considerate men then the too common pollutions of others which are meerly through negligence but not justified and defended Let Master Baxters own words judge him who makes the same foul work in the Ordinance of baptism by admitting Infants to it upon a Parents or Proparents as he terms them profession when all his proofs of the necessity of profession to go before baptism are of the profession of the party himself to be baptized and this device of a Parents or Proparents profession instead of the Infants is his own invention that hath not any intimation in Scripture and by his own proofs makes Infants capable of the Lords Supper and perverts the nature of Sacraments which his own words do fully express thus Pag. 123 124. The first Argument of Master Gillespies 20. is from the nature of Sacraments which are to signifie that we have already faith in Christ remission of sin by him and union with him The sense of the argument is That seeing Sacraments according to Christs institution are confirming signs presupposing the thing signified both on our part and on Gods therefore none should use them that have not first the thing signified by them Though I undertake not to defend all the Arguments that other men use in this case yet this doth so much concern the cause of baptism which I am now debating that I shall give you this reply to it What Divines are there that deny the Sacraments to be mutual signs and seals signifying our part as well as Gods And how ill do you wrong the Church of God by seeking to make men believe that these things are new and strange If it be so to you it is a pity that it is so but sure you have seen Master Gataker's Books against Doctor Ward and Davenant wherein you have multitudes of sentences recited out of our Protestant Divines that affiâ—m this which you call new It is indeed their most common Doctrine that the Sacrament doth presuppose remission of sins and our faith and that they are instituted to signifie these as in being It is the common Protestant Doctrine that Sacraments do solemnize and publickly own and confirm the mutual covenant already entred in heart as a King is Crowned a Souldier Listed a Man and Woman maried after professed consent So that the sign is causal as to the consummation and delivery as a Key or Twig and Turff in giving possession but consequential to the contract as privately made and the right given thereby so that the soul is supposed to consent to have Christ as offered first which is saving faith and then by receiving him Sacramentally delivered to make publick profession of that consent and publickly to receive his sealed remission Master Cobbet cited by you might well say that primarily the Sacrament is Gods seal but did he say that it is onely his and not secondarily ours And in the next words you do in effect own part of the Doctrine your self which you have thus wondered at as new and strange saying I confess it is a Symbol of our profession of faith If you mean as you speak taking profession properly then 1. you yield that the Sacrament is our symbol and so declareth or signifieth our action as well as Gods 2. And it is not onely a sign of our profession but a professing sign and therefore a sign of the thing professed for the external sign is to declare the internal acts of the mind which without signs others cannot know As therefore the words and outwards actions 〈◊〉 â—wo distinct signs of the same internal acts so are they two wayes of professâ—â—â— My signal actions do not signifie my words which are plainer signs the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and therefore need not darker to express them but they both expre 〈…〉 mind So that they are not only symbols of our professiâ—â— as you spea 〈…〉 t professing symbols 3. And if so then they must be signs and professions of those internal acts which correspond with them The Fourth Argument of Master Gillespy is from Rom. 4. 11. Circumcision was a seal of that righteousness of faith therefore so is baptism therefore it belongeth onely to justified believers He that maketh it the instituted nature or use of circumcision to be a seal of righteousness of faith which the person had before doth make his circumcision a proof of his foregoing righteousness of faith Pag. 133. You cannot shew where ever the wicked are commanded to communicate with the Church in the Sacrament but in this order First to be converted and repent and so baptized and so communicate Gillespy Aarons rod blossoming pag. 514 515. The assumption that baptism it self is not a regenerating ordinance I prove thus 1. Because we read of no Persons baptized by the Apostles except such as did profess faith in Christ gladly received the word and in whom some begun work of the Spirit of grace did appear I say not that it really was in all but somewhat of it did appear in all Baptism even of the aged must necessarily precede the Lords Supper Pag. 144. My Twelfth Argument is from Matth. 22. 