the cause of blessedness this manner of arguing will appear to be more forcible by an evident Testimony of Scripture Argument Ma. That which is the cause of blessedness the same is the cause of Iustification Mi. Remission of Sins is the cause of blessedness and Salvation Con. Theresore Remission of Sins is the cause of Iustification But you may say What must then be answered to the Words of Christ who seems to promise the blessedness of the Kingdom as a reward of Works You may find an answer to this objection in the Book of Iacobus Cartusiensis who hath written on this manner Men do accept and love the persons of others for their Works that are acceptable and profitable to them but God accepts the Works for the sake of the person c. Therefore here there is need of a distinction between the Work and the person of the Worker But you may say Are not Works that are performed in Charity for the relief of the Poor pleasing and acceptable to God We deny not that our selves But we enquire into the cause wherefore they become acceptable Which that it may appear the more evidently let us examine these words of Scripture I was an hungred said Christ and ye gave me Meat I was thristy and ye gave me Drink c. I ask in the first place who is it here that was an hungred You will say Christ either himself in his own Body or in a Member of his Body Did you then feed Christ when he was an hungred That was Piously done indeed Therefore I see and commend what you have done But I ask what was it that stirred you up to do it Whether was it Charity setting Faith a work or was it not rather Faith setting Charity a work But what if some other that was no Member of Christ whether Heathen or Turk had need of your Meat Would you in your Charity have fed him I doubt of that But suppose you your self had not believed in Christ but had been an Enemy to him if you had seen one that belonged to Christ almost ready to perish for hunger would you have relieved him I do not believe so Why Because it is only believers that feed Christ but Infidels persecute him The Lord was thirsty on the Cross and he had Vinegar given him for drink which was a Hellish wickedness But why did they give him Vinegar Was it want of Love or was it not rather want of Faith in those unbelieving Pharisees Who if they had not wanted Faith they would not have wanted Charity to administer help and Charity would not have been unrewarded But let us proceed Suppose one that is not a believers whether Turk or Heathen should refresh a hungry Christian by giving him of his Meat as old Simon the Pharisee entertained Christ with a Dinner And many of the Heathens have been Eminent in offices of kindness and Love Can the giving of Meat and Drink by any such without Faith merit Eternal Life Surely not But if a believer gives his Christian Brother so much as a Cup of cold Water in his necessity shall he lack his Reward Christ himself says he shall not Hereby you may see whence it is that our Vertues and good deeds are acceptable to God and dignified with Rewards not for themselves but for the Faith of him that works them which first justifies the person before all works And after the person is justified his performances are accepted and though they are of small value in themselves yet they are looked upon as great and rewarded plentifully Wherefore we deny not that sometimes in the Scriptures the name of Reward is joyned with Eternal Life and that the works of Brotherly Charity may in some sense be called meritorious if so be these works are performed by persons who are already justified and received into favour by remission of sins and have obtained a right unto the promise of Eternal Life Not that their works are of such value that they should make satisfaction to the Law of God or merit any thing with God ex congruo or condigne as they phrase it either by congruity or worthiness But they are imputed as Merit by Grace Not that Eternal Life is due to the works themselves but because there are consolations laid up in Heaven for Saints and persons in a justified state to support them in their afflictions Eternal Life not being due to them for their works but by right of the promise just as a Son and Heir to whom his Father's Inheritance is due doth not merit the right of Sonship by any duties that he performs but he being born a Son his duties upon that account are meritorious so that he wants not a due reward and recompence Therefore in this Popish Argument there is a fallacy Another Argument taken from the words of Christ Matth. 25. Da. HE that doth the will of the Father shall enter into the Kingdom of Heaven Ti. It is the will of the Father that we should do good works that are commanded in his Law Si. Therefore an entrance into Heaven is obtained by the works of the Law Answer Suppose we grant all contained in this Argument what will these Roman Iusticiaries infer from thence Therefore as Vega speaks Faith is not sufficient to Salvation without the keeping of the Commandments It is easie to answer him in a word Let him keep the Commandments according to the exact Rule of the Divine Will and he shall be saved But neither he nor any other man can perfectly keep the Commands of God in this Life From whence we infer this by necessary consequence That either there is no hope of obtaining the Kingdom or else that it lies not in the works of the Law Now if it be so what remains but that finding this is not the way to Heaven we should seek for another way and because there is no door of Salvation opened to sinners in the Law of Commandments therefore we must flie to another Refuge But what that Refuge is appearing to us from Heaven it self the Divine Will declares unto us which is not set forth in the Old Law but in the New Testament of the Gospel And this is his Will that every one who believeth in the Son should not perish but have Eternal Life For whereas the Law was weak because of the flesh God sent his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and for sin condemned sin in the flesh that the Righteousness of the Law might be fulfilled in us that walk not after the flesh but after the spirit Objection But here some may object Will the Faith of Christ justifie us in such a manner that there may be a Legality and Impunity for us to disobey the Will of his Father God forbid The Liberty of the Gospel allows not that for it openly affirms That they who are justified by the Faith of Christ walk not after the flesh but
