Selected quad for the lemma: spirit_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
spirit_n	dead_a	life_n	quicken_v	5,491	5	10.4511	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A13142	A summe or a briefe collection of holy signes, sacrifices, and sacraments instituted of God euen since the beginning of the world, and of the true originall of the sacrifice of the Masse; Sum or a brief collection of holy signes, sacrifices and sacraments.	Ling, Nicholas, fl. 1563.; Brett, John, Sir, attributed name.; Devonshire, William Cavendish, Earl of, 1590-1628, attributed name.	1609 (1609)	STC 23434; ESTC S113014	129,473	362

then the bread that nourisheth and maintaineth the heart and life of men Luk. 9. Matt. 15. When Sathan tooke vpon him to tempt Iesus Christ to declare vnto vs that he was very man did he not chose bread to entice him to change stones into bread When Iesus Christ did celebrate his feastes to giue food one time vnto 5000. men the other time vnto 4000. persons did hee not shew his might vnder the signe of bread When he taught vs to make our praiers vnto God Matth. 6. Luk. 11. did he not ordeine the Lordes prayer to beseech God to giue vs our daily bread And not onely in the holy Bible is there mention made of bread for corporal common food But also the sacrificers celebrated by the Priests of the Hebrues there was a lawe prescribed of the bread ordeyned of God Exod. 21. Leui. 4.21 Matth. 11. 1 King 21. Esay 30. Prouerbs 20. Ezec. 4. namely sweat bread without leauen other bread there was called shew bread which the priests did renue euery weeke eate which Dauid vsed being presented vnto him by Achemelech the high Priest cotrariwise this terme bread is applyed vnto breade of wickednesse vnto breade of lying Malac. 1. Psal 23. Ezech. 12. Oze 7. Deut. 8. Matth. 4. Luk. 4 vnto bread of sorrow vnto vncleane bread of idolatry vnto vncleane bread offered at the Altar vnto the bread of trembling and vnto the bread of teares The Ephraimites also are called the bread of ashes not turned that is to say in part baked part not circūcised Idolators Wherefore O Massesaiers Capharnaits Math 25. ye must not be so hardened rooted in your fleshlinesse that you regard not the phrases of the holy scriptures in that which the terme of bread is sometime taken for the earthly bodily bread as when it is said that man liueth not by bread only Math. 15. Mark 7. but also by all that proceedeth out of the mouth of God Somtime also bread is taken for the word of God and for doctrine when Iesus Christ commanded his Apostles to take heede for eating of the leauened bread of the Scribes and Pharisees are not these termes of bread and leauen taken and interpreted for the doctrine of the Pharisees heretikes When the woman of Canaan did demand grace and mercie for the health of her daughter holden with a sore disease Did not Iesus Christ answere that it was not lawfull to take the bread of the children and giue it vnto dogges In this answere is not the bread taken for life and health and not onely for the corporall nourishment Seeing then that bread is taken for the life of man the which hangeth chiefly of bread and wine and that the goodnes of God willing to applie it selfe vnto our infirmities would chuse those two signes notes and markes notable to signifie his body and bloud namely bread and wine being two substances common to all nations is that an occasion to imagine a carnall transubstantiation as if without the same God were not able inough to figure and represent really and sacramentally life to be giuen vnto vs yea euerlasting life by the communion of the holy bread and wine consecrated figures and signes of his body and bloud Matth. 6. Marke 14. Iohn 5. Iesus Christ spake these words That the bread was his body and the wine his bloud he said also That hee is the liuing bread that he is the breade of life that hee is the liuing breade which came downe from heauen he saith also that hee that eateth of this breade shall liue for euer Is this to bring in that by this word is Iesus Christ is turned transubstantiated into bread and is no more Christ but an accident without substance O detestable heresie O Massalians haue ye no more reason to interpret carnally these words this is my body to change the bread into his body then when he affirmeth that he is the bread to change him into bread cōsidering that it is written that the partaking of this bread giueth life euerlasting Iesus Christ said Iohn 6. Matth. 