not for himself or People he cannot die and he deriveth his Power from none but himself But 't is certain that the Lord Christ could not himself without the previous Ordination of the Father confer the prime Dignities of Heaven or of the Church He placed his Safety in the Father's Presence and Help He prayed often and fervently to the Father both for himself and for his Disciples He died and was raised from the dead by the Father After his Resurrection he received of another that great Power which he now injoyeth Matth. 20. 23. To sit on my right Hand and on my left is not mine to give but it shall be given to them for whom it is prepared of my Father John 8. 29. He that sent me is with me and the Father hath not left me alone for I always do those things that please him Luke 22. 42. Father if thou be willing remove this Cup from me Heb. 5. 7. Who in the Days of his Flesh offered up Prayers and Supplications with strong Crying and Tears unto him that was able to save him John 17. 20. Neither pray I for these alone but for them also which shall believe in me through their Word Ephes 1. 19 20. According to the mighty working of his Power which he wrought in Christ when he raised him from the dead Matth. 28. 18. Jesus came and spake to them saying All Power is given to me 7. Jesus Christ is in holy Scripture always spoken of as a distinct and different Person from God and described to be the Son of God and the Image of God Rom. 16. 27. To God only wise be Glory through Jesus Christ. Luke 18. 19. Why callest thou me good there is none good save one that is God. 1 Tim. 2. 5. There is one God and one Mediator between God and Men the Man Jesus Christ. John 13. 18. He that believeth not is condemned already because he hath not believed on the Name of the only begotten Son of God. Luke 1. 35. The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee Blessed Mary and the Power of the Highest shall overshadow thee therefore also or and therefore the Holy thing that is born of thee shall be called the Son of God. Col. 1. 15. The Image of the invisible God. ' Tis. say the Socinians as impossible that the Son or Image of the one true God should himself be that one true God as that the Son should be the Father and the Image that very thing whose Image it is which they take to be simply impossible and contradictory to common sense which Religion came not to destroy but to improve Whereas to these arguings 't is objected that these things are in Holy Scripture spoken of Christ according to only his humane Nature or as he is a Man but that he is also God the Son though united to an humane Nature that is to an humane Soul and Body The Socinians reply that there is in Scripture no real Foundation for such a Conceit that 't is inconsistent with almost all the Texts already cited especially those in which the Lord Christ is spoken of as a distinct and different Person from God and that there are many other Considerations and Passages of holy Scripture which no less than demonstrate it to be false As 8. Because so many Texts expresly declare that only the Father is God John 17. 1 2 3. Father this is Life eternal that they know thee the only true God and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent or Jesus Christ thy Messenger 1 Cor. 8. 6. But to us there is but one God the Father of whom are all things and we in him and one Lord or Master i. e. Teacher by whom are all things In the Greek thus One Lord Jesus Christ for whom are all things and we for him See the Note on Heb. 1. 2. in the Fourth Letter Eph. 4. 4 5 6. One Spirit one Lord one God and Father of all who is above all 1 Cor. 15. 24. Then 〈◊〉 the End when he Christ ver 23. shall deliver up the Kingdom to God even the Father Jam. 3. 9. Therewith with the Tongue ver 8. bless we God even the Father Rom. 15. 6. With one Mind and with one Mouth glorify God even the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ 9. If Christ were indeed God as well as Man or as Trinitarians speak God the Son incarnate in an humane Nature it had been altogether superfluous to give the Holy Spirit to his said humane Nature as a Director and Guide For what other help could that Nature need which was one Person with as they speak God the Son and in which God the Son did personally dwell Luke 4. 1. Jesus being full of the Holy Ghost departed from Jordan Acts 1. 2. After that he through the Holy Ghost i. e. through direction and motion of the holy Spirit and Inspiration of God had given Commandments unto the Apostles Acts 10. 38. God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost 10. Had the Lord Christ been as Trinitarians speak God the Son joyned to an humane Nature he could not have ascribed his miraculous Works to the Holy Ghost or to the Father dwelling in him but to the Son dwelling in him and united to him Matth. 12. 28. I cast out Devils by the Spirit of God. John 14. 10. The Father that dwelleth in me he doeth the Works John 5. 30. I can do nothing of my self Acts 2. 22. Jesus of Nazareth a Man approved of God among you by Miracles and Wonders and Signs which God did by him in the midst of you 11. Had our Lord been more than a Man the Prophecies of the Old Testament in which he is promised would not describe him barely as the Seed of the Woman the Seed of Abraham a Prophet like unto Moses the Servant and Missionary of God on whom God's Spirit should rest Gen. 3. 5. I will put Enmity between thy Seed and her Seed Her Seed is by all Interpreters understood to be Christ Gen. 22. 18. In thy Seed shall all the Nations of the Earth be blessed This again is universally interpreted of Christ Deut. 18. 18. I will raise them up a Prophet from among their Brethren like unto thee and I will put my Words into his Mouth This is interpreted of our Lord Christ in many Texts of the New Testament as John 1. 45. and Acts 3. 22. and Acts 7. 37. Isai 41. 1. Behold my Servant whom I uphold mine Elect in whom my Soul delighteth I will put my Spirit upon him and he shall bring forth Judgment to the Gentiles This is interpreted of Christ Matth. 12. 17 18. Now that the Holy Ghost or Spirit is only the Power and Inspiration of God at least is not himself God they hold is ascertained by these Considerations 1. The Holy Ghost or Spirit and the Power of God are spoken of as one and the same thing 1 Cor. 2. 4 5. My preaching was not with enticing Words
Psal 95. 9 10. Your Fathers tempted me forty years long was I grieved with this Generation These words spoken by and of God are interpreted of the Holy Ghost Heb. 3. 7 9 10. As saith the Holy Ghost your Fathers tempted me c. Answ As saith the Holy Ghost that is As saith the Holy Spirit or Inspiration of God by the Mouth of the Prophet David So Estius Piscator Capellus Grotius c. Note that in the Psalmist's words there is an Enallage of the Person frequent in the Hebrew and especially in the Psalms Me for Him and I for He. 10. Psal 97. 7. Worship him all ye Gods or all ye Angels These words though spoken of God are interpreted of Christ Heb. 1. 6. Again when he bringeth the first-begotten into the World he saith And let all the Angels of God worship him Answ In the Greek 't is When he bringeth again the first-begotten into the World that is when he raised Christ from the dead who is his first-begotten from the dead he commandeth let even all the Angels of God worship him 'T is uncertain whether St. Paul had any respect to the Words in the Psalm but if he had he doth not quote the Words of the Psalmist as if they were spoken of Christ but only declareth the Decree of God known to him by the Spirit for subjecting the Angels to Christ in the same words that the Psalmist had used on another occasion because they are words most proper to express that Decree for the Writers of the New Testament generally affect to speak in Scripture Language 11. Psal 102. 25. Of old hast thou laid the Foundation of the Earth c. This seems applied to Christ Heb. 1. 10 11 12 13. And thou Lord in the Beginning hast laid the Foundation of the Earth but to which of the Angels said he at any time Sit on my right Hand Answ Thomas Aquinas hath rightly acknowledged that the Words of both these Texts may be understood of God only not of Christ The Context of the Hebrews hath this sense And thou Lord that is and in another Text of the Psalms 't is said Thou Lord. So Estius Camerarius Grotius hast laid the Foundation of the Earth But to which of the Angels said he i. e. said the Founder of the Earth c. sit on my right Hand as he saith to Christ at Psal 110. 1. For though Psal 110. 1. is literally designed of David yet you Hebrews knowing that David was a Type of Christ do also apply the Words there sit on my right Hand unto the Messias or Christ 12. Psal 110. 1. The Lord said unto my Lord Sit on my right Hand until I make thine Enemies thy Footstool It appears by Matth. 22. 43. that the Jews understood these words of David as spoken of God and Christ and therefore our Saviour puts this Question to them how Christ could be David's Son for they were it should seem commonly taken to be David's Words if he was David's Lord which can no way be answered but by saying he was David's Son according to the Flesh and David's Lord as he was God. Answ Our Saviour's Words are David in Spirit calleth him Lord saying The Lord said unto my Lord Sit on my right Hand that is David in the Spirit of Prophecy foreseeing Christ calls him his Lord. But he calleth him so not because Christ is God for if that were true himself could have made his Enemies his Footstool but because not only the Spirits of David and all Saints but even Angels are in Heaven made subject to Christ and that as the Reward of his most Holy Life and obsequious and acceptable Death 1 Pet. 3. 22. Phil. 2. 8 9. But note that when the Psalmist says the Lord said unto my Lord the Lord said is to be understood he hath in decree said he hath decreed it shall be so So Dr. Patrick in his Paraphrase on this Text. 13. Psal 110. 3. Thy People shall be willing in the day of thy Power in the beauty of Holiness from the womb of the Morning thou hast the Dew of thy Youth Answ This Text as 't is in the English Translation is wholly unintellible Seb. Castalio has as he is wont made a probable and elegant sense from the Hebrew thus Thy People or thy Troops shall be chearful when with sacred Majesty thou goest to Battel thou shalt have innumerable Youth The words are spoken to David 14. Psal 139. 7. Whither shall I go from thy Spirit Answ From thy Spirit is an Hebrew Phrase for From thee Like as when 't is said of Moses Psal 106. 33. They provoked his Spirit the undoubted meaning is They provoked Him. So also Eph. 4. 30. Grieve not the holy Spirit of God is an Hebraism for Grieve not God. 15. Prov. 8. 24. When there were no depths I was brought forth Answ Solomon speaketh here of the Quality or Faculty of Wisdom by which God and Men order their Affairs wisely That he meaneth not as some have fancied the Son or the Spirit of God appears by the Gender he useth For he saith ver 2. She standeth in the top of high Places ver 3. She crieth at the gates and chap. 7. 4. Say unto Wisdom Thou art my Sister 16. Prov. 30. 4. Who hath ascended up into Heaven who hath established all the Ends of the Earth what is his Name and what is his Son's Name Answ Dr. S. Partick interpreteth this Verse thus Hath any Man ascended into Heaven who among Men hath gathered the Wind or fixed the Earth what is the Man's Name or his Sons 17. Isa 6. 1 8 9. I saw the Lord sitting upon a Throne I heard the Voice of the Lord go tell this People Hear ye indeed but understand not shut their Eyes c. This Appearance of God is ascribed to Christ John 12. 41. These things said Isaias when he saw his Glory the Words Go tell this People c. are ascribed to the Holy Spirit Acts 28. 25 26. Well spake the Holy Ghost by Isaias Go unto this People c. Answ 1. The Words in St. John are to be understood not of Christ but of God for God only is intended in the foregoing Verse as all confess 2. Accordingly the best Greek Bibles read that Text thus These things said Isaias when he saw God's Glory 3. The Texts in the Acts ascribeth the Words in the Prophet to the Holy Spirit because the Vision and all the Words there mentioned were a Scene wrought in the Prophet's Mind not exhibited to his outward senses by the Spirit or Power of God. 18. Isa 7. 14. A Virgin shall conceive and bare a Son and shall call his Name Immanuel 'T is added Matth. 1. 23. which being interpreted is God with us Answ 1. Matthew as all know wrote his Gospel in Hebrew and therefore did not interpret the Hebrew Name no more than the Prophet whose Words he cited had done before him We are not bound
