not written in the same order wherein they were delivered Tostat. qu. 24. 2. Rab. Salâ—mon and so also Iosephus doe thinke that five Commandements were written in the first table and five in the second and to the foure first they joyne the fifth Honour thy father c. in the first table But by this meanes the precepts of divers kindes which command love toward God and our neighbour should be put together which are better distinguished into two tables 3. Tostatus with other doe distinguish the Commandements well in respect of the tables placing in the first those which containe our dutie toward God and in the second those which are to bee practised toward our neighbour but the Commandements he rightly divideth nor making of the two first but one and so counting but three in the first table and dividing the last into two which is but one But these two points are handled before at large that it were superflous to treat of them here againe the first quest â— 10. generall before the Commandements chap. 20. and the second quest 1. upon the 10. Commandement 4. Wherefore the Commandements are thus best
live Calvin It was therefore commendable in Moses that hee desired in cognitione Dei magis magis aâ—geri to increase more and more in the knowledge of God Marbach As Bernard speaketh of some Qui pro fidei magnitudine inveniuntur qui inducantur in omnem plenitudinem Which are found worthy for their great faith to be brought to a fulnesse of knowledge talis erat Moses qui andebat dicere c. such an one was Moses that was bold to say shew thy selfe unto mee Such was Philip that desired the Father to be shewed them and David that said Thy face will I seeke Magna fides magna meretur c. magnuâ—â—iritibus magnus accurrit sponsus A great faith is worthy of great things to great spirits the Spouse offereth himselfe in stately manner To this purpose Bernard Herein Moses desire then was to be commended but he goeth somewhat beyond his bounds Hereof Ambrose thus writeth excellently Norat sanctus vates Domini quod invisibilem Deum facie ad faciem videre non posset sed devotio sancta mensuram super greditur putavit Deo etiam hoc esse possibile ut corporeis oculis faceret id quod est incorporeum comprehendi non reprehensibilis hic error sed etiam grata cupiditas inexplebilis c. The holy Prophet of God knew well enough that he could not see the invisible God face to face but his holy devotion exceedeth measure and he thought this not to be impossible unto God to make that to be comprehended with corporall eyes which was incorporeall this errour is not much to be reprehended but his insatiable desire was gratefull and accepted c. Cyrill more fully toucheth this point comparing together Moses desire here and Philips Ioh. 14. that Christ should shew them the Father Studiosus quidem Philippus fuit sed non adeo acutus ut commode apte quae sit visio Dei posset intelligere Philip was studious and desirous but not sharp enough to understand what the vision of God is c. And in the same place hee sheweth that Philip failed in these two things first in his understanding for it was impossible for a man oculiâ— corporis Dei substantiam aspicere with the eyes of his body to see the substance of God and in his discretion Non valde prudenter cum imago character patris verus adesset Neither did he aske this wisely seeing the true image and character of God Christ Jesus was present seeing then that the vision and knowledge of the Son sufficed to understand the nature of the father supervacaneus iste Philippi sermo videtur this speech of Philip seemed to be superfluous Non tamen lande sua privandus Philippus yet Philip is not to be deprived of his due praise c. And in these two things Cyrillus setteth forth his commendation first in respect of that which he desired Visionem Patris caeteris omnibus rebus anteposuit He preferred the vision of the Father before all other things Secondly in regard of the end that whereas the Jewes boasted of Moses that God spake with him in the mount and shewed him his glorie hee thought that the Jewes mouths might be stopped Si Christus quoque credentibus in cum Patrem ostenderet c. If Christ also would shew the Father to those which beleeved in him c. In like manner Moses here is to be commended in these two things first ut plurimum spiritualia petit Moses desireth all spirituall things he desired nothing more than to see Gods glorie which is all one with that petition Hallowed bee thy name Ferus And Moses propounded unto him a good end that hee might see Gods glorie ut de eo populo tuo concionari queam