no other way laid open to Salvation but by keeping the Commandments and if according to the Iudgment of Bernard the Law is of such a weight that it wholly exceeds humane strength which was just now shewed what hope of Salvation does there now remain for us Verily say you if any man consider his own strength in so great a frailty of humane strength it will be most difficult to attain unto a divine state of righteousness but if you consider in your mind the divine riches which if you will will always be present with you nothing is more easie Hence as Moses says this Commandment which I command thee this day is not above thee nor far off nor placed in Heaven that thou shouldest say who of us can ascend into Heaven Neither is it placed beyond the Sea that thou shouldest say who will pass over the Sea Neither do you bear it now engraven on stones but engraven upon the heart by Faith For if we believe the Promises of God we presently obtain the help of God that we may very easily perform all things that are commanded us and so be saved Must we be thus saved O Osorius in keeping God's Commands is this your harangue and think you this so easie to be performed Why not say you when the Spirit of God helps How little does this Saying differ from that Antient one of the Pelagians which Augustine rehearses in a certain place writing against Iulian the Pelagian for thus they said By an easie endeavour after holiness which God helps a Man may be without sins But let us hear Augustine answering both them and you We deny not saith he that the help of God is so powerful if he will that at this day we might have no evil concupisences against which we should fight though with the greatest certainty of Conquest And yet you your self deny not that it doth not so come to pass but why it comes not to pass who hath known the mind of the Lord Yet I know not a little when I know whatsoever that cause is that it is not the iniquity of a just God nor the insufficiency of an Almighty God Therefore there is something in his deep and hidden Counsel why as long as we live in this mortal flesh there is something in us against which our mind should fight There is also something why we should say forgive us our sins and a little after that Man understands these things who being hunger-bitten returns to himself and says I will arise and go to my Father and presently he subjoyns therefore it comes to pass in this place of infirmity that we should not live proudly and that we should live under the daily remission of sins But whether that be the cause or another which I am much more ignorant of yet that which I cannot doubt is how much soever we get forward under this burthen of a corruptible body if we say that we have no sin we deceive our selves c. This he said but why should I urge you with humane Authority seeing the matter it self carries against you with a very strong voice and the whole Scripture gives this honour only to Christ and the Universal experience and example of Men and the practice of life besides your very own retired Sense the Domestick Witnesses of your Conscience do publish a manifest Testimony against you You say we presently obtain the help of God whereby we may most easily perform all things that are commanded us c. Is it so all things what then if I ask you of that first Command of Love which you owe to the Lord your God with all your heart and all the endeavour of your mind or of that whereby you are commanded not to covet at all do you perform it I know what a distinction the talkative Schools of the Sophisters use here according to the substance of the act and according to the intention of the Law-giver But I do not value these Fables of subtleties We know this by the writings of Paul that the Law is Spiritual we are Carnal and sold under sin I ask if thou thy self being compassed about now with this frailty of the flesh dost fulfill this Spiritual Law of God with that sincerity of Spirit that thou oughtest Answer ingenuously are you silent What I my self do by my own strength say you I do not dispute here yet I can by the help of the grace of God O cunning device After all your debate it comes to this that you plead the commands of God are easie and you would have nothing appointed by him which cannot be observed by us Now after a most heavy dream that I may speak with Hierom to deceive ignorant Souls you in vain endeavour to add not without grace But I enquire not what the Almighty Grace of God can do of it self but what it does in you or in any other mortal Man You make the Precepts of Righteousness easie which when the Divine Grace assists do not exceed our best endeavour and yet you cannot produce one Man that hath fulfilled them all Now what an Argument is that that a thing can be which hath not been that that can be done which you bear witness none hath done and to attribute that to I know not whom which you cannot prove to have been in the Patriarchs Prophets and Apostles Paul the Apostle himself complains of the refractory rebellion of his Members who was not able to do the good which he desired crying out that he was both carnal and miserable and captive Augustine testifies that sins may be deminished in this life but that they cease not until death And the same Augustine writing to Petrus concerning holy and righteous Men bids him hold that most firmly that righteous and holy men themselves except Infants that are Baptized none of them all do live without sin in this World And do you think that all the roots of Unrighteousness are so plucked up in the Saints that you can say it is most easie by the help of God which is never wanting to them that desire to pass the life without sin and so obtain Salvation But Hieron is of a far different Opinion for I judge saith he thus That no Creature can be perfect according to true and compleat righteousness That one differs from another and that there are divers righteousnesses in Man no Man doubts and that one is greater or lesser than another and that according to their state or measure they may be called just who in comparison of others are not just Briefly that there is none of the Saints nor Prophets nor Apostles that possess'd all Vertues for now we Prophesie in part and we know in part for all things cannot be in any one Man And to Ctesiphon This should be attributed to him only concerning whom it is written as peculiar to him who did no sin neither was guile found in
Obliging to eternal punishment is not only taken away in the life to come but also in this life by the holy laver and continual remission of sins for the sake of a Mediator But the infirmity of sinning which is concupiscence in the flesh and ignorance in the mind that I may speak with Hugo it also is abolished in the regenerate but yet after its own order and by its own degrees For it is daily diminished in this Life by the renewing of the Spirit and it shall be abolished in the Life to come by the Resurrection of the Flesh. In the interim the relicks of infirmity stick yet in the Flesh as both Death and Temporal punishments stick yet in the Flesh to exercise the Saints unto Combat not to condemn them to destruction Iust as the Land of Canaan was promised to the Hebrews a great while before which yet they did not suddenly take possession of Neither was the frame of this World made immediately in one moment but the Works of God were perfected in distinct intervals of Days So neither is the whole Flesh suddainly renewed but by degrees and daily increases it is going on unto perfection An example may be conveniently taken from him whom being Wounded the Samaritan cap. 10. Luc. doth not suddainly cure but first pours Wine into his Wounds washes off the Blood afterwards he adds Oyl that he may mitigate the grief and the Wound may begin to cleave together Afterwards the Wound being bound up he puts the Sick-man upon the Beast and afterwards commands him to be cured in the Inn. Iust so Christ suffering the punishment of our Sins in his Body by remission immediately takes away the guilt from us pouring into our Wounds the gladning Oyl of the Gospel joined together with the Wine of serious Repentance whereby whatsoever is deadly in the Wounds is washed away with a health restoring