26. Iohn 6. Hoc est corpus meum He saith also Hic est panis qui de coelo descendit In both these places is there not this word is bestowed Must we therefore bring in a witchcraft of trāsubstantiatiō in place of sound interpreting of the scriptures by a likenes or familiar comparison of breade with Iesus Christ causing vs to vnderstand that by him life euerlasting is giuen vnto vs And by him our spirituall nourishment is giuen vs like as by the bread we haue our bodily foode How so euer it be we must alwaies haue recourse vnto the true interpretation of Iesus Christ the true Lawgiuer and author of the holy sacrament who putting forth his institution said in the first place that he was the bread of life then after that this bread is his flesh and his body which must be giuen for the health of the world He said that his flesh is true food and his bloud the true drinke he saith that hee that eateth his flesh and drinketh his bloud shall abide in him How doth he interpret this eating Iesus Christ doth interpret it himselfe by these words Iohn 6 He that commeth vnto mee stall neuer hunger hee that beleeueth in me shall neuer thirst Is not this the true eating and the true drinking neuer to haue hunger and neuer to haue thirst Behoueth it to get faith which consisteth in spirit behoueth it to addresse ourselues vnto Iesus Christ our heauēly bread our spirituall drinke to fill vs for euer to quench euerlastingly our thirst of sinne to runne into a witchcraft of transubstantiation and to forge an accidence without a substance Wherefore O Massalians haue yee inuented another interpretation then that of Iesus Christ who witnesseth that the flesh profiteth nothing but the spirit quickneth and that his words are not carnall but spirituall giuing spirit and life by faith and hope that he is the sauiour of the world incarnat dead and crucified to giue vs eternall life and after rose againe ascended into heauen and sitteth on the right hand of God his Father abiding an euerlasting Priest propiciator mediator and redeemer Let vs returne againe to this terme is which tormenteth the braines of the Masse sayers so sore Iohn 15. to imagine a transubstantiation If Iesus Christ hath said that he is the true vine that God his Father is a husbandman ●ohn 14 and we are the branches Is this to bring in this terme is a witchcraft of changing God into a Husbandman Iesus Christ into a vine and vs into vine branches If Iesus Christ is said to be the vnspotted lambe that blotteth out the sins of the world is this to bring in a transubstantiation If Iesus Christ hath said that he is the doore of the sheepe-folde by the which we must enter to saluation and that hee is the Shepheard and we the

and holy signe vnto the people of Israell The oblations offered in sacrifices The offered sacrifices as well of earthly beastes as vnleauened bread and other holy signes ordained of God for sacraments and holy signes to cleanse the people of Israel Were they changed into an accidence without substance All the holy signes ordained of God in the Church of Israel notwithstanding that they did represent really and sacramentally that which they did figure and not as a simple signe without effect yet so it is that there was neuer none so horrible an heretike that did inuent this wichcraft of transubstantiation Yet must you confesse O Massalians that the good and holie fathers of Israell were adopted grafted and regenerated by faith in Iesus Christ begotten before all worlds and that they were nourished and got euerlasting life by Iesus Christ A conference of the faith of the ancient fa●hers of Israel with ours and that they and wee haue but one onely God and one onely Iesus Christ our mediatour and redeemour And that they through faith did sacramentally communicate and spiritually partake the bloud of Iesus Christ for their saluation and euerlasting life And there is no difference as touching God betweene them that were before the incarnation of Iesus Christ and we that are after the incarnation But they and wee are the Church of God bought with the bloud of the iust and vnspotted lambe Iesus Christ Furthermore that they had faith in the promise to come and obserued the sacraments and holy signes of the sacrifice which ought to be finished by Iesus Christ And that we by the new law do celebrate the memorie remembrance of the sacrifice alreadie finishede by Iesus Christ hauing the fruition of his promise accomplished 1. Cor. 10. August in Psalm If then the Israelites did eate of the same heauēly bread and drinke of the same water of life by faith that wee doe in one onely