must appere Sic luceat lux vestra Let your light so shine before men that they may se your good workes And therfore works of S. Iames are called Fructus iustitiae the frutes of rightousnesse fructus spiritus the frutes of the spirite The frutes of the tree are not the cause of the trees iuyce sap but the iuyce and sap is the cause of the trees frutes The frutes are not the cause that the tree lyueth but the sappe and iuyce is cause of the trees lyfe The tree hath not fruite before it hath sappe and iuyce nor yet hath fruite in receyuing sappe and iuyce But after it hath receyued sappe and iuyce then in due tyme it bryngeth foorthe his fruite And very wel herein dothe the scripture in diuers places liken a iustified manne to a good and fruitefull tree for fyrste sayth Christ the tree muste be made good it muste bee planted sayeth Dauid by the water syde to take his iuyce Wee muste sayeth Saint Paul be grafted in Christ and his woorde sayeth Saincte Iames be ingrafted in vs Wee muste bee braunches of the true Uine we muste haue his sappe and iuyce in vs fyrste and thys is our fayth in hym and oure lyfe in vs or euer we can bring forth our frute Nowe being thus replenished with the moste sweete iuyce of faith it is not more vnpossible for a tree to be frute lesse thā it is for a faithful mā to be without good workes We do not say therfore faith is without good workes for good works immediatly folow faith and waite vppon her as their maistresse at an inche and be always attendant on the bidding and becke of faith to do whatsoeuer she comaundeth them but the maistresse is one and the mayden is an other only we denie that the handmaiden intermedleth in this high matter of Iustification whiche is alone betwene God and vs faith she onely on oure parte maketh vp the spousall betwixte Christe and vs Desponsabo te mihi fide I wil sayth Christ espouse thee to me by faith faith shal ioyne our hands togither A saucie Iill were that handmayden that woulde intrude her selfe in to her mistresses priuiledge This then belongeth to faith alone to receiue this benefit at gods handes and to nothing but onely faithe for she alone can fully doo it Why then sayth the Papist what should let but that the diuell may be saued and that the diuell may doo good also and so be no more the diuel that was a lier and murderer from the beginnyng For the diuels haue faith Daemones credunt sayth S. Iames the diuels beleue The diuell in dede was a lier from the beginning and a murtherer Et qui facit peccatum ex diabolo est He y wilfully maliciously cōmitteth maynteineth these sinnes is euen a limme of the diuell But how the Papists legende or rather legion of lies will euicte them to be willfull mainteyne◅s of lies let them looke to it as for their murders al the world doth ring of them and openly crie with Christ Vos estis ex patre vestro diabolo ye are euen of your father the deuell And as this is an argument against the deuell that he hath not faith Euen so is it an argument against them that they haue no faith neither And where in the diuels defence they replie that the deuill beleueth this argueth not that he hath the true and right belefe No say they Did not he crie out to Christ that he was the holy one and son of the liuing God Here was belefe profession of it the thing that they professed to beleue is true What wil they gather hereon that saying of the Apostle If we confesse with our mouth the lord Iesus Christ and beleue in our hart that God raised him from death we shall be safe Do they thinke the diuell beleueth on this fashion They shew themselues earnest proctors for the deuell but the deuell hath no true faith for all that he so sayde nor they his proctoures neither thoughe they confesse Christ and thinke him to be the sonne of God euen as mutche as did the deuel althoughe their works shew the contrarye that they thinke him not so mutche to be Christe as the deuels dyd thinke him for to be For if they did they woulde at least haue that the dyuels haue with all a feare and trembling at him they wold feare so shamfully to abuse him as they doe For saynt Iames ioyneth these two things together in the diuels Daemones credunt contremis◅unt The diuels beleue and tremble Which later word of horror and feare hauing hatred ioyned withall Quem metuūt oderūt whom they feare they hate him this the Papists leaue out As the diuell alleaging scripture to Christ left out the best parte of it and hacked and hewed the sentence as the Papists mangled the word of God in piece meale and dare not set it out whole as God hath set it out This therefore shewethe they haue no more faith thā the diuel hath Yea they know not what faith doth meane For as already is sayde beleefe is not only a knowledge nor an acknowledging of