discerned by the feeling and therefore our Saviour saith feele and see a spirit hath not flesh and bones as yee see mee to have And some have reported that they have felt such bodies assumed by spirits as colde as yce and of a divers substance from humane flesh as Alexander ab Alexandro so writeth of another to whom a spirit appeared and Cardanus of himselfe If any man object that Abraham washed the Angels feet and yet discerned them not I will not answer with Pererius whose judgement I refuse not in the rest that Abrahams intent upon other things regarded it not But I note a difference betweene the operation of good and bad Angels that these never appeared with true bodies and therefore were called Phantasmata visions fansies Marke 6.49 But unto the other God gave the use of true bodies for a time during that ministerie or service as appeareth in that they did eat and drinke were lodged had their feet washed c. 3. But howsoever spirits may assume bodies they are not such as can be instruments of generation by conveying of humane seed as some have imagined because the scripture saith children are the inheritance of the Lord Psal. 127.3 And Evah confesseth when Cain was borne that she had obtained a son of God Gen. 4.1 and if that were true which is fabled of Merlin such kind of birth should be oftner seene in the world Wherefore by the sonnes of God in this place 1. Neither doe wee understand Angels good or bad 2. Neither men of tall and great stature as such things as are excellent in their kind are so called as high and tall trees are said to be the trees of God Psal. 104.16.3 Nor yet the sonnes of Princes and great men as the Chalde readeth to whom Mercerus subscribeth which are called Gods in scripture Psal. 82.6 I said ye are Gods c 4. Neither yet are they so called because they came of Seeth who as Suidas thinketh was in respect of his religion and great knowledge saluted as a God in earth 5. But they are here named the sonnes of God that were of the righteous seed and worshippers of the true God as the wicked are called the sonnes of the Devil and he their father Iohn 8.44 ye are of your father the Devill who although they were not indeed the sonnes of God in his eternall election yet were they so in respect of their externall calling QVEST. VII The meaning of these words My spirit shall not alwaies strive c. 4. Vers. 3. MY spirit shall not alwaies strive c. 1. Not as the latine text is My spirit shall not alwaies remaine which some expound of Gods wrath some of his providence some of the holy Ghost some of the soule and spirit of man inspired of God and then the sense to bee that Gods wrath shall not alwaies continue but he will punish them at once or he will no more protect them or take care for them neither his spirit shall be with them or he will take away their life and spirit from them For this variety of interpretation ariseth of the mistaking of the word which signifieth to contend or judge not to remaine 2 Neither is Pagmines interpretation so apt my spirit shall not alwaies bee sheathed as a sword in a scabbard and so hee would derive the word jadon of neden which signifieth a sheath 3. The meaning then of these words my spirit shall not alwaies judge or contend is neither as Hierom expoundeth non eos ad â—ternos servabo cruciatus I will not punish them for ever but render unto them here that which they deserve For S. Peter sheweth that their soules are now in the prison of hell and so everlastingly punished 1 Peter 3.19 Neither as Cajetane that God would no more punish them spiritually as hee had done by taking his grace and spirit from them but now he would inflict a corporall punishment upon them for God had not yet punished them giving them the space of 120. yeares to repent But either wee may understand these words with Oleaster that God would no longer strive with them in reprooving and admonishing them which they regarded not or with Iunius God would no longer consult or dispute the matter as it were with himselfe what to doe with them but if they amended not within that space set he would certainly destroy them QVEST. VIII What these Giants were 5. Vers. 4. THese were Giants c. Some thinke that these were called Giants not for their greatnesse of stature but their cruell and beastly conditions so thinke Philo Ioseph Damas. Cyril with others so also Iunius 2. But beside their fierce and cruell nature it is most probable that they were of huge and great stature Mercer for such there were also after the floud as the sonnes of Anak in comparison of whom the Israelites seemed as grashoppers Num. 13.34 such were the Emmims and Zaâ—zummims Deut. 2.10 17. and Og the King of Basan whose bed was of iron being nine cubits in length and foure in breadth Deut. 3.11 and of this judgement are Ambrose Augustine Theodoret. 3. And these Giants huge in stature men of great strength as is shewed after in this verse did most abound before the floud and such also was the off-spring of this unlawfull copulation betweene the sonnes of God and daughters of men 4. And they were men of renowne that is famous over all the world because they did tyrannize over their neighbours and brought them in subjection of whom Berosius writeth that they had a City called Enos about the mountaine Libanus which ruled over all the world they did eat mans flesh and had unlawfull company with their mothers daughters with mules and bruit beasts 5. Some as Rasi doe referre this generation of Giants to the times of Enos further affirming that the Lord sent the Ocean Sea which destroyed the generation of these Giants and the third part of the world but the Giants which succeeded them were as wicked as they But of this inundation of the Ocean no mention is made in Scripture neither is it like that the generation of Giants began so soone in the world neither with Aben Ezra doe we understand this of the generation of Giants after the floud of whom came Og and the rest as though any of the Giants had escaped the floud to beget Giants afterward and that Noe and his sonnes were Giants it is not to be thought Mercer Neither were these Giants onely in Noahs time but when this violent rage of lust beganne to reigne in the world then this off-spring of Giants came in which continued till the time of Noah 6. Neither were these Giants onely of Seths race as some thinke nor yet onely of Cain as R. Sel. but in both families there were Giants after they thus coupled together with out the feare of God Mercer Calvin 7. So that the Nephilim here spoken of so named of Naphal which
Quievit à condendo alio mundo non quievit ab administrando God rested from creating another world but not from the administration and government thereof Lippoman as our blessed Saviour saith in the Gospell My father worketh and I woâ—ke 2. But God rested not as though he were wearie for virtus infinita non est fatigabilis an infinite power cannot be wearied as Gods power is infinite though Aristotle ignorantly denie it giving this for a reason why the earth moveth not because there is no power sufficient to stirre it out of the place lib. 2. de Caelo And beside potentia incorporea a power which is incorporeall is not subject to be wearie though it be not infinite as the Angels and the intellectuall part of man though this seeme sometime to bee dulled not in it selfe but in respect of the organes and instruments but if spirits of a finite nature are not fatigable or apt to be wearied much lesse God who is an infinite spirit Tostat. qu. 15. 3. Therefore God is said to rest both that this rest might bee mâ—numentum perfectae absolutae creationis a monument of the creation perfited and that God by his example might induce us in like manner to rest from our labours upon his Sabbaths QUEST XIV Of the changing of the Sabbath from the seventh day to the first day of the weeke THe seventh day 1. The Apostolicall Church changed the holy day of rest from the seventh day to the first which is the Lords day in remembrance of our Redemption by Christ which in the time of the new law is maximum beneficiorum recentissimum the greatest benefit and the newest and most fresh in memorie as the greatest benefit in the old law was the creation of the world 2. And although our redemption was purchased by the death of Christ yet because this benefit should not have a full perfection unlesse we should rise againe unto life eternall this day was to be assigned rather in memoriall of Christs resurrection than of his passion and though the rest of the Sabbath did signifie the rest of Christ in the grave having consummate and finished the painfull works of his passion yet because pretiosior nobis fuit resurrectio c. the resurrection of Christ was more precious unto us than his rest in the grave therefore not upon the Sabbath but upon the day of the resurrection doe we keepe an holy memoriall unto God Tostat. quaest 11. 3. The Apostolicall Church according to their Christian libertie in stead of the seventh day made choyce of the first in remembrance of the resurrection of Christ ut se à Iudaica synogoga discerneret that they might be discerned from the Jewish Synagogue Vrsin QUEST XV. How the Lord is said to have blessed and sanctified the day Vers. 11. THerefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day c. 1. Not that other dayes were accursed sed quod prae aliis hanc celebrem fecit but because he preferred this before the rest for if those dayes are counted blessed and had in remembrance wherein some good is wrought for the Church or Common-wealth much more this day wherein all things were finished Simler 2. Of the other six dayes it is not said the Lord blessed them for it was sufficient quod in singulis illis creatura productae sunt that in every one of them some creature was brought forth but of this day it is said God blessed and sanctified it what is this He sanctified it ab aliis illum segregavit he did separate and set it apart from other dayes Chrysost. homil 10. in Genes 3. Benedictio semper importat multiplicationem c. Blessing doth alwayes imply multiplying So God bestowed many blessings and good things upon this day beyond other dayes Tostat. qu. 16. 4. Isidore doth specially referre this Commandement to the holy Ghost for these reasons quia spiritus sanctus septiformis dicitur c. because the holy Ghost in respect of the manyfold graces thereof is said to be seven-fold the sanctifying of the seventh day peculiarly belongeth unto the Spirit quia non est nominata sanctificatio nisi in Sabbato and because no mention is made of sanctification but in the Sabbath day and further for that dono spiritus sancti nobis requies aeterna prâ—mittitur by the gift of the Spirit eternall rest is promised unto us whereof mention is made in this precept 5. But how is the Lord said to blesse the Sabbath here seeing the Lord saith by his Prophet I cannot suffer your new Moones and your Sabbaths Isai. 1.13 The answer is that the Jewes sinned carnaliter observantes sabbatum in observing the Sabbath carnally and so the Sabbath is not acceptable unto God but when it is so kept as that it putteth us in minde of our everlasting rest in the Kingdome of heaven Isidor 2. Places of Doctrine observed out of the fourth Commandement 1. Doct. Of the generall and particular contents of this Commandement IN this Commandement generally all such holy works and duties are prescribed to be done whereby the service of God is advanced and likewise therein is forbidden either the omission and neglect of such holy works or the prophanation thereof by all such works as do hinder the holy exercises and are contrary thereunto 1. In particular here is commanded the faithfull and diligent preaching and setting forth of the Word of God as the Apostle saith Wo is unto me if I preach not the Gospell 1 Cor. 9.16 and he chargeth Timothie to preach the Word to be instant in season and out of season 2 Tim. 4.2 Contrary to this dutie are 1. The neglect and omitting of teaching and preaching as the Prophet Esay reproveth the idle and carelesse watchmen They are all dumbe dogges they cannot barke they lie and sleepe and delight in sleeping Isai. 56.10 2. The abusing and counterfeiting of this holy function when the word of God is not sincerely and purely handled but according to mens fansies and humours but the Apostle saith We are not as those that make merchandize of the Word of God 2 Cor. 2.17 2. The often administration of the Sacraments as occasion serveth is another exercise whereby the Lords day is sanctified as Act. 2.42 They continued in the Apostles doctrine fellowship breaking of bread Contrary hereunto on the Ministers behalfe are 1. The negligent administration of the Sacraments and omitting to call upon the people often to resort unto them 2. The corrupting or perverting of the Sacraments as the Romanists have turned the Sacrament into a sacrifice being ordained for the living they applie it to the dead Christ biddeth us to eat and drinke it they hold it up to be gazed upon and in many such things have they degenerated from the institution of our blessed Saviour 3. The carefull hearing of the Word of God is commanded and diligent resorting to the exercises of religion as the Bereans are commended for searching the
him as he is But yet this must be understood with three conditions the first is touched by Hierome Non solum Divinitutem Patris c. posse oculos carnis aspicere sed mentis That not onely the Divinitie of the Father but neither of the Sonne or holy Ghost can the eyes of the bodie see but of the minde c. So also Athanasius as he is cited by Augustine Deum omnino esse invisibilem c. nisi in quantum Spiritu mente nosci potest That God is altogether invisible but as he may be knowne in the Spirit and minde c. These then at this time saw not with their bodily eyes the essence of God but certaine visible signes onely and demonstrations of his presence Secondly we shall have a more full sight of God in the next world than in this as Augustine saith Nemo potest in hac vita videre sicuti est No man can see him in this life as he is Eâ— promittitur sanctis in alia vita To see God in his nature is promised in the next life c. So also Gregorie Quamdiu hic mortaliter vivitur c. As long as we live in this mortall life God cannot be seene in his nature c. Thirdly yet fully the Divine nature shall not be comprehended of the Saints no not in the next life as Augustine to this purpose citeth Ambrose interpreting that place of the Apostle Who onely hath immortaliter c. whom never man saw neither can see c. Si natura ipsim est invisibilitas sicut incorruptibilitas c. If it appertaine to the nature of God to be invisible as well as to be incorruptible that nature shall not be changed in the next world of invisible to become visible because he cannot of incorruptible become corruptible c. And againe upon those words of the same Apostle To the King everlasting immortall invisible c. hee writeth thus Vnde ego non audeo ista distinguere c. Therefore I dare not divide or distinguish these things which the Apostle hath joyned together to say To him that is incorruptible for ever in this world and the next but invisible not in the next world but onely in this Contrarie then to this orthodoxall doctrine of the Fathers agreeable to the Scriptures are these ventrous and bold positions That wee shall in the next life participate with Christs Godhead and be made capable of his Divine substance That there is not any thing of Gods which his Saints shall not see In which assertion Augustine doth directly oppose himselfe to all such Dogmatists and Novelists in these words Non quia Dei plenitudinem quisquam non solum oculis corporis sed vel ipsa mente aliquando comprehendit Not because the fulnesse of God any can comprehend at any time not onely with the eyes of the bodie but with the minde it selfe c. for it is one thing to see another to comprehend the whole in seeing c. Totum comprehenditur videndo quod ita videtur ut nihil ejus lateat videntem c. The whole is comprehended in seeing which it so seene that no part thereof is hid from the seer c. Here Augustine evidently testifieth that God cannot wholly be seene unlesse nothing in the Godhead should be hid unto us which here he manifestly denieth 6. Morall observations 1. Observ. Honour in this life no signe of Gods favour Vers. 1. COme up thou and Aaron Nadab and Abihu c. These two which are bidden to come up with Moses and Aaron afterward were slaine with fire from heaven which sheweth that preferment in this life is not alwayes a signe of Gods favour but that the wicked are often exalted and lifted up that they may have the greater fall as the Lord said he 〈◊〉 appointed Pharaoh to shew his power in him Ferus 2. Observ. We must 〈◊〉 upon the Lord 〈◊〉 patience Vers. 16. THe seventh day the Lord called to Moses God would not at the first call unto Moses but maketh him to wait six daye Ne 〈◊〉 familiaritate superâ—iret Lest he should was proud by too much familiaritie Oleaster Vt discamus patienter ferre c. And that we may learne to beare it patiently if God at the first doe not answer to our desire Lippoman As S. Paul therefore be sought the Lord thrice that the temptation of his flesh whereby he was buffered might depart from him 2 Cor. â—â— 8 3. Observ. Sufficient deputies to be left in the Magistrate or Ministers 〈◊〉 absence Vers. 14. IN that Moses leaveth Aaron and Hur in his place It sheweth that the like 〈◊〉 in Ministers God would blesse to leave able deputies in their place when they have just cause to be absent and the contrarie fault he will severely punish 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 4. Observ. The 〈◊〉 of fasting and prayer CHAP. XXV 1. The Method and Argument IN this Chapter Moses beginneth to set forth such generall ceremonies as belonged to the Tabernacle then instituted for the publike service of God there are two parts thereof the preparation to vers 10. the description to vers 40. 1. In the preparation these things are expressed in the charge which God giveth to Moses 1. Who shall offer the things required namely the people vers 2. 2. What they shall offer vers 3 4 5 6. 3. To what end vers 8. 4. After what manner vers 9. 2. In the description First the Arke is appointed to be made both the bodie thereof 1. Of what matter vers 10. 2. Of what measure vers 10. 3. With what ornaments it must be overlaid with gold vers 11. 4. What adjuncts and appendants both of rings and barres vers 13 14 15. 5. And of the use thereof vers 16. As also the cover of the Arke 1. The matter vers 18. 2. Measure vers 18. 3. The fashion with Cherubims how to be made vers 19. and how to be placed vers 20. 4. The place of the cover vers 21. 5. The use vers 22. Secondly the Table is described 1. The matter 2. The measure and forme vers 23. 3. The parts thereof the crowne vers 24. The border vers 25. The rings vers 26. 4. The appendants the barres v. 28. 5. The appertenants the dishes cups goblets vers 29. 6. The use to set the Shew-bread upon vers 30. Thirdly the Candlesticke is appointed to bee made 1. The matter and after what manner to bee wrought of gold beaten with the hammer vers 31. 2. The parts six branches three on the one side and three on the other vers 32. 3. The forme and fashion with boules almonds knops and flowers to v. 37. 4. The use thereof vers 37. 5. The appertenances the snuffers and snuffe-dishes vers 37. 6. The quantitie of a talent of gold all this must be made vers 39. 2. The divers readings Vers. 4. Fine linnen G. rather than cotten or bombasine I. or silke caeter
Egyptians in the true worship of God but that he urged them generally to circumcision being not of the seed of Abraham to whom that ceremonie appertained is not like Mercer 4. Ioseph is said v. 56. to breake to the Egyptians that is to sell them food for so the word shabar signifieth either because it breaketh famine or because it is broken and ground to make bread of or rather because they made their bread in thin cakes and so used to breake not to cut it Mercer 4 Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. God only the disposer and foreteller of things to come Vers. 25. GOd hath shewed Pharaoh what he is about to doe God therefore is not an idle beholde or foreteller of things to come but a doer and disposer of them which overthroweth the opinion of the heathen that ascribe the actions of men some to fatall necessity as the Stoikes some to fortune or chance as the Epicures but the Scripture telleth us that whatsoever pleaseth God be doth in heaven and earth Psal. 135.6 Further we see that onely God that worketh in the world can foretell the things that are done in the world as the Prophet joyneth them both together Shew the things that are to come hereafter c. doe good or evill c. 41.21 therefore neither spirits nor any other creatures that are not able to dispose things done in the world have the foresight or knowledge of things to come 2. Doct. Repetitions of the same thing in Scripture not vaine Vers. 32. THe dreame was doubled because the thing is established with God c. Hence then it is evident that repetitions in the Scripture are not vaine tautologies and superfluous battâ—logies but that they are set downe for more certaintie for which cause this dreame was doubled to Pharaoh Mercer like as Saint Paul saith Philip. 3.1 It grieveth me not to write the same things unto you and for you it is a sure thing 3. Doct. The holy Ghost proved to be God Vers. 38. CAn we finde such a man as this in whom the spirit of God is Augustine noteth this to be the third place in Genesis where mention is made of the spirit of God the first is Gen. 1 2. The spirit of God moved upon the waters the second Genes 6.3 My spirit shall not alwaies strive with man the third in this place quaest 134. in Gen. 4. Doct. The mutability and change of time Vers. 54. THen began the seven yeares of famine to come c. After the yeares of plenty follow the yeares of famine so after peace commeth warre after health sicknesse nothing is permanent or of long continuance here Muscul. as the wise man saith There is a time for every purpose under heaven c. a time to weepe a time to laugh a time to mourne a time to dance Eccles. 3.14 5. Doct. Of the lawfulnesse of rich apparell and other ornaments in men of honourable place and calling Vers. 42. PHaraoh tooke off his ring Ioseph commeth forth adorned with these complements of honour a ring gold chaine fine linnen riding in the second charriot So that such ornaments are not to be condemned in men of honourable place and condition if these two rules be observed that neither such things be ambitiously sought and desired as here this great honour was offered to Ioseph by Pharaoh of him not begged and that they be not used to ostentation and vaine glory And for the lawfulnesse of rich apparell and ornaments of gold in men of high place to shew their authority and the more to keepe the people in feare and obedience the testimonie of our Saviour may suffice Mat. 62.9 Salomon in all his glory was not arayed like one of these 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Against superstitious shaving Vers. 14. ANd he shaved him c. Ioseph was shaved not only to cleanse himselfe from the filthinesse and smell of the prison but because it was not the fashion of that country to comâ— before the king with long and disordered haire Mercer This was a civill use of shaving they placed no religion in it as the Popelings of Rome doe 2. Confut. The vulgar Latine not wholly Hieromes translation Vers. 43. THey cryed before him Abrech This Hierome taketh to signifie a tender or young father of Abh father and rech tender delicate tradition in Gen. yet the Latine translation under Hieromes name readeth otherwise They cried before him that all should bow their knees whence it is evident that the vulgar Latin was not wholly of Hieromes doing beside it is very corrupt in divers places as vers 54. for in all the land of Egypt was bread the Latine hath in all the land of Egypt was famine 3. Confut. Against the popish prohibition of the marriage of Ministers Vers. 50. HE gave him to wife Asenah daughter of Potipherah prince or priest of On. The word cohen signifieth both a priest and a prince the Chalde readeth prince others the priest H.S. But because the priests were in great authority in Egypt and as from the Philosophers they chose Priests so out of the priests they made princes Mercer I thinke he was both priest and prince that is the chiefe and principall priest This sheweth that among the Egyptians their priests were married and had children so also was it lawfull in the old testament for the priests and in the new for the Apostles to be married and never forbidden in the Church of God till Antichrist began to set in his foot and his adherents to teach the doctrine of devils c. forbidding to marry and commanding to abstaine from meats as the Apostle saith 1 Tim. 4.1 3. 4. Confut. Against the superstitious restraine of marriage among Hebrews and Romanists Vers. 50. NOw unto Ioseph were borne two sonnes before the yeares of famine came The Hebrews note from hence that all the time of famine Ioseph abstained from the company of his wife because his children were borne before the famine came and that it is unlawfull for the man and wife to come together in the time of famine or any other common calamitie as they would gather out of Ioel 2.16 Let the Bride-groome goe forth of his chamber and the Bride out of her bride-chamber c. Contra. 1. It followeth not because Ioseph had no children borne in the time of the famine that therefore he came not to his wife all that time as though it is to be imagined that the Patriarkes when they had no children borne abstained from their wives 2. True it is that the man and wife according to the counsell of the Apostle should sometime sequester themselves for fasting and prayer but it must bee onely for a time and with consent lest Satan tempt them for their incontinency 1 Cor. 7.5 they must not then defraud one another for many moneths or many yeares Not much unlike to this Jewish conceit is the Popish restraint of marriage in the time of Lent for the
together with the fire was seene a thicke and darke cloud but there bright shining flames of fire like cloven tongues shewing the cleare light of the Gospell in respect of the cloudy darknesse of the Law Simler Here onely Moses was suffered to goe up the hill there all which were present received the holy Ghost here the people tremble and are afraid but there they were emboldened by the Spirit to preach the wonderfull works of God 4. Doct. By the preaching of the Word we are joyned unto God by faith Vers. 17. MOses brought the people out of their tents So Ministrorum officium est It is the dutie of Ministers by the preaching of the Gospell to draw men out of the tents of sin to joyne them unto God by faith Lippom. As the Apostle saith Faith is by hearing and hearing by the Word Rom. 10.17 5. Doct. Distinction of offices in the Church Vers. 24. COme up thou and Aaron with thee The people stand below in the campe but Moses and Aaron ascend up into the mount This sheweth the distinction of offices and callings in the Church betweene the Ministers and the people that none should take upon them the office of teaching and delivering the high things of God but they which are thereunto called as the Apostle would have every one to abide in the same vocation wherein he was called 1 Cor. 7.20 Marbach 5. Places of Controversie 1. Cont. Angels carrie not up our prayers unto God as Mediatours Vers. 8. ANd Moses reported the words of the people unto the Lord. Tostatus hereupon inferreth thus that as Moses carried up the peoples answer unto God Sie Angeli coram Deo proponunt orationes nostras So the Angels propound before God our prayers quaest 3. in fine Contra. 1. This followeth not for Moses was a messenger betweene God and his people hee was commanded to propound unto them what the Lord had said so when it can be shewed in Scripture that the Angels have the like charge from God to report our prayers the argument will follow else not 2. If the Angels should returne our prayers and sayings unto God as they doe the rest of our doings they do not as mediatours interpose themselves but onely as reporters returne as they find in the world and it is to this end as Augustine saith Vt super his Domini voluntatem consulant That they may know Gods pleasure further therein in Psal. 67. No doubt they doe observe who are faithfull and devout in prayer and who are otherwise The devill observed Iob as the Lord saith Hast thou not considered my servant Iob how none is like him in the earth Iob. 1.8 But he did it with envie the good Angels were witnesses of his pietie with joy So the Angels which were sent thorow the world returne this answer That all the world sitteth still and is at rest Zachar. 1.11 There was no devotion or exercise of godlinesse but all given to securitie and carelesnesse In this manner Angels may report as mens doings so their sayings unto God but this maketh nothing at all for the invocation of Angels which is by the Romanists hereby intended 2. Cont. That man hath no free will unto good Vers. 5. I◠yee will heare my voyce indeed and keepe my covenant c. From hence Lippoman would gather that man hath free will ad quid enim ita loqueretur c. For to what end should hee so speake if it were not in the peoples power to heare and keepe the covenant Contra. 1. If this were in mans power to keepe Gods covenant which is to observe his law and obey the commandements to what end then came our blessed Saviour to performe the law for us which wee in respect of the weaknesse of our flesh could not doe 2. Therefore these precepts are propounded in Scripture to these two ends that thereby mans drowsie nature should be stirred up to labour unto perfection and that finding himselfe to come farre short of the commandement he might see his owne weaknesse and flee for succour unto Christ. And therefore S. Paul saith that the law is a Shool-master to bring us unto Christ Gal. 3.24 3. Cont. No absolute faith or credit to be given unto teachers but as they agree with Scriptures Vers. 9. LOe I come unto thee in a thicke cloud that the people may heare while I talke with thee It was Moses credit with the people that they heard the Lord speaking with him And Moses desired no further to be beleeved than he had his warrant from God Non alio jure fidem in Ecclesia obtinuit quà m quia Dei mandata pertulit He by no other right obtained credit in the Church but because he brought the commandements of God Calvin It is therefore great presumption for those which take upon them now to bee the Pastors and Doctors of the Church to arrogate and assume more unto themselves than Moses did As the Romanists doe hold that we ought to receive all the decrees and constitutions of the Church without any further discussing We ought to take our faith and all necessary things of our salvation at the hands of our superiours Rhemist Act. 10. sect 8. We must beleeve the Church and trust it in all things 1 Tim. 3. sect 9. Whereas the Apostles themselves required not their doctrine otherwise to bee received then as it was consonant to the Scriptures for the Bereans are commended for conferring those things which they taught with the Scriptures Act. 17.11 4. Cont. Perpetuall abstinence from marriage not required of Ministers Vers. 15. COme not at your wives Bellarmine out of this text would enforce the single life of the Clergie because the people being to appeare before the Lord are commanded to abstaine from their wives Lib. 1. de Clericis cap. 19. Contra. 1. It followeth not the people were commanded abstinence for three dayes Ergo Ministers all their life should abstaine or they had wives and came not at them for three dayes therefore Ministers must have no wives 2. The practice of those times was otherwise for the Priests and Levites were married if this example pressed not them it doth not enforce perpetuall single life now 3. Neither doth the argument follow because then there was in the use of marriage in the naturall issue a legall pollution which made them uncleane untill the even Levit. 15.18 and therefore such abstinence and forbearance was required but such uncleannesse now is taken away as in like manner he that touched a dead corse then was uncleane and yet therein he sinned not there was then a kind of legall uncleannesse which was not sinne Simler 4. But so much as is morall in this precept bindeth now that to make our prayers more fervent as by fasting so by this kind of abstinence for a time is fit agreeable to the Apostles doctrine 1 Cor. 7.5 But as it followeth not it is good to fast sometime to be more earnest in
and of the soule or life of beasts which was produced out of the earth contrary to the opinion of Porphirius and the Pythagoreans who taught that the soule of man tooke beginning from the elements as the life of other creatures 5. Doct. That God hath no humane shape 5. LEt us make man after our image vers 26. which image was shewed before to be in the graces of the soule and not in the body against the heresie of the Anthropomorphites who imagined God to be of a humane shape like unto man 6. Doct. God not the author of evill 6. Vers. 31. GOd saw all he had made and â—oe it was very good From hence we conclude that God only is the author of good and that whatsoever the Lord doth is very good Against the Manichees who affirmed that the God of the law was the Prince of darknesse and anchor of evill 7. Doct. Marriage made free for all men 7. Vers. 28. BRing forth fruit and multiply This Scripture sheweth 〈◊〉 marriage had the institution in mans innocency and that this blessing to increase should have taken place though 〈◊〉 had not fallen against the heresie of the Tatiâ—â—i and Maâ—ichees which condemned marriage as a work of the devill Againe seeing God giveth here a liberty to all men and women by marriage to increase and multiply it maketh strongly against the Popish inhibition of marriage in Ecclesiasticall persons and Monasticall enforced vowes for by both these this generall liberty given of God is restrained To this argument divers answers are framed 1. That this precept of multiplying was onely to hold â—ll the world was replenished Magister lib. â— distinct 2â— 2. This precept was not given to all but onely to the multitude Thomas 2.2 quast 152 art 2.3 This precept was not for all times but only in case of necessâ—ty when propagation failed Scotus 4. Some say this precept did hold onely till Christ. 5. Some that this increasing is to be understood of â—â—â—ctifying in the soule not in the body But all these answers mislike the moderne Papists And therefore now their answer is that these words increase and multiply containe not a precept but an institution of nature and a promise of fecundity â— for the same words are uttered untâ— other creatures which are not capable of precepts and if iâ— were â— precept iâ— should binde all to increase and multiply by marriage and so injury should be offered to Christ to Mary and other holy Virgins thus Bellarmine de Clericis lib. 1. c. 21. Pererius in Genes lib. 4. p. 657. Contra. 1. Our adversaries fight here with their owne shadow for neither doe wee say that this is an absolute precept binding all to marriage but a liberty granted to all that will marry that thereby mankinde may still be propagated like as where Christ faith if they persecute you in one City flye into another hee doth not take away this liberty that flyeth not having received a greater gift of strength and patience to stay and endure the utmost triall but he which shall deny this remedy to the weake So they offend not against this grant of marriage for increase that need it not but are indued with a more excellent gift of continency but they which deny it to those that are apt to generation 2. Though bruit beasts are not capable of mans precepts yet when God biddeth the creatures understand in their kind and obey Ion 2.10 God spake to â—he fish and it cast up Ionah upon the dry land 3. If it bee an institution of nature then they tyrannize by their superstitious lawes over the bodies of men forcing them to single life against the generall inclination of nature 5. The 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is places of confutation out of this first chapter 1. Confut. Against the Manichees and Atheists I Will briefly first set downe the objections of the Manichees and ancient Pagans concerning the creation because they are sutable to the impious conceits of the Atheists in these dayes 1. Object If God in the beginning made the world what did hee before was hee weary in doing of nothing Answ. God as Augustine saith nec cessando torpuit nec operando laboravit neither was idle in resting nor weary in working neither received he any happinesse by the things created without which he was happy but when it pleased him he made the world to manifest his glory and declare his mercy August cont aedvers leg lib. 1. c. 2. 2. Object If God created light hee was before in darknesse Answer God needeth no corporall light which was made but dwelleth in a spirituall and uncreated light Aug. de gâ—n cont Manic cap 4. 3. Object If God made the light who made darknesse Answer Darknesse is nothing it need no creation being but the absence of light as nakednesse is the want of cloathing silence the ceasing of a sound ibid. 4. Object If the spirit moved upon the waters then were they the habitacle or mansion of the spirit Ans. The Sunne is carried above the earth yet is not the earth the habitation thereof and the spirit did so move upon the waters as the workman over the worke which he intendeth to make Aug. ibid. c. 5. 5. Object But who made the waters whereupon the spirit moved Answ. It is comprehended under the name of the earth which was covered with the waters made at the first as an unformed lumpe or matter whereout other creatures were made Aug c. 7. 6. Object God saw that the light was good it should seeme he knew it not before Answ. It followeth not that because God approveth the light being made he knew it not before Christ wondred at the Centurions faith which he himselfe had wrought God saw it before in his intention and now approveth it brought forth in action 7. Object How could there be light or the distinction of daies and nights before the Sun was made Cels. lib. 6. Orig. and so object the Manichees Ans. Augustine answereth that there was a division of the day and night before the sunne but a more exact division afterward de genes cont Manich. c. 15. Ambrose saith the light of the day is one thing the light of the sunne another as wee see by experience that there is a light before the sunne rise and after he is set lib. 4. Hexemer c. 3. But we doe againe say that God is not tyed to the creature as though hee could not make light without the sunne â—ee that made the â—unnâ— was able to make light before and without the sunne see more hereof in the Theologicall explanation upon vers 3. I will now touch some of the Papists objections 2. Confut. Sacraments doe not conferrâ— grace BEllarmine by the moving of the spirit upon the waters enforceth that the Sacrament of Baptisme conferreth grace as those waters concurred to the making of naturall things so the water of baptisme toward spirituall regeneration lib. 2. de sacram ca.
