in perfection And if God be infinite in perfection then surely there cannot be a multiplicity of Gods seing that which is infinite in that respect cannot be multiplied 2 It is evident from Deut 32 39 where the Lord speaketh of himself I even I am he and there is no God with me 3 Because God is Omnipotent and so cannot be hindred by any other in his working Rev 15 3 4 It is evident from Christs words to the young man of the Gospel there is none good but one that is God 5 From the Words of Hanna in her Song for there is none beside thee O Lord neither is there any Rock beside our God 6 From the Testimony of the Apostle 1 Cor. 8 6 to us says he there is but one God 7 From what Christ said to one of the Scribes viz the Lord our God is one Lord Mark 12 29 8 Because God is a most absolute and most perfect Beeing and so beyond all other things One Iohn 10 29. Psalm 145 3 147 5 9 Because this one blessed God is most absolutely sufficient and furnished with infinite Power and Wisdom for the production conservation and ruleing all things in Heaven and in Earth 10 Because he is of all things without himself the first and supream cause from which all the Creatures visible or invisible have their rise and beginning 11 It is evident lastly from the testimonies of the most wise Heathens who have been necessitated to acknowledge but one God only Quest. II. IS GOD infinite in beeing and perfection Yes Iob 11. 7 8 9. Iob 26 14. Well then do not the Vorstians Socinians and Anthropomorphitans err who maintain that God is finite in beeing and perfection Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because God hath a beeing from himself and all things have their dependence from him and therefore there can be nothing by which he can be limited Romans 11. 36. 2 Because GOD is every where present in heaven and in earth and beyond the Heavens Ierem 23 24 Isaiah 66 1. 2 Because the Scripture affirms that the perfection of God is the highest is unmeasurable unchangeable and infinitely great beyond all creatures Iob 11. 7 8 9. Psal. 145. 3. Iob 26. 14. Quest. III. IS the only living and true God a most pure Spirit invisible without a body and parts Yes Iohn 4 24 1 Tim 1 17 Deut 4 15 16 Luke 24. 39. Well then do not the Vorstians Anthropomorphitans and Socinians err who maintain God to have a body and endued with parts and an outward shape and form Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because God is the Father of spirits Hebr. 12 9. 2 Because God is invisible 1 Tim 1 17. 3 Because God is like to no bodily thing nor can he be represented by any image or corporeal likeness Isa 40. 18. Acts 17. 29. Quest. IV. ARE there in the unity of the Godhead three Persons of one substance power and eternity Yes 1 Iohn 5. 7. Matth. 3. 16 17. Matth. 28 19. 2 Cor. 13. 14. Well then do not the Arians and Socinians err and others Who deny the Godhead of the Son and holy Ghost Yes Do not likewise the Tritheitae err Who deny the Unity of the Divine essence Yes Thirdly do not the Sabellians err Who deny the real distinction of the Persons Yes And lastly do not the Quakers err who maintain there are no Persons in the Godhead Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 From the places of Scripture already cited 2 From the Apostolical Benediction in which the three Persons of the God-head are called upon expresly 2 Cor. 13. 14. 3 From 1 Cor. 12. 4 5 6. Where the three Persons are named Spirit Lord God And from Iohn 15. 26. But when the Comforter is come whom I will send unto you from the Father even the Spirit of Truth 4 Because there are three that bear record in heaven the Father the Son and the holy Spirit 1 Iohn 5. 7. These three must be either three Persons or three Gods This last is the hight of impossibility therefore they must be three Persons Here they are put to silence and have nothing to reply such is the strength and power of Truth which is able to stop the mouths of the greatest rebels against religion and reason But there is good ground for the word Person Heb. 1. 3. where Christ is said to be the express Image or impression of the Fathers Person Because the Person of the Son perfectly represents the Person of the Father as an Impression doth the Seal wherefore he is also called the image of the invisible GOD Col. 1. 15. The Greek word is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Subsistence or Person whereby is understood the Person of the Father as distinct from the Son and subsists of himself and in himself and is as the Original of the Person of the Son by an eternal and ineffable generation That there are three Persons in the Godhead it is further evident 1 from all the Epistles written to the seven Churches of Asia For as may be gathered from Rev. 1. 1. it is the Father that sends it is the Son that gives Iohn the Commission and it is the holy Ghost in the close that is mentioned as a joynt speaker 2 Because in that Epistle written to Thyatira there are three distinctly named first the Father and the Son in these words these things saith the Son of God Next there is named in the last verse of that second chapter the Spirit he that hath an ear let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the Churches 3 Because in the beginning of that Epistle to the Church of Sardis they are all three put together these things saith He to wit the Son that hath the seven Spirits of GOD. Here GOD that is the Father is distinctly considered as another Person The seven spirits are the holy Ghost 4 Because these three Persons are most fully and clearly distinguished in the fifth chapter First the Father sitting on the Throne Secondly the Lamb or the Son of GOD And thirdly the seven Spirits or the holy Ghost so called from the pouring out of his Gifts upon the Churches in that aboundant manner as if he were seven Spirits or a sevenfold Spirit It is evident also that the Father Son and Spirit are really distinct from one another and are three Persons They are indeed in respect of their Essence which is indivisibly communicable to them One and the same GOD but considered Personally they differ really for the Father is not the Son neither is he that sits upon the Throne the Lamb. Neither the Father nor the Spirit were incarnate but the Son who died and was buried which can be said of none but of a Person It cannot be said that the Father died or that the Spirit died Next is not the holy Ghost the spirit of GOD as the Son is the Son of GOD And if that suppose a real distinct personality this
maintain that good works flow only from God as a Moral Cause Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because Christ says ye can do nothing without me Iohn 15. 5. 2 Because of our selves we are not able to think a good thought 2 Cor. 3. 5. 3 Because it is God that worketh in us both to will and to do of his good pleasure Phil. 2. 13. Quest. IV. ARE they who are Regenerated to grow negligent as if they were not bound to perform any duty unless by a special motion of the spirit No. Ought they to stir up diligently the Grace of GOD which is in them Yes Phil. 2. 12. Heb. 6 11 12. 2 Peter 1. 3 5 10. Isa. 64. 7. 2 Tim. 1. 6. Acts 26. 6 7. Iude verse 20. 21 22. Well then do not the Quakers Familists and other Giddy-headed Persons err who maintain that Believers ought not to perform any duties in Religion unless the Spirit within move and excite them to those duties and that we ought to forbear when this is wanting Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the Holy Ghost forbiddeth us to be slow in performing such duties nay commands us to stir up the gift which is in us and use all diligence to perform duties commanded by himself Phil. 2. 12. Iude verse 20. 2 Because the Prophet confesseth that as the great sin of the Lords people that there is none that calleth upon his name that stirreth up himself to take hold of him Isaiah 64. 7. 3 Because to neglect the worshipping of GOD is an evident sign and token of an Atheist Ps 14. 4. Ps. 53. 4. 4 Because the Lord hath threatned to pour out his fury upon the Heathen that know him not and upon the Families that call not on his Name Ierem. 10. 25. 5 Because the twelve Tribes which hoped to come to the promise made to the Fathers instantly served GOD day and night Acts 26. 6 7. And the Apostles gave themselves continually to Prayer and to the Ministry of the Word Acts 6. 4. 6 Because Christ himself who had always the Spirit was very frequent in all those Exercises and Duties as all the Histories of the four Evangelists do testifie Those Fanatick Recusants either have the Spirit of God in them or they want it This last they will not grant If then they have it why do they refuse to perform duties of Religion more then our blessed Saviour did when opportunitie and occasion did call him They have the Spirit but want the Impulse But contrarywise this impulse is never wanting when there is a call But the Spirits call is never wanting when opportunity is offered 7 Because Christ will have the Gospel preached to every creature Mark 16. 15. And hath commanded the administration of the Lords Supper even to his second coming 1 Cor. 11. 26. And will have the work of the ministry to continue in his Church for the perfecting of the Saints for the edifying of the body of Christ till we all come in the unity of the Faith c. Eph. 4. 11 12 13. 8 Because we are commanded to pray without ceasing 1 Thes. 5. 17 That is upon all opportunities and in all our necessities 9 Because we are commanded to trust in him at all times Psalm 62. 8. 10 if we shall forbear outward duties as prayer and such like then ought we to forbear inward exercises as Acts of Faith Love and Fear till we be moved thereunto which is most absurd for we are commanded as was cited to trust in him alwayes 11 What assurance can men have the next hour or to morrow more than in the present time of the Spirits motion on their souls or that they shall be thus at a greater advantage by putting off the duty till they have some inward motion and impulse thereunto than by waiting on the ordinary call of the Word or of Providence Quest. V. ARE they who in their obedience attain to the greatest hight which is possible in this life so far from being able to supererogate and to do more than God requires that they fall short of much which in duty they are bound to do Yes Luke 17. 