day their creation was in working till the fifth day for this were to confound the workes of the creation which Moses precisely referreth to their severall dayes workes Mercer QVEST. XXV Whether all kind of creeping things were made in the beginning Vers. 25. EVery creeping thing If every kind of worme and creeping thing were created in the beginning then we refuse Augustines conceit that such creatures as are generated of dead bodies were not then made lib. 3. de Genes c. 14. For like as other perfect beasts were at the first formed out of the earth yet afterward left to their usuall generation so these creeping wormes flyes and such like might then have their creation as the rest though now ingendred by corruption of other matter Likewise wee reject Pererius conceit that thinketh those creatures which doe spring of corruption and are noysome and offensive to man not to have had their beginning then for by this reason neither should the serpent have beene created these creatures though hurtfull now to mans nature if man had not fallen should not have beene so We therefore rather allow Basils opinion that even these small beasts which doe spring from corruption now were produced in the first creation hom 7. in Genes and this is more agreeable to the text which mentioneth every creeping thing then to have beene made yet wee doe not thinke that there may not bee or is not in the world any other forme or fashion of flye or worme than was in the first creation but that the generall kind was then formed of such severall creeping things and a generall power and ability given to produce them out of such corruptible matter as is fit for their generation QVEST. XXVI Whether creatures of a mixed kind were made in the beginning ANother question also here ariseth concerning those kinds of beasts which are brought forth by a mixt generation as the mule by the mixture of the Asse and the Mare the Leopard of the Libbard and Lionesse the Lynx of the wolfe and hind whether these mixed kindes were created in the beginning Some doe thinke that they were but I hold rather the contrary with Rupertus lib. 1. de Trinitat c. 57. and for these reasons 1. because these are no new kinds but the first kinds made in the creation mixed and conjoyned together that we need not fetch their originall from the creation 2. Because wee finde it directly expressed in Scripture that Anah the sonne of Sibeon first found out mules in the wildernesse as he fed his fathers asses Gen. â—6 24 he was the first that found out the generation of mules by the unnaturall coupling of asses and mares 3. The Lord directly forbiddeth to plow with an oxe and an asse Deut. 22.10 much more unlawfull was it to couple divers kinds for generation than to yoke divers kinds together for tillage 4. By the same reason wee might fetch the patterne of other monstrous births from the creation as such whereof Plutarch maketh mention as of one Onoscâ—lis the daughter of one Aristonymus begotten of an asse and Epona begotten of a mare by Fulvius Stellus Plutarch parall 29. But these monstrous generations 〈◊〉 never by Gods creation or ordinance brought into the world but by mans wicked invention QVEST. XXVII How God made man according to his image Vers. 26. LEt us make man in our image according to our likenesse 1. We neither here approve the opinion of Ruperâ—us who by image here understandeth the second person of the Trinity by likenesse or similitude the third person namely the holy spirit lib 2. de Trinitat c. 2. for in that the Lord saith let us make man in ouâ— image the image of the whole Trinity is expressed and not the image of the father onely 2 Neither are the words so to be taken as though man was made according to the similitude of that humane nature which Christ the Sonne of God was to assume whereas the Scripture saith that Christ tooke upon him the likenesse of man Phil. 2.7 and not man his likenesse 3. We also reject the conceit of Eugubinus and Oleaster who thinke that God took upon him an humane shape when he created man and therefore said Let us make him in our image for neither did God the Father ever appeare in any such shape neither could it bee said to bee Gods image being assumed but for a time 4. Neither yet doe we distinguish these words as some of the Fathers Origen Basil Ambrose who referre image to the naturall gifts of reason understanding memory the similitude to the supernaturall gifts of grace as of holinesse righteousnesse for we see that the Apostle applieth the image to the work of grace in our renovation or regeneration Coloss. 3.10 Let us put off the old man c. seeing wee have put on the new which is renewed in knowledge after the image of him that created him Wee conclude therefore that there is no difference in the sense and meaning of these words but that one is the explication of the other QVEST. XXVIII Wherein the image of God consisteth in man ANother great question is here briefly to be discussed wherein this image of God consisteth according to the which man was created 1. Epiphanius judgeth it a matter incomprehensible because he thought that the perfect image of God is here understood without any difference or dissimilitude Epiphan haeres 70. whereas the Scripture saith not that man absolutely was made like unto God 2. Theodoret thought that man onely and not woman was created after the image of God whereas the contrary is evident vers 27. God created man in his image and then it followeth male and female created hee them signifying thereby that both were created according to his image And whereas the Apostle saith 1 Cor. 11.7 Man is the image and glory of God the woman the glory of the man he speaketh onely of the authority and preeminence given unto man wherein the image of God in that behalfe is more expressed in the man but not of the principall part of that image which as the Apostle saith consisteth in righteousnesse and holinesse according to which image the woman was created as well as the man Basil Chrysostome doe understand this image of the dominion which man hath over the other creatures Augustine of the immortality of the soule where in it is like unto God lib. de quantitat anim c. 2. Nyssenus in Hexemeron herein saith this image consisteth because the soule is capable of all goodnesse Damâ—scene because man hath free-will lib. 2. de fide c. 12. The Master of Sentences distinct 16. because man hath reason and understanding and therein excelleth all other creatures Others beside these faculties of the soule wherein the image of God is expressed doe further affirme that the likenesse is in these respects 1. Because that as all things originally are in God so also man doth participate with the nature of all creatures
could punish them by so small a creature they might thinke that if God armed the greater creatures against them they should not endure it Simler QUEST XIV Why the Lord by the stretching out of Aarons rod brought forth lice Vers. 17. AAron stretched out his hand with his rod. It was not Aarons rod or hand that of it selfe could doe any such thing God needed not any of these meanes but thus it pleased him that this plague should bee wrought 1. To shew his great power that is able to doe great things by weake and small meanes 2. And that not only he hath power in himselfe to doe whatsoever it pleaseth him but that hee can give power unto his creatures to execute his vengeance so the Lord is able by himselfe and by others to bring forth his judgements 3. This hee did also to shew how much hee setteth by his elect to whom hee giveth such great power and to countenance the ministry and calling of these his servants Ferus QUEST XV. Why the Sorcerers could not bring forth lice Vers. 17. NOw the Enchanters assayed likewise with their enchantments to bring forth lice c. 1. The Sorcerers could not bring forth lice not as the Hebrewes imagine as Lyranus and Thostatus report of them because they cannot bring forth any creature lesse than a barly corne for if they could produce to the sight greater creatures they might more easily have compassed the lesse whose generation is not so perfect but commeth out of corruption Indeed in artificiall workes it is harder to worke upon a small substance and therefore Pliniâ— commendeth the curious devices of certaine workemen for their smalnesse as Cicero telleth of the Iliades of Homer written so small that they might bee put into a small nutshell Callicrates made antes of Ivory so little that the partes thereof could not be perceived Mirâ—ecides made a ship that a Bee might cover it with her wings But in naturall workes the reason is contrary the lesse workes are more easily perfected for the force of nature worketh from within but the artifices applieth his instruments without and cannot therefore worke upon every small substance 2. Rupertus hath this conceit that the Sorcerers did indeed bring forth lice as they did frogs before but because they did not sting and bite as the true lice which Aaron caused their fraude was discovered but this is contrarie to the text which saith they endevoured or wrought to bring forth lice but could not 3. Cajetanus thinketh that the Sorcerers did erre in their worke and did not applie their enchantments aright and so failed But it proceeded not from any vertue of their enchantments that they did counterfeit the three signes before but of the will and power of Satan who is not tied to these enchantments which are but a signe and ceremonie of their covenant and league with the devill therefore though they had failed in some circumstance the devill would not have forsaken them seeing they wrought under him and for him if it had been in their power 4. Augustine maketh this the reason why the Magicians were confounded in this third plague but it was the fourth signe counting the turning of the rods into serpents for the first to signifie that the heathen Philosophers some of them had knowledge of the Father and Sonne but erred concerning the holy Ghost But beside that some of the philosophers did see as in a cloud the mysterie of the Trinitie as both Cyrillus Eusebius Theodoret witnesse Plato in his writings maketh mention of God the Father the Word and the Minde this is rather a mysticall than historicall reason And if to seeke the cause thereof we neede flie unto mysteries it rather signifieth thus much that many of the philosophers did know divers things concerning God and his creatures but they were ignorant altogether of the Trinitie Perer. 5. The sorcerers then were hindred by the power of God who suffered them hitherto to deceive by their Satanicall illusions but now by a superiour commaunding power he controlleth the power of darkenes Simler Pererius Pellican Cajetan Ferus And Satan is hindred in his working two waâ—es either altogether that he cannot do what he would as in this place or when he is permitted to doe any thing yet the Lord so disposeth as that he cannot atchieve that end which he intendeth as appeareth in the temptation of Iob Borrh. And the Lord confoundeth them in this small and base creature for their greater confusion when their mysticall working by the operation of Satan is there restrained where they thought most easily to have prevailed Ferus QUEST XVI What the sorcerers understand by the finger of God Vers. 19. THis is the finger of God 1. Some by finger understand the plague it selfe as the Chalde Paraphrast as though in effect the sorcerers should confesse thus much that this plague was of God and they could not resist it so Iob saith the hand of God hath touched me cap 19.21 2. Augustine by the finger of God understandeth the spirit of God whereras Saint Luke saith that Christ cast out devils by the finger of God cap. 11. Saint Matthew saith by the spirit of God and fitly is the spirit compared to the fingers that as the fingers proceed from the hand and arme the arme from the bodie so the spirit proceedeth from the Father and the Sonne and as there are ten fingers upon both the hands so there are divers gifts of the spirit and here are tenne plagues answering to the number of the fingers So also Ierom saith that the arme and strength of God is the Sonne and the Spirit is the fingers and with this finger did the Lord write the tenne Commandements in the Tables of stone But this collection seemeth to be somewhat curious neither is it like that the Sorcerers had any such knowledge of the mysterie of the Trinitie 3. Therefore Rupertus thinketh that the sorcerers did onely meane by this phrase the power of God but that unwittingly also by a divine instinct they doe give an evident testimony of the holy spirit the third person of the Trinitie as Caiphas did ignorantly prophesie of Christ. But it seemeth that these sorcerers being professed servants of Satan and possessed with his spirit were not fit vessels to receive any such divine instinct 4. Pererius thinketh that by the finger of God they understand a great invincible power as the Scripture saith the Cedars of God a man of God for the tall cedars and for an excellent man But in this sense they could not denie but that the other works were also excellent more admirable than this 5. Liranus will have them by the finger of God to understand the power of some superiour devill that staied the working of the inferiors But this is an insolent speech by the name of God to understand the devill and by this meanes Satan should strive against Satan and the kingdome of
spake B.G.L. for vaichi it was is omitted 3. The explanation of difficult questions QUEST I. Of the divers names which are given unto God in Scripture Vers. 3. I Appeared c. by the name of almightie God Hierome noteth that in the Scripture there are tenne severall names given unto God 1. Eel which signifieth strong 2. Elohim 3. Elohe God derived of the former word Eel so called because he is mightie and powerfull 4. Sabaoth or Tzebaoth the God of Hostes. 5. Helion high as Gen. 14.22 he is called the most high 6. Eheje Exod. 3.11 so named of his being 7. Adonai Lord. 8. Shaddai Genes 17.1 omnipotent all sufficient which Aquila translateth strong mightie 9. Iah which is contracted of Iehovah 10. The last and tenth name is Iehovah QUEST II. Of the divers kinds of names given unto God THe names which are given unto God are of foure sorts 1. Some are simply given unto God without respect to any other thing but himselfe and either these names shew his essence as Iehovah or the persons of the Trinitie as the Father Sonne Holy Ghost 2. Other names have relation to the creature so he is called the Creator Lord Governour Preserver 3. Some names include a negation or absence of some imperfection incident to the creatures so is God called immortall immutable 4. Some names are given from the properties which are essentiall in God but accidentall in others as hee is called just wise mercifull gracious ex Perer. QUEST III. Of the excellencie of the name Iehovah BUt of all names which are given unto God none doth more fully expresse unto us what God is then the name Iehovah first it is derived of hajah which in piel doth not onely signifie to be but to give being which best agreeth unto God not onely for that he gave being and life unto all things but giveth being to his promises and gratiously effecteth whatsoever he hath promised to his servants Simler 2. The Hebrewes also observe that the letters of this name of Iehovah jod he and van are called literae flatus quietis The letters of breathing and of rest whereby is signified that God is the author of breath and life and that in him onely there is true rest to be found 3. Some of the Rabbines doe in this name comprehend the Trinitie for Iehovah they say signifieth God begetting or giving essence and if there be a God begetting there must bee also a God begotten and because it is impossible but that betweene the God begetting and the God begotten there should bee a coeternall and consubstantiall love therefore in this name is insinuated the holy Spirit the God of love 4. Hereupon some also thinke that our Saviour alludeth to this name when he thus saith in his prayer Father I have manifested thy name unto the men whom thou gavest me Ioh. 17.6 that is hee declared openly the doctrine of the Trinitie commanding his Disciples to baptise in the name of the Father of the Sonne and of the Holy Ghost Ex Perer. 5. Beside whereas some other names of God as Adonai Elohim are communicable unto creatures as to Angels and men the name Iehovah is not communicated to any but given onely unto God Simler QUEST IV. The name Iehovah understood of Christ. SOme thinke that the name Iesus is derived of Iehovah shin being inserted onely to signifie the assumption of the humane nature but the Angell giveth another interpretation of the name Iesus because Christ should save the people from their sinnes Matth. 1. so that it is rather derived of Ieshuah salvation than of Iehovah Simler But howsoever it is for the derivation of this name the signification doth most properly agree unto Christ who is indeed God Iehovah for so the Prophets speaking of Christ doe call him Iehovah as Ierem. 23.61 This is the name whereby they shall call him Iehovah our righteousnesse And as now the Lord calleth himselfe Iehovah because of this powerfull deliverance of the Israelites out of the bondage of Egypt so Christ shewed himselfe Iehovah in delivering of us from the spirituall thraldome of Satan Borrh. QUEST V. Of the right pronuntiation of the name Iehovah FUrther there is some difference in the pronuntiation of this word Iehovah which is called tetragrammaton because it consisteth of foure letters he jod vah he as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Greeke Deus in Latin have likewise foure letters Irenaeus doth seeme to call it Iaoth Isodor iodiod Diodorus Siculus saith that the name of the Jewes God was Ia◠lib. 2. cap. 5. So also Macrobius lib. 1. Saturnal cap. 18. Clemens Alexandrinus Iau lib. 5. Stromat Theodoret saith that the Samarites pronounce it Iava the Hebrewes Ia quast 15. in Exod. Perer. But the received pronuntiation is Iehovah as may appeare by the abbreviation thereof used in Scripture Iah Exod. 15.2 Iah is my strength Hence also it is probable that the Heathen derived the oblique cases of Iupiter Iovis Iovi for from Iehovah the word love seemeth to be contracted which might make Varro also to thinke Deum Iudaeorum esse Iovem that Iove was the God of the Jewes as Augustine alleageth out of Varro QUEST VI. Whether the name Iehovah be ineffable that is not to be pronounced BUt here will be moved a greater question why this name Iehovah should be called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ineffable not to be uttered as the generall custome of the Hebrewes is at this day not to expresse it 1. We refuse Genebrands opinion who confidently affirmeth that the word Iehovah is neither Iudaicum nor Christianum neither a Jewish nor a Christian word neither received of the Fathers nor of the Rabbines nor yet learned of Christ and his Apostles to this it may be answered that the Rabbines followed herein the received use of the Hebrewes and whereas the Septuagint in stead of Iehovah read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Lord it is no marvell if in the new Testament therein they follow the translation of the Septuagint being of so great authoritie 2. Bellarmine because Hierome for Iehovah readeth here Adonai contendeth that it ought alwayes to be so read and that the points or prickes of this word Iehovah are the same that are in Adonai which moved Origen also in his Hexapla to read for Iehovah Adonai Contra. It is evident that Iehovah and Adonai are two divers words and therefore not of one pronuntiation and sometime they concurre together as Gen. 15.8 Iehovi Adonai will they here read the same word twice adonai adonai That the same prickes doe serve divers words is not strange nor unusuall and the Septuagint observe not this rule for they read not Adonai but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 3. A third opinion is that the name Iehovah was of old and former times pronounced but the right pronuntiation thereof was lost in the Captivitie of Babylon as likewise the puritie of the Hebrew tongue Perer. But this is a meere conjecture and yet
of us to be worshipped Ergo the Father Sonne and holy Ghost are that one God Simler So our Saviour saith Yee beleeve in God beleeve also in mee Ioh. 14.1 Christ the Sonne of God is God because he is to be beleeved upon And againe This is life eternall that they know thee to be the only very God and whom thou hast sent Iesus Christ Ioh. 17.3 God the Father then and Christ his Sonne are the only very God And that the Sonne of God is to be worshipped with the Father the Prophet David sheweth Psal. 2. 11 12. Serve Iehovah in feare c. Kisse the Sonne lest he be angry In the former verse whom hee calleth Sonne here he nameth Jehovah So wee reade in the words of the Prophet Agur Prov 30.4 Who hath established all the ends of the world what is his name and what is his Sonnes name if thou canst tell Further that the Spirit of God is also one God with the Father and Sonne to be worshipped and glorified beside plentifull evidence out of the new Testament which shall not need to be inserted here because we are in hand with the law of the old Testament sufficient testimony may be taken from the law and Prophets as Gen. 1.1 The Spirit of God moved upon the waters But God only created the world So likewise the renovation of the heart is onely the worke of God because it is a new creation as David saith Create in me a new heart Psal. 50.10 but this is also the worke of the Spirit Take not thine holy Spirit from me ibid. vers 11. Likewise it is only Gods worke to teach us his will and to bring us to life eternall but this is wrought by the Spirit Psal. 143.10 Teach mee to doe thy will for thou art my God leâ— thy good Spirit lead me unto the land of righteousnesse Ambrose very fitly proveth the Spirit to be God by that place Iudg. 14.5 where it is said That the Spirit of the Lord came upon Sampson But Iud. 16.20 after his lockes were polled it is also said Hee knew not that the Lord was departed from him Hee which came upon him before was the same that departed from him now there called the Spirit of the Lord and here the Lord and Jehovah therefore the holy Spirit is Lord and Jehovah Ambros. lib. 2. de Spirit cap. 2. Damâ—scen doth thus excellently prove the Trinity by this demonstration Vnus Deus non sine Verbâ— est God being but one is never without the Word but this Word hee hath in himselfe begotten of his owne substance not like unto our word which hath no substance but vanisheth in the aire because the condition of our nature is temporall But like as our word proceeding from the mind neque per totum menti idem est c. is neither the same with the mind nor yet altogether divers from it So is the Sonne unto the Father which is his Word the same in substance but divers in subsistence Oportet autem Verbum Spiritum habere nam verbum nostrum nequaquam spiritus est expers But the Word also must have a Spirit for neither is our word without a spirit but here is the difference our spirit is not of the same substance with us but the drawing in of the aire for wee are of a compound nature but the Spirit of the Word is of the same substance with the Word To this effect Damascen lib. 1. de fide orthodox cap. 6.7 And in the same place he useth another demonstration Impossible est Deum destitutum esse nativae foecunditatis c. It is impossible that God should bee destitute of naturall fecundity The Lord therefore must needs beget Sed ex propriâ— substantia generat but he begetteth out of his owne substance and that from all eternity for if the Sonne had not beene from the beginning coexistent with him of whom hee was begotten we shall bring in a change of his substance Nam cùm non esset Pater postea factus est Pater for so when he was yet no Father he afterward should become a Father c. Damascen ibid. Thus out of the first Commandement both the unity of the Godhead and the Trinity is concluded as Bernard thus elegantly inferreth Quid sibi vult iste ut ita loquar â—ine numero numerus si tria quomodo non numerus si unum ubi numerus What meaneth this number without a number if there be three how can there be but a number if one where is the number But here I have what I may number and what I may not number there is one substance and three persons c. Bernard lib. de consideraâ— Thus by the unity of nature the errour of the Gentiles is abolished and by the joyning of the Word and the Spirit to the Father the Jewish opinion is overthrowne Et ex utraque secta nobis accedit utilitas ex Iâ—daica opinione naturae unitas ex Gentilitia sola personarum discretio So by either sect wee receive some profit by the Iewes opinion the unity of nature by the Gentiles the discerning and difference of the persons only Damasc. ibid. Transgressors then of this Commandement concerning the unity of the Deity and Trinity of the persons are 1. They which affirme and hold one God but deny the three persons as the Montanists and Marcellians in times past and the Turkes and Jewes now 2. They which hold not the distinction of three persons only but the division also of substance as the Tritheists The Arrians and Eunomians are of the same sect qui filium Deum confitentur sed conditum asseverant which confesse the Sonne to bee God but yet affirme him to be made So they bring in another God contrary to this precept Thou shalt have no other Gods c. Theodoret. 3. They which brought in a quaternian of persons as Anastasius the Emperour and the Apollinarians 4. They also which affirme the three persons to be but three names given unto God in Scripture and therefore they say that the Father became man and suffered for us which are therefore called Patripassians 3. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. That justifying faith is not contained or commanded in the law 1. BUt although to beleeve in the Trinity be commanded in the first precept to adore and worship the Father Sonne and holy Ghost as the only God yet it followeth not that justifying faith which properly belongeth to the Gospell whereby we apprehend Christ and his merits should be contained and included in the law therefore we mislike that assertion of Bellarmine concurring therein with other Romanists That the Gospell differeth from the law as a perfect thing from an imperfect and that the Gospell is contained and included in the law as the tree in the seed Bellarm. de justif lib. 4. cap. 4. Some Protestants also come somewhat neere this opinion as Marbachius saith that they offend against this precept Qui Christi