word God it is not like that God would give you any such precept 6. Aben Ezra interpreteth aph ci by quanto magis how much more that after Satan had shewed many reasons to perswade the woman that God loved them not hee urgeth this above the rest that God had given them this prohibition 7. But the best interpretation is this that after long communication had with the woman at length the serpent commeth to that which he intended to draw from the woman some answer whereupon he might worke further and therefore with some admiration saith in effect it seemeth very strange or I much wonder that God would give any such prohibition unto you Mercer QVEST. IIII. Why Satan tempted man and that by the woman NOw the Devill thought to supplant man in Paradise not because he did foresee that the Messiah should take flesh of Adam for as yet man was not fallen nor Gods counsell revealed concerning the Redeemer that should breake the serpents head but the envie of Satan was the cause that moved him to this tentation that he might bring man into the same state of damnation and he sheweth his malice against God in seeking to deface his image Calvin 2. Hee setteth upon the woman first not because as Ambrose thinketh the precept was given onely to Adam by God himselfe for it was spoken to them both but because he saw her to be the weaker and so fittest for him to worke by Mercer QVEST. V. How Eva indured to talke with the serpent NOw whereas it will bee questioned how it came to passe that Eva was not afraid to talke with the serpent 1. which was not either because this serpent which Satan vsed had a pleasant countenance and virgins face which opinion is imputed to Beda which is rather to be held a painters fancie than the worke of nature there beeing no such serpent to be seene in the world 2. neither for that the serpent was more familiar with man than any other creature as thinketh Damascen 3. neither can the very kind of the serpent be described as Eugubinus saith it was the Basiliske which poisoneth hearbs and plants with his very breath Pererius saith it is most like to be the serpent called Scytala which hath a backe of divers colours for this is too great curiositie seeing the Scripture onely generally nameth a serpent noting no speciall kind 4. But as Chrysostome well observeth the sight of the serpent which after sin became terrible hatefull to man was now not abhorred neither were any creatures as yet in the state of mans innocencie loathsome unto man and therefore Eva might well indure the sight of the serpent QVEST. VI. What mooved Eva to give eare to the serpent BVt whereas Eva was not astonished to heare the serpent speak 1. it was neither as Rupertus thinketh because the woman imagined that some powerfull spirit caused the serpent to speake and therefore gave reverent eare for this had not beene farre from Idolatrie to yeeld any such reverence to any but to the Creator 2. Neither did shee thinke as Bonaventure holdeth that some good spirit intending her good thus spake in the creature For then shee would not have said the serpent but the spirit or Angel deceived me 3. Neither is it like that Eva as Cyrillus seemeth to thinke was ignorant whether the use of speech were given unto any creature beside man to the which opinion Tostatus and Pererius subscribe for seeing that Adam had before given names to all creatures which God brought unto him they could not be ignorant by this experience that man onely had the gift of calling and giuing names 4. But Eva knowing well that God had created angelicall powers was carried away with the voice and goodly promises delivered from the serpent not beeing so much intent from whom they came as what was spoken not considering while shee was ravished with an ambitious desire of bettering her estate whether a good or a bad Angell might thus speake out of the serpent for to say that man was either ignorant of the creation of Angels or of the power and facultie of beasts was too great a defect of knowledge to be incident to that perfect estate QVEST. VII Whether the serpent went vpon his bellie before the curse vers 14. VPon thy belly shalt thou goe dust shalt thou eate c. 1. It is neither to be thought with Barcephus that the serpent before went upon his feete as other beasts for God would not alter the nature and shape of his creature having given power to every creature before to multiply his owne kinde this had beene to mislike the worke of his owne hands 2. Neither is it to be supposed with Didymus Hieromes master that the serpent during onely this time of tentation was caused by the spirit to stand upright for it had beene no punishment for the serpent to returne to his first nature 3. Neither doe we approove the sentence of the fathers as of Augustine Gregory and others who by an allegorie doe apply these words to the Devill that he goeth upon his belly when he tempteth men to gluttony leachery whereof the bellie is the instrument and he eateth earth having power over earthly minded men for after this manner the whole storie may likewise be allegorized 4. Neither with some others as Pererius doe we approve both an historicall sense of this malediction in the serpent an allegoricall in the Devill but the whole is historicall the first part whereof concerneth the serpent the instrument the other Satan the principall that his head and power should be broken by this meanes and where he had thought to gained he should sustaine a greater losse 5 Our sentence then is this that the curse denounced against the serpent consisteth not in the thing it selfe but the manner of it the serpent did from his creation creepe upon his brest and feede of the earth but now this is made ignominious and accursed unto him which was not before as weeds and thistles were created before mans fall but after beganne to bee a curse to the earth and man was naked before his transgression but was not ashamed of it till after so the raine-bow was before the floud but then onely ordained to be a signe of the covenant that God would no more destroy the world with water QVEST. VIII Why the Devill spake out of the serpent IF it bee further demanded why the Devill spake out of the serpent rather than appeared in any other shape 1. I say with Augustine because God permitted Satan to use no other beast as his instrument but the serpent 2. That it was neither fit that hee should have appeared in humane shape for Eva knew well enough that her selfe and Adam were all mankind and none beside them neither if Satan had framed a voice out of the aire would Eva have endured so familiar a conference and for that the serpent in regard of his subtilty
was the fittest instrument that would soone winde himselfe in and out and creepe away that he should not be seene of Adam 3. In that Moses maketh no mention of the Devill but of the serpent only it was both in regard of the weaknesse and rudenesse of the people who could not well conceive any other but the visible creatures and for that Moses writing a story reporteth things as they appeared as the story of Samuels apparition to Saul calleth it Samuel whereas it was Satan in Samuels shape because it so appeared 4. The Hebrewes here are not to be approved that say the serpent coveted to have company with the woman for that is against the nature of beasts QVEST. IX Of the manner how the woman was tempted of Satan COncerning the tentation of Satan and seduction of the woman 1. he beginneth subtilly hath God indeed said yee shall not eat of every tree whereas God onely forbad them one tree as though God had dealt hardly with them in abridging them of their liberty 2. The woman reporteth not the words of the prohibition truly some thinke that shee added of her owne yee shall not touch it as Ambrose some that she changed the words as Rupertus for the tree of knowledge of good and evill saying the tree in the midst of the garden but certaine it is that she taketh somewhat from Gods words pronouncing doubtfully lest ye die which God had denounced most certainly ye shall dye the death that is surely dye 3. Satan in his reply v. 4 5. heapeth up many lies together 1. that they shall not dye 2. that God did envy their happinesse 3. that knowledge might be had in eating of fruit 4. that they should thereby bee made like unto God Beside Rupertus conceit is here excellent that the Devill in every one of these points speaketh doubtfully as he gave the Oracles of Apollo that every word which he spake might have a double meaning ye shall not die that is not presently the death of the body though presently made subject to morrality your eyes shall bee opened so they were to their confusion knowing good and evill not by a more excellent knowledge but by miserable experience after their transgression ye shall bee as gods either as Angels or like unto us sinfull and wicked spirits 4. The woman seeth the tree to be good for meat there is her voluptuous desire pleasant to the eyes there is her curiosity and to be desired for knowledge there is the vanity of her minde Thus as the Apostle saith whatsoever is in the world is the concupiscence of the flesh the concupiscence of the eye the pride of life 1 Ioh. 2. QVEST. X. Adam tempted and deceived as well as the woman though not in the same degree THe order then and manner of the tentation was this 1. It is evident that neither Adam nor Eva had committed any sin before this congresse with Satan for the Scripture saith that til then they were both naked and were not ashamed Gen. 2.25 So that herein both Rupertus and Ferus are deceived 2. Satan first assaileth the woman both being as the weaker more easie to be seduced as a fit instrument also to entice Adam 3. Adam did not only incline unto her amicabili quadam benevolentia of a loving mind and thereby enticed as Sampson was by Dalilah and Salomon by his wives but it is like he was seduced by the same flattering and false perswasions whereby the woman was first beguiled being carried away with an ambitious desire in knowledge not to be equalized but made like unto God this may appeare out of the 22. verse Behold man is become like unto us to know good and evill where the Lord reproveth also mans affected and curious desire to attaine to a greater perfection Neither doth that place of the Apostle contradict this opinion Adam was not deceived but the woman was deceived and was in the transgression 1 Tim. 2.14 for whether we expound it with Epiphanius and Calvin that the Apostles meaning is the woman was first deceived not the man or with Mercerus that the man was not deceived but entised by the womā or with Hierome that Adam was not deceived by the serpent but by the woman or that Eva did not wittingly deceive Adam as the serpent beguiled Eva whereof the two first expositions being one in effect are most agreeable to the Apostles minde by this text Adam is not wholly exempted from being deceived but only in that manner as Eva was perverted and seduced QVEST. XI Whether Adams sinne was the greatest of all sinnes NOw as touching the greatnesse of Adams sin simply it was not the greatest sin of all committed in the world neither in respect of the kind of the sinne as adultery is greater than fornication for so we hold blasphemy and Idolatry to be greater sins than Adams was neither in respect of the affection of the offender for many are with a more ungodly violent and sinfull desire given over then Adam in this tentation neither was it the greatest in respect of the quality of the sin for it was pardonable in Adam whereas sinne against the holy Ghost is impardonable But yet it may truly bee said to bee the greatest 1. in regard of the fruits and sequele of that sin the contagion and infection of all mankind 2. in respect of Adams person who in his excellent gifts considered might have more easily resisted 3. in regard of the facility of the commandement which required no hard or difficult thing 4. the place also it selfe being considereth namely in Paradise where there was no provocation or allurement unto sinne QVEST. XII Whether Adams or Eves sinne were the greater NOw if Adams sinne be compared with the womans in some things it will be found equall in some things superiour in some inferiour to it 1. Both Adam and Eva sinned in their infidelity in not beleeving the word of God but giving credit to Satans faire promises that they should not dye 2. in their concupiscence in coveting the forbidden fruit 3. in their ambition in desiring a further state of perfection Secondly in respect of Adams person who was appointed to be the womans head and of his gifts of knowledge and wisdome the man was more faulty than the woman Thirdly yet simply the womans sinne was greater because beside other sinnes common unto them this was proper unto her in seducing her husband so that as Augustine well noteth de Genes 11.42 the man sinned onely against God and himselfe the woman against God her selfe and her neighbour beside the woman was first deceived and became the author and beginner of transgression Therefore the opinion of them is not here to bee allowed who doe either aggravate Adams sinne or extenuate the womans of the first sort is the author of the questions upon the old Testament under Augustines name who ascribeth idolatry to Adam quest 83. whereas hee desired not
〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 translated him S. tulit tooke him H. B. G. non occidit killed him not Ch. sumpsit received him Tr. heb lachach to take away receive v. 25. an 165. yeares S. an 187. yeares cat v. 26.802 yeares S. 782. yeares cat v. 28. an 178. yeares S. an 182. yeares cat v. 29. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 shall cause us to rest S. shall comfort us cat heb â—â—ach to rest to refresh v. 29. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from the earth S. de terra from off the earth Ch. in the earth H. as touching the earth G. aboue the earth B. propter terram because of the earth Tr. v. 30.565 yeares S. 595. yeare cat v. 31.753 yeares S. 777. yeares cat 3. The Theologicall explication QVEST. I. Booke of generation how to be understood Vers. 1. THis is the booke of the generation 1. Moses setteth downe the genealogy of the fathers before the floud because of Christs line which Luke deriveth from Adam Matthew goeth not beyond Abraham not as some thinke because of the rest of that line beyond Abraham might easily bee supplyed out of Moses books which were then well knowne but for that the most conspicuous and manifest promises of the Messiah were made to Abraham all the generations to Matthew supplying â—â—enty from Adam to Abraham make but 72. but Luke reckoneth 77. The Reason is because Matthew omitteth some of purpose to make the numbers equall which Luke supplyeth and Matthew maketh his account by Salomon Luke by Nathan so that there might bee more persons in the one discent than in the other 2. Moses beginneth now to set downe Adams generation by Seth because Cain was rejected and Abel died without issue 3. It is called a booke that is an ennumeration for so Sepher signifieth a booke because things are rehearsed in it not because as R. Isaac Carus Moses beginneth his booke here and the other 3. chapters should bee as a preface 4. Generation is here taken actively for the posterity of Adam increased by him as in Matthew the booke of the generation of Iesus Christ is taken passively for the generations of whom Christ came 5. And whereas it is added in the day that God created Adam we need neither with Lyranus to understand day generally for time and wee refuse the opinion of the Hebrewes that hold that Adam in the same day of his creation began to have generations for so they fable that Adam and Eve had foure or five children the same day they were created but in the day is to be referred to the latter part of the verse wherein mention is made of Adams creation according to the image of God Mercer QVEST. II. How Adam begat a Sonne in his owne likenesse Vers. 3. ADam begat a sonne in his owne likenesse c. 1. which is neither to be understood of the shape and image of his body for so Cain was in outward shape like to Adam 2. neither is it to be taken for the image of vertue and piety in his soule for Adam had lost that image neither is vertue ingendred by nature and Abel had the image of his fathers vertue before Seth. 3. neither is it so said because the image of mankind was continued and preserved in Seth whereas both Abel died without issue and Cains posterity was extinguished in the floud for this notwithstanding seeing the world was increased by Cain he might be said also to be after Adams image 4. But hereby is signified that originall corruption which is descended unto Adams posterity by naturall propagation which is expressed in the birth of Seth not of Abel because hee had no of-spring nor of Cain because it might appeare that even the righteous seed by nature are subject to this originall depravation and yet Seth was otherwise after the image of Adam than Cain because his seed was sanctified of God who purposed in Seth and his seed to make good the promise made to Adam as touching the seed of the woman that should breake the serpents head Iun. 5. And whereas Adam was an hundred thirty yeere old before he begat Seth wee abhor the lewd fables of the Hebrewes that thinke in this meane space that Adam companied with female spirits or devils and begat male spirits and Eva with male spirits and brought forth masculine or male devils neither doe I thinke with Mercer that in the meane time Adam begat other sonnes and daughters but God by this meanes Adam staying so long without children did try his faith in looking for the promised seed and his patience in seeing the wicked stocke of Cain so mightily to increase Iun. QVEST. III. Wherefore it is added and he died Vers. 5. ALL the dayes that Adam lived c. 1. Neither were these yeares otherwise accounted than by 12. moneths as it may appeare in the story of Noahs floud where mention is made of the 7. moneth and 27. day of the moneth 2. Neither did these righteous fathers onely live thus long by miracle as thinketh R. Moses but it was usuall in those dayes 3. And the conclusion of every ones life is mortuus est he died not as some think because it should appeare that they dyed not in the floud but by their owne naturall death and therefore they say this clause is not added after the floud in the genealogy of the fathers but it is thus said to shew what the condition of all mankind was after Adams fall 4. It is said only of Adam all the dayes that he lived Whereby the Hebrewes inferre that Adam lived a godly life and repented his repentance we doubt not of but not soundly hence gathered Mercer QVEST. IIII. Whether Adam the longest liver NOw whereas Adam lived but 930. yeares Mathuselah 969. yeares v. 27. yet may Adam be well supposed to have beene the longest liver because he was created in a perfect state of body apt to generation which was not then under sixty yeares for none of the Patriarkes began to have children under that age Mahalalel begat at 65. yeares of age v. 15. and none under then adde unto Adams yeares 60. more in what age and state of body he was created and he will bee found to have beene the longest liver of the Patriarkes and to exceed Mathuselahs age 21. yeares QVEST. V. The yeares of the Patriarkes full and complete yeares consisting of twelve moneths COncerning the long life of the aged Patriarkes 1. Neither is the conceit of the Aegyptians to bee received that a man cannot live above an 100. yeares for they say that a mans heart increaseth till he come to 50. every yeare two drachmaes in weight and then decreaseth every yeare as much till he come to an hundred and then for want of heart hee can live no longer For this fancy of theirs is confuted by experience for Pliny maketh mention that in Vespatian the Emperors time there were found in Italy two men of an 105. yeares foure of
it as the water in the red sea did or that though it were covered with water it might be preserved as the Olive tree whereof the Dove tooke a branch or that God might restore Paradise againe after the floud the first is presumptuous to imagine a miracle without warrant of Scripture and if it had beene so Noah needed not to have made an arke he and his sonnes and the cattell might have beene preserved there the second is not sufficient for though Paradise which is not like had beene so preserved yet Henoch must have beene drowned The third is frivolous for if the terrene Paradise had beene planted againe seeing it was situated in a knowne place in Mesopotamia it could not have beene hid In this question Pererius is an adversary to Bellarmine Senens and the rest that yet dreame of a terrene Paradise 5. Confut. Henoch shall returne into the world to die IT is also the constant opinion of the popish writers that Henoch shall come againe toward the end of the world and then shall die being to be slaine by Antichrist Pererius cum Bellarm. Cont. But this is contrary to the Apostle That Henoch was taken away that he should not see death neither was found Heb. 11.5 Ergo Henoch shall not see death nor bee found in a mortall state in earth whereas they object that place Heb. 9.27 It is appointed unto men that they shall once die The answer is ready like as they which are alive at Christs comming shall not die but be changed 1 Cor. 15. which notwithstanding shall bee in stead of death so Henoch was changed in his taking up though he died not a common death 6. Confut. Henoch shall not returne to preach repentance to the world COncerning the end and causes wherefore Henoch was translated 1. Wee admit that God hereby would put the righteous in comfort that notwithstanding the sentence pronounced against Adam there was a way of righteousnesse whereby to recover Adams lost state 2. To minister comfort to the afflicted members of Christ that they should not doubt but that their reward is with God as Habel though he had an untimely end yet lived with God as Henoch did thus Theodoret. 3. Wee refuse not the collection here of Thomas Aquinas that God both by Henochs translation before the law and Elias under the law would nourish the hope of life in his Church as by types representing the ascension of Christ in whom the promise of salvation should be accomplished These causes of Henochs translation may safely be received 4. But we neither thinke as it is in the booke of Wisdome which is no Canonicall Scripture and therefore we may safely dissent from it That hee was taken away lest wickednesse should alter his understanding for as he walked with God before God kept him in his feare and preserved him from evill so he could have guided him still as the Apostle saith He shall be established God is able to make him stand Rom. 14.4 speaking of the faithfull servants of God as Mathuselah the sonne of Henoch being the longest lived of all the Patriarkes continued righteous to the end 5. Neither is that surmise fit to be received that Henoch is kept alive to preach repentance in the end of the world and to maintaine the Gospell against Antichrist which is the common opinion of the papall professors For of Henochs preaching in the end of the world there is no mention in Scripture but only of the sending of Elias which is not understood of Elias person but of his spirit and zeale And this Elias the Angell expoundeth to be Iohn Baptist who should goe before Christ in the spirit and power of Elias And there is no such necessity that Henoch should be preserved so many yeares by miracle to that end seeing the Lord is able to raise up Prophets and Ministers as he did Iohn Baptist in the spirit of Elias and Henoch to maintaine the truth against the Pope and Antichrist which we see plentifully performed in these dayes 7. Confut. Of the Prophesie and booke of Henoch WHereas S. Inde in his Epistle vers 14. maketh mention of the Prophesie of Henoch the seventh from Adam which is not found in any other part of the Canonicall Scripture lest the adversaries might hereupon build their traditions and unwritten verities I will briefly declare what is to be thought of this Prophesie of Henoch 1. I neither thinke with Tertullian that there was any such propheticall booke of Henoch then extant who conjectureth that though it perished in the floud yet it might be restored againe by Noah thereunto inspired 2. Neither yet with Hierome that this booke of Henoch was an Apocriphall booke yet some part of it might be true which the Apostle might alleage For it is not like that the Apostle would derive a testimony from an hidden and obscure booke of no authority in the Church 3. Neither yet is it like as Michael Medina thinketh that there was no such booke at all under Henochs name for the fathers Origen Hierome Augustine doe in many places make evident mention that such a booke there was but thought it to be forged 4. And it is as unlike that the true book of Henoch was extant in the Apostles time which was afterward corrupted with fables and so rejected of the Church for then the Church would rather have purged the true booke from such errours and preserved the rest pure as they did discerne the true Gospels from the forged and adulterate Our opinion then is 1. With Augustine that the booke of Henoch which in his time was produced by Heretikes was altogether forged and no part of it of Henochs writing Non quod eorum hominum qui Deo placuorunt reprobetur authoritas sed quod ista non creduntur ipsorum not that saith he we refuse the authoritie of such men as pleased God but for that they were thought not to be theirs 2. We judge it not unlike with Origen that there might be such an authenticall booke of Henochs prophesie out of the which Iude did take his testimony which is now lost as some other parts of the Canonicall Scripture are as the books of God Nathan Iddâ— and other Prophets mentioned in the Chronicles 3. Or this prophesie of Henoch might be preserved by faithfull tradition in the Church of the Iewes which is approved by the Apostle But this is no warrant for other unwritten traditions unlesse some had the like Apostlike spirit to judge of them as Iudas had and further this prophesie of Henoch is a greeable to the Scriptures so are not many unwritten traditions urged by the Church of Rome 6. Places of exhortation 1. IN that the line only of the race of the faithfull is rehearsed in this chapter it both sheweth that God will alwaies have his church in the world and that in the most corrupt times God will have a remnant that shall
owne worke 6. Place of Morall observation 1. Observ. That riches be no let unto our vacation Vers. 2. ABraham was very rich and yet his riches were no impediment to him let rich men learne by his example that they be not entangled and hindred by their riches from going forward in their vocation Calvin and as the Apostle saith that they be not high minded nor trust in uncertaine richeâ— c. 1 Timoth. 6.17 that they be rich in good works as Abraham was 2. Observ. The inconvenience of riches Vers. 6. ABraham and Loe before their riches did so mightily increase were inseparable companionâ— but being growne now to be rich they can no longer dwell together so they whom neither poverty nor want not weary journies nor strange Countries could part riches and prosperity divide if 〈◊〉 these holy men riches brought forth this inconvenience how much harder is it for rich men to keepe theâ— within bounds Mer. Musculus for as the Apostle saith They that be rich fall into temptation and snares 1 Timoth. 6.9 3. Observ. Of humility towards our inferiours Vers. 7. THen Abraham said to Loâ— c. Chrysostome well noteth here Cogita quemadmodum 〈◊〉 jâ—niori cesserâ—â— patrum 〈◊〉 c. Câ—nsider how the elder giveth place to the younger the 〈◊〉 to the nephew he that had received great grace of God to him that yet had shewed no proofe of his vertue We learne hereby not onely to honour our superiours but to be humble toward our inferiours as the Apostle saith In giving of honour goe one before another make your selves equall to them of the lower sort Rom. 12.10 16. 4. Observ. Gods patience in suffering the wicked Vers. 13. THe men of Sodome were wicked c. God sometime beareth with the wicked yea and suffereth them to enjoy temporall blessings as here the Sodomites inhabited the most fruitfull Vallies but they as the Apostle saith 〈◊〉 the riches of his bountifulnesse c. not knowing that the bounty of God leadeth them to repentance Rom. 2.4 Caâ—â—â—â— 5. Observ. God will not shew himselfe where dissension is Vers. 14. THen the Lord said to Abraham c. When Lot was now departed and the occasion of dissension cut off then the Lord appeared to Abraham so that God will not shew himselfe nor the spirit of peace there dwell where is contention Perer. As Saint Peter sheweth that by dissension prayers are interrupted 1 Pet. 3.7 6. Observ. It is dangerous to love preeminence Vers. 15. ALL the land which thou seest Chrysostome noteth quantum malum siâ—â—mar◠〈◊〉 what an hurtfull thing it is to love to have preeminence because Lot that tooke upon him to chuse first and as he thought the best ground yet gained nothing by it for not long after he was caâ—ried away captive Likewise we see what a rich thing a contented minde is Abraham that was coâ—â—eâ—â— to take the worst lot hath the whole Countrey given unto him so the Lord to Salomon that onely â—â—â—ved wisdome gave honour and riches beside in great abundance 1 King 3. Marlâ—rat CHAP. XIV 1. The parts and contents THis Chapter hath two parts In the first is set forth the overthrow of Sodome and taking of Lot prisoner In the second the victory of Abraham In the first are expressed 1. Betweene whom the battell was vers 1.2 2. The occasion vers 4. 3. The order first they fight against the lands of the gyants vers 5.6 then against the five Kings of the Plaine vers 8. 4. The successe of the battell the Kings are discomfited vers 10. their substance carried away vers 11. Lot taken prisoner vers 13. In the second 1. There is the battell of Abraham his preparation vers 13. the order of it vers 14. the successe vers 15. 2. Abrahams triumph described by the persons that met him and by Abraham behaviour the persons that came to meet him were two Kingâ— Melchisedeck that blessed God and blessed Abraham vers 19 20. and comforted him with bread and wine vers 18. the King of Sodome that would onely have rewarded Abraham temporally with the goods that he had received vers 21. In Abrahams behaviour is set forth his godlinesse toward Melchisedeck in paying tithe of all in token of his thankfulnesse vers 20. toward the King of Sodome his wisdome in refusing to be made rich by him vers 22 23. his justice in not depriving his confederates of their right vers 24. 2. The divers readings or translations v. 1. King of Babel C. of Shinar câ—t v. 1. Ariâ—â—â— King of Pâ—ntus H. King of Ellasar câ—t In the reigne of Aâ—â—aphel S. time or dayes cat v. 2. Balla. S. Basa H. Bersha cat King of Sodome Senâ—ar King of Adaâ—â— S. Seâ—aâ—â— cat v. 3. In the salt valley S. wâ—â—ddie valley A field valley C. valley of Siddim T.B.G.P. shiddâ—m tilled fields the like difference is vers 8 10. v. 5. Gyants C.S.B. Rephaim T.G.H.P. Gen. 15.20 the strong nations with them S. the Zuzâ—ms with them H. the strong men in Hâ—m Ch. the Zuzâ—ms in Haem T.B.G.P. zâ—z a post in Save the City S. Sâ—riathâ—â—m C.P.G.H. plaine of Câ—râ—athaim T. B. shavâ—h to be made plaine v. 17. Shaveh is taken for a proper name v. 6. unto the Tereâ—iâ—th or Turpentine tree of Paran S. the Plaine of Paran câ—t heb â—el a Plaine v. 7. to the fountaine of judgement S. to the Plaine of the division of judgement C. to the fountaine Misphat H. En Misphat T.B.G.P. sâ—â—e all the Princes S. smote or destroyed all the Countrey câ—t Engadâ— C. Hazâ—zâ—â— thâ—maâ— cat v. 11. tooke all their horse S. substance cat recâ—â—â—h substance recâ—sh horse v. 13. Abraham peâ—aâ—e the passenger S. the hebrew ca. gâ—eâ—er to passe over v. 14. he numbred S.H. brought forth G. armed T.B.P. heb caused to draw a weapon rich to draw or â—â—sheath a weapon his homeborne S. exercised H. well instructed T.B. brought up G. his boyes or servants C. heb chaâ—ich a youth well instructed v. 15. he fell upon them S. divided himselfe cat chalach to divide v. 17. the King of Sodome and the King of Gomorrhe S. King of Sodome cat this is the field of Melchisedeck S. the place of refreshing for the King C. the Kings valley cat 18. Melchisedeck King of Ierusalem C. King of Salem cat for he was a Priest H. but he was C. and he was B.G.P. as he was T. v. 19. which created heaven and earth S. H. possessor of heaven and earth chaâ—â—â— to possesse v. 20. which hath delivered thine enemies into thy hand câ—t who protecting thee thine enemies are in thy hand H. heb ziggen of magan to deliver not of ganan to defend with a shield v. 20. gave him one of the tenth out of all C. the tenth of all câ—t v. 21. give me the men take the horse to thy selfe S. give me the soules and take the rest H. give me the soules and take the goâ—dâ—
little inferiour as it is in the Psalme 8. Thou hast made him a little lower than the Angels 4. But if man be compared with the omnipotent and eternall God hee is but as dust and ashes before him and indeed as nothing as the Prophet saith Behold the nations are as a drop of a bucket and as the dust of the ballance all nations are before him as nothing and they are counted to him lesse than nothing and vanity Isa. 40.15.17 therefore Gregory saith well Sancti quanto magis interna divinitatis conspiciunt tanto magis se nihil esse cognoscunt c. the Saints the more they consider the divine nature of God so much the more they acknowledge themselves to be nothing 5. Places of confutation 1. Confut. Angels are not to be adored or worshipped Vers. 2. HEe bowed himselfe to the ground From hence it cannot bee concluded that Angels are to bee adored and worshipped as the vulgar latine readeth for Abraham supposed these to be men and not Angels and therefore it is but a civill kind of reverence which hee giveth unto them otherwise though Abraham should have forgotten himselfe in yeelding unto them adoration yet would not they have accepted it as the Angell forbiddeth Iohn to worship him Revel 22.8 Thomas Aquinas answer that Iohn would have given unto the Angell the divine and highest kinde of worship due unto God and therefore was forbidden is insufficient for this were to make so great an Apostle ignorant what duty was only to be yeelded to God and it is misliked by Pererius one of that side And whereas he findeth out an other shift that this adoration exhibited by Iohn was not unlawfull but inconvenient to bee done in respect of the great excellency to the which man was now advanced by Christ this is as slender an answer as the other for in that the Angell forbiddeth Iohn to worship him because hee was his fellow servant it sheweth that it was not only inconvenient but unlawfull also for one servant to worship another Iohn then adoreth the Angell not of ignorance but of forgetfulnesse being in an ecstasis of minde and ravished with the glory of the Angell for if the Apostle had not forgotten himselfe he would not twice have failed herein Apoc. 19.10.23.9 2. Confut. The foresight of our obedience not the cause of the increase of grace Vers. 19. I Know him that hee will command his sonnes c. Pererius here noteth that God foreseeing Abrahams godlinesse and obedience doth bestow upon him these great benefits among the which was this revealing of his councell concerning Sodome whereas the onely reason as Vatablus well noteth why the Lord doth accumulate and multiply his graces upon his servants is his owne fatherly love toward them who having once made choyce of them doth for ever love them for what else doth the Lord here make mention of but his owne graces vouchsafed to Abraham it was not then any merit in Abraham that procured this increase of graces but Gods favour who leaveth not his but addeth graces upon graces till he have accomplished their salvation Calvin 3. Confut. Chrysost. Errour of freewill HEre further may bee noted Chrysostomes errour who saith that Abraham ex seipso scientia sibi naeturaliter insita ad tantum virtutis fastigium pervenit of himselfe and his naturall knowledge did attaine to such an high degree of vertue Pererius would thus excuse Chrysostome that by saying of himselfe c. he excludeth all externall helps by the instruction of other and not the secret revelation of Gods spirit and supernaturall gift of faith If Chrysostome could be so handsomely expounded for mine owne part I would be glad but who seeth not that his words carry another sense for the scripture useth to set these two one against another by grace and of our selves Eph. 2.8 By grace are yee saved through faith not of your selves if Abraham then was made righteous of himselfe it was not by grace The Scripture also sheweth that God first called Abraham from his idolatrous countrey before he did yet any commendable worke Gen 12.1 Wherefore all Abrahams righteousnesse depended upon the calling of God as Chrysostome in another place hath this sound saying quamvis fidem adducas à vocatione eam accepisti what though thou hast faith thou hast received it from thy calling 4. Confut. There is no preparation in a mans nature to his calling Vers. 19. THat the Lord may bring upon Abraham c. Hence Chrysostome noteth that Abraham primum in omnibus virtutis suae dedit specimen sic divinum meruit praesidium did first shew every where an example of vertue and so merited the divine assistance Pererius two wayes would justifie Chrysostome 1. he saith he speaketh not of merit of condignity but of a sufficient and fit preparation only unto grace 2. or hee meaneth not that Abraham merited the first grace of justification but onely the amplification or increase of it Perer. in 18. Genes disput Contra. 1. It is Gods mercy and love which first calleth us before we can be any way prepared thereunto there is no fitnesse aptnesse or congruity in our nature but all is of grace so Moses saith because the Lord loved thy fathers therefore he chose their seed after them Deut. 4.37 Gods love was the first motive for the choyce and calling of Abraham And againe seeing Terah Abrahams father was an Idolater under whom Abraham was brought up and by all likelihood infected that way before the Lord called him what preparation could there be in Abraham or provocation to his calling 2. Neither was the beginning only of Gods favour toward Abraham of grace the increase thereof by merit for Iacob being of Abrahams faith confesseth that he was not worthy or lesse than the least of Gods mercy Gen. 32.10 he confesseth that none of Gods graces neither first or last were conferred upon him for his worthinesse therefore Calvin well noteth that this word that consequentiam magis notat quam causam doth note rather a consequence than a cause Where the Lord findeth his servants faithfull and obedient he will increase them with further graces not merited by their obedience but added in mercy according to the gracious promise of God that vouchsafeth of his fatherly goodnesse so to crowne the faithfull service of his children For otherwise if our service and obedience bee weighed in it selfe it deserveth nothing as our Saviour saith When we have done all things which are commanded we must say we are unprofitable servants wee have dine that which was our duty to doe Luke 17.10 Morall observations 1. Moral The commendation of hospitality Vers. 2. HE ran to meet them from the tent doore Ambrose here well noteth non otiosus sedit Abraham in ostio tabernaculi c. Abraham did not sit idlely in the doore of his tabernacle sed longe aspicit nec aspexisse contentus cōcurrit obviam festin◠vit