12. Friend how camest thou in hither not having on a wedding garment and he was speechless To come in hither is to come into the Church of Christ By the wedding garment is undoubtedly meant sincerity of true faith and repentance so that I may hence argue If God will accuse and condemn men for coming into his Church or the communion of Saints without sincere faith and repentance then it is not the appointed use of baptism to initiate those that profess not sincere faith and repentance But Infants profess not sincere faith and repentance as is manifest by sense therefore it is not the appointed use of baptism to initiate Infants Pag. 145. The Thirteenth Argument is this We must baptize none that profess not themselves Christians But no Infants profess themselves Christians as is manifest by sense therefore we must baptize no Infants The major is certain because it is the use of baptism to be our solemn listing sign into Christs Army our initiating sign and the solemnization of our mariage to Christ and professing sign that we are Christians and we do in it dedicate and deliver up our selves to him in this relation as his own So that in baptism we do not onely promise to be Christians but profess that we are so already in heart and now would be solemnly admitted among the number of Christians the minor I prove thus 1. No man is truely a Christian that is not truly a Disciple of Christ that is plain Act. 11. 26. No man is truly a Disciple of Christ that doth not profess a saving faith and repentance therefore no man that doth not so profess is truly a Christian The minor I prove thus No man is truly a Disciple of Christ that doth not profess to forsake all contrary Masters or Teachers and to take Christ for his chief Teacher consenting to learn of him the way
any thing in the world be so and no man can profess to be maried to Christ that doth not profess to take him for a husband Therefore for my part I never intend to baptize any without profession of saving faith Amen And let the Lord God say so too that Mr. Bâ—xter may baptize no more Infants nor defend so palpable an abuse but may wipe away the reproach he hath cast on Gods people and ordinance He goes on thus Pag. 100. Argum. 10. If Paul account all the baptized Saints or Sanctified men dead with Christ and risen with him such as have put on Christ sons of God by adoption Abrahams seed heirs according to promise and justified then they did all profess a true justifying faith But no Infant did profess a true justifying faith if they did let it be shâ—wed when and where and to whom therefore no Infant was then baptized nor are now to be The antecedent Master Blake confesseth and I shall prove it by parts The consequence is that which lyeth chiefly on me to prove and I shall do both together The Apostle in the beginning of his Epistle to the Corinthians and in many other places calls the whole Church Saints 1 Cor. 6. 11. He saith to them but ye are washed ye are sanctified That part of the antecedent then is certain the consequene I prove thus There are none called Saints in all the New Testament but onely such as were in heart devoted to Christ by a saving faith or professed so much therefore the word Saint in this case must signifie onely such If any will prove a third sort of Saints viz. such as profess a faith not saving they must do that which I never saw done The first and most famous signification of the word Saints or Sanctified in the New Testament is onely of them that are in heart devoted to Christ by true faith therefore the borrowed or Analogical or less proper signification call it what you list must be of that which hath the likeness or appearance of this and that is onely the profession of it Profession maketh Saints visible or by profession as hearty dedication to God by faith maketh real or heart Saints Master Blake addeth we read of Churches of the Saints 1 Cor. 14. 33. And they were taken to be Church-members as soon as they made profession as they ceased to be Jews or Pagans and took them to the way of Christianity as we see Acts 2. Acts 8. 12. 13. 38. Answ. 1. They renounced the way of ungodliness and wickedness in general by a profession of repentance as well as the way of Paganism and Judaism in particular There were no Christians that professed not repentance towards God from dead works 2. We believe that there were Churches of the Saints and therefore that none should be of the Church that profess not to be true Saints But prove if you can that there was ever either Church or Church-member called Saints in Scripture that had not either special sanctity or a profession of it And as for those Acts 8. you cannot prove that any of them were either called Saints or baptized without a profession of a justifying faith as shall further be shewed afterwards The Galatians I find not called Saints but to call them a Church of Christ or believers is equipollent and what Saints were they Why they were all the sons of God by faith in Christ Jesus having been baptized into Christ and put him on and were all one in him and were all Abrahams seed and heirs according to the promise Gal. 3. 26 27 29. A Church in Scripture sense is a society of men professing true saving faith And thus we see what a Church was and what Saints were and what believers and Disciples were supposed to be by the Apostles and what is the signification of these words in Scripture for they are all of the same extent Thus much I have said to prove that all the baptized are accounted Saints and therefore professed a saving Sanctity The second title which I mentioned follows of which I shall be more brief All the baptized are accounted to be dead and risen with Christ even dead to sin and risen to newness of life therefore they all profess a saving faith The proof of this is full in the two Texts already cited Rom. 6. and Col. 2. 11 12. Rom. 6. 