Selected quad for the lemma: spirit_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
spirit_n body_n life_n quicken_v 5,163 5 10.2542 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A07348 Ecclesiastica interpretatio: or The expositions vpon the difficult and doubtful passages of the seuen Epistles called catholike, and the Reuelation Collected out of the best esteemed, both old and new writers, together with the authors examinations, determinations, and short annotations. The texts in the seuen Epistles of Iames, Peter, Iohn and Iude are six and forty. The expositions vpon the Reuelation are set forth by way of question and answer. Here is also a briefe commentary vpon euery verse of each chapter, setting forth the coherence and sense, and the authors, and time of writing euery of these bookes. Hereunto is also annexed an antidot against popery. By Iohn Mayer, B. of D. and pastor of the Church of Little Wratting in Suffolke. Mayer, John, 1583-1664. 1627 (1627) STC 17731; ESTC S112551 448,008 564

There are 8 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

persons preserued are said to be saued by the water because when all others perished in the water they were borne in the Arke vpon the waters and escaped drowning So likewise by Baptisme whatsoeuer is carnall naturall is destroyed and we are made spirituall when we are hereby receiued into the Church as into the Arke depending vpon Christ by faith But it is nothing outward in baptisme that saueth vs but the couenant whereupon a good conscience doth comfortably rest being able to say This thou hast promised Lord vnto me and therefore wilt performe it By the resurrection of Christ that is it being by faith apprehended not onely that Christ died for vs but that he rose againe to make his death effectuall vnto vs. Luther acknowledgeth this place to be so obscure Mayer as that he is not fully satisfied about the sense of it but preferreth this as seeming to him the best that yet could be found out Caietan saith that Christ went and preached to the spirits in hell and that not vnfruitfully But this is worthily reiected by Luther because there is no comming out of that place Gagneus And Gagneus a Papist also derideth it asking who told him of any that were there conuerted He also confesseth that he cannot attaine to any satisfying resolution of this place Some he saith expound it of Christs comming once before his comming in the flesh euen in Noahs time to preach whilest the Arke was in building but as they disobeying not flying into the Arke were drowned so now that Christ hath come in the flesh if any obey not to fly to the Sacrament of Baptisme they cannot but perish The Greekes reade that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the spirits in hell which we read in prison holding that he went to preach vnto them not to saue them but to vpbraid them with their infidelity and sinnes notwithstanding the long warning which they had by Noah Beda Beda is altogether for preaching to men in this world and therefore readeth it either in prison that is to such as were shut vp in the body as in a prison or in the flesh that is such as were greatly oppressed with fleshly desires But to examine and determine in order the doubts or this place first what is meant by being put to death or mortified in the flesh and quickened in the spirit The old Latine translation followed by Tho. Aquinas and Gorra● readeth it Mortificatos carne c. as I haue shewed already and it is expounded by them accordingly of our being mortified and quickened But the Latine translation hath beene amended according to the Greeke as Lorinus acknowledgeth being by the fault of the Writer corrupted according to Gagneus and Augustine Ierom and Cyprian and Ruffin follow this reading He being quickened c. But it being agreed about this reading yet there is a question what is meant by Christs being quickened in the spirit 〈◊〉 An answer to certaine obiections against Christs descent Some contend that his soule was preserued aliue when he was bodily dead and that nothing else is meant And one taketh great paines in alleaging other places of Scripture where to quicken doth signifie to keepe aliue as Luke 17.33 Luke 9.24 Marke 8.33 Iohn 12.25 Exod 1.22 1 Sam. 27.9 c. And the Syrian Interpreter who readeth these words here Gecumen August Th● Aquin. Euther He died in body but liued in spirit Some would haue his diuine power meant quickening others that were dead who came out of their graues Some vnderstand his reuiuing againe to a spirituall life after his bodily death the quickening spirit comming againe into his dead body Some lastly vnderstand his diuinity wherein he liued ●●●d ras 〈◊〉 and alwaies liueth because the Godhead is a spirit expounding his being quickened in the spirit of his being restored to life by the power of his diuinity Beda citeth Athanasius taking the spirit here for the holy Ghost Athanesues as if it were meant that he was quickened in the faithfull his members in the spirit comming into them I subscribe to that of Augustine and Luther as seeming to me most genuine he died the naturall death but liued againe the spirituall life in soule and body For although the word here vsed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 be often put for preserued aliue yet here it being opposed to 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it agreeth better to vnderstand it of that which is opposite to being put to death that is being raised to life againe in the spirit that is by the power of the Deity his very body is now become spirituall as ours shall also be And thus it agreeth excellently with that which went before that we should patiently suffer any wrongs because as the Lord Iesus did not so neither shall we lose any thing no not though we should be put to death for we shall but exchange as Christ did a naturall life for a spirituall and heauenly which is for euer Secondly What is meant by Christs going in the spirit to preach to the spirits in prison c. To this it is answered diuersly by diuers some of which answers I haue shewed already First It was a generall receiued opinion amongst most that Christ descended into hell there in person to preach to such spirits as were departed out of this world before his comming Clemens Alexandrinus Strom. 