because the King of Moab by their evill example did sacrifice the King of Edoms son as Burgens for no such thing is expressed in the text 2. Neither was this indignation conceived by the idolatrous Israelites against the rest thinking the King of Moab invincible because of this sacrifice Cajetan for this indignation was kindled not by the Israelites but against them 3. And for the same reason the common exposition seemeth not to be so proper that this indignation and griefe of the Israelites was for the horror and cruelty of this unnaturall fact which they could not endure to behold Tostat. for this indignation or wrath should not have beene against the Israelites but against the King of Moab 4. Therefore it seemeth more agreeable to the text that this wrath was on the Edomites part against the Israelites because it was their quarrell that brought the King of Edom to take part with them against the Moabites upon which occasion this hard hap fell out upon his sonne and upon this division they brake off and left the siege Iunius QUEST XXVI Of Huz Buz Kemuel Chesed the sonnes of Nahor Vers. 21. HVz c. and Buz. Of this Huz was not named the Countrey where Iob dwelt Iob 1.1 but of that Huz rather which was the sonne of Aram Genes 10.22 Hierome 2. Of Buz came the family of the Buzites of the which Elihu was Iob 32.6 3. Kemuel here mentioned was not the father of the Syrians as the Greeke and vulgar Latine read nor yet of Aram Naharaim as Tostatus or Aram Seba as Cajetane for the City of Nahor was in Aram Genes 24.10 This name and Countrey therefore was more ancient than Kemuel Nahors sonne and was rather so called of Aram the sonne of Sem Genes 10.22 4. Neither is Chesed here named the father of the Chaldees which was Abrahams Countrey and could not therefore be founded by his nephew 5. But these sonnes of Nahor were fathers of certaine families in Syria whereof there was some remainder in Constantius Caesars time as may appeare by the names of certaine townes Reman and Buzan remembred by Ammianus Lib. 18. ex Iun. 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. How God is said to tempt Vers. 1. GOd did tempt or prove Abraham c. 1. God is not said here to tempt Abraham metaphoricè metaphorically as he is said to be angry to repent in a figurative speech as Cajetane but God truly and verily tempteth that is proveth and taketh triall of Abrahams faith 2. And God doth it Non ut ipse hominem inveniat sed ut homo se inveniat Not that God need to finde out man but that man may finde out himselfe as Augustine saith 3. God tempteth otherwise than Satan is said to tempt God properly is the author only of good temptations but Satan is the tempter unto evill Evill temptations proceed not from God effective sed permissive by way of action but by way of permission when the Lord withdraweth his sufficient grace and necessary helpe Gods tempting and Satans tempting doe diversly differ 1. In respect of the end Deus tâ—ntat ut doceat Diabolus ut decipiat God tempteth to teach the Devill to deceive as Augustine saith 2. In respect of the persons God tempteth onely the good to make their faith and obedience knowne sometimes the weake are tried that after they have fallen they may repent and be restored sometimes the strong that they may be more and more confirmed But the devill tempteth both good and bad the good to bring them into evill the bad that they forsake not evill 3. The object of good and evill temptations are divers good temptations are especially seene in outward things as in poverty sicknesse persecution and such like evill temptations are exercised in spirituall and inward evils as in evill suggestions ungodly thoughts stirring to evill desires and provoking to sinne Perer. 2. Doct. The grave motions of the spirit of God differ from the furious fansies of those led with an evill spirit Vers. 4. THen the third day c. We see a manifest difference betweene the furious and sudden motions of those which are possessed with an evill spirit such as Saul had who in his rage all at once cast a javelin at his sonne Ionathan to have killed him 1. Sam. 20.33 and the deliberate actions of those which are guided by the good spirit of God as here Abraham not suddenly is moved to sacrifice his son but after three dayes journey having thorowly advised upon it he obediently yeeldeth himselfe to Gods commandement 3. Doct. The obedience of the will is accepted of God for the deed Vers. 12. SEeing for my sake thou hast not spared thine onely sonne God accepteth the resolute purpose and will of Abraham for the done deed An obedient will then is accepted before God as the worke it selfe as the Apostle saith If first there be a willing minde God accepteth it according to that a man hath not according to that he hath not 2 Cor. 8.12 Muscul. 5. Places of confutation 1. Confut. By faith we are assured of our justification Vers. 12. I Know that thou fearest God It is confessed by our adversaries that Abraham at this time was certaine that he was in the state of grace but because it is their opinion that we cannot by faith ordinarily be assured of remission of sinnes they have framed divers answers to this place 1. Thomas Aquinas saith that this assurance that Abraham had was a particular experimentall knowledge that in this worke he feared God Thom. 1.2 qu. 112. ar 3. Cont. Abraham not onely in this particular was assured of Gods favour but was undoubtedly perswaded of the promise in generall concerning the Messiah as the Apostle saith Neither did he doubt of the promise c. but was strengthened in the faith Rom. 4.20 And this is that which our Saviour saith That Abraham desired to see his day he saw it and rejoyced Ioh. 8.56 His assurance which he had of salvation in the Messiah procured unto him this great joy 2. The same Thomas saith Abraham illud cognovit per specialem Dei revelationem That Abraham knew this that he was in the state of grace by Gods speciall revelation Contra. This assurance that Abraham had was not by any particular or extraordinary revelation but by the proper and ordinary operation of faith as the Apostle saith He was strengthened in the faith Rom. 4.20 3. Pererius answereth that this revelation was made to the Patriarks in the old Testament and the Apostles in the new which were as it were the founders of the people of God 10. disput in 22. cap. Gen. Contra. Saint Paul in the matter of faith maketh no such difference betweene the Patriarks and other beleevers as he saith Now it is not written for him onely that it was imputed to him for righteousnesse but also for us c. Rom. 4.23 And the Apostle saith That a crowne of righteousnesse was not
Calvin Mercer Wherefore in this manner to aske a signe not of distrust in Gods power or doubtfulnesse of his promises but with confidence in God nor prescribing unto him but onely desiring to be assured what is his good pleasure and this to doe not with any superstitious minde but with devout prayer and by the secret motion of Gods spirit it is no tempting of God at all But as Augustinus saith of Gedeon asking a signe Consultatio illa magis quà m tentatio fuit It was a consultation rather than a tentation Now seeing an entrance is made into this question concerning the lawfulnesse of such ghesses and conjectures as are made by mens speeches or behaviour of things to come as Abrahams servant desireth here to be informed by the answer and behaviour of the maid whether she were appointed to be Isaacks wife it shall not bee amisse some what more fully to discusse this matter QUEST XV. Of the divers kindes of conjecturall and ominous predictions THere are then foure sorts of such conjectures and ominous predictions of things to come The first are naturall which doe for the most part certainly foreshew that which followeth as the cause producing the effect as a cloud rising in the west causeth and foresheweth raine the Southwind heat Luke 14.55 or the effect doth sometime premonstrate the cause following as the lightning the thunder which though it be first seene and perceived by reason of the quicknesse of sight yet is it last done These signes and conjectures it is not superstitious or vaine to observe Secondly there are some humane conjectures which are taken by the words behaviour and actions of men as when the king of Israel had let fall a word calling Benhadad brother the messengers tooke it for a good signe the Latine translation saith acceperunt pro omine they tooke it for good lucke 1 King 20.22 they thereby gave conjecture of the kings favour So when the king Ahashuerosh had said of Haman will he force the queene also before me c. they tooke this as a signe of the kings displeasure and covered Hamans face Esther 6.8 The like in forraine stories is recorded of Tarquinius Superbus king of Rome who being sent unto by his sonne Sextus Tarquinius how hee should use the Gabii that had received him into their citie he gave no other answer to the messenger but topped the heads of the poppies in his garden with his staffe whereby his sonne perceived his meaning that he should make the chiefe of the citie lower by their heads By these humane conjectures we may ghesse of such things which are in mens owne power and purpose to doe but otherwise to catch at words and syllables and to make them as divine oracles it is a superstitious and ridiculous use as Cicero giveth an instance how when M. Crassus did ship his Armie at Brundusium one in the haven that brought figs from Cannus a citie in Caria chanced to crie out caricas canneas Cannean figges if Crassâ—s had taken this hint as a signe of evill lucke and gone no further he had not perished Tullie himselfe condemneth such observations as ridiculous for then saith he by the same reason pedis offensio abruptio corrigiae sternut amenta sunt observanda the stumbling of the foot breaking of the shooe point sneesing and other such things must be observed as ominous Perer. The third sort of predictions is divine which are either uttered by men inspired of God being well advised and knowing what they say as Ionathan encourageth himselfe with this signe thereunto directed by the spirit of God that if the Philistims should say come up unto us he would take it as a signe that God had delivered them into his hand and so it came to passe 1 Sam. 14.10 Sometime God directeth mens tongues to speake the truth unawares as Caiphas prophesied that it was better for one man to die for the people than the whole nation to perish Iohn 11.50 yet Caiphas understood not what he said of this kinde was that direction given unto Augustine much perplexed within himselfe what profession of life he should betake himselfe unto by a voice saying unto him Tolle lege Take up thy booke and read and then opening the booke hee light upon that place Rom 13.13 See that wee walke honestly c. not in gluttonie and drunkennesse chambering and wantonnesse c. by reading which sentence hee was resolved to reforme his life and to leave his youthfull pleasures The fourth kind of ominous predictions is superstitious and diabolicall whereof Augustine giveth his judgement thus Cum ad decipiendos homines fit spirituum seductorum operatio est VVhen it is done to deceive men it is the working of seducing spirits such was that conjecture of the priests and soothsayers among the Philistims that if the arke which they had put into a new cart went up the way by Bethshemesh then it is he that is the God of Israel that hath done this great evill 1 Sam. 6.9 This indeed came so to passe and the event answered the prediction whereby the devill cunningly wrought that those idolatrous priests and soothsayers should still retaine their credit and estimation Pausanias maketh mention of the like superstitious observation in the towne of Phare in Achaia where after the people had consulted with the oracle their manner was going away to stop their eares and the first voyce which they heard afterward they tooke as a divine oracle Pausan. in Achaic Cicero reporteth of Paulus Aemilius that preparing to goe against Perses king of Macedonia and seeing his daughter sad and she answering being asked the reason because her little dogge called Persa was dead saith he Accipio omen I take this as a signe of good lucke my daughter Such superstitious curious and vaine observations are not beseeming a Christian profession which Sathan useth as meanes to keepe men in a superstitious awe and feare and to seduce them from trusting in the providence of God QUEST XIV Why it is said that Rebecca was a virgin with this addition and unknown of man Vers. 16. A Virgin and unknowne of man c. Lest this might be thought a superfluous speech because she could not have bene a virgin unlesse she were unknowne of man divers interpretations are given 1. Some thinke that she is called a virgin in respect of her outward habit and unknowne of man for her chastitie Cajetan 2. Others that because there was a lewd use among the Gentiles to abuse other parts of the body to their filthy lust beside the place of virginitie they thinke shee is called not onely a virgin but altogether untouched or unknowne in any part of her body Rasi Rabbi Salomon 3. Some that she was not a virgin onely in body but unknowne of man that is not tempted in her minde of the devill Origen hom 10. in Genes 4. Some thinke this clause is added to shew a
the Assignes of THOMAS MAN PAVL MAN and IONAH MAN 1632. TO THE MOST HONOVRABLE LORD THE L. DVKE OF LENOX AND TO THE RIGHT Honourable the Earle of Marre Lords of his Majesties most Honourable Privie Counsell Grace mercie and Peace from the Lord JESUS RIght Honourable as the highest Majestie in his wise providence hath united and conjoyned your Honours not onely in one consent and judgement of religion but also in the joynt administration and regiment of this Nation and Kingdome under his excellent Majestie so I thought good to make your Honours with other of your Honourable place united Patrons of these my labours and as he saith non debet charta dividere quos amor mutuus copulavit It was not fit that I should sever you in this my duty who are combined in your mutuall amity Men of noble birth delight much in antiquities and it is their glory to derive their bloud by many descents from their thrice renowned ancestors here I present to your Honourable view that noble and most ancient family of Abraham Isaack and Iacob who were in favour with God and in honour and great reputation with men whose children they are which imitate their piety and obedience that famous Matron Paula whom Hierome so much commendeth was by her father descended of Aeneas and the noble house of the Gracchi by her mother of Agamemnon of whom Hierome made this Epitaph thought her Christian profession more honourable than her noble birth and condition and so I doubt not but that it is also your honourable resolution to say with the Apostle who having rehearsed his great privileges after the flesh his birth parentage and profession thus concludeth I count all these things but losse for the excellent knowledge sake of Christ Iesus for whom I have counted all things as losse and doe judge them as dung that I might winne Christ as Hierome also saith well Summa apud Deum nobilitas clarum esse virtutibus I it is the greatest nobility with God to shine with vertue Here your Honours have the worthy example of the Patriarks to follow the Heathen presidents are but counterfeit and deceitfull they had the shadowes of vertues rather than the substance as Ambrose saith well of Polemo who of a drunken and riotous companion by hearing of Xenocrates became a Philosopher Siresipâ—ir a vino fuit semper tamen temulentus sacrilegio If hee were sober from wine yet hee was drunke with superstition But these holy examples are seasoned with grace and savour of true religion Abraham was famous in Pharaohs Court so was Isaack in Abimelecks and Iacob in another Pharaohs also for their piety and vertue So they which walke in their steps shall be great both with God and man Abraham told Abimelech plainly of the wrongs which his servants had done him Gen. 21.15 so is it the part of good Courtiers to shew unto the King the wrongs and oppressions that are done in the lanâ— to succour the poore to releeve the oppressed to countenance the truth to maintaine justice and equity Iacob being in Bethel saw a ladder which reached to heaven and the Angels ascending and descending upon it whereupon one thus noteth In the house of Bethel there is alwayes both going up and comming downe this I say not that the goers down should dismay you but the climers up incourage you So in the Princes Bethel and Court there be examples of both sorts of some that are declining and sliding backe onely seeking to make themselves great and to bee enriched by the Kings favour some there are though the smallest number which doe ascend upon this ladder not aspiring to their owne honour but using their favour to the glory of God and benefit of his Church Thus I trust your Lordships have learned to scale this ladder of honour to the which you are called to raise up those which are in the dust to set forward the truth to nourish and encourage the Preachers thereof to speake for the innocent to hold out your helpfull hand to the needy so shall your Honours ascend from step to step till you come to the top of the ladder where Christ sitteth who shall cast and tumble downe from thence all unfaithfull Stewards and cut them off to have their portion with hypocrites Matth. 24.51 but shall say unto you and all other that shall serve him faithfully herein in earth It is well done good servant and faithfull thou hast beene faithfull in little I will make thee ruler over much enter into thy masters joy Amen Your Honours ready to be commanded in the Lord ANDREW WILLET THE FIRST BOOKE OF THIS SECOND PART OF GENESIS Containing the Historie concerning the Patriarks ISAACK IACOB Hitherto hath beene continued the holy story of those three great Patriarks Adam before the floud Noah in the floud Abraham after the floud the rest of this Booke of Genesis followeth which setteth forth the life acts and death of the three other fathers Isaack Iacob Ioseph CHAP. XXV 1. The Contents of the Chapter IN this Chapter 1. Concerning Abraham his second mariage is declared with the issue thereof his children and their gifts vers 1. to 6. Then Abrahams yeares death and buriall vers 7. to 11. 2. Concerning Ismael his generations or off-spring are expressed his yeares of life his place of dwelling vers 12. to 20. 3. Of Isaack there is set downe his time of marriage the barrennesse of his wife the remedie by prayer vers 20.21 4. Concerning Esau and Iacob these things are rehearsed 1. Their manner of conception vers 22 23. 2. Of their birth 24. to 27. 3. Their divers education vers 27 28. 4. Esau his prophanenesse in selling his birth-right for a messe of pottage vers 29. to the end 2. The divers readings v. 1. Abraham had taken him another wife H.G. proceeding or adding tooke another wife caeter v. 2. Zambran Ioctan Madal Sebe S. Zimran Iocksan Madan Shuah caeter v. 3. The sonnes of Dedan were in holds tents and Islands â— the sons of Dedan Asshurim Letushim Leumim v. 4. Gephar Apher Raga S. Epha Epher Eldaha caeter v. 6. Sonnes of the Concubine C. of the Concubines caet v. 8. And fainting or wearing away H.S.C.B. he yeelded up the spirit or died T.G.P. jagaug signifieth to faint gavagh expirare to yeeld the spirit which word is here used v. 11. Isaack dwelt by the Well of the living and seeing H.B. the Well of vision S. Where the Angell of life appeared C. Beâ—r-lahairâ— G.P. the fountaine Lahoiro T. v. 12. Which Hagar the Egyptian Sarahs maid bare H. bare to Abraham caet v. 13. These the names of his sonnes H. of the sonnes of Ismael cat v. 13. Nadbehel Massa. S. Adbehel Mibsa cat v. 18. from Havilah to Agara C. from Havila to Sur. cat v. 18. he died in the presence of all his brethren H.B.P. he dwelt S.C. his lot fell T. G. naphal signifieth 〈◊〉 fall
and fruitfulnesse of corne wine oyle to the taste who knoweth not the pleasant savour of the fields in the spring of the corne in harvest and of a vineyard in the time of vintage Perer. 3. Gregorie by the smell of a field garnished with divers flowers understandeth the variety of gifts and the graces of Gods spirit in the Church Ambrose maketh Iacob this field replenished with divers vertues 4. Some thinke that these garments kept this savour which they had in paradise being supposed to be the same that Adam did weare but these are but Jewish fables they were either perfumed garments or Rebeckah might of purpose make them sweet or it is most like they savoured of the fresh springs and flowers it being now Spring time as Aben Ezra thinketh thorow the which Esau was accustomed to walke QUEST XIV The meaning of Isaacks blessing upon Iacob Vers. 28. GOd give thee of the dew of heaven 1. Isaack doth not only pray as Iosephus setteth it downe or wish well to his sonne as R. Levi but this speech is a certaine prophecie and declaration of the blessing which should fall upon Iacob and his posterity Luther Mercer 2. Here are foure blessings contained 1. Of abundance 2. Of victory 3. Of domesticall preeminence 4. Of outward prosperity Cursed be he that curseth c. Perer. 3. He maketh mention of the dew of heaven especially in regard of the drie and thirsty Countrey of Canaan where they have no raine but twice in the yeare in seed time in the moneth of October and in May which is called the latter raine and therefore the earth was chiefly moystened with dewes Perer. By his brethren and sonnes of his mother the posterity of Esau is understood which Isaack unwittingly pronounceth of Esau for Iacob whom he blesseth was yet unmaried 4. But this blessing was not fulfilled in Iacobs time who rather was subject to his brother Esau yet in his posterity to the which Iacobs faith looked it came to passe for the Idumeans were servants to the Israelites 5. This benediction is diversly allegorized Gregory by the dew of heaven understandeth the contemplative life by the fatnesse of the earth the active Theodoret the divinity and humanity of Christ Rupertus by the dew interpreteth the grace of Gods spirit by the fatnesse of the earth the opening of the heart QUEST XV. Of the cause of Isaacks feare Vers. 33. ISaack was stricken with a marvellous great feare 1. Not as the Hebrewes fable because hee saw Esau accursed for ever seeing hell wide open to receive him 2. Neither as Cajetane did it proceed of a strife in Isaacks minde betweene his love toward Esau and Gods will revealed concerning Iacob for Isaack is resolved the blessing shall stand 3. And it is more than to marvell as the Latine text addeth Vltra quam credi potest admirans Marvelling beyond measure 4. But Isaack feared and was troubled being as in a trance and ecstasie as the Septuagint and Augustine read wherein the will of God was revealed to him because he had beene so grossely deceived in not remembring how the Lord had chosen Iacob before Esau Calvin And this feare was as a stay and bridle to Isaack not to reverse the blessing pronounced Iun. QUEST XVI How Isaack saith Iacob came with subtilty Vers. 35. THy brother came with subtilty c. 1. We need neither with Tostatus to excuse Iacobs fraud and craft that herein he offended not at all 2. Nor with Lippomanus to justifie Iacobs deceit who maketh three kinds of fraud one eruditionis of instruction as was the thrusting of Iosephs cup into Benjamins sacke another noxiae deceptionis of hurtfull deceit as the Prophet of Bethel deceived the man of God 1 King 13. The third inspirationis divinae by divine inspiration as this of Iacobs was so he maketh foure kinds of simulation or dissembling una providentiae one of providence which Iosua used against Hâ—i altera doctrinae the other of doctrine as Christ made as though he would have gone further tertia calliditatis the third of deceit as the devill can transforme himselfe into an Angell of light quarta significationis the fourth of signification as this was of Iacob for as is shewed before Iacobs infirmity in this dissimulation though it pleased God to use the same to effect his purpose cannot be wholly defended 3. Nor yet will we strive about the word as Lyranus saith mirmah sometime signifieth prudence wisdome as the Chaldee translateth and in the civill law there is a title de dolo malâ— of evill craft whereby it may bee gathered that all deceit is not evill 4. Neither yet will wee aggravate Iacobs oversight with some who thinke that for this lie made to Isaack his sonnes lyed unto him concerning Ioseph which they note as a punishment 5. But we take the word as it properly signifieth for deceit and fraud though Isaack to please his sonne committeth some oversight in transferring the fault upon Iacob Iunius 6. And yet though there were a fraud and error personae errour of the person which is sufficient to disanull other civill contracts yet for as much as God ratified the blessing thus pronounced ignorantly by Isaack the sentence was to stand Perer. QUEST XVI Esau falsly chargeth Iacob Vers. 36. WAs he not justly called Iacob 1. Esau doth cavill at Iacobs name which was not given him in respect of any such supplanting but because he held Esau by the heele 2. Hee lyeth in saying he tooke away my birth-right for Esau sold it unto him and confirmed it with an oath Mercer 3. Neither did hee take away his blessing for having the birth-right the blessing did justly belong unto him for the birth-right and blessing could not be divided and separated Mercer Iun. QUEST XVII Why Isaack had but one blessing Vers. 38. HAst thou but one blessing 1. True it is that principall blessing which carried with it the spirituall promises in Christ was but one because Christ is one Esau by joyning himselfe to Iacob might have beâ—ne partaker of this blessing but apart by himselfe hee could not because without the Church there is no salvation Mercer 2. For this causâ— Ismael was excluded Abrahams house that the blessing might remaine in Isaack so Esau is excluded and Iacob made the heire of blessing But Iacob gave a blessing to all his children because they all belonged to the visible Church yet the more principall blessing was promised unto Iudah of whom the Messiah should come 3. Though there be no speciall mention of any such blessing given by Abraham to Isaack yet it is not like that Abraham was wanting therein and the manifest promises so often renewed concerning Isaack the ejection of Ismael and sending away of all the rest of Abrahams children might stand in stead thereof 4. Though the blessing of all parents specially such as feare God be effectuall toward their children yet the ancient Patriarks and Prophets that were the founders of
Perer. for God expresseth no condition in his promise 4. Nor yet need we answer that Iacob doth not vow the generall worship of God whereunto he was bound by his profession having received circumcision but a speciall service in consecrating that place to Gods service and offering of tythes or that it is lawfull for a man to tie himselfe by a new bond to performe that to God which he is otherwise bound to doe as the Prophet David saith Psal. 119.126 I have sworne and will performe it that I will keepe thy righteous judgements both these answers are true though not pertinent to this place ex Perer. 5. Wherefore Iacob doth not bring this forth as a condition If God will be with me this particle im is not here a conditionall but a word of time as it is taken vers 15. untill if that is when I have performed c. so is it taken here when God hath beene with me and kept me in this journey Iun Mercer and the words following are not to be read then the Lord shall be my God but when the Lord hath beene my God so they are not parcell of the vow which is complete in the 22. vers but they are part of the reason of this vow Rasi Iun. QUEST XVIII To whom Iacob voweth to pay the tenth Vers. 22. I Will give the tenth 1. Some thinke that he payed the tenth to Sem or Eber but Sem died before Iacob was borne and Eber also was dead many yeares before this in the 19. yeare of Iacob who is now supposed to have beene 77. yeare old 2. Therefore this giving of tithe was nothing else but the consecrating of the tenth part of his goods to be bestowed in building of Altars and in sacrifices for the service of God and such things as are devoted to religious uses are truly said to be given unto God sic Cajetan Mercer 3. Some Hebrewes referre this to the consecrating of Levi to the Priesthood but as Aben Ezra not men but cattell and beasts used to be tithed 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. The ministery of Angels Vers. 12. THe Angell of God went up and downe By this is expressed the ministery of the Angels that are continually imployed for the good of the elect they ascend to report our necessities they descend to be ministers of Gods mercies as the Apostle saith Are they not all ministring spirits sent forth to minister for their sakes that shall be heires of salvation Heb. 1.14 2. Doct. How Gods providence is seene in permitting evill to be done in the world HEreby also is set forth Gods providence that watcheth over all things for the Lord standeth upon the top of this ladder whereby is signified the administration and government of the world Against which providence whereas it is objected that many evill things are committed in the world to the which the Lord is no way consenting Thomas Aquine answereth that although some defects are against the particular nature of things yet they are for the good of the universall and therefore as Augustine saith Deus non sineret malumesse in operib suis nisi sciret benefacere etiam de malâ— God would not suffer evill to be in his works if he did not know how to turne evill into good But it will be said God ought to draw men against their will unto good Dionysius answereth Non est providentia divinae violare naturam sed est cujusque naturae conservatrix Gods providence doth not change or violate nature but is the preserver of naâ—ure leaving to things indued with reason to follow their owne will and inclination Lib. de Divin nominib cap. 4 par 4. 3. Doct. How God forsaketh not the elect finally Vers. 15. I Will not forsake thee c. Gods promises to his servants are so stable and firme in Christ that they are sure finally not to be forsaken as the Lord said to Iosua I will never faile thee nor forsake thee Heb. 13.4 Calvin 4. Doct. Lawfull to vow Vers. 20. IF God will be with me c. By Iacobs vowing both their errour is condemned that take away the use of all vowes from Christians and their superstition that vow not as they ought Iacob 1. directeth his vowes to God the papists vow unto Saints 2. He voweth to testifie his thankfulnesse they vow to merit 3. He voweth such things as were in his power as to pay tithe they such things as are beyond their reach as single life where the gift is not 4. Iacob voweth such things as God commanded they vow things of their owne inventing as to goe in pilgrimage to fast with bread and water to garnish Idols and such like concerning the which we may say with the Prophet who required this at your hands Isay 1. â—2 Calvin 5. Doct. Signes called by the names of the things Vers. 22. THis stone shall be the house of God This stone was not Gods house but a monument or signe of the place of Gods worship for there Iacob to fulfill this vow afterward at his returne built an Altar to God Gen. 35.7 Thus by a metonymie that which is proper to the thing is given to the signe in which sense the bread in the Eucharist is called the body of Christ Marlâ—r 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. How the Angels are reporters of our prayers unto God and yet no mediators Vers. 12. LOe the Angels of God ascended and descended upon it Hence Pererius would gather that the Angels descended from heaven to reveale unto us the counsels of God and to execute his will so their office is by ascending to report unto God our prayers vowes and necessities in Gen. 25. numer 23. We grant that the Angels doe report unto God the affaires of the world and the acts and gests of men and so their supplications in generall but this they doe as messengers not as mediators The Prophet Zachary sheweth a distinct office of the Angelicall spirits and Jesus Christ there called the Angell of the Lord they returne this answer to Christ Wâ—e have gone thorow the world and behold all the world sitteth still and is at rest But the Angell of the Lord Christ the Mediator of his Church steppeth forth and prayeth O Lord of hosts how long wilt thou be unmercifull to Ierusalem Zach. 1.12 So then though the Angels be witnesses of our devotion and beholders of our teares and plaints they have no office of mediation neither have we any warrant to pray unto them 2. Confut. Against the Platonists that make three kinds of providence Vers. 12. THere stood a ladder upon the earth and the top reached to heaven Gods providence then descendeth from heaven to earth contrary to the opinion of the Platonists noted by Gregor Nyssen lib. 8. de provident cap. 3. who make three kinds of providence the first of God in taking care onely for things celestiall and spirituall and the generall causes of other things in the world the second
