of thy heart and especially receiue it whole Christ with the thirstie draught of the inward man Eusebius declareth by this similitude what maner of change is made in the sacrament how earthly things be turned into the substance of Christ and what maner of substance that is without doubt like vnto that change wherewith wee be altered in our Baptisme and such a substance as wee put on in the bath of Regeneration when we be borne the children of God and made a new creature and new men when we passe into the body of the Church where in our outward part nothing is changed but all inwardly and for that cause calleth he it spirituall food which we behold in faith touch with minde take with the hand of our heart and receiue with the thirstie draught of the inward man Ambros in Epist ad Hebr. de consecrat dist 2. With this agreeth that that Ambrose writeth vpon the Epistle to the Hebrewes and is repeated De consecrat dist 2. In Christ was once a mighty sacrifice offered for an euerlasting Redemption vvhat doe vve then doe vve not dayly offer him yes but in remembrance of his death and it is but one sacrifice not many for Christ vvas once offered and this sacrifice is a paterne of that Ambrose saith plainely that that true sacrifice vvas once offered but this sacrifice is offered euery day and hee declareth in vvhat sort it is one sacrifice and not one vvhen he saith that this is a paterne of that The same man in his booke of Mysteries saith Idem in lib. de Myst. In that sacrament is Christ because it is the body of Christ it is not then a corporall but a spirituall food vvhereupon the Apostle also saith of the figure of it That our fathers did eate the same spirituall food for the body of God is a spiritual body the body of Christ is the body of the diuine spirit These things cannot be said of Christes true and proper body namely that it is a spirit for a spirit hath not flesh and blood vvhich that body hath as the Lord himselfe did vvitnesse before his disciples Feele yee and see you saith he for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as you see me haue Idem de Sacr. lib. 4. Wherefore the same auctour De sacramentis lib. 4. saith thus Thou seest therefore hovv mighty in operation the vvord of Christ is If then there be so great force in the vvord of the Lord Iesu that those things should begin to be which were not hovv much more is it of force to make those things remaine which were and yet to change them into another thing The heauen was not the sea was not the earth was not But hearken to him that saith He spake the word and they were made he commanded and they were created Therefore that I may ansvvere thee it was not the body of Christ before the consecration but after the consecration I tell thee it is now the body of Christ He spake the word and it was made he commanded and it was created Thou wast thy self but thou wast an old creature after thou wast consecrated thou didst beginne to be a new creature Wilt thou know how new a creature Euery one is saith he a new creature in Christ Ambrose taketh his argument à maiore By the word of God new things are made then is it no marueile if things which now be and remaine are changed into another thing by his word vvhich thing is done in Sacraments Examples of the first are Heauen the Sea the Earth of the later man which before he be regenerate is an old creature but after regeneration by force of the word albeit he be the very same he vvas before namely a man still yet he receiueth an invvard change and of an old is made a new creature Like vnto this he affirmeth the change in the sacrament to bee when as both bread remaineth and yet getteth to it selfe a nevv substance that is to say a new dignitie That same thing doth hee yet more fully expound in his sixt booke writing thus Idem de sacrament lib. 6. Peraduenture thou mayest say How is it very flesh for I see a similitude I see not the trueth of blood in deed First of all I told thee of the vvord of Christ that it worketh as of force to change and alter the appointed kindes of nature Moreouer when the disciples of Christ could not away with his talke but hearing that hee vvould giue them his flesh to eate and his blood to drinke went their way yet Peter alone said Thou hast the words of eternall life whither shall I goe from thee Least therefore any moe should so say but the grace of Redemption should remaine Therefore thou takest the sacrament in a similitude but thou doest attaine the grace and vertue of the true nature At the last he addeth to make vp the matter And thou which receiuest bread art made partaker in that spirituall food of the diuine substance We learne by the authoritie of this so great a man that that which we take in the sacrament is a spiritual not a corporall food neither that that flesh is to be taken after the maner of his proper flesh as the Capernaits did and vvith offence went backe but together with the outvvard signe we obtaine the grace and vertue of the true nature and receiuing the bread are partakers of his diuine substance And here also we see that Ambrose was of the same opinion that Emissenus was and far otherwise vnderstandeth both the alteration which is made in the sacraments and also the very terme of substance then it is either taken in proper speach or as Philosophers do naturally speake Idem de offic lib. 4. cap. 48. To the same purpose serueth also that which he writeth in his booke De officijs lib. 4. cap. 48. Here is the shadovv here is the image there is the trueth the shadow in the Lavv the image in the Gospel but the trueth in heauen In time past the Lambe was offered the calfe vvas offered Novv is Christ offered but he is offered as man as taking his Passion but hee as a Priest doeth offer himselfe here as in an image but there in trueth where hee maketh intercession for vs as an aduocate vvith his Father Hee putteth a difference in the one oblation from the other And albeit both after their maner be done in deed yet this vvhich is solemnized in the Church is done in an Image but the trueth it selfe remaineth as an Aduocate for vs vvith the Father And this place of Ambrose doeth seeme to be like to that place of Origen vpon the 38. Origen in Psal 38. Psalme vvhere he intreateth of that saying of Paul For the Law hauing a shadow of those good things to come hath not the very Image of the things c. And thus he vvriteth But if any man can passe from this shadovv let him
