Selected quad for the lemma: spirit_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
spirit_n	ghost_n	holy_a	spiritual_a	7,986	5	6.3875	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A62157	Some queries proposed, to the monethly meeting of the Quakers at Aberdeen; the sixth day of June, 1700. By Robert Sandilands With their answers thereto; together with some remarks thereupon. Published by authority. To which is prefixed a letter from George Keith, sent to the Quakers in Aberdeen, containing a very serious and Christian expostulation with his old friends, &c.	Sandilands, Robert.; Keith, George, 1639?-1716. aut	1700 (1700)	Wing S663; ESTC R220626	23,403	36

of Life the word that is nigh in the Heart and in the Mouth but the Letter of the Scripture is outward of it self a dead thing a meer declaration of good things but not the things themselves therefore it nor is nor can be the Chief or Principal RULE of Christians But least any should mistake him and think that tho he owned them not to be the principal Rule yet at least he acknowledged them to be a RULE he immediatly adds § 3 That which is given to Christians for a RULE and Guide must needs be so full as it may clearly and distinctly Guide and Order them in all things and occurrences that may fall out But the Scriptures are not such as he instanceth in several particulars therefore the Scriptures cannot be a RULE to them And as they are not a RULE so nor the Rule as he sayeth in another place As for CHRIST and his Apostles using the Scriptures for convincing of their Opposers so do we and yet this proves not that either he or we judge them pag. 15. near the end to be the Rule whereby to try all things and Spirits c. The Reader may plainly observe the great inconsistency betwixt what R. B. says and what Andrew Jaffray and his Friends say They affirm the Scriptures to be an RULE an Infallible RULE and an Infallible RULE of Faith and Life in which they are very orthodox and I must in Charity believe that in so farr are our Modern Quakers Reformed and very justly laid aside their former Doctrine Which is yet more plainly and explicitly delivered by William Penn in his Appendix to the Christian Quaker for after endeavouring to prove that the Scriptures were never the General RULE he at last by way of Objection says Pag 136 But is not the Scripture the RULE of our Day he answers if the RULE then the general RULE for pag 137. whatsoever is the RULE of Faith and Life excludeth all other from being general they being but particular in respect of it self therefore not the RULE of Faith and Life but besides their not being general I have several Reasons to o●ter and he brings no less then nine or ten Reasons why they cannot be the Rule of Faith and Life See George Keith's Book called the Deism of William Penn c. Wherein there is a full examination and confutation of William Penns Discourse of the General RULE of Faith and Practice and Judge of Contraversie Printed Anno 1699. Observe also what is said in one of their Books called the Quakers Refuge p. 17. Whether the first Penman of the Scriptures was Moses or Hermes or whether both these are one or whether there are not many Words contained in the Scriptures which were not spoken by INSPIRATION of the Holy Spirit And in a Book called Truths Defence by G. F. and R. H. p. 2d You may as well Condemn the Scriptures to the Fire as our Queries Q. 2. Whether the Light within be sufficient of it self to Salvation without any thing else A. Unto such as are under a moral impossibility of coming to the knowledge of the Incarnation Life Miracles Crucifiction Death Resurrection and Ascension of our Lord JESUS ' CHRIST the Light wherewith he inlighteneth every Man coming into the World is sufficient to Salvation Ioh. 1. 9. Tit. 2. 11. But where the outward knowledge of the Scriptures is attainable or the outward History of our Saviour it is altogether damnable not to believe the same R. This Answer to the second Querie is in my opinion no Answer at all but a down right shifting the Question which hath no respect to such as are under a moral impossibility of knowing the Life Death Miracles c. of our Blessed Lord JESUS CHRIST but to such as have the means of knowing them and tho to such it be certainly Damnable not to believe them yet that tells us not whither the Light within be of its self sufficient to Salvation without any thing else yea or not and therefore I must again intreat that they may be pleased Candidly and sincerely to give a plain and direct Answer