Secondly Iacob putteth on sackcloth which was a ceremonie used in the East Countreyes to testifie their humility as Benhadads servants presented themselves before the King of Israel with sackcloth about their loines and ropes about their necks suing for pardon 1 King 20. Perer. QUEST XXVIII Who were those sonnes and daughters that comforted Iacob Vers. 35. THen all his sonnes and daughters rose up c. 1. These were not properly Iacobs daughters as the Hebrewes imagine that with every sonne Iacob had a daughter borne which they afterward married for such marriages the world being now multiplied were not in use among the faithfull Mercer 2. Neither could Iacobs sonnes the eldest not exceeding twenty foure or twenty five yeares not above seven yeares elder than Ioseph have daughters of that age able to comfort their father as Musculus thinketh they were therefore Iacobs sonnes wives that were his daughters in law 3. Neither did Iacob refuse to bee comforted because as the Hebrewes thinke where wee know certainly of the death of our friend we cease mourning but not where it is uncertaine whether they be dead or no for Iacob did perswade himselfe here that some wilde beast had devoured Ioseph but the greatnesse of his griefe would admit no consolation Mercer 4. We see the hard and cruell hearts of Iacobs sonnes that willingly did suffer their father to continue in this griefe and that with fained words they seemed to comfort him concealing the truth Luther 5. So it is added his father wept for him not Isaack who indeed was yet living as some thinke Aben Ezra Iun. But Iacob mourned for Ioseph his brethren mourned not but the father sorroweth for his sonne Muscul. QUEST XXIX Potiphar how he is said to be an Eunuch Vers. 36. TO Potiphar an Eunuch of Pharaohs 1. This Potiphar was not indeed an Eunuch or gelded man as the Septuag reade 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for he had a wife and a daughter married afterward to Ioseph 2. Neither for the same cause can that conceit of R. David have any likelihood that Potiphar was an Eunuch in part as retaining still the nerve or sinew though not the other instruments of generation 3. Neither is there any ground of that tradition of the Hebrewes that God caused Potiphars privie parts to wither and drie up because he thought to abuse faire Ioseph to his filthy lust 4. But whereas Eunuches were at the first used by Kings and Princes to wait upon their Queenes Esther 2.14 and so were as the Chamberlaines and neare unto their persons as Harbonah was to King Assuerus Esther 7.9 Hence the name of Eunuch was taken generally to signifie a Courtier Prince or great man toward the King as the word is used 2 King 8.6 The King commanded an Eunuch or one of his Princes to restore unto the Shunamite her lands and in this sense is Potiphar called an Eunuch that is one of Pharaos princes or courtiers as the word Saras signifieth sic Chal. Mercer Iun. with others QUEST XXX What officer Potiphar was to Pharao PHaraos chiefe Steward or master of the guard 1. For we neither reade with the Septuag Pharaos chiefe cooke although the word tabach be sometime used in that sense 1 Sam. 9.23 which reading Iosephus Philo and Ambrose follow 2. Neither yet was he Pharaos chiefe steward as some reade B.G. 3. Nor the chiefe captaine of his souldiers as both the Chalde and Hierome translate 4. But seeing the word tabach signifieth to kill and so the word is indifferently applyed both to Cookes and Butchers that are the slaughter men of beasts and to souldiers that kill men in battell and executioners that put men to death that are condemned by the law It appeareth that this Potiphar had the chiefe charge of those that were adjudged to imprisonment or death as Pharaos two officers his chiefe Baker and Butler were committed to his charge Gen. 40.3 and so may be well thought to be the chiefe Marshall or Captaine of the Guard unto Pharaoh Iunius Mercerus 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. The father is as the Sunne and chiefe in the house Vers. 9. THe Sunne Moone and Stars did reverence unto me c. Ioseph by the Sunne and Moone understandeth his father and mother The father then of the house by Gods ordinance as the Sun from whom the wife as the Moone the children as Stars must receive their light and direction in every family Muscul. for the Apostle saith concerning wives If they will learne any thing let them aske of their husbands at home 1 Cor. 14.35 and concerning the rest the same Apostle saith Having children under obedience with all honesty 1 Timoth. 3.4 2. Doct. The Prophets did not forsee all things but what was revealed unto them AGaine he dreamed c. Ioseph as Bernard well noteth did by the spirit of prophecie foresee his exaltation yet his humiliation and captivity was not declared unto him though this was nearer than the other tractat de gradib humilitat Whereby we see that the Prophets did not foresee all things neither had they a propheticall spirit residing with them whereby to foretell what they would but they onely knew those things which it pleased God to reveale unto them as the Prophet Ieremie at the first did not perceive the falshood of the Prophet Hananie that prophesied of their returne from captivity after two years but wished that it might fall out even so till the word of God came unto him Ier. 28.6.12 3. Doct. True obedience followeth not the words but the minde of the commander Vers. 7. IOseph went after his brethren and found them in Dothan c. Yet his father sent him onely to seeke them in Sechem vers 12. Ioseph sheweth his prompt obedience in not strictly tying himselfe to his fathers words but fulfilling his minde Iacob spake but of Sechem to Ioseph but he knowing that it was his meaning that hee should seeke out his brethren followeth after them to Dothan that hee might finde them out Muscul. by which example we are taught what kinde of obedience is most accepted with God not to keepe onely the letter of the law as the Scribes did whose corrupt glosses our Saviour confuteth Matth. 5. but to observe the true meaning and sense thereof 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. The Latine text corrupt and not justifiable Vers. 2. WHen Ioseph was seventeene yeares old The Latine text readeth most corruptly When Ioseph was sixteene yeare old which reading Perer. would justifie by these reasons 1. The Latine text understandeth sixteene yeares complete the Hebrewes seventeene yeares now but begun 2. He thinketh that the Latine translator set downe divers things whereof no reason can bee given not without the secret instinct of the spirit Pererius disput 1. in Gen. cap. 37. Contra. 1. It is the manner of the Hebrewes when they set downe a number of yeares to make the account by full and complete yeares as is manifest by the phrase here used
therefore we should not set our affections upon earthly things but presse forward in our desire toward our heavenly Countrey 5. Morall Good officers should not seeke to inrich themselves Vers. 14. IOseph laid up the money in Pharaohs house Ioseph was a faithfull officer to Pharaoh he did not seeke to inrich himselfe by his office but sought the Kings profit and increased his treasure Mercer Such an one was Iosua who in the division of the land of Canaan to the tribes did not share any thing to himselfe but the children of Israel gave him an inheritance among them when they had made an end of dividing the land Ios. 19.49 Such should officers and Judges be toward the King and people to deale faithfully with the one and justly with the other not to turne all to their owne profit and gaine as many doe now adayes CHAP. XLVIII 1. The Method and Argument of the Chapter FIrst in this Chapter is declared how Ioseph came to visit Iacob when he was sicke Secondly Iacobs testament is set downe first concerning Iosephs sonnes then his gift and legacie toward Ioseph himselfe vers 22. with a generall prophecie of the returne of all his children vers 21. Concerning Iosephs sons 1. The ground and occasion of Iacobs blessing of them is expressed which is first the promise of God vers 4. then the right property that Iacob had in them vers 5. Thirdly because Rachel was taken away leaving not much issue behinde her vers 7. and Ioseph was the eldest of her who was his principall wife 2. Iacobs blessing followeth first the preparation to the blessing where we have set forth 1. Iacobs kissing and embracing of Manasses and Ephraim vers 9 10. 2. Iosephs reverence to his father vers 12. 3. The presenting of his two sonnes and the order of disposing them Manasses to Iacobs right hand and Ephraim to his left vers 13. Secondly in the blessing 1 There is the ceremonie the laying on of Iacobs hands contrary to Iosephs expectation the right hand upon the youngest the left upon the eldest vers 14. 2. The pronouncing of the blessing which sheweth the author or efficient cause God who had fed him and delivered him vers 15 16. and the effects the naming of them among the tribes and their great increase and multiplying vers 16. 3. The ratification of the blessing where we have first Iosephs exception vers 17 18. then Iacobs answer containing a satisfaction to Ioseph vers 8 9. a confirmation of the blessing vers 20. 2. The divers readings v. 1. It was told to Iacob H.S.C. one told Iacob caet v. 7. Concerning the divers reading of this verse see before chap. 35. vers 16. and quest 13. upon that Chapter v. 7. I buried her in the way of the horse-race S. neare the way to Ephrata caet v. 11. I am not deprived of thy face H.S. I had not thought to have seene thy face caet v. 14. He layed his left hand upon the head of Manasses which was the elder changing his hands H.S. hee taught his hands although Manasses was the elder C. guiding or directing his hands of purpose for Manasseh was the elder B. G. he knew feeling with his hands that Manasses was the elder T. caused his hands to understand that Manasseh was the elder P. sacal to understand v. 15. God whom my fathers pleased in his sight S. served in his sight C. walked in his sight cat halach to walke v. 16. That they may grow into a multitude S.H. grow as fish into a multitude cat v. 20. In thee Israel shall be blessed H.S.C. shall blesse caet v. 21. The word of God shall be your helpe C. God shall be with you caet v. 22. I give thee Sechem the chiefe part above thy brethren S. I have given thee one portion of land c. B. I give thee one principall part or portion above c. C.G.T. Sechem signifieth a part portion or elbow of ground and it is also the proper name of a place Which I tooke out of the hand of the Amorites by my prayer and deprecation C. by my sword and my bow caet 3. The explanation of doubtfull questions QUEST I. Of the adopting of Manasseh and Ephraim into the degree of Iacobs sonnes Vers. 5. MAnasseh and Ephraim shall be mine as Ruben and Simeon are mine 1. Iacob upon Gods promise that he should increase into many people by the spirit of prophecie adopteth Manasseh and Ephraim into the number of his sonnes that seeing Rachel was taken away before he had many children by her he should by these be increased 2. He adopteth them in the place of Ruben and Simeon the two elder brethren and so the birth-right is conveyed from Ruben to Iosephs sonnes because he had defiled his fathers bed 1 Chron. 5.1 3. Here we have the practice of that law afterward established Deut. 22.17 of allotting a double part to the eldest Iun. for Ioseph had a double part in that two tribes came of him whereas the rest of his brethren had but each one his tribe Manasseh and Ephraim had not each of them his double part to the rest as some Hebrewes thinke but they two being the fathers of the two tribes doe make their fathers part double to the rest Mercer QUEST II. Whether Ioseph had any other sonnes beside Manasseh and Ephraim Vers. 6. THe linage which thou hast gotten after them c. 1. This is to be understood 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 potentially which thou maiest get afterward for the Scripture maketh no mention of any sonnes beside these two that Ioseph had at this present Iun. Mercer as also it might be uncertaine whether Iosephs wife were at this time with childe Mercer 2. The other sonnes should be more properly Iosephs yet so as that they should make no tribe of themselves but be accounted with Manasseh and Ephraim Iun. 3. They are deceived which thinke that Machir and Galaad of Manasseh and others of Ephraim were those other sonnes of Ioseph for they are his nephewes and Manasseh and Ephraim were their fathers not their brethren also some thinke that if Ioseph had begotten any other sonnes they should have had no inheritance in Canaan but this is not like seeing they came of Iacob whose whole seed was chosen likewise whether Ioseph had afterward any other sonnes it is uncertaine it is like he had not because no mention is made of them in Scripture neither doth it much skill seeing they were to be annexed and incorporate into these two tribes of their brethren Mercer QUEST III. Why Iacob maketh mention of the death and buriall of Rachel Vers. 7. I Buried in the way to Ephrath 1. Iacob maketh mention of the death and buriall of Rachel 1. Not to answer a secret objection why he buried not Rachel in the double cave with his fathers as he himselfe desired to be buried and thereupon tooke an oath of Ioseph because she
may be warned that they offend not in the like as this correction imposed upon Simeon and Levi was for the admonition of their brethren and posterity 3. That men feeling the justice of God in their due corrections may flee unto Gods mercy and the promises of God in Christ as Adam when he received the sentence of death for his transgression had also the promise of the Messiah given him Mercer 2. Confut. Against popish 〈…〉 SEeing then that corrections remaining after the forgivenesse of sin are to make ourselves and others more cautelous this is no ground for the Popish purgatory paines which are not visible and so serve not for the example of others neither are they availeable unto godly repentance for the which there is no place after this life Mercer 3. Confut. Peter not the chiefest of the Apostles because first 〈◊〉 Vers. 3. RVben mine eldest sonne This is to be observed that the twelve Patriarks are not rehearsed in the same order here as before Gen. 30. and Genes 27. and afterward Numb 1. 〈◊〉 33. yet 〈◊〉 these places Ruben is named first but not alwayes sometime Iudah is named before him as Numb â— 2 As then this were but a simple argument for the preheminence of Ruben before his brethren because he is in most places named first being the eldest so as simply doe the Papists conclude for Peters supremacie before the other Apostles because he is commonly named firsts which was rather because of his Eldership than any priority before the rest neither is he alwayes named in the first place for Galat. â—9 〈◊〉 is named before him 4. Confut. The bookes of Iudith and Tobie not canonicall Vers. 5. SImeon and Levi brethren in evill Hence it may appeare that the booke of Iudith is not Canonicall because there this fact of Simeon is commended cap. 9.2 which here Iacob condemneth and accurseth It satisfieth not to say with Dyonis Carthusian that the fact of Simeon and Levi in respect of the Sichemites was just but unjust in respect of them who brake their faith and covenant for Iudith commendeth their zeale which were moved with thy zeale v. 4. Neither is Lyranus and Pererius answer sufficient 1. For Iudith in that place commendeth also the manner of the fact and saith that God did put the sword of vengeance into their hand vers 2. and Iacob here curseth their very affection and zeale wherewith they were first moved Cursed be their wrath for it was cruell and further whereas Iudith doth set it downe as a reward of their zeale Thou gavest their Princes to the slaughter Iacob even therein doth accurse For in their wrath they slew a man It is evident then that the booke of Iudith was not written by the spirit of God because it commendeth that which is here condemned Seeing also Iacob remembreth Sampson in Dan Mordecai and Esther in Benjamin Barak in Nepthali it is like that Tobie also under Nepthali and Iudith in Simeon should not have beene forgotten if their stories were of like truth 5. Confut. The Pope succeedeth not Christ in this Kingdome Vers. 10. THe scepter shall not depart from Iudah Pererius applieth this to the kingdome of Christ that is his Church which shall endure for ever and so shall the Pope Christs vicar saith he who succeedeth Christ as the sonne doth the father in his authority and dignity in Gen. 49. numer 58. Conâ—â—a True it is that of Christs dominion there shall be none end and that he will alwayes have a Church upon the earth But the Pope which is the Antichrist is no successor to Christ but an usurper of his kingdome he is Christs son as the Jewes boasted they were Abrahams sonnes but Christ telleth them plainly They were of their father the Devill if ye were Abrahams children saith our Saviour ye would doâ— the workes of Abraham Iohn 8.39.44 So the Pope is his sonne whose doctrine he followeth but to forbid to marry and to teach to abstaine from meats as the Pope doth are the doctrines of Devils 1 Tim. 4.1 2. 6. Confut. Antichrist shall not come of Dan. Vers. 17. DAn shall be a serpent by the way c Divers of the ancient Writers upon this place did ground their opinion that Antichrist should come of Dan and therefore they say that tribe is omitted Apocal. 7. and this Pererius holdeth a probable opinion and worthy of credit Conâ—r 1. By this meanes that which Iacob pronounceth as a blessing upon Dan they turne to a curse and whereas Iacob speaketh of one that should be a deliverer of his people which some doe fitly apply to Sampson they would have him point out an enemy and adversary to the Church of God 2. The tribe of Dan was dispersed a thousand yeeres before Antichrist appeared in the world 3. Dan is omitted in the Apocalypse because of the idolatry which began in that tribe wherein Antichrist doth imitate him though hee come not of his stocke so likewise is Simeon omitted in Moses benediction Deuter. 33. yet they will not â—nferre that Antichrist should come of that tribe as Simeon is omitted by Moses for his evill example so Dan is by Iohn for his idolatry 7. Confut. Against Limbus 〈◊〉 Vers. 25. WHo shall blesse thee with the blessings of the deepâ—◠〈◊〉 lieth beneath Pererius maketh Ioseph here a type of Christ whom the Patriarks blessed and praised in the lake or Limbus in the deepe beneath whom he delivered from thence numer 1â—5 Contra. 1. These are but weake arguments of such weighty matters that are taken from types and figures â— Iacob speaketh here of temporall blessings of the wholesome aire pleasant dewes fruitfull ground and nourishing springs in the deepe below they are therefore unproperly applied to spirituall 3. Neither shall he ever be able to prove that the Patriarkes were shut up in the deepe below seeing that the rich man in hell looked up and lift up his eyes to Lazarus being in Abrahams bosome Luk. 16. it was then a place above not in the deepe beneath 8. Confut. What it is to be gathered to his people Vers. 33. WAs gathered to his people 1. Burgensis will have this people to be the fathers in Limbus to whom Iacob went so also Lyranus Contra. 1. Henoch was of this people to whom the Patriarks went after death but hee was not in Limbus hee was taken up to heaven and walked with God 2. Abraham went to his fathers in peace Gen. 15.15 that is with joy and comfort but what comfort is there in Limbus a lake and dungeon of darkenesse 3. Wherefore to be gathered to his people is not to be joyned to the Angels as gloss interlinear for Abraham is said to goe also to his fathers but the Angels were not his fathers neither is this phrase all one as to say he slept with his fathers or went the way of all flesh or changed his life as Perer. Mercer for Ismael is said also to goe to his people
of him 7. Iosephus is here deceived that Iosephs brethren refused to returne into Egypt with him but that hee gently intreated them for all this was done after that they were returned QUEST XI In what sense Ioseph saith am I God Vers. 19. AM I in Gods stead c. 1. Some doe read Am not I under God and make this sense if God be ready to forgive much more I. 2. Some I doe feare God or I am Gods S.C. therefore I will not seeke to revenge 3. But the best reading is Am I in Gods stead with an interrogation not without as Cajetane readeth I am in Gods stead that is I follow Gods will and sentence I looke not to your evill intent the word thacath signifieth both pro for and sometime it is a note of subjection but here it is taken in the first sense 4. The meaning then of these words Am I God is not 1. either that they should aske God forgivenesse and not him 2. or that he committed his revenge to God for hee thought of no revenge 3. or that he would not have them to worship him as God for he had divers times before received that reverence at their hands 4. neither doth he by this meanes excuse their fault because he referreth all to Gods will 5. But the meaning is that seeing God had turned their evill counsell against him to his good and theirs and of many beside he would not for his part be the man that should turne it to revenge Calvin Mercer and so the Latine Interpreter doth hit the sense though not the words can I resist Gods will Iacob after the same manner said to Rachel that said give me children am I God Gen. 30.2 that is it is not in my power to give thee children so here Ioseph saith am I God it is not in my power to hurt you whom the Lord intendeth by this meanes to blesse Iun. QUEST XII The computation of Iosephs age Vers. 22. IOseph lived an hundred and ten yeeres 1. Thus God recompenced Iosephs short affliction which endured 13. yeeres from the 17. yeere not from the 16. as Pererius saith following the corrupt Latine text of his age to the 30. when he stood before Pharaoh with a long time of prosperity for the space of 80. yeeres that is from the 30. yeere to the 110. yeares for so long he lived 2. Yet attained not Ioseph to the yeeres of his father which were 147. and some of his brethren overlived him as Levi who lived 137. yeares Exod. 6.16 nhether Ioseph dyed first of all his brethren as Pererius thinketh it is uncertaine the great affliction and hard imprisonment in his youth the cares and troubles of the government and administration of the kingdome might be some reason of the shortning of his dayes Perer. 3. This then was the age of Ioseph hee was 17. yeares old when he was sold into Egypt Gen. 37.2 at 30. yeares he stood before Pharaoh Gen. 41.46 he was 49. yeares old when Iacob came into Egypt for the seven yeares of plenty were then past and two of famine Gen. 45.6 at Iacobs death who lived 17. yeares in Egypt Gen. 47.28 he was 56. yeares old and 54. yeares he lived after which make 110. in all 4. By this age of Ioseph it may appeare how long hee dyed before Moses was borne namely 64. yeares and 144. yeares before the departure of Israel out of Egypt as may be thus gathered from the promise made to Abraham to the going out of Israel are 430. yeares Exod. 12.40 Galat. 3.17 of this time 215. yeares were run when Iacob came downe to Egypt for Abraham was 75. yeares old when the promise was first made Gen. 12.4 Isaack was borne when Abraham was 100. yeares old Gen. 17.17 Isaack at 60. had Esau and Iacob borne Gen. 25.26 Iacob at 130. came downe to Egypt Gen. 48.9 these yeares put together 25. of Abrahams age 60. of Isaacks 130. of Iacobs make 215. exactly there remaineth then the other halfe of 215. of the which time Ioseph lived 71. yeares for he was 49. when Iacob came downe to Egypt and lived 110. yeares there remaineth then 144. yeares take from this 80. yeares for so old was Moses when Israel went out of Egypt and the remnant is 64. from Iosephs death to Moses birth 5. Here appeareth Tostatus errour that would have 66. yeares from the death of Ioseph till Moses and 146. from thence to Israels departure wherein he faileth in 2. yeares But Iustinus the historiographer is in a greater error who would have Moses to be Iosephs son lib. 36. and in the same place he hath other untruths as that Ioseph was his fathers youngest sonne that his brethren sold him for the excellency of his wit whereas they did it of malice that he got his skill of interpreting dreames by art magicke whereas the Magitians and wise-men of Egypt could not do it but he by the spirit of God was enabled thereunto ex Perer. QUEST XIII How many generations Ioseph saw of Ephraim Vers. 23. IOseph saw Ephraims children to the third generation 1. Thus most doe read that Ioseph onely saw Ephraims childrens childrens children in the third descent from Ephraims proâ—epotes his grand-nephewes which were abâ—epotes to Ioseph nephewes in the fourth degree but of Manasseh he saw onely his childrens children so that Manasseh was only a grand-father Ephraim a great grand-father while Ioseph lived so that Ephraim was forwarder in his posterity than Manasseh by one descent 2. But I rather thinke that Ioseph saw Ephraims children in the fourth generation from Ephraim in the fift from himselfe 1. Because they are called in the originall the sonnes of the third namely from Ephraim the sons of the third are in the fourth generation and so Iunius translateth well abnepotes that is nephewes in the fourth descent 2. Because we finde that Ephraim though younger than Manasseh exceeded him by two descents for Iosuah was the seventh from Ephraim who was the sonne of Nun the son of Elishama of Ammihud of Hadan of Shutelah of Ephraim 1 Chron. 7.26 27. But Zelophehad who lived with Iosua and dyed in the wildernesse of Hepher of Gilead of Machir of Manasseh was but the fift from Manasseh Numb 29.1 Therefore when Ioseph saw the sonnes of Machir of Manasseh in the second degree from Manasseh he might see Elishama in the fourth descent from Ephraim and thus Iacobs prophecie more fully tooke effect even in Iacobs time that Ephraim should be greater in number than Manasseh QUEST XIV The meaning of this phrase to be brought up upon the knee Vers. 23. WEre brought up on Iosephs knees The Scripture useth three phrases of this kinde 1. As to come from betweene the feet which is taken for education and bringing up Genâ—s 49.10 though sometime it be specially applied to the birth of women Deuter. 28.57 2. They are said to beare upon his knees that is to receive the children newly borne and
as is before shewed so that he is farre elder than the seven wise men of the Grecians and then Pythagorâ—â— Heraclitus Hippocrates Democritus Anaxagoras Socrates Plato with the rest who were many yeeres after Homer 4. Hence then appeareth that notable error of Appion the Grammarian in Tiberius Caesars time who would have Moses bring the Israelites out of Egypt in the first yeere of the seventh Olympiade at what time the Tyrians built Carthage in Africa For it is evident that Carthage was built about the time of the Trojan battell for Aeneas went from thence to Dido the founder of Carthage as Virgil. testifieth and Iosephus writing against the said Appion sheweth that from Hiram King of Tyre in whose time the Temple was built unto Pigmalion and Dido were 155. yeeres and to the beginning of the Olympiades in the 8. yeere of Ahaz reigne were 280. yeeres so that by this account Carthage was built 140. yeeres before the count of the Olympiades began Appion then is found to be in a double error for both Moses was divers hundred yeeres before the building of Carthage and Carthage was built long before the computation of the Olympiades ex Perer. QUEST VIII Whether the name of Moses were knowne unto the Gentiles before Christ. NOw then it is evident 1. that Moses name was knowne unto the ancient writers of the Gentiles as Saconiatho that Phenicean Antiquarie and Berosus Chaldeus Ptolomeus and Manetho Egyptian Chronographers and among the Grecians Artapanus Polemo Eupolemus doe make honourable mention of Moses Likewise Troyus Pompeius cited by Iustin. Martyr lib. 36. and Diodorus Siculus Numâ—nius Pythagoricus calleth Plato the Attik or Athenian Moses 2. But yet sparing mention is made of Moses among the Ethnik writers because they held his writings to bee sacred and divine and so not to bee prophaned and made common as Demetrius Phalerius the keeper of the great Library of Alexandria said unto Ptolomeus Philadelphus alleaging at the same time the examples of Theopompus the Historiographer and Theodectes the tragicall Poet that when they attempted to transpose some things out of Moses bookes the one into his story the other into his tragedie the first was perplexed in minde the other smitten with blindnesse till they perceived their error and desisted Aristeas 3. Origen then is deceived who thinketh that till after Christ the name of Moses was not heard of among the Gentiles â— Homil. 2. in Cant. Pererius QUEST IX How Moses is said to be a proper child and by whom he was hid Vers. 2. WHen she saw that he was faire and goodly she hid him 1. Both the parents did their part iâ— hiding him Heb. 11.13 but the mother was the chiefe either in regard of her motherly affection or for that the advice came first from her 2. Iosephus writeth that Amram had a speciall revelation vision concerning this child that he should be delivered from this danger and be himselfe a deliverer of his people But seeing these parents of Moses are commended for their faith which must bee grounded upon the word of God it is likely that they builded rather upon the promises made to their Fathers than any speciall revelations 3. The child was goodly to see to that is a certaine divine comelinesse appeared in him not onely propernesse of body as Stephen sheweth Act. 7. and the Apostle Heb. 11.23 this act of theirs then principally proceeded of faith which was so much the more increased by the object of this goodly child in whom they saw such signes of grace as that they doubted not but that God would take the protection of him Simlâ—r QUEST X. The Arke wherein Moses was put whereof it was made and where placed Vers. 3. SHe tooke an Arke of bulrushes The word here used is Tebath which is given also to Noahs Arke and the Arke of the Tabernacle The Septuag retaine the same word Thibis without any other interpretation but it is like through the error of some Scribes that Thibin was put for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the edition Complutense readeth but Origen is here deceived that thinketh Thibis to bee a coffin made of wicker or of the barkes of trees Hom. 2. in Exod. it signifieth nothing but an Arke for the frame the matter whereof it was made is beside expressed 2. which some thinke was of Reed Vatab. Genevens othes of Bulrushes Iun. Pag Mont. which is most like or of the tree Papyrus as Iosephus whereof they made the paper which word is used to this day though our paper be now made of linnen it was a light matter that might easily be supported in the waters and both to fasten the stuffe the better and to keepe out the water they daubd it with slime and pitch Simler as Noah pitched his great Arke to hold out the waters 3. This Arke for the bignesse Iosephus thinketh was no greater than could well containe the child but Iosephus is deceived that they put this Arke or coffin into the middest of the floud for the text is evident that they put it amongst the flagges or reedes that it should not so easily flote upon the waters and to be the better defended from the winde Pererius QUEST XI Whether Moses parents did well in exposing him BUt here the question will be moved whether Moses parents did well in exposing the infant thus to apparent danger seeing nature hath given unto bruite beasts a naturall instinct rather to adventure their lives for their young ones than to leave and forsake them These reasons then may bee yeelded in defence of this their fact 1. That if they had kept their childe at home then they had most certainly exposed not onely him to danger who could not be hid partly from the diligent inquisition of Pharaoh partly from the notice of the Egyptians among whom they dwelled Iunius but also his parents by all likelyhood should have perished therefore in that they doe thus expose the infant they doe deliver him from a certaine danger leaving him to an uncertaine Perer. 2. Beside they use all carefull meanes to provide for the childe in pitching the Arke in laying it in a safe place Perer. from whence the mother might take it by stealth and suckle it at her pleasure Simler Beside they appointed his sister to bee his keeper to seâ— what should become of the infant 3. Further though there be no certaintie either of the revelation shewed to Amram that the childe should be preserved as Iosephus writeth or of that excuse of the Hebrewes that Miriam being a Prophetesse gave direction what they should doe yet seeing this act of theirs proceeded of faith in God as the Apostle sheweth Heb. 11. it is not to be doubted but that herein they were directed by the instinct of the spirit and that they did it not in griefe and despaire as Philo seemeth to affirme that they wished they had exposed their childe so soone as he was borne seeing they could no longer keepe
and consumed therewith as a child halfe consumed in the mothers wombe Numb 12.10 Iunius QUEST V. Whether the third signe of turning the water into bloud were shewed at this time Vers 9. IT shall bee turned into bloud Iosephus thinketh that this signe as likewise the two other were done in this place But the truth is as Philo noteth that the other two were shewed now the third was done in Egypt because hee is bid to take of the water of the river that is of Nilus Perer. 2. This miracle seemeth to bee divers from that chap. 7. of turning the waters of the rivers into bloud for there the waters in the rivers are changed here the water is taken out of the river there the waters so continued 7. dayes but here the water is powred upon the dry land and so it is like it was soone dried up of the earth and returneth not into his kinde as in the two first miracles And againe Aaron is said to have done these miracles in the sight of the people vers 30. but the waters of the rivers were not yet turned into bloud therefore in this place those signes are shewed which should serve principally to confirme Moses calling before the Israelites which afterward as occasion was offered were done also before Pharaoh Simler 3. And this signe of turning water into bloud did signifie that the time was at hand that God would judge the Egyptians for the death of the infants whose bloud they had shed in the waters Lyranus Simlerus QUEST VI. Whether in these miracles there were a substantiall change NOw here it will be demanded whether these conversions and changes were verily and substantially done or they so appeared only 1. But it is not to be doubted of for the very substance and nature of these things for the time was changed 1. Because the word and the thing must agree together Now the Lord saith that the water shall be turned into bloud therefore it was turned but the Hebrew phrase is more significant shall bee into bloud so the rod was into a serpent that is turned or changed 2. The sense both of the sight and feeling discerned them to be truly changed 3. Because it is not impossible or hard with God the creator of the substance to change the substance 4. Such were these conversions as that of water into wine by our Saviour Christ at the marriage feast Ioh. 2. which was a true conversion Simler 2. And this is one speciall difference betweene the miracles which are wrought by God and such wonders as are wrought by Satan these are done in truth the other in illusion as our Saviour saith A spirit hath not flesh and bones as ye see me to have Luke 24.39 that is spirits may assume a shape but a true body Satan cannot counterfeit as Hierome saith Signa qua faciebat Moses imitabantur signa Aegyptiâ—rum sed noâ— erant in veritate The signes of the Egyptians did counterfeit the signes which Moses did but they were not in truth for the rod of Moses devoured the rods of the Egyptians QUEST VII Whether Moses indeed had an impediment of speech and what it was Vers. 10. I Am not eloquent c. but I am slow of speech and slow of tongue 1. Some thinke that Moses spake thus only of modesty and humility Borrh But it appeareth by the Lords answer that hee had some want in his speech 2. Others judge that Moses thus speaketh by way of comparison that since God had talked with him which they define to be three dayes taking those words simply according to the letter as they are in the Hebrew I am not eloquent from yesterday to yer yesterday whereas he seemed somewhat before now hee seeth that his eloquence is nothing Origen in cap. 3. Ruperius But these words yesterday and yer yesterday doe for the most part signifie indefinitely the time past as Gen. 31.2 Labans countenance was not toward Iacob as yesterday and yer yesterday and so it is taken here and the rather because these two times are distinguished I am not eloquent yesterday and yer yesterday and that which followeth no not since thou spakest with thy servant and beside Moses after this complaineth that hee was of uncircumcised lippes Chap. 6.12 Hee therefore only at this time seemeth not so to bee 3. Some thinke that Moses indeed was astonished at this vision and thereby began to be as speechlesse Osiander Pellican But that infirmity continued afterward as is before shewed and therefore it was not procured by his present astonishment 4. Others do thinke that Moses had indeed an impediment of speech but it was onely in the Egyptian language which he might have forgotten in this long time of his exile Hugo S. Victor But beside that it is not like that Moses could forget that language wherein he had beene trained up 40. yeeres he simply complaineth of his utterance 5. Therefore it is most like that Moses had some naturall impediment in his speech and some one or more of these defects either that hee was a man of few words not flowing in speech for so it is in the Hebrew a man of words which the Chalde translateth a man of speech or that he was not a man of choice words not eloquent as the Latine readeth or that he was of a slow tongue as the Latine so it is in the Hebrew of a heavy tongue or of bad pronuntiation as the Septuagint reade of a small voyce for he saith that hee was both of an heavie or slow mouth and of a slow tongue 6. But that seemeth to be one of the Hebrewes fables that Moses by this meanes became a man of imperfect speech that when Pharaoh playing with him had set his crowne upon his head and he had cast it downe which one of the Egyptian Priests interpreted to be an ominous signe against Pharaoh and his Kingdome then to trie the childs innocencie they put a burning cole to his mouth by the which the top of his tongue was seared and so the child thereupon began to stammer in his speech Perer. 7. Now it pleased God to make choice of such an unlike instrument one of an imperfect speech that God might have all the glory of this worke and nothing should be ascribed unto man As for the same cause our Saviour made choice of his Apostles from simple and unlettered men to whom he gave the gift of utterance and of divers languages Theodoret. 8. But here it will bee objected that S. Stephen saith of Moses that he was mighty in words and in deeds Act. 7.22 How then could he be imperfect and defective in speech To this some answer that he was mighty in invention and disposition not in elocution for so the Greeke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 may as well bee referred to the inward conceit of the minde as to the words of the mouth Simler But this rather may bee answered that as S. Paul saith of himselfe
