by Priests of the Church lay Elders because they are not Church-ministers taken in the proper sense neither is it their office to pray ouer the sick and to administer holy vnction vnto remission of sins and it matters not that the Apostle sayes let them bring in Priests wheras the practice of the catholick Church is to employ one sole Priest in the administration of Extrem-vnction for the true meaning therof is let him bring in some one of the Priests the Apostle vseth the signre which Gramarians call Enallogy putting the plurall for the singular number After the same manner Mat. 1. the Angell of our lord appearing to Ioseph says Take the Babe and his Mother and goe into the land of Israel for they are dead that sought the Babes life notwithstanding he mentioneth only Herod saying when Herod was dead c. Lastly in as much as the Apostle asserteth absolutly putting no limitation of time If any be sick among you he plainly sheweth Extrem-vnction (e) Since all the other precepts S. Iames inioyn's in his catholick Epistle concerne christians in all ages t' is not as to reason probable that the sole precept of anointing the sick should be giuen for a short tyme onely and according to Caluin scarcely for the space of one age but this his interpretation the Council of Trent has condemn'd sess 14. doct de Sacram. Extr. vnct and can 2. to be of perpetuall vse in the catholick Church to the worlds end which is essentiall to a Sacrament of the new law wherfore sundry ancient Fathers that liued in the subsequent ages when they speake of christian belieuers reduced through sicknesse to eminent danger of death recommend to them holy vnction as a Sacrament of the new law and alledge for it the authority of S. Iames set down * Hieron Epis 65. ad Pamach oceanum de erroribus Originis in simili re ad fidem spectūte de qua tamen prima concilia nihil definierant sic scribit Confessi sunt quod negabatur tacuerunt de quo nemo quarebat and though the first generall Councill's make no mention of Extrem-vnction neuertheless no man ought to infer from that negatiue authority an argument to the preiudice of so warrantable a doctrine for they declared and defined such point's of christian faith as were questioned and impugned by the Hereticks of those times respectiuely but then no controuersy arose concerning Extrem-vnction By the premises is plainly euidenced that the guift of healing through vnction or laying on of hands (f) S. Marke mentioneth sick persons whom the anoynting with oyle cured And in the last Chapter of S. Marke t' is promised that the imposition of hands shall heale the sick mentioned by S. Mark and practiced in the primitiue times was not this holy vnction that s. Iames prescribeth in the forenamed catholick Epistle for that was a miraculous end owment and no gifts of doing miracles did confer sanctifying grace vnto remission of sins which is proper to a Sacrament of the new law and truly that particular guift (g) Often tymes such as were not Priests heald the sick by anoynting them namely according to S. Hierom S. Hilarion that had not receiu'd the Sacrament of holy Order and according to Tertull. ad scap c. 4. A certain lay-christian named Proculus anoynted with oyle Seuerus the Emperour and recouered him thereby called the gift of healing was extended only to corporall infirmities it could cure the body but not the soul Besides one and the same spirit distributed that and all other guifts of doing miracles seuerally according to his own free will 1. Cor. 12 wherfore neither such only as by ordination were promoted to Priestly ordination nor all those had the guift of healing but to the administring of Extrem-vnction is necessary Priestly ordination for the Apostle sayth expresly If any be sick among you let him bring in Priests of the Church Also our Extrem-vnction requireth oyle of Oliues blessed (h) The Councils of Flor. in the Decree of Eugenius and of Trent sess 14. cap. 1. declare that the oyle that is applyed in and is proper to the Sacrament of Extream-vnction ought to be blessed and consecrated by a Bishop which vsage is conform to the generall practice of the catholick Church and consecrated by a Bishop neither is it applyed to euery sick person but to such only as be incorporated into Christ by faith hope and charity nor to euery part of the sick body but to the Organs of the fiue senses which be the windows that let in sin into the howse of the soul and although our Extrem-vnction be endowed with vertue euen as to the healing corporall infirmities when the supreme prouidence thinketh it expedient for the sick yet the cure of these is the secundary effect thereof only being instituted specially to heale the soul Furthermore to the forementioned healing vnction no determinat form of prayer was annexed as is to our Extrem-vnction for example the Roman Church vseth this form * Concil Trid. expressè docet ritum vsū Extremaevnctionis quem obseruat Romana Ecclesia esse optimum idque patet ex decreto Eugenij ad calcem Concilij Florentini which doubtlesse is the best our Lord in vertue of that holy vnction and his most benigne mercy grant vnto thee Indulgence of all thy offences committed by seeing hearing smelling tasting and touching and indeed the Priest that ministreth Extrem-vnction (i) The necessity of the precept requires that the form of sacramentall vnction which consistes of these word's Per istam sanctam vnctionem pijssimam suam misericordiam indulgeat tibi Dominus quicquid deliquisti per visum auditum c. ought to be repeated fiue seuerall tymes in fiue seuerall anoyntings of the fiue senses I say the precept of necessity requires this ceremony though perhaps neither a fiue fold repeating of the formall words nor a siue fold anoynting of the sick can lay claim to the essence of the Sacrament is bound to anointe the Organs of euery sense and express the name of each one particularly together with a repetition of the said form vnless he shall obserue that the sick person is seiz'd with pangs of present death for then one sole vnction and the naming of all the outward senses respectiuely is sufficient enough as to the essence of the Sacrament and vnto obtaining the fruites therof for example it sufficeth if anointing one Organ only the Priest say our Lord through that holy vnction and his most benigne mercy grant vnto thee Indulgence of all thy offences committed by seeing hearing smelling tasting and touching As to the anointing reins breasts and feet though these vnctions haue nothing of the essentiall matter yet as to them a Priest ought to obserue the custome of that particular Church wherunto he is subiect howeuer decency requireth that he omit to anointe the reins and breasts of sick women CHAR. XIX OF THE
scripturae and comfort of the scripturs may haue hope Rom. 15. although they doe not define and iudge all matters of faith and religion yet they (l) The Apostle 2. Timot. 3. Saith that all scripture is giuen by inspiration from God and is profitable to teach argue correct and instruct in iustice That is according to the ancient Fathers to resiste conuince and condemne false doctrines Wherfore according to the same Apostle ad Tit. l. a Bishop must be vnreproueable embracing the faithfull word and sound doctrine that he may be able to exhort and conuince those which say against it conduce mainly therunto tending specially to christian instruction and erudition besides they stir vs vp to ioyne vertue with faith and with vertue knowledg and with knowledg temperance and with temperance patience and with patience godliness and with godliness loue 2. Epis 2. Pet. which is the consistency and plenitude of the law Scripturs are liud * S. Ambros Epis 19. vocat sacras scripturas fontes viuos qui saliunt in vitam aeternam fountains springing vp vnto euerlasting life but the keeping and dressing of them is cōmitted only to the Church of Christ that was the rock whence they sprāg it is the christian catholick Church taught of the holy Ghost that cōprehēdeth the bredth lenght depth and hight of these heauenly fountaines which is to say it is a speciall prerogatiue giuen to the Church of Christ to interpret infallibly and iuridically the holy scripturs (m) According to S. Hierom Epis ad Paulum S Chrys hom 40. in Ioa. S. Austin l. 4. de doct christ cap. 3. the hardness of holy scrpitures proceeds from the profoundnes copiousnes compendiousnes therof in consequence of which a right vnderstanding of sundry passages of necessary depends of tradition as well obserues S. Austiu l. de fide oper and S. Hierom in his scripture prologue ingeniously confesseth that he could not vnderstandand the holy Prophets Isaias Ieremy and Daniel again S. Irenaeus l. 3. cap. 7. Orig. in explic Epis ad Rom. and S. Austin l. de fide oper cap. 14. confess with one accorde that S. Paul is hard to be vnderstood and especially in regard he vseth frequent hyperboles which proceeded from the vehemency of the spirit that guided his pen. which profoundness of misteries plenteousness of senses shortness of sentences haue rendred obscure hard and intricate as plainly appeareth by the holy writers of the old law namely Isay Ieremy Ezechiel Daniel and of the new law Saint Paul especially according to the testimony of Saint Peter 2. Pet. 3. wherein he speaketh of his writings thus * S. Irenaue l. 3. cap. 7. scribens de Haereticis testatur Paulū hyperbolis vti frequenter propter impetu spiritus qui in ipso fuit Idē sentiūt Origines explicat Epistolae ad Rō Aug. de fide operibus cap. 14. 