of Mans Wisdom but in demonstration of the Spirit and of Power that your Faith should not stand in the Wisdom of Men but in the Power of God. Luke 1. 35. The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee Blessed Mary and the Power of the Highest shall overshadow thee Luke 11. 20. I with the Finger of God that is by the Power of God Exod. 8. 19. cast out Devils Mat. 12. 28. I cast out Devils by the Spirit of God. Compare also Luke 24. 49. with Acts 1. 4 5 8. 2. A manifest Distinction is made as between God and Christ so also between God and the Holy Spirit or Power and Inspiration of God so that 't is impossible the Spirit should be God himself Rom. 5. 5. The Love of God is shed abroad in your Hearts by the Ho-Ghost which is given to us 1 Cor. 3. 16. The Grace or Favour of our Lord Jesus Christ the Love of God and the Communion of the Holy Ghost be with you Rom. 8. 27. He the Spirit v. 26. maketh Intercession for the Saints according to the Will of God. They note here that God's Spirit or Inspiration being designed to be a continual Director and Guide to the Faithful it is spoken of in these and some other Texts as a Person by the same Figure of Speech that Charity is described as a Person 1 Cor. 13. 4 5. and Wisdom Prov. 9. 11. and the Law or Commandments of God Psal 119. 24. They note also that in some Texts 't is called the Holy Ghost and Holy Spirit in the same sense that we commonly say the Holy Wisdom Holy Will of God. 3. The Spirit is obtained for us of God by our Prayers therefore it self is not God. Acts 15. 8. God which knoweth the Hearts bare them witness giving them the Holy Spirit as he did to us Luke 11. 13. How much more shall your Heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to them that ask him If we say these Texts are to be understood not of the Person of the Holy Ghost but of his Gifts and Graces the Socinians readily confess it but they say also that if the Holy Spirit were at all a Person much more a God his Gifts and Graces would be bestowed by himself and asked of himself not bestówed by and asked of another Person as 't is manifest and by all confessed they are in these Texts They add there is neither Precept nor Example in all Holy Scripture of Prayer made to the Spirit on this or any other occasion which on the Trinitarian Supposition that the Holy Spirit is a Person and God no less than the Father is very surprizing nay utterly unaccountable 4. If the Holy Spirit and our Lord Christ are Gods or God no less than the Father then God is a Trinity of Persons or three Persons but this is contrary to the whole Scripture which speaks of God as but one Person and speaks of him and to him by singular Pronouns such as I Thou Me Him c. Job 13. 7. Will ye speak wickedly for God Will ye accept his Person Heb. 1. 1. God hath in these last times spoken to us by his Son who being the Brightness of his Glory and the express Image of his Person sat down at the right Hand of the Majesty on high Deut. 6. 4 5. Hear O Israel the Lord our God is one Lord and thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thine Heart In the Hebrew thus O Israel hearken to Jehovah our God Jehovah is one and thou shalt love Jehovah thy God with all thine Heart The Jews by a most ancient Tradition and Custom are obliged to repeat this Verse every Morning and Evening to keep it in perpetual Memory that Jehovah or God is one only not two or three Isa 45. 5. I am the Lord there is no God but Me. Psal 102. 25. O my God of old hast thou laid the Foundation of the Earth Matth. 4. 10. the Lord thy God him only shalt thou serve No Instance say the Socinians can be given in any Language of three Persons whoever spoke of themselves or were spoken to by the singular Pronouns I Thou Me Him Thee c. Such speaking is contrary to Custom Grammar and Sense which are the Laws of Speech therefore the Holy Scriptures always speaking thus of God either he is only one Person or the Scriptures are one continued ungrammatical Soloecism and Impropriety and that in the capital Article of Faith which no reasonable or good Man can or ever will allow For it no way helps the Trinitarians that God according to some Translations says at Gen. 1. 26. Let Vs make Man. Because nothing is so usual in common Speech as for single Persons to speak of themselves indifferently by singular or plural Pronouns thus 2 Cor. 10. 2. I think to be bold against some who think of Vs saith Paul of himself only as if We walked according to the Flesh Briefly they contend that when God speaks of himself in the plural Number or by plural Pronouns which yet some deny he ever does and if he doth 't is not above once or twice in the whole Scripture he speaks according to the Custom of single Persons especially Princes and great Persons in all Nations and Languages but were Almighty God three Persons they could never speak of themselves or be spoken to by the singular Pronouns I Thou Thee Him Me because 't is contrary not only to Grammar which is always to be observed when there is no Custom to the contrary but to the Custom of all Nations which understand to speak intelligibly and sensibly 5. Had the Son or Holy Ghost been God this would not have been omitted in the Apostles Creed This Creed say they which is of next if not equal Authority to any part of Holy Scripture after having declared that God is the Father Almighty and Maker of Heaven and Earth speaks not a Word of the Godhead of the Son or Holy Ghost It describes the Son by all the characters of a Man and by such only it says he was conceived or begotten by the Holy Ghost on Blessed Mary that accordingly he was born of her that he was crucified died and was buried that he rose on the third day and ascended into Heaven all these are the Descriptions of a Man for God cannot be conceived or be born or die no nor ascend into Heaven for he is always there Not content to take no notice that he is God this Creed distinguishes him very plainly from God that is denies him to be God by adding He sits at the right Hand of God. i. e. He is advanced to be next to God and is under the immediate and particular Protection of God. Concerning the Holy Ghost this Creed says no higher thing than it says of the Church I believe in the Holy Ghost and in the Holy Catholick Church For in the Greek the same Preposition in is before both alike and so also is this Creed
Psal 95. 9 10. Your Fathers tempted me forty years long was I grieved with this Generation These words spoken by and of God are interpreted of the Holy Ghost Heb. 3. 7 9 10. As saith the Holy Ghost your Fathers tempted me c. Answ As saith the Holy Ghost that is As saith the Holy Spirit or Inspiration of God by the Mouth of the Prophet David So Estius Piscator Capellus Grotius c. Note that in the Psalmist's words there is an Enallage of the Person frequent in the Hebrew and especially in the Psalms Me for Him and I for He. 10. Psal 97. 7. Worship him all ye Gods or all ye Angels These words though spoken of God are interpreted of Christ Heb. 1. 6. Again when he bringeth the first-begotten into the World he saith And let all the Angels of God worship him Answ In the Greek 't is When he bringeth again the first-begotten into the World that is when he raised Christ from the dead who is his first-begotten from the dead he commandeth let even all the Angels of God worship him 'T is uncertain whether St. Paul had any respect to the Words in the Psalm but if he had he doth not quote the Words of the Psalmist as if they were spoken of Christ but only declareth the Decree of God known to him by the Spirit for subjecting the Angels to Christ in the same words that the Psalmist had used on another occasion because they are words most proper to express that Decree for the Writers of the New Testament generally affect to speak in Scripture Language 11. Psal 102. 25. Of old hast thou laid the Foundation of the Earth c. This seems applied to Christ Heb. 1. 10 11 12 13. And thou Lord in the Beginning hast laid the Foundation of the Earth but to which of the Angels said he at any time Sit on my right Hand Answ Thomas Aquinas hath rightly acknowledged that the Words of both these Texts may be understood of God only not of Christ The Context of the Hebrews hath this sense And thou Lord that is and in another Text of the Psalms 't is said Thou Lord. So Estius Camerarius Grotius hast laid the Foundation of the Earth But to which of the Angels said he i. e. said the Founder of the Earth c. sit on my right Hand as he saith to Christ at Psal 110. 1. For though Psal 110. 1. is literally designed of David yet you Hebrews knowing that David was a Type of Christ do also apply the Words there sit on my right Hand unto the Messias or Christ 12. Psal 110. 1. The Lord said unto my Lord Sit on my right Hand until I make thine Enemies thy Footstool It appears by Matth. 22. 43. that the Jews understood these words of David as spoken of God and Christ and therefore our Saviour puts this Question to them how Christ could be David's Son for they were it should seem commonly taken to be David's Words if he was David's Lord which can no way be answered but by saying he was David's Son according to the Flesh and David's Lord as he was God. Answ Our Saviour's Words are David in Spirit calleth him Lord saying The Lord said unto my Lord Sit on my right Hand that is David in the Spirit of Prophecy foreseeing Christ calls him his Lord. But he calleth him so not because Christ is God for if that were true himself could have made his Enemies his Footstool but because not only the Spirits of David and all Saints but even Angels are in Heaven made subject to Christ and that as the Reward of his most Holy Life and obsequious and acceptable Death 1 Pet. 3. 