God doth not require this of them for they are under this Law of Nature and so he doth require it of them or else it is some distinct special Law whereby he requires it of others and not of them By this Notion God never made any Law beside this one Law of Nature no positive Law no ceremonial Law for this Law of Nature did bind Man to observe them when God was pleased to command them and yet they were special Laws for all that And why then must the Command of Faith in Christ and Repentance for Remission be no Law when God commands them because the Law of Nature requires us to obey them when God doth command them What a Government do these men assign to God who allow him but one and the same Law to govern the whole Creation by when their state and circumstances be so different though all are his Creatures 4. As for such as confound the Law of Nature with the Law to Israel as taken into the Covenant of Grace I shall not think fit to say more to than this Though the carnal Iews did turn it into a Covenant of Works as if their imperfect Obedience and chargeable Sacrifices were the very Righteousness for which they were justified and so neglected Repentance and Faith in the Promise of Forgiveness for the sake of Christ who was typified in their Sacrifices nevertheless it was a Law of Faith and Repentance as Wittichius calls it p. 106. in cap. 2. v. 25. and therefore such great Titles are given it in the Old Testament and not as such is it opposed by the Apostle Paul in the New Testament it was the base perverting of it as exclusive of Faith in Christ and as opposing Gospel Institutions by Jewish Ordinances that he reprehends See Calvin on Ps. 19 9. he states the difference between the Law commended by David and as represented by Paul and saith that Paul had to do with the perverse Interpreters of the Law which separated it from the Grace and Spirit of Christ c. and sums up all in these words Haec diversa legis acceptatio c. This different acceptation of the Law easily reconciles the seeming difference in the words of David and Paul because Paul's purpose is to shew what the Law of it self viz. as it sincerely requires the Duty we owe to God without the Promise of Grace can do in us or for us but David commends the whole Doctrine of the Law which is the same with the Gospel and therefore includes Christ therein See Mr. Ball 's Arguments for the Covenant with Israel being the Gospel-Covenant and how the Precepts were Gospel-Precepts Indeed it 's true the matter of the Ten Commandments were much of the matter of the Law of Innocency but God did not deliver it to his Church as a Law to innocent Man but to fallen Man for his direction and recovery Therefore when any Authors take the Law as given on Sinai to be the Covenant of Grace they deny Faith to be commanded Adam in Innocency though they grant it requir'd in the Law at Sinai 2. The Sanction of the Gospel is not the same with the Law of Innocency which I shall evidence in the promissory and minatory parts I 'll begin with the promissory part I. The promissory part of the Gospel differs from that of the Law of Innocency 1. There are many things promised in the Gospel which that Law never promised Did that Law ever promise Union with Christ or the indwelling Spirit or Forgiveness of Sin or Perseverance Surely no But the Gospel doth all this Nay Dr. Goodwin urgeth many Arguments to prove that the Reward of Adam was to be only a continuance in the same Life he had in Paradise and not a translation to Heaven 2. The Rewards of the Law of Works were not promised on the same account as the Benefits promised by the Law of Grace be those were on the account of Works as a meriting Righteousness ours are by Free Grace on the account of Christ's sole meriting Righteousness Dr. Goodwin saith The Reward of the Law was in a just sence due of Debt unto the Creature and that from God Not that God can owe any thing to his Creature or be obliged for any thing to him but because in a way of natural Justice or rather Comeliness and Dueness such as is by the Law of Creation to be between a just Creator and a holy Creature there is an approbation due to him from God whilst that Creature obeys him and that as a Debt of Nature But I say all the claim we have is for Christ and ex pacto as the Free Promise assureth us 3. The Benefits are promised on different terms By the Law all was for perfect Sinless Obedience but the Gospel promiseth Pardon upon our true repenting and believing and we forfeit not our Interest in its Blessings if our Faith be effectual and persevering in sincere Holiness and Obedience 4. The Law of Adam did not justifie till the whole time of the trial of Obedience was finished It 's true it did continue the Blessings he had while he sinned not but it did not fix his state of Happiness till his trial was over but the Gospel puts us in a justified state upon our first believing II. The threatning part of the Gospel differs from that in Adam's Law 1. The Evils threatned are not wholly the same Here 's not only Death but that in sorer degrees Heb. 10. 