15. our Brother Paul in all his Epis mentioneth things in which Epistles some things are hard to be vnderstood which they that are vnlearned and vnstable wrest as they doe also others scripturs vnto their own perdition for further proofe of this catholick assertion may be alledged the perpetuall contention between one sectary and an other concerning the interpretation of scripture Texts in reference to controuersies of faith for example from the words This is my body Luc. 22. Lutherans doe argue the true and real presence of Christs body in the Sacrament together with the substance of bread contrariwise Caluinists infer a meer figure of Christs body Anabaptists deduce out of the commission Christ gaue vnto his Apostles Math. 18. goe and teach all nations baptizing them in the name of the Father c. That baptism ought not to be administrated but to such as are de facto apt to receiue instruction And the Arians misinterpreting that saying of Christ Io. * Apud S. Joan. dicit Christus Pater maior me est alibi ego Pater vnum sumus Posterior textus explicatur ab Arianis de vnitate consensus conformitate voluntatū My Father is greater then I denied his Godhead the holy scriptures are a great light of christian doctrine for they are the dictates of the holy Ghost yet not sufficient enough to let vs see the way to euerlasting life vnless they be set on the cādlestick of the * Vt luceat omnibus qui in domo sūt Mat. 5. Church it is not the same thing to be a light and to enlighten a light vnder a bushell is a light and shineth there howeuer it doth not giue light to all that are in the house but when it is put on the candlestick Math. 5. euen so the scripturs light put vnder a bushell that is vnder the interpretation of priuate wits continueth a shining light in it selfe neuertheless doth not enlighten vnto euerlasting life but when it is put on the candlestick of infallible authority proper to the Church of Christ Again the scripture is a booke written within and on the backside Apoc. 5. the outward writing is the letter that killeth the inward the spirit that giueth life 2. Cor. 3. as the soul quickneth the body (n) S. Austin ser 70. de tempore expounding the sacred Text Epis ad Cor. the letter killeth the spirit quikneth If saith he thou follow the true sense of scripture which is the spirit that giues life to the soule it will bring thee vnto saluation but if thou shalt neglect the true sense adhering to the outward letter presuming the true sense to be therein it will often tymes lead thee into errour And according to Tertul. l. de resur carnis Heresies spring vp in regard the scriptures are misinterpreted And he speaking of S. Pauls Epistles affirms that it ought not to seem a hard thing or any way strang that from thence errours should arise since heresies must be 1. Cor. 11. which notwithstanding would not be if the scriptures were interpreted aright Heresies must be not becaus God hath appointed that they should be but because he permitted that they might be and mans free will together with pride and malice makes them to be against Gods positiue will howeuer the supream prouidence from euil heresies draws good things soe the spirit or sense of the scriptures quickneth the letter but to come vnto the spirit of necessity there is required the opening of the booke which the Church onely can doe trusted with the key of authority that openeth it wherfore in as much as many men down from the begining of christianity to these times haue adhered rather to the letter then to the sense of scripture and thence cut out vnauthorized interpretations of their own many heresies haue sprung vp to the distruction of infinit souls wherof Christ prophesying said heresies must be He fore saw that euen of such as were incorporated into his Church would men rise * S. Cypri Epis 55. ad Cornelium Nec aliunde
for as seruants present vnto their lords a cup of drink so persecutours reach vnto those they persecute a chalice of affliction wherby they serue and help them to a purchase of heauenly blessednes A goldsmith serueth a king when he maketh for him a crown of Royalty persecutours serue good Christians when they afflict them in as much as they deuise and forme for them crowns of eternity and with ihe hammer of persecution fit them to their heads Wherfore though persecutours lorde it while they inflict torments neuertheless they are indeed but the seruants of the tormented and only aboue them as chaff is aboue the good grain not because they are more worthy but in regard they be more light and when the time of winowing with the fan of diuine justice shall come God will make clean his floore and gather his good grain into his garner but will burn vp the chaff with vnquencheable fire Mat. 30. Wherfore persecutours of justmen * Aug. in psal 53. florent inquit iniusti persecutores felicitatesaeculi pereunt in virtute Dei Non enim quomodo florent pereunt florent enim ad tempus pereunt in eternum florent falsis honis pereunt veris tormentis doe not perish as they florish they florish for a short time and perish for euer Furthermore good Christians vnder the blak rod of tribulation in as much as they suffer for God and doc not desert him in their sufferings God doth not desert them he is with them in their trouble and deliuereth and glorifieth them God went down * Sap. 10. descendit eiâ— illo Joseph in foueam in vinculis non deroliquit eâ—m with Ioseph into the dungeon and left him not in the bands he couereth them vnder his wings and secureth them * Ps 90 scapulis suit obumbrabit tibi sub pennis cius sperabis .... cu ipso sum in tribulatione eripiaÌ„ eum glorificabo cum vnder his Feathers he is their sheild buckler and fortress he is near to all that call vpon him in truth Psal 104. He was not farre * Ion. 2. orauit Ionas ad Dominum Deum suum de ventre piscis c. from Ionas whom he mercifully heard euen praying out of the fishes belly while the waues of the sea compassed him about he foresook not Daniel in his den of affliction for Daniel prayed vnto him * Dan. 6. Deus meus misit Angelum suum conciuâ—â— ora leabum c. and he sent his Angell to shut the lyons mouthes that they might not hurt him his Angell likewise descended with Azarias and his fellowes into the hot fiery furnace quenched the flames of the fire and made the midds of the furnace as a wind of dew blowing * Misit Angelum suum eruit seruos suos qui crediderunt in eum and the fire had no power ouer their bodyes for not an hair of their head was burnt Daniel 3. The wind of dew blowing in the mids of the furnace denotat's the spirit of God giuing comfort in the midds of tribulation as that wind did so mitigate and temper the hot fire of the furnace that it had no power ouer the bodies of the three Innocent children so doth the spirit of God mitigate and sweeten the afflictions which innocent Christians suffer for his sake that they may not be swallowed vp with ouermuch heauines Wherfore such as are vnder the black rod of persecution haue no cause to fear or apprehend prejudice therby hauing God ready to defend them and his spirit to comfort them which is all sweet and sends