discerned by the feeling and therefore our Saviour saith feele and see a spirit hath not flesh and bones as yee see mee to have And some have reported that they have felt such bodies assumed by spirits as colde as yce and of a divers substance from humane flesh as Alexander ab Alexandro so writeth of another to whom a spirit appeared and Cardanus of himselfe If any man object that Abraham washed the Angels feet and yet discerned them not I will not answer with Pererius whose judgement I refuse not in the rest that Abrahams intent upon other things regarded it not But I note a difference betweene the operation of good and bad Angels that these never appeared with true bodies and therefore were called Phantasmata visions fansies Marke 6.49 But unto the other God gave the use of true bodies for a time during that ministerie or service as appeareth in that they did eat and drinke were lodged had their feet washed c. 3. But howsoever spirits may assume bodies they are not such as can be instruments of generation by conveying of humane seed as some have imagined because the scripture saith children are the inheritance of the Lord Psal. 127.3 And Evah confesseth when Cain was borne that she had obtained a son of God Gen. 4.1 and if that were true which is fabled of Merlin such kind of birth should be oftner seene in the world Wherefore by the sonnes of God in this place 1. Neither doe wee understand Angels good or bad 2. Neither men of tall and great stature as such things as are excellent in their kind are so called as high and tall trees are said to be the trees of God Psal. 104.16.3 Nor yet the sonnes of Princes and great men as the Chalde readeth to whom Mercerus subscribeth which are called Gods in scripture Psal. 82.6 I said ye are Gods c 4. Neither yet are they so called because they came of Seeth who as Suidas thinketh was in respect of his religion and great knowledge saluted as a God in earth 5. But they are here named the sonnes of God that were of the righteous seed and worshippers of the true God as the wicked are called the sonnes of the Devil and he their father Iohn 8.44 ye are of your father the Devill who although they were not indeed the sonnes of God in his eternall election yet were they so in respect of their externall calling QVEST. VII The meaning of these words My spirit shall not alwaies strive c. 4. Vers. 3. MY spirit shall not alwaies strive c. 1. Not as the latine text is My spirit shall not alwaies remaine which some expound of Gods wrath some of his providence some of the holy Ghost some of the soule and spirit of man inspired of God and then the sense to bee that Gods wrath shall not alwaies continue but he will punish them at once or he will no more protect them or take care for them neither his spirit shall be with them or he will take away their life and spirit from them For this variety of interpretation ariseth of the mistaking of the word which signifieth to contend or judge not to remaine 2 Neither is Pagmines interpretation so apt my spirit shall not alwaies bee sheathed as a sword in a scabbard and so hee would derive the word jadon of neden which signifieth a sheath 3. The meaning then of these words my spirit shall not alwaies judge or contend is neither as Hierom expoundeth non eos ad â—ternos servabo cruciatus I will not punish them for ever but render unto them here that which they deserve For S. Peter sheweth that their soules are now in the prison of hell and so everlastingly punished 1 Peter 3.19 Neither as Cajetane that God would no more punish them spiritually as hee had done by taking his grace and spirit from them but now he would inflict a corporall punishment upon them for God had not yet punished them giving them the space of 120. yeares to repent But either wee may understand these words with Oleaster that God would no longer strive with them in reprooving and admonishing them which they regarded not or with Iunius God would no longer consult or dispute the matter as it were with himselfe what to doe with them but if they amended not within that space set he would certainly destroy them QVEST. VIII What these Giants were 5. Vers. 4. THese were Giants c. Some thinke that these were called Giants not for their greatnesse of stature but their cruell and beastly conditions so thinke Philo Ioseph Damas. Cyril with others so also Iunius 2. But beside their fierce and cruell nature it is most probable that they were of huge and great stature Mercer for such there were also after the floud as the sonnes of Anak in comparison of whom the Israelites seemed as grashoppers Num. 13.34 such were the Emmims and Zaâ—zummims Deut. 2.10 17. and Og the King of Basan whose bed was of iron being nine cubits in length and foure in breadth Deut. 3.11 and of this judgement are Ambrose Augustine Theodoret. 3. And these Giants huge in stature men of great strength as is shewed after in this verse did most abound before the floud and such also was the off-spring of this unlawfull copulation betweene the sonnes of God and daughters of men 4. And they were men of renowne that is famous over all the world because they did tyrannize over their neighbours and brought them in subjection of whom Berosius writeth that they had a City called Enos about the mountaine Libanus which ruled over all the world they did eat mans flesh and had unlawfull company with their mothers daughters with mules and bruit beasts 5. Some as Rasi doe referre this generation of Giants to the times of Enos further affirming that the Lord sent the Ocean Sea which destroyed the generation of these Giants and the third part of the world but the Giants which succeeded them were as wicked as they But of this inundation of the Ocean no mention is made in Scripture neither is it like that the generation of Giants began so soone in the world neither with Aben Ezra doe we understand this of the generation of Giants after the floud of whom came Og and the rest as though any of the Giants had escaped the floud to beget Giants afterward and that Noe and his sonnes were Giants it is not to be thought Mercer Neither were these Giants onely in Noahs time but when this violent rage of lust beganne to reigne in the world then this off-spring of Giants came in which continued till the time of Noah 6. Neither were these Giants onely of Seths race as some thinke nor yet onely of Cain as R. Sel. but in both families there were Giants after they thus coupled together with out the feare of God Mercer Calvin 7. So that the Nephilim here spoken of so named of Naphal which
usuall food before the floud as it is now as seemeth to thinke Dominicus à Soto a Popish Writer for when as yet the earth and plants were not corrupted by the floud but retained their naturall force and vigour they yeelded more sufficient nourishment so that the eating of flesh was not then so necessary and as the more delicate use of some plants as the use of Wine by Noah was brought in afterward so much flesh of fowles and beasts did grow in request after the floud which was not covered before 5. Wherefore the sounder opinion is that not onely the eating of flesh was permitted before the floud but used not onely among the prophane race but with the faithfull though with greater moderation Our reasons are these 1. Because there is made no new grant neither in this nor in the rest as of multiplying and bearing dominion c. but onely the ancient privileges granted to man confirmed 2. The distinction of cleane beasts which it was lawfull for them to eat and the uncleane whereof they might not eat Levit. 13.8.3 It is evident by the oblation of Abel who offered the first fruit of his sheepe and the faâ— of them but it had beene no praise to Abel to offer the fatlings if he used not to eat of them it had beene all one to God whether to offer leane or fat but herein Abel is commended because he preferred the service of God before his owne private use and therefore Iustinus well collecteth Si anâ—e posuit Abel utilitatisâ—a Deum non dubium quia solitus fit ex labore suo utilitatem percipere If Abel did preferre God before his profit certainly he did reape profit of his labour and to the same purpose he alleageth that saying of the Apostle Who feedeth a flocke and eateth not of the milke thereof 1 Cor. 9.7 and by the same reason also of the flesh thereof 4. In that expresse mention is here first made of eating of flesh it is not as one well resolveth quantum ad usum in respect of the use sed quantum ad necessitatem in regard of the necessity The food of flesh beganne now to be more necessary because the plants and herbs had lost the first naturall vigour and strength QVEST. IIII. Whaâ— the meaning is of eating the flesh with the life or bloud 4. BVt flesh with the life thereof that is the bloud c. 1. This word anima in Hebrew nephesh translated life is taken foure wayes in Scripture first for man as the soule that sinneth shall die Ezek. 18. Secondly for the reasonable soule feare not those that can kill the body but cannot kill the soule Matth. 10. Thirdly it is taken for the inferiour part of the soule that is the affection as thou shalt love the Lord with all thy heart and soule Matth. 22. Fourthly it is taken for the life as a good shepherd will lay downe his life for his sheepe Ioh. 10. and so it is taken in this place for the bloud is the seat and chariot of the life and vitall spirics 2. These words are neither figuratively taken as Eugubinus thinketh for the shedding of mans bloud because he that killeth a man seemeth to devour his flesh for in this sense the words should have no coherence at all with the former verse and where words may be taken in their proper sense without any inconvenience a figure is not to be enforced neither is it all one to eat flesh with the bloud thereof and to eat things strangled as Chrysostome collecteth for the Apstoles distinctly speake of bloud and things strangled Act. 15. Neither is the eating of live flesh here onely prohibited as Cajetanus conjectureth or of hot bloud as Mercer for from this bruitish kinde of food the very nature of man abhorreth and therefore it needed not so especially to be provided for by precept But here generally the eating of the bloud with the flesh is forbidden whether together with the flesh alive or dead or separated from the flesh as to drinke it or to eat it as now the use is in confected meats QVEST. V. Wherefore the eating of bloud was prohibited NOw whereas the eating of bloud was forbidden both before the Law and under the Law Levit. 17. and after the Law in the beginning of the Gospell Act. 15. it shall be profitable to consider the causes of this prohibition First it was forbidden before the Law 1. Not so much for decencie and comelinesse or for that bloud is a grosse and heavy food 2. But either that aforehand by these ceremoniall precepts mens minds might be prepared the better to beare the yoke of the Law which afterward should be promulgated 3. Or rather that by this precept of abstaining from bloud men might be the more terrified from the shedding of mans bloud sic Chrysost. Secondly this law was revived Levit. 17.11 12. whereof two reasons are given one civill because the life of the flesh is the bloud that they should forbeare from all shew of cruelty and so much the more detest the shedding of mans bloud the other religious because I have given the bloud to offer at the Altar the bloud the organ of life is holy unto God the Author of life and therefore they should not pollute or prophane it by devouring thereof Thirdly the Apostles did forbid the eating of things strangled and bloud 1. Not because among the Gentiles suffocated things were held to be the food of evill spirits as Origen writeth for it is not like that the Apostles would ground their decree upon such heathenish fantasies 2. Neither by bloud is homicide forbidden and by things suffocated uncleane as some thinke for the Apostles would not use obscure and mysticall tearmes in their decree and these things were already provided for by law among the Gentiles 3. Neither did the Apostles forbid these things onely to restraine intemperancie for many kinds of food are more delicate and to be defiâ—ed than these 4. But Augustine sheweth the true cause of this prohibition Quâ—dideo fâ—ctum est quia elâ— gere voluerunt Apostoli pro tempore rem facilem c. This was decreed because the Apostles for a while would chuse some easie thing not burdensome to the observers which the Gentiles might observe in common with the Iewes c. Thus Augustine disputing against Faustus This the Apostles did onely for a time lest the beleeving Jewes who could hardly all at once be removed from the legall rites might have beene offended at the libertie of the Gentiles but now this cause being removed and there being no such feare this decree also is expired QVEST. VI. How this prohibition dependeth of the former verse Vers. 5. FOr surely I will require your bloud c. 1. Which words are neither an exposition of the former verse as Eugubinus who by the eating of flesh with the bloud understandeth figuratively the shedding of mans bloud 2. Neither is the
goeth further and distinctly sheweth how many nations and languages came of Sem Cham and Iapheth upon these words Psal. 105.8 he hath remembred his promise that he made to a thousand generations hee sheweth that there are in the world a thousand generations and 72. languages from Persia to the Indians and Bactrians of Sem he maketh 27 languages and 406. nations from Euphrates and Nilus to the Gades of Cham 394. nations 22. languages from Tigris westward of Iapheth were multiplied 200. nations and 23. tongues eâ— Perer. But this is set downe onely by meere gesse and conjecture that there should be divided 72 languages for there are but 70. fathers named 14 of Iapheth 31 of Cham 25. of Sem for Heber and Peleg must be counted for one familie whereas tenne of the sonns of Noahs sonnes are set forth with their issue and posteritie two of Iapheth fower of Cham fower of Sem they make not severall nations without their sonnes no more than Noahs three sonnes and therefore tenne more must be detracted from the number of 70. and so there will remaine but 60. As Canaan must not be reckoned for a severall nation beside those that came of him and so of the rest And if those whose generations are not expressed whereof there are 11. five of Iapheth two of Cham fower of Sem did not make severall nations as Augustine thinketh but were incorporate to the rest then so many more are wanting of this number and there will remaine but 50. But admit that this last conjecture of Augustine be uncertaine yet it is most probable that all the Cananites of Canaan of whom came an eleven severall nations as they are â—ehearsed Gen. 10.15 spake but one language Isa. 19.18 they shall speake the language of Canaan which if it be so then could there not be 72. languages divided in the confusion of Babel Wherefore concerning this matter there are some things certaine some things uncertaine first it is certaine that the tongues and languages were divided then that every particular person had not a severall language for then there could have beene no society but that the principall and chiefe families onely had their proper speech Secondly as uncertaine it is 1. whither 72. languages or more or lesse tooke then beginning 2. whether some of those nations are not now utterly perished as Pliny out of Eratosthenes alleageth that divers people in Asia as of the Solymans Lelegians Bebrycians Calycantians are extinguished 3. Neither is it certaine whether every particular language now used was then founded or only the mother originall tongues out of the which other since have bin derived which is most like Mercer QVEST. XVI Where Cainan first added to the genealogie reconciled Vers. 12. THe Septuagint betweene Arphacsad and Sale place Cainan and so doth S. Luke in his Gospell ca. 3. according to most copies but Cainan is not found in the Hebrew to reconcile this doubt 1. We neither allow Cajetanes solution that the septuagint have set downe the true genealogie and that the Hebrew copies are imperfect and have beene corrupted by the Jewes for the Jewes had no reason to corrupt the genealogie which giveth the Christians no advantage neither maketh against them and beside the Chalde Paraphrast which is most ancient leaveth out Cainan 2. Neither is it like as Eugubinus saith that the Septuagint erred herein and that S. Luke followeth their error for although an error may be admitted in the Septuagint in this place as in many other yet the holy Evangelist was farre from approving their error being directed by the spirit of God 3. Neither doth the answer of Ioannes Lucidus and before him Nauclerus satisfie that Cainan and Salâ— were one and the same and that the place in Luke should be read which was of Sala which was of Cainan Luke 3.36 But this cannot be for beside that that there was no cause why Luke should set downe two names only of Sala and of none of the rest beside in the Septuagint Cainan is made the father and begetteâ— of Sala Genes 11.4 Lippoman and Canus answere that as Mathewe omitteth three of the kings in his genealogie betweene Ioram and Ozias to make the line of 14. generations equall from Abraham to David from David to the captivitie and from thence to Christ so Moses to make tenne generations from Sem to Abraham correspondent to the ten patriarkes before the floud might omit Cainan But the reason is not alike 1. For those three Kings Ahaziah Ioas Amaziah are thought by some to to bee omitted for another cause because they were killed for evill government Concent 2. And againe Moses summeth the yeeres of these Fathers which Mathewe doth not and therefore if Moses should of purpose leave out Cainan a great error would fall out in the Chronologie and computation of yeares 3. If Moses had left out Cainan to make the genealogie equall yet if there had beene any such hee should not have beene omitted in that catalogie of their names 1 Chro. 1.18 where was no such cause of â—mission 5. Some thinke that the Septuagint erred in adding of Cainan and that Luke followed that text not approoving that error but giving way to the time because the Septuagint was then well knowne among the Gentiles least if he had departed from that translation it might have hindred the credit of his Gospell Thus Iansenius and Genebrard among the pontificall writers and learned Iunius among the Protestants who saith that it was not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a slip or fault of memory but a faultlesse confession in respect of the time so also Mercerus who thinketh that this being but a matter of genealogie is not much to be stood vpon which Paul calleth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 endlesse 1. Tim. 1.4 6. But I approove rather Beza his answere that Cainan was put into the text in Luke by the ignorance of some that tooke upon them to correct it according to the Septuagint for in that ancient manuscript which he followed Cainan was not to be found and therefore Beza in his translation upon good ground left it out and so doth the great English Bible Other thinke further that the translation of the septuagint was also herein corrupted by some that at the first these Greeke interpreters put not in Cainan for neither Iosephus nor Epiphanius which follow the septuagint rehearsing the fathers before Abraham make mention of this Cainan and in the best Greeke copies it is left out 1 Chronic. 1. QVEST. XVII When Arphaxad was borne Vers. 10. BEgat Arphachsad two yeare after the floud the question is whereas Elam and Asshur the sonnes of Sem are named before Arphacsad the third sonne how Sem could have these three in two yeares I answer 1. Neither with Aben Ezra that Sems wife might bee with childe in the Arke when the waters began to decrease for I thinke rather that