6. Athanasius Epist ad Ep●ctet Epiphan Haeres 77. Cyrillus Alex. in Iohan. cap. 36. lib. 12. Hillar in Psal 118. Ieronym in cap. 54. Esa Ambros in Rom. 10. Iustin in tryphon Irenaeus lib. 3. cap. 23. And the last of these two alleageth a place out of Esay the former of Ieremy in these words The holy Lord of Israel was mindfull of his dead which slept in the earth and descended to preach saluation to them that he might saue them Which words are not now extant any where but are thought by Irenaeus through the hatred of Christianity to haue beene put out by the Iewes yet they that agree in the generall of Christ his descent doe greatly differ about the effect thereof Some holding that hee saued all that were in hell before by his preaching as Hilary and Hermes in his booke entituled Pastor but the disobedient in Noahs time are named onely because they were the greatest number that perished together This is mentioned and reiected as an heresie by Augustine August lib. de Hares cap. 79. and that worthily because so contrary to the holy Scriptures Esa 66.24 Matth. 18.8 Luke 16.26 Some aga●ne hold that hee saued onely those that were worthy who led a good life and would haue beleeued if he had before come amongst them but vpbraided the rest by their disobedience and infidelity as Occum Gregory Nazianzen c. or that there were some penitent amongst them that were drowned by the floud whom he had saued as Lyra teacheth And it is a thing generally held amongst the Papists that there were
and Rom. 12.2 Bee not conformed to this world Faber Stap. Gagneus Some referre this saying to Exod. 20. I the Lord thy God am a ielous God the Spirit of God that dwelleth in you enuieth that ye should be ioined to any other but vnto himselfe seeing he doth offer more grace than any other vnto vs as it followeth but he giueth more grace c. the world giueth nothing of worth but taketh away but God giueth his holy Spirit and Son vnto vs here Piscator and life euerlasting hereafter Some vnderstanding the Spirit of God that dwelleth in vs also doe yet referre it vnto Numb 11.29 reading it interrogatiuely doth it lust vnto enuy as if he should say it doth not for it did not in Moses when Eldad and Medad prophecied in the Host Pareus for he forbad it vnto Ioshuah or else vnto Exod. 25.8 ch 29.45 Ier. 7.3 I will dwell in the midst of the children of Israel rendring the sense thus the spirit that is often said to dwell in vs lusteth against that is hareth and carrieth vs against enuy Of all these expositions it is hard to say which is to be preferred and the place must needs be confessed to bee most intricate But that exposition whereby it is said that the Spirit of God is here meant though it be most commonly imbraced seemeth to me to be most improbable because he that is God who offereth more grace vers 6. is opposed to the spirit here spoken of for an aduersatiue particle but is vsed as if he should haue spoken of two contraries thus is our spirit inclined but God prescribeth otherwise Againe it were a strange speech to say that the spirit lusteth to enuy if the meaning were is iealous as Faber rendreth it seeing enuy is the corruption so much in this Epistle impugned and therefore if he would haue spoken a word which should carry a good sense he would haue chosen some other and not haue vsed this which was neuer yet taken but in an ill sense And to expound 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Pareus doth vnto by against is as strange neither doe the next words currantly follow any of both these expositions for so it should rather haue beene therefore or for he giueth more grace I preferre therefore that exposition which interpreteth the spirit that dwelleth in vs of that spirit which all men haue in common the spirit of naturall life for euery man that liueth liueth by a spirit which is the soule for when this departeth out of the body the spirit is said to goe to God that gaue it Eccl. 12. ● and this is called the spirit of the world and as it is now corrupt since the fall of Adam is opposed to Gods Spirit 1 Cor. 2.12 By the spirit then dwelling in vs I vnderstand our naturall corruption which is vsually set forth by the name of a spirit as for example that corruption whereby we are vnfaithfull and doe not beleeue is called The spirit of bondage Rom. 8.15 That whereby men haue beene carried away to idolatry is called The spirit of whoredome Hos 4.12 That whereby men are blinded to goe on in sinne without looking at the danger is called The spirit of a deepe sleepe Esay 29.10 And this corruption is said to dwell in vs euen when we are regenerate Rom. 7.20 And in regard that it is an infection in the soule and spirit sometime a man infected herewith is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Cor. 2.14 naturall from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifying the soule and because he is carried hereby to carnall things and it vttereth it selfe by the fleshly members of the body sometime he is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 carnall as 1 Cor. 3.41 And if we vnderstand by the spirit dwelling in vs this corruption we shall easily finde out the Scripture where thus much in effect is set forth though not in the same words viz. Gal. 5.17 for there is shewed how the flesh lusteth against the spirit and vnto what this lusting tendeth when hee enumerateth the particular fruits thereof and amongst the rest enuy and strife And being thus vnderstood all things agree here most notably For it is as if hee should haue said Hereby it appeareth that to bee linked vnto the world by being like affected as the men of the world are is to be shaken off from God as being in enmity with him because the corruption whereby the world is carried as by their spirit here therefore called The spirit dwelling in vs lusteth vnto enuy fighting and striuing to bee most eminent and in highest place but God inclineth the contrary way viz. to humility by promising grace to the humble and threatning the proud that out of their pride breake out into such vnchristian brabbles and stirres This sentence He resisteth the proud and giueth grace to the humble is taken out of Prouerbs 3.34 where though the words be a little different in the Hebrew yet according to the Septuagints they are the very same here alleaged Resist the Deuill and he will flie from you Verse 7. this resistance is made by Faith 1 Pet. 5.8 and by other parts of the spirituall Armature Ephes 6.12 But it is not to be thought that hee will for euer be gone when he is thus resisted for he will returne againe and make new assaults but hee must alwaies bee thus resisted Vers 8. and so we shall preuaile against him Draw neere to God this is by reformation of our hearts and liues as is immediatly expressed and by lamenting our sinnes past vers 9. Speake not one against another Vers 11. hee that speaketh against a brother and iudgeth him speaketh against the Law c. Hauing exhorted to a course of reconciliation to God he now intreateth of vnity amongst themselues and forbearing one to detract from another or to impeach another wrongfully Hee that doth thus Leu. 19.16 speaketh against the Law because in the Law it is forbidden to goe about as a Tale-bearer against a mans neighbour and in carrying himselfe herein as contemptuous of the Law he taketh vpon him as it were as a Iudge ouer the Law so farre is he from submitting to the obedience thereof whereas indeed there is but one Iudge namely God whose Office whilst he thus vsurpeth hee may iustly feare a future condemnation by him And in this exposition all Interpreters generally doe agree Note Note that to be wedded to our owne wills and waies is to be at enmity with God for so much as our waies and Gods waies are diametrically contrary the one to the other our spirit as the spirit of the world generally doth carrieth vs to enuy and all euill affections but God would faine draw vs to humility Wherefore let vs renounce our owne wills and lusts and hearken to the Lord that we may haue his loue and not continue in enmity with him the heat of whose anger