29. 12. 25. God's Wrath will be more poured out and Conscience will find matter of sorer Reflections Here 's a privation of Christ and his Spirit and Pardon We are not only without them but we are barr'd from them because of our wicked refusal when they were sincerely offer'd us after our Apostacy If the Gospel were no Law we could not be obliged to more Misery than Adam brought us under yea and Adam could not be our full Representative in his Covenant if we are capable of encreasing our Misery by that Law without disobedience to a new one 2. The Gospel doth not denounce Death for the same Sins as Adam's Law did that Law threatned Death for the least Sin yea for one Sin but the Gospel threatens Death not for every Sin it doth not bar every Sinner from actual Relief but the impenitent unbelieving and utterly ungodly Hypocrite 3. The Gospel binds not Damnation on us unless we are finally impenitent Unbelievers If at any time of life we truly repent and believe we shall find Mercy but Adam's Law denounced him miserable on his first Sin III. There be a great many other Differences viz. in Adam's Law God acted as meer Creator in the Law of Grace he acts as Redeemer as well as Creator in Adam's Law Men were considered as innocent and sinless in the Gospel we are considered as Sinners by that Law God governed us as happy in order to
hath no Forgiveness for them and therefore would require no Repentance of them It is not nor ever was a Duty encumbent on them to repent nor is it so unto the Damned in Hell God requires it not of them nor is it their Duty there being no Forgiveness for them What should move them to repent Why should it be their Duty so to do Assignation then of Repentance is a revelation of Forgiveness God would not call upon a sinful Creature to humble it self and bewail its Sin if there were no way of recovery or relief Pray see him p. 151 c. P. 184. he saith Whence is it that men perish in and for their Sins Is it for want of Mercy Goodness Grace or Patience in God Is it through any defect in the Mediation of the Lord Christ Is it for want of the mightiest Encouragements and most infallible Assurances that with God there is Forgiveness Not at all but meerly on the account of their own obstinacy stubbornness and perverseness they will not they hate the Light they will not come to Christ that they may have Life See his awful denunciation of the Curse against all that resolve to continue in the neglect of this Salvation p. 272. I 'll add one Passage of his p. 144. the satisfaction made for Sin being not made by the Sinner himself there must of necessity be a Rule and Law-Constitution how the Sinner may come to be interessed in it and made partaker of it for the consequent of the Freedom of one by the Suffering of another is not natural or necessary but must proceed from a Law-Constitution Compact and Agreement Now the way constituted and appointed is that of Faith or Believing as explained in the Scripture If Men believe not they are no less liable to the Punishment due to their Sins than if no satisfaction at all were made for Sinners P. 624. he asks whether there be any Terms or no Terms in the Covenant he answers Surely there are How shall poor Creatures make out their Interest therein unless God hath declared upon what Conditions we shall be possest of the Priviledges c If God hath once declared the Conditions if we would have the benefit we must consent to them In the last part p. 127. he tells us the Conditions of the Covenant are Faith Repentance and new Obedience P. 374. Nothing can be objected against the Conditions He requires viz. Repentance and Faith Can any Malefactor expect Peace with his Sword in his Hand And is it not fit there should be such Conditions to justifie God since we were the guilty Offenders can there be less than to cast away our Weapons bewail our Sins receive the Mediator and serve him with newness of life They are such reasonable Conditions that the Honour of God would not be provided for nor have a salvo without them See p. 692 349 c. P. 36. Make sure of true saving justifying