Order in which this is administred betwixt Baptism and the Supper or presently after the Baptism 6. The principal Ground Principal Ground upon which they assert it viz. The Scripture especially from Heb. 6.2 Acts 8.17 19. Thus have you an Account of this Rite Wherein all Parties do agree not only from Scriptures but how it hath been owned and practised since the first times by several sorts and who notwithstanding the vast differences among them in the Ceremonial part yet do all of them harmoniously agree in the following Substantials viz. That there is a warrantable ground to conclude that the Hands of the Bishop Elder or Presbyter should be imposed upon every Baptized Person for the receiving of the Spirit or Confirmation and that without it none ought to be admitted to the Lord's Supper It remains therefore in the next place that we consider the said Grounds upon which so great an Ordinance is enjoined and which we find to be either Tradition or the Scripture 1. That of Tradition which is principally asserted by the first four is made good either from the Sayings of the Ancients and Decrees of Councils or the Usage of the ancient Churches 2. And that of Scripture which is principally urged by the two latter is especially from Heb. 6.2 compared Act. 8.17 19.6 Which we shall examine distinctly and apart Tradition And first As to the Sayings of the Ancients that are avouched to make this good we shall first consider what they say about this Rite and 2. Of what Credit and Authority the said Authors are who be produced for the same And first As to the Rite it self which they would make us believe to be so great an Ordinance of Jesus Christ we find it to be so blasphemous and Ridiculous that the very naming of the Particulars thereof may be sufficient to detect the Folly and Impiety thereof to all discerning Christians Whether respecting the Name which they call Chrysm Vnction Perfection Confirmation of which the Scripture is so much a stranger or the Nature which must be by putting the Sign of the Cross with a Bishop's greas'd Finger in the Forehead of the Confirmed with these words of Blasphemy I sign thee with the Sign of the Cross and with the Chrysm of Salvation in the Name of the Father Son and Spirit the Party being in a white Garment his Head bound with Linnen his Hair cut and attended with Gossips or Sureties And this is that which the several fore-cited Popes and Fathers have reported to be Apostolical and the several Councils have by their Canons and Decrees determined and enjoyned as the great Sacrament of Confirmation and so transcendent also to Baptism it self and which without dispute we must believe was so much the appointment and practice of Christ and the Apostles and as yet practised accordingly by the Church of Rome to this day Concerning which Hommius Hommius tells us That it is not only unknown and contrary to the Scriptures but blasphemous and Idolatrous and the vain Invention of superstitious men And Tilenus Tilenus upon their lifting it up above Baptism and confining it only to a Bishop's hand saith That they make an Excrement of Antichrist so much more excellent than the Sacrament of Christ by how much they make a Bishop excel a common Priest or an ordinary person Syntag Part 2. c. 58. § 15. And Amesius saith Ames The Reasons given by the Papists for the same are both empty and impious Bel. Enervat c. 4. And notably Mr. Calvin Calvin In Pref. ante Catechis inter Opuscul That beyond measure they have dâ—ckt this Adulterous Confirmation like an Harlot with great splendor of Ceremonies and many pompous Gauderies moreover while they will adorn it they do it with execrable Blasphemies boasting that it is a Sacrament more worthy than Baptism and calling them half-Christians whoever have not been besmear'd with their stinking Oyl but in the mean while their whole action contains nothing else but Histrionical Gestures or rather wanton Apish Plays without any Art or emulation c. 2. What their Authorities Secondly From the Authorities themselves urged in proof hereof concerning whom we may so well say as is the Doctrine so are the Doctors viz. Those that are first cited to deliver the same the very naming of whom may be sufficient to detect the Cheat we having already by substantial evidence proved that all those first-recited Authorities viz. Dionys Areopag Clem. 4. Ep. Justin Martyr's Respons Hyginus's Decree and the Decretal Epistles of those first Popes to have been Impious Lies and Forgeries things that in after-Ages by the Rise of the Mystery of Iniquity were feigned and invented by some Monks and Friers and put upon those men of Name of the first Ages the better to countenance those Antichristian Impieties that were to be imposed upon the World for Apostolick for by such Lies and Forgeries did the man of sin ascend the Throne And is there not good ground think you to suspect the Justice and Truth of that Cause that cannot otherwise be defended nor maintained but by suborned Witnesses and Knights of the