Iesus Christ if they had holy signes to represent actually and really the death of Iesus Christ to come euen as we haue had holy signes of his death present or past they for the time to come and wee for the time past Wherefore is it then that the Massalians haue inuented this new witchcraft of tourning one holy sacrament ordained of God into a wichcraft of transubstantiation and an accident without a substance If God to make knowne his power and to declare the hardinesse and stiffeneckednesse of Pharao pleased to doe merueilous things by Moyses and Aaron Against the mir●cles alledged by the massalians Exod. 7.8.14 in changing a rod into a serpent the water of the riuer into bloud and into frogges the dust of the earth into lice and further to make the saileable sea drie and to doe many other miracles Is this to bring in a transubstantiation of little round hostes vnleauened printed full of pictures into an accidēce without substance In what place of the holy scripture when there is mention made of holy Signes Sacraments or Sacrifices ordained of God is it said the signe or sacrament is changed Contrariwise God willing to accōmodate himselfe to the infirmities of man hath ordained vnto him from time to time common signes for notes and markes of the assurance of the thing signified Wherein the might of God is more renowmed and magnified by giuing vnto vs with the holy signe the thing represented by the power of faith and the holy Ghost then if the selfe signe were really changed by some visible miracle For the Sacraments doe containe in them more spiritualnesse the fleshlines for which cause God did alwaies blame his people Israel by his Prophets for taking his Sacraments ouer fleshly as we haue before briefly declared The expositiō of Iesus Christ of the communion of his body But tell me O Massalians when Iesus Christ would expound that hee was the true bread of life which came downe from heauen to giue euerlasting life and how these sacramentall wordes ought to be vnderstood to eate his flesh and drinke his bloud when the Capharnaites your predecessours were offended did hee teach by his interpretation that to eate his flesh ought to bee vnderstood by a little round hoste transubstantiated The round hoste of flowre and the wine to bee no more bread and wine but an accidēce without substance Is this your abhominable Witchcraft the doctrine of Iesus Christ Iohn 6. Nothing lesse but Iesus Christ as a true law giuer vnto whom the interpretation of his law appertained answered vnto the Doctours Capharnaites that they were to grosse and carnall and that they did abide in the flesh as ye doe O Massayers Notwithstanding that the flesh alone proffiteth nothing saying that these sacramental words were spiritual Iohn 5. The fleshe saith hee profiteth nothing it is the spirite that quickneth Moreouer O Massayers how can you safely make to agree your transubstantiation with the doctrine of Iesus Christ which doth promise and assure to giue euerlasting life to those which eate his fleshe and drinke his bloud if yea take these wordes carnally For you cannot be ignorant that your bodies notwithstanding that they haue deuoured the little round hostes transubstantiated into flesh and bone and supt and licked the wine changed into bloud doe die and are mortall by the necessitie of the lawe Wherefore life euerlasting promised by this communion may not bee vnderstood of the bodie nor of the mortall flesh You must then of necessitie acknowledge for a sure interpretation that to eate the bodie and drinke the bloud of Iesus Christ ought to be referred vnto the life spiritual and heauenly and that the flesh profiteth nothing but the spirituall word and communion of the body and bloud of Iesus Christ by faith and in spirite giuing euerlasting life Iohn 6. This interpretation is often recited by the holy Apostle Iohn in many places when he vseth these tearmes he that cometh vnto me shall neuer hunger he that beleeueth in mee shall neuer thirst but shall haue euerlasting life Are not these tearmes sufficient plaine to interprete this holy sacrament of the body and bloud of Iesus Christ without running vnto your witchcraft of transubstantiation Conference of baptisme vnto the sacrament of the supper Another like interpretation of the doctour and authour of the sacramentall law is discribed when Iesus Christ was asked of Nicodeme the meane how a man could bee regenerate and borne againe Is it possible saith Nicodeme that a man should enter into his mothers wombe and be borne againe Did Iesus Christ answere vnto this demaund that in the holy sacrament of Baptisme the water was turned into the bodie into fleshe and into bloud and transubstantiate into a carnall wombe to be thereby againe engendred and borne Is there not as great reason after your witchcraft here to vse this answere as in the holy Sacrament of the supper for by the one of these two holy sacraments wee be regenerate and by the