10. Neh. 13. 22. Gal. 15. 17. Iob 9. 2 3. Well then do not the Papists err who maintain That a man regenerated can not only fulfil the Law of God perfectly but may do also more good than the Law of God requires of him This is their mad fancy of the works of Supererogation Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because no man living is able to fulfil the Law of God Psalm 143. 2. Isaiah 64. 6. 1 Iohn 1. 8. Far less is any man able to do more than the Law requires 2 Because we are obliged to seek remission of sins every day Matth. 6. 12. But to seek pardon for sin every day and to perform works of Supererogation are inconsistent together 3 Because Christ says when you shall have done all things which are commanded you say we are unprofitable servants we have done that which was our duty to do Luke 17. 10. 4 Because according to this Doctrine of works of Supererogation we must accuse the Scripture and Law of God of imperfection as if they were not a perfect Rule of life and manners which is contrary to the Psalmist 19. 8. And contrary to 2 Tim. 3. 15 17. Deut. 4. 2. 5 Because whatsoever things are true honest just pure lovely of good report these are commanded as things necessary to all men therefore either the Works which the Papists call works of Supererogation are true honest just and pure and if they be such they are commanded by God in Scripture and not works of Supererogation or they are unhonest impure unjust and if such then no man is so mad as to call them Good-works much less Works of Supererogation Phil. 4. 8. Quest. VI. CAN our best works merit pardon of sin or eternal life at the hands of God No. Rom. 3. 20. Rom. 4. 2 4 6. Eph. 2 8 9. Titus 3. 5 6 7. Rom. 8. 18. Psalm 16. 2. Iob 22. 2 3. Well then do not the Papists and some of the Quakers err who maintain that the Good works of Regenerate men do truely and properly Merit and deserve eternal life Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because there is no proportion between our imperfect works and life eternal between the work and the Reward 2 Cor. 4. 17. For our light afflictions worketh for us that is brings forth not of any Merit but of meer Grace for Christs sake see Rom. 8. 18. Rom 3. 28. 2 If by our good Works we deserved the pardon of sin we might have whereof to boast for if Abraham were justified by works he hath whereof to glory but not before God Rom. 4. 2 But the Scripture saith he that glorieth let him glorie in the Lord 1 Cor. 1. 31. 3 Because no creature performing the most excellent Works can deserve any favour from God
Sacrament of Baptism in case of necessity Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because Christ gave the power of dispensing the Sacraments to them only to whom he gave the power of Preaching Mat. 28. 19. But the power of preaching is not given to all men Heb. 5. 4. 2 Because all that ever did dispense the Sacrament of Baptism in the New Testament were either called Ordinarly or Extraordinarly as is evident from the examples of Iohn the Baptist and the disciples of Christ. From the example of Peter Acts 2. 41. From the example of Philip Acts 8. 38. From the example of Ananias Acts 9. 18. From the example of Paul and Silas Acts 16. 15. 33. 3 Because it is unlawful for any man to affix the Kings seal to a Charter or Letters-patent unless he be a person authorized and deputed by the King for that use But the Sacraments are seals of the Covenant between God and his people Rom. 4. 11. 4 Because women are not permitted to speak publickly in the Church therefore they have no power to dispense the Sacrament of Baptism 1 Cor. 14. 34. 1 Tim. 2. 12. 5 Because the Adversaries grant that it is unlawful to women or Laicks to administer the Lords Supper therefore it is as unlawful for them to administer Baptism No just cause of reason or disparity can be given 6 Because the benefit of regeneration is not tyed as the Adversaries may dream to the outward Baptism as is clear and evident from the conversion of the Thief upon the cross And from 1 Peter 3. 21. Therefore there is no such necessity of Baptism as the Papists and Lutherians do fancy Quest. VI. ARE the Sacraments of the Old Testament in regard of the spiritual things thereby signified and exhibited the same for substance with those of the New Yes 1 Cor. 10. 1 2 3 4. Well then do not the Papists and Lutherians err who maintain that the difference between the Sacraments of the Old Testament and the New consists in this that those did deliniate and shaddow forth Grace these contain offer and confer Grace Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the Apostle 1 Cor. 10. 1 2 3. expresly says that the Cloud and the passing thorow the Red-Sea did signifie these same things to the Iews which Baptism signifies to us And that the Manna and the Water from the Rock did signifie the same thing to them which the Lords Supper signifies to us 2 Because the Sacraments of the Old and New Testament did obsignate and seal up the same righteousness of Faith Rom. 4. 11. 3 Because the Scripture applyeth to Believers under the Old Testament the Sacraments of the New 1 Cor. 10. 1 2 3. And on the other hand the Scripture applyeth the Sacraments of the New Testament to Believers under the Old which is not done by reason of the sign for the signs are diverse and different therefore it must be done by reason of the thing signified and by consequence the Sacraments of the Old Testament must agree in the thing signified with the Sacraments of the New 4 Because the Sacraments of both Testaments agree in the Word of Promise Gen. 17. 7. Acts 2. 38 39. Rom. 4. 11 12 13. Gal. 3. 29. CHAP. XXVIII Of BAPTISM Question I. IS the Sacrament of Baptism with Water by Christs appointment to be continued in his Church to the end of the World Yes Matth. 28. 19 20. Well then do not the Quakers err who maintain that Baptism with Water is not an Ordinance of Divine institution and that there is no Gospel precept for it Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because Christ taking his fare-well of his Disciples gave them this Commission Go ye therefore and teach all Nations Baptising them in the Name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost Or according to the Original Word make all Nations Disciples by your Doctrine Baptising them in the Name of c. All which words are spoken with one breath Whence it is clear that the same very persons that were commanded to make all Nations Disciples by their Doctrine were commanded to baptise them But it was not in their power to administer the Inward Baptism that is to baptise with the holy Ghost and with fire Men may well administer the Water or external sign but it is Christ that bestowes the inward Grace and thing signified as is clear from Matth. 3. 11. where Iohn the Baptist sayes I indeed baptise you with Water unto Repentance but he that cometh after me shall baptise you with the holy Ghost and with fire If any man had received this power of Baptising with the Holy Ghost then surely Iohn should have received it whom Jesus so highly commends as that there was not a greater than he born of women Matth. 11. 11. And though our Saviour subjoyns he that is least in the kingdom of Heaven is greater than he yet this will not infer that any among the Teachers of the Gospel had the power of baptising with the holy Ghost which he had not but only that they did shew Christ more clearly as having most perfectly accomplished whatsoever was requisite to our salvation and did publish this not only to the Iews but also to the Gentiles And so Christ as the Master employed only the Disciples as his servants to dispense and act ministerially in his service reserving the blessing of their employments to himself Now baptizing with the holy Ghost is the greatest blessing of the Gospel and so cannot flow but from Christ himself 2 Because the Disciples of Christ acted only ministerially under him in working of miracles therefore they could not administer baptism with the holy Ghost seing this is a greater power than the other The cureing of the soul is a far greater work than to cure miraculously the body The work of Conversion and regeneration is a work beyond the creating of heaven and earth There was only here the introducing of a new Form but no contrary Form or quality to be expelled But in this the heart of stone must not onely be taken away but a heart of flesh must be given That they acted only Ministerially under Christ it is evident from what Peter sayes ye men of Israel why look ye so earnestly on us as though by our own power and godliness we made this man to walk Acts 3. 12. And the same Peter says Eneas Jesus Christ maketh thee whole Acts 9. 34 See Mark 16. 17. 1 Cor. 12. 10. 3 Because if this commission empowred the Apostles to baptise onely with the Holy Ghost and not with water then they in the exercise of this Commission would onely have baptized men and women with the holy Ghost and not with water but the contrary is manifest Acts 2. 38. where Peter makes a distinction between being baptized in the name of Jesus Christ and receiving the gift of the holy Ghost namely the gifts and graces of the holy Spirit which are common
