in his second Apologie writeth thus And this meate is called with vs that is Thankesgiuing c. whereof none other may be partaker but he which both beleeueth those things to be true which we say also hath bene purified with the washing which is giuen for the remission of sinnes and regeneration and also so liueth as CHRIST hath appointed For wee take not these things to be common and wonted bread and accustomed drinke but euen as the word of God IESVS CHRIST our Sauiour was made man and had both flesh and blood for our saluation Euen so in like maner wee haue bene taught that the meate which is hallowed by the prayers of the word that we receiued of him and by which our blood and flesh by a change made are nourished is both the flesh blood of the same CHRIST which was made man For the Apostles in their Commentaries which be called the Gospels haue left in writing that CHRIST did so command them and that he said when he had taken bread and giuen thankes Doe this in remembrance of me This is my body And that when he had taken the cup and giuen thankes hee said This is my Blood Partly the other words of this testimoniall doe affirme the trueth of his body and chiefly because by a similitude taken of the two natures in CHRIST he declareth that there be also two natures in the Sacrament namely of the outward signe and of the flesh Blood of IESVS CHRIST Alike vnto this is spoken in Irenaeus in his 4. booke For how say they againe that the flesh commeth into corruption doth not receiue life which is nourished of the body and Blood of the Lord Therefore let them either change their opinion or else abstaine to offer the things which are aforesaid but our opinion is agreeing to the Sacrament of thankesgiuing and this Sacrament againe confirmeth our opinion For wee offer those things that be his preaching agreeably the partaking and trueth of Flesh and Spirit For euen as the bread which is of the earth receiuing the calling vpon God is now no more common bread but a Sacrament of thanksgiuing made of two things earthly and Heauenly so also our bodies receiuing the Sacrament of thankesgiuing be not now corruptible because they haue the hope of resurrection The same man in his fift booke and because wee be his members and are nourished by the creature he giueth vs the creature making his Sonne to arise and raining as he listeth the same Cup which is a creature he confirmed to be his Body by which he increaseth our bodies When therefore both the Cup mixed and the bread made receiueth the word of God it is made the Sacrament of the blood and body of CHRIST whereof both the substance of our flesh is increased consisteth how then doeth he denie that the flesh is able to receiue the gift of God which is life Euerlasting seeing it is nourished with the blood and bodie of CHRIST These words of Irenaeus albeit not very dark yet wil they be more plaine if we adde certaine things to them out of S. Augustine August tit de consecrat dist 2. He in his booke of the Sentences of Prosperus and is found De consecratione distinct 2. writeth thus This is it that we say and that by al meanes we labour to proue that the Sacrifice of the Church is made two maner awayes that it consisteth of two things Of the visible forme of Sacraments and the inuisible flesh and blood of our Lord IESVS CHRIST of the Sacrament and of the substance of the Sacrament that is the body of CHRIST As the person of CHRIST consisteth of God and man since CHRIST himselfe is very God and very man because euery thing conteineth in it selfe the nature and trueth of those things whereof it is made But the sacrifice of the Church is made of two things of the Sacrament and of the substance of the Sacrament that is the body of CHRIST There is therefore the Sacrament and the substance of the Sacrament the bodie of CHRIST S. Augustine repeateth that comparison between the person of CHRIST and the Sacrament of thankesgiuing and therein hee saith plainely that the trueth and nature of the bodie is conteined The same man De consecrat distinct 2. Idem ibidem Whether is this mysticall Sacrament of the Cup made in figure or in trueth The trueth saith My flesh is verily meat and my blood is verily drinke Else how can it bee a great matter The bread that I shall giue is my flesh for the life of the world vnlesse it bee very flesh But because it is not godly that CHRIST should be deuoured with teeth the Lords will was to haue this bread and wine in mysterie to be by his power made his flesh and blood in veritie by the consecration of the holy Ghost and to be daily offered mysticallie for the life of the world That like as his true flesh is created of the Virgin by the holy Ghost without the companie of man so by this same Spirit the same bodie mystically is consecrated of the substance of bread and wine The body of CHRIST is both trueth and figure Trueth in that the bodie and blood of CHRIST by the power of the holy Ghost is made by the strength thereof of the substance of bread and wine And the figure is that which outwardly is perceiued The same man in the same title Idem ibidem They that eate and drinke CHRIST eate and drinke life To eate him is to be refreshed to drinke him is to liue That which is visiblie taken in the Sacrament is eaten and drunke spiritually in very trueth Idem ibidem The same man in his booke of the Sentences of Prosperus in the same title saith But we in the forme of bread and wine which we see do honor inuisible things namely flesh and blood Neither doe we alike take these two formes as we did take them before the consecration seeing that we faithfully confesse that before the consecration they be bread and wine which nature hath framed but after the consecration they be the flesh blood of CHRIST which the blessing hath hallowed He againe vpon the 54. Psalme Vntill the world come to an end the Lord is aboue yet for all that the Lords trueth is also here with vs For it is fit that the body in the which he rose againe should be in one place but his trueth is spred euery where He also in his Epistle to Irenaeus CHRIST is bread of the which hee who so eateth liueth for euer whereof hee himselfe saith thus And the bread which I will giue is my flesh for the life of the world And he expoundeth it how it is bread not onely according to the word whereby all things liue but according to the flesh that hee tooke for the life of the world For mans flesh which was dead through sinne being knit
