may be Object expounded thus God did actually purpose to sanctifie it after the giving of the Law If to sanctifie the seventh day be only Resp to purpose to sanctifie it then the Sabbath was no more sanctified since the creation then ab aeterno for then God purposed it should be sanctified c. For the further clearing of this truth I shall give you the Arguments of some learned persons why they conceive that the Sabbath was not instituted till the giving of the Law on mount Sinai Adam in innocency should not have Arg. 1 needed a Sabbath not his soul for every day was a Sabbath to that nor his body because his body was not then subject to wearinesse neither could it be appointed for the ease of servants because then no such thing as servitude in the world The Sabbath was instituted not for Resp 1 common rest or rest from natural wearinesse principally but for holy rest that the soul might have more immediate communion with God Returne to thy rest O my soule saith the Psalmist The rest of the soule is not a ceasing from all operation for that cannot stand with the nature of a spirit hence the soul is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an act because it is still in action a spirit cannot be and not act but when the soule centers on God then it is said to rest Bodies rest in their proper places and souls rest in the enjoying of their proper objects Now Adam in innocency thogh his body was not subject to wearinesse might stand in need of such a rest as this is Adam was to serve God in a particular calling God took the man put him into the garden of Eden that he might dresse it keep Gen. 2. 5. it now Luther professeth It followes from hence saith he that if Adam had stood in his innocency yet he should have kept the seventh day holy viz. on that day he should have taught his children what was the Word of God wherein his worship did consist and wholly have sequestred himself to his service on other days he should have dressed and kept the garden though every day was to be spent in holinesse mediately in seeing God in the creatures and meeting with God in his labour yet it was not unsuitable for that estate to have one day in the week for more immediate and special converse with God and though it was no paine to him to dresse the garden yet this must needs take up his thoughts while he was about it The Saints and Angels in Heaven have Object had no set Sabbath and why man in innocency The state of innocency on earth should Resp not have been in all things alike to the state of glory in heaven and particularly in this there should have been marriage dressing of the garden day and night in Paradise but no such thing in Heaven We do not read that there was any other Arg. 2 positive precept or law given to our first parents in the state of innocency but only this that they should not eat of the forbidden fruit Now the command of God for the observation of the Sabbath is a positive command and that appears because although the worship of God do belong to the Law natural viz. founded in the Law of nature yet the circumstance of time when God in an especial manner is to be worshipped that we should keep an holy rest unto the Lord every seventh day this is a positive precept and was never determined by the Law of nature That Adam had from the creation at Resp least that which amounted to a positive Law for the observance of the Sabbath is plaine It is said God sanctified the seventh day Now though this word is variously taken in the Scripture yet in this place the seventh day must be said to be sanctified one of these two wayes Either by infusion of holinesse or sanctification into it now the circumstance of a seventh day is not capable of sanctification in this sense only rational creatures Angels and men may be said thus to be sanctified By separation of it from common use and dedication of it to an holy use as the Temple and Tabernacle were which had no inherent holinesse in them Now if the Sabbath were thus sanctified it must either be for the use of God or man either God must impose upon himself the observation of every seventh day to keep it holy which is absurd or else it was dedicated and consecrated for mans sake and use and if so man had that which amounted to a positive Law for the observation of the Sabbath When Moses makes repetition of the Arg. 3 Law of God Deut. 5. 15. he laies downe this as a ground of the observation of the seventh day as a Sabbath the deliverance of Israel out of Egypt therefore the Sabbath was not instituted from the creation This that is urged is placed by God by Resp way of preface and motive as an argument for the observation of all the Commandments yet who will say that none of them were in force till the deliverance of Israel out of Egypt This was one reason why the Sabbath Resp 2 should be sanctified but not the only reason therefore Exod. 20. 