Faith c. it secures from this Condemnation both as it is the Grace which unites to Christ and also as it is the great Condition of the Gospel upon which it promiseth Life and Salvation c. He may set down what Condition he pleases in order to the giving out of his Grace which when they are performed he is engaged to make good what he promiseth upon them How oft doth he tell us that God requires of every man Faith to be the Condition to be Partaker of the Covenant P. 114. and p. 143. he saith The Condition requir'd of us is the doing this viz. to repent to serve the Lord in newness of Life Bulkley by very many Arguments from p. 278 to 298. doth prove the Gospel-Covenant to be conditional P. 280. The Lord doth not say to any Soul I will save you and bring you to Life though you continue impenitent and unbelieving but commands and works us to repent and believe and then promises that in the way of Faith and Repentance he will save us Had I room I would give thee full proof that Davenant Pemble Perkins Twiss Scharpius Zanchius Rollock Wendelin Altingius Burgess Blake New-England Synod Turretin Synod of Dort with hundreds more do positively affirm the Gospel-Covenant to require a Condition on our part and so fix this Gospel-Rule Mr. Chancy's Father urgeth it p. 79 132 123 116. where he shews what we must do to obtain the Propitiation So 117. Mr. Rutherford affirms That to deny there be Conditions is to bely the Gospel and adds That Good Works are Conditions without which we cannot be saved p. 38. and p. 36. It is a new Heresie of Antinomians to deny a conditional Gospel it is all one as to bely the Holy Ghost who saith He that believeth shall be saved he that believeth not is condemned already Or they may say whether Men believe or no they may be saved as Dr. Crisp saith P. 445. If not then be wise and 〈◊〉 from the Wrath to come and there is but one way and that is by closing with Jesus Christ and giving your selves up to an entire subjection to his Yoke There is no way to escape Wrath and secure Eternal Life but this P. 276. Consider where you will lay the blame of your Destruction you cannot lay it upon God for he gave Christ to redeem and save you you cannot lay it upon Christ for he would have gathered you and you would not he never cast you off till you cast him off you cannot lay it upon the Spirit for he would have convinced and converted and sanctified you and you have resisted and quenched him you cannot lay it upon your Ministers for they have set before you Life and Death and declared to you the danger of Sin and necessity of Holiness but you would not believe their Report c. So that you can lay the blame no where but upon a cursed corrupt Heart thy Destruction is of thy self See what he saith of Conditions and decree under the Head the Gospel is a Law P. 182 183 184 c. proves the Covenant to be conditional that without Faith there is no relation in a way of Covenant 'twixt God and us and that upon Faith God becomes our God in Covenant and answers Objections P. 188 189. he speaks to Sinners presuming of the many Promises of Salvation c. Oh but Sirs there is a Condition in the Bond which he oft repeats P. 430. when he had proved Repentance was necessary to the remission of Sin he adds Whereas they say this is Popish and Legal they speak ignorantly if not maliciously c. it is as Popish to say Repentance is required for Assurance as for Remission for both are Acts of Grace Conjunctas autem c. But Repentance and Remission of Sin are joyned together and truly so that Repentance goes before Forgiveness This partly the Word of God teacheth yea Reason it self and common Sence however corrupt doth
Act they are such ungodly ones as believing Abram was 5. Their Faith doth not merit Pardon nor is it the Righteousness by which they are pardoned that 's Christ's alone 6. Faith or the first Grace is far from making a Sinner sound or whole before Pardon it makes him sound but as being the Condition upon which Christ's Righteousness will be applied to him for healing but without this applied to the Believer for Pardon he would be miserable notwithstanding Faith 7. Faith is necessary to our Interest in Pardon see cap. 12. 8. This Faith is an effect of the Work of the Spirit on the Heart of a Sinner in effectual Vocation and by Vocation there is a change of the Soul and its prior to Pardon Whom he called them he justified Rom. 8. 30. Lest they should be converted and I should heal them Mat. 13. 15. Act. 26. 