sheepe must we therefore ratch these places of the holy scripture so farre that necessarily we must beleeue a transubstantiation for as much as this terme is is there When Iesus Christ admonished his Disciples Matth. 5. saying to them that they were the salt of the earth did hee change and transubstantiate them into pillors of salt as he did the wife of Lot Genes 28. If Iesus Chrrist hath said by his Apostles that we are the tēple of God wherin the holy Ghost doth dwell Is this to imagine that we are transubstantiated into a peece of stone 1. Cor. 3. 2. Cor. 6. If the Apostle haue said that Christ is the rocke out of the which did come the liuing water to wash vs cleane from our sins 1. Cor. 10. is this craftily to deuise a changing of Iesus Christ into a rocke or materiall stone 1. Cor. 12. If the Apostles haue witnessed that we are the body of Christ Is this to bring in that we are vanished away and are no more men but changed into an accidence without a substance I foresee well O Massesayers more than hardened that you wil obiect that in all these places before alleaged wherin this word is is found that no mention is made of sacramentes which must be deeply considered for asmuch as they be holy misteries ordeyned of God which also is true And also this word is is not onely found in the holy scriptures before noted Genes 17. Exod. 12.13 but also when there was speaking of the holy sacraments ordeyned before of God vnto the people of Israell was it not written that circumcision is the band and couenant of God Genes 17. Numb 10. Psal 68.94 Mattfl 21. Iohn 2. In the other holy sacrament of the communion of the Paschall lambe is it not sayd that the Lambe is the Passeouer or passage Is this to bring in a witchcraft of transubstantiation Will you not confesse O Massalians and changers of substances that in these places of holy scriptures speaking of the sacraments this word is cannot otherwise be expounded but to signifie and that circumcision was the signe and marke of the band and couenant contracted betweene God and Abraham that the Pascall lambe was also the signe of the holy passage for remembrance of their deliuerance from Egypt The Arke of the couenant for another sacrament whereof it is written that it is the true power of the Lord. Is this to say that it was transubstantiated into the maiesty of God It behoueth to interpret the holy scripture with dicression and humility without sophistrie and witchcraft to vnderstand soundly the true meaning of words and not to abide in the letter that killeth but to receiue the word of God in spirit that puickneth If then the holy Arke be named the Lord and called God for that in it he exercised his might shewed his wonders and misteries to draw the people of Israell by an outwarde signe to remember God and to feare and obey him Also if Iesus Christ is called the bread that came from heauen the bread of life that the bread broken is his body and the wine is his bloud that the cup is the new Testament that by these outward signes of bread and wine he might cause vs to vnderstand our life and nourishment of saluation to stay onely vpon Iesus Christ and that by his death and bloudshedding we are so assured of euerlasting life as the bread and wine are nourishment for the body and that it pleased him to ordeine these holy signes to serue vs for sacraments for the triall and confirmation of our faith is this an occasion to play the Capharnaits or the Nicodemianes to doubt of the power of God how is it possible to eate the body and drinke the bloud of Iesus Christ How is it possible to be regenerate and borne againe Then seeing wee haue a promise giuen vnto vs by the word of God wherefore O Massalians haue ye imagined a carnall transubstantiation mistrusting the incomprehensible power of God ought it not to suffice you to beleeue simply that the body bloud of Iesus Christ is offred vnto vs really sacramētally to communicate for our nourishment and to giue vs euerlasting life by the bread and wine consecrated with giuing of thankes the bread being truely his body and the wine his bloud which ought to be receiued worthily