do was to administer the outward Element but Christ could give the spirit by means of the outward Baptism so that Iohn here depresseth himself advanceth Christ it being Christ alone who bestoweth what the outward Baptism signifieth I indeed have baptized you with water but he shal baptize you with the Holy Ghost He saith they agree not in the end for the end of Iohns Baptism was but to point and shew forth the other as the end of the shadow is to point to the substance Ans The Scripture speaking of Iohns Baptism calleth it the Baptism of repentance for the remission of sins Mark 1.4 intimating that its end was to signify and seale remission of sin which likewise is the end of Christs Baptism Act. 2.38 Now Iohns Baptism and Christs agreeing not onely in the Authour but also in the matter and end this proveth thar there is no substantial difference between them Object They differ in substance for it is written Act. 19 2.3.4.5 that there were of the Baptism of Iohn who had not so much as heard of the Holy Ghost Answer The meaning is not that they heard not of the person of the Holy Ghost being Disciples and Believers they could not be totally ignorant of this doubtless they were acquainted with the Scriptures and from thence they could not but know that there was a Holy Ghost But the thing they were ignorant of was the visible miraculous and extraordinary gifts of the Holy Ghost which then flourished in the Church and yet were not common to all that were Baptized Act. 8.15.16 they prayed for them that they might receive the Holy Ghost for as yet he was fallen upon none of them onely they were baptized in the Name of the LORD JESUS The Apostle did not anew baptize those persons that had been baptized with the Baptism of Iohn onely he gave a right explanation of Iohns Baptism and then laid hands on them upon which followed the gifts of the Holy Ghost viz speaking with tongues and prophesying verse 6. SECT II. Shewing that Baptism with Water is an Ordinance of CHRIST and to be continued in the Church He addeth That where Christ commands his Disciples to baptize Matth. 28. there is no command to baptize with water Answ The subsequent practise of the Apostles may satisfy sober persons that Christs command had reference to baptizing with water Can there be a better comment upon the command then Apostolical practise And it is observable that when Philip had preacht Christ to the Eunuch and it would seeme had informed him of the ordinance of Baptism however it is sure the knowledge of it he had immediatly upon the sight of water he desired to be baptized Act. 8.37 see here is water what doth hinder me to be baptized And that command of Christs Matth. 28. to his Apostles as it doth not expresly speake of Baptism with water so neither of Baptism with the spirit and therefore if the Quaker exclude the one he may likewise exclude the other Object It is said baptize into the Name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost and this is Baptism with the spirit Answ This is affirmed but without proof The Name of GOD hath various acceptations and how doth he make good that it is taken here in his sense and not any other way If by baptizing into the Name of GOD he meane regenerating of men making them just and holy like GOD Then I say this was commanded before when our Lord said go teach or disciple all nations doth not this imply an endeavour to make them holy and righteous And therefore if Baptizing them into the Name of GOD import the same thing this would inferre a needless tautology in the command of Christ which the GOD of wisdom will not owne in so short a summe of words He addeth page 50. That Peters words in baptizing Cornelius after he had received the spirit imply no command Ans Is it not totidem verbis in plaine terms said he commanded them to be baptized in the Name of the LORD Act 10.48 and the Scripture phrase of doing a thing in the Name of the LORD is as much as doing it at his command and by authority and warrand from him Matth. 18.20 Where two or three are gathered together in my Name that is in obedience to my command there am I in the midst of them Object That the Apostles received no commission to baptize with water is clear from that of Paul where he saith I thank GOD I baptized none of you but Crispus and Gaius and the houshold of Stephanus for I was not sent to baptize but to preach the Gospel 1. Cor. 1. Answer If the Apostle had no commission to baptize with water how was it then that he thus baptized some He would not have done this of his own head and self-will Paul should have sinned in baptizing any at all without commission and therefore we gather that he was sent indeed to Baptize but his principal mission was to Preach and this is not an adding to Scripture but the true meaning of it which will be further cleare by comparing it with Hos 6.6 for I desired mercy and not sacrifice Now it is certaine that sacrifice was a thing that GOD required but mercy was the principal thing it was not so much sacrifice as mercy that GOD called for Even so Christ sent Paul not so much to Baptize as to Preach he sent him principally to Preach as being a more principal work The Quakers instance about worshipping of Images is altogether impertinent the Religious worshipping of them more or less is absolutly forbidden But Paul had not such an absolute prohibition as to baptizing with water otherwise he had not adventured upon the baptizing of any He saith That Scripture Matth. 