Selected quad for the lemma: spirit_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
spirit_n	body_n	holy_a	soul_n	16,669	5	5.2335	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A41581	Of laying on of hands Heb. 6. 2. Or, a discourse containing these 4. chapters. 1. Of the several ends of laying on of hands, in the New Testament. 2. What laying on of hands, is not, and cannot be meant. Heb. 6. 2. 3. What laying on of hands, is and must be meant there. 4. That the laying on of hands, practised by some in these days, on all baptized believers, was never instituted, commanded, nor practised at all, by Jesus Christ, or his apostles in all the New Testament.	Gosnold, John, 1625?-1678.	1656 (1656)	Wing G1311B; ESTC R223702	12,054	16

by this Pen-man to put and reckon it amongst such Principles of the Christian Religion as Repentance Faith Baptisme the Resurrection and eternall Judgment and these granted by all under the least profession of Christianity to be Foundation-Doctrines This being premised we notwithstanding deny that it is either laying on of Hands for Healing the sick or for giving the extraordinary gifts of the Holy Spirit much lesse the laying on of Hands practised by some in these days as you may further see in Chap. 4. I. Here cannot be meant laying on of Hands for healing or recovering the sick and that for these reasons 1. Because the gift or power of healing by laying on of Hands is ceased Now that cannot be a Principle c which is not in force in all ages nor any man capable to practise it At the first promise of giving this power it was accompanied only with miraculous gifts Mar. 16. 17 18. In my name shall they cast out Devills they shall speake with new Tongues they shall take up Serpents and if they drinke any deadly thing it shall not hurt them they shall lay Hands on the sick and they shall recover Now how dangerous and destructive a principle is this that miracles should be of the essence of Religion as Principles are and yet no power to practise them 2. As it is necessary a foundation-Principle should continue and be in force in all ages so it is necessary also it should concerne the whole Church and every member thereof as a Foundation doth the whole and every part of the Building to support and uphold it Admit then this power were now in force how would the healing of any one particular member concerne the whole body as a principle c. Therefore we conclude that Laying on of Hands for recovering the sick cannot be that Principle c Heb. 6. II. The Laying on of Hands for giving the extraordinary gifts of the holy Spirit cannot be meant here and that for these reasons 1. Because as before this power of giving the extraordinary gifts of the holy Spirit is now ceased As appears by the practice of it at this day for although so many have had hands laid upon them to this end yet these extraordinary gifts have never followed to any one of them but both they and the administrators are and remaine as other men Yet to call this a Principle c what were this but to grant that one of the Foundation-stones of the Christian Building were now lost And if but a part of the Foundation faile how tortering must the whole building stand and will soone decay and come to nothing And it is well known that a principle in all Arts and sciences is of constant and standing Use 2. That this laying on of Hands cannot be the principle Heb. 6. because this Laying on of Hands is there called a Doctrine Ver. 1 2. But that laying on of Hands to give the holy Spirit was never once taught in all the New Testament no not by them that practised it 3. If this laying on of Hands were the principle Then this very Church of the Hebrews the first constituted Church in the New Testament after Christs Ascension this Church being the same with that Act. 1 2 had wanted a principle in Religion which were very absurd to imagine for they themselves had not Laying on of Hands to this end Act. 8. being the first place that ever it was practised and sure in all matters about worship the written word must be our Rule and to the Scriptures silence we must give consent according to that Proverb Where God hath not a mouth to speake we must not have an Ear to hear Besides that they had not Laying on of Hands to this end is evident because they received the extraordinary gifts of the holy Spirit without it Act. 2. Vers 1 2 3 4 5 c. Therefore we conclude that neither of these two Layings on of Hands can be meant in Heb. 6. 9. CHAP. III. What Laying on of Hands is and must be meant Heb. 6. 2. FOr the better resolving this Question we must take notice that it is Laying on of Hands here in the singular number {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} c therefore can be but one Laying on of Hands that is called here a Principle c and not more as some would have it for then it should be Layings on of Hands in the plural number As in the same place when the Apostle would understand more Baptisms then one he saith The doctrine of Baptisms in the plurall number This being considered we must remember what went before that it is neither Laying on of Hands for healing the sick nor for giving the extraordinary gifts of the Holy Spirit Then it must be Laying on of Hands for ordaining of Officers Which will more clearly appeare by this Argument It must be Laying on of Hands either for healing the sick or for giving the extraordinary gifts of the holy Spirit or for Ordaining of Officers But neither for healing the sick nor for giving the extraordinary gifts of the holy Spirit Therefore for ordaining of Officers For the first Proposition That it must be for one of these three Ends because there is no other Laying on of Hands upon any other account in all the New Testament For the second Proposition that it is neither for healing the sick nor for giving the holy Spirit hath beene already proved Chap. 2. Therefore it follows it must be Laying on of Hands for appointing of Officers And this shall suffice for the first Argument 2. That Laying on of Hands for Officers is here meant will further appeare because this Laying on of Hands is called a Doctrine ver. 1. and therefore must be a Laying on of Hands which is some-where else taught But the other Layings on of Hands were never once taught But this Laying on of Hands was taught viz. by the Apostle Paul 1 Tim. 5 22. Lay Hands suddenly on no man that is Admit none rashly or too hastily into office and that this concernes Officers see before Chap. 1. In this verse there are two things taught one expressed the other necessarily implied that which is expressed is that Timothy should not suddenly Lay Hands on any man that which is implyed is that it was to be done if advisedly If not to be done at all it were frivolous to say it should not be done suddenly Thus you see the Apostle Paul teacheth this Laying on of Hands which in Heb. 6. he calls a Doctrine Now lest any should say that this laying on of Hands concernes all Baptized believers we therefore shall enmind them that from their own principle and practice this cannot be because they Lay Hands on all their disciples immediately upon their Baptisme and therefore leave no roome for this word suddenly in the Apostles exhortation and it is sore against their wills if they may not Lay their Hands suddenly upon