that I may preach thereof to thy people Osiander So also in two other things Moses faileth because hac carne circundatus being compassed about with this flesh hee desired to see the greatnesse of Gods glorie and that hee desired to see the brightnesse of Gods glorie qui ministerium non lucis sed umbrae teneret who had the ministerie not of the light it selfe but of the shadow Borrh. QUEST XXXVII What the Lord meaneth by All my good Vers. 19. I Will make all my good goe before thee 1. Some by all my good understand all Gods creatures which he saw in the creating of them to be good and those hee caused to come before Moses that in them hee might behold the glorie of God ex Simlero But Moses which had writ the storie of the creation therein had seene and considered Gods power before and this is a common and ordinarie knowledge of God by his creatures but here Moses craveth an extraordinarie demonstration of his glorie 2. Tostatus by all the Lords good understandeth the divers kindes of good things bonum spirituale both the spirituall good which was the divine essence of God bonum corporale a corporall good which was a most glorious lightsome body both which the Lord shewed unto Moses quest 18. But although it bee true that Moses both inwardly in his minde and outwardly with the eyes of his body did see Gods glorie yet the Divine Essence hee saw not for no man can see God and live as the Lord himselfe saith 3. Ferus giveth this sense thou needest not looke so high as unto my essence inspice opera mea inspice bonâ— quae tibi feci faciam looke unto my workes looke unto those good things which I have done for thee and meane yet to doe c. But this sight and experience Moses had of the Lord before he desireth to see him now in an extraordinarie manner and measure 4. Lippoman followeth the same sense Omne bonum meum quote donabo istum populum oculis tuiâ— videbis All my good which I will bestow upon thee and this people thou shalt see with thine eyes But the demonstration here made of Gods glorie was presently done it cannot therefore bee referred to the benefits which the Lord intended afterward to bestow 5. Some doe understand it of the life to come Requiem aternam dabo tibi in qua est omne bonum in visione Dei c. I will give thee everlasting rest wherein there is all good in the sight of God Gloss. interlin Hugo de S. Victor So also Thomas Aquinas sheweth at large how in illa foelicitate quae provenit ex divina visione c. in that felicitie and happinesse which commeth of the vision of God all humane desire shall bee satisfied and so God will shew them all his good 1. Est quoddam hamanum desiderium intellectuale There is a certaine intellectuall desire of man in the knowledge of the truth which shall then be satisfied 2. Est quoddam desiderium rationale A certaine desire grounded on reason as in attaining unto morall vertues this shall also then be filled when as reason shall be perfect without errour 3. There
confusion but of peace 1 Cor. 14.33 2. Doct. Our knowledge is not perfect here THe drawing of a veile before the most holy place sheweth that our knowledge is not perfect here but that when this veile is removed and we are entred into the most holy place of heaven then shall we know as we are knowne but now we see in a glasse 1 Cor. 13.12 Simler 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Of the difference of the Law and Gospell whether they differ in matter and substance BEcause the outward Court and other parts of the Tabernacle were figures of the new Testament under Christ Marbachius here taketh in hand to shew the difference betweene the old Testamenâ— and the new and that in three respects as the word Testament is diversly taken 1. The Testament first signifieth the covenant and league which God maketh with his people to bee their God and they to be his people whâ—â—ein the new and old Testament doe much differ 1. The one was given by Moses the other by Christ. 2. The one was propounded upon condition of their obedience if they kept the Law the new Testament requireth faith and beleefe 3. That was consecrated by the bloud of beasts but the new Testament is confirmed by the bloud of Christ. 