speaks of is that Justification which we have in that Text of Genesis where it is said And Abraham believed and it was accounted to him for Righteousness Or That Juslification Paul speaks of is that Imputation of Faith for righteousness which is spoken of in that Text in Genesis That Justification which St. James speaks of is that Justification which we have in that Text in Genesis Or is that Imputation of Faith for Righteousness as is spoken of in that Text in Genesis Therefore St. Pauls justification and St. James justification are the same Justification Again That Faith which St. Paul speaks of is the Faith that is spoken of in that Text in Genesis or the same Faith as was imputed to Abraham for righteousness in that place That Faith which St. James speaks of is the same Faith which is spoken of in that Text in Genesis Or the same Faith that was imputed to Abraham for righteousness in that place Therefore the faith that St. Paul speaks of and the faith which St. James speaks of is the same faith also And when the Faith is the same and the Justification the same we must distinguish of Works then out of question to reconcile these Scriptures Of Works then let us distinguish and the distinction is this There are Works which are inconsistent with Grace and Pardon so that if we had them we should have no need of Christ's righteousness or sacrifice but the doing of them would make the reward to be of debt or make life to be due out of district justice He that doeth them shall live in them That is Works which the Law requires unto Justification And these are the Works St. Paul speaks of and the reasons which he alleadges why we are not justified by these Works is because no man hath them This is that which he apparently urges for he ascends in his dispute from the Law of Moses to the Law of Nature which concerns both Jew and Gentile in his three first Chapters to the Romans so that if any man be justified it must be without them Therefore we conclude saies he that by faith without them that is without having them a man is justified There are then Works also which are consistent with Pardon and Mercy though we have them so that when we have done these we do need the righteousness and satisfaction of our Redeemer to cover their imperfection and for acceptation of our persons no less than if we had Faith alone without any and these are Works of sincerity required of us in the Gospel It is no wayes derogatory I say to Gods Grace and Christs Merits for a man to be justified by these works any more than to be justified by Faith alone in regard to Debt or Merit upon which account St. Paul excludes works in his Disputation It is of these Works I must say as the Apostle saies it is of Faith that it may be of Grace And these are the Works St. James speaks of when he saies By Faith and Works also that is all one as by a Faith working by Love in Pauls words otherwhere And the being justified by Faith working by Love or by a Faith productive of Works or by these Works and Faith also which being such Works as fall short of the Law and do need grace and forgiveness for their acceptation with God is all one with St Pauls by Faith without works of the Law or without such as the Law requires unto justification Thus are Paul and James reconciled I will advance hence then my former argument That justification by Faith without works which St. Paul speaks of is that Justification or that Imputation of Abrahams Faith for righteousness which is spoken of in that Text in Genesis That justification by Works and Faith also which St. James speaks of is that Justification or that Imputation of Abrahams faith for righteousness which is spoken of in that Text in Genesis Therefore St. Pauls justification by faith without works and St. James justification by faith and works also or by works and not by faith only is the same in the two Apostles The medium upon which all three Syllogisms depend is the Apostles citing the same Text both of them for that which either of them assert while one saies by faith without works and the other by works and not by faith only The major and minor therefore in all three are undeniable and in the conclusion of the last I am sure the Doctor and I shall agree together I have another thing to offer to the thoughts of the Dr. that whereas he tells us of a Commutation between Christ and us in his taking upon him our sins and our partaking of his righteousness I do apprehend this expression and doctrine to be Christian holy and good according to the sense of that Text He was made sin for us that we might be made the righteousness of God in him and the like places But only there is a difference to be put between the use of the notion against the Socinians in the point of Satisfaction and the use of it against the Mediocreans in the point of Justification I do believe such a Commutation as the Dr. speaks of is necessary to that great work which Christ undertook for Mankind as it concerns the whole world in the procuring Reconciliation and Life for all upon the terms of the Redeemer for if he had not taken on him our sins to suffer in our behalf which is his being made sin for us and fulfilled the whole Law also for us that God might without dishonour to him as Rector dispense with it so as to impute to us our faith and imperfect obedience for righteousness which is our being made the righteousness of God in him there would have been no satisfaction offered and consequently no Reconciliation or Redemption But as for such a Commutation in the point of Justification which concerns particular Believers I am yet to learn what to make of it from this Reverend person To enquire then to the bottom the foundation of this Commutation is laid I see by him in the Mystical Union between Christ and his Members which must pertain therefore only to such and that as a fruit or effect of the Spirit of Christ given to them if it be so to that end When this indeed is a thing that does not belong at all to the operation of the Third person of the Trinity but to the work of the Son and the arbitrary ordination of the Father Whatsoever influence Christ hath upon the soul as our Head by the operation of the Holy Ghost or whatsoever is an effect of the Spirit when once given for uniting us to him it must have this Union for its ground or foundation But whatsoever arises to us from Christ another way and is no effect of the Spirit it may not be ascribed without contradiction to that spring from whence it comes not The Dr. judges right that such a