to pure flesh incorporat made one with it doth liue by his spirit euen as one bodie by his owne spirit But he that is not of the body of CHRIST liueth not of the Spirit of CHRIST Hitherto Augustine hath plainly inough proued the trueth and nature of the body of CHRIST in this Sacrament Hilar. de tri lib. 8. Hilarie in his 8. booke of the Trinitie I would know now of them that alledge vnitie of wil between the Father and the Sonne whether CHRIST nowadayes be in vs by trueth of nature or by agreement of will For if the Word be verily made flesh and wee receiue the word verily flesh in the Lords meate how should a man not suppose him to remaine naturally in vs which being borne man tooke to himselfe an vnseparable nature now of our flesh and hath mixed the nature of his owne flesh with the nature of eternitie vnder the Sacrament of his flesh to be partaked among vs And a little after Therefore whosoeuer wil denie the Father to be naturally in CHRIST let him first denie either himselfe to be naturally in CHRIST or CHRIST to be in him because the Father in CHRIST and CHRIST in vs do make vs to be one thing in them If CHRIST therefore did verily take the flesh of our bodie if the same man which was borne of the Virgine Mary be verily CHRIST and we verily take vnder a mysterie the flesh of his body and thereby shal become one because the Father is in him and hee in vs How is the vnitie of will alledged seeing the naturall propertie by meanes of the Sacrament is a Sacrament of perfect vnitie Also a little after For those things which wee speake of the naturall trueth of CHRIST in vs vnlesse we learne of him we speake foolishly and wickedly For he saith My flesh is meat in deed and my Blood is drinke in deed Hee that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood remaineth in mee and I in him There is no place left of doubting of the trueth of Flesh and Blood For now it is verily Flesh and verily Blood both by the confession of our Lord himselfe and also by our Faith and these things being receiued by eating and drinking doe worke that effect that both wee be in CHRIST and CHRIST is in vs. Is not this trueth Let it happen vnto them not to bee true which denie IESVS CHRIST to be very God And soone after And so by a Mediator the perfit Vnitie should be taught when as wee abiding in him hee should abide in the Father and he abiding in the Father should abide in vs and so should we clime to the vnitie of the Father when hee is naturally according to his birth in him we also should be naturally in him so long as he abideth naturally in vs. And that this natural vnitie is in vs he hath thus witnessed He that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood abideth in me and I in him And by and by he addeth This is truely the cause of our life for that we haue CHRIST remaining in vs carnal men according to the flesh whereas wee shall liue hereafter by him after the same sort as he liueth by the Father If we therefore liue naturally by him after the flesh namely hauing taken vpon vs the nature of his flesh how hath he not the Father after the spirit naturally in him since he liueth by the Father And he concludeth To this end be these things rehearsed by vs because the heretiks affirming falsly the vnitie of wil onely betweene the Father and the Sonne vsed for the example of our vnitie with the Lord as though we were vnited to the Sonne and by the Sonne to the Father only by obedience and will of Religion and no propertie of naturall fellowship were granted to vs by the Sacrament of his flesh and blood whereas in deed the mysterie of the true and naturall vnitie should be taught both for the honour of the Sonne of God that is giuen vs and for the Sonne carnally abiding in vs and wee knit corporally and vnseparably in him Hilarius doeth manifestly teach the true and naturall partaking of the flesh of CHRIST in the Sacrament And as plainely doeth Cyrillus witnesse the same in the 10. Cyrillus lib. 10. cap. 13. booke chap. 13. when he saith Yet wee denie not that wee be ioyned spiritually in CHRIST by a right faith and sincere loue but that wee haue no maner of ioyning with him according to the flesh that truely we vtterly denie And soone after But doth hee happily thinke that the vertue of the mysticall blessing is vnknowen to vs which when it is wrought in vs doth it not also make CHRIST to dwell corporally in vs by the partaking of the flesh of CHRIST For why be the members of the faithfull the members of CHRIST Know ye not saith he that your members be the members of Christ Shal I therefore make the members of Christ the members of an harlot Our Sauiour also saith He that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood remaineth in me and I in him whereby it ought to be considered that CHRIST is in vs not onely by that accustomed qualitie which is perceiued by loue but also further by a naturall partaking For euen as if a man shall melt waxe by the fire and mingle it with other waxe which is likewise melted so that one lumpe may seeme to be made of both So by the