Selected quad for the lemma: spirit_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
spirit_n believe_v holy_a scripture_n 6,955 5 5.9774 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A49808 Baptismalogia, or, A treatise concerning baptisms whereto is added a discourse concerning the supper, bread and vvine, called also, communion / by Thomas Lawson. Lawson, Thomas, 1630-1691. 1678 (1678) Wing L723; ESTC R36244 71,361 108

There are 11 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

denyes Christ and his Baptism with the Spirit and sets John and his Water-baptism in his Throne thou stumblest at the Rock the Day-Star thou knowest not nor the Sun of Righteousness risen and the Shadows flown away Now if any scruple this Scripture and simply desires to be resolved whether Baptism he preaches up the Mouth of Paul in another place may inform thee 1 Cor. 12.13 By one Spirit we are all baptized into one Body Here thou may'st be satisfied he tells thee there is One Baptism he also informs thee what that one Baptism is not into Iordan not into a Bowl Bason or Font but by the one Spirit into one Body So to every seeing Eye Iohn's Water-baptism is here laid aside his Ordinance thereto repeal'd Now it being that Paul was not sent to baptize with Water and that he preached up one baptism and that of the Spirit it necessarily follows that whom he baptized with Water he did it by Permission in reference to Iohn's Ministration Using and Instituting are two things the Apostles Condiscended where they never Commanded And whereas some alledge The Eunuch said unto Philip Here is Water what doth hinder me to be baptized Philip said If thou believe with all thy heart thou mayest Acts 8.36 37. He saith not thou must he held it not to be of absolute Necessity so condescended as before The holy Spirit which seals up to God was received without Water-baptism or Rantism where then is the Necessity of Dipping or Sprinkling Now in reference to what was last objected several Testimonies consonant to what I here assert might be produced and that of such who were not of mean Account in their Day their Works by many yet had in esteem The use of the Ceremonial Law saith Wollebius in his common places was profitab●e before the Death of Christ after his Death unto the Promulgation or spreading abroad of the Gospel it 〈◊〉 as indifferent but after the Promulgation or clear publishing of the Gospel the observation of Ceremonies is not only unwholsome and unprofitable but also deadly Hence Paul at the beginning would have Timothy Circumcised because of the weakness of the Jews Acts 16.3 but after that the Gospel was more fully Preached he would not yield that Titus should be Circumcised Gal. 2. And saith he ' The Observation of Iewish Ceremonies would now be nothing but a denying of the Coming and Death of Chr●st So there was a time say I when Iordan-washing was profitable there was a time when it was indifferent in which time the Apostles made some use of it and there is a time when it may be said to be Antichristian in pleading for the outward Washing when the Laver of Regeneration filled with the Water of Life for the clensing of the inward Man is set open and when performed in that Spirit which is at Enmity unto Christ Wilfred a Presbyter reasoning with Bishop Coleman about the time of the celebration of Easter said God forbid we shou'd accuse the Apostle of Folly when he observed the Precepts of Moses the Church as yet Iudaizing in many things neither were the Apostles on a sudden able to abolish all Legal Observances which had been of Divine Institution On this account Paul circumcised Timothy offered in the Temple purified himself allowed of Head-shaving had his Head shorn at Cencrea profitable to no other end but to avoid ministring of Offence to the Jews who being weak saw not the End of these things in the year 664. Piscator on Acts 16.3 saith After the Example of Paul and Timothy that the Weak may be gained let us not refuse to submit unto troublesome things which otherwise we might with a good Conscience forbear Paul saith Trapp on 1 Cor. 9. became all things to all men that he might save some and how not in conforming to their Impieties but in the Use of things indifferent in Bowels of Compassion to them Paul saith he harp'd much of this String out of a fervent and ardent Desire to gain Souls to the Lord. Though many Legal Types saith Gell continued some considerable time after Christ's Death yet they lost their positive and obligatory Power and were used only as Adiaphora things indifferent in Compliance with the inveterate Prejudices of new Converts lately brought over from Judaism who could not quickly lay aside that great Veneration which they had for the Rites of Mosaik Institutions Obj. Peter baptized some Gentiles after that the Spirit was fain upon them doth not this perpetuate Water-Baptism Answ True it is while Peter preached the Everlasting Gospel unto the Gentiles the Gift of the Holy Spirit was poured out upon them then said Peter Can any man forbid Water that these should not be baptized which have received the Holy Spirit as well as we Acts 10.44 c. The Grounds and Reasons why Water-Baptism John's Ministration was some time used for a season in the primitive times by the Apostles are before mentioned I do not believe that Peter had any more Command for Water-Baptism then Paul had who said expresly Christ sent me not to baptize but to preach the Gospel Yea and this Paul said Acts 20.27 I have not shunned to declare unto you the whole Counsel of God It seems John's Ministration of Water-Baptism's Continuance was not of his Counsel Where did he exhort Timothy Titus Philemon or any of the Churches he wrote Epistles to to continue Water-baptism on the contrary he shews it was fulfilled ended repealed as hath before been spoken to though in Relation to Iohn's Ministration and in Compliance with the present State he baptized some few as others upon the same grounds did Paul circumcised Timothy yet in 1 Cor. 7.19 he saith Circumcision is nothing and Vncircumcision is nothing but the keeping of the commandments of God The same may be said of Water-baptism ' Ti● not Dipping or Not Dipping but the keeping of the Commandments of God this is the bonum hominis the totum hominis the one thing necessary 't was not easie to bring them from what had been commanded but as Truth discovered it self to be the Substance thereof Paul writing to the Galatians said How turn ye again to the weak and beggarly Elements whereunto ye desire again to be in Bondage Gal. 4.9 W●at is earthly and beggarly is not of power to enrich with spiritual Blessings Water is an Element appertains to the elemen●ary Part in man which is to pass away in the Revelation of the Substance which turns out the earthly within and earthly Rudiments without establishing a Kingdom in Righteousness and Substance out of Figures and Shadows Peter never ascribed Regeneration to outward Water neither did he preach That Children damnati priusquam nati that is damned before they be born as the Doctrine is now by sprinkling Water upon them are made Members of Christ Children of God and Inheritors of the Kingdom of Heaven but he ascribed Regeneration to the Eternal Word saying Being born again not of
the Purity of the primitive Church through the Smoak of the Bottomless Pit darkned then Traditions and Inventions of men were multiplyed then the Necessity of Infants Baptism by Augustine Cyprian and such like was introduced and by the Ratification and Enjoynment of Popes Councils General National or Provincial Synods Kings as absolutely necessary was strengthned Johannes Bohemius saith That Baptism of old was administred to none unless upon urgent Necessity but to such as were before instructed in the Faith and catechised but when it came to be iudged Necessary to Everlasting L●fe it was ordained that Infants should be baptized and that they should have Godfathers and Godmothers who should be Sureties for Infants and should renounce the Devil in their behalfs it grew to this in the Roman-Catholick-Church that at the baptizing of a Child the Priest 1. blows three times in the Infants Face 2. he anoints his Eyes Ears and Nostrils with Earth moistned with his Spittle 3. he names him and marks him with the sign of the Cross upon his Breast and Back with Hallowed Oyle 4. he dips him into the Water or pours Water upon him three times in form of a Cross 5. dipping his Thumb in the Holy Chrism as they call it he signs the Childs Forehead with the sign of the Cross 6. he covers him with a White Garment 7. he puts into his Hand a Burning Candle Lib. 2. de Gentium moribus When the primitive Purity was turned from the one Baptism by the one Spirit into one Body lost then steamed such like things out of the Bottomless Pit into the Church and to gain Estimation they must be stiled Christ's Commands or at least Apostolical Traditions Augustine as 't is said was the first that preached the Necessity of Infants Baptism and as Nations became drunk with the Cup of Abomination and Fornication idolatrous and strange Erroneous Doctrines streamed out of Apostatized Christendom About the year 402. the Milevitan Council celebrated by ninety two Bishops put out this Canon All that affirm that young Children receive Everlasting Life without the Sacrament of Baptism and will not that young Children newly born be baptized to the taking away of original Sin that they be anathematized Magdiburg Cent. 5. This Canon then sent to Rome had the Ratification of Pope Innocent the third In the 5th General Council at Carthage held in the year 416. 