28.19 relateth to the Baptism of the Spirit and not to Baptism with Water Arsw Because this is the maine Scripture that the continuance of VVater Baptism is grounded upon it will be needful to clear that by Baptism here is intended not the Baptism of the spirit but Baptism with water For making out of which two things are to be remarked 1. That the Baptism here mentioned is held forth to be the action of the Apostles hence Christ said to them go and teach all Nations Baptizing them Now to baptize with the Spirit is spoken of as the peculiar action of Christ to ascribe to men a power of Baptizing with the Spirit is to attribute to them what is peculiar to Christ Matth. 3.11 he that cometh after me is mightyer then I he shal baptize with the Holy Ghost 2. The Baptism of the spirit is a sanctifying renewing operation of the spirit in and upon the heart Now if this Baptism were here intended then the duty commanded should be confounded with the promise for the promise is I will be with you that is by the assistance presence and powerful operation of my spirit accompanying your labours making them effectual upon
safer way can there be of trying then that for which the Beraeans are commended even in trying the Apostles themselves They searched the Scriptures whether these things were so Act. 17.11 and Christ appealed to the Scriptures Ioh. 5.39 He saith cannot the spirits be tryed by the Spirit of God How tryed Peter the spirit of Ananias and Saphirah And is not the tryal and discerning of spirits the priviledge of the Saints now Ans We are speaking about the trying of Doctrines now Ananias and Saphirah their failing was not in a matter of Doctrine but of Fact by lying in keeping back paâ—â— of the price of the possession which Peter knew extraordinarily as appears by the miraculous effect that attended his reproving of this sin which was their suddaine death and present giving up of the Ghost Act. 5.5 As for discerning of spirits if thereby he either intend the knowledge of the secret conceptions and inward thoughts of mens spirits or a certaine infallible knowledge who be truely spiritual and who not It is not the priviledge of the Saints now neither was it ever a priviledge common to all the Saints 1. Cor. 12.10 to another is given the working of miracles to anothter discerning of spirits Though the Saints have that anointing in them which teacheth them all things yet as hereby external teaching is not excluded for Iohn himself was now teaching in writting this very Epistle to them so is not trying of the spirits by an external rule the anointings teaching may well consist with bringing Doctrines to the Touch-stone of the Word doth not the anointing or the spirit direct us to the law and testimony And if they speak not according to this word it is because there is no light in them He saith were there any more strongly deluded then the Pharisees yet how much did they lay claime to the scriptures how came they to be deluded who were so skilled in the scriptures according to the letter of them Ans That the Pharisees were deluded the Scripture is not to be blamed for this the fault was in their blindness hence they are so often called blind guids Matth. 23.16.24.26 It is granted that deluded souls such as are unlearned and unstable may and do wrest the scriptures unto their own destruction 2. Pet. 3.16 But yet there is enough said in the Scriptures by which delusions might be discovered and controversies ended If men would be humble and studious in the use of helps and means bringing not discutiendi acumen a disputing head but discendi pietatem a pious heart desirous to be instructed And for further clearing of our mind in this it is to be considered that albeit we look upon the scriptures as a rule for finding out truth and deciding controversies yet that we may be right discerners we judge a work of the spirit necessary for removing our natural depravedness perversness and ignorance so that though the scripture be sufficient for discovering delusions and ending differences in genere objecti yet the spirit is necessary in genere causae effectivae He addeth page 30. Though the same deluding spirit who deceived first may deceive over againe that makes nothing against the insufficiency of the spirit to discover the delusion Answer We blaime not the spirit for mens falling into delusion at first or for their continuance in delusions Who can charge the spirit with insufficiency as if he could not discover the tricks and deceits of Satan Yet persons who reject the Scripture refussing it to be the rule pretending onely to an inward rule they provoke the spirit to give them up to delusions and open a gap for a deluding spirit to enter in May not the History of I. Galpen once a Quaker be an admonition and warning to all that Sect who by casting off external teaching and hearkning to a voice within was put upon mischievous and detestable practises Sometimes he was led to the Fidlers house and being told it was such a mans house he answered be it whose house it will Christ led me hither and hither I must go Then was his hand forced to knock at the dore and a voice bad him say behold Christ stands at the dore and knocks Otherwhile he was carried upon his hands and knees out of the dores into the street and when his wife would have stopt him he said he must not be stopt he must forsake wife children and all to follow Christ Sometimes he was forced to take up a knife and to put it to his throat and the voice said open a hole there and I will give eternal life But in the end the Lord was pleased to give him repentance whereupon