Church but if they will often read and consider the Socinian sense of them they will soon discern that 't is not only a probable sense but the true and only sense of which these Texts are capable if we would reconcile them to the rest of Scripture and particularly to the many and clear Texts and Demonstrations cited and hinted in the first Letter SIR I am Yours A Third Letter TO A FRIEND Concerning the UNITARIANS Called also SOCINIANS Containing the Texts objected to them out of the Evangelists and Acts and their Answers Matth. 22. 29. Ye do err not knowing the Scriptures Printed in the Year 1687. A Third Letter Concerning the Unitarians called Socinians SIR IN this I give you the Texts of the Evangelists and Acts objected to the Socinian Doctrine concerning God our Lord Christ and the Holy Spirit and the Answers of the Socinians to the Arguments arising from them 1. Matth. 1. 23. They shall call his Name Immanuel which being interpreted is God with us Answ See on Isai 7. 14. 2. Matth. 2. 2. Where is he that is born King of the Jews for we are come to worship him Answ Neither the Hebrew Greek nor Latin Word for worship him import any more than a civil Worship and Honour And it was the manner over all the East and particularly among the Jews to prostrate to Kings 2 Sam. 19. 18. 1 Kings 1. 16 23 31. 2 Sam. 9. 6. 3. Mat. 9. 6. The Son of Man hath Power on Earth to forgive Sins Answ This is plainly spoken of Christ as he was a Man. God gave this Authority to the Lord Christ because he gave to him also to know what was in Mens Hearts namely whether their Repentance and outward Professions were sincere and lasting John 2. 24 25. Rev. 1. 1. 4. Mat. 11. 27. All things are delivered to me of my Father and no Man knoweth the Son but the Father c. Answ 1. If Christ were himself that one true God it could not be said here that another Person gave all things into his Hands 2. The most Orthodox Interpreters do understand all things here to be all things requisite for procuring and effecting the Redemption and Salvation of Men or all things necessary to the executing the Office of the Messias Whereas our Lord adds None knoweth the Son but the Father c. Maldonate and Grotius make the sense to be None but God knows what the Son's Office is or what he is to do and suffer in order to the Salvation of Men as on the other side none but the Son knows the Father's Mind concerning the way and means by which Mankind is to be redeemed and saved 5. Mat. 12. 31. Blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven Answ St. Austin and generally all judicious Interpreters by Blasphemy against the Holy Ghost or Spirit understand Mens ascribing with the Scribes and Pharisees in this Chapter the Miracles and Works done apparently by the Spirit or Power of God unto Magick or the Power of the Devil So that the Holy Ghost or Spirit is not in this Text a Person or a God but merely the Power of God. 6. Mat. 18. 20. Where two or three are gathered together in my Name there am I in the midst of them Matth. 28. 20. I am with you always even to the end of the World. Answ Christ is in the midst of and is with his People not by an immediate Presence as God is but by his most powerful Aid and Help which he affordeth partly by his continual and succesful Mediation with God for them all in general Heb. 7. 25. partly by the Angels who are under his Directions and by him engaged in the Defence of the Faithful Heb. 1. 14. 7. Matth. 26. 63. Tell us whether thou be the Christ the Son of God. Like to which Text are Matth. 14. 33. Mat. 16. 16. John 1. 49. Answ It being manifest that Princes are called Sons of God by the Psalmist Psal 82. 6. As also that Psal 2. 7. Thou art my Son is literally meant of David Hence it was that the Jews both then and now call the Messias the Son of God not because as some imagine they think he is God or is generated of the Divine Substance but because they expect he shall be a very great Prince an universal Monarch and therefore the Son of God in a more perfect and higher sense than David or other Princes are 8. Mat. 28. 19. Baptizing them in the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost Answ 1. To be baptized in the Name of a Person or Persons is a Rite by which one delivers himself to the Institution Instruction and Obedience of such Person or Persons so that to be baptized in the Name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost is to profess to be led and guided by them or as Grotius expresses this matter 't is to declare we will admit of no other thing as a part of our Religion but what proceeds from these that is nothing but what is commanded by God or the Father and has been delivered by his Son the Lord Christ and confirmed externally by the Miracles and internally with the Witness and Testimony of the Spirit that is of the Power and Inspiration of God. 2. 'T is in vain not to say ridiculously pretended that a Person or thing is God because we are baptized unto it or in the Name of it For then Moses and John Baptist also would be Gods 1 Cor. 10. 1 2. Our Fathers were all baptized unto Moses Acts 19. 3. Vnto what then were ye baptized and they said Vnto John's Baptism that is saith the Generality of Interpreters unto John and the Doctrine by him delivered Nor can it be doubted that to be baptized unto a Person or Persons and to be baptized in the Name of such Person or Persons is the same thing For 1. 'T is acknowledged by all that understand the Hebrew and Syriac Idioms 2. 'T is manifest by comparing some Texts of Scripture For what in some of them is called baptizing unto is in others called baptizing in the Name of Rom. 6. 3. As many of you as have been baptized into Jesus Christ or unto Jesus Christ for 't is the same Preposition in the Greek that is used of Moses 1 Cor. 10. 1 2. and of John Baptist Acts 19. 3. have been baptized into or unto his Death Gal. 3. 27. As many of you as have been baptized into Christ in the Greek unto Christ have put on Christ Acts 2. 38. Be baptized every one of you in the Name of Jesus Christ. Acts 8. 16. They were baptized in the Name of the Lord Jesus Who does not now see that to be baptized unto and in the Name of Christ or any other Person or thing are used as equivalent terms And accordingly the Fathers particularly Tertullian often say baptized unto the Father Son and Holy Ghost Nothing therefore can be inferred from this Text for the Godhead of the Son or Spirit because as now Christians are baptized unto them so the Jews were baptized unto Moses and John's Disciples
of the Lord Josh 24. 27. Are these things Persons Is it not evident that Actions proper to Persons are ascribed to them as well as to the Holy Spirit or Power and Inspiration of God by the Figure called Prosopopeia Briefly We ought to conceive thus of this matter a great Effusion of God's Inspiration and Power being to be given to the Disciples that it might be a continual Director and Guide when the Lord Christ was no more personally with them therefore this Guide is by the aforesaid Figure spoken of in such terms as if it were some Doctor Teacher and Advocate Hence it is said to reprove the World to guide into all Truth to intercede for us namely because it suggesteth Prayer and Affection in Prayer also not to speak of himself but to speak what he shall hear from God to receive of Christ's that is receive of God the Remainder of Christ's Doctrine and teach it to the Apostles For 't is to be noted that our Lord left some things to be taught by this Inspiration of God because the Disciples were not capable to hear and believe them till they had seen the great Miracles of our Lords Resurrection and Afcension into Heaven John 16. 12. I have yet many things to say to you but ye cannot bear them now Howbeit when the Spirit of Truth is come he shall guide you into all Truth The Spirit that guided the Apostles into all Truth was it not the meer Inspiration of God It is for the same Reason and by the same Figure that this Power and Inspiration of God in the Apostles is said to bear Witness John 15. 26. to search Mysteries 1 Cor. 2. 10. 11. to distribute Gifts 1 Cor. 12. 2. to appoint Bishops Acts 20. 28. to glorify Christ John 16. 14. Finally It appeared in the Form of a Dove on Christ and of Cloven Tongues on the Apostles Matth. 3. 16. Acts 2. 3 4. Because God conveyed this Divine Energy to the Lord Christ and to the Apostles in these outward Symbols which were fit Emblems of the Quality of the Gifts then bestowed The Dove signified the mild and peaceable Spirit of Christ and that the Power then conveyed to him should not be for the Damage or Hurt of Mankind The Tongues denoted that the Apostles did then and there receive the Gift or Faculty of speaking with many Tongues But what sense can the Trinitarians make of these things they say the Spirit is a Person and God did God receive and assume the Shape of a Dove that is of a Brute What hinders but that they may believe all the Transformations in the Metamorphosis of Ovid 29. John 16. 15. All things that the Father hath are mine Answ 1. St. Paul hath said as much of every Christian 1 Cor. 3. 21 22. All things are Yours things present things to come all are yours 2. All things in this Text of St. John are all things relating to the Christian Faith Doctrine and Discipline for it follows Therefore said I He the Spirit shall take of mine and shew it to you The meaning of the whole Passage is all things relating to the Doctrine and Discipline of the Christian Church which the Father hath in his Mind and Design are mine that is are known to me and shall for the most part of them be ordered by my self as for the rest which I my self do not discover or order the Spirit shall receive it and shew it to you 30. John 17. 