3. c. How shall we that are dead to sin live any longer therein Know ye not that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father so we also should walk in newness of life For if we have been planted together into the likeness of his death we shall be also in the likeness of his resurection knowing this that our old man is crucified with him that the body of sin might be destroyed that hence forth we should not serve sin for he that is dead is freed from sin Now if we be dead with Christ we believe that we shall also live with him Likewise reckon ye also your selves to be dead indeed unto sin but alive unto God through Jesus Christ our Lord Here is a full report of the use of baptism and the profession of all that are baptized and the state they are supposed to be in So that I cannot speak it plainlyer then the words themselves do So Col. 2. 11 12. which I shall not stay to recite because it is to the same purpose and before cited The third title mentioned in the argument is this All that are baptized have professedly put on Christ therefore they have professed saving faith The Antecedent is expressed Gal. 3. 23. for as many as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ the consequence is proved in that to put on Christ heartily is to be made true partakers of him and living members of him therefore to profess this is inseperable from the profession of saving faith yea by that faith he is truly put on Putting on Christ is the same with putting on the new man which after God is created in righteousness and true holiness being renewed in the Spirit of our minds Ephes. 4. 20 21 22 23 24. Col. 3. 10. It is putting on the new man which is renewed in knowledge according to the image of him that created him and putting on the Lord Jesus Christ is put for the state of Sanctity in opposition to a fleshly life Rom. 13. 13 14. Saith Calvin on this Text induere Christum bic significat virtute spiritus ejus undique nos muniri qua idonei ad omnes sanctitatis partes reddamur sic enim in nobis instauratur imago Dei quae unicum est animae ornamentum Respicit enim Paulus ad vocationis nostrae finem quia Deus nos adoptans in corpus unigenti filii sui inserit
ratifieth the external ceremony in those who are his Bullinger in loc. saith Baptizâ—ri in nomine Domini Jesu Christi est baptismatis signo testari se Christo credere ad remissionem peccatorum To be baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ is by the sign of baptism to testifie that we believe in Christ for the remission of sins 1. Mark It is not onely an engagement to believe hereafter but the profession of a present faith 2. And that not a common faith but that which hath remission of sin 3. And this was not an accidental separable use of baptism but he makes this the very exposition of baptizari in nomine Jesu Christi to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ And thus he expoundeth the covenant est enim baptismus pactum seu foedus gratiae quod init inter baptizandum nobiscum Christus For baptism is an agreement or covenant of grace which Christ enters into with us when we are baptized And that it is a professing sign of our true repentance he shews before rectissime conjungitur paenitentia baptismus quia baptismus paenitentiae signum est and most rightly is repentance and baptism joyned together between baptism is the sign of repentance Calvin in loc. upon the place Per baptismum ut Paulus docet crucifigitur vetus homo noster ut in vitae novitatem resurgamus by baptism as Paul teacheth our old man is crucified that we may rise to newness of life Rom. 6. 4. 8. Item indutmus Christum ipsum Gâ—l 3. 27. 1 Cor. 12. passim docet Scriptura esse paenitentiae quoque Symbolum Also we put on Christ himself and the Scripture doth up and down teach it to be also a badge of repentance Calvin on Acts 22. 16. Non dubium est quin fideliter rudimentis Pietatis Paulum imbuerit Ananias neque enim verâ— fidei expertem baptizasset nor doubt but Ananias did faithfully instruct Paâ—l in the rudiments of Piety neither would he have baptizeâ— him if he had been void of true faith John 3. 5. Except a man be born of water and of the spirit he shall not enter into the Kingdome of God though we are agreed against the Papists that Christ intendeth not here to place the same necessity in baptism as there is in or of the new birth by the spirit yet it is by most acknowledged that Christ doth here speak of the new birth as signified by baptism and so hath respect to baptism as the ordinary confirming sign And so the Text fully sheweth us that baptism is instituted to be the sign of our present regeneration or else it could not be said that we must be born of water and the spirit Calvin saith most are of Chrysostomes mind who took it to be meant of baptism and so did the generality of ancient Expositors and though himself and some more think otherwise yet as long as they take it to be a metonymical expression the sign being put for the thing signified it doth as well acquaint us with the use of baptism as if it were a proper speech Bullinger in loc upon the place saith Hanc Christi sententiam omnes pene de baptismo interpretantur almost all interpret this Scripture of Christ to baptism Beza believeth that the Text speaketh of baptism either Christs or some other but rather Christs Justly doth Beza in Mark 1. 