he published a narration of those things to discover the danger of these wayes and to be for caution of others to take heed how they go out of Gods wayes and forsake his ordinances lest falling into the errour of the wicked they decline from their former stedfastnesse and lest not receiving the love of the truth that they might be saved God give them over to strong delusions to believe a lie See this History set down largly by Mr. Samuel Clark in his book called the Mirrour for Saints and sinners SECT IV. The Quakers way is ineffectual to convince an Opposer Quakers in their way cannot convince a Gainsayer for what they call truth others differing from them call delusion and errour and how can they produce any evidence that they are not deluded for the conviction of an unbeliever who knoweth not the testimony of the spirit in them And himself hath not the spirit being in the number of those who are without GOD and without the Spirit Suppose one say that he hath a testimony of the spirit to assure him of his gracious state I would ask whether the testimony of the spirit be any otherwise then according to the Word of GOD It is like Quakers will confesse that every testimony speaking peace being contrary to the word that testimony is not the voice of the spirit of the Lord but the voice of the spirit of delusion Now I would ask if tryal by the word be neglected how is it possible to know whether this testimony speake according to the word or whether it speake contrary to the word If Quakers say that they are assured by the same spirit that gives the testimony that it is according to the word and other evidence they need not look after the voice of the spirit that speaks in them is that beyond which there needs no enquiry Then I aske again how can Quakers convince deluded persons who pretend to the testimony of the spirit in reference to their gracious state For they perswade themselves that it is the voice of the spirit that speaks peace to them and other evidence they will not look after the testimony of the spirit is that beyond which there must be no enquity Now will not Quakers according to their principles be so far from convincing such of their mistake
that they will rather confirme them in their deceit Now according to us scripture is the rule which lyes patent open to both parties And therfore a Papist of great note is faine to acknowledge that Scripturis nihil est certius nihil est notius i. e. nothing is more certaine and more evident then the Scriptures And this is profitable 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is for conviction and as was said though the Scriptures do not actually convince the stubborn and stiff-heretick yet there is so much in them as may satisfy an inquisitive adversary who is willing to know right from wrong and truth from errour Appollos mightily convinced the Jews by the Scriptures It is inconsequential to argue that the Scripture or written word is not the rule to us to whom GOD hath set down his mind in write because it was not a rule to them who lived when the Scripture or written word was not As for the Prophets the event of what they foretold was that whereby they were to be tryed Deut. 18.22 When a Prophet speaketh in the Name ef the LORD if the thing follow not that is the thing which the LORD hath not spoken but the Prophet hath spoken presumptuously thou shalt not be affraid of him Ierem. 28.9 The Prophet which prophesieth of peace when the word of the LORD shal come to passe then shal the Prophet be known that the Lord hath sent him But because GOD for the tryall of his people may sometimes suffer such things to fall out as false-prophets fortell Deut. 13.2 Therefore when men pretend themselves to be prophets sent of GOD their doctrine must be brought to the rule and touch-stone of GODS written word and thereby examined Esay 8.20 He saith page 31. that we disjoyne the word and the spirit because many preach and read the scriptures and talk of them without the joyn'd concurrence of the spirit which they ought not to do Answer He hath not offered to prove that the Scriptures should not be read or spoken of without the concurrence of the spirit unless that be his proof we say they ought not to do but upon what ground do ye say so 1. The command for reading and speaking of the Scriptures hath not this condition annexed to it that we should read and speak of the scriptures onely when we have a concurrence of the spirit and never but then where is there such a condition mentioned 2. What shal be the carriage of wicked persons who are strangers to the drawings and motion of the spirit must the Bible be to them as an Almanack out of date Shal it be to them as a book useless to look into 3. When the Saints want the concurrence of the spirit may they not read and talk of the Scriptures as a mean of good to their souls Hovv many cold hearts have been rubbed and chaffed into spiritual heat by reading and talking of the Scriptures In so doing the Lord hath met vvith them and made their hearts to burne within them Now though the scriptures may be read and spoken of without the concurrence of the spirit Yet to affirme this is not to disjoyne the Scriptures and the spirit separating the one from the other for still the Scriptures remaine to be the endytment of the spirit being spoken and breathed forth by the spirit Act. 28.25 Well spake the Holy Ghost by Isaias the prophet unto our fathers Act. 1.16 this scripture must needs have been fulfilled which the holy Ghost spake by the mouth of David Marke