't was decreed That whosoever denies that little Children by Baptism are freed from Perdition and eternally saved let them be accursed Tuis was confirmed and ratified by the said Pope Innocent the third after by Pope Zosimus after by Pope Boniface Isidore saith If Children were not baptized so thereby renewed and original Sin washed away they were in a state of Damnation Madg. cent 7. Pope Hormisda ordained That Children if they be weak should be baptized the same day in which they are born Summa Concil et Pontis And what care is taken in this Nation for weak Children to make sure their Christendom as they say I may be silent About the year 692. In a King of the West-Saxons ordained That every Infant should be baptized within thirty dayes after its Birth on the Penalty of his Parents forfeiting thirty shillings and if the Child dyed unbaptized the whole Estate These Saxons received the Faith of the Church of Rome from the mouth of Austine the Monk and others About the year 816. the Council under Wolfred ordained That they should not pour Water upon the Heads of Infants but immerge that is dip them in the Font Full. pag. 109. It seems they were for Dipping not for Sprinkling In the 9th Century it crept in ' That in Exorcism the Head Ears and Nose should be salted and anointed before Baptism Magd. Cent. 9. Augustine's Doctrine That Children born or unborn were damned if they dyed within Baptism being received at a Heavenly Oracle hence Infants Baptism was enjoyned by Popes Councils and Kings and great Virtue was ascribed to it as the taking away of Original Sin and of regenerating Infants and renewing of them and freeing them from Perdition and eternally saving them and of making them Members of Christ Children of God and tha● it made the Receivers as pure and innocent as Adam was before his Fall these things being believed Church-men became Defenders and Propogators of it common people received it with Greediness Who would refuse an Eternal Inheritance tendred upon such terms Thus Ignorance Blindness entering Christendom the Custom and idolatrous Tradition of Infants Baptism became so epidemical and general as that in the eleventh Century it was scarce questioned in this Age it crept in That Salt should be put into the Mouth of the Baptized Magd. Cent. 11. In the Discourse between Dr. Harpsfield Arch-Deacon and John Bradford Martyr this Bradford said I dare not exclude from Christ all that dye without Baptism He placed not Salvation in visible elementary Water but the Roman-Catholicks are otherwise minded and thrust the Souls of Infants that dye without it into a Limbus infantum a place very nigh Hell and their Bodies out of Christian-burial into an Unhallowed Place and in this Nation who pretend to Reformation behind the Church so called if granted for burial to the Unbaptized must be received as a Favour And to the Decrees of Popes Councils and Kings there are several wrested Scriptures and Objections alledged for the defence and confirmation of Infants Baptism I. Obj. Whole Families were baptized so Children Answ 'T is written that whole Families believed John 4.53 Must it be inferred hence that Children not grown up to years of Discretion believed Families may be without Children they may be grown up or they might be newly married Families or their Children might be dead so 't is a wild Inference to ground Infants Baptism on this saith Optatus II. Obj. The Spirit accompanies Water in Baptism and Water so accompanied is Christ's Baptism the Spirits Baptism Answ The Scripture bears record against that the holy Spirit sell on the Apostles on the day of Pentecost this was Christs Baptism the Spirits Baptism and here was no Water made use of Acts 1 2. yea and in Acts 11.15 he call the holy Spirit falling on them the Spirits Baptism without the Element of Water as for Water that he calls John's Baptism III. Obj. Those that have right to the Promise they have right to the Seal thereof but the Children of Believers have right to the Promise ergo they have right to the Seal that is baptism Answ In Christ the Promise of the Father all the Kindreds of the Earth obtain the Blessing he is also the Covenant of Light given for Salvation to the Ends of the Earth Isaiah 43.6 and that such as have right to the Promise have right to the Seal thereof that is a real Truth but that Dipping or Sprinkling of Infants should be the Seal of the Covenant that I deny as Antichristian consider the first Covenant stood in Meats
and Drinks and divers Baptisms that is Washings it had a temporary Seal to wit Circumcision Rom. 4.11 but the New Covenant Christ Jesus the great Promise of the Father hath a spiritual yea an eternal Seal this is my positive Affirmation in this case that the Old Covenant standing in outward things had an outward Seal but the new Covenant the Promise of the Father hath a spiritual Seal Paul a Witness of Christ the new covenant the great Promise of the Father in writing to the Saints at Ephesus he testified on their behalf saying After that ye believed ye were scaled with the holy Spirit of Promise Ephes 1.13 He calls the Spirit the Seal of the New Covenant Christ the Promise of the Father not Baptism not Rantism dipping or sprinkling Further he exhorted them in these words Grieve not the holy Spirit whereby ye are sealed to the Day of Redemption Ephes 4.30 He preaches up the Spirit to be the Evangelical Seal of the New Covenant the Promise of the Father so who preach up Water-baptism to be the Seal they oppose the Apostles Testimony deny the Lord's Privy and Royal Seal and introduce another of mans making the sealed are the Lord 's Excellent Ones his Worthies And as for that Scripture Acts 2.39 The Promise is unto you and to your Children unto all that are afar off even as many as the Lord shall call This makes nothing for Water-baptism or Rantism to be the Evangelicall Seal Peter told the House of Israel that the Promise was to them to their Children yea to all the called of the Lord. Outward Water was not the Promise which they were to wait for but a thing of a more Heavenly Nature Christ told the Jews John 8.39 If ye were Abraham 's Children ye would do the works of Abraham so that such were the Children of Abraham and had right to the Promise who were found doing the Works of Abraham yea and the Apostle told the Galatians that they which were of Faith were the Children of Abraham Gal. 3.7 such Children as these have right to the Promise and know the Seal thereof IV. Obj. Infants-baptism is an ancient Custom so to be continued in the Church Answ The antiquity of a humane Tradition proves it not to be of divine Institution the spreading or over-spreading of Leprosie proves it not to be Soundness the Entrance of true Reformation thrusts out humane Inventions old as well as new what Christ received of his Father that he taught his Disciples Apostles what the Apostles received from Christ the treasury of Wisdom and Knowledge that they taught to and in the Churches and the same was to be committed and commended to faithful men in the Faith the Tongue of the Learned was their All to them and in them and in this Faith that Tongue was kept silent which afterward brought the Darkness into the Church in the Eye of divine Illumination we see to before August in was or Cyprian was or Pope Innocent the third was who as 't is said first established Infants-baptism by ratifying the Canon of the Milevitan Council by this Eye we see and feel to the Primitive Order before the Apostacy was Christ the Apostles and primitive Church in the Beauty of Heavenly Virginity taught no such thing as dipping or spriekling of Infants and in the Faith the primitive Order is to be pressed after contended for the Smoak of the Pit Inventions Traditions and Idolatious Customs inconsistent with the living Life-giving Truth are to be warred against Id verum quod prius prius quod ab initio ab initio quod ab Apostolis Tertul. contra Marcion lib. 4. That is Truth that was first that was first which was from the beginning which was from the beginning which was from the Apostles what the Apostles preached that they received from Christ who is Alpha and Omega the First and the Last the Beginning and the End glorified with the Father before the Foundation of the World Augustine Bishop of Hippo testified saying Custom is not to be preferred before Truth but ought to give place to the Truth but who plead for Infants-baptism or Rantism they would keep Custom in the Throne and exclude Truth Cyprian Bishop of Carthage bare Testimony saying Custom crept in among some people ought not to hinder Truths prevailing and overcoming for Custom without Truth is nothing but ancient Error wherefore forsaking Error let us pursue the Truth These two said well though true it is as their Writings evidently demonstrate they were guilty of mingling their traditions inventions and imaginations with the Doctrine of Christ and of the Apostles V. Obj. 