influences of diuine sweetnes to their hearts that stirs them vp to praise bless and glorify him with Azarias and his fellows in the midds of their affliction and to pray with S. Paul Blessed be God the Father of our lord Iesus-Christ the Father of mercies and the God of all comfort which comforteth us in all our tribulations 2. Cor. 10. CHAR. XIJ. OF CHRISTIAN FAITH THE CONTENTS Christian faith is a gift of God conuinceth the truth of things that are not seen and bringeth into captivity all vnderstanding to the obedience of Christ through faith poor fishermen subdued kings and Emperors vnto embracing Christian Religion deuils belieue and tremble yet haue nothing of diuine faith being they want obedience the greatest praise of a faithfull Christian is to confess with his toungue outwardly what he belieueth with his heart inwardly faith without good works proceeding from diuine grace through the merits of Christ is a body without life faith alone cannot iustify no man through faith is certain that his sinns are forgiuen him CHristian faith is the substance of things hoped for As substance giues existence to the thing which it is the substance of so Christian faith causeth the existence of the thing hoped for representing it as present that during this life is absent with greater certainty then if the hand toucht or the eye saw it It is (a) According to the Apostle Hebr. 13. faith is the substance of things hoped for the argument of things which are not feen but S. Austin l. 2. de pec merit remis cap. 30. defining diuine faith in room of argument vseth conuiction saying faith is the substance of things hoped and the conuiction of things which are not seen that is faith as a strong argument conuinceth the truth of things vnseen the conuiction of things not seen that is to say neither by sense conceiued nor by reason comprehended * Ephes 2. Dei enim donuÌ„ est nempe fides It is the diuine gift that brings into * 2. Cor. 10. in captiuitatem redigentes omnem intelictum in obsequium Christi captiuity all vnderstanding to the obedience of Christ in a firme assent to supernaturall truth supernaturally reueiled and propounded by the authority of the Catholick Church to be beleiued This captiuity is a supernaturall motion laid on the will which it inclineth effectually and vseth nothing of violence it proceeds * 1. Pet. 2. qui de tenebris vocauit eos in admirabile lumen suum from the marueilous light of saith that enlightens the mind among the dark mists of errour As the carbuncle hath a singuiar prerogatiue of brightnes beyond all other precious stones which is to shine in darknes and chase away night so faith hath a speciall excellency of light aboue all other vertues which is to dissipate the darknes (b) Vnless God had been the author of Christian faith and assisted the Apostles poor fishermen that preach'd it the conuersion of so many kings Emperors and other illustrious Princes to the faith of Christ had been impossible for abstracting from diuine assistance it had not been as to reason consonant that so great Monarchs might euer haue been perswaded to despice wordly pleasures riches and honours vnto embracing of humility pouerty and the ignominious Cross of Christ for a reward of happines
the feast before the vigil that is they feast before they fast the present and the next life are as it were two dayes wherof one is the vigil the other the feast the present time is after the similitude of a vigil the time of rest to come after death is as a festiuall solemnity good Christians wisely consider this Wherfore in this present life as in a vigil they suffer many tribulations exercising often watching in hungre and thirst and often fasting in cold and nakednes but when the festiuall tyme of the next life is come they doe then feast for euer and are clothed in white robs of glory but the wicked which inuert the order that the supream prouidence hath appointed feasting in the vigil that is in the tyme of this life wheras they should haue prayed fasted watched put on sackcloath and suffered tribulation in punishment of their sins when the festiuall day shall come they will be spoiled of their rich garments depriued of their pleasures and cast into vtter darknes of hell to keep an euerlasting fast in torments Yet in regard the soul of man is a nobler part then the body the best abstinence is in order to it wherfore S. Paul 1. Coloss 4 declareth that it is the will of God our sanctification that is the command of God who hath not called vs vnto vncleanes but to holynes of life that we abstaine from fornication and S. Peter 1. Pet. 20. in the person of God beseecheth and exhorteth that we will abstaine from fleshly lustes which fight against the soul and indeed to fast from and without sin * Cor sapiens inzelligibile abstinebit à peccatis is the true fast vnto saluation for he that fasteth with the guilt of a mortall offence offereth the body to God * Rom. 12. obsecro vos per misericordiā Dei vt exhibeatis corpora vestra hostiam vinentem nō mortuam as a dead carkeise only that wanteth the spirit of life but he that fasteth both from and without sin giueth the body a liuing sacrisice holy and acceptable vnto God Hereby appeareth the manifest blindnes of many carnall and sensuall men which say that they cannot abstaine from the pleasures of this life that t' is impossible to fast from vnclean affections that t' is not in the power of any whosoeuer to stop the course of the law of wantonnes written in the flesh to the mastring of fleshly lustes carnall loue when it engrosseth all power to it selfe and beareth rule maketh men foolishly mad for euen then the most carnall man can fast from meates which he thinkes will prejudice the body but not from sin though he know it will * Aug. omn◠seminarium voluptatis venenū puta ' id est voluptas est animae mortifera poyson the soul likewise shame can refrain him from the exercise of his fleshly lustes in the sight of a temporall Prince (a) S. Hierom compareth abstinence to a wine-press in as much as it purgeth out of our souls the aboundant humours of sin and indeed abstinence is able to driue away the deuil for according to S. Ambrose as fasting spitle is poyson to a serpent so abstiinence is to the deuil And some kind of deuils cannot be cast out but by prayer and fasting Mat. 17. howeuer he is not ashamed to commit fornication in the presence of God who is the Prince of Princes But the spirituall man that is wise and vnderstanding will abstaine from sin Eccle. 30. CHAR. XXVIJ OF FORTITVDE THE CONTENTS Fortitude taken in the proper sense inclineth neither to the right nor left hand that is attempteth nothing of danger out of vashnes and escheweth nothing of difficulty out of pusillanimity many enterprises begin happely which end vnhappely the gift of perseuerance only is able to crown the vertue of fortitude FOrtitude taken in the proper sense is strength whereby a iust man is enabled to ouercome the works of the flesh which are adultery fornication vncleanes wantonnes emmulations contentions seditions heresies euuy murder drunkennes glutony and such like Gal. 5. (a) S. Ambrose and S. Gregory ascribe true fortitude to such only as bear rule ouer their passions feight against all vices and endure persecution for Iustice sake cheerfully fortitude is the conquerer of all vices and the defender of all vertues in as much as it quencheth the heat of fleshly lustes extinguisheth the fire of vnclean delights refraineth the inbrdinat pleasures of this life moderateth the sweetnes of prosperity sweeteneth the bitternes of aduersity (b) S. Hierom. com in Esa counteth those which turn to the right rash and those which incline to the left hand faint hearted and S. Austin Epis ad Hierom teacheth that such as haue the vertue of fortitude neither attempte rashly nor feare vnaduisedly declineth neither to the right or left hand that is attempteth nothing of danger out of rashnes and flyeth nothing of difficulty out of feare loueth persecution for iustice vnto obtaining a crown of reward for merit but as fortitude is the armour of all vertues so all vertues respectiuely are the support of fortitude for example as fortitude is the sheild that defendeth faith (c) According to S. Austin faith is the ground of all good things and the root of all other vertues so faith is the