Post for upon no better Authority have they imposed this which they call the Sacred Rite of Confirmation Infants-Baptism Exorcism and a hundred ridiculous Ceremonies more which they would perswade us to believe were Apostolical though as to this of Confirmation some of themselves are constrained to acknowledge Rivet nec ab Apostolis nec à Christo fuisse Institutio c. That it was neither instituted by Christ or his Apostles but by Pope Calixtus Anno 218. Rivet's Controv Tom. 2. Yet so intoxicated with the Whores Cup were all these Councils upon no better grounds to decree it and all these after-Doctors as Ambrose Jerom Austin and others to assert and plead it for an Ordinance of Christ which was not only so contrary to the Scripture but so blasphemous and ridiculous as before And if it had been an Apostolical Tradition to practise this as the first Councils decreed and the Fathers and others practised viz. for many hundred years as a Baptismal Rite to be performed at one and the same time with Baptism whether upon Infants or Adult and to whom also as perfect and compleat Christians they gave the Eucharist how came the after-Councils to be so bold to alter and change it from Infancy to the Adult state putâ—ing it upon them only for so many Ages and the Church of Rome afterwards to alter and change it again returning it to its first practice leaning upon the Validity of those first Authorities concerning whom though it is no wonder that they should hold fast such impious Forgeries and have recourse to such lying Fables to maintain it yet it is matter of admiration to find our Protestant-Writers and Churches to fly to these Authorities both Fathers and Councils to create some colourable pretence for Confirmation Objection as to the Waldens Church
A TREATISE OF Laying on of Hands With the HISTORY THEREOF Both from the Scripture and Antiquity Wherein an Account is given how it hath been practised in all Ages since Christ the mistakes about it rectified and the sence of Heb. 6.2 cleared By H. D'ANVERS Isa 57.14 Take up the stumbling-block out of the way of my People LONDON Printed for Fran. Smith at the Elephant and Castle near the Royal Exchange in Cornhil 1674. A TREATISE OF Laying on of Hands HAving given you an Account both from Scripture and Antiquity of the business of Baptism in its Institution Subject Manner End The Introduction c. It may neither be unnecessary nor unprofitable to give you here some Account of that of Laying on of Hands not only because it immediately followes that of Baptisms Heb. 6.1 2. but more especially because for Confirmation as it hath been called it hath been next after Baptism so solemnly asserted practised and enjoined both in former and latter times as an Ordinance of Christ and Essentially necessary to Church-Communion But what this laying on of Hands is and how that of Confirmation is founded upon the Word of God we shall here consider and examine and recommend to the judgment of all discerning and impartial Christians The Method observed The Method I shall observe herein shall be first to give you an Account what we find of this Rite in the New Testament Secondly How asserted and Practised by the Ancients with the Opinions of the Fathers and Decrees of Councils upon it Thirdly How Practised and enjoyned by the Church of Rome Fourthly How by the Church of England Fifthly How asserted by some of the Presbyterian and Independent perswasion Sixthly And how practised and enjoyned by several of the Baptised Churches in this Nation with some remarks upon each of them for the better discovery of Truth 1. How used in the New Testament 1. How laying on of Hands is used in the New Testament 1. Benediction First in Benediction Mark 10.16 He took the young Children up in his Arms put his Hands upon them and blessed them Miraculous healings Secondly In the Cure of Diseases and healing the sick Mark 6.5 And he could there do no mighty work save that he laid his Hands upon a few sick folks and healed them And c. 16.17 18. In my Name they shall cast out Devils they shall speak with New Tongues they shall take up Serpents and if they drink any deadly thing it shall not hurt them They shall lay Hands on the sick and they shall recover Acts 28.8 And it came to pass that the Father of Publius lay sick of a Feaver and of a Bloody Flux to whom Paul entred in and prayed and laid his Hands on him and healed him 3. For extraordinary Gifts 1. Before Baptism Thirdly For the conferring the extraordinary Gifts of the Spirit viz. 1. Before Baptism Act. 9.17 And Ananias went his way and entred into the House and putting his Hands on him said brother Saul the Lord even Jesus that appeared unto thee in the way as thou camest hath sent me that thou might'st receive thy sight and be filled with the Holy Ghost and immediately there fell from his eyes as it had been Scales and he received sight forthwith and arose and was Baptised 2. After Baptism 2. After Baptism Acts 8.14 15. c. Now when the Apostles which were at Jerusalem