Pardon But the Wounds are not yet altogether healed But health will be compleat in Eternal Life In the interim he will have diseases cured in the Church by Godly Exercises the Cross and constant Prayer Briefly if those Men desire to know what that is which Christ hath abolished in us by his Death I will say it in a word Whatsoever was laid upon Christ on the Cross to be carried away for our sakes that is taken away from us in this Flesh. Only the guilt and punishment of Sin not the matter it self of our actions was laid upon Christ to bear upon the Cross. The act or substance of sin is not wholly abolished by the Death of Christ in this flesh but only the guilt and punishment of sin Or more briefly let them take it thus Whatsoever Christ by dying did bear for us that only he took away by his death in this Life Christ by dying did bear only the punishment of our Sins not the Sins themselves in his Body whereof he had none Therefore Christ in this Life took away only the punishment not the matter it self of sin by his Death But afterwards by his power he shall also take away the whole matter of Sin in the Glory of the Resurection to come Concerning the necessity of the practice and care of good Works THerefore in this place something hath been said of Faith and all that manner of Righteousness which the Divine Authority attributes to Faith only without Works More things elsewhere have been explained by us in other Books From which things just conclusions being drawn it evidently appears if I am not mistaken wherein all our righteousness consists not in Works without Faith nor joined together with Faith but wholly in Faith without Works that is without the merits of Works or any condition of meriting For if Faith which is nothing else but an internal and illuminated contemplation and receiving of Christ the Son of God receives a free promise of Life in him I do not well see what the good deeds of our Life thought excellent can perform in this part of justification Yet it doth not follow from hence that the Holy practice of good Works for necessary uses that I may speak with Paul is not upon any account necessary Neither is it a reason forcible enough if any Man teaches that no trust should be put in Works that therefore there is no need of any care to do good For what Logick is this Works should not be trusted in when they are performed Therefore there is no need to endeavour to perform Good and Holy Works We are no other ways justified but upon the account of Faith which is in Christ Iesus Therefore Offices of Piety are not necessary in those who are justified by Faith Faith only not upon the account of Love but of the Mediatour promotes us to righteousness Therefore it profits nothing to repent and to weep and mourn for sins committed It is of no concernment after what manner every one leads his Life for so you seem to gather and not you only O Osorius but also as many as being like to you bear an enmity to Luther And hence such fierce out-cries of yours against him such odious and bitter ragings reproaches evil reports and outragious invectives being filled not so much with Evil Speeches as most filthy Lyes But this is no new nor strange thing either because you are of your old temper and disposition or because it is and always was the condition of the Gospel which hath already been accustomed enough to such like Enemies and reproaches So Saul persecuted David a most moderate Prince by whom he had never been hurt So when Christ was born Herod was troubled and all Ierusalem with him By the like fury Christ himself the Prince of the Church was slain So of Old Stephen was Stoned The same also did the Ancient Martyrs of all Times hear from their own People which Luther now and other Ministers of Gods Word are forced to hear 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 take away these Enemies of the god's yea also that Divine Martyr Iohn Huss of latter memory was brought forth to Death in a manner not unlike that whereby Luther is brought forth by you after his Death For they Cloathed him with odious Pictures of Devils and abominable Titles Neither is Luther here handled much more handsomly by you being Cloath'd with most vain Lyes and set forth by you in such Colours not as he really was nor as his Writings had persuaded you concerning him which it seems you have not read but as other accusers to whom you use to give too much credit have described him For what other thing declares this your narrative which is curiously fitted for calumny whereby you make him liker a Monster than a Man as if he brought in a certain new kind of Faith that was not heard of before and was unknown in former times as if he were an example of Wickedness an encourager of Slothfulness an Turbulent Person and disturber of
merits of Works or before Works the same Paul will teach you As soon as you are Baptized saith he you have put on Christ. To which also Chrysostom subscribing saith as soon as a Man Belives he is presently also Iustified Which if it be true then it is false which you assert For you affirm that the obtaining of Salvation consists wholly in this that we should transform our selves entirely into the similitude of Christ. And again youn say there is no other way of Salvation established for us but that which is contained in the Law of God And the same you affirmed elsewhere having openly asserted That ascent into Heaven is given to the merits of the greatest Vertues and that the Mansions of the Eternal Kingdom are given justly and deservedly to Holy and Pure Men. For so Say you it comes to pass that the Immortal Kingdom is due by the best right to Iust Men not only as a recompence and remard but also as a Lawful Inheritance being founded upon the Wisdom and Bounty of the Father All which things as being represented gloriously by you seem at a distance to have some shew of Truth if they be referred to that Platonick Righteousness of yours or to the state of our First Innocency But now in this wounded and destroyed Nature they have no place at all but that they may wholly prelude from us all passages into the Eternal Mansions of the Kingdom I know indeed that the Everlasting reward of Righteousness is due by best right to Pure and Holy Men as you say and those that observe the Law unblameably But I know likewise that the Eternal Punishments of Hell are due to those that do not perform the Royal Law according to the Scriptures What would you do in this case good Friend What good can your Platonick Philosophy do here I am not Ignorant what the Lord said to the Rich Pharisee If you will enter into Life keep the commands That indeed is true Do you then perform what he was commanded to do Sell all that you have and give to the Poor and follow Christ Naked But if you do it not what else can you look for but to perish together with him But now the goodness of God hath found out another way to consult our Infirmity who hath not only put upon us the beauty of Righteousness but whole Christ so that you may not only being Naked follow Christ but that whole Christ may live in your self and Cloath you and also may make you a Son of God by Faith What then may some Man say is not the Holy Spirit given to them that trust in Christ to Illuminate their minds with new light to renew their Hearts to enrich them plentifully with the Riches Gifts