22. Phil. 2. 8 9. But note that when the Psalmist says the Lord said unto my Lord the Lord said is to be understood he hath in decree said he hath decreed it shall be so So Dr. Patrick in his Paraphrase on this Text. 13. Psal 110. 3. Thy People shall be willing in the day of thy Power in the beauty of Holiness from the womb of the Morning thou hast the Dew of thy Youth Answ This Text as 't is in the English Translation is wholly unintellible Seb. Castalio has as he is wont made a probable and elegant sense from the Hebrew thus Thy People or thy Troops shall be chearful when with sacred Majesty thou goest to Battel thou shalt have innumerable Youth The words are spoken to David 14. Psal 139. 7. Whither shall I go from thy Spirit Answ From thy Spirit is an Hebrew Phrase for From thee Like as when 't is said of Moses Psal 106. 33. They provoked his Spirit the undoubted meaning is They provoked Him. So also Eph. 4. 30. Grieve not the holy Spirit of God is an Hebraism for Grieve not God. 15. Prov. 8. 24. When there were no depths I was brought forth Answ Solomon speaketh here of the Quality or Faculty of Wisdom by which God and Men order their Affairs wisely That he meaneth not as some have fancied the Son or the Spirit of God appears by the Gender he useth For he saith ver 2. She standeth in the top of high Places ver 3. She crieth at the gates and chap. 7. 4. Say unto Wisdom Thou art my Sister 16. Prov. 30. 4. Who hath ascended up into Heaven who hath established all the Ends of the Earth what is his Name and what is his Son's Name Answ Dr. S. Partick interpreteth this Verse thus Hath any Man ascended into Heaven who among Men hath gathered the Wind or fixed the Earth what is the Man's Name or his Sons 17. Isa 6. 1 8 9. I saw the Lord sitting upon a Throne I heard the Voice of the Lord go tell this People Hear ye indeed but understand not shut their Eyes c. This Appearance of God is ascribed to Christ John 12. 41. These things said Isaias when he saw his Glory the Words Go tell this People c. are ascribed to the Holy Spirit Acts 28. 25 26. Well spake the Holy Ghost by Isaias Go unto this People c. Answ 1. The Words in St. John are to be understood not of Christ but of God for God only is intended in the foregoing Verse as all confess 2. Accordingly the best Greek Bibles read that Text thus These things said Isaias when he saw God's Glory 3. The Texts in the Acts ascribeth the Words in the Prophet to the Holy Spirit because the Vision and all the Words there mentioned were a Scene wrought in the Prophet's Mind not exhibited to his outward senses by the Spirit or Power of God. 18. Isa 7. 14. A Virgin shall conceive and bare a Son and shall call his Name Immanuel 'T is added Matth. 1. 23. which being interpreted is God with us Answ 1. Matthew as all know wrote his Gospel in Hebrew and therefore did not interpret the Hebrew Name no more than the Prophet whose Words he cited had done before him We are not bound
occasion both to his Friends and Enemies to think him an Arian He saith that Phil. 2. 6. was the principal Argument of the Fathers against the Arians but that to say true it proves nothing against them He notes on Eph. 5. 5. that the word God being used absolutely doth in the Apostolick Writings always signifie the Father In his Scholia on the third Tome of St. Jerom's Epistles he denies that the Arians were Hereticks he adds farther that they were superior to our Men in Learning and Eloquence 'T is believed Erasmus did not make himself a party to that which he esteemed the ignorant and dull side of the Question In his Epistle to Bilibaldus he speaks as openly as the times would permit a wise Man to speak I saith Erasmus could be of the Arian Perswasion if the Church approved it 2. H. Grotius is Socinian all over This great Man in his younger Years attacked the Socinians in a principal Article of their Doctrine But being answered by J. Crellius he not only never replied but thank'd Crellius for his Answer and afterwards publishing some Annotations on the Bible he interpreted the whole according to the mind of the Socinians There is nothing in all his Annotations which they do not approve and applaud His Annotations are a compleat System of Socinianism not excepting his Notes on John 1. 1 c. which are written so artificially and interwove with so many different Quotations that he has cover'd himself and his sense of that Portion of Scripture from such as do not read him carefully 3. D. Petavius the most Learned of the Jesuits has granted that generally the Fathers who lived before the Nicene Council and whose Writings are preserved agreed in their Doctrine concerning God with the Nazarens or Socinians and concerning the Son our Lord Christ and the Holy Spirit with the Arians For 't is to be noted that the Arians and Socinians agree in their Doctrine concerning God that he is only one Person the God and Father of our Lord Christ but they differ concerning the Son and Holy Spirit The Son according to the Arians was generated or created some time before the World and in process of time for great and necessary causes became incarnate in our Nature The Holy Ghost they say is the Creature of the Son and subservient to him in the Work of Creation But the Socinians deny that the Son our Lord Christ had any Existence before he was born of Blessed Mary being conceived in her by the holy Spirit of God They say the Spirit is the Power and Inspiration of God saving that Mr. Bidle and those that follow him take the holy Spirit to be a Person chief of the Heavenly Spirits prime Minister of God and Christ and therefore called the Spirit by way of excellence and the Holy Spirit to discriminate him from Satan Prince and Chief of the wicked and Apostate Spirits This difference notwithstanding because they agree in the principal Article that there is but one God or but one who is God both parties Socinians and Arians are called Vnitarians and esteem of one another as Christians and true Believers as may be seen on the part of the Arians in their Historian Chr. Sandius Hist Eccl. l. 1. c. de Paul. Semosat and for the Socinians in the Disputation of Alba. But to return to Petavius He often affirms that the Doctrine of the Trinity and of the Divinity of the Son and Spirit cannot be proved by Scripture only and that those who have attempted it have always been baffled He adds there is no way to Unity in the Church about these matters but by contenting our selves to speak concerning them as the Fathers who lived nearest to the Apostles time did speak 4. S. Episcopius so much esteemed by our English Divines seems to have been an Arian He saith the Father is so first as to be first in order i. e. time in Dignity and in Power He saith that to make three equal Persons in God or in the Godhead is to make three Gods. He denies that the Lord Christ is the Son of God by substantial Generation that is by Generation from the Father's Substance or Essence Speaking of the Creeds that express the Catholick Doctrine of the Trinity and the Divinity of the Son and Spirit he saith that Bishops in general Councils being led by Fury Faction and Madness did not so much compose as huddle up Creeds for the Church See for these things Episc Inst Theol. l. 4 c. 32 33 34. 5. C. Sandius a Gentleman of prodigious Industry and Reading and no less ingenious then learned in all his Books refuses in Words to be called either Arian or Socinian but has written an Ecclesiastical History in Quarto with Addenda to it Coloniae 1678 on purpose to prove that all Antiquity was Arian and that the Vnitarian Doctrine has been reduced so low by the Persecutions of Rome and the puissant Arms of Charles the Great and other Kings of France for which Services they have been requited by the Roman Pontiff with the Titles of Most Christian Kings and Eldest Sons of the Church He has also under the borrowed Name of Cingallus written a small Treatise with this Title Scriptura Trinitatis Revelatrix here under pretence of asserting the Trinity he has as much as he could defeated all the strengths of the Catholick Cause and shews that there is no considerable Text objected to the Arians or Socinians but is given up as an incompetent and insignificant proof by some or other of the principal Critics and Authors who were themselves Trinitarians so that among them they have given away the Victory to their Adversaries But Sir I perceive I have drawn out this account of the Socinians to already a sufficient length for a Letter I will therefore conclude with a Passage out of Dr. Burnet's second Book of the History of the Reformation abridged George van Parr a Dutch Man refused to abjure so he was burnt in the year 1549 by virtue of a Law or Writ since abolished by Act of Parliament for affirming that only the Father is God and denying the Divinity of the Son our Lord Christ He had led a very exemplary Life for Fasting Devotion and a good Conversation and suffered with extraordinary Composedness of Mind These things cast a great Blemish on the Reformers It was said they only condemned Cruelty when acted on themselves but were ready to practise it when they had Power The Papists made great use of this in the next Queen Mary's Reign and what Arch-Bishop Cranmer and Bishop Ridly Authors of Van Parrs Punishment suffered in her time was thought a just Retaliation on them by that wise Providence which disposes all things justly to all Men. Thus far Dr. Burnet SIR I am most sincerely Yours A Second Letter TO A FRIEND Concerning the UNITARIANS Called also SOCINIANS Containing the Texts objected to them out of the Old Testament and their Answers Acts 24.