have not these words the rest have v. 6. unto an high oake S. famous valley H. unto the plaine of Morch caet celon signifieth both an oake and a valley or plaine v. 8. Bethel toward the west caeter toward the sea S. heb because the Mediterranean Sea was in the west side of Canaan v. 9. in the desart S. toward the South caeter negebh signifieth both v. 11. tooke his journey toward the East T. tooke his journey first C. from the East câ—t heb micehedem toward the East Gen. 28. v. 13. Say I am his sister S. thou art my sister caet I shall live for thy sake H. T. by thy occasion B. shall be preserved by thee G. for thy words C. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because of thee S.P. heb biglal propter because v. 16. mules and Camels 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 S. she ashes and camels câ—t athon a she asse chamer an hee asse the mule is the shee v. 19. I have taken her to my wife S.C.P. I might have taken her caet 3. The Exegesis or Theologicall Explication QVEST. I. Where and how the Lord spake to Abraham Vers. 1. FOr the Lord had said c. 1. God thus spake to Abraham not after his fathers death but while he was yet in Mesopotamia Act. 7.2 for to what end should the Lord have thus said Get thee out of the countrey c. if hee had beene come out thence already Calvin 2. Wee read that God spake unto Abraham eight times Gen. 12.1 againe v. 7. and c. 13.14 and c. 15.4 and 17.1 also c. 18.9 and c. 21.9 and 22. 1. It is like that divers other times the Lord spake unto him but these are expressed 2. And how God spake unto Abraham Basil thinketh it was citra ullam corporis vocem without any corporall or outward voyce but by the illumination of his minde Ramban thinketh it was by dreame some that God spake to him by Sem or some other Prophet but in this place it is like that God spake to Abraham either by himselfe or his Angels when he spake by dreame in sleepe or by vision when he was waking it is so expressed in the text as c. 15.1 QVEST. II. Whether God named it a countrey to Abraham whither he called him TO the land that I will shew thee c. 1. When the Lord thus called to Abraham hee named no certaine countrey whither hee should goe for the better triall of his faith for the Apostle saith Hee knew not whither hee went Hebr. 11.8 and Stephen Act. 7.3 nameth no countrey whither hee was called 2. Whereas Canaan is named in the former chapter vers 31. either Moses setteth downe the name of the country by way of anticipation or God might afterward shew unto Abraham as he went whither hee would have him to goe Calvin R. Isaach Carus thinketh that at the first Abraham understood that countrey to the which hee was called to be Canaan because of the curse that hee should be a servant c. but that is not like QVEST. III. Wherefore Abraham was called out of Chaldea into Canaan ANd the Lord called Abraham out of Chaldea into Canaan 1. Because Chaldea was given to abominable Idolatry and other great corruptions of life where Abraham could not remaine without great danger 2. That Gods blessing in the multiplying of Abrahams seede might better appeare abroad in a strange countrey Perer. 3. But the greatest cause was not as some thinke to converse with Sem who is held to be Melchizedek but that Abraham might take possession of that countrey and by faith and hope enioy that which was promised to be given to his seede Calvin QVEST. IIII. Where Abraham was when the Lord first called him Where Abraham should be when as God first called him there are divers opinions 1. It can neither be as Augustine thinketh that Abraham was called after he was departed out of Chaldea before he came to Charran beeing yet in Mesopotamia for to what end should the Lord have bidden Abraham to goe out of his countrey if he had beene removed alreadie To say with Augustine and Eucherius that now he is commanded to leave his countrey in affection as he had alreadie done in bodie hath no probabilitie for both Abraham should have beene disobedient to Gods Vocation beeing wedded still in desire to his countrie and it is not like that he had a minde to returne to an idolatrous countrey where he was to expect nothing but persecution Steven indeed saith he was in Mesopotamia when God called him but Mesopotamia is there taken largely as it comprehendeth Siria and Chaldea and so Steven saith that he came out of the land of the Chaldeans Act. 7.4 Mercer 2. Neither was Abraham twice called once in Chaldea and againe in Charran as Rupertus and Tostatus thinke upon this place for this had argued Abrahams sloth and negligence if hee had made no more haste to obey the calling of God Steven also Act. 7. maketh mention but of one calling 3. To say further that Steven beeing occupied with other matters might forget himselfe and not well remember the circumstance of time or that he was contented to follow the vulgar account is to doe wrong to so holie a man being directed by the spirit of God to speake neither doth Eucherius answer satisfie that expoundeth Steven thus that Abraham was placed in the land of Canaan after the death of Terah he might depart from Charran his father yet living but all that while hee was a sojourner in Canaan had no certaine place till after his fathers death Contra. But this sense is contrarie to the text that God after his fathers death 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 translated or brought Abraham into Canaan this must be understood not of Abrahams setling in Canaan but his first remove thither 4. Neither is Lyranus opinion sound who therein followeth Rasi and Mizrahi that the calling which Moses here speaketh of was that in Charran for Abraham is bidden to come out of his countrey but Charran was not his countrey and the Lord saith hee brought him out of Vr of the Chaldeans chap. 15.7 not out of Charran But Paulus Burgensis opinion is farre wide that Charran was Abrahams countrie not Chaldea for Vr of the Chaldees is called the land of his brother Arans nativitie now whereas Abraham calleth it his countrie where Naâ—or dwelt in Charran in Aram Naharahim or Mesopotamia Gen. 24.8.4.10 there Mesopotamia or Naharaim the countrie betweene the rivers is taken in a large sense as it containeth both Siria and Chaldea as is before shewed or for that all his kindred were now remooved thither Mercer 5. Wherefore the truth is that Abraham was in Chaldea when the Lord called him so Aben Ezra Mercer for so the Lord saith cap. 15.7 and although he is bid to leave his kindred who came with him as Terah and Lot yet for all this his calling was in
Neither because Abraham had married another wife as some suppose did Isaack dwell apart from him in Beersheba his father remaining in Hebron as Calvin for it is not like that Abraham would want the presence and comfort of his dutifull sonne 3. Nor yet for a time did Isaack dwell apart employed as is most like in some speciall affaires in that countrey Merc. 3. But it is most like that Abraham at this time dwelt in Beersheba both because Abrahams servant returned thither as also there was Sarahs tent into the which Isaack brought Rebecca v. 67. QVEST. XXVIII Why Isaack used in the evening to walke in the field Vers. 62. TO pray in the field 1. Some read to talke or conferre in the field Aquila 2. some to talke with his workmen Cajetan 3. some to exercise himselfe in the field Septuag 4. Some to give himselfe to meditation Ambr. Iun. 5. some to meditate and contemplate the heavens and starres other naturall things Lyran. 6. some to talke with himselfe as they doe which are given to meditation 7. some to take the aire Vatabl. 8. But it is most like hee went into the field to pray unto God and to pray with deepe meditation for so the word suach signifieth both to meditate and pray and it may be that he intended his prayer specially concerning this businesse of his mariage QVEST. XXIX How and wherefore Rebecca lighted downe from the camell Vers. 6.4 SHe lighted downe from the camel c. 1. She neither bowed her selfe a little upon the camell as Ramban 2. neither did she hurt her selfe in lighting downe forcing by the fall the markes of her Virginity whereby Isaack suspected that the servant in the way had deflowred her as the Hebrewes fable 3. But she did for reverence unto Isaack light downe from the beast Mercer 4. so that we need not with Gregory to make an allegory hereof who by Isaack walking in the evening understandeth Christ comming in the end of the world and by Rebecca lighting from the camel the Church of the Gentiles forsaking her vitious life and manners Gregor in 42. Iob. QVEST. XXX Why they used to cover the face Vers. 65. SHe tooke a vaile and covered her 1. The covering of the head sometime is a signe of mourning as David covered his head when he mourned for Absolom 2 Sam. 19.4 2. sometime it is a signe of great reverence as Elias covered his face in the mount Horeb when hee talked with God 1 King 19. 3. It is also a signe of displeasure as they covered Hamans face when the King was incensed against him Esther 7.4 but it is here a signe of modesty and shamefastnesse as Tertullian writeth of the Arabian women quae non caput sed faciem ita totam tegunt ut uno oculo liberato contentae sive dimidia frui luâ—e potius quam totam faciem prostituere which doe not only cover their head but their whole face that having but one eye to see with they had rather enjoy but halfe the light than prostitute their whole face Caius Sulpitius Gallus is said to have divorced his wife because she was seene abroad with her face uncovered Valer. Maxim l. 6. c. 3. ex citation Perer. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. It is lawfull to take an oath where there is just cause Vers. 3. I Will make thee sweare c. Abraham both sweareth himselfe where none required an oath Gen. 14.12 he also sware to Abimelech who demanded an oath of him Gen. 21.31 and here he requireth an oath of his servant It is therefore lawfull to take an oath where there is just cause Muscul. Therefore that saying of Origen is some what hard perfectis viris jurare ipsis c. for perfect men either to sweare themselves or to adjure others it is uncomely homi ultim in Matth. 2. Doct. Children ought not to marry without their parents consent Vers. 4. TAke a wife to my sonne Isaack Abraham provideth a wife for Isaack It is not then lawfull for children to enterprise mariage without the consent of their parents so Rebeckas parents doe dispose of her for marriage v. 51. Rebeckah is before thee take her and goe and she afterwards giveth consent to their choice v. 58. wherefore great wrong is offered to the right of parents by the popish Canons that allow contracts made without the parents consent Calvin 3. Doct. Angels Presidents and Ministers of marriage Vers. 7. HE shall send his Angell before thee c. The holy Angel is appointed to be a guide in this businesse of mariage which therefore is hence concluded to be an holy thing seeing such holy spirits are presidents of this action As the Apostle also saith Mariage is honourable among all men Heb. 13.3 If Angels vouchsafe their presence and assistance in mariage how can it be a polluting or prophanation of orders as some popish writers affirme Greg. Martin dis c. 15. sect 11. 4. Doct. Iewels and ornaments how farre lawfull for women Vers. 22. HE tooke an abillement of gold concerning the use of these ornaments and jewels as simply they are not unlawfull the manner and person of wearing them considered so these captions must bee admitted 1. that although these tokens were sent unto the spouse and it was the use of the bride to decke and attire her selfe Ierem. 2.32 yet did they not usually thus apparrell themselves as with gold and such like as S. Peter sheweth 1 Pet. 3 3.5 2 The simplicity of that age is to beâ— considered that did not set their delight upon such things as we read note of 〈◊〉 that she bare a pitcher of water upon her shoulders our gentlewomen in these dayes thâ—â— urge 〈…〉 for bracelets and jewels would be loth to doe in other things as Rebecca did 3. Their speciall care was to decke and adorne the hid man of the heart with a meeke and quiet spirit 1. Pet. 3. 4. Let our nice and curious women first imitate them therein then let them plead their example for the rest Places of confutation 1. Confut. Peter not the chiefe among the Apostles Vers. 2. ABraham said to the eldest servant of his house which had the rule To this servant Pererius resembleth Peter 1. because of his age 2. and he was likewise by Christ set over his whole house that is the Church as this servant was over Abrahams house 3. as this servant was sent to chuse a wife for Isaack so S. Peter was the first that converted the Gentiles to Christ and invited them to this spirituall marriage for Peter first of all the Apostles was instructed by vision that the Gentiles were to be called and the first conversion of the Gentiles namely of Cornelius and his family was wrought by Peter Perer. in 24. Gen. num 5. Contra. 1. That Peter was one of the eldest in yeares among the Apostles wee deny not but that hee was the eldest of all as it seemeth this servant was cannot be
aâ—tributed to the second ranke of gods who provided for all things betweene the Moone and the earth the third they yeelded to the spirits who governed the actions of men But the Scripture teacheth us that all things in heaven and earth are ruled by Gods providence in so much that a sparrow cannot fall upon the ground without the will of God Matth. 10.29 as the Prophet David also saith Who is like unto the Lord our God that hath his dwelling on high who abaseth himselfe to behold things in the heaven and the earth Psal. 113.5 6. 3. Confut. Iacobs ladder doth not signifie the monasticall profession PErerius interpreteth this ladder out of a counterfeit peece of Bernard to be the discipline of Monasticall life and namely the way and rule of Benets order whereby the founder of that order S. Benedict went to heaven numer 34. Contra. 1. First then it is requisite if this ladder signifieth Monasticall discipline that he which first saw it should have beene a professed Monke but I thinke they will not say that Iacob was a Monke the most speciall part of which profession consisteth in the vow of single life 2. Christ himselfe standeth upon the top of this ladder to whom the way and ladder is directed he then that climbeth this ladder must ascend by faith in Christ but the Monks thinke to climbe up to heaven by their merits 3. Iacob was a figure of Christ upon whom the Angels of God should ascend and descend Ioh. 1.51 it is great presumption then to put Benet in Christs place that Iacob should bee a figure of him 4. This ladder sheweth the way that every true Israelite of Iacob should ascend by but every true Israelite and Christian is not a Monke 4. Confut. Philo confuted concerning the ascending and descending of soules PHilo understandeth the ayre to be this ladder Basis terra coelum caput The earth is the foot of this ladder the heaven is the head or top the Angels are the soules Quas aer habet stellis pares which the ayre is filled with equall to the starres in number some of these descend into the bodies some ascend Alia ad corpora recurrunt Some returne to the bodies againe thus Philo Platonizeth Lib. de somniis In this device of Philo three notable errours are discovered 1. The ayre is not the seat or region of soules but the spirits of the just are in heaven where Jesus Christ is and the holy Angels Heb. 12.22 23 24. 2. The soules had no being before their bodies that they should descend into them as from another place God formeth the spirit of man within him Zachar. 12.1 3. Neither doe the soules once separated from the bodies returne any more to cohabit in earthly and mortall bodies The spirit returneth to God that gave it Eccles 12.7 5. Confut. Against the Helvidians Vers. 15. I Will not forsake thee till I have performed c. The Helvidians because it is said that Ioseph knew not Mary â—â—ll she had brought forth her first-borne sonne Matth. 1.25 would gather thereupon that he knew her afterward they may as well conclude here that after God had performed to Iacob that which he promised that he did forsake him then Muscul. 6. Confut. Temples have no inherent holinesse but in regard of the use Vers. 17. THis is no other but Gods house c. This proveth not that Temples and Churches are more holy places in themselves which is the opinion of the Romanists 1. Their Temples being polluted with idolatry are prophane and unholy 2. Though before Christs comming the Lord chose his speciall place where he would have sacrifices offered and not in any place beside and so some places were privileged with a legall kinde of sanctity more than others yet now since that Christ hath every where opened heaven to the prayers of the faithfull that distinction remaineth not 3. Even Bethel retained not an inherent holinesse but in respect of the religious use for after that it was by Ieroboam defiled with Idolatry it was no more Bethel the house of God but Bethaven the house of iniquity 7. Confut. Against the anointing of Altars Vers. 18. HE powred oyle upon the top of it c. Hence Rabanus groundeth that superstitious use of anointing the Altar with oyle Altare post aspersionem aquae Chrysmate ungitur ad imitationem Patâ—iarcha Iacob The Altar after the sprinkling of water is anointed with Chrysme after the imitation of the Patriarke Iacob Lib. de institut Clericor cap. 45. Contra. 1. The ceremonies of the law which were figures and shadowes of things to come are not meet ornaments for the Gospell such were their washings anointings sacrifices and other rites they were shadowes of things to come but the body is Christ Coloss. 2.17 The body then being come what need the shadow 2. The same ointment that Christ was anointed with his members also receive but that was a spirituall unction Luk. 4.18 The spirit of the Lord is upon me because he hath anointed me Of this anointing the Apostle speaketh You have an oyntment from him that is holy and ye have knowne all things 1 Ioh. 2.20 3. But if Iacobs anointing must be a patterne why doe they also sprinkle water which he did not Iacob also used profane and common oyle such as he carried for his journey but their oyle must be hallowed first and consecrated Iacob here maketh no Altar but setteth up a pillar for a monument why doe not they by the same example powre oyle upon their Crosses and Pillars in the high-way 8. Confut. Bethel become Bethaven and Rome Babel Vers. 19. HE called the name of that place Bethel Yet afterward when it was prophaned by idolatry it was called by the Prophets Bethaven the house of iniquity we need not therefore marvell if that Rome sometime the Church of God bee now become Babel the fountaine of corrupt doctrine the place and seat of Antichrist they cannot shew such warrant for the consecration of Rome as the Scripture speaketh for Bethel which of the house of God was made an habitation of filthy Idols and so is Rome Muscul. 6. Places of morall observation 1. Observ. We must not amend one errour by another Vers. 9. THen went Esau to Ishmael c. Esau in stead of correcting his former errour in taking him wives from the daughters of Canaan committeth another in matching into the stocke of Ismael that was also a stranger from the covenant he thought he should please his father though he did not thorowly reforme himselfe if he came a little nearer such is the reformation of hypocrites they thinke they have done well if they can dawbe over their sinnes and set some colour upon them by a pretended reformation as Herod did Who seemed to reverence Iohn and when he heard him hee did many things and heaâ—d him gladly Mark 6.30 Mercer Calvin 2. Observ. Patience and labour to be endured for vertue Vers. 11. HE tooke of the stones
hand Although Iacob doubted not of Gods protection according to his promise yet he wisely useth all the meanes which he could devise to seeke his brothers favour by sending a present and to provide for his safety whereby we doe learne that we must not immediately depend upon Gods providence but carefully use the meanes which the Lord sheweth for our deliverance from danger or confirmation in his promises therefore Ahaâ— is said to grieve God for that he refused to aske a signe of God for the better assurance of their deliverance Isay 7.13 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Against merits Vers. 10. I Am not worthy or lesse than all thy mercies Iacob ascribeth nothing to his merit or worthinesse but acknowledgeth all to have proceeded of Gods mercie Thus our Saviour teacheth his Disciples humbly to confesse of themselves when you have done all that is commanded you say yee are unprofitable servants Luk. 17.10 Muscul. The popish doctrine then of merits is not agreeable to Iacobs faith And if the benefits of this life cannot be merited much lesse the Kingdome of heaven 2. Confut. That Angels are not mediators or impetrators of grace and blessings Vers. 29. HE blessed him there c. Theodoret alleageth this as a reason that this was not an Angel but the Sonne of God that wrestled with Iacob because it belonged not to Angels but unto God to blesse Pererius taketh upon him to confute Theodorets reasons affirming that Angels though they blesse not as authors of any grace yet a blessing may be asked of them as the impetrators and intercessors for the same at the hands of God and therefore Saint Iohn wisheth grace and peace to be given to him that was and is and is to come and from the seven spirits which are before the throne Apocal. 14. that is from the seven Angels In Gen. 32. numer 18 19. Contra. 1. Spirituall blessings are conferred either by the author thereof which is onely God or by the Mediator thereof which is onely Christ or by the ministers or instruments thereof which may be as well Angels as men for as Isaack blessed Iacob and Iacob his sonnes ministerially onely as being Gods mouth to pronounce them so Angels likewise may be messengers or ministers of Gods blessing and not otherwise 1. For every good gift commeth from God Iam. 1.17 2. Neither are the Angels to be sued unto for any spirituall or temporall blessing but onely God If any of you lacke wisdome let him aske it of God Iam. 1.5 and our Saviour saith Whatsoever yee shall aske the father in my name he will give it you Ioh. 16.23 a promise is made to them that aske in Christs name and not otherwise neither doe we reade that any of the ancient Patriarks or Prophets became suters to the Angels for any blessing 3. In that place in the Revelation by the seven spirits we must understand the holy spirit of God with his manifold graces for the seven spirits are the seven lamps of fire burning before the throne Revel 4.5 they are also the seven eyes of the Lambe Revel 5.6 the Angels are not the eyes that is the wisdome or knowledge of the Lambe but the holy Ghost which dwelleth in him bodily Coloss. 2.9 that is substantially essentially And whereas he urgeth that phrase Which are before the throne whereby a ministerie and service should be expressed this collection is not sound for both in Daniel 7.13 Christ is brought before the Ancient of dayes and in the Revelation 8.2 he is the Angell that stood before the Altar Neither in all Saint Pauls salutations doth he wish grace and peace from any other than from God the Father and the Lord Iesus nor yet Saint Iohn 2. Epist. vers 2. this forme of benediction then here used must be expounded by the like place of Scripture 6. Places of exhortation 1. Exhort Prayer in extremity availeable Vers. 9. MOreover Iacob said O God of my father Abraham Iacob being driven to a great strait turneth himselfe unto God by earnest prayer and so indeed the prayers of the faithfull which are powred forth in their necessity are much availeable with God Luther as it is in the Psalme Call upon me in the day of trouble and I will deliver thee Psal. 51.15 2. Exhort The hope of our celestiall inheritance to be preferred before all worldly things Vers. 14. TWo hundred shee goats c. The summe of Iacobs present which hee sent to Esau amounted to five hundred and fifty cattell of divers kinds as is shewed before quest 9. hee spared no to redeeme his quiet passage and returne into the land of Canaan which was promised to him and his seed for an everlasting inheritance which teacheth us that we should preâ—â—rre 〈◊〉 heavenly inheritance before all earthly and worldly possessions Calvin 〈◊〉 Saint 〈…〉 all things 〈◊〉 and even as 〈◊〉 that hee might win Christ Philip. 3.8 3. Exhort With iâ—â—oceâ—â—y we must â—oyne wisdome and prudence Vers. 13. A Present for his brother Iacob as a wife and 〈…〉 for his owne safety 1. He sendeth an humble message to his brother 2. When that would not speed he divideth his company into two parts that if Esau did strike the one the other mighâ—â—â—cope 3. He sendeth a liberall present to make a way to insinuate himselfe to his brothers favour Thus according to our Saviours rule we should be as wise as Serpents and innocent as Doves Mâ—â—th 10.16 Mercer 4. Exhort Importunity in our prayers acceptable to God Vers. 26. I Will not let thee goe till thou blesse me Iacobs importunity is striving and not giving over both obtaineth victory and procureth a blessing so should we strive in our prayers with God as Saint Paul saith of Epaphras Coloss. 4.12 And Moses was so instant with God in his earnest prayers for Israel that the Lord at his request suspended the judgements which hee had thought to have brought upon them because of their idolatry Exod. 32. Luther 5. Exhort Against curiosity Vers. 29. WHerefore now dost thou aske my name Iacob is reproved for his curiosity that could not bee contented with this heavenly vision and sensible apparition glorious victory and honourable name given unto him but would enquire further as touching the Angels name Wee learne then to bee contented with such measure of knowledge as it pleaseth God to reveale unto us in his word and not curiously to inquire after hid matters Calvin The Disciples were reproved for gazing after Christ into heaven Act. 2. neither shall it be any profit for us to exercise our selves in difficult and intricate questions 6. Exhort Not rashly to judge those which have defects or infirmities in their bodies Vers. 31. HE halted upon his thigh We see then that the servants of God may have infirmities in their bodies which are inflicted of God not as punishments of their sinne but corrections for their triall If Isaack then were blinde Iacob halting Lâ—â—h squint eyed Moses 〈◊〉