and Endowments of good Works and to adorn them exceedingly with all kind of Vertues What do these good Works nothing with God which are performed by the influence of the most Holy Spirit Do they contribute nothing towards Righteousness have they no use nor place upon the account of reward For this seems to be the Foundation of all your arguing Where you write these words If we believe the promises of God we presently obtain the help of God that we may very easily do all things that are commanded us and so may be saved And presently after the Interposition of a few words You say Faith causes us to have the Law of God Written in our mind and so to make an everlasting Covenant of Salvation with the Lord. Therefore when we have the Law of God put into the most inward parts of our mind it comes to pass that Lust being subdued Evil concupisence extinguished the pravity of a stubborn mind taken away the mind becomes on a sudden a Temple of the Holy Ghost and is stirred up with all its might to the study of the Law of God And that I may express it in one word such a Man contains the Magnificence and Glory of Divine Righteousness comprehended in his mind And a little after you say Therefore it is of Faith Saith Paul that according to Grace the promise may be firm What manner of promise is that That they who come to the Lord with the Faith of Christ may both be freed from their Wickedness and delivered from the Curse whereunto they were lyable and may have the Law of God Written in their Hearts and have the very Divinity of the Holy Spirit comprehended in their mind and not defile their Life with any wicked deed But may govern it by the Law of God or as it is in Ezekiel They may walk in the commands of God and perform Holy and excellent works and also that they may be Righteous For hereunto all the promises of God are referred c. Answer What do I hear Are then all the promises of God referred to this That there is no hope of Righteousness no way of Salvation no reconciliation for us nor remission of Sins unless the Law be kept And where then is that peace with God which the Apostle Preaches Being justified by Faith we have peace with God through our Lord Iesus Christ Where is that access to the Throne with boldness Where is the hope of Glory Happiness the Blessing the Inheritance of Eternal Life according to promise if these good things come no otherways as you suppose but by a Covenant of Life which no spot of Sin defiles What hath your profession of God received this Gospel from the teachings of the Apostles or from the opinion of Plato It is therefore of Faith Saith Paul that the promise may be firm according to Grace But what way is it firm if it is of Works upon any account Or how is it of Faith if you confine all the Promises of God to the Law of Righteousness which may confirm the minds of all men with a sure hope of Righteousness as you say Or what will that assurance of Righteousness be if you with the Tridentine and Iesuitical Iebusites detaining us in a doubtful wavering of hope take aways all encouragement of good hope Concerning the Promises of God what to whom and how God hath promised BUT now because here there is a convenientoccasion of speaking concerning the Promises of God it remains that we should hear from you who treat of these things so sharply what that is which God hath promised to whom he hath promised how and for what cause he doth it Now there are both many and great Gifts of God and Ornaments partly bestowed upon us and partly promised through the singular bounty of his Grace yea seeing there is nothing in this Workmanship of Nature nor in the meanest things but what we ought to acknowledge to be his free Gift if we would be thankful And also amongst all these things which being so many and so great he hath conferted upon us with so liberal a hand I esteem that nothing is more glorious nor more admirable
and being now reconciled to God as it cannot be destitute of the favour of God so being stirred up by his holy breathings begins now to be a Law to it self whereby it fears God and according to its power honours him with due Reverence cleaves unto him with all its might refers its actions and counsels to him calls on him by prayers adheres to him in adversity celebrates his benefits with a thankful remembrance lays its hope and confidence and its whole self upon him and also for his sake loves and cherishes all the Brethren And as there is no Man that denies these Offices of necessary Obedience performed by the help of the Spirit of God are fruits of a well-instructed Faith So there is no controversie between us and you in that matter especially seeing you your self also together with us confess That these are not works of the Law but of Faith and that they should not be referred so much to the Law as to the holy Spirit and Faith relying upon his help as you say But the greatest difference that is between us consists in this that whereas we assert That the Obedience of Man born again by the Divine Power is but begun and imperfect in this mortal infirm state You on the contrary dream of I know not what perfection of obedience in works the Spirit of God so working in us that whosoever is qualified therewith needs nothing that belongs to compleat perfection of righteousness for all your debate about this matter seems to drive at this as being concluded with this one Syllogism Argument Ma. Whosoever walk in the Precepts of the Lord and perform them should be called perfect who can easily live without sin Mi. All the Faithful according to the promise of God walk in his precepts and perform them because God promises nothing but what he can and will perform Concl. Therefore according to the promise of God nothing hinders but Believers may be perfect here who are capacitated to live without sin That I may answer the Argument it is a Sophistical Argument from secundum quid to simpliciter because in the Major those are called perfect who walk in the Precepts of the Lord and frame their life according to them it is true in them who simply and perfectly perform all those things which are commanded in the Law according to that perfection which is requisite According to which Rule if the major be understood that which is assumed in the minor must be upon this account deny'd For though God hath promised to his Saints that the Assisting grace of his Spirit shall not be wanting which may help forward pious attempts in his Elect and stir up their endeavours after more holy obedience but where hath he at any time promised or on whom hath he bestowed that happiness in walking which turns no where to the right hand nor to the left which stumbles not through the whole life which in all kind of vertues by a constant perseverance so conforms the course of life to compleat innocency that it never fails in any thing The Adversaries use for the defence of their own cause to catch at the words that were just now cited out of Ierem. chap. 31. and Ezek. chap. 26. I will cause you to walk in my Precepts and keep my Iudgments c. And then out of Deut. chap. 30. I will Circumcise saith the Lord the fore-skin of your heart that ye may love the Lord with all your heart and with all your soul. I know indeed that in these words there is a glorious promise contained of the gift of the Holy Ghost and the restoring of new obedience but