the being influenced by such passionate censures guide lead and direct them since our Saviour who was the most excellent guide that ever the World had and the most innocent person was so highly defamed and so injuriously aspersed with unreasonable calumny 35. Secondly I intend hereby to manifest how much courage stedfastness and constancy is necessary for the sincerely pious man It may be the portion of any such person whomsoever Unreasonable censures are to be couragiously undergone in his speaking and doing well to be misrepresented and exposed to calumny and slander Our great Master hath foretold that his servants must in this particular expect the same measure which himself received But let no good man be dismayed if he be thus treated in the World but let him be stedfastly resolved to pursue his duty and to be unmoveably upright and conscientious whatsoever respect or disrespect he may meet with among men Whoever is made more remiss in well-doing or whose spirit is royled and discomposed by undeserved censures doth hereby fall into temptation and the snare of the evil one but he that resolvedly holds fast his integrity and runs with patience his Christian race amidst all these oppositions this is the man who rightly dischargeth the duty of a Christian and taketh up his Cross and followeth his Lord. 36. And it is infinitely better for any man being the pious mans advantage to fear the censure of the greatest part of the World in well-doing than to neglect what may please God and do good to men since hereby he gains the blessing of Christ Our Saviour declared Luk. 6.22 Blessed are ye when men shall reproach you and cast out your name as evil for the Son of mans sake Rejoice ye in that day and leap for joy for behold your reward is great in Heaven Wherefore though a clear and good reputation and general esteem is useful and desirable to a good man because it gives him many advantages of doing good in his generation yet if in the faithful and prudent management of his duty he meeteth with hard measures from the uncharitable expressions of other men it may justly so far as concerns himself rather affect him with joy than disturbance Yea with respect to these words of Christ which I have now mentioned the Author under (q) Epist ad Oceanum S. Hierom's name thinks it a thing desirable to be reproached and evil spoken of Quis non maledici desideret saith he ut mereatur Christi nomine laudari coelesti copiosaque mercede munerari This also was a mighty satisfaction to S. Austin who declared that whilst he opposed the Donatists (r) Aug. cont lit Petil. l. 3. c. 7. he underwent sharp and opprobrious reproaches from the enemies of the glory of Christ but then reflecting upon the blessing in this case pronounced by our Lord he adds Quisquis volens detrahit famae meae nolens addit mercedi meae he that willingly lessens my reputation doth unwillingly add to my reward But he who is turned aside from the paths of goodness by the slander of men is guilty of greater rashness and imprudence than that traveller who takes a journey of great concernment to his life and estate and yet will stop his course or go out of his way if he discerns the wind to blow upon him CHAP. III. The manifold sinfulness and severe punishment of reproaching and speaking evil especially against Superiors 1. HAving shewed the unreasonable proceedings of a reviling tongue and how unruly an evil it is I shall now add some further general considerations concerning the greatness of the sin of reproaching others especially our Superiours And in this Chapter I shall shew two things First How many great sins are contained in it and Secondly What a dreadful punishment is denounced against the practisers of it Wherefore 2. First This is a complicated and multiplied sin and so comprehensive an evil that very many great transgressions are contained and linked together in it S. Basil seems to think that a reproaching Spirit (a) Bas in Esai c. 2. might be the beginning of all sin in the world which may well be accounted true if we consider it with respect to God and include under it that disposition of mind from whence it flows Uncharitable evil-speaking includes very many great sins For the closing with that temptation whereby the Serpent reproached the infinitely good God was that which brought sin and ruine on mankind And it may well be thought that the original transgression of the fallen Angels was their having ill thoughts of the highest good and thereupon being forward to depart from God and to draw others from him into the same defection And this is the very root of reproaching or that disposition of spirit from whence it ariseth 3. And this ought to be the more detested because the exercise of this sin includes in it many heinous offences Now though one single sin which any person willingly and wilfully pursues is sufficient to manifest him void of the fear of God and estranged from the Christian life yet where the evil heart can readily choose and the conscience