are found besides Heb. 6. viz. Acts 8. Act. 19. with which they have raised such a dust that hath indeed blinded the eys of some honest well-minded people and by good words and fair speeches have deceived the hearts of the simple But to lay this dust which they have raised and to discover the but pretences they have made We shall first consider their fore-mentioned Allegations in the General and then view them more particularly First neither any one nor all of these places have the least word of Institution or Command in them Nor one syllable of proof brought from them that this should be done to all Baptized persons Besides the Ends of Laying on of Hands in these days is a different thing from the Ends in these Texts all which will more appear in the particular view of them which is the second thing propounded to speak to And first for Heb. 6. 2. Neither the Subjects nor the Ends are particularly mentioned and expressed in this place and therefore we must go to other Scriptures to find out what Laying on of Hands is most agreeable to this Text as we do in the case of Baptism in the same place The Text neither telling us who should have Hands laid on them not to what End neither is the word All in it as was before noted we have already proved 〈◊〉 from other Texts and clear Arguments that this Laying on of Hands is to another End See Chap. 3. The two other places they bring we put them both together because they are of the same nature are Acts 8. 14. 17. where Peter and John Laid their Hands on them at Samaria and Acts 19. 6. where Paul Laid his Hands on the twelve at Ephesus That the Laying on of Hands in these Texts was for the giving of the extraordinary Gifts of the Holy Spirit we have already proved Chap. 1. There is not one word of Command here requiring us to do as they have done They Laying on their Hands as moved thereunto by the Holy Spirit having received power to minister the extraordinary Gifts of the Spirit as appears because those Gifts did immediatly follow their Laying on of Hands We have also before proved that the power of giving these Gifts being ceased the Rite and Ceremony as to this End ought to cease also and cannot but presumptuously be practised at this day the gifts never following much lesse reckoned for a principle in Religion But these gifts did both times immediatly follow in the Acts. The gifts now being neither found in the Minister norfollowing the Administration Have we not as good ground to adventure the Laying on of Hands miraculously to heale the sick having I am sure as good a warrant and may hope to speed as successfully Besides these two places they have not another to pretend to where the words are found As for that place Act. 9. 17. where Paul had Hands Laid on him from their own confession this will not serve their turne for it was before his Baptisme verse 18. and it was for the receiving of his sight as well as for his being filled with the holy Spirit if not principally for the recovering of his sight see ver. 12. Only we will note in generall that this Laying on of Hands to extraordinary or miraculous ends had not at all respect to Baptisme for it was as well before Baptisme as after it as in this case before us Nor do we think it needfull to make answer to those Texts brought in by some of them for number but not for weight as Eph. 2 20. we are built upon the Foundation c and Heb. 3. 14. we are made pertakers of Christ if we hold the beginning c And 2 Epist. of John 9 10. whosoever transgre●●●th and abideth not in the Doctrine of Christ c and such like Texts as these are where they can find the word beginning Doctrine or Foundation We cannot but judge the very recitall of these Texts a sufficient confutation to any man that hath his reason in his head And wish with all our hearts they might not incurre that severe censure of the Apostle of Handling the word of God deceitfully 2 Cor. 2. 17. and 4. 2. And thus we doubt not but all unprejudiced and unbiassed people considering what we have said will see they have no footing in the Scripture which must be our Rule and Directory for our whole worship for this their Laying on of Hands much lesse to make it a principle of Religion and so as they do a Boundary of Communion The truth is they themselves are so much at a losse in this matter that they agree not about the end They make more Ends of their one Laying on of Hands then of the several kinds of Layings on of Hands in the New-Testament Some for one end and some for another and so proceed to a third and a fourth end as if God indeed had sent among them the confusion of Tongues instead of speaking with Tongues and the miraculous Gifts of the Holy Spirit Some would have Hands Laid on for the obtaining of the extraordinary gifts of the holy Spirit in imitation of Act. 8. and Act. 19. to this we have once and againe spoken Some would have Laying on of Hands for Confirmation as they call it and though they shrowd themselves under the forementioned Scriptures yet to speak truth their best argument is the Common Prayer book and some of them have beene so ingenuous to confesse as much and have very much boasted and gloried in this one inartificiall unconcluding Argument for the Scripture owns them not all in this case Doctor Gouge on Heb. 6. saith that though Laying on of Hands were anciently practised by the Fathers to this end yet it is not expresly set down in Scripture But thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord we have beene better taught in these last daies then to own any thing in the worship of Christ from their Tradition or Authority unlesse also grounded on the word of God What is this practice then but setting our posts by Gods posts and bringing in a Tradition of men instead of an Appointment of Christ A third sort there are who practise this Laying on of Hands as a meanes to receive more of the Holy Spirit and that in the ordinary measures of it I confesse here they say well if they could make the least proofe of such an End from the Holy Scriptures This fair Pretext to obtaine more of the Spirit hath beguiled many a poore weake unstable soul We professe our selves so farre one with them in this thing that we cannot Judge him a Christian nor worthy to be accounted Christs Disciple that would not use all meanes appointed by God to obtaine more of the Holy Spirit we are so sensible of the daily need of more of the supplies of the Spirit and could they but shew one place where ever Laying on of Hands was practised upon all Baptized