6. the reason that is rendered there why the seventh day is the Sabbath is this for in six dayes the Lord made heaven and earth c. The Jewes were to observe the Sabbath not only upon the ground of its first institution but upon reasons proper and peculiar to that Nation It is likely their deliverance out of Egypt was on the Sabbath day and therefore urged by Moses as a ground of their observation of it We finde not any expresse mention Arg. 4 that the Patriarchs before Moses time did sanctifie a Sabbath We may as well argue it was not kept Resp all the time of the Judges and Samuel because no expresse mention made in those Books of any such thing No doubt but they observed it because Object it was published on mount Sinai The like may we say of the Patriarchs Resp 1 before the promulgation of the Law on mount Sinai because it was sanctified from the Creation Abraham is commended for keeping Gods Commandments and the Sabbath is one of Gen. 26.5 them We may as well argue that the Patriarchs for two thousand five hundred yeares together observed not any day at all for the worship and service of God for there is in Scripture as much mention of a Sabbath as any other day yea It is plaine in the Scripture that the Jewes did keep the Sabbath before the Law was given This is that which the Lord hath said To morrow is the rest of the holy Exo 16.23 Sabhath unto the Lord c. I might adde that it is not improbable but the sacrifices of Cain and Abel were upon the Sabbath-day the usual stated time for such services If a time had not beene set apart even in Adams
suddenly extinguished Scripturall grounds are these The creation of Adam and Eve God's breathing into their face the breath of life is a Argu. 1 good probable argument at least If it be objected that this proves nothing because it was necessary that the soules of Adam and Eve should be by creation when there was nothing pre-existent whereby they might be naturally propagated Answer may be made that if any thing material had necessarily been required to the being of the soul of a man as to the souls of brutes then as the soules of other creatures were concreated in and with the matter of which they were made in the like manner in all reason should God have dealt with the soules of men but we finde it otherwise after the body was made and the matter prepared then the soul is infused The soul of Jesus Christ was created Arg. 2 and he was in all things like unto us sin onely excepted If it be objected that this was extraordinary that Christ might not be tainted with sin We may answer Non magis difficile erat Spiritui sancto semen Josephi quám virginis ab omni vitio purgare c. I suppose Christ was borne after an extraordinary way rather upon the account of the malediction that was pronounced against our first parents in case of eating the forbidden fruit that in the day they did eat thereof they should die the death Then upon the account of generation Ecclesiastes 12.7 Then shall the dust returne Argu. 3 to the earth whence it was and the spirit shall returne unto God who gave it where you have the essentiall parts of man his body and his soul compared one with another The body that was compacted of dust and it returnes to the dust from whence it was the soul created by God and that returnes to God that gave it When the Spirit of God speakes of the body he makes mention of the materiall cause but when of the soul onely of the efficient and the word gave it is empâ—haticall and spoken by way of eminency for God gave the body as well as the soule Heb. 11.9 Furthermore we have had fathers of our flesh which corrected us and we Argu. 4 gave them reverence shall we not much rather be in subjection to the Father of spirits It appeares by the Antithesis the Spirit of God makes between fathers of flesh and Father of spirits that we receive our body from our parents but our soul from God he is the Father of spirits Now marke how the Apostle argues If to those from whom we receive our worser part we give reverence haw much rather should we be in subjection to the Father of spirits It is worthy our consideration that God by a peculiar title is called the Father of spirits and herein he is opposed to the fathers of the flesh Now if the soul be by traduction those that are the fathers of the flesh would also be the fathers of the spirits neither would God by this title be distinguished from others The Objections made against this assertion are such as these Gen. 2. 2. On the seventh day God ended his worke which he had made and he rested on Obje 1 the seventh day from all his work which he had made This Scripture must be understood of the workes of creation therefore the soules of men and women are not now created God after the sixth day ceased from the Resp creation of new species not from the creation of new individuals Now the rationall soules that are now created by God non specie sed numero differunt differ not in kinde but in number from the soule of Adam which was at first created Though God ceased from the work of creation in regard of species yet not in regard of individuals Gen. 46.26 All the soules that came with Obje 2 Jacob into Egypt which came out of his loynes besides Jacobs sons wives all the soules were threescore and six soules coming out of Jacobs loines is the same with this that the soul of man is by generation The soul here is put by a synecdoche for Resp the totum compositum for the whole man Now though the soul may not be said to be generated yet the totum compositum or the man may as hereafter shall be demonstrated If the soul of man be not produced by generation then man is in a worse condition Obje 3 then a plant or a brute which can and do beget soules suitable to their kinde viz. animam vegetativam sensitivam Man is in a better condition then a brute even in regard of generation because by Resp that very act Nobilissima forma unitur cum materia That which is urged advances the condition of man and not lowers or debases it we may observe the lesse use God makes of second causes in the carrying on of any work the more excellent that work is viz. Adam and Eve exceeded their posterity in soul and bodily perfections the body of Christ that was formed in an extraordinary