in the true worship of God but that he urged them generally to circumcision being not of the seed of Abraham to whom that ceremonie appertained is not like Mercer 4. Ioseph is said v. 56. to breake to the Egyptians that is to sell them food for so the word shabar signifieth either because it breaketh famine or because it is broken and ground to make bread of or rather because they made their bread in thin cakes and so used to breake not to cut it Mercer 4 Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. God only the disposer and foreteller of things to come Vers. 25. GOd hath shewed Pharaoh what he is about to doe God therefore is not an idle beholde or foreteller of things to come but a doer and disposer of them which overthroweth the opinion of the heathen that ascribe the actions of men some to fatall necessity as the Stoikes some to fortune or chance as the Epicures but the Scripture telleth us that whatsoever pleaseth God be doth in heaven and earth Psal. 135.6 Further we see that onely God that worketh in the world can foretell the things that are done in the world as the Prophet joyneth them both together Shew the things that are to come hereafter c. doe good or evill c. 41.21 therefore neither spirits nor any other creatures that are not able to dispose things done in the world have the foresight or knowledge of things to come 2. Doct. Repetitions of the same thing in Scripture not vaine Vers. 32. THe dreame was doubled because the thing is established with God c. Hence then it is evident that repetitions in the Scripture are not vaine tautologies and superfluous battâ—logies but that they are set downe for more certaintie for which cause this dreame was doubled to Pharaoh Mercer like as Saint Paul saith Philip. 3.1 It grieveth me not to write the same things unto you and for you it is a sure thing 3. Doct. The holy Ghost proved to be God Vers. 38. CAn we finde such a man as this in whom the spirit of God is Augustine noteth this to be the third place in Genesis where mention is made of the spirit of God the first is Gen. 1 2. The spirit of God moved upon the waters the second Genes 6.3 My spirit shall not alwaies strive with man the third in this place quaest 134. in Gen. 4. Doct. The mutability and change of time Vers. 54. THen began the seven yeares of famine to come c. After the yeares of plenty follow the yeares of famine so after peace commeth warre after health sicknesse nothing is permanent or of long continuance here Muscul. as the wise man saith There is a time for every purpose under heaven c. a time to weepe a time to laugh a time to mourne a time to dance Eccles. 3.14 5. Doct. Of the lawfulnesse of rich apparell and other ornaments in men of honourable place and calling Vers. 42. PHaraoh tooke off his ring Ioseph commeth forth adorned with these complements of honour a ring gold chaine fine linnen riding in the second charriot So that such ornaments are not to be condemned in men of honourable place and condition if these two rules be observed that neither such things be ambitiously sought and desired as here this great honour was offered to Ioseph by Pharaoh of him not begged and that they be not used to ostentation and vaine glory And for the lawfulnesse of rich apparell and ornaments of gold in men of high place to shew their authority and the more to keepe the people in feare and obedience the testimonie of our Saviour may suffice Mat. 62.9 Salomon in all his glory was not arayed like one of these 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Against superstitious shaving Vers. 14. ANd he shaved him c. Ioseph was shaved not only to cleanse himselfe from the filthinesse and smell of the prison but because it was not the fashion of that country to comâ— before the king with long and disordered haire Mercer This was a civill use of shaving they placed no religion in it as the Popelings of Rome doe 2. Confut. The vulgar Latine not wholly Hieromes translation Vers. 43. THey cryed before him Abrech This Hierome taketh to signifie a tender or young father of Abh father and rech tender delicate tradition in Gen. yet the Latine translation under Hieromes name readeth otherwise They cried before him that all should bow their knees whence it is evident that the vulgar Latin was not wholly of Hieromes doing beside it is very corrupt in divers places as vers 54. for in all the land of Egypt was bread the Latine hath in all the land of Egypt was famine 3. Confut. Against the popish prohibition of the marriage of Ministers Vers. 50. HE gave him to wife Asenah daughter of Potipherah prince or priest of On. The word cohen signifieth both a priest and a prince the Chalde readeth prince others the priest H.S. But because the priests were in great authority in Egypt and as from the Philosophers they chose Priests so out of the priests they made princes Mercer I thinke he was both priest and prince that is the chiefe and principall priest This sheweth that among the Egyptians their priests were married and had children so also was it lawfull in the old testament for the priests and in the new for the Apostles to be married and never forbidden in the Church of God till Antichrist began to set in his foot and his adherents to teach the doctrine of devils c. forbidding to marry and commanding to abstaine from meats as the Apostle saith 1 Tim. 4.1 3. 4. Confut. Against the superstitious restraine of marriage among Hebrews and Romanists Vers. 50. NOw unto Ioseph were borne two sonnes before the yeares of famine came The Hebrews note from hence that all the time of famine Ioseph abstained from the company of his wife because his children were borne before the famine came and that it is unlawfull for the man and wife to come together in the time of famine or any other common calamitie as they would gather out of Ioel 2.16 Let the Bride-groome goe forth of his chamber and the Bride out of her bride-chamber c. Contra. 1. It followeth not because Ioseph had no children borne in the time of the famine that therefore he came not to his wife all that time as though it is to be imagined that the Patriarkes when they had no children borne abstained from their wives 2. True it is that the man and wife according to the counsell of the Apostle should sometime sequester themselves for fasting and prayer but it must bee onely for a time and with consent lest Satan tempt them for their incontinency 1 Cor. 7.5 they must not then defraud one another for many moneths or many yeares Not much unlike to this Jewish conceit is the Popish restraint of marriage in the time of Lent for the holinesse
charge Chrysost. Mercer Vatab. Iun. QUEST XII How Iacobs heart is said to faile or faint and for what cause Vers. 29. IAcobs heart failed c. 1. Iacob was astonished at the report of his sonnes that Ioseph yet lived hee had not heard it then before as the Hebrewes fable how Serah Asers daughter had told Iacob that Ioseph was alive and therefore she was translated alive into Paradise ex Munster 2. The meaning is not that Iacob withdrew his heart and attention from them and greatly regarded them not as R. Sel. or as the Latine translator he was as raised out of an heavy sleepe that is Attonitus stupidus ad intelligendum heavie and hard to understand as a man newly awaked as Rupertus expoundeth 3. Nor yet as Ramban and R. Abraham whom Oleaster followeth is the meaning that his heart left beating and panting and so they would have the word phag to signifie to cease 4. But Iacob for the time did faint and swound not for any sudden joy conceived as Perer. for as yet he beleeved them not nor of an affection mixt together of joy and feare as Calvin Mercer for then the one would have qualified the other that Iacob should not have fainted but the very naming of Ioseph did renue and revive his former griefe and so perplexed him Iun. QUEST XIII How Iacobs spirit is said to revive Vers. 27. THe spirit of Iacob revived and he said it is enough c. 1. The Chalde paraphrast readeth The holy spirit rested upon Iacob as though the spirit of prophecie had departed from Iacob all the time of his griefe and heavinesse whereupon the Hebrewes further note that the spirit of God commeth upon those that are chearfull for which cause they say most of the Prophets were young men who are more given to chearfulnesse than they which are old but this is spoken of Iacobs spirit not of the spirit of God who now came to himselfe againe more giving credit to the sight of his eyes when they shewed him the charriots than to their words Muscul. Mercer 2. He saith it is enough not either in respect of Iosephs great honour or the rich gifts which were sent but because he heard he was alive Iosephs life was more worth unto him than all the rest Iun. 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. The righteous are not void of affections Vers. 2. HE wept and cryed In that Ioseph sheweth himselfe to be a man of affection which draweth from him plenty of teares we doe learne that the righteous are not as stones and blocks that cannot be moved as the Stoicks defined their wise men but they also are subject to the affections of love joy sorrow compassion Calvin Our Saviour in the day of his flesh did weepe loved Iohn more than the rest sometime he was angry but in all these he sinned not as it is hard for us to keepe â— measure 2. Doct. God turneth evill to good Vers. 8. YOu sent me not hither but God c. who hath made me a father c. As God turned the malice of Iosephs brethren to the great good of his Church the advancement of Ioseph preservation of the whole land of Egypt so is the Lord able still out of evill to draw goodnesse as he commanded light to shine out of darknesse 2 Cor. 4.6 Luther as Sampson found honey in the mouth of the dead and stinking Lion as the Apostle saith All things shall worke together for the best to those that love God Rom. 8.28 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. The selling of Ioseph into Egypt not done onely by Gods provision Vers. 8. YOu sent me not hither but God Not that God was the authour of that wicked conspiracie against Ioseph which was inspired by the suggestion of Satan not by the instinct of Gods spirit neither did God onely permit or suffer the same to be done as Bellarmine would have it lib. 2. de amission grat cap. 11. For if God withdraw his power nothing can be done in the world and therefore the Psalme saith Whatsoever pleased the Lord did he in heaven and in earth Psal. 135.6 Wherefore the Lord as he did foresee what Iosephs brethren should doe in this action and disposed and directed the same after it was done to an happy end so also he decreed that this thing should be done by no other meanes and although in the particular the evilnesse of the action proceeded not from the malicious minde stirred by Satan yet the generall overruling power and disposing providence of God so concurred as that Ioseph should by this meanes and no other be sold into Egypt So that Iosephs brethren were instruments herein of Gods decree and purpose yet not thereby are they excusable because they did that of a wicked minde which God in his wise providence converted to good as Iudas sinne was no whit the lesse in betraying Christ though as Peter saith he were delivered up by the determinate counsell of God Act. 2.23 Calvin Muscul. 2. Confut. Against the vulgar Latine translation Vers. 20. REgard not your stuffe The Latine translator maketh a contrary sense Leave nothing of your stuffe see before qu. 8. whereas the meaning is that they should not care to leave their stuffe behinde them thus that translation which the Romanists so much extoll and magnifie is found to bee faulty and erronious in many places 6. Places of Morall vse 1. Mor. Not to suffer men to be swallowed up of griefe Vers. 3. THen Ioseph said I am Ioseph He seeing his brethren almost oppressed with griefe doth speake comfortably unto them lest they might have beene overcome with too much heavinesse which teacheth governours not to cast downe altogether with griefe those which are sufficiently humbled Calvin as S. Paul shewed himselfe toward the incestuous party lest he be swallowed up of overmuch heavinesse 2 Cor. 2.7 2. Mor. To preserve from spirituall famine the greatest deliverance Vers. 7. TO save you alive by a great deliverance If it bee a great deliverance to preserve men from the famine of corporall food as Ioseph did much more ought wee to be thankfull to God for such governours as provide food for the soules of their people and deliver them from spirituall famine Muscul. for much more grievous is the famine of hearing the word than of bread or water Amos 8.11 3. Mor. Gods providence in turning all things to the best should move us to forgive Vers. 8. YOu sent me not hither but God Ioseph looking into Gods providence who turned his brethrens evill meaning toward him to good in that consideration is more easily brought to forgive them for when we see how God disposeth to our good of those wrongs that are done to us in the world wee should in that respect be more ready to forget them Thus S. Peter speaketh comfortably to the people that gave consent to the killing of Christ ye have killed the Lord of life c. but those things that God
darkenes should be divided which argument our Saviour useth in the Gospell to shew that he did not cast out devils by the power of Satan 6. Wherefore the best interpretation is that by the finger of God they understood the power of God as the heavens in the Psalme are said to be the worke of his fingers sic Thostatus Lippoman So also is the hand of God taken 1 Sam. 6.9 And hereby is insinuated the great power of God if these horrible plagues were but the worke of his fingers that is an effect of his smallest power what are the workes of his arme and handes when hee sheweth his mightie power for so that which one doth easily or with small labour he is said to doe with his finger as the phrase is used of the Pharises in the Gospell that they laid heavy burdens upon others and would not themselves stirre them with their finger And indeede these plagues of Egypt if they be compared with Gods great workes as the universall floud brought upon all the world the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrha they will appeare to be but workes of Gods fingers in comparison of his whole hand Simler Perer. QUEST XVII Whether the sorcerers had any feeling of Gods power BUt now it will further be inquired whether these sorcerers thus spake as having any knowledge of God or feeling of his power 1. Some thinke that they used this pretence of words to satisfie Pharaoh that was angrie with them because they could not doe now as before and to excuse their want of power Cajetane But it seemeth rather seeing the Sorcerers were indeede hindred and controlled that they spake as they thought 2. Lyranus thinketh that they had no thought at all of God but that they understood the power of some superiour devill And his reason is that if they had in truth confessed and acknowledged the power of God they would not afterward have resisted Moses as it appeareth they did for they were smitten with botches and biles in the sixt plague cap. 9. Contra. But this is a weake argument for though they had at this present some sense of Gods power yet they might afterward returne to their former obstinacie as Pharaoh himselfe would one while seeme to relent and eftsoone be hardned againe and Nebuchadnezzar who upon the interpretation of his dreame by Daniel acknowledged the true God Dan. 2. yet presently after setteth up Idolatrie Perer. 3. Some as is shewed in the former question did thinke that the Magicians had some knowledge and speciall revelation not only of the power of God but of his spirit and so consequently of the Trinitie but such a particular knowledge cannot be ascribed unto them 4. Therefore I thinke rather that for a time they seeing their power hindred did indeede and as they thought acknowledge Gods power that Pharaoh might thereby be left inexcusable Iun. but this knowledge was soone againe obscured by the malice and obstinacie of their heart QUEST XVIII By what power Sorcerers do worke NOw whereas they confesse that Moses wrought by the finger of God they therein evidently bewray that they themselves did not worke by God This therefore shall briefly be made plaine and maniâ—est that Magicians and Sorcerers doe not worke wonders by any divine humane or naturall or Angelicall power I meane the good Angels but Satanicall and Diabolicall 1. These spirits whom they confederate with do require of them divine worship and that affectation of divine honour which they began in heaven and obtained it not being cast downe from thence they seeke to compasse in earth but good Angels refuse to be adored and worshipped as the Angell that appeared to Iohn Revel 22. 2. Sorcerers are men of an impure and wicked life and they use their enchantments to wicked purposes as to theft adulterie murther but good Angels do neither favour wicked men neither will bee assistant in any wicked worke 3. Magicians use to threaten the spirits to enjoyne them certaine impossible things if they come not when they are called but men can exercise no power neither can have any command over the good Angels 4. if it bee objected that Magicians doe often cast out devils but Satan doth not cast out Satan as our Saviour saith for then his kingdome should be divided and could not long stand To this it is answered that our Saviour speaketh of such casting out of devils as is done with power when Satan is violently dispossessed not of such when hee giveth way of himselfe by some compact and contract with the Conjurer And as Augustine saith our Saviour meaneth the perfect ejection of Satan when hee is cast both out of the bodie ad soule But when any seemeth to be cast out by a Satanicall power he goeth out of the bodie that he may more strongly possesse the soule which is indeede no casting out 5. That Sorcerers doe worke by the power of Satan themselves are the best witnesses for Porphyrius who was a great Magician as Eusebius noteth him doth confesse that the devils themselves whom he calleth gods doe signifie unto men quibus rebus dij cogantur qua illis offerendâ— sunt c. with what things the devils are forced and what is to be offered unto them what daies they should chuse what signes and images thâ—y should make and such like And Eusebius further setteth downe to the same purpose an epistle written by Porphyrius to Aâ—ebonus the Egyptian wherein he propoundeth nine inexplicable doubts as he calleth them about Magicall practices 1. How Magicians doe invocate the spirits as their superiours when they command them as their inferiours 2. Why the spirits of Magicians bid men to be just when as they being called upon and sent doe many wicked things 3. They will not heare the Conjâ—rer unlesse hee abstaine from venerie and yet they being sent doe inflame to venerie and unlawfull lust 4. They prescribe their disciples when they are about invocation to abstaine from eating of flesh and yet themselves delight in the smell and bloud of sacrifices 5. They will not have him that hath touched any dead thing to use any Magicall practice and yet many magicall enchantments are practised with dead things both beasts and men 6. They doe terrifie the spirits in their invocations with threats as if they answere not they will reveale the mysteries of Isis and deliver Osiris members to Typhan but how can spirits be feared with threats 7. They use ridiculous invocations as thus they call upon their spirits Thou which camest forth of the slâ—â—e of the earth which hast thy seate in the lake which canst change thy shape every houre which kind of prayers spirits should seeme not to regard 8. They use barbarous and strange words as though the spirits understood only the Scythian or some other barbarous tongue 9. Seeing spirits are insensible and incorporeall how then can they be allured with sensible and corporall things These are Porphyries doubts by the
not be amisse first to examine his reasons and then to confirme the truth 1. He urgeth these and such like places That God would have all men to be saved and come to the knowledge of the truth And I will not the death of a sinner If mercy be offered to all then the way is open for all to returne unto God Contra. 1. God indeed offereth himselfe unto all and denieth not the externall meanes to any if they had grace to apprehend them The Gospell hath beene preached to all the world and is many times to the impenitent and reprobate so God offereth grace to all but all will not receive it Augustine hereof thus writeth Correctio medecinabiliter omnibus adhibenda est etiam si salus aegrotantis sit incerta c. The wholesome medicine of admonition must be ministred to all though the health of the sicke be uncertaine that if he which is admonished belong to the predestinate it is unto him a wholesome medecine if he doe not it is a penall torment 2. The argument then followeth not God calleth all to repentance therefore all may have grace to repent The Scripture saith many are called but few are chosen Ambrose saith In aliis praevaluisse gratiam in aliis reâ—iluisse naturaâ— That grace prevaileth in some in others their obstinate nature resisteth 2. So long as men are in this life they are in the way and are not deprived of all grace nor utterly forsaken till they come into hell Contr. Everlasting punishment in hell is the end and execution of damnation but men in this life may be in the state of damnation and be utterly forsaken of Gods grace as Saul and Iudas and they whom the Apostle saith God gave them over to a reprobate sense Rom. 1.28 3. If any had beene in this life wholly excluded from grace Pharaoh of all other was most like yet his state was not desperate seeing he was in the same case with Nebuchadnezzar who repented and confessed God Contr. 1. He reasoneth flatly against the Apostle who propoundeth Pharaoh as a vessell of wrath prepared to destruction Rom. 9. Now if there be hope for the vessels of wrath to come to grace then there was hope for Pharaoh The Apostle maketh these two distinct things God hath mercy on whom he will and whom he will he hardneth Rom. 9.18 As God hardneth not those on whom he hath mercy so neither sheweth he mercy on those whom he hardneth 2. Nebachadnezzar and Pharaoh were most unlike for the one had not so many wonders shewed as had the other neither so often dallied and made shew of repentance as did the other this sheweth their state to be most differing for if Pharaoh had beene no more hardned than Nebuchadnezzar was he would likewise have repented 4. We are to despaire of none in this life therefore it is possible for all to repent Contr. 1. Such as wee see and know commit a sinne unto death which is the irremissible sinne against the holy Ghost which I confesse is a rare thing now to be discerned such wee may despaire of because the Apostle forbiddeth us to pray for them 1. Ioh. 5.16 And those for whom the Lord did forbid Ieremy to pray chap. 7.16 what hope I pray you was there of them 2. Though wee in charity are to hope the best even of the greatest sinners yet this followeth not that all of them may have grace to repent wee judge according to that we see but the Lord seeth the heart and knoweth from the beginning who are his and who are not But on the contrary side that some in this life are so hard hearted that they cannot repent and so are incorrigible and without hope of remission of sinnes it is proved thus 1. Sinne against the holy Ghost is irremissible as our Saviour saith He that blaspphemeth against the holy Ghost shall never have forgivenesse Mark 3.29 Therefore there are some in this life that cannot repent neither can have their sinnes forgiven them And because Bellarmine and Pererius and the rest here answer that the sinne against the holy Ghost is said to be irremissible not because it cannot at all be forgiven but because it is hardly forgiven therefore to prevent this objection that place of the Apostle is also urged that it is impossible for such to be renued by repentance Heb. 6.6 that which is impossible is not only hardly done but not at all 2. The foreknowledge and decree of God concerning the rejection of some is unchangeable and cannot be altered but God hath foreseene some to be damned and decreed them to bee rejected as Iudas is called the childe of perdition Ioh. 17. therefore it is not possible for such to come to repentance to be saved therefore Gregory saith well Qua non sunt praedestinata obtineri non possunt Those things which God hath not predestinate cannot be obtained But God hath not decreed repentance for them that are rejected and reprobate 3. There is no hope of forgivenesse for that sinne for the which it is not lawfull to pray but there is a sinne unto death for the which we are forbidden to pray 1. Ioh. 5.16 Ergo c. Pererius answer here is that by sinne unto death is meant that sinne wherein a man continueth unto death and so dying therein he is not afterward to be prayed for Contr. 1. It would follow by this reason that no sinne of any is to bee prayed for while hee liveth for how doth any know whether a man may continue in a sinne till his dying day 2. The Apostle speaketh of such sinnes which a man seeth his brother to sinne now sinnes are onely seene to be done in this life neither is a mans repentance knowne which God may give him in his very passage out of the world 3. Let them shew us any place in all the Scriptures that authorizeth prayer for the dead if they can wherefore they are not to give a sense of Scripture that cannot be warranted by Scripture 4. The Apostle therefore calleth it a sinne unto death for the which there is no forgivenesse and so is there no sinne but blasphemy against the holy Spirit And thus Ambrose expoundeth it Non potest ibi exoratio esse veniae ubi sacrilegis est plenitudo there can be no intreating of pardon where there is fulnesse of Sacrilege 4. Where there can bee no repentance there can be no remission of sinnes but some have such hard hearts that they cannot repent Rom. 2.4 therefore the sinnes of such are irremissible 5. Hereunto may be added the testimonies of Cyprian Non posse in Ecclesia ei remitti qui in Deum deliquerit that he can find no forgivenesse in the Church that sinneth against God lib. 3. de Quirinum cap. 28. Of Ambrose Cassa erat proditâ—ris poenitentia qui peccavit in spiritum sanctum The betrayers repentance was in vaine having sinned against the spirit of God in Luc. 22.