by faith and in purenes of conscience as holy signes and markes of the godly badge without enquiring euer subtilly the meanes otherwise then Iesus Christ hath interpreted saying the flesh profiteth nothing it is the spirit that quickneth and that his words were spirit and life Ought we to doubt that God hath not the power to make vs partakers of the body and bloud of Iesus Christ by the holy signes of bread and wine consecrated the bread neuerthelesse remaining bread and the wine wine If it were otherwise this should not be called a sacrament but a myracle as when Iesus Christ turned the water into wine that he vsed a miracle of transubstantiation changing water into wine But he did not then ordeine a sacrament as he did of the communion of his body bloud by the holy figures of bread and wine Was it not as easie for God to make the wine to bee changed into bloud or the bread into flesh as for Moyses Aarō to change the water of the riuer into bloud to approue the hardnes of Pharaoh or when the cloudes were turned into the flesh of Qailes which rained vpon the people of Israell alwaies God did not ordeine these miracles to serue for ordinarie sacraments but would apply himselfe to our infirmitie giuing vnto vs signes holy and not transubstantiated which are neither vaine nor fantasies but are outward signes which wee can see touch eate taste abiding in their substance and neuerthelesse representing sacramentally that which is comprised and signified by them wherein our triall of faith doth stand to declare vs by a sacramentall worke to be of the number of them that are regenerated nourished by the holy sacraments of baptisme and of the supper If it be lawfull to make comparisons of the 2. holy sacraments of Baptisme and of the Supper A comparison of the two holy Sacraments notwithstanding that there is difference betweene regeneration which doth not reiterate for it sufficeth once to be regenerate and borne againe But the nourishment must be often done againe according to to the order of nature and other differences largely discribed by the holy Apostles and ministers of the word of God Yet the same end the same God the same Iesus Christ is shewed declared as well in baptisme as in the supper By the bloud of Iesus Christ we be regenerate and by the same bloud nourished By the bloud of Iesus Christ we are renued set and graffed and by the same bloud we are kept and preserued from hunger and thirst for euermore By the bloud of

other nourished And the regeneration is as marueilous vnto mans wisedome as the nourishment For after mans carnall iudgement it seemeth vnpossible twise to be engendred But our good God hath vsed like interpretation for the regeneration as hee did for the communion of his flesh and his bloud namely that these sacramentall tearmes must be spiritually vnderstood and not carnally for the flesh profiteth nothing but the spirit quickneth Iohn 3. That which is of the fleshe is fleshly that which is of the spirit is spirituall The holy Apostle giuing vnto the Corinthians that which hee receiued at the hand of God did admonish them of the second comming of Iesus Christ in looking for the which he commanded to communicate the body and bloud of Iesus Christ by breaking of bread and the Cup of blessing called the new Testament and the new Couenant contracted by the bloud of Iesus Christ For as much then as we are assured of the second comming of Iesus Christ Being gon vp into heauen and sitteth on the right hand of God his Father vntill the day appointed that he must come againe to iudge the quicke and the dead How do ye O Massalians with this issue when as by your Magicke you say that euery day you cause to come downe and make returne the body of Iesus Christ in flesh and bone before the time appointed of his second comming be come Tit. Liuius 1. Decad. 1. This witchraft was restored by you frō the first author of your Masse sacrifice Numa pompilius Valerius Max. lib. 1. cap. 3 who by his witchcraft gaue to vnderstand that he caused his Nyphe and Goddesse Aegerie and also his Iupiter Eticius to descend from heauen by whose meanes the heauenly secrets and misteries were reuealed vnto him Euen so by our witchcraft the round host consecrated is transubstantiated into the true and reall body of Iesus Christ Iohn 19. Exod. 12. Numb 9. The bread being no more bread How haue you learned this boldnesse to bruse and breake in peeces the body of Iesus Christ Corruption of the holy sacraments according to the inuention of Sergius the second of that name