5. Glorify me with thine own self with the Glory I had with thee before the World was Answ 1. St. Austin and many other learned and Orthodox Interpreters not only grant but contend that the meaning here is Let me now actually receive that Glory with thy self which I had with thee in thy Decree and Design before the World was This Interpretation is confirmed by this that the Sufferings of Christ were to precede his actual Glory 1 Pet. 1. 11. Searching what and what manner of time the Spirit did signify when it testified before-hand the Sufferings of Christ and the Glory that should follow 2. As 't is here said The Glory that I had with thee before the World was so 't is said 2 Cor. 5. 1. We have a Building of God an House not made with Hands Where we have is we have it in God's Decree and Intention or it is prepared for us 2 Tim. 1. 9. Grace was given us in Christ before the World was Where again was given to us is was given in God's Decree and Intention Therefore so also we may understand that Christ had Glory before the World was 31. John 17. 10. All mine are thine and thine are mine Answ It appears by the foregoing verse and by what follows that Christ speaks of such as were or should be his Disciples His meaning is all that are my Disciples are of thy giving to me and still remain thine and all that are true Servants and Lovers of God readily become mine that is Disciples to me 32. John 17. 24. For thou lovedst me from the Foundation of the World. Answ None can deny that God loved all the Elect from the Foundation of the World. To God all things are present not only what is past but what is to come is present to the Divine Mind and Knowledg 33. John 20. 28. Thomas answered and said unto him my Lord and my God Or O my Lord and O my God! For 't is an Attic Vocative Answ 1. Nestorius Patriarch of Constantinople was of Opinion that these Words were not designed to Christ but to God. For though the Evangelist saith Thomas answered and said unto him i. e. to Christ O my Lord and O my God. Yet the Exclamation might be addressed to God as it's Object tho it was also an Answer to our Saviour or in Answer to our Saviour and to what he had said at ver 27. Or if the Words were addressed to our Saviour also it may be admitted as true what others say here Namely 2. When Thomas had felt the Prints of the Spear and Nails in our Saviour's Side and Hands and was thereby fully satisfied that he was indeed risen again he breaks forth into this Exclamation the first part of which he directed to Christ the other to God. O my Lord are Words of Congratulation to our Saviour And O my God! Words of Admiration and Praise to God. 34. Acts 5. 3 4. Why hath Satan filled thine Heart to lie to the Holy Ghost Thou hast not lied unto Men but unto God. Answ Some of the most celebrated Interpreters among the Trinitarians have owned that this Text ought to be thus understood Why hast thou lied to the Holy Ghost i. e. to us Apostles who have thou knowest the Holy Spirit or Inspiration of God in us Thou hast not lied unto Men but unto God i. e. thou hast not hereby lied to Men only or chiefly but to God who is in us by his Spirit and Inspiration This
11. 1 Pet. 1. 12. believed on in the World received with Glory that is entertained in most places with the greatest Respect and Honour Gal. 4. 15. Note that the Gospel is here called a Mystery because it was so long concealed and so late discovered and the Mystery of Godliness from its Effect namely because it disposeth Mens Minds to true Piety and Godliness Note also that it was Macedonius the 2d Patriarch of Constantinople that corrupted this Text by substitution of the word God instead of the word which and for this and other matters he was deposed in an Episcopal Council and banished by the Emperour Anastatius about the Year 512. But 2. Admitting the word God were truly read in the vulgar Copies of the Greek yet if you will make sense you must thus translate and interpret great is the Mystery of Godliness God was manifested by Flesh i. e. God's Nature and Will was manifested by Flesh that is by Man by Jesus Christ and his Apostles to us Gentiles was justiby the Spirit i. e. the same Will and Nature of God was verified by Miracles done by the Spirit or Power of God was seen of Angels was known to the Angels who were very desirous to understand this new Revelation believed on in the World received with Glory or gloriously 22. 1 Tim. 6. 14 15 16. Vntil the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ which in his time he shall shew who is the blessed and only Potentate whom no Man hath seen nor can see Answ The last Words shew that not the Lord Christ but God is designed in this whole Description 23. 2 Tim. 3. 16. All Scripture is given by Inspiration from God. 2 Pet. 1. 21. Holy Men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost Answ The Holy Ghost or Spirit being only the Inspiration and Power of God it is truly said that the Scriptures which proceeded from that Inspiration did proceed from God and that those who were acted by that Inspiration were acted by God. 24. Titus 2. 13. Looking for the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ Answ 1. Nothing hinders but that we may believe that not only the Lord Christ but God himself will appear at the last Judgment So that Christ is said to judg the World because he shall pronounce the Decree and Sentence of God and order the Angels to execute it So several of the Fathers understood this Text. 2. But the Truth is the Words in the Greek are thus Looking for the appearing of the Glory of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ Where the Glory of the great God is the Pomp Power and Angels that God even the Father will cause to accompany the Lord Christ on that Day Matth. 16. 27. The Son shall appear in the Glory of his Father with his the Fathers Angels 25. Heb. 1. 2. By whom also he made the Worlds Answ Grotius renders the Greek thus For whom he made the Worlds The Author saith Grotius writing to the Hebrews refers to a Maxim received among them that the World was made for the Messias This Translation suits well with what went before whom he hath appointed Heir of all things for what can be more agreeable than that the World should be made for him who is appointed Heir or Lord of it Others render the Words thus By whom he made the Ages understanding hereby the Gospel-Ages or Times 26. Heb. 1. 3. Vpholding all things by the Word of his Power or governing all things by his Powerful Word Answ This is to be understood of God's Word or Power not of Christ's otherways than it was communicated to him by God and did abide on him For the whole Context runs thus Who Christ being the Brightness of his God's Glory and the express Image of his God's Person and upholding in the Greek Governing all things by his God's powerful Word So the sense is Christ upholds the Government and Order of the Church both in Heaven and Earth he governs the Angels and Spirits of Heaven and the Church militant on Earth by the Word i. e. the Power of God given to him without measure See also on John 1. 1 c. 27. Heb. 1. 5. Thou art my Son. Answ See on Psal 2. 7. in the second Letter 28. Heb. 1. 6. Again when he bringeth the first-begotten into the World he saith And let all the Angels of God worship him Answ See on Psal 97. 7. in the second Letter But as to the word First-begotten or First-born it doth not belong to Christ only in all the senses of it Christ is Almighty God's first-begotten or First-born from the dead as was said on Col. 1. 16. but in other respects others also are so called Israel is Gods First-born Exod. 4. 22. and David Psal 89. 26 27. for this Expression in the Hebrew signifies ordinarily no more than the most beloved or much beloved as is apparent from the Texts last cited and from Jer. 31. 9. Heb. 11. 17. 29. Heb. 1. 8. Vnto the Son he saith Thy Throne O God is for ever Answ In the Greek 't is unto the Son he saith God is thy Throne i. e. thy Seat Resting-Place and Establishment for ever So Grotius 30. Heb. 1. 10. And thou Lord in the Beginning hast laid the Foundation of the Earth Answ See on Psal 102. 25. from whence these Words are taken 31. Heb. 2. 14. For as much as the Children are partakers of Flesh and Blood he also himself took part of the same Answ The Socinians do not deny that the Soul of Christ took part in Flesh and Blood that is was incarnate as his Children that is his People were also Partakers in Flesh and Blood. 32. Heb. 2. 16. He took not on him the Nature of Angels but he took on him the Seed of Abraham Answ In the Greek and in the Margin of our Bibles 't is He taketh not hold of Angels i. e. he saved not from Ruin and from utter and final falling into Perdition the Apostate Angels but of the Seed of Abraham he taketh hold i. e. he saveth the Seed of Abraham The Author here mentioneth only the Seed of Abraham because this Epistle was written only to the Hebrews Unless perhaps by the Seed of Abraham he meaneth Abraham's spiritual Seed all the faithful all true Believers 33. Heb. 3. 3 6. He who hath builded the House hath more Honour than the House Christ as a Son over his own House whose House are we Answ The House here is not Mens Bodies but the Church of Christ which under God he is truly said to build partly by himself partly by his Ministers 34. Heb. 4. 15 16. We have not an High-Priest which cannot be touched with the Feeling of our Infirmities but was in all points tempted as we are Let us therefore come boldly unto the Throne of Grace Answ We are encouraged here to pray with Assurance and Faith to God by this Argument or Consideration
A Brief History OF THE UNITARIANS Called also SOCINIANS In Four Letters Written to a Friend Acts 17. 11. They searched the Scriptures daily whether those things were so Printed in the Year 1687. The First Letter Concerning the Unitarians vulgarly called Socinians SIR IN Answer to yours demanding a brief account of the Vnitarians called also Socinians their Doctrine concerning God in which only they differ from other Christians the Remonstrants professedly agreeing with them in other points of Faith and Doctrine and the Defence they usually make of their Heresy They are called Socinians from F. Socinus an Italian Noble-Man and a principal Writer of their Party They affirm God is only one Person not three They make our Lord Christ to be the Messenger Minister Servant and Creature of God they confess he is also the Son of God because he was begotten on blessed Mary by the Spirit or Power of God Luke 1. 35. But they deny that he or any other Person but the Father the God and Father of the said our Lord Christ is God Almighty and Eternal The Holy Ghost or Spirit according to them is the Power and Inspiration of God Luke 1. 35. That the Lord Christ was a Man the Son Prophet Messenger Minister Servant and Creature of God not himself God they think is proved by these as they call them Arguments 1. If our Lord Christ were himself God there could be no Person greater than he none that might be called his Head or his God none that could in any respect command him But the Holy Scriptures teach that the Father is greater than Christ is the Head and the God of Christ and gave Commandment to him what he should say and what he should do John 14. 28. My Father is greater than I. 1. Cor. 11. 3. The Head of Christ is God. John 20. 