Note that it concerneth euery one be he learned or vnlearned to reade and studie vpon the holy Scriptures that he may not be to seeke in his answers about the doctrine of faith Hom. 16. in Iohan when he is required thereunto Chrysostome doth sharply reproue Christians that labour not for knowledge that they may vnderstand the reason of the Christian faith alleaging how Artificers will fight in the defence of their profession and the Gentiles will argue strongly for their superstition and against the Christian religion and yet hee saith that many Christians are so ignorant that they cannot giue an answer what the Trinity is what the resurrection or why Christ was incarnate at such a time And lastly he refuteth that tenent that a simple soule is blessed that is one that is ignorant and knoweth nothing Oh how contrary to this is the teaching of the Papists at this day who commend ignorance and speake against reading of the Scriptures as most dangerous CHAP. 3. VERS 18 19 c. Being put to death in the flesh but quickened in the spirit Vers 19 Wherein he went preached to the spirits in prison which had sometime beene disobedient when once the long-suffering of God waited in the daies of Noah c. As Christ was both God and man so he dyed as man Occumen in 1 Pet. 3. and as God rose againe to deliuer vs from death and corruption For he was raised by the power of his deity to shew that we shal rise againe raising vp the bodies of many that were dead also for our further confirmation herein In which he went c. Here is shewed how the benefit of his passion extended to the vniust not onely liuing but dead long before because hee had said He suffered the iust for the vniust Wherein therefore is as much as for which cause that there might redound benefit from him to such as were dead long before as well as to the liuing namely to so many as liued well and would haue beene ready to embrace the faith of Christ if hee had come amongst them hee went and preached to them that they might bee deliuerd by him And that it might appeare that there haue beene alwaies meanes of comming to faith and obedience so that the condemnation of the vnfaithfull is iust he maketh mention of Noah who was long agoe euen almost from the beginning by whom they might haue beene conuerted And hauing spoken of the Arke and those that were in it saued by the waters he applieth it vnto Baptisme for as the waters then drowned the wicked world but those that fled into the Arke were preserued so by baptisme the wicked and vnbeleeuing deuils are drowned but the faithfull are saued as water washeth away the filthines of the flesh so baptisme cleanseth the soule in a mysticall and wonderfull manner and it is called the interrogation of a good conscience towards God because they only which apply their minds to an holy life are wont to make questions and to seeke vnto God by what meanes they may be saued and so vnderstanding that baptisme is the meanes they haue recourse thereunto Christ is said to haue died once it being implied Th. Aquinas Gorran Glos Ordin that hee shall die no more against those heretikes that held that he suffered in the aire for the deuils after that he had done suffering here vpon earth and to rouze vp the secure from sinne because if now after that Christ hath suffered they liue in sinne there will be no more redemption for them Mortificatos car ne vtuificatos autem spirtus seeing Christ dieth no more That he might offer vs vp vnto God being quickened in the spirit that is either the holy Ghost or our spirit because the true Christian dieth to the flesh but liueth to the spirit In which he went that is in a spirituall manner by internall inspiration euen before that he was incarnate preaching by Noah by his Angels whom he vsed as his M●nisters to declare his will in those times To those that were in prison that is of the flesh of sin errour according to that Ps 141. Take my soule out of prison in one translation therefore it is To them that were shut vp in the flesh When they expected Gods patience that is thinking that God would still with patience beare with them They were saued by the water because the water lifted vp the Arke and eight persons are mentioned as alluding to him that should rise againe the eighth day and to the time of the generall resurrection which some thinke shall be vpon the same day Baptisme is like vnto the Arke and so is tribulation through which a Christian must goe in diuers things First The Arke was made of boords hallowed so the Church consisteth of persons afflicted Secondly The Arke was of incorruptible wood so are Christians such as will not be corrupted Thirdly They that were saued in the Arke were saued by Noah signifying rest so the Church is saued by Christ Fourthly Out of the Arke none were saued so neither out of the Church Fiftly The waters being increased the Arke was borne vp higher so the Church grew greater by tribulations But the Baptisme that saueth is not any Baptisme for there is no such thing in the Iewes baptizings or in Iohns baptisme or in that of heretikes in which there is onely water but not the spirit but the baptisme vsed in the true Church wherein the Minister demandeth whether he beleeueth and renounceth the deuill c. exacting a pure conscience in him that commeth to be baptized which good conscience tendeth to God and he that comming with such a conscience is baptized Iuther in 1 Peter 3. is saued by the resurrection of Iesus Christ that is exemplariter rising from sinne to vertue as he rose againe Rom. 6. Christ is said to be put to death in the flesh when the man Christ died vpon the Crosse his naturall faculties ceasing he not liuing by meat and drinke and rest any more as is vsuall amongst men that are liuing here And he was quickned in the spirit that is was raised vp againe to a spirituall life wherein he liueth for euer both in soule and body And liuing this life now he preacheth not vocally as hee did but spiritually when his Apostles and other Ministers preach being spiritually present with them vnto the end of the world The spirits vnto which he is said to preach are they that were sometime disobedient in the daies of Noah not that they precisely are meant but such as they were for when hee preacheth in wardly to mens hearts and spirits now hee may well be said to preach to the spirits in prison because some are such as they that now are in prison were so that they are in the number of rebellious spirits to whom it is daily preached Here is therefore a Synecdoche whereby the part is put for the whole The eight