4. fall upon Erasmus sharply for saying {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} in praepâ—sitio praeparationem significat non effectum the preposition in signifieth a preparation and not the effect Because repentance and remission saith Beza cannot be separated so that he took it not to be a common preparatory repentance or baptism Piscator on Mark 14. saith It s called the baptism of repentance for remission of sin because John preached remission of sin to the penitent and believers praecip iebatque ut inhujus rei testimontum atque professionem baptizarentur He concluded that they should be baptized in testimony and profession of this thing and that is called {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} the baptism of repentance id est qui resipiscentiae testificandae atque profitenda adbibebatur Neque enim baptizabat nisi eos qui confessione peccatorum â—dita resipiscentiam suam testatam reddebant Caeterum nomine resipiscentiae per synecdochen membri simul intelligenda est fides in Christum that is to say was used to testifie and profess repentance neither did he baptize any but those who by confession of their sins testified their repentance but by a Synecdoche of a part for the whole is also to be understood Faith in Christ And on Matth. 3. 11. Observe he shews that Christs baptism and Johns are the same in that both have the same end and use viz. obsignatio remissionis peccatorum resipiscentiae The sealing of remission of sins and repentance that is as already extant as his judgement is oft delivered as in his Schol. on ver. 11. he expresly faith In resipiscentiam id est in testimonium resipiscentiae ut nimiâ—um susceptione baptismi testatum faciatis vor resipuisse indies magis ac magis resipiscere velle sed simul hic intelligendum Joannem baptizasse quoque in remissionem peccatorum hoc est ut nimirum nomine Dei testatum faceret resipiscentibus in Christum credentibus peccata ipsis remissa esse propter Christum agnum Dei Unto repentance that is in testimony of repentance viz. that by receiving of baptism you testifie that you have repented and that you will daily renew your repentance more and more but withal we must here understand that John did baptize also for the remission of sins that is that he might testifie in the name of God to the penitents and believers in Christ that their sins were forgiven them for the sake of Christ the Lamb of God And I pray mark his observation on Mat. 3. 6. 8. 10 concluding our present question Baptismus nulli adulto conferendus est nisi prius ediderit confessionem peccatorum fidei in Christum ac praterea promissionem sanctae vitae Baptism is not to be administred to any of age unless he first make confession of his sins and of his faith in Christ and besides a promise of a holy life which he proves Calvin on Matth. 3. 6. saith Ergo ut se rite ad baptismum offerant homines peccatorum confessio ab illis requiritur alioqui nihil quam inane esset ludicrum tota actio Therefore that men may rightly offer themselves to baptism confession of sins is required of men otherwise the whole action would be nothing else but sport If I had charged the guilty so of making the whole work of baptism Ludicrous they would have been highly offended and yet Paedobaptists do so Paraeus on Matth. 3. 5. shews that the order was that confession as a testimony of true repentance
the Son by which they cry Abba Father So Tit. 3. 5 6 7. According to his mercy he saved us by the washing of regeneration and renewing of the Holy Ghost which he shed on us c. that being Justified by his Grace we should be made heirs according to the hope of eternal life The heirs then are regenerate justified and have the hope of eternal life So Ephes. 3. 6. The Gentiles being made fellow-heirs and of the same body are partakers of the promise in Christ by the Gospel even the unsearchable riches of Christ Heb. 6. 17. The heirs of promise have their salvation confirmed by Gods oath And Heb. 1. 14. they are called the heirs of salvation And Heb. 11. 6. 9. It is true justified believers that have that title and James 2. 7. They are called heirs of the promised Kingdom and 1. Pet. 3. 7. they are called coheirs of the same grace of life So that to be heirs in the first and proper notion is to be Sons that have title to the inheritance of glory and therefore to be heirs in the second analogical notion is to be such as seem such by profession of that Faith which hath the promise of that glory The last title that I mentioned in the Argument was Justified Paul calleth all the baptized Church of Corinth Justified None that profess not a justified Faith are called Justified therefore none such should be baptized The major I proved to Master Blake out of 1 Cor. 6. 11. Ye are washed ye are sanctified ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus and by the Spirit of our God Master Blake doth not at all deny the major or the sense of the Text alledged to prove it but darkly in generals intimateth a denial of the minor silently passing over that particular title justified as if he durst not be seen to take notice of it I confess its sad that good men should be so unfaithful to the truth which is so precious and is not their own and which they should do nothing against as Master Baxter hath done but all they can for it Having gon thus far about titles let me add another the title Regenerate Christ hath instituted no baptism but what is to be a sign of present regeneration But to men that profess not a justifying faith it cannot be administred as a sign of present regeneration therefore he hath instituted no baptism to be administred to such The major I have proved already in the first Argument and its plain in John 3. 5. Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit he cannot enter into the Kingdom of God And so in Tit. 3. 5. where it is called the laver of regeneration In both which though I am of their minde that think that the sign is put for the thing signified yet it may thence plainly appear what is the thing signified even regeneration or the new birth Yea so commonly was this acknowledged by all the Church of Christ that there is nothing more common in the writings of the Fathers then to take the terms regenerate illuminate c. and baptized as signifying the same thing or at least spoken of the same person which occasioned one of our late Antiquaries so stifly to plead that regeneration in Scripture signifyeth meer baptism and that all the baptized are regenerate I grant that it oft falls out that baptism being misapplied sealeth not regeneration at present and that the same person may afterward be regenerate and his remembred baptism may be of use to him for the confirmation of his faith But this is not the institutes commanded use of it to be so administred at first if the party profess not saving faith though this review of it is a duty where it was so abused at first The minor I shall take for granted while regeneration in Scripture stands so connexed to salvation I know no regenerate ones but the justified or those that profess to have a justifying faith nor hath he proved any more Pag. 118. Argum. 11. All that are meet subjects for baptism are after their baptism without any further inward qualification at least without any other species of saith meet subjects for the Lords Supper But no Infant is a meet subject for the Lords Supper as is acknowledged therefore no Infant is a meet subject for baptism Or thus Those whom we may baptize we may also admit to the Lords Supper But we may admit no Infants to the Lords Supper as is acknowledged by baptizers of Infants therefore we may baptize no Infants The major Master Blake will easily grant me and if any other deny it I prove it thus 1. It is the same covenant that both Sacrament seal one for initiation the other for confirmation and growth in grace therefore the same saith that qualifieth for the one doth sufficiently qualifie for the other for the same covenant hath the same condition 2. They are the same benefits that are conferred in baptism and the Lords Supper to the worthy receiver Therefore the same qualification is necessary for the reception The antecedents is commonly granted Baptism uniteth to Christ and giveth us himself first and with himself the pardon of all past sins c. The Lords Supper by confirmation giveth us the same things it is the giving of Christ himself who saith by his Minister Take Eat Drink offering himself to us under the signs and commanding us to take himself by faith as we take the signs by the outward parts He giveth us the pardon of sin sealed and procured by his body broken and his blood shed 3. A member of Christs Church against whom no accusation may be brought from some contradiction of his first profession must be admitted to the Lords Supper but the new baptized may be ordinarily such therefore if he can but say I am a baptized person he hath a sufficient principal title to the Lords Supper Coram Ecclesia before the Church I mean such as we must admit though some actual preparation be necessary unless he be proved to have disabled his claim on that account either by nulling and reverting that profession or by giving just cause of questioning it 4. The Church hath ever from the Apostles dayes till now without question admitted the new baptized at age to the Lords Supper without requiring any new species of faith to intitle them to it I take the major therefore as past denial I must confess as much as I am against separation I never intend to have communion with Master Blakes congregation if they profess not saving repentance and faith And if he exact not such a profession I say still he makes foul work in the Church and when such foul work shall be voluntarily maintained and the word of God abused for the defilement of the Church and ordinances of God it is a greater scandal to the weak and to the schismsticks and a greater reproach to the Church and sadder case to
Their first task is to make Disciples which are by Mark called believers The second work is to baptize them whereto is annexed the promise of their salvation The third work is to teach them all other things which are afterward to be learned in the School of Christ To contemn this order as Master Baxter doth in Infant baptism is to contemn all rules of order For where can we expect to find it if not here I profess my conscience is fully satisfied from this Text that it is one sort of faith even saving that must go before baptism and the profession whereof by the Party himself to be baptized He that believeth and is baptized not another then the believer make Disciples and baptize them not others then the Disciples made the Minister must expect of which see what is before cited out of Calvin and Iâ—scator I shall be amazed reading this passage at the blindness of Master Baxter if he see not how unanswerably his own words overthrow Infant baptism or his hypocrisie if being satisfied as he saith in conscience of his own exposition he do not deny Infant baptism and bewail his alledging of Matth. 28. 