because there is a twofold perfection and a twofold righteousness according to Hierom. one which is suited to the vertues of God another which is agreeable to our frailty And again seeing according to the Authority of Augustine there is a twofold kind of Obedience one that is seen in this Life being but begun and imperfect Another that is perfect which is compleated in the life to come It is not difficult to discern in what sense the perfection of Renovation should be understood in the Scriptures To wit not simply and absolutely but according to the measure and capacity of this Life Therefore Augustine says well that a Man is sometimes called perfect because he hath profited in a great degree And the same again But whereas Men are called Saints sometimes and perfect in the Scriptures I say to this that it is a certain manner of perfection whereby Holy Men acknowledge their own imperfection They are also called perfect who in any respect imitate the perfection of the Heavenly Father who rains on the Iust and Unjust c. And again the same Augustine writing to Boniface The Vertue saith he which is now in a Righteous Man is called perfect upon this account because it belongs to his perfection both to acknowledge in Truth and confess in Humility his own Imperfection Moreover Hierom not much differing from him answered wittily To whom when that place of St. Paul was objected Whosoever of us are perfect we understand this To this Hierom says What then do we understand yea what ought we to understand that we who are perfect should acknowledge our selves to be unperfect and that they have not yet comprehended nor yet attained unto perfection This is saith he the Wisdom of Man to know himself to be imperfect and that I may so speak the perfection of all Righteous Men in the Flesh is imperfect c. And afterwards again in the same Book Therefore we are Righteous then when we confess our selves to be Sinners For our Righteousness consists not of our own merit but of the mercy of God as the Scripture says The Righteous Man is an accuser of himself in the beginning of his Speech And again to Ctesiphon This is Mens only perfection saith he if they know themselves to be imperfect c. Moreover the Adversaries set upon us with another Argument also which they produce out of the words of Deut. 30. To defend the perfection of their own Righteousness after this manner Ma. In these two commands thou shalt love thy God with all thy Soul and thy Neighbour as thy self is contained the summ of all perfection Mi. They that are regenerate can love God with all their Heart and all their Soul and their Neighbours as themselves according to the promise of God Deut. 30. Concl. Hence then it follows that the Regenerate by the help of the Spirit of God can fulfil all Righteousness by the Works of the Law This reasoning as it differs not much from the former so there is implied in it a certain kind of fallacy not unlike it Which of what sort it is if I may with your allowance Osorius I will declare For there lurks under the words of Scripture not rightly understood a fallacy or venom wholly Pelagian But
dwells not where there is any Sin Con. Therefore no Sin remains in the regenerate Answer No Man discovers the deceit of this argument better than St. Paul himself who complaining of himself and deploring his misery could not according as he desired totally root out the strength of Sin out of his Flesh though he was held in Captivity against his will and yet no Man can say that he was void of the Grace of God But let us more accurately examin the reason of the Argument Which seems to draw its chief force from things privatively opposite for Sin and Grace are privatively opposite Which cannot consist together in the same subject Whence this Reason of the Argument follows Argument Ma. There is no Union of Sin with the Grace of God Mi. The Regenerate stand in the Grace of God Con. Therefore no Sin remains in the Regenerate Answer Here there is need of a Twofold distinction To wit of Sin and of the Sinner For as one Sin is reigning 〈◊〉 another is not reigning So there is more then one sort of Sinners For though both the Godly and the Ungodly Sin Yet not after one and the same manner For that Man Sins one way who rushes upon all manner of Wickedness against his Conscience and wittingly and willingly perseveres in sin without Repentance of whom it is said Iohn 3. He that worketh unrighteousness is not of God And that man sins another way who is rather overcome by his infirmity than yields willingly to the sinful inclinations of his flesh though sometimes he slips into the evil that he would not And nevertheless with his mind obeys the Law of God and endeavouring after Holiness in the midst of his sins he strives and cries out against them Therefore I answer with this distinction of the Majon which I deny not to be true in those who living according to the flesh wallow in all filthiness without measure or shame Of whom Paul said expresly If ye live after the flesh ye shall die but yet it must be acknowledged after the Example of the same Apostle that the Holy Spirit of God dwelling in us may consist with infirmities in the Regenerate And oft-times after this manner the Apostle joyns the Old Man and the New Man in the Regenerate the Law of the Members and the Law of the Mind the Flesh striving against the Spirit and the Spirit against the Flesh as when speaking of himself he testifies Therefore I my self with my mind serve the Law of God and with my flesh I serve the Law of sin As this disease of infirmity being never idle in the Saints doth often drive them into great and grievous sins and brings them to such distress sometimes that for a season they seem like unto the wicked forsaken of God and void of all Faith and Consolation But God in his infinite Goodness never leaves them so destitute of his Mercy whom once he hath planted in his Son by Faith but that he puts his hand under them when they fall that they are not broken to pieces and again he stretches forth his hand unto them to reduce them from their sins Though he is greatly offended and angry at their wickedness yet in his wrath remembring Mercy he doth not cast them off for ever This appears evidently by the known Examples of David Peter Manasseh Evah Adam Aaron Miriam Solomon and others And this is the difference between the godly and ungodly that though both of them fall into grievous sins against their Conscience yet in this they are distinguished the wicked run head-long on in their sins and taking pleasure in them not only for a while but through their whole life give themselves up to the bondage of corruption and take no care to return unto God by Repentance but the case is contrariwise with the Godly and Regenerate for though they may sin securely for a time and reigning sin may have dominion over them for the present yet nevertheless by the Grace of God they are brought to the acknowledgment of their sins and are recovered by Repentance Therefore I answer to the Major with this restriction It were so except Remission came together with Conversion without which Divine Grace hath no place in sinners Now though Conversion may seem lost for a season by the falls of the Saints yet notwithstanding the Regenerate are not cast out of the favour of God in as much as they are not finally forsaken Otherways