though hee were rude in speech yet he was not so in knowledge 2. Cor. 11.6 the power of S. Pauls speech consisted not in eloquence of words but in the wisdome of the spirit so Moses though defective in the manner of elocution yet might speake with gravity and wisdome and so bee powerfull in words 9. Wherefore notwithstanding this or what else is objected the most probable opinion is that Moses had some naturall impediment of speech as appeareth both by his owne excuse by the Lords answer by the coadjutorship of Aaron his brother an eloquent man vers 14. and because Moses after this saith he was a man of uncircumcised lips and whereas he saith here nor since thou hast spoken to thy servant his meaning is that if at this time when God spake unto him who was able to take away all impediment of speech yet his infirmity remained much more was it like afterward to continue Iunius QUEST VIII How God is said to make the deafe and dumbe Vers. 11. WHo hath made the dumb or the deafe 1. Wee refuse here the fables of the Hebrewes that when Pharaoh had appointed one to kill Moses he was striken blind that he could not see Moses and Pharaoh became both deafe and dumbe that though he espied Moses escape yet hee could not speake to have him stayed but it is evident by the story that Moses fled before hee was apprehended The Lord here speaketh in generall not of any one dumbe or deafe but that as hee sendeth these infirmities upon man so also hee is able to heale them 2. And although these infirmities are evill in respect of nature yet God is the author of them because they are good also in respect of the end which is to humble man and bring him to repentance and to set forth the glory of God as our Saviour saith of the blind man that his blindnesse came that the workes of God might be shewed upon him Simler QUEST IX How and wherefore the Lord was present with Moses mouth Vers. 12. I Will be with thy mouth 1. Although Moses was no eloquent man in outward speech as humane eloquence is accounted yet there was in him a grave and divine eloquence such as the Apostles were endued with the Lord promiseth the assistance of his spirit and to bee present with his mouth 2. But the impediment of his tongue the Lord doth not altogether take away both that Gods glory and power might appeare and that Moses should see how needfull the helpe and society of his brother was neither did Moses pray unto God to heale that infirmity but only useth it as an argument to decline his calling Simler QUEST X. Whom Moses meaneth that he would have sent Vers. 13. SEnd by the hand of him whom thou shouldest send 1. Lyranus thinketh that Moses meaneth his brother Aaron who was elder than he and fitter for his eloquent speech but no mention was made yet of Aaron whom Moses knew not to be alive as may be gathered vers 18. till the Lord first spake of him and promised hee should assist him 2. Rabbi Selomo taketh that hee meaneth Iosuah whom God revealed unto him should be the man that was to lead Israel into the promised land But beside that Iosuah is not yet spoken of this request of Moses would have shewed some emulation or envy toward Iosuah 3. Many of the ancient writers as Iustenus Martyr Tertullian Cyprian with others thinke that Moses here speaketh of the Messias that should be sent into the world so also Perer. But this seemeth not to be so fit both for that Moses not being ignorant of the prophesie of Iacob concerning the comming of Shiloh and how the Lord promised that he would raise up a Prophet like unto him Deus 18.18 which is understood of Christ could not yet expect the comming of the Messiah and this request for the comming of the Messiah proceeding of faith would not have provoked the Lords wrath Therefore Eugubinus opinion though Pererius checkt him for it is not herein to be misliked that neither would have those places of Scripture which are understood of the Messiah to bee referred to others for that savoureth of Judaisme nor yet that which is spoken of others to be applied to Christ which also would bewray curiosity and superstition 4. Therefore the plaine meaning of Moses is that wheâ—â—as God might find out many more fit than himselfe he would send by their hand that is ministery so he aimeth not at any one in particular to be sent but any other whosoever QUEST XI Whether Moses sinned in his so often refusall seeing God was angry with him Vers. 14. THen Iehovahs wrath was kindled 1. Neither doe we consent to some Hebrewes that doe aggravate Moses sinne as distrusting Gods word and therefore some say hee was punished in being deprived of the Priesthood which was given to Aaron some in that he was not suffered to enter into the land of Canaan Contr. But neither was the first a punishment for Moses still was the chiefe and gave Aaron direction and it was a comfort to Moses to have such a coadjutor and beside Aaron was the elder to whom the priesthood appertained Neither was Moses offence here the cause why he entred not into the land of Canaan but his disobedience at the waters of strife Simler 2. Neither on the other side is their opinion found that doe justifie Moses herein and commend his humility in refusing so weighty a calling as Gregorie who by Pauls example would have us ready to suffer adversities and by Moses to refuse prosperity And Hierome commendeth Esaâ—es readinesse after his lippes were purified and Moses unwillingnesse being guilty to himselfe of his owne infirmity Contra. 1. In that God was angrie with Moses it is evident he offended 2. And as S. Paul was willing to suffer adversity because it was Gods will the spirit so testified every where of him that bands and persecution did abide him so Moses should not have refused this charge seeing God so often had signified his will unto him 3. And if Esay did well after the Lord had purged his lippes being before unwilling to shew his readinesse then Moses did not well who after the Lord had promised to be with his mouth yet still persisted in his refusall 3. Thostatus granteth that Moses sinned yet it was a veniall and small sinne because wee reade of 〈◊〉 punishment that followed Cajetanus is of the same opinion and his reason is taken from the phrase here used The wrath of God was kindled as when a man is moved suddenly of choller than of set purpose Contra. In some sense we confesse that both this and all other of Moses sinnes and of all the elect are veniall in respect of Gods mercie in Christ that pardoneth them but otherwise in it owne nature neither this nor any other sinne is pardonable for the wages of sinne is death Rom. 6.23 in the justice of
father in law that he might be more willing to let them goe Simler QUEST XVII Of Moses wife and children and of his provision for his journey Vers. 20. THen Moses tooke his wife and his sonnes and put them on an asse 1. Here mention is made of Moses children in the plurall whereas onely Gershom is spoken of before chap. 2. Pellican But Eleazar also was now borne which is the child that Zipporah afterward circumcised the story therefore of the birth of both his children must bee supplied out of the 18. chapter 2. Moses substance was not great nor yet his companie that one asse could suffice to carry his wife and children it seemeth that his abilitie was not such as to provide Camels thus the Lord would use weake instruments Moses commeth not with power honour and riches to deliver Israel but in the name of God as the Prophet Zacharie prophesieth of Christ Behold thy King commeth c. poore and riding upon an asse 3. Moses taketh his wife with him as the Apostles carried about their wives 1. Cor. 9.5 because men are to forsake father and mother to cleave to their wives Sâ—mlerus and Moses would have them also joyned to the people of God Ferus 4. Yet at this time Moses wife and children went not forward into Egypt but by reason of that which fell out by the way about Moses childe his wife being thereby offended Moses sent them backe unto his father in law who bringeth them unto him Exod. 18. Iunius QUEST XVIII Why Moses staffe is called the rod of God Vers. 20. MOses tooke the rod of God in his hand 1. It is called the rod of God not as the Hebrewes imagine because it was foure square the foure letters of the name of God Iehovah being written upon it or because it grew in Iethros orchard and none could pull it up but Moses or because it was sent from heaven but it was so called because the Lord commanded Moses to take it in his hand Pererius and for that thereby the Lord would have Moses to worke miracles Iunius yet not by any vertue in the rod but by the power of God Pellican 2. It was also called Aarons rod because he was the minister but God was the author and worker of the miracles Simler This rod also was a signe of the divine authority of Moses like as Magistrates have their ensignes of office carried before them Pellic. 3. Thus it pleased God who could have wrought by wonders without any visible signes that Moses should use the rod for the more visible demonstration of the power of God yet the Lord useth such meanes which have no power of themselves or likelihood to effect that which is wrought as Naaman was bid to wash himselfe in Jordan our Saviour used spittle and clay to anoint the eyes of the blind David goeth with a staffe against Goliah And this the Lord doth that the worke should not be ascribed to the meanes Simler 4. And hereby also the high spirit and pride of Pharaoh might bee abated and confounded when hee saw so great workes to bee wrought by the contemptible staffe of a shepheard Simlerus QUEST XIX How God is said to harden Pharaohs heart Vers. 21. I Will harden his heart 1. Some thinke that God is said to harden the heart when he deferreth his punishments and so men abusing Gods patience and long suffering are hardened but seeing the hardning of mans heart is one of the greatest punishments that can fall upon man whereas Gods long suffering proceedeth from his mercie and is a great benefit these two cannot agree together that the same thing should be both a punishment and a benefit Simlerus 2. Neither doth it satisfie that God hardeneth by permission and sufferance for if God permitteth either unwillingly then should he not be omnipotent or willingly so should he be accessarie to sinne if permission therefore be opposed to Gods will as though hee should suffer only things to be done and bee as an idle beholder and no doer this distinction cannot be admitted If permitting be taken for not approving or not assisting with his grace so the Lord may be said to permit but then he rather permitteth or suffereth the heart to be hardened than hardeneth it Simlerus 3 Wherefore thus the Lord may bee said to harden the heart 1. By the deniall or withholding his grace as he tooke his good spirit from Saul and the Lord is not debtor to any hee may give his grace to whom it pleaseth him and withhold it at his pleasure 2. God may leave a man to himselfe and give him over unto Satan who worketh upon the corruption of mans owne heart and hardeneth it so an evill and a lying spirit was sent upon Ahabs Prophets 3. The generall power of moving and working is of God but the evilnesse of the action is of mans owne corruption as when the Rider doth cause a lame horse to goe hee is the cause of his going but the horses evill and uneven going proceedeth of his owne lamenesse Simler And like as a good workman using a bad instrument so the Lord worketh by the wicked Borrh. 4. The occasions whereby the heart is hardened through mans corruption doe proceed oft from God as the miracles which Moses wrought whereby Pharaoh became more indurate and obstinate 5. God is to be considered here as a just Judge who punisheth mens former sinnes by their hardnesse of heart as here Pharaoh is judged so the hardning of the heart is of God as it is poena a penalty not as it is culpa faulty Ferus 6. Likewise God is said to harden the heart dispositivè because he disposeth of it and turneth it to such end as shall bee most to his glorie as the Lord ordered the envie of Iosephs brethren in selling their brother and the treachery of Iudas in betraying his Master to the good of his Church and his owne glorie Simler So some things are done in the world simply and absolutely according to the will of God and by it all such good actions Some things are not done absolutely according to Gods will but in respect of a further end for the which the Lord permitteth them to be done as Gods will was that Pharaohs heart should be hardened that God might declare his power in him Exod. â— 16 Borrh. 7. Thus God hardeneth not onely by permitting but in withdrawing his grace and ordering and disposing even mens evill actions to the end which the Lord hath propounded to himselfe and in using the meanes which the corruption of mans heart apprehendeth and perverteth to his destruction so God is the cause of the action of hardning but man is the cause of the sinne Iunius So God hardeneth Satan hardeneth and man hardeneth his owne heart man as the instrument Satan as the worker and efficient God as the supreme Judge overruling every action and disposing of it unto good Borrh. As in a ship man is as
account of them In the Apostles times Iarchas among the Indian Drachmanes Tespesion among the Gymnosophists of Aethiopia excelled in this kinde and Simon Magus was in that time But Apollonius Tyaneus in Domitians time went beyond them all 5. And what might be the cause that these Diabolicall studies received such liking in the world Plinie declareth because this Magicall profession borroweth of three notable Arts Physicke or Medicine the Mathematikes and a colour or shew of Religion is the third and thus mens mindes were bewitched therewith But whosoever was the minister and instrument to set abroach these impious Arts Satan was the author and inspirer of them for he was a lier from the beginning and when hee telleth a lye hee speaketh of his owne as our Saviour saith Ioh. 8.44 Porphyriâ— also confesseth as much that the mysticall knowledge of these things came first from the spirits themselves Quibus rebus gaudâ—ant quibus alligantur dâ—i hominibus significarunt ad haec quibus rebâ—s ipsi cogantur qua illi offerenda sint c. The Gods hee meaneth such Gods as Magicians worship themselves signified unto men what things they were pleased with and with what they are bound and further wherewith they are forced and what is to bee offered unto them Ex Perer. Which testimonie of Porphyrie by the way sheweth what we are to thinke of those usuall receits against witchcraft as in scratching the Witch burning of some part or seething of the urine and such like that these were Satans owne revelations at the first in making carnall men beleeve that he is bound with such things QUEST X. Who were the ringleaders and chiefe of the Egyptian Magitians BUt if further it be inquired who these Magicians were 1. Saint Paul sheweth that the principall of them were Iannes and Iambres 2. Tim. 3. which Paul had either by some certaine tradition or by inspiration for in Scripture their names are not found so thinketh Chrysostome Theodoret and Theophylact upon that place It seemeth that some Heretikes afterward by occasion of these names framed a booke of Iannes and Iambres which Origen and Ambrose count among the Apocryphall bookes and of hid authority 2. Other forren Writers also have made mention of these two Iannes and Iambres as Nuâ—enius Pythagoricus as Eusebius reporteth writeth that these two resisted Moses whom he calleth Musius the Captaine of the Jewes Plinie also calleth them Iamne and Iotape whom hee saith were many thousand yeeres after Zoroastres wherein he is deceived for from Abrahams birth which was in the time of Ninus when Zoroastres flourished were not above 500. yeeres 3. But that seemeth to bee very strange which Palladius reporteth in the life of Macarius if it be true that whereas Iannes and Iambres in their life had made them a sepulchre in a pleasant place set with all manner of fruitfull trees and therein made a fountaine of water which place was kept by evill spirits Macarius having a desire to see this place and approaching thither was met with 70. Devils in divers shapes gnashing their teeth and running upon him but he not affraid passed along and came to the sepulchre where the great Devill appeared unto him with a naked sword shaking it at him and there he saw a brasen bucket with an iron chaine wasted and consumed and pomegranates dried having nothing in them Wee may worthily suspect that some Friers finger hath beene tempering with this fable as in other reports of the Saints lives to get credit unto them with fained miracles QUEST XI Whether things done by magicall enchantment are in shew or in truth NOw it followeth to shew by occasion of this conversion of rods into serpents wrought by these Egyptian Magitians whether such things done by magicall inchantment are verily so effected or but in shew and appearance only 1. It cannot bee denied but that many apparitions brought forth by sorcery are meere illusions as the transforming of Vlysses companions into divers shapes of beasts so the Arcadians are said by swimming over a certaine river to bee turned into wolves Augustine writeth of certaine women in Italy that by giving certaine inchanted cheese unto passengers changed them into beasts and used them to carry their burdens for a time The like Philostratus reporteth of Apollonius that as he sat at the table brasen men served them with drinke and filled the cups like butlers and how the image of Memnon in Egypt as soone as the Sunne rising shined upon the mouth began to speake and how Vespesion the chiefe of the Gymnosophists in Aethiopia caused an elme with a low and soft voice to salute Apollonius So to this purpose in the Cannons mention is made of certaine women that were so deluded of Satan that they thought they did ride in the aire in the night and were brought unto a pleasant place where they did feast with Diana and Herodias 2. These and such like were but done in conceit and imagination for the Devill cannot in truth bring forth the substance of Lions and such other beasts which cannot come without generation and not at once but in continuance of time they come to their growth and seeing to speake and worke are actions incident to man they cannot bee performed in truth by images and dead things And whereas they have seemed by Magike to raise up the dead as is also written of Apollonius that is beyond the Devils power for the soule being immortall the Devill hath no command over it it is in Gods hand and though he had yet can he not prepare the body being without naturall heate and life to bee a fit and apt instrument againe for the soule 3. Yet notwithstanding that some workes of Magicians are counterfeit it followeth not that all should bee so the Scripture sheweth that a false Prophet may shew a signe or wonder that may come to passe Deut. 13.1 Apollonius principles and receipts were currant through the world whereby they used to stay the inundation of waters and incursion of wild beasts which Iustinus Martyr thinketh might bee done by the great skill which hee had in naturall things The Roman histories remember how Claudia Vestalis to prove her chastity did move a ship her selfe alone tying her girdle to it that many men and oxen could not stirre So Tucia another vestall Virgin for the triall of her chastity carried water in a fieve from the River Tibris unto the Capitoll Plin. lib. 28. cap. 2. These things seeme verily to have beene so done but by the operation rather of Satan to keepe the prophane Gentiles still in blindnesse and unbeleefe than by the ministry of the good Angels as thinketh Thomas Aquinas ex Perer. 4. Now that many such things may be truly effected by Sorcerers through the power of Satan it is evident by these two reasons first because Satan by the subtility of his nature and long experience hath great knowledge of naturall things he knoweth their
sympathies and Antypathies their qualities and operations he can apply and temper the causes together and so is able to worke wonders though not true miracles which are beside the order and course of nature which Satan cannot invert As to put this for an example the small fish which is called Echinus or Remora is able by applying himselfe to the ship to stay it though it bee under saile and have both the sea and winde with it which Plinie sheweth to have beene found by experience how that Antonius his ship at one time and Caius at another were stayed by this fish Now if a Magitian should secretly apply this fish to a ship hee might bee thought to worke a great wonder and yet it should bee naturall The other reason is that beside the knowledge of nature Satan is skilfull of all humane arts and sciences by the benefit whereof even men doe worke wonders as Archimedes was able to stirre a ship with his hand by certaine engines which he had prepared which a great number of men by strength could not doe He also devised such kinde of instruments when Marcellus the Romane Captaine besieged Syracusa whereby they so annoyed their enimies and made such havock and slaughter of the Romanes that Marcellus himselfe said they fought not against men but against the Gods Architas the Pythagorean by Mechanick art made a dove of wood to flie Severinus Boetius made serpentes of brasse to hisse and birdâ— of brasse to sing If men can make such admirable things by art it need not seeme strange if by the power of Satan wonderfull matters are sometime compassed Ex Perer. QUEST XII What things are permitted unto Satan to doe THe next point to be shewed here is what things which seeme to us to be miraculous the Devill may doe by himselfe or his ministers the Magitians First in generall wee are here to consider a twofold action of spirits the one is immediate as they can themselves passe speedily from place to place as Iob. 1. Satan came from compassing the whole earth for if the Sunne being of a bodily substance can compasse the heavens of such a huge circuit many hundred thousand miles about in the space of 24. houres the spirits can doe it with greater agility they have also power to transport bodies from place to place aâ— our Saviour yeelded his body to be transported of Satan to the tempters further confusion The other action is mediate as Satan can transport and bring together the causes of things which being tempered and qualified may bring forth divers naturall effects which are wrought immediatly by those naturall causeâ— yet mediately by Satan which bringeth them together Secondly in particular these things are permitted to Satans power he can transport bodies and carry them from place to place as thâ— Ecclesiasticall stories make mention how Simon Magus was lift up on high in the aire by the 〈◊〉 of Satan but by the prayer of Peter was violently throwne downe so sometime serpents and 〈◊〉 have beene seene flie in the aire Albertus Magnus saith that oxen have rained and fallen out of the aire all which may be wrought by the conveyance of Satan 2. The Devill can suddenly convey things out of ones sight as Apollonius from the presence of Domitian Thus it may be that Gyges if that report be true not by the vertue of a ring but by the power of Satan became invisible 3. They can make images to speake and walke as before wee heard of Apollonius brasen butlers and the image of Memnon so the image of Iuno Moneta being asked if she would remove to Rome answered se velle that she would and the image of fortune being set up said ritè me consecrastis yee have consecrated mee aright Valer. Maxim lib. 1. cap. ultim de simulachris But the Devill cannot give power unto these things being dead to performe any action of life but that hee moveth and speaketh in them as the Angell caused Balaams Asse to speake 4. The Devill can cause divers shapes and formes to appeare as of men Lions and other things in the aire or on the ground as in the life of Antonie the Devill appeared unto him in the shape of terrible beasts 5. And as he can counterfeit the shape of living things so also of other things both naturall as of gold silver meat and artificiall as of pots glasses cuppes for if cunning artificers by their skill can make things so lively as that they can hardly bee discerned from that which they resemble as Plinie writeth of Zeuxis grapes lib. 35. cap. 11. much more can Satan coyne such formes and figures as Philostratus lib. 4. of the life of Appolonius maketh mention how a certaine Lamia pretending marriage to one Menippus a young man shewed him a banquet furnished with all kinde of meat and precious vessels and ornaments which Appolonius discovered to be but imaginarie things and shee confessed her selfe to bee a Lamia 6. The Devill by his subtile nature can so affect the sensitive spirits and imaginary faculty as that they shall represent unto the inward sense the phantasie of some things past or to come and cause them to appeare to the outward sense as wee see that franticke persons imagine many times that they see things which are not and there is no doubt but that the Devill can effect that which a naturall disease worketh 7. Hee can also conforme the fantasies of those that are asleep to represent unto them things which the Devill knoweth shall come to passe and by this meanes to bring credit unto dreames 8. In some things the Devill can interpose himselfe and helpe forward those superstitious meanes which are used to prognosticate as the Augurs by the flying and chirping of birds by looking into the intrals of beasts by casting of lots tooke upon them to divine and the Devill by his mysticall operation concurred with them more strongly to deceive 9. The Devill can stirre up in naturall men the affections of love anger hatred feare and such like as he entred into the heart of Iudas Iohn 13.1 and this he doth two wayes either by propounding such externall objects as helpe to inflame and set on fire such affections and by conforming the inward phantasie to apprehend them Hierome in the life of Hilerius sheweth how a certaine virgin by Magicall enchâ—ntments was so ravished with the love of a young man that shee was mad therewith QUEST XIII How divers wayes Satans power is limited THese things before recited Satan by his spirituall power is able to doe yet with this limitation that his power is restrained of God that he cannot doe what he would but sometime the Lord letteth him loose and permitteth him to worke either for the triall and probation of his faithfull servants as is evident in Iob or for the punishment of the wicked as hee was a lying spirit in the mouthes of Ahabs false Prophets for if Satan had free
Devill could bring downe fire from heaven But how is it then called the fire of God if it were of Satans sending therefore the text it selfe is against that opinion some take it to bee called a fire of God that is a great and most vehement lightning as things of excellencie are so called as the wrestlings of God Gen. 30.8 and the mountaines of God Psal 36.7 Iunius But this sense in that place seemeth to be improper for as here the lightning is called the fire of God so Psal. 29. thunder is called the voice of God I thinke that it will not be said that here also it is so called because the thunder giveth a mighty voice for this is there beside expressed The voice of the Lord is mighty but there the reason is shewed why it is called the voice of the Lord because the God of glorie maketh it to thunder vers 3. Againe every where the Scripture maketh God the author of thunder and lightning and windes as Psal. 107.25 Hee commandeth and raiseth the stormie winde and Psal. 147.15 Hee sendeth forth his commandement upon the earth and his word runneth very swiftly he giveth snow like wooll Psal. 148.7 8. Praise the Lord c. fire and haile snow and stormy winde which execute his word they execute Gods word and commandement onely but if they might bee raised by the power of Satan then should they execute his word Further the Lord saith Iob. 38.25 Who hath divided the spoutes for the raine as the way for the lightning of the thunders and vers 28. the Lord is said to bee the father of raine and so consequently of the other meteors If the Devill can cause raine thunder lightning then he might be said to bee the father of it Hence it is that the people of God have used to pray unto him as the only author and giver of raine and weather as Samuel saith Is it not wheate harvest I will call unto the Lord and he shall send thunder and raine 1. Sam. 12.17 So Ambrose saith Cum pluvia expeteretur ab omnibus quidam dixit neomenia dabit eam c. When raine was desired of all one said the new Moone will bring raine although we were very greedy of raine yet I would not such assertions to bee true yea and I was much delighted that no raine was powred donec precibus ecclesiae datus manifestaret non de initiis lunae sperandum esse sed providentia misericordia creatoris untill it being at the prayers of the Church did manifestly shew that raine is not to be hoped for by the renewing of the Moone but by the providence and mercy of the Creator Some thinke that the fire which came upon Iobs flocke did not come downe from heaven but was otherwise kindled by Satan but that the Devill made as though it came from Heaven the more to terrific Iob when hee should see that even the heavens and God himselfe were set against him Of this opinion seemeth to bee the author of the Commentary upon Iob under Origens name Non de coelo cecidit ignis ille sed ita finxit nequissimus c. Non à Deo missus est sed tua iniquita â— miserrime omnium diabole succensus est That fire came not downe from heaven but so the wicked one fained it was not sent of God but kindled by thy wicked meanes O thou Devill of all most miserable And afterward hee sheweth that Satan cannot bring fire from heaven Dic ergo infoelix tunc super oves Iob ignem de coelo potuisti adducere cur non potuisti revocare illum ignem quem advocavit Helias Say then couldest thou O wretched one bring fire upon Iobs sheepe and why couldest thou not then keepe backe the fire which Helias called for upon the fifties for they were thy ministers and servants This authors judgement in this latter point wee willingly imbrace but his first conceit seemeth not to bee agreeable to the text which saith it was the fire of God then not kindled by Satan Neither yet is it to be thought that Satan had no hand in it but that it was wholly Gods worke for so God should be Satans Minister in serving his turne and not Satan his Wherefore my opinion is this that this tempest of fire and winde were in respect of the naturall generation of them of the working and sending of the Creator But Satan was Minister dejecti ignis the minister of the fire cast downe as Osiander saith not the author but the minister yet not Gods minister in the originall worke which proceeded of naturall causes but in the execution God caused the fire but Satan brought it upon Iobs flocke God raised the winde but Satan drave it upon the foure corners of the house for this we doubt not of but that thunder and lightning and winde being once raised that Satan hath power by Gods permission to carry and transport it from place to place if the winde blow one way he can turne it to another but of himselfe by his spirituall power I deny that he can raise windes and tempests where none are upon the reasons before alleaged And therefore we may hold that to bee a fable which Philostratus reporteth how Apollonius saw two tunnes among the Indians which being opened did send out the windes and being shut they were restrained So I conclude this place with that decree of the Councell Bracaâ—ens 1. c. 8. Si quis credit quòd diabolus tonitrua fulgura tempestates siccitates sua authoritate facit sicut Priscillianus docet anathema sit If any man beleeve that the Devill by his owne authority can make thunder lightning tempests drought as Priscillanus holdeth let him be accursed QUEST XV. Of the power of spirits in naturall workes NOw concerning the other actions of spirits which is called mediate they by applying tempering and qualifying naturall causes may bring forth strange effects for the vertues and properties of herbes plants precious stones mettals mâ—nerals are exactly knowne unto them and but in part unto us 1. As we see man by art by composing things together can effect rare and strange workes as is evident in the graffing and incision of trees in distilling of waters compounding of medicines so much more can spirits by aportioning and applying divers naturall causes together produce strange things 2. Againe many times the excellencie of the artificer or workeman addeth to the perfection of the worke beyond the vertue of the instrumenâ—â— as an axe serveth but to cut but the cunning workeman can therewith doe more than cut as frame a bed or table and such like so these spirituall powers by their great skill can by naturall instruments and meanes bring forth more excellent and strange works than their naturall force serveth unto because they are the instruments of Angels and spirits Sic Thom. Aqui. cont Gent. c. 103. 3. Augustine giveth instance of divers strange and admirable workes in
nature as the naturall burning of certaine mountaines as of Aetna in Cicilia Vesuvius in Campania It is found by experience that certaine things putrifie not as the flesh of a Peacoke as Augustine saith and coales upon the which for the same cause Chersiphron founded the temple of Diana lime boyleth with water and is quenched with oile the adamant is so hard that it cannot bee broken upon a smithes anvill the Agrigentine salt melteth in the fire and sparkleth in the water there is said to bee a fountaine among the Garamants that boileth in the night and freezeth in the day the stone Asbestus burneth continually being once set on fire and is never extinct the wood of a certaine figge tree in Egypt sinketh in the water in the Isle Tilo the trees cast no leaves in the Temple of Venus there was a lampe that no tempest could put out and Lodovicus Vives there reporteth that a certaine lampe was found in a grave that had burned above 1050. yeeres At Alexandria in the Temple of Serapis a certaine image of iron did hang in the top by reason of a certaine loadstone which was inclosed in the roofe These and other such like strange things in nature Augustine remembreth Some wee have knowledge of but many secrets of nature are hid from us but knowne unto the spirits who by this meanes doe worke wonders only producing extraordinarie effects of nature 4. Augustine further in another place sheweth the reason thereof in this manner Sunt occulta quaedam semina arborum plantarum c. in elementis c. There are certaine hid seeds of trees plants in the elements for as there are visible seeds so there are hid seeds which give unto the other their vertue like as then the husbandman doth not create corne but bringeth it out by his labour so the evill Angels doe not create things but only doe draw forth those seeds which are unknowne to us but well knowne to them As Iacob did not create that variety of colour in the sheep but by applying of particoloured rods brought it forth sicut ergo matres gravidae sunt foetibus itâ— mundus gravidus est causis seminibus nascentium Then as mothers that are great with child so the world is full of such seeds and causes of the beginning of things which causes they better knowing then we doe worke wonders yea wee see that men by the pounding of certaine herbes and by such like meanes can cause wormes and other like small creatures to come forth To this purpose Augustine QUEST XVI What workes in naturall things are forbidden unto spirits to doe IT followeth now to shew as wee have seene what things are possible to bee done by spirits so what things are out of their reach and beyond their power 1. Touching the immediate action of spirits which is by locall motion the Devill cannot destroy the world or any principall part thereof nor subvert the order and course of nature he cannot change the course of the heavens or put the starres out of their place neither although he may work some alteration in some part of the earth the whole he cannot remove these and such great workes he cannot doe Perer. ex Aquinat the reason is this because this were to crosse the Creator who by his providence as by his power hee created the world and all that is therein so he preserveth the same in that order which he hath appointed as the Psalmist saith The earth is the Lords and all that therein is hee hath founded it upon the sea and established it upon the flouds Psalm 24.1 2. Secondly concerning the other mediate action of spirits by the instrument and mediation of the creatures these things are denied unto spirits 1. They cannot create any thing of nothing for that argueth an infinite power and is peculiar unto God 2. The Devill being himselfe spirituall and without a bodily substance cannot immediatly change or transforme any materiall or corporall substance without some other naturall cause comming betweene 3. Neither can these spirits change any naturall thing into an other naturall thing immediatly without that subordination of nature and preparation and disposition of the matter which is observed in the generation of things therefore hee cannot bring forth a beast without seed nor a perfect beast all at once because naturally both the generation of such things is by seed and they receive their increase and growth not all at once but by degrees and in time therefore when by the operation of Satan lions and beares and such like creatures have beene made to appeare either they were but phantasies and no such things indeed or were transported from some other place and by this reason he cannot restore dead bodies to life because the body being void of naturall heat and spirits is not fit to entertaine the soule 4. Neither can Satan hinder the operation of naturall things if nothing be wanting which is necessâ—ry for their working And generally whatsoever alteration may be made by naturall causes as wormes and frogs and such like may come of pâ—â—refaction these things may be atchieved and compassed by spirits but such changes and transmutations as cannot be done by naturall meanes as to turne a man into a beast are not within the limits of Devils power But when such things seeme to be done they are in shew rather than truth which may be done two wayes either by so binding and blinding the inward phantasie and sense as that may seeme to be which is not or by fashioning some such shape and forme outwardly and objecting it to the sense Perer. Ex Aquinat QUEST XVII Whether Satan can raise the spirits and soules of the dead AMong other things which exceed the power of spirits it is affirmed before that they cannot raise the soules of men departed as Necromancers doe take upon them to talke with the dead 1. Let us see the vaine opinion of the heathen of this devilish Necromancy Porphyrius writeth that the soules of wicked men are turned into Devils and doe appeare in divers shapes and the soules of them that want buriall doe wander about their bodies and sometimes are compelled to resume their bodies Likewise Hosthanes did professe and promise to raise what dead soever and to bring them to talke with the living as Plinie writeth lib. 30. cap. 2. who in the same place reporteth a farre more strange or rather fabulous thing that Appion the Grammarian should tell of a certaine herb called Cynocephalia and of the Egyptians Osirites which hath power to raise the dead and that thereby he called Homers ghost to inquire of him touching his countrie and parents There were among the Gentiles certaine places famous for Necromancie where they received oracles from the dead as they were made to beleeve such was the Cymmerian oracle at the lake Avernam in Campania such was Ericthone the Thessalian that raised up the dead to declare to Sextus