19. in his Book termed Plain Scripture proof of Infants baptism Part. 1. chap. 3. And I pray God to deliver me from such hardness of heart be adds That it was saving faith that was required of the Jews and professed by them Acts 2. 38 41 48. is shewed already and is plain in the Text Acts 8. The Samaritans believed and had great joy and were baptized into the name of Jesus Christ vers. 8. 12. whereby it appeareth that it was both the understanding and will that were both changed and that they had the profession of a saving faith even Simon himself Acts 8. 37. The condition on which the Eunuch must be baptized was if he believed with all his heart which he professed to do and that was the evidence that Philip did expect Paul was baptized after true conversion Acts 9. 18. The Holy Ghost fell on the Gentiles Acts 10. 44. before they were baptized and they magnified God And this Holy Ghost was the like gift as was given to the Apostles who believed on the Lord Jesus and it was accompanied with repentance unto life Acts 11. 17 18. Acts 16. 14 15. Lydia's heart was opened before she was baptized and she was one that the Apostles judged faithful to the Lord and offered to them the evidence of her faith Acts 16. 30 31 33 34. The example of the Jaylour is very full to the resolution of the question in hand He first asketh what he should do to be saved the Apostle answereth him Believe in the Lord Jesus and thou shalt be saved and thy house so that it was a saving faith that is here mentioned He rejoyced and believed with all his house and was baptized that same hour of the night or straightway It is here evident that he professed that same faith which Paul required Acts 18. 8. Crispus the chief Ruler of the Synagogue believed on the Lord with all his houseâ— and many of the Corinthians hearing believed and were baptized Here we have two proofs that it is saving faith that is mentioned Those in Acts 19. 5. were baptized as believers in Jesus Christ In a word I know of no one word in Scripture that giveth us the least intimation that ever man was baptized without the profession of a saving faith There is constantly this order in the prescribed duty that no man should seek baptism but a true believer and no man should baptize any but those that profess this true belief Acts 8. 37. Philip is determining a question and giveth this in as the decision If thou believe with all thy heart thou mayest And to say that this is but de bene esse meaning that it includeth not the negative otherwise thou mayest not is to make Philip to have deluded and not decided or resolved Use that liberty in expounding all other Scripture and you 'l make it what you please A Dogmatical faith is not the Christian faith nor anywhere alone denominateth men believers in Scripture I remember but one Text John 12. 42. where it is called believing on Christ and but few more where it is simply called believing but none where such are called believers Disciples or Christians or any thing that intimateth them admitted into the visible Church without the profession of saving faith I conclude that all examples in Scripture do mention onely the administration of it to the professors of saving faith and the precepts give us no other direction and I provoke Master Blake as far as is seemly for me to do to name one precept or example for any other and make it good if he can I conclude that all examples of baptism in Scripture do mention onely the administration of it to the same persons who in their own persons were professors of saving faith and the precepts give us no other direction And I provoke Mr. Baxter as far as is seemly for me to do to name one precept or example for baptizing any other and make it good if he can and if not by his own reason he ought to baptize no other but must reject baptism of Infants who do not in their own persons profess saving faith and give over his vain Plea of Parents or Proparents profession of saving faith as entituling Infants to baptism which unless his violence and wilfulness of spirit blind him his own words and arguments will inforce to do Pag. 156. Argum. 17. is from 1 Pet. 3. 21. The like figure whereto even baptism doth also now save us Not the putting away the filth of the flesh but the answer of a good Conscience toward God whence I thus Argue If baptism be appointed for our solemn admission into a state of salvation as Noahs Ark received men into a state of safety from the Deluge then none should be baptized but those that profess that faith which entereth them into a state of salvation but no Infant professeth that faith which entereth them into a state of salvation as is manifest by sense and reason therefore no Infant should be baptized Here it is implied plainly that this is quoad finem instituentis as to the end of him that instituted it the common appointed of baptism which the Text mentioneth though eventually it prove not the common effect through the errours of the receivers and this appeareth 1. In that it was spoken plainly in the text of the very nature and appointed use of baptism and so of baptism as baptism without any exception limitation or distinction Therefore it is not spoken of any different use that it is appointed for to the elect as distinct from its common use to others It s spoken of that signification and common use to which baptism is appointed viz. to save else we shall never be able to understand the use of it or any ordinance from Scripture if we