heard that Samaria had received the Word of God they sent unto them Peter and John who when they were come down prayed for them that they might receive the Holy Ghost for as yet he was faln upon none of them only they were Baptised in the Name of the Lord Jesus Then laid they their Hands on them and they received the Holy Ghost And when Simon saw that through laying on of the Apostles Hands the Holy Ghost was given he offered them mony saying give me also this Power that on whomsoever I lay Hands they may receive the Holy Ghost but Peter said thy Mony perish with thee because thou hast thought that the gift of God may be purchased with mony c. Fourthly 4. Ordination 1. Deacons In Ordination or setting apart to Office viz. Acts 6.6 whom they set before the Apostles viz. the seven Deacons the Church had chosen and when they had prayed and laid their hands on them and the Word of God encreased c. 1. Tim. 4.14 Neglect not the Gift which is in thee that was given thee by Prophecy with the laying on of Hands of the Presbytery 2. 2. Elders Tim. 1.6 Wherefore I put thee in remembrance that thou stir up the gift of God which is in thee by the putting on of my hands 1 Tim. 5.22 Lay hands suddenly on no Man neither be partaker of other mens sins keep thy self pure 3 Messengers Acts 13.3 And when they viz. the Elders or Teachers of Antioch had Fasted and Prayed and laid their hands on them viz. Paul and Barnabas they sent them away In which Scriptures speaking of this Rite we may take notice of these things 1. First the several kinds of it viz. For Benediction Healing Ordination and giving of the Spirit 2. Secondly what called viz. Laying on of Hands 3. Thirdly the Subjects viz. Little Children Sick Persons and such upon whom the Spirit had not faln and Church-Officers 4. Fourthly the Administrators viz. Christ Jesus himself any gifted Believer the Elders or Presbyters The gifted Apostles 5. Fifthly the end to Bless little Children to give Miraculous healing And for Extraordinary gifts of the Spirit to confirm the Gospel And for Ordination of Church-Officers 2 How by the Ancients Secondly How asserted by the Ancients and by the Canons and Decrees of several Councils Dionysius Dionysius the Areopagite Pauls Convert at Athens supposed to be the first Writer about the year 70. in his Ecclesiastical Hierarchy cap. de Bapt. saith After Baptism let the Sacrament of Confirmation be adjoined with Vnction then let the Eucharist be given Contemp. 3. Serm. 8. Pope Clement P. Clement in his fourth Epistle saith Let them be Baptized and then Consigned by the Bishop for the Holy Spirit for without Confirmation no perfection Joseph Vice comes De Bapt. Ritibus p. 369. c. 18. Justin Martyrs Responses 137. Quest saith Justin Martyr after Baptism we are to anoint with Holy Chrysm for Spiritual benefit Vice com ch 28. p. 369. Pope Hyginus P. Hyginus in his Decree as saith Gratian L. Osiand Cent. 2. l. 2. c. 5. saith in Catechism Baptism and Confirmation let there be a Gossip if necessity require Pope Calixtus P. Calixtus Anno. 218. Ordained Confirmation to be performed with Chrism Flores Temporum confes Fabo c. 7. Pope Vrban P. Vrban in his decretal Epistle enjoins that the Sacrament of Confirmation be immediately given after Baptism and that all the faithful are to wait for the Spirit by the imposition of the
was practised till confirmed by the Councils before mentioned viz. Laodicea Eliberis c. 3 Manner 3. As to the manner of performing it viz. by Crossing and anointing the Forehead of the Confirmed party with Oyl and Chrysm 4 Admin 4. As to the Administrators viz. only a Bishop to whom in an especial manner it was entailed it being unlawful for any other to do it from Peter and Johns being sent by the Church of Jerusalem to impose hands which Philip did not do 5 Subjects 5. As to the Subjects viz. All Baptised persons who were either Adult or Infants immediately or afterwards Baptised Infants at years of discretion The Adult were first the Catechumens who were either the Children of Heathen that inclined to Christianity or the Children of Christians newly come to the Faith who to their compleating in Christianity were to take these five steps thus known and distinguished 1. They were to be Catechised 1. Adult taught and instructed and then were called the Catechumeni 2. Upon their propounding themselves to Baptism were called the Competentes 3. Being admitted to Baptism were called the Illuminati or initiati 4. After Baptism being confirmed were called the Perfecti 5. After Confirmation and receiving the Eucharist they were called the fideles Or Secondly Infants who were for the 4 2 Infants presently 5 6 and 7. Cent. the Subjects of it and with Baptism did receive Confirmation and the Eucharist immediately and so esteemed perfect and compleat Christians then it began to be deferred for a week after Baptism the Children wearing the Baptismal white Garment all the week and upon the 8 day Baptism was perfected by Confirmation as saith Raban Maurus L. Inst Cler. c. 30. Or 3. 