to the Querie and this I have the more reason to demand because Robert Barclay of Urie at the first giving in of their Answers being ●ressed to declare whether to such as have the means of knowing the Life Death Miracles c. of the Holy JESUS the Light within was of it self sufficient to Salvation He answered negatively that it was not and carried away the Answers to have that insert as thier Answer to the Querie which after all was not done From whence it appears that either they are not agreed amongst themselves about the resolution of this Querie and so shift the Answering it Or else that they are afraid to own the Truth plainly least thereby they contradict their Antient Friends And particularly George Whitehood who plainly asserts in his Antidote p. 28. That the Quakers are offended with G. K. for saying the Light within is not sufficient to Salvation without something else The which Proposition seing he blames as false he must hold the Contradictory to be true that the light within is sufficient to Salvation without any thing else Yea G. W. hath granted in his Antidote p. 28. that CHRIST as outwardly Considered is that something else which G. K. means And W. P. in his appendix to the Christian Quakers pag. 158. plainly affirms that the belief of the History of CHRIST's Birth Death c. is none of the absolute necessaries to our Salvation And in his Quakerism a new Nickname c. He saveth That Faith in the History of CHRIST's outward pag. 6 manifestation is a deadly poyson these latter Ages has been infected with and he sayes also in his Rejoynder to I. Fa●do that CHRIST in the Gentiles is a greater mistery then CHRIST as he was made manifest in the Flesh it is strange that should be counted most misterious which was the introduction to the mistery and these transactions counted most difficult that were by the Divine Wisdom of GOD ordained as so many facil representations of what was to be accomplished in Man it is to le●en if not totally exclude the true mistery of Godliness which is CHRIST manifested in his Children their hope of Glory p. 335 Like to this is his saying in his Preface to the Collection of Robert Barclays Book ' s. O Reader sayeth he great is the mistery of Godliness and if the Apostle said it of the manifestation pag. 36. of the Son of GOD in the Flesh if that be a mistery and if a mistery it is not to be spelled out but by the revelation of the Spirit how much more is the See also His Christi an Quaker pag. 12. work of Regeneration a mistery that is wholly inward and spiritual Q. 3. Whether the Holy Three the FATHER SON and HOLY GHOST that bear record in Heaven be not threedistinct Persons of one

12. R. This Answer the Reader may be pleased to compare with the Quotations in the Remarks on the 10 and 12. Answers Q. 14 Did not the LORD JESUS CHRIST by his most perfect obedience and sacrifice of himself which he offered up unto GOD fully satisfy the Justice of his FATHER and so pay the Ransom for the sins of Mankind Q. 15. Did CHRIST suffer the punishment due for the sins of fallen Man and did he make full payment in mans stead for the debt contracted by sin A. To both which last Queries we answer that we believe that the LORD JESUS CHRIST did freely offer himself an acceptable Sacrifice for the sins of Mankind and that the FATHER of his great mercy accepted of that Sacrifice as a sufficient expiation for the sins of the whole World as in these Scriptures 1 Pet. 1. 19. 1 Pet. 2. 24. 1 Pet. 3. 18. John 10. 14 15 17 18. Verses R. This Answer to the 14 and 15. Queries may be compared with the 11th Question in G. Ws. Appendix to the 2d part of the Christian Quaker p. 242. where it is asked whether Divine Justice did propperly and strictly require a full payment and punishment upon CHRIST in mans stead for all the debt contracted and injury done by fallen man to which it is answered No CHRIST'S sufferings were not of that nature or intent c. and thereafter he says p. 244 and see p 240 All these Scriptures relating to CHRIST'S sufferings as Isa 53 c. do all intimat GOD'S great kindness and Condescention in CHRIST JESUS and his humiliation and deep suffering under the weight and burden of sin and as by the Grace of GOD he tasted Death for every man all which fall greatly short of proving our adversaries charge against him viz that GOD poured down his Wrath and Revenge on his innocent SON for satisfaction to Divine justice in mans stead that have done the injury I say all the Sciptures alledged by them can never prove this c. Here we have