Selected quad for the lemma: spirit_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
spirit_n	heart_n	new_a	stony_a	5,787	5	13.2107	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A85957	The fort-royal of Christianity defended. Or, a demonstration of the divinity of scripture, by way of excellency called the Bible. With a discussion of some of the great controversies in religion, about universal redemption, free-will, original sin, &c. For the establishing of Christians in truth in these atheistical trying times. / By Thomas Gery, B.D. and Rector of Barwell in Leicestershire.	Gery, Thomas, d. 1670?	1657 (1657)	Wing G618; Thomason E1702_1; ESTC R209377	93,977	264

the will of the flesh nor of the will of man but of God In which words the Spirit of God expressing a perfect distribution of all the powers and forces that are or can be in man excludes them all from this work and ascribes it to the alone will of God for it neither proceedeth from the bloud of man that is from any prerogative of natural propagation or generation which was wont to be the Pharisees vain brag and oftentation We are Abraham's peed for a which they were sharply reproved by John Baptist Matth. 3.9 Nor doth it proceed from the will of the flesh that is from the natural strength of mans corrupt will nor yet from the will of man that is of such a man whose corrupt will is corrected bettered and amended either by the help of the common grace of God or by the acquisition of humane learning or by his own wise observation and experience for this force the Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 carrieth with it which is here used and so in like manner doth the Latine word uir by which it 's also translated in the Latine from none of these forces in man doth this worke proceed and these are all the forces in man's will but they are all excluded and God alone is made the Author and Procreant cause thereof A second testimony that I shall produce for proof of this Truth is in Ephes 2.8 9 10 verses where the Apostle speaks thus to the Ephesians By grace ye are sa●ed through faith and that not of your selves it is the gift of God not of works lest any man should boast For we are his workmanship created in Christ Jesus unto good works which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them In which words the Apostle strives to annihilate our selves about this work and to take away all pretences of our cooperation with God therein For first He saith It 's not of our selves and then he saith It 's not of works lest any man should boast but there were matter of boasting if our selves were co-workers with God herein And then he addeth to remove all scruple about it that we are his workmanship created in Christ Jesus unto good works Where note that he doth not say his workmanship renewed or repaired though that be true too but his workmanship created The Apostle as it may seem did pick out this word on purpose which he again also useth speaking of this work in the 4 Chapter following and 24. v. his words are Put on the new man which after God is created in righteousnesse and true holiness that he might altogether exclude all cooperation herein with God on our part for to create is the proper act of God and no creature can have any hand therein There be many other pregnant and punctual proofs of Scripture for this point As Ezek. 36.26 A new heart will I give you and a new spirit will I put within you and I will take away the stony heart out of your flesh and I will give you a heart of flesh If God make all new and take away all the old then is there none of the old left to help to make it self new Philip. 2.13 It 's God that worketh in you both to will and to do of his good pleasure Therefore the Will works not till God first work upon it 2 Cor. 3.5 We are not sufficient of our selves to think any thing as of our selves but our sufficiency is of God If we be not sufficient of our selves to think that which is good then not to will it for Voluntas sequitur intellectum the Will follows the Thought Jam. 1.18 Of his good will begat he us by the word of truth If of his own will then not by help of our will But to avoid prolixity and tediousnesse which I ever disliked I will rest satisfied with the quotation of those few proofs of Scripture which I have already cited pretermitting a number more of like sort as hoping they may satisfie the unprejudiced Reader because they are so clear and convincing I have not yet done with this Controversie but have something more to say about it And that is to invalidate the main Argument or objection which is brought by them of the Adversarie part against this truth for I read of no other of any force which is this It 's said by them That men are called upon in Scripture to turn to God very often which if they have not power of themselves to do the commandment is unjust and needless for Nemo tenetur ad impossibile To this I return a five-fold solution or answer First That though we have no power so to do now as we are fallen in Adam yet