Pompeius the successe of the Pharsaliam battell Tertullian writeth that the Nasomannae and Celtae used to consult with the dead at the tumbes of their parents and of warlike men lib. de anima Such was the vaine opinion which the heathen had of this magicall art which Plinie himselfe derideth as vaine and foolish because Nero that wicked and bestiall Emperour who was given over to all lewdnesse yet could not be induced by Tyridaetes whom he greatly advanced and gave him a Kingdome solliciting him thereunto and bringing Magitians unto him to give any credite unto Necromancie Plin. lib 30. cap. 2. 2. Now this vaine or rather prophane profession of summoning of the dead and consulting with them may evidently be convinced to be nothing else but the Devils sophistry and forgery for first the soule being separated from the body hath no power to move or exercise any body but that which it did give life unto being the forme thereof which being now dead is an unapt organ or instrument for the soule and therefore such soule being once departed from the body can neither assume it nor any other body Secondly the soules that are departed are either in heaven at rest and over the soules of the holy and righteous which are in the hands of God the Devill hath no command or they are in hell and from thence there is no returning againe as is manifest in the parable of the rich man and Lazarus where it was denied unto the rich man that any could goe from thence to be a messenger to the living 3. True it is that the Lord by his power hath called againe into the bodies and caused to appeare some that were departed of the which we finde three sorts some were restored to life and their soules joyned againe to their bodies as the daughter of Iairus the widdow of Nains sonne and Lazarus others appeared in their true bodies and came out of the graves yet not to converse among the living but to bee witnesses of the resurrection of Christ Matth. 27.53 And yet wee reade of a more strange apparition of Moses and Helias in mount Tabor where our blessed Saviour was transfigured who appeared not out of their graves but from heaven in their glorious persons We deny not but that God hath and can at his pleasure cause the Saints departed to appeare unto men but not out of purgatory as Pererius imagineth or to the end to bee patrons and helpers to his Church for wee have alwayes the presence of Christ and of his Angels neither yet can we beleeve that so many Martyrs have appeared at their Tombes as some Ecclesiasticall histories make mention for as Christ is gone out of the world not to returne till the day of judgement so because he saith where I am there shall my minister bee Ioh. 12.26 so wee cannot but thinke that the Saints departed attending upon Christ are not now to bee seene in the world This then being granted that the Lord hath power over the soules of men departed to command them to their bodies for a time for some speciall service and to send them into the world at his pleasure yet this is no warrant at all to thinke that Satan or his ministers can doe the like for seeing this is as great a miracle for the spirits of the dead to appeare as to raise the dead to cause the borne blinde to see or to doe any such great worke and God being the only worker of miracles this cannot fall under Satans jurisdiction Such visions then and apparitions when dead men appeare in their bodily shape though not with true bodies and in their wonted apparell counterfeiting their voice and behaviour while they lived are to bee held meere illusions of Satan that can transforme himselfe into an Angell of light so I conclude this point with that saying of Tertullian Et si quosdam revocavit Dei virtus in documentum juris sui non id circo communicabitur fidei audaeciae Magorum falaciae somniorum licentiae Poetarum c. Although the power of God hath called some againe to shew his dominion yet this power is not communicated to the confidence and boldnesse of Magicians to the deceitfulnesse of dreames or to the libertie of Poets QUEST XVIII Why Satan doth counterfeit the spirits of the dead THe Devils then doe counterfeit the spirits and soules of the dead as Chrysostome sheweth Homil. 29. in Matth. and August lib. 10. de civit Dei cap. 12. for these causes 1. By this meanes the Devill more strongly deceiveth seeing men are ready to heare their parents and friends departed 2. By this subtilty the Devill perswadeth men that hell is not so fearfull a place nor so enclosed but that there may bee a respite and going forth 3. Thus that opinion is nourished of the passing of soules from one body to another as Pythagoras taught 4. And it commeth also to passe that the living are afraid of the dead whom they imagine doe appeare unto them and so to please and reconcile them they superstitiously worship them and offer unto them Ex Perer. 5. Tertullian addeth further that these apparitions bred a conceit that all wicked men goe not to hell but their spirits wander up and downe 6. Et judicii resurrectionis fidem turbant And they doe hinder the faith of the last judgement and of the resurrection if they could assume their bodies being dead which the Christian faith holdeth to sleepe in the grave untill the resurrection QUEST XIX Of the divers kindes of miracles NOw to proceed and draw neere to the principall question in hand concerning these wonders wrought by the Egyptian Magicians two things in generall are briefly to be touched first concerning the divers kindes of miracles then of the difference betweene true miracles and false Concerning the first A miracle is taken three wayes first simply and absolutely in respect of any nature whatsoever so there is no miracle for unto God the author and framer of nature to whom all things are possible there is nothing strange or miraculous that is called a miracle which either excelleth ones power or understanding but God both knoweth all things and can doe all things 2. A miracle is called in respect of men those things which are unusuall and whose causes they are ignorant of men use to wonder at and in this sense not only spirits and their ministers the Sorcerers but wise and cunning men may doe miraculous and strange workes 3. But properly that is a miracle which exceedeth the nature and power of things created and is beside the ordinary course of naturall things And this kinde of miracle last spoken of is effected three wayes 1. The miracle is either in the thing that is made or done which nature can by no meanes bring forth as for the body of man to bee made immortall and to remaine in the heavens and this is the highest degree of miracles 2. Or
might bring forth serpents of a sudden Contra. The excellency of the agent doth adde to the manner of the worke as to doe it sooner or better it addeth noâ— to the matter Angels working by naturall meanes doe it more admirably than nature can worke it of it selfe but beyond the strength of nature or against the course of nature they can doe nothing 3. Pererius misliking both these answers of Cajetane yet consenting to his opinion for the truth of this miracle addeth a third that Satan fetched those serpents and suddenly transported them into this place and suborned them in stead of the rods Cont. But the text saith the rods were turned into serpents the serpents then were not brought from any other place but there changed or seemed so to be Againe as here they turne their rods into serpents so afterward did they change water into bloud but that was not by transportation for from whence could Satan convey such abundance of true lively bloud which is not ingendred but in the body neither have they power to alter substances it was therefore done by collusion and so was this 3. Wherefore the founder opinion is that those serpents which the Egyptian Sorcerers brought forth were only such in shew not indeed or in truth so Iosephus writeth that the Magicians serpents In speciem ac similitudinem verorum serpentium reptasse did creepe in shew and likenesse of true serpents lib. 2. antiquit cap. 15. And Iustinus Martyr Those things which the Magicians did by the helpe of the Devill spectantium oculis praestigias offundebant did dazle and deceive and as it were cast â— mist before the eyes of the beholders quaest Orthodox 16. Tertullian Mosis veritas mendacium Magorum devoravit Moses trueth devoured their lie lib. de anima Gregor Nyssenus saith they were visus deceptione serpentes serpentes onely in the mistaking of the fight Ambrose calleth it commentitiam emulationem a fained emulation in cap. 3.2 Epist. ad Timoth. Hierome saith imitabantur signa quae faciebat Moses sed non erant in veritate They did imitate the signes which Moses did but they were not in truth lib. 2. advers Iovin The reasons of this opinion before alleaged are these 1. because solius divinae potestatis est It belongeth onely to the power of God to convert a dead substance into a living creature Rupert 2. Moses true serpents devoureth the other which Iosephus and Ferus urge as an argument that they were imaginary 3. Other signes which they did were only imaginary as the turning of water into bloud as is before shewed and so this also QUEST XXII By what meanes Satan deluded Pharaoh with a shew of serpents THis being then thus resolved upon that those were but serpents in shew and to the outward sense this counterfeit signe might be wrought two wayes by the operation of Satan 1. Either by the confounding the inward sense and phantasie of the beholders that they imagined to see that which was not as sicke men of phrensie doe conceive they see strange sights and there is no question but that the Devill can effect whatsoever by diseases or other naturall meanes may be wrought 2. Or else which is more like Satan did forme such a shape and shew of spirits as before is shewed that the Devill hath such power by illusions apparations and phantasies to deceive as the Apostles seeing Christ walking upon the seas supposed it had beene a spirit Phantasma that is a phantasticall apparition Mark 6.49 Ex Perer which sheweth that such illusions were usuall QUEST XXIII Why the Lord suffered the Sorcerers of Egypt to shew such contrary signes NOw the Lord suffered the Magitians thus by their lying signes to contend with Moses for divers weighty causes 1. That by this meanes Moses the faithfull servant of God and true Prophet might be the better knowne as darkenesse maketh the light more glorious and sicknesse health Chrysostome So Saint Paul saith There must bee Heresies that they which are approved among you might bee knowne 1. Cor. 11.29 2. That Moses might be freed from the imputation of being a Sorcerer which thing some have not beene affraid to object and a difference might appeare betweene his working by the power and in the name of God and of the Sorcerers working by the power of Satan Rupert 3. That thereby it might be made manifest how the truth hath alwayes gainesayers and is never without contradictions and oppositions as Lucifer opposed himselfe to God in heaven Cain to Abel in earth Ismael was against Isaack the true Prophets were molested by the false Thus Saint Paul collecteth that as Iannes and Iambres withstood Moses so these also resist the truth 2. Tim. 3.8 Perer. 4. Hereby also it is manifest how according to the common saying the Devill is Gods ape that he taketh upon him to imitate and counterfeit Gods workes that therefore wee should examine such workes and signes whether they be of God that wee be not deceived and as the Apostle saith cry every spirit 1. Ioh. 4.1 5. Another reason is that seeing the Devill by his ministers can doe such strange things that the servants of God bee not offended when thy see wonders and signes to be done in the false Church by Heretikes or Idolaters the instruments of Satan 6. This was permitted for the triall of the faith and constancie of Moses and Aaron and the rest of the Hebrewes whether because of the contrary signes they would doubt of the truth of Gods promises Perer. 7. And for the further hardning of Pharaohs heart as hee had deserved by his former sinnes that God might take occasion thereby to worke all his wonders in Egypt Simler Ferus Borrh. QUEST XXIV Whether Pharaoh being deceived by the Magicians false signes be thereby excusable BUt seeing these Magicians by their Satanicall craft doe so strongly deceive whether is Pharaoh to be excused that he doth not acknowledge Moses to be the Minister and Prophet of God To this the answer is that this notwithstanding Pharaoh is not to be held excusable because there are evident signes to have discerned betweene the working of the one and of the other so that Pharaoh could not plead ignorance To omit the differences before noted Quest. 20. how that true miracles differ from false in the power of working in the quality of persons that worke the worke it selfe the manner and the end which differences are not so easie to be discerned of all there were besides most notorious workes that discovered the hypocrisie and weaknesse of those Sorcerers 1. Moses serpent devoured theirs which required a greater power 2. They could counterfeit the like plagues but they could not remove the true plagues as Moses did 3. They faile in their working they could not bring forth lice nor counterfeit any of the plagues following 4. The plagues doe fall upon the Sorcerers themselves chap. 9.11 5. Lastly they themselves doe give way and confesse it was the finger of God
the kingdome of darkenes should be divided which argument our Saviour useth in the Gospell to shew that he did not cast out devils by the power of Satan 6. Wherefore the best interpretation is that by the finger of God they understood the power of God as the heavens in the Psalme are said to be the worke of his fingers sic Thostatus Lippoman So also is the hand of God taken 1 Sam. 6.9 And hereby is insinuated the great power of God if these horrible plagues were but the worke of his fingers that is an effect of his smallest power what are the workes of his arme and handes when hee sheweth his mightie power for so that which one doth easily or with small labour he is said to doe with his finger as the phrase is used of the Pharises in the Gospell that they laid heavy burdens upon others and would not themselves stirre them with their finger And indeede these plagues of Egypt if they be compared with Gods great workes as the universall floud brought upon all the world the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrha they will appeare to be but workes of Gods fingers in comparison of his whole hand Simler Perer. QUEST XVII Whether the sorcerers had any feeling of Gods power BUt now it will further be inquired whether these sorcerers thus spake as having any knowledge of God or feeling of his power 1. Some thinke that they used this pretence of words to satisfie Pharaoh that was angrie with them because they could not doe now as before and to excuse their want of power Cajetane But it seemeth rather seeing the Sorcerers were indeede hindred and controlled that they spake as they thought 2. Lyranus thinketh that they had no thought at all of God but that they understood the power of some superiour devill And his reason is that if they had in truth confessed and acknowledged the power of God they would not afterward have resisted Moses as it appeareth they did for they were smitten with botches and biles in the sixt plague cap. 9. Contra. But this is a weake argument for though they had at this present some sense of Gods power yet they might afterward returne to their former obstinacie as Pharaoh himselfe would one while seeme to relent and eftsoone be hardned againe and Nebuchadnezzar who upon the interpretation of his dreame by Daniel acknowledged the true God Dan. 2. yet presently after setteth up Idolatrie Perer. 3. Some as is shewed in the former question did thinke that the Magicians had some knowledge and speciall revelation not only of the power of God but of his spirit and so consequently of the Trinitie but such a particular knowledge cannot be ascribed unto them 4. Therefore I thinke rather that for a time they seeing their power hindred did indeede and as they thought acknowledge Gods power that Pharaoh might thereby be left inexcusable Iun. but this knowledge was soone againe obscured by the malice and obstinacie of their heart QUEST XVIII By what power Sorcerers do worke NOw whereas they confesse that Moses wrought by the finger of God they therein evidently bewray that they themselves did not worke by God This therefore shall briefly be made plaine and maniâ—est that Magicians and Sorcerers doe not worke wonders by any divine humane or naturall or Angelicall power I meane the good Angels but Satanicall and Diabolicall 1. These spirits whom they confederate with do require of them divine worship and that affectation of divine honour which they began in heaven and obtained it not being cast downe from thence they seeke to compasse in earth but good Angels refuse to be adored and worshipped as the Angell that appeared to Iohn Revel 22. 2. Sorcerers are men of an impure and wicked life and they use their enchantments to wicked purposes as to theft adulterie murther but good Angels do neither favour wicked men neither will bee assistant in any wicked worke 3. Magicians use to threaten the spirits to enjoyne them certaine impossible things if they come not when they are called but men can exercise no power neither can have any command over the good Angels 4. if it bee objected that Magicians doe often cast out devils but Satan doth not cast out Satan as our Saviour saith for then his kingdome should be divided and could not long stand To this it is answered that our Saviour speaketh of such casting out of devils as is done with power when Satan is violently dispossessed not of such when hee giveth way of himselfe by some compact and contract with the Conjurer And as Augustine saith our Saviour meaneth the perfect ejection of Satan when hee is cast both out of the bodie ad soule But when any seemeth to be cast out by a Satanicall power he goeth out of the bodie that he may more strongly possesse the soule which is indeede no casting out 5. That Sorcerers doe worke by the power of Satan themselves are the best witnesses for Porphyrius who was a great Magician as Eusebius noteth him doth confesse that the devils themselves whom he calleth gods doe signifie unto men quibus rebus dij cogantur qua illis offerendâ— sunt c. with what things the devils are forced and what is to be offered unto them what daies they should chuse what signes and images thâ—y should make and such like And Eusebius further setteth downe to the same purpose an epistle written by Porphyrius to Aâ—ebonus the Egyptian wherein he propoundeth nine inexplicable doubts as he calleth them about Magicall practices 1. How Magicians doe invocate the spirits as their superiours when they command them as their inferiours 2. Why the spirits of Magicians bid men to be just when as they being called upon and sent doe many wicked things 3. They will not heare the Conjâ—rer unlesse hee abstaine from venerie and yet they being sent doe inflame to venerie and unlawfull lust 4. They prescribe their disciples when they are about invocation to abstaine from eating of flesh and yet themselves delight in the smell and bloud of sacrifices 5. They will not have him that hath touched any dead thing to use any Magicall practice and yet many magicall enchantments are practised with dead things both beasts and men 6. They doe terrifie the spirits in their invocations with threats as if they answere not they will reveale the mysteries of Isis and deliver Osiris members to Typhan but how can spirits be feared with threats 7. They use ridiculous invocations as thus they call upon their spirits Thou which camest forth of the slâ—â—e of the earth which hast thy seate in the lake which canst change thy shape every houre which kind of prayers spirits should seeme not to regard 8. They use barbarous and strange words as though the spirits understood only the Scythian or some other barbarous tongue 9. Seeing spirits are insensible and incorporeall how then can they be allured with sensible and corporall things These are Porphyries
the heart fat the eares heavy and to shut the eyes Isai. 6.10 all which phrases doe imply an action and operation it is evident that God some wayes concurreth either directly or indirectly negatively or positively by way of working or giving occasion in the hardning of the heart QUEST XV. God otherwise hardeneth then by way of manifestation BUt yet God doth more than by way of manifestation harden the heart as some doe expound it that the Lord hardned Pharaohs heart which interpretation Augustine toucheth quâ—st 18. in Exod. that is by his plagues and judgements declared how hard it was 1. For in this sense God might bee said to commit any other sinnes when he doth manifest them and bring them to light 2. And though this exposition might serve here yet it faileth in other places as Deut. 2. it is said that God hardned the heart of Sehon King of the Amorites and Iosh. 10. that God hardned the hearts of the Canaanites and Rom. 9. God hath mercie on whom he will and whom hee will hee hardneth In these places it cannot be so expounded that God hardned that is declared their hearts to be hard QUEST XVI God hardeneth the heart not only by permission SOme doe expound it by way of permission because those that are hardned God depriveth of his grace and leaveth them to themselves So Damascen Ista non 〈◊〉 Deo agente accipienda sunt sed ut Deo permittente these sayings as God shut up all in unbeleefe and God gave them the spirit of slumber eyes that they should not see are not to be taken as though God did them but permitted them So likewise the ordinarie glosse in 4. Exod. Indurabo cor Pharâ—onis i. indurari permittam I will harden the heart of Pharaoh that is suffer it to be hardned So also Chrysostome Tradidit in reprobum sensum nihil aliud est quam permisit He gave them up to a reprobate sense it is nothing else than that hee permitted it as a Captaine leaving his souldiers in the midst of the battell may be said to deliver them into their enemies hands in Epist ad Roman Cajetane to confirme this interpretation sheweth how sometime in Scripture that is called a precept which is permitted as when Matthew said chap. 19.8 Moses for the hardnesse of your heart suffered you to put away your wives Marke hath Moses for the hardnesse of your heart wrote this precept unto you chap. 10. But although this be most true that God suffereth such to continue in their hardnesse of heart yet this is not all 1. For so the Lord suffereth also other sinnes to be done for there is nothing done in the world nisi omnipotens fieri velit vel sinendo ut fiat vel ipse faciendo unlesse the omnipotent God will have it done either by suffering it to be done or doing it himselfe Then if this were all the Lord might be said as well to steale and such like because he suffereth them to be done 2. Wherefore Augustines judgement is rather here to be received Deum ad indurationem cordis concurrere non modo secundum permissionem vel secundùm patientiam sed etiam secundùm actionem potentiam non sane per quem fiat immediatè duritia ipsius cordis sed per quem multa fiant à quibus peccator vitio suo concipiat duritiam corâ—â—â— That the Lord doth concurre in the hardning of the heart not only by permission or suffering but according to his power and action not by the which immediately the hardnesse of the heart is made but whereby many things are done by the which a sinner by his owne corruption doth conceive the hardnes of heart 3. And concerning the place alleaged out of Marke a precept is not there strictly taken for a commandement but for any order or decree that is written QUEST XVII Whether hardnesse of heart be of God as it is a punishment of sinne SOme doe hold because the induration of the heart is two wayes to be considered as it is a sinne and a punishment of sinne in the first God hath no part but as thereby God punisheth former sinnes so he as a just Judge inflicteth hardnesse of heart as a punishment as the Apostle sheweth Rom. 2.28 As they regarded not to know God so God delivered them up to a reprobate mind And 2. Thess. 2.11 Because they received not the love of the truth God shall send them strong delusions that they should beleeve lies In these places the Apostle sheweth how the Lord punisheth them with blindnesse and hardnesse of heart because of their former sinnes This distinction is approved by Augustine lib. 5. cont Iulianum Isidorus thus concludeth the same point Facit Deus quosdam peccatores sed in quibus talia jam peccata precesserant ut justo judicio ejus mercantur in deterâ—us â—re Therefore God maketh some sinners but in whom such sinnes are found before that by the just judgement of God they deserve to become worse and worse So Cajetane upon these words 2. Sam. 12. Behold I will raise evill upon thee out of thine owne house which was verified in Absolon that rose up against his father thus resolveth Deus non est author peccati ut sic sed ut est poena peccati God is not the author of sinne as it is sinne but as it is the punishment of sinne The same judgement he giveth of Shemei whom David saith the Lord bid curse David that God wrought that Shemei cursed David Non quatenus erat peccatum sed quatenus erat poena peccati Davidis Not as it was sinne but as it was a punishment of the sinne of David So Ioâ—senius Illa Deo tribuuntur non quatenus peccata sunt sed quatenus poena peccati they are ascribed to God noâ— as they are sinnes but as they are the punishment of sinne in chap. 15. Ecclesiastic But Pererius misliking this opinion thus reasoneth against it 1. If God be said to be the Author of the induration of the heart as it is a punishment of sinne then he may aswell be said to be the Author of the other sinnes when as a man falleth into them as a punishment of his former sinnes Contra. As though all such sinnes doe not proceede from the hardnesse of the heart that confirmeth and setleth the sinner in his wickednesse therefore God is not said to be the cause of these sinnes but of the hardnesse of heart which is the cause of those sins Man by continuing in sin hath his heart hardned by the just judgement of God and then out of the hardnesse of his owne heart he bringeth forth other sinnes of himselfe 2. The hardnesse of heart as it is a great and horrible sinne so it is a punishment of former sinnes if God then doe cause it to be a punishment he also causeth it as it is a sinne Contra. In this argument there are ambiguous termes for in the first clause this
Lyranus yet it followeth not but that in resâ—ect of the knowledge which we shall have in the life to come we see now but darkly and as in a cloud And to this purpose he alleageth that saying of the Apostle Now we see thorow a glasse darkly but then shall we see face to face now I know in part but then shall I know even as I am knowne 1 Cor. 13.12 Lyranus annotation therefore being so evidently grounded upon the Apostles direct words they had small reason thus to carpe at him QUEST XXXIV Of the blowing of the trumpet at the giving of the law what it signifieth ANd the sound of the trumpet exceeding loud 1. There was not there any such materiall trumpet as the Jewes imagine that it was an horne made of the Rammes hornes which was sacrificed in stead of Izbak Lyran. But such a sound was made by the ministry of Angels as if it had beene the blowing of a trumpet Tostat. for as S. Stephen sheweth they received the law by ordinance of Angels Act. 7.53 The Angels attended upon the Lord as Ministers when the law was given Simler 2. This sounding of the trumpet was a signe of the presence of God tanquam imperatore praesente as if a great Emperour were comming before whom they use to blow trumpets Chrysost. 3. Sonitus â—â—ba significat gravitatem praeceptorum c. The sound of the trumpet betokened the heavinesse of the commandements quibus indicebatur bellum homini contra seipsum by the which warre is proclaimed to man against himselfe Thomas 4. As the sounding of this trumpet made a terrible and fearefull noise Sic lex tumultum excitat in conscientia peccatorum So the law raiseth a tumult in the conscience of sinners Lippoman Tales terrores in conscientia peccatoris lex Dei operatur Such terrors the law of God stirreth in the conscience of the sinner Osiand 5. Hereby also was prefigured the office of the Levites that sounded afterward with silver trumpets which also was a figure of the silver sound which the living trumpets of the Prophets and Apostles should give in gathering together the faithfull by the preaching of the Gospell as Isaias was bidden to lift up his voyce like a trumpet Isai. 58.1 Simler Herein also is set forth the forme of Christs comming to judgement when the trump shall blow and summon all both the living and dead to give account how they have kept this law which was first given with the sound of a trumpet of the blowing of this last dolefull and dreadfull trumpet speaketh the Apostle 1 Cor. 15.52 1 Thess. 4.16 6. Oleaster thinketh that the sounding of this trumpet was a signe of the departing of the Lord from the mount and of the libertie of the people to come up but it shewed the contrary that God was then come downe upon the mount and therefore Moses bringeth the people out of their tents to meet God in the next verse Hereof see more before quest 26. QUEST XXXV Of the different manner of the delivering the law and the Gospell Vers. 16. ANd all the people that was in the campe was afraid 1. By this terrible apparition which wrought in the people such terror and feare the nature of the law is expressed which as it was delivered with feare and trembling so it worketh terror in the conscience for divine apparitions are made agreeable to the thing for the which they are shewed so the Angels appeared to Abraham in humane shape because they came to tell Abraham that he should have a sonne When the Israelites were in the fierie fornace of affliction in Egypt the Lord appeared in a flame of fire in a bush When Ioshua was to warre against the Cananites an Angell appeared with a naked sword so because a law here is given which should reveale sinne and the wrath of God against the transgressors thereof it is delivered with feare and terror Ferus 2. Herein then appeareth a manifest difference betweene the Law and the Gospell 1. In the Law-giver then the Lord appeared in fire and smoake and terrible manner but Christ came lowly and meeke to preach the Gospell 2. In the place the Law was delivered in Sinai a place of servitude the Gospel began to be preached in Jerusalem which was a figure of the new Jerusalem which is above which is free Galath 4.26 3. In the Law it selfe which is a killing letter threatning curses and damnation to all the disobedient but spirit and life is given by the faith of the Gospell of Christ. 4. In the people which received it they were then rude and ignorant as children under tutors and governours they could not see the brightnesse of Moses face but under a vaile we now under the Gospell are as the heire which is come to age and now the vaile is removed and we see the glory of the Lord with open face Simler 5. Augustine therefore well saith Brevis differentia legis Evangelii timor amor There is a short difference of the Law and Gospell feare and love for Christ did teach the Gospell in great tranquillitie Incepit sedens dulciter tradere documenta legis novae He began being set to deliver sweetly the precepts of the new law Tostat. saying Blessed are the poore in spirit c. blessed are the meeke Ita lex vetus data est cum terroribus So the old law was given with terrors Lyranus 6. Yet we are not so to conceive as though the Gospell were altogether void of feare or the Law of comfort Hic timor Evangelio quoque fuit communis This feare was also common to the Gospell as the Apostle sheweth Whose voyce then shooke the earth and now hath declared saying Yet once more will I shake not the earth onely but also heaven Heb. 12.26 Calvin And againe If the word spoken by Angels was stedfast and every transgression and disobedience received a just recompence of reward how shall we escape if we neglect so great salvation Heb. 2.2 Neither was the law altogether void of comfort for in that the people are not fraied away by these fearefull signes but are brought by Moses to meet the Lord it sheweth Foedus Dei tam amabile fuisse quam metuendum That the covenant of God was as amiable as it was terrible and fearefull Calvin But here is the difference The law of it selfe and properly wrought feare and terror and the Gospell peace but accidentally also there was comfort in the law as it was a School-master to bring us to Christ and terror in the Gospell to them which contemned and refused it 7. Some thinke that in this generall and great feare of the whole campe yet that Moses feared not and was therein a type and figure of such as are perfect Pellican But the Apostle sheweth the contrary that even Moses also trembled and quaked Heb. 12.21 But yet Moses was not afraid as the people were Timuit Moses sed non timore servili