the imputed righteousnesse of Christ Iesus but Workes make a mans Faith euident and conspicuous to the world it being hereby proued that a man is a true beleeuer and so accepted for iust and righteous before God Ob. Hypocrites haue good workes and therefore it seemeth Obiect that good workes are no certaine euidence of Faith and consequently on one iustified Sol. Their workes are not truly good Sol. for such are the proper effects of Faith but because they are the same which the faithfull doe and it is hidden from man oftentimes who is an Hypocrite if wee shall iudge one to be faithfull because hee doth good workes we may bee deceiued Yet good workes doe manifest the truly faithfull because such a one is not without good workes though hee that hath good workes in our thinking is not alwaies faithfull but God seeth accuratly of what sort euery mans worke is He that desireth to reade more about iustification by Faith and Workes may haue recourse to Rom. 3.28 Touching the particular passages here verse 18. Vers 18. But some man may say thou hast faith and I haue workes shew we thy faith by thy workes c. Here such as trust to bare Faith are confuted by the bringing in of two speaking together the one seeming to himselfe to be faithfull the other manifested to bee such by his workes But that is but I will oppose thee by this prosopopeia Admit that a man truly faithfull challengeth thee thus Thou saist that thou hast Faith but how dost thou proue it hauing no works I can proue my Faith by my workes here the conscience of him that wanteth workes must needs bee conuinced Thou beleeuest that there is one God Vers 19. thou doest well the Deuils beleeue also and tremble To beleeue this though it be an Article of our Faith and likewise to beleeue and hold aright the other Articles doth not make one a true beleeuer though to beleeue this be to doe well because here is not all required to a sauing Faith Faith what which is to beleeue to the hauing of the affection moued to all due obedience vnto him in whom it is beleeued for loue as Oecumenius hath partly touched already and as Augustine sometime speaketh Faith with charity is a Christian faith August Fides cum charitate est fides Christiana fides sine charitate est fides daemonis Faith without charity is a faith of Deuills that is Faith inclining the heart to obey the Law of God the substance whereof standeth in loue Pareus and others of our Writers generally teach that a sauing Faith is to beleeue with application to a mans owne soule in particular This I confesse is true if we speake of that Faith which is growne to more perfection Iob 19.25 such as was in Iob saying I know that my Redeemer liueth Gal. 2.20 c. and in Paul saying I liue by the Faith of the Son of God who hath died for me But the Faith necessary to saluation commended vnto vs in the holy Scriptures is a beleeuing with loue and affection ioyned hereunto Such was the Faith of the Samaritans said to be Ioh. 4.42 Such a Faith Philip told the Eunuch if he had he might be baptized Act. 8.37 and such was Abrahams Faith Rom. 4.21 And this is such a Faith as none but the Elect can haue the Deuill cannot haue it for he beleeueth with an auersation the wicked cannot haue it for there is the like auersenesse in them also or at the least a deadnesse of affection for their Faith worketh not by loue of which they are void Here is also a certainty without wandring or doubring which is set forth as a property of true Faith for it is without all doubting assented to Iam. 1.5 that Iesus is the Sauiour of the world and that whosoeuer rightly beleeueth on him shall haue euerlasting life But as for certainty of a mans owne particular estate in grace I suppose that is not so of the Esse of Faith as the hee should bee said to haue no Faith who is not able for the present to apply Gods promises without doubting vnto himselfe for then wofull were the case of many true Christians who in time of temptation finde many feares and perplexities in themselues in so much that they are ready to say with Dauid they are cast out of Gods presence though afterward they see their weaknesse and recouer their hold againe Besides this particular assurance is a thing that is to increase daily as men grow vp in Christ and therefore no maruell if in those that are yet children in the Faith it be not so strong as it should be Certainly true loue is an inseparable companion and fruit of a true Faith and then who can deny it to be a liuely Faith wherwith true loue concurreth though such assurance touching a mans owne particular estate be not yet atrained vnto Thou seest that Faith wrought together with his workes Vers 22. c. that is for so much as I haue spoken of his iustification by his worke I would not haue it vnderstood but with reference to his Faith whereby he brought forth this worke so that Faith as the cause and worke as the effect did perfectly iustifie him so that his worke was in no part cause of his iustification as though his iustice stood herein but hereby his Faith was perfected because without it his Faith could not haue beene a perfect and liuing Faith as it is not in any other man Euen as he that from his heart without any dissimulation assenteth to any thing that is iust and equall is in that instant honest and iust but this assent of his is perfected by his act when he doth accordingly And the Scripture was fulfilled saying Vers 23. that Abraham beleeued God and it was counted to him for righteousnesse that is by this fact he shewed that he beleeued and in his beleeuing whereby he did it stood his iustice and not in the doing of this thing nothing can be plainer for iustification by Faith and to declare that what is attributed to worke in Abraham is meant of a working Faith as hath beene touched already Touching the conclusion Vers 24. v. 24. it must not be vnderstood but according to the Premises that when a man bringeth forth the fruit of Faith he is iustified and not when he doth barely beleeue not being able to shew his Faith by any such fruits Vers 26. And to this also do the last words v. 26. agree as the body without a spirit is dead so is Faith without workes Faith only iustifieth not because being alone without Workes it is dead and vnprofitable as a Carkasse without a soule Note Note that to beleeue only in Christ doth not auaile vnto saluation but when with the apprehension of the loue of God toward a man in Christ which is the greatest loue that euer was doth concurre the loue