sacrifice was sanctified But in that which is commonly called the liturgie of Basill it is plaine otherwise and the rest of the Fathers do oftentimes the like And Damascenus himselfe shutteth vp his oration with this conclusion And they be called the patterns of things to come not because they be not verely the bodie and blood of Christ but because now by them we be made partakers of the diuinitie of Christ and then shall be by vnderstanding by sight onely What shall we do with this man who a little before denied that they were called patternes after sanctification and now he himselfe doeth plainely call them patternes after sanctification what maner inconstancie is this This is not a teaching of mysteries but in saying somewhile one thing and another while another it is to wrap all things in blind darkenesse Truly I thinke in my mind that Damascenus knew not how to determine this matter certainely but did heape together hastily and confusedly those things which hee had read and which were written wisely of the olde Fathers and when hee could not winde himselfe out hee floteth to and fro and as the Grecians terme it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to say wafteth with his wings For that hee was perswaded that there should be a carnall as they terme it transubstantiation that is not likely since that the very Greeke Church vnto this present day hath not admitted that opinion And indeede no marueile if in this mysterie he saw the lesse or had no sound opinion if those things be true which be reported of him in his life that after hee was made a Monke hee fondly became a basketseller in the market place that he fained foolish miracles that he was a superstitious worshipper of Images and a most earnest maintainer of the same The authoritie of them of old time ought to bee of more credit with vs whose iudgement commended to vs with learning and vnfained godlinesse is of much more weight vvho for the vnderstanding of this so great a mystery exclude all sence of the flesh and cal vs backe to a spirituall maner of vnderstanding Wherefore wisely and learnedly doth Bertram which was no long time after seeme to haue obserued this distinction in the ancient Fathers and agreeable also to the scriptures and to haue set foorth in a worke of his though not long yet clearely and truely what ought to be thought of this controuersie and if wee gather thereout a few places fit for our purpose it shall not be amisse for he is neither a very new Author seeing hee liued about seuen hundreth yeeres past and beside he was no lesse famous for his life then for his learning With many arguments hee proueth this proposition That the flesh of Christ taken of the Virgine and that which is taken in the sacrament differ one from another For he writeth in this maner expounding these wordes of Ambrose That is the vndoubtedly true flesh of Christ that was crucified that was buried Therefore it is verely a sacrament of that flesh The Lorde Iesus himselfe cryeth Bertramus de corp sang Christi This is my body How diligently saith Bertram hovv wisely is this distinction made Of the flesh of Christ vvhich was crucified which was buried that is by the vvhich Christ vvas both crucified and buried he saith It is his very flesh indeed but of that which is receiued in the sacrament he saith It is therefore verily the sacrament of that flesh making a distinction betweene the sacrament of his flesh and the trueth of his flesh in that he said That in the trueth of his flesh which he tooke of the Virgine he was both crucified and buried and therefore said that the mysterie that is now ministred in the Church is verily a sacrament of that flesh wherein he was crucified manifestly instructing the faithfull that that flesh in which Christ was crucified and buried is not a mysterie but the trueth of nature But this flesh which now conteineth in a mysterie the similitude of that other is not flesh in forme but in Sacrament so that in forme it is bread in sacrament the true body of Christ as the Lord IESVS himselfe crieth This is my body Whose minde that we may the better vnderstand it is to be marked the which we did also note before that as he meaneth the body of Christ two maner of wayes so doth he alledge also two maner of truethes of the same namely the one trueth properly which he termeth the trueth in forme and the trueth of nature which he doth attribute to the flesh that was crucified and buried the other a spirituall trueth which he termeth the true body in the sacrament The same man repeating the saying of Ambrose The food then is not corporall but spirituall saith Thou mayest not therefore bring the sense of the flesh for according to that there is nothing here determined It is indeed the body of Christ but not corporall but spirituall It is the blood of Christ but not corporall but spirituall There is nothing therefore to be vnderstood corporally but spiritually It is the body of Christ but not corporally and it is the blood of Christ but not corporally Note when he saith Not corporally he meaneth not properly corporally for by the spirituall eating also in the sacrament we are corporally annexed with Christ as Cyrillus and Hilarius doe witnes but mystically not properly The same man saith of the same Ambrose a little after He hath taught vs very plainely how we ought to vnderstand the mysterie of the Body and Blood of Christ For after he had said that our Fathers did eate spiritual food and drinke spirituall drinke when as for all that there is no man that doubteth but the Manna which they did eate and the water which they did drinke were corporall he applieth it to the mysterie which now is ministred in the Church defining after what sort it is the body of Christ For in that he saith The body of God is a spirituall body Christ vndoubtedly is God and that body vvhich he tooke of the Virgine Mary which suffered which was buried which rose againe was vndoubtedly a true body the same that continued visible and able to be felt but that body which is called the mysterie of God is not corporall but spirituall But if it be spirituall then is it not visible nor able to be felt and therefore S. Ambrose addeth saying The body of Christ is the body of a diuine Spirit But a diuine spirit is nothing that is corporall nothing that is corruptible nothing able to be felt But this body which is solemnized in the Church as touching the visible forme is both corruptible and to be felt Soone after also he concludeth vpon the words of Ambrose in this wise By the authoritie of this great learned man we be well taught that there is a great difference betweene the body wherein Christ suffered and the blood which he shed hanging
