Selected quad for the lemma: spirit_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
spirit_n	holy_a	scripture_n	son_n	7,316	5	5.5655	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A67119	Eleutherosis tēs aletheias, truth asserted by the doctrine and practice of the apostles, seconded by the testimony of synods, fathers, and doctors, from the apostles to this day viz. that episcopacie is jure divino / by Sir Francis Wortley ...	Wortley, Francis, Sir, 1591-1652.	1641 (1641)	Wing W3637; ESTC R34763	18,183	38

not rather break in pieces that unprofitable vessell with his Apostolike staffe and rod of iron and deliver him up to the destruction of the flesh that his soul might be saved And it seemes strange to mee that any should think that our blessed Saviour his Excecutors Administrators and assignes knew not the meaning of his will and Testament as well as wee in these dayes Christ who ascending into Heaven gave guifts unto many would not deny this guift so necessary Hee I say giving supereminent guifts to his Apostles ad fundandam Ecclesiam for the founding his Church would not deny to their successors those which were necessary Ecclesiae fundatae to the Church being founded and so necessary that nothing more concerneth the Church Would he not or could he not informe his Trustees how he pleased to have his Church his houshold governed in his absence To say he would not is derogatory to his wisdome and goodnesse to say he could not to his Almighty and Sovereigne power I therefore conclude these 2. points 1 That Ordination of Presbyters was left to Titus and Timothy as to men of higher place and authority and not to the Presbyters who were of inferiour degree 2 That the power given to the Angells of Ephesus and the other Churches puts a difference of superiority and eminence betwixt a Bishop and an ordinary Presbyter and others the teachers of the Churches and gives them commission prae caeteris tam Clericis quam Laicis above others both Clergie and Laity yea a coercive and castigative power Further they object and say That Episcopacie is not Iure Divino because Christ did not command it in the Gospell To this I answere That Ius Divinum aliter se habet in rebus credendis aliter in agendis aliter in rebus fidei aliter in rebus facti There is a difference of Divine right betweene matters to bee believed and matters to bee done betwixt matters of faith and matters of fact In matters of faith there must be textus manifestus aut convincens deductio a cleere text or a sound consequence As for example In the beginning God made all things Here is textus manifestus But there is only convincens deductio concerning the mystery of the blessed Trinity for the Trinity is proved not by an expresse Text but by convincing deductions out of sacred Scriptures as thus There came downe at the Baptisme of Christ the Holy Spirit in the form of a Dove and a voice was heard saying This is my beloved Son in whō I am well pleased Here wee find the Spirit in the form of a Dove There is heard a voice And Christ is seene in the water We know both by the sacred Scriptures and by the light of nature that there is but one God and that from one all things are and that in one they terminate and that there is aliud medium copulans primum ultimum one between both coupling the first and the last Seeing also we reade that there is a Father a Son and a Spirit and that there is but one God we hence infer by necessary deduction that there are three persons and but one God Besides this deduction is further confirmed by that place {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} These three are one which in some sort is textus manifestus a cleere text Now a matter of fact may be inferred to bee Iure Divino as I suppose if I prove 1 That the same fact was the practice of the Apostles 2 That it is analogical to the institution of the Church of the Jewes which was setled according to Gods appointment by the mediation of Angels by the Ministery of Moses and Aaron 3 That it is pointed at and insinuated in the New Testament 4 That it hath successively continued since the Apostles time And as elsewhere so particularly in Britain If these points can bee proved concerning the fact viz. Government by Bishops in question I hope that none will deny it to be Iure Divino Now for proofe and confirmation of my Tenent That Episcopacie is Iure Divino I will prove these points and then say something more concerning the practice of some other Churches 1 Saint Paul the Apostle and Doctor of the Gentils gave power and authority to Titus and Timothy ordinare dignos to ordain men worthy and to examine such as were faulty to reprove and discharge such as were guilty and did {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} teach other Doctrine and were offensive to the honour of their callings and to cherish such as did well These things are evident in the Epistles of Paul to Timothy and of that to Titus From Pauls practice of superiority over these two and from the institution of Timothy and Titus to be Bishops the one of Ephesus the other at Creet I prove Episcopacie to be practised by the Apostles To make which good thus I argue If Saint Paul himselfe practised an eminent superiority and in the Epistles alleadged gave all that power which of right Bishops challeng or doth belong to the definition of a Bishop to Timothy and Titus then Paul himselfe did not only practise Episcopacie but did also constitute and institute them Bishops But verum prius ergo posterius That he had {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} a Bishoprick as the other Apostles had Act. 1. 20. did diligētly run his course therein no man will deny And that he gave power to Timothy and Titus the same which himself had 1 To ordain 2 To convent 3 To punish 4 To reward duplici honore with double honour the Epistles alledged doe sufficiently prove Therefore Paul himselfe practised superiority and constituted Timothy and Titus Bishops in place superior to Presbyters whom they had authority to ordain convent punish and reward If they further object That the Presbyters with their President may doe the same even all things which are commanded Timothy and Titus and therefore these things were spoken to Timothy and Titus and to their Presbyters collectively in the persons of Timothy and Titus I answer this is petere principium this evasion I formerly took away And now further I argue Such as the charge is such is the power but the tharge is personall that is given to Timothy and Titus particularly and therefore the power and authority given is personall to them for their time and to their successors in place after them and not to them and the Presbytery collectively nothing in places where such charge is given doth intimate the Presbyters or Deacons interposing themselves in these Episcopall actions with Timothy and Titus If they will have these priviledges and performances to belong to their President they must plead them due to him as he is successor to Timothy and Titus and so hee is in effect if you give him continuance in his place a Bishop indeede the bare name of President cannot make him