in Limbo patrum the soules of the faithfull who died before Christs incarnation who were by his descent deliuered Some againe and they be the Diuines of our side which teach a descent of Christs soule hold that he went downe to vpbraid the incredulous in Noahs time and such like with their infidelity shewing them what he had suffered for the saluation of the faithfull of the benefit whereof they were altogether depriued through their owne default to their greater terrour Touching the distinction which is made of Christs preaching as if it had beene partly to such as were appointed to life when it is spoken onely of the disobedient in prison it is a plaine wresting of the place and therefore Lorinus himselfe a Iesuite calleth it in question how it can stand Touching the penitency supposed to haue beene in some that were drowned it is a meere coniecture without all ground and if any such were they went not with the rest doubtlesse to this prison but to Abrahams bosome or as the theefe vpon the crosse to Paradise Touching the last it seemes to be implied in an article of our Church determined in a Synod * Synod Angl. Quemadmodum Christus pro nobis mortuus est sep●ltus i●a ●tiam cred●ndus est ad inferos dese●nd●sse Nam corpu●● sque ad resurrect●o●●m in sepulchro iacu● spiritus ab illo commissas cum spiritibus qui in carcere vel inser●o detinebantur fuit illisque praedican●t quemadmodum ●●statur Petrilocus assembled in King Edwards daies An. 1552. Artic. 3. Euen as Christ died for vs and was buried so he is also to be beleeued to haue gone downe into hell for his body lay in the graue to the time of his resurrection but his spirit that went out of him was with the spirits in hell or in prison and preached vnto them as Peter testifieth Secondly Some hold that Christs preaching in a spirituall manner by Noah is meant herein Thomas Aquinas followeth Augustine August epist 99. In this also ioyne Beda Hugo Carthusianus Beza c. Thirdly Luther Some vnderstand his preaching by the Apostles to whom he sent the holy Ghost Hessil●u● and herein they went and preached to the Gentiles being in the prison of the flesh who are described as bound in chaines Psal 106. Esa 42.49 And to shew that of olde they were bound with the chaines of infidelity he mentioneth the imprisoned in the daies of Noah and they are called spirits to intimate the immortality of the soule Fourthly Some vnderstand by the prison here Purgatorie Francis Turria Fiftly and lastly Some most absurdly apply this preaching to the eight persons in the Arke A●ias Montan Caluanstu lib. 2. cap. 16. §. 9. as in a prison for the time And yet there is another interpretation of Caluin by his going and preaching vnderstanding his making them to feele the power of his passion who died long agoe and yet remained in their soules expecting the Lord Iesus and he saith that it should not be read in prison but in a watch-tower in specula as the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth For my owne part I subscribe to those that hold this to be the most obscure place in all the Epistles for no Exposition that hath hitherto beene giuen doth so fully satisfie but that some exceptions will lie there against That of Arias Montanus falleth of it selfe because they in the Arke were obedient whereas this preaching was to the disobedient 2. That of Purgatory is a meere fiction there being no such place in rerum natura 3. That of Caluin applying it in part to the soules of the faithfull seemeth to be improbable because these were the disobedient and it is not onely said that hee preached but went and preached intimating a locall motion and not onely a vertuall penetration 4. To expound it of his preaching by Noah is to peruert the order of the Text according to which this his going must be after his inclining againe and why should he call the men liuing at that time spirits which is a word no where vsed to set forth liuing men by but either Angels good or bad or soules departed 5. Much lesse can the Gentiles bee vnderstood by the spirits in prison amongst whom the Apostles came because they were such as liued in the daies of Noah not men of like quality but those very men 6. The Popish Limbus is but an imaginary place and to hold that any being in hell were deliuered againe seemeth to be contrary to the holy Scriptures as hath beene already shewed There remaineth then onely that of his descending to triumph ouer the Deuils and to vpbraid the damned spirits with their infidelity and impenitency shewing how iustly they were for euer therefore shut vp in that place of torment and because they of the old world were the most noted for their great multitude that went downe thither together hee mentioneth them but in them vnderstandeth all other then damned spirits also And this is the most probable of all other expositions and most consonant with the rest of the holy Scriptures For this is one part of Christs preaching to conuince the impenitent as iustly and certainly reprobate and damned as appeareth Mat. 11.21 Mat. 12.41 c. What is meant when Baptisme is said not to be an outward washing Verse 21. but the request of a good conscience vnto God by the resurrection of Iesus Christ What others haue said hath beene already set downe Piscator Scholia Piscator to this speaketh most fully and excellently Baptisme standeth not so much in the outward washing of the body as in the remission of sinnes by the bloud of Christ which is the washing of the soule and conscience which being by faith apprehended the conscience becommeth good and so the faithfull in the confidence hereof boldly questioneth with God about his fauour reconciled vnto him by Christs death and testified by his resurrection saying Hath not Christ reconciled thy fauour vnto vs by his death to endure for euer Certainly it is so for his resurrection doth testifie it seeing that vnlesse he had made a perfect expiation of our sins by his death reconciled thy fauour vnto vs he could not haue risen againe to life and heauenly glory So that these words by the resurrection of Iesus Christ haue not reference to the word saueth but to the request of a good conscience for this ariseth from Christ his resurrection August contra Faustum cap. 12. Beda Gagneus Angustine and Beda say the same with Thomas Aquinas and Gagneus also setting it forth more fully thus The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth a stipulation or promise conceiued in words whereby he that is baptized couenanteth to beleeue and doe as hee is in baptisme required Act. 8. as the Eunuch answered Philip. And this beleeuing and renouncing of sinne and Satan saueth and not the washing with water by the resurrection of