Christ wherby we verely thinke him to be the sonne of God and sauior of the world and approue this our thought with assent thervnto alowing it so to be But also it is a stedfast confidence and trust in him apprehēding him and applying him to vs And this thing which is the principall thing in belefe the diuels haue not nor can not haue They haue the first part of knowledge and a shew they made here of the seconde that is acknowledging But the third and especiall thing in belefe a trusty confidēce in him they had not Which if they had had they wold haue fled vnto hym haue caught holde on hym but they feared and hated him and therefore with trembing fled from him Now this third thing in faith whiche is principally to be reckened vppon the Papist considereth not And this is the cause whie hee so staggereth in a continuall doubte whether he shall be saued with Christe or he shall bee damned with the diuell and feling thys continuall trembling in himselfe for who wolde not tremble standing in this perplexitie And hearing that the diuels tremble also in their belefe he concludeth that belefe is no more but a fyrme opinion of a thing so to be and at the most a trembling assent therunto And therfore saithe the Papist the diuell hathe faithe But seing withall the diuells apparant condemnation that he is not nor can be iustified he concludethe hereon that only faithe iustifieth not for if it dyd the diuel were iustified Then reasoneth he if faith be not able to iustifie we must seeke helpe of good woorkes to iustifie vs whiche good workes the diuell hathe not Now seeking to be iustified by works he is entred into sutche a laborsom mase and infinite
vocatione sua sancta non ex operibus nostâ—…is sed iuxta pro positum suum God called vs wyth his holy callyng not by reason of our workes but according to his purpose Neyther are wee iustified by the the woorkes euen of Gods law In lâ—…ge nemo iustificatur apud Deum neyther saued hee vs sayeth S. Paule for the workes of our righteousnesse If then we are neyther saued nor iustified nor cal led for our workes shall wee thinke we be chosen for our workes when Gods choyce is before hys calling his calling before our iustifying our iustifying before wee obteyne saluation Naye if our workes be not the cause of our sauing nor of our iustifying nor yet of our calling much lesse be they the cause of oure election whiche was before the foundations of the world were cast I grant that God foresaw we should do good works howbeit our good woorkes were not the cause of his election but his election was the cause of our good workes Elegit nos in ipso ante mundi constitutionem vt essem us sancti immaculati in coÌ„spectu eius per charitatem He chose vs in him before the making of the worlde that we should be holy and vnreprouable in his syght through loue Then were not good works to come the cause of Gods choise made before but God that by his election did ordein them to glory ordeined them also to do good workes after And so good workes are not in the cause wherfore but in the purpose whereto the elect of God are chosen Conditi sumus ad bona opera Wee are made of God to doo good workes Good workes are the fructes of the sprite of God after he hath iustifyed vs Quomodo enim potest iuste viueâ—…e saith S. Augustine qui non fueâ—…it instificatus How can he liue iustly that before hand shall not be iustified 〈◊〉 bâ—…na opera iustificatum non praecâ—…dunt iustificandum They folowe hym that is iustified already but they goe not before him that is to be iustified Then are not good woorks the cause but the effects of Gods worâ—…s in vs He chose vs he called vs hee conuertâ—…d vs he gaue vs faith he maketh vs ayte to do all good workes to the prayse of his glory and not to merite our saluation by them For saythe Saincte Augustine 〈◊〉 facis opera tua vt glorificeris hoc prohibuit Si autem vt Deus glorificetur hoc iussit Christus If thou dost thy works for thys cause that thou mayst be glorifyed thys Chryst forbad thee But yf thou doste them that GOD maye be glorifyed thys Chryste commaunded thee These therfore and all these Papisticall cauillations that make man or any thing in man be it neuer so good to bee the cause of this good purpose of Gods eternall Election to the worldes saluation are but false Popish fetches and lying vauntes to establishe theyr owne ryghtousnesse to deface Gods glorye and are no causes at all that moued God hereto Nay soft sayth the Papiste stay your conclusion there is one thyng yet behynde Be it that none of all these are the causes no not mannes good woorkes nor that wee ought to woorke to merite saluation thereby but to set foorth the prayse and glorie of GOD and that God made all things for his glorie yet notwithstanding myght this be