suffer many notorious sins to prevail without being either so watchful as to observe them or so faithful as to raise all the powers and faculties of the soul to oppose them here is a mind and conscience so much the more grosly defiled and vitiated His condition is like that of the man into whom the unclean Spirit entring taketh with him seven other Spirits who enter in and dwell there And as that body is in a bad condition in which divers dangerous diseases are reigning so that soul cannot be in any safe condition where many great sins do rule and govern it And it is considerable in this case that a defaming temper and the neglect of forsaking it by repentance alwaies include a voluntary choice and therefore hath in it as all other sins of choice have a want of reverence to God and his laws And besides this 4. First It contains under it an opposition to 1. It is inconsistent with Christian love and neglect of the great command of love It was our Saviours Doctrine that among all the precepts given by God in the Old Testament that of loving God with all the heart was the first and the other of loving our Neighbour the second which is like unto it And the wisest men among the Jews have owned and acknowledged the same truth (b) Phil. de Charitate 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Philo speaking of the love of men esteemeth it so nearly allyed unto Religion towards God that he calls it its Sister and Twin And it can be no small sin to live in the breach of so great a Commandment This duty is so particularly pressed and inculcated by Christ on all his Disciples and so great Motives are superadded to the force this Commandment had before that it appears under the Gospel as
shape to their souls but referr to them by expressing the resemblance of the bodies in which they once dwelt and to which they were and shall be again united though now separated from them And therefore this notion allows the Images of God in like manner as the Church of Rome sets up Images of Angels and Saints deceased not making any considerable difference betwixt these so far as concerns the representing every one of them by their Image and consequently must allow the worshipping every one of these Images with a proportionable honour in relation to the Beings represented by them 4. If this notion were of any weight the Jewish Church might then have been warranted in setting up Images of God and worshipping them also with respect to God provided they were not like him nor esteemed so to be And yet God plainly forbad their making any Image of him in the likeness of male or female or any other thing though he had sufficiently taught them and they well knew that the Deity was not in shape like to any of these And God declares his dislike against any such Images because they could frame nothing which they could liken to him which being a reason of perpetual and abiding truth doth concern the Christian state as well as the Jewish and the laying down this reason doth sufficiently declare against all such Images as are not like to him 13. Secondly Of the Romanists worshipping the Eucharist with Divine Worship I shall shew that the Romanists give proper Divine worship to that which is not God And here I shall particularly instance in the Sacrament of the Eucharist to which they profess to give that Latria or high worship which is due to the true God alone This is the plain Doctrine of the Council of Trent (q) Conc. Trid. Sess 13. c. 5. fideles omnes Latriae cultum qui vero Deo debetur huic Sacramento deferre that all good Christians do give to this Sacrament that properly Divine worship which is due to the true God And in the beginning of that Session they strictly forbid all Christians thenceforward to believe otherwise and their sixth Anathema is against him who shall say that Christ in the Eucharist is not to be adored with that which is the proper Divine worship In like manner it is expressed in the Roman Catechism published by the authority of Pius the Fifth (r) Catech. ad par de Euch. Sacr. in init huic Sacramento divinos honores tribuendos esse that Divine honour is to be given to this Sacrament And the words of Adoration in the Missal and the acts of adoration unto this Sacrament are accordingly to be understood to give Divine honour thereunto And Azorius is for giving this Divine worship even to the (Å¿) Instit Mor. part 2. l. 5. c. 16. species or appearances of Bread and Wine in this Sacrament But the Council of Trent seem not to extend it so far and the Roman Catechism declares that when they affirm this Sacrament is to be worshipped they understand this of the Body and Blood of Christ therein 14. We greatly reverence the holy Sacrament as an excellent institution of our Saviour but reserve the Divine honour to God alone for there is nothing which is not truly God be it otherwise never so sacred to which such worship may be given S. Paul was an eminent Apostle but with detestation disclaimed the receiving it Act. 14.13 14 