Selected quad for the lemma: spirit_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
spirit_n	ghost_n	grace_n	holy_a	21,659	5	5.3148	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A42457	An antidote against errour concerning justification, or, The true notion of justification, and of justifying faith, cleared by the light of scripture, and solid reason, from several mistakes of the words, which misapprehensions prove the seeds of dangerous errours by ... Thomas Gataker ... ; to which is added, The way of truth and peace, or, A reconciliation of the holy apostles S. Paul and S. James, concerning justification by faith without works, Rom. 3.28, by works and not by faith only, Jam. 2, 21, 24, by Charles Gataker ...	Gataker, Thomas, 1574-1654.; Gataker, Charles, 1614 or 15-1680. Way of truth and peace.	1679 (1679)	Wing G311; ESTC R6785	56,240	74

considered two ways either as an act of God working in us or as a change thereby wrought upon us Conceiv we this by the like concerning conversion conversion may be taken two ways either as an act of God working in us or a change thereby wrought upon us and we shall find both together mentioned Jer. 31. 18. Convert me O Lord there is the act of God working in him and I shall be converted there is the change thereby wrought upon him In like manner may Regeneration be considered either as an act of God working in or on a man Jam. 1. 18. 1 Pet. 1. 3. and so sanctification is an effect or fruit of it or as a change wrought thereby upon him 1 Pet. 1. 22 23. and so it is a principal branch of regeneration whereof one main arm is illumination respecting the minde and understanding and sanctification respecting the wil and affections an other shooting out and dividing it self into many sprigs as sincere repentance the filial fear the tru love of God and the like all which and among the rest this faith unfeigned 1 Tim. 1. 5. being branches of sanctification ar all holie dispositions and the acts issuing from them of no other nature or qalitie then the disposition or first act as the School termes it from which they proceed Seeing then that the habit of this faith whereby anie ar justified is an holie disposition such as makes the soul and person possest with it holie that purifies and sanctifies him that hath it and the acts of it conseqentlie such as proceed from an holie heart and a sanctified disposition it must needs follow that no wicked man no unregenerated and unsanctified person while he so continues can have the faith by the Apostle here intended And thus much shall suffice for the proof of the proposition I shal now proceed to the proof of the assumption That a man may beleiv the doctrine of the Gospel that Jesus Christ is the Sonne of God and the Saviour of mankind and yet be never a whit the holier but remain stil irregenerate and unsanctified is apparent For first the Devils as hath ben said and shewed before know and beleiv all this and that now doubtles as undoubtedlie as anie man living doth or can do and yet are no whit at all the holier for all that but remain stil as evil as ever they were yea manie wicked men limmes of the Devil have done the same And here why should I not name Balaam for one for did not Balaam know Christ yes undoubtedlie how could he els have Prophesied of him he had an heavenlie revelation a revelation from God concerning Christ that might be said of him that Christ himself said of Peter Mat. 16. 17. Flesh and bloud did not reveil this mysterie unto him but God himself that is in heaven tho he were not blessed as Peter nor sanctified therefore as he was But hear we Balaams own words Num. 24. 15-17 Balaam the son of Beor the man whose eyes were opened who heard the words of God and knew the knowledge of the most High and saw the visions of the Almightie he saith I shal see him but not now I shall behold him but not nigh as if he had said The time shal come when I shal see the Messias the Savior of Israel I shall one day behold him but afar off so as I shal not be the better for my sight of him it will be little to my comfort There shal come a Star out of Jacob and a Rod or a Scepter shal arise or stand up out of Israel c. a plain Prophecie of Christ as all confes and is generallie acknowledged Yea mark we how far he proceeds Chap. 23. 10. Let me dye or Oh that I might dye saith he the death of the righteous and that my last end might be like unto his Balaam would never have thus spoken had he not beleived that if he did take the same cours that Gods people did who trusted in the Messias and yeilded themselvs up to be ruled whollie by him he might be saved by him as they were but for all that his beleif he would not nor did condescend so to do But leave we him and proceed to some other instances What is the sin against the Holie Ghost of which our Saviour Christ saith Matth. 