to them an horrible and hainous thing to feed vpon mans flesh thinking hee had spoken this after that sort as though they should haue bene taught to haue eaten his flesh sod or rosted and cut in pieces whereas the flesh of his person if it should bee deuided into morsels could not haue bene sufficient for all mankinde which being once spent Religion should seeme to perish vvhich should not haue aftervvard a sacrifice remaining any longer But in such like thoughts flesh and blood profiteth nothing because as the Master himselfe hath expounded These words be Spirit and life neither doth the carnall sense pearse the vnderstanding of so great a depth vnlesse Faith be added too The Bread is food the Blood is life the Flesh substance the Body the Church A body because of the agreeing of members in one Bread for the conformitie of nourishment Blood for the effect of life giuen Flesh for the propertie of the humanitie taken Also hee sayth This common bread beeing changed into flesh and blood doeth procure life and encrease to the bodies and therefore by the accustomed effect of things the weakenesse of our faith is aided and taught by a sensible argument that the effect of eternall life is in the visible Sacraments and that we be knit to Christ not so much by corporall as by spirituall passage Also this bread which hee reached to his disciples beeing changed not in forme but in nature by the omnipotencie of the Word is made flesh and euen as in the person of Christ the humanitie was seene and the diuinitie hid so into the visible Sacrament vnspeakeably doeth the diuine substance powre it selfe Also the Master truely of this Institution sayd that Vnlesse wee should eate and drinke his blood we should not haue life in vs instructing vs by a spirituall lesson and opening our vnderstanding to so hidden a matter that wee should knowe that our eating is an abiding in him and our drinke as it were a certaine incorporation by submitting our seruice and ioyning our willes and vniting our affections Also hee sayth Among the guests of the Lords table the natural man is not admitted whatsoeuer flesh and blood doeth appoint is shut out from this company it sauoureth nothing it profiteth nothing whatsoeuer the finenes of the sence of man doth goe about Cyprian hath these and many other places to the same purpose The very words of Cyprian doe sufficiently declare that which belongeth to our purpose How the Letter is not to bee followed in these things which be spoken of this mysterie how the vnderstanding of the Flesh is vtterly to be shunned and all things to be referred to a spiritual sense That there is the presence of the diuine power in this Bread the effect of euerlasting life and that the diuine substance is powred thereinto that the words are spirit and life that a spirituall lesson is giuen that this Body this Blood and Flesh this substance of body ought not to be taken after a common sort nor as mans reason doth appoint but to be named thought of beleeued for certaine excellent effects powers and properties ioyned thereto which be euen within the body and blood of Christ by nature namely that it doeth both feede and reuiue our soules and prepareth our bodies to resurrection and immortalitie Cyrill in Ioan. lib. 4. cap. 14. The same opinion hath also Cyrillus who though he affirme in many places the trueth and nature of the body of Christ to be in the Sacrament yet hee is in opinion that it is a spiritual and diuine matter and not to be vnderstood after the manner of men For first he declareth that the same maner of eating is set foorth in the words of the Lords Supper which the Lord himselfe signified when he said Vnlesse you eat the flesh of the Sonne of man c. For so he writeth in his 4. booke vpon the 14. Chap. of Iohn Where after he had spoken somewhat of them that did say How can this man giue his flesh to be eaten hee addeth these words Therefore they ought first to haue set the rootes of faith in their minde and then to seeke for those things that are to be sought for of man but they before they would beleeue did seeke importunately For this cause therefore the Lord did not open how it might be but exhorteth to seeke it by faith So to his disciples that beleeued he gaue the pieces of bread saying Take ye and eate ye this is my body The cup also in like maner he caried about saying Drinke yee all of this This is the cup of my blood which shall be shed for many for the remission of sins Thou seest manifestly that by no meanes he would declare the maner of the mysterie to them that sought it without faith but to them that did beleeue and did not seeke it he plainely declared it Likewise in cap. 21. Idem in cap. 21 vpon these words This is a hardsaying thus he saith And such as want sharpenesse of wit are wont to abhorre knowledge which should be sought with great study and much labour but yet the spirituall man accustomed to the Lords doctrine as to great dainties doth continually sing How sweet be thy words vnto my throat yea aboue hony to my mouth But the naturall Iew doeth thinke this spirituall mysterie full of foolishnesse and where by the Lords words he is stirred to an higher vnderstanding of things yet he falleth still to his accustomed madnesse Likewise in his cap. 22. expounding these words Doeth this offend you Idem in cap. 22 c. hee writeth on this sort For ignorance many which followed Christ not vnderstanding his words were troubled for when they heard him say Verely verely I say vnto you vnlesse ye eate the flesh of the Sonne of man and drinke his blood you shall not haue life in you they thought Christ had called them to the cruel maners of beasts and stirred them to eate the rawe flesh of a man and to drinke blood which be euen horrible to heare For they had not yet knowen the maner of this mysterie and the godly ministration thereof Also in the 24. chapter Idem cap. 24. The words therefore that I haue spoken to you bee spirit that is spirituall and of the spirit and life that is to say they be of the liuely and naturall life Idem ad Calosyrium The same mans words are rehearsed to Calosyrius which follow For least we should abhorre flesh and blood set vpon the holy Altars God fauouring our frailty powred into the things offered the power of life turning them into the trueth of his owne flesh that a body of life as it were a certaine seed that giueth life might be found in vs. By these and many other places in Cyrillus we be lift vp from the letter to the spirite from the sence of the naturall man to a more hie vnderstanding of a spirituall mysterie It must not
