Selected quad for the lemma: spirit_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
spirit_n	father_n	scripture_n	word_n	5,665	5	4.3306	3	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A13839	A synopsis or compendium of the fathers, or of the most famous and ancient doctors of the Church, as also of the schoolmen Wherein is clearely shewed how much is to be attributed to them, in what severall times they lived, with what caution they are to be read, and which were their perfections, which their errors. A treatise most necessary, and profitable to young divines, and delightfull to all such whose studies in humanity take from them the leisure, though not the desire of reading the fathers; whose curiosity this briefe surveigh of antiquity will in part satisfie. Written in Latin by that reverend and renowned divine, Daniel Tossanus, chiefe Professor of Divinity in the University of Heidelberge, and faithfully Englished by A.S. Gent.; Synopsis de patribus. English	Tossanus, Daniel, 1541-1602.; Stafford, Anthony.	1635 (1635)	STC 24145; ESTC S118496	31,571	108

of Patience of Mortality of the lapsed also against Demetrianus and the Iewes scarce anything of Saint Cyprian is left us although I cannot deny some other Sermons are inserted The explication of the Creed is rather made by Ruffinus than Saint Cyprian The Treatise of the Lords Supper seemes also to have another Author After the Frobenian and Lugdunensian Edition his workes were printed and revised by Turnebus at Paris and after that at Colen with an addition of some fragments Hee confuted Novatus the Hereticke whom in his Epistles hee stiles an importunate Innovat●r and a murtherer of penitence The staines of Saint Cyprian were that hee contended too obstinately that they were to be re-baptized who were baptized by Heretickes or who leaving Heresie repented Although the Affrican Councell assented to him yet Stephanus a Roman Bishop opposed him Saint Augustine lib. 2. contra Crescon Grammat saith thus Nos nullam Cypriano facimus iniuriam cum eius quaslibet literas a Canonica Divinarum Scripturarum anthoritate distinguimus Non teneor authoritate Epistolae Cypriani ad Iubaianum et cum eius pace quod cum Scripturis non convenit respuo Wee doe no wrong to Cyprian if we distinguish any of his letters from the Canonicall Authority of the Divine Scriptures I am not tyed to the authority of Cyprians letter to Iubaianus and by his leave I refuse that which agrees not with the Scriptures Saint Cyprian also in his Epistles over-carefully and superstitiously urgeth water to be mixed with wine in the Administration of the Lords Supper because water and blood flowed from the side of Christ Also Epist 8. lib. 3. hee affirmes Infantes statim esse baptizandos ne pereant quòd eis misericordia non sit deneganda That Infants must forthwith be baptized lest they perish because mercy is not to be denied them Where hee seemes to confine mercy to the Signes Anno 260. Gregorius Neocaesariensis the Disciple of Origen a learned and pious man confuted Samosatenus of whose workes there is nothing extant save a confession of his in the Councell of Antioch against Samosatenus To these times may be referred Arnobius an Affrican of whose composing eight bookes are extant against the Gentiles as also his Commentaries on the Psalmes but they are very briefe and falsified by the Monkes About the yeare after Christ 317. flourished Lactantius Firmianus in the beginning of the reigne of Constantine the great to whom hee dedicated his bookes of Divine Institutions against the Gentiles Hee lived at Nicodemia and excelled in Elegancy and lustre of Language all the Writers of the Church But hee seemed little to understand the proper Doctrine of the Gospell concerning the Benefits of Christ and of Faith For hee expresly writeth that Christ was therefore sent that by his Word and Example hee might invite us to vertue and suffered onely to be a president of Patience And when in his 5. and 6. booke hee expresly and of purpose handles the point of Christian Justice he onely disputes of the Justice of the Law and mentions very sparingly the Justification by Faith But the first part of his Institutions which taxeth the heathenish Idolatries and Philosophicall opinions of God and the Chiefe Good as also his booke of the Workemanship of God in the structure of man may be read with great profit and pleasure The Fathers in the time of the Nicene Councell which was held anno Christi 330. whose Writings are extant Athanasius although in the time of the Councell he were not a Bishop yet was he alwayes a faithfull assistant of Alexander the Bishop of Alexandria whom hee afterward succeeded and deservedly obtaines the first place amongst the Fathers of that time For although hee were exposed to innumerable Calumnies yet with an incredible constancy he frustrated all the endevours of his adversaries and is stiled