thicke and darke cloud but there bright shining flames of fire like cloven tongues shewing the cleare light of the Gospell in respect of the cloudy darknesse of the Law Simler Here onely Moses was suffered to goe up the hill there all which were present received the holy Ghost here the people tremble and are afraid but there they were emboldened by the Spirit to preach the wonderfull works of God 4. Doct. By the preaching of the Word we are joyned unto God by faith Vers. 17. MOses brought the people out of their tents So Ministrorum officium est It is the dutie of Ministers by the preaching of the Gospell to draw men out of the tents of sin to joyne them unto God by faith Lippom. As the Apostle saith Faith is by hearing and hearing by the Word Rom. 10.17 5. Doct. Distinction of offices in the Church Vers. 24. COme up thou and Aaron with thee The people stand below in the campe but Moses and Aaron ascend up into the mount This sheweth the distinction of offices and callings in the Church betweene the Ministers and the people that none should take upon them the office of teaching and delivering the high things of God but they which are thereunto called as the Apostle would have every one to abide in the same vocation wherein he was called 1 Cor. 7.20 Marbach 5. Places of Controversie 1. Cont. Angels carrie not up our prayers unto God as Mediatours Vers. 8. ANd Moses reported the words of the people unto the Lord. Tostatus hereupon inferreth thus that as Moses carried up the peoples answer unto God Sie Angeli coram Deo proponunt orationes nostras So the Angels propound before God our prayers quaest 3. in fine Contra. 1. This followeth not for Moses was a messenger betweene God and his people hee was commanded to propound unto them what the Lord had said so when it can be shewed in Scripture that the Angels have the like charge from God to report our prayers the argument will follow else not 2. If the Angels should returne our prayers and sayings unto God as they doe the rest of our doings they do not as mediatours interpose themselves but onely as reporters returne as they find in the world and it is to this end as Augustine saith Vt super his Domini voluntatem consulant That they may know Gods pleasure further therein in Psal. 67. No doubt they doe observe who are faithfull and devout in prayer and who are otherwise The devill observed Iob as the Lord saith Hast thou not considered my servant Iob how none is like him in the earth Iob. 1.8 But he did it with envie the good Angels were witnesses of his pietie with joy So the Angels which were sent thorow the world returne this answer That all the world sitteth still and is at rest Zachar. 1.11 There was no devotion or exercise of godlinesse but all given to securitie and carelesnesse In this manner Angels may report as mens doings so their sayings unto God but this maketh nothing at all for the invocation of Angels which is by the Romanists hereby intended 2. Cont. That man hath no free will unto good Vers. 5. I◠yee will heare my voyce indeed and keepe my covenant c. From hence Lippoman would gather that man hath free will ad quid enim ita loqueretur c. For to what end should hee so speake if it were not in the peoples power to heare and keepe the covenant Contra. 1. If this were in mans power to keepe Gods covenant which is to observe his law and obey the commandements to what end then came our blessed Saviour to performe the law for us which wee in respect of the weaknesse of our flesh could not doe 2. Therefore these precepts are propounded in Scripture to these two ends that thereby mans drowsie nature should be stirred up to labour unto perfection and that finding himselfe to come farre short of the commandement he might see his owne weaknesse and flee for succour unto Christ. And therefore S. Paul saith that the law is a Shool-master to bring us unto Christ Gal. 3.24 3. Cont. No absolute faith or credit to be given unto teachers but as they agree with Scriptures Vers. 9. LOe I come unto thee in a thicke cloud that the people may heare while I talke with thee It was Moses credit with the people that they heard the Lord speaking with him And Moses desired no further to be beleeved than he had his warrant from God Non alio jure fidem in Ecclesia obtinuit quà m quia Dei mandata pertulit He by no other right obtained credit in the Church but because he brought the commandements of God Calvin It is therefore great presumption for those which take upon them now to bee the Pastors and Doctors of the Church to arrogate and assume more unto themselves than Moses did As the Romanists doe hold that we ought to receive all the decrees and constitutions of the Church without any further discussing We ought to take our faith and all necessary things of our salvation at the hands of our superiours Rhemist Act. 10. sect 8. We must beleeve the Church and trust it in all things 1 Tim. 3. sect 9. Whereas the Apostles themselves required not their doctrine otherwise to bee received then as it was consonant to the Scriptures for the Bereans are commended for conferring those things which they taught with the Scriptures Act. 17.11 4. Cont. Perpetuall abstinence from marriage not required of Ministers Vers. 15. COme not at your wives Bellarmine out of this text would enforce the single life of the Clergie because the people being to appeare before the Lord are commanded to abstaine from their wives Lib. 1. de Clericis cap. 19. Contra. 1. It followeth not the people were commanded abstinence for three dayes Ergo Ministers all their life should abstaine or they had wives and came not at them for three dayes therefore Ministers must have no wives 2. The practice of those times was otherwise for the Priests and Levites were married if this example pressed not them it doth not enforce perpetuall single life now 3. Neither doth the argument follow because then there was in the use of marriage in the naturall issue a legall pollution which made them uncleane untill the even Levit. 15.18 and therefore such abstinence and forbearance was required but such uncleannesse now is taken away as in like manner he that touched a dead corse then was uncleane and yet therein he sinned not there was then a kind of legall uncleannesse which was not sinne Simler 4. But so much as is morall in this precept bindeth now that to make our prayers more fervent as by fasting so by this kind of abstinence for a time is fit agreeable to the Apostles doctrine 1 Cor. 7.5 But as it followeth not it is good to fast sometime to be more earnest in prayer therefore we should alwayes fast so
that divers of the servants of God have taken oathes So neither is an oath usually to be taken where there is no just cause and yet an oath is restrained Non propter seipsum sed propter mala quae sequuntur ex eo not for it selfe but for the evils and inconveniences that follow as wine is to bee used warily not for that it is evill but because being abused it procureth drunkennesse so the frequenting of an oath is not good because perjury often followeth 4. Therefore that text alleaged is no commandement to sweare for then they which sweare most should be counted the most holy and religious men but Loquitur ex permissione the text speaketh by way of permission that when one is to sweare he may and ought only to sweare by the name of God and not of any other Tostat. quaest 9. QUEST VI. Whether it be lawfull to use cursing NOt farre discrepant or differing from the nature of an oath is execration or cursing where it is to be considered 1. That simply it is unlawfull to curse as offending both against the first table in the abuse of Gods name and against the second in the breach of charity when men of hatred and in their rage doe curse and wish evill unto their neighbours 2. Yet there are examples in Scripture of holy men as of David who in the Psalmes often wisheth the destruction of his enemies and of Paul who saith I would they were cut off that trouble you But here there are divers considerations to bee used 1. That divers of these execrations were denounced with a propheticall spirit and so were propheticall predictions of their destruction rather than maledictions 2. They wished not their destruction as a revenge upon them but only that God would bring their wickednesse to an end by cutting them off which kinde of prayer is not against the glory of God 3. They did not pray as private persons wishing they might bee revenged upon their enemies but as publike persons respecting the glory of God and the good of his Church 4. Yet these examples are very cautelously to be followed Simler QUEST VII For what things an oath is not to be taken THese five things a man is not to take an oath of 1. Of things that are false for hee that so sweareth maketh God the witnesse of a lye 2. Of things doubtfull and uncertaine for it were presumption to call God to be witnesse of that which he is uncertaine whether it be true or not 3. Of things unlawfull for so he maketh God contrary to himselfe in calling him to be a witnesse to that which hee himselfe hath forbidden 4. Of things impossible which are not in our power This were a mocking of God for hee cannot have a serious purpose when he sweareth to doe that which hee knoweth hee cannot doe 5. Of light and frivolous matters for he that sweareth upon small occasion giveth not due reverence unto God Vrsin QUEST VIII Whether all kinde of oathes are to be kept IT will be here further questioned whether all kinde of oathes are strictly to bee kept 1. Whether oathes made unto enemies and theeves are to bee performed The answer is they are 1. In the 15. Psalme vers 5. he is described to be a righteous man that sweareth to his owne hinderance and changeth not 2. The cause why a man keepeth not touch with his enemy is the feare of the losse of life or goods but the honour of God should bee more deare unto us Regulus is commended in the Romane histories for keeping his faith in returning to his enemies 3. Beside if faith should not be kept to such this inconvenience would follow that in such like extremities no credit would bee given unto others Simler 2. Concerning oathes made to theeves for the preservation of the life though they bee extorted oathes if the things be lawfull and possible which he sweareth as a man bindeth himselfe to a theefe by oath to pay him a summe of money and to be silent to save his life the innocent party is bound to keepe this oath It will be objected that this oath is hurtfull to the commonwealth for by this meanes theeves escape unpunished But it may be answered 1. That the hurt hereby redounding to the State is not in this case to be redeemed or prevented with the losse of a mans life 2. It is for the good of a Common-wealth that the life of every honest member thereof should be preserved Vrsin 3. But there are unlawfull oathes that are not to be kept such as Novatus exacted of his followers that they should not returne unto Cornelius the Bishop of Rome his communion Such is the oath of fealty and obedience made to the Bishop of Rome these oathes are better broken than kept 1. That which it is unlawfull to sweare it is unlawfull also to performe being sworne it is but a doubling of sinne to keepe a wicked oath as Herod did in putting Iohn Baptist to death Vrsin 2. David brake the rash oath which he made against Nabals house and the Israelites which had entred into covenant and so bound themselves by oath to serve Baal who was thereof called Baal bereth Iudg. 8 33. yet afterward forsooke Baal and his worship when they turned unto God 3. And the reason is because in all oathes there is a secret exception of the higher power and former oathes made God is greater than man and wee have first bound our selves unto him therefore no oath ought to be performed which is against God or godlinesse 4. As touching the oath which Iosua made to the Gibeonites it was a lawfull oath though Iosua was somewhat deceived in it 1. Because those Canaanites were not excluded which sought peace and imbraced the religion of the Israelites as appeareth Iudg. 11.19 20. 2. The Lord approved this oath and judged the house of Saul because he violated it 2. Sam. 21. Simler 3. Ioshua kept this oath lest it might have brought a slaunder upon the name of God among the Gentiles by whom they had made this oath if it should have beene violated Vrsin 5. There are certaine oathes that are lawfull in the promising and fall out to be unlawfull in the performing as if a man binde himselfe by oath to assist his friend and he afterward prove an enemy to his countrey 6. Although unlawfull oathes are better broken than kept yet it is not to bee done rashly lest other might be incouraged to violate lawfull oathes as though the Israelites had sworne that they would not give their daughters in marriage to them of Benjamin which was no lawfull oath yet they were carefull to keepe it Simler QUEST IX Of the commination added to the third Commandement THe Lord will not hold him guiltlesse c. 1. The Hebrewes when they will increase the signification of a thing Id per negationem nominis quod nos per superlativum fâ—cere solent Use to expresse that
quievit ab administrando God rested from creating another world but not from the administration and government thereof Lippoman as our blessed Saviour saith in the Gospell My father worketh and I woâ—ke 2. But God rested not as though he were wearie for virtus infinita non est fatigabilis an infinite power cannot be wearied as Gods power is infinite though Aristotle ignorantly denie it giving this for a reason why the earth moveth not because there is no power sufficient to stirre it out of the place lib. 2. de Caelo And beside potentia incorporea a power which is incorporeall is not subject to be wearie though it be not infinite as the Angels and the intellectuall part of man though this seeme sometime to bee dulled not in it selfe but in respect of the organes and instruments but if spirits of a finite nature are not fatigable or apt to be wearied much lesse God who is an infinite spirit Tostat. qu. 15. 3. Therefore God is said to rest both that this rest might bee mâ—numentum perfectae absolutae creationis a monument of the creation perfited and that God by his example might induce us in like manner to rest from our labours upon his Sabbaths QUEST XIV Of the changing of the Sabbath from the seventh day to the first day of the weeke THe seventh day 1. The Apostolicall Church changed the holy day of rest from the seventh day to the first which is the Lords day in remembrance of our Redemption by Christ which in the time of the new law is maximum beneficiorum recentissimum the greatest benefit and the newest and most fresh in memorie as the greatest benefit in the old law was the creation of the world 2. And although our redemption was purchased by the death of Christ yet because this benefit should not have a full perfection unlesse we should rise againe unto life eternall this day was to be assigned rather in memoriall of Christs resurrection than of his passion and though the rest of the Sabbath did signifie the rest of Christ in the grave having consummate and finished the painfull works of his passion yet because pretiosior nobis fuit resurrectio c. the resurrection of Christ was more precious unto us than his rest in the grave therefore not upon the Sabbath but upon the day of the resurrection doe we keepe an holy memoriall unto God Tostat. quaest 11. 3. The Apostolicall Church according to their Christian libertie in stead of the seventh day made choyce of the first in remembrance of the resurrection of Christ ut se à Iudaica synogoga discerneret that they might be discerned from the Jewish Synagogue Vrsin QUEST XV. How the Lord is said to have blessed and sanctified the day Vers. 11. THerefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day c. 1. Not that other dayes were accursed sed quod prae aliis hanc celebrem fecit but because he preferred this before the rest for if those dayes are counted blessed and had in remembrance wherein some good is wrought for the Church or Common-wealth much more this day wherein all things were finished Simler 2. Of the other six dayes it is not said the Lord blessed them for it was sufficient quod in singulis illis creatura productae sunt that in every one of them some creature was brought forth but of this day it is said God blessed and sanctified it what is this He sanctified it ab aliis illum segregavit he did separate and set it apart from other dayes Chrysost. homil 10. in Genes 3. Benedictio semper importat multiplicationem c. Blessing doth alwayes imply multiplying So God bestowed many blessings and good things upon this day beyond other dayes Tostat. qu. 16. 4. Isidore doth specially referre this Commandement to the holy Ghost for these reasons quia spiritus sanctus septiformis dicitur c. because the holy Ghost in respect of the manyfold graces thereof is said to be seven-fold the sanctifying of the seventh day peculiarly belongeth unto the Spirit quia non est nominata sanctificatio nisi in Sabbato and because no mention is made of sanctification but in the Sabbath day and further for that dono spiritus sancti nobis requies aeterna prâ—mittitur by the gift of the Spirit eternall rest is promised unto us whereof mention is made in this precept 5. But how is the Lord said to blesse the Sabbath here seeing the Lord saith by his Prophet I cannot suffer your new Moones and your Sabbaths Isai. 1.13 The answer is that the Jewes sinned carnaliter observantes sabbatum in observing the Sabbath carnally and so the Sabbath is not acceptable unto God but when it is so kept as that it putteth us in minde of our everlasting rest in the Kingdome of heaven Isidor 2. Places of Doctrine observed out of the fourth Commandement 1. Doct. Of the generall and particular contents of this Commandement IN this Commandement generally all such holy works and duties are prescribed to be done whereby the service of God is advanced and likewise therein is forbidden either the omission and neglect of such holy works or the prophanation thereof by all such works as do hinder the holy exercises and are contrary thereunto 1. In particular here is commanded the faithfull and diligent preaching and setting forth of the Word of God as the Apostle saith Wo is unto me if I preach not the Gospell 1 Cor. 9.16 and he chargeth Timothie to preach the Word to be instant in season and out of season 2 Tim. 4.2 Contrary to this dutie are 1. The neglect and omitting of teaching and preaching as the Prophet Esay reproveth the idle and carelesse watchmen They are all dumbe dogges they cannot barke they lie and sleepe and delight in sleeping Isai. 56.10 2. The abusing and counterfeiting of this holy function when the word of God is not sincerely and purely handled but according to mens fansies and humours but the Apostle saith We are not as those that make merchandize of the Word of God 2 Cor. 2.17 2. The often administration of the Sacraments as occasion serveth is another exercise whereby the Lords day is sanctified as Act. 2.42 They continued in the Apostles doctrine fellowship breaking of bread Contrary hereunto on the Ministers behalfe are 1. The negligent administration of the Sacraments and omitting to call upon the people often to resort unto them 2. The corrupting or perverting of the Sacraments as the Romanists have turned the Sacrament into a sacrifice being ordained for the living they applie it to the dead Christ biddeth us to eat and drinke it they hold it up to be gazed upon and in many such things have they degenerated from the institution of our blessed Saviour 3. The carefull hearing of the Word of God is commanded and diligent resorting to the exercises of religion as the Bereans are commended for searching the Scriptures whether those things were so which the
evill but wait upon the Lord and he shall save thee Prov. 20.12 3. Observ. Surfetting by eâ—cesse forbidden FUrther by this precept they are condemned qui luxu se occidunt c. which kill themselves with surfetting and drunkennesse riot and excesse Basting whereupon often ensueth also quarrelling and wounds as the Wise-man sheweth To whom is woe to whom is strife c. to whom are wounds without cause to whom is rednesse of the eyes to them that tarrie long at wine Prov. 23.29 30. The seventh Commandement 1. Questions discussed QUEST I. Of the order and negative propounding of this Commandement THou shalt not commit adulterie 1. This Commandement very fitly followeth after the other Thou shalt not kill Quia post injuriam quae infertur personae nulla est major quà m illa quae infertur conjunctae Because next after the injurie done to the person there is none greater than that which is offred unto the joynt person for they two shall be one flesh Thom. in opuscul So also Lyranus 2. This Commandement is propounded negatively rather than affirmatively because the negative is more generall than the affirmative Tum quoad tempâ—ra quà m personas both in respect of the time and persons for at all times and in all places it is unlawfull to kill to commit adulterie c. but at all times and in all places wee must not honour our parents and for the persons wee must not offer violence or wrong unto any but for the affirmative it is impossible to doe good to all Thom. in Epist. ad Roman cap. 13. See before quest 1. upon the sixth Commandement QUEST II. Whether the uncleane desire of the heart be forbidden in this precept IN this Commandement not onely the impuritie of the bodie but of the soule also is forbidden and chastitie commanded in both Gregories opinion is that God Per hoc praeceptum non peccata cogitationis sed operis resecuit c. Doth not by this precept cut off the sinfull thoughts but the sinfull act and that Christ afterward in the law Cogitationes hominum religavit Did bind also the thoughts of men In Ezech. homil 13. Augustine also is of opinion that in this precept Ipsum opus notatum est The worke of uncleannesse it selfe is noted but in the other Thou shalt not covet Ipsa concupiscentia the very concupiscence because saith he sometimes it may fall out that a man may commit adulterie cùm non concupiscat illam when he doth not covet her but upon some other cause doth companie with her Aliquando eam concupiscat nec ei misceatur poenam timens Sometime he may covet her and not company with her fearing the punishment in quaest 71. in Exod. Contra. 1. Our Saviour Christ doth not adde any thing to the law of Moses or bringeth in any new interpretation but doth free and cleare the law from the grosse and corrupt gloses of the Scribes and Pharisies delivering the true sense and meaning thereof as it was first given unto the people And therefore Chrysostome well saith Vt per concordiam mandatorum ipse inveniatúr author legis fuisse gratia That by the agreement of the Commandements in the old and new Testament the same may be found to bee the author of the law and of grace in Matth. hom 11. And that even the inward concupiscence and desire was forbidden in the old Testament it is evident by Iobs practice in whose heart the morall law was written I have made a covenant with mine eyes why then should I thinke on a maid chap. 31.1 2. Concerning Augustines opinion the concupiscence which is joyned with a full purpose onely wanting opportunitie and being restrained by feare from the externall act is a breach of this Commandement and not of the last as our blessed Saviour expoundeth Matth. 5.28 What kinde of concupiscence is prohibited in the last precept and how it differeth herein ftom this shall bee shewed afterward when wee come to that place 2. And that commixtion which hath no concupiscence nor consent of will being violent and forced as in them which are ravished it is no adulterie at all which alwayes proceedeth out of the heart 3. But that the inward sanctimonie and puritie of the minde is here commanded and the contrarie forbidden it is thus proved 1. By the definition of puritie and chastitie which is to be holy both in bodie and spirit as S. Paul describeth a true Virgin 1 Cor. 7.34 So the same Apostle 1 Thess. 5.23 That your whole spirit soule and bodie may be kept blamelesse unto the comming of our Lord Iesus Christ. 2. Both the soules and bodies of the faithfull are the Temples of the Spirit and therefore ought to be kept holy 1 Cor. 3.16 Know yee not that yee are the Temple of God and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you if any destroy the Temple of God him shall God destroy Basting 3. Chrysostome urgeth these foure reasons first from the interpretation of our blessed Saviour who sheweth that this Commandement is broken in the very inward lust and concupiscence Matth. 5.28 4. Secondly from the analogie and correspondencie which it hath with other Commandements that Irasci proximis sine causa to be angrie with our neighbours without cause is a breach of the precedent Commandement Thou shalt not kill So Concupiscere mulierem alienam c. to desire a strange woman though the act of concupiscence follow not is against this precept 5. Thirdly in respect of God Qui non tantum opus hominis aspicit quantum cor Who doth not so much looke unto the worke of man as to his heart 6. Fourthly because concupiscence is the cause of adulterie Omne adulterium ex concupiscentia All adulterie proceedeth from concupiscence as our blessed Saviour sheweth Mark 7.21 Even from the heart of man proceed evill thoughts adulteries fornications c. Quomodo ergo tolletur adulterium nisi pracisa fuerit concupiscentia c. How then shall adulterie be taken away unlesse concupiscence be first cut off Homil. 12. in Matth. Seeing then that the effect that is adultery and outward uncleannesse is forbidden in this precept it followeth also that the very cause thereof which is concupiscence should be restrained QUEST III. Other acts of uncleannesse beside adulterie here forbidden COncerning the externall act of uncleannesse which is in the very letter of this precept prohibited the Hebrewes are of opinion that onely concubitus adulterinus the adulterous act is here forbidden But this opinion is easily convinced 1. Tostatus urgeth this reason Qui prohibet minus malum à fortiori prohibet majus c. He that forbiddeth the lesse evill doth much more prohibit the greater evill for there are more unlawfull acts of uncleannesse than adulterie as those unnaturall sinnes committed either with another kinde as with brute beasts which is monstrous or with the same kinde and with the same sex as Sodomitrie and abusing of the male or with the
by externall objects useth to tempt men thereby stirring and provoking their natural lust as David was inflamed at the sight of faire Bathsheba but here needeth no other sorcerie or inchantment than the corrupt inclination of a mans owne affection the devill doth but offer the occasion and shew the object hee draweth not the affection but the corruption of the heart of it selfe is ready to apprehend and lay hold of the object set before it Another way there is whereby the affection is stirred as when the evill spirit entereth and possesseth any with madnesse and phrensie for the time not changing the understanding or will but troubling the vitall spirits and inflaming the blood and so incensing unto lust The third way is when Satan entreth not to disquiet the bodie and trouble the spirits but externally offereth violence transporting and carrying by Gods permission bodies from place to place which is no hard thing for Satan to doe and so hee may bring one to the place where their lover is Tostat. qu. 13.3 But here two things are to be considered 1. That Satan directly cannot worke upon the heart of any in the immediate change or alteration of their affections but hee doth it by meanes either externall in moving by objects or by internall provocation and stirring of carnall lust 2. That he hath not the like power over the servants of God which he exerciseth over carnal men which are his owne vassals he ruleth in the children of disobedience as he listeth as the Apostle saith They are taken of him at his will 2 Tim. 2.26 But the faithfull doe resist him by faith 1 Pet. 5.9 So that his tentations cannot fasten upon them to intangle them further than God shall see it good for the triall of their faith This is made evident by that storie of Iustina the Virgin whom Cyprian then a dissolute young man and given to Art Magicke but afterward a most holy and constant Martyr loved exceedingly and when he was not able to prevaile with her by any allurements hee called for the Devils helpe to bring her unto him who by faith chased the evill spirit away Ex Tostat. qu. 13. QUEST XXXII Whether witches can indeed effect anything and whether they are worthie to bee punished by death NOw further by this sentence of the law which adjudgeth witches worthie of death they are found to be in error which thinke that witchcraft is nothing but nudum phantasma a verie phantasie that sillie women imagine they doe things which indeed they doe not but in their owne conceit and imagination First I will examine the objections which are made in the defence or at the least the excuse of these wicked women and in favour of them for the mitigation of their punishment 1. They say that this law is made de veneficis of such as kill and destroy by secret poisons and noysome herbes it concerneth not witches Answ. 1. Indeed the Septuagint reade 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the Latine translateth maleficos workers of mischiefe but they are both in error for the Hebrew word mecashephah is put in the feminine whereas they both interpret it by the masculine And the word mecashphim is applied to those which worke by evill spirits and have confederacie with them as Exod. 7.10 it is given to the Egyptian Sorcerers and Magicians 2. The practice of poisoning belongeth to the sixth Commandement Thou shalt not kill whereas witchcraft here forbidden is a breach of the first Table Simler 2. These sillie women can effect nothing they imagine they doe many things but it is only in their owne conceit Answ. 1. True it is that they cannot effect what they would for the Lord restraineth the power of the devill by whom they worke as he did when the Sorcerers attempted to bring forth lice and could not Exo. 8. 2. Yet it cannot bee denied but that they effect many strange things by the operation of the devill as the Magicians of Egypt could turne their rods into the similitude of Serpents and water into the likenesse of blood and the witch at Endor could cause the likenesse of Samuel to appeare which was not in deed Samuel but the devill taking upon him his shape So it is no strange thing by the operation of Satan when they take a mans garments and beat them to cause the bodie of the man to feele the smart Simler 3. And if they did no hurt and could effect nothing why was this law ordained against them God gave no superfluous or unnecessarie lawes to his people nor without great reason 4. Though they should effect nothing yet their wicked desire and endevour thereunto is worthie to bee punished 3. Witches many times doe good and heale men of their infirmities and diseases therefore they deserve no such punishment Answ. 1. Indeed in the Civill law such a decree is extant made by Constantine Qui per incantationes intemperiem aeris grandinis evertit puniendus non est c. Hee which by inchantment turneth away the intemperate season of the aire and weather is not to bee punished But it is no marvell that such things were tolerated then when they came newly from Gentilisme wherein such things were not only suffered but honored and rewarded 2. We have a more perfect rule out of the Scriptures that no such unlawfull meanes are to bee used no not to a good end as to procure health or such like for this cause the Prophet reproved the King of Israel having received hurt by a fall because he sent to the god of Ekron for helpe And to this purpose Augustine saith well as he is cited in the Decrees Si aliquando sanare videntur languidos id Deipermissu sit ut homines probentur c. If they seeme sometime to heale the diseased it is done by Gods permission that men might bee thereby proved c. And againe hee saith Laque◠sunt adversarii mederi non possunt They are the deviles snares they cannot heale 4. Object But the meanes which they use are wholesome and medicinable as herbs and oyntments and therefore herein they are not to bee found fault with Answ. 1. For the most part they use such meanes whereof no naturall or apparent reason can be given as to burne the thatch of the house to cut off some part of the beast bewitched and burne it and such like Concerning such things Augustine giveth a good rule Remedia ligaturae qu◠medicorum disciplina condemnat non adhibenda c. Such remedies and ligatures which the skill of Physicke condemneth are not to be used 2. He saith further Ex traditione malorum angelorum sunt Such remedies had their beginning from the tradition of evill angels therefore hee concludeth that Phylacteria sunt animarum vincula Such Phylacteries things applied to or hung about the necke or other parts are but the snares of the soule 3. If they doe use herbs and oyntments and such other