2. Persons Baptised in Infancy in their Adult state Such Infants who after they had been Baptised did arrive to knowledge and discretion and were able to say the Lords Prayer 10 Commandements and Creed by heart as appears by some of those latter Councils And the reason of the said Alteration as saith Vice comes p. 378. was because about Charles the first 's time in the 8 Cent. Adult Baptism did very much wear off The People for the most part being now Christians their Children became so numerous that the Bishop found it too hard a task to perform his part Therefore they appointed certain Visitations especially at Easter and Whitsontide to confirm those in their Diocesses that having been Baptised in Infancy were able to give an Account of their Faith which saith Vice comes was Practised in several places in the Latin Church 6. The End 6. As to the end of this Rite viz. For the giving of the Spirit and conferring of Grace to perfect and confirm imperfect Baptism and therefore esteemed a Sacrament of greater force and Vertue than Baptism it self and therefore to be done with Oyl typing figuring or signing the Spirit 7. Ceremonies 7. As to the Ceremonies they were divers viz. The party to be confirmed was to be in white Garments his head bound up in Linnen the hair of the head to be Cut and to have Gossips to undertake for them 8. The Order 8. As to the Order of Administring it viz. especially after Baptism though some of the Catechumens in Imitation of Ananias his imposing hands upon Paul Act. 9. had it before and then had they an immediate right given them to partake of the Eucharist without which they could not be admitted to partake thereof 9. As to the Form The Form in which the Bishop administred it viz. in these words I Sign thee with the Sign of the Cross and confirm thee with the Chrysm of Salvation in the Name of the Father Son and holy Spirit The Vsage of the Church of Rome The Church of Rome Church of Rome observed the very same Order and manner with the same rites and Ceremonies to the same ends and upon the same ground as an Apostolical Tradition which the former Centuries had done only whereas there began to be some space betwixt the Infants Baptism and their Confirmation that they for the most part especially in the latter Centuries have performed them together Contarenus Lib. de Sacrament Contarenus a great Popish Writer saith that Thomas Aquinas thought that this Sacrament ought to be given to very young Infants because they obtain more Grace and therefore more Glory which custom saith he we have kept leaning upon the Authority of so great a Man Aq. part 3. Q 72. Ar. 8. Didoclavius saith in Altar Damasc Many think it to be expedient rather in the time of Infancy because the Infant-Age is not capable of Fiction whereby the effect of the Sacrament may be hindred and that the Antient use of the Church favours that Opinion Ordo Rom. In the Ordo Romanis An old Popish Missal it is Recorded that the Bishop having seated himself in the Church the Arch-Deacon holding the Chrysm the Priest presents the Baptised Infants with their Names to the Bishop who dipping his Finger in the Oyl and Crossing every one in the Forehead saith I Signe thee with the Sign of the Cross and Confirm thee with the Chrysm of Salvation in the Name of the Father Son and Spirit and which Rite they say is confirmed by the Act of the Apostles and opinion of the Fathers from the Scriptures viz. Act. 8.17 Acts 19.6 and Heb. 6.2 and called Confirmation because the Vnity of the Church was confirmed by the Bishop as saith Ambrose upon Heb. 6. Haimo and Ansel Joseph Vice comes c. 30. p. 375. C. Trent The Council of Trent as before decreed That whosoever should say that Children should first give an account of their Faith before Confirmation should be accursed Bellar. Bellarmine de Sacrament L. c. 11. saith that Confirmation confers greater Grace than Baptism neither can Baptism be perfected without it And again Tom. 2. saith Confirmation is to confer Grace that maketh acceptable and to strengthen the soul against the Assaults of the Devil and to be enroled thereby the servants of Christ And again in the same Tom. 2. That it is more perfect than Baptism it self for whereas Baptism may be administred by Ordinary Priests or Deacons yea even women themselves in case of necessity this is not to be performed but by the holy hands of a Bishop The Vsage of the Church of England The Church of England Chur. of Engl. though they lop off many of the Ancient and Popish Superstitions and Ceremonies herein yet do they retain the thing viz. Confirmation after Baptism by a Bishop only and the Subjects viz. Baptized Children able to say their Catechism according to the Decrees of the Council of Constance and the Gallican Councils before-mentioned The whole Rite and Ceremony thereof with what appertains thereto you have at large in the Engl. Liturgy in the Rubrick the substance whereof you may please to take as followeth The Order of Confirmation or