communion of the body and blood of CHRIST he is in vs and wee in him For this corruptible nature of the bodie could not otherwise be brought to vncorruption and life vnlesse the body of naturall life should be ioyned thereto The same man also in his 4. Idem in Io. lib. 4. cap. 14. booke vpon Iohn the 14. chapter doeth witnesse For truely it behoueth that not onely the soule should ascend into blessed life by the holy Ghost but also that this rude and earthly body should be brought againe to immortalitie by a taste feeling and meate like vnto it The same man in his 11. book vpon Iohn cap. 27. The Sonne Idem in Io. lib. 11. cap. 27. as man is made one with vs corporally by the mystical blessings but spiritually as God And a little after For we receiuing corporally and substantially as it hath bene said the Sonne of God which is made one by nature with the Father be made pure and glorified being partakers of the nature that is from aboue The same man in the same book vpon the 26. chapter Idem eodem lib. cap. 26. For to the end therefore ye might knit euery one of vs among our selues and God although wee differ both in body and soule yet hath he found a meane agreeable to the determination of his Father and his owne wisdome For he blessing with his owne body through the mystical communion them that beleeue doth make vs one bodie both with himselfe and also among our selues For
as oft as they of old time treat of the Sacrament they all apply to the Sacrament the vvords of our Lord vvhich are spoken in the sixt chapter of Iohn My flesh is verily meat my blood is verily drinke The bread which I will giue is my flesh and vnlesse you eate the flesh of the Sonne of man c. Which things shal be proued by their ovvne sayings before alledged and also by those that shall follovv Neither are they to bee allovved that deny this chapter of Iohn to be referred to this Sacrament seeing so great a troupe of vvitnesses be against them But the opinion of them seemed more probable vvho as they iudge this Euangelist to set forth the humanitie of Christ lesse then the rest and his diuinitie more amply so doe declare that these things vvhich are rehearsed by the other Euangelists concerning the institution and outvvard ceremonie of this Sacrament are not at all mentioned of Iohn but that he openeth expoundeth more plainly vnto vs the true and right vnderstanding of them And it is plaine that the mindes of the Capernaites vvhen the Lord said My flesh is verily meat And vnlesse ye eat the flesh of the Sonne of man c. vvere much offended and troubled and therefore leauing him departed for they vnderstood him too grosly and after the common sort But his Tvvelue Apostles that taried by him being admonished and lift vp to a more higher meaning and of more Maiestie heard of him The words which I haue spoken be spirit and life Vpon this it commeth to passe that all the old vvriters do flie the common iudgement and vsuall vnderstanding in those vvordes This is my body and vvhich the Lord spake of eating his flesh and follovv a more diuine vvay of vnderstanding them and more agreeable to the Sacraments as they themselues affirme Chrysost in Matth. cap. 26. Hom. 83. Chrysostom vpon Matthew 26. hom 83. expounding the vvords of the Supper Take ye eate ye this is my body c. doth aske this question Why were they not troubled vvhen they heard this And he ansvvereth Because he had taught them alreadie many and great things concerning this point before Wherefore also hee did not confirme that vvhich they had often before perceiued And not long after hee addeth Hee himselfe did also drinke of it least at the hearing of those vvordes they should say What do vve then drinke blood and eate flesh and vpon that might be troubled For at the first also when he spake of these matters many vvere offended onely for the wordes Lest therefore this should then also haue happened he did this first himselfe that hee might bring them to the partaking of these mysteries vvith a quiet minde We be taught here by Chrysostom that the Apostles were not troubled when they heard the Lord say Take ye eat ye this is my body Because they had bene alreadie taught before hovv that which vvas spoken ought to be vnderstood namely where others were offended as it is in Iohn said This is a hard saying they abode and had learned It is the Spirit that giueth life the flesh profiteth nothing The wordes that I haue spoken vnto you are spirit life that is to say as the same Chrysostom in the same place expounded it they are spiritually to bee vnderstood which selfe thing the Lord himselfe confirmeth by his owne deed vvhen hee did eat the same bread drinke the vvine vvith them lest they should thinke vpon any base or common matter but should be brought to the partaking of the mysteries with quiet minds It is no hard matter to perceiue by this that Chrysostom vvriteth in this place that it is one way a body that Christ himselfe called his body when he said Take ye eat ye this is my body the which he also receiueth himselfe together with his disciples and another vvay to bee his proper body which was fed vvith the other The one did eat the other was eaten after a diuers sort either of them is called his body To this purpose maketh also that vvhich Clemens Alexandrinus schoolemaster to Origen Clemens Alexand lib. inscrip Paedagogus teacheth in his booke intituled Paedagogus when he saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The blood of Christ is two maner of wayes the one fleshie whereby vve are vvashed the other spirituall vvherevvith we haue bene anointed Hierom. in Epi. ad Ephes ca. 1. Whom Hierom follovving vpon the Epistle to the Ephesians the first chapter saith The blood and flesh of Christ saith he is vnderstood tvvo