did God give us so much grace in our first creation as would have impowred us hereunto if we our selves had not lost it And therefore is it no severity or injustice for God to require that at our hands which he once gave us power to do though now we cannot do it because we our selves have made our selves unable to do it and not God And here I desire the Reader to take notice how unfit a comparison one of our Adversaries in this point hath used though cryed up for a man of learning who chargeth God with as great severity bidding us to turn unto him if we have not of our selves now freedome of will so to do as for a man to cut off another man's legs and then bid him run But by his leave for all his great learning the case is not alike but varies and fails in the main point of all which is this In that God gave man legs to run the ways of his commandments before he bad him run which he hath cut off himself God gave man power to do all that he requires at his hand and man hath bereaved himself thereof And therefore it 's neither injustice nor severity in God to require of man what he once gave him power to do though now he be unable because he hath disabled himself If God had made man unable the comparison might have held but seeing man made himself unable the comparison halteth Secondly I answer that God's commandments do not alway import what we can do but what we should they do not always argue our ability but our duty As for example to instance but in one particular of many We are commanded to love the Lord our God with all the heart and with all the soul and our neighbours as our selves This we cannot do in that fulsse that the Law requires yet it is not severity in God to require it of us because he once impowred us unto it namely in our first creation And the case is the same about our conversion Thirdly I answer that God requires it though we cannot of our selves do it that we may be put in mind to crave his aid who only is able to make us to do it This reason is given by S.

3. 2 By miracles in the Church page 18. 3 By the death of the Martyrs of the Church page 24. 4 By the wonderful preservation of it against all adverse power that did rise up to abolish it page 27. 2 From within it self which are 8. 1 By the majesty of it page 30. 2 By the purity of it page 33. 3 By the profundity of it p. 37. 4 By the harmony of it p. 46. 5 By the prophesie of it p. 48. 6 By the repugnancy of it with man's nature page 56. 7 By the impartiality of the Pen-men of it page 58. 8 By the power of it which is manifested by four effects p. 60. 1 By revealing thoughts p. 60. 2 By terrifying consciences p. 62. 3 By converting souls p. 63 4 By comforting souls and consciences in deepest misery p. 65 2 Part The application consists of 2 parts 1 of consequents deducted for information which are two p. 76 1 That therfore no man may dare to dispence with any of the precepts of Scripture because it 's God's Word page 76. 2 Therefore it s of supreme authority to the present Church-militant p. 78 2 of practicall inferences which are applied to 3 sorts of persons p. 82 1 To all in place of Magistracy to enduce them to defend Scripture p. 82 2 To all in the office of the ministery to induce them to dispense it p. 88 3 To all of all sorts to enduce them to these four duties 1 To learn it p. 94 2 To believe it p. 105 3 To embrace that religion which holds best correspondence with it 110 4 To obey it p 131 THE FORT ROYALL OF CHRISTIANITY DEFENDED IT s a confessed maxim a known and received truth in Theology that the seeds of all sins are transmitted and propagated into the nature of every son and child of Adam who descends from him by the common way of generation amongst which the seeds of Atheism are not the least predominant whence it comes to passe that the heart of man is oft sollicited to doubt whether the books of Scripture be the very Oracles of God or a humane invention to keep in awe such protervious refractory and unruly spirits as without these would no more be awed by the laws of man then Job's Leviathan by the hook and line To affront and discountenance this suggestion and silence these whisperings of incredulity about this particular that all doubting spirits may gain plenary satisfaction in it that will not wilfully shut the eye of their own reason nor damp the light of their own understanding against the Sun-shine of this heavenly truth I have selected or collected partly out of the writings of Orthodox Divines but principally out of Scripture it self these ensuing arguments Some whereof are not only most probable but to a clear apprehension demonstrative and so undeniable reasons to prove the Bible to be Gods own book And the structure of this discourse is framed and fashioned like to Jacob's ladder to lift up the imagination of man from-Earth to Heaven and to this end I have placed in it twelve arguments as so many rounds or stairs whereby the minds of rational men may be raised up by each step and gradation to a clearer speculation and view of that celestial