root that bringeth forth fortitude for God giues fortitude to those who with a prefect heart beleiue in him 20. parae 16. as fortitude is the preseruer of hope so hope is the renewer of fortitude for they that hope in our lord shall renue their strength Esa 40. as fortitude rendreth * Cantico 8. fortis est vt mors dilectio charity as strong as death Can. 8. so charity giueth fortitude power (d) The Apostle 1. Cor. 13. denyeth that there is any meritorious work without charity and indeed Charitas est principium meriti and according to S. Austin if a man hath charity he can do what pleaseth him for nothing of wickednes can proceed from the root of charity for the meriting of life 1. Colos 13. yet there is but one vertue that crowneth fortitude which is perseuerance for he only that continueth strong in the exercise of good works to the end shall be saued Perseuerance is the coat of Ioseph reaching down to the feet the preistly garment coming down to the ancles the rump of the peace offering due to God the heel of good works that protecteth against the bite of serpents Augus ser 8. ad fratres in Erenio tom 10. no man that striueth for a prize is crowned except he striueth as he ought to doe perseuering to the end a good begining without a good ending hath nothing of profit Saul when he began to raign was humble and innocent as a child of one year 1. Reg. 13. Saul falling of from humility and innocency lost his kingdom together with his life if Salomon had perseuered in godlines he had
not been depriued of wisdom nor Sampson of his mighty strength if he had taken diligent ligent heed * Mat. 10. Iuda vna cuÌ„ alijs Apostolis dixit Iesus euntes praedicare dicentes quia appropinquauit Regnum calorum infirmos curate mortuos suscitate leproses mundate demones eijcite and what auaileth Iudas his election to the high dignity of an Apostle his familiarity with Christ his society with other Apostles and the power giuen him against vnclean spirits to cast them out to heal euery sicknes and to raise vp the dead Mat. 10. seeing his good begining ended in wicked treachery to the deliuering vp of his diuine lord vnto death many begin well that end ill many depart from Egypt and come to the wildernes which do not enter into the land of promise that is many are brought to the marueilous light of Christian faith euen vnto iustification of life that come not vnto glorification he that endureth to the end shall be saued Without (e) S. Bernard Epis 29. ad Ianuenses assureth that without perseuerance neither those which fight can gain the victory nor those which ouercome obtaine the prize perseuerance neither he that striueth to get the victory nor he that ouercometh obtaines the prize And although perseuerance be a diuine gift freely giuen * Aug. I de prad SS aliqua inquit danda praeparari à Deo non orantibus vt initium fidei alia vero non nisi orantibus vt donuÌ„ persenerantiae neuertheless the feruent (f) According to S. Austin I. de dono perseu c. 6. an humble prayer can merit the gift of perseuerance merito de congruo duntaxat and he means finall perseuerance And indeed t is but meet that a friend grant assurance of his friendship to his friend that humbly intercedes for it prayer of a just man conduceth some thing to the hauing of it Hereby is plainly euident that true fortitude does not consist in the arme of flesh or in the outward gallantry of euery man but in the spirit of a just Christian that ouercometh the lusts of the flesh vnto sanctifying and glorifying the soul in consequence of which the fortitude of Mutius Sceuola of Cocles of Attilius Regulus so much renowned and extoiled by the Roman writers was but a shadow of true fortitude in regard their braue enterprises and gallant sufferings tended meerly to get a name vnto perpetuating a memoriall of their own praise that therby the remembrance of their gallantry might be as hony sweet in all mouthes for the future No man how glorious soeuer his actions or passions appeare in the sight of the world can lay claim to true fortitude when they doe not tend to the glory of the soul Many heathen Captains which haue been renowned to the ends of the earth for valiantnes are not now crowned in heauen for fortitude for though with their courage they mastred fortresses of earth vnto winning of Cities yet they did not ouercome the works of the flesh vnto the obtaining of blessednes wherin is the consistency of true fortitude CHAR. XXVIIJ OF SIN THE CONTENTS God that made all things of nothing made not sin which is nothing The deuil is the sole author of sin wherby he maketh those his seruants which he ouercom's through a voluntary condescension thereto to whomsoeuer a man giueth himselfe to obey his seruant he is exceeding great miseries accompany the seruitude of sin to be deliuered from the bondage of sin is a worke of diuine grace whereby a finner turneth to God his maker whith a penitent heart confessing his wickednes against himselfe SIn taken in the formall sense (a) God made all things and vvithout him vvas made nothing 10. 10. where according to S. Austin by the particle nothing is meant sin which God made not and indeed sin taken in the formall sense hath nothing of a reall entity being a meer priâ—â—tion of that conformity to the law of God which ought to be in all in ward and outward human actions that is to say in all our outward deeds and inward thoughts Wherefore S. Austin l. 22. con Faustum Manichae defineth sin to be That vvich is done or said or coueted contrary to the eternall lavv so that outward deeds or sayings or inward thoughts are the acts only whereby sinnes are committed is nothing yet not that nothing of which God created all things that were very good but that nothing of which the deuil hath made all things which are very euill For example the deuil through sin ouercame man and thereby brought him into seruitude for of whomsoeuer one * 2. Pet. 2. à quouis superatus est huius seruus is ouercome euen vnto the same is he in bondage which is an euil thing because a slaue is tyed to the will of his master wherefore a sinner * S. Chris homo obligatus peccato per propriam voluntatem iaÌ„ non agit quod vult sed quod diabolus vult of necessity as it were walketh after the flesh in the lusts of vncleanes being it is the deuils will whose slaue he is that he doe so A stag that is once mastred by an other stag afterwardes resisteth him no more * Sic referuÌ„t naturales de ceruo victo but boweth down his head whensoeuer he passeth in presence of his conquerour in token of his subiection a maid that once suffereth her selfe to be deflowred will go whether it pleaseth the deflourer euen so he that is once ouercome of the deuil through voluntary condescention vnto sin afterwards is vnwilling to resist him some times it is in the power of man to make king whomsoeuer he pleases but once made he cannot vnking him at his pleasure for To whomsoeuer we giue our selues as seruants to obey his seruants we are to whom we obey whether it be of sin vnto death or of obedience vnto iustice Rom. 6. Wherfore as a seruant cannot cast of the yoke of seruitude when or as he pleaseth so neither can a sinner according to the form of morall speech (b) The Apostle in his Epistle to the Rom. cap. 7. saith Not the good things vvhich I vvould but the euill vvhich I vvould not that doe I novv if I doe that I vvould not it is no more I that do it but the sin that dvvelleth in me whereby is meant that the iustest man carryed by the violence of carnall concupiscence which he calleth sin taken in a larg sense may do or suffer many things in his outward parts or faculties without the consent of his will in consequence whereof a man put in that condition is so far from sinning sin taken in the proper sense for a voluutary act of the will that according to S. Austin he neuer need say to God forgiue us our sins for sin vnless it be voluntary contractes nothing of guilt that is ther 's no sin taken in the proper sense without a free consent of the