Church but if they will often read and consider the Socinian sense of them they will soon discern that 't is not only a probable sense but the true and only sense of which these Texts are capable if we would reconcile them to the rest of Scripture and particularly to the many and clear Texts and Demonstrations cited and hinted in the first Letter SIR I am Yours A Third Letter TO A FRIEND Concerning the UNITARIANS Called also SOCINIANS Containing the Texts objected to them out of the Evangelists and Acts and their Answers Matth. 22. 29. Ye do err not knowing the Scriptures Printed in the Year 1687. A Third Letter Concerning the Unitarians called Socinians SIR IN this I give you the Texts of the Evangelists and Acts objected to the Socinian Doctrine concerning God our Lord Christ and the Holy Spirit and the Answers of the Socinians to the Arguments arising from them 1. Matth. 1. 23. They shall call his Name Immanuel which being interpreted is God with us Answ See on Isai 7. 14. 2. Matth. 2. 2. Where is he that is born King of the Jews for we are come to worship him Answ Neither the Hebrew Greek nor Latin Word for worship him import any more than a civil Worship and Honour And it was the manner over all the East and particularly among the Jews to prostrate to Kings 2 Sam. 19. 18. 1 Kings 1. 16 23 31. 2 Sam. 9. 6. 3. Mat. 9. 6. The Son of Man hath Power on Earth to forgive Sins Answ This is plainly spoken of Christ as he was a Man. God gave this Authority to the Lord Christ because he gave to him also to know what was in Mens Hearts namely whether their Repentance and outward Professions were sincere and lasting John 2. 24 25. Rev. 1. 1. 4. Mat. 11. 27. All things are delivered to me of my Father and no Man knoweth the Son but the Father c. Answ 1. If Christ were himself that one true God it could not be said here that another Person gave all things into his Hands 2. The most Orthodox Interpreters do understand all things here to be all things requisite for procuring and effecting the Redemption and Salvation of Men or all things necessary to the executing the Office of the Messias Whereas our Lord adds None knoweth the Son but the Father c. Maldonate and Grotius make the sense to be None but God knows what the Son's Office is or what he is to do and suffer in order to the Salvation of Men as on the other side none but the Son knows the Father's Mind concerning the way and means by which Mankind is to be redeemed and saved 5. Mat. 12. 31. Blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven Answ St. Austin and generally all judicious Interpreters by Blasphemy against the Holy Ghost or Spirit understand Mens ascribing with the Scribes and Pharisees in this Chapter the Miracles and Works done apparently by the Spirit or Power of God unto Magick or the Power of the Devil So that the Holy Ghost or Spirit is not in this Text a Person or a God but merely the Power of God. 6. Mat. 18. 20. Where two or three are gathered together in my Name there am I in the midst of them Matth. 28. 20. I am with you always even to the end of the World. Answ Christ is in the midst of and is with his People not by an immediate Presence as God is but by his most powerful Aid and Help which he affordeth partly by his continual and succesful Mediation with God for them all in general Heb. 7. 25. partly by the Angels who are under his Directions and by him engaged in the Defence of the Faithful Heb. 1. 14. 7. Matth. 26. 63. Tell us whether thou be the Christ the Son of God. Like to which Text are Matth. 14. 33. Mat. 16. 16. John 1. 49. Answ It being manifest that Princes are called Sons of God by the Psalmist Psal 82. 6. As also that Psal 2. 7. Thou art my Son is literally meant of David Hence it was that the Jews both then and now call the Messias the Son of God not because as some imagine they think he is God or is generated of the Divine Substance but because they expect he shall be a very great Prince an universal Monarch and therefore the Son of God in a more perfect and higher sense than David or other Princes are 8. Mat. 28. 19. Baptizing them in the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost Answ 1. To be baptized in the Name of a Person or Persons is a Rite by which one delivers himself to the Institution Instruction and Obedience of such Person or Persons so that to be baptized in the Name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost is to profess to be led and guided by them or as Grotius expresses this matter 't is to declare we will admit of no other thing as a part of our Religion but what proceeds from these that is nothing but what is commanded by God or the Father and has been delivered by his Son the Lord Christ and confirmed externally by the Miracles and internally with the Witness and Testimony of the Spirit that is of the Power and Inspiration of God. 2. 'T is in vain not to say ridiculously pretended that a Person or thing is God because we are baptized unto it or in the Name of it For then Moses and John Baptist also would be Gods 1 Cor. 10. 1 2. Our Fathers were all baptized unto Moses Acts 19. 3. Vnto what then were ye baptized and they said Vnto John's Baptism that is saith the Generality of Interpreters unto John and the Doctrine by him delivered Nor can it be doubted that to be baptized unto a Person or Persons and to be baptized in the Name of such Person or Persons is the same thing For 1. 'T is acknowledged by all that understand the Hebrew and Syriac Idioms 2. 'T is manifest by comparing some Texts of Scripture For what in some of them is called baptizing unto is in others called baptizing in the Name of Rom. 6. 3. As many of you as have been baptized into Jesus Christ or unto Jesus Christ for 't is the same Preposition in the Greek that is used of Moses 1 Cor. 10. 1 2. and of John Baptist Acts 19. 3. have been baptized into or unto his Death Gal. 3. 27. As many of you as have been baptized into Christ in the Greek unto Christ have put on Christ Acts 2. 38. Be baptized every one of you in the Name of Jesus Christ. Acts 8. 16. They were baptized in the Name of the Lord Jesus Who does not now see that to be baptized unto and in the Name of Christ or any other Person or thing are used as equivalent terms And accordingly the Fathers particularly Tertullian often say baptized unto the Father Son and Holy Ghost Nothing therefore can be inferred from this Text
of the Lord Josh 24. 27. Are these things Persons Is it not evident that Actions proper to Persons are ascribed to them as well as to the Holy Spirit or Power and Inspiration of God by the Figure called Prosopopeia Briefly We ought to conceive thus of this matter a great Effusion of God's Inspiration and Power being to be given to the Disciples that it might be a continual Director and Guide when the Lord Christ was no more personally with them therefore this Guide is by the aforesaid Figure spoken of in such terms as if it were some Doctor Teacher and Advocate Hence it is said to reprove the World to guide into all Truth to intercede for us namely because it suggesteth Prayer and Affection in Prayer also not to speak of himself but to speak what he shall hear from God to receive of Christ's that is receive of God the Remainder of Christ's Doctrine and teach it to the Apostles For 't is to be noted that our Lord left some things to be taught by this Inspiration of God because the Disciples were not capable to hear and believe them till they had seen the great Miracles of our Lords Resurrection and Afcension into Heaven John 16. 12. I have yet many things to say to you but ye cannot bear them now Howbeit when the Spirit of Truth is come he shall guide you into all Truth The Spirit that guided the Apostles into all Truth was it not the meer Inspiration of God It is for the same Reason and by the same Figure that this Power and Inspiration of God in the Apostles is said to bear Witness John 15. 26. to search Mysteries 1 Cor. 2. 10. 11. to distribute Gifts 1 Cor. 12. 2. to appoint Bishops Acts 20. 28. to glorify Christ John 16. 14. Finally It appeared in the Form of a Dove on Christ and of Cloven Tongues on the Apostles Matth. 3. 16. Acts 2. 3 4. Because God conveyed this Divine Energy to the Lord Christ and to the Apostles in these outward Symbols which were fit Emblems of the Quality of the Gifts then bestowed The Dove signified the mild and peaceable Spirit of Christ and that the Power then conveyed to him should not be for the Damage or Hurt of Mankind The Tongues denoted that the Apostles did then and there receive the Gift or Faculty of speaking with many Tongues But what sense can the Trinitarians make of these things they say the Spirit is a Person and God did God receive and assume the Shape of a Dove that is of a Brute What hinders but that they may believe all the Transformations in the Metamorphosis of Ovid 29. John 16. 15. All things that the Father hath are mine Answ 1. St. Paul hath said as much of every Christian 1 Cor. 3. 21 22. All things are Yours things present things to come all are yours 2. All things in this Text of St. John are all things relating to the Christian Faith Doctrine and Discipline for it follows Therefore said I He the Spirit shall take of mine and shew it to you The meaning of the whole Passage is all things relating to the Doctrine and Discipline of the Christian Church which the Father hath in his Mind and Design are mine that is are known to me and shall for the most part of them be ordered by my self as for the rest which I my self do not discover or order the Spirit shall receive it and shew it to you 30. John 17. 