18. The Sanctification which follows Justification doth not import that there 's no Calling before nor that begun habitual Holiness is not infused in Vocation But I would ask 1. Q. What kind of Faith is that by which we are justified if there be no Work of the Spirit on the Heart Is it a vital Act before Life Is it the Faith of God's Elect when it proceeds from an unregenerate Heart Is it an Act of an enlighten'd Mind before the Mind be enlighten'd or Can they see Christ before their Eye be opened Is it an Act of the Will before the Will be at all determined by Grace Is it a receiving of Christ while the Heart is yet under an utter aversion to him Is it a renouncing of all for Christ whilst the byass of the Heart is against Christ and for other things above him and against him Do we believe before we are made a willing People Can it be an Effect of Infinite Power and make no change in the principle of our Actings Or can that Principle be and yet have place neither in Understanding or Will It 's true as they describe Faith a man may be Evangelically ungodly and yet believe because it 's a Faith common to the most prophane who perswade themselves all is safe though Destruction is near and this while they hate and reject Christ with their whole Heart How can it be a Faith unfeâ—…gned while Villany and Hypocrisie reign in the Soul Or be adapted to such great Operations whilst in its whole Essence there is nothing which argues the least alteration on the Soul or operation of the Holy Spirit Here 's the Faith of a dead Soul of an unregenerate Soul of an unconverted Soul and by such a Faith we are justified they say But 2. Q. How dare these men pretend to agree with our Orthodox Divines when they are so plain against them Read the Assemblies lesser Catechism Q. What is Effectual Calling A. Effectual Calling is the Work of God's Spirit whereby convincing us of our Sin and Misery enlightening our Minds in the knowledge of Christ and renewing our Wills he doth perswade and enable us to embrace Iesus Christ freely offered to us in the Gospel Q. What Benefits do they that are effectually called partake of in this Life A. They that are effectually called do in this Life partake of Iustification Adoption Sanctification and the several Benefits which in this Life do either accompany or flow from them Reader is not the Assembly plain that a man is called before he is justified When Justification is a Benefit that the Called and none but they partake of and this Benefit supposeth them effectually called who partake of it let 's next see who are called Is there no change made upon them by effectual Vocation Sure there is and this in order to their embracing Christ which is Believing They are convinced of Sin and Misery their Minds are enlighten'd with the Saving Knowledge of Christ. Their Wills are renewed they are perswaded and enabled to put forth that Act of Faith whereby they embrace Christ. Is here no change Sure it 's a great one in the Understanding and Will too and all this to make a man an Object of Justification And shall these men face us down as if we differ'd from the Assembly Nay do not all our Orthodox plead against the Arminians that there is the infused Habit of Faith before the Act yea and that most Habits are infused at once and included in the vital Principle What heaps of Testimonies could I produce for this Yea is it not our common Principle that Vocation is before Justification Herewith agree the Canons of the Synod of Dort par 1. p. 303. Hooker's Effect Calling p. 344 345. Mr. C. saith p. 123. Hence Justification is set after Vocation and therefore after Faith because Faith is wrought in Vocation Norton p. 260 261 263. Union in order of Nature followeth Vocation p. 291. So also Ball of Cov. p. 334 339. See how Mr. Rutherford exposeth this Error p. 131. and p. 111 112. he sets down this as the Gospel-Order 1. The Sinner dead in Sin a Son of Wrath 2. a Walker after the Errours of this World 3. The Gospel of Free Grace is preached to the Dead the elect Heirs of Wrath c. 4. The Law and Curses of it preached with the Gospel lest they despair to humble them 5. The Sinner legally humbled Rom. 7. 