15. The brazen Serpent under the Law was of Gods institution for the healing those Israelites who looked upon it but yet it was a great sin to worship it with Divine honour If the homage peculiarly due to a Prince be given to any other in his Dominions though it be to one he hath highly advanced he will account this a disparaging his dignity and practising Treason and Rebellion and God who is a jealous God will not give his worship to another But this practice of the Roman Church depends upon their Doctrine of Transubstantiation This is grourded upon transubstantiation for if that substance which is in the Sacrament be no longer Bread and Wine but be changed into the substance of the very Body and Blood of Christ in union with his Divinity then and only then may Divine honour be given unto it And if it be in truth the very same glorified Christ who is at Gods right hand and nothing else then is that worship which is due to Christ the Son of God which is proper Divine Worship as much to be performed to this Sacrament as to him in Heaven since both is substantially one and the same thing wholly and intirely The (t) Sess 13. c. 1 4 5. Anath 1. 2. Council of Trent declares that by the consecration of the Bread and Wine there is a conversion of their whole substance into the substance of the Body and Blood of Christ And they say the Body and Blood of Christ with his soul and Divinity and therefore whole Christ are contained in the Eucharist but the substance of the Bread and Wine remains not but only the species or appearance thereof and that this the Church calls Transubstantiation On this Doctrine it founds the Divine worship of the Sacrament and it anathematizeth him whosoever shall speak against this Transubstantiation and forbids all Christians that they shall not dare to believe or teach otherwise concerning the Eucharist than as this Council hath determined Now if this Doctrine of Transubstantiation be true the giving Divine worship to this Sacrament is but just but if this be false as the (u) Article 28. Church of England declares then is the giving Divine honour thereto certainly and greatly sinful and evil 15. It is acknowledged that this holy Sacrament administred according to Christs institution doth truly and really exhibite and communicate Christs Body and Blood with the benefits of his Sacrifice in an Heavenly Mystical and Sacramental way but the manner of this gracious presence it is needless curiously to enquire And though the elements of Bread and Wine remain in their proper substances yet are they greatly changed by their consecration from common Bread and Wine to contain under them such Spiritual and Divine Mysteries which is the effect of Divine power and grace Nor is it possible that these elements should tender to us Christ and the benefits of his Passion if this work had not been ordered by the power and authority of God in his Institutions who hath the disposal of this grace But that the elements of Bread and Wine remain in their substance and that they are not transubstantiated into the Body and Blood of Christ is generally asserted by all Protestants whilst the contrary is universally affirmed by the Romanists and is made one great branch of the true Catholick Faith and the new Roman Creed according to the famous Bull of Pius the Fourth which is so solemnly sworn unto Indeed there are such expressions frequently
of Sin yet he must not be owned as a good man because he was not in all things so strict as some of their errours directed them to be While they were more severe and rigid he shewed himself more mild and gentle even towards Publicans and Sinners and hence was reviled as their friend He had not that reverence for the vow of Corban which the Pharisees had but declared against the evil of it as making void the Commandment of God which required a due honour to Father and Mother Nor had he that opinion of the rest of the Sabbath day as to think it not lawful for himself to heal or for his Disciples to pluck ears of corn and he was therefore censured and condemned of the Jews And thus it fares in part with others also who are his followers and so it frequently hath done in the best times of Christianity Many men have had such a zeal for their own errors that if others live the most holy and angelical lives in conscientious obedience to the moral laws of God and in a pious reverence to all the Christian institutions and precepts of our Saviour they will not acknowledge these to be good men or such as have any true care of Religion or piety if they do not join with them in their mistaken notions and their practices founded upon those mistakes 13. On this account the Catholick Church On this account the Catholick Church was defamed as impure and carnal and the true members thereof have oft-times fallen under unjust censures When the abetters of the Novatian Schism declared against second Marriages and the admitting those to repentance in the Church who were lapsed after Baptism they so far