splendour which is diffused throughout the whole region of Scripture till at the length namely by such time as they have ascended to the top of this scale they may be able to discry and discern here in open view such radiant beams of divine light as will readily dispell and drive away all foggy mists of ambiguity and hesitation that ecclipsed and shadowed this light formerly from their sight These twelve staves of this scale or twelve arguments are digested into this order The four lowest which are first s●t down are drawn from without the Scripture and the eight highest from within it Those from without the Scripture are of two sorts either from without the Church or from within it First Argu ∣ ment 1 From without the Church I find but one and that is an argument inartificial as Logitians call it but very energetical and valid which is the suffrage and testimony that many of the Heathen who were out of the visible Church have afforded of the divinity of our Scriptures and that both of the Old and New Testament And first for the divinity of the Old Testament I find a notable testification thereof out of Josephus his History of the Antiquities of the Jews and that from divers of the Heathen with which therefore I shall content my self and I hope the Reader also This Author saith (a) Joseph Antiq said lib. 12. cap. 2. in fine cap. That after the translation of the Books of Moses Law into the Greek Tongue by the seventy two Elders of the Jews was finished by the means and at the cost and charges of Ptolomy Philadelph King of Egypt the said King was highly contented therewith and took pleasure in reading the said Law admiring at the deep conceit and wisedom of the Law-maker And thereupon began to question with one Demetrius the Master of his Library and the chief instrument by him used to obtain of the Jews this translation of their Law what might be the reason that neither Poet nor Historiographer had made any mention thereof considering that in it self it was so admirable To whom Demetrius returned this answer That no man was so hardy to touch that work by reason that it was divine and every way venerable assuring him also that certain men who had attempted to set their hands thereto had been punished by God And thereupon acquainted him how one Theopompus an Historian intending to reduce certain contents of that Law into his History had been distracted in mind for more then thirty days and that having some intermission of his fit he appeased God by prayer as having perceived this attempt to be the cause of his malady and thereupon desisted from his foresaid intention He likewise certified him further That one Theodectes a Tragick Poet intending to make mention in some of his Poems of a certain History written in the sacred Scriptures was stricken blind acknowledging the cause thereof to proceed from his audacious presumption in that intent was restored to his sight after that he had appeased Gods displeasure meaning by his repentance and desistence from his said purpose He alledgeth there also to the King in the former part of the forementioned Chapter a saying out of Haecateus Abderita who was a Philosopher brought up with great King Alexander and writ a Book of the Jewish Nation who affirmed these Scriptures to be pure and not to be uttered by impure lips Hence we have clear testimony that the Scriptures of the Old Testament were at this time had in great reverence by the very Heathen as sacred and divine as there also Demetrius is said to have told the King several times Secondly For the Divinity of the Gospel it may be

Augustine in these words Jubet Deus quae non possumus ut noverimus quae ab illo petere debemus God commands us what we cannot do to intimate unto us what we ought to crave of him namely what we cannot do of our selves And hence are those many prayers of several sorts of persons in the Scripture as Psalm 51.10 Create in me a clean heart O Lord and renew a right spirit within me And Jer. 31.18 Convert thou me and I shall be converted And Lament 5.21 Turn thou us unto thee O Lord and we shall be turned Fourthly I answer that God commands us this though we cannot do it of our selves that we may be excited to use such means as are by God's ordinance and appointment conducible and available thereunto and which we have of our selves power to use which are Prayer the Word and the Sacraments for his calling to us to repent and return unto him is a provocation or calling to us to use such means as he hath appointed to produce the same in us Fifthly and lastly I answer That such commands aim not only at our first conversion but at our secondary and subsequent returns to God when after our first conversion we prevaricate and digress from him in which secondary return mans will cooperates with the grace of God as formerly hath beeen said And therefore God's invitation of men to these returns wherein their wills have some ability to cooperate with his grace is not vain or needlesse but very efficacious to allure and induce them thereunto Not to