'T is said Except a man be born of Water and of the Spirit he cannot enter into the Kingdom of God John 3.5 deth not this perpetuate Infants-baptism Answ Christ gave no command for Infants-baptism neither did the Apostles practise any such thing whoever alledge this or any other Scripture for it they use the Scriptures as Torturers who putting innocent men upon the Rack so force them to speak that which they never thought such are these who wrest the Scriptures to draw a sense out of them which the holy Spirit never intended so tortures and perverts them as to make them speak for maintaining those things which were not commanded nor spoken of in those dayes wherein the Scriptures were given forth After the Apostles dayes Satan made an Encroachment upon the Garden of the Lord Earthly Exaltations of Darkness fumed into the Professors of Christianity then their Judgment became carnal and being not able to savour divine things they wrested those Scriptures which spoke of the Water of Life and applyed them to outward Water ascribing inward Washing and Regeneration thereto whenas indeed external Water can contribute nothing thereunto in this place Christ preached unto Nicodemus the Necessity of Regeneration and informed him how it was brought forth not by outward Water which can reach no further then outward things but by a Water able to renew a man to make him a New Holy and Heavenly Creature to dissolve the rotten and loathsom Fabrick of unrenewed untransformed man where Belial is King and to erect a Building in Righteousness and true Holiness where Christ is Monarch sole Lord. Other Scriptures give witness to this as John 4.10 Christ said to the Woman of Samaria If thou knew the Gift of God c. thou wouldst have asked of him and he would have given this living Water Mark here is a Living Water a Life-giving Water effecting a living Work and this all the Re-born know Further saith Christ Vers 14. The Water that I shall give him shall be in him a Well of Water springing up unto Everlasting Life And John 7.38 39. He that believeth on we out of his belly shall flow Revers of living Water which Believers in him should receive there is a living Water producing a Work of Wonder in the Bodies of men making all things new this fulfils inwardly
corruptible Seed but of incorruptible by the Word of God which lives and abides forever 1 Pet. 1.23 Peter a Fisher of Men having caught a Draught of Gentiles was right-glad thereof so in Compliance with the present Season as others did condescended to Outward Water which washes the Outward Man and might take Occasion therefrom to exhort them to wait for an Encrease of the Spirit 's Virtue and Power the Heavenly Baptism which washeth the Inward Man for inward cleansing the Effect of the Spirit 's Baptism is a gradual Work The Third Assertion Christ's Baptism in or with the Spirit only is the Baptism that is to continue in the Church to the End of the World JOhn being the Fore-runner of Christ according to the Father 's Appointment was to baptize with Outward Water John 1.33 to wash away the Filth of the Outward Man shadowing out Christ ready to be revealed and by his spiritual Baptism to cleanse the Inward Man to make it a Habitation of God and this Water-baptism was to be of less Continuance then the Shadows of Moses as the Morning-Star though brighter then the other Stars shines less while then they because the sudden Appearance of the Sun swallows it up So John's Water-baptism though its Beginning was long after Circumcision commanded in Abraham's dayes and the Shadows of the First Priesthood commanded in the dayes of Moses yet was it to have an End with them for when as after Christ's Ascension Christ's Baptism began cleansing inwardly then John's Baptism a Figure thereof was ended and fulfilled the Shadow was to give way to the Substance the Sign to the Truth the Letter to the Spirit the Servant to the Son for as the Prophets were until John so John was until Christ and John must no more exceed his Bounds then Moses and the Prophets theirs as the Prophets gave up to John so Iohn was to give up to Christ Iohn a Creature had a Temporary Baptism but Christ who is the same to day yesterday and forever hath an Everlasting Baptism by the Spirit into one Body and Christ's Kingdom stands not in Signs Figures and Shadows but in Righteousness Peace and Joy in that Spirit wherewith he baptizeth Now after Iohn's Water-Baptism had continued some 4 Years then Christ's Baptism with the Spirit without Water began to be manifested as you may see Acts 1.5 Christ told his Disciples saying John truly baptized with Water but ye shall be baptized with the holy Spirit not many dayes hence Confider they were not to stick in Iohn's Baptism much les in Rantism a Tradition then unheard of nor build their Tarbernacles there nor judge it sufficient but were to wait for the Promise of the Father even the Spirit wherewith Christ baptizeth the plentiful effusion of the Spirit was reserved as the great Blessing of Gospel-days of the Evangelical State and Dispensation which is to run parallel with the Age and Duration of the World herein the Everlasting Gospel is preached to Kindreds Tongues and Nations T●is precious Promise of the Father was accomplished and fulfilled at the Day of Pentecost when the Disciples were waiting together in one Place Cloven Tongues like as of Fire sate upon each of them and they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and spake with other Tongues as the Spirit gave them Utterance Acts 2.1 2 3 4. Thus it was evident and manifest that Iohn the Baptist was a true Prophet who said I baptize with Water but Christ shall baptize with the Holy Spirit and with Fire Christ Acts Chap. 1. bad them wait for the promise of the Father he told them what the Promise was even the Baptism with the holy Spirit and they received what they waited for at the Day of Pentecost Acts 20. they were filled with the holy Spirit which was Christ's Baptism without Water mark this without Water more excellent then Iohn's Baptism with Water Now Baptists and Rantists Dippers and Sprinklers for the most part are faln into that Diminution Deprivation or utter Abolution of divine Understanding as that it seems ridiculous or al●ogether erroneous to tell them of a Baptism without Waters This of Pentecost was the beginning of Christ's Baptism after he was ascended to this Iohn witnessed saying Joh. 7.39 He that believeth on me said Christ out of his Belly shall flow Rivers of living Water but this spake he of the Spirit which they that believe on him should receive for the holy Spirit was not yet given because that Jesus was not yet glorified but as soon as he was glorified then he began to let out the Power of his Spirit even his Baptism the Progress of Christ's Spiritual Baptism was further manifested as Acts 8.17 Peter and Iohn laid their hands on the Believing Samaritans and they received the holy Spirit after this the Apostle Peter preached Christ to Correlius his family and Friends the holy Spirit fell upon them Acts 10.44 Moreover all the Saints at Pome at Corinth in Galatia in Ephesus in Philippi in Coloss in Pontus in Capadocia in Asu● in Bithyniae yea and all the true Churches were in their respective Measures Partakers of the Spirit of the Lord and of its Baptism which was and is the One Baptism to continue in the Church of Christ to the End of the World for in the Church the Kingdom of Christ the Apostles preached not up Circumcision nor Baptisms but one Circumcision made without Hands one Baptism by the Spirit into one Body and of the Necessity of the Continuance of the Spirit 's Baptism in the Church of Christ let the Wise in Heart who read these things consider First Without the Spirit 's Baptism none come to fee the Volumn of Corruptions in his Heart to be cancelled none escape the Bondage Slavery Darkness Defilements and Reprobate State of corrupt Nature but who walk in the Light wherewith Christ hath enlightned them and submit to its Guidance they encrease in heavenly Encreases they grow in the Spirit and seel its Baptism so receive a New Nature and their Thoughts Words and Works are savoury Effects and Fruits of this new and heavenly Nature Peter wrote to the Saints who were Partakers of the Divine Nature 2 Pet. 1.4 Here the Image of God is renewed the Life of God known Fellowship with him in his Holiness and Purity yea in his Blessednes● in the beatifical Presence and Brightness of his Glory this Outward Washing though a Thousand times over can never bring unto but leaves the old Nature the cursed Nature alive and vigorous in the Creature Secondly Christ's Baptism gives a New Name who hearken to Wisdom's Teaching and in the Cros of Christ see Sin crucified in their Mortal Bodies and with the Sword of the Spirit in which the Evangelical Baptism is see the Enmity slain such receive a New Name To him that overcomes will I give to eat of the hidden Manna I will give him a white Stone and in the Stone a New Name written which no man knows