17. I ascend to my Father and your Father to my God and your God. John 12. 49. The Father which sent me he gave me a Commandment what I should say John 14. 31. As the Father gave me Commandment so do I. 2. If our Lord Christ were indeed God it could not without Blasphemy be absolutely and without Restriction affirmed of him that he is the Creature the Possession the Servant and Subject of God or that for his Obedience he was rewarded and advanced by God. But the inspired Authors of Holy Scripture do say that the Son our Lord Christ is the Creature of God the Possession of God the Servant of God was obedient to God and for that cause by him rewarded and exalted also that when God shall have subjected all Men to his Son our Lord Christ yet even then shall he remain subject to God. Col. 1. 15. The first-born from the dead ver 18. of every Creature Heb. 3. 1 2. Consider the Apostle and high Priest of our Profession Jesus Christ who was faithful to him that appointed him In the Greek and in the Margin of our Bibles 't is faithful to him that made him 1 Cor. 3. 23. Ye are Christ's and Christ is God's Matth. 12. 17 18. That it might be fulfilled that was spoken by Isaias Behold my Servant Phil. 2. 8 9. He humbled himself and became obedient Wherefore God hath highly exalted him and given him a Name above every Name 1 Cor. 15. 28. When all things shall be subdued to him then shall the Son also be subject to him that put all things under him that God may be all in all 3. He that is true God is not the Minister or Priest of any other Person or Persons he neither doth nor will being himself Omnipotent and All-sufficient mediate or intercede with any whomsoever for his Servants and People But 't is certain that our Lord Christ is the Minister and Mediator of God and Men a Priest that appeareth in the Presence of God and intercedeth with him for Men. Heb. 8. 6. Now hath he obtained a more excellent Ministry 1 Tim. 2. 5. There is one God and one Mediator between God and Men the Man Jesus Christ. Heb. 2. 17. A merciful and faithful High-Priest in things pertaining to God. Heb. 9. 24. Christ is not entred into the Holy place made with Hands but into Heaven it self now to appear in the Presence of God for us Heb. 7. 25. He ever liveth to make Intercession for them 4. Almighty God doth all things in his own Name and by his own Authority He ever doth his own Will and seeketh his own Glory he declares himself to be the prime Object of Faith and Worship and pronounces all Doctrines or Religions to be vain which proceed not from Him alone But in our Lord Christ all things are contrary for he declares that he came not into the World in his own Name or Authority not to do his own Will or seek his own Glory or propound himself as the principal Object of our Faith or Worship or to publish a Doctrine of his own John 17. 28. I am not come of my self John 5. 43. I am come in my Father's Name John 8. 42. I proceeded forth and came from God neither came I of my self but he sent me John 5. 30. I seek not my own Will. John 8. 50. I seek not my own Glory John 12. 44. He that believeth on me believeth not on me but on him that sent me Phil. 2. 11. That every Tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord to the Glory of God the Father John. 7. 16. My Doctrine is not mine but his that sent me 5. God was always most wise never ignorant of any thing He needeth not the concurrence of any other Person to assure him that he judgeth right He cannot saith St. James chap. 1. ver 13. be tempted And as he is infinitely great so he is no less Good. But the sacred Writers do not speak of the Lord Christ after this Tenor They say our Lord Christ increased in Wisdom that he professed himself ignorant of some things that he ascribed the Certainty and Infallibility of his Judgment to the Father's Presence with him that he was tried by great Temptations being thereto exposed by the Holy Ghost that he refused to be called Good because God only is Good. Luke 2. 52. Jesus increased in Wisdom and in Favour with God and Men. Mark 13. 32. Of that Day and Hour knoweth no Man In the Greek tis none knoweth no not the Angels which are in Heaven neither the Son but the Father S. Matthew Mat. 24. 36. adds But the Father only John 11. 34. Where have ye laid him They say unto him Lord come and see John 8. 16. My Judgment is true for I am not alone but I and the Father that sent me Matth. 4. 1. Then was Jesus led of the Spirit to be tempted of the Devil Luke 18. 19. Why callest thou me good there is none good save one that is God. 6. God giveth what and to whom himself pleaseth he needs not the Aid of any other he entreateth
of Mans Wisdom but in demonstration of the Spirit and of Power that your Faith should not stand in the Wisdom of Men but in the Power of God. Luke 1. 35. The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee Blessed Mary and the Power of the Highest shall overshadow thee Luke 11. 20. I with the Finger of God that is by the Power of God Exod. 8. 19. cast out Devils Mat. 12. 28. I cast out Devils by the Spirit of God. Compare also Luke 24. 49. with Acts 1. 4 5 8. 2. A manifest Distinction is made as between God and Christ so also between God and the Holy Spirit or Power and Inspiration of God so that 't is impossible the Spirit should be God himself Rom. 5. 5. The Love of God is shed abroad in your Hearts by the ho-Ho-Ghost which is given to us 1 Cor. 3. 16. The Grace or Favour of our Lord Jesus Christ the Love of God and the Communion of the Holy Ghost be with you Rom. 8. 27. He the Spirit v. 26. maketh Intercession for the Saints according to the Will of God. They note here that God's Spirit or Inspiration being designed to be a continual Director and Guide to the Faithful it is spoken of in these and some other Texts as a Person by the same Figure of Speech that Charity is described as a Person 1 Cor. 13. 4 5. and Wisdom Prov. 9. 11. and the Law or Commandments of God Psal 119. 24. They note also that in some Texts 't is called the Holy Ghost and Holy Spirit in the same sense that we commonly say the Holy Wisdom Holy Will of God. 3. The Spirit is obtained for us of God by our Prayers therefore it self is not God. Acts 15. 8. God which knoweth the Hearts bare them witness giving them the Holy Spirit as he did to us Luke 11. 13. How much more shall your Heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to them that ask him If we say these Texts are to be understood not of the Person of the Holy Ghost but of his Gifts and Graces the Socinians readily confess it but they say also that if the Holy Spirit were at all a Person much more a God his Gifts and Graces would be bestowed by himself and asked of himself not bestówed by and asked of another Person as 't is manifest and by all confessed they are in these Texts They add there is neither Precept nor Example in all Holy Scripture of Prayer made to the Spirit on this or any other occasion which on the Trinitarian Supposition that the Holy Spirit is a Person and God no less than the Father is very surprizing nay utterly unaccountable 4. If the Holy Spirit and our Lord Christ are Gods or God no less than the Father then God is a Trinity of Persons or three Persons but this is contrary to the whole Scripture which speaks of God as but one Person and speaks of him and to him by singular Pronouns such as I Thou Me Him c. Job 13. 7. Will ye speak wickedly for God Will ye accept his Person Heb. 1. 1. God hath in these last times spoken to us by his Son who being the Brightness of his Glory and the express Image of his Person sat down at the right Hand of the Majesty on high Deut. 6. 4 5. Hear O Israel the Lord our God is one Lord and thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thine Heart In the Hebrew thus O Israel hearken to Jehovah our God Jehovah is one and thou shalt love Jehovah thy God with all thine Heart The Jews by a most ancient Tradition and Custom are obliged to repeat this Verse every Morning and Evening to keep it in perpetual Memory that Jehovah or God is one only not two or three Isa 45. 5. I am the Lord there is no God but Me. Psal 102. 25. O my God of old hast thou laid the Foundation of the Earth Matth. 4. 10. the Lord thy God him only shalt thou serve No Instance say the Socinians can be given in any Language of three Persons whoever spoke of themselves or were spoken to by the singular Pronouns I Thou Me Him Thee c. Such speaking is contrary to Custom Grammar and Sense which are the Laws of Speech therefore the Holy Scriptures always speaking thus of God either he is only one Person or the Scriptures are one continued ungrammatical Soloecism and Impropriety and that in the capital Article of Faith which no reasonable or good Man can or ever will allow For it no way helps the Trinitarians that God according to some Translations says at Gen. 1. 26. Let Vs make Man. Because nothing is so usual in common Speech as for single Persons to speak of themselves indifferently by singular or plural Pronouns thus 2 Cor. 10. 2. I think to be bold against some who think of Vs saith Paul of himself only as if We walked according to the Flesh Briefly they contend that when God speaks of himself in the plural Number or by plural Pronouns which yet some deny he ever does and if he doth 't is not above once or twice in the whole Scripture he speaks according to the Custom of single Persons especially Princes and great Persons in all Nations and Languages but were Almighty God three Persons they could never speak of themselves or be spoken to by the singular Pronouns I Thou Thee Him Me because 't is contrary not only to Grammar which is always to be observed when there is no Custom to the contrary but to the Custom of all Nations which understand to speak intelligibly and sensibly 5. Had the Son or Holy Ghost been God this would not have been omitted in the Apostles Creed This Creed say they which is of next if not equal Authority to any part of Holy Scripture after having declared that God is the Father Almighty and Maker of Heaven and Earth speaks not a Word of the Godhead of the Son or Holy Ghost It describes the Son by all the characters of a Man and by such only it says he was conceived or begotten by the Holy Ghost on Blessed Mary that accordingly he was born of her that he was crucified died and was buried that he rose on the third day and ascended into Heaven all these are the Descriptions of a Man for God cannot be conceived or be born or die no nor ascend into Heaven for he is always there Not content to take no notice that he is God this Creed distinguishes him very plainly from God that is denies him to be God by adding He sits at the right Hand of God. i. e. He is advanced to be next to God and is under the immediate and particular Protection of God. Concerning the Holy Ghost this Creed says no higher thing than it says of the Church I believe in the Holy Ghost and in the Holy Catholick Church For in the Greek the same Preposition in is before both alike and so also is this Creed