therefore for it is another and this Authour must not compound his with it to be laid down in the second place By the natural man which is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 we may understand him who hath onely the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or reasonable soul derived from Adam and by the spiritual man him who hath received the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or that Spirit which is from Christ The first man Adam was made a living soul the second Adam was made a quickening spirit This Spirit as it was promised to be poured out upon men in the latter daies which was the time of the New Testament so do we find it given ordinarily at their Baptism and Confirmation as we read in the Acts and as we find in this Epistle The manifestation of the Spirit is given to every man to profit with all Where we have this Spirit given and that to every one and the Manifestation of it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That manifestation possibly might be by some Shechinah sometimes on the heads of the baptized but the certain meaning appears in the following verses to be by the miraculous gifts then poured out Among which gifts one of them was the Discernment of mysteries Spirits that is Doctrines and so is the Spirit given and received we are to suppose in this place We have received the Spirit of God saies the Text to this effect That we may know the things which he hath freely given us The whole meaning then is thus the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the man who had not this Spirit then poured on him could not discern those things of the Spirit as others of them could who had it because these hidden things were discoverable by that miraculous gift and he having not the Gift to discern them must judge of them by natural reason onely and so they were foolishness to him when as to them who had it they appeared the Power of God and Wisdom of God And of this Spiritual man so interpreted that is the inspired man one that had the mind of Christ in the last verse and that received the Spirit in the tenth for this effect the discernment of these things it is easie to understand how he could judge all things and be judged of none in regard that this inspâ—ration within could be discernable to himself onely and so the text and context and the whole chapter shall be made to agree throughout one verse with another Nevertheless there is one inconvenience this interpretation is liable to as will make it to be refused by most men when we have said all we can It is this that if this be the meaning then must this whole place be applicable onely to those Christians in the Apostles daies and no Christian at this time can be concerned That is if this be the sense then is there no man now that hath received the Spirit of God that he may know the things of God no spiritual man now in the true sense of this place but all must be natural men onely as having not the Spirit according to this interpretation when yet the giving of the Spirit otherwhere and in the sense of other Texts is a branch of the New Covenant and he that hath not the Spirit of Christ St. Paul saies in another place is none of his There is a third Interpretation therefore that by the Natural man and Spiritual man we are to understand the Vnregenerate and Regenerate man that is one that hath not and one that hath received the Spirit to the ordinary effects of it which is illumination and sanctification And this is the most general Opinion and Interpretation which is received by our Divines and so taken up by Dr. Owen however elaborately he hath improved it so little reason hath this Gentleman or any others to make any assault on him for that matter When the unreâ—â—â—â—rate man then in the Text is said not 〈…〉 things of the Spirit or Doctrines of Christ 〈…〉 he cannot that is morally cannot receive 〈…〉 meaning of our Divines in general is this that 〈◊〉 does not or cannot receive or discern them so as to savour them or relish them he does not or cannot embrace them in his heart as good to him or so as to lead his life according to them In short he cannot receive them so as to apply them And this is a Truth never to be gainsaid by this man though which of the three Interpretations is to be preferr'd I pass not my own judgment Let us hear this Authour's Objections The Doctor saies he does grant that an unregenerate man may assent to the truth of the things of God and if he can assent to them he can see a conformity in them to God's Attributes and a suitableness to the ends of the Gospel and if he can see this then will they not appear foolishness to him and consequently he can know them Every one will answer to this There is a Speculative and a Practical knowledge When our Divines say the unregenerate man cannot know these things they understand it of a Practical knowledge he does know them special lively but he hath no vital experimental knowledge of them And when the reason is given in the Text because they are spiritually discerned we must expound spiritually i. e. by the assistance of God's Spirit according to this third Interpretation The Natural man does not receive know or discern these things of God as able I account to apply them because they are discerned onely by a supernatural assistance of the Holy Ghost which they having not cannot do it I will answer farther The Spirit may be given and received to divers effects on her for illumination and conviction or for conversion and sanctification If the Natural man who is one without the Spirit hath not the Spirit at all to illuminate and convince him he believes not the Doctrines of Christ though he hears them There is no man can say that Jesus is the Lord but by the Holy Ghost and while he in his heart believes them not they are indeed to him but foolishness when if he hath the Spirit but to enlighten and to convince him he may dogmatically receive them going so far and yet until he hath the Spirit also to convert him and sanctifie him he cannot discern them I must still say so as to apply them to his salvation Here are three Interpretations then proposed to them who please to strive for mastery I have but one Note more to add out of this Authour By being spiritually discerned saies he speaking of these things in the Text is meant their being known understood and judged of by the revelation and testimony of the Spirit Thus much is right and must be agreed upon by all three Interpretations onely their difference then also must be laid down This revelation or testimony of the Spirit therefore is either external or internal The first Opinion which is this Author's will have this
revelation external and so shall he that hath the Scriptures onely be accounted to have the Spirit and to discern these spiritual things The other two Opinions will have this testimony or revelation internal so that without the Spirit 's operation within the man is to be held a Natural man and not to understand these things This internal revelation of the Spirit then is either extraordinary in the miraculous gifts and discernment of the Primitive times and the second Opinion is that the place is to be understood of these gifts and such workings of the Spirit as do not belong now to ours or it is ordinary in the work of illumination and conversion which still continue in the world and the third Opinion which is the Drs. rests in this as of most concern to us and most easie of admission There is a fourth Interpretation By the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 may be understood the Sensual man and by the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the intellectual contemplative man The Platonists do distinguish their 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and some of our Platonical Divines do favour this Exposition To confirm it there is that Text in Jude may be produced where the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are so translated sensual not having the Spirit with other places where 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are opposed This Note by the way I take up however that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are indeed