meat saith he is bread but the vertue in it doth quicken and he declareth that this vertue of the bread doth sanctifie and strength of the water is made by grace not naming it with one word but describing it more fully with many wordes saying That these things be done by faith and hope and the perfection of the mysteries Idem in Anacephaleosi and calling vpon of the sanctification for the perfection of saluation The same Author rehearseth almost the same words in Anacephaleosis Cyprian de Coena Dom. The same was also Cyprians opinion There is giuen saith he an immortall food differing from common meats retaining the shape of bodily substance but prouing by inuisible working that the presence of a diuine povver is there Thou hearest the presence of a diuine povver thou hearest an inuisible working that is to say the grace of God Againe By the wonted effect of things the weakenesse of our faith being aided is taught by a sensible argument that the effect of eternal life is in the visible sacraments And againe Euen as in the person of Christ humanitie was seene and diuinitie hid so into the visible sacraments vnspeakeably doth the diuine substance powre it selfe Againe These words be spirit and life neither doth the carnall sense pearce the vnderstanding of so great a depth vnlesse faith be added The bread is food the blood is life the flesh substance the body the Church A body for the agreeing of members in one bread for the conformitie of nourishment blood for the working of quickning flesh for the propertie of the humanitie taken In this place Cyprian witnesseth that this sacrament is called flesh and blood for the working of the quickning and for the propertie of the humanitie which Christ tooke that is the proper vertue thereof namely spirit and life And foorthvvith he addeth Christ doth othervvhile call this sacrament his body otherwhile flesh and blood othervvhile bread with the corporal nature whereof according to these visible things he hath communicate the portion of euerlasting life And againe The sacraments as much as in them is cannot be without their proper vertue neither by any meanes doeth the diuine Maiestie absent it selfe from the mysteries These termes which Cyprian commonly vseth The diuine povver The working of quickning The effect of eternall life The portion of life The diuine substance The diuine Maiestie what other thing doe they set out to vs then that which Augustine said that according to his Maiestie according to his vnspeakeable and inuisible grace Christ is with vs euen vnto the end of the world especially since that he shutteth out the carnall sense and requireth a spirituall as we haue in another place more fully expounded Neither thought Cyrillus any othervvise writing in this sort to Calosyrius Cyril ad Calos For that we should not abhorre flesh and blood being set vpon the holy Altars God fauouring our frailtie putteth a force of life into those things that be offered turning them into the trueth of his proper flesh that a body of life as it were a certaine quickning seed may be found in vs. That trueth of body which Cyprian calleth The working of quickning The effect of eternall life The portion of life the same doth Cyrillus terme the force of life a body of life a quickening seed meaning the spiritual power grace as he expoundeth himselfe vpon Iohn lib 4 ca. 17. Idem in Ioan. lib. 4. cap. 17. saying thus Euen as a little leauen as Paul saith doth sowre the whole lumpe so a little blessing of God doth draw the whole man into himselfe and doth fill him with his grace and in this sort doeth Christ abide in vs and we in Christ By this meanes he reiecteth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to say the eating of mans flesh and withdraweth the minds of the faithfull from vntrue meanings worldly thoughts and affirmeth to Euoptius Idem ad Euopt that this mysterie is receiued in an onely pure and exquisite faith as we haue mentioned before For it is necessary that such an eating be spirituall and made by grace Athanasius was of this opinion Athanas de Pecca in Spiri Sanct. In his booke of the sinne against the holy Ghost he writeth in this sort For this cause made hee mention of the Ascension of the Sonne of man into Heauen that hee might withdraw them from a corporall imagination that they might afterward learne that the heauenly meate that commeth from aboue and the spirituall food which he giueth is called the flesh of Christ For the wordes that I haue spoken to you saith he be Spirit and life Which is asmuch as if he should say The body which is shewed and slaine shal be giuen for the food of the world that it may be spiritually distributed in euery one and bee made a preseruation for all to the resurrection of eternall life For this cause sayeth Athanasius mention was made of the Ascension of the Sonne of man that he might call vs away from corporall imagining of his presence and might aftervvard learne that the grace or spirituall povver which he termeth the heauenly meat comming from aboue and spirituall food and affirmeth that it is spiritually distributed is called the flesh of Christ To these agreeth Chrysostome vpon Matthew cap. 26. Chrysost in Matth. cap. 26. Homil. 83. Hom. 83. Will ye not see saith he with what a chearefulnesse of minde Infants doe snatch the breast with what appressing do they fasten their lips to the nipples Let vs with no lesse desire come also to this Table and spirituall nipple of this cup yea rather with a greater coueting let vs like sucking babes sucke the grace of the Spirit Idem ibidem Let vs haue one griefe and heauinesse of heart if we be depriued of this spirituall food The same man in the same Homily saith That it is an insensible thing which is giuen vs in this sacrament but by things sensible euen as in Baptisme These be the words Since therefore he saith This is my body let vs haue no doubt but beleeue and behold it with our vnderstanding For no sensible thing is deliuered vs from Christ but by sensible things and yet all things which he deliuered be insensible So also in Baptisme by water which is a sensible thing that gift is granted but that which is wrought in it namely regeneration and renuing is a certaine intelligible thing For if thou haddest bene without a body hee would haue giuen thee the gifts barely without body but because thy soule is ioyned to a body in sensible things to be vnderstood are giuen thee O hovv many do now a daies say I would I might see his forme and shape I would I might see his garments also his shooes I would I might see Thou doest therefore see him touch him eat him thou desirest but to see his garments but he giueth thee himselfe not only that thou maiest