will free himselfe of his bondage at his pleasure As a ship that hath lost her helme cannot sail whether and as her self would but is caryed whether and as the wind will euen so a sinner that is depriued of the helme of grace cannot doe the good things which he should but the euill which he should not and as ship of it self can descend but not ascend so a man by the power of his own free will can fali into But cannot rise from sin The works of nature (c) God said by the mouth of his Prophet Ose cap. 13. Perdition is thine O Israel onely in me is thine help whereby is clearly euidenced that the euils which happen come of our own procurement in regard of the sinnes we commit which do not proceed from God who cannot be the author of euil as it is an euil worke though according to the Prophet Amos cap. 3. he is cause of punishment due to sin which is called malum poena But God punisheth in order to amendement in this life and Iustice after death so that those which amend their life need not feare the diuine iustice after death can cast him down but the works of grace only can raise him vp again that he is a seruant of sin and freed of iustice is his own free act but that he is freed of sin and a seruant vnto iustice is the work of grace through IESUS-CHRIST and indeed if the works of nature were sufficient enough to raise vp a sinner vnto iustification of life Christ had dyed * Ga. 2. so per legem iustitia ergo Christus gratis mortuus vnde Aug. infert contra Pelagi Si per naturaÌ„ tustitia ergo Christus graits moriuus ergo scandalum crucis euacuatum est without cause Furthermore besides this bondage there be sundry other euil things which the deuil hath made of sin for he that sinneth speakes * Jsa 5. va vobis qui dicitis maluÌ„ bonum bonum malum ponentes tenebras lumeÌ„ lumen tenebras poneÌ„tes amarum in dulce dulce in amaruÌ„ good of euill and euil of good puts darknes for light and light for darknes puts bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter goes far from the springs of liue waters and dyes in the waters of vnclean delights that is to say a sinner preferreth wickednes to godlines ignorance to knowledg vice to vertue and death to life for as much as he forsaketh God his creator without whom nothing can be lightened sweetened sanctified quickened know therefore says the holy Prophet Ieremy cap. 2. and Behold ô sinner that it is an euil thing and bitter that thou hast for saken God thy lord which is an infinit treasure of good things The deuil makes a couenant with euery man that sinneth which is like the league * 1. Reg. 11 Naas interpretatur serpens significat diabolum of Naas the Amonite 1. Reg. 11. on condition that he may thrust out his right eye that is his obedience to God and his loue to spirituall things which is a very ill agreement in regard it spoileth him of knowledg grace and glory a chess player by one negligent remouall or touch of his men a miss often times loseth the whole game and the whol gaine too euen so one sin destroyeth much good Eccles 9. for euen When a iust man turneth away from his iustice and committeth iniquity all his iustice that be bath done shall not be remembered but in his transgression that he hath committed and in his sin that be bath sinned in them shall be dye Ezech. 8. That is when a sinner does not cast away from him his wickednes wherby he hath taken the couenant of the deuil and turne to God with a new heart and a new spirit but die in the bitternes of his soul he shall lose all the fruit of his good works together with the glory of Heauen Neither are these all the euill things that the deuill hath made of sin for the burdens which he layes on the shoulders of him that sinneth mortally are most beauy and grieuous and albeit that for the present they seem sweet and light yet afterwards they press him down as he that in water drawes a log of wood feels not the full waight therof till he come to land so the burden of a sinner is not felt in the waters of fleshly delights and the pleasures of this life but when he shall goe out of them that is when he shall depart out of the world he will find the (d) S Iohn Apoca. 8. faith that the waters destroy many that is worldly delights which after death are made bitter water in which he delighted as bitter as wormwood and the load that sin laid on his neck so heauy that it will suppress him suddenly for as lightening descends from Heauen in the turne of an eye so a sinner will fall down into hell in * Job 21. in puncto descendune ad inferos Ex Luc. 10. videbam Satanam sicut fulgur de calo cadentem a trice which is the place of diuine execution in punishment of transgressions As earthly kings haue faire lodgings for the entertaining of the good people and dark prisons for the punishing of malefactours so the king of glory that is exalted aboue all Princes of the earth hath goodly pallaces for delighting such as do well which is Heauen and dungeons of vtter darknes for tormenting of those that doe euill which is hell where the wicked experience in bitter suffering the power of him whose mercy in bountifull gifts they haue despiced as he that walketh in iustice and shutteth his eyes from seeing euill shall dwell on high with God in full enjoyment of all good things so he that deuiateth from the waies of godlines and delighteth in the pathe of iniquity when the number of his life is cut of (e) The Prophet Isaias cap. 33. expressing the punishments which the wicked endure after their death speaketh to sinners thus Who among yee can endure to dvvell vvith the deuouring fire vvho among yee vvith euerlasting burnings Wherfore S. Gregory saith that the death of the wicked is an euerlasting death shall dwell below with the deuil in deuouring fire and euerlasting burnings which is a death without dying and sorrow without ending for death there is alwayes * S. Gregorâ—â—it miseris â—â—ors sine â—â—â—rte begining and sorrow neuer ending in reguard the deuouring fire is for euer burning and no deliuerance from hell which is a laborynth in the mids of the earth though easely entred into yet affordes no guid or thread to direct out againe and the windings and turnings therof minister nothing of pleasure for brimstone is scattered in euery walke * Job 14. vndique terrebunt eum formidines and trouble anguish feares together with dispaire and horrible confusion be on euery side hope of blessednes being rooted out of this dwelling yet
that is to say such as are not mēbers of Christs Church haue no right to the mysticall meate and drink which is the reall body and blood of Christ 11. The corporall and linnen clothes that couer the Altar doe signify the linnen cloath that wrapped the sacred Body of Christ when he was laid in the sepulcher Io. 19. Furthermore besides the many religious visible ceremonies God commanded to be employed in exhibition of diuine worship during the continuance of the old law Exod. 29. Christ Authour of the new law instituted sundry ceremonies and rites which be of necessity namely washing with water in Baptism imposition of hands and anoynting with consecrated oyle in the Sacrament of Order c. Yea Christ himself practised visible ceremonies for he fell on his face and prayed Io. 26. lift vp his eyes and prayed Io. 11. lift vp his hands and blessed Luc. 24. Besides when he found in the Temple which is a sensible ceremonie too deputed vnto diuine worship those that sold oxen sheep and doues c. Io. 20. he was offended to see his Fathers howse made an howse of marchandice Hereby is euidently plain that Christ when in his conference with the Samaritan Woman Io. 4. said the hower cometh and now is when the true adorers shall adore the Father in spirit and truth he did not meane that he was come to take away sacrifice Sacraments prayers Churches and all other sensible ceremonies practised in the seruice of the new law but for as much as the cited Text is often tymes alledged by ancient and moderne sectaries especially against all visible rites of christian religion it will conduce greatly to vndeceiuing the deceiued in the sense and meaning therof if they consider duely that the Samaritans were Schismaticks as Luther and Zuinglius religious men both and Priests illegally and sacrilegiously marryed against the holy Canons and vowed chastity went out from the catholick Church in the time of Henry the eight king of England and began a schism in Germany likewise as Ballev Peter Martyr Martin Bucher c. Apostat-wedded-priests also in the reign of Edward the Sixt a childe began the schism in England countenanced and supported by Bishop Cranmer specially to which Henry the eight king Edwards Father had opened