judged the Catholick Church impure for practising contrary to their errors that avoiding its communion they gave themselves the name of the Cathari or the persons who were pure And that themselves were the authors of this name whereby they were afterwards known and that they called themselves thereby in a way of distinction from the Catholick Christians hath not only been declared by Dionysius Alexandrinus and Theophilus Alexandrinus and other private Authors but it is also affirmed by the (q) Conc. Nic. c. 8. Conc. Const c. 7. two first general Councils And after Tertullian declined to Montanism though that Sect impiously owned Montanus to be the Paraclete and this Author of them was guilty of very great impurities of conversation he defamed the Catholick Church and its members as being (r) Tert. de Monogam adv Psychicos carnal because it allowed of second Marriages and did not prolong its Fasts and stationary abstinence to such late hours of the day as the Disciples of Montanus did And the Donatists in the vehemency of their Schism upon the like pretence of greater strictness and rigidness towards them who had offended ran to that height of censure against those pious Bishops and Christians who kept communion with the Church as to call them (s) Baron An. 348. n. 38. Pagans And the like might be noted concerning others 14. Zeal when well guided very useful but partial or misplaced hurtful Zeal and the greatest strictness of life and conversation when it is well ordered and directed is of excellent use but a pretending hereto is really hurtful when it acts by a mistaken rule It was the miscarriage of the Pharisees that they were earnest and strict about their Corban but loose and negligent concerning the fifth Commandment and shewed a great respect to the Sabbath but gave not due allowance to works of mercy and charity Let every man be as conscientious and strict as he can be in entertaining all needful truth in practising all the great duties of Religion and avoiding all evil But let not zeal be spent about such lesser things as are in truth of no concernment in Religion nor let any make such measures the standard to judge of the piety either of themselves or others for then they must miscarry This is to act like a man who hath some mistaken fancies of the best road and will allow none to be skilful travellers but them who wander with him out of the right way The Kingdom of God is not meat and drink but righteousness peace and joy in the Holy Ghost Rom. 14.17 It is not concerned so much about such lesser things of which many men are fond as about practising all righteousness minding the wayes of peace and unity and being greatly delighted in the exercises and rewards of the Christian hope and obedience 15. But that I may prevent the misapprehending what I mentioned concerning some of the Jewish errors above mentioned I shall here add by way of caution that though they were too nice and vainly strict concerning their Sabbath it is a fault amongst us much to be lamented and needful to be amended that very many in our age are too loose in neglecting a due reverence for the time of Worship and the Worship of God it self as I shall hereafter further note And they who neglect the worship of God whatever party they are of cannot approve themselves the faithful Servants of God 16. Secondly Our Holy Saviour was accused 2. The worthiest persons have been oft charged with promoting the Devils work and depraving Religion of complying with the Devil and carrying on his work and corrupting Religion The Devil is so bad that whatsoever proceeds from him and whosoever join themselves to him to serve him are deservedly hateful Now our Saviour was manifested to destroy the works of the Devil and he actually overthrew his Kingdom He cast out Devils and dispossessed them of that outward dominion they had over the bodies of many men and he so vanquished the evil Spirit and that Idolatry sin and wickedness which he set forward in the world that he gained the victory over the Devil with respect to that inward dominion whereby he had governed the hearts and lives of the children of disobedience He also silenced his oracles whereby he had obtained a great veneration among the Gentiles And so admirably did our Lord prevail against all the power of Satan that even Porphyry an Apostate from Christianity and Patron of Gentilism confesseth that from the time that Jesus was honoured in the world the Gentile Gods who were no other than evil Spirits lost their power As (t) Euseb Pr. Evang. l. 5. c. 1. Eusebius relates these are his very words even in that Book which he wrote against Christianity 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 after Jesus was worshipped none had any sence of the manifest help of the Pagan gods 17. And yet notwithstanding all this so unreasonably spiteful were the reviling tongues of his adversaries that against all the evidence in the world he was charged with acting from the Devil and promoting his interest And when he cast-out Devils they would not allow this to be otherwise done than by Beelzebub the Prince of the Devils The Holy Jesus