did Acts 17. 11 12. 3 Because unwritten Traditions are subject and lyable to many corruptions and are soon and quickly forgotten 4. Because we have Life Eternal in the Scriptures therefore they must be most necessary to the Church Iohn 5. 39. 5. Because the Scriptures are given that the Man of GOD may be perfect thorowly furnished to all good works 2 Tim. 3. 16 17. And the Scriptures are written that men may believe Iohn 20. 31. Quest III. ARE these former wayes of GODS revealing his will unto his People now ceased Yes Well then do not the Enthusiasts and Quakers err who maintain That the Lord hath not ceased yet to reveal his Will as he did of old Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1. Because GOD who at sundry times and in diverse manners spake in times past unto the Fathers by the Prophets hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son Heb. 1. 1 2. The Apostle calls the time of the New Testament the last days because under the same there is no more alteration to be expected but all things are to abide without adding or taking away as was taught and ordained by Christ until the last day See also Ioel 2. 28. Acts 2. 17. The Wayes and Manners of old was first by Inspiration 2 Chro. 15. 1. Isaiah 59. 21. 2 Pet. 1. 21. Secondly by Visions Numb 12. 6. 8. Thirdly by Dreams Ioh 33. 14 15. Gen. 40. 8. Fourthly by Urim and Thummim Numb 27. 21. 1 Sam. 30. 7 8. Fifthly by Signs Gen. 32. 24. Exod. 13. 21. Sixthly by audible Voice Exod. 20. 1. Gen. 22. 15. All which do end in Writing Exod. 17. 14. which is a most sure and infallible way of the Lords revealing his Will unto his People Quest. IV. DO the Books of the Old and New Testament come under the name of the holy Scripture and Word of GOD Yes Well then do not the Quakers err who maintain That the Scriptures ought not to be called the Word of GOD Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1. Because Christ says if he called them Gods unto whom the Word of GOD came and the Scripture cannot be broken Ioh. 10. 35. Here it is evident that the Word of GOD and the Scripture are the same 2. Because the predictions of the Prophets are expresly called the Word of GOD. Now in the first year of Cyrus king of Persia that the Word of the Lord spoken by the mouth of Ieremiah might be accomplished 2 Chro. 36. 22. Here we see it is evident that the written Prophesies of Ieremiah which are a part of the holy Scripture are called the Word of GOD. 3. Because what Christ calls the commandement of GOD He calls the Word of GOD Mar. 7. 9 10. compared with v 13. 4. Because the Apostle calls the sword of the Spirit the Word of God This sword is the sword of the Holy Spirit which he doth as it were put into our hand to resist Satan against all his temptations Eph. 6. 17. Therefore by the sword of the Spirit must be understood the Scripture not the Spirit it self as some Quakers affirm It is evident also from the fourth chapter of Matthew where Christ being tempted by the Devil with three different temptations resists him with three different places of Scripture And being asked by the Pharisees why his Disciples did pluck the ears of Corn upon the Sabbath day answered by Scripture Mat. 12. 1 2 3 4. Teaching us that Satans temptations must be carefully answered and that by Scripture as the onely mean to overcome him and his Instruments 5. Because the Word of GOD is quick and powerful and sharper than any two edged sword Heb. 4. 12. This cannot be understood of Christ because Paul in his other writings doth not call the Person of Christ by this name and therefore must be understood of the word of the Gospel the power whereof is described Rom. 1. 16. 6. See these following places of Scripture Psalm 119. 172. 1 Kin. 16. 12. and 2 Kin. 9. 36. and 2 Kin. 23. 16. Isa. 28. 13. Hos. 1. 1 2. Isa. 37. 22. Prov. 30. 5. By the Scripture or Word of GOD we do not understand the bare letters or the several written words of the holy Scripture which the Adversaries may imagine we call the Word of GOD. These are only the Vessels which carry and convey that Heavenly Light unto us But we understand thereby the Doctrine or Will of GOD revealed unto reasonable creatures teaching them what to do believe or leave undone Deut. 29. 29. Quest. V. ARE the Scriptures given of GOD to be the Rule of Faith and Life Yes Luke 16. 29 31. Eph. 2. 20. Rev. 22. 18 19. 2 Tim. 3. 16. Well then doth not the Popish Church err who maintain their Unwritten Traditions to be the Rule of Faith Yes Do not likewise the Enthusiasts and the Quakers err who maintain the Spirit within that teaches the Elect to be the only Rule of Faith And that the Dictates of the Light within are of as great authority as the Scriptures Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1. Because the Scriptures are called a Rule Gal. 6. 16. 2. Because nothing is to be added to the Scriptures Deut. 4. 2. and 12. 32. Prov. 30. 6. Rev. 22. 19 20. 3. Because we ought rather to follow the Scriptures in this Life than a voice spoken from Heaven 2 Pet. 1. 19 21. 4. Because the Scripture is written that we may believe Iohn 20. 31. 5. Because the Scripture is given for making the man of GOD perfect 2 Tim. 3. 17. 6. Because we must betake our selves in the whole of Religion to the Law and to the Testimony Isa. 8. 20. 7 Because Christ himself refers the greatest question that ever was whether he be the Son of GOD or not to the Scriptures Ioh. 5. 38 39. Search the Scriptures says he for they testify of me 8 Because the Holy Ghost did never give such a designation to his own Word as an Historical Rule and dead Letter or as some Quakers call them not the principal Fountain of Truth and knowledge nor the first rule of Faith and Manners but the Regula secundaria subordinate to the Spirit whence as they affirm the holy Scriptures have all their true worth excellency and certainty whereas Paul sayes expresly Faith comes by hearing and hearing by the Word of GOD Rom. 10. 14. 9. Because the spirits cannot be known by any other Rule than by the written Word It is certain that the Devil transforms himself into an Angel of light 2 Cor. 11. 14. There is a spirit of the World 1 Cor. 2. 12. A spirit that rules in the hearts of the children of disobedience Eph. 2. 2. There is a lying spirit 1 Kin. 22. 22. And a Spirit of error and delusion 1 Iohn 4. 6. How shal these be known to be such or the Spirit which the Quakers obtrude upon us not to be one of them but by the Rule of the
must do it also Now if the Father be God and the Son be God and the Spirit God also who have one and the same divine nature and essence indivisibly communicated to them and so if there be but one God and yet these three really distinct then they must be distinct persons in respect of their Personal properties seing they are Persons and distinct The Son as was said is called the express Image of the Fathers Person which evidently shews that the Father considered as distinct from the Son is a Person and subsists If then thus it be must not the Son as distinct from the Father and so lively and expresly representing his person be a person also having this from the Father The same must be true likewise of the holy Ghost who is GOD equal with both yet different from both for he who proceedeth from the Father and from the Son must differ from the Father and from the Son as he who is begotten must be distinct from him that begat him Some Quakers either ignorantly or perversely will have the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 translated substance as it is Heb. 11. 1. and thus they read Heb. 1. 3. the Character or Image of GODS substance which is to be understood of Christ say they not simply as GOD but as Man But they might as well have said it signifies confident or confidence because it is so translated 2 Cor. 9. 4. and 2 Cor. 11. 17. But they speak here consequentially to their own Tenets who in effect deny the Trinity and all distinction between the Father Son and holy Ghost not only in words but in very deed The Apostle in this place is proving Christ the Son of GOD to be Lord and Heir of all things because GOD created the Worlds by him He is the brightness of his glory the express Image of his person upholdeth all things by the Word of his power These Titles are here given to the Son of GOD as a Creator and a Preserver of all things which belong to him only according to his Divine Nature therefore these Titles must be understood of Christ forasmuch as he is the eternal Son of GOD and a Light from the Eternal Light of one Essence and Glory with the Father nevertheless distinguished from the Person of the Father by whom the Father executes his Operations and shews his Properties even as the Sun by its light doth shine Quest. V. IS the Son of God of the same substance Power and Eternity with the Father Yes 1 Iohn 5. 20. Rom. 9. 5. Isa. 9. 6. Well then do not the Arians err who maintain the Son to be a creature brought forth before the foundations of the World Yes Do not likewise the Socinians err who maintain the Son to have had no Existence before he was conceived in the Womb of the Virgin Mary Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 From the Scriptures above cited 2 Because the Son is Omnipotent the Creator and Preserver of all things Rev. 1. 18. Col. 1. 16 17. 3 Because he is Omniscient and searcher of the heart Matthew 9. 3 4. Iohn 2. 25. Iohn 21. 17. Quest. VI. IS the Holy Ghost GOD Yes Acts 5. 3. 1 Cor. 6. 19 20. 1 Cor. 3. 16 17. Well then do not the Macedonians or Pneumatomachians Arians Socinians and many of the Anabaptists err who maintain the Holy Ghost to be a Creature as do the Macedonians or a Power Vertue or Efficacy of the Father as many Socinians and others do Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1. Because the Holy Ghost is to be worshipped as God Matth. 28. 19. 2 Cor. 13. 14. Rev. 1. 4. 2. Because he is omniscient and knoweth all things 1 Cor. 2. 10 11. 3. Because he is omnipotent the maker and preserver of all things the worker of miracles and it is he that sanctifies and justifies the Believers Gen. 1 2. Psalm 33. 6. Matth. 12. 28. Compare Isaiah 6. 9. with Acts 28. 25 26 27. 4. Because Ananias is said to lie to the holy Ghost Acts 5. 3. and verse 4. he is said not to lie to men but to GOD. 5. Because Believers are said to be the Temple of God 1 Cor. 3. 16 17. And they are said 1 Cor. 6. 19. to be the Temple of the holy Ghost therefore the holy Ghost is God seeing to be the Temple of God and the Temple of the holy Ghost are the same 6. Because none can be properly sinned against but the true God therefore the Holy Ghost is God because many have been said to have sinned against the holy Ghost Matth 12. 31. Quest. VII DOth not the Holy Ghost eternally proceed from the Father and the Son Yes Iobn 15. 26. Gal. 4. 6. Well then doth not the Greek Church err who maintains the holy Ghost to proceed only from the Father Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1. Because he is sent by the Son Iohn 15. 26. Acts 2. 33. 2. Because all things which are the Sons are the Fathers except the Personal Properties by which they are distinguished and all things are communicated from the Father to the Son and consequently the holy Ghost Iohn 16. 