maner of vvayes that is either that spirituall and heauenly whereof he himselfe spake My flesh is verily meat and my blood is verily drinke And vnlesse you eate my flesh and drinke my blood you shall not haue euerlasting life Or else the flesh and blood that vvas crucified that was shed vvith the speare of the souldier There bee tvvo things that Hierom teacheth in this place That those vvords in the 6. chap. of Iohn do appertaine to the Sacrament euen as Chrysostom doth and that the flesh that vvas crucified doeth differ from that vvhich is in the Sacrament vvhich he calleth Spirituall Diuine The same man vpon Leuiticus and is to be seen De consecrat Idem in Leuit. de consecrat dist 2. dist 2. Of this sacrifice vvhich is by miracle vvrought for the remembrance of Christ it is lavvfull to eate but of that which Christ offered vpon the Altar of the Crosse it is of it self lavvful for no man to eat A plaine and manifest distinction Augustin in lib. senten Prosperi August in lib. Sent. Prosperi It is his flesh vvhich couered with the forme of bread we receiue in the Sacrament and his blood which vnder the forme and tast of wine we drinke that is to say the flesh is the sacrament of flesh and blood is the sacrament of blood By flesh and blood being both inuisible spirituall intelligible is betokened the visible sensible body of our Lord Iesus Christ full of the grace of all vertues diuine Maiestie Who seeth not hovv plainly Augustine putteth a difference between the proper body of Christ which he termeth visible and sensible and that flesh which we receiue in the sacrament vvhich he affirmeth to be inuisible spirituall intelligible and a signe of the other body Idem in Epist. ad Iren. The same man in his Epistle to Irenaeus You shall not eat this body which you see and drinke that blood which they that shall crucifie me shall shed The same truely and not the same The same inuisiblie and not the same visibly He putteth a difference when hee saith Not this body and againe The same not the same The maner of the difference is the same inuisibly which hee termeth before the inuisible body namely the Sacrament of the body and not the same visibly or the visible body which is referred to the proper body for this body
to them an horrible and hainous thing to feed vpon mans flesh thinking hee had spoken this after that sort as though they should haue bene taught to haue eaten his flesh sod or rosted and cut in pieces whereas the flesh of his person if it should bee deuided into morsels could not haue bene sufficient for all mankinde which being once spent Religion should seeme to perish vvhich should not haue aftervvard a sacrifice remaining any longer But in such like thoughts flesh and blood profiteth nothing because as the Master himselfe hath expounded These words be Spirit and life neither doth the carnall sense pearse the vnderstanding of so great a depth vnlesse Faith be added too The Bread is food the Blood is life the Flesh substance the Body the Church A body because of the agreeing of members in one Bread for the conformitie of nourishment Blood for the effect of life giuen Flesh for the propertie of the humanitie taken Also hee sayth This common bread beeing changed into flesh and blood doeth procure life and encrease to the bodies and therefore by the accustomed effect of things the weakenesse of our faith is aided and taught by a sensible argument that the effect of eternall life is in the visible Sacraments and that we be knit to Christ not so much by corporall as by spirituall passage Also this bread which hee reached to his disciples beeing changed not in forme but in nature by the omnipotencie of the Word is made flesh and euen as in the person of Christ the humanitie was seene and the diuinitie hid so into the visible Sacrament vnspeakeably doeth the diuine substance powre it selfe Also the Master truely of this Institution sayd that Vnlesse wee should eate and drinke his blood we should not haue life in vs instructing vs by a spirituall lesson and opening our vnderstanding to so hidden a matter that wee should knowe that our eating is an abiding in him and our drinke as it were a certaine incorporation by submitting our seruice and ioyning our willes and vniting our affections Also hee sayth Among the guests of the Lords table the natural man is not admitted whatsoeuer flesh and blood doeth appoint is shut out from this company it sauoureth nothing it profiteth nothing whatsoeuer the finenes of the sence of man doth goe about Cyprian hath these and many other places to the same purpose The very words of Cyprian doe sufficiently declare that which belongeth to our purpose How the Letter is not to bee followed in these things which be spoken of this mysterie how the vnderstanding of the Flesh is vtterly to be shunned and all things to be referred to a spiritual sense That there is the presence of the diuine power in this Bread the effect of euerlasting life and that the diuine substance is powred thereinto that the words are spirit and life that a spirituall lesson is giuen that this Body this Blood and Flesh this substance of body ought not to be taken after a common sort nor as mans reason doth appoint but to be named thought of beleeued for certaine excellent effects powers and properties ioyned thereto which be euen within the body and blood of Christ by nature namely that it doeth both feede and reuiue our soules and prepareth our bodies to resurrection and immortalitie Cyrill in Ioan. lib. 4. cap. 14. The same opinion hath also Cyrillus who though he affirme in many places the trueth and nature of the body of Christ to be in the Sacrament yet hee is in opinion that it is a spiritual and diuine matter and not to be vnderstood after the manner