5. Glorify me with thine own self with the Glory I had with thee before the World was Answ 1. St. Austin and many other learned and Orthodox Interpreters not only grant but contend that the meaning here is Let me now actually receive that Glory with thy self which I had with thee in thy Decree and Design before the World was This Interpretation is confirmed by this that the Sufferings of Christ were to precede his actual Glory 1 Pet. 1. 11. Searching what and what manner of time the Spirit did signify when it testified before-hand the Sufferings of Christ and the Glory that should follow 2. As 't is here said The Glory that I had with thee before the World was so 't is said 2 Cor. 5. 1. We have a Building of God an House not made with Hands Where we have is we have it in God's Decree and Intention or it is prepared for us 2 Tim. 1. 9. Grace was given us in Christ before the World was Where again was given to us is was given in God's Decree and Intention Therefore so also we may understand that Christ had Glory before the World was 31. John 17. 10. All mine are thine and thine are mine Answ It appears by the foregoing verse and by what follows that Christ speaks of such as were or should be his Disciples His meaning is all that are my Disciples are of thy giving to me and still remain thine and all that are true Servants and Lovers of God readily become mine that is Disciples to me 32. John 17. 24. For thou lovedst me from the Foundation of the World. Answ None can deny that God loved all the Elect from the Foundation of the World. To God all things are present not only what is past but what is to come is present to the Divine Mind and Knowledg 33. John 20. 28. Thomas answered and said unto him my Lord and my God Or O my Lord and O my God! For 't is an Attic Vocative Answ 1. Nestorius Patriarch of Constantinople was of Opinion that these Words were not designed to Christ but to God. For though the Evangelist saith Thomas answered and said unto him i. e. to Christ O my Lord and O my God. Yet the Exclamation might be addressed to God as it's Object tho it was also an Answer to our Saviour or in Answer to our Saviour and to what he had said at ver 27. Or if the Words were addressed to our Saviour also it may be admitted as true what others say here Namely 2. When Thomas had felt the Prints of the Spear and Nails in our Saviour's Side and Hands and was thereby fully satisfied that he was indeed risen again he breaks forth into this Exclamation the first part of which he directed to Christ the other to God. O my Lord are Words of Congratulation to our Saviour And O my God! Words of Admiration and Praise to God. 34. Acts 5. 3 4. Why hath Satan filled thine Heart to lie to the Holy Ghost Thou hast not lied unto Men but unto God. Answ Some of the most celebrated Interpreters among the Trinitarians have owned that this Text ought to be thus understood Why hast thou lied to the Holy Ghost i. e. to us Apostles who have thou knowest the Holy Spirit or Inspiration of God in us Thou hast not lied unto Men but unto God i. e. thou hast not hereby lied to Men only or chiefly but to God who is in us by his Spirit and Inspiration This
not for himself or People he cannot die and he deriveth his Power from none but himself But 't is certain that the Lord Christ could not himself without the previous Ordination of the Father confer the prime Dignities of Heaven or of the Church He placed his Safety in the Father's Presence and Help He prayed often and fervently to the Father both for himself and for his Disciples He died and was raised from the dead by the Father After his Resurrection he received of another that great Power which he now injoyeth Matth. 20. 23. To sit on my right Hand and on my left is not mine to give but it shall be given to them for whom it is prepared of my Father John 8. 29. He that sent me is with me and the Father hath not left me alone for I always do those things that please him Luke 22. 42. Father if thou be willing remove this Cup from me Heb. 5. 7. Who in the Days of his Flesh offered up Prayers and Supplications with strong Crying and Tears unto him that was able to save him John 17. 20. Neither pray I for these alone but for them also which shall believe in me through their Word Ephes 1. 19 20. According to the mighty working of his Power which he wrought in Christ when he raised him from the dead Matth. 28. 18. Jesus came and spake to them saying All Power is given to me 7. Jesus Christ is in holy Scripture always spoken of as a distinct and different Person from God and described to be the Son of God and the Image of God Rom. 16. 27. To God only wise be Glory through Jesus Christ. Luke 18. 19. Why callest thou me good there is none good save one that is God. 1 Tim. 2. 5. There is one God and one Mediator between God and Men the Man Jesus Christ. John 13. 18. He that believeth not is condemned already because he hath not believed on the Name of the only begotten Son of God. Luke 1. 35. The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee Blessed Mary and the Power of the Highest shall overshadow thee therefore also or and therefore the Holy thing that is born of thee shall be called the Son of God. Col. 1. 15. The Image of the invisible God. ' Tis. say the Socinians as impossible that the Son or Image of the one true God should himself be that one true God as that the Son should be the Father and the Image that very thing whose Image it is which they take to be simply impossible and contradictory to common sense which Religion came not to destroy but to improve Whereas to these arguings 't is objected that these things are in Holy Scripture spoken of Christ according to only his humane Nature or as he is a Man but that he is also God the Son though united to an humane Nature that is to an humane Soul and Body The Socinians reply that there is in Scripture no real Foundation for such a Conceit that 't is inconsistent with almost all the Texts already cited especially those in which the Lord Christ is spoken of as a distinct and different Person from God and that there are many other Considerations and Passages of holy Scripture which no less than demonstrate it to be false As 8. Because so many Texts expresly declare that only the Father is God John 17. 1 2 3. Father this is Life eternal that they know thee the only true God and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent or Jesus Christ thy Messenger 1 Cor. 8. 6. But to us there is but one God the Father of whom are all things and we in him and one Lord or Master i. e. Teacher by whom are all things In the Greek thus One Lord Jesus Christ for whom are all things and we for him See the Note on Heb. 1. 2. in the Fourth Letter Eph. 4. 4 5 6. One Spirit one Lord one God and Father of all who is above all 1 Cor. 15. 24. Then 〈◊〉 the End when he Christ ver 23. shall deliver up the Kingdom to God even the Father Jam. 3. 9. Therewith with the Tongue ver 8. bless we God even the Father Rom. 15. 6. With one Mind and with one Mouth glorify God even the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ 9. If Christ were indeed God as well as Man or as Trinitarians speak God the Son incarnate in an humane Nature it had been altogether superfluous to give the Holy Spirit to his said humane Nature as a Director and Guide For what other help could that Nature need which was one Person with as they speak God the Son and in which God the Son did personally dwell Luke 4. 1. Jesus being full of the Holy Ghost departed from Jordan Acts 1. 2. After that he through the Holy Ghost i. e. through direction and motion of the holy Spirit and Inspiration of God had given Commandments unto the Apostles Acts 10. 38. God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost 10. Had the Lord Christ been as Trinitarians speak God the Son joyned to an humane Nature he could not have ascribed his miraculous Works to the Holy Ghost or to the Father dwelling in him but to the Son dwelling in him and united to him Matth. 12. 28. I cast out Devils by the Spirit of God. John 14. 10. The Father that dwelleth in me he doeth the Works John 5. 30. I can do nothing of my self Acts 2. 22. Jesus of Nazareth a Man approved of God among you by Miracles and Wonders and Signs which God did by him in the midst of you 11. Had our Lord been more than a Man the Prophecies of the Old Testament in which he is promised would not describe him barely as the Seed of the Woman the Seed of Abraham a Prophet like unto Moses the Servant and Missionary of God on whom God's Spirit should rest Gen. 3. 5. I will put Enmity between thy Seed and her Seed Her Seed is by all Interpreters understood to be Christ Gen. 22. 18. In thy Seed shall all the Nations of the Earth be blessed This again is universally interpreted of Christ Deut. 18. 18. I will raise them up a Prophet from among their Brethren like unto thee and I will put my Words into his Mouth This is interpreted of our Lord Christ in many Texts of the New Testament as John 1. 45. and Acts 3. 22. and Acts 7. 37. Isai 41. 1. Behold my Servant whom I uphold mine Elect in whom my Soul delighteth I will put my Spirit upon him and he shall bring forth Judgment to the Gentiles This is interpreted of Christ Matth. 12. 17 18. Now that the Holy Ghost or Spirit is only the Power and Inspiration of God at least is not himself God they hold is ascertained by these Considerations 1. The Holy Ghost or Spirit and the Power of God are spoken of as one and the same thing 1 Cor. 2. 4 5. My preaching was not with enticing Words