defective resemblances of the properties of God could be a sufficient defence for the making Images of the Deity the Pagans might then be justified in many of their Images who spake more on their behalf than all this comes to For besides what perfections the figures of their Images might darkly express it was pleaded by (l) in Eus pr. Evang. l. 3. c. 7. Porphyry on their behalf that as to the matter of their Images they framed them of Crystal Marble Gold and such like pure Metals because the Divine Being is not capable of being stained 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Gold doth not admit of any defilement or corruption And that which represents the purity excellency and incorruption of the Divine Nature if it were done worthy of God hath respect to none of the least Divine perfections 10. And concerning the Argument The forms under which God appeared in vision or otherwise in the Old Testament or the New were not resemblances of his Being but testimonies of his more special presence at that time and place made use of from the visions in the Scriptures or the appearances under which God manifested his presence to men as the Holy Ghost descended in a bodily shape like a Dove Luk. 3.22 and the ancient of days is intended to signifie God Dan. 7.9 it is to be considered that these appearances the one in vision and the other in plain view with others were not representations of the Divine nature as if that was like to these things or might be pictured by them but they were extraordinary testimonies visibly evidencing a more eminent and signal presence of God at that time and place And of this nature was also the bush burning and not consumed the pillar of cloud and fire that led the Israelites the darkness blackness and tempest on Mount Sinai the Cloud on the Mercy-seat and that which sometimes filled the Tabernacle and the Temple as at the first Consecration of each of them Such also was the appearance of fiery cloven tongues which sat on the Apostles at the descent of the Holy Ghost and the fire which oft came down from Heaven upon the Sacrifices in testimony of Gods acceptance All these were manifestations of a more special presence of God but none of them were intended to express any such likeness of the Deity that it should be lawful to picture it in that figure And those words I above mentioned Deut. 4.15 Ye saw no manner of similitude in the day the Lordspake unto you in Horeb out of the midst of the fire do sufficiently shew that though there was an extraordinary and particular presence of God manifested in the fire upon Mount Sinai the appearance of that fire out of which the Lord spake was far from being intended to be any similitude of God or to give us a liberty to make any similitude of him whatsoever And if any Image of God should be pretended to be of like nature with those appearances now mentioned so as to contain a peculiar testimony of the signal presence of God in them this would render them the more manifestly Idolatrous 11. But besides this (m) de Eccl. Triumph l. 2. c. 8. Cardinal Bellarmine urgeth for the lawfulness of resembling God in the figure of a man that Angels are painted though they be incorporeal and that the Scripture speaks of his hands face feet and attributeth to him all the parts of a man when it speaks of his standing sitting and walking Of the Picturing of Angels To which I Answer 1. The picturing of an Angel if it be only done to suggest to our minds some general notice of an Angel or to put us upon framing a conception of that Being is a thing which may be allowed But if a glorious Angel should be purposely presented to us as an object for our great honour under such a representation as is usual in the picturing an Angel he would be much misrepresented thereby to the disadvantage of the excellencies of his nature But yet there would not that great injury be done to the Angel thereby that is done to the Majesty of God in debasing him against the duty of a Creature and also against his express Law and Command 2. and the expressions of the face and eyes of God That the Scripture speaking of the face of God and his hands and eyes since these phrases are to be understood in a sigurative sense doth give us no more allowance to take them in a proper literal sense and thereupon to picture God with such a corporeal face and hands against his particular Command and in derogation from his Majesty than it gives countenance to our affirming that God hath a body and such corporeal parts which are contrary to his Spiritual nature And it might be added that the picturing God in such a bodily shape may have an ill influence upon the gross conceptions of some men concerning the Deity And men are not so wholly out of danger of these misconceptions when it was once so openly and hotly asserted (n) Socr. Ecc. Hist l. 6. c. 7. Soz. l. 8. c. 11 12. by the Egyptian Monks that God had a body and an humane shape and that Theophilus then Bishop of Alexandria complyed with this opinion though that was probably done out of design and even Epiphanius is reported by (o) Socr. ibid. c. 9. Soz. ibid. c. 14. Socrates and Sozomen to be more heartily a favourer of that Opinion And this was also propagated by Audaeus of whom Theoderet gives some account Hist Eccles l. 4. c. 9. 