the Scriptures which Dav d and others of the Prophets penned they are the breathings forth of the Holy Ghost himself Why doth the Quaker complaine so much for my improving Esay 59.21 as if it made so much against me whereas it is directly to that purpose which it was alledged for namely that GODS Spirit and word go together and doth not the Lord here promise that the Spirit and Word should continue with his Church and People to direct and instruct them in all necessaries throughout all ages sucessivly even unto the end of the world He asketh cannot dead things kill if men feed upon them Answ There is no doubt of it yet the Scripture or that part of Scripture which is called the law is said to be killing in such a way as dead things are not And therefore this killing Letter is spoken of as being the ministration of death and the ministration of condemnation For the Law threatens death against the sinner and curseth every one that abideth not in all things that are written therein 2. Cor. 6.7.9 Now are the dead things which the Quaker reckons up thus killing It shal not be denyed but feeding upon sand gravel stones c. will prove deadly and destructive to the body even as the drinking in of the lifeless poysonous opinions of Quakers will prove hurtful and destructive to the soul SECT V. Quakers have learned their Language about the Scriptures from Papists Now any may perceive a Popish designe in all the Quakers reasonings against the Scriptures for both Papists and they joyne in studing to disgrace them Herein they very much resemble one another Ye may hear how Quakers lisp after the Papists and concurre with them in speaking the language of Ashdod Do not Papists call the Scriptures Do not Quakers say of them 1. A nose of wax or a rule of lead which may be bowed every way as men please If the delusion be strong in the heart will it not twine the Scriptures without to cause the scriptures to seem for it 2. Papists call the Scriptures inky Divinity paper and parchment Quakers speake of the Scriptures as a dead letter 3. Papists blaime the Scriptures the reading of them by the Laity as that which causeth controversies multiplyeth both Heresies and Sects Quakers say ye that set up the Scriptures as a rule what Sects what jangling and contesting is among you 4. Papists preferre the Church before the Scripture Quakers prefer the light within hence they say that it is by the inward dispensation that the outward dispensation of the Gospel is serviceable without which it hath no service at all 5. Papists contemne and vilify the Scriptures Quakers will not have the Scriptures to be so much as a copy to thē but the Spirit is both their teacher and their copy and if they walk according to this by looking upon it and eyeing it they shal be good scholars and proficients they need not go forth for a copy 6. Papists say the church was judge before the Scriptures were written Quakers say there was a rule before the Scriptures were written 7. Papists deny the Scriptures to be the principal compleat rule of faith And Quakers do the same So true is that of Tertullian CHRIST is alwayes crucified between two theives He denyeth That that more sure word of prophesie 2. Pet. 1.19 is the scripture Answer Had it not been meet not onely to have denyed this but
He asketh Why I cite Ephes 4.11 Answer To shew that Christ appointed Ministers to be in his Church and here is touched the principal and publick Officers given to his Church whereof the three first were extraordinary and but temporary and the three last ordinary and perpetual For should these cease as the former Then Christ might come under that imputation of not being faithful to his promise who gave them to continue till we all come in the unity of the faith unto a perfect man He addeth That it is owned by them that the Ministry is not common yet that hinders not but that any of them may speake when the saints are met together according to 1. Cor. 14.31 Answer I would aske how he can make out that the prophesying mentioned in that place is an ordinary Office And if it be extraordinary then it can be no foundation for Quakers to build an ordinary practise upon Besides when it is said ye may all prophesie one by one it is not to be understood of all the members of the Church indifferently for some are forbidden expresly to speak in the Church verse 34. And therefore that all must be referred to the Prophets all the Prophets may prophesie and the same Apostle saith all are not Prophets 1. Cor. 12.29 He alledgeth it is not proved that some are called to the Ministry īmediatly without the intervention of men and some mediatly by men authorized for that purpose Answer Were not the Prophets and Apostles called immediatly The Lord sent them by his own immediat command Amos. 7.15 Matth. 