14. After the way which they call Heresy so worship I the God of my Fathers believing all things that are written in the Law and the Prophets Printed in the Year 1687. A Second Letter Concerning the Unitarians vulgarly called Socinians SIR THE Texts and Arguments from them objected to the Doctrine of the Vnitarians and Saoinians concerning God are so many that 't is impossible to give a tolerable account of what they answer to the Orthodox in a Letter their Answers would indeed require a Volume Yet because I would not wholly disappoint your Expectations and Demands I will in several Letters lay before you some part of what they reply to the Texts and Arguments taken from the Old Testament what to those that are found in the Gospels and Acts what to those out of the Epistles and Revelation The Texts objected to them out of the Old Testament are of two sorts 1. Those which singly and alone prove the Trinity or the Divinity of the Son or Spirit 2. Those which perhaps would not if alone considered prove the Orthodox Doctrine but do it sufficiently when compared with and interpreted by some Texts of the New Testament I will propound both these in the order of Scripture 1. Gen. 1. 26. Let Vs make Man in our Image Answ 1. This Text hath been considered in the foregoing Letter 2. But 't is to be also farther observed that some Rabbies render the Original Hebrew thus Let Man be made in our Image Meaning say they in the Likeness of God and Angels for he speaketh to the Angels who were all present Job 38. 4. 7. Yet God speaketh to them not as Adjutants but as Spectators of his Work. They note that this Translation agreeth with the stile used all along in this chapter ver 3. Let there be Light. ver 6. Let there be a Firmament ver 20. Let the Waters bring forth ver 24. Let the Earth bring forth the living Creature 2. Gen. 3. 22. God said The Man is become as one of Vs to know Good and Evil. Answ 1. It may be and is by very many learned Men said that God speaketh here to the Angels 2. But others translate the Hebrew words thus the Man is become one of himself knowing Good and Evil. And thus also 't is expressed in the Chaldee Translation by Onkelos 3. Gen. 11. 6 7. The Lord said Let Vs go down and there confound their Language Answ 1. It is said by some that God speaketh here to the Angels and the Ministers and Executors of his Decree 2. Others say Let their Language be confounded for so the Hebrew may be rendred is an Hebrew Phrase signifying I will confound their Language For so he saith Gen. 1. 3 6 20 24 26. Let there be Light. Let there be a Firmament Let the Waters Let the Earth bring forth Let Man be made that is I will make Light I will make a Firmament I will cause the Waters and Earth to bring forth I will make Man. Note that God is said to go down because his Power accompanied his Angels who were either Ministers or Spectators of his miraculous Work. 4. Gen. 19. 24. The Lord Heb. Jehovah rained Fire from the Lord Heb. Jehovah out of Heaven Answ The Translation of Seb. Castalio is generally approved by the most learned Criticks as agreeing to the Genius and manner of the Hebrew Tongue he renders the original Words thus Jehovah rained Fire from himself from Heaven But see also what they say on Zech. 3. 2. a place parallel to this 5. 2 Sam. 23. 2 3. The Spirit of God â—ake by me the God of Israel said Answ The Spirit of God that is the Inspiration of God q. d. God inspired and spake by me 6. Psal 2. 7. Thou art my Son this day have I begotten thee Answ Paul hath taught us that this Text so far forth as it respecteth Christ and is a Prophecy of him and what God would do for him was not intended of his supposed eternal Generation from the Essence of the Father or God but of his being begotten to Life again from the dead Acts 13. 34. God hath fulfilled the same in that he raised up Jesus from the dead as it is written in the second Psalm Thou art my Son this day have I begotten thee Col. 1. 18. The Head of the Body the Church the first born from the dead 7. Psal 45. 6 7. Thy Throne O God is for ever and ever thou hast loved Righteousness therefore thy God hath anointed thee with the Oyl of Gladness above thy Fellows These Words are interpreted of Christ by the Author to the Hebrews Heb. 1. 8 9. Vnto the Son he saith Thy Throne O God is for ever c. Answ In the Hebrew and in the Greek 't is God is thy Throne i. e. thy Seat resting-place or Establishment for ever 8. Psal 68. 18. Thou hast ascended on high thou hast led Captivity captive thou hast received Gifts for Men or as 't is in the Syriac and Eph. 4. 8. hast given Gifts to Men. These Words manifestly spoken of God are interpreted of Christ Eph. 4. 8 9 11 Whereforh he saith when he ascended up on high he led Captivity captive and gave Gifts to Men. Now that he ascended what is it but that he also descended first into the lower parts of the Earth He that descended is the same also that ascended up far above all Heavens that he might fill all things And he gave some Apostles some Prophets and some Evangelists c. Answ 1. Those Words descended first into the lower parts of the Earth are to be understood of our Lord's descent into the Grave and Hell from whence he arose and afterwards ascended into Heaven 2. These Words ascended far above all Heavens that he might fill all things had been better rendred that he might fulfil all things namely all the Prophecies of himself and others concerning his Death and Descent into the Grave and Hell and his Ascension into the highest Heavens far above all the visible Heavens all the Heavens and Orbs in which the Sun and Stars move 3. Thou hast ascended and given Gifts to Men are in the Psalm litterally meant of God and of Christ only by way of Prophecy or rather of Emblem and Accommodation And that Paul in the Ephesians intended no more than an Accommdation or as Grotius speaks a mystical or allegorical Interpretation of the words in the Psalm is evident by the Gifts he mentioneth He gave some Apostles some Prophets some Evangelists that is he advanced some to be Apostles others to be Prophets and Evangelists in the Christian Church These Gifts not being given or received till about one thousand Years after David's time Paul could not possibly intend a literal Interpretation of David's Words but only to accommodate them to Christ because Christ also did ascend on high and give Gifts to Men. To this effect speak Grotius Dr. Patrick and other famous Interpreters on this Text. 9.
to subscribe to the Interpretation of the Greek Translator being an obscure and unknown Person Immanuel is by Erasmus interpreted God with him a Name most proper for the Lord Christ and to this Interpretation of the Name Immanuel S. Peter very plainly alludes Acts 10. 38. 2. Admitting that Immanuel may signify God with us yet the Child also who was to be a Sign to King Ahaz and whom Grotius thinketh to be the Son of the Prophet Isaiah was called Immanuel by order from God. And there are several Names of this high Import and Signification in Scripture Elihu recorded 1 Chron. 12. 20. signifies He is my God. Eliatha mentioned 1 Chron 25. 4. is Thou art my God. 3. Christ may well be named Immanuel taking it for God with us as God was most plentifully with his People by sending the Lord Christ to be his Ambassador and Representative and our Redeemer Several of the most learned Trinitariaus acknowledg that no more than this was intended by this Name 19. Isai 8. 4. He shall be a Stone of Stumbling c. This is spoken of God in the Prophet and applied to Christ Rom. 9. 33. 1 Pet. 2. 8. Answ Neither St. Paul nor St. Peter cite the Words of the Prophet as spoken of Christ but only as in some sense applicable to him namely as Christ also was to many a Stone of stumbling 20. Isa 9. 6 7. Vnto us a Child is born unto us a Son is given He shall be called Wonderful Counseller The mighty God The everlasting Father The Prince of Peace Of the Encrease of his Government and Peace there shall be no end upon the Throne of David to order and establish it with Judgment and Justice from henceforth and for ever The Zeal of the Lord of Hosts shall perform this Answ 1. This cannot be a Prophecy of Christ because it speaks of a Prince actually born at that time Unto us a Child is born Unto us a Son is given Isaiah lived above seven hundred Years before Christ 2. The Text is indeed to be understood of Hezekiah but is very extravagantly rendred in the English In the Hebrew 'tis thus Vnto us a Child is born unto us a Son is given the wonderful Counsellour the mighty God the everlasting Father shall name him the peaceable Prince his Government shall be multiplied i. e. He shall reign long even twenty nine Years and he shall have very great Peace he shall sit upon the Throne of David ordering and establishing it with Judgment and Justice from henceforth to the end of his Life The Zeal of the Lord of Hosts shall perform this i. e. God's Love to his chosen People shall make good this my Prophecy Note that no end of Peace and no end of Riches are never to be strictly understood in humane Affairs but we mean by them very great Peace and Riches Therefore the Peace of Hezekiah being in twenty nine Years interrupted by only one Expedition against him and that also in the end unsuccessful he may be said to have enjoyed great Peace or speaking hyperbolically as is the manner of this Prophet Peace without end 21. Isai 35. 4 5. Your God will come then the Eyes of the Blind shall be opened c. This seems to be applied to Christ Matth. 