4. That had but types and ceremonies which are now abolished the new Testament hath the verie body and substance 5. The one was peculiar to the Israelites only the other is generall to all beleevers 2. The old Testament and the new are distinguished in time that was before the comming of Christ the new Testament comprehendeth the time since And so they differ modo patefactionis revelationiâ— in the manner and measure of revelation and opening Gods will all things are more plainly opened in the new Testament 3. The old Testament is taken for the Propheticall writings the new for the Apostolicall and so they differ because the old receiveth light of the new and cannot well be understood without it Hitherto Marbachius proceedeth well but yet he addeth thus much further that the new Testament and the old differ in substance and matter because they have divers and contrarie effects and hee findeth fault with them which affirme that there is the same substance of their Sacraments and ours Contra. 1. The divers and contrarie effects as because the Law worketh terrour the Gospell comfort prove not a diversitie of substance the Sunne worketh contrarie effects it hardeneth the clay and mollifieth the wax yet the substance is the same the difference of the worke is in the divers nature of the things so the Law worketh terrour in respect of the infirmitie and weaknesse of our flesh the Gospell bringeth comfort our hearts being mollified by the Spirit 2. Christ is the end of the Law and the Law is a schoole-master to bring us unto Christ therfore the matter and substance is the same but the manner condition and qualities are divers 3. Saint Paul sheweth that Christ was the substance of their Sacraments as he is of ours They did all eat the same spirituall meat with us 1 Cor. 10.3 yet our Sacraments doe after a more lively manner exhibit Christ than he was represented in the Legall Sacraments 6. Morall observations 1. Observ. They that truly turne unto God must forsake their vaine delights Vers. 8. HE made the laver of the glasses of the women These devout women are content to leave their vaine toies their looking-glasses and other such delights and now resigne themselves wholly unto Gods service and thinke nothing too good to bestow upon the same So they which are truly converted unto God will forsake their vanities wherein they before delighted as Zacheus left his unconscionable and deceitfull trade wherein he had gathered much by extortion and other fraudulent meanes Luke 19. 2. Observ. We must be liberall toward the maintenance of Gods service Vers. 25. THe silver was an hundred talents c. The great liberalitie of the Israelites is here commended which gave such a great masse of silver and gold toward the building of the Tabernacle which teacheth us not to bee sparing or close handed in giving toward the maintenance of Gods house service and servants Simler Remembring what the Apostle saith He that soweth sparingly shall reape sparingly and he that soweth liberally shall reape also liberally CHAP. XXXIX 1. The Method and Argument IN this chapter 1. A rehearsall is made of the vestures and garments of the Priests which were made by the work-men as 1. The Ephod with the things thereunto belonging vers 8. 2. The brest-plate with the parts and ornament vers 22. 3. Then the robe of the Ephod with the bels vers 27. 4. Then the coats miter bonets girdles vers 30. 5. Lastly the golden plate vers 30. 2. Then it is shewed how all these things were exhibited to Moses which the work-men had made vers 42. and how Moses approved them vers 43. 2. The divers readings For the differences in the translation the Reader likewise must have recourse here to the 29. chapter wherewith this chapter agreeth both in order and in the verie words 3. The questions discussed COncerning the several garments which were made for the high Priest and for the inferior Priests the description forme and fashion of them with the mysticall signification because they are handled â—efore at large chap. 28. thither I referre the studious Reader Some questions here follow out of the second part of this chapter QUEST I. At what time the worke of the Tabernacle began and when it was finished Vers. 32. THus was all the worke of the Tabernacle c. finished 1. It is evident that the Tabernacle was all finished and made an end of in the first yeare of Israels departure out of Egypt because it was set up in the first day of the first moneth of the second yeare chap. 40.17 all the worke then was dispatched before it could be set up 2. The time also may by conjecture be gathered when this work began which was at Moses second comming downe from the mount in the end of the fifth moneth which was July or in the beginning of the sixth moneth namely August As further may bee shewed thus in the beginning of the third moneth about the fourth day of the moneth was the Law delivered in mount Sinai after that Moses was twice fortie dayes with the Lord which make above two moneths and an halfe and some dayes Moses spent among the people before his second going up when he caused the golden Calfe to be broken in peeces and burned and removed his Tabernacle without the host and caused the people to put off their best raiment and to shew their sorrow so that all this could not bee done with Moses staying twice with the Lord in the mount in lesse than three moneths namely the third fourth and fifth Then as soone as Moses was come downe with the second tables he called all the people together and charged