way by the Spirit of God was of a finer make and a more excellent composure then the body of any man or woman in the world and this may be the reason which made his torments on the cross exquisitely painfull It is true we read of some that were rolled in barrells stuck with nayles and of others whose flesh was plucked off with hot iron pinchers and of others that have been broyled on a Gridiron their deaths might be more harsh and severe in themselves considered then the death of Christ and yet Christ might suffer as much or more bodily paine then they According to the rules of Philosophy we say That the nature and quality and measure of paines must be taken not so much from the force or violence of the agent as from the condition and temper of the patient the fire hath not the same operation upon Gold as it hath upon Lead The lead suffers a great deale more from the fire then the gold If a man should deale blowes with an even hand on a sound body and on a sickly crazy body their pain would be unequal though the blowes were equall now to our purpose without question the body of Christ was soft and tender Aristotle hath this rule Quò complexio nobilior mensque dexterior eò mollior ac tenerior solet esie caro The more noble the complexion and the more dextrous the mind the more soft and tender the body The body of Christ was of a most excellent temperament Quae fiunt per miraculum excellentiora sunt quám quae fiunt per naturam Those things that are done by miracle are more excellent then those things that are done by naturall causes viz. the wine that Christ made at a marriage in Cana of Galilee and the body of Christ If God creates the soul of all those that are Object begotten then he concurres with whoremongers and adulterers in the act of generation Nam fornicariis
After the death of Christ their use was indifferent for a time this time was till the doctrine of Christian liberty might be fully made known to the world which could not be done on a sudden As Acts of Parliament have a day set downe when they shall be in force that so all the subjects of the Land may have time convenient to take knowledge of them so it is in this case 3. But now they are not necessary nor indifferent but absolutely forbidden After the passion of Christ Jewâ—sh Ceremonies were mortuae saith a learned man that is dead But after the divnlgation of the Gospel they becâ—me mortiferae that is deadly Saint Aâ—gustine elegantly expresseth this by a similitude A mans friend dyes he doeth not so soone as the breath is out of his body take him by the heeles and dragge him out of the doores and cast him upon the dunghill but he keeps him a certaine time wraps him in fair cloaths and so with honour accompanies him to the grave so these Ceremonies were alive till Christ and because they had been by divine Ordinance of great use in Gods worship they remained for a time indifferent that so they might be laid down in an honourable manner And here you may see the difference between Lawes Ceremoniall and Lawes morall the one were temporary the other are universall â—nd perpetuall the one were therefore good because they were commanded the other were commanded because they were good Morall Lawes â—ave an inward goodnesse in them which others have not When the Apostle would set forth the glory and excellency of the morall Law he gives these titles to it that it is holy and just and good which holinesse justice Rom. 7.12 and goodnesse he opposeth to his owne wickednesse I am carnall saith he but the Law is holy and just and good Now look as his carnality that was contrary to the Law was evill in it selfe so the Law which was contrary to that carnality was just holy and good in it selfe The Prophet Micah perceiving how forward many were in Ceremoniall duties and sacrifices in opposition hereunto he tells them He hath shewed Mic. 6.8 thee Oh man what is good speaking of morall duties as shewing mercy and walking humbly with God were not sacrifice and offerings good as well as mercy and walking humbly Yes but herein lyes the difference sacrifice and burnt-offerings were not in themselves good but onely as commanded by God but morall obedience as shewing mercy and walking humbly is good in it selfe and therefore said the Prophet He hath shewed thee Oh man what is good 10. Rule Comparisons in Scripture must not be wrested further then the scope of the comparison requires For instance Saint James â—aith As the body without the Jam. 2.26 spirit is dead so faith without workes is dead also The Papists gather from hence as the soul is the forme of the body and animates it so are workes the forme of faith which animate faith but the comparison is wrested for the scope of the Apostle is this as the body is known not to be dead by the operation and presence of the soul so faith is known not to be dead by workes So the Church is called the piller of truth The Papists make the comparison 1 Tim. 3. 