a doore only so a certain Priest of the Iews called Mansses to retain and enjoy an vnlawfull wife fell from the society of the faithfull Iewes at Hierusalem and broached schism in Samaria Besides as Luther and those other afore mentioned to establish their schisms leaped * Ioseph l. 11. Antiquit cap. 8. est propriū inquit Haereticis Schismaticis transilire capita antiquarum Ecclesiarum vt suam reddant Religionem antiquissimam ouer the heads of all christian Churches then and for many ages before establish't pretending that these were not agreeing with Christ and his Apostles in the essentialls of doctrine worship and gouernment and in consequence thereof made reformation the disguised end of their leape in like manner Manasses to render his schism plausible and taking with that people he leaped ouer the Prophet Moyses to Iacob the Patriarch and ouer the Temple in Ierusalem to the Temple of the Samaritans in Mount Garizim tying thereto the sacrifice of the Iews religion vpon pretence that the said Patriarch Iacob had therin adored long before the Temple of Salomon was built or the law giuen to obtain superiority in his schism he gaue the preeminence in Church-seruice to the place wherin he began it This was the true cause that moued the faithfull Iews to abstain from the company and conuersation of the Samaritans who maintained their adoring in Garizim to be more ancient then the worship of the Iews in Ierusalem In regard of this contention about the Temple in Ierusalem and the Temple in Garizim the Samaritan woman conceiuing Christ to be some Prophet for as much as he had reuealed vnto her the secret passages of her whole life propounded vnto him a Theologicall question touching the afore said controuersy on design to be informed to which of the two publick (e) According to holy scriptures by publick solemn adoration is meant proper sacrifice namely Joan. 12. and There vvere certain Gentils amongst them that came vp to adore at the feast And Act. 8. the Euneuch came vp to adore in Jerusalem in both these scripture-places by adoration which was publick and solemn is vnderstood proper sacrifice that was offered onely in Ierusalem but all other adorations outward and inward might be vsed in any whatsoeuer place besid's Ierusalem adoration or sacrifice was tyed and confined saying Our Fathers adored in this mountaine and ye say that in Ierusalem is the place where men ought to adore that is to offer sacrifice to which Christ replying (f) The Iews and Samaritans contended about the place of sacrifice and for as much as both of them were in fault therefore Christ form'd his answere in order to both Although the Iews sacrifice was the true sacrifice neuertheless it was vnprofitable being not able to procure sanctifying grace but the Samaritans sacrifice was erroneous for they were schismaticks and adored that is offered sacrifice where God would not haue had them that is they offered sacrifice out of Gods Temple in Ierusalem and therefore Christ said to the Samaritan woman Yee adore vvhat yee knovv not said woman belieue me the houre cometh when ye shall neither in this mountaine nor at Ierusalem adore the Father c. Wherby he for'told her that the adoration or sacrifice as to both the Temples should shortly cease and be disannulled and that the true sacrifice suddenly to be instituted in room therof should not be tyed to one place or nation but should be offered in all the parts of the world according to the Prophecy of Malachias cap. 10. and instructed her with all concerning this new sacrifice signifying that is should not be a gross and carnall adoration exhibited in and by the flesh and blood of goates sheepe oxen c. as afore but that it should be a clean adoration or sacrifice containing in it selfe spirit grace and life which the others wanted yea that it should be the verity it self wherof all former sacrifices were shadowes and figures only wherefore Christ told her that the new adorers should adore the Father in spirit that is to lay should offer to God a sacrifice giuing grace and life Christ did not inculcate adoration of God in spirit to condemne adoration vnder whatsoeuer sensible rites and ceremonies but to exclude the carnall adoration or sacrifice of the Iews that wanted spirit to giue life to the soul In like manner Christ did intimate adoration of God in verity to condemne the erroneous worship of the Samaritās who albeit they did adore the true God of Israel neuertheless being Schismaticks they did not adore him in verity because they adored him out of the communion and vnity of the faithfull Iews and in the mountaine of Garizim
whosoeuer eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood hath eternall life and except you shall eate the flesh of the son of man and drinke his blood you haue no life in you again the bread that I will giue is my flesh for the life of the world Thus saith S. Austin ser 2. de verbis Apos c. 1. life said of life and to him that thinketh life to be a lyer this meat shall be death and not life The bread that I will giue is my flesh for the life of the world c. Thereby signifying plainly his intent of leauing to his Church his substantiall reall body in meate and his substantiall reall blood in drinke as an effectuall expedient for the obtaining eternall life for alwaies the words of Christ or God which doe importe a thing promised tending to mans saluation ought to be vnderstood in the sense wherein they be outwardly expressed in scripture that is to say * Aug. l. de doc Chris cap. 10. 16. in sermone inquit diuino id omne pertinet ad sensum literalem id est debet accipi literaliter vt verba sonāt non figuratè quod potest referri ad morum honestatem vel fidei veritatem locutio quae iubet vel vtilitatē vel beneficentiā est propria non figuratiua secundum Iustinum codice de legibus litterally setting aside Tropes and mysticall significations Besides a law or precept that exact's obedience from subjects and such indeed is the legacy of the new Testament ought to be cleare and plain to the vnderstanding of euery man that each one may decline what is forbidden and obserue what is enjoyned For no law or precept can be vnderstood by all subjects if the words thereof be mysticall or figuratiue but Christ to shew that he spok according * Concil Nicae quod est 7. synodus generalis Act. 6. probat ex citato Textu Jo. 6. con Iconiclastas Sacramentum Eucharistiae non esse imaginem Christi sed verum reale corpus erus probat insuper ex eodem loco Trid. sess 21. can 1. laicos non adctrings iure diuine ad communionem sub vtraque specie to the plain litterall sense when he perceiued that the Capharnaits for in the synagogue at Capharnaum Christ taught these thinges began to reason among themselues concerning the possibility of giuing his flesh to eate and his blood to drinke he did not correct their conceptions as to orall manducation and orall drinking thereof yet his custome (c) In regard Nicodemus conceiu'd spirituall regeneration after the similitude of naturall generation Christ rectifyed his vnderstanding in regard the Pharisees Io. 16. Mat. 15. imagined that a meer omission of washing their hand 's before refection was a grieuous crime Christ instructed them in the knowledge of sin and in regard the Apostles made a wrong construction of his saying in order to eating his body anddrinking of his blood Christ forthwith expounded his meaning telling them that the words he had spoken were spirit and life that is according to S. Austin Epis 98. they were spiritually not carnally meant as if Christ had intended to giue vnto his Apostles particles of his body diuided from the whole so that Christ in order to the manner and that onely of eating his body and drinking of his blood corrected his Apostles was constant in conformity to his pastorall office to instruct his auditory conceiuing amiss of his sayings but repeated the same words confirmed with an oath saying to them Amen Amen except yee eat the flesh of the son of man and drink his blood yee haue no life in you which conuincingly shews that Christ spake not figuratiuely but litterally and indeed an oath is sworn to the end that such as doubt of the thinges promised or spoken may be assured of the true meaning of him that promiseth or speaketh any thing Hebrae 6. in consequence of which a thing