occasion both to his Friends and Enemies to think him an Arian He saith that Phil. 2. 6. was the principal Argument of the Fathers against the Arians but that to say true it proves nothing against them He notes on Eph. 5. 5. that the word God being used absolutely doth in the Apostolick Writings always signifie the Father In his Scholia on the third Tome of St. Jerom's Epistles he denies that the Arians were Hereticks he adds farther that they were superior to our Men in Learning and Eloquence 'T is believed Erasmus did not make himself a party to that which he esteemed the ignorant and dull side of the Question In his Epistle to Bilibaldus he speaks as openly as the times would permit a wise Man to speak I saith Erasmus could be of the Arian Perswasion if the Church approved it 2. H. Grotius is Socinian all over This great Man in his younger Years attacked the Socinians in a principal Article of their Doctrine But being answered by J. Crellius he not only never replied but thank'd Crellius for his Answer and afterwards publishing some Annotations on the Bible he interpreted the whole according to the mind of the Socinians There is nothing in all his Annotations which they do not approve and applaud His Annotations are a compleat System of Socinianism not excepting his Notes on John 1. 1 c. which are written so artificially and interwove with so many different Quotations that he has cover'd himself and his sense of that Portion of Scripture from such as do not read him carefully 3. D. Petavius the most Learned of the Jesuits has granted that generally the Fathers who lived before the Nicene Council and whose Writings are preserved agreed in their Doctrine concerning God with the Nazarens or Socinians and concerning the Son our Lord Christ and the Holy Spirit with the Arians For 't is to be noted that the Arians and Socinians agree in their Doctrine concerning God that he is only one Person the God and Father of our Lord Christ but they differ concerning the Son and Holy Spirit The Son according to the Arians was generated or created some time before the World and in process of time for great and necessary causes became incarnate in our Nature The Holy Ghost they say is the Creature of the Son and subservient to him in the Work of Creation But the Socinians deny that the Son our Lord Christ had any Existence before he was born of Blessed Mary being conceived in her by the holy Spirit of God They say the Spirit is the Power and Inspiration of God saving that Mr. Bidle and those that follow him take the holy Spirit to be a Person chief of the Heavenly Spirits prime Minister of God and Christ and therefore called the Spirit by way of excellence and the Holy Spirit to discriminate him from Satan Prince and Chief of the wicked and Apostate Spirits This difference notwithstanding because they agree in the principal Article that there is but one God or but one who is God both parties Socinians and Arians are called Vnitarians and esteem of one another as Christians and true Believers as may be seen on the part of the Arians in their Historian Chr. Sandius Hist Eccl. l. 1. c. de Paul. Semosat and for the Socinians in the Disputation of Alba. But to return to Petavius He often affirms that the Doctrine of the Trinity and of the Divinity of the Son and Spirit cannot be proved by Scripture only and that those who have attempted it have always been baffled He adds there is no way to Unity in the Church about these matters but by contenting our selves to speak concerning them as the Fathers who lived nearest to the Apostles time did speak 4. S. Episcopius so much esteemed by our English Divines seems to have been an Arian He saith the Father is so first as to be first in order i. e. time in Dignity and in Power He saith that to make three equal Persons in God or in the Godhead is to make three Gods. He denies that the Lord Christ is the Son of God by substantial Generation that is by Generation from the Father's Substance or Essence Speaking of the Creeds that express the Catholick Doctrine of the Trinity and the Divinity of the Son and Spirit he saith that Bishops in general Councils being led by Fury Faction and Madness did not so much compose as huddle up Creeds for the Church See for these things Episc Inst Theol. l. 4 c. 32 33 34. 5. C. Sandius a Gentleman of prodigious Industry and Reading and no less ingenious then learned in all his Books refuses in Words to be called either Arian or Socinian but has written an Ecclesiastical History in Quarto with Addenda to it Coloniae 1678 on purpose to prove that all Antiquity was Arian and that the Vnitarian Doctrine has been reduced so low by the Persecutions of Rome and the puissant Arms of Charles the Great and other Kings of France for which Services they have been requited by the Roman Pontiff with the Titles of Most Christian Kings and Eldest Sons of the Church He has also under the borrowed Name of Cingallus written a small Treatise with this Title Scriptura Trinitatis Revelatrix here under pretence of asserting the Trinity he has as much as he could defeated all the strengths of the Catholick Cause and shews that there is no considerable Text objected to the Arians or Socinians but is given up as an incompetent and insignificant proof by some or other of the principal Critics and Authors who were themselves Trinitarians so that among them they have given away the Victory to their Adversaries But Sir I perceive I have drawn out this account of the Socinians to already a sufficient length for a Letter I will therefore conclude with a Passage out of Dr. Burnet's second Book of the History of the Reformation abridged George van Parr a Dutch Man refused to abjure so he was burnt in the year 1549 by virtue of a Law or Writ since abolished by Act of Parliament for affirming that only the Father is God and denying the Divinity of the Son our Lord Christ He had led a very exemplary Life for Fasting Devotion and a good Conversation and suffered with extraordinary Composedness of Mind These things cast a great Blemish on the Reformers It was said they only condemned Cruelty when acted on themselves but were ready to practise it when they had Power The Papists made great use of this in the next Queen Mary's Reign and what Arch-Bishop Cranmer and Bishop Ridly Authors of Van Parrs Punishment suffered in her time was thought a just Retaliation on them by that wise Providence which disposes all things justly to all Men. Thus far Dr. Burnet SIR I am most sincerely Yours A Second Letter TO A FRIEND Concerning the UNITARIANS Called also SOCINIANS Containing the Texts objected to them out of the Old Testament and their Answers Acts 24.
World that he gave his only begotten Son to die and shed his Blood for us From SIR Your Faithful and Assured A Fourth Letter TO A FRIEND Concerning the UNITARIANS Called also SOCINIANS Containing the Texts objected to them out of the Epistles and Revelation Rom. 1. 25. Who changed the Truth of God into a Lie and worshipped and served the Creature more than the Creator who is blessed for ever Amen Printed in the Year 1687. A Fourth Letter Concerning the Unitarians vulgarly called Socinians SIR WE are come to the last part of our Task the Texts of the Epistles and Revelation and the Answers of the Socinians to them 1. Rom. 1. 3. Jesus Christ our Lord which was made of the Seed of David according to the Flesh Rom. 9. 5. Of whom as concerning the Flesh Christ came who is over all God blessed for ever Amen Answ 1. It is very probable by the Syriae and by some Passages in Ignatius and other Fathers that the word God was not originally in this Text for they read it thus Of whom as concerning the Flesh Christ came who is blessed above all for ever 2. But admitting the reading in the vulgar Editions of the Greek the Greek Words as Erasmus and Curcellaeus observe should have been thus translated Of whom as concerning the Flesh Christ came God who is over all be blessed for ever For the Words are a Thanksgiving for Christ and for his Exaltation The Addition of the word Amen proper in Prayers and Thanksgivings doth much countenance this Translation 3. These Words according to the Flesh and as concerning the Flesh never signify as Trinitarians would here interpret them according to his humane Nature as if Christ had also a Divine Nature Rom. 9. 3. My Kinsmen according to the Flesh Rom. 4. 1. Abraham our Father as pertaining to the Flesh Col. 3. 22. Servants obey in all things your Masters according to the Flesh Had now Abraham or Paul's Kinsmen or have Masters a Divine Nature because these Words according to the Flesh and as pertaining to the Flesh are used of them The Truth is these Phrases are only as much as to say according to the Body and are to signify that Abraham is the Father of the Jews according to their Bodies as God is the Father of their Souls or Spirits and that the Jews were Paul's Kinsmen according to the Body but not of Kin to him in Respect of Likeness in Faith or Manners also that Masters are Masters over our Bodies not of our Minds or Spirits Therefore in the other Texts also where Christ is said to be of the Seed of Abraham of Israel and of David according to the Flesh the meaning can only be that as to his Body or outward Man he descended of the House of David and of the Stock of Israel and Abraham his Soul or Spirit being from God. 2. Rom. 2. 16. God shall judg the Secrets of Men by Jesus Christ 1 Cor. 4. 5. Who both will bring to light the hidden things of Darkness and will make manifest the Counsels of Hearts Answ The Knowledg Christ hath or at the last Judgment shall have of the Secrets of Hearts is purely by Revelation from God and the Divine Word communicated to him Rev. 1. 1. The Revelation of Jesus Christ which God gave to him to shew unto his Servants 3. Rom. 10. 12. The same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him Answ This and what follows is spoken of God not of Christ 4. 1 Cor. 1. 2 3. All that in every place call upon the Name of Jesus Christ Ver. 3. Grace be to you and Peace from God our Father and from the Lord Jesus Answ 1. As to the former of these Texts see on Acts 9. 14 21. For all that is there said takes place here also 2. But as to ver 3. It shows plainly that Christ is not God for it speaks of him as a distinct and different Person from God Therefore Grace and Peace is wished to the Corinthians from God as the Author of every good and perfect Gift and from Christ to use the Words of Origen as the Procurer by his Intercession with God. 5. 1 Cor. 6. 9. Your Body is the Temple of the Holy Ghost 2 Cor. 6. 16. Ye are Temples of the living God. Answ The Holy Ghost or Spirit being the Inspiration and Power of God the same Bodies that are Temples of one must needs be Temples also of the other 6. 1 Cor. 10. 9. Neither let us tempt Christ as some of them also tempted and were destroyed of Serpents It had been said before at ver 4. They drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them and that Rock was Christ Answ 1. The Rock was Christ not really but in Signification it signified and prefigured Christ for which reason 't is called a spiritual Rock So St. Austin contr Advers Leg. et Prophet l. 2. c. 6. This Interpretation is confirmed by Instances of like Nature Gen. 41. 26. The seven good Kine are seven Years and the seven good Ears are seven Years that is they signify and prefigure seven Years of plenty This Rock prefigured Christ as he is the true Rock of his People and Church Its Waters also signified Christ for as they were the Refreshment and Life of the Israelites in the Wilderness so is Christ of the true Israel of God in the howling Wilderness of this present World. 2. Whereas we are bid at ver 9. not to tempt Christ 't is to be noted that the ancient and true reading of this Text is Let us not tempt God. S. Epiphanius hath left upon record that it was the Heretick Marcion who corrupted this Text by putting Christ for God in the Copies by him published Epiphan L. 1. T. 3. p. 358. Edit Petav. But admitting the reading in the English Bibles yet the sense will be Let us not tempt that is murmur against Christ as the Israelites tempted or murmured against God in the Wilderness That tempting God and Christ is rightly interpreted by murmuring against them appears by Numb 14. 27 28 29. 7. 1 Cor. 12. 4 5 6 11. There are Diversities of Gifts but the same Spirit Differences of Administrations but the same Lord Diversities of Operations but it is the same God which worketh all in all All these worketh that one and the same Spirit Answ The plain meaning is God and his Spirit that is God by his Spirit and Inspiration worketh that great Diversity of Gifts Prophecy Tongues Healing which were in the Christians of those times and that though there are different Administrations that is Orders of Men in the Church yet they are all under one Lord or Head even Christ 8. 2 Cor. 8. 9. Ye know the Grace of our Lord Jesus Christ that though he was rich yet for our sakes he became poor that we through his Poverty might become rich Answ The sense is Such was the Favour and Love of Christ to Mankind that in his