13 14 15. Matth. 11. 27. Iohn 17. 10. 3. Because Christ gave to his Apostles the Spirit by breathing it upon them Iohn 20. 22. To shew that he proceeded from himself 4. Because he is the Spirit of the Son no less than the Spirit of the Father Gal. 4. 6. 5. Because if the holy Ghost did not proceed from the Son as truely as from the Father he would not be a person really distinct from the Son which is contrary to Iohn 14. 16 17. 6 Because it is said Iohn 16. 14. He shall glorify me namely by his testimony gifts and miracles for he shall receive of mine that is the doctrine of Salvation which I have taught you he shall also reveal it unto you seing he shal receive the same from me and shall shew it unto you And Rom. 8. 9. He is called the Spirit both of the Father and of the Son It is said if any man hath not the Spirit of Christ that is the same Spirit which in the foregoing verse is called the Spirit of GOD namely the Father and is here also called the Spirit of Christ because he also proceeds from Christ and is procured for us by Christ Iohn 14. 26. Iohn 16. 7. CHAP. III. Of GODS Eternal Decrees Question I. DId God from all eternity by the most holy and wise Counsel of his Will freely and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass Yes Eph. 1. 11. Romans 11. 33. Heb. 6. 17. Romans 9. 15. 18. Well then do not the Socinians Arminians and Iesuits err who maintain the things which come to pass in time to fall out and come to pass without the Decree of God Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1. From the knowledge of God whereby from all eternity he hath known all things infallibly which come to pass
to all believers and necessary to salvation 4 Because if baptism with the holy Ghost be here meant then all whom the Apostles did baptize were baptised with the holy Ghost which is false for Ananias and Saphira could not have been Hypocrites if they had been baptized with the holy Ghost And Simon was baptized and yet not with the holy Ghost as appears by Peters answer to him verse 21 22. of the fifth chapter 5 Because if Christs commission carry not a warrant for baptizing with water whence then had the Apostles a warrant for baptizing with Water Either they must produce and let us see another commission for it or else they must acknowledge that the Apostles did warrantably baptise with Water But another commission the Quakers cannot shew us from Scripture Quest. II. IS dipping of the person to be baptised into Water necessary No. Is Baptism rightly administred by pouring or sprinkling water upon the person Yes Acts 2. 41. Acts 16. 33. Well then do not the Anabaptists err who maintain Dipping to be an absolute and necessary ceremony in Baptism Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the Greek word in the original signifies as well to poure and sprinkle water as it signifies to dip Mark 7. 4. Where it is said and when they come from the mercat unless they wash or be Baptised they eat not 2 Because we read of three thousand baptised in one day in the streets of Ierusalem by twelve Apostles at the most where there was no river to dip them into Acts 2. 41. And was not Ierusalem and all Iudea and the region round about Iordan baptised by Iohn the Baptist himself alone which could not be done to all and every one by Dipping Matth. 3. 5 6. 3 Were not many baptised in private houses as we read in the History of the Acts chapter 10. 47. and 18. 8. with 9. 17. and 16. 33. 4 Because Dipping of Infants into water in these cold Countries would be hurtful and dangerous to them But GOD will rather have mercy than sacrifice Matth. 9. 13. Quest. III. ARE the Infants of one or both believing Parents to be baptised Yes Gen. 17. 7 9. Gal. 3. 9. 14. Col. 2. 11. 12. Acts 2. 38. 39. Rom. 4. 11 12. Well then do not the Anabaptists err who maintain that no Infants though born of believing Parents ought to be baptised Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because to covenanted ones of which number the Infants of Believers are no less than their Parents Acts 2. 38 39. Acts. 3. 25. Rom. 11. 16. Gen. 17. 7 22. that seal of the covenant of which they are capable is not to be denyed Gen. 17. 7 10 11. 2 Because the outward Sacrament of Water cannot be denyed to such as have received the Spirit of Christ and to whom the promises of the New Covenant sealed up in Baptism do belong Acts 10. 47. Acts 11. 15 16 17. But to some Infants of Believers as well as to others come to Age the Spirit of Christ hath been given Ierem. 1. 5. Luke 1. 15. Matth. 19. 14. Mark 10. 13 14. And to them do the promises belong Acts 2. 39. 3 Because the Infants of Believers are members of the Church which is sanctified and cleansed with the washing of water by the Word Eph. 5. 25 26. Ioel 2. 16. Ezek. 16. 20 21. 1 Cor. 7. 14. 4 Because Infants no less than others come to Age were Baptised in the Cloud and in the Sea 1 Cor. 10. 2. 5 Because Christ commanded that all Nations should be baptised a great part whereof were Infants Gen. 22. 18. Matth. 28. 19. 6 Because Christ commanded Baptism to be administred to Disciples Infants also are here to be taken in Acts 15. 10. Matth. 28. 19. The word in the Original is Matheteusate Teach Instruct or make Disciples all Nations or make Disciples among all Nations baptising them The signification of this Greek word may be gathered from Iohn 4. 1. where it is said that the Pharisees had heard that Jesus made Disciples So that Matheteuein and Mathetas poiein are both one thing 7 Because the children of Believers were by a Divine right circumcised under the Old Testament therefore the children of Believers under the New Testament ought to be baptised because the one hath succeeded to the other That Baptism succeeds to Circumcision is evident first because they both seal up the same very thing Next as Circumcision was the initiating Seal under the Old Testament so is Baptism under the New because the Apostles did administer it so early to the Disciples at the first appearing of their new birth and interest in the Covenant Moreover because by Baptism we are said to put on Christ Gal. 3. 27. That they both seal up the same thing is evident by comparing Rom. 4 11 with Mar 1 4 Acts 2 28. Where Circumcision is declared to be a seal of the righteousnes of Faith and Baptism is held forth to be a pledge of the remission of sins as also may be seen Rom. 4. 6 7 8. see Col. 2. 11. 12. Where the Apostle teaches that our being buried with Christ in Baptism is our circumcision in Christ which shews that Baptism hath succeeded to us in the room of Circumcision 8 Because the Apostle sayes that the Infants but of one believing Parent are holy 1 Cor. 7. 14. that is are comprehended in the outward Covenant of GOD and have access to the Signs and Scals of GODS Grace as well as they are that are born of both believing Parents Quest. IV. ARE Grace and Salvation so inseparably annexed unto Baptism as that no person can be regenerated or saved without it No. Are all that are baptised undoubtedly regenerated No. Acts 8. 13 23. Well then do not the Papists and Lutherians err who maintain that Baptism is simply necessary to Salvation and that all and those onely who are baptised are most surely regenerated in that same very moment of time wherein Baptism is administred Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the Thief upon the Cross and others were saved that were never baptised Luke 23. 43. 2 Because persons unbaptised have had saving Faith Acts 10. 22 44. 3 Because Infants that are predestinated unto life though they die in their mothers belly yet they cannot perish Matth. 18. 14. 4 Because some children before their Baptism have been beloved of GOD whose love is unchangeable Rom. 9 11 13. Others have been Regenerated by the Holy Ghost Luke chap 1 ver 15 and some have also been comprehended within the Covenant of Grace Acts 2. 39. 5 Because that Baptism without faith and the inward operation of the holy Spirit hath no efficacy to Salvation Mark 16. 16. 1 Peter 3. 21. 6 Because the Baptism of the Spirit at one time goes before at another time follows Baptism with water Acts 10. 37. Matth. 3. 11. 7 Because very many that are baptized within the visible Church are damned Matth.
Word Quest. VI. ARE the Books commonly called Apocrypha of Divine Inspiration No. Luke 24. 27 44. Rom. 3. 2. and 2 Pet. 1. 21. Well then do not the Papists err who affirm That the books called Apocrypha are of divine Inspiration and of equal authority with the undoubted Word Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1. Because they were never written in the Hebrew tongue nor by any of the Prophets 2. Because they are never cited in the New Testament by Christ or by any of the Apostles as the books of the Canonical Scriptures are 3. Because they contain many fabulous and impious Doctrines and Histories First in Tobit 5. 12. The Angel says he was Azariah the son of Ananias This was a manifest lie which cannot be attributed to a good Angel and therefore the Spirit of GOD hath not dictated this History 2. It is reported Tobit 6. 6 7 16 17. that the heart and liver of a Fish was good to make a perfume to drive away the Devil if any man was troubled with him or with any evil Spirit And it is said Tobit 12. 15. by the Angel I am Raphael one of the seven holy Angels that presents the prayers of the Saints This is only proper to Christ. 3. Because the fact of Simeon and Levi condemned by Iacob acted by the Spirit of GOD Gen. 34. 25. in killing the Shechemites is commended by Iudeth 9. 2 3. 4. Because you will read of an offering for the dead Prayers and Reconciliation for the dead that they might be delivered from sin 2 Maccab. 12. 43 44 45. See what contradictions are in comparing together 1 Maccab. 6. 8. 2 Maccab. 15. 16. 2 Maccab 9. 5. Quest. VII DOTH the Authority of the holy Scripture for which it ought to be believed and obeyed depend upon the testimony of any man or Church No. 2 Pet. 1. 19. 21. 2 Tim. 3. 16. 1 Thes. 2. 