12. But (p) ubi supra Bellarmin 's distinction considered Bellarmine further endeavours to evade all that can be said against the Images of God by distinguishing between 1. An Image to express a perfect similitude of form and this he grants is not to be admitted concerning God 2. To represent an History And 3. without respect to History in resembling the nature of a thing not by proper similitude but analogically and by metaphorical significations and he saith thus they paint Angels as young men hoc modo pingimus Deum patrem cum eum extra historiam pingimus humana forma on this manner we paint God the Father when out of History we paint him in the shape of a man But this distinction will not be to any great purpose because 1. Euen the Pagans did not think their Images to have a likeness of shape unto their Gods 2. It seems to be no great commendation of any Image that it is unlike the thing it represents and doth not truly express it 3. That all the Images of the Roman Church are also of this nature even the Images of Saints departed For the Roman Church worships only the Souls and Spirits of Saints deceased as enjoying this beatifical vision not their bodies which till the Resurrection are dead in their graves And therefore the Images of these Saints do not express a likeness of
did own himself to be the most high God and as Irenaeus relates (y) Iren. adv Haeres l. 1. c. 20. that it was he who appeared as the Son amongst the Jews and descended as the Father in Samaria and came as the Holy Spirit in other Nations and they who were his followers both in Samaria Rome and other Nations did worship him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the chief God as (z) Justin Apol. 1. Justin Martyr affirms and (a) Eus Hist Eccl. l. 2. c. 13. gr Eusebius from him Now if it should be supposed that the Gnosticks should own the true God and that there is no other God besides him and should therefore design to give Divine honour to him alone but should be perswaded that he was incarnate in Simon Magus and thereupon should worship him with Divine honour this could not excuse them herein from being Idolaters And whereas Montanus and the propagators of his Heresie did declare him to be the Paraclete as is oft expressed in Tertullian and is affirmed also by divers Catholick Writers as (b) Hist Eccl. l. 5. c. 14. Eusebius (c) Basil ad Amphil. c. 1. Basil and others or as (d) de Consec dist 4. c. Hi vero Gregory expresseth it that he was the Holy Ghost if any of his followers professing Divine Worship to be due only to the True God and the three persons of the glorious Trinity should upon a presumptive delusion believe that the Holy Ghost was imbodied in Montanus and thereupon yield to him that Divine Worship which is due to the Holy Ghost this could not excuse them from Idolatry 29. Assert 2. All Idolatry is not equally heinous Assert 2. In Idolatry which is in its nature a great and grievous sin all the acts and kinds thereof in misplacing proper Divine Worship are not equally heinous and abominable There is a great difference from the temper of the persons whence acts proceding from sudden surprize from weakness of understanding or from great fear are not of so high a guilt as those which proceed from carelesness of duty neglect of instruction or contempt of God or wilful enmity against the true Religion There is also difference in the acts of worship which I mentioned n. 27. as also from the plyableness of temper to be drawn from them and the resolved obstinacy of persisting in them And there is a difference also with respect to the object to which Divine Worship is given whence the worshipping of Baal or the Gods of other Nations in opposition to the God of Israel was more heinous than the Idolatry of Jeroboams Calves because it included a professed departing from the true God and the worshipping of Simon Magus was the more abominable as including a following him and consequently rejecting the fundamental Articles of the Christian Religion But the Idolatry of the Calves was not of so high a nature nor did it utterly exclude the ten Tribes from all relation to the Church of God though even this would exclude those persons who designedly espoused it or who perversely or negligently joined in it from the blessing of God 30. Assert 3. All misplacing Divine honour upon an undue object which is Idolatry is a very great sin Assert 3. All sorts thereof are greatly evil To suppose that ignorance and mistake should be any sufficient plea or excuse is to reflect upon the goodness and wisdom of God as if even