11. 4 5. Jesus answered Go tell John what ye do see and hear the Blind receive their Sight c. Answ God is said to come to the Jews in his Ambassadour and Messenger Jesus Christ and because in and by him God gave Sight to the Blind c. John 14. 10. The Father that dwelleth in me He doeth the Works Acts 10. 38. God was with him 22. Isai 40. 3. The Voice of him that crieth in the Wilderness Prepare ye the way of the Lord a high way for our God. This Voice was John Baptist Matth. 3. 1 3. And it was Christ's way he prepared Luke 1. 76. compared with Matth. 11. 10. Mark 1. 7. Acts 13. 24. Answ John Baptist is said to prepare the way for God when he prepared the way for Christ because Christ was the Ambassadour and Representative of God and God was with and in Christ Acts 10. 38. God was with him John 14. 10. The Father that dwelleth in me he doeth the Works 23. Isai 44. 6. Thus saith the Lord I am the first and I am the last Christ also is called the first and the last Rev. 1. 8 17. Rev. 22. 13. Answ Rev. 1. 8. is not spoken of Christ but of God. At v. 17. Christ is called the First and the Last but Erasmus Grotius and Hugo Cardinalis interpret the Words of him as he is a Man. Christ saith Hugo is the first or most honourable with good Men and the last or most despised with Infidels and wicked Men. Briefly both Almighty God and our Lord Christ are the First and the last but in different Senses 24. Isai 45. 23. I have sworn by my Self Vnto me every Knee shall bow These Words of God are applied to Christ Rom. 14. 10 11. We shall all stand before the Judgment Seat of Christ for it is written Every Knee shall bow to me and every Tongue shall confess to God. Answ In bowing and confessing to Christ at the last Judgment we are said to bow and confess to God because Christ then and there holdeth the place of God representeth him and acteth by his Commission So Men are said to appear before our Soveraign Lord the King when they appear at the Bar of his Judges because the Judges act in the Kings stead and by his Commission 25. Isai 48. 16. I have not spoken in secret from the Beginning from the time that it was there am I and now the Lord God hath sent me and his Spirit Answ I in this Text is not Christ but the Prophet for Christ was not sent by the Lord God and his Spirit in the days of the Jewish Prophets Heb. 1. 1 2. But if it were Christ or the Son that here speaketh yet this very Text would prove that he is not God for he is here distinguished from the Lord God as one who is not himself God but is sent by God. The Prophet seems to speak of the Overthrow of the Chaldean and Babylonish Troops by some great Prince whom God either had or would raise up against them see ver 14. and 15. Therefore Grotius and Forerius do not translate as the English hath it From the time that it was but before this thing is or before it hapneth There am I that is I declare it as explicitly and clearly as if I were present on the place 26. Jer. 23. 5. 6. I will raise unto David a righteous Branch in his days Judah shall be saved and Israel shall dwell safely and this is the Name whereby he shall be called The Lord Heb. Jehovah our Righteousness Answ In the Hebrew 'tis This is the Name which they shall call the Lord our Justifier that is in the happy and peaceful
for the Godhead of the Son or Spirit because as now Christians are baptized unto them so the Jews were baptized unto Moses and John's Disciples unto John. 9. Luke 1. 16 17 76. Many of the Children of Israel shall he John Baptist turn to the Lord their God and he shall go before him in the Spirit and Power of Elias Thou Child shalt be called the Prophet of the Highest for thou shalt go before the Face of the Lord to prepare his way Answ See on Isa 40. 3. 10. Luke 17. 5. The Apostles said unto the Lord Increase our Faith. Answ By thy Prayers to God which are always heard for us 11. Luke 24. 47. That Repentance and Remission of Sin should be preached in his Christ Name Answ The sense is Christ commanded the Disciples to require Men to repent and on their so doing to assure them in his Name or from him that God would forgive them 12. John 1. 1. c. In the Beginning was the Word c. Answ The Trinitarian Exposition of this Chapter is absurd and contradictory 't is this In the Beginning i. e. from all Eternity Answ From all Eternity is before the Beginning or without Beginning not in the Beginning In the Beginning must refer to some time and thing it must be in the Beginning of the World or of the Gospel or of the Word and in which ever of these senses it is taken the Word cannot be from all Eternity by Virtue or Force I mean of this Expression Was the Word i. e. was God the Son. Answ But where in Scripture is the Word called God the Son The Word was with God i. e. The Son was with the Father Answ It seems then that God in this clause is the Father But was not the Son also with the Holy Ghost and is not he too according to the Trinitarians God or a God If he is why doth St. John only say the Son was with the Father and how comes the Father to engross here the Title of God to the Exclusion of the Holy Ghost The Word was God. What shall we do here was the Word the Father for so they interpreted God in the foregoing clause No God in this clause hath a new meaning 't is God the Son. But in the whole Scripture there are not these words God the Son. The same was in the Beginning with God. How comes this to be again repeated for John had said once before that the Word was with God. They care not 't is said and that 's enough The Truth is according to their sense of this Context no account can be given of this Repetition and they must allow it to be a meer Tautology But let us say the Socinians hear Grotius interpreting this sublime Proem of St. John's Gospel Ver. 1. In the Beginning i. e. when God created the Heavens and the Earth For these Words are taken from Gen. 1. 1. was the Word The Hebrews call that Power and Wisdom of God by which he made the World and does all other his extraordinary Works his Word Psal 33. 6. By the Word of the Lord were the Heavens made Heb. 11. 2. The Worlds were made by the Word of God. 2 Pet. 3. 5. By the Word of God the Heavens were of old They borrowed this Expression from Moses who in describing the Creation saith that God said Let there be Light Gen. 1. 3. God said Let there be a Firmament Gen. 1. 6. and so through the whole Chapter Undoubtedly Moses is not to be understood of a Word orally spoken for God is a Spirit but his meaning is God put forth his Power and Wisdom and thereby created Light and the Firmament c. As easily as Men can speak these Words Let there be Light Let there be a Firmament Thus we see why the Divine Wisdom and Power was called the Word by David and so many Writers of the New Testament The Word was with God i. e. It was not yet in the World or not yet made Flesh ver 10. and 14. but with God. The Word was God i. e. The Word or Divine Wisdom and Power is not something different from God but being his Wisdom and Power is God. 'T is the common Maxim of Divines that the Attributes and Properties of God are God. Which is in some sense true We may also here note that those Persons whether Angels or Men to whom the Divine Word hath been in an extraordinary Degree communicated have also had the Names Jehovah and God given to them The Angel who destroyed Sodom by a miraculous Tempest from Heaven is called Jehovah so is he that promised Abraham to cause Sarah to conceive a Son Gen. 18. 13. On the same account God says to Moses Exod 7. 1. See I have made thee a God to Pharaoh Ver. 2. The same was in the Beginning with God. This is here again repeated by the Evangelist to teach us that the Word is so God that it is not all that God is there being other Properties and Attributes of God that are communicable as well as the Word Ver. 3. All things were made by him The English-Geneva Translation saith here All things were made by It. But it matters not for the Word begins here to be spoken of as a Person by the same Figure of Speech that Solomon saith Wisdom hath builded her House and hewn out her seven Pillars Prov. 9. 1. And that David calls God's Commandments Counsellours Psal 119. 24. Ver. 4. In him i. e. In him when he was in the World and was made Flesh Ver. 10. and 14. Was Life i. e. By the Word when made Flesh or Man the way and manner of obtaining Life eternal Life was discovered to the Gentiles The way is the Doctrine of the Gospel John 12. 50. And the Life was the Light of Men i. e. The Life-giving Doctrine by him taught was that Light to and by which Men may and ought to direct their Steps in order to eternal Blessedness John 12. 50. So here the Doctrine of Christ the Gospel is called Light as before it was called Life Ver. 8. He John was not that Light i. e. John neither was nor was the bringer of the Light of the Gospel though he bare Witness to both 'T is usual in familiar Speech to call the Bringer of a thing by the name of the thing he brings and for this reason our Saviour is called Life and Light John 14. 6. John 8. 12. Ver. 10. He was in the World. Here the Evangelist returns to speak of the Word The sense is in Process of time the Word became incarnate that is Abode on the Person of Jesus Christ and so conversed in the World among Men. God communicated his Word that is a vast Effusion of his Divine Power and Wisdom to his Son the Lord Christ Acts. 10. 38. The World was made by him i. e. The World and all Men were made by this Word which afterwards abode on Jesus Christ and which