Baptisms in the plural number and that these are John's with Water and Christ's with the Spirit may be proved by a fruitful and plentiful Harvest of Testimonies So they err greatly who affirm that the Baptism of John and the Baptism of Christ made up but One Baptism it being so evident in Scripture that they were distinct which may further thus appear First They were distinct in Name for John's Baptism still kept its Name yea when the Apostles used it it was still called the Baptism of John why so because it was required of him his Office and Work by divine Institution Joh. 1.33 yea after Christ's Baptism with the Spirit came in John's Baptism with Water still retained its Name as being distinct from it Acts 18.24 25. Secondly They were distinct in Manifestation that is Christ's Baptism was to follow John's and did not go along with it at the same time as men now would jumble them together saying The Spirit goes along with the Water and both make up but One Baptism after the Resurrection of Christ before his ascending though John's Baptism had been used several years yet Christ told them that what John spoke concerning him of his baptizing with the Holy Spirit was not fulfilled but shortly to be fulfilled Acts 1.4 5. Christ being assembled with the Apostles commanded them not to depart from Jerusalem but to wait for the Promise of the Father which saith he you have heard of me for John truly baptized with Water but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Spirie not many dayes hence which was fulfilled at the day of Pentecost So that Christ's Baptism did not accompany John's Baptism to make up one entire Baptism for it followed it several years after it so that the Effusion of the Holy Spirit is Christ's Baptism the great Blessing of Gospel-dayes of the Evangelical Dispensation which qualified and doth qualifie to be the Lord 's True and Living Witnesses Thirdly John's Baptism and Christ's were distinct forasmuch as those that John baptized had need of the Baptism of Christ Now if John's Baptism had been one and the same with Christ's that only had been sufficient but John's baptizing of them with Water left them in need of the Baptism of Christ John said unto Christ who came from Galilet to Jordan to be baptized of him I have need to be baptized of thee and comest thou unto me Mat. 3.13 14. So that John the Baptist knew his Baptism to be inferiour to Christ's Baptism so desired more fully to partake of it See also Acts 19.1 2 3 4 5. Paul found certain Disciples Partakers of John's Baptism but they had not received the Spirit as they themselves confessed so that the Spirit and Water outward go not along to make up One Baptism Paul laid his hands on them and they received the Spirit so knew its Baptism these had John's Baptism before they received the Spirit and its Baptism which proves them distinct Baptisms Fourthly They are distinct inasmuch as the Figure and the Substance are distinct as Circumcision Outward and Circumcision Inward were not One but Two that is distinct Circumcisions so the Baptism of Iohn with Water and the Baptism of Christ with the Spiria were distinct Baptisms whereby the unfound Judgments of such appear who affirm teach and preach That the Spirit goes along with the Water and both make up One Baptism and that the Water is so influenced with a supernatural Vertue by the Word of Institution that Children damnati priusquam nati damn'd before they be born are thereby made Members of Christ Children of God and Inheriters of the Kingdom of Heaven And though since the Primitive Times to fulfil Divine Praedictions Darkness yea gross Darkness hath benighted the Professors of Christianity and the peccant Humour of Error Heresie Schism and Misapprehensions of Divine Truths hath been predominant in the infirm and crazy Body of nominal Christianity yet the Lord hath so far opened the Eyes of some as that they have dropped forth Testimonies in Vindication of that Truth here asserted that is that the Baptism of Iohn with Water and the Baptism of Christ with the Spirit without Water were distinct Baptisms and that none may have occasion to render this a groundless Flourish I shall here subjoyn a few Testimonies Augustine said in a certain place Illud manifestum est alium fuisse baptismum Johannes alium Christi that is It is clear and evident that there was One Baptism of John and another Baptism of Christ Contr. Lit. Petil. 2. Pasor paraphrasing on Heb. 6.2 of the Doctrine of Baptisms said Here the Plural Number shews forth the Outward and Inward Baptism Chrysostom saith That in the Apostles time the Baptism of Water and the Baptism of the Spirit were different Baptisms and done at different Times Magd. 5. Cent. 363. Cyprian Bishop of Carthage who lived about the year 230. said The Baptism of Iohn washed the outward Body but the Baptism of Christ cleanseth the inward Man from the Defilements of Sin Polydor. lib. 4. cap. 4. The Baptism of John gives not spiritual Grace nor Remission of Sins but Christ forgives Sins and gives the Spirit plentifully Theophylact on Mat. 3.11 Iohn was sent to baptize with Water but the Baptism of the Spirit was committed to Christ John baptized with Water inviting to Repentance Christ by his Spirit wherewith he baptizeth renews the Heart and sanctifieth by his Grace Aug. Marlolat on Acts 1.5 John the Baptist makes Christ the Author of spiritual Baptism but himself the Minister of outward Baptism only not the putting away of the filth of the Flesh the Work of John's Baptism but the Answer of a good Conscience which is an Effect of Christ's Baptism saith Aug. Marlolat on Matth. 3.11 A clear Distinction of the two Baptisms is here implyed Spark the King's Chaplain speaking of the pouring forth of the Spirit upon the Apostles saith They had before baptismum fluminis the Watry Baptism of Iohn but now baptismum flaminis the Baptism of the Holy Spirit their Tongues were touched with a Coal from the Heavenly Altar A full Distinction of the two Baptisms The Baptism of Iohn saith the same Spark doth not take away Sin but puts them in mind thereof but Christ's Baptism takes away Sin his Spirit saith he is our Iordan Forgiveness of Sins was not in nor by John's Baptism but in our Baptism all sins are blotted out saith Ven. Bed Histor Eccles Piscator on Matth. 3. speaking of 1 Pet. 3.21 saith Lest any should think that Outward Baptism saves us Peter makes a Distinction and ascribes Salvation to Inward Baptism saying Not Outward Baptism whereby the Filth of the Flesh is put off save us but Inward Baptism c. There is a two fold Baptism saith Trapp on Matth. 3.11 viz. fluminis et flaminis that is of Water and of the Spirit by John's with Water the Polution of the Flesh is put away by Christ's with the Spirit the Answer of a
Good Conscience purged from Dead Works to God-ward is known Trapp on Heb. 6.2 concerning the Doctrine of Baptisms makes a clear Distinction betwixt the outward Baptism of Iohn with Water and the inward Baptism of Christ with the Spirit Piscator on Mat. 3.11 saith There is a two-fold Baptism the one Outward whereby the Body is cleansed the other Inward by the Spirit whereby men are regenerated and renewed washed and purged from the Filth of Sin People were to be taught saith Wilson in his Comple at Christian-Dictonary 'to put a Difference betwixt Outward Baptism by the Minister and the Inward Baptism by the Spirit wherewith Christ baptizeth The Minister saith the same Wilson baptizeth by Sprinkling with water Christ baptizes by bestowing the Gifts of his spirit Prudentius holds out a clear Distinction betwixt Iohn's Baptism with Water and Christ's Baptism with the Spirit saying in his Euchirid ' Perfundit fluvio pastus Baptista locustus ' Sylvarumque savis et amistus veste Cameli ' Tinxerat et Christum sed spirit us aethere missus ' Testatur tinctum qui tinctis crimina donot John fed with Locusts and with Honey wild Clothed with Camel's Hair the Baptist stil'd He dipped Christ Christ by the Spirit 's Grace Baptizeth his and doth their Sins deface The Second Assertion John's Baptism in or with Water was a Figure or a Shadow of Christ's Baptism in or with the Spirit so thereby fulfilled and ended THE Living God made Man perfect and upright at the beginning as a Garden watered with Heavenly Drops beautified with Fruits of Righteousness according to the Nature of the noble Seed in him yet he kept not his original Station but was entangled in the Net of the Hellish Spider whereby Fruits of Unrighteousness sprung up in him the Foundation of another Kingdom was laid so that a world of Wickedness was usher'd in the comfortable Sun-shine of the Lord's Presence was lost yet in this State there issued out from the Court of Heaven a Hu-and-Cry as I may say after faln and forlorn man and it was proclaimed yea evangelized to and in his Ears that The Seed of the Woman should bruise the Serpent's Head Gen. 3.15 Now after this in Ages and Generations this Seed was figured out by Types and Shadows whereby the Faithful were led as by the hand to look after and wait for the Promised Seed Abel in his day offered a Firstling of the Flock shadowing out the Seed of the Woman Christ Jesus the First and the Last Lord of and in his Flock who was to destroy the Works of the Devil Gen. 4. Noah after the Flood builded an Altar unto the Lord and offered clean Beasts and clean Fowl thereon unto the Lord which the Apostle witnessed fulfilled when he said We have an Altar whereof they have no Right to eat who serve the Tabernacle Hebr. 13.10 in which Altar only is offered up a Clean Heart and Holy Hands In the dayes of Abraham Circumcision outward was instituted Gen. 17.10 a Shadow of a Circumcision without hands in and