Deum We must obey them in Gods stead but not against God Lippoman 7. As Princes are not to bee reviled so yet they may bee soberly and discreetly admonished not taunted or checked or malepertly rebuked Augustus was wont to say In libera civitate liberas esse linguas oportere That in a free city tongues ought to be free But herein the lenitie of those Christian Emperours Theodosius Honorius Arcadius was admirable who would have them subject to no punishment which spake evill of them for say they Si ex levitate profectum est contemnendum si ex insanla miseratione dignissimum si ab injuria remittendum If it come of lightnesse it was to be contemned if of madnesse to bee pitied if of wrong to bee remitted Gallas 8. There is here no punishment set for him that should raile on the Magistrate but seeing he that railed on his father and mother was to die for it chap. 21.17 much more worthie of death was he which should curse the Prince the father of the countrie Simler QUEST LII Whether S. Paul transgressed this law Act. 23. when hee called the high Priest painted wall and whether in deed he did it of ignorance BUt here by the way somewhat would be added concerning S. Pauls fact in calling Ananias the high Priest painted wall and afterward being told that he reviled Gods high Priest he excused himselfe by his ignorance alleaging this text Act. 23.4 5. 1. Some here answer that where he saith God shall smite thee thou white or painted wall that it was no imprecation but a prediction that God would punish him Genevens And in saying I knew not that he was the high Priest his meaning is Non se attendere debuisse quis ipse sit c. That he was not to regard what he was but what the Lord commanded him Marbach But if S. Paul had knowne him to be the high Priest and yet had spoken evill of him he had alleaged a text against himselfe neither can any extraordinarie motion or instinct of the spirit be pretended in stirring him up to doe an act against the law for God is not contrarie to himselfe 2. Some thinke that Paul speaketh 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as it were in mockage hee did see nothing in him worthie of the Priesthood and therefore did not acknowledge him to bee the high Priest Calvine Gallas Or because the Priesthood was now determined and abolished in Christ that hee did usurpe upon an office that belonged not unto him But this cannot stand neither for if S. Paul had knowne him to bee the high Priest though hee were an usurper or unworthie that place yet occupying that roome and place hee would have reverenced him for his place sake for even evill Magistrates are not to bee deprived of that honor which belongeth to their office as S. Paul said to Festus who had objected Too much learning maketh thee mad I am not mad O noble Festus he giveth him his title of honour though he were a partial Judge And Cyprian to this purpose saith Quamvis in falsis spoliatis Sacerdotibus umbram tamen ipsam inaâ—era Sacerdotalis nominis cogitans dixit c. Although in false Priests now spoiled and robbed of their place yet he considering the vaine shadow of the verie Priests name said I know not brethren c. Hee saith that Paul reverenced the very shadow and shew of the Priestly authoritie in them 3. Some thinke that Paul reverenced his place knowing him to bee the high Priest but taunted his person But Paul could not have reverenced the place and Priesthood but hee must needs also have given some honour to the man qui illo praeditus erat which bare that place and office Calvine 3. Procopius his opinion is this Paulus seipsum reprehendit colligit cum liberiâ—s invectus fuisset in summuni Pontificem Paul doth reprehend and recover himselfe having too freely inveighed against the high Priest But S. Paul in this place railed not at all for then he had offended against his owne doctrine Ephes. 4.29 Let no corrupt communication proceed out of your mouthes Though S. Paul had not knowne him to be the high Priest yet hee was not to revile nor speak evill of any 5. Iunius opinion is that Paul was utterly ignorant indeed that hee was the high Priest because he was a stranger and the high Priest was not discerned by his priestly apparell but when he went into the Temple Iunius further seemeth to thinke that Paul did not know him so much as to be a Judge for the Tribune or Captaine of the souldiers was the chiefe in that assemblie and the rest stood by on their feet 6. But it appeareth that Paul knew him to sit as Judge as hee saith Thou sittest to judge me according to the law c. But in the rest I subscribe unto his judgement that Paul non ironicè loquitur sed simpliciter spake not ironically but simplie and plainely that he knew him not to be high Priest and yet hee confesseth no error for hee railed not at all Nam longe differt justa reprehensio à maledicta A just reprehension farre differeth from rayling Gallas There are then two parts of Pauls answer for as they objected two things that he railed and that upon the high Priest so he answereth to the latter part excusing it by his ignorance that hee knew him not to bee the high Priest to the other hee also maketh answer out of his judgement and knowledge denying that hee had railed for hee knew well enough by the law that no ruler of the people ought to bee railed upon therefore S. Paul knowing him to siâ— as a Judge though hee was utterly ignorant that he was the high Priest had sinned against his owne knowledge if hee had railed upon him So indeed as Cyprian saith Nihil contumeliose locutus est adversus sacerdotem Hee spake nothing contumeliously against the high Priest c. QUEST LIII What is understood here by abundance and licour Vers. 29. THine abundance or plentie and thy licour The Hebrew word signifieth teares 1. Some by the word melea fulnesse understand wine because it floweth abundantly by the other word dimah teares oyle because it is pressed forth by drops like unto teares Vatablus But in this sense the principall part of their fruits and increase should have beene omitted namely their corne and other dry fruits 2. Some by fulnesse understand the plentifull yeere by teares the barren yeere signifâ—ing that even then when they had the least increase they should remember to pay their first fruits and oblations Cajetane But this seemeth too curious 3. Calvine will have plenitudinem fulnesse taken pro genere in generall for all kinde of increase and teares to be referred to one speciall kinde namely the licour 4. But D. Kimhi his exposition is more currant and R. Salomon agreeth with him whom Lyranus and Iunius follow that by fulnesse wee
assumpturus erat naturam humanam c. That he was to take upon him our humane nature So also Osiander Marbach For if the Lord had appeared here in any humane forme Moses reason had not beene sufficient dehorting the people from idolatry because they saw no Image in the day that the Lord spake unto them in Horeb Deut. 4.15 For though the Lord had then appeared in any Image yet if he had at this time so shewed himselfe they might have taken occasion thereby to resemble God by some Image therefore neither then nor now did the Lord so appeare Tostat. quaest 13. 4. Neither yet because it is said Vnder his feet c. did they see as the feet of a man as Cajetane thinketh Sub specie Iudicis quasi hominis visus est c. He was seene as a Judge sitting in judgement and so they saw but his feet but this is so said quantum ad situm in respect of the site and placing because the pavement of Saphir was beneath as under the feet and they might imagine the more glorious part of Gods Majesty to be upward Tostatus 5. Neither yet is the meaning Quod clarius cognoverint Deum c. That they only knew the Lord more clearely than the common people Ferus Or as the Septuagint translate they saw only the place 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 where the Lord stood 6. But the Lord by a bright shining cloud shewed his Majesty and presence as the Chalde Interpreter readeth Viderunt gloriam Dei Israel They saw the glory of the God of Israel and that much more now than when hee appeared in mount Sinai when notwithstanding the people said The Lord hath shewed us his glory and greatnesse Deut. 5.24 Tostat. So also Calvin Forma ipsius Dei nulla describitur sed basis in qua stabat c. There is no forme described of God but the bottome where he stood is said to be like unto Saphir c. QUEST XXII Wherein the place under Gods feet is said to be like to Saphir Vers. 10. AS a pavement or stone-worke of Saphir 1. This place under Gods feet for the colour is resembled unto the precious stone called the Saphir and to the cleare heavens Tostatus thinketh the Saphir to be of a bright reddish colour and that two colours are hereby signified a bright shining red and a blew or azure as in the skie But the Saphir stone is knowne to be of a skie blewish and airy colour as Hierome observeth and one of these similitudes is added to explaine the other Borrhains saith that the fairest Saphirs are full of red golden spots So also Oleaster Which answereth to this description that the pavement or bricke worke for so libnath signifieth either bricke or stone is said to be of Saphir Tostatus further thinketh that it is compared unto caelum stellatum the starrie skie but QUEST XXIII In what sense the Lord is said not to lay his hand 〈…〉 Vers. 11. VPon the Nobles c. he laid not his hand The laying of the hand is taken in Scripture 〈◊〉 threefold sense 1. The hand of God was said to be upon the Prophets when the Spirit of God came upon them And so Ab. Ezra understandeth this text Non porrexit illis manum He did not 〈◊〉 his hand unto them He gave them not the Spirit of Prophecie as he did to Moses they did not see God so cleerely as Moses did But the wordâ— are to be joyned together thus That although they sâ—â— God yet his hand was not upon them and then no such sense can be gathered Calvin 2. The laying on of the hand signifieth also to hide as God is said to have laid his hand upon Moses as he passed by Exod. 33. And so they make the meaning to be this that God did not hide himselfe to 〈◊〉 which were farre off as the Latine text is that is hee shewed himselfe also to the people in the 〈◊〉 Lyranus Gloss. 〈◊〉 Tostatus But the word is 〈◊〉 which signifieth to separate the text then meaneth those 70. Elders which Moses had selected and separated from the rest Iun. Lippom. Or 〈◊〉 may be derived of etâ—â—l which signifieth neare as Gen. 41.3 They 〈◊〉 neere or by the 〈◊〉 and so in this place iâ— may betoken those which were neere unto God namely the 70. Elders who came neerer than the rest of the people Oleaster 3. There is also a third signification of this phrase to lay the hand is to sinite or punish contrarie whereto is that phrase To take his hand from one 1 Sam. 6.5 that is to leave smiting or punishing So thâ—n the meaning here is Non 〈…〉 Hee sent not upon them his hurting hand Cajetaâ—â— Non 〈…〉 Hee killed them not Lippomanus For it was a received opinion in those dayes that no man could see God and live Oleaster Nihil incommodi senserunt They felt no harme after this Simlerus QUEST XXIV Why they are said to eat and drinke Vers. 11. ANd did eat and drinke c. 1. Rab. Salomon saith that this is added to shew their fault that after they had seene God as though they had not much cared for it they turned them to temporall pleasures in eating and drinking And though God did forbeare them now yet afterward they were punished Nadab and Abâ—hu died in the Tabernacle by fire sent of God Levit 10. and the Elders afterward at the grave of lust Numb 11. Contra. 1. It seemeth that God was not offended with them in this place because he laid not his hand upon them and therefore it is not like that they shewed any such contempt 2. Nadab and Abihu were afterward smitten but it was not for any such fault committed here but for offering strange fire Tostat. qu. 15. 2. Some understand it of their rejoycing as if they had eaten and drunke so the Châ—lde But here is no such note of similitude Quasi 〈◊〉 c. As though they did eat But it is expressed plainly They did eat It is then to bee taken rather historice historically than metaphorice metaphorically Tostatus 3. Ab. Ezra giveth this sense that although they had seene God yet they were not so ravished with it as Moses was that did neither eat nor drinke 40. dayes after but they did eat and drinke afterward 4. Some here by understand the spirituall delight which they conceived which is sometime expressed by eating and drinking as Christ saith to his Disciples in the Gospell That yee may eat and drinke at 〈◊〉 table in my Kingdome Ferus 5. Some referre it to their publike feastes which they made that day in token of their joy They are and dranke in laetitia magna post talem 〈◊〉 in great mirth after such a vision Lyran So also Tostat. Osiander 6. But the proper and true sense is this Salvi integri manserunt They remained sound and in good health Calvin Tanquam omnino incolumis comederunt c. As in perfect health
any other Priest or Levite to gaze or looke upon it Therefore this is no warrant for the setting up of Images in Churches in the open sight and view of the people who thereby are bewitched and withdrawne from the true spirituall worship Simler Gallas 6. Confut. Against the Iewes that they are cast off for crucifying of Christ. Vers. 22. THere will I appoint with thee or meet thee Chrysostome from hence doth notably convince the Jewes that God hath forsaken them and cast them off because now they have not the Arke nor Propitiatorie seat from whence the Lord used to speake And if the Jewes should hominibus imputare rerum suarum vastationâ—m impute unto men the ruine and destruction of their state hee thus answereth First that men could not have destroyed their Citie Nisi Deus permisisset unlesse the Lord had permitted it to be done Secondly he saith But be it granted that men pulled downe your walles Num ignem ex alto dâ—vehi vetuit homo Did man fâ—â—bid fire to be brought from heaven Num vocem ex propitiatorio audiri solitam inhibuit homo c. Did man forbid that a voice should be heard out of the Propitiatorie Did man take away the declaration of Gods will by the precious stones in the Priests breast-plate and the sacred unction c. An non Deus haec omniae submovit c. Did not God take all these away Thirdly if the Jewes shall answer Quoniam civitate â—aremus caremus istis c. Because we are without a Citie we want these things also c. He addeth further yet after the Temple was destroyed and the Altar broken downe there were Prophets in the captivitie Daniel and Ezechiel say then Quâ—m ob causam nunc non habetis Prophetas What is the cause that now ye have no Prophets Is it not evident by this Quòd Deus vos repulerit that God hath cast your off And why hath he cast you off Ob illum crucifixum impium illud facium because of that impious fact in the crucifying of Christ And whence doth this appeare because before when ye lived wickedly ye obtained many things now cum videamini modestiùs vivere when yee seeme to live more soberly yet ye suffer more grievous punishment noc quicquam eorum contigit habâ—re quae prius habebatis and ye enjoy none of those things which before ye had c. To this purpose Chrysost. 7. Confut. Against the Romanists concerning their niâ—â— orders of Angels NOw further whereas these winged pictures which were made upon the Mercie seat are called Cherâ—bim which is a name indifferently given to the blessed Angels in generall it is evident that it is no speciall order as the Romanists have curiously â—orted the Angels into nine orders whereof the Cherubim Seraphim and Thrones are the three highest And Tostatus one of their owne writers confesseth that in this place Aequaliter Cherubim ad omnes â—eatoâ— spiritus referantur That the Cherubim here equally may be referred to all the blessed Spirits c. And as in this place so in other also the Cherubim and Seraphim are names and titles given to the Angels in generall as Isai. 6. Ezech. 1. and 10. See more hereof elsewhere Synops. Câ—ntur 2. err 1. 8. Confut. Against the superstitious use of candles in Churches Vers. 37. THou shalt make thee seven lamps thereof c. to give light c. The use then of this candlesticke and the lamps thereof was to no other end than to give light in the Sanctuarie which was covered Tostatus addeth further Non solùm lumen candelarum est ad necessitatem toll â—idâ—â—um tenebrarum sed etiam ad honestatem cultum c. The light of candles is not onely for necessitie to remove the darknesse but for more comelinesse and it belongeth unto worship c. Which superstitious conceit is convinced in this place These lamps were ordained onely to give light therefore at noone day when there is no use of candle light to set up tapers and candles is a superfluous and a superstitious use 6. Morall Observations 1 Observ. God must be honoured with our riches Vers. 2. REceive an offering for me of every man c. Whereas God requireth an offering of the people out of their substance it sheweth that our goods are not ours to waste at our willes but God looketh to be honoured with them and to have them employed unto his glorie B. Babingt As the Wise-man saith Prov. 6.8 Honour the Lord with thy riches and with the first fruits of thine increase 2. Observ. We must give unto God with a willing heart WHose heart giveth it freely So also chap. 35.5 Whosoever is of a willing heart let him bâ—ing this offering unto the Lord which sheweth that what is bestowed upon Gods service should be given willingly and cheerefully as it is said in that great offering of David and the people toward the building of the Temple which Salomon made The people offered willingly unto the Lord with a perfit heart 1 Chron. 29.9 and David thus professeth vers 17. I have offered willingly in the uprightnesse of mine heart all these things So the Apostle saith The Lord loveth a cheerefull giver 2 Cor. 9.7 B. Babing 3. Observ. Of the diversitie of gifts which every man must employ accordingly as he hath received Vers. 3. TAke of them gold silver brasse c. This sheweth that in the Church there are diversities of gifts God hath endued some with gold and silver some with brasse all have not the like gifts as the Apostle saith There are diversities of gifts but the same spirit 1 Cor. 12.5 No man therefore can excuse himselfe that he hath nothing to offer if he have neither gold silver nor brasse yet heâ— may bring goats haire B. Babing He that hath neither gold silver nor brasse Osserat vel pilas capraruâ— munere suo defunctus est Let him but offer goats haire and he hath done his dutie Ferus 4. Observ. What desire we should have to the Lords house Vers. 8. THat I may dwell among them Seeing the house of God is the place of Gods habitation and there is his presence it sheweth with what delight and desire wee should come unto Gods house and with what reverence wee should behave our selves there as Iacob said How reverend iâ— this place this is no other but the house of God and the gate of heaven Gen. 28.17 So Chrysostome excellently saith Non est ecclesia tonstrina aut unguentaria tabâ—rna c. sed locus Angelorum regia coeli coelum ipsum c. The Church is no Barbers shop or Apothecaries house but a place of Angels the palace of heaven yea heaven it selfe 5. Observ. Gods law must be laid up in the heart Vers. 16. THou shalt put in the Arke the Testimonie As the tables of the Law were laid up in the Arke so the Law and Word of God must be
all his servants an holy Priesthood toward God though for order sake and better edifying of the Church there ought to be a distinction betweene the Pastor and people As also in placing the people a great way off that they only see and gaze but heare little they hinder their edifying and instruction contrary to the Apostles rule Let all things be done unto edifying 6 Morall observations 1. Observ. God requireth diligent and cheerfull service Vers. 1. IN them thou shalt make Cherubims c. God seemeth to be delighted with these similitudes of Cherubims which were winged to shew their speed and agility to shew that he is delighted in those qui summa diligentia verbum ejus faciunt which are diligent in performing his word Oleaster As the Prophet David saith I will run the way of thy Commandements when thou shalt enlarge my heart Psalm 119.32 2. Observ. That we should be inwardly adorned and not make a faire shew outwardly Vers. 37. THou shalt cast five sockets of brasse for them Men use to set the fairest shew outward so doth not God without are sockets of brasse but within sockets of silver to teach us that Christians should not make a faire shew outwardly but seeke to adorne the inward man Oleaster As it is in the Psalme 45.13 The Kings daughter is all glorious within So S. Peter teacheth women that their apparelling should not be outward with broidered haire and gold put about but that the hid man of the hear◠be uncorrupt c. 3. Observ. God revealeth himselfe more and more to his children FUrther whereas one comming into the Tabernacle at the first entrance saw brasse but going in further the light of the golden candlesticke directing him he saw nothing but gold So the more one looketh into Gods secrets being illuminated by the Spirit he shall finde every thing still more glorious and heavenly Borrh. As Iob at the first had heard of God but by the eare but having had comfortable experience of his mercie in his affliction then he saw him with the eye CHAP. XXVII 1. The Method and Argument HItherto chap. 25 26. such things have beene described as belonged unto the Tabernacle with a description of the Tabernacle it selfe Now in this Chapter such things are set forth as were without the Tabernacle with a particular precept concerning the preparing of oile for the lampes So that this Chapter hath two parts an explication of the instruments belonging to Gods service without the Tabernacle to v. 10. and of the service required concerning the oile of the lamps In the first there is expressed how the Altar of burnt offering should be made to vers 9. then a description of the place where it should stand in the outward court to vers 20. 1. Concerning the Altar these things are declared in particular 1. The Altar it selfe is described the bignesse of it vers 1. the parts thereof the hornes in the corners the matter of Shittim wood within and of brasse without vers 2. 2. The instruments that belong unto it vers 3. 3. The fashion of the Altar it must be made with a grate in the middest vers 4 5. with barres and rings vers 6 7. and hollow vers 8. 2. The court is described in particular how each side shall be South North East West what length and breadth what curtaines and pillars to vers 16. Then the gate is set forth how it shall be made vers 16. Then is it described in grosse how the pillars of the whole court shall be made vers 17. and what shall be the length and breadth of the whole vers 18. and of what matter all the vessels and pins shall be made vers 19. In the second part is shewed concerning the oile by whom it shall be prepared and to what end vers 20. and how it shall be used by the Priests vers 21. 2. The divers readings Vers. 3. Of the divers reading of this verse and of the divers names of the instruments see quest 6. following Vers. 4. According or by the grate thou shalt make foure rings upon the foure corners thereof that is of the Altar I. or at the grate V. that is about the same place of the Altar where the grate is better than thou shalt make to the grate S. or upon the grate A.P.B.G. for the grate was within and the rings were set without in the Altar the preposition ghal may be as well translated secundùm by or neere as above or upon Vers. 8. Thou shalt make the Altar hollow of boords I.B.V.C. or a boorded hollow S. better than hollow betweene the boords G.P. for he spake of no boords before or Thou shalt make it not sieled but hollow L. for here the word which signifieth boords is omitted Vers. 9. Hangings full of eyes or holes I.A. like unto a sling or casting-net Oleaster for so kalagh signifieth to carve or grave with incisions and indenting 1 King 6.29 the rest reade curtaines or hangings simply without any other addition 3. The questions discussed QUEST I. Why the Lord commanded an Altar to be made and of the bignesse thereof Vers. 1. THou shalt make thee an Altar 1. Seeing the chiefe part of Gods externall worship then consisted in sacrifices it is necessary that an Altar should be made whereupon their sacrifices should be offered and the same but one and in one place lest it might have given them occasion to thinke pluribus diis sacrificari that they sacrificed to many gods Tostat. quaest 3. 2. This Altar was but three cubits high of an indifferent heighth that the Priests might with a little helpe stand up and conveniently minister at the Altar Tostat. But the heighth of three cubits was more than any man could reach unto to minister as Augustine thinketh seeing foure cubits is just a mans height Iunius and therefore it is like that although there were no steps made to the Altar yet there might be some slope going up that the Priest might ascend as it were by degrees for how else could they afterward have ministred upon Salomons Altar which was ten cubits high 2 Chron. 4.1 Iun. in cap. 20.26 3. It is called foure square not in respect of the whole Altar for it was not so high as it was broad and long but it is so called in regard of the length and breadth as is shewed above which was foure-square every way five cubits 4. There were two Altars this of the burnt offerings of brasse and the golden Altar of incense chap. 30.1 Tostat. QUEST II. How fire was made upon the Altar framed of wood OF Shittim wood Here Augustine moveth a doubt how this Altar could be made of wood seeing that the sacrifices were burnt upon it and the fire never went out 1. Some answer that praservatum fuit eo miraculo quo locus sacrificiorum à muscis that both the wood and brasse that covered it were preserved that they consumed not with
blessed Saviour saith Without me yee can do nothing Ioh. 15.5 3. Confut. No festivall daies to be dedicated to Saints Vers. 17. IT is a signe betweene me and the children of Israel c. If this festivall day of the sabbath was consecrated unto the Lords honour and it was a signe betweene the people and him hence it is evident that holy and festivall daies are not to be erected to the honour of Saints The Lord is the Creator of time and daies and therefore he only must have the honour of them Simler 4. Confut. Against the observation of the Iewish festivalâ— Vers. 17. FOr ever c. Hence the Ebionites grounded their heresie that Christians were bound now to keepe the Jewish Sabbath because the Lord calleth it here and in the former verse an everlasting covenant But this is a weake and slender ground Augustine thinketh it is called an everlasting covenant because the Sabbath was a signe of that which was eternall namely our spirituall rest in Christ or because there is no time prefixed or determined for the continuance of it But rather it is so called not simply but in respect of the policie and state of that Common-wealth that as long as it stood and the time of ceremonies did hold so long should the law of the Sabbath be in force for otherwise they may as well urge the celebration of the Jewish Passeover which is established by an ordinance for ever Exod. 12.17 and Aarons Priesthood by the same reason should continue still of the which the Lord saith Exod. â—8 43 This shall be a law for ever unto him and his seed after him 6 Morall observations 1. Observ. Arts not to be abused to any unlawfull purpose Vers. 2. WHom I have filled with the Spirit of God Seeing humane Arts are the gift of God artificers must take heed that they do not profane Gods good gifts and abuse their trades to pride wantonnes superstition or such like Gallas B. Babingâ— As in these daies many doe make their handicrafts to attend as handmaids upon pride And some thereby set forth superstition and idolatrie as Esay describeth the foolishnes and vanitie of such as carved images to make them gods thereof to worship Isai. 44.13 Such an one was Demetrius who made silver shrines for Diana Act. 17. 2. Observ. Against vaine pompe in the multitude of servant and officers Vers. 4. TO worke in gold silver brasse c. The Lord could have raised up a cunning workman in every one of these but hee rather thought it good to give unto one man skill in all these whereby the pompe of many vaine glorious persons in the world is reproved that will have a severall officer for every service as Oleaster noteth Alius culinam curat aliuâ— equos c. One looketh to the kitchin another to the horse a third waiteth on the table another attendeth in the chamber c. Bernard reproved this pompe in the Abbats of his time whereof some hee noteth to have ridden in the way accompanied with threescore horse Aâ— non unus aliquis minister posset saith he jâ—mentuâ— ligare ad mensam servire lectulum praeparare May not one minister suffice to saddle the horse serve at the table and make the bed But Oleaster here is overseene to checke Princes for this their magnificence and state in having many officers for it is seemely for their high place and calling to bee served in different sort from others In meaner persons it may worthily be noted for a fault if any in the vaine ostentation of servants and officers shall exceed the bounds of their calling 3. Observ. Gifts to be mutually communicated Vers. 6. I Have joyned with him Aholiab Oleaster hereupon giveth another good note Serui Dei societatem admittunt The servants of God refuse not societie though they have never so good gifts yet they desire the helpe of others as Moses envied not that Eldad and Medad prophesied in the campe So then as in the bodie one member standeth in need of another so is it in the diversitie of gifts which are given to the members of Christs mysticall bodie they should communicate them one to another and so use them as best may serve for the common good of the Church CHAP. XXXII 1. The Method and Argument IN this Chapter is set forth the sinne of Israel in committing most grosse idolatries whereof there are foure parts 1. The narration of their wicked fact to Vers. 7 2. The examining of their fact and the knowledge thereof to vers 26. 3. The punishment inflicted thence to vers 30. 4. A preparation to their repentance vers 30. to the end 1. Their sin is described 1. Both by the counsell and advice which they tookes first the people in propounding the matter to Aaron to make them gods with the occasion moving them therto the absence of Moses then Aaron in setting them a course what to doe vers 2. 2. By the fact it selfe which is either of them apart of the people in bringing their jewels vers 3. of Aaron in making thereof a Calfe and setting up an Altar vers 4 5. or of them both together Aaron proclaimeth an holy day vers 5. The people offer sacrifices eat drinke and play vers 6. 2. The examination cognizance or taking knowledge of this sinne was either while Moses was with God to vers 15. or when he was departed from God and returned to the campe 1. In the first there is first the Lords complaint of the people in generall that they had corrupted their waies vers 7. so also vers 9. in particular by the description of their sinne vers 8. Secondly Moses intercession with the effect thereof Moses intercession is grounded upon three reasons The deliverance of the people vers 11. The blasphemie of the Egyptians which is feared vers 12. The covenant made with their fathers vers 13. Then the effect is God changed his minde vers 14. 2. In the second cognizance there are two degrees first Moses confused knowledge when they were yet a farre off as he went and conferred with Ioshua to vers 19. Then his certaine knowledge 1. By the sight of his eyes vers 19. whereupon followed two effects of his indignation the breaking of the Tables and the burning of the golden Calfe vers 20 21. 2. By Aarons confession whom Moses fifteth and examineth to vers 25. 3. The punishment is thus set forth 1. The reason that moved Moses to take revenge the nakednes of the people vers 26. 2. Moses charge to the Levites vers 26.27 3. The execution vers 28 29. 4. The preparation to their repentance and reconciliation consisteth 1. of Moses admonition to the people vers 30. Of Moses supplication unto God his petition which containeth the confession of their sinne vers 32. and the craving of pardon with a disjunction or else himselfe to bee blotted out c. 2. And of Gods answer wherein the Lord refuseth Moses disjunctive
unto them Tostat. quaest 21. QUEST XLII Why there were but two tables neither more nor fewer THe two tables c. The reasons why there were two tables were these 1. Because if all the Commandements had beene written in one table of stone it would have beene too large and so too heavie and cumbersome for Moses to beare whereas being now divided in two they need not bee so great in thicknesse or bredth and so were more portable for Moses that he might carrie them without a miracle which some Hebrewes vnnecessarily conceive for they being tables of stone in forme and fashion made like unto writing tables but larger not thicke or grosse but plaine and of no great thicknesse but so much as might suffice for the depth of the letters might well bee taken up and borne in Moses hand 2. But the speciall reason of this division of the tables into two is to distinguish the Commandements which concerned our dutie toward God and the other towards our neighbour The first being written in one table and the other in the second Tostat. qu. 23. QUEST XLIII How the tables were written on both sides Vers. 15. THey were written on both sides 1. R. Salomon thinketh that each table was so written that the letters might appeare on both sides and so be read indifferently on each side But this opinion is improbable for two unlikely things are here presupposed one that the stone whereof the tables were made was transparent that what was on the one side written might be discerned on the other and beside whereas the letters appearing on the backside must be read backward these letters by another miraculous worke must on both sides appeare all one 2. Lyran. Tostatus and Lippoman thinke that the tables were written each on both sides as in the first table there might be the three first Commandements which Tostatus maketh but two graven on the one side and the fourth on the other so in the second foure on the one side and two on the other which he divideth into three or he thinketh that the same Commandements might be written on the inside and repeated againe on the outside So also Gallasius aversa adversa parte scriptas fuisse that they were written on the neare and ofward side both of them such writing the Greekes call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 written behinde and before But the words of the text will not beare this sense for thus the tables should have been written on their foure sides whereas it is said they were written mishene on the two sides 3. Therefore the meaning is no other but this that these tables were written on the two sides namely the two inward or foresides And so Oleaster noteth by the signification of the word gheber which he pronounceth without any asperation at all eber which signifieth properly not the side but the forepart because so the word ghabar or abar signifieth to goe over or passe on before So also Vatabluâ— translateth ab utraque faecie on both the foresides And thus the writing might better be preserved one table lapping over another like unto a booke Oleaster But this further may be gathered that these tables were written full within that no spare place was left which signified that the Law of God was perfect Et nullum locum nobis relictum aliquid addendi That no place was left for us to adde any thing to his Law Simler QUEST XLIV Why the tables are called the worke of God Vers. 16. ANd these tables were the worke of God and this writing was the writing of God 1. Some Hebrewes thinke because it is said before vers 15. that they were written and here againe mention is made of the writing that the first writing was of the Commandements only the second was the exposition of the Commandements But that there was no such exposition is shewed before quest 41. 2. But in that the tables are said both to be the worke of God and writing of God to signifie that God both prepared those tables and was the writer also he was both artifex tabularum scriptor the workman of the tables and the writer Cajetan The second tables were factâ— opere Mosis made by Moses workmanship and written onely by God Tostat. qu. 23. 3. And whereas they are said to be Gods worke we are not to thinke with some that these tables of stone were of purpose now created of God anew Vocatur factio Dei non creatio sed delatio The worke of God is not said to bee the creation but the fashioning and preparing of them Tostat. 4. And this was not done by the worke of Angels as Tostatus thinketh aut scalpello non calamo or was graven with a knife not written with a pen Cajetan For the Lord needed no such instruments but it was written with the finger of God chap. 31.8 that it as Ambrose expoundeth Spiritu suo dedit legem He gave his Law by his Spirit whereby it is written in the fleshie tables of our hearts See more chap. 31. vers 18. QUEST XLV How many precepts each table contained COncerning the order observed in the writing of the Commandements in the tables there are divers opinions 1. Some thinke that the negative precepts were written in one table and the affirmative in another But this cannot be admitted for these causes 1. There are but two affirmative precepts the fourth concerning the Sabbath and the fifth Honour thy father and mother so it would follow that two precepts should onely be in one table and eight in another and so the one table must needs be very large â—he other very little 2. Thus also the precepts which concerne our dutie toward God and the other belonging to our neighbour should bee mingled together 3. And the greatest inconvenience of all is that the order of the Commandements should be inverted and that they were not written in the same order wherein they were delivered Tostat. qu. 24. 2. Rab. Salâ—mon and so also Iosephus doe thinke that five Commandements were written in the first table and five in the second and to the foure first they joyne the fifth Honour thy father c. in the first table But by this meanes the precepts of divers kindes which command love toward God and our neighbour should be put together which are better distinguished into two tables 3. Tostatus with other doe distinguish the Commandements well in respect of the tables placing in the first those which containe our dutie toward God and in the second those which are to bee practised toward our neighbour but the Commandements he rightly divideth nor making of the two first but one and so counting but three in the first table and dividing the last into two which is but one But these two points are handled before at large that it were superflous to treat of them here againe the first quest â— 10. generall before the Commandements chap. 20. and the second quest 1.