11. with a half hope of Mercy prepared for Christ c. 6. The stony Heart of meer Grace removed in the same moment a new Heart put in him or the Habit of Sanctification put in him 7. In the same moment the Soul believeth in him that justifieth the Ungodly 8. In the same moment God for Christ's sake of meer Grace justifieth the believing Sinner Is not here a new Heart in order of Nature before Faith and that Faith before Justification tho' not in time Mr. C. p. 22. When I had affirmed that in Adam's Law Life was promised to sinless Obedience c. and that Salvation is now impossible by that Law but that God in the Gospel promiseth Blessings on lower Terms viz. unfeigned Faith c. Mr. C. answers To talk of any obedience to that Law besides sinless in respect of that Law in its preceptive part is nonsence for sinful Obedience which you are going to plead for is Disobedience And p. 26. I roundly assert that no Law of God with a Sanction of Life and Death upon performance or non-performance of Obedience doth admit of the least imperfection in the said Obedience He oft speaks in this manner whence I think this is his Principle That God hath not promised any Benefit for Christ's sake upon any terms short of perfect Obedience and sincere Faith Love and Holiness because imperfect are formally downright Disobedience or Sin which is the same Rep. 1. I grant sincere Faith and Holiness be imperfect as to the preceptive part of Adam's Law 2. I grant that nothing imperfect can be a meritorious Righteousness
the Elect and declared in the Gospel and God doth not fix on these terms for any Worth in them or profit to him 3. The Gospel is the Instrument or Sign by which this Will of God is expressed This is not the Language of God in Adam's Law if this were not superadded to that we had been utterly miserable 4. This fixeth that Rule of the Promise which Mr. C. p. 33. is at a loss to know God promiseth he will justifie him that truly believes and save the upright in Heart Hereby he that in Truth believes and is upright answers that Rule which the Unbelievers and Hypocrites do not and so God doth not hereby promise to save them yea he declares they shall not have an Interest in these Mercies because they continue such and condemns them as such at last It 's Faith not Infidelity it 's Faith in Truth not Faith in Perfection nor Hypocrisie I shall offer thee some few Reasons why I say this is some part of the Essence of the Gospel and that God hath fixed this Rule therein R. 1. The Gospel is oft called a Law by the Spirit of God Isa. 42. 4. He shall not fall nor be discouraged till he have set Judgment in the Earth and the Isles shall wait for my Law Mic. 4. 2. Many Nations shall come c. for the Law shall go forth of Zion c. Rom. 3. 27. The Law of Faith Rom. 10. 31. The Law of Righteousness the Law of Liberty Iam. 1. 25. 2. 12. A converting Law Psal. 19. 7. The Law of Christ Gal. 6. 2. The best Commentators expound these to be the Gospel yea many say this is that Law of the Spirit of Life in Christ Rom. 8 2. Many more places might be added R. 2. Mens Behaviour towards the Gospel is expressed by words that denote it to be a Law Rom. 10. 16. They have not obeyed the Gospel 2 Cor. 9. 13. Your professed Subjection to the Gospel 2 Thess. 1. 8. To take vengeance on them that obey not the Gospel 1 Pet. 4. 17. What will the end of them be that obey not the Gospel R. 3. Justification is a judicial Act and therefore it must be by a Law if we allow God to be a Ruler when He doth it We dispute this against the Papists who deny it to be a forensick Term. It 's true the Righteousness for which we are justified is Christ's which answer'd the Law of Innocency but the application of it to one man rather than another and to the same man at one time and not before is by the Gospel It 's not the voice of the Law of Works that the believing Sinner shall be justified for Christ's Righteousness Rom. 3. 26. So Gal. 3. 22. And I might shew that in Justification is a Right to Impunity And can any thing but a Law give this for Condemnation by Law cannot be reversed without a Law R. 4. The Gospel gives a Right to its Benefits upon believing Ioh. 1. 12. to as many as received him to them gave he power to become the Sons of God even to them that believe in his Name What did God by his Gospel give to these 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Right a Title to be the Sons of God Very many places of this kind might be urged And little do men see what follows from denying this Gospel-Rule when we read such Places as they were worthy Rev. 3. 