some cause euen that hee sawe hee shoulde get glory by vs and by oure woorkes Neyther myghte this seeme so small a cause for had he not saued vs then should not he haue ben glorifyed by oure good workes What then Bonoruâ—… meorum non eges sayeth Dauid Thou haste no neede of my good workes Maye a man bee profitable vnto God as hee that is wyse may be auaylable vnto himselfe is it any thyng vnto the Almightie that thou arte iust or is it profytable to him that thou 〈◊〉 est thy wayes vprighte Can his glory shine no other way but by our workes or by our saluation What if all we had ben lost had he lost any thyng therby Lost Christ any sparke of hys glorie by the lost chyld Iudas Lost God any glorie by the wyckednesse of Pharao Nay he got glory therby and so hee doth ouer all his enemies They hinder not his glorie as they thynke they doo nor he hath any neede that wee should encrease it and set it out And thoughe we had neuer ben borne he had lost no glorie and we had vtterly ben loste he had loste no glorie and no creature had euer bene made he had loste no whit of glory It had ben al one to him although not al one to vs for he hath no nede of vs nor of any creature but we haue nede of him To coÌ„clude therfore none of all these are any causes that moued God to bestowe this benefit on the worlde that it should not perishe but haue eternall lyfe why what is the cause then is it a causelesse thing is there no cause of it Yes verily and that a great cause What is that we haue runne thorough all causes that I thynke maye well bee reckened vp and you haue denyed them euery one In deede Papist thou haste runne rounde aboute the wood and haste assayed at manye a gappe to enter but canste not get in lyke to the olde riddle What is that that runneth rounde aboute the tree and neuer entreth in They hadde wonte to say it is the barke of the tree but it is a blind Papist that sticking only to the trees rinde and barke looketh altogether on the outwarde apperance of man and searcheth to fynd in the visyble creature the cause of the highest workes of the inuisible Creator O saplesse barke of a rotten and frutelesse tree twise dead and plucked vp by the rootes when wylte thou be able to fynde out this cause of Gods eternall purpose he that will fynd a thing must seke it where it is not where it is not The Papistes seke this cause where it is not not where it is In maÌ„ they haue raked metely wel but ther it is not they haue sought ouer al the world and euery creature neither is the cause of Gods purpose to be fouÌ„d in any creature no not in the elect theÌ„selues Where muste it needes then remayne but euen in the Creator the cause of the purpose in the purposer and only in God himself and to say the truth it can not be otherwise For sithe the purposer is God and God is agens liberrimum he can not bee tyed to causes besydes himselfe for then he were not free sith Gods purpose is eternall as is hymselfe without beginning and al other things and causes haue beginning then is nothing the cause of Gods purpose but Gods purpose is the cause of euery thing For if he had not purposed ought to haue ben it had not ben but it is it is then bycause he purposed it shold be To coÌ„clude sith God
that rightly Neyther are we against it that faithe shewe it selfe by works but rather they that dare not let theyr works come to the light and shew of the word of God least the worde should reproue their workes and shew them to be but works of darknesse to be their owne deuises not any suche good workes at all as they to the simple do crake vpon For the triall of this they shunne the light ▪ and therefore it is a good argument of our 〈◊〉 Christe against their works that they be nought Qui malè agit odit lucem nec venit ad lucem ne arguantur opera eius Hee that do the euill hateth the light and commeth not to the lyght least his workes should be reproued Wheras therfore faith should be shewed forth by works euen by this argument of S. Iames Ex effectibus fidei of the effects and and works of faith besides the forlayd argument of Saincte Paule are they agayne consuted to to haue no Fayth For where they not onely doo the woorkes of darknesse but openly defende and maynteyne them as the sitting vp of stewes and brothell houses and that euen vnder theyr owne Popes nose And thys is a ruled case of Christ A good tree can not bring forth euil frute Then surely if they were true beleuers on Iesus Christ they could not mainteine and defend suche wickednesse which is a thousand partes worse than the doing of it But as S. Iohn sayth In hoc manifesti sunt filij dei filij diaboli In this is manifest who are the sons of God and who are the sonnes of the diuell The sonnes of God doo sinne but it is of infirmitie but to maynteyn