13. Well then do not the Popish Writters err who maintain the Authority of the Scriptures to depend upon the testimony of the Church as to us Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1. Because the Word is to be received by us not as the word of man but as the Word of GOD 1 Thes. 2. 13. 2. Because the Doctrine of Christ to be received by Belivers dependeth not upon mans testimony Ioh. 5. 34. 3. Because GOD only is true and infallible and all men are liars Rom. 3. 4. Heb. 6. 18. He is of incomprehensible wisdom Ps. 147. 5. Of great goodness Exod. 18. 9. Rom. 11. 12. Ps. 34. 8. Of absolute power and dominion Gen. 17. 1. Ps. 50. 1 2. Of infallible truth who can neither deceive nor can be deceived Ro. 3. 4. Tit. 1. 2. Heb. 6. 18. Therefore ought he to be credited in all his Narrations Promises Threatnings and Prophesies and obeyed in all his Commandements allanerly because he himself hath said so Quest. VIII IS the whole counsel of GOD concerning all things necessary for his own Glory Mans Salvation Faith and Life either expresly set down in Scripture or by good and necessary consequence may be deduced from it Yes 2 Tim. 3. 15. Gal. 1. 8 9. 2 Thes. 2. 2. Well then doth not the Popish Church err who maintain The Scripture to be an imperfect Rule and therefore to stand in need of a supply of unwritten Traditions Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1. Because all Scripture is given that the Man of GOD may be perfect thorowly furnished to all good works 2 Tim. 3. 16 17. 2. Because the Psalmist sayes expresly the Law of the Lord is perfect converting the soul Psal. 19. 7 8. 3. Because nothing is to be added to the Word of GOD Deut. 4. 2. Prov. 30. 6. Therefore the Scriptures must be a compleat and perfect Rule of Faith and not an imperfect Rule or but partly a Rule as they teach Quest. IX IS it warrantable to argue in Articles or Matters of Faith by Consequences natively deduced from Scripture Yes Well then do not the Socinians Quakers Anabaptists and Arminians err who maintain That all matters of Faith are set down expresly and in so many words in Scripture and that no matters of Faith at least necessary to Salvation can be built upon Consequences drawn from the Scripture Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1. Because Christ himself proves that necessary point of Faith The Resurrection of the dead from the Scripture by a Consequence Matth. 23. 29 31 32. To be any one 's GOD is to give one eternal life Psal. 33. 12. Psal. 144. 15. Whence followeth that those Patriarchs lived still with God in respect of their Souls which these Sadducees also denyed Acts 23. 8. and should also rise in respect of their Bodies and live eternally seing he is called a God not of one part of them only but of their whole persons And in that same chapter verse 43 45. Christ proves his Deity by a consequence from Scripture against the Pharisees 2. So doth Apollos Acts 18. 28. and Paul Acts 19. 22. prove from the Old Testament Jesus to be the Christ but it is not expresly said in the Old Testament that he is Christ. Is not that which necessarly followes from Scripture contained in it implicitly and implicitly revealed by God and is infallibly true Quest. X. IS the inward Illumination of the Spirit of GOD necessary for the saving understanding of such things as are revealed in the Word Yes Iohn 6. 45. 1 Cor. 2. 9 10 11 12. Well then do not the Socinians and Armiâ—ians err who maintain That men without the revelation of the Spirit are able to understand the Scriptures for their Salvation Yes By what Reasons are they confuted 1. Because the Disciples of Christ were not able to understand the Scripture before he opened their eyes Luke 24. 45. 2. Because the Iews to this day cannot understand the Scriptures of the Old Testament until the Vail by the spirit of GOD be taken away 2 Cor. 3. 14 15 16 18. 3. Because the Psalmist David seeketh from God the opening of his eyes that he may behold wondrous things out of his Law Psal. 119. 18. Quest. XI ARE all these things which are necessary to be known believed and observed for salvation so clearly propounded and opened in some place of Scripture or other that not only the Learned but the Unlearned in a due use of the ordinary means may attain unto a sufficient understanding of them for their salvation Yes Psal. 119. 105 130. Well then do not the Papists err who maintain That things necessary to salvation are obscurely and darkly set down in the Scripture and that without the help of unwritten Traditions and the infallible expounding of the Church the Scriptures cannot be understood Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1. Because the Word is a lamp unto our feet and a light unto our paths Psal. 119 105. 2. Because the Scripture is a light which shineth in a dark place 2
Pet. 1. 19. 3. Because the Scripture enlighteneth the eyes and maketh the simple wise Psal. 19. 7 8. Quest XII HAth the Lord by his singular providence and care keeped pure in all Ages the Old Testament in Hebrew and the New Testament in Greek Yes Matthew 5. 18. Well then do not the Papists err who maintain the Old Testament in Hebrew and the New Testament in Greek which are the Fountains to be corrupted and that their common Latine Version is authentick Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1. Because Christ sayes till Heaven and Earth pass one jot or one title shall in nowise pass from the Law till all be fulfilled Matth. 5. 18. 2. Because there can be no urgent necessity shown why the Fountains are corrupted 3 If any such corruption had been in the Scripture Christ his Apostles and the Orthodox Fathers had declared so much 4 Because they never have nor can make out any manifest corruptions in the Fountains albeit most manifest and undenyable demonstrations are given of the corruptions of their Latine Version which they make authentick Quest XIII ARE the Original tongues viz. the Hebrew and the Greek to be translated into the Vulgar Language of every Nation into which they come Yes Are we commanded in the fear of GOD to read and search the Scriptures Yes Iohn 5. 39. 1 Cor. 14. 6 9 11 12 14 24 27 28. Well then do not the Papists err who maintain There is no necessity of translating the Original Tongues the Hebrew and the Greek into the vulgar Language of every Nation unto which they come but rather a very great hazard and danger of Errors and Heresies Yes Do not likewise the same Papists err who forbid the reading of the Scriptures in the vulgar tongues Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1. Because the Scriptures were given long since to the Iews in their own vulgar Language that they might be read publickly and privately by all Deut. 31. 10 11 12. Deut. 11. 18 19 20. 2. Because the New Testament was written in the Greek Language which at that time was most generally known to all Nations 3. Because Christ bids all promiscuously search the Scriptures Ioh. 5. 29. 4. Because the Prophets and Apostles preached their Doctrines to the People and Nations in their known Languages Ier. 36 15 16. Act. 2. 6. 5. Because immediately after the Apostles times many Translations were extant 6. Because all things must be done in the Congregation unto edifying 1 Cor. 14. 26. but an unknown tongue doth not edify 7. Because all are commanded to try the Spirits 1 Thes. 5. 21. 1 Cor. 10. 15. 8. Because the Scriptures teach the way of Life Prov. 2. 9. Luke 16. 29. Acts 24. 14. 9. Because the Scriptures set forth the duties of every man in his place and estate of his life Deut. 17. 18 19 20. Iosh. 1. 8. Psal. 119. 24. 2 Chron. 23. 11. 10. Because they are the ground of Faith Rom. 4. 20. 2 Chron. 20. 20. 11. Because they are the Epistle of God sent to his Church Hos. 8. 12. Rev. 2. 1 8 12. 12 Because they are his Testament wherein we may find what legacies he hath bequeathed unto us 2 Cor. 3. 14 16. Heb. 10. 16. Ioh. 14. 16. 13 Because they are the sword of the Spirit Ephes. 6. 17. 14 Because being imbraced and known they make a man happy Psalm 119. 97 98. Luke 10. 42. Luke 16. 29. Psalm 1 2 Rev 1 3. 15 Because when the Scriptures are neglected or contemned they plunge men into all misery Heb 2 3 Matth 22 29 Psalm 50 16. Quest XIV WHen there is a Question about the true meaning and full sense of any Scripture must it be known and searched by other places which speak more clearly Yes 2 Peter 1 21 Acts 15 15 16. Well then do not the Papists err who maintain The Scriptures not to be a sufficient Interpreter of it self and that the sense of it cannot be gathered infallibly when the text is doubtfull from other places which speak more clearly but onely from the Magisterial Traditions and unwritten Opinions of the Church of Rome Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the noble Bereans compared Scripture with Scripture for finding out the true and sure sense of it Acts 17 11. 2 Because the Apostle Paul did the same Acts 28 23. 3 Because the same was done by the council of the Apostles and Elders Acts 15. 15 16 17. Quest. XV. IS the holy Spirit speaking in the Scripture the Supream Iudge by which all controversies of Religion are determined and all Decrees of Councils Opinions of Ancient Writers Doctrines of men and private Spirits are to be examined and in whose sentence we are to rest Yes Matth 22 29 31 Eph 2. 20 Acts 28. 25. Well then do not the Papists err who maintain That the Church of Rome and the Pope are the supream Iudges of all Controversies of Faith and that his Decrees and Determinations are to be believed without examination and implicitly to be believed by all Believers Yes Do not likewise the Quakers err who maintain that the Light within which teacheth the Elect is the only Iudge of all Controversies of Faith Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because God commands all men to go to the Law and to the Testimony in doubtful matters Isaiah 8 20 2 Because all doubts in Religion are to be examined by the Rule of the Word Acts 17. 11. Galatians 6. 16. 3 Because Christ and his Apostles did alwayes dispute and reason from the Scriptures against the enemies of the Truth Matth. 22 31. Gal. 3. 13. 4 Because the Church of GOD is founded upon the Writings of the Prophets and Apostles Eph. 2. 20. 5 Because we are commanded to prove all things and to try the Spirits 1 Thes. 5. 2. 1 Iohn 4. 1 6. CHAP. II. Of GOD and of the Holy Trinity Question I. IS there but one onely the true and living GOD Yes Deut. 6. 4. 1 Corinth 8. 4. 6. 1 Thes. 1. 9. Well then do not the Tritheitae err who maintain three GODS numerically distinct the Father the Son and Holy Ghost Yes Do not likewise the Manicheans err who maintain That there are two Gods being diverse and opposite as to kind viz. One good the Author and cause of all good things and of things immaterial being the God of the New Testament The other evil to wit the Devil the Author and cause of all evil things and of things material being the God of the Old Testament Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because though there be a plurality of Persons mentioned in Scripture yet it is ever God as One as is evident from the first chapter of the Revelation and the last For if that one God have in himself all perfections there can be no perfection beside him and so no God but this one true God for if there were He should not be God because not infinite