of men For first he declareth that the same maner of eating is set foorth in the words of the Lords Supper which the Lord himselfe signified when he said Vnlesse you eat the flesh of the Sonne of man c. For so he writeth in his 4. booke vpon the 14. Chap. of Iohn Where after he had spoken somewhat of them that did say How can this man giue his flesh to be eaten hee addeth these words Therefore they ought first to haue set the rootes of faith in their minde and then to seeke for those things that are to be sought for of man but they before they would beleeue did seeke importunately For this cause therefore the Lord did not open how it might be but exhorteth to seeke it by faith So to his disciples that beleeued he gaue the pieces of bread saying Take ye and eate ye this is my body The cup also in like maner he caried about saying Drinke yee all of this This is the cup of my blood which shall be shed for many for the remission of sins Thou seest manifestly that by no meanes he would declare the maner of the mysterie to them that sought it without faith but to them that did beleeue and did not seeke it he plainely declared it Likewise in cap. 21. Idem in cap. 21 vpon these words This is a hardsaying thus he saith And such as want sharpenesse of wit are wont to abhorre knowledge which should be sought with great study and much labour but yet the spirituall man accustomed to the Lords doctrine as to great dainties doth continually sing How sweet be thy words vnto my throat yea aboue hony to my mouth But the naturall Iew doeth thinke this spirituall mysterie full of foolishnesse and where by the Lords words he is stirred to an higher vnderstanding of things yet he falleth still to his accustomed madnesse Likewise in his cap. 22. expounding these words Doeth this offend you Idem in cap. 22 c. hee writeth on this sort For ignorance many which followed Christ not vnderstanding his words were troubled for when they heard him say Verely verely I say vnto you vnlesse ye eate the flesh of the Sonne of man and drinke his blood you shall not haue life in you they thought Christ had called them to the cruel maners of beasts and stirred them to eate the rawe flesh of a man and to drinke blood which be euen horrible to heare For they had not yet knowen the maner of this mysterie and the godly ministration thereof Also in the 24. chapter Idem cap. 24. The words therefore that I haue spoken to you bee spirit that is spirituall and of the spirit and life that is to say they be of the liuely and naturall life Idem ad Calosyrium The same mans words are rehearsed to Calosyrius which follow For least we should abhorre flesh and blood set vpon the holy Altars God fauouring our frailty powred into the things offered the power of life turning them into the trueth of his owne flesh that a body of life as it were a certaine seed that giueth life might be found in vs. By these and many other places in Cyrillus we be lift vp from the letter to the spirite from the sence of the naturall man to a more hie vnderstanding of a spirituall mysterie It must not
other Fathers but those things that follow be not so It is verely his body saith he that is knit with the diuinitie that body taken of the holy Virgin This before him no man had said If his meaning be of the proper body the authoritie of the Fathers that were before him cryeth out against him which plainely affirme that body to be taken from the earth caried aboue the starres and not to be here who also with manifest difference doe separate that body from the sacrament of the bodie vnlesse peraduenture we may so interprete it as that saying of Augustine The same body and not the same body the same by grace and power and not the same according to the proper maner of a body the which it may seeme that this Authors meaning was when he writ this For by and by there followeth Not that the body that was taken of the Virgin should come down from heauen but that the very bread and wine is chaunged into the body and blood of the Lord. By which woords hee himselfe testifieth that this body which is receiued in the Sacrament is to bee vnderstood one way and that body which was taken which hee denieth to come downe from heauen another way For if it abide in heauen without comming downe hither and if bread be made of the very same body that was taken sure the bread must be in heauen and the faithfull shall here receiue neither the bread nor yet the body which thing no man in his right wits can affirme But if wee leaue the body that was taken in his place in heauen as our faith doth require and say notwithstanding that the same is present in the sacrament by grace and power as the rest of the Fathers do pronounce and therefore this bread may be called and beleeued for the naturall propertie of a body that is coupled with it to be the body of Christ not properly as that body that he tooke vpon him but after a spirituall sort as the sacrament of that body the matter is not intricate but plainely opened neither shall there bee any neede to frame crooked mazes that be cleane contrary to our faith or to knit vaine ropes of sand or to shun the similitudes that the former Fathers vsed and to inuent other similitudes grosse and strange from mysteries as Damascenus doth in this place For euen as saith hee the bread in eating and the wine and water in drinking are naturally turned into the body and blood of him that eateth and drinketh them and be made another body then that they had before so the Shewe bread and the wine and water by inuocation and comming of the holy Ghost bee changed aboue the law of nature into the body and blood of Christ and be not two but one and the same What other thing doeth hee by this similitude but open a way to 