a positive answer to the Queries and no shuffling or shifting the matter as A. J. and his Friends do in their answer And W. P. in his Rejoinder to Io. Faldo p. 284 and 255 Justifyeth W. Smiths saying CHRIST in us offereth himself a living Sacrifice to GOD for us by which the Wrath of GOD is appeased to us And G. W. in his Light and Life p. 44. doth also justify the same but what he sayeth is too large to be here inserted and therefore I refer the Reader to the Book it self and to G. Ks. 3 Nar. p. 24. W. P. in his reason against Railing p. 9. sayes That if it is our duty to forgive without a satisfaction received and that GOD is to forgive us as we forgive others then is a satisfaction totally excluded See also his Sandy foundation wherein he expresly argueth against CHRIST's satisfaction and insists largely on it I have not the Book at present by me so cannot quote exactly any passage out of it But above all that which I think is most horrible and blasphemous and undervaluing the sufferings of our Blessed LORD E. B. of great esteem among them sayeth in his works p. 273 printed 1672 and which his friends reprinted and approved of the sufferings sayeth he of the People of GOD called Quakers in this Age is greater suffering and more unjust then in the dayes of CHRIST or of the Apostles what was done to CHRIST or the Apostles was chiefly done by a Law and in great part by the due execution of a Law c. Q 16. Do the best works that any are enabled to perform even by the assistance of the Spirit merit pardon of sin and eternal Life A We answer negatively we have no merit all is of free Grace and mercy through CHRIST Tit. 3. 5. R. This Answer seems to bespeak a humble and self denyed frame of spirit and I am very glade to find such come from A. I. c. But I am sure their Friends books are filled with a great deal of self exaltation and abasing of all others and too much spiritual pride and boasting of their faithfulness as that by and for which they merited or hoped to attain eternal Life may be too much observed in most of their preachings and as an evidence for what I say let the Reader consider what Samuel Fisher sayeth in his Rusticus c. p 90. that because evil works saith he are the meritorious cause of our Condemnation therefore good works are the meritorious cause of our Justification See also p. 84. 88. ibid. and see also G. Ws Voice of Wisdom p. 36. Q 17. Shall the Man CHRIST JESUS come again and appear without us to judge the Quick and the Dead A. We answer affirmatively yea He shall according to these Scriptures Mat. 25 31. Acts 17 31. This Answer may be compared with what G. W. says in his Light and Life p 41. but three comings saith he not onely that in the Flesh at Jerusalem and that in the Spirit but also another coming in the Flesh yet to be expected we do not read of but a 2d coming without sin unto Salvation which in the Apostles days was looked for And in his CHRIST ascended c p. 21. 22. c. not only denyeth any personal comming of CHRIST yet to be at the end of the World but denyeth him to have a Personal Existance in Heaven without the Saints and chargeth it to be Anthropomorphism and Muggletonism See also W. Bailies Coll p. 29. Q. 18. Is there any Resurrection of the Dead that all or any of the Deceased Saints wait for and doth the same Natural Body that Dyeth rise again or is the Resurrection nothing else but what ye have already or what ye shall have immediatly after Death A. We believe that there shall be a Resurrection both of the Just and of the Unjust according to the Scriptures Acts 24 15 1 Cor. 15 5. also the same Chap. from 35 to 38 verse and we believe that the Resurrection is not already past nor is that which we shall immediatly enter into after Death R. By this answer to this 18 Q. A. J. and his friends shift the question intirely for I know that verbally they seem to own a Resurrection but that our Natural Elementary bodies shall rise again they utterly deny and oppose So G. W. argueth most violently against it in the second part of his Christian Quaker p. 352. 353. c. and so doth W. P. in his reasoning against railing p. 134 137. If the thing saith he can be the same and notwithstanding changed for shame let us never make so much stur against the Doctrin of transubstantiation for the absurdity of it is rather out down then equalled by this carnal Resurrection And R. Hubberthorn sayes Coll. p. 121 these are they that plead for a life in sin while they are here and that say that the Saints glorified in Heaven do yet hope for