sins Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because he that offendeth his Brother ought to return to him saying I repent Luke 17. 3 4. 2 Because Christ did even value so much a private mans offence that he was not to be admitted to the Altar with his gift until he was reconciled to his Brother Matth. 5. 23 24. 3 Because the incestuous person was not received into the communion of the Church of Corinth before he had evidenced his repentance by satisfying the Church 2 Cor. 2. 6. 4 Because publick confession of sin glorifies God Iosh. 7. 19. 5 Because those who sin must be rebuked before all that others also may fear 1 Tim. 5. 20. Quest. VIII ARE those who are offended bound to be reconcilled to the offending party he declaring his Repentance and ought they in love to receive him Yes 2 Cor. 2. 8. Well then do not the Novatians and Anabaptists err who maintain that Professors of Religion falling into publick scandal especially in denying the Truth in the time of persecution are no more to be received into the Church even though they Repent Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because Christ says if they Brother trespasse against thee rebuke him and if he repent forgive him and if he trespass against thee seven times in a day and seven times in a day turn again to thee saying I repent thou shalt forgive him Luke 17. 3. 4. 2 Because for a Heathen and Publican that is one casten out from the communion of the Church he only is to be esteemed who neglecteth to hear the Church Matth. 18. 17. 3 Because such as have offended the Church after submission to the churches censure ought to be comforted the Church ought to make their love known to them and receive them again into communion least happly their grief and sorrow increasing they be swallowed up 2 Cor. 2. 7 8. 4 Because if a man be overtaken in a fault they who are Spiritual ought to restore such an one in the Spirit of meekness considering themselves least they also be tempted Gal. 6. 1. 5 Because if men repenting of their faults committed against their Brethren and fellow Christians be not received into the communion of the Church both they and the Church are in hazard lest Satan by his devices gain an advantage of them 2 Cor. 2. 10. 11. 6 Because Miriam who for her sedition against Moses was shut out from the Camp seven days was brought in again Num. 12. 15. So was the incestuous person received into the communion of the Church 2 Cor. 2. 8. CHAP. XVI Of GOOD WORKS Question I. ARE Good Works onely such as GOD hath commanded in his holy Word and not such as without the warrant thereof are devised by men out of blind zeal upon any pretence of good intention Yes Micah 6. 8. Rom. 12. 2. Heb. 13. 21. Matth. 15. 9. with 1 Sam. 15. 21 22 23. Isa. 29. 13. 1 Pet. 1. 18. Rom. 10. 2. Well then do not the Papists err who maintain That not only such works are good which are done according to the Will and Law of GOD but others also which are commanded by the publick Authority of the Church though over and above what the Law of GOD requires And that those also are good Works which are done out of a good intention to advance GODS Glory or to perform Worship to Him though they be not commanded by GOD Yes Do not likewise the old and late Libertines err who maintain That the difference between good Works and evil depends onely upon the private and particular Opinion of every man For they think that no work ought to be called evil but in so far as he that doth it thinks it evil Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because Good works are described by the Apostle to be such as GOD before hath ordained that we should walk in them Eph. 2. 10. 2 Because GOD expresly commands that every man must not do that which seems good in his own eyes but onely such works as he hath commanded and must neither add thereto nor diminish from it Deut. 12. 8 32. Iosh. 1. 7. Prov. 30. 6. Rev. 22. 18. 3 Because the Lord openly testifies that in vain they do worship Him teaching for Doctrines the commandments of men not requiring that Will-worship which Phantastick men would give him Isaiah 1. 13. Matth. 15. 9. Micah 6. 6 7 8. Col. 2. 23. 4 Because the Scribes and Pharisees are severely rebuked by Christ that made the Commandment of GOD of no effect by their Traditions Matth. 15. 6. And it is often mentioned in the Books of the Kings and Chronicles as a fault in the Kings of Iuda that the High-places were not taken away And how severely were the Israelites punished for their worshipping of the Golden-Calf Exod. 32. And for worshipping the Calves which Ieroboam set up at Dan and Bethel all know 1 Kin. 12. 28. 5 Because the Law of God is the perfect Rule and Square of good works To the Law and to the Testimony if they speak not according to this Word it is because there is no light in them Isaiah 8. 20. 6 Because without Faith it is impossible to please God Heb. 11. 6. But Faith hath alwayes a respect to the Word of God Quest. II. ARE good works done in obedience to Gods commandments the fruits and evidences of a true and lively Faith Yes Iames 2. 18 22. Well then do not the Antinomians and Libertines err who deny That Believers ought to make evident to themselves and others the truth of their Iustification by good works as fruits of a true and lively Faith Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because Christ sayes by their fruits ye shall know them for a good tree bringeth forth good fruit Matth 7. 16 17 18. 2 Because we are commanded to make sure our Calling and Election by good Works as by the fruits of Faith 2 Peter 1 5 6 10 11. 3 Because in Scripture there are delivered many undoubted and sure marks of Regeneration taken from the fruits of Faith and good Works 1 Iohn 1 6 7 and 1 Iohn 2 3 and 1 Iohn 3 9 10 14. Quest. III. IS our ability to do good Works wholly from the Spirit of Christ and not at all from our selves Yes And that we may be enabled thereunto besides the Graces already received is there not required an actual influence of the same holy Spirit to work in us both to will and to do of his good pleasure Yes Iohn 15. 4 6. Ezek. 36. 26 27. Phil. 2. 13. 2. Cor. 3. 5. Well then do not the Pelagians err who maintain That Good works done by the strength of our free-will are conform to the Law of God and worthy of the Kingdom of Heaven Yes Do not likewise the Papists err who maintain that good works may be done by a meer general and common influence from God Yes Do not lastly the Arminians err who
children for their faults yet he will never take away his mercy and loving kindness from them Psalm 89. 30 31 32 33 34. Ier. 32. 38 39 40. 8 Because that Golden chain that Paul speaks of cannot be broken Rom. 8. 30. Whom he did predestinate them also he called c. 9 Because Christs says this is the Fathers will which hath sent me that of all which he hath given me I should lose nothing Iohn 6. 39. 10 Because we are keeped by the power of God through Faith unto salvation ready to be revealed in the last time 1 Peter 1. 5. 11 Because he hath prayed for us that our Faith fail not Luke 22. 32. Iohn 17. 20. Quest. II. CAN Believers by reason of their sins and failings incurr GODS displeasure and grieve his holy Spirit come to be deprived of some measure of their Graces and Comforts have their hearts hardned and their consciences wounded hurt and scandalize others and bring temporal judgements upon themselves Yes Isaiah 64. 5 7 9. Ephes. 4. 30. Psal 51. 8 10 12. Rev. 2. 4. Cant. 5. 2 3 4 6. Isa 63. 17. Psalm 37. 3 4. 2 Sam. 12. 14. Psal. 89 31 32. Mark 16. 14. 1 Cor. 11. 32. Well then do not the Antinomians err who maintain That the sins of the Regenerate do not displease GOD and cannot grieve his holy Spirit and that Believers are not chastised in any wise for their sins Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the Prophet says thou art wroth for we have sinned Isai. 64. 5. 2 Because it is said that the thing which David had done namely his Murder and his Adultery displeased the Lord 2 Sam. 11. 27. 3 Because the Scripture testifies that the sins of Believers grieve his holy Spirit Eph. 4. 30. 4 Because the Saints by reason of their sins are deprived of some measure of grace and consolation Psalm 51. 8 9. Rev. 2. 4 5. 5 Because the Lord hath inflicted temporal punishments upon Believers for their faults Psalm 89. 31 32. 2 Sam. 12 11. and 24 15. 1 Cor. 11. 30. CHAP. XVIII Of assurance of Grace and Salvation Question I. MAY they who truely believe in the Lord Iesus and love him in sincerity and endeavour to walk in all good conscience before him May they I say be certainly assured in this life that they are in the state of Grace and being enabled by the Spirit to know the things which are freely given them of GOD may they without extraordinary revelation attain thereunto Yes 1 Iohn 2. 3. 1 Iohn 3. 14 18 19 21 24. 1 Iohn 5. 13. 1 Cor. 2. 12. Heb. 6. 11 12. Ephes. 3. 17 18. Well then do not the Papists err who maintain that no man can be sure namly sure by divine Faith of Gods peculiar favour towards himself without extraordinary revelation Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the Apostle commands us saying Brethren give all diligence to make your calling and election sure for if you do these things ye shall never fall for so an entrance shall be ministred unto you aboundantly into the everlasting kingdom of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ 2 Peter 1 10. 