the same But this interpretation I think too extreamly opposite to the first which is our Authors for these mens spiritual man is no more than his natural man and I am satisfied with him that no man of the highest attainment by contemplation can be able to find out any of these things in the text which depend on Gods Soveraign Will and can be discovered only by his Spirit For As no man knoweth the things of a man saies the text save the spirit of a man which is in him even so the things of God knoweth no man but the Spirit of God These things of God are I say the arbitrary councils of God's will for the saving man by his grace in and through Jesus Christ which lies not within the scheam of Nature and come not therefore within the ken of humane understanding unless they be made known to us either by inspiration of them into our selves or by the Revelation of them through the Spirit by others There may be haply more Interpretations than these for I consult not Commentators but if any be apt to mingle the two former into one for confutation of the third because it is Dr. Owens I do apprehend such to betray a precipitate disaffection rather than a ponderous judgement I know that the first and second this Authors and the Friendly Debaters may be made use of to confute the third which is the received interpretation and the Doctors but so may the third and second be used to confute this Authors and yet that will neither make the first and second nor the second and third to be the same That interpretation which gives such a sense of the Chapter as makes the receiving the Spirit there applicable only to the Christians in the Primitive times cannot be the same with that which gives such a sense of it as makes it applicable to Christians now whether all of them regenerate and unregenerate who have but their Bibles as this man will have it or those only who are partakers of it to the effect of Regeneration according to Dr. Owen Let us look the Gentlemans Introduction now again over and we shall find that the braggery of that Interpretation which he hath advanced to confute Dr. Owen does lye herein that every one who hath the Scriptures and does not reject them must have the Spirit in the Text to discern the things of God and the Doctor must be a very proud man who does number himself among such and will allow the Regenerate only to know them This must be shewn by all means what an absurd person the Doctor is who will have an almighty irresistible new light brought into the soul by the Holy Ghost that is a work of illumination on the mind and conversion on the heart to enable a man to discern these things when by the Spirit according to him we are to understand the outward revelation of the Word only which all have to enable them to discern the same There is one notion for all this which is much inculcated by him that seems to verge upon a mixture of the two first Interpretations by setching in something from the second into his which upon the account of corroborating is but some confounding himself first for confutation of the Doctor The Apostle saies he proposes the demonstration of the Spirit and of power to judge of the truth of the Gospel and he also proposeth the comparing spiritual things with spiritual to judge of the sense of the Doctrines of it Again Things that are spiritually discerned are those which be discernable only by the revelation of the Spirit That is by the testimony of the Spirit in miracles as to the truth of them and by comparing one divine revelation with another as to the meaning of them I love the Author for this because I must confess it seems to me to be very neatly spoken and yet it is but a tale when he hath said it The Apostle distinguishes not the truth of the things of God in the Text and the meaning of them 'T is he makes the distinction and puts it on the Apostle as if he intended that which came not once into his mind Nor does the Apostle propose these two ways of discerning things spiritually but himself proposes them I do not think the Apostle to be so double minded as to understand two things by this one expression spiritually discerned If he intended by it that the truth of the things revealed was discerned by the testimony of the Spirit given thereunto by miracles he intended not by it that the meaning of them is discerned by the testimony of Scripture And e contra if he intended the later he meant not the former The Apostle I believe had but one meaning though these two things be true asunder There is no man can be sure that by the demonstration of the Spirit in this Chapter and the comparing spiritual things with spiritual the Apostle intended two things or two wayes of that Spirits testimony it is more likely that the later expression does de industria expound the former To wit that when we find out any truth or doctrine by comparing one Scripture with another this is the demonstration of the Spirit intended in the place which I shall have occasion to suppose again by and by in regard to another Writer If they are two sorts of testimony no man can be sure that he intended them both I say still by that one explanation And who can
tell moreover whether the Apostle meant by his comparing spiritual things with spiritual the comparing one inspiration with another which belongs to the second or one Scripture with another that is the revelations of the New with those of the Old Testament which is proper to the first interpretation The man who had a Revelation within must have the truth of it and meaning both confirmed to him by that inspiration so that to distinguish of the truth and meaning of a doctrine inspired that is as to such is certainly of no signification And as for those who judge of any doctrine by the Scriptures they are but rightly to understand the meaning and they have the truth by that understanding Where the Revelation or Doctrine is divine the truth and meaning are one another As for the confirmation of Christianity by miracles and more particularly by the effusion of Gifts in the Primitive times it does not belong to this Author's but the second interpretation And from hence arises another objection against the Doctor It is from the demonstration of the Spirit we read of in the fourth verse by which this quick Divine I suppose after the famous Author of that book entituled the Friendly Debate does understand the miraculous operation of the Spirit in those times When the Apostle preached the Gospel at first the Holy Ghost fell on the hearers and they spake with tongues underhood mysteries and could do miracles This was an undenyable testimony to the divinity of their Doctrine so that no man can Preach out of doubt with such demonstration now in our dayes If this then be the meaning of the Spirit in that verse it must be the meaning of it in the verses following that is to judge tightly and the defect of this ready man is here that he hit not on our intimation before Consequently as this demonstration of the Spirit if it be so is by those miraculous gifts the receiving the Spirit there must be in those gifts and particularly the gift of discerning so the spiritual man must be him that had that gift the Natural man him that had it not whereby the one could judge of all things that is those things in the Text the other could not know them upon that account And this is both against the Authors