light from Moses bookes 26. qu. Of the name of God Iehovah whether it be ineffable 27. qu. VVhy Moses is bid to gather the Elders together 28. qu. Why they make request but for three daies journey 29. qu. How the people is said to have sacrificed in the wildernesse 30. qu. How it is said Pharaoh should not let them go no not with strong hand Questions upon the fourth Chapter 1. QUest Whether Moses offended in charging the people 2. qu. What the first signe meaneth of turning the rod into a serpent 3. qu. What is signified by the leprosie of Moses hand 4. qu. VVhat kind of leprosie Moses hand was stricken with 5. qu. Whether the third signe of turning water into bloud were shewed at this time 6. qu. Whether in these miracles there were a substantiall change 7. qu. VVhether Moses indeed had an impediment of speech and what it was 8. qu. How God is said to make the deafe and dumbe 9. qu. How and wherefore the Lord was present with Moses mouth 10. qu. VVhom Moses meaneth that hee would have sent 11. qu. Whether Moses sinned in his so often refusall seeing God was angrie with him and wherein Moses sinned and how God is angrie with his children 12. qu. Why Aaron is called the Levite 13. qu. How Moses is said to be as God to Aaron 14. qu. VVhether Moses did well being called of God in taking his leave of his father in law 15. qu. VVhy Moses concealed from Iethro the principall end of his going 16. qu. Whether God spake to Moses in Midian beside that vision in Horeb. 17. qu. Of Moses wife and children and of his provision for his journey 18. qu. VVhy Moses staffe is called the rod of God 19. qu. How God is said to harden Pharaohs heartâ— that God man and Satan are said to harden the heart but diversly 20. qu. How Israel is called the first borne sonne of God 21. qu. Who smote Moses in the Iune and how 22. qu. For what sin the Lord would have killed Moses 23. qu. Whether the Israelites transgressed in omitting circumcision fortie yeares in the wildernesse 24. qu. VVhat moved Moses to deferre the circumcision of his child 25. qu. Why the Lord meeteth Moses by the way and not before 26. qu. VVhether Zipporah circumcised her sonne with a sharpe knife 27. qu. Whether both Moses sonnes or one only were uncircumcised and upon what occasion 28. qu. At whose feete Zipporah and what shee cast 29. qu. Why Zipporah called Moses husband of bloud 30. qu. VVhether those words of Zipporah rehearsed againe were uttered by Zipporah or by Moses the writer 31. qu. How Zipporah knew that Moses was stricken for the neglect of circumcision 32. qu. VVho it was that departed from Moses 33. qu. Of the mysticall application of the historie 34. qu. VVhat manner of faith it was which the people had in beleeving Moses Questions upon the fifth Chapter 1. QUest Why the Lord sent Moses so often to Pharaoh 2. qu. Whether Moses and Aaron went in alone to Pharaoh 3. qu. Whether Pharaoh were altogether ignorant of God 4. qu. Why mention is onely made of going three dayes journey 5. qu. What other things were said and done by Moses before Pharaoh 6. qu. In what sense Pharaoh saith they were much people 7. qu. Why they used straw in making of bricke 8. qu. Whether Moses sinned in expostulating with God 9. qu. How the Lord is said to afflict his people Questions upon the sixth Chapter 1. QUest Of the divers names which are given unto God in the Scripture 2. qu. Of the divers kinds of names given unto God 3. qu. Of the excellencie of the name Jehovah 4. qu. Whether the name Jehovah bee understood of Christ. 5. qu. Of the right pronuntiation of the name Jehovah 6. qu. Whether the name Jehovah be ineffable that is not to be pronounced 7. qu. How the Lord was not knowne by his name Jehovah to Abraham Isaak and Jacob. 