11. Heb. 6. 11. 2 Because the Apostle commands the Corinthians to examine themselves whether they be in the Faith 2 Cor. 13. 5. 3 Because the Scripture proposes and setteth forth sure Marks and Tokens by which a Believer may be infallibly assured that he is one of the number of Christs sheep Iohn 10. 4 5 27 28. And that he is one of Christs Disciples Iohn 13. 35. Nay it is the scope of the whole first Epistle of Iohn to propose such sure Marks to Believers whereby they may know that they have life eternal 1 Iohn 5. 13. 4 Because the true Believer may be perswaded that neither death nor life nor any other thing can separate him from the love of Christ Rom. 8. 38. 39. Where the Apostle not only speaketh of himself but of them to whom he writes 5 Because Believers have received the Spirit of Adoption whereby they cry Abba Father and he himself witnesseth with their Spirit that they are the children of God Rom. 8. 15. 16. 6 Because Believers have received not the Spirit of the World but the Spirit which is of God that they might know the things that are freely given to them of God 1 Cor. 2. 12. Quest. II. IS this certainty a bare conjectural and probable perswasion grounded upon a fallible hope No. But is it an infallible assurance of Faith Yes Heb. 6. 11. 19. Heb. 6. 17 18. Well then do not the Papists and Arminians err who maintain that the assurance of salvation is only conjectural or at the most only probable which hath for its foundation a failling and fadeing Faith Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because assurance is from the testimony of the Holy Spirit witnessing with our Spirits that we are the Children of God Rom. 8. 16. 2 Because this assurance is founded upon the promises of God who cannot lie Isai. 54. 10. Iohn 3. 36. 3 Because Believers are sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise which is the earnest of their inheritance but he that receiveth the earnest not only hath right to the possession but knows assuredly that he hath that right and shall be put in the actual possession thereof Eph. 1. 13 14. 4 Because God willing more aboundantly to shew unto the heirs of promise the immutability of his counsel confirmed it by an oath that by two immutable things in which it was impossible to God to lie we might have a strong consolation Heb. 6. 17 18. Quest. III. IS the infallible assurance of Faith founded upon the divine truth of the promises of Salvation and upon the inward evidence of those Graces unto which these promises are made Yes Heb. 6. 17 18. 2 Peter 1. 4 5. 1 Iohn 2 3 and 1 Iohn 3. 14. 2 Cor. 1. 12. Well then do not the Antinomians err who maintain that none ought or can gather any comfort or assurance of Salvation from his own works of holiness but that a Believer ought to lean and rest upon the alone testimony of the Spirit without any Marks or Signs from which testimony he may say they be fully assured of the remission of his sins and of his own salvation Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 From the example of the Saints who gathered their comfort from the fruits of Faith and works of holiness as David did Psalm 119. 6. And as Paul did 2 Cor. 1. 12. 2 From the reckoning up of Marks which are held out in Scripture by which Believers may be known from unbelievers as mutual love Iohn 13. 35. Observing and keeping his Commandments 1 Iohn 2. 3. Doing of righteousness 1 Iohn 3. 14. And loving the Brethren 3 Because unless Faith be proven by Marks true Faith cannot be discerned from presumption neither can assurance rightly founded be discerned from a delusion of Satan 1
Iohn 4. 2. 4 Because reason requires that from the knowledge of the effect we should come to the knowledge of the cause according to that of Matth. 7. 16. 5 Because marks of Grace have so much clearness in themselves that they will even beget in others a judgement according to charity concerning the Election of others therefore much more in those same very Persons who are able to discern and know better their own hearts 1 Thes. 1. 3 4. Quest. IV. DOTH this infallible assurance belong to the essence of Faith No. May a true Believer wait long and conflict with many difficulties before he be partaker of it Yes 1 Iohn 5. 13. Isai. 50. 10. Mark 9. 24. Psalm 88 throughout Psalm 77 to the 12. verse Well then do not the Antinomians err who maintain That the assurance of Salvation is Faith it self And that Faith is nothing els but the Eho of the Soul answering the holy Spirit my sins are forgiven me Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the sealing of the Holy Spirit which is the Earnest of our inheritance is given to Believers after they have believed Eph. 1. 13 14. 2 Because Believers may sometimes not know that they have eternal life 1 Iohn 5. 13. And he that feareth the Lord obeying the voice of his servant may walk in darkness Isaiah 50. 10. 3 Because if this assurance which takes away all doubting as the Antinomians affirm were of the Essence of faith there should not be any degrees of faith which is contrary to Mark 9. 24. Matth. 8. 10. Matth. 15. 28. 4 Because there are evident examples in Scripture from the Experience of the Saints as that of faithful Heman who thus complained Psalm 88. Why casteth thou off my soul why hidest thou thy face from me And of faithful Asaph under very sad exercise Psalm 77. to the 10 verse Quest. V. DOTH this assurance of Salvation incline men to loosness No. 1 Iohn 2. 1 2. Rom 8 1 12 1 Iohn 3 2 3 1 Iohn 1 6 7 Rom 6 1 2 Titus 2 11 12 14 2 Cor 7 1 Well then do not the Papists err who maintain That the Doctrine of Assurance of Salvation is of its own nature hurtful to true Piety and inclines men to sin and wickedness Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the Apostle Peter argues the contrary way and infers a far other conclusion namely because Believers know they are redeemed by the pretious blood of Christ they ought to pass the time of their sojourning here in fear 1 Peter 1. 17 18 19. 2 Because the Apostle Paul who was certainly perswaded of his interest in Christ rejects and abominats that conclusion with indignation and wrath Rom. 6. 1 2. 3 Because from the promise that God is the Father of Believers the Apostle exhorts the Corinthians by consequence to cleanse themselves from all filthiness of the flesh and Spirit and to perfect holiness in the fear of God 2 Cor. 7. 1. 4 Because they who are in Christ to whom there is no condemnation and are assured of it walk not after the Flesh but after the Spirit Rom. 8. 1. 12 38 39. 5 Because a Believer knowing God to be merciful concludes that God ought to be feared Psalm 130. 4. 6 Because whosoever hath that hope namely that he shall see Christ and be made like unto him he purifies himself as he is pure 1 Iohn 3. 3. 7 Because it is evident from the example of those who were perswaded of their salvation who yet lived piously and holily As Paul Rom. 8. 38 39. compared with 2 Cor. 1. 12. Acts 24. 16. Next we have the example of Abraham Gen. 17. 1. compared with Rom. 4. 18 19 20. Quest VI ARE true Believers when they fall into some special sin which woundeth the Conscience and grieveth the Spirit destitute of the seed of GOD and life of Faith No. 2 Iohn 3 9 Luke 22 32 Well then do not the Quakers and others err who maintain That true Believers falling into some special sin can have nothing of the life of faith and seed of GOD in them Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin for his seed remaineth in him and he cannot sin because he is born of God 1 Iohn 3. 9. For his seed remaineth in him that is doth not totally perish but abideth thenceforeward working the fruits of regeneration once begun in them Phil. 1. 6. 2 Because although Peter fell into that grievous sin of denying his Master thrice yet he still retained that seed of God and life of Faith and love to Christ because Christ had said to him I have prayed for thee that thy Faith fail not Luke 22. 32. The like may be said of David and others of the Saints of GOD who by falling into some special sins have wounded the Conscience and grieved the holy Spirit CHAP. XIX Of the Law of GOD. Question I. DID GOD give to Adam a Law as a Covenant of Works by which he bound him and all his Posterity to Personal Entire Exact and Perpetual obedience Yes Did he promise life upon the fulfilling and did he threatten death upon the breach of it Yes Was Adam endued with Power and Ability to keep it Yes Gen 1 26 27 Gen 2 17 Rom 2 14 15 Rom 5 12 19 Gal 3 10 12 Eccl 7 29 Iob 28 28 Well then do not the Socinians err who maintain that God made no Covenant with Adam in his integrity in which he promised to him and his posterity life eternal Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 From those places of Scripture where the righteousness of the Law is described Lev. 18. 5. Rom. 10. 5. Gal. 3. 12. Ezek. 20. 11. 13. Whosoever therefore keepeth my Statutes and Judgements saith the Lord shall live in them And to whom life is promised for ever upon their perfect obedience and continuance in all things written in the Book of the Law And from those places in which death is threatned to them that in the least transgress the Law of God Deut. 27. 26. Gal. 3. 10. Ezek. 18. 4. 2 From the words of our Saviour who spoke to the Young man according to the Covenant of Works in which the Lord promiseth life eternal to such as shall fulfil the Law Matth. 19. 17. Luke 10. 28. Observe that Christ answereth here according to the question and opinion of this young man who thought he was able to obtain salvation by his own good works and therefore Christ directs him to the Law thereby to bring him to the acknowledgement of his own imperfection and afterwards to Faith in himself 3 Because man was created by God in righteousness holiness and immortality according to the similitude and image of God Gen. 1. 26. Gen. 9. 6. Eccl. 7. 29. Eph. 4. 24. Col. 3. 9 10. And received from him the Law of Nature naturally ingraven upon his heart Rom. 2. 14. 15.