and the Doctors interpretation The Doctor understands the Text so as no man can discern the things of God spiritually unless he be regenerate this Gentleman to oppose this will have all understanding Christians be able to understand them spiritually because they have the revelation of the spirit in the Scriptures and why not demonstrate them so by the Spirit likewise And yet is he unhappily lead I apprehend by the Friendly Debater to give such an exposition of one of the verses of this Chapter as the rest being carried on accordingly his own interpretation and the Doctors both are quite gone That is when this ingenious man hath offered so handsom a sense of this Text as to render the place gratefully applicable to all Christians and in so much larger a capacity than the Doctor as the unregenerate are more than the regenerate he does by one inadvertant leading concession fall into theirs as does make this place proper only to the primitive times Such need have they who are too forward in charging others with inconsistencies to look to themselves that their own writings be consistent with a mature judgement and the fear of God in doing to others as they would be done to by others I will therefore now turn to some words of the Friendly Debater himself and in the mean time make this stand The revelation which a man hath from without and the understanding accordingly this receiving the Spirit by having the Scriptures and judging all things by them is one thing and the revelation which he hath from within and understanding the receiving the Spirit by the miraculous gift of discernment by which he judges of these things so as indeed he can be judged of none is another Either let this Author cleave to his own Exposition and forsake the other or let him forsake his own and cleave to the other And hereby shall all arguments gathered from this place of Scripture about any point in dispute in our dayes such as are the doctrines of free grace and free will and of the subject of this Authors Book the operations of the holy Spirit be laid to sleep and give us no trouble The words I mean of the Friendly Debate are these because they afford us some farther necessary matter The Assembly of Divines when they direct men how to perform their Ministry doe not speak so in their Directory as to be understood since they cannot prophesie nor speak with tongues nor demonstrate their doctrine by miracles as the Apostles did I would gladly know what they mean by delivering the truth in the demonstration of the Spirit and of power I am apt to think it would puzzle a new Assembly to tell us in plain words what they intended by that phrase Let me desire you not to use words without sense belonging to them and to entreat your Minister that he would hereafter forbear to pray to God he may speak so as no body now can hope to do I wonder at you that you should not discern the Apostle speaks there of the wonderful work of the Holy Ghost I doubt your Minister is not inlightned because he doth not instruct you better in the Scripture I do not here dislike this liberty of conception in so well-studied an Interpreter of Scripture as I take that Writer to be that when the Apostle speaks of his own Preaching in the demonstration of the Spirit and of power he accounts it to be understood of that confirmation of the Christian Doctrine by the miraculous gifts as was in those times yet when he proceeds to so universal an adventure as to forbid every Minister to use that expression henceforward any more in his prayer the singularity offends In the Liturgy we have these words in a prayer Almighty God who alone workest great miracles send down upon our Bishops and Curates the helpful Spirit of thy grâ—ace This expression does allude to the mission of the Holy Ghost at first on the Apostles when there appeared eleven tongues and fâ—r on eaâ—h of them and the Church does pray here in this sense that God who wrought that great marvel on the Apostles in sending down his Spirit and gifts at first in that extraordinary manner and way as he did upon them for sitting them for their Office would be pleased to vouchsafe the grace and gifts of the same Spirit on our present Ministers whether superiour or inferiour in that ordinary manner and measure full as is sit for such as do succeed them in that great imployment I may presume I doubt not to say the same here that suppose the Apostles Preaching in the demonstration of the Spirit and of power to lye only
in those miraculous gifts or effects of the Holy Ghost now ceased the Minister while he prayes to God for his blessing that he may preach so is to be understood in the like allusion and meaning to wit that as God enabled the Apostles in their time to speak in the demonstration of the Spirit and of power whatsoever that was so he would assist him in such a way and manner now as is but sutable to the present work and his ordinary operation Thus much I say upon supposition of our second and this Debaters Interpretation but I must confess I do not find my self convinced in the reading the Text that this interpretation is indubitable 〈…〉 at leasâ— for Dr. Owens and his 〈…〉 from the place against it 1. I see not any thing that will restrain our sense 〈◊〉 nâ—cessity to that meaning and we are not to be 〈◊〉 in our allowances to the thoughts of others who keep to the analogy of faith without cogent reason 2. The demonstratiin of the Spirit and of power is opposed to the excellency of speech or enticing words of mans wisdom But the Apostles speaking with tongues or his miraculous gifts does not oppose the eloquence of man or excellency of words but rather agree with it That which does in the most direct sense oppose the excellency of speech and enticing words of mans wisdom is plain truth which the Spirit teaches 3. The Apostle proceeding on in the Chapter speaks not of himself only but of the whole Church Now we have received not the spirit of the world but the Spirit which is of God that we might know the things which are freely given to us of God That which all the faithful do know by the Spirit as well as the Apostles cannot be miraculous or extraordinary Such is the demonstration here Or thus That which is common to all the faithful and not peculiar to the Apostles and primitive times or to any particular person cannot be miraculous or extraordinary Such is the receiving the Spirit here and consequently the demonstration of it 4. Those things the Holy Ghost teaches a man by comparing one thing with another as spiritual things with Spirituals which is by way of study and discursive reason are not demonstrated in a way miraculous and extraordinary belonging only to the Apostles and not other Ministers of Christ But such was the Apostles speaking here Which things also we speak not in the words which mans wisdom teacheth but which the Holy Ghost teacheth comparing spiritual things with spiritual 5. The following comparison between the natural man and the spiritual man that one receives or relishes not the things of God as disagreeing to his judgement and the other does seems more aptly to be understood as it is ordinarily of the regenerate and unregenerate than of the extraordinarily inspired only unto which this most curious Interpreters thoughts must lead him 6. In the last place I humbly offer an interpretation of this expression which if it be not