the Bulwark of Faith in the Ecclesiastical History neither was there any other cause that more whetted the bitter hatred of the Arians against him as saith Theodoret lib. 1. hist than that they perceived the sharpnesse of his wit and industry in confuting of Heretickes in the Nicene Councell His Creed or his explication of the Apostolical Creed is in the Church among other Creeds received There are yet some of his most grave and excellent Treatises extant at Basill set forth heretofore by the Frobenii and Episcopii but more lately at Paris by Nivellius Petrus Nannius an eloquent man being his Interpretour as an oration against Idols of the Incarnation of the Word an Epistle against Heretickes to Epictetus Bishop of Corinth an Exposition of Faith foure Orations against the Arians a double Apology for his flight against the Calumnies of the Arians of divers questions of the Scripture to Antiochus and many others of the same Argument which our Divines usually object against the Neorians and Vbiquitarians The life of S. Anthony the Abbot is father'd on him but there are in it many things fabulous which savour not of the gravity and simplicity of S. Athanasius Most true it is that both S. Athanasius and those ancient Fathers were too fervent in commending the signe of the Crosse and the miracles wrought by that signe and by Martyrs thinking by this meanes to authorize the Evangelicall Doctrine While wee give these cautions touching the blemishes of the Fathers we are not lyable to that censure which the Papists lay upon us derived from the Authority of the same Father who in his first Oration complaines that the Arians accused the Fathers for he speakes not there of all the writings of the Fathers but of the Nicene Creed gathered out of the Scriptures by the Fathers of that Councell to confute the Arians For hee there diligently admonisheth us to try the Spirits which may be easily done by those who are conversant in the Scriptures There are some memorable speeches of Athanasius to be observed First against the Lutherans out of the second Oration against the Arians Nunquam populus Christianus ab Episcopis suis sed a Domino in quem creditum suit nomen accepit Ne ab Apostolis quidem appellationes adepti sumus sed a Christo Illi qui aliundè originem suae fidei ducunt ut haeretici meritò authorum suorum cognomenta praese ferunt The Christian people never tooke their Name from the Bishops but from the Lord in whom they beleeved Neither have wee our appellations from the Apostles but from Christ himselfe They who derive their Faith from any other Originall as heretickes deservedly beare the surnames of their Authors Then against the Vbiquitaries upon that saying Omnia mihi tradita sunt c. All things are given mee Tradita sunt illi omnia ut medico qui sanaret morsum serpentis ut vitae qui vivificaret ut luci illuminanti id est ratione officii Dedit inquit Deus ut quemadmodum per eum facta sunt omnia ita in eo omnia

reigne of Ludovicus pius Haimo Bishop of ●abberstat wrote upon the Epistles o● Saint Paul and many other things Anno 856. lived Rabanus Maurus who being first made Abbot of Fulda was afterwards Bishop of Mens Hee is reported to have written the glosse commonly called the Ordinary There is a saying of his memorable in cap. 2. Epist Iacobi Abraham per opera quae fecit iustus non fuit sed sola fide oblatio autem ejus opus testimonium fuit fidei Abraham was not just by the works that he did but by faith onely but his oblation was a worke and testimony of his Faith But it is to be observed that the zeale and diligence of the Bishops decreasing and their wealth and dignity augmenting the priviledge of Teaching and Writing was conferred on certain Munks Priests called Schoole Doctors because they taght most in the Schools Before this time the Doctrin of Saint Austin and his manner of teaching was for the most part received but about the yeere 1200. the Schoole Divinity beganne to spring up which afterwards degenerated from its first simplicity and purity and fell upon many unprofitable and doubtfull questions full of Phylosophy call subtilties together with definitions and sentences accommodated to the corruptions of those times The chiefe of these were Lanfrancus Monachus Papiensis who opposed himselfe against Berengarius Albertus Magnus and Peter Lombard Then also did Gratianus gather the Decrees of the Popes into one Uolume and without judgement insomuch that the Glosse sweats in reconciling the contradictions Peter Lombard about the yeere 1150. wrote foure Books of Sentences collected out of all the Fathers as the foundation and compendium of all Scholasticall Divinity which with some are of great value yet hath he cited many things amisse out of the Fathers and omitted not a few necessary Many things there are in him which if rightly understood and explained make against the Papists especially where hee treats of the