confirmed with an oath ought to be interpreted in the * Innocentius 3. cap. veniens Extra de iuramento plain literall sense and according to the conceptions of those for whose sake an oath is sworn but the Capharnaits for whose sake Christ * Augus ait Christum iurasse dicēdo Amen Amen swore conceiued Christ to speake of orall manducation of his body and orall drinking of his blood wherefore it was that manner of eating and drinking that Christ confirmed with his oath but when he saw that his Disciples did misunderstand his meaning as to the eating his flesh and drinking his blood imagining him to mean that they were to eate his flesh and drink his blood with the mouth of their body after the manner of common meate and drink that is to teare Christs body and blood diuiding one part from an other in eating and drinking it he corrected (d) According to S. Cyprian ser de Coena Domini the intent and aime of Christs saying Ioan. 6. Vnlesse you eate c. was to instruct vs that our abiding in him is meate and drinke from whence Caluinists vnaduisedly infer that S. Cyprian interpreted Christs words Vnlesse you eate c. Of spiritualll manducation onely For in the place set down S. Cyprian expresly assertes that Christ cōmanded Christians in the new law to drink his blood the eating wherof in the old law Deut. 12. was prohibited which doubtless is meant of true reall drinking Wherefore S. Austin 9.57 in Leuit ingeniously confesseth that in the new law wee are as truly cōmanded to drinke the blood of Christ as were the Jews in the old law forbidden to drink the blood of sacrifices offered vnto expiating sins in consequence of which according to S. Cyprian and S. Austin reall drinking of Christs reall blood is commanded in the chapter alledged and instructed them as to the manner therof only saying The words that I spake vnto you are spirit and life that is sayes S. Aug. on the 98. Psal They ought not to be vnderstood carnally as if Christs intent had been to giue certaine particles or peices of his body diuided from the whole but they ought to be vnderstood spiritually which is to say that Christs body is in the Sacrament after the manner of a spirituall substance invisible indivisible whole and entire in the whole entire subject also whole and entire in each part thereof And here is observable that a reall substantiall and true body may be considered after two sundry fashions conformably to the Apostle that sayes 1. Cor. 15. A body is raised spirituall in incorruption that is sown naturall in corruption First as it is cloathed with terrene conditions and qualities which naturally accōpany a body in this mortall life For example visibility divisibility and mortality Secondly as it is deuested of such rayments of corporall accidents and inuested with the noble conditions and qualities of a spirit or spirituall substance namely invisibility indivisibility impassibility According to this latter consideration which is
reason lay claim to that passage as a proof of their forbidden doctrine in order to communion in both kind's in regard they deny that any part of the said chapter of S. Iohn is meant of sacramentall eating or drinking lest by assenting thereto they might be forced to grant Christs reall presence in the Sacrament which the chapter plainly declares if it shall beare an interpretation of sacramentall eating and drinking Howeuer the precept so interpreted doth not euince communion vnder both kinds to be enjoyned of necessity in order to each Christian in particular since according to scripture vsage the particle * Julius Paulus insignis Jurisconsultus ait comparatum esse vt coniuncta pro disiunctis accipiantur Di gestis de verborum significatione l. saepe And is frequently taken in a disiunctiue sense only For example S. Peter Act. 3. sayes Siluer and Gold haue I none where the particle And is taken disiunctiuely the true meaning thereof being Siluer or gold haue I none In like manner it is written Exod. 21. He that smiteth his Father and Mother so it is read in Hebrew shall die the death Where And is taken for or Again Math. 20. it is said by thy words thou shalt be iustified and by thy words thou shalt be condemned Where likewise the particle And is taken disiunctiuely for Or and Aristotle also taketh And in the disiunctiue sense when he defineth Nature to be Authour or cause of motion and rest all his interpreters vnderstanding the particle And in that definition to signify Or and truly by the latter particle And in the cited passage of scripture vêªt videlicet Except ye cate the flesh of the son of man and drink his blood See doubtless was meant Or as doe plainly demonstrate other word 's of Christ there set down wherby he explaines that precept saying v. 47. I am the bread of life v. 50. This is that bread that came down from Heauen If any man eate of this bread he shall liue for euer and the bread that I shall giue is my flesh which I shall giue for the life of the world Whereby is plainly euident that Christ did ascribe the effect of this Sacrament as common alike to the bread alone and to the bread and wine ioyntly Howeuer sectaries haue nothing of aduantage if the latter particle And in S. Iohn ought to be taken in the copulatiue sense for the precept euen so meant and indeed so catholick writers do vnderstand it importes an obligation only in order to the whole Church wherin there is neuer want of Priests that be obliged to communicate in both kinds as often as they offer sacrifice and not to each member therof In the old law God hauing iustituted Circumcision added this precept in generall tearmes viêªt videlicet Ye shall circumcise the foreskin of your flesh and notwithstanding only such had right to exercise that function as were deputed therunto by the Church or Synagegue which sheweth plainly that though the precept did oblige the whole Church or Synagogue yet it did not reach to each member thereof howeuer it seemes as if it had been enioyned in order to all vniuersally Again when God instituted the pascall lambe as a Sacrament and sacrifice also he imposed two precepts Exod. 12. the one Let euery man take vnto him a lambe the other all the multitude of the children of Israel shall kill it which two precepts though they be expressed in generall words to the obliging the whole Synagogue yet euery particular member therof had not right to choose and take vnto him a lamb and sacrifice it but the heads of each family only which executed Priestly function as to that sacrifice being a priuiledge giuen to them before Priesthood was appropriated to the family of Aaron as appeareth manifestly by the said chapter of Exod. As to the passages which some sectaries alledge out of S. Innocent Ep. 26. and S. Augustin lib. 7. against Iulian the Pelagian to proue a necessity of communion vnder both kinds in regard that these ancient Fathers expresly assert that Infants cannot be saued except they eate Christ's flesh and drinke his blood they make not a jot for them who require a presonall act of inward faith to the eating of Christ's body and drinking of his blood Infant 's being vncapable of exercising any such acction in consequence where of the alledged * Agunt Innocen Aug. contra Pelagium qui negabat peccatum originale in infantibus authorities afforde them nothing of aduantage But as to the true sense of these primitiue Fathers doubtless their meaning is only to shew that Infants cannot enter into the kingdome of God except they receiue sanctifying grace in baptism through the merits of Christ's body and blood that were offered for all men vnto remission of sins (d) According to Origin hom 29. in num we are said to drink of Christ's blood not only when we receiue the Sacrament but when wee heare his diuine word preach'd wherein is life according to Christ's own saying the Words vvhich I have spoken are spirit and life in as much as they be dispositions to diuine grace which is the life of the soul through the merits of Christ Again such as hear Mass deuoutly and ioyne in heart with the Priest receiue life and fruit by the Sacrament though they neither eate of Christ's body nor drink of his blood sacramentally Fourthermore in as much as Infants through baptism be made members of that Church which eateth Christ's flesh and drinketh his blood the same Church as it doth furnish them * Aug. Tom. 10. ser 10. de verbis Apostoli Mater Ecclesia inquit accommodat parvults alioruÌ„ pedes vt veniant ad Ecclesiam altorum cor vt credant alioruÌ„ linguam vt fatcantur it a Ecclesia accommodat aliorum ora vt comedant bibant with the feet of others to come vnto it with the heart of others to belieue and with the tongues of others to professe the christian faith in like manner according to a spirituall metaphoricall form of speech it may be said to furnish them with the mouths of others to eate Christ's flesh and drink his blood CHAR. X. OF PENANCE THE CONTENTS Penance hath a iust claim vnto all requisits necessary to a speciall Sacrament of the new law Christ after the similitude of an outward Court of iustice instituted an inward Tribunall where by diuine dispensation Priest's sit as Iudges of sinns committed after baptism whatsoeuer Priests judge here below God approu's aboue the power Christ gaue to the Apostles and heir successors in priestly function and authority was not onely to declare but effect indeed remission of hones in vertue of the word of reconciliation ioynt vnto a sinners sincere sorrow and humble Confession of his sinnes together with a full purpose to sin no more PEnance is a (a) There are three requisits necessary to the nature of a Sacrament of the
likwise defined that vnwritten Tradition the faithfull of these dayes might haue been * S. Basil dicit Sabellianismum esse queÌ„dam Iudaismum Sabellius voro qui omnibus hareticis impietate antecelluit eirca annum 260. haresim Trinitatis propagauit quod Prâ—xeas omniuÌ„ primus humo Romanae inuexit proximè accessit ad errorem Iudaeorum Sabellians or Iewes as for any clear speaking scripture to hinder them Again we belieue that the holy Ghost is not the son of God nor that his procession is generation taken in the proper sense notwithstanding without tradition and interpretation of the holy Church it cannot be proued sufficiently that is to say by express scripture-testimony nor matters it that the Euangelists doe name the second person of the blessed Trinity the only begotten son for hence it follows not by necessary consequence that the holy Ghost is no son for Salomon is styled the only begotten son Prouerb 4. Howeuer it plainly appeareth by the first booke of Paralipomenon or cronicles that he had many brothers yet he was named the only begotten son in regard he was beloued as if he had been the only begotten We must belieue that such (f) The Council of Nice hath defined that such as are baptized by hereticks must not be rebaptized And in regard the Donatists impugned this assertion which is grounded vpon tradition and the Churches definition they were counted hereticks and S. Aust I. de vtilitate credendi cap. 22. expresly affirms that the said assertion is not contained in any express scripture and indeed practice and tradition of the Church only was obiected against S. Cypri that asserted rebaptizing of such as were baptized by hereticks as appeares by his own Epistle ad Iubaian 74. ad Pompeium he conceiuing that he had scripture authority on his side left the Churches tradition and practice yet S. Austin in sundry places of his writings excuseth him from heresie because he was not obstinate in defending of his opinion neither did he break vnion with the Church Besid that controuersy rose before any generall Council defined validity of baptism conferred by Hereticks as are baptized by hereticks ought not to be baptized again wee must belieue that we are bound to keepe holy our lords day which is sunday and we must belieue that there is a necessary obligation to receiue the Apostles Creed yet for as much as none of all these doctrines be contained expresly in or can be deduced out of the holy scriptures by immodiate necessary and euident consequences they would haue nothing of weight with vs in the conuincing of our vnderstanding if the tradition and definition of the Church were laid a side Moreouer the Lutherans and Caluinists in regard they reject Church tradition adhering to the meer letter of scripture and their own interpretations thereof cannot as yet after frequent disputes euince against the Anabaptists that the SacrameÌ„t of Baptism ought to be administred vnto infants where they alledge the words of Christ set down Math. 19. suffer little children and forbid them not to come to me for of such is the kingdom of Heauen as also the practice of the Apostles that baptized whole housholds Act. 19. it is plainly euident that from neither of these testimonies they can as much as deduce by any necessary consequence what they assert as a doctrine of their faith namely that baptism ought to be applied to young children that want the vse of reason especially supposing (g) Caluin l. 4. insti c. 16. and the whole sect of Lutherans though they denyed baptism to be a requisit necessary to the saluation of children neuertheless in their conferences with Anabaptists ingeniously confessed that baptism might lawfully and indeed ought to be ministred vnto children what Lutherans and Caluinists hold as an other article of their reformed religion viz. that baptism is not absolutly necessary to saluation for as to the first testimony though by litle children Christ meant not such only as can goe and speake but also infants sucking their Mothers breasts neuertheless the words of Christ declare them only capable of blessedness without mentioning baptism at all Since then Lutherans and Caluinists doe teach that baptism is not an expedient absolutly necessary to blessedness they can infer nothing of moment and efficacy from these words of Christ to conuince the Anabaptists because the blessedness that is to say the kingdom of Heauen whereof Infants are declared capable may be obtained without baptisin according to Lutherans Caluinists and Anabaptists yet for as much as catholick faith teacheth absolute necessity of baptism out of S. Iohn Cap. 3. that except a man be borne againe of water he cannot enter into the kingdom of Heauen Catholicks can by a clear inference from the said words of Christ proue that Baptism ought euen of necessity to be administred to children because Christs words declare theÌ„ capable of the kingdom of Heauen and consequently of baptism that being an expedient absolutly necessary vnto the obtaining of it whosoeuer is capable of any end is likwise capable of the expedient or medium which is of absolute necessity in order to the purchasing of it As touching the latter scripture testimony though it containes a most pregnant coniecture or presumption that the Apostles when they baptized whole families baptised children with all neuertheless it is not sufficient enough to the grounding of an euident and necessary consequence vnto prouing that de facto they did so because experience sheweth that many whole housholds haue no children at all Wherefore it is cleare that neither of the scripture testimonyes do proue effectually the baptism of Infants laying aside the tradition and definition of the Church And truly Lutherans and Caluinists haue only meer coniectures and remote inferences drawn from the interpretation of their own priuat spirits which is the Mother of heresies to euince the foundamentall and essentiall doctrines of their reformed religion namly that faith alone iustifieth that there are but two Sacraments that no addresses of intercession ought to be made vnto Saints or prayers offered for the benefit of soules departed c. and it is a foundamentall article of Caluinism that the Sacrament of the Eucharist signifieth only the body of Christ being a meer figure thereof contrary wise it is a foundamentall article of Lutherans that the body of Christ is really contained in the Sacrament together with the substance of bread and though both Caluinists and Lutherans teach that the scriptures speake and propounde clearly doctrines of faith howeuer they haue not as yet reconciled that controuersy which notwithstanding the many conferences and disputes held about it continueth in debate Caluinists impute to the Lutherans an heresie or errour in faith for admitting and the Lutherans ascribe heresie vnto the Caluinists for denying the reall presence of Christs body and bloud in the Eucharist whereby appeareth plainly the necessity of Church tradition and interpretation for the deciding all hard