c. yet in the originall they are distinguished for the first word is chaâ—â—n which signifieth to give to bestow to shew grace the other is racham that betokeneth to be inwardly moved with pitie and compassion Oleaster The first then signifieth that favour which is seene in bestowing of gifts the other in remitting of sinnes and delivering from evill QUEST XLII Of the divers kindes of mercie which the Lord sheweth I Will shew mercie There is mercie of divers sorts 1. First there is a generall mercie which the Lord extendeth toward all both good and bad as in granting the Sunne and raine indifferently to all 2. There is a peculiar mercie toward his owne children which also is shewed in divers manner 1. As in the remission of great sinnes as David prayeth as Psal. 51.1 Have mercie upon mee according to thy loving kindnesse c. 2. There is mercie also seene in forgiving sinnes of ignorance as S. Paul saith I was received to mercie because I did it ignorantly 1 Tim. 1.13 3. There is a mercie which they taste of that are in Gods favour and doe love him which is seene not only in the remission of sinnes but in the heaping of blessings upon them as the Lord sheweth mercie unto thousands upon them that love him 4. And mercie is also exercised toward them which being unable to performe any thing of themselves are thereunto assisted and aided by grace as the Apostle saith It is not in him that willeth nor in him that runneth but in God that sheweth mercie Rom. 9.16 This mercie here mentioned is of that kinde which is peculiar to Gods chosen Procopius QUEST XLIII Of the divers kindes of visions and sights of God Vers. 20. THou canst not see my fate That wee may arise by degrees to come to the handling of Moses Sinai sight first is to be premised the consideration of the divers wayes and kindes of the vision or sight of God We are said to see either with the eyes of our bodies or with the eyes of our minde and each of these hath a threefold distinction or difference for there is of each an ordinarie or extraordinarie sight in this life but the same imperfect and in the next a perfect sight so there are six kindes of visions in all three of the body and three of the minde First concerning the ordinarie sight of the body 1. It is that whereby wee see and behold sensible things which are object to the eye which discerneth nothing but that which is of a finite and circumscriptible nature 2. The extraordinarie when God in vision sheweth him in some externall forme and shape which is of two sorts either in corporali speciâ— in some corporall shew Quod voluntas elegit non quod natura formavit Which it pleased God to chuse not of natures forming Augustine The other is in humani corporis veritate in the assumption of a true humane body so Christ was seene in humane flesh 3. Then in the next world when our bodies shall be glorified wee shall see more perfectly as Iob saith I shall see God in my flesh Secondly the sight of the soule also is divers 1. There is an ordinarie sight which is of two sorts either common which is the sight and knowledge of God that commeth by the creatures Rom. 1.20 or peculiar to the children of God which is the sight of him by faith whereby the heart is purified Acts 25.9 and the eyes of the minde cleared 2. There is an extraordinarie sight and illumination by the minde as when God did manifest himselfe unto the Prophets by inward visions and revelations As when Peter fell into a trance and saw that foure cornerd sheet Acts 10. 3. And in the next life our inward sight of God shall be perfected as Saint Paul saith Now wee see thorow a glasse darkly but then face to face now wee know in part but then shall wee know even as wee are knowne Now in order it shall be discussed by which of these kindes of vision God may be seene and apprehended of man QUEST XLIV Whether God may be seene with the eyes of the body in this life FIrst it is not possible to see God in this life with the eyes of the body 1. For it must needs follow that God should be of a corporall and materiall substance if he might be seene with carnall eyes for nothing by the eyes of flesh can bee discerned but that which is visible finite and circumscriptible but the Lord is infinite Anthropomorphites and Audiâ—â— Heretikes did hold indeed that God himselfe had an humane and visible shape and that man according to his body is the image of God which heresie is contrarie to the Scripture which saith that God is a Spirit therefore of no bodily shape 2. And God being of a spirituall nature cannot be seene by the eyes of the body for that which is of a spirituall nature non cadit sub sensus corporis doth not come under the sense of the body Simler 3. It is said that God is love which sheweth his substance noâ— a qualitie as our love is then as faith hope and love in us cannot be seene much lesse can God 4. The image of God in man which is the inward renovation of the minde cannot bee seene much lesse God himselfe whose image we beare 5. The minde also of man is invisible mulâ—o magis simplicissima illa infinita mens much more that most pure and infinite minde Simler 6. Chrysostome giveth this reason Deus simplex omni concoctione abjunctuâ— nulla forma aut figura effigiatus God is of a simple nature without any composition he hath no forme or figure c. But nothing is perceived of the sense but that which is of a mixt and compound nature that hath forme and fashion 7. Gregorio Nyssene Est interminabilis divina natura interminabile comprehendi non potest The divine nature is infinite and not to be confined or limited and that which is not to be limited cannot be comprehended c. And that God cannot be confined or determined he thus sheweth Quod continet majus est contento That which containeth is greater than that which is contained and it is also heterogeneâ— natura of another nature as the fish is confined in the water and the bird in the aire But nothing is greater than God and he being perfectly good that which should confine him being of a divers kinde must be perfectly evill So it would follow Deum vinci à malo that God should bee overcome of evill 8. Cyrill useth this argument God is said to have beene seene of divers of the Saints but none of them did thinke that they saw the verie nature of God Aliter alius vidit aliter Esaias aliter Ezechiel c. Therefore everie one saw God after a divers sort otherwise Esaias after another manner Ezechiel saw him c. If they had seene the verie
substance of God then God must be of a divers nature and substance for he was diversly seene 9. And that it is impossible Oculis corporis substantiam Dei aspicere with the eyes of the body to see the substance of God it is evident by our blessed Saviours answer unto Philip who desired Christ to shew them the Father He that hath seene me hath seene the Father insinuating thereby that God cannot otherwise be seene of us than in Christ his Son who is the verie engraved forme of his person And if Christ would not grant any such carnall vision of God unto his Disciples who were conversant with him in the flesh who can in this life expect it 10. Whereas then the Prophet Isaiah saith I saw the Lord sitting upon an high throne and he is said to have beene seene of other of the Saints wee must not thinke that they saw Gods substance with their carnall eyes sed juxta possibilitatem humanam non ut est sed ut voluit se videre but as mans nature could see him not as hee is but as it pleased him Hierom who in the same place reproveth the Jewes who affirme that Isaias was slaine of their fathers because he writeth he saw God with his eyes whereas Moses saw only Gods back-parts for seeing Moses also writeth that God talked with him face to face interficite Mosen cum Esaia yee might as well have killed Moses as Isaias QUEST XLV Whether we shall see the divine nature with the eyes of our bodies in the next life BUt it is a greater question whether the Saints shall not in the next life see the Divine Essence with their bodily eyes which some doe affirme upon these reasons 1. Iob saith he shall see God in his flesh Iob 19. that is in the resurrection 2. S. Paul also saith that then we shall see face to face 1 Cor. 13.13 3. We shall then be like unto the Angels which doe behold the face of God 4. Our bodies shall then be spirituall and therefore wee shall even with our bodily eyes see and discerne Spirits 5. Otherwise if our eyes should not behold God what use should there be of our sight Contr. 1. The Hebrew Interpreters expound that place of Iob of his sight of God in this life but taking it rather to be spoken of his state and condition in the resurrection as most of our writers doe interpret we deny not but then the Redeemer who is cloathed with our flesh shall be seene of us even with these our eyes as Iob there saith But it is one thing to see the person of the Mediatour another to see the divine essence and nature 2. Saint Paul speaketh not of the â—ight of the bodily eyes but of the sight of the minde as hee expoundeth himselfe Now I know in part but then shall I know even as I am knowne 3. The likenesse similitude which we shall have with the Angels holdeth not in everie thing as that we shall have the like nature or knowledge but in that wherein the resemblance is made as that we shall neither marrie nor be married nor need meat and drinke but in that respect shall be as the Angels and yet neither doe the Angels fully comprehend the divine nature as afterward shall be shewed 4. Our bodies are said to be spirituall not as opposite to the nature of our bodies now which shall remaine but as set against the corruptible and earthly qualities thereof our bodies shall be bodies still but not earthly naturall corruptible bodies as they are now therefore the argument followeth not 5. And this shall be the use of our heavenly sight wee shall see God in his workes but after a more cleere manner than now we shall see the elect we shall behold Christ himselfe Upon these reasons Simlerus concludeth In futura vita nos oculis corporis corpora tantum visurâ—s In the next life we with our bodily eyes shall see onely bodies and not the essence of God Thomas Aquine also thus interpreteth Iobs words I shall see God in my flesh I consisting of body and soule shewing Quod suâ— modo visionis illius erit particeps corpus That the body also after a sort shall be partaker of that vision not that the eyes of the body shall see the Divine Essence Sed quia oculi corporis videbunt Deum hominem factum But because the eyes of the body shall see God which was made man Videbunt etiam gloriam Dâ—i in creatura refulgâ—â—tem They shall also see the glorie of God shining in the creatures But this further must bee added that though the divine essence of God shall not bee seene of our bodily eyes then because God is of an infinite and incomprehensible nature yet the blessed Spirits the Angels and Ministers of God shall bee seene of the elect Angelorum beatorum omnium consortio conspectu colloquio fruemur We shall enjoy the fellowship fight and conference of the Angels and of all the blessed Buâ—an For if the eyes of the young man were so opened at the prayer of the Prophet that he saw the Lords heavenly host which appeared in the likenesse of fierie horse and charriots much more shall our eyes then be so cleared as that we shall see the Angels themselves though not in their very spirituall nature yet in such sensible manner as that we shall both converse have conference with them QUEST XLVI Whether the Divine Essence can be seene and comprehended by the minde of man in this life NOw it followeth to be considered seeing Gods essence cannot be seene by our bodily eyes either in this life or the next whether that in our minde and understanding here in this life wee may attaine to the fight and knowledge of God where that position of Thomas Aquine is to be held Impossibile est animae hominis secundum hanc vitam viventis essentiam Dei videre It is impossible for the soule of man in this life to see the essence of God the reasons whereof are these 1. Because the soule being in the body naturally knoweth not any thing nisi quâ— habent formâ—â— in materia but such things as have their forme in some matter or may be knowne by such things but the essence of God per naturas rerum materialium c. by the nature of materiall things cannot be knowne Thomas 2. Almost all our knowledge initium habet à sensibus taketh the beginning from the sense but God cannot be perceived by sense Simler 3. Ambrose likewise saith Anima carnis hujus maculis coâ—â—â—vionibus obumbratae faciem Dei sâ—ncere videre non possunt The soules being shadowed and obscured with the spots and blemishes of the flesh cannot cleerely here see the face of God c. And he further giveth this reason Qui faciem Dei videt esse â—ine peccato He that seeth the face of God must be without
sin as our Saviour saith Blessed are the pure in heart for they shall see God But none are here without sin therefore none here can see God 4. Gregorie Nyssâ—n Propriâ—m suum est ut omnem cognitionem excedat It is proper and peculiar unto God to exceed and goe beyond all knowledge Qui verâ— est is cognitione non comprehenditur He thaâ— truly is and the cause of the being of all things cannot be comprehended by any knowledge c. The minde of man being of a finite nature cannot comprehend that which is infinite and incomprehensible 5. Further Bernard to this purpose urgeth that place 1 Ioh. 3.2 We know that when he shall appeare we shall be like him for we shall see him as he iâ— whereupon he inferreth thus Videre illum jam in hoc mundâ— illuminatus potest tanquam jam in aliquo similis sicuti est non omnino potest quia nondum perfecte similis He that is illuminate may see him in this world as in some thing like unto him but as he is hee cannot see him because he is not perfectly like him c. If then we shall only see him as he is when wee shall be like him then now in this life we cannot see God because we are not like him 6. Irenaeus enforceth this argument Si neque Moses vidit Deum nec Helias c. If neither Moses saw God nor Elias nor Ezechiel but those things which they saw were similitudines claritatis Domini only similitudes of divine brightnesse and prophecies of things to come it is manifest quoniam Pater invisibilis that the father is invisible of whom the Scripture saith Never any man saw God c. For if any had seene God it is most like those great Prophets should have had a sight of him but they saw him not otherwise than by certaine similitudes 7. Cyrillus affirmeth the same out of that place Ioh. 1.18 No man hath seene God at any time the only begotten Son of God c. hath declared him Soli consubstantiali â—ilio Pater visibilis est nulli praeter eum alii Only the Father is visible to his Son of the same substance with him and beside him unto none 8. Whereas then the Prophet Isaiah saith that he saw the Lord chap. 5.1 and the Scripture testifieth that God spake with Moses face to face and that the pure in heart shall see God Matth. 5.8 These places are either understood of the vision and sight of God by faith as Ioh. 14.9 He that seeth mee seeth my Father or else of the symbolicall sight of God by certaine similitudes and representations as Cyrillus calleth it symbolica similitudo divinâ— gloriae a symbolicall similitude of the divine glorie as Ezechiel also saith it was visio similitudinis gloria Domini a vision or appearance of the similitude of the glorie of the Lord. And so Bernard well concludeth Itaque de ipso vides sed non ipsum Therefore in this life thou seest somewhat of God but not God himselfe QUEST XLVII Whether the Angels nâ—w or the soules of men shall fully see the Divine Substance in the next life THat the Saints in the next world shall see God the Apostle is an evident witnesse that when hee appeareth we shall be like him for wee shall see him as he â—s wee shall see him after a more cleare manner than either Moses saw him in the mount or our parents before their fall But even then we shall not bee able fully to comprehend the divine substance of God we shall see him qualis est sed non quantum est as he is but not all that he is Bucanus 1. Deus vere incomprehensibilis dicitur God is said truly to be incomprehensible therefore hee cannot of the creature be comprehended Nec etiam Angelicae naturae comprehensibilis est No hee cannot be comprehended of the Angelicall nature for then he were not simply incomprehensible Alcuinus 2. Chrysostome concludeth as much Ne supernas virtutes Deum posse videre That the high powers of the Angels cannot see God out of that place Isai. 6.2 where it is said that the Seraphim with two of their wings covered their face Cum de Seraphim audis oculos avertisse pinnas visui obduxisse c. when thou hearest that the Seraphim turned away their eyes and drew their wings over their sight c. Nihil aliud docet nisi ejus cognitionem integram non potuisse recipere c. It teacheth nothing else but that they were not capable of the full knowledge of God neither durst behold his most perfect substance c. If then the Angels cannot comprehend the Divine Essence much lesse the spirits of men As Aleniâ—us inferreth Quamvis usque ad aqualitatem Angelicam humana post resurrectionem natura perficiat videra tamen essentiam ejus plene non valet Although our humane nature should attaine after the resurrection to the equalitie of Angels yet it should not be able fully to see Gods essence So also Calvin Licet Angeli excellentiore modo c. Although the Angels are said to see Gods face after a more excellent manner than men yet they are not capable of his infinite greatnesse which would swallow them up quast ex novo Testamento 3. Augustine also urgeth that place Ioh. 1.8 No man hath seene God at any time the onely begotten Sonne which is in the bosome of his Father hath declared him Sinus Patris quid est nisi affectus in châ—â—iâ—ati veri Patris per naturae unionem in filium What is the bosome of the Father but the affection of true charitie of the Father by the union of nature toward the Sonne c. Whereupon it followeth that the Sonne only who is of the same substance and nature with the Father hath seene him But the soules and spirits of the Saints are not in the bosome of God nor of the same substance therefore they cannot see God in his divine nature 4. Further Bernard thus inferreth upon that place 1 Ioh. 3.2 We shall see him as he is for wee shall bee like him Non aliud est videre sicuti est quam esse sicuti est It is no other thing to see him as he is than to be as he is c. But we shall not bee altogether like unto God only in some sort therefore wee shall not see God in his nature perfectly or altogether 5. Therefore whereas the same Bernard saith Talis visio non est vita praesentis c. Such a vision to see God in his nature is not in this life present but is reserved for the time to come c. And Augustine Promittitur sanctis in alia vita That fight is promised to the Saints in the next life c. they must bee understood to speake by way of comparison that in the next life wee shall see God in his owne nature that is
is a place by me that is not farre off in the mount where I use to commune with thee it seemeth then that the Lord was in some part of the mount by the description of the place in the rocke 3. Therefore it is like that this communication was had betweene the Lord and Moses not in the top of mount Sinai for then the Lord at this time would have shewed this sight which was not done till afterward when the Lord proclaimed his name Iehovah before Moses which followeth in the next Chapter chap. 34.7 Gallas But Moses went up to some part of the mountaine the next day after the slaughter of the people chap. 32.30 where he had all this conference with God which is declared in this Chapter saving that it is somewhat interrupted by the inserting of that narration of the peoples laying aside of their best garments and Moses removing of the Tabernacle out of the host vers 7. to vers 12. 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. That the contemplative life should not hinder the active Vers. 23. AFter he returned to the host Moses did not dwell in the Tabernacle which he pitched without the host but returned againe to the campe after he had talked with God to attend the businesse of the people which sheweth that men should not be so much given to the contemplative life as to neglect their callings and to withdraw themselves from doing good unto others As some in time past for love of solitarie life being fit for their gifts to bee imployed in the Church did utterly refuse all kinde of calling therein But this is not the fault of this age Nimius ambitus jam damnandus too much ambition in seeking of preferment in Church and Common-wealth is now rather to be condemned Simler But our blessed Saviour sheweth by his example what a good temper should be made of the active and contemplative life who in the day time taught in the Temple and in the night went out and abode in the mount of Olives there giving himselfe to prayer Luk. 21.37 2. Doct. Grace with God is of mercie not by works Vers. 12. THou hast found grace in my sight Oleaster hereupon noteth that man is said to find grace Quia eam quasi thesaurum casu invenit non suâ— industria aut labore Because he findeth it unlooked for as a treasure not by his owne labour or industrie as the Apostle saith It is not in him that willeth or runneth but in God that sheweth mercie 3. Doct. The Lord knoweth all his Elect by name Vers. 12. I Know thee by name This sheweth that God hath a peculiar and particular knowledge of the elect as here Moses is knowne unto God by name And lest any should thinke that this was a speciall privilege unto Moses that he was more knowne unto God than another Procopius addeth I thinke it were better ut universaliter ille locus accipiatur de omni qui eadem qua Mosis pollent sanctitate That generally this place be understood of every one that is endued with Moses holinesse c. So the Apostle maketh a generall doctrine of it The foundation of God remaineth sure and hath this seale the Lord knoweth who are his 4. Doct. That there is mention made in Moses of everlasting life Vers. 20. NO man shall see me and live Cajetan well urgeth this place against those which thinke there is no mention made in Moses of everlasting felicitie For if no man should see God after this life it had beene sufficient to say no man shall see me at all therefore in adding and live hee insinuateth Quod adempta hominis vita poterit homo videre ipsum That when this life is taken away a man may see him c. As the Apostle saith When he appeareth we shall be like him for we shall see him as he is c. 1. Ioh. 3.3 5. Doct. A difference betweene the decree of election and reprobation Vers. 19. I Will shew mercie to whom I will shew mercie Marbachius here observeth the difference betweene election and reprobation Electio citra respectum operum nostrorum est Election is without the respect of our works but Damnatio reprobatio non est sine operum hominis respectu Damnation and reprobation is not without respect of mens works for if it were otherwise it would follow that the absolute will of God is the cause of their damnation which were contrarie to the Prophet I will not the death of a sinner The Apostle indeed calleth the vessels of wrath prepared to destruction as it is said He hath prepared the vessels of mercie unto glorie But yet with this difference it is said actively that God hath prepared the one to glorie his will and decree is the onely cause of their election without any foresight of their works it is of his mercie as here the Lord saith to Moses but the other are said passively to be prepared because first the Lord doth Eos in sordibus suis relinquere leave them in their filthinesse and upon the foresight of their sinne decree them unto everlasting damnation God doth sponte praeterire of his owne will as he electeth some so pretermit others but the decree of actuall condemnation is upon the foresight of their sinne See more Synops. pag. 822. 5 Places of Controversie 1. Controv. Of the corrupt reading of the Latine text Vers. 15. WHereas the Hebrew text here readeth to this effect If thy face goe not with us The Latine text changeth it thus If thou goe not which Tostatus justifieth thus that Hierom Cautissime mutavit did most warilie change it because there should otherwise seeme to be no difference betweene the Lords answer and Moses replie as now there is for by my face the Lord might understand his Angell But Moses is not contented that Gods Angell goe with them but requireth that the Lord himselfe would be their guide Contra. 1. If the Latine translator were cautelous in altering of the originall reading for If thy presence goe not If thou goe not then it would follow that it is an oversight in the originall and what is this else but for man to take upon him to correct the enditing of the Spirit 2. By Gods face and presence Moses understood not any Angell but God himselfe as vers 20. the Lord by face understandeth himselfe Thou canst not see my face for there shall no man see me and live 3. Neither doth the difference betweene the Lords speech and Moses replie consist in that distinction as is shewed before quest 31. the like error is committed before vers 13. where the Latine Interpreter readeth Shew me thy face for shew me thy way 2. Controv. That our calling is altogether of grace Vers. 19. I Will shew mercie to whom I will shew mercie Ambrose hereupon inferreth well Quod Dei gratiam nemo praeveniat merito suo c. That no man preventeth Gods grace by his merit as
here what God can doe but what he doth Let him or any other Romanist shew a text of Scripture for this privilege of the Virgin Marie that shee was exempted either from originall or actuall sinne this only was peculiar unto Christ that he was in all things like unto us sinne only excepted And she her selfe acknowledging Christ to be her Saviour in her song saying My spirit rejoyceth in God my Saviour confesseth therein that she was a sinner The Romanists then must looke for small thanke at the Virgin Maries hand who would fasten upon her such a blasphemous conceit to be free from originall sinne See more hereof also Synops. pap Centur. 2. er 79. 5. Controv. Images not to be tolerated Vers. 15. BReake their images in peeces c. for thou shalt bow downe to no other god Osiander here giveth this corrupt note Vbi ergo nihil est periculi ab adoratione ibi nihil est periculi à statuis c. Where therefore there is no danger of adoration there is no danger to be feared from any images c. Therefore he thinketh that such images as are not adored may stand Contra. 1. Nay the Lord in this place would have the occasion of stumbling removed and images to be defaced lest the people might be corrupted by them and therefore Deut. 7.5 they are simply commanded to breake downe their images because they were an holy people unto God 2. And if it shall be said that the Israelites were weake and prone to idolatry and therefore are so charged the Apostle also reviveth the same precept Babes keepe your selves from idols 1 Ioh. 2.21 shewing that even now also under the Gospell there is like danger to be feared from images and idols 6. Controv. Christs and Moses forty dayes fast cannot be imitated Vers. 28. HE was with the Lord forty dayes c. The Romanists are ridiculous in grounding their forty dayes fast yeerely upon this example and our blessed Saviours fasting forty dayes 1. The miracles which the Prophets and Apostles wrought scimus nobis ad confirmationem veritatis non ad imitationem proponi c. we know are propounded unto us for the confirmation of the truth not for imitation Gallas We may as well imitate Christ in his walking upon the sea and other miraculous workes as in fasting forty dayes 2. Our blessed Saviour so likewise Moses did eat nothing at all but they feed delicately in their fasts 3. Christ fasted but once they injoyne this fast yeerely Gallas 4. Christ fasted ut Evangelio plenam fidem acquireret to win credit to the Gospell as Moses did to the Law unlesse then they bring in a new Gospell no such fast for religion sake is to be injoyned Calvin 7. Controv. That Henoch and Elias are not preserved in their bodies in Paradise Vers. 28. HE did neither eat bread nor drinke water c. Tostatus thinketh that as Moses was preserved in the mount without any naturall decay at all forty dayes and forty nights so Henoch and Elias are kept still in Paradise by the power of God in their bodies to returne againe in the latter dayes to turne the hearts of the fathers to the children quaest 23 24. Contra. 1. If he meane they are kept in the terrestriall Paradise that cannot be for seeing all the earth was overflowed in Noahs floud how could Henoch live there 2. And in heaven they are not with their bodies for Christ was the first as Origen saith Qui carnem evexit in coelum Which carried his flesh into heaven 3. Concerning that prophecie of the comming of Elias it was fulfilled in Iohn Baptist as our blessed Saviour saith If yee will receive it this is Elias that was to come Matth. 11.14 See further of this question Synops. Centur. 5. error 32. 6. Morall observations 1. Observ. God giveth more than we aske Vers. 10. I Will doe marvels such as have not beene done c. Moses only asked of God forgivenesse and that he would go with them the Lord granteth more to doe such wonders for them as never were seene Such is the Lords bounty that he giveth more to his servants than they aske as unto Salomon that desired wisdome he gave both honour and riches Simler 2. Observ. God will protect his children being occupied in his service Vers. 24. SO that no man shall desire thy land Such care hath God of those that are occupied in his service that he will then most of all protect and defend them as the Israelites while they went up to appeare before the Lord are promised that no detriment should befall them in the meane time at home Gallas Like as when the enemies came upon the Israelites in Samuels time while they were assembled in prayer yet they were delivered 1 Sam. 7. 3. Observ. God will provide all things necessary for them that serve him Vers. 28. HE did neither eat bread nor drinke water While Moses attendeth upon God he hath no need either of meat or drinke this was miraculous and extraordinary in Moses yet it teacheth that God will provide for those all things necessary that preferre his glory and service before all other things as our blessed Saviour saith Matth. 6.33 Seeke first the kingdome of God and his righteousnesse dnd all things shall be ministred unto you 4. Observ. Gods children are not proud of their gifts Vers. 29. MOses wist not that the skin of his face shone bright Lippoman hereupon noteth Ignorabat Moses propriam gloriam c. Moses knew not his owne glory for the Saints doe not acknowledge their excellencie but are humble c. As the Apostle saith If any man thinke that he knoweth any thing he knoweth nothing yet as he ought to know 1 Cor. 8.2 5. Observ. God lighteneth mens hearts by prayer and hearing the Word ANd as Moses in talking with God had his face lightened so in our prayers and hearing the word of God accenditur in mentibus nostris nova lux c. a new light is kindled in our mindes as the two Disciples which went to Emmaus felt their hearts to burne within them while Christ opened unto them the Scriptures CHAP. XXXV 1. The Method and Argument HItherto from the 31. chapter hath beene set forth the let and impediment unto the worke of the Tabernacle by the sinne of the people and their reconciliation now unto the end of the booke is declared their diligence in obedience in the worke of the Sanctuary both of the people in bringing stuffe of the workmen and artificers in framing and working it of Moses in approving and disposing of it This chapter hath three parts 1. A rehearsall or repetition of the former charge given them first there is an interdict and prohibition that they worke not upon the Sabbath to vers 4. then a commandement and charge 1. Concerning the people what they shall offer to vers 10. 2. How it shall be ordered and disposed and to what end to v. 20. 2.
Neither yet were they fastened directly in the verie corner of all where the sides joyned together for then the bars could not conveniently have beene thrust thorow them but by the corners are meant the sides neere unto the corners as it is said afterward that the barres were in the rings by the sides of the Arke Tostat. qu. 1. QUEST II. Why it is said He made where the Lord said before to Moses Thou shalt make Vers. 6. HE made the Mercie-seat c. The phrase must be observed that whereas chap. 25. the Lord saith to Moses Thou shalt make an Arke thou shalt make a candlesticke thou shalt make a table and so of the rest here it is said He that is Bezaleel made the Arke he made the table he made the candlesticke The reason hereof is to shew the obedience of Moses and the people lest they might have beene thought to have received many precepts of the Lord and performed few of them In that therefore the Lord said to Moses Thou shalt make there the charge and commandement is given But now where it is thus rehearsed and he made the dutifull and carefull performing is expressed of that which was given them in charge Pellican QUEST III. In what forme the branches of the candlesticke went up Vers. 18. SIx branches came out of the side thereof 1. Pellican seemeth to thinke that these branches went up erectis calamis with their stalkes upright 2. But their opinion seemeth more probable who thinke that the branches in their going up semicirculos effecisse made halfe circles for both that forme and fashion was more comely to sight and beside if they had gone upright this inconvenience would have followed that the lamps above where the oyle was put for the lights would not have stood right up but leaning one way which had been unfit both for the droppings of the oyle and the lights would not have burned so cleare nor so bright if the lamps had not stood even and levell Gallas The rest of the questions concerning these instruments and ornaments of the Temple which are described in this chapter are before discussed chap. 25. and chap. 30. in the beginning of the chapters 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. Christ our true propitiatorie and Mercie-seat Vers. 6. HE made the Mercie-seat The Mercie-seat signified Christ our true 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Propitiatorie who hath reconciled us to God his Father The Cherubs upon the Mercie-seat doe represent the holy Angels whose ministerie Christ useth in the government of his Church Pelargus As the Apostle saith They are sent forth to minister for their sakes that shall be heires of salvation Hebr. 1.14 Marbach 2. Doct. Christ both God and man THe making of the Arke of wood within and gold without did set forth the two natures in our blessed Saviour joyned together in one person the divine and humane Simlerus In the Propitiatorie and Mercie-seat are typically set forth the benefits that we have by Christ that as the Propitiatorie covered the Arke wherein was the Law so Christ Legem nos accusantem tegit doth cover and hide the Law which accuseth us Simler But more particularly the Apostle rehearseth the benefits which we have by Christ saying that he is made of God unto us his wisdome righteousnesse sanctification redemption 1. His wisdome in that Christ hath revealed unto us the will of his Father to give his Sonne for us That whosoever beleeveth in him should have eternall life 2. He is our Iustice in that hee imparted to us both his active righteousnesse in fulfilling the Law and his passive obedience in bearing the punishment due unto our sinne so the Apostle saith Christ is the end of the Law for righteousnesse to everie one that beleeveth 3. Christ is our Sanctification in that hee doth not only impute unto us his righteousnesse by faith but doth also sanctifie and regenerate us by his Spirit inabling us in some measure to keepe his Commandements as the Lord saith by his Prophet I will put my Spirit within you and cause you to walke in my statutes 4. He is our Redemption in that he hath by his innocent death appeased the wrath of God toward us as the Apostle saith Who shall condemne us it is Christ which is dead c. Marbachius 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Against such hereticks as erred concerning Christs divine or humane nature AS Christ is shadowed forth in the Arke to be both God and man so all such are condemned which doe erre concerning the divine or humane nature of Christ. As touching Christs divine nature 1. Some utterly deny it making Christ a meere man and not to have beene before he was conceived of the Virgin Marie in which heresie were Cerinthus Ebion contrarie to the Scripture which saith that the Word which was made flesh was in the beginning c. Ioh. 1.1 2. Some confesse another nature in Christ beside his humanitie but not of the same substance with God yet of an higher nature than any creature so held Carpocrates Basilides Arrius but our blessed Saviour himselfe saith I and my Father are one Ioh. 20.30 3. Some affirmed that Christ beside his humane nature consisted also of a divine yet not begotten of the Father but making one person with God the Father as well as being of one substance so the Sabellians and Patropassians whereas the Apostle saith God sent his Sonne made of a woman Gal. 4.4 The person then of the Sonne and not of the Father was made man for us Concerning Christs humane nature 1. Some affirmed that he was not a true man but onely in outward appearance as the Manichees and Marcionites who are confuted by Christs owne words Luke 24.39 Handle me and see for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as yee see me have 2. The Valentinians and Anabaptists hold that Christ had not his flesh of the Virgin Marie but brought it with him from heaven contrarie to the Apostle who saith That hee was made of the seed of David according to the flesh Rom. c. 3. 3. Some taught that Christ had a true humane nature but in respect of his body onely not of his soule as Apollinaris Bishop of Laodicea who is convinced by the words of our Saviour Matth. 26. My soule is heavie unto death 4. Some grant that Christ tooke upon him our whole nature but not our humane infirmities But the Apostle teacheth the contrarie that Christ was in all things tempted in like sort as we are yet without sinne There are two kinde of infirmities some are personall as leprosie blindnesse sicknesse diseases these Christ was not subject unto there are naturall infirmities which doe belong unto the whole humane nature as wearinesse hunger griefe and such like these our blessed Saviour undertooke that he might be in all things like unto us 5. Some hold that Christ had a true humane nature but after the uniting thereof in one person to his
2. But it seemeth that this great defection was about the seventh age for then Lamech of Cains race tooke unto him two wives then the Lord tooke away righteous Henoch that he should bee no longer grieved with the wickednesse of the world Then the world being replenished with great multitudes which are ring-leaders for the most part unto evill as it is written thou shalt not follow a multitude to doe evill began to give themselves to all kinde of wickednesse adultery oppression cruelty multiplicity of wives unlawfull lust even against nature and to fill the earth with uncleannesse 3. And although in this seventh age iniquity was come to the full height yet it began long before even in the dayes of Enos when as the righteous abhorring the great wickednesse of Cains posterity separated themselves and a part beganne to call upon the name of God Iun. 4. The Hebrewes note that at the beginning women were not so multiplied as afterward by whom they tooke occasion to sinne and therefore it is added there were daughters borne unto them c. vers 1. but this clause sheweth not a more speciall multiplying of that kinde but that when the world began to be stored both with men and women then they gave themselves to wantonnesse QVEST. III. The particular sin of the old world here noted Vers. 2. THey saw the daughters of men that they were faire c. 1. Their fault was not onely in that they of the righteous seed matched into Cains stocke Calvin 2. Or that they respected onely beauty having no regard to their piety and vertue Marlorat 3. But they by violence tooke unto them not to their wives but women for so with Mercerus and Iunius I rather interpret the word nashim from all men whatsoever as Iunius readeth both virgines and wives they cared not whom 4. Some Hebrewes here understand also the filthy sinne of buggery that they tooke all they liked even from among the bruit beasts but Moses speaketh onely of the daughters of men QVEST. IV. Who were these sonnes of God Vers. THen the sonnes of God 1. These sonnes of God were not the Angels which some have supposed to have fallen for their intemperancie with women and to have begotten of them spirits as Ioseph Philo Iustine Clemens Alexandrinus Tertullian conjectured who so expoundeth that place of S. Paul that women should be covered because of the Angels lest they should bee tempted with their beauty This opinion is easily confuted 1. Because the world was punished and God was angry not for the sinne of Angels but of men vers 3. My spirit shall not alway strive with man 2. Chrysostome urgeth that place Matth. 22. in the resurrection they neither marry nor are married but are the Angels Ergo Angels are not subject to carnall affections as men are 3. If Angels fell first for the love of women then they sinned not for 1000. yeares after the creation whereas the Scripture sheweth that the Devill was a murtherer and a liar from the beginning Ioh. 8.44 QVEST. V. Devils not corporall nor mortall IT is also absurd and improbable that these were devils which did company with women and of them came Gyants as thinketh Franciscus Georgius who affirmeth devils to have bodies and a generative faculty and to company with women Of the like opinion is Psellus that the devils have bodies and they are nourished by sucking and attraction as spunges and that they are males and females at their pleasures some are of a fiery some ayrie some a watery some of a terrene nature But these are fables and fictions fit rather to be laughed at than worthy to be confuted 1. The Devils are of a spirituall not corporall nature it appeareth by that story Luk. 8. where we reade that in one man there was a legion that is six thousand Devils how could so many spirits if they were corporall be included in one body 2. If they were of a fierie watery or earthly so of an elementall nature they should bee subject to corruption mutability and mortality and so some have imagined also as Plutarch writeth of the death of the great Pan a famous Devill among the Pagans and Cardane reporteth that he heard his Father say who was above thirty years familiar with the Devils that he learned of them that they doe die decay revive againe but this fancie is contrary to the Scripture which testifieth that the Devill hath beene a murtherer from the beginning of the world Ioh. 8 44 Ergo he hath continued from the beginning of the world and how should the soule of man be immortall if these spirits which are of a more subtill nature were mortall 3. Though it were granted that Devills have a kinde of airie bodies yet could they not ingender for the power of generation agreeth onely to perfect bodies which have their materiall and distinct parts and receive nourishment 4. And they being as they say male and female should ingender among themselves in their owne kinde 5. Or if they did company with women they could not beget men but multiply their owne kinde or at the least a mixt kinde as the mule is engendred of an horse and an asse and so some likewise have conceited that the Faunes and Satyres were the off-spring of such generation As Hierom in the life of Antonie reporteth that such an one appeared unto him in the wildernesse with goats feet long crooked nailes and hornes upon his head and spake unto Antonie but either this may be held to be a fable foisted under Hieromes name or if there were any such thing it might be some monster of the wildernesse which the Devill used as his trunke to speake out of QVEST. VI. Spirits doe not generate BUt much more absurd is the opinion of Paulus Burgensis that thinketh these which companied with the daughters of men were spirits called Incubi which doe assume bodies of the aire for a time representing the shape sometime of men sometime of women in the act of generation and then they are called Succubi and thus saith he were the Giants engendred and Tostatus approoving this conceit of Incubi and Succubi seemeth to give credit to that report of Merlin that he was begotten by a spirit In these assertions and uncertaine conjectures of men some what is true some part false 1. True it is that the Devill may appeare in the shape of man or woman and dissemble and counterfeit the act proper to both not that the spirits have any delight in such carnall acts having no true but assumed and counterfeit bodies but they doe it more strongly to delude men and women and entice them to that abominable sinne of the flesh which they know hath corrupted the hearts of many excellent men as of David Salomon 2. Though spirits can take upon them the shape of bodies yet they are but so to the eye they are not true bodies being easily