faithfull person liueth not as the naturall man doth though he cannot but through humane frailty sinne yet his heart is against all sinne and his life is such a continuall practice of repentance and the Spirit of Christ doth so sway and carry him as that he falleth not so often as the naturall man doth and he doth daily wash and cleanse himselfe from sinne by the teares of true repentance and that when there is no worldly shame or losse to moue him hereunto Neither can I see but that the regenerate must needs be of such an holy life as not at any time to fall into any great sinne as of adultery murther theft drunkennesse or the like although vnder the Law most holy men haue fallen for the Spirit is now giuen in a greater measure than it was in those daies and the force of corruption is more abated as is cleare from sundry passages of holy Scripture Whereas vers 8. it is said Vers 8. that the Deuill sinneth from the beginning and the Sonne of God appeared that he might dissolue the workes of the deuill the meaning is that he was euer the Author of sinne by his temptations so preuailing amongst men as that the world hath hitherto beene full of sinne but now the Sonne of God comming hath giuen a contrary Spirit into the hearts of his people whereby they are sanctified to leade an holy and new life The Deuill had them before as it were in the chaines of sinne fast bound for stirring to forsake those superstitious and riotous courses but now these bands are loosed and they are set at liberty to walke in the waies of Gods Commandements because free will which was lost in Adam is restored in the regenerate by Christ that we may now striue against and resist euill temptations Note that the most certaine marke of a childe of God Note is to leade an holy life and truly to endeuour to refraine from all sinne out of an inward affectation of holinesse and the dislike and hatred of euery sinne be it neuer so pleasing or profitable to the outward man and not in any by-respect and being ouertaken with sinne by infirmity to be humbled therefore and to beg for mercy and pardon and that toties quoties The comfort of those that doe thus is that they are not now accounted sinners but are iustified here-from Luke 13. as it is said of the poore Publican that hauing knocked vpon his breast and humbled himselfe he went away iustified The penitent person sinneth not because he doth daily that which is righteous in calling himselfe to account for his sinnes and iudging himselfe therefore as Beda saith Beda in Luc. 10. Seruos nos inutiles fatcamur vt in sortem vtilium veniamus Hieron Vnica iustitia nostra est iniustitiam fateri In confessing our selues to bee vnprofitable seruants we come to be profitable and Ierome Our only righteousnesse is to confesse our vnrighteousnesse For whoso doth thus and bewaileth it daily in secret cannot but haue his heart set against sinne and so sinneth not in will and desire CHAP. 3. VER 21. If our heart condemne vs not wee haue boldnesse towards God and receiue what wee aske of him because we keepe his Commandements c. In commending brotherly loue Mayer Vers 14. which he had often done before he saith Hereby wee know that wee are translated from death to life if we loue the brethren vers 14. By the loue of brethren all vnderstand here the loue of one another which is vsually expressed by the word neighbours in the old Testament but by the word brethren in the new Brotherly loue is a signe of true grace which is the beginning of the spirituall life that is eternall it is not the cause of life as euen the Iesuit condescendeth orinus Hereby a man may know that hee is raised from the death of sinne to the life that is by grace if he hath true loue in him because all that are partakers of this life haue this loue in them and consequently a man may know that euerlasting life is his and not only haue a probable coniecture hereof as popish writers teach For to put it out of doubt that we may know certainly he saith vers 24. We know that he abideth in vs by the Spirit that he hath giuen vs Verse 19 20 21. and in vers 19 20 21. he argueth from the heart and conscience of euery man which vpon this ground of actuall loue comming to be quiet and free from any accusation argueth most certainly that wee are in his fauour He that loueth to the exercising of charitable actions keepeth Gods Commandements which stand but in two things the loue of God and the loue of our neighbour God is said to be greater than our conscience that is more able to iudge and condemne because all things are most euident vnto him so that if our conscience condemneth vs hee will condemne vs much more And this is his commandement Vers 23. Oecumen that we beleeue in the Name of his Sonne Iesus Christ To beleeue in the name of Christ here saith Oecumenius is to giue credit to his will for by his Name is set forth sometime his glory and sometime his will Now his will whereunto he would haue vs giue credit is that we should loue one another But this exposition is forced for hauing spoken of loue hitherto and how necessary it is because God hath commanded it hee now goeth somewhat higher and sheweth that in commanding vs to beleeue in the Name of his Sonne hee commandeth loue also seeing that loue is inseparable from a liuely faith Therefore hee addeth This is his command that we beleeue and loue one another as if he should haue said For so much as I haue spoken of the Commandements of God affirming that he which loueth keepeth thē hereby it plainly appeareth to be so because that in commanding to beleeue in Christ he inioyneth vs both to beleeue and to loue loue being vnto faith as the soule is to the body which is but a dead carkasse if it be away And so hee commeth aptly to mention the Spirit giuen vnto vs in the next verse whereby we know that we are in God that is The. Aquin. Gorran Beza this grace of the Spirit loue And hereunto doe others consent Note here Note because he maketh the keeping of Gods Commandements the ground of our confidence to God-ward so as that we may pray with certaine expectation to be heard that none but such as are of a godly life charitable to the poore can haue any assurance of Gods fauour All wicked men and hard-hearted cannot but haue an accusing conscience if it bee not cauterized and therefore their hope to God-ward is vaine though they call and cry to him for mercy they shall not preuaile Iam. 5.16 Mat. 7.22 CHAP. IIII. HAuing spoken in the last verse of the former Chapter of knowing