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is the eating of mans flesh which thing Cyrillus Theophylactus and other Fathers do detest How much better haue Cyprian Ambrose Epiphanius Emissenus and other said which affirme a like change in the sacrament of thankesgiuing as that which is made in Baptisme whereby it commeth to passe that the signes do remaine the same and by grace they get to themselues a new substance in like maner as one selfe man being not yet regenerate doeth belong to the olde Adam and after regeneration becommeth a new man and a new creature not by a fleshly meane which agreeth not to sacraments but after a spirituall sort But Damascenus forgetting himselfe who had before affirmed this meate to be spirituall as the regeneration in Baptisme now teacheth it to be carnall if this bread must passe into the body of Christ as common bread doth into the bodies of those that eate it vvhereby it happeneth that he falleth also into another errour for he denieth this bread and wine to bee a figure This bread and wine saith he is not a figure of the body and blood of Christ God forbid but the very deified body of the Lord. And no marueile it is that he denieth this if he be in opinion that this bread is so changed as common bread is into the body of the feeder But all they of old time throughout be repugnant and surely hee iarreth with himselfe for after those wordes cited out of the sixt Chapter of Iohn Vnlesse yee eate the flesh of the Sonne of man c. And My flesh verely c. by and by he bringeth another similitude of a coale farre diuerse from the former A coale saith he is not simple wood but coupled with fire so the bread of communion is not simple bread but coupled with the diuinitie How diuers is the maner of these two similitudes before he said that the Shewbread was turned into the body of Christ beyond nature as the common bread is naturally changed into the body of him that eateth it but that is not done vvhile there remaineth bread here he saith that the bread of communion is not simple bread but bread coupled with the diuinitie The bread therefore remaineth to what is it coupled to the diuinitie Where is then that grosse transmutation Againe a litle after This is that pure sacrifice without blood which God hath commanded by the Prophet should be offered to himselfe from the rising of the Sunne to the going dovvne of the same If hee speake of the body that hee tooke vpon him how is it without blood if hee speake of his spirituall body and blood he saith trueth Againe he saith This body is not consumed it is not corrupted nor cast into the draught If his meaning be of his spirituall and better substance of the sacrament vvee confesse it if of the outward signe Origen farre better learned then Damascenus saith As touching to that material part that it hath it goeth into the belly and is cast into the draught Damascenus goeth yet further and saith The bread is the first fruites of the bread to come which is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but epiousios doth signifie either the bread to come that is of the world to come or els that which is taken for the consecration of our substance But vvhether it be this way or that way it is aptly called the body of Christ For the Lords flesh is a spirit giuing life because it was conceiued of a quickening spirit For that which is borne of spirit is spirit But this I speake not to take away the nature of a body but willing to shew his quickening and diuinitie How changeable is this speach sometime one and the selfe bread is one and selfe body another time it is the first fruits of the bread to come otherwhile flesh at another time spirit At last about the end he saith For albeit some named the bread and wine patternes of Christs body and blood as that holy man Basill yet after the sanctifying they called it not so but before the
vpon the Crosse out of his side and this body which in the mysterie of Christes passion is daily solemnized of the faithfull and that blood also which is receiued in the mouth of the faithfull is a mysterie of that blood wherwith the whole world was redeemed Hee confirmeth that also by the authoritie of Hierom and after rehearsall of this place The blood and flesh of Christ is vnderstood two maner of wayes either that spirituall c. thus he concludeth With no small difference hath this doctour made a distinction of the body and blood of Christ For in that he saith that the flesh or blood which are daily receiued of the faithfull are spirituall and yet that the flesh that was crucified and the blood which was shed with the souldiers speare are not said to be spirituall nor diuine he doeth manifestly signifie that they differ as much one from another as do spirituall things and corporall visible and inuisible diuine and humane and that those things which differ from themselues are not all one But the spirituall flesh which is receiued in the mouth of the faithfull and the spirituall blood which is daily giuen to the faithfull to drinke doe differ from the flesh that was crucified and from the blood that was shed with the souldiers speare as the authoritie of this man doth witnesse Therefore they be not all one For that flesh which was crucified was made of the flesh of the Virgin framed together of bones and sinevves and seuered with the features of the members of a man quickned with the spirit of a reasonable soule indued with reason into a life proper to it selfe and motions agreeable to the same But on the other side the spirituall flesh which feedeth spiritually the people that doe beleeue after the forme that it beareth outwardly is made of the graines of corne by the handes of the workeman framed together of no sinewes and bones seuered with no varietie of