Supper of the Lord. He that would know the defects of Lombard let him peruse the notes of Danaeus in lib. 1. sentent But like as Lombard did not well in that he would confirme the opinions of Christian Religion rather by the Authorities of the Fathers then by the Testimonies of the Scriptures so hee is more tolerable farre then the other Schoolemen who acknowledge Aristotle for their Master and attribute more to his authority then to the Scriptures Among others of that time William Occam was famous anno 1030. who defended the right of the Emperor against the Pope very learnedly Question Whether therefore did Tertullian against Hermogin rightly call the Philosophers Patriarks of Hereticks and lib. de praescript hee tearmes the Logicke which the Hereticks learnt out of Aristotle the subverter of Truth and the turne-coat artificer of building and destroying Answer These are to be understood secundum quid of Chrisippean Sophismes and such Logicians as Eutydemus in Plato who instantly denied what hee formerly granted Next of those who make Philosophy a Mistresse and a Lady in Divine matters who ought to be the Waitingmade the imbecillity of reason in Divine things being not onely apparent but its Adunamia 1 Corinth 12. Yet are not Philosophy and Reason to be rejected but God is to be invok'd that he wil giue us the spirit of wisedome whereby the eyes of our minds may be illuminated that wee faine not false Principles and involve our selves and others in ambiguities and subtilties of words as in times past the Valentinians did and many of the Schoolemen doe which Abbot Trithemius acknowledgeth when he saith Ab hoc tempore Philosophia secularis sacram Theologiam f●cdare coepit from this time saith hee secular Philosophy began to pollute sacred Divinitie But to returne to Peter Lombard It is not to be expressed how many of his successors have I cannot say explain'd but inuolv'd his bookes of Sentences as amongst the rest Bonaventura Albertus Magnus Thomas Aquinas Occam Durandus and innumerable others the last whereof was Thomas Caietanus who lived in the time of Luther The Disciple of Albertus Magnus was Thomas Aquinas commonly called the Angelicall Doctor who lived in the yeare 1270. In him two things are laudable First that hee argued very methodically Secondly that as well in his Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans as in his Summa Theolog. he hath disputed more tolerably of Justification and Predestination than any of the rest But he is much to bee blamed in this that hee imployd the whole strength of his wit in defending Transubstantiation though most unhappily and with many contradictions Not long after lived Iohannes Scotus surnamed Duns a Franciscan who opposed Thomas whence sprung the two sects Thomists and Scotists of which the first were called Nominall the latter Reall because the one concluded the names onely the other the things themselves also to bee comprehended under the predicaments But it is to be noted that there was another Iohannes Scotus long before those times anno 874. a man most learned in the Greeke and Latin Tongues who govern'd the Schoole at Oxford and at length was murdered by his Schollers with Penneknives because his opinion of the Lords Supper was no way pleasing to the Monks The last Age of the Schoolemen from the Councell of Constance to the time of Luther was not more happy but more audacious infinitely ignorant although some were more enlightned with knowledge than others The chiefe of these were Iohannes Capreolus Iohannes Gerson Chancellour of Paris Gabriel Biel Tubinga Petrus de Alliaco Cardinalis Cameracensis who wrote questions upon the booke of Sentences of Peter Lombard where amongst others this saying of his concerning the Eucharist is observable Communem Sententiam esse panem Transubstantiari licet id non sequitur evidenter ex Scriptura sed ex determinatione tamen Ecclesiae Alia opinio est quod substantia panis remanet valde enim possibile est substantiam panis coexistere substantiae corporis nec est magis impossibile duas substantias coexistere quam duas qualitates Possibile inquam est Corpus Christi assumere corpus perunionem et ille modus non repugnat rationi nec authoritati Biblicae It is the common opinion saith hee that the bread is Transubstantiated although that evidently appeare not by the Scripture yet by the determination of the Church it does Another opinion is that the substance of the bread remaines for it is very possible that the substance of the bread may coexist with the substance of the body neither is it more impossible that two substances should coexist than two qualities It is possible I say the body of Christ may assume another body by union and that manner is neither repugnant to reason nor the authority of the Bible Which opinion though Lanfrancus had long before refuted as not agreeable to the words of Christ yet Luther embrac'd it as