through Christ Isaac burded an Altar and called on the Name of the Lord Gen. 26.25 Jacob erected an Altar and called it El Elohe Israel which is being interpreted God the God of Israel Gen. 33.20 And among the other Figures of the first Priesthood which time fails me to speak of particularly Moses was commanded to make a Laver of Bra●● and to put Water therein and Aaron and his Sons were to wash their Hands and their Feet therein lest they dye Exod. 30.18 c. Who are of God they read these things and see what was pointed out thereby Now when John was come who was not the Christ but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Fore-runner of Christ it pleased the Lord that he should not be without something in his Dispensation which might point out that which should shortly be revealed as others before him in their respective Ages and Generations had and what was that even to baptize with Water such as repented and believed to clense away the filth of the flesh outwardly figuring thereby Christ Jesus who by the Power of his Spirit should purifie wash and clense inwardly all that received him so that Christ being come who was before Abel yea before the Hills and Mountains were he put an End not only to Abel's Firstlings to Noah's Altar to Abraham's Circumcision to Jacob's Altar to Moses's Laver-washing but also to John's Jordan-washing yet I say though these things were but outward and availed nothing to the purifying of the Conscience yet inasmuch as they were divine Commands and Shadows of a future Glory they were not to be disputed but practised owned and honoured in their time and season To this purpose well said Bernard Non attend it verus obediens quale sit quod praecipitur hoc solo contentus quia praecipitur that is One truly obedient minds not what like the thing is which is commanded in this only contenting himself or acquiescing because it is commanded Now if John's Water-baptism was a Figure a Shadow a Type of Christ the Life the Glory the Treasury of the Evangelical Dispensation the Head of his Body the Church his Kingdom which stands not in Words but in Power not in Shadows Types and Figures but in Substance in Righteousness Peace and Joy in the holy Spirit and that it was a shadow Writers have born evidence and plentifully then by Christ ended and fulfilled so bears no Evangelical Perpetuity Hugo Grotius on Mat. 3. calls Water-Baptism a Ceremony Piscator on John 1. saith When John had instituted a new ceremony those that were sent enquired of him By that Authority he did those things if he was neither Christ nor E●as Repentance and Faith saith one were the Qualifications of John 's Typical Baptism which was in slain Water without Oyl Salt Spittle Cream which are Antichristian Additaments Danvers in his Treatise of Baptism calls it a Sign or a Figure of the Mystery of the Gospel Baxter calls Water-Baptism a Sign of Regeneration pag. 117. Dr. Taylor calls Water-Baptism a Shadow The Sacraments of Baptism and of the Supper of the Lord saith Juel in his Apologet we with Tertullian Origen Ambrose Augustine Jerome Chrisostom Basil Dionisius and othe ancient Fathers do call them Figures Ceremonies Signs Types Shadows Similitudes Remembrances c. And every Type hath its Anti-type by the which it is ended and fulfilled Water-Baptism saith one was not instituted to have Grace inseparably tyed to it but to figure out the Power of divine Grace giving these Reasons 1st That John made a Distinction I with Water Christ with the Spirit 2dly Otherwise all the Baptized should be regenerated which appears otherwise in Simon Magus Ananias Saphira c. Calvin in his Institutes calls Water-Baptism a Sign a Figure saying If men be Partakers of the thing signified that is of the Substance why shall they be with-held from the Sign If they obtain the Truth why shall they
first telling them that all Power was given unto him in Heaven and in Earth then he informed them what their Work should be First To Disciple the Nations that is by the Power of their Ministry to bring them to be Disciples of Christ to learn of him to know his Teaching to take up his Yoke to bear the same to learn Obedience to come into the self-denying state of Discipleship so the word ●riginally imports saith Bullenger Zwinglius Leigh Fisher c. Trapp Secondly He told his Disciples that they should baptize or dip the Nations not in the Name but into the Name of the Father c. Dell Fisher Hammon Trapp And what is it to baptize or dip into the Name of the Father Even the same that Paul spoke of when he said By one spirit we are all bapt●zed into one body 1 Cor. 12.13 So that it is the Spirit that baptizeth into one Body as also into the Name of the Father to be a living Member of that Body whereof Christ is the Head 't is the Spirit that effects this not visible Water Furthermore Christ in these words commanded not his Disciple to turn back to John's Ministration to dip them in Jordan or in any other River or in a Bowl Bason or Font but into the Name of the Father c. which is no other thing then by the Power of the Spirit whereof they were Ministers to bring them into the Power of God to have fellowship with him through the Spirit Now the Name of God is his Vertue or Power as In my Name they shall cast out Devils that is in my Power this Zwinglius on this place observes Teachers in Sprinkling of Infants which they call Baptism use this Scripture as a Form of words saying I baptize thee in the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost which thing the Apostles did not which undoubtedly they would have done if Christ had commanded it as an absolute Form Further Zwinglius said of this place Christus Jesus baptismi formulam qua uteremur his verbis non instituit quemadmodum Theologi hactenus falso tradiderunt that is Christ Jesus did not in these words institute a form of Baptism which we should use as Divines have hitherto falsly taught This was the Testimony of Zwinglius who in his Day was a great Opposer of Anabaptists Lib de bap pag. 66. Tom. 2. oper Piscator on the same place peaks fully to the same purpose Again This place cannot be meant of Water-baptism because Paul thanked God he had baptized none but such and such for saith he Christ sent me not to baptize but to preach the Gospel 1 Cor. 1.14 15 16 17. yet he fulfilled that Mat. 28. he preached the Gospel in a circuit from Jerusalem to Illyricum and many by his Ministry were discipled brought into the state of Disciples to learn of Christ yea and into the Name of God that is into his Power many were baptized into the Name of the Father as his Sons into the Name of his Son as his Jewels and Ransomed Ones into the Name of the Holy Spirit as his Sanctified Ones these knew the One Baptism by One Spirit into One Body Why doth Paul thank God that he baptized none but such and such 1st Because he saw them idolizing and jangling about it which he knew to be a thing not of absolute Necessity not a Command of Christ but used or born with for a season for the sake of the Weak and others in reference to Iohn's Ministry if he had commonly practised it before from his Practice they might have been strengthned in their Thoughts about it he being a great Apostle Secondly He thanks God that he baptized none but such and such And why Because he was not sent of Christ so to do Thirdly Lest some should say that he baptized in his own Name rather into his own Name as the Greek Copies and divers English Translations render it seeing from Christ in whose Name he came he had no Command so to do What Ambassadour of an earthly Prince commissioned to treat with a forreign Prince about especial Matters if he fail in reference to the Contents of his Commission and treat about Matters whereto he was not commissioned can he expect that his Prince's Favour should be unto him as Dew upon the Grass or rather that his Wrath should be as the Roaring of a Lyon So if that in Matth. 28. had been a Command obligatory to all Gospel-Ministers to Baptize with outward Water could Paul have Cause of Rejoycing in that he fulfilled ●ot the Command Consider this and judge Cbj. That in Mat. 28. must needs relate to outward Water for the Apostles could not Baptize with the Spirit Answ Who as thus reason are ignorant of the Ministry of Christ which is a Ministry of the Spirit for all that are sent of Christ through their Ministry people are turned from Darkness to Light and translated from Death to Life where Christ's Baptism is known and this they do as indued with Power from above John 17.18 As thou hast sent me into the World saith Christ even so send I them And must not Christ and his Ministers be found in one Work even to turn people from Satan's power to the Power of God where the spiritual Baptism is While Peter preached to Cornelius and his Kinsmen and near Friends the holy Spirit fell on them Acts 10. wherein Christ's Baptism is Moreover Paul laid his Hands on certain and the holy Spirit fell upon them Acts 19. even that Spirit wherewith Christ baptizeth Yea and in Acts 26. Paul gave a Relation of his Call as also of his Work I saith the Lord have appeared unto thee for this purpose to make thee a Minister And what was his Work In preaching to the Gentiles to open their Eyes to turn them from Darkness to Light from the power of Satan usto God that they may receive Forgiveness of Sins and an Inheritance among them that are sanctified by Faith in Christ Iesus Paul declared his Commission to preach and the Effects of it was glorious Conversion Faith Remission of Sins Sanctification Salvation he took not Flesh and Blood into counsel evil Counsellors for the Soul but silencing Flesh entertaining a noble Resolution he put himself into the hand of God saying in effect Te duce vera sequor To duce falsa nego Consider Paul in and through the Virtue of him that sent him opened peoples Eyes and turned them from Darkness to Light and from Satan's power unto God Were not these Witnesses of the Spirit 's Baptism Yes for without the Spirit and its Baptism none come to God nor out of Satans power Thus Paul discipled the Gentiles that received his Testimony and baptized them in and through the Spirit into the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the holy Spirit and this was and is done not by Water-baptism without but by the Spirit 's