members quickened with no reasonable substance nor can exercise any proper motions For whatsoeuer giueth the substance of life it is of a spirituall force and of an inuisible working and of a diuine power Againe of the wordes of Augustine he concludeth in this maner By authoritie of this doctour intreating of the Lords wordes of the sacrament of his body blood we be manifestly taught that those wordes of the Lord be to be vnderstood spiritually and not carnally as hee himselfe sayeth The words which I speake to you bee spirit and life Namely the words of eating his flesh and drinking his blood for he spake it vpon that occasion whereat his disciples were offended Therefore that they should not bee offended the heauenly Master calleth them back from the flesh to the Spirit and from a corporall sight to inuisible vnderstanding We see therefore the food of the Lords body and the drinke of his blood are after a sort his very body and his very blood namely in that they be Spirit and life Hee addeth againe after the matter proued Therefore we see that there is a great difference betweene the mysterie of the body blood of Christ which is now receiued of the faithfull in the Congregation and that body which was borne of the Virgin Mary which suffered which was buried which rose againe which ascended into heauen which sitteth at the right hand of the Father For this that is ministred in the way is to be taken spiritually For Faith beleeueth that which it seeth not and spiritually feedeth the soule and doth reioyce the heart and giueth euerlasting life and incorruption while that is not minded which feedeth the body which is crushed with teeth which is broken in pieces but that which by faith is spiritually receiued But that body wherein Christ suffered and rose againe is his owne proper body taken of the Virgin Maries body able to be felt and seene euen after his resurrection as he himselfe said to his disciples Beholde my hands and my feet for I am euen he handle me and see for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as ye see me haue Bertram writeth many things to this purpose but let it suffice that wee haue touched thus much Which mans exposition and manner of disputing vpon the Sacrament is in mine opinion diligently to be wayed and imbraced for tvvo respects First because hee sticketh to the authoritie and testimonie not onely of those fathers of whom he hath repeated a few but also many moe I might say of all the most auncient Secondarily because that where the credit of the man was so much that he was prouoked to write by a most famous Prince and his writing published abroad and in sight of all men he was praised of many reprehended of none or noted of any one spot of erronious doctrine whereby it came to passe that before these new grosse and naturall transubstantiation makers sprung vp the doctrine of Bertram touching the Sacrament was allovved by the iudgement of euery man that was best learned Albeit this terme of transubstantiation being indeed new not necessarie yet perhaps might haue some place as the word Trans-elementation if they had not brought in another change of the substances then a sacramentall and that which the auncient fathers did vnderstand which is brought to passe the former substance remayning still But they not satisfied with the noueltie of the terme haue inuented a monstrous interpretation For they appoint the very proper body of Christ to be in the Sacrament and plucke from it the true properties of a mans body whereas it should seeme that Aquinas himselfe was not ignorant of the distinction aboue mentioned Aquin. 3. parte Sum. q. 76. art 3. For he writeth 3. part Sum. q. 76. art 3. on this manner Christ is whole vnder ech peece of the formes of Bread and Wine not onely when the hoste is broken but also when it remaineth whole neyther is there distance of parts one from another as the eye from the eye or the eye from the eare or the head from the feete as there is in other bodies organicall for such maner of distance is in the true body of Christ but not as it is in this Sacrament He affirmeth the true body of Christ to bee one which is organicall and hath difference of members which also hee denyeth to bee in the Sacrament and that to be another which is in the Sacrament and wanteth varietie of members which thing if he meant of the spirituall body as the old writers did speake he iudged right but if hee meant to signifie any masse of flesh without forme it is a great absurditie and contrarie to the opinion of all the old writers Lombardus Lombardus also Author of the sentences concerning the verie and proper flesh of Christ lib 3. Sentent Dist 3. saith thus Christs flesh that was taken is neither heauenly nor of the aire nor of any other nature then of such as all mens flesh is Since
meat saith he is bread but the vertue in it doth quicken and he declareth that this vertue of the bread doth sanctifie and strength of the water is made by grace not naming it with one word but describing it more fully with many wordes saying That these things be done by faith and hope and the perfection of the mysteries Idem in Anacephaleosi and calling vpon of the sanctification for the perfection of saluation The same Author rehearseth almost the same words in Anacephaleosis Cyprian de Coena Dom. The same was also Cyprians opinion There is giuen saith he an immortall food differing from common meats retaining the shape of bodily substance but prouing by inuisible working that the presence of a diuine povver is there Thou hearest the presence of a diuine povver thou hearest an inuisible working that is to say the grace of God Againe By the wonted effect of things the weakenesse of our faith being aided is taught by a sensible