under the Christian revelation he had not sufficiently directed men in so important a duty as to know the object of Divine adoration or whom we are to worship And how little any misunderstanding upon the grounds laid down by the Romanists is like in this case to be available for their excuse I shall manifest by proposing another case which may well be esteemed parallel hereunto As our Saviour said concerning the Eucharistical Bread This is my Body so there is a greater plenty of expressions in the Scriptures which are as plausible to confer Divine honour upon pious Christians They are said to be partakers of the Divine Nature to be born of God The Remish Adoration of the Host parallel'd to be renewed after the Image of God and that God dwelleth in them and that Christ is formed in them and is in them and that they are members of his body of his flesh and of his bones and with respect to them he said to Saul why persecutest thou me and he will say to others I was an hungred and ye gave me no meat c. and the Spirit of God dwells in them Now if from such expressions as these any sort of men should give Divine Worship to every Saint in pursuance of that fond notion of some Fanatick heads that they are Godded with God and Christed with Christ and consequently to those in Heaven as well as to those on Earth and thereby multiply the objects of Divine Adoration really beyond all the Polytheism of the Gentiles I doubt not but they of the Church of Rome would account this abominable Idolatry Nor would they think it sufficient here to be pretended that these worshippers own only one true God and give Divine Worship to the Saints only because they believe them to receive a new Divine Nature in becoming Saints and to put on Christ and to be changed into the nature and substance of that one God and though this may seem as contrary to sense and reason as Transubstantiation doth they therefore believe it because God hath said it if their manifestly mistaken sense of Scripture be allowed and they can confidently rely on his word And if we compare these two together the grace of the Sacrament is very excellent but it is that which is to be communicated to the communion of Saints and conferred upon them But the nature of the pious Christian is so much advanced above that of the Sacramental elements that that must be confessed to be true which was affirmed by Bishop Bilson (e) Differ of Christ Subject Unchr Rebel Part. 4. p. 713. that Christian men are members of Christ the Bread is not Christ abideth in them and they in him in the Bread he doth not he will raise them at the last day the Bread he will not they shall reign with him for ever the Bread shall not But these and such like words we mention not as having any low thoughts of the Holy Sacrament but as owning the truth of the Sacramental elements remaining in their created substances and even these we duly reverence as set apart to an holy use and purpose but we most highly value the great blessings of the Gospel and the spiritual presence of Christ which though it be tendred in the Sacramental elements yet being the invisible grace of the Sacrament is to be distinguished from the visible sign thereof To this we have our eye chiefly in the Sacrament according to that ancient admonition (f) Cyp. de Orat. Dom. sursum
by the Persecutions it endured but should prevail under them And if it had not been from the Support of the Power of God the Christian Church in its weakest Estate could never have stood against the Wisdom and Power of the World which was then engaged against it but God then did and yet will uphold his Church even to the end And with a particular eye to God's especial Care hereof in these latter Times we read that when the Thousand Years were ended and the Nations and Gog and Magog compassed the Camp of the Saints and the beloved City then Fire came from God out of Heaven and devoured them Rev. 20.8 9. And those Interpreters who would understand these Phrases of the Camp of the Saints and the Beloved City concerning any particular City or Place upon Earth seem not herein to observe the Nature of the Prophetick Style which will direct us to understand it of the more eminent and chief part of the Christian Church Wherefore we have great grounds for expecting Good from God if we mind our Duty to him Now upon this Encouragement let us in the Fear of God undertake this Duty that we may be instrumental to the procuring Good to the Church of God and that we our selves may be Partakers of eternal Happiness This is the way to have God to be our Friend and no other Peace in the World can be concluded and secured upon those advantagious Terms as our having Peace with God may be And therefore I shall now come to the second thing I proposed to discourse of what we are here commanded to do Quest 2. What is it to turn to God with all our Heart Answ This is one and the same thing with Repentance The Septuagint express this Phrase of Turning in the Text