the which notwithstanding either they meant to signifie some other honour and reuerence meet for holy matters then that which is cōmanded of God when he saith Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God and him onely shalt thou serue So that worshipping may be defined to bee of two sorts the one wherewith we worship God himselfe The other wherewith we worship the prescribed signes diuine mysteries according to that saying Worship yee his footstoole which thing most men vnderstand to be spoken of the arke of couenant other interpret it to be of the humanitie of Christ Or admit that there is one manner of worshipping in both places wee might say that the flesh of Christ is to be worshipped though it bee a creature for the diuinitie ioyned therewith that the arke of couenant was to be worshipped for the presence of the diuine maiestie which God himselfe promised should be there present After the which sort also we may worship the sacrament of Thankes-giuing for the vnspeakeable and inuisible grace of Christ ioyned therewith as Augustin saith not honouring that which is seene and passeth away but that which is beleeued and vnderstood This also is worthy to be marked that the worship in old time was not done by the idle lookers on but by them which did receiue the mysteries and were made partakers of their grace For he that worshippeth receiueth to him it is the body of Christ not to him that worshippeth receiueth not For to this intent was that meat ordained that wee worshipping should eate and not that wee should worship it when others eate Thus much bee said concerning the worshipping But in that it is denied that euill men can eate the body of Christ which thing should necessarily be done if the spirituall vertue grace be ioyned with the bread it may be answered That there is a distinction to be vsed For if we haue regard to the very nature of the sacrament the diuine povver can by no meanes be absent from the signe in that it is a sacrament serueth to that vse but if we regard the manners inclination of the receiuer it is not life grace to him vvhich othervvise of the ovvne nature is both because the vvickednesse of euill men cannot be partaker of so great a goodnesse suffereth it not to bring forth fruit but contrariwise to them is it death damnation For euen as diuers kinds of meats bee of their owne nature wholesome but if they be put into diseased bodies they increase the euill and oftentimes shorten their time not through their nature but through the fault of the receiuer so also commeth it to passe in the sacrament vvhose proper vertue is alvvayes present till it hath performed the office thereof although an euil man when he receiueth it cannot be partaker of so great goodnesse nor perceiue any fruit thereof Cyprian de Coena Domini confirmeth the very same Cyprian de Coena Dom. The sacraments truely saith he as much as in them is cannot be without their proper vertue neither by any meanes doth the diuine Maiestie absent it selfe from the mysteries But albeit the sacraments permit themselues to be receiued or touched of vnworthy persons yet for all that they cannot be partakers of the Spirit whose infidelitie or vnworthines doth resist to so great an holinesse And therefore these gifts to some be a sauour of life to life and to some a sauour of death vnto death For it is altogether right that the despisers of grace be depriued of so great a benefit that the puritie of so great grace should haue no dwelling in the vnworthy Augustin against the letters of Petiliane lib. 2. August cont literas Petill. lib. 2. cap. 47. ca. 47. Therefore remember that the maners of ill men do nothing hurt the sacraments of God to make that either they be not sacraments at all or be lesse holy but the hurt is to the ill men themselues that they should haue them for a testimony of damnation and not for a helpe to saluation The same man in his fift booke of Baptisme Contra Donatistas cap. 8. Idem de Bapt. lib. 5. For euen as Iudas to whom the Lord gaue a sop made place for the deuil in himselfe not by receiuing that which was euil but by ill receiuing it So euery man that receiueth vnworthily the sacrament of the Lord maketh it not euill because he is euill or that he receiue nothing because he receiueth it not to his saluation For it was the body of the Lord the blood of the Lord also to them to whom the Apostle said He that eateth vnworthily Idem contra Crescen lib. 1. cap. 25. eateth drinketh his owne iudgement The same man contra Crescen lib. 1. cap. 25. Albeit the Lord himselfe say Vnlesse a man eate my flesh and drinke my blood he shall haue no life in him doth not the same Apostle teach that this becommeth destruction to them that vse it ill For he saith He that eateth the bread and drinketh of the cup of the Lord vnworthily is guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. Behold how diuine and holy mysteries do hurt those that vse them ill Why not Baptisme in like maner By these many other places it is euident that the sacrament of Thankesgiuing asmuch as pertaineth to the nature of the sacrament is verily the body and blood of Christ and is verily a diuine and holy thing albeit it be receiued of the vnvvorthy where notwithstanding they be not made partakers of the grace holines thereof but they draw thereout death and damnation For neither doth so great a goodnes remaine in them or enter into them to the intent to remaine but to condemne them Neither doeth the touching of the Lords body any more profit them then it did the Iewes that crucified Christ to touch his body that was hallowed alwaies indued with his grace Wherefore let this be certaine that the sacraments as long as they be sacraments doe retaine their vertue neither can they be separated from it For they alwayes consist of their parts heauenly and earthly visible and inuisible inward outvvard whether good men or euill worthy or vnvvorthy receiue them And also that change of signes and passage of elements into the invvard substance which wee often find in the old writers can by no meanes stand if we separate the vertue from the signe or would haue the one receiued apart from the other But this is so to be vnderstood as long as the signe serueth to that vse and is applied to that end for the which it was ordained according to Gods word For if we apply it to other vses and abuse it contrary to Christs institution either it is no sacrament at all or else it ceaseth from being a sacrament Therefore they commit no light offence which do not direct the signes of bread and wine to that end which Christ ordained them