of iudgement and our delight standeth firme in Gods Commandements To the naturall man the Law is an heauy burthen but to the spirituall such as all the faithfull are it being spirituall is a delight through the Spirit that is in them Note Note that the loue of God is not but in him that keepeth his Commandements the wicked man that tradeth daily in sinne whatsoeuer he boasteth of his louing of God yet he hath not one dramme of true loue in him Note againe Note that there is not that vnpleasant life which the world imagineth to the godly that make conscience of keeping Gods Lawes not daring to aberre here-from in any thing for Gods Commandements are not grieuous vnto them as all Iaacobs paines were not vnto him for the loue which he bare to Rachel as the Brides putting on of all her ornaments though it be some trouble yet it is not painfull but delightfull and so for any man to lay off his old vndecent clothes and to put on a faire new suit of apparell CHAP. 5. VER 6. This is he that came by water and bloud euen Iesus Christ c. and the Spirit witnesseth that the Spirit is the truth Vers 7. For there are three that beare witnesse in Heauen the Father the Word and the Spirit and these three are one Vers 8. And there are three that beare witnesse in earth the Spirit the Water and the Bloud and these three agree in one Hauing spoken of our regeneration and adoption to be the Oecumen in 1 Ioh. sonnes of God here he proceedeth to 5. set forth the Author of it Christ Iesus and by what meanes it is effected namely by water and bloud and therefore to shew this he declareth by what meanes he as he was man came to be adopted through whom we partake of the same dignity namely by water and bloud And indeed there was a threefold testimony Matth. 3. that hee is the Sonne of God First in the time of his baptisme by water Secondly a little before his bloudy passion when that voice came again from Heauen like thunder Iohn 13. I haue glorified my name and will glorifie it Thirdly after his death when he arose againe which could not be but by a diuine Spirit in him In that these three the Water the Bloud and the Spirit are said to agree in one the meaning is that they agree in testifying the same thing that Christ is the Sonne of God and that wee by him are made so likewise yet some Fathers thinke that the Father testifying of him in his baptisme is meant by the Spirit Concerning the Bloud and Water Mayer wherein the chiese difficulty of this place lieth I finde no difference almost in others from this of Oecumenius Th. Aquinas Thomas Aquinas vnderstandeth the Water of our Baptisme and the Bloud set forth hereby for the washing away of our sinnes and so doth the Glosse Glos ●rd Beza Beza addeth also the Bloud represented in the Lords Supper But for so much as the Water and Bloud by which Christ came is spoken of I rather assent to Oecumenius But for that which is added It is the Spirit that witnesseth that the Spirit is truth I doe not thinke that the Spirit here setteth forth his resurrection but the Spirit descending at the feast of Pentecost as hee had promised When as the speech may seeme to be strange as we reade it according to the Greeke the vulgar Latine rendreth it The Spirit testifieth that Christ is truth but for so much as here a word is plainly altered that ought not to bee we must rather cleaue to the originall and so the words will carry a good sense if we vnderstand them as Faber doth Faber Stapul because the Spirit is truth these last words seruing to illustrate the former as if he should haue said It is the Spirit that giueth restimony vnto Christ and his testimony ought to bee receiued because the Spirit is truth For that which followeth of the three that beare record in Heauen and the three in earth these things being thus premised it hath no difficulty in it Beza by the Spirit will haue the vinifying vertue of the Spirit vnderstood shewing it selfe in the faithfull who are by Baptisme ingraffed into Christ but I rest vpon that which hath beene already deliuered The Water and Bloud which are said to be vpon earth and the Spirit Aug contr Maxin inum c. 22. Th. Aquinas Gorran Gagneus are expounded by some of the Water and Bloud that flowed out of his side vpon the Crosse and of the water of his teares when he wept ouer Ierusalem and of the bloud which hee sweat in the Garden Bloud came from him at other times also testifying the truth of his humanity as at his circumcision and when hee was scourged Mat. 27. By the Spirit they vnderstand the Spirit that he gaue vp when in his Passion he said Father into thy hands I commend my Spirit And so they make these three the witnesses of his humane nature the preceding three of his diuine which doth not seeme improbable to me but let the Reader consider Touching the words following Vers 9. wherein the diuine testimony from heauen is further vrged comparatiuely by the consent of all Expositors the testimony of men there is the testimony of the Prophets who spake of the Messiah to come if this be receiued then much more the Testimony immediatly from Heauen ought to be receiued it being beleeued that this is the Messiah who hath already come Or it may be an allusion more particularly as some will haue it to that Law of witnesses at the mouth of two or three witnesses euery word shall stand For if humane testimony must be beleeued much more the diuine He that beleeueth Vers 10. Oecumen hath the testimonie in himselfe that is by being made the sonne of God such as hee beleeueth Christ to be for it is by the Spirit of Christ that he beleeueth this Note Note that if vpon testimonie we beleeue things then there is great reason that without all doubting we should beleeue in Christ touching whom there hath beene so ample testimonie the Father from heauen pronouncing him to be his dearely beloued Sonne the Spirit by comming downe and resting vpon him and his owne declaring of himselfe by signes and miracles for hereby it plainely appeareth that he was the Sonne of God Then the water and bloud that flowed from him which could not come from a phantasticall but a true naturall bodie and his giuing vp of the ghost for hereby he is manifested to haue beene man If any be incredulous and doe not beleeue Note it is because they haue no part in Christ for had they interest in him they should then haue him by his spirit dwelling in them and so they could not but turne witnesses of the same themselues The vnbeleeuing and doubtfull herein are guiltie