the very meaning of the Text as much of that which is urged here seems to attest yet will it be sufficient I hope to justifie our Prelates Universities Doctors with the most of the Ministers of the Church as well as the Assembly and the more plain and honest meaning Country-Preachers in their using the same so ordinarily as they do in their prayers It is this To speak in the demonstration of the Spirit is to deliver the very truth of Scripture or the plain sense of the Spirit in Scripture in opposition to humane conceit or invention and to speak so is to speak in Power because a man may expect that assistance of the Holy Ghost to accompany such Preaching which he cannot upon other The Preaching of the Cross is to them that perish foolishness but unto us which are saved it is the power of God I am not ashamed of the Gospel of Christ for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believes Ye received it not as the word of men but as it is in truth the word of God The receiving the word as the word of God and not of man is the receiving it in power and the preaching it accordingly so is the preaching it in power and what that power is does follow Which effectually worketh in you that believe Our Gospel came unto you not in word only but also in power and in the Holy Ghost This is my Covenant with them My Spirit which is upon thee and my words which I have put in thy mouth shall not depart out of thy mouth and of thy seed for ever CHAP. II. Of the Substance or Contents of the Authors four first Chapters wherein I make my self concerned but little farther I Return to the Doctors Opposer and I come now from his Introduction to his Book Of this Book there are two parts The first is to shew us what the Scriptures hold forth concerning the Spirits operations The second is to confute many pernicious Doctrines of Dr. Owen The first and second both is indeed to do this but the second shall do it all together And this part he hath reserved I suppose to come out hereafter The first part then having this subject The Spirits Operations does contain seven Chapters In his first Chapter he explains to us what he means by the Spirit and by its Operations The word Spirit saies he signifies three things The Mind the Temper of the mind the Holy Ghost and he understands it of the last I have two things to say here The one is as to his second signification The temper or disposition of the Mind is either of Nature only and belongs to the Spirit of man within him or of Grace and belongs to the Spirit of God that works it Of this Temper the Author must be understood to speak when he speaks of the Spirit of Faith Fear and Love The other is that there are more significations of the word Spirit than these which himself knows Every spirit which confesseth seth Christ in John is I think as much as every Doctrine Which by the way does put me in mind to say thus much that when this Author comes to speak of things which are common heads and only require a grave and comprehensive Divine to marshal them he does methinks appear to me so lank as I cannot tell well whether that which he saies be solid or no because I am sure it is not full though when he falls upon several particular things he seems to look through them well By the operations of the Spirit he understands and defines them those which are on the mind to cause certain qualities promised in the Gospel and continued in all ages I have two things therefore to say here likewise One is that though this were never so much too short there is no body in the main of what is said is like to contradict him Dr. Owen by the Spirit understands the Holy Ghost as
he does and by the Operations of it what he does And why then will he fall foul on the Dr. When he agrees with him in the substance what need is there he should pursue a flea in the circumstances of words only or variety of expression Another is that where he excepts at the Doctor for alluding in his words to some Texts that speak of miraculous gifts and so cannot be applied to us and also for a critical note he had before on the Hebrew word put on him Isa 42.1 from whence he collects that in Gods giving us the effects of his Spirit the Spirit it self is also given I will compound with this Author The Doctor shall submit his critical note to the Spirit of the Prophets and this man shall let the Doctor speak but the same things by way of allusion to Scripture whether they be proved thereby or not which other Divines do speak and affirm ordinarily without that allusion In his second Chapter he shews us what these effects are for the producing of which the holy Spirit is given which he undertakes to do here from that Text Luke 11.13 where After two parables of the man asking three Loaves for his Friend and of a Son asking Bread of a Father our Saviour tells us that God will give his holy Spirit to those that ask him From hence he gathers that the effects for which God gives his Spirit are such as are needful because it is Bread the Son and the Friend asks and profitable because a Fish and Egg also is given Here he tells that our need is to be measured by the end That the end is our salvation Consequently the Spirits operations on the mind are to produce all those effects as are necessary to eternal life These are Faith Knowledge All Vertue or graces which make us practical Christians and Perseverance Here are his needful effects then his profitable and not necessary are degrees of Goodness which are more highly so or degrees of Knowledge that are less profitable Here he discourses whether God does give the Spirit for these things profitable upon our asking and tells us God may give us things better or more sutable and so deny them Then he shews us how the Spirit is prayed for in the Lords prayer because when we ask for any grace or vertue we ask for him to work it In the whole then of this Chapter we have nothing against the Doctor or the Doctor against him but a good Sermon I suppose we have which he might have preached somewhere and adapts it to this occasion which makes it look though well yet feat and unlike a beaten Divine who in shewing what the effects of Gods Spirit are would have cast them into some proper and fuller order and then proved them by Scripture and quite let alone this Sermon His third Chapter is about Regeneration which he makes room for by an Objection that this will be thought but a lame account of those qualifications that are needful to salvation seeing one thing most necessary thereunto is omitted and that is Regeneration And here then must Regeneration be brought in and shewn us that it is not such a thing as Dr. Owen makes it but is comprized in his Moral graces and vertues Regeneration then as a state he defines it is to become a sincere Disciple of Jesus Christ And here though one might well require a little more accuracy in a definition there is no body like to differ with him upon the matter The Doctor may use other terms and expressions and he uses these but they both intend the same thing This is certain He that doth righteousness is born of God The Doctor belike hath said that Regeneration is a proper Term and he will prove it to be metaphorical Be it so The Doctor must be candidly understood then that he means it is a proper metaphor To wit that there is such a secret and powerful work of the soul signified thereby as does