15. here as the pillar upholds the house so the Church upholds truth But the comparison is wrested the Church is the pillar of truth viz. it holds out truth we use to hang out things upon pillars but it doth not hold it up 11. Rule When we read concerning Christ in the Scriptures we must consider what expressions referce to Christ as he was God what expressions referre to Christ as he was man and what referre to his person as he was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 God-man This Rule must heedfully be observed that we may neither confound the natures of Christ with Eutyches or cry up two persons in Christ with Nestorius As we may say concerning a man that some things are attributed to him which are proper onely to his soul as he is said to understand to grieve to rejoyce to fear to hope some things are attributed to him which are proper onely to his body as to eat and drinke and walk some things again are attributed unto him which are neither proper to the soul alone or the body alone but to the Quid compositum the person consisting of both for instance to laugh to write accurately to speake judiciously In like manner some things are spoken of Christ as he was God for instance he is called the Word the image of the invisible God the expresse image of his substance Some things are spoken of Christ as he was man as that he was acquainted with griefs that he was hungry thuirsty c. some things againe are spoken of Christ neither as he was God nor as he was man distinctly considered but as he was God-man for instance Had they known it they would not have crucified 1 Cor. 2.8 the Lord of glory So Take heed unto your selves and to all the floock c. to feed Act. 20. 28. the Church of God which he hath purchased with his owne blood 12. Rule There are severall promises in the Scriptures which although as to the rinde and outside of them they seem to relate onely to temporals yet if we look within we shall finde that they containe spiritualls Now this must carefully be observed that we may be established concerning the truth of divine promises Abraham was promised a sonne a blessing temporall but there was a spirituall blessing annexed even the greatest that ever the sonnes of men were made partakers of viz. the Lord Jesus Christ whom the Scripture calls the sonne of Abraham that seed in which all the nations of the earth should be blessed You have another instance also in Samuel where Nathan says to David When thy dayes be fulfilled and thou shalt 2 Sam. 7. 12 13 c. sleepe with thy fathers I will set up thy seed after thee which shall proceed out of thy bowels he shall build an house for my Name and I will establish the throne of his Kingdom for ever These words here are spoken of Solomon and yet something else is intended by the Spirit of God in this Scripture then can in propriety of speech be attributed unto Solomon For the power of Solomon was exceedingly weakned before his death and afterward his son even upon the point cast out of his Kingdom by the revolting of the ten tribes But that which is more then all this Solomons race we may see ended in Jeconiah Thus saith the Lord Write ye this man childlesse Jerem. 22. 30. a man that shall not prosper in his dayes for no man of his seed shall prosper sitting upon the throne of David and ruling any more in Juda. Therefore this promise must be extended further then to Solomon and his seed to Christ even of whom
dayes for Divine service how improbable is it that Cain and Abel should concurre at the same time in bringing their offerings unto the Lord and if not at the same time how could Cain discerne that Abels offering was respected and accepted of God when his was Gen. 4.3 not and besides it is said In processe of time it came to passe that Cain brought of the fruit of the ground an offering unto the Lord. In the processe of time or at the end of days as it is in the margin of your Bibles and as the original will bear it viz. on the Sabbath-day when there is an end of the dayes of the week and they begin again I might adde that it is not improbable but that Noah and his family kept the Sabbath in the Ark for it is said that he stayed Gen. 8. 10 12. other seven dayes and sent forth the Dove out of the Ark and verse 12. He stayed other seven dayes and sent forth the Dove why did Noah this on the seventh day It was likely that then Noah and his family were at prayer and engaged in the worship and service of God and at such times it is good to make experiments of Gods fatherly care of us and providence over us Quest. 3. verse 4. In the first Chapter it is said that God made the heavens and the earth in six dayes and in this verse it is said These are the generations of the heaven and the earth in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens From this place some would gather that Resp 1 all the world was made in one day and that Moses doth divide the creation into six dayes propter captum that it might be the better understood Others conceive that Moses relates to that first matter or substance of which all things were created now this was made in one day Others think with whom I close that Moses doth not speak strictly here but indefinitely in the day the Lord made the earth that is to say in the time the Lord made the earth so it is taken in other places of Scripture To day if you will hear Psal 95.7 his voice c. Quest. 4. verse 5. How God could be said to create every plant of the field before it was in the earth Either the meaning is that they were Resp 1 created potentialiter in the first masse and so created before they were in the earth Or else the meaning is this God created every plant of the field before it was in the earth viz. there was not a plant in the earth before God created it Quest 5. verse 7. It is said God formed man of the dust of the earth How can man be said to be made of dust or earth when he is made of the four elements earth fire aire water Moses saies God formed man of the dust Resp 1 of the earth but not only of the dust of the earth Moses loquitur de terra ut de causa partiali non totali Moses speaks of the dust but as part of that matter of which man was made But he expresses the one and therefore Object by consequence denies the other This is just as if a man by calling one his Resp fathers sonne should deny him to be his mothers Quest 6. verse 7. Why doth the Lord speak distinctly in this verse concerning mans body and soul We shall finde God speaks of other creatures in the bulk body and soul together Let the waters bring forth abandantly the moving creature that hath life and so verse Gen. 1. 