11. 31 32. All manner of sinne and blasphemie shal be forgiven unto men but the blasphemie against the Holie Ghost shal not be forgiven neither in this world nor in the world to come Is it not almost generallie by most Divines acknowledged that this irremissible sin is a sin always joyned with knowledge and what knowledge not a bare speculative or notional knowledg but a beleif of the truth of the Gospel accompanied with a malicious opposition thereuuto No man therefore can commit that sin but such an one as knows and beleives the doctrine of the Gospel which yet he malitiouslie opposeth and conseqentlie must needs have that Faith which these men would have to be justifying faith It was somtime the speech of a Reverend Divine that if Paul had had Peters knowledge when he opposed the Faith of Christ or Peter Pauls malice when he abjured his Master they had both them committed that unpardonable sin But Paul did what he did in ignorance and Peter what he did out of weaknes and both repented of what they had done which none of those that have committed that sin ever do Heb. 6. 6. In which place further the Apostle plainly intimates vers 4. 6. that men that have ben illightned with what think we means he but with the knowledge of Evangelical truths and have partaked of the Holie Ghost of the common graces of the Spirit and tasted of the heavenlie gift and the good word of God as those compared to the seed sowen on stonie ground that receiv the word with joy and beleiv for a time Matth. 13. 20. Luk. 8. 13. and the powers of the world to come may yet not fal onlie but fall utterlie away as those also in the Gospel Luk. 8. 13. yea not fall whollie off onlie but sin in despite of Gods Spirit Chap. 10. 26 29. and so sin that it 's a thing impossible for them to be restored again by repentance Chap. 6. 6. and what sin it is that is there so deciphered is no great difficultie to determine which albeit I dare not say that Judas committed for it seems avarice not malice that run him hedlong into that guilt of impietie little imagining it may be but that his Master would rid himself wel enough out of their hands unto whom he had betraied him as he had sometime before done the like Luk. 4. 29 30. John 8. 59. and 10. 39. and himself go away with their money the whiles yet it is verie likely that he beleived that concerning his Master to be tru that he preached unto others Howsoever the former instances shewing that wicked ones so continuing

herein to consist that if sinne of all sorts were so rife and so rank among that people who had the greatest light to inform them of the nature and haynousnes of sin and the strongest means to courb and restrain it in them it must needs argu an universal corruption and depravation of mans nature and a very sinful disposition in the whole race of mankind Hence the Apostle inferres drawing all that he had before delivered to an hed that the whole world consisting of Gentile and Jew stands guiltie of sin in Gods sight Chap. 3. 19. and consequentlie that no man be he Jew or Gentile if he come to be araigned as a sinner at Gods Tribunal and there tried by Gods Law whither written or inbred can be justified by his works vers 20. Thus having remooved the wrong means of the Justification of a sinner in Gods sight he proceedeth to establish the right And that is by such means onelie as God out of his free favor and grace hath assigned now the means by God assigned are the satisfaction to Gods Justice made by Christ with his bloud and Faith on mans part apprehending and relying on him and it Vers. 21 27. In prosecution whereof the Apostle layeth down the main causes and means of Mans Justification 1. The contriving or designing cause God vers 25. 2. The procuring and producing cause Christ vers 24. 3. The purchasing or meritorious cause on Christs part the ransome paid vers 24. and satisfaction therby made with his bloud vers 25. 4. The instrumental cause on mans part apprehending him and it Faith vers 25. 5. The impulsive cause of the thing done in general Gods free favor and meer mercie vers 24. 6. The impulsive cause of doing it in this manner and by these means 1. The manifestation of Justice vers 26. on Gods part 2. The exclusion of Gloriation on Mans part vers 27. 1 Cor. 1. 