mortal Life he raised and changed the Body of Lazarus which was corrupted that the Power by which he restored Lazarus to Life again was not our Lords own proper Power but God's that is the Fathers is plainly intimated by our Lord himself John 11. 41. Father I thank thee that thou hast heard me c. Almighty God can lodge even in dry Bones a Power of restoring the dead 2 Kings 13. 21. see also what hath been said on John 5. 19. 20. John 8. 56 58. Abraham rejoiced or desired to see my Day and saw it Before Abraham was I am Or as 't is rendred by the Syriac Nonnus and Grotius I was Answ 1. Abraham saw Christ's Day in the Spirit of Prophecy he saw it as coming not as present he foresaw as he desired the time when it should be 2. St. Austin has confessed that Christ is here said to be before Abraham not actually but in the Counsel Decree and Ordination of God. And so St. Peter explains this matter 1 Pet. 1. 20. Who verily was fore-ordained from the Foundation of the World but was made manifest in these last times In like manner at Rev. 13. 8. Christ is called the Lamb slain from the Foundation of the World. The Words are Whose Names are not written in the Book of Life of the Lamb slain from the Foundation of the World. Every one sees that Christ could be no otherways slain from the Foundation of the World but in the Counsel and Decree of God. See more such Instances on John 17. 5. 'T is true the Jews did not apprehend in what sense our Lord meant he was before Abraham but neither did he intend or care they should for finding them averse from Truth and Piety he often so spake to some of them as to perplex and affront their Blindness and Arrogance yet more and not to instruct them see for this Luke 8. 10. 21. John. 10. 30. I and the Father are one Answ Not one God but as Friends are said to be one Thus our Lord explains himself John 17. 11. Keep them whom thou hast given me that they may be one as we are The Disciples could be one no otherways than as Friends are one namely in Affection and Design neither with one another nor with God. Ver. 22. The Glory which thou gavest me i. e. the Power of doing Miracles I have given them that they may be one as we are one 22. John 10. 33. Thou being a Man makest thy self God or a God. Answ It appears they lied by our Saviours Answer at ver 36. Say ye of him whom the Father hath sanctified and sent into the World Thou blasphemest because I said I am the Son of God. Had our Lord been more than the Son of God he would have owned his Dignity when they charged him with Blasphemy for saying those things from which it might by their strained Consequences be inferred that he made himself a God. Camero on this Text ingenuously confesses that in this Context our Lord doth not make himself God He adds that times and circumstances required that the Revelation of this Mystery should be deferred till our Lord's Resurrection and Ascension into Heaven In which saying he gives up to the Socinians all the Texts of the Evangelists 23. John 10. 38. The Father is in me and I in him Answ 'T is also said 1 John 4. 16. He that dwelleth in Love i. e. exerciseth Love and Charity dwelleth in God and God in him Therefore Christ and Christians are said to be in God and God in them by their mutual Love or because of their mutual Love. 24. John 12. 41. These things said Isaias when he saw his Glory and spake of him Answ see on Isai 6. 1 8 9. 25. John 14. 1. Ye believe in God believe also in me Answ Our Lord has himself interpreted this John 12. 44. He that believeth on me believeth not on me but on him that sent me 26. John 14. 7 9. If ye had known me ye would have known my Father also and from henceforth ye know him and have seen him He that hath seen me hath seen the Father how sayest thou then shew us the Father Answ It is also said Luke 10. 16. He that heareth you heareth me 't is there farther added He that despiseth you despiseth me and he that despiseth me despiseth him that sent me Shall we now infer that the Disciples and Ministers of Christ are Christ nay are him also that sent Christ namely God The Truth therefore is when we are said to know see hear despise God in knowing seeing hearing or despising Christ or his Ministers the meaning only is that Christ and his true Ministers being the Ambassadours and Messengers of God and revealing to us his Nature and Will they are so far forth to be esteemed one with God and in seeing and hearing them we see and hear him as much as the invisible God can be seen or heard in this mortal Life 27. John 14. 14. If ye ask any thing in my Name I will do it Answ The obvious meaning is if ye pray for any thing to God using my Name I will cause it to be done for you by my Intercession the general Intercession that I will make for all good Christians Heb. 7. 25. He is able to save them that come unto God by him i. e. that pray to God in his Name seeing he ever liveth to make Intercession for them 28. John 16. 8 13 14. When he the Comforter or Spirit is come he will reprove the World of Sin He shall not speak of himself He shall receive of mine and shew it to you Here the Spirit is plainly spoken of as a Person Answ 1. Of those that are Vnitarians all the Arians and very many Socinians do acknowledg that the Holy Spirit is a Person chief of the Heavenly Spirits prime Minister of God and Christ because he is here called the Comforter or Advocate and said to hear speak and teach and elsewhere to interceed for us But they add that this very Context in telling us ver 13. He will guide you into all Truth for he shall not speak of himself Sufficiently sheweth that he is not God or a God. For it were intolerable to say of God he shall lead you into all Truth for he shall not speak of himself the contrary is true of God he shall lead you into all Truth For he shall speak of himself 2. But more generally the Socinians say that Actions proper to Persons are by a Figure ascribed to things and even to Qualities of things not only in Holy Scripture but in all Writers God's Commandments are called Counsellours Psal 119. 24. Understanding is said to lift up her Voice Prov. 8. 1. Wisdom to build her House and hew out her seven-Pillars Prov. 9. 1. Charity to think no evil 1 Cor. 13. 5. Water and Blood to bear Witness 1 John 5. 8. The Stone set up by Joshua to hear all the Words
that our High-Priest and Intercessor having been in our very Circumstances is touched with a true Feeling of our Infirmities and therefore doth with great Earnestnest intercede for us all in general 35. Heb. 7. 3. Without Father without Mother having neither Beginning of Days nor end of Life but made like unto the Son of God abideth a Priest for ever Answ All acknowledg that these Words are spoken of Melchizedec And that because neither his Father nor Mother nor the time of his Birth or Death are mentioned in Scripture he is therefore said to be withour Father or Mother and without Beginning of Days or end of Life But he is not herein like the Son of God the time of whose Birth and Death is recorded in Scripture and whose Mother was blessed Mary and his Father the everlasting God but he is like the Son of God in that he abideth a Priest for ever 36. Heb. 10. 5. A Body hast thou prepared for me Answ 'T is undoubted that God prepared a Body for the Soul of Christ 37. Heb. 11. 26. Esteeming i. e. Moses esteeming the Reproach of Christ greater Riches than the Treasures of Egypt Answ The sense is Moses preferred being reproached and ill used by Pharaoh and the Egyptians as Christ was reproached and abused when he came to deliver the true Israel of God from the Bondage of Sin and Satan before all the Treasures and Riches which he as an adopted Son of Pharaoh's Daughter might have expected and had in Egypt So Grotius and others the most esteemed Interpreters 38. Heb. 13. 8. Jesus the same yesterdy today and for ever Answ This is prefaced to what here follows be not carried away with diverse and strange Doctrines as an Argument to perswade Constancy in the true Faith. The sense is the Lord Christ and his Gospel is the same thing that it always was be not therefore carried about to every novel Doctrine Ye will by Experience find that 't is a good thing to be establish'd in the Grace of the Gospel and not in Doctrines about Meats which the Jews from the Mosaic Law and the Gentiles from the Dictates of their Philosophers so much urge 39. 1 Pet. 1. 11. Searching what and what manner of time the Spirit of Christ which was in them did signify when it testified before-hand the Sufferings of Christ. Answ 1. The Spirit of Christ that is the same Spirit of Prophecy that was in Christ Or 2. The Prophetick Spirit in them which spoke of Christ So Grotius interprets here Others confirm his Interpretation by observing that the Spirit of Truth and the Spirit of Error mentioned 1 John 4. 6. are those Spirits which speak the Truth and teach Error So we call Virgil the Poet of Eneas and Homer of Achilles and Vlisses because they have written and spoken of Eneas Achilles and Vlisses 40. 1 Pet. 3. 19 20. Quickned by the Spirit by which also he went and preached to the Spirits in Prison which sometimes were disobedient in the days of Noah Answ This Text seems to speak of Christ's descent into Hell. The sense is Christ being dead was shortly quickned or brought to Life again by the Spirit or Power of God by which also that is by assistance of which Spirit he preached and spoke to the Spirits imprisoned in Hell who would not harken to Noah who in his Life-time preached Righteousness to them 2 Pet. 2. 