bring in a new disposion into the inner man as well as reforms the outward life which is that only in effect he contends for Let them grant saies the Doctor that their Moral reformation of life does proceed from a Spiritual reformation of our nature the difference will be at an end And what saies this Author He answers This difference is at an end before it began for we have alwaies granted it And why is the difference up then that hath no beginning or cause for it The Doctor is perhaps too warm in the allusion but the meaning is acknowledged the same with his who is as it were quite cool and off from it There is indeed one point as to the manner of the Spirits operation wherein these two Champions will differ but that belongs to another Chapter Here he speaks of Regeneration only as a state and therefore I pray let him be quiet yet a while till he comes thither In his fourth Chapter he laies down the several graces of the holy Spirit which having done once before I cannot apprehend it to be momentous in his making two Chapters of it These graces then again are Faith Teachableness in order to it All Christian vertues The improvement of them Progress in them Perseverance to the end To this we oppose nothing and there is no dissention with the Doctor The Doctor or another perhaps would have marshalled these things otherwise but that all these are the operations of Gods Spirit or such effects for which the Holy Ghost is to be implored is beyond dispute amongst us What he hath thrust in here upon that subject of Gods dwelling in good men I take to be another excellent good Sermon CHAP. III. Of Assuranee and praying by the Spirit the subject of his fifth Chapter with indifferency whether it be by a Form or conceived Prayer I Come to his fifth Chapter which is to shew us what effects we are not to expect from the Spirit having shewn before what effects as he reckons them are promised by it And there are three pretended gifts he saies which are none of these effects and so may not be hoped or prayed for upon that account Immediate Revelation of the sense of any Scripture Absolute assurance of our particular election and the dictates of Extempore prayer These are three things belike he designes to have a sling at which he may do but I must tell him in the way whether any thing of this kind may be expected from the holy Spirit or not I am not satisfied with his argument or the way of his bringing it about that the effects for which we are to pray to God to give us his Spirit are only things needful and therefore we may not expect his help in extemporary prayer and these two other matters This indeed may be argued from the Parables in the context that the gift it self of the Spirit is a thing needful A gift which next to Gods giving his Son is the greatest and
most necessary to mankind for as Christ was given for our Redemption the Spirit is and must be given for the Application But that the effects of the Spirit being given should be confined by him to these only he mentions or such only as he can fetch Scripture for unless he could bring Scripture also to say there are no more is such reasoning as before a year is gone over his head may give him occasion to believe that some things may seem strong in a Sermon that are not fit for a Book that must undergo a discussion I do not think he hath spoken this as a close Polemical Divine nor yet that he hath laid down the method of those benefits which we have from the Holy Spirit as a Comprehensive Preacher For when the Holy Ghost is not only our Sanctifier but Comforter and promised and sent to the Church as the Comforter it is strange that the Consolations of the Spirit should be left out in the draught of those effects which we are to expect from him And when the Spirit is first given to a man to unite him to Christ and this Vnion is the primary effect of his having it and by means hereof all saving influences from the Head is derived this by another would not have been forgotten The Holy Ghost is given I count for our Sanctifier our Comforter and our Guide Regeneration is to be comprehended in Sanctification as the beginning of it and Union is supposed to both I cannot serve God without his grace I must therefore have the Spirit to Sanctifie me If I serve him I must be supported in his service I must therefore have him to Comfort me When I am supported in my duty I know not what uncertainties may befal me in all my spiritual and temporal concernments in this life and therefore I must have him to Conduct me and lead me in all my affairs so as they may work together for the best which he hath promised to those that love him Under this head now of the Spirits heavenly Guidance are all those things that are good for us and not absolutely necessary to be reduced seeing we know not what to pray for as we ought as we shall have occasion farther to speak of that Text by and by but the Spirit helpeth us that is we know not in many things temporal says this Author and I will say in spirituals too what is best for us and it is the Spirit that is our Guide as to these things and Intercessor for them so that be it the true Sense of a place of Scripture or Assurance or assistance of us in our Prayers or any thing else that we would have we are under the safe conduct of his word and unperceptible motions and with the resignation of our wills unto him as our great disposer for all good to set our selves to our duty and leave the issue to him I will add it were better that this man never wrote this Book than that in the promise of God's giving his Spirit to us we should be discouraged from praying to him and trusting in him for our direction in all the concerns of our souls and outward conditions who is the Comforter of the afflicted the Sanctifier of all the faithful and our Guide unto death To his three things now in order For the first of them it is manifest that in the Primitive times one of the miraculous gifts then given was the gift of Interpretation and there is no body that I know does pretend to any of these wonderful gifts in our days I am sure this Author cannot charge any thing of this kind upon Doctor Owen who is a person of that industry and learning as his excellency in this gift is well known to come another way As for these arguments then that the thing is not needful and if profitable that it is more profitable to our selves and to others to get the sense of any Scripture by enquiry and study than by immediate Revelation which if we could have it so is as certainly false as that Gold is not so good as Brasss they may be spared seeing there need no proof of this that we are now to expect no Miracles from the Spirit of God For the second there are two points about Assurance which this Author does confound The one is the assurance that a man is in a state of Grace and the other an assurance of Salvation That a man who is in a state of Grace can never fall away sinally and perish which is the Doctrine of Perseverance is a point of the Synod of Dort against the Arminians and Lutherans Whether a man may be assured that he is in a state of Grace or no is a Point between Protestants and Papists For the former Perseverance depends on special Grace and that on personal Election and I perceive this Gentleman hangs his head at that but as for the latter we may be in doubt what indeed his mind is One would