Selected quad for the lemma: spirit_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
spirit_n body_n bone_n flesh_n 7,585 5 7.4908 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A62613 A sermon preach'd before the Right Honourable the Lord Mayor, the aldermen, and governours of the several hospitals of the city of London, at St. Bridget's Church on Easter-Monday, 1700 by ... William, Lord Bishop of Oxford. Talbot, William, 1658 or 9-1730. 1700 (1700) Wing T125; ESTC R23464 21,314 34

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

promised for himself as the great proof of his Authority and Religion that in three Days he would raise again the Temple of his Body Then if after three Days he was not risen what should move them to try with so much hazard to themselves to make Men believe he was risen Whereas if he had fail'd them in this they had all the reason in the World to look upon him as an Impostor and themselves as Cheated by him who had avouched himself to be the Messias and yet had not Answered the Characters given by the Prophets of the Messias who had made himself the Antitype of Jonas who lay three Days and Nights in the Whale's Belly and declared that in conformity to the Type he would lie three Days and Nights in the Belly of the Earth and rise again the third and yet was so far from making this good that after many three days he still lay Captivated under the Power of Death When they were once convinced of this it had been surely the greatest madness in the World for them to expose themselves to Dangers and Miseries to attest so monstrous a lie either for the sake of such a deceiver or of a Religion which such an Impostor was the Author of But I need not insist upon this for the Sepulchre was not only found empty but he frequently appear'd and shew'd himself alive to several the very Day of his Resurrection that it might appear that the Circumstance of time which he foretold was fullfilled And when his Disciples upon his first appearance among them he shew'd himself three several times to them when they were Assembled together were affrighted supposing they had seen a Spirit without any real Body he calls for Meat and eats before them he appeals to their Sences bids them Handle him and Feel that he had a true Body consisting of Flesh and Bone and to convince them that 't was the same Body that suffered he shews them the Prints of the Nails in his Hands and Feet and afterwards made Thomas who it seems was resolved to submit to no less Conviction to thrust his hands into the Wound made by the Spear in his Side and to support the Testimony which these should give of his Resurrection and to put it beyond all Contradiction he appear'd to more than Five hundred at once and last of all to St. Paul who appeal'd to the greatest part of that Five hundred as then living for the proof of this 1 Cor. 15. So that this matter as it is laid in these Books is so attested that no one former thing in the whole World ever had that evidence of Fact The sum of what I have said is this The evidence of these Facts is so strong that whoever can disbelieve them can never believe any thing that happen'd before his own time or out of his own sight The Facts are such that whoever believes they were done cannot disbelieve that Doctrine for the proof of which they were done without believing that God who can no more deceive than be deceived has misled Men into the belief of a falshood in a matter wherein it is of the greatest consequence to them not to be mistaken by the greatest and most irresistible External Evidence that can be had of the Truth of any thing And consequently those to whom these Facts are thus made out can have no good reason to deny or suspend their Assents to that Religion for the confirmation whereof these Works were wrought What cloake they have for their Infidelity what pretences they would cover it with we shall see in the third and next particular And here First 'T is said that the Christian Religion has not been generally Reveal'd and therefore cannot be necessary to future Happiness because if it were those who could not know it are out of a Possibility of a future State of Blessedness which seems Inconsistent with God's Infinite goodness who provides for all his Creatures the means of attaining that Happiness whereof their Natures are capable Orac. of Reas p. 198 c. The force of which objection depends upon a false supposition they take it for granted that we teach that those who could not have any knowledge of the Christian Religion are out of a capacity of being saved Thus they would have it believ'd that we say because otherwise they have no ground for this Argument But for our parts we deny that our Church teaches any such Doctrine We do not determine Peremptorily of the Eternal State of the Heathens we do not pretend to Judge those that are without to their own Master they stand or fall We say indeed Infidelity is a damning Sin but we mean not a Negative but a Privative Infidelity a want of Faith in a subject capable of it We say there is no Salvation but through the Merits of Jesus Christ but say not whether or how far God may extend the benefit of those Merits to such as live according to the best light they have and whose unhappiness and not fault it is that they want the light of Revelation To be sure they shall not be Judged by or Condemned for not obeying the Revealed Law which being not made known could not be a Rule to them but shall be tryed by the Law written in their Hearts So St. Paul expresly says Rom. 2.14 The Gentiles having not the Law are a Law to themselves which shew the Work of the Law written in their Hearts their Conscience also bearing witness and their Thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another in the Day when God shall Judge the secrets of Men by Jesus Christ according to my Gospel But if we are so Charitable to the Gentiles why should not we Judge as favourably of our Modern Deists Their cases are widely different The former never heard of Christ or his Religion These have heard of and yet oppose and revile both And our Saviour has plainly determined in favour of the former rather than these in my Text If I had not come and spoken unto them they had not had Sin but now they have no Cloke for their Sin Secondly It may be objected against the Authority of the Scriptures that there have several Books gone abroad in the World under the Names of the Sacred Writers which are discover'd to be Forgerles But surely 't is no new discovery that there have been such Books or that they are Forgeries The cheats have been long since detected and the Books rejected by the Christians But what can be inferred from hence Any thing to the prejudice of the Books which the Christians own Not in reason For if another man should write a Book in the name of a celebrated Author or under the Title which his Works bear and that Book should afterwards appear to be Spurious 't would be very hard that this should affect the credit of that Author 's genuine Works I think the consequence turns the other way and the Books falsly