if any sin of infirmity should utterly make void all the Grace of God how was the Grace of Christ sufficient for Paul when he was buffeted by a Messenger of Satan or how is his strength said to be made perfect in weakness Moreover how else is that saying of the Apostle true Where sin abounded grace hath superabounded if Divine Grace hath no union with any but them that are arrived at perfection But here again there arises an Objection out of Iohn Whosoever is born of God cannot sin c. And what is concluded from hence Therefore he that is truly regenerate in Christ is free from all pollution of sin The same fallacy returns again from that which is said in a certain sense to that which is said simply If the signification of the word sinning be taken simply in this place for any kind of sin in this sense it is false which they assume by a wrong interpretation of Iohn But if it be understood of those only who wilfully give themselves up to work wickedness or through obstinate malice allow themselves in sinning and resolutely persevere therein I confess that which they cite out of the Apostle is true of such to wit that they are not of God who sin after this manner which yet cannot be truly said of the regenerate that are born of God Therefore the difference should be observed not only of the things which are committed but much more of those that commit them For the same disease of corrupted Nature and inclination to sin abides in both which nevertheless the Regenerate suppress by strugling against it resisting their vicious affections as much as in them lies Howbeit they are not so perfect and entire but that sometimes they wilfully fall into gross sins but they do not continue in them but at length return to God by Repentance Therefore let us grant that which neither can be denied nor ought to be excused that both the godly and ungodly by reason of the common Law of Infirmity are liable to sin but yet they differ very much in their purpose and continuance Solomon knew this difference and therefore spake of it The righteous man though he fall seven times yet he rises up again but the wicked fall into mischief Perhaps they of Trent themselves will not deny that there is some natural infirmity common to the godly and ungodly which makes it possible for them to sin if they will but they deny that
the godly can will to sin because by a voluntary receiving of Grace they are endued with so pure Charity and Innocency that being polluted with no spot of unrighteousness they are not only accounted clean and undefiled by imputation and the remission of sins but are in reality righteous and unblameable by the true possession and exercise of Vertue But where will they find those righteous men that dare profess themselves free from all guilt of sin As I may speak it of all the other Apostles so here I would ask them particularly of Iohn whom they quote whether they think that he himself should be reckoned in the Catalogue of the righteous who are not tainted with the least spot of sin Let us then hear the Apostle confessing of himself If we say that we have no sin we deceive our selves and the Truth is not in us Now then if so great a Disciple of Christ and one so dearly beloved of him durst not plead a total and perfect freedom from sin nor could do so without a Lye dare those Tridentine Seducers attribute that unto themselves and do they suppose that the World can be so blinded by them that it doth not easily take notice of and detest their manifest Lyes Deceits and Impostures and so great an impudence in Lying and Deceiving Pious Reader what Testimonies of greater Authority dost thou look for That which the Tridentines affirm the Apostle denies If they say true the Canonical Truth is a Lye But if it be blasphemy to entertain such a thought must not they of Trent be Lyars What need is there to prove it I will express it in a word The Testimony of Scripture the Consent of Nature the Experience of all Ages the Iudgment of the Learned the Sayings of the Antient Fathers the Examples of all the Saints the general Opinion of all good men the guilty Conscience of evil doers the constant Prayers of the Church her Complaints and Tears the Rebellion of the Flesh the wicked Imaginations arising in the Heart the Deceit of Errours the Groans of troubled Spirits the Disturbances incident to a Mortal Life and Death it self common to all men Moreover the constant Confessions of the Papists and their often repeated Absolutions what is the meaning of these so many and weighty Arguments What is it that they declare but that the Righteousness attainable in this Life is either none at all or such as Augustin describes that consists more in the remission of sins than in the perfection of Vertues And lest any should flatter himself with hopes of perfection in this Life let us hear what the same Augustin commenting upon Iohn infers Let not sin reign in your mortal body He says not let it not be but let it not reign For as long as you live of necessity sin must be in your Members Yet let the dominion be taken from it let not that be done which it commands c. And again writing to Macedonius Who of us is without sin And presently again repeating the same But who in this Life is without some sin But him we call good whose goodness prevails and him we call best who sins least Therefore those whom the Lord himself calls good by reason of the participation of Divine Grace he calls the same also evil because oftheir infirmities until our whole man be thoroughly purged from all corruption by passing into that Life in which we shall sin no more c. Thus said Augustin Where then is that real infusion of Vertues as they call it where are these new Qualities and that Inherent Righteousness that hath no need of remission of sins for what need is there of remission there where there is nothing to be forgiven For what sin can remain there where the perfect purification as they speak of Body and Soul from all pollution of sin makes us holy and partakers of the Divine Nature Briefly that I may comprehend the matter in a few words lest this discourse should grow into too great a bulk I suppose I have sufficiently by what I have discoursed at large cleared these things following First what is the nature of true Faith which causeth Righteousness what is its proper Object from whence it receives power to justifie which we have proved by the Scriptures to proceed wholly from its object that is the person of him only in whom we believe Now because Faith only embraces the person of Christ therefore it is that Faith only upon the account of its Object and not for the sake of our Vertues justifies the sinners and ungodly What sinners are justified by Christ. BUT here there is another thing to be enquired into to wit who are these sinners to whom this Iustification belongs In which the difference must of necessity be observed For as it is not every Faith or act of believing that procures Iustification but that only which eyes the Mediatour So this very Faith doth not belong to all sinners promiscuously Though all men are sinners by nature and in many things we offend all yet all are not sinners alike They that have no sense of their sins no trouble in their Conscience nor shame for the Abominations they have committed but run on headlong and without fear into all wickedness