by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or being converted to God And this supposeth or includeth 1. A serious Consideration and minding of our Rule together with the Motives that should put us upon a Practice answerable thereto This Rule is the Word of God or the Holy Scripture as superadded to the natural Light of Reason and Conscience Upon due pondering of this Josiah's Heart was tender and he humbled himself and undertook a Reformation 2. Self-reflection and Examination of our Minds Ways and Actions by this Rule with this stedfast purpose that nothing may be entertained or allowed in us which is not agreeable thereunto 3. An humble and serious Sorrow for past Miscarriages with hearty and unfeigned Confession of Sin and earnest Supplication to God for the obtaining Mercy 4. A resolved undertaking to forsake all Evil in Heart and Life and to do our Duty These things are so plain in the Nature of them and so evidently necessary in their general Consideration that they need not either further Explication or Proof The Practice and Exercise of Repentance and turning to God taketh in all these but both the Phrase of Turning and the chief Design of Repentance hath principal respect to the last of them it being all one to turn to God and to return to and carefully set upon our Duty And therefore I shall now insist on this and that we may practise these things to good effect I shall urge some particular Instances which are of great use to be performed in our minding this Duty 1. In avoiding Schisms and Divisions and practising Unity and Peace 2. In the forsaking Debauchery and Profaneness and the embracing Seriousness and Sobriety 3. In rejecting all Irreligion and Neglect of the Worship of God and engaging our selves in true Piety and hearty Devotion 1. In the avoiding Schisms and Divisions and practising Unity and Peace How many and frequent are the Precepts for Peace and Unity delivered in the Doctrine of our Saviour and how earnestly is this urged and inculcated If there be any Consolation in Christ c. saith the Apostle Phil. 2.1 2. Fulfill ye my Joy being of one accord and of one mind And if we view and consider the Business of our Religion as it was delivered by our Saviour and his Apostles this will be found to be one of its great and weighty Precepts And shall we then be forward to contend about other lesser things to the neglect of this As the Scribes and Pharisees would tithe Mint Anise and Cummin but neglected the weighty Things of God's Law St. Paul tells us The Kingdom of God is not Meat and Drink but Righteousness Peace and Joy in the Holy-Ghost For he that in these Things serveth Christ is acceptable to God and approved of Men. Rom. 14.17 18. In which Words it is very plainly asserted that whilst some other Things which Men may contend about are of less moment these Things here mentioned are of great concernment to Religion it self and the being esteemed of God and good Men. And as Peace is one of these great Duties here urged so that the Apostle had a very particular Eye thereupon may be concluded from the Words immediatly following v. 19. Let us therefore follow after the Things which make for Peace And the Neglect of this Duty is very hurtful and pernicious to the Christian Church For as in the Body when it is rent and torn and the Members disjointed there must be from this very Cause great Disorders Weakness and Feebleness so is it also in the Church of God Yea these Things are to be accounted of dangerous Consequence for the undermining or shaking the Kingdom of Christ since our Lord himself hath told us that a Kingdom divided against it self is brought to Desolation And shall any good Man be pleased to join with the Enemy in his Designs against the welfare stability and safety of the Church of Christ Now besides many other Arguments which might be insisted on to disswade from Schisms and Divisions there are two things I shall recommend to you as being well worthy your serious consideration First making Divisions in the Church either includes a total want or at least a defect in a great degree of the true Spirit of Christianity This must needs be so because the observing Peace and Unity are so great a part and duty of our Religion If we reflect on our Baptism we are baptized into one Body and therefore are to observe Unity And when S. Paul urgeth the Ephesians to take care of that great Duty of walking worthy of that Vocation wherewith they were called Eph. 4.1 To that end he most particularly and largely insists on their keeping the Vnity of the Spirit in the Bond of Peace v. 3 c. And from this very Reason he concluded the Corinthians to be carnal because of the envying strife and divisions that were among them 1 Cor. 3.3 And where-ever the Peace and Unity of the Church is broken from those corrupt Principles of Pride Self-will and the carelesness of obeying God's Commandments this speaks such an unchristian temper as will exclude such Persons from the Kingdom of God And therefore those very phrases the Apostle