own Person he set us an Example of Mortification and Self-denial in his living a poor sort of Life though 't is certain he could have lived in the greatest Splendor Dignity and Plenty He that could multiply the Loaves and Fishes and the Wine at the Wedding of Cana need not have wanted any of the Comforts of Life if for our Sakes that we Gentiles might be rich and blessed for ever he had not chose to imploy himself in preaching and making Disciples who might be his Agents in planting the Word of the Gospel over all the World. 9. 2 Cor. 12. 8 9. I besought the Lord thrice that it might depart from me Therefore I will rather glory in my Infirmities that the Power of Christ may rest on me Answ He besought the Lord that is he besought God. The Power of Christ here is the Strength or Power which Christ procures by his general Mediation for all his Church and every Member of it with God. So the sense is that what my Lord Christ can do and procure for me with God may abide on me namely Power and Strength either to overcome or bear this Affliction But note that the Socinians for the most part of them do grant that the Word or Power of God abiding on Christ doth qualify him both to hear our Prayers and to succour us in all Distresses 10. 2 Cor. 13. 14. The Grace of our Lord Jesus Christ the Love of God and the Communion of the Holy Ghost be with you Answ 1. This Text demonstrates that neither the Lord Christ nor the Holy Spirit are God for it plainly distinguishes them from God. 2. The sense of the whole Verse is I wish you the continual Favour and Intercession of Christ for you are not unknown to him seeing the Angels of whom he is made King and Head signify to him your State and Condition Rev. 5. 6. Heb. 1. 14. I wish you as an Effect of Christ's Intercession the Love of God or the Father and as the Consequence of that a plentitiful Communication of God's Holy Spirit or Inspiration together with all the Effects of it 11. Gal. 1. 1 12. Paul an Apostle not of Man neither by Men but by Jesus Christ and God the Father I neither received it of Man neither was I taught it but by Revelation of Jesus Christ Answ As we truely say the Holy Bible is the Word not of Men but of God because though it was spoken and written by Men yet it proceedeth as to the matter of it from the Inspiration of and Direction from God So Paul rightly denies he is made an Apostle by Man because he was made one by Jesus Christ who in all things acted by the Spirit and Directions of God. Briefly Not of Man neither by Man in these Verses is only as much as to say not by humane Authority but by Authority from God by the Lord Christ 12. Eph. 3. 9. Who created all things by Jesus Christ. Answ Though the Words might have been rendred Who created all things for Jesus Christ see on Heb. 1. 2. yet the truth is these Words by or for Jesus Christ were not originally in this Text but added to it For it appears by the most ancient Greek Copies and by the Syriac and Latin as also by several of the Fathers that the true reading here is only thus Who created all things 13. Phil. 2. 5 6 7 8. Let this Mind be in you which was in Christ Jesus who being in the Form of God thought it not Robbery to be equal with God But made himself of no Reputation and took upon him the Form of a Servant And being found in Fashion as a Man he humbled himself and became obedient unto Death even the Death of the Cross Wherefore God hath highly exalted him and given him a Name above every Name Answ It cannot be the Design of the former part of these Words to intimate that Christ is God because 't is at last added that God hath exalted him and given him a Name above every Name for these Words plainly distinguish Christ from God as one who is not himself God but exalted by God. This and other Considerations has obliged the more judicious and learned Trinitarians to interpret this whole Context of Christ as he is a Man and to translate somewhat otherways than we have done in the English They render and interpret the Words thus Ver. 5. Let this Mind be in you that was in Christ Jesus i. e. be ye humble and lowly as the Lord Christ was ver 3 4. Ver. 6. Who being in the Form of God i. e. who being made like to God and namely by a Communication to him of Divine and miraculous Power over Diseases Devils the Grave the Wind the Seas c. Committed not Robbery by equalling himself to God i. e. did not rob God of his Honour by arrogating to himself to be God or equal to God. Ver. 7. But made himself of no Reputation i. e. chose a poor Life like a Person of no Reputation or Merit And took upon him the Form of a Servant i. e. became like a Servant possessing nothing of his own and suffering Injuries and Reproaches without making Reply or seeking Revenge Being a Preacher of Mortification Humility and Self-denial he lived up to the height of his Doctrine Ver. 8. Being made like other Men in the common Similitude of Man he humbled himself and became obedient unto Death i. e. being a Man in all respects like other Men Sin excepted he always expressed a great Humility and notwithstanding that he could have delivered himself from them yet was he obedient even to evil Magistrates and without Resistance underwent that Death which their Wickedness and Malice prepared for him Ver. 9. Wherefore God hath highly exalted him For this as well as other causes he is now by God advanced even above Angels the very Angels being put under his Directions 14. Phil. 3. 21. Who shall change our vile Body that it may be fashioned like to his glorious Body according to the mighty working whereby he is able to subdue all things to himself Answ See on John 6. 44. and on John 5. 19. places parallel to this 15. Col. 1. 15. The Image of the invisible God. Heb. 1. 3. The Express Image of his Person Answ 1. These Texts are Demonstrations that Christ is not God it being simply impossible that the Image should be the very being or thing whose Image it is 2. Those that alledg these Texts to prove that Christ is God forget that St. Paul saith of every Man that he is the Image and Glory of God 1 Cor. 11. 7. 16. Col. 1. 15 16. The Image of the invisible God the first-born of every Creature For by him were all things created that are in Heaven and that are in Earth And he is before all things and by him all things consist Answ 1. Christ is called the first-born of every Creature not absolutely as if he
in and by him performed Works not much less wonderful than was the first Creation And the World knew him not Knew not that the Word abiding on Jesus was that very Divine Word which made both the World and all Men. Ver. 11. He came unto his own i. e. To those whom he had made ver 10. He is to be understood of the Word The Word came in the Person of Christ His own received him not i. e. did not own him for what he indeed was the Divine Word 'T is again repeated to brand the Ingratitude and Stupidity of the Jews of that Age. Ver. 12. Them that believe on his Name On his Name is an Hebrew Phrase as much as to say on him i. e. Them that believed on the Word made Flesh or them that received and owned him for what he indeed was even the Divine Word Ver. 14. And the Word was made Flesh Or For the Word was made Flesh i. e. did abide on and inhabit an humane Person the Person of Jesus Christ and so was in Appearance made Flesh or Man for Flesh is the usual Scripture Phrase for Man Gen. 6. 12. Deut. 5. 26. Jer. 12. 12. Jer. 17. 5. Mark 13. 20. And we beheld his Glory i. e. The Glory of the Man on whom the Word did abide and inhabit in him We beheld his Glory in his many Miracles John 2. 11. Also in his Transfiguration 2. Pet. 1. 17. And on many other occasions The Glory as of the only begotten of the Father i. e. A Glory worthy of the only-begotten of the Father Christ is called the only-begotten on several accounts this especially that he only was begotten by the Divine Power on a Woman Luke 1. 35. Ver. 15. John bare Witness of him saying He was before me i. e. Was before me in Dignity being the only-begotten of God. So Erasmus and Beza as well as Grotius Ver. 18. Which is in the Bosom of the Father i. e. Who is most dear to the Father So the Phrase signifies in other Texts Numb 11. 12. Deut. 13. 6. Hath declared him i. e. hath revealed his Mind and Will to Men. Hitherto for the most part Grotius Briefly The Word according to Grotius is not an eternal Son of God but is here the Power and Wisdom of God which Word abiding without measure on the Lord Christ as it is expresly said Heb. 1. 3. Matth. 28. 18. Col. 2. 3. see the Notes on these Texts 't is therefore spoken of as a Person and as one Person with Christ and he with that This notion of the Word will lead a Man through all the Difficulties of this Chapter with far more ease than any other hitherto offered Besides that it is so well founded as has been shown on ver 1. 't is also as easy and obvious and clears the sense as much as can be expected on a Portion of Scripture that is so obscure and dark and which was designedly written after a mysterious and sublime manner 13. John 2. 19 21. Destroy this Temple and in three Days I will raise it up He spake of the Temple of his Body Answ Christ raised his Body by a Power communicated to Him by the Father and accordingly his being raised is always attributed to the Father not to himself Gal. 1. 1. Paul an Apostle by Jesus Christ and God the Father who raised him from the dead See also Eph. 1. 19 20. 1 Thess 1. 9 10. Had our Lord raised himself by his own proper Power his Resurrection could in no respect be ascribed to the Father 14. John 2. 