birth of Christ were seuen hundred and fifty yeeres from thence till the ouerthrow of that Empire about fiue hundred yeeres in all neere vpon one thousand two hundred and threescore set forth by these two and forty moneths Some expound these moneths Fox as Daniels Sabbaths of yeeres and so reckon them to bee two hundred ninety and foure all which time the Roman Empire did by persecution as here it is said to bee giuen him to doe for from the imprisonment of Iohn the Baptist when this persecution may be reckoned to begin to the time of the Churches deliuerance at the death of Licinius who was ouercome by Constantine the great were iust two hundred ninety and foure yeeres Some holding P. du Moulin as I haue already said that the time here described is the same with that Chap. 11. viz. one thousand two hundred and threescore yeeres of the Papall persecution begin it not till ann 755. and extend it to 2015. which is almost 400. yeeres hence And lastly Brightman some taking this time for the whole time of Antichrists birth growing wounding and recouery that he might be able to exercise his malice against the Church of God begin it ann 304. when ambition first crept into the Church through the bounty of Constantine the great and end it ann 1546. at what time the Councell of Trent hauing so plainly opposed it selfe against the light then breaking out the forces of the Papacy were broke men beginning euery where to reuolt from the obedience of that Sea but because that part of this time the Pope could doe little or nothing viz. all the time of the Empire of the Gothes which was one hundred and forty yeeres they hold that this space of time is to be added to one thousand fiue hundred forty and six wherein he shall still haue power that is vnto ann 1686. but then there shall bee a full end of his greatnesse and in this time is his fight with the two witnesses mentioned Chap. 11. Whilst I was considering of these diuers expositions I heard a man of great note for his accurate calculating of these times handling this very point his opinion was that this time ought to be begun when the head spoken of in the Text was deadly wounded by the irruption of the Gothes Vandals and Rugians which because it was not all at once but at three most remarkable times first vnder the conduct of Alaricus King of the Gothes ann 414.2 Vnder Gensericus King of the Vandals ann 445. or 459.3 Vnder Odoacer King of the Rugians ann 476. he determined it to bee vncertaine when this time of the beast shall bee fully ended euen as the ending of the seuenty yeeres captiuity spoken of by Ieremiah was vncertaine till the accomplishment vpon the like reason of three seuerall times of captiuity from either of which it might bee reckoned And thus the neerest time should bee ann 1658. reckoning by the Aegyptian account the next 1689. and the furthest of all 1710. But this beginning of the time cannot stand because to haue power to doe argueth life and strength and not a languishing estate as of one deadly wounded and in the order of the Text it is after the healing of the wound againe that this power is giuen to the beast and not in the time that he lay bleeding vnder the wound Against that of Brightman I haue shewed my reason before Cha. 11.2 and it is improbable that this time of two and forty moneths should be interrupted and so to be made vp by one hundred forty yeeres following after and if it be taken together so ended at the time of the Councell of Trent the Pope hath farre exceeded his limited time seeing he hath made so much stirre about religion now fourescore yeeres since and still preuaileth mightily and so here were little solid comfort in the prophecy The errour in Du Moulin is in that he beginneth this time too high long after the wound healed whereas the time of any Potentate is to bee reckoned not from his comming to an height and perfection of power but from his very first beginning to reigne though more weakly The rest that apply these moneths to the old Roman Empire consider not the wound made and healed after which the computation ought to begin and whereas the scope of this Reuelation is chiefly to comfort vs against the Roman Antichrist by setting a bound to his reigne by this their exposition applying this time another way they leaue it boundlesse Other expositions there are but lest I should be ouer tedious I omit to recite them resoluing most confidently that this time began ann 606. as I shewed before vpon Chap. 11.2 when the deadly wound of the Roman Empire might well bee said to be healed in the Popes rise and first attaining to such vniuersall authority Touching that Epiphonema vers 10 11 12. Vers 10 11. it is agreed that it is added to stirre vp men to a diligent enquity about Antichrist that finding him out they may take heed of being carried on with others to worship him to the destruction of their soules the comfort is that Antichrist who hath tyrannized for a time by killing with the sword and bringing his oppugners to great misery shall finally perish most miserably himselfe at what time the Saints who haue suffered vnder him shall haue perfect deliuerance And this is the end that faith and patience shall haue after the greatest troubles and miseries and the end that cruelty and oppression shall haue though it goeth on vnreuenged a long time Quest 6. And I saw another beast rise out of the earth Vers 11. which had two hornes like the Lambe and spake like the Dragon c. What beast is this and what is meant by his rising out of the earth by his Lambe-like hornes and Dragon-like voyce Answ This beast is the Pope of Rome who doth no more differ from the first beast but that the state whereof hee is the head is represented by it and hee the head ruling in that state by this They which by the first beast vnderstand the old Roman Emperours by this doe generally vnderstand the Popes reuiuing that decaying Empire but they which make both these beasts one and the same Pareus Forbs interpret the first of the Pope the head and this second of his guard of spirituall persons considered together with him who endeuour by all meanes to aduance him in the hearts deuotions of the people Why the first beast may not be taken for the Roman Emperours of old I haue already shewed and touching this guard or these instruments helping to aduance the beast I cannot see how they should bee here represented Brightman He hath equall power with the beast so as no instrument of the Popes hath or euer had for it is not any body but an head which the Spirit of God doth altogether apply himselfe to describe here this beast