think by his arguments at the beginning against Assurance he should be no Protestant but he is for we have his express words for it If we be the Children of God it is certainly possible for us to be assured of it I must ask him then is Assurance a good thing St Paul had it and St. John had it Hereby we know we are passed from death to life and By this we know that we know him If it be a thing then that is good it must be an effect of God's Spirit and this is proved The Spirit also beareth witness with our spirits This witness is our Assurance and consequently it may be prayed for according to the promise in Luke as well as any other of the profitable effects he hath mentioned Whether it be a thing needful is a question not needful so long as it is good It is an Egg I hope to argue with him though it be not Bread The only difficulty here is to state this Assurance It is a controversal point and his one term Absolute will do little to the decision When our first Divines defined Faith by a Persuasion of special mercy so that without this assurance they must think a man could not be saved this was the most dangerous extreme on one hand and that no man at all without Revelation according to the Trent Doctors can be assured that he is in God's favour is the extreme on the other But for the stating this assurance aright between the Protestant and Papist To be a certainty not of Faith because the Scripture gives no testimony to any particular person but a certainty moral or of hope which must be such as excludes doubting that is all sinful doubting though not fear or all fear that is the fear of diffidence or distrust but not the fear of pious solicitude is a work requires from me more deliberation and more paper This I will say only that there is a neutral truth in the most of
Prayer The Gift of Prayer Praying in the Spirit Praying by it or with it The Spirit of Prayer I apprehend to be no other than the Spirit of Grace or Regeneration with the connotation of its operation on the soul in regard to this duty There is no Christian born of God without this whereby he cries Abba Father as no man born after the flesh without his breathing There is no holy thought meditation desire after God or request that is acceptable to him in Christ but it is from this Spirit of Adoption or Prayer It follows then that forasmuch as any gracious and regenerate man may use a Form if he pleases and some such have used a Form sometimes as well as Conceived Prayer that it is a conceit exceedingly extravagant and in no wise to be approved to think that a Liturgy or use of a Form is inconsistent with the Spirit of Prayer Suppose we saw those holy men Bradford Rogers Philpot Saunders saying their Prayers out of the Psalter and blessing God for the Book of King Edward I will pour upon the house of Judah and Jerusalem the Spirit of Prayer and Supplication The Gift of Prayer I account to be a natural or acquired not infused ability or faculty of expressing the thoughts and affections with fluency or readiness in Prayer It does depend chiefly I think upon an aptness of memory retaining the sentences and very words of Scripture when others can retain the sense only together with a warm fancy and a tongue that is voluble In short it is a ready utterance which must be always distinguished from the former I remember a person who was otherwise of large parts filled with all present matter for administring a word in season to the weary who in praying sometimes alone with me I have observed to hum and hack so in his Prayer that I never heard any so unable to express himself in my life who yet would use only conceived Prayer and in the mean while I have been so assured of the Grace of God and eminency of that Grace in the person of that sincerity in his duty such an humbling under sin fervency in his petitions melting under the sence of God's mercy and pardon and in a word a heart it self no less broken than those words that I cannot but be satisfied beyond doubt for ever since that the Gift of Prayer is one thing and the Spirit of Prayer is another Now forasmuch as the gifts which are administred to men by God's Spirit are bestowed for use and the edification of the Church if a Liturgy or form of Prayer were imposed on the Clergy in opposition to that provision which God hath made and appointed for the good of his Church that is Gifts unto men for the work of the Ministry or if the Bishops would not suffer them to be employed to the end they are given I do not know any argument of so much weight and like to be prevailing with Religious people against Common-Prayer as this allegation As every one hath received the gift even so minister the same one to another as good stewards of the manifold Grace of God But we must not judge so of our Superiors The Churches imposing a Liturgy and set forms on the Minister is to be lookt on as cumulative to his gifts and not as destructive to them There is the gift of Prayer as of Prudence and Knowledge to Ministers as they are single and as they are in conjunction These forms of Prayer are the exercise of the mutual gifts of the Churches Pastors in conjunction and when this Common Service of theirs is performed in the Pew the Minister is lest to the use of his single gifts in the Pulpit without any prejudicing the one by the other Indeed if the Common-Prayer be made a Napkin to wrap up the Talents of any I will not justifie the abuse of that which hath its use and commendation upon other reasons And yet by the way I do not know moreover whether all those Texts which speak of gifts for the Church and which argue power thereupon to profit with them are not to be understood of the Spirit in those times so that when it was manifestly injurious to the Holy Ghost himself then to forbid the use of those Gifts to any which he had ministred to them to that end it may not be so altogether as to those natural gifts and talents that men have now which notwithstanding they are not to be denied to be also from the Spirit seeing even Bezaleel and his fellows skill in working in curious works is attributed to him and every good gift is said to be of God I question whether the person himself be either so engaged to put them to that particular use having them from nature to general service or that there does appear the like injury to God and the Church in some restraint on them as there would be in the other There are diversity of Gifts but the same Spirit Praying in the Spirit I apprehend to be praying with those qualifications which are wrought in us by the Spirit and prescribed by him in the word to make our Prayers acceptable to God Praying in the Spirit say Practical Divines consists not in a copiousness of words but extent of affections The actuating of all does lie in the operation of the Spirit on our hearts in this duty We must pray also according to God's will which is another qualification in Prayer and when a man does pray according to what the Spirit hath directed in the Word he may be said very appositely to pray in the Spirit Two things there are then more particularly wherein I will place this operation The one is the Spirit doth many times pitch the heart upon those objects or things which are most fit for us to ask The other is and then doth excite our desires and enlarge our affections about the same The Spirit also helpeth our infirmities for we know not what we should pray for as we ought but the Spirit it self maketh intercession for the Saints according to the will of God I will not doubt to quote this Text again for thus much It is said that Satan entred into Judas when he went to betray his Lord. And Satan moved David to number the people It appears from hence that Satan puts evil thoughts in the heart and pitches them on objects he tempts them withal The Spirit of God doubtless does no less in the good actions which he stirs up in Gods Saints He puts good thoughts in the mind and represents things to us says the Author of the Friendly Debate himself more clearly than we could make them by all our reasoning I might perhaps cite something from this Gentleman to sute with this but I think the subject here too grave to make him my Authority When the Spirit is said to help us in the Text before exagitated to make our Prayers even about things our selves know not and