though they prosess Christ and Faith in him with their mouth yet their heart is void of him neither doth this empty profession yield them any benefit Of which sort of men Christ Preaches in the Gospel Not every one that saith to me Lord Lord but he that doth the Will of my Father c. After the same manner the whole Epistle of Iames treats of these and such like men whom he denies to be justified by this counterfeit and hypocritical Faith But on the contrary those that sincerely repent and mourn for their sins and abhorring their own Wickedness return to Christ with all their Hearts and receive him by Faith these only are 〈◊〉 whom Faith alone Iustifies without Works according to that well known saying of Paul And by this means it will not be difficult to reconcile both the Apostles Paul and Iames to one another For as Iames a Servant of Iesus Christ cannot deny but Faith when it is found in a Penitent and Humbled sinner justifies him freely without Works and before all good Works So on the other side neither doth Paul an Apostle of Iesus Christ approve of that Faith which works not by love nor admits abominable wretches of profligate lives to have any fellowship with Christ. Which things being granted what can the Papists say against this Assertion concerning justifying Faith Or what valuble Author can they produce in defence of their Erroneus Doctrine Now if to justifie from sins is nothing else but to absolve from sins as we have demonstrated out of the Apostle Is there any that can absolveus but Christ only Or how should he absolve unless he be received Or after what
after the spirit And to this purpose our Lord himself speaks though not in the same words Not every one that saith unto me Lord Lord shall enter into the Kingdom of Heaven but he that doth the Will of my Father which is in Heaven For what is it to do the Will of the Father but as Paul expresses it to walk not after the flesh but after the spirit In which place a perfect obedience to the whole Law is not required to Iustification but the meaning of our Lord's words is this that he requires a Faith which is not counterfeit nor hypocritical but upright and sincere which doth not only outwardly and with the mouth make mention of the name of the Lord or the Temple of the Lord the Temple of the Lord as the Pharisees and Hypocrites did of old but heartily endeavours to walk in the fear of God and though it cannot perform all things commanded in the Law yet it strives as much as in it lies to shun all things that are contrary to the Will of God that at least sin may not have the dominion if it cannot be wholly excluded or rooted out Thus I understand these words of Christ To do the Will of his Father which is in Heaven For God requires us to do his Will but does not exact a compleat perfection of Obedience in this Mortal Life On the contrary he that makes an outward shew of Faith and an external profession of the Name of Christ whilst he takes no care to lead a Life suitable to his profession but runs on in sins against his Conscience it is certain that such a Faith according to the saying of Christ profits him nothing though he boast in the Name of the Lord as much as he will not that Faith without Works doth not justifie before God provided it be true and not counterfeit that is if it is received into a heart truly humbled as seed into good ground But because that Faith which doth not provoke unto Love and good Works though it may be boasted of at a high rate yet in reality it is no Faith at all but only a shadow and false resemblance of Faith And the same Answer may serve for all their Arguments which they have wrested out of the Sermons of Christ in the Gospel to defend their Doctrine of Iustification by Works Of which sort are these next following Argument Matth. 7. Many shall say to me in that day Lord we have prophesied in thy Name and in thy Name we have cast out Devils and in thy Name we have done many mighty works Then shall I profess unto them I know you not depart from me ye that work iniquity From these words they draw this Argument Ce. Whosoever is rejected of Christ is not justified La. Every one that works iniquity though he hath the Faith of Miracles is rejected of Christ. Rent Therefore he that works iniquity tho' he hath Faith he is not justified Or thus We are approved by Christ after the same manner that we are justified By Works ofRighteousness we are approved of Christ. Therefore by Works of Righteousness we are justified Answer I answer to the first The Minor must be understood with a distinction He that works iniquity is taken two manner of ways in Scripture Sometimes godly men work iniquity and likewise wicked men for both of them sin but they differ in their manner of working iniquity Godly men commit many things which they hate and which are truly sins But because they delight not in them in their inner man but in their love to Christ they endeavour with all their might to return unto God by Repentance God doth not impute their sins to them wherefore those sins that are done away by remission are not reckoned for sins But the case is far otherways in those that are wholly bent upon the fulfilling of the lusts of the flesh and continue in them with delight and satisfaction And unto them belongs that sentence of Christ whereby he commands all that work iniquity to depart from him As touching the second Argument it is a fallacy a non causa pro causa as we call it if our Vertues were of sufficient efficacy to merit the Grace of God there would be some ground for that which they infer Now our Works being such as have always need of Mercy and never satisfie the Law of God nor bring Peace to the Conscience nor support us under the stroke of Death or the weight of Iudgment How evidently doth it hence appear what we should answer to this Argument Good Works are pleasing to God I grant their assumption But first the person must please God and be reconciled to him that so his works may please and be acceptable for the person being once reconciled the works from thence derive their dignity I acknowledge therefore that works of Piety are pleasing to God but yet only as they are performed by persons reconciled and justified But if the manner how they that do good works are reconciled be enquired into they do not obtain Reconciliation by works but before all merits of works for works go not before him that is to be justified as a cause thereof but always as an effect follow him that is justified As fruits if they be good they receive their goodness from the Tree whence they grow but they are not the cause why the Tree is good So in like manner we grant with Augustine that the righteous have great merits But it comes not from their merits but from another caufe that they are righteous So Iacob was beloved of God before he had done either good or evil What did David before he was anointed King to deserve so great a dignity The same may be said of Abraham of whom we read in sacred Records how great things were promised to him when first he was called away from his Fathers house But the Scripture gives us no account of any merits of his as if thereby he had Right unto so great preferments What shall I say of Adam did he not first lose Paradise before he received the promise of recovery And God had respect unto the Sacrifice of Abel What is your Opinion concerning this Did the worth of his Oblation procure him this favour Or shall we say there was some other thing that made his person acceptable to God before he had any regard to his Sacrifice If you cast your Eyes about upon all the Histories of the holy Scripture and take a view of all the Generations of the People of Israel when God in his great goodness did bear with all the provocations of that People can you discern any thing in their works that merited so great long-suffering and patience or should we say that it was only for the sake of Christ that was to be born of that Nation In like manner it may be said of the Church which though it hath been