8. qu. Why the Genealogie of Reuben Simeon and Levi is inserted 9. qu. How Reuben is said here to be the first borne 10. qu. Of the age of Levi. 11. qu. Of the age of Kohath 12. qu. Of the age of Amram 13. qu. Why the sonnes of Korah and Ithamar are set downe 14. qu. Why Aaron tooke a wife of the tribe of Judah 15. qu. How Moses without ostentation setteth forth his owne commendation 16. qu. In what sense Moses saith he was of uncircumcised lips Questions upon the seventh Chapter 1. QUest The divers appellations of the name of God 2. qu. In what sense Moses is called Aarons God 3. qu. In what sense Aaron is called Moses Prophet 4. qu. Why the tribes of Israel are called Armies 5. qu. Of Moses age 6. qu. Whether Pharaoh asked a signe and whether a signe may be required 7. qu. Of the divers names of the Egyptian Magicians here used 8. qu. Of divers kinds of Magicke 9. qu. Of the first author and inventor of art Magicke 10. qu. Who were the ringleaders and chiefe of the Egyptian Magicians where also of the place where Jannes and Jambres were buried 11. qu. Whether things done by magicke and inchantment are in truth or in shew onely 12. qu. What things are permitted to Satan to doe 13. qu. How divers wayes Satans power is limited 14. qu. Whether the devill by his owne power can cause thunder and lightning 15. qu. Of the power of spirits in naturall works and of divers strange and admirable works in nature 16. qu. What works in naturall things are forbidden unto spirits to doe and how Satan two wayes maketh things to appeare that are not 17. qu. Whether Satan can raise the spirits and soules of the dead where these particulars are handled of the fabulous reports of the Heathen of the imagined force of Necromancie 2. Reasons against Necrâ—mancie 3. In what cases the dead have been raised and appeared 18. qu. Why Satan doth counterfeit the spirits of the dead 19. qu. Of the divers kinds of miracles 20. qu. Of the difference betweene true miracles and false 21. qu. Whether the Sorcerers brought forth true serpents 22. qu. By what meanes Satan deluded Pharaoh with a shew of serpents 23. qu. Why the Lord suffered the Sorcerers of Egypt to shew such contrarie signes 24. qu. VVhether Pharaoh being deceived by the Magicians false signes be thereby excusable 25. qu. Of the number of the plagues of Egypt 26. qu. Of the greatnesse of the plagues of Egypt how the Egyptians were every way punished 27. qu. Where the plagues of Egypt and to what place they were sent at the first 28. qu. At what time the plagues were sent upon Egypt 29. qu. In what time all the plagues were finished 30. qu. Whether the good Angels or the Lord were the ministers of the Egyptian plagues 31. qu. For what ends and causes the Lord wrought such wonders in Egypt 32. qu. Who were exempted from the plagues of Egypt 33. qu.
Whether the Egyptians which cohabited with the Israelites in the land of Goshen were exempted from the plagues 34. qu. Of the diversitie in the manner of the plagues 35. qu. Of Pharaohs divers and variable behaviour 36. qu. Why the Lord sent divers plagues upon Pharaoh not cutting him off at once 37. qu. Why Aaron is sometime the minister of the plagues and not Moses 38. qu. Why the first plague beginneth in the water 39. qu. Of the greatnesse of the first plague 40. qu. Whence the Sorcerers had the water which they also turned into bloud 41. qu. What shift the Egyptians made for water during the first plague 42. qu. Whether the raine that fell were turned into bloud 43. qu. Whether the Sorcerers did turne the waters into true bloud 44. qu. How this first plague was staied 45. qu. Of the application and use of this first plague Questions upon the eighth Chapter 1. QUest What kinde of frogs the second plague brought upon Egypt 2. qu. Of the greatnesse of this plague of frogs 3. qu. From whence this great abundance of frogs came 4. qu. In what place and how the Sorcerers brought forth frogs 5. qu. Why Pharaoh calleth now for Moses and not before 6. qu. Why Moses saith to Pharaoh Take this honour to thee 7. qu. Whether Moses tempted God in prescribing the time of removing the plague 8. qu. Of the use and application of the plague of frogs 9. qu. Why Pharaoh appointeth Moses to morrow 10. qu. Why the Lord did not remove the frogs quite 11. qu. The difference of the third plague of lice from the former 12. qu. Whether the third plague was of lice 13. qu. VVhy the Lord plagued the Egyptians with lice 14. qu. VVhy the Lord by the stretching forth of Aarons rod brought forth lice 15. qu. VVhy the sorceres could not bring forth lice 16. qu. VVhat the Sorcerers understand by the finger of God 17. qu. Whether the Sorcerers had any feeling of Gods power 18. qu. By what power Sorcerers doe worke and how the devils sometime be cast out by the power of the devils 19. qu Why spirits prescribe