20 24 24. Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kinde c. To note the spirituality and immateriality Resp 1 of the soul the soul of man non educitur ex potentiâ materiae as the Learned phrase it but the body was made of one kind of substance and the soul of another for Consider 1. The condition and nature of its object speaks this truth Seneca could say Hoc habet argumentum anima suae divinitatis quòd illam divina delectant This argument of its spirituality hath the soul of man in its own essence that it is delighted with things divine and spiritual If the soul were material we could not reach to the knowledge of any thing but that which is material and we might as well see Angels with our eyes as understand them with our mindes We say Receptio fit per modum recipientis you cannot fill a chest with vertue 2. It s independence on the body it is able of it self to performe its own actions without the help and concurrence of the outward man It seeth when the eys beshut and sometimes seeth not when the eyes be open It travelleth while the body resteth resteth when the body travelleth Rev. 1. 10. When John saw his glorious revelation he is said to be in the spirit when Paul had his revelations and saw things unutterable he knew not whether he were in the body or out of the body for beleevers to know that there are laid up for the Saints such joyes which eye hath not seene nor eare heard what is this but to leave sense behinde us and out-run our bodies 3. Time that wears out all corporeal things addes perfection to the souls and understandings of men old men who have the weakest bodies have the most lively and vigorous souls yea we may observe that men who have the most admirable soul-accomplishments have usually the weakest bodies and are not of the longest lives 'T is a remarkable passage that of Saint John to Gaius I wish saith he that thy body prospered even as thy soul prospers Here is a clear text against the Atheists of these dayes that question whether there be a soul or not the truth is a man cannot doubt of it without it as a man cannot prove Logick to be unnecessary but by Logick as a man cannot say he is dumb without speaking Quest 7. verse 7. In what sense these words are to be understood He breathed into his face the breath of life for the Manichees from hence held that the soul was part of Gods Essence as the breath is part of a mans substance It is true in mans breath there is part of Resp his substance but these words are not spoken of God properly but metaphorically if Moses should have said Jehovah by the power of his Spirit without making use of any elementary matter breathed into man a vital soul An horrid blasphemy to think the Essence of God should be subject to change ignorance sinne c. as the soul is Quest. 8. verse 7. Why is God said to breath into his nostrils or face the breath of life rather then into any other part of the body Because the operations of the soul discover themselves in no part of the body Resp 1 more then in the face hence a living man is usually pictured smiling or reading c. And besides the face and head
and then we must affirme corpore infici posse spiritum which is an absurdity for 1. Though the truth of this axiome be taken for granted that Corpus non potest agere in spiritum yet I conceive we may demurre to it For though it should be assented unto that this could not be done by the power of nature yet it may be done by the efficacy and power of divine ordination Especially if we consider what a strict union there is between the soul and the body and that according to the various disposition and affecton of the body the soul also is variously affected and disposed We finde by experience that children resemble their parents not onely in their countenance and the outward lineaments of their body but in their manners and inward habiliments of their mind We finde that the soul in a great measure followes the temper of the body and that the spirits humors organs of the body being vitiated and disordered there followes upon this frenzy Melancholy passion and the like The Learned say Potentia materiae est duplex 1. Naturalis quae educibilis est in actum vi alicujus agentis naturalis There is a naturall power in that which that materiall or corporeall which is educible into act by vertue of a naturall agent that is to say wood hath a naturall power to receive heat viz. vi naturalis agentis scilicet ignis 2. Obedientialis an obediential power which is educible into act by vertue of a superior agent this wood or stone hath an obediential power to be formed into astatue for this is not effected by a natural agent which doth necessariò agere but by vertue of an Artist such a power also hath the soul to receive spiritual gifts the supernatural gifts of the Spirit as faith hope c. We say the work of conversion is possibile naturae though impossibile naturâ possible to nature though impossible to be wrought by a natural power Obediential power of a subject to receive a new form puts not any causall power in the thing or matter to be changed all such power is without viz. in the