Baptism within Again 2 Cor. 3.6 Paul testifies That they were made of God able Ministers of the New Testament not of the Letter but of the Spirit even of the Spirit in which Christ's Baptism is revealed And Paul demanded of the Galatians saying Received ye the Spirit by the Works of the Law or by the hearing of Faith Gal. 3.2 As if he should have said True it is you have received the Spirit but not by the Works of the Law but by the hearing of Faith so that the Apostles preaching the Word of Faith unto them they received the Spirit even that Spirit which baptizeth into one Body So that it is clear unto me that such as alledge this Scripture Go and teach all Nations baptizing them in the Name of the Father c. to patronize Water-Baptism or Rantism that is dipping or sprinkling in Gospel-dayes they are Wresters and Perverters of the Scripture and that this Scripture as many others hath in the dark Night of Apostacy been wrested perverted abused and mis-interpreted beside what hath been spoken may be more fully made apparent Zuinglius and Piscator say expresly that Christ Jesus did not in those words institute a Form of Baptism and that Divines had taught falsly who held it out as a Form One Gulielmus who was a Roman-Catholick taught That the Form of Baptism should be thus I baptize thee in the Name of the Father of the Son of the holy Ghost and of the blessed Virgin Mary Cent. 13. Mag. 419. There was a certain Priest who being a Lack Latin said in baptizing Baptizo te in nomine patria et filia et spiritu sancta which is false Latine as Latinists know about this there was no small contention as whether the Baptism was lawful yea or nay where False Latin was broached Bonifacius Bishop under Car●lus Magnus was of Opinion that the Party thus baptized ought to be Re-baptized upon which Pope Zacharias wrote to Donifacius That he should not be Re-baptized for that notwithstanding the False Latine it was True Baptism he also put him in mind of the Custom of the Church that if any were baptized by Hereticks such should not be re-baptized but only purged by Imposition of Hands Thus False Latin got the Day A Bishop of Paris in a Synod expressed himself thus Let Baptism be celebrated with Reverence and let the Priest be very cautious in the Distinction and Pronuntiation of Words in which all the Vertue of the Sacrament and the Salvation of Children consists Statut. Synodal Odonis Parisiensis Episcopi This is a strange yea an unchristian Doctrine denying the Virgin 's Birth Jesus by interpretation a Saviour in whom alone Salvation is and ascribing the same to Water without Formal Words Distinctions and Pronuntiation without Obj. The Apostles practised Water-baptism not only before the coming in of Christ's Baptism but after as 't is evident in the Acts of the Apostles doth not this infer the continuance of it in Gospoltimes Answ As it was said in a certain Case so may I say in this Judicis officium est ut res it a tempora rerum Quarere that is A Judge must not only enquire after things but also after their Times and Seasons True it is the Apostles for a season practised Water-Baptism not Rantism that is Dipping not Sprinkling but whether they did it by Command or by Permission hath been a point of controversie As for me and Thousands more we believe that they did it not by Command from Christ but took it up and continued it for a season in relation to Iohn's Water-Baptism as Paul said in a certain case 1 Cor. 7.6 But I speak this by Permission and not by Commandment After the Ascension of Christ some of the Apostles used outward circumcision not as by Christ's Command but in relation to Moses for their sakes for a season who were weak or otherwise affected certainly knowing that soon after the Virtue and Purity of Circumcision made without Hands would put an End to Circumcision outward for the Mosaical Shadows and Figures were the most truly put off when t●ey felt the Substance Christ the Life the End of such things risen in their mortal Bodies for as the Sun-light swallows up the Moon-light and as Darkness is chased away when the Sun appears and mounts up in its lustre so all outward Shadows Types and Figures from the dayes of Righteous Abel to John were to vanish as the Life of Christ came to be exalted in his Church John intimated thus much when he said I must decrease he must increase So John's Water-baptism was to decrease Iohn being a Fore-runner and his Servant was to resign up his Baptism to Christ yea and as a Servant to deliver all things into his hands as Heir and Lor● Iohn's Baptism reached unto Christ's Kingdom but hath no place therein yea and to bring Shadows and Figures into his Kingdom is if rightly understood antichristian for his Kingdom is wholely spiritual and in his Church he is a Bundle of Myrh yes that very thing which from Abel to Iohn was represented by outward Shadows So that those the Apostles baptized as internally I am perswaded they did it for a season in relation to John's Ministration for the sake of the Weak and of others the Day being but even dawning which was to put an End unto and fulfil the Laver-Washing yea and the Jordan-washing as all other Shadows from Abel to that very season And that they baptized on this Account and not by a Command of Christ several Grounds induce me to believe First Paul a chosen Vessel who planted many Churches yet altogether ceased from John's Ministration of Water-baptism after that he had used it twice or thrice as probably all the Apostles did 1 Cor. 1.14 15 16 17. he thanks God that he baptized none but such and such saying expresly Christ sent him not to baptize dip or plung their Bodies in Outward Water though he did is to a few yet he had no command for it Hence it necessarily follows that he did it by Permission in reference to John's Ministration for the sake of the Weak or of others and the present time till the Lord Christ the End of all Figures was more revealed in them What was he sent to do To preach the Gospel Christ and his Baptism which washes inwardly fulfilling outward Washings Secondly This Paul who had the Mind of Christ held out but one continuing Baptism in the Kingdom of Christ writing to the Saints at Ephesus he said There is one Lord one Faith one Baptism Ephes 4.5 There had been two Baptisms Iohn's with Water Christ's with the Spirit yet the one is repealed and not preached up among them So to the wise in heart I appeal whether this one Baptism he preached up was John's with Water or Christ's with the Spirit and whatever thou be that sayes that the one Baptism which the Apostle preached up was John's Water Baptism I tell thee thou
this day stile themselves Musulmans that is The only true believers The Angel of the Church of Sardis was thus reproved Thou hast a Name that thou livest but art dead Rev. 3.1 so could neither praise nor serve the living God A Ship may be called Safeguard or Goodspeed yet may fall into the Hand of Pirats So specious Names of Christians Believers Church-members advantage nothing except the Cross of Christ be borne the Anointed received which truly makes such Eleventhly The Spirits Baptism saves is present Salvation Now who contend for Iohn's Ministry Water-baptism be it Dippers or Sprinklers their discourse is of what the Saints enjoyed in the primitive times and of what Salvation shall be in another World not waiting for Salvation and Redemption in this Life but they that live not the Life of the Righteous shall not dye the Death of the Righteous nor shall have the Reward of the Righteous but the Apostle Paul preached present Salvation not by Iohn's Baptism or Water-washing but by the Baptism of Christ through the renewing of the Spirit Titus 3.5 According to his Mercy he saved us by the Laver or Washing of Regeneration and renewing of the holy Spirit so that so far as a man is regenerated renewed by the holy Spirit which is Christs Baptism so far he is saved from sin and from the Reward thereof this Laver of Regeneration fulfils inwardly what Moses's Laver and Iohn's Jordan-washing shadowed forth outwardly this Laver of Regeneration removes the old Nature and brings in a new Nature whence issues new Thoughts new Desires new Words and new Works he lives thinks speaks works loves and acts otherwise then he was wont the Old Man and his Deeds are put off the New Man and his Deeds are put on