5. Cardinal Bellarmine has quoted above thirty of the Fathers who interpret this Text after this manner The Interpretation seems confirmed by 1 Pet. 4. 6. For this cause was the Gospel preached also to them that are dead For that he speaketh of the real dead appears by the foregoing verse 41. 1 John 1. 1 c. That which was from the Beginning which we have seen with our Eyes of the Word of Life declare we unto you Answ The Word of Life here is the Gospel The sense is we declare or preach to you that Gospel or Word of Life which from the Beginning was in the Mind and Decree of the Father So St. John explains himself in these Words at ver 3. That eternal Life which was with the Father and was manifested to us He calleth the Word of Life eternal Life as 't is the ordinary and appointed means and way to eternal Life He saith he had heard it and seen it with his Eyes and handled it with his Hands to signify by these Expressions that it was fully certainly and perfectly known to him For the Hebrews use to express full and certain Knowledg of things by Words and Phrases borrowed from the senses 42. 1 John 3. 16. Hereby perceive we the Love of God because he laid down his Life for us Answ Neither the Syriac nor almost any Greek Copy of the Bible hath the Word God in this Text. The true reading is hereby perceive we his Love because he Christ laid down his Life for us 2. Admitting the reading in the English Bible yet he in this Text is not God but Christ the Son of God who was mentioned ver 8. So Grotius And the Interpretation is certain for God cannot lay down his Life 43. 1 John 4. 3. Every Spirit that confesseth not that Christ is come in the Flesh is not of God. Answ This saying is come in the Flesh or in Flesh for so 't is in the Greek is opposed to those false Prophets and Teachers that affirmed Christ had not a real Body of Flesh and Blood but a spiritual and consequently was not a true Man nor the Off-spring of David On the contrary St. John here teaches that Christ is come in Flesh or in the Flesh that is was clothed with a real Body of real Flesh 44. 1 John 5. 7. There are three that bear Record in Heaven the Father the Word and the Holy Ghost and these three are one Answ 1. This verse was not originally in the Bible but has been added to it 'T is not found in the most ancient Copies of the Greek nor in the Syriac or Arabick or Ethiopic or Armenian Bibles nor in the most ancient Latin Bibles 'T is not acknowledged by the Fathers who treated professedly of this Question of the Trinity 't is wholly rejected by abundance of the most learned Criticks and Interpreters and by all acknowledged to be doubtful and uncertain 2. Admitting this verse to be genuine yet the most learned Trinitarians confess the sense is not these three are one God but these three are one in their Testimony or they agree in their Testimony for they are here considered and spoken of as Witnesses So Beza Vatablus Calvin Erasmus the English-Geneva Notes And accordingly most of the Greek Bibles which have this verse in them read here as they do in the next verse not these three are one but these three agree in one i. e. in one and the same Testimony 45. 1 John 5. 20. We know that the Son of God is come and hath given us an Vnderstanding
that we may know him that is true and we are in him that is true even in his Son Jesus Christ This is the true God. Answ This was a very negligent Translation say the Socinians For whether you interpret him that is true to be God or to be Christ no sense can be made of the Words The latter part of the Text ought to have been thus rendred We are in him that is true i. e. in God by his Son Jesus Christ This is the true God i. e. He whose Son Christ is and in whom we are he and no other is the true God. So that this Text plainly denies that Christ is the true God. When we are said to be in God by Christ the meaning is we are united to God by his Love to us and ours again to him by the Procurement and means of the Lord Christ who hath by his Gospel revealed God to us and by the highest Arguments engaged us to love and serve him 46. Rev. 1. 8. I am Alpha and Omega saith the Lord which is and which was c. Answ This verse speaks of God only not of Christ for at ver 4. and 5. Christ is distinguished from him which is and which was 47. Rev. 1. 11. I am Alpha and Omega the first and the last Answ 1. This part of the verse is not in the Latin nor in any good Greek Bible 2. But admitting the Words it has been said on Isai 44. 6. in the second Letter in what sense these terms may be used of the Lord Christ 48. Rev. 1. 17. I am the first and the last Answ See on Isai 44. 6. 49. Rev. 2. 23. I am he which searchesh the Reins and Heart Every one knows this is an Hebrew and Scripture Phrase signifying I know the most secret Thoughts which is a Property belonging only to God. Answ The Knowledg which the Lord Christ had or hath of any ones secret Thoughts is a Revelation made to him by God as it was also sometimes to former Prophets Rev. 1. 1. The Revelation of Jesus Christ which God gave to him to shew unto his Servants 2 Kings 6. 12. The Prophet that is in Israel telleth the King of Israel the Words that thou speakest in thy Bedchamber 2 Kings 8. 12. I know the Evil that thou wilt do to the Children of Israel Prophets search the Heart that is know the Thoughts and Propensions of the Heart by the Spirit or Inspiration of God in them But the Lord Christ hath a far greater measure of that Spirit than any of the former Prophets ever had 50. Rev. 3. 14. The Beginning of the Creation of God. Answ 1. These Words prove that Christ is not God but a Creature 2. But the Truth is the Greek should have been thus rendred The Prince or chief of the Creation of God. 51. Rev. 5. 5. The Root of David Answ That is a Root springing from David As a Root of the Earth is a Root which springeth from the Earth not on the contrary a Root from which the Earth springeth 52. Rev. 5. 6. I heheld in the midst of the Throne a Lamb as it had been slain having seven Eyes which are the seven Spirits of God sent forth into all the Earth Answ This Text confirms what has been often said namely that the Knowledg which our Lord Christ now hath of Affairs on Earth is partly by means of those ministring Spirits which are sent forth into all the Earth as his Eyes to see and relate the state of things for what other reason can they be here called his Eyes 53. Rev. 5. 8. Having every one of them Vials full of Odors which are the Prayers of the Saints Answ In this Vision the Prayers of the Saints are by the Elders or Presbyters offered to Christ as the Mediator that is with Intention that he should recommend them to God by his Intercession But note also that 't is not here said that these Prayers were at all offer'd to Christ 54. Rev. 17. 4. Lord of Lords and King of Kings Answ Christ is so Lord of Lords as that himself hath one who is not only his Lord but his God. John 20. 17. I ascend to my Father and your Father to my God and your God. 55. Rev. 21. 6. I am Alpha and Omega Answ These Words are spoken by and of God only 56. Rev. 22. 20. Even so come Lord Jesus Answ 'T is a Wish not a Prayer 57. Rev. 22. 21. The Grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you Answ In what sense the Grace or Favour of Christ is wished to Christians hath been explained on 1 Cor. 1. 2. and on 2 Cor. 13. 14. Besides these Answers to particular Texts the Socinians say farther in general to all the Quotations out of the New Testament that 1. Whereas they differ from the Church in translating several and in interpreting all the before-cited Texts their Translations and Interpretations ought to be admitted and those of the Church or Trinitarians rejected because that Interpretation of Scripture can never be true which holds forth either a Doctrine or a Consequence that is absurd or contradictory and impossible Is it not say they manifestly contradictory and impossible that there should be three Almighty and most wise Persons and yet but one God when nothing can be more certain or evident than that every Almighty and most wise Person is a God a most perfect God to whom nothing can be added Is it not doubly contradictory and absurd to say there are three Persons who are severally and each of them the true and most high God and yet there is but one true and most high God Unless you mean one thing by a true and most high God in the first clause and another thing in the other clause and if so you introduce two sorts of true and most high Gods which I think all Christians abhor We reject the Doctrine of the Anthropomorphites that God hath humane Parts and Passions though grounded if you regard only the sound of the Words on a great many clear Texts of Scripture as may be seen in Mr. Biddles Catechism because 't is absurd and impossible that he who has humane Parts and Passions and resides in Heaven only should create and preserve the World and should be conscious to Mens Thoughts on Earth What can be more express than this is my Body yet we justly reject the Doctrine of the Transubstantiation because 't is contradictory and impossible that the same Body should at the same time be in more places than one Therefore any other Doctrine that plainly appears to be absurd and contradictory ought also to be rejected how agreeable soever it may seem to the meer Chime and Jingle of the Words of some few Texts We are as Tertullian rightly saith to interpret Scripture not by the sound of Words but the Nature of things Malo saith the Father te ad sensum rei quam ad sonum vocabuli exerceas Turtul