tire the Reader with any further dispute about this controversie I will close it up with the addition of these two reasons to the former Arguments to induce all persons to adhere to this opinion as the safest which I have here asserted First because this opinion makes a clearer reconciliation of those Texts of Scripture which hold forth a seeming contradiction about this point then the other doth for according to the other opinon they are not reconciled without some scruple Secondly because this opinion ascribes most glory to God to whom all glory belongs wherein there is no danger though men detract from themselves For to detract from nature and give to grace is no danger but to detract from grace and give to nature cannot but be dangerous This was the saying of Peter Lumbard and is of all acknowledged and owned for truth The fourth Controversie About the merit of good works THe Papists opinion about this and Mr. Haggar's in affirming good works to be causes of salvation which both they do and he also in the 9. page of his forenamed discourse hath so little appearance of truth that it deserves to be exploded rather then refuted And I have good ground for what I affirm First Because it 's so apparently repugnant to Scripture as to Ephes 2.8.9 where it 's said By grace ye are saved through faith and that not of your selves it is the gift of God not of works lest any should boast And Tit. 3.5 Not by the works of righteousnesse which we have done but according to his mercy he saved us And whereas to salve up the discord between Paul's affirmation and theirs they make a distinction of good works of which some say they go before justification and some follow after it and St. Paul they say speaks of those that go before but they speak of such as follow after and therefore they do not contradict him I have formerly declared namely in my 4th Argument about the first Controversie in page the 20. that the Apostle speaks of the same good works which they speak of namely of good works after justification and regeneration And therefore they are herein contradictors of holy Scripture Another ground for what I affirmed before is this Because I never had conference with any Papist yet and I have conferred with many in my time but they all disclaimed the merit of their own works when upon occasion of discourse I have charged them with this grosse Tenet I have yet a third ground for what I said and that is because I find Bellarmine their Arch champion after his affirmation of the merit of good works and that they are true causes of salvation and that some confidence may be placed in them in his book of Controversies namely Libr. 5. cap. 7. de Justificat to give men counsel within ten lines after to put no confidence in their merits but in the alone mercy and benignity of God as the safest way So that there is no great necessity to confute this opinion of the merit of works seeing themselves do distrust it and after a sort desert it But yet some short confutation of this palpable error I will deliver which I hope shall sufficiently convince it And the first Argument I frame thus Argument 1. IF eternal life or salvation be Gods gfit then it is not merited by man's good works so the Apostle argues Rom. 11.6 If it be of grace it is no more of works But eternal life is God's gift so saith our Saviour Luke 12.32 Fear not little flock for it is your Father's pleasure to give you a Kingdom where note that it 's said to be a gift and from no other motive but from his own good pleasure And John 10.27 My sheep hear my voice and I know them they follow me and I give unto them eternal life And saith S. Paul Rom. 6.23 The gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord. Therefore eternal life is not merited by man's good works Argument 2. IF all the good works which possibly we can do be due debt to Almighty God then can they not merit Heaven at his hand for merit and debt cannot stand together a man cannot be said to merit by paying that which he oweth But they are due debts so our Saviour teacheth Luke 17. ●0 When ye shall have done all those things which are commanded you say We are unprofitable servants we have done that which was our duty to do Therefore they cannot merit Argument 3. IF our good works be not properly our own but proceed from the grace of God which worketh them in us and by us then can they not be said to merit from God though they may merit from others because we return no more to God then what we have received from him we give him but a cluster of grapes out of his own Vineyard and water out of his own Fountain If any man discern not the necessity of this consequent it 's for want of perspicacity in his own understanding and not for want of truth in the consequence And Bellarmine doth acknowledge it in Libr. 5. cap. 15. De Grat. Lib. Arb. Good works are not properly our own but proceed from the grace of God which worketh the same in us and by us so it 's said Isa 26.12 Lord thou wilt ordain peace for us for thou also hast wrought all our works in us