argument that the effect of eternal life is in the visible sacraments And againe Euen as in the person of Christ humanitie was seene and diuinitie hid so into the visible sacraments vnspeakeably doth the diuine substance powre it selfe Againe These words be spirit and life neither doth the carnall sense pearce the vnderstanding of so great a depth vnlesse faith be added The bread is food the blood is life the flesh substance the body the Church A body for the agreeing of members in one bread for the conformitie of nourishment blood for the working of quickning flesh for the propertie of the humanitie taken In this place Cyprian witnesseth that this sacrament is called flesh and blood for the working of the quickning and for the propertie of the humanitie which Christ tooke that is the proper vertue thereof namely spirit and life And foorthvvith he addeth Christ doth othervvhile call this sacrament his body otherwhile flesh and blood othervvhile bread with the corporal nature whereof according to these visible things he hath communicate the portion of euerlasting life And againe The sacraments as much as in them is cannot be without their proper vertue neither by any meanes doeth the diuine Maiestie absent it selfe from the mysteries These termes which Cyprian commonly vseth The diuine povver The working of quickning The effect of eternall life The portion of life The diuine substance The diuine Maiestie what other thing doe they set out to vs then that which Augustine said that according to his Maiestie according to his vnspeakeable and inuisible grace Christ is with vs euen vnto the end of the world especially since that he shutteth out the carnall sense and requireth a spirituall as we haue in another place more fully expounded Neither thought Cyrillus any othervvise writing in this sort to Calosyrius Cyril ad Calos For that we should not abhorre flesh and blood being set vpon the holy Altars God fauouring our frailtie putteth a force of life into those things that be offered turning them into the trueth of his proper flesh that a body of life as it were a certaine quickning seed may be found in vs. That trueth of body which Cyprian calleth The working of quickning The effect of eternall life The portion of life the same doth Cyrillus terme the force of life a body of life a quickening seed meaning the spiritual power grace as he expoundeth himselfe vpon Iohn lib 4 ca. 17. Idem in Ioan. lib. 4. cap. 17. saying thus Euen as a little leauen as Paul saith doth sowre the whole lumpe so a little blessing of God doth draw the whole man into himselfe and doth fill him with his grace and in this sort doeth Christ abide in vs and we in Christ By this meanes he reiecteth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to say the eating of mans flesh and withdraweth the minds of the faithfull from vntrue meanings worldly thoughts and affirmeth to Euoptius Idem ad Euopt that this mysterie is receiued in an onely pure and exquisite faith as we haue mentioned before For it is necessary that such an eating be spirituall and made by grace Athanasius was of this opinion Athanas de Pecca in Spiri Sanct. In his booke of the sinne against the holy Ghost he writeth in this sort For this cause made hee mention of the Ascension of the Sonne of man into Heauen that hee might withdraw them from a corporall imagination that they might afterward learne that the heauenly meate that commeth from aboue and the spirituall food which he giueth is called the flesh of Christ For the wordes that I haue spoken to you saith he be Spirit and life Which is asmuch as if he should say The body which is shewed and slaine shal be giuen for the food of the world that it may be spiritually distributed in euery one and bee made a preseruation for all to the resurrection of eternall life For this cause sayeth Athanasius mention was made of the Ascension of the Sonne of man that he might call vs away from corporall imagining of his presence and might aftervvard learne that the grace or spirituall povver which he termeth the heauenly meat comming from aboue and spirituall food and affirmeth that it is spiritually distributed is called the flesh of Christ To these agreeth Chrysostome vpon Matthew cap. 26. Chrysost in Matth. cap. 26. Homil. 83. Hom. 83. Will ye not see saith he with what a chearefulnesse of minde Infants doe snatch the breast with what appressing do they fasten their lips to the nipples Let vs with no lesse desire come also to this Table and spirituall nipple of this cup yea rather with a greater coueting let vs like sucking babes sucke the grace of the Spirit Idem ibidem Let vs haue one griefe and heauinesse of heart if we be depriued of this spirituall food The same man in the same Homily saith That it is an insensible thing which is giuen vs in this sacrament but by things sensible euen as in Baptisme These be the words Since therefore he saith This is my body let vs haue no doubt but beleeue and behold it with our vnderstanding For no sensible thing is deliuered vs from Christ but by sensible things and yet all things which he deliuered be insensible So also in Baptisme by water which is a sensible thing that gift is granted but that which is wrought in it namely regeneration and renuing is a certaine intelligible thing For if thou haddest bene without a body hee would haue giuen thee the gifts barely without body but because thy soule is ioyned to a body in sensible things to be vnderstood are giuen thee O hovv many do now a daies say I would I might see his forme and shape I would I might see his garments also his shooes I would I might see Thou doest therefore see him touch him eat him thou desirest but to see his garments but he giueth thee himselfe not only that thou maiest