observation that Cherubim with van alwayes signifieth the creature but without van the worke it selfe of Cherubims But this observation doth not alwayes hold for in this place cherub 〈◊〉 the singular number is expressed with van though Cherubim in the plurall be written without is 〈…〉 they both in this place doe signifie the worke of the Cherubims 6. Therefore the best and 〈◊〉 sense of this word is to signifie a beautifull picture and is metaphorically translated from externall and materiall things to spirituall because the Angels are beautified and adorned with many excellent 〈…〉 In which sense the King of Tyrus in respect of his glorious state is called the annointed Cherub Ezech. 28.14 QUEST XXV What forme and fashion these Cherubims were of COncerning the forme and fashion of these Cherubims there are divers opinions 1. Iosephus thinketh they had the similitude of certain birds which are not knowne unto us being found only in the remote parts of the world and the reason of his opinion may be this lest if they had beene after the similitude of any knowne thing it might have ministred occasion of idolatry But Iosephus is convinced by that which is written Gen. 3. that the Cherubims were see to keepe the way to Paradise they were not fowles or other winged beasts but Angels which kept that way neither was there here any feare of idolatry because these Cherubims were not in the open view and sight of the people but in the most holy place whither none had accesse but only the high 〈◊〉 and that once in the yeere 2. R. Abraham Ab. Ezra thinketh that the Cherubims doe signifie any shape either of bird beast or man as Ezech. 1. the beasts which appeared having the face of an Eagle a Lion a Bullock a Man are chap. 10. called Cherubims Contra. The Prophet calleth them Cherubims not in respect of that forme and shape wherein they appeared but because he knew thâ—m to be Angels and blessed spirits that so appeared therefore he giveth the 〈◊〉 name to them all and there their forme and shape is expressed but when they are called Cherubims without any determination of their forme they are alwayes held to have appeared in humane shape Tostat. qu. 〈◊〉 3. Oleaster leaveth not this matter indifferent as Ab. Ezra but thinketh that these Cherubims had rather formam animalium the sonne of beasts such as Ezechiel describeth than of men because it is no where expressed that the Cherubims had the shape of men as there they are described to have the faces of beasts and beside if they had beene made like men with hands that would have hindered the stretching out of their wings Contra. 1. As though the Cherubims in Ezechiel are not as well said to have had the face of a man as of other creatures there expressed 2. To take away the other doubt and difficulty we need not imagine with Montanus who seâ—â—eth forth the Cherubs with wings only without hands for that were an imperfect forme to give them the shape of a man without hands and the Cherubs described Ezech. 1 8. had 〈◊〉 which came under their wings but the Cherubs might very well be described with stretching out wings notwithstanding their hands which they either touched the mercy seat with as some thinke 〈◊〉 her held them upright as praysing God as R. Salomon 4. Montanus saith 〈…〉 That these Cherubs were divers in the shape of male and female But that is not like 〈◊〉 they were made to represent the Angels and blessed Spirits where is no diversity of sex of male or female 5. The opinion than of R. Salomon is the â—â—st that the Cherubs were pictured and portraited in humane shape in the forme of young men because so the Angels used to appeare in times past as to Abraham and Lot and they 〈…〉 the Angeli were sent from heaven they are said to flie as birds 〈…〉 the ground Tostat. And what shape the Cherubims were of 〈…〉 be gathered by the description 〈◊〉 those which Salomon made which stood upright on their feet 2 Chron. 3. â—3 〈…〉 understood of any other than the humane shape Pelarg. Ribera They were pictured with wings and not naked as Montanus describeth them but clothed and apparelled because it is forbiddâ—nâ— chap. 20. 〈…〉 should be discovered at Gods Altar Iunius QUEST XXVI 〈…〉 Cherubim 〈◊〉 Seraphim BUt it will here 〈…〉 these are called Cherubim rather then Seraphim which is another name giâ—en 〈◊〉 Angels 〈…〉 1. Some were of opinion that they might indifferently be called either Cherubim or Seraphim but Hierom confuteth them writing 〈…〉 say in their prayers Thou which sittest 〈…〉 no where used in Scripture but only 〈…〉 2. Others answer that the Seraphim◠〈…〉 which shall be revealed in the next world the Cherubims ad ministerium for the ministery and service of God and therefore the Cherubims are here pictured rather than the Seraphims Contra. 1. But the most holy place where these Cherubims were set was made to represent Gods glory therefore the Cherubim served here to set forth Gods glory 2. The Seraphims also were ministring Spirits as well as the Cherubims as they are set forth Isay 6. 3. Neither is it a sufficient answer to say that the Seraphims appeared with six wings a peece Isay 6. and these had but two they were therefore Cherubims not Seraphims for the Cherubs that here were described but with two wings Ezach 1.6 were said to have foure So that if that were a good reason these should neither be called Cherubims Therefore they are not so called or distinguished in respect of their more or fewer wings for the Angels being Spirits have neither wings nor any other visible shape of themselves but they are described and called diversly according to those severall offices and imployments wherein it pleaseth God to use them 4. Ribera maketh this to be the reason why God is said to fit upon the Cherubims which word signifieth multitude of knowledge to shew that God farre exceedeth the wisdome and knowledge even of those excellent Spirits and therefore he is said to sit above the Cherubims But beside that this signification of the word Cherub hath no ground as is before shewed God in this sense might as well be said to fit betweene the Seraphim which signifieth burning as fire for the Lord in brightnesse and in fiery justice exceedeth the Angels 5. This reason then may rather be yeelded Visiones ad rerum sâ—â—arum argumenta accommodanda sunt Visions must be applied unto the argument and scope of the things themselves Iun. in Isai. 6.2 Now because Seraphim is a name given to the Angels in respect of their fiery and purging zeale they are so called when they are sent to purge and cleanse the world in being ministers of Gods judgements but Cherubim being a title of love and favour being taken for a beautifull and lovely picture this name was more fit to be used in this place these
curtaines understandeth the ten Commandements and by the eleven the transgression of the law because that number exceedeth ten by one 2. Beda referreth the first curtaines of divers colours to the divers sorts of the faithfull and elect whereof the Church consisteth by the length of them the patience and longanimitie of the Saints by the breadth he understandeth charitie by the strings and loops the Commandements of God as in remembrance thereof they were charged to make fringes in their garments by the number of fiftie the great yeare of Jubile in the Kingdome of God or the grace of the holy Spirit which came downe upon the fiftieth day The haire-covering and rams skins he taketh to signifie the Pastors and guides of the Church by whom it is defended and protected from heresie by the red skins the Martyrs by the badgers-skins he would have signified those which have mortified the flesh with the lusts thereof 3. Gregorie by the curtaines understandeth the faithfull Qui per fidem in cordibus coelestia secreta vâ—lant Which doe vaile by faith in their hearts the heavenly secrets c. By the badgers skins the carnall which are sometime preferred in the Church By the inward curtaines such as are given to contemplation and shine in vertue 4. Rupertus by the rams and badgers-skins insinuateth the rich in the Church Qui Sanctis necessaria vitae sâ—bministrant Which minister necessarie things for life unto the Saints Thus diversly according to their severall conceits the Fathers doe allegorize the externall Tabernacle with the parts thereof with more curiositie than profit or edifying 4. But thus farre these typicall rites and ordinances may be mystically applied as we have Scripture to direct us 1. The three parts of the Tabernacle doe signifie the outward court the Church of the Jewes under the old Testament the holy place the militant Church in earth the most holy the triumphant Church in heaven Ferus As the Apostle sheweth that of this familie there is one part in heaven another in earth Ephes. 3.13 2. The Tabernacle in generall is a type of the Church of Christ for as that was habitaculum ceremonialâ— the ceremoniall habitation of God so this is the spirituall Levit. 26.11 2 Cor. 6.16 Piscator 3. The foure coverings shew the most sure protection and defence of the Church by Christ against all the assaults of Satan as our blessed Saviour sheweth that his Church is built upon a rocke that the gates of hell shall not prevaile against it Matth. 16. Marbach QUEST XV. How thicke the boords of the Tabernacle were Vers. 15. ALso thou shalt make boords c. 1. The length and breadth of these boords is expressed in the text but so is not the thicknesse 1. R. Salomon thinketh they were a cubit thicke So also Borrhaius But that cannot be for then from one outside to another it would be 12. cubits it being ten cubits from one inside to another for it was within six boords broad which made nine cubits and the two corner boords being halfe a cubit a peece made the tenth cubit Then it would follow that the first curtaines covered not the sides by two cubits But it is shewed before quest 8. out of the 13. verse that they reached downe to the ground within one cubit and that the second coverings of haire did hang downe on the sides to the bottome for they are said to cover the Tabernacle But if the boords had beene a cubit thicke and the Tabernacle from outside to outside were 12. cubits broad and the two sides made 20. cubits each side being ten cubits high then the curtaines of 30. foot in length could not reach to the ground by a cubit on each side Tostat. qu. 11. 2. Therefore Iosephus opinion is more probable that the boords were foure fingers thicke and no more though Montanus therein dissent from him thinking that they were of a greater thicknesse which yet he doth not certainly define With Iosephus consent Lyranus Tostatus with others And this may be a good conjecture thereof because that is the usuall scantling for the thicknesse of planke boord Seeing therefore the thicknesse is not specially mentioned it is like that therein Moses is referred to the ordinarie use QUEST XVI Whether the tenous were in the sides or in the bottome of the boords Vers. 17. TWo tenous shall be in one boord set in order as the feet of a ladder 1. The Latine Interpreter readeth In lateribus tabulâ— dua incastratura erunt c. In the sides of the boord shall be two regals or incisians whereby they shall one be joyned to another so also the Chalde or one run into another Septuag This reading Tostatus followeth who thinketh that these regals served to shoot the boords together in the sides that one might run within another 2. Oleaster also urgeth the Hebrew phrase because it is said The woman to her sister that is one against another He thinketh it more probable Quòd una ingrediabatur alteram That one went into another Contra. 1. If one boord should have beene shot within another there would have beene at the least an inch abated in the breadth of every boord in twentie boords twentie inches almost two foot above one cubit then the twentie boords being a cubit and halfe broad would not have made 29. cubits the length of the Tabernacle which was 30. cubits 2. And whereas all the boords were to have these two incisians one on the one side and the other on the other Tostatus is driven to confesse that the two utmost boords of the North and South side had but one incisian because they were joyned but on the one side to other boords qu. 11. 3. The Hebrew phrase inferreth no such thing but as Cajetane better expoundeth Quia aequales erant in omnibus incisiones Because the incisians were all alike the breadth the depth the spaces it is said A woman to her sister 4. The word in lateribâ—â— in the sides is not in the originall 2. Therefore the word jadoth which signifieth hands is rather taken for the tenons In imo tabulae in the bottome of the boords which some translate denticulos teeth Vatab. Some the hinges Chalde Iun. which went into the sockets or foot-stals of silver as is described vers 19. Two sockets under one boord for his two tenons Which sheweth that these tenons were not in the sides of the boords but under them because they went into the tenons Cajetan Lippoman So also Iosephus Singulis tabulis inerant cardines biâ—i immissi per duas bases Every boord had two hinges which went into the two sockets 3. These tenons are said to be set in order as the feet of a ladder not because they were made slope broad above and narrow below as Cajetane but for that as ladder staves they were equally distant one from another Iun. 4. There were not foure of them in every boord as Oleaster two on the sides and
Chalde Interpreter calleth it Tabernaculum foederis the Tabernacle of the covenant But there is another word used for a covenant aroâ— bâ—rith the Arke of the covenant 1 Sam. 4.3 3. The most usuall reading is The Tabernacle of the congregation for so the word maghed is taken for the assemblie or congregation Numb 16.2 So Paguine Simlerus Osiander with others But Oleaster useth a good reason against this interpretation because the assemblies of the people came not into the Tabernacle but onely to the outward couâ—t as the people themselves confesse Numb 17.13 Whosoever approcheth to the Tabernacle of God shall die 4. Therefore the word maghed comming of jaghad or jaad as Oleaster readeth which signifieth to come or meet with at a certaine or appointed time it is better interpreted Tabernaculum conventâ—â— the Tabernacle of meeting Iunius or the Tabernacle of appointment Vatabluâ— as the Lord himselfe giveth the sense of the word chap. 25.22 Where I will meet with thee or appoint with thee So also Numb 17.4 It may therefore most fitly be called the Tabernacle of appointment or of the appointed meeting where the Lord appointed to meet with Moses and to talke with him QUEST XXIII Whether it belonged to Aaron onely to dresse the lamps Vers. 21. SHall Aaron and his sonnes dresse them 1. Cajetane well noteth Non erat Levitarum hoc efficium sed sacerdotum This was not the office of the Levits but of the Priests the sonnes of Aaron to dresse the lamps 2. And it must not bee read with a conjunction copulative Aaron and his sonnes as Lat. Vatab. Moâ—tanuâ— as though all the whole companie of them should goe in together but disjunctively Aaron or his sonnes Tostat. Iâ—n 3. Hilarie seemeth to be of opinion that it belonged onely unto Aaron to dresse the lamps making this allusion Summus sacerdâ—s lucernas fâ—vens c. iâ—â—ago Christi est qui solus ministrat donat Spiritum sanctum The high Priest nourishing the lamps is a representation of Christ who onely giveth the holy Ghost But this text sheweth that not onely Aaron but his sonnes also are charged with this dutie 4. Therefore Beda well applieth this text understanding by the sonnes of Aaron the Ministers and Pastors of the Church Qui filii sunt veri sacerdotis nostri qui lucem verbi ministrant Which are the children of our true high Priest which minister the light of Gods word 5. And whereas Levit. 24.3 it is said Aaron shall dresse them it must be understood of Aaron and of his sonnes the Priests ex ipsius mandato by his commandement or appointment Iunius And therefore Aaron is onely named because all was done by his direction QUEST XXIV Of the mysticall application of the lamps and oyle thereof THe mysticall application of this oyle which must be offered to maintaine the lamps is this 1. In that the candlesticke was placed not in the most holy place which was a figure of celestiall Jerusalem it sheweth that in the Church now present wee have need of the direction of the word of God yet in the Kingdome of heaven there shall be no such need For the Lambe shall be the light thereof Apocal. 21.23 Rupertus 2. By the light we understand the word of God which the Prophet David saith is a lanterne to the feet Psal. 119.105 Pelargus 3. Oleum gratiam Spiritus sancti ostendit The oyle signifieth the grace of Gods Spirit Isidor Of this holy oyle or ointment the Apostle speaketh Ye have an ointment from hiâ— that is holy 1 Ioh. 2.20 4. As the oyle is pressed forth of the Olive so Oleum Spiritus sancti ècracis Christi torculari expressum The oyle of the holy Spirit is pressed out of the Wine-presse of the crosse of Christ Borrh. 5. In that they are commanded to bring pure oyle without mixture or dregs the puritie of doctrine is signified Haeretisi adulteriâ—um excogitant â—leâ—â— Heretikes doe devise adulterate oyle that is corrupt doctrine Procopius 6. Lastly Augustine thus applieth all together by the Tabernacle he understandeth the world Luceâ—nae accensid verbi est incarnatio candelabrum crucis lignum lucerna in candelabro lucens Christus in cruce pendâ—â—s The lighting of the lampe is the incarnation of Christ the candlesticke is the crosse the lampe giving light in the candlesticke is Christ hanging upon the crosse c. QUEST XXV Of the description and situation of the whole Tabernacle THis then was the forme and fashion of the whole Tabernacle 1. The outward court was first set up which was an hundred cubits long of each side and fiftie cubits broad at each end and round about it were sixtie pillars twentie of a side and ten at each end and this court was hung round about with curtaines of five cubits high on the East end was the gate in the middest of the side of twentie cubits hung with a vaile of foure colours white blew scarlet purple 2. Then was set up the Tabernacle which was thirtie cubits long and twentie cubits broad the which was compassed on each side saving before toward the East with boords laid over with gold twentie on each side and at the West end eight Then it was hung over with the fine curtaines wrought with Cherubims which hung on each side of the Tabernacle and went over the roofe upon them were laid the haire curtaines then round about below were hanged the red Ramme skins and above them the covering of Badgers skins Thus the Tabernacle was finished without 3. After this it was divided into the most holy place which contained ten cubits square and there upon foure pillars was hanged a vaile wrought with Cherubims their followed the holy place which contained twentie cubits in length the rest of thâ—se thirtie cubits on the East side whereof was hung up a vaile upon five pillars which was made of fine twined linen blew silke purple scarlet as the other but not wrought with Cherubims 4. The Tabernacle being thus set up and divided then the holy instruments were placed therein in the most holy place was the Arke with the tables of the Law onely within it and before it Aarons rod and the pot of Manna in the most holy place without the vaile was set on the South side the candlesticke over against that on the North side the table with the shew-bread and before the vaile of the most holy place the Altar of incense In the outward court before the doore of the Tabernacle toward the North was the brasen Altar for sacrifice and betweene that and the Tabernacle the brasen Laver wherein the Priests did wash their hands and feet chap. 30.19 Montan Ribera ex Iosepho 5. Now it appeareth by this description that Augustine is in great error 1. He saith Intrabatur in Tabernaculum ab occidente They entred into the Tabernacle on the West Whereas it is most evident chap. 26.22 that the West end of the Tabernacle was closed up with boords
the bars are understood the Ministers and teachers of the Gospell by whose preaching the frame of the Church is held together 3. The two vailes did both keepe the people from curious gazing and bold accesse which admonisheth us that we must not draw neere unto God without great reverence 4. The large outward court did represent and prefigure the vocation of the Gentiles which should be called in great multitudes whereas the Church of the Jewes was straitned and pent up in a small corner Simler 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. There is no salvation but in Christ. Vers. 1. THou shalt make the Altar The Israelites had but one onely Altar appointed upon the which they were to offer all their sacrifices and therefore both Ieroboam sinned that afterward set up two other Altars one in Dan the other in Beersheba and Vrias the high Priest who to please the idolatrous King Ahaz caused a new Altar to be set up after the patterne of the Altar of Damascus This one Altar was a type of our blessed Saviour who onely satisfieth for our sinnes neither are we to use any other helpes in our owne works or in the merits or mediation of Saints beside Christ for this were nothing else Quam aliud novum Altare prater Christum instituere Then to appoint another new Altar beside Christ who onely is ordained of God to bee the Saviour of the world Marbach As S. Peter saith Neither is there salvation in any other for among men there is given no other name under heaven whereby we must be saved Act. 2.12 2. Doct. That all things should be done orderly in the Church Vers. 9. THou shalt make the court of the Tabernacle We learne by this that Nihil in Ecclesia confusum esse debet Nothing in the Church must be confused but all disposed in order as in the Tabernacle the outward court was appointed for the Levits and vulgar sort the holy place for the Priests the most holy place none could enter into but the high Priest So now in the Church of God all things should be done in comelinesse and order Our assemblies should be orderly and reverently set and disposed Distinction of degrees and persons to be observed not all confusedly shuffled together as now in many Churches men and women one with another are mingled together Oleaster This is S. Pauls rule that all things be done honestly and by order 1 Cor. 14.40 3. Doct. The mysteries of Christian religion are manifested to all Vers. 16. IN the gate of the court shall bee a vaile of twentie cubits Although the court were compassed about with curtaines yet Ostium satis amplum habuit It had a doore wide enough thorow the which they might see all the breadth of the Tabernacle and the Hebrewes thinke that the curtaines were made with holes Quibus ea quae in atrio agebantur conspici potuerint Whereby such things as were done in the court might be seene By the which is signified that the holy mysteries of the Church are not such as the ceremonies of Ceres of Eleusis which were not imparted to strangers or of Iuno of Coos unto the which servants were not admitted but the secrets of the Gospell are revealed to all the world Pelargus Lippoman As the Apostle saith If our Gospell bee hid it is hid to them that are lost 2 Cor. 4.3 5. Places of Controversie 1. Confut. Against free will in good things Vers. 4. THou shalt make unto it a grate like networke c. Beda thinketh that the fire was made under tbis grate and that thorow the holes thereof the flame ascended and consumed the sacrifice whereupon he giveth this note Nequaquam obduremus corda nostra more Pelagianorum c. sed liberè aperiamus c. Let us not harden our hearts and locke them up as the Pelagians against the grace of God but so open them that as thorow many doores in all things that we begin well the grace of God may illuminate us c. And he sheweth what the error of the Pelagians was Sâ—â—e gratia Dei se aliquid boni perficere posse praesumunt They presume they can without the grace of God doe some good thing And so they doe not set a grate before their hearts for the sacred fire of Gods Spirit to enter Sed quasi parietem solidum inter se ignâ—m Spiritus sancti interponunt But doe put a thickâ— wall betweene them and the sire of the holy Spirit lest they should be heated thereby and warmed with love With the Pelagians herein consent the Romanists whose assertion is this That a man naturally without faith both with speciall assistance from God and without it can performe some morall good worke if no temptation let Bellarmin But against both these may be opposed that saying of our blessed Saviour Without me can ye doe nothing Ioh. 15.5 See more hereof Synops. Centur. 4. err 43. 2. Confut. Against Altars in Popish Churches Vers. 7. THe bars shall be in the two sides of the Altar c. This Altar was a type and figure of Christ and it was to continue till Christ the true Sacrificer should offer himselfe upon the Altar of the crosse But now the Church of God knoweth no such materiall Altars as Rupertus well observeth this Altar was holy Antequam Christus qui per hoc promittebatur veniret c. before Christ came who was promised by it but after that he is entred into the most holy place Nunc reprobatum abjectum est Now it is repelled and rejected The Romanists therefore doe Judaize in retaining still Altars in their Churches Antiquitie knew no such Altars of stone as Celsus as Origen saith objected it as a fault among the Christians Quod nec imagines nec Templa nec aras haberent That they had neither images Temples nor Altars Augustine calleth it Mensam Domini The table of the Lord Chrysostom 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The holy boord Athanasius Mensam ligneam The table of wood B. Babing Neither have they any colour for their Altars out of that place Heb. 13. We have an Altar whereof they have no authoritie to eat which serve in the Tabernacle c. For the Apostle there speaketh of no materiall Altar but of the death and passion of Christ as it followeth vers 12. And Bellarmin forbeareth to urge this place because divers of their owne writers apply it to Christs crosse lib. 5. de miss cap. 9. 3. Confut. Against the setting up of candles in the day in popish Churches Vers. 1. SHall dresse them from evening to morning The lamps burned in the Tabernacle onely in the night and were put out in the day as is before shewed quest 21. which sheweth that the Romanists are herein more superstitious than the Jewes in setting up candles and tapers by day in their Churches Hierom saith Ceras non clara luce accendimus c. We doe not light candles at noone day but to qualifie the