constellations to bee observed and delight in corporall and externall visages 20. qu. Whether it be ordinarie for lice to breed out of the slime of Nilus 21. qu. Why Moses is bid to meet Pharaoh by the water 22. qu. Why there is no mention made in this miracle of Moses rod. 23. qu. What manner of Sorcerers were sent in the fourth plague 24. qu. Of the name of Beelzebub the god of flies 25. qu. Whether the land of Goshen were exempted from the former plagues 26. qu. What things were an abomination to the Egyptians 27. qu. Whether Moses were ignorant what kinde of beasts they should sacrifice to God in the desart Questions upon the ninth Chapter 1. QUest Why Pharaoh is so often sent unto whom the Lord did foresee that he would not heare 2. qu. Why Moses in bringing the plagues doth not alwaies use Aarons rod. 3. qu. Why the Lord punisheth the Egyptians in their cattell 4. qu. Why the Lord doth not alway exempt his people from temporall calamities 5. qu. In what sense all the cattell of Egypt are said to have died 6. qu. Whether Pharaoh sent into Goshen in the other plagues 7. qu. Why Pharaoh calleth not to Moses here to pray 8. qu. Whether this plague were naturall or supernaturall 9. qu. Why Moses is the Minister of the sixth plague 10. qu. Of the plague of boyles and the manner thereof 11. qu. Why the Magicians are smitten with ulcers 12. qu. Of the hardning of Pharaohs heart 13. qu. What plague the Lord threatneth to destroy Pharaoh with 14. qu. In what sense the Lord saith I have kept thee 15. qu. Whether the plague of haile were supernaturall 16. qu. Whether there useth to bâ— no raine or haile in Egypt 17. qu. Of the meaning of those words Since the foundation of Egypt 18. qu. Of the greatnesse of this tempest of haile 19. qu. How Moses knew that Pharaoh dissembled 20. qu. What kinde of graine was not smitten with the haâ—le Questions upon the tenth Chapter 1. QUest Why Moses is bid to goe to Pharaoh notwithstanding his heart was hardened 2. qu. How Moses is said to be a snare to the Egyptians 3. qu. Of Pharaohs wish Let the Lord so be with you 4. qu. Of the nature of Locusts and whether this plague were extraordinarie 5. qu. Of the greatnesse of this plague of Locusts 6. qu. Why sometime Moses sometime Aaron stretcheth out the rod. 7. qu. What kinde of winde it was which brought the Locusts 8. qu. Whether this plague of Locusts were incomparable and not to be matched 9. qu. In what sense it is said the Locusts devoured that which was left 10. qu. Why the plague of Locusts is called a death 11. qu. Of the mysticall application of this plague of Locusts 12. qu. How Moses turned himselfe going out from Pharaoh 13. qu. Of the cause of darknesse of the Egypt 14. qu. How it is said the darknesse was felt 15. qu. How the Israelites had light in their dwellings 16. qu. Whether the Egyptians used in the time of this darknesse any candle or fire light 17. qu. How it is said No man rose up from his place 18. qu. When Pharaoh sent for Moses whether after the darknesse was removed or afore 19. qu. Of the greatnesse of this punishment of three dayes darknesse 20. qu. Of the mysticall application of this three dayes darknesse Questions upon the eleventh Chapter 1. QUest When the Lord spake these words to Moses 2. qu. Why the overthrow of Pharaoh in the red sea was counted none of the plagues 3. qu. Whether God used the ministerie of good or bad Angels in the slaughter of the first borne 4. qu. Whether one Angell or many were used in this destruction 5. qu. Vpon whom this plague in smiting the first borne was executed 6. qu. Whether in every house the first borne were slaine 7. qu. Why the Lord destroyed the first borne 8. qu. VVhy the first borne of the cattell also are destroyed 9. qu. How the gods of the Egyptians were judged 10. qu. How the Israelites escaped the destruction of the first borne 11. qu. The mysticall application of the last plague upon the first borne 12. qu. Of the generall application of these ten plagues the ten plagues of Egypt compared with the ten benefits which the children of Israel received in the wildernesse Divers questions concerning the hardnesse of heart 13. QUest What the hardnesse of heart is 14. qu. Whether God bee the efficient and working cause of the hardnesse of heart 15. qu. God otherwise hardneth than by way of manifestation 16. qu. God doth not harden the heart onely by permission 17. qu. Whether hardnesse of heart bee of God as it is a punishment of sinne where Pererius is refuted that misliketh Augustins distinction 18. qu. How God is said to harden the heart