your predecessor Bishoppe of Rome Are not you more detestable hangmen then your predecessors Lieutenants of the Church of Rome Against trāsubstantiation which crucified Iesus Christ but without bruising and breaking his body in peeces as it was propheceied before And that more is you are not content to breake it in 3 peeces but in your Masse sacrifice ye haue enterprised to drowne or steep one portiō of it in the wine changed into bloud to deuoure it To confirme your witchcraft of transubstantiation haue ye not ordeyned to preserue your litle round printed hosts the which you do keepe and lay vppe so curiously in boxes and shrines after they be changed into flesh and bone Harman contr and into the reall body of Iesus Christ Is not this a detestable heresie to beleeue that the body of Iesus Christ can receiue corruption Blond Platina Yea and often it is eaten of wormes mites rattes and mise Can you interpret that this is an accidence without a substance seeing that your hosts become often stincking and corrupt within your boxes Many times also deuoured of earthly brute beasts the which you cause to be burned and their ashes to be put into the place for Relikes When the Bishop of Rome Victor the third of that name receiued poyson by your transubstantiated wine was it an accidence without a substance Or when the Emperour Henry the seauenth of that name was poysoned in eating a litle round host cōsecrated was it an accidence without a substance seeing it gaue him his deaths wound There is a more manifest appearance in the heauenly Manna giuen vnto the people of Israell Neem 1. Psal 78.104 Iohn 6. Sapi. 16 the which notwithstanding that it became corrupt if it were kept yet being put in the secrete place of the Arke of the Couenant it was preserued without corruption was it therefore transubstanciated into flesh and bone to bee called the heauenly bread the bread which came downe from heauen the bread of life and the bread of Angels Now it remaineth to bring into iudgment the subtell reasons of the Massayers The exposition of the sacramentall words which for the whole foundation of their witchcraft do carnally in this word Est saying these wordes are expresly written This is my body this is my bloud when Iesus Christ did institute the communion of his body and of his bloud vnder the signes of bread wine But I beseech all that are zealous of the honour of God diligently to consider the holy institution of the sacrament by the which God would declare and signifie the communion of his body by the bread and the drinking of his bloud by the wine and the cup. All will confesse that the true and principal nourishment of the body of man is conteined vnder the kindes of bread and wine so the true bread is often taken in the holy scriptures for the nourishment and life of Man But let vs begin to bring in the places of the Bible Genes 3. To the first man created to the likenes of God for punishment of his offence Genes 28. was it not said vnto him before that hee must eate his bread in the sweat of his body Is there any man so ignorant that hee will not confesse all the foode and life of man to be vnderstood by the bread When Iacob praied vnto God to giue him bread and cloathing did not he vnderstand by the bread all that was necessary for his nourishment Exod. 16. Neem 9. Psalm 78. Sapi. 15. Iohn 6. Genes 14. When it is recited that God made it to raine bread vpon the people of Israell in the wildernesse and that with this heauenly bread the children of Israell were filled was not this terme bread vnderstood of the heauenly Manna sent of God for the nourishment of the people of Israell This Manna is not called the bread of heauen and the bread of Angels giuen vnto the people without trauell Genes 41. Genes 47. Numb 21. Leuit. 26. When Melchisedech would releeue the hoste of the good Father Abraham did he not present vnto him bread and wine When Abraham would gratifie and refresh the three Angels appearing to him did he not offer to them cakes baked in the ashes Gaue hen ot to Agar bread for her nourishment The mother of Isaac fauouring her welbeloued sonne gaue him bread Ioseph in Egypt offered bread vnto his brethren for their nourishment When one will describe a famine and dearth Iohn 4. Psalm 104. Matth. 4. Luk. 4. Iohn 6. Matth. 4. doth hee not say there lacketh bread When God promiseth any fauour vnto people keeping his commandements doth he not giue them assurance of sufficient bread when he commanded the poore as his members did he not command to giue them bread It is