16.1.6.7 was nor Timothy set a part to the work mediatly by the laying on of the hands of the Presbytery 1. Timothy 4.14 And it was given him in charge to lay hands suddainly on no man 1. Tim. 5.22 we deny not but such recorded in Scripture as had a mediat outward Call to the Ministry had also an inward Call that is competent qualifications gifts and abilities for the work but it must be observed that the inward call and immediat call are not the same thing In Scripture the one is opposed to the other Paul who was immediatly called to be an Apostle opposeth himself 1. To false Apostles who were called by the meer authority of men 2. He opposes himself to ordinary Ministers who might have an inward call from GOD and an outward call from men appointed by GOD for this work see Gal. 1.1 Paul an Apostle not of men neither by man but by Jesus Christ. He addeth That they who come preaching the Gospel not in speach onely but also in power and in the Holy Ghost and in the evidence and demonstration of the spirit give sufficient proof that they are called of GOD. Answer Methinks then he should have more favourable thoughts of PROTESTANT MINISTERS who have been and are powerful Preachers of the Gospel being able to give as evidences of their mission from GOD besides their competent qualifications and ordination to the Ministry the success of and some dayly assistance of the Spirit in their Labours and yet the Quaker in the heat and anger of their spirits do not spare such But stepping up to the Throne of Judgement they impiously censure them as deceivers hypocrites and children of the Devil He maketh much ado page 58. as if we were falling in with Papists in pleading for miracles when as it is known we do not pretend to the doing of miracles onely if men be so bold as to assert an immediat call which the Quakers do such as the Apostles had we think it meet that they shew the signs of their Apostoleship and the tokens of their immediat call which hath been alwayes accompanyed either with the working of miracles foretelling of things to come or some other extraordinary thing Ionah foretold the destruction which within fourty dayes was to come upon Nineveh Iohns call was attended with extraordinary things at his conception and birth and there were singular predictions concerning him Object So there are special predictions concerning the Lords pouring forth of his Spirit upon many in these latter dayes to prophesie Answer I suppose the special prediction which he aimes at is Joel 2.28 now this prediction was accomplished in the extraordinary pouring forth of the Spirit upon the Apostles when they were filled with the Holy Ghost and began to speak with tongues the Apostle urgeth this as the accomplishment of that promise in Joel see Act. 2.15.16.17 When Quakers can manifest that Scripture predictions of preparing the way of the Lord are applyed to them by Angels and confirmed by the testimony of Christ as they were to Iohn we shal then look upon them as called as he was but not till then He saith that Tit. 1.5 Act. 14.23 Prove not that those Elders had not the Call of the Spirit of GOD in themselves Answer What ever inward call they might have yet they had not an immediat call which is by the immed at voice and command of GOD without the intervention of men and therefore in that Moses consecrated Aaron it followeth that his call was not immediat but rather an extraordinary mediat call and yet he was called of GOD being set a part in that way which the Lord had prescribed and appointed SECT II. Proving the continuance of the MINISTRIE He addeth that my proof from Ephes 4.12.13 is altogether impertinent because we are against the perfection of the Sa nts in this life Answer This is a pregnant and pertinent proof to bold forth the continuance of the Ministry the terme whereof is the day of judgement For this Ministry must cōtinue till all the Elect come meet in that compleat unity not onely of opinion but also of he art and affection which is called the unity of the faith and it is that which the Saints shal attaine unto being come to the state and degree of perfection in the life to come which state is here called a perfect man Neither can it be gathered from verse 14. that this perfection is on earth where the Apostle onely sheweth that the Ministry of the word is a meane ordained by God to preserve keep his People from the poyson of dangerous errours and from the snares of subtile crafty seducers It is true the Ministry is given for perfecting of the Saints and hereby as a meane they are brought to perfection in parts and pressed to seek after an absolute full perfection even in degrees Now in casting of the Ministry that we plead for namely a Ministry according to the order delivered by the Apostles and prescribed in the word Quakers manifest themselves to be enemies to the Ministry of Christ and injurious to their own souls XIII HEAD Concerning the SABBATH SECT I. The observation of the SABBATH is warranted by the fourth Command He addeth page 59. That as the fourth Command requireth the observation of one day of seven so it expresly instanceth that day to be the seventh Ans Though the
Testament Though the inward testimony of the spirit be of great use to perswade and assure us of the divine authority of the scripture yet it is false to affirme that this can be proved no other way but by the spirits inward testimony there are other arguments whereby the authority of the scripture may be convincingly and solidly proved against Turks and Pagans and all Anti-scripturists whatsoever Let me crave leave to put Quakers in minde of one argument which is excellently improved by that judicious servant of GOD Mr. Baxter in his book of the Saints rest page 239. Where he thus reasoneth if the Scriptures be neither the invention of Devils nor of men then they can be from none but GOD he takes it for granted that good Angels could not be guilty of forging the scriptures now he proves at length it would be needless to set down here the full proof of this argument because the book is common and in the hands of many that the Scripture is not the invention of Devils that no meer men were the inventers of Scripture it was neither devised by good men nor by bad men then sure by no man and consequently must of