29-31 There followeth lastlie hereupon in the words of my Text the Main and Apostolical Determination of the Principal Point containing in it the Summe and Substance of all and that tanqam è cathedra in a Doctoral manner peremtorilie delivered as by necessarie and irrefragable consecution from the premisses resulting We conclude therefore that a man is justified by Faith without the Works of the Law In the opening whereof to proceed the more closelie and cleerlie and to remoov such rubs and scruples as we shall meet with in the way we shall take into consideration these fower heds 1. What is ment here by the word Justified 2. What Faith it is by which we ar said to be Justified 3. How by this Faith man is said to be Justified 4. How by Faith to be Justified without Works For the first of these what is here ment by the word Justifie or what it is to Justifie and how the word is here taken I shal in the first place examine and endevor to remoov some senses or meanings of the word given by divers whom I conceiv to be mistaken and in the next place deliver and endevor to assert what I take to be the right Of those whom herein I conceiv to be mistaken some there are that give the word Justifie here a single some that give it a double sense Of the former sort to wit of those that give it a single sense there are two classes or ranks The one is of those who would have the word Justifie here signifie to make reallie inherentlie habituallie formallie just that which we commonlie according to the usual phrase of Scripture ar wont to term to sanctifie or to make holie For Justice or Righteousnes and Sanctitie or Holines taken in the largest sense when not opposed either to other or where not distinguished either from other seem both one and the same and signifie goodnes in general as Job 1. 1. Matth. 5. 20 33. and elswhere Thus the Fathers of that Tridentine Councel or Conventicle rather after many windings and turnings and ambiguous passages seem at length to pitch upon when thus they conclude Session 6. de Justificat cap. 7. Vnica Justificationis formalis caussa est Justitia Dei non qa ipse justus est sed qa nos justos facit qa videlicet ab eo donati renovamur spiritu mentis nostrae non solum reputamur sed vere justi nominamur sumus c. The onlie formal cause of Justification is the Righteousnes of God not whereby he is righteous but whereby he maketh us righteous to wit wherewith being by him endowed we ar renewed in the spirit of our mind and become not reputed onely but ar named and ar indeed trulie righteous receiving righteousnes each one in himself according to that degree which the Holie Ghost imparts to each at his pleasure And Bellarmine therefore whatsoever he or they seem to say elsewhere de Justificat lib. 2. cap 2. maintains this to be the meaning of the Councel there Formalem causam justificationis esse justitiam inherentem That the formal cause of Justification is inherent righteousness And hence Suarez entituleth his Books wherein he debates the point of Justification De Sanctificatione Of Sanctification Hence that distinction so rife with Popish writers taken from that place of the Councel of Trent before mentioned and of which also Bellarmine de Justificat l. 1. c. 1. concerning a first and a second Justification Illa qa ex impio justus ista qa ex justo justior fit A first whereby a man is of a bad man made good a second whereby he is of a good man made better The former whereof they say is done by an infusion of grace inherent the latter by exercise of such grace so infused Which indeed are no other but two degrees of that which we usuallie and more fitlie term Sanctification the one the beginning the other the growth and progress of it 1 Pet 1. 22 23. and 2. 2 2 Pet. 3. 18. Now tru it is 1. That it we respect the Notation or Original of the word Justifie it should signifie to make just as Sanctifie to make holie But if we regard the common use of it it no more so imports then as Sanctifie used of God doth to make holie or magnifie in common use of speech to make great And it is the Ordinarie use of words not their Original without it that must carrie it and determine what they do import and how they ar to be understood 2. It is not improbable that the Hebrew and Greek words which the Latine word Justificare tho not found in any Classical Author and our English Justifie verie rife with us seem to answer are sometime tho verie seldome taken in Scripture for to make a man inherentlie or habituallie just by a good qalitie infused or wrought into him so Dan. 12. 3. the Hebrew word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 word for word Justificantes as Junius and Pagnine render it or qi justificant as Calvin qi justificaverint as