doth in that manner work his graces in us that they are still the genuine effects of the Evidence and Motives of the Gospel Of the natural use of our faculties the understanding and will and of our own care and diligence in using the external means of grace His operations in us make us capable of recovering our selves by degrees and all the while there is no sensible difference between them and the natural operatious of our minds and yet we are sure we have his assistance and help in all the good we do and without it we can do nothing at all to saving purposes This is the Doctrine which if no inferences but Orthodox be drawn from it I take to be sound We have then some Vse of it which is also very good There is but a little of it but if he had been more in that and less in quarrels with the Doctor it had yet been all better And so God bless the hopeful Author in his Studies CHAP. VI. Of the Authors Calumniations of Dr. Owen and some reply to them Having thus done with the Book there are some passages require my reflection upon them for the Doctors vindication The Doctor is accused of Nonsense of Contradiction of Error It is fit that some thing should be said in reference to the two latter though it be but a rudeness to go about to answer any thing to the former For the first therefore I will say this only If the Doctor hath expressed any thing darkly that this Author cannot make sense of it such a place or passage as to him is to go for nothing That is all in civility to be said of it For the second There is one instance I will mention about Election The Doctor in one place of his Book speaking I suppose to a prophane person yet presuming on his Election tells him He cannot believe his Election any otherwise but as God reveals it by the effects that is untill he believe and repents he cannot conclude he is Elected In another place speaking I suppose to the tender serious Christian who is yet in trouble about his Election he saies He cannot justly doubt of his Election until he be in such a condition as wherein it is impossible that the effects of Election should be wrought in him This the Author makes a contradiction but it is only the distinguishing between these two things A not concluding and A concluding not and the Doctor is cleared The man who sees not the effects of Election on his heart and in his life cannot conclude that he is elected here is the not concluding which ought to be And the man that sees them not cannot conclude for all that that he is not Elected because they may be wrought in him before he dies here is the concluding not which must be avoided So the one is rebuked and the other supported as they should both be Such are the Doctors contradictions For the third which is the Doctors Errors I must distinguish of Error There is Human Error Error common to man It is the nature of man to be subject to mulake to be deceived to err saies the Orator and there are Pernicious Errors This Gentlemans accusations are of both sorts For the former sort There is two or three places where this Author is very confident upon the Doctor for his saying that the Spirit is given to us in his Person as well as in his Effects which methinks I cannot pass because I do not know well whether the Error be in the Doctor or in this Author or in my self I am apt to think that it is too much to say that the Spirit dwelleth personally in any man though we are said to be the Temples of the Holy Ghost and that it is too little to say he is given only in his gists graces or effects I would say rather that the Spirit is given it self for these Effects I look upon the Spirit of Christ to be given to us for a principle of life and union with our Head from whom we have through this Spirit the communication of all saving influence unto a holy life It is the received opinion that there is an habitual righteousness infused by God in the soul for our justification according to the Schools or according to our Divines for our Regeneration and that this is the principle of life and power in the soul unto holy operations I must confess here I do not receive this Doctrine I have it somewhere in my Mediocria I think more cautiously but I do really believe no infusion of habits I count that the Spirit by a motion on the Will exciting it to act does incline it to farther acts by the impression which is made and that the habit then is acquired by the iteration of those acts and delight in them or love to them shed abroad in our hearts by the same Holy Ghost given to us I do believe consequently that it is the Spirit it self dwelling in us as the Scripture understands its own expression which is that principle of life from whose constant secret and unperceptable aid does proceed all those actions which are holy and good and acceptable to God I do believe there is a time when Christ gives his Spirit to every one of his Elect for uniting him to himself as his head and that this union is effected immediately by that communication and that through this Spirit all vital influence must be derived to us I cannot frame my self to say the Spirit is personally in us but he is in Christs members as a principle of life and spiritual action and as the formal band of that union which we have with him Now ye are the body of Christ and members in particular As the body is one and hath many members and all the members of that body are one body so also is Christ I cannot tell well therefore how to brook some expressions as I find somewhere in this Author and in another before him that when the Scripture speaks of our having the Spirit of Christ and having it so as to be led by him and if we have not the Spirit of Christ we are none of his they are willing to interpret the having Christs Spirit to be only the being of his temper and and disposition which is the bringing down the Scripture to our ordinary converse and seems to me unholy I hope these men do believe the Christian faith and do reverence his mysteries And there are these three of them The mysterie of the Trinity The mysterie of the Incarnation and the Mystical Union between Christ and his Church It is true that Christ is not a Natural head but a Political as opposed to natural but not as opposed to mystical He is a Political head as he governs us and as we are in subjection to him but he is also a Mystical head vouchsafing to us that spiritual influence which enables us to obey him He governs us and so