vpon the Crosse out of his side and this body which in the mysterie of Christes passion is daily solemnized of the faithfull and that blood also which is receiued in the mouth of the faithfull is a mysterie of that blood wherwith the whole world was redeemed Hee confirmeth that also by the authoritie of Hierom and after rehearsall of this place The blood and flesh of Christ is vnderstood two maner of wayes either that spirituall c. thus he concludeth With no small difference hath this doctour made a distinction of the body and blood of Christ For in that he saith that the flesh or blood which are daily receiued of the faithfull are spirituall and yet that the flesh that was crucified and the blood which was shed with the souldiers speare are not said to be spirituall nor diuine he doeth manifestly signifie that they differ as much one from another as do spirituall things and corporall visible and inuisible diuine and humane and that those things which differ from themselues are not all one But the spirituall flesh which is receiued in the mouth of the faithfull and the spirituall blood which is daily giuen to the faithfull to drinke doe differ from the flesh that was crucified and from the blood that was shed with the souldiers speare as the authoritie of this man doth witnesse Therefore they be not all one For that flesh which was crucified was made of the flesh of the Virgin framed together of bones and sinevves and seuered with the features of the members of a man quickned with the spirit of a reasonable soule indued with reason into a life proper to it selfe and motions agreeable to the same But on the other side the spirituall flesh which feedeth spiritually the people that doe beleeue after the forme that it beareth outwardly is made of the graines of corne by the handes of the workeman framed together of no sinewes and bones seuered with no varietie of members quickened with no reasonable substance nor can exercise any proper motions For whatsoeuer giueth the substance of life it is of a spirituall force and of an inuisible working and of a diuine power Againe of the wordes of Augustine he concludeth in this maner By authoritie of this doctour intreating of the Lords wordes of the sacrament of his body blood we be manifestly taught that those wordes of the Lord be to be vnderstood spiritually and not carnally as hee himselfe sayeth The words which I speake to you bee spirit and life Namely the words of eating his flesh and drinking his blood for he spake it vpon that occasion whereat his disciples were offended Therefore that they should not bee offended the heauenly Master calleth them back from the flesh to the Spirit and from a corporall sight to inuisible vnderstanding We see therefore the food of the Lords body and the drinke of his blood are after a sort his very body and his very blood namely in that they be Spirit and life Hee addeth againe after the matter proued Therefore we see that there is a great difference betweene the mysterie of the body blood of Christ which is now receiued of the faithfull in the Congregation and that body which was borne of the Virgin Mary which suffered which was buried which rose againe which ascended into heauen which sitteth at the right hand of the Father For this that is ministred in the way is to be taken spiritually For Faith beleeueth that which it seeth not and spiritually feedeth the soule and doth reioyce the heart and giueth euerlasting life and incorruption while that is not minded which feedeth the body which is crushed with teeth which is broken in pieces but that which by faith is spiritually receiued But that body wherein Christ suffered and rose againe is his owne proper body taken of the Virgin Maries body able to be felt and seene euen after his resurrection as he himselfe said to his disciples Beholde my hands and my feet for I am euen he handle me and see for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as ye see me haue Bertram writeth many things to this purpose but let it suffice that wee haue touched thus much Which mans exposition and manner of disputing vpon the Sacrament is in mine opinion diligently to be wayed and imbraced for tvvo respects First because hee sticketh to the authoritie and testimonie not onely of those fathers of whom he hath repeated a few but also many moe I might say of all the most auncient Secondarily because that where the credit of the man was so much that he was prouoked to write by a most famous Prince and his writing published abroad and in sight of all men he was praised of many reprehended of none or noted of any one spot of erronious doctrine whereby it came to passe that before these new grosse and naturall transubstantiation makers sprung vp the doctrine of Bertram touching the Sacrament was allovved by the iudgement of euery man that was best learned Albeit this terme of transubstantiation being indeed new not necessarie yet perhaps might haue some place as the word Trans-elementation if they had not brought in another change of the substances then a sacramentall and that which the auncient fathers did vnderstand which is brought to passe the former substance remayning still But they not satisfied with the noueltie of the terme haue inuented a monstrous interpretation For they appoint the very proper body of Christ to be in the Sacrament and plucke from it the true properties of a mans body whereas it should seeme that Aquinas himselfe was not ignorant of the distinction aboue mentioned Aquin. 3. parte Sum. q. 76. art 3. For he writeth 3. part Sum. q. 76. art 3. on this manner Christ is whole vnder ech peece of the formes of Bread and Wine not onely when the hoste is broken but also when it remaineth whole neyther is there distance of parts one from another as the eye from the eye or the eye from the eare or the head from the feete as there is in other bodies organicall for such maner of distance is in the true body of Christ but not as it is in this Sacrament He affirmeth the true body of Christ to bee one which is organicall and hath difference of members which also hee denyeth to bee in the Sacrament and that to be another which is in the Sacrament and wanteth varietie of members which thing if he meant of the spirituall body as the old writers did speake he iudged right but if hee meant to signifie any masse of flesh without forme it is a great absurditie and contrarie to the opinion of all the old writers Lombardus Lombardus also Author of the sentences concerning the verie and proper flesh of Christ lib 3. Sentent Dist 3. saith thus Christs flesh that was taken is neither heauenly nor of the aire nor of any other nature then of such as all mens flesh is Since