therefore there must be such a distinct office by divine institution They must take special care of the Church of GOD 1 Tim. 3. 5. 1 Pet. 5. 2. 3. They are not to neglect the gift which is in them 1 Tim. 4. 14. They are to meditate on these things and to give themselves wholly to them 1 Tim. 4. 15. Acts 6. 2. 4. They are to preach the Word to rebuke to instruct gainsayers 2 Tim. 4. 2. 2 Tim. 2. 25. To administer the Sacraments Matth. 28. 19. 1 Cor. 11. 13. To ordain others for the Ministry by imposition of hands 1 Tim. 4. 14. To watch over the flock as those that must give an account Heb. 13. 17. 5 Because Christ requires peculiar distinct duties in the people in reference to their Ministers therefore the office of the Ministry must be of divine institution They must know and acknowledge those that are over them in the Lord 1 Thes. 5. 12. Highly to esteem them in love for their works sake 1 Thes. 5. 13. To obey them to encourage them Heb. 13. 7. To maintain them Gal. 6. 6. To pray for them 2 Thes. 3. 1. 6 Because GOD hath made peculiar promises to his Ministers as Lo I am with you alway even to the end of the world Matth. 28. 20. The promise of special assistance 2 Cor. 3. 5. 6. Of protection and defence in all aslaults Rev. 1. 20. The promise of the power of the keyes which promise was not limited to the Apostles as Apostles but was given to the Apostles as Ministers of the Gospel as is evident from Mat. 18. 17 18. The promise of special sympathy with them Matth. 10. 40. Luke 10. 16. Iohn 13. 20. 1 Thes. 4. 8. Now would ever the Lord have promised to keep up and maintain that office in his Church which he had not set up and instituted The other thing to be made out is that the office of the Ministry is perpetually necessary 1 Because the ordinances are perpetually necessary by divine institution therefore the office of the Ministry to dispense these ordinances is perpetually necessary by divine institution For if God had only appointed the ordinances to continue in his Church then would preaching and administration of the Sacraments fail because that which is every mans work is usually and effectually no mans work The Lord doth not immediatly administer them himself neither are Angels employed for this work But he hath committed this service to men who are Stewards and dispensers of the mysteries of God It is evident that the preaching of the Word shall continue to the end of the world from Matth. 28. 20. Eph. 4 11 12 13. It is evident of Baptism and the Lords Supper which are conjoyned in the institution of Christ with the Ministery of the Word For to whom he gave commission to preach to them also he gave commission to administer the Sacraments Baptism is an ordinance of the New Testament appointed by God himself For Iohn was sent to baptize God was the Author Iohn was only the Minister This was to continue perpetually as is evident from Christs promise and his precept Matth. 28 20. The ends for which Baptism was ordained are not temporary but moral and so perpetual Do not all Christians now need these means as the Christians during the age of the Apostles Are not Christians to be baptized into his death buried with him by Baptism that like as Christ was raised from the dead by the Glory of the Father even so we also should walk in newness of life It is called by the holy Ghost a saving Ordinance and is unto believers and their seed in the New Testament as the Ark was to Noah and his family in the old World who being in the Ark was saved from perishing in the waters when the rest were drowned so Baptism doth now save us not only or mainly the outward part of it the putting away the filth of the flesh which is yet an Ordinance to further our salvation but when the Spirit of Regeneration effectually concurs so that we find there is a renewing of the holy Ghost and thereby the answer of a good conscience towards God 1 Pet. 3. 21. It is evident that the Sacrament of the Lords Supper is to continue to the end of the world It was not only appointed for Apostles to whom it was first administred but unto all believers both Iews and Gentiles And not only for that age but for all generations succeeding for Believers are commanded to shew forth the Lords death till he come by eating this bread and drinking this cup. Therefore if these ordinances be appointed by God to continue to the end it follows evidently that he hath designed the office of the Ministry to hold up and hold forth his Ordinances to the end of the world 2 Because the promises which Christ hath made to uphold the Ministry are perpetual therefore the office must be perpetual Matth. 28. 20. Go teach and baptize all Nations and lo I am with you to the end of the world This promise cannot be limited to the particular age during the lives of the Apostles because the Holy Ghost useth three expressions to declare the perpetuity of this promise Aion that this promise shall continue so long as the world continues Secondly Synteleia Heos tes synteleias tu Aionos that this promise shall have no end till the world be consummat or brought to a Period Thirdly Pasas tas Hemeras all days and successions of times Not only Meth hymon hemeras hymon not only with you during your own dayes but all the dayes of the Gospel till time shall be no more And this promise was made not to the Apostles as Apostles nor to the Apostles as Believers but to the Apostles as ministers and Stewards of the Mysteries of God 3 Because the Elect require the office of the Ministry perpetually Our Natures are as bad as Iews and Pagans Eph. 2 3. Our judgements full of darkness and ignorance 1 Cor. 2. 14. Our wills stuborn and rebellious and so alienated that we rebel against the light The delusions of Satan are strong The multitude of false Teachers are very numerous so that they are ready to seduce the Elect themselves if it were possible 4 Because the ends for which Christ hath appointed a ministry are perpetually necessary The Elect must be called and gathered for there will be some still in every age to be added to the Church of them that shall be saved There are many sheep which are not yet brought into his fold many who belong to the Election who are not yet effectually called them also will Christ bring in both Iews and Gentiles that there may be one fold as there is one shephers Now God hath revealed no other ordinary way to convert and bring these into his fold but the Ministry of his word for how shall they believe without a Preacher Therefore if there be some Elect continually to be brought into
Christ in this Sacrament corporally or carnally in with or under the brèad and wine No. 1 Cor. 10. 16. Well then do not the Lutherians err who maintain that the body and blood of Christ are corporally in with and under the bread and wine and that as the Papists also teach his body and blood are taken corporally by the mouth by all Communicants believers and unbelievers Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because Christ was sitting with his body at the Table 2 Because he himself did eat of the bread and drink of the wine 3 Because he took bread from the Table he took not his own body he break bread and did distribute it he break not his own body so he took the Cup and not his own blood 4 Because Christ said the Cup was the New Testament in his blood but the Cup is not in with and under the Wine 5 Because Christ said the bread was his body which was broken the Wine was his blood which was shed But neither was his body broken under the bread nor his blood shed under the Wine seing Christ as yet was not betrayed crucified and dead In the next place the end of the Lords Supper is that we may remember Christ and declare his death until be come Luke 22. 19. 1 Cor. 11. 24 25 26. Therefore if Christ be now present with his body in with and under the bread the Sacramental remembrance of Christ and the declaring of his death ought to cease This Doctrine of Consubstantiation is contrary to the Articles of our Faith It is against the Truth and Verity of his Humane Nature which is visible palpable and in a certain place circumscriptive It is against the Article of his ascension for it makes his body which is now in Heaven until the last day to be in with and under a piece of bread It is against the spiritual communion of the Saints with Christ the Head which the Lutherians makes by this doctrine a corporal and carnal communion contrary to 1 Cor. 10. 3 4. Ephes. 1. 22. Ephes. 4. 4. Rom. 8. 9. 1 Cor. 6. 17. 1 Iohn 4. 13. Iohn 15. 5. It brings with it many and great absurdities as that the body of Christ Non habeat partem extra partem hath not one part of it without another but as if all the parts of his Body were in one part which is contrary to the Nature of a true and real Quantum which consists essentially in three dimensions length breadth and thickness It makes in effect his Body to be no body It brings down the glorious Body of Christ from Heaven and puts it under the base Elements of this Earth It makes as many bodies of Christ as there are pieces of Eucharistical bread It makes his body to be broken in with and under the bread and bruised with the teeth It sends his Body down to the stomach where it is turned into a mans substance and afterwards throwen out Moreover all true Eating brings life and Salvation Iohn 6. 50 51. but eating by the mouth profiteth nothing Iohn 6. 63. Again our union with Christ and therefore our eating of his Body from whence ariseth this union is not corporal but spiritual Eph. 3. 17. And the Body and Blood of Christ are meat and drink not carnal but spiritual even as the hunger whereby we long for this meat is spiritual and the life to which we are nourished is spiritual and the nutriment is spiritual Lastly according to this Doctrine of Consubstantiation stiffly maintained by the Lutherians it follows that Christ did 〈◊〉 his own body while he did eat the bread of the first supper That his Disciples did eat their Lord and Masters Body That Christ before he was crucified was dead That his Disciples were more cruel and inhumane to him than the Iews were that crucified him That he is often buried within the intrals of wicked men Quest. VI. IS the Body and Blood of Christ as really but spiritually present to the faith of Believers in that Ordinance as the Elements themselves are to the outward senses Yes 1 Cor. 10. 16. Well then do not the Socinians err who maintain that the Body and Blood of Christ in the Sacrament of the Supper are not really present Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because the body of Christ in this Sacrament is spiritually eaten by Believers and his blood is spiritually drunken But a spiritual presence is a true and real presence because it comes and flowes from true and real causes namely from Faith and the Holy Spirit 2 Because in the right use of this Sacrament Christ is united to a man by faith and by the Holy Spirit 1 Cor. 10. 16. 3 Because the body of Christ in so far as it was given to the death and was broken for us on the cross and in so far as his blood was shed for the remission of our sins all these I say are the internal matter of this Sacrament Luke 22. 19. Mat. 26. 28. 1 Cor. 11. 24. 4 Because those who eat and drink unworthily are said not to discern the Lords body and therefore to such as eat and drink worthily the body and blood of Christ must be truely present according to their spiritual sense namely Faith 1 Cor. 11. 24. 5 Because length of time doth not hinder but that Faith may make things past and things to come spiritually present and therefore distance of place doth not hinder but that things most distant as to place may be made spiritually and truely present Heb. 11. 1. Iohn 6. 56. Phil. 3. 10. Heb. 11. 9. Quest. VII ARE all ignorant and ungodly persons as they are unfit to enjoy Communion with Christ unworthy of his Table Yes Can they without great sin against Christ while they continue such partake of these holy Mysteries No. And are not therefore Church-officers to debar those who appear grosly ignorant and scandalous Yes 1 Cor. 11. 27 28 29. and 2 Cor. 6. 14 15. and 1 Cor. 5. 6 7 13. Matth. 7. 6. Well then do not some men err in their Practise if not in their Opinion who suffer many ignorant scandalous and ungoodly persons to come to the Lords Table Yes By what reasons are they confuted 1 Because ignorant and wicked men eating and drinking unworthily are guily of the body and blood of Christ and so bring judgement upon themselves Cor. 11. 29. 2 Because all were not admitted to eat of the Passover neither was it for all promiscuously to partake thereof Numb 9. 6 7. and 2 Chron. 23. 19. Esek 22. 26. 3 Because it was not lawful for any man to come to the Marriage feast that wanted the Wedding garment Matth. 22. 11. 4 Because Pearles are not to be casten before Dogs and Swine men manifestly ungodly and wicked Matth. 7. 6. 5 Because they who deserve to be excluded from the Fellowship and Society of Believers ought not to be admitted to the Sacrament of intimate Communion