their sinfull worke is the very declaration of the childe of Sathan Oh saye they we mainteyne it not as good but confesse it to be euill howebeit we maynteyne it to driue away a greater euill But sayth S Paule Non faciamus malum vt inde eueniat bonum Let vs not do euill that good may come of it For it followeth Quorum damnatio iusta est Whose damnation is iust Now if they shall iustly be damned that wyll do euill that good may come theron shall they escape more iust damnation that will doo euill not that so muche as good may come thereon by theyr owne confession but onely the auoyding of a greater euill and yet that is no necessary auoyding of it neither Now if these euil doers shall be damned and no true beleuers shal be damned then are the Papistes no true beleuers muche lesse were they not extreme impudēt can they boast of workes that maynteine sutche open wickednesse But they wil say they boast not of this as in dede they haue little cause and mighte more honestly seeke fygge leaues to hyde their shame therein but they haue infinite other woorkes to shewe their faith by and that I do them iniurie they vpbrayding want of worls to vs to shewe our faith by and we to stande in examining of their workes to improue therby their faith but I crie them mercy I will no further rippe vp their euill workes but be contente for this once to haue shewed this one euil herbe that I thinke is able to marre all their pot of porrage For I tell yee it is Mors in olla Death in the porrage pot that no lesse thā damnation had they twenty good herbes besides But let them doe now as mutche for vs hardily and spare not and lay in our dishe so muche as but one like faulte I speake not this as though wee were without fault we are sinners greuous sinners the iustest of vs all and if we shoulde say we had no sinne we shoulde deceiue our selues and there were no truth in vs This doo the Papistes that say they can do all that God commanded but God commaunded not to sinne and therefore in saying they can fulfill the commaundements of GOD what do they saye but that they can be withoute sinne Whiche the proude Pharisey vaunted of that he was not a sinner as other men We sinne euen with the Publican but with the publican we are sorie for and repent vs of our sinne But name me one worke that God forbiddeth and we bidde defende and mainteyne the same one good worke that god biddeth and we forbid oppugne write against the same This wee haue named in them neyther shall they be euer able to name the lyke in vs But what neede we name say they any particular vice publikely defended of you when this only doctrine takes away all good workes For if I be iustified only by faith what neede I doo any good works are they not all cleane taken awaye No forsooth are they not taken away at all bycause they be remoued from the article of Iustification the workes remayn and that as necessarily to be done as before is shewed but they be not set in the place where the papists wold haue them placed in this article of receauyng Iustification where only faith consisteth Why then say they ye turne faith out of her cloathes if ye take works from her ye leaue her naked and doth a naked and bare faithe iustifie vs In deede woorkes are the cloathes of faith and serue as clothes doo decke and set this lady out but as the body was before the clothes and without the clothes and is of an other substance than the clothes so was faith before workes and is borne of God as naked as my nayle in respect of any merite of woorkes eyther preceding or concurring And thus was alwayes fayth pictured Nuda fides a naked faith But not so but that she is clad streyght wayes with the frutes of the spirite and the ornaments of al good woorkes but it is not her apparell that sets her out to god Omnia nuda sunt aperta oculis eius All things are naked open to his eyes But her apparell sets her out to man And so sayth S. Iames being a man Shewe me thy fayth by thy workes and I will shew thee my faithe by my woorkes Therfore works serue to shew forth faith to them that can not see but by outwarde shewing and so iustifieth one man before an other declareth vnto me y suche an one is iustified not to iustify him before God who seeth the things not seene Nec iuxta intuitū hominis ego iudico Homo enim videt ea quae parēt Dominus autē intuetur cor Neither do I iudge saith God after the sight of man for man seeth those things that appere but the Lord beholdeth the heart He loketh on the faith hidden within Domine oculi tui fidem respiciunt sayeth Ieremie O Lord thy eyes loke vppon the faithe Corde creditur ad iustitiam sayth S. Paule with the hearte wee beleeue to righteousnesse Fides est argumentum non apparentium Faith is an argument of things that appeare not But works