say This is my body when he gaue the signe of his bodie Chrisostome And Chrysostome vpon the 26. of Matthew Homilia 83. For if Christ be not dead whose figure signe is this sacrifice Finallie of some it is called a figure and a badge as of Origen and Chrysostom of some other an example patterne and image as of Ambrose Basill and Origen wherefore not without cause it hath also the name of that thing whose figure badge and patterne it is Wherefore it is the more to be maruelled what commeth into their mindes that cannot abide to haue it called a figure nor doe acknowledge any figure in the words of the Supper but doe reprochfully call them that doe acknowledge it figure framers whereas it is plaine for all that that all old writers did so call it and that by those words of the Lords supper the Lorde did consecrate the Sacrament of his body this being manifest also that after the letter proper manner of speech the bodie of Christ signifieth one thing and the Sacrament of his bodie another And if it shall not be a figure it shall neither be a signe nor a sacrament And so such as be ready to call other men sacramentaries they themselues doe take away the sacraments altogether Therefore let no man doubt but this sacrament is both a figure and therefore doeth also take the name of that thing whereof it is a figure We said there was another thing which the auncient Fathers acknowledging in this sacrament would haue it verily to be the Lords body and that is the vertue of the body it selfe that is of force and giueth life which vertue by grace and mysticall blessing is ioyned with the Bread and Wine and is called by sundry names where the matter it selfe is all one Of Augustin an intelligible inuisible spirituall body Of Hierom diuine spirituall flesh Of Irenaeus a heauenly thing Of Ambrose a spirituall foode and body of a diuine spirit Of other some such like thing And this also doth make much the more that the sacrament is most worthy to haue the name of the true body and blood seeing not onely outvvardly it showeth forth a figure and image of it but also inwardly it draweth with it a hid and secret naturall propertie of the same bodie that is to say a vertue that giueth life so that it cannot now be thought a vaine figure or the signe of a thing cleane absent but the very body of the Lord diuine indeede and spirituall but present in grace full of vertue mightie in operation And it hapneth often that the names of the thinges themselues be giuen to their vertue and strength We say leauen is in the whole lumpe wheras a small quantitie of leauen cannot spread so farre abroad but the strength and sharpenes of the leauen We say that the fire doth warme vs when the heate of the fire doth it we being a good way off from the fire Likewise that the Sunne is present doth lighten burneth nourisheth when indeede the heat of the Sunne doth it and the Sunne himselfe cannot goe out of his spheare So is a King said to be in all his realme because of the power of his dominon Neither doth the scripture want these examples for we often meet with them Wee will at this time bee content with one of them but very manifest Christ spake of Iohn saying He is Helias because he was indewed with the vertue or power of Helias the angell vnto Zacharie witnessing the same and saying Hee shall goe before him in the spirit and power of Helias Likewise therefore as Iohn was Helias because he had the spirit and power of Helias So the Lords bread is the body of Christ because it hath his grace and liuely power ioyned therewithall But that this is not a fained or a lately sprung opinion but was receiued and allowed of the auncient writers we wil confirme it by their open testimonies partly reciting some of the forenamed places and partly adding other Augustin vpon Iohn tract 27. If therefore yee shall see the Sonne of man where hee was before What meaneth this by this hee answereth that which had troubled them by this he openeth the cause why they were offended by this plainely if they would vnderstand For they thought that hee would haue giuen among them his body but he said that he would ascend into heauen euen whole When ye shall see the sonne of man ascend where hee was before surely euen then shall ye see that hee giueth not his body in such sort as ye imagine surely euen then shall yee vnderstand that his grace is not consumed by biting nor perisheth by eating The same man out of the sermon of the words of the Lord and it is rehearsed de consecrat Dist 2. The faithfull doe know how they do eat the flesh of Christ Euery man taketh his part whereupon the parts bee called the grace it selfe by parts hee is eaten and he remayneth all whole by parts he is eaten in the sacrament and remayneth all whole in thy heart The same man vpon Iohn tract 50. Thou hast Christ both at this present and in time to come presently by signe presently by the sacrament of Baptisme presently by the meate and drinke of the Altar Thou hast Christ presently but thou shalt haue him alway for when thou shalt goe from hence thou shalt come to him that said to the thiefe This day shalt thou be with mee in Paradise And soone after The poore shall yee alway haue with you but mee shall yee not alwayes haue Let good men receiue this also and not be troubled for he spake of the presence of his body For according to his maiestie according to his prouidence according to his vnspeakeable and inuisible grace that is fulfilled which he hath spoken Behold I am with you daily euen vnto the end of the world But according to the flesh which the Worde tooke vpon him according to that that hee was borne of the Virgin according to that that hee was taken of the Iewes that he was fastned to the tree that hee was taken downe from the Crosse that he was wrapped in linnen clothes that he was laid in the graue that hee appeared in his resurrection yee shall not haue him alwaies with you Why Because according to the presence of his body he was conuersant with his Disciples fortie dayes and they being in his company and seeing him and not following him he ascended into heauen and is not here for he is there hee sitteth on the right hand of the Father These be Augustins words Whereas he said before that Christ is present with vs by faith and by the sacraments afterward he said that he is present with vs by Maiestie by vnspeakeable and inuisible grace and so that is fulfilled by him which hee spake Behold I am with you to c. But according to the proper presence of the flesh that he is not