25. He knew what was in Man. Answ The Knowledg which the Lord Christ had or now in his state of Exaltation hath of the Secrets of Mens Hearts is the pure Gift of and Revelation from God and the Divine Word abiding on him Rev. 1. 1. The Revelation of Jesus Christ which God gave to him to shew unto his Servants John 3. 34. God giveth not the Spirit by measure that is sparingly unto him But see also what they say on Rev. 2. 23. 15. John 3. 13. No Man hath ascended up to Heaven but he that came down from Heaven even the Son of Man which is in Heaven Answ 1. Erasmus Beza Camerarius acknowledg that the Greek should be rendred which was in Heaven Neither so are the Words which was in Heaven an idle Repetition of what went before for it is repeated majoris asseverationis causâ for its greater Confirmation The most learned Orthodox Interpreters understand this ascending into and being in Heaven as also the descending only metaphorically and interpret thus No Man hath ascended up to Heaven No Man hath known the Mind of God our Heavenly Father But he that came down from Heaven i. e. but he that is sent to you as the Messenger of Heaven or of God. Even the Son of Man which is in Heaven i. e. even I whose Meditation and Conversation is in Heaven As St. Paul says of himself Phil. 3. 20. Our Conversation is in Heaven So they interpret the whole Passage of the humane Nature I suppose because our Lord considers and speaks of himself here by the Name only of the Son of Man. But the Socinians do generally understand this Text literally and say that 't is here intimated that before our Lord entred upon his Office of Messias he was taken up to Heaven to be instructed in the Mind and Will of God as Moses was into the Mount Exod. 24. 1 2 12. and from thence descended to execute his Office and declare the said Will of God. The same thing they say is also hinted John 6. 38 46 51 62. John 8. 40. 16. John 3. 18. The only begotten Answ See on John 1. 14. 17. John 5. 19. Whatsoever things He the Father doth those also doth the Son. Answ The Son doth them only by the Spirit or Power of the Father inhabiting in him John 5. 30. I can do nothing of my self John 14. 10. The Father that dwelleth in me He doth the Works Matth. 12. 28. I cast out Devils by the Spirit of God. 18. John 5. 23. That all Men should honour the Son even as they honour the Father Answ The meaning only is as we honour God or the Father so we must not forget to honour also the Son of God because to him the Father hath committed the last Judgment of all Men ver 22. An Equality of Honour is no more intended here than an Equality of Perfection in those words Be ye perfect even as your Father which is in Heaven is perfect Matth. 5. 48. For the sense there is as God is truly perfect so do ye endeavour to be perfect with that Perfection of which your finite Natures are capable 19. John 6. 44. I will raise him up at the last Day Answ The Lord Christ shall raise and change our Bodies by the same Divine Word or Power of God communicated to him and abiding on him by which while he was in this
that our High-Priest and Intercessor having been in our very Circumstances is touched with a true Feeling of our Infirmities and therefore doth with great Earnestnest intercede for us all in general 35. Heb. 7. 3. Without Father without Mother having neither Beginning of Days nor end of Life but made like unto the Son of God abideth a Priest for ever Answ All acknowledg that these Words are spoken of Melchizedec And that because neither his Father nor Mother nor the time of his Birth or Death are mentioned in Scripture he is therefore said to be withour Father or Mother and without Beginning of Days or end of Life But he is not herein like the Son of God the time of whose Birth and Death is recorded in Scripture and whose Mother was blessed Mary and his Father the everlasting God but he is like the Son of God in that he abideth a Priest for ever 36. Heb. 10. 5. A Body hast thou prepared for me Answ 'T is undoubted that God prepared a Body for the Soul of Christ 37. Heb. 11. 26. Esteeming i. e. Moses esteeming the Reproach of Christ greater Riches than the Treasures of Egypt Answ The sense is Moses preferred being reproached and ill used by Pharaoh and the Egyptians as Christ was reproached and abused when he came to deliver the true Israel of God from the Bondage of Sin and Satan before all the Treasures and Riches which he as an adopted Son of Pharaoh's Daughter might have expected and had in Egypt So Grotius and others the most esteemed Interpreters 38. Heb. 13. 8. Jesus the same yesterdy today and for ever Answ This is prefaced to what here follows be not carried away with diverse and strange Doctrines as an Argument to perswade Constancy in the true Faith. The sense is the Lord Christ and his Gospel is the same thing that it always was be not therefore carried about to every novel Doctrine Ye will by Experience find that 't is a good thing to be establish'd in the Grace of the Gospel and not in Doctrines about Meats which the Jews from the Mosaic Law and the Gentiles from the Dictates of their Philosophers so much urge 39. 1 Pet. 1. 11. Searching what and what manner of time the Spirit of Christ which was in them did signify when it testified before-hand the Sufferings of Christ. Answ 1. The Spirit of Christ that is the same Spirit of Prophecy that was in Christ Or 2. The Prophetick Spirit in them which spoke of Christ So Grotius interprets here Others confirm his Interpretation by observing that the Spirit of Truth and the Spirit of Error mentioned 1 John 4. 6. are those Spirits which speak the Truth and teach Error So we call Virgil the Poet of Eneas and Homer of Achilles and Vlisses because they have written and spoken of Eneas Achilles and Vlisses 40. 1 Pet. 3. 19 20. Quickned by the Spirit by which also he went and preached to the Spirits in Prison which sometimes were disobedient in the days of Noah Answ This Text seems to speak of Christ's descent into Hell. The sense is Christ being dead was shortly quickned or brought to Life again by the Spirit or Power of God by which also that is by assistance of which Spirit he preached and spoke to the Spirits imprisoned in Hell who would not harken to Noah who in his Life-time preached Righteousness to them 2 Pet. 2. 5. Cardinal Bellarmine has quoted above thirty of the Fathers who interpret this Text after this manner The Interpretation seems confirmed by 1 Pet. 4. 6. For this cause was the Gospel preached also to them that are dead For that he speaketh of the real dead appears by the foregoing verse 41. 1 John 1. 1 c. That which was from the Beginning which we have seen with our Eyes of the Word of Life declare we unto you Answ The Word of Life here is the Gospel The sense is we declare or preach to you that Gospel or Word of Life which from the Beginning was in the Mind and Decree of the Father So St. John explains himself in these Words at ver 3. That eternal Life which was with the Father and was manifested to us He calleth the Word of Life eternal Life as 't is the ordinary and appointed means and way to eternal Life He saith he had heard it and seen it with his Eyes and handled it with his Hands to signify by these Expressions that it was fully certainly and perfectly known to him For the Hebrews use to express full and certain Knowledg of things by Words and Phrases borrowed from the senses 42. 1 John 3. 16. Hereby perceive we the Love of God because he laid down his Life for us Answ Neither the Syriac nor almost any Greek Copy of the Bible hath the Word God in this Text. The true reading is hereby perceive we his Love because he Christ laid down his Life for us 2. Admitting the reading in the English Bible yet he in this Text is not God but Christ the Son of God who was mentioned ver 8. So Grotius And the Interpretation is certain for God cannot lay down his Life 43. 1 John 4. 3. Every Spirit that confesseth not that Christ is come in the Flesh is not of God. Answ This saying is come in the Flesh or in Flesh for so 't is in the Greek is opposed to those false Prophets and Teachers that affirmed Christ had not a real Body of Flesh and Blood but a spiritual and consequently was not a true Man nor the Off-spring of David On the contrary St. John here teaches that Christ is come in Flesh or in the Flesh that is was clothed with a real Body of real Flesh 44. 1 John 5. 7. There are three that bear Record in Heaven the Father the Word and the Holy Ghost and these three are one Answ 1. This verse was not originally in the Bible but has been added to it 'T is not found in the most ancient Copies of the Greek nor in the Syriac or Arabick or Ethiopic or Armenian Bibles nor in the most ancient Latin Bibles 'T is not acknowledged by the Fathers who treated professedly of this Question of the Trinity 't is wholly rejected by abundance of the most learned Criticks and Interpreters and by all acknowledged to be doubtful and uncertain 2. Admitting this verse to be genuine yet the most learned Trinitarians confess the sense is not these three are one God but these three are one in their Testimony or they agree in their Testimony for they are here considered and spoken of as Witnesses So Beza Vatablus Calvin Erasmus the English-Geneva Notes And accordingly most of the Greek Bibles which have this verse in them read here as they do in the next verse not these three are one but these three agree in one i. e. in one and the same Testimony 45. 1 John 5. 20. We know that the Son of God is come and hath given us an Vnderstanding
adv Prax. c. 3. 2. They say farther that none of the objected and above-cited Texts are by Trinitarians themselves thought to be true and demonstrative Proofs either of the Trinity or of the Divinity of the Son or Spirit Every one of these Texts but John 1. 1 c. is given up to the Socinians as an incompetent and unconcluding Proof by some or other of the most learned and allowed Criticks and Interpreters of the Protestant Party As to the Catholick Doctors so called Chr. Sandius hath made a great Collection of Testimonies out of them to this Effect that neither the Trinity nor the Divinity of the Lord Christ or of the Holy Spirit can be proved by the Scripture but by Tradition only Some of them confess that the Scriptures rather favour the Socinian Doctrine and that the Trinity is not only above but contrary to Reason finally that if the Authority of the Church did not oblige them to be Catholicks they should choose to be Socinians See for these things Sandius Hist Eccl. l. 1. c. de Ario and Cingallus in Script Trin. Revel An English Author of the Romish Persuasion has these Words in Fiat Lux. p. 379 380. I may truly say Christ is the Pope's God. For if the Pope had not been or had not been so vigilant and resolute a Pastor as he is he means such a Persecutor Christ whom the Pope both worships himself and propounds to the World to worship as the very true God that made all things Christ I say had not been taken for any such Person as this day we believe him to be Whereas besides the above-cited Texts the Orthodox object that if Christ were not God as well as Man he could not satisfy the Justice of God for our Sins or be a full and sufficient Atonement for them The Socinians answer 1. That the Lord Christ is a Propitiation and Atonement for Sin is a Demonstration that he is not God for God doth not give or make but receive the Satisfaction for our Sins 2. They wonder that the Son of God though he is a Man only should not be judged a sufficient Satisfaction and Propitiation for Sin through the gracious Acceptance of God when 't is so known and evident that the Oblation and Sacrifice of Beasts under the Mosaic Law and from Adam till those times was accepted as a full Atonement and Satisfaction in order to Forgiveness Lev. 6. 