4. the Reward a Right to the Tree of Life Are these Terms proper from the meer nature of Mens Actions That 's Popish Merit Or from the Law of Works That 's false and anti-Evangelical But it 's safe to say it 's a Gospel Worthiness Reward Right c. God having for Christ's sake promised to give Blessings in such a way The Gospel-Law is so entirely founded on Christ and refers to him so fully that there is no more than an inviolable Connexion between Terms and Benefits there 's no boasting when the Claim is strongest yea not boasting but ascribing all to Christ is one of the great Terms R. 5. If God hath no Gospel-Rule beside Election and Distinguishing Mercy to confer Glory by then God will not nay cannot forgive or save the Non-Elect though they should believe in Christ. Say not they will not believe that makes no alteration as to the Point in hand Hath not God declared he will save them if they believe That is his Law and their rejecting his Salvation God arraigneth them for He is condemned because he hath not believed c. What an allay to their Misery would it be to think Tho' I had believed I had not escaped this Woe I have lost neither Christ nor Heaven by my Unbelief Read God's Pleas with all Sinners remember Christ's Tears over lost Ierusalem What do Men speak of a Day of Grace that Men may sin away Nay what are the serious Pleas of Ministers with every Soul to believe and repent All are delusive Mockery whilst God is as free to pardon the Elect whether he believes or no He is at liberty to damn others though they should believe nay He is sure to do it should they believe because they are not Elect. If this leads not to Hobbism I see nothing I own that Forgiveness is an Act of Soveraignty that is he is free to give Faith and Forgiveness upon it to whom he will But they that think God hath left himself absolutely free to forgive the Adult whether they believe or no and to condemn the Believer seem to forget their Bible Would men of this Principle but preach according to their Scheme I think their Influence would abate with all that seriously mind Heaven not withstanding Mr. C. says that Pardon will not leave them impenitent R. 6. The Apostles with all the Saints may be arraigned as fallen from Grace and turned from the Gospel if it be no Rule according to which God applies Christ's Righteousness for Justification How could Peter say Repent and be baptized for the remission of Sin c. when the People cried What shall we do How could Paul answer the Goaler's Question What shall I do to be saved Believe on the Lord Iesus Christ and thou shalâ—… be saved This is not an Advice to Signs but to appointed Terms q. d. God hath commanded you to repent and believe and hath enacted that if you do so the Blood of Christ shall wash and save you So Gal. 2. 16. We have believed that we might be justified by the Faith of Christ. They believed for this very end If any say it was Christ justified it 's true but it was upon believing Faith is not the justifying Righteousness but it is the Condition of our being justified by this Righteousness and the Saints did ill to believe to this end if God had not enacted it to this end Nor could they do it in this assurance that they should be justified when they believed if God
have God for their own God which with him the vilest if Elect have their Sins can do them no hurt at all and in that regard there is no cause of fear from any of their Sins that ever they have committed Beloved I conceive this may seem harsh to some Spirits especially to such as misconceive the drift at which I aim which is not to encourage any one unto Sin but to ease the Consciences of the distressed I desire you to resolve with your selves this one thing and I beseech you kick not against the Truth There is not one sin nor all the sins together of any one Believer that can possibly do that Believer any hurt real hurt I mean and therefore he ought not to be afraid of them I will make it appear And goes on for five Pages to prove it Now Reader can this one line make all the rest safe There is no more said by him it 's in a Doctrinal way stated and not in a use to wounded Consciences He oft says it elsewhere without so much as this and he saith this to avoid the Odium not to guide his Discourse and it 's no other than if a man were proving a quarter of an hour â—…o a whole company very apt to drink poysoned Wine if this Poyson be drank it will do no harm to them that drink it but yet should once say I prove this all this while but it 's for the sake of them that have drank the Poyson but not to encourage you to drink the Poyson yet be you all assured that when it 's drank it cannot harm you more than them C. It 's to evince the damning nature of sin is taken away A. But that 's a gross Error thô Pardon will prevent its effects Yet hear D. C's own words p. 511. No you will say no condemnation in Hell but yet as there is remainders of Sin in Gods own People so there will some Evil or other fall upon the commission of Sin Mark c. and in many words answers it Now sin is condemned to the Believer it can do no hurt at all to