Outward Water is not of that virtue to effect this in man 't is a Water of a more Heavenly Nature Paul writing to the Saints at Ephesus said By Grace ye are saved through Faith and that not of your selves it is the Gift of God Ephes 2.8 These were Witnesses of present salvation they had known stirrings in the Womb of Grace precious unto God had persevered therein so became God's Workmanship to know the glorious Fabrick of the New Man erected in them these were truly made alive unto God who had lain rotting and stinking in the sepulchre of Corruption these knew Christ's spiritual Baptism to this purpose Peter ●are record saying The like Figure whereunto even Baptism doth also now save not the putting away of the Filth of the Flesh but the Answer of a good Conscience towards God by the Resurrection of Jesus Christ Peter here speaks of the Ark of Noah which by Command of the Lord was made of Gopher wood Gen. 6.14 a kind of Cedar saith the old Naturalist Pliny which is not subject to Rottenness nor Worm-eatenness but endures forever a shadow of Christ Jesus who is the same to day yesterday and forever so the Ark was a Figure of Christ as it saved by Water outwardly so Christ by his Baptism the Water of Regeneration saves inwardly from the Deluge of sin from the drowning Waves of iniquity and transgression Baptism saves now saith Peter But what Baptism doth he speak of of John's with Water or of Christ's with the Spirit the Apostle answers this lest any should misapprehend his sense and intent he explains himself evidently and fully saying Not the putting away the Filth of the Flesh the cleansing of the outward man the effect of John's Baptism but the Answer of a good Conscience towards God the effect of Christs Baptism in and with the Spirit which inwardly saves and brings to know and witness the Answer of a good Conscience by the Resurrection of Jesus Christ 1 Pet. 3.9 20 21. Piscator on Matth. 3. gives his Testimony altogether answerable to what is here written saying That the Apostle Peter here ascribes Salvation to inward Baptism not to the outward which extends no further the● the outward man Hammond in his Paraphrase and Annotations on the New Testament saith on the aforesaid place As the Ark in the Water kept men safe from drowning even so Baptism doth save not that of John which cleansed but the Body but that which is signified by it even the Baptism of Christ with the Spirit who saves from sin and from the wages thereof Obj. The Baptism here spoken of by Peter must needs be Water-baptism because he calls it a Figure for it were not proper to call the Spirits Baptism a Figure Answ I confess while I had recourse only to our English Translations this before was my own Objection but consulting the Greek Copies the thing was cleared unto me and our English Translations appeared not so sound and clear as might be desired Peter speaking of the Preservation of 8 Souls in the Ark by Water saith if truly translated Whose Antitype Baptism doth also now save us And what is this Antitype even Christ who baptizes with a spiritual and saving Baptism even Christ the Truth the Sum the Substance the Thing signified by Types and Figures Circumcision outward was a Type Circumcision inward the Antitype Moses's Laver a Type the Evangelical Laver of Regeneration the Antitype Anointing without a Type Anointing within the Antitype the Ark saving by Water without a Type Christ by his spiritual Baptism saving from the proud Billows of Wickedness and Uncleanness is the Antitype so that the Antitype comes in lieu stead place or room of the Type 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is the Greek word and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies pro as well as contra 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Consul 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Proconsul the Consuls Deputy one that officiates for him these things Linguists understand so that though our English Translation renders it The like Figure whereunte even Baptism doth also now save us yet it is properly truly and answerable to the nature of Truth rendred Whose Antitype Baptism doth also now save us even as the Ark saved them of old And if any say This is but a Conceit or Whimsie of my own Head let such read Gerh. on this word who saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in hoc loco ipsam veritatem significat typo ac figurae respondentem that is Antitype in this place of Peter signifies the Truth it self answering to the Type and Figure Truth that is Christ the Way the Truth and the Life who baptizeth with the Spirit and saves from sin as the Ark saved outwardly Vatabalus Grotius Frafmus Cap●dus Beza Hammond gave their Testimonies to the same purpose If chi● Scripture of Peter held out a Figure or Type then one Type would answer another which were improper for every shadow type or fu●ure rew●●● to the substance as its Fulfiller Again it were to conclude the Gospel-Dispensation to be a state of figures and shadows which is the sum and substance of all the Kingdom of God stand not in Meat and Drink but in Righteous●●●● Peace and Joy in
the holy Spirit wherein the Redeemed cry Abba Father Rom. 14. Visibles are temporal as Moses's Laver-washing John's Jordan-washing imposed only until the Time of Reformation but Invisibles are eternal as the Spirit of the Lord is eternal in which Christs Baptism is such as center in temporals that Eye being shut which sees into the beginning before the temporals these are but as an House without Pillars tottering with every Blast as a Ship without Anchor tossed with every Wave for the Establishment is in that which is Eternal Whose Antitype Baptism doth also now save us By this Scripture as all the wise in heart understand Peter puts an End to Baptism of the Flesh as Paul did to Circumcision of the Flesh for saith Paul Rom. 2.28 29. He is not a Jew which is one outwardly neither is that Circumcision which is outward in the Flesh but he is a Jew which is one inwardly and Circumcision is that of the Heart in the Spirit and not in the Letter whose Praise is not of men but of God which in effect is this In Gospel-dayes where all shadows are fulfilled Circumcision in the Spirit puts an end to Circumcision in the Flesh in effect Peter saith as much of Baptism Baptism saith he saves but not that Baptism which puts but away the Filth of the Flesh but that Baptism of Christ in the Spirit where the Answer of a good Conscience is known Yea by this Peter intimates that Baptism in the Spirit puts an to Baptism in the Flesh for of a Truth it may be said He is not a Christian who is one outwardly neither is that Baptism which is outward in the Flesh but he is a Christian which is one inwardly and Baptism is that of the Heart in the Spirit and not in the Letter whose Praife is not of men but of God For neither Moses's Laver-shawing nor John's Jordan-washing could bring inward Cleanness and Purity of Conscience therefore Christ put an end to all outward shadows figures and Types by the Power of his Spirit inwardly effecting and fulfilling that which they in an outward manner shadowed out Many bear record in Truth to the Apostles Testimony who said The Law make nothing perfect but the bringing in of a better hope by the which we draw nigh unto God Hebr. 7.19 Here is the perfecting of the Children of Light here they are truly joynted whom Satan had dislocated Paul who was not sent to baptize but to preach the Everlasting Gospel a more weighty and ponderous Concern he had his Call from Heaven in writing to the Church at Rome he speaks of Gifts differing and exhorts every one to be faithful but of baptizing with Water he speaks not but in other places sets up the Spirit 's Baptism as conducing to the Salvation of the Soul So who are serious in the things of God cannot but conclude from what is spoken that the Spirit 's Baptism is the only Baptism peculiar to Gospel-dayes and that the continuance thereof is of absolute necessity whatever you be that deny it to and in the Church you shut out of the Church the divine Nature the new Name the true Worship Translation into the Kingdom of God the Lords Temple the Gospel-Ministry the true Service of God true Unity inward cleansing true Christianity present Salvation and what is that Church and what are the respective Members thereof that are destitute hereof Out-sides Formalists tossed to and fro as a Feather or Froth upon the Waves hurried about with every Wind of Doctrine like Glasses blown into this or that shape at the pleasure of mans breath what are Professors that are destitute of the Spirit and its Baptism as hollow Trees in an old Wood tall but pithless sapless and unsound What are these lifeless Formalists as a Bulrush whose Colour is fresh Skin smooth Body knotless yet nothing is within but a kind of spongeous unsubstantial substance The Swan in the Law was rejected for sacrifice as some affirm because of her Black Skin under White Feathers thus it is with Unscripturalized Out-side Formalists their Performances how specious soever black Death reigning within brings them not unto divine Acceptance their most Religious Duties and Performances issue from Art and Acquired Parts not from divine In-dwellings who then touched with the sense and possession of the Lord's Presence and with the