necessity proceed from GOD. When the Ancient Fathers had to do with Pagans who were strangers to the inward testimony of the spirit they made use of other arguments in proving the Scriptures Divinity such as the Heavenliness of the matter the Majestie of the style the efficacy of the Doctrine the verity of the predictions and by these and such like arguments they confounded the learnedst Pagans And JOHN CALVIN lib. 1. cap. 7. of his Instit plainly supposeth that there are other arguments besids the testimony of the spirit to prove the divine authority of the Scriptures saith he verum quidem est si argumentis agere libeat multa posse in medium preferri quae facile evincant siquis est in Coelo DEUS Legem Prophetias Evangelium ab eo manasse i. e. True indeed it is that if we pleased to deale by arguments many things might be produced that may easily prove that if there be a GOD in Heaven that the Law the Prophets and the Gospel came from him Now seeing the Quakers have cited CALVIN I would advise them to look to the 9. chapter wherein be fully sheweth that fanatical men who forsaking scripture betake themselves unto revelation do overturne all principles of godliness He saith that Ioh. 5.39 may be translated ye search the scriptures as Pasor translateth the words Ans The same Pasor speaking of that scripture the kingdom of God is within you 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he rendereth the words in medio vestro in sinu gentis vestrae that is in the midst of you in the bosome of your nation and yet the Quakers will not admit of this translation It is confessed that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is taken by some even PROTESTANT Writters in the indicative mood though by that which followes it appears to be imperative rather then indicative for the great controversie at that time was whether Christ was the Son of GOD and the true Messiah now Christ remits them to the scriptures which the Jews deservedly had in high esteeme as bearing witnesse unto him search the scriptures and they are they which testify of me As who would say peruse them frequently search them diligentlie digging for these heavenly treasures as men do for gold who break every clod that they may find the golden oare Neither doth Christ check them when he saith in them ye think to have eternal life this was a true thought as to the scriptures pointing out the way to Eternal life 2. Tim. 1.10 Seeing the Quaker page 29. granteth that the scriptures are profitable for doctrine correction reproof instruction in righteousness why then doth he not acknowledge them to be a perfect rule of faith and manners VVhat more can be requisite to prove their perfection then their teaching truth confuting errour reproving sin and discovering duty There is enough said and delivered in the Scripture to direct us in things to be believed and practised and if the Scriptures do not actually profit us for this end the blaime is to be laid at the door of our ignorance and perversnesse Now the scriptures are thus profitabe that the man of God may be perfect i. e. That the Minister of Jesus Christ may be compleate and every way fitted for the work of his Calling for though any man led by the spirit of GOD may in a general sense be called the man of God yet the Lord honours his Ministers with this tittle and peculiarly attributs it to them 1. Sam. 2.27 and 9.6 1. King 17.18 SECT III. Shewing that the Spirit within is not the Rule In stead of answering my argument proving that the Spirit within is not the rule he saith did these Jews receive Christ who had the scriptures Did they not reject him and why Because they hearkned not to the inward voice and testimony of the Father concerning him and this was the testimony which he said was greater then that of John Ans Look into the place where Christ speaks of this testimony and it will be found that it is no inward voice of the Father there spoken of See Ioh. 5.36 I have a greater witness then that of John for the works which the Father hath given me to finish the same works that I do bear witness of me That is his works in doing miracles these were a more convincing witness of Christs being the promised Messiah then that of John And therefore when Iohns Disciples askt saying art thou he that shal come or do we look for another Jesus answered go and shew John these things which ye do hear and see the blind receive their sight c. As for that testimony which the Father gave concerning Christ verse 37. it was not an inward voice and testimony but an outward audible voice from Heaven Matth. 3.17 compared with 2. Pet. 1.17.18 And Christ reproveth the unbelieving Jews in that they were ignorant of the Father though they gloried so much of him as being the people whose Progenitors had heard the voice of GOD Deut. 4.12 Now Christ sheweth that all this was nothing to them for they were strangers to such manifestations of GOD and they looked not like that people whose Ancestors had heard so much of GOD ye have neither heard his voice nor seen his shape He saith there is not any word 1. Ioh. 4.1 of trying the spirits by the scriptures Answer It is sufficient if there be warrand in other places though no express mention of it in this for trying the spirits by the scripture Now seeing every spirit is not to be believed that is every doctrine propounded as received by inspiration from Gods spirit false teachers will be as ready as any to boast of the spirit and therefore we must try from what spirit their doctrine cometh And what surer and