him for what hurt can that do which is carried into the Land of Forgetfulness and this he oft affirms was when Christ died Reader I 'll tell thee on what Principles Dr. Crisp affirms that Sin can do no hurt Take his words 1. God hath no more to lay to the charge of such a person Elect thô a Murtherer than he hath to lay to the charge of a Saint in Glory p. 364. and the Lord hath not one Sin to charge on an elect person from the first moment of conception to the last moment of Life 2. A man doth sin against God God reckons not his Sin to be his he reckons it to be Christs therefore he cannot reckon it his see p. 270. Except God will be offended where there is no Cause to be offended he will not be offended with a Believer because he doth not find the Sin of the Believer to be the Believer's own Sin but he finds it to be the Sin of Christ p. 15. Now Reader judge how vain Mr. C's Excuses be and how injurious his Censures What Mr. C. p. 15. pleads for Dr. Crisp's saying that Graces and Holiness cannot do us the least good is as vain and false viz. that he is only against setting them in the place of Christ for he reckons they are put in Christ's place thô they be affirmed but as Means or Conditions antecedently necessary by divine appointment to obtain any Blessings for the sake of Christs Merits His Principles are 1. That Faith is not so much as the Instrument by which we are united to Christ or justified p. 616. 2. That Christ brings us all good things when we are ungodly and so it 's in vain to do any thing to obtain these p. 41 42. yea that we had a full Title before we are born 3. He saith p. 45 46. It 's a received Conceit among many that our Obedience is the way to Heaven and thô it be not say they the cause of reigning yet it is via ad regnum the way to the Kingdom But all this Sanctification is not a jot the way of that justified person unto Heaven 4. Salvation is not the End of any good work we do 5. No Believer should have the least thought in his Heart of promoting or advancing himself or any end of his own by doing what he doth Consider these with many such and what good can Faith or Holiness do us See my Book c. 13 14. Read the Preface to Mr. Flavel's Blow at the Root which Mr. Mather subscribed Reader distinguish 1. between the Righteousness for which we are justified and the way of applying it to us 2. between a Law by which Christ's Merits are applied and that Obedience whereto is our meriting Righteousness 3. between the Precepts included in the Gospel taken in a large sence and what are its proper Conditions 4. Free Grace as it gives Faith and Pardon and as it 's a Liberty to condemn the Believer and justifie the Unbeliever 5. between the Promises of Grace and Promises to Grace 6. The Gospel as a means to quicken us and as a Charter of Benefits and thou wilt Answer Mr. C's Arguments FINIS The Reasons of my Sermon at P. H. above a year since Why I printed my Book about six months since Vulgar Objections against my Book answered The History thereof is worth the buying Mr. Parkhurst lately reprinted it Part of the Controversie between Mr. C. and me stated which appears fully in his Principles as in the following Book The Method Election asserted The Law not abrogated Christ's Righteousness the sole meritorious Cause or material Righteousness in Iustification and it is applied to Believers Gospel-Conditions not the Righteousness for which we are justified nor of the same nature as legal Works Gospel-Conditions no way meritorious of Iustification or Salvation nor other workingconditions but a meer conformity to the Gospel way of receiving the Gifts of Christ. A moral specifick difference between true Grace and meer moral Endowments The First Grace absolutely given Christs Righteousness is imputed Iustified by Faith before Works Gospel â—…ons no 〈◊〉 of Iustification Iustification by Faith alone as the 〈◊〉 Receiving Condition All Elect Believers shall persevere Christ not opposed but exâ—…ted Free Grace honour'd and not oppos'd Holiness not compared with Christ nor Works sâ—…t in 〈◊〉 place The 〈◊〉 of the Eleâ—… â—…f God be considered as meer Proprietor The state of fallen Men as GOD is considered a paternal Ruler A plain account of my Iudgment by Questions and Answers Popish 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Arminian Iustification as our Divines state it Mr. C's first Principle Mr. C's 2d Principle Mr. C's 3d Principle The word Law of Grace same as the Covenant How for a new Law and yet no new Gospel Heb. 11. 4 6. Gen. 4. 7 11. How the Gospel is not a Law How the Gospel is