efficient there is onely a power of reception in the thing or matter not a power of causality Now we may take into consideration whether vi superioris agentis corpus may not agere in spiritum To this I might adde the consideration of the fire of hell which for ought I can learne may be material and yet can tâ—rment spirits as calor naturalis hath two properties 1. Calefacere to make warme and this it acts of it selfe 2. Alimentum in debitas partes distribuere To convey nourishment into the severall parts of the body and this it acts as an instrument of the soule so Hel-fire may be considered in its selfe and so it burnes bodies or as an instrument of divine wrath and so it torments spirits 2. Be it granted that the soule is created pure by God and that it cannot be tainted by the body yet it may be polluted ratione suppositi by Gods ordination and appointment as it is the soul of a man son and heir of corrupt Adam If you aske me Supposing this be taken for granted that we are defiled upon the account of divine ordination as a punishment inflicted by God on man for his apostasie by what instrument or second cause this is effected or brought to passe I answer that as there is nothing more secret then the forming of the child in the wombe the union of the soul with the body and the manner how it is united thereunto so this also must needs be a secret by he mediation of what instrument or second cause man comes to be defiled There are also other Objections urged against the doctrine of the creation of the soul It seems not to suit with the justice and Obj. 2 goodnesse of God to shut up a pure and innocent soul into a stincking prison and to thrust it as it were into abridewell that it might be corrupted there The consequence is to be deny'd for he Resp 1 may be said to act unjustly that acts contrary to what he is bound to do according to principles of justice but God is not bound to infuse the soules of the sonnes of Adam who sinned in Adam and merited thereby eternall death into pure bodies But rather the contrary according to the curse In the day thou eatest thereof thou shalt dye the death We say that God doth infuse a pure soul into an impure body as the phrase may vulgarly be taken for that would imply that our souls before they were united to our bodies were pure which suits not with our principles formerly mentioned Causa causae est etiam causa causatâ— Obj. 3 The cause of the cause is also the cause of that which is caused by that cause viz. if God be the cause of the union of the soul with the body therefore he is the cause of that sinne that is occasioned by that union This rule is to be understood de causis Resp perse not de causis per accidens viz. God is the cause of his divine Law the Law is the cause of sinne per accidens as the Apostle I was alive without the Law once but when the Commandment came sin revived and I Rom. 8.9 died Yet no man will from thence conclude that God was the cause of sin How can Originall sin be propagated Obj. 4 and not the soul Non potest accidens traduci sine subjecto Accidents do frequently transire à subjecto Resp 1 in subjectum non transeunte subjecto as for instance heresie is propaged in these dayes and derived from one to another but so is not the soul which is the subject of these errours The same numericall accident cannot transire à subjecto in subjectum but so may the same in kind as appeares in the former instance Quest 5. vers 4. According to what space of time the yeares of the Patriarchs were measured The great age of the Patriarchs hath Resp enclined some to believe that their yeares did not containe the same space of time with those after the flood and with ours to this day Indeed we read of two periods of time especially by the ancients called yeares 1. There was annus solaris or that which they called their solar yeare which was the same with ours and contained 12. moneths Now this yeare was called solaris because it was measured by the Suns passing through the Zodiack 2. There was annus lunaris or that which they call their lunar yeares the same with our moneth or thereabouts now this was called Lunaris because it is measured by the Moons passing through the Zodiack Some think that the yeares of the Patriarchs were Lunar yeares The dayes of Adam were eight hundred yeares that is say Gen. 5.4 they eight hundred moneths c. Now this cannot in any case be allowed for these reasons 1. Enoch begat children at 65. yeares
religion on those who succeeded Let the consideration of the frailty of our bodies teach us to consult for the good of our immortall soules We may observe many times it so falles out that our rational life is best when our vegetative is worst and we begin to grow in wisdome when we cease to grow in strength As it is with the rationall life so it should be with the spirituall when the life of the flesh is ready to dye the spiritual life should have so much the more spirit and vigour Quest 8. V. 24. It is said in this verse that Enoch was not for God tooke him now the question here may be whether Enoch was translated in soule and body or whether in soule only c Some thinke that Enoch was translated Resp in soule only and not in body and they say he died in the translation so as his soule only was taken up to heaven and his body slept in the earth I shall propound their arguments and give you the answers rendered thereunto No mortall body unglorified can enter Argu. 1 into heaven But there is no mention of his glorification Ergo. It is a slender kinde of arguing to say that Resp 1 a thing