Virtue of his spiritual Baptism can be silent And not as the Lord's Worthies contend for it of the which such excellent things are spoken if Christ must have preheminence in all things if he be All in his Church beautified out of his Wardrobe why is Outward Water so much magnified in Gospel dayes Christ is sufficient to and in his Church without John though John was of use in his season to point out Christ to come so the Baptism of Christ without visible Water is sufficient in his Church without the Baptism of John with Water though the Baptism of John with Water was useful in its season being a shadow of a better thing to come even of Christs Baptism with the Spirit who said He that believes on me out of his Belly shall flow Rivers of living Water but this spake he of the Spirit which Believers in him should receive John 7.38 39. So that Believers receive the Spirit so Christs Baptism living Water is to flow out of the Womb of their Souls they know the precious Virtue thereof its Cooling Cleansing Thirst-quenching and Fructifying Virtue they know the fulfilling of Moses's Laver and John's Jordan-Washing in their Mortal Bodies The Fourth Assertion Rantism that is Sprinkling of Infants is a Case unpresidented in the Primitive times an Irreptitious Custom sprung up in the Night of Apostacy after the Falling Away from the Primitive Order I Have already shewed the Temporary Baptism of John and have likewise spoken of the Baptism of Christ with the Spirit and that this Baptism put an end to John's Water-baptism as to the other shadows so that to and in the gathered Churches one Baptism was preached and that by one Spirit into one Body the shadow being left off now it remains that I inform you how Dipping which was John's Ministration came to be re-assumed and likewise how Sprinkling of Infants got entrance among the Professers of Christianity Christ being upon the Mount of Olives with his Disciples told them that False Christs and False Prophets should come Mat. 24. which John seeing fulfilling and fulfilled said expresly they were come saying Little Children it is the last time and as ye have heard that Antichrist shall come even now are there many Antichrists whereby we know that it is the last time ● John 2.18 Paul in the Spirit of Discerning sore-saw and fore-told of an Apostacy a Departure from the Faith that seducing spirits should be heeded and Doctrines of Devils 1 Tim. 4.1 John in the Spirit fore-saw all the world wondring after the Beast Revel 13.3 yea and he saw and fore-told of a great Whore that
Trent Council What was become of the Unity of the Spirit and the Spirit of the Prophets which is subject to the Prophets Some said Ebrius Infantes Erroneus atque furentes Cum pueris domini non debent sumere corpus Of giving the Sacrament so called to Dead People From the before-mentioned Scripture Except ye eat the Flesh of the Son of Man and drink his Blood ye have no Life in you John 6. ●3 the Fathers in the Degeneration from the primitive Faith Doctrine Worship and Practice fell into the Gulf of that Conceit That none but Communicants should partake of the blessedness of Salvation upon which they not only gave Sacramental Bread c. to Infants but put it into the Mouthes of Dead Men There were some saith Sparke the Kings Chaplain pag. 127. that baptized the Dead and put the Sacramental-Bread in their Mouths as their Viaticum judging it better to have such a necessary Ordinance by Proxy then altogether to go without it That such a thing was in use in the Church may be certainly concluded from the sixth Canon of the third Council of Carthage 't is there apparent that that Council condemned certain Hereticks who thrust the Sacramental Bread into the Mouths of Dead Men yea and the sixth general Council at Constantinople was concerned to eradicate the Tares of that Delusion and smoky Conceit saying Let none give the Encharist that is sacramental Bread to the Dead for it is written Take and eat but the Dead are neither in a Capacity to take nor to eat Summa Concil et Pontif. Thus the Cup of Blessing being lost they received at the old Serpents hand the Cup of Abomination Fornication Delusions and Conceits and they were drunk therewith Of Time and Times of taking the Sacrament As the Churches in the Apostles days and primitive Ages grew up in the sanctifying Faith in the purifying Hope thorow the Cross of Christ the Life of Jesus came to be manifested in their mortal Bodies they were true and living Witnesses of Fellowship with the Lord thorow the Leadings and Teachings of the Anointing they knew Christ supping with them and they with him without outward Bread and Wine being in the Heavenly Banquetting House in the End and Substance of all Types Figure and Shadows but as the Serpent seducing Eve brought in a world of Wickedness so the same by little and little wearing the Church from the Simplicity that is in Christ Jesus brought in a flood of Confusion an earthly Mind within turned to earthly Figures and Shadows without Elements and Rudiments losing the Life of Communion within they placed it in Shadows without and much Confusion and Uncertainty hath been in the Church about the Times of taking it as appears in the Writings of Men. Very anciently saith Polydor Christians took the Eucharist that is the sacramental Broad every day in the Morning and Fasting Polydor lib. 5. After this Augustin said This daily taking of the Communion of the Eucharist I neither Praise nor blame yet my Perswasion is that men take it every Lords Day his Perswasion very likely took place hence it came to be called Panis hebdomadarius Weekly Bread Polydor lib. 5. Zephyrinus afterwards appointed That all Christians who were come to sutable years should once a year at least take the Sacrament namely at Easter Once every day now once a year will serve either much of Zeal was in the one or much of Coldness was in the other Polyd. lib. 5. Fabian afterwards established That men should take the Sacrament thrice in the year if not oftner at Easter Pentecost and Christmas Polyd. lib. 5. Summa Concil et Pontif. Anacletus commanded That they that would not take the Sacrament should be excommunicated as Prophane Persons Polyd. lib. 5. Several are of another Disposition in this our Age who shew not much dislike at peoples Refusal of the Sacrament provide they give them the same Price as they do who take it but refusing that War is prepared Concerning the Communion Cup. In the primitive Times the Church of living Stones was under the Rule and Government of the blessed Spirit in and thorow which the Cry and living Soul-breathing was Abba Father here the Cup of Salvation of Consolation of Blessing full of Righteousness Peace Joy Assurance Heavenly Riches was plentifully drunk of this being lost thorow the Smoke Inchantments Delusions pompous Shew bewitching Splendor Misleadings Muzlings and enfatuating Sleights of Antichtist and men fast bound in the Dungeon of spiritual Servitude and toiling in the Entanglements of Will-worship Self-righteousness Traditions Conceits in this condition the Cup of Abomination and spiritual Fornication got entrance making Nations drunk and in the barren Wilderness of this State there hath been no little jangling about the Sacramental Cup without as of what Mettal it should be made of some have been for Wood some for Glass some for Pewter some for Gold some for Silver as may be assuredly concluded by the Canons and Constitutions of Popes Kings Arch-Bishops Provincial Councils c. It is very clear saith Polydor that the Cups used in the consecration of divine Blood was at the first made of Wood de Invent. lib. 2. cap. 12. Zepherinus afterwards commanded That Glass Cups should be used not Wood Cups as before Polyd. lib. 2. cap. 12. Succeeders skrewed a Peg higher the former Decree by little and little vanished and it was constituted That Golden Silver or at the least Pewter Cups or Chalices should be used Polydor lib. 2. Bonifacius Martyr and Bishop said Formerly Golden Priest did wake use of Wood Cups or Chalices but now on the contrary Wood Priests use Golden Chalices As the Apostatical Pomp and Splendor increased so the simple and homely use of Wood Cups came to be generally hissed at and sleighted so that the Provincial Triburiensian Council decreeed thus We decree that henceforth no Priest may by any means presume to make the sacred Mystery of the Body and Blood of our Lord in Wood Cups or Chalices Summa Concil et Pontif. Our King Edgar put out a Canan to this purpose saying We teach that every Chalice or Cup wherein any one shall consecrate the Eucharist shall be of Molten Mettal and not at all consecrated in a Wood Cup or Chalice One Remigius an Arch-Bishop appointed these his Verses to be set on the side of the Sacremental Cup Haurit hinc populus vitam de sanguine sacro Injecto aeternus quem fudit vulnere Christus c. Hence People drink Eternal Life that 's good For in this Cup contained is Christ's Blood Thus you see what a stir hath been about Invention after that the Simplicity and Stability of the Truth as it is in Jesus was turned from and after that credens was given that Bread and Wine by the Priests consecration was transmuted that is changed into the real Body and Blood of Christ How Communion in both Kinds was forbidden That Christ gave Bread and Wine unto his