6. He shall bring his Trespass-Offering a Ram without Blemish and the Priest shall make Atonement for him before the Lord for any thing of all that he hath done in trespassing See the whole Context Finally whereas the Orthodox do decline many of the Socinian Arguments by the Distinction of two Natures a Divine and humane Nature in Christ For Example when the Socinians object John 14. 28. My Father is greater than I or John 5. 30. I can do nothing of my self We answer that these things are spoken of Christ only according to his humane Nature but that he hath also a Divine Nature by which he is equal to the Father and can do all things of himself To this they reply 1. That the Distinction of two Natures a Divine and Humane in Christ is clearly overthrown by the 8th 9th 10th and 11th Arguments mentioned in the the first Letter 2. If a thing otherways true of Christ may be denied of him because 't is only in one of these pretended Natures and not in the other if our Saviour saith he can do nothing of himself only because he can do nothing of himself according to his humane Nature and can do all things of himself according to his pretended Divine Nature then 't is lawful and allowable to say Christ is no Man was never born of the Virgin was not crucified dead or buried did not rise again from the dead ascended not into Heaven under pretence that according to his Divine Nature he never was born of the Virgin never was crucified dead or buried c. Now who does not see that to speak thus were to deny the whole New Testament and renounce Christianity Have not we say the Socinians reason to reject and abhor a Distinction that if it incommodes our Doctrine and the Allegations for it does as effectually fight against the most evident and acknowledg'd Points of the Christian Faith Nay the Distinction and Evasions founded on it do at least as much hurt to the Trinitarians as to the Socinians For if the Distinction of two Natures be true and the Answers founded on it allowable then no Fault can be found with a Socinian when he shall say Christ is not true God was not generated of the Essence of the Father was not from Eternity for all this may be said of him according to use their own Words his humane Nature for according to that he is not true God was not generated of the Fathers Essence was not from Eternity Do not Trinitarians absolutely disallow as false and Heretical these Forms of Speech though defended by the Distinction of the two Natures why then do they expect that their Adversaries in this Controversy should admit their Answers which are founded on the same and no other Defence This Sir is the Sum of what these Gentlemen say on this great Question a Brief of their Arguments and Answers by which they would support their Doctrine that God is but one Person and that as some of them add our Lord Christ nor the Holy Spirit neither are nor ever are called Gods or God in Holy Scripture as also that neither Creation whether New or Old nor any of the Attributes of God are ascribed to our Blessed Saviour For a Conclusion give me leave to advise you in the Words of St. Paul 1 Thess 5. 21. Prove all things hold fast that which is good SIR I am Your most Obliged The Publisher to whom the foregoing Letters were written having left them some time with a Gentleman a Person of excellent Learning and Worth they were returned to him with this following Letter SIR HAving had the Favour of perusing these Letters I cannot but greatly esteem the Learning and Judgment of the Author who has brought so large a Controversy and that has been debated with the utmost Industry Learning and Subtilty for many hundred Years even from soon after the time of the Apostles into so small a Compass that one may soon see the Allegations from Scripture on both sides with the most material Distinctions and Answers Wherein it seems obvious to me what is said in one of the Paragraphs of the first Letter that the Vnitarian Doctrine is an accountable and reasonable Faith grounded on clear and evident Scripture-Arguments so far as a negative Proposition can reasonably be expected to be Whereas the Trinitarian Doctrine is founded upon obscure or mistaken Texts and defended by such unreasonable Distinctions as cannot be admitted by any Man of a free Judgment being either contradictory in themselves or utterly unintelligible
Interpretation is confirmed by 1 Thess 4. 8. He therefore that despiseth despiseth not Man but God who hath also given unto us his Holy Spirit Here 't is manifest that those who despised the Apostles are said to despise God because God was in them by his Spirit What hinders then but that for the same reason those that lied to the Apostles should be said and understood to lie to God 35. Acts 7. 59. They stoned Stephen calling upon God and saying Lord Jesus receive my Spirit Answ 1. The Word God is not in the Original Greek in no Greek Bible 2. Admitting this Word God to be here rightly understood yet the Greek when rendred Grammatically maketh this sense calling upon God and saying O Lord of Jesus receive my Spirit 3. Admitting the English Translation the meaning here is only this Stephen called upon God and he also said Lord Jesus receive my Spirit because at the same time he saw Jesus in Prophetick Vision standing at the Right Hand of God. He began to have this Vision while he stood before the Council ver 56. and it continued with him to the Moment of his Expiration for his Consolation and Support as is granted by many learned Interpreters of the Orthodox party 36. Acts 9. 14 21. To bind all that call upon thy Name The Words are spoken to the Lord Christ as is made undeniable by ver 17. Is not this he that destroyed them which called on this Nome Christ's Name in Jerusalem Answ 1. The Socinians generally not only grant but earnestly contend that Christ is to be worshipped and prayed to because God hath they say by his â—â—â—â—biting Word or Power given to the Lord Christ a Faculty of knowing all things and an Ability to relieve all our Wants The Polonian Vnitarians were so zealous in this matter that they excommunicated and deposed from their Ministry such of their own Party as denied that Christ might be prayed to and worship't with Divine Worship This had bad Effects therefore the Vnitarians of Transylvania were more moderate they admitted to the Ministers and Professors-Places those that rejected the Invocation and Adoration of Christ but obliged them under their Hands not to speak against worshipping or praying to the Lord Christ in their Sermons or Lectures 2. Those Vnitarians that reject the Invocation of Christ say 1. That the most learned of the Ancients were of their Opinion It appears by St. Austin T. 6. L. 1. de Haeres Num. 43. and by Photias Cod. 117. that Origen denied that the Son was to be adored or prayed to He is saith Origin not the Author but Procurer of the good things bestowed on us 2. Our Lord Christ when he was consulted about the Object and matter of Prayers directed his Disciples to God Luke 11. 1 2. When ye pray say Our Father which art in Heaven 3. It seems clear enough that he forbad the Disciples to pray to himself ordering them at the same time to pray to God in his Name or for his Sake John 16. 23. In that Day i. e. after I am risen have seen you again and being ascended into Heaven have procured for you the Comforter whose Consolations none can take from you So all Interpretters of note ye shall ask me nothing whatsoever ye shall ask the Father in my Name he will give it you 4. To make Christ himself the Object of Prayer is to destroy his Mediatory Office. For if he doth hear our Prayers and can and doth by a Power constantly resident in him relieve our Wants to what purpose is he our Mediator with God. They that make it a Duty to pray to Christ will find it hard to give a good account of those Words Heb. 7. 25. He Christ is able to save unto the uttermost all that come unto God by him i. e. that pray to God in his Name or for his sake seeing he ever liveth to make Intercession for them What can be more evident than that here Christ's saving us from the Evils we either fear or labour under is ascribed not to his own inherent Power but to his Intercession with the Almighty It is farther to be observed that these Gentlemen say that Christ's Mediation and Intercession for us is not to be understood of a verbal or personal Mediation proceeding from a particular Knowledg of our Wants and Prayers but he mediates by his Merits that is by the perfect Obedience and most acceptable Services that he has performed to God. As to the objected Texts To bind all that call upon thy Name And again Is not this he that destroyed them that called on this Name in Jerusalem They answer that the Original Greek may be translated several ways 1. Thus to bind all that are called by thy Name And Is not this he that destroyed them who are called by this Name in Jerusalem that is All that from Christ are called Christians And this seems to be the genuine sense of these Texts 2. Thus To bind all that name thy Name And Is not this he that destroyed them who name this Name in Jerusalem that is that profess the Name of Christ that speak of Christ as their Master and Teacher Agreably to this St. Paul saith 2 Tim. 2. 9. Let all that name the Name of Christ depart from Iniquity 3. Thus as 't is in our English Bibles to bind all that call upon thy Name And Is not this he that destroyed them that called on this Name in Jerusalem For though the first Christians did not pray to the Lord Christ yet they called upon his Name in Prayer they used his Name in their Prayers to God praying for all things in his Name which is a calling upon his Name in the most proper and grammatical sense of these Words and is indeed the only sense of which they are capable when they are used of a Man as Christ was So they 37. Acts 15. 28. It seemed good to the Holy Ghost and to us Answ that is to God's Inspiration in us and therefore to us also See on John 16. 8 13 14. 38. Acts 20. 28. Feed the Church of God which he hath purchased with his own Blood. Answ 1. It appears by the Syriac the Armenian and the most ancient Greek Bibles that the true reading of this Text is Feed the Church of Christ which he hath purchased with his own Blood. 2. Admitting the reading in the vulgar Editions of the Greek yet some great Masters of that Tongue have rendred the Greek Words thus Feed the Church of God which he hath purchased with his own Son's Blood. 3. Admitting the Translation in our English Bibles some learned Men particularly Erasmus have noted that the Blood of Christ is here called the Blood of God because it was the Blood which God gave for the Redemption of the World. So John 1. 36. Behold the Lamb of God that is the Lamb of Sacrifice which God giveth for the Sins of the World. For God so loved the