is not scriptural because it is not expressely mentioned in the Scripture The glorification of his body is plainly implied though not expressed for it is said he was translated that he should not see death Heb. 11.5 Now if his body saw not death it was made immortall which is a speciall part of glorification If the bodies of Enoch and Elias were translated Argu. 2 into heaven then it will follow that some ascended into heaven before Christ ascended thither But this seemes not to be allowed for heaven to us as Paradise to Adam was shut up till Christ opened it by hsme rits We readily grant that the opening of Resp 1 heaven the celestiall Paradise is to be ascribed to the merits of Christ We confidently deny that heaven was then only opened when Christ actually suffered or ascended up into heaven and we cannot but peremptorily assert that the force and efficacy of the merits of Christ extended to Old Testament-Saints long before Christs coming in the flesh for the Lord Jesus was a Lambe slain from the foundation of the world Christ the same yesterday to day and for ever and our Fathers under Old Testament-dispensations ate the same spiritual meat and drank the same spiritual drink as we do under the Gospel viz. the body of Christ crucified and his blood shed for the remission of sinnes and these things though they were future to hope yet they were present to faith which is the Substance of things hoped for and the evidence of things not seene From Joh. 3.13 And no man hath ascended Arg. 3 up to heaven but he that came downe from heaven even the Son of man which is in heaven By which words say some is signified that no man bodily ascended into heaven untill the time of Christs ascension This place is to be expounded Metaphorically Resp No man hath ascended into heaven so as to know the secrets of the Almighty and to lie in the bosome of the Father but onely Christ and indeed the context gives great light to this Exposition for the Lord Jesus would by this convince Nicodemus that he was more able to teach him heavenly mysteries then all the Doctors among the Jewes as you may perceive by vers 11. and 12. Verily I say unto thee We speak that we do know and â—estifie that we have seenâ— c. And besides Prov. 30. 4. Ascending up into heaven is made all one with the knowing of holy things From Heb. 6.20 Where Christ is called Arg. 4 the forerunner And Christ saith John 14. I go to prepare a place for you Therefore before Christs death and ascension a place was not prepared Christ might be called a forerunner Resp 1 in respect of those who died after his ascension Christ might be called the forerunner of his Saints under the Old Testament in regard of the effiâ—acy of his merits That a place was prepared for Old Testament-Saints by Christ but with respect to his future sufferings and merits and therefore though a place might be said to be prepared for Enoch and Elias yet it was necessary Christ should die and Christ should ascend From Col. 1.15 where Christ is called Arg. 5 the first-borne of every creature and verse 18. in all things to have the preeminence and Rom. 8.29 he is called the first-born among many brethren The primogeniture of Christ doth not Resp consist in this that no man either in regard of body or soul or both ascended into heaven before Christs coming in the flesh but in this that no man hath nor shall ever come thither but by the vertue and efficacy of his merits As Christ is called the first-fruits of them that sleep not because none arose 1 Cor. 15. â—0 before Jesus Christ but because he alone arose by his owne power and is the cause of the resurrection of all those that have or shall arise unto glory sâ— here Christ alone ascended into heaven by his owne power and is the cause of the ascension of his people unto glory To whom be glory for ever Amen 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 FINIS Directions FOR The right understanding Of the SCRIPTURES 1. Rule THere are tropes or figurative expressions which are made use of by the Spirit of God in the Scriptures which if not warâ—ly observed will occasion a misunderstanding of the text The Scriptures are adorned with various kinds of Elegancies and Rhetoricall expressions demulcere animos legentis Amongst many others I shall instance in two 1. The figure called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a figure whereby one thing is signified by two severall Noune substantives As The Lord will create upon every dwelling place of Mount Sion and upon her assemblies a cloud aâ—d smoke by day viz. a smoaky cloud Isa 4. 5 So I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance but he that cometh after me is Mat. 3.11 mightier then I whose shoes I am not worthy to beare he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost and with fire viz. with the holy Ghost as with fire Sad consequences may follow upon the literall Interpretation of this Scripture I have read that the Abyseni tooke this text literally and when they baptized their children they poured water upon them and then marked them with an hot iron 2. The figure called Ironia whereby we speak one thing and meane another but signifie our meaning either by our gesture or manner of speaking this manner of speech though it be often abused unto sinne as in deriding and scorning our brethren yet is in it selfe lawfull if rightly used and of this we have example in the Scriptures Such a speech was that of Michaiah to wicked Ahab Go up and prosper If this figure were not 1 King 22. 15 observed we might question the