here which proper nature of the flesh also he hath dilated plentifully by a Periphrasis to exclude altogether such a manner of presence to establish his presence in the sacraments by grace power Augustin teacheth vs by the Lords words that his true and proper body is ascended into heauen euen whole but the grace of that body we receiue by the sacraments which is neither consumed by biting nor perished by eating Idem in Psal 65. To this agreeth that the same Author writeth vpon the 65. Psal The murtherers dranke the same blood by grace Idem in Ioan. tract 26. which they shed through madnes The same man vpon the Gospel of Iohn tract 26. Giue eare to the Apostle I would not saith he haue you ignorant bretheren that our Fathers were all vnder a cloud and all did eate one maner spirituall food Spirituall truely all one but corporall another for they did eate Manna we another thing but the same spirituall meat that wee doe And they all dranke the same spiritual drinke yet they one thing we another in outward appearance which notwithstanding did signifie all one in spiritual power He calleth the sacrament spirituall food for the spirituall power ioyned therewith which power also was in the sacraments of the old testament albeit our outward signes and theirs were diuerse The spiritual power was all one in both That of a body to bee borne at his time This of a body alreadie borne suffered and raysed againe So Manna was to them the bodie of Christ as the sacrament of thankes-giuing is now to vs. For this spirituall power Augustin also called it as we said before a spirituall inuisible and intelligible body wherby is signified the visible body of the Lord and able to be felt Hereunto also belongeth that saying of the same Author The body of Christ is both trueth and a figure Trueth while the body blood of Christ by the power of the holy Ghost in power of the same is made of the substance of bread wine but a figure is that which is outwardly seene The meaning of these words be that the substance of bread wine be made the body of Christ for the power of his body giuen to them by the holy Ghost The same man in Psalme 77. Idem in Psal 77. Their meate and drinke therefore in mysterie was all one with ours yet in signification not in outward appearance for the selfe same Christ was figured to them in the rocke but to vs he was made manifest in flesh But hee saith That God was not well pleased with them all In that he saith not with all there were some then there in whom God was pleased And albeit the sacraments were common to all yet his grace which is the power of the sacraments was not common to all This place of Augustin if it bee well weighed doth much helpe to vnderstand how Christ is present in the sacraments For he ioyneth together these two Signification and Grace which hee affirmeth to be the strength of the sacrament To these agree those things which Ambrose writeth lib. 6. de Sacramentis Afterward Ambros de Sacra lib. 6. when the Disciples of Christ could not away with his talke but hearing that hee would giue them his flesh to eate and his blood to drinke went their way yet Peter alone said Thou hast the words of eternall life whither shall I goe from thee Least therfore any moe should so say as though there should be a kind of loathsomenes of blood but that the grace of redemption might remaine thou therefore takest the sacrament in a similitude but thou doest obtaine the grace and vertue of his true nature Ambrose doth plainely teach how it is true flesh For hee hath noted both The figure where hee saith thou takest it in a similitude and the inward strength because vndoubtedly it giueth the grace and vertue of the true nature Which place being diligentlie marked the residue which be found of his may easilie be expounded The same man in his booke De ijs qui initiantur mysterijs Idem de ijs qui initiantur mysterijs Christ is in that sacrament because it is the bodie of Christ Therefore it is not a corporall but a spirituall food whereupon the Apostle speaketh of the figure of it that our fathers haue eaten spirituall meate haue drunke spirituall drinke For the body of God is a spirituall body The body of Christ is the body of a diuine spirit By these words of Ambrose we be admonished what manner of body this is and why it is so called because it hath the spirituall vertue of the true bodie For these termes Not a corporall but a spirituall food and The body of the heauenly spirit bee most aptly applied to the grace and vertue of his true bodie Which thing also Eusebius Emissenus confirmeth de consecrat Dist 2. Eusebius Emissenus Seeing hee meant to take from our eyes the body taken of the virgin and would place it aboue the starres it was necessary that in the day of his supper the sacrament of his body blood should be consecrated vnto vs to the end that that might bee worshipped continually in mysterie which was once offered for a ransome for vs that seeing a daylie and vnceasing redemption did runne for the saluation of all men it might be a continuall oblation of redemption and that continuall sacrifice might liue in memorie and might euer be present in grace a true perfect and only sacrifice to be esteemed in faith not to be iudged by forme nor outward sight but by the inward affection It is manifest by the wordes of Emissenus that the body that was taken of the Virgin was taken from vs and was placed aboue the starres and therefore that the sacrament of the same was necessarily ordayned that that true perfect and onely sacrifice which vvas once offered vpon the Crosse might liue continually in memory and might alvvay be present in grace that vve should not cease to remember continually the benefit of our perpetuall redemption neither haue any cause vvhy vve should require the presence of his flesh seeing vve feele the presence of the same by grace to be of no lesse efficacie vvhich is to bee esteemed by faith not to be iudged in forme or outward appearance but n the inward affection Idem ibidem And that which he writeth immediatly after in the same place For the inuisible priest doth turne with his word by a secret povver the visible creatures into the substance of his body blood saying thus Take ye eate ye this is my body c. And least we should imagine it a more grosse substance or that called againe which he said before was taken avvay he alledgeth foorthvvith the example of Regeneration saying Hovv great benefit therefore the force of the heauenly blessing doth worke and hovv it ought not to be a nevv and vnpossible matter to thee