promulgation of the Law I would ask him What the Law is which if it is nothing but the Rule of Righteousness how can any man be just where there is no Law But what man was there ever in the World but he carried about with him the Law of God if not written in Tables yet written on his heart and engraven on his conscience But the Decalogue was not yet engraven on Tables of Stone But what was contained in the Moral Decalogue which that holy man did not already comprehend within his own heart both of loving God and his Neighbour of not Murthering of not committing Adultery or honouring Parents c. 3. As touching the scope of this Epistle how greatly is campian mistaken For who is so void of sense that he doth not clearly perceive that the drift of the Apostle is not that which those Iesuits dream of to attribute our Salvation or Iustification to any Works either going before or following after Neither was this Office of an Ambassadour committed unto him that he might contend with the Iews about Ceremonies or with the Gentiles about Moral Duties but as Peter was entrusted with the Apostleship of the Circumcision so also the Preaching of the Gospel to the Uncircumcision was committed unto Paul not that he should Preach the Law but the Faith which before he opposed Not that he might declare the Righteousness of Works in which there is no Salvation but that God by him might reveal his Son amongst the Gentiles and might manifest unto the World that heavenly Trophy and glad Tydings of Peace and Victory obtained in Heaven by Christ and spread abroad far and wide through the Churches the boundless riches of Divine Grace which he had experienced in himself For he was called for this purpose to the Apostleship that the infinitely gracious Lord and Redeemer Christ Iesus might first exercise his Mercy towards him and afterwards by him declare his great Mercy towards Sinners not only by hisExample but also by his Ministry For thus he bears witness of himself that the Ministry of Reconciliation was committed to him for which he was appointed to be a Preacher and Apostle and Teacher of the Gentiles in Faith and Truth that he being an Ambassadour in Christ's stead might invite all men yea and beg of them that they would be reconciled unto God And this seems to be the principal scope that Paul aims at not only in the Epistle to the Romans but also in all his Doctrine to proclaim amongst the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ and that he might set before the view of all men what is the Communion of the Mystery that was hidden with God in former Ages c. But now in the Righteousness of Works no such Mystery lay hidden with God from former Ages Therefore it is false and abominable which Campian the Iesuit and such like Sophisters assert concerning the scope and sense of Paul's Epistle to the Romans For by the Law which Paul excludes from Iustification they understand that part thereof which comprehends Ceremonial and Iudicial Works wherein the Iews gloried or Works purely Moral performed before Faith on which the Gentiles relied Yea on the contrary when Paul removes the Law from Iustification he doth not only exclude it upon the account of Iewish Ceremonies or Moral Works performed before Faith but also upon the account of its weakness through the flesh both in Iews and Gentiles both in the regenerate and the unregenerate so that it cannot make sufficient satisfaction to the Iustice of God And Paul affirms That for this cause God sent his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh What did God do but what flesh could not do For sin he condemned sin in the flesh In what flesh ours or his own Sons Who of all the Regenerate though endued with great habitual Faith and Grace hath so led his life walking not according to the flesh but according to the spirit but he always carries about with him flesh that is weak in many respects and vicious and subject to sin Concerning which every one may complain with the Apostle I know that in me that is in my flesh dwells no good thing And again I find a Law that when I would do good evil is present with me c. For what they speak of Works following Faith and Grace how little that helps their cause appears not more evident by any Argument than by the Lives of those that maintain this Controversie if they be strictly enquired into If that be true which Campian with his Iesuits pleads for That Righteousness is not obtained in men come to years but by Works that follow after Faith Let us behold then what excellent Works this Faith of the Mother Church of Rome brings forth seeing they so much glory in the Title of Catholick Faith and Preach so many things about Charity which is the fulfilling of the Law Let us look into the Life and Works of the Roman Popes Cardinals and Bishops and the whole Crew of the Monks and Iesuits Where can you find more of the flesh or less of true holiness than in those false-hearted and painted Hypocrites whose whole profession of Religion consists in Purple Gowns high topped Mitres Purple Caps Rings adorned with Iewels solemn Vows Ceremonies which in reality are rather Stage-playes than Exercises of Piety This appears to be too true by the unhappy Tumults raised in the World the Wars and Persecutions that are stirred up by none more than by those very men that call themselves Spiritual and Catholick whom it should become to be the chiefest encouragers of Concord and Messengers of Peace But having so much enlarged upon this sort of men with their Works and Merits let us return to the Examples of those of whom we spake before who were freely admitted unto Baptism and received into favour by Faith without any commendation of Merits at all yea without mention of any Works except such perhaps as were evil Amongst which number those Iews may be reckoned of whom three thousand at one time were Baptized by Peter Likewise also the Eunuch whom Faith only without Works made not only meet for Baptism but also an Heir of the Heavenly Kingdom And the Iaylor whom Paul Baptized Moreover Paul himself and all the Apostles and Publicans the family of Cornelius Zacehaeus Mary Magdalen and the Thief on the Cross If Faith without Works was sufficient to them for the Grace of Baptism why not also for the obtaining of Iustification and Life Eternal Vega and those of his Association answers after his usual manner that in all these Repentance was joyned with Faith and other things also belonging to good Manners and a godly Life But it easily appears how vain and insignificant this Answer of Vega is He says Repentance and other Vertues are joyned with Faith Which tho' I confess to be in some sense true in the lives and persons of