that Samuels mother made him a little meghil coat But because there was another coat beside under this this is better taken to be the robe which was the outward garment the coat was next underneath which was the longer garment but this the looser it is better therefore translated pallium a robe Iun. than tunica a coat Lat. 2. It is called the robe of the Ephod quia pars non minima superhumerali tegebatur because a great part of it was covered with the Ephod or shoulder garment Beda Et quia immediatè erat sub veste superhumerali And because it was next under the Ephod Cajetan 3. For the fashion of it Hierome thinketh that it had assutas manicas sleeves sewed unto it So also Tostatus But the more probable opinion is that it was sine manicis without sleeves and had only holes or slits in the sides for the armes Montan. Iun. Ribera and Iosephus seemeth to be of the same opinion Qua manus exornatur est scissa It was slit at the going out of the hands c. for the robes used not to have sleeves but the coats and inward garments 4. It had an hole in the middest for the head to goe thorow and it seemeth to have beene inconsutilis tota to have beene made whole of weavers worke without any seame and so was the edge round about the hole for the head made also opere textoris of woven worke ne extrinsecus assuatur it was not sowed to but made out of the same Augustine So also Hierome though Tostatus and Ribera seeme to thinke otherwise that the edge was sewed to therein following Iosephus But the text is against them which prescribeth the edge to be made textorio opere with woven worke and the reason is added ne facilerumpatur that it be not rent but if it had beene sewed to it had not beene so strong and would more easily have rent than being woven unto it 5. The Septuagint whom Iosephus followeth calleth it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 tunicam talarem a coat downe to the feet but it was shorter than the inward coat which was a side garment reaching downe to the ground Montanus And if the bels and pomegranates had hung downe to the feet it would have hit upon the Priests feet and so hindred his going Simler Montanus and Lyranus in their description make it to reach but a little beyond the knees 6. For the matter of it it was unlike unto the Ephod to the making whereof went five things gold blew purple silke skarlet and fine linen but this was made altogether of blew silke like to the hyacinth which Cajetanus taketh to have beene a violet colour some an azure colour like to the aire but it was rather betweene both for if it had beene a perfect violet it would not have differed much from the purple it is better translated then a blew colour than a violet Genevens QUEST XXXII Of the bels which hung in the skirts of the robe Vers. 33. THou shalt make Pomgranates 1. The Pomgranates are prescribed to be made of three colours blew purple skarlet all which doe appeare in the Pomgranates themselves for the kirnels within are red the colour of the rine or barke on the Sunside is purple and on the other blewish And by this mixture the naturall colours of the Pomgranates were fitly represented Montan 2. Oleaster seemeth to thinke that these Pomgranates were rather acupicta quà m suspensa wrought in with the needle into the skirts of the robe than hung on But seeing that the bels were made by themselves and did hang betweene the Pomgranates it is like also that the Pomgranates were made after the same manner and so put to as the bels were 3. Montanus conjectureth that the golden bels were made ad formam mespilorum after the fashion of medlers being open below as little brasen bels of that fashion are in use this day and being thus made they were more apt to send forth their sound 4. Hierome thinkes that there were 72. golden bels hanging in the skirts and as many Pomgranates Prosper saith there were fifty of each sort Iustin in Triphon saith there were twelve to signifie the twelve Apostles but of this there is no certainty only it is said Ecclesiastic 45.9 that he compassed him about with many bels there were many of them but what was the certaine number it is not expressed QUEST XXXIII Why the sound of the bels was to be heard Vers. 35. ANd his sound shall be heard when he goeth in c. and commeth out that he dye not 1. Some thinke that because in the holy place there were divers visions and apparitions of Angels that by this signe the Priest comming in about his office and ministery might give warning and not rush in of a sudden to see the Lords secrets like as men use to knock at their neighbours doores before they enter in But God needeth not any such signe to be warned by hee knoweth every mans going in and out and the holy Angels being searching Spirits could have knowne when the Priest was entring without any such notice 2. But the reasons why the Lord would have the bels heard were these two first in respect of the Priest himselfe that hee might enter with more reverence like as one will not rush into a great mans house by stealth but first will knock at the doore or ring the bell Tostat. quaest 17. Oleaster The other reason was in regard of the people it was done for a remembrance to them Ecclesiast 45.9 that they might know when the high Priest entred in and then lift up their hearts when the high Priest went in to minister before the Lord for them Calvin 3. Mention is made of his going in and comming out because only when he went and moved himselfe the bels sounded but while hee remained within and stood still the bels stirred not 4. The Lord threatneth death if the Priest should enter otherwise than thus apparelled with these garments Non quòd sonus aliquid confert ad evadendum mortem obedientia est illa quae confert c. Not that the sound helped any thing to escape death but it was his obedience that helped Cajetan QUEST XXXIV Of the mysticall application of the robe THis priestly robe is diversly applied 1. Iosephus by the linen coat understandeth the earth by the blew robe heaven by the pomgranates the lightning by the bels the thunder 2. Philo resembleth the aire to the blew robe which was long and side as the other is extended from the Moone to the earth and the consent of the elements among themselves to the sound of the bels 3. Hierome approveth Philo his conceit concerning the coat and Iosephus for the bels 4. Rupertus by the bels much better understandeth the sound of Christ preaching in the dayes of his flesh 5. Beda by the blew robe which resembleth the heavens the celestiall conversation of the Ministers of the Gospell
for all offer up himselfe in sacrifice for us and still continueth our Mediatour Borrh. 4. Now the inferiour Priests garments are fitly applied to set forth the qualities and conditions of the faithfull which are the members of Christ as the other did shadow forth Christ our head 1. Beda by the linen garment interpreteth decorem castitatis the comelinesse of chastitie by the girdle vigilantem mentis custodiam the diligent watchfulnesse of the minde to keepe the same by the bonnets visus anditus gustus custodiam the diligent keeping of the sight hearing taste and of all the senses 2. Thomas maketh a more generall use Castitas significatur per femoralia c. Chastitie is signified by the breeches Puritas vita per lineam tunicam Puritie of life by the linen garment Moderatio discretionis per cingulum Moderate discretion by the girdle Rectitudo intentionis pertiaram And a right intention by the bonnet 3. But this application is more fit The linen garment signifieth our innocencie and righteousnesse which we receive in the lavacre of regeneration being cloathed with Christs righteousnesse as the Apostle saith All yee that are baptized unto Christ have put on Christ the girdle signifieth constancie in the truth as S. Paul saith Stand therefore your loines girded about with veritie Tiara protectionis divinae signa erant The bonnets were signes of the divine protection the linen breeches shew what care should be had of comelinesse and what reverence is to be used in the service of God Pelarg. Marbach Who addeth this further that as we put more comelinesse upon our uncomely parts as the Apostle saith 1 Cor. 2.23 So our Saviour hath respect unto the vile and abject members of the Church such as are despised and counted base in the world 4. And like as we use three kinde of garments some for necessitie to cover our naked parts some for ornament and comelinesse and some for defence as militarie garments as here the Priests had their linen breeches of the first sort their linen coat of the second and their girdle of the third So unto a Christian are necessarie three kinde of spirituall garments the first is the garment of faith whereby our sins are covered secondly the ornaments of the soule are requisite whereby Christians must be adorned in the sanctitie and integritie of life thirdly they must put on their spirituall armour and take the sword of the Spirit the word of God whereby they may fight against Satan Simler Borrhaius 4. Places of Doctrine 1 Doct. None must intrude themselves into the callings of the Church Vers. 1. CAuse thou thy brother Aaron to come In that Aaron intruded not himselfe into the Priests office but was thereunto called Procopius giveth this note Qui temerario ansu ad se trahere sacerdotium c. He that will rashly draw unto himselfe the Priesthood shall suffer punishment So also Oleaster So the Apostle observeth upon this very example of Aaron No man taketh this honour to himselfe but he that is called of God as Aaron Heb. 5.4 2. Doct. The agreement which ought to be betweene the Civill and Ecclesiasticall state OLeaster noteth here further in that Moses who was the chiefe Magistrate called Aaron to the Priesthood the concord and amitie that ought to be betweene the Civill and Ecclesiasticall state is commended that as Ioash prospered while hee followed the direction of Iehoiadah so both the Ecclesiasticall state should imitate Iehoiadah to give holy counsell and direction unto the Magistrate and the Magistrate to be like Ioash in following the same 3. Doct. Profitable arts are the gift of God Vers. 3. SPeake unto all cunning men whom I have filled with the Spirit of wisdome c. Gallasius hereupon thus writeth Omnem artem industriam c. Dei donum agnosco Every art and industrie which bringeth utilitie unto man I acknowledge to be the gift of God as the Prophet Isaiah saith that God instructeth the husbandman to have discretion Isa. 28.26 Men therefore to whom God hath given the knowledge of profitable and commendable arts should have a care to employ them to Gods glorie and not to abuse them to wantonnesse 4. Doct. Whatsoever is instituted in Gods service must proceed from his wisdome Vers. 3. SPeake unto all cunning men in the Hebrew wise in heart Whatsoever is instituted in the service of God à sapientia Dei proficisci debet must proceed from the wisdome of God no humane device must have place or bee admitted there Simler Sauls policie in transgressing Gods Commandement in saving the best things of the Amalekites though hee thought hee did therein well and wisely yet was displeasing unto God 5. Doct. The sound of the Word in the Gospell exceedeth the sound of Aarons bels under the law Vers. 35. HIs sound shall be heard c. Herein as Lippoman well observeth appeareth the excellencie of the Gospell beyond the Law they heard then but the sound of Aarons bels Nunc audimus clarum sonitum Evangelii Now we heare the cleere sound of the Gospell c And as the understanding of a man exceedeth the capacitie of a childe and the cleere day the dawning so the cleere light of the Gospell excelleth the shadowes of the Law God providing better things for us as the Apostle saith that they without us should not be perfect Heb. 11.40 6. Doct. There ought to be order among the Ministers of the Church Vers. 40. THou shalt make for Aarons sons coats In that Aaron the high Priests coats were made more costly and glorious than his sons the inferiour Priests therein commendatur ordo inter Ecclesiae ministros is commended order among the Ministers of the Church that although Christ doe forbid bid his Disciples Luk. 22. to exercise dominion one over another as the Princes of the world doe Neutiquam tamen ordinem abrogat Yet he doth not abrogate order seeing he hath not onely distinguished them himselfe in gifts but in offices as the Apostle saith Ephes. 4. He hath given some to be Apostles some Prophets some Evangelists some Pastors and Doctors c. Marbach 5. Places of Controversie 1. Controv. Against the superstitious apparell of the Romish Priests Vers. 4. THou shalt make a breast-plate an Ephod and a robe and a broidered coat These Priestly garments being ceremoniall and typicall are now abolished Christ the true high Priest being come with his ornaments Therefore the Romanists doe plainly Iudaize in bringing againe into the Priestly order such varietie of garments as the Pall the Miter the Crozier staffe the Albe the Chimere the gray amice the Stoale with such like Their Priests come forth as though Aaron addressed himselfe with his attire to sacrifice at the Altar S. Paul hath given us a rule concerning these things which are but a shadow of things to come but the bodie is in Christ Coloss. 2.17 But it will bee here further asked if it bee not lawfull now for the
that is none that is not of Aarons family 3. Tostatus giveth this solution That Kings are not here excluded because Kings when they were anointed did not use this ointment ad delectationem for delight which is here only forbidden sed ad cultum Dei but for the service and worship of God because as the Lord appointed Priests for his service so he ordained Kings in his stead to rule and governe his people Tostat. quaest 13. But it was not lawfull for any of the people to use this oile upon any occasion at all whether for delight or otherwise to consecrate any thing privatly nor upon any person not here excepted which are the Priests only for the words are generall 4. Wherefore the best answer is this God forbiddeth any other to be anointed with this ointment saving the Priests nisi scilicet aliter jusserit unlesse he otherwise command the Lord reserveth unto himselfe a liberty above his Law Simler As yet there were no Kings in Israel and therefore no mention is made of their anointing So that this ointment was afterward used to anoint both Kings and Priests sed non sine novo Dei mandato but not without a new commandement from God Pelarg. QUEST XXXVI What it is to be cut off from his people Vers. 33. HE shall be cut off from his people 1. Pellicane seemeth to understand this of the penalty of death to be publikely inflicted upon him that should prophane this holy ointment prohibetur profanus usus sub poena mortis the prophane use is forbidden under paine of death 2. Some of the separation of them de coetu sanctorum from the society and company of the faithfull Gloss. interl 3 Some of the punishment divinitus by God himselfe to be imposed upon them Osiander as Vzzah for the like transgression was smitten with sudden death 4. Tostatus both understandeth the extraordinary punishment by the Lords hand and the sentence of death to be denounced by the Magistrate if any did continue in this offence nec desistere vellet and would not cease or give over 5. Vatablus referreth it to the spirituall and everlasting punishment of the soule anima ejus peribit his soule shall perish 6. But all these three are better joyned together that both God shall cut off such an one by sudden and extraordinary death in this world and punish him eternally in the next as in this sense it is said that hee which was not circumcised should be cut off from his people because he had broken the Lords covenant Deut. 17.16 Iunius ibid. For as the faithfull are said to be gathered to their people when they died as Abraham Gen. 25.8 and Iacob Gen. 49.33 so the wicked and prophane shall be cut off from their people that is from the fellowship of the Saints in the next world Tostat. qu. 18. unlesse they doe repent Pelarg. Likewise if such prophane persons did obstinately persist in their sinne they were to die also by the hand of the Magistrate in which sense it is said that he that did sinne with an high hand that is presumptuously shall be cut off from among his people Numb 15.30 QUEST XXXVII The spirituall application of this holy ointment THis holy ointment made of these foure simples Myrrh Cinamom Calamus and Cassia 1. Some apply unto the senses by Cinamom understanding two of them the senses of seeing and hearing ut a sordibus repurgati that they should be purged from filthinesse c. Procop. 2. Some by these foure would have signified the foure morall vertues which must be tempered together Gloss. ordinar 3. Other by the Myrrh the mortification of the flesh by the Cinamom of ashy and earthly colour mortality by the Cassia growing in moist places Baptisme Gloss. interlinear 4. But these applications are too curious and impertinent therefore this holy ointment better setteth forth that holy ointment of the Spirit wherewith the Messiah was anointed who is said Psal. 45.8 to be anointed with the oile of gladnesse above his fellowes Thus Hierome applieth it in 3. cap. Hab. and Cyril lib. 12. in Levit. 5. But it signifieth not only the holy Ghost which was powred upon Christ without measure but that portion of grace wherewith every one of Christs members is anointed Osiander that as without this ointment neither the Tabernacle nor any part thereof was sanctified so without the operation of the holy Ghost all our labours and endevours are unprofitable Marbach 6. Pelargus more particularly applieth every one of these foure severall ingredients by the Myrrh which is good to joyne and as it were glue wounds together and helpeth a stinking breath and cleereth the voice he understandeth the merit of Christs death which healeth our wounds and cureth our evill thoughts and words by the Cinamom which is good against poisonfull beasts the spirituall force of Christs death which prevaileth against Satan by the sweet Calamus charity is signified which covereth a multitude of sinnes by the Cassia which healeth the biting of vipers the holy Sacrament of the Eucharist which is a spirituall medicine to the soule But we have no direction in Scripture for any such particular application It sufficeth that this ointment prefigured the spirit of grace wherewith the faithfull are anointed as the Apostle saith Yee have an ointment from that Holy one and know all things 1 Ioh. 2.20 QUEST XXXVIII Of the spices whereof the holy perfume was made Vers. 34. TAke these spices stacte c. Now followeth the composition of the perfume 1. The first is called in Hebrew nabaph which signifieth a drop distilling R. David Vatablus Oleaster take it for balm which distilleth from the tree some for storax liquida liquid storax But liquid things could not be beaten to powder as this was vers 36. Some interpret it pure myrrh Genevens But that was prescribed before for the oyntment called there mar Rab. Salomon thinketh it was a kinde of gum But there is great difference betweene stacte and gum it was therefore the distilling of myrrh indurata being hardned Lippom. Which the Septuagint called before 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the flower of myrrh Simler 2. The next is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 shâ—cheleth which Oleaster would derive of shachal a Lion or Cat a mountaine the sweat or ordure whereof is of great savour that which we call muske R. David and Papias take it for the root of a certaine odoriferous and fragrant herbe But the most thinke it to be a little shell like unto a small oyster or cockle of the bignesse and colour of ones naile which is found in India in the lakes where nardus groweth where the small shelfish doe feed of nardus and thereupon the shels become to be of an excellent sweet smell Dioscorides lib. 2. cap. 20. So Lyranus Tostat. Pelargus Some take it for cleare gum Genevens But that is not so apt to be beaten and pounded Vatablus calleth it ungulam cabellinam or aromaticum which
small peeces that is confesse them particularly unto God Procop. 5. And as this perfume was only to be offered unto God so our prayers must only be directed unto him Osiander QUEST XLII How the Lord talked with Moses in the Mercie seat whether in any visible shape Vers. 36. WHere I will meet with thee c. 1. That is in the Arke of the Testimony before mentioned not in the Altar of incense because as Lyranus saith the voice of the Lord was heard from the Mercie seat thither for neither did it belong unto Moses but unto Aaron to offer incense and the Lord used to speake unto Moses not from the Altar of incense but from the Mercie seat Numb 7.89 Tostat. quaest 16. 2. But though in this he correcteth Lyranus upon good ground yet he himselfe is more grossely deceived that Moses who was privileged at all times to goe into the most holy place videbat effigiem quâ— apparebat in propitiatorio c. he saw a certaine shape which appeared in the Mercie seat which was an Angell in a bodily appearance And for this cause he saith the high Priest when he went into the most holy place was with a cloud of incense to cover the Mercie seat Levit. 16.13 that the Angell in that visible shape might not be seene Tostat. qu. 17. Contra. 1. God could frame a voice from the Mercy seat without any such visible apparition therefore it is superfluous to imagine any such 2. Neither is it more like that Moses saw any image in the most holy place than he did in mount Horeb Deut. 4.15 3. The cloud of incense was to cover the Mercie seaâ— not to that end but for reverence of the place that the high Priest should not gaze upon Gods seat 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. That it is lawfull to number the people upon just occasion Vers. 12. WHen thou takest the sum of the children of Israel c. It is not then unlawfull for Princes to take the numbers of their people either to make choice of such as are fit for warre or for the imposition of moderate and necessary taxes and subsidies As here this people are numbred to levy a certaine summe toward the maintenance of the Tabernacle Servius Bullus is noted to have beene the first that brought in this order of summing and mustering the people in the Romane Common-wealth which as a politike device may safely be reteined now of Christian Magistrates so that they do it not with ostentation as rejoycing in the numbers of the people and as it were placing their confidence therein which was Davids fault when he caused Ioab to number the people 2 Sam. 24. Simler But Kings when they see their people to multiply and increase may thereby be stirred up to give the praise unto God as the Wise-man saith In the multitude of the people is the honour of a King and for want of people commeth the destruction of the Prince Prov. 14.28 2. Doct. God is no accepter of persons Vers. 15. THe rich shall not passe and the poore shall not diminish from halfe a sicle This sheweth that God is no accepter of persons that the poore as well as the rich doe belong unto him therefore God would have the poore to pay as much as the rich lest they might have thought themselves to be lesse deare in Gods sight So the Apostle saith There is neither Iew nor Grecian there is neither bond nor free there is neither male nor female for ye are all one in Christ Iesus Galath 3.28 Marbach 3. Doct. The Ministers of the word are to be competently maintained Vers. 16. ANd put it to the use of the Tabernacle Here the common charge of the Tabernacle and the things thereunto belonging lieth upon the contribution of the people which sheweth how ready and carefull all sorts of men ought to be in maintenance of the Lords house for he that is borne to inherit heaven must thinke himselfe borne to maintaine â—he meanes that lead us unto heaven Men are carefull to maintaine their labouring beasts which worke for their corporall food as the Apostle to this purpose alleageth that text out of the Law Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the oxe that treadeth out the corne 1 Cor. 9.9 much more should the Ministers of Gods word be maintained which labour for the food of our soules To this purpose B. Babingt 5. Places of controversie 1. Controv. Against the invocation of Saints Vers. 8. THe perfume shall be perpetually before the Lord c. As this perfume was only to be censed to the Lord which signifieth the prayers of the Saints so God only through Christ must be invocated this honour must not be given unto any other Simler for God only must be beleeved upon as our blessed Saviour saith Yee beleeve in God beleeve also in mee Ioh. 14.1 And men cannot call on him in whom they have not beleeved Rom. 10.14 2. Controv. Against superstitious censing of Churches NOw seeing that this perfume and incense was a type of the spirituall sacrifices and prayers of the faithfull Psal. 141.2 Apocal. 8.3 which types and figures are now ceased the superstition here of the Romanists and Grecians is discovered that use censers and censing still in their Churches not as a civill thing for reverence and decencie but as a part of their religious service which seeing it is now abrogate with other shadowes the body being come Coloss. 2.17 I say with Gallasius Caret testimoniâ— verbi merum hominis commentum est It wanteth the testimony of the word and is a meere device of man 3. Controv. Of the superstitious use of washing the hands among the Romanists Vers. 21. SO they shall wash their hands c. The Romanists have the like use who when they addresse themselves to consecrate the host and to approach unto the Altar doe wash their fingers muttering these words of the Prophet David Psal. 26.6 I will wash mine hands in innocencie O Lord and compasse thine Altar The like fashion was retained among the Gentiles among whom it was counted an impious thing 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with unwashen hands to handle holy things But this outward ceremony did not make the idolatrous service of the Heathen acceptable so neither is the superstitious worship of the Romanists thereby justified who while they wash their hands coenam Christi profanant c. doe profane Christs supper and take away the fruitfull application and efficacie of his death by instituting a new sacrifice Gallas And as Pilate washed his hands yet delivered Christ over to be crucified so they wash their hands and yet doe crucifie Christ daily in the Masse in offering him up still in sacrifice 4. Controv. Against the superstitious Chrisme of the Romanists Vers. 29. ANd thou shalt make of it the oile of holy ointment c. This holy ointment was a type and figure of the spirituall ointment the graces and gifts of Gods spirit which should be
it was not for him also to shew his anger too but rather to expresse his love in pacifying the Lords wrath Non oportuit in Dei praesentiâ— indignari sed furorem Dei deprecari c. It was not for Moses in Gods presence to be angrie but by entreatie rather to pacifie his anger 2. Now then whereas there are duo impetus in ira two forcible motions in anger the one when we know any thing by heare-say which may worthily move us to anger the other when by our sense wee perceive it so was it here with Moses hee was inwardly moved when first the Lord declared unto him the sinne of the people But this motion he suppressed when he saw the Lord bent to destroy the people amor vicit iram love in him overcame his anger but afterward when first by hearing he perceived their singing and rejoycing and further by his eye beheld the Calfe which he had made then his anger was vehemently kindled Tostat. qu. 26. QUEST L. Whether Moses sinned in his anger Vers. 19. MOses wrath waxed hot 1. It may seeme at the first that Moses wrath was immoderate because in his haste he cast the tables of the Law out of his hand And this may be thought more probable because Moses long after this sinned in his hastinesse when he smote the rocke in anger Numb 20. and if this had beene a sudden passion in Moses it had not beene so much now being so vehement and fervent it should seeme to bewray some infirmitie But Moses cannot bee convinced by these reasons to have offended in this his anger 1. Though Moses sinned at the waters of strife it followeth not that he was overseene here for there the Scripture noteth Moses infirmitie but here no such thing in him is reproved 2. And anger though it be exceeding great if it be in Gods cause is commendable Sicut enim amor Dei non circumscribitur terminis c. For as the love of God is not limited nor hath any bounds so neither hath zeale in Gods cause Simlerus 2. This then was a just anger and an holy rage in Moses There are two kindes of anger one is inconsiderate rash seeking private revenge there is another which is for Gods cause when wee see his honour called in question and his glorie defaced this anger is pleasing unto God when wee are angrie with mens vices not with their persons which kinde of anger is discerned by this Si postquam quis se correxerit eum odio habeat c. If one hate a man still after he hath amended his fault it is a signe hee hated not his vice but his person But if he returne in love againe the fault being redressed it sheweth his anger was only for Gods cause such was Moses here who after hee had taken revenge of the people for their sinne continueth his prayer unto God for them Tostat. qu. 27. Such was the zeale of Phinehas in slaying the adulterer and adulteresse and of Helias against Baals Priests and of our blessed Saviour when he cast the money-changers out of the Temple Ferus So Calvin concludeth well that Moses anger Cum manaverit à Spiritu sancto which proceeded from the holy Spirit was a vertue praise-worthy though it must be confessed that the affections of the Saints are not so perfect but that they may sâ—vour a little of the leaven of our corrupt nature QUEST LI. Whether Moses offended in breaking the tables of the Law Vers. 19. HE cast the tables out of his hand 1. Some thinke that Moses being carried away with heat of anger did not well consider what hee did Et prae infiâ—mitate tabulaâ— e manu excidisse And that through infirmitie the tables fell out of his hand But the text sheweth that Moses cast them out of his hand and Deut. 9.17 he saith I tooke the two tables and cast them out of my two hands it was then a voluntarie and advised act 2. R. Salomon to excuse Moses saith that of a sudden the writing of the tables was wiped out and Moses seeing them to be then for no further use cast them out of his hand But this fable contradicteth the text which describeth the tables at the verie same time when Moses carried them to bee written on both sides which is expressed of purpose to shew what a precious monument the Israelites were deprived of 3. Some make it simply an act of Moses rage that Furore turbatus tabulas fregerit c. Being distempered with rage he brake the tables which oversight of Moses in their opinion may seeme to be proved by these reasons 1. Because the tables of the Law were a most holy monument of Gods Covenant with his people in so much that Moses would not commit them to Ioshuah but carried them in his owne hands so that Moses in breaking the monument of the Covenant might seeme to offend against God the author of the Covenant and of that writing 2. It may be thought also to have beene done rashly and hastily of Moses so that therein hee could not be blamelesse 3. Like as if a Princes letter should bee cancelled by his messenger that was sent with it so the Lord might be herein angrie with Moses for defacing this writing Contra. 1. The tables indeed were a most holy and worthy monument when Moses received them of God but now inuntiles factae sunt they became unprofitable the Covenant being broken by the people the signe of the Covenant was needlesse and of no necessarie use and therefore it was no offence to breake them 2. Neither did Moses it suddenly or rashly but with good advisement he cast the tables out of his hand judging the people unworthy of them and he did it not without the instinct of Gods Spirit 3. It is no wrong to the Prince to have his letters cancelled where hee meaneth they should serve to no use but his minde is they shall be reversed So Moses knew that God would not have the tables of the Covenant offered at this time to the people that had broken his Covenant 4. This fact then of Moses in breaking of the tables may bee thus justified 1. Id fit asslatu peculiari Divini Spiritus It was done by the peculiar motion of Gods Spirit Simler Iun. Though Hugo de S. Victor make some doubt of it Vtrum ex humano affectu vel divino instinctu hoc fecerit non patet It is not evident whether hee did it of an humane affection or a divine instinct But seeing God was not angrie with Moses for doing it but biddeth to prepare the like tables againe chap. 34. it is certaine that it was no humane motion in him to doe it 2. Moses in respect of himselfe brake them Recusans esse paedagogus inobedientis populi Refusing to be the schoolemaster of such a disobedient people 3. Moses thought the people unworthy of such a benefit In poenam populi indigni beneficio tabularum c.
Hee brake them to be a punishment of the people unworthy of such a benefit Cajetan 4. Beside the equitie thereof appeareth that as they had broken the Covenant on their part so it was fit the monument of Gods Covenant should be broken Tostat. qu. 29. And Moses shewed by this that they by their apostasie tabulas legis rupisse had broken the tables of the Law first Marbach So Chrysostome saith Moses thought it an absurd thing si populo ebrio c. legem afferet if hee should have brought the Law to a drunken and besotted people Theodoret to the same purpose Quia dotalium libeliorum typum tabulae gerebant c. Because the tables were as the libels or bils of dowrie and the spouse before the marriage was solemnized had committed adulterie jure optimo dotalem libellum fregâ—sse existimandus est hee may bee thought by good right to have cancelled the bill of dowrie 5. Testari etiam voluit c. And Moses would hereby testifie unto them how they deserved to be cast off and forsaken Pelarg. And God hereby for the time Per manum Mosis repudiavit populum Did by the hand of Moses cast off his people Calvin 6. And this was done ad majorem terrorem populi for the greater terrour of the people who was more moved with signes than with words as when Samuel declared unto the people their sinne he prayed and there came thunder and lightning that the people by those terrible signes might be the more moved 1 Sam. 12. So Ieremie to shew after a more lively manner the destruction of Jerusalem brake the earthen bottle before their face signifying that the Lord would breake them as a potters vessell Ier. 19.11 Ferus Gallas QUEST LII What the breaking of the tables signified 7. ANd by the breaking of the tables the Lord would have other things signified 1. Fractio tabularum signum fuit evacuationis legalium in adventu Christi The breaking of the tables was a signe of the evacuating of the legall ceremonies in the comming of Christ Lyran. The first Law delivered in mount Sinai continued not Lex nova ei successit the new Law of the new Testament succeeded in place thereof Tostat. qu. 29. 2. It was a signe Regnum Iudaeorum ad Gentes transiturum That the kingdome of the Jewes should be translated to the Gentiles Ferus That the Arke Tables Temple Altar should be dissolved and taken from the Jewes Simler 3. The breaking also of the tables signified that it was impossible for the Law to be kept Donec Christus per Spiritum sanctum c. Untill Christ should renue the same in our hearts by his holy Spirit Marbach Osiander 4. Augustine further maketh this signification of it that as the tables which God made were broken and yet those which Moses prepared did continue So God created man with reason and understanding and freedome of will Sed eas homo confregit cùm Diabolo acquievit se illa gratia indignum reddidit But man brake those tables when he gave place to the Devill and made himselfe unworthy of that grace But now the second tables must be made that is enitatur elaborare ad virtutes man must endevour to labour for vertue c. Ex Gloss. ordinar Seeing man lost the graces of his creation which were given him without his labour he must by his endevour and labour Gods Spirit so working in him seeke for the renovation of grace by faith in Christ. QUEST LIII In what part the tables were broken and what became of the fragments COncerning other circumstances observed in this action of the breaking of the tables 1. That is a ridiculous and unsavourie fable of the Hebrewes that Moses tooke the fragments of those broken tables which they say were made of a precious stone and sold them and became verie rich thereby for this were to lay a grievous imputation of covetousnesse upon Moses which he was not in the least manner touched with 2. Some thinke that Moses tooke those fragments and put them in a chest which was used to be carried before the host Numb 10.35 But the Arke there spoken of was the Arke of the Covenant ibid. vers 33. 3. That also is a light conjecture that the tables were broken about the place where the fourth Commandement concerning the Sabbath was written because that precept onely of the ten was ceremoniall and not to continue for both the tables were broken and not onely the first wherein that Commandement was written QUEST LIV. Why the tables were broken at the bottome of the mount Vers. 19. HE brake them in peeces beneath the mountaine Why the tables were broken in this place at the foot of the mountaine these reasons may be given 1. Because Moses was now come to the bottome of the mountaine before he saw the golden Calfe through the indignation of the fight whereof being moved in zeale he forthwith brake the tables 2. Also the people when they came forth to meet the Lord and to heare his voice were suffered to come so farre to the foot and bottome of the hill chap. 19.17 in the same place therefore where the Law was given unto the people it was convenient that the tables of that Law should bee broken which they had first transgressed and broken themselves Tostat. qu. 30. 3. Beside it may have this mysticall signification that as the Law was given in the mount and broken at the bottome of the mount so if we will know the Law oportet nos altius ascendere we must ascend higher into the mount and mortifie the old man Simlerus QUEST LV. Whether the Calfe were burned to powder in the fire Vers. 20. HE tooke the calfe and burned it in the fire and ground it to powder c. 1. This golden Calfe was more than melted in the fire Deformavit liquefaciens igne He deformed the fashion thereof melting it in the fire As Iunius for if it had beene only melted it would have run into a lump and so have been the more unfit to fall to powder 2. Tostatus thinketh that Moses might apply certaine herbs unto the gold which if they be used in the melting of gold in cineres redigetur it will fall to ashes quest 30. But such conjectures having no ground out of the text are better rejected than received whence should Moses have such herbs here in the barren desart and to what purpose should they bee used seeing the gold not by burning but by stamping and beating was brought to powder 3. Some thinke that by the verie burning it selfe the gold was made powder as Sa. upon this place saith that he saw at Millaine gold in a founders shop burned in the fire to powder So also thinketh Osiander But it is evidently gathered out of the text that beside the burning the gold was beaten to powder yea it was stamped and ground small as dust Deut. 9.22 4. Wherefore it was first cast into the fire not
onely to be melted and the fashion thereof to be defaced but it was burned that is so long kept in the fire that by the burning it was made brittle as wood when it is burned to a coale and so being taken out it was pounded and beaten So also Tostatus adding somewhat to his former opinion QUEST LVI Why the powder of the golden Calfe is cast into the river Vers. 20. HE strowed it in the water 1. Cajetan thinketh that as everie one tooke of the water of the river and did drinke modicum pulveris spargebatur super aquam a little of the dust or powder was strowed upon the water for if it had beene any while in the water it would have sunke downe to the bottome and so the people should not have drunke of it But this had beene too great a labour for Moses as everie one drunke to have sprinkled a little of the gold powder in the place where hee tooke up the water to drinke And Moses saith Deut. 9.21 that hee cast the dust into the river it is like it was all at once throwne into the river and the people being afraid to doe otherwise than Moses commanded were ready as the powder was cast into the water to take thereof and drinke 2. Augustine findeth out here a mysterie by water understanding Baptisme which signified the conversion of the idolatrous Gentiles unto the faith of Christ Ille vitulus per ignem zâ—li aciem verbi aquam Baptismi ab eis quos absorbere conatus est absorptus est The golden Calfe that is the idols of the Gentiles by the fire of zeale the edge of the word and water of Baptisme is devoured which sought to have devoured them c. But this seemeth too curious 3. The historicall meaning is this rather the dust is cast into the water which they had received not long before out of the rocke in that drie and barren place Pelarg. Iunius Thereby to upbraid their unthankfulnesse which in the same place where they had received so great a benefit forgate God and fell away from him QUEST LVII How the Israelites were brought to drinke of this water and why Vers. 20. ANd caused the children of Israel to drinke of it c. 1. This was done for some speciall signification though it bee not expressed For it is not to bee thought that so holy a man as Moses being directed by Gods Spirit would cause all this to bee done the golden image to bee burned and beaten to powder and cast into the water and the people to drinke thereof and all in vaine Tostat. qu. 31. 2. And the people though they knew that this was no good signe unto them to drinke water mingled with such ashes and beside it was a bitter and unpleasant water yet durst not gaine-say Moses as neither before did they resist him when he so used their new molten god for both they were stricken with a conscience of sinne and inward terror and God had set in Moses an evident Majestie and authoritie which made them all to feare and tremble before him as it appeareth afterward when a few of the Levites armed themselves against all the host which consisted of six hundred thousand fighting men and killed whom they met none daring to resist them 3. Such like authoritie and Majestie appeared in our blessed Saviour when he whipped the money-changers and merchants out of the Temple and none durst oppose themselves against him Tostat. qu. 31. QUEST LVIII Wherefore the people were compelled to drinke the powder of the idoll NOw these reasons are given why Moses compelled them to drinke of this bitter water 1. Ambrose saith it was done Vt omnia impietatis aboleret vestigia To abolish all the reliques of impietie c. So also Gregorie Nâ—ssen Materia quae eorum peccato subministravit deleta est The verie matter which ministred occasion to their sin was taken away 2. By this meanes a kinde of judgement was shewed upon the verie instrument of their sinne for otherwise it had beene sufficient if hee had done as Iacob did Genes 35.4 to have defaced it and hid or buried it in the ground therefore this was done ut in eo sceleris pateret judicium in quo scelus patratum fuerit that there might be shewed a signe of their sin in that wherein it was committed Tostat. quaest 30. 3. This was done to shew the basenesse and vilenesse of that idoll Vt contemnere discat quod in secessum projici videat To contemne that which they saw cast out in the draught Hierom. So also Borrh. That they should thinke no better of such idols than of their dung and excrements simulque testatur idoli impotentiam and withall it shewed the impotence and weaknesse of that idoll which they saw consumed to dust 4. Hereby was also signified Quòd corpora animos inquinaverant That they had defiled their bodies and soules with this sinne that by drinking of the ashes of the idoll they might understand non cuti tantum adharere that this sin did not cleave only to their skin sed defixum in visceribus but that it was fastened to their verie bowels Calvin So also Procopius to shew Animos ipsorum infectos idololatria that their verie soules were infected with idolatrie 5. Voluit ut pulveribus idoli sui saetiarentur He would have them glutted and satiate with the dust of their idoll as when they lusted for flesh they had such plentie that it came out at their Nostrils Numb 11. So here as with greedinesse they desired an idoll to be made Moses will have their greedie desire satisfied and filled even with drinking it Oleaster 6. And by this was signified Maledictionem à se exhaâ—riendam potandam That they should drinke and draw out their owne malediction and sup up the verie dregs if the Lord were not more mercifull unto them Iun. That as this bitter water was heavie to the stomacke so their sinne was like to sticke by them And this shewed calicem hibere perpetuae infoelicâ—â—atis that they should drinke the cup of perpetuall miserie as when they cried unto Pilate wishing Christs bloud to bee upon them and their seed Lippom. Pellican And so Moses Gerundens one of their owne Rabbines confesseth Non accidit tibi O Israel ultio aliqua in qua non sit vel uncia de iniquitateâ— vituli There hath not happened unto thee O Israel any revenge where there is not an ounce or some part of the iniquitie and sinne of the Calfe 7. Augustine maketh this mysticall signification of it that as the Israelites did drinke and receive into their bodies the golden Calfe so the Gentiles qui erant corpus diaboli credendo transirent in corpus Christi which before were as the body of the Devill while they were idolaters should by beleeving bee graft into the body of Christ c. Like as Moses serpent devoured the Magicians serpents sic diabolus
â—â—mplicitie In the first sense simple theft may be punished by death not in the â—â—cond Neither in that place pag. 5. is any exception take to the lawes of the Realme as too rigorous against simple theft but it is mainâ—â—ined that the lawes of the land intend not the punishment of death for such imple theft as is more at large shewed pag. 412. quest 3. chap. 22. but alloweth â—he favour of the booke Onely a request is made to Reverend Iudges that â—o great exactnesse bee not required in reading of such simple Clearks Bâ— it will be objected that such as steale for necessity being once acquitted anâ— burnt in the hand if they be deprehended in the like againe do die for it aâ—d therefore the law of the land punisheth simple theft with death The answeâ— is thaâ— now it is not simple theft being joyned with obstinacie and custome 〈◊〉 sinne Againe it will be objected that women â—tealing for necessitie being not admitted to the privilege of their booke though they steale onely for necessitie doe suffer death for such theft It may be â—nswered that in women such kinde of theft argueth great boldnesse and impuâ—encie to whom their naturall shamefastnesse and impotencie ought to be a brâ—lle more â—â—an unto men and therefore in them it is a greater fault and yet if â—he like favour were extended to them as to men in the like cases no great inconvenience neeâ— to be feared Thus much in this place I thought good to advertise the Reader oâ— lest there might be any mistaking This laborious and painfull worke was finisheâ— by the Lords gracâ—ous assistance the fifth of Iune Anno Domini 1608. aetatis Authoris 46. Pâ—â—ysed be God our â—eavenly Father with the holy Spirit through Christ Iesus our most blessed Lord and Saviour forever Amen FINIS Deut. 4. v. 18. Synopsis papismi ad Regiam Majestatem and the Antilogie or counterplea Ecclesia triumphans ad sereniss Reginam Antithesis doctrinae Evangelicae Pontificiae ad Henricum Principem Epist 3. nescio quomodo quotiescun que legitur quasi nunc fiar ita afficit mentes audientium serm 77. Cor. 4.16 Noah signifieth rest Abram an high father Isaack laughter Iacob â—a supplanter Ioseph added Hosh. 10.3.8 Ezech. 28 1â— 2 Sam. 19.25 1 Sam. 19.31 〈◊〉 43. Cum haberet supra omnes potestatem quasi parens expostulare malebat quam quasi judex punire vincere volebat non plectere aequitatis judex non poenae arbiter maluit sibi homines religione quam timore astringere de obit Theodos. Prefat ad 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 21. 2 Sam. 20.25 Phil. 1.18 Act. 15.39 Theodoret. lib. 5.6.7 Ambr. in obit Valentinian 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 99. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p 34. Ierem. 38.9 Theodor. l. 4. cap 32. Pro â—e praesente senatus hominumqâ—â— praeterea viginti â—ilia vestem mutâ—verunt orat post redit 1 Sam. 2 3â— 2 King 2◠◠〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 43 Ego tibi mercedem dabo si me tanto labore liberaveris Socrat. lib 6. cap. 20. quâ—mad modum parentes a filiis vel pueris vel aegrotis multa patiuntur donec pueritia vel aegritudo transeat de serm in monte 34. Psal. 45 4. Socrat. lib. 7.23 Matth. 25 2â— 2. Peter â— 13.â—â— quis mihi jure succenseat si quantum caeteris ad res suas obeundas quantum ad festos dies Iudorum celebrandos quantum ad alias voluptates conceditur temporis quantum alij tribuunt in tempestivis conviviis quantum denique aleae quantum pilae tantum egomet mihi ad haec studia recolenda sumpsero Tull. orat pro Archi. poeta 1. Cor. 4. â—â— 2 Cor. 10. â—â— Eph. 6.19 Psal. 12â— Hieronym Sophronio Hieron ad Rustiâ— Epist. 7. Augustin ibid Tit. 1.8 Epist. 57. In Cantic â—3 ser. Philip. 3.15 Philip. 1.18 Mar. 9.40 Rom. 14.17 18. Epist. 15. Tom. 9. de utiliâ—ate jeâ—unii Cyril ad Geâ—â—adium Cyprian lib. 3. Epist. 2. Hom. 43. ad cap. Matth. 23. 1 Cor. 4. Epist. 11â— Lib. 83. quest Quest. 71. Hâ—â—ron Pammach S.c. S.c. S.c. T.r. T.r. S.c. G.r. S. ad S.H. Whether were firsâ— created thâ— heaven or the earth How God called the light day Whether the firmament be the starry heaven Mountaines before the flood The earth not dryed by the winde The opposite part of the earth not drowned The water and earth make buâ— one Globe The earth deeper than the water The measure of the compasse of the earth Pererius Whither the waters were conveâ—ed that covered the earth Terra humilia potuit defâ—â—derâ—â— How the sea is kept in that it overfloweth not the earth Whether the red sea be higher than Egypt The earth higher than the sea Whether the whole sea be a continued water Why the approbatioÌ„ God saw it was good is omitted the second day Hebrewes curious observations Dionâ—â— Halicaâ— Rom. Antiq. li. â— What Moneth the first in the yeare Lib. 1. Hexem c. 4. First moneth in the yeare Exod. 12.2 Epist de celebr Paschal Hebrewes 〈◊〉 Why the Moone is called a great light The distaÌ„ce of the Sunne and Moone from the earth Ambrose reasons of the greatnes of the Sunne and Moone The lawfull vse of the celestiall bodies The vanity of judiciall Astrology Astrologicall predictions false and vncertaine Oracles of Apollo deceitfull How men may prognosticate of the weather The blasphemous assertions of some Astrologers How it commeth to passe that astrological predictions sometimes come to passe Hebrewes â—ables Ex Peretio Monstrous births of women begotten of beasts God appeared in no humane shape when he made man Divers opinions of the image of God in man Augustines divers conceits hereof The image of God consisteth not in the natural substance of the faculties oâ— the soule but in the gifts of grace Adam lost the image of God by his fall Origen unjustly condemned by Epiphanius How man exerciseth his dominion over creatures If man had not sinned no beasts should have been killed for food Beasts should not have beene killed for knowledge or pleasure before mans fall Their reasons answered that thinke no flesh to have beene eaten before the floud What food the cattell lived of in the Arke Divers reasons proving the use of beasts for food before the floud See more of this matter C. 9. q. â— To whom God said let us make man The lying computation of yeeres of the Egyptians The Papists confuted that â—estâ—aine marriage 1. The great wisdome of God in the creation 2. The great bounty of God 3. Gods image must be repaired 4. Mans obedience toward his Creator 5. God illuminateth the soule 6. To delight in good things S.H. S. c. S. c. differ vet S. H. ad S. H. s. b. div accep Ch.c. h.c. appâ—spr s.c. h.s.c. s. c. S.h.c. S.h.c. s. ad h. c. differ veâ— diff veâ— h. C.c. app pro. prop. S. plur 〈◊〉 singul s.c. S.h. sense Of the Fâ—unes and Satyres Pereriâ—s deceived Hebrewes curious obseruations The