A Brief History OF THE UNITARIANS Called also SOCINIANS In Four Letters Written to a Friend Acts 17. 11. They searched the Scriptures daily whether those things were so Printed in the Year 1687. The First Letter Concerning the Unitarians vulgarly called Socinians SIR IN Answer to yours demanding a brief account of the Vnitarians called also Socinians their Doctrine concerning God in which only they differ from other Christians the Remonstrants professedly agreeing with them in other points of Faith and Doctrine and the Defence they usually make of their Heresy They are called Socinians from F. Socinus an Italian Noble-Man and a principal Writer of their Party They affirm God is only one Person not three They make our Lord Christ to be the Messenger Minister Servant and Creature of God they confess he is also the Son of God because he was begotten on blessed Mary by the Spirit or Power of God Luke 1. 35. But they deny that he or any other Person but the Father the God and Father of the said our Lord Christ is God Almighty and Eternal The Holy Ghost or Spirit according to them is the Power and Inspiration of God Luke 1. 35. That the Lord Christ was a Man the Son Prophet Messenger Minister Servant and Creature of God not himself God they think is proved by these as they call them Arguments 1. If our Lord Christ were himself God there could be no Person greater than he none that might be called his Head or his God none that could in any respect command him But the Holy Scriptures teach that the Father is greater than Christ is the Head and the God of Christ and gave Commandment to him what he should say and what he should do John 14. 28. My Father is greater than I. 1. Cor. 11. 3. The Head of Christ is God. John 20. 17. I ascend to my Father and your Father to my God and your God. John 12. 49. The Father which sent me he gave me a Commandment what I should say John 14. 31. As the Father gave me Commandment so do I. 2. If our Lord Christ were indeed God it could not without Blasphemy be absolutely and without Restriction affirmed of him that he is the Creature the Possession the Servant and Subject of God or that for his Obedience he was rewarded and advanced by God. But the inspired Authors of Holy Scripture do say that the Son our Lord Christ is the Creature of God the Possession of God the Servant of God was obedient to God and for that cause by him rewarded and exalted also that when God shall have subjected all Men to his Son our Lord Christ yet even then shall he remain subject to God. Col. 1. 15. The first-born from the dead ver 18. of every Creature Heb. 3. 1 2. Consider the Apostle and high Priest of our Profession Jesus Christ who was faithful to him that appointed him In the Greek and in the Margin of our Bibles 't is faithful to him that made him 1 Cor. 3. 23. Ye are Christ's and Christ is God's Matth. 12. 17 18. That it might be fulfilled that was spoken by Isaias Behold my Servant Phil. 2. 8 9. He humbled himself and became obedient Wherefore God hath highly exalted him and given him a Name above every Name 1 Cor. 15. 28. When all things shall be subdued to him then shall the Son also be subject to him that put all things under him that God may be all in all 3. He that is true God is not the Minister or Priest of any other Person or Persons he neither doth nor will being himself Omnipotent and All-sufficient mediate or intercede with any whomsoever for his Servants and People But 't is certain that our Lord Christ is the Minister and Mediator of God and Men a Priest that appeareth in the Presence of God and intercedeth with him for Men. Heb. 8. 6. Now hath he obtained a more excellent Ministry 1 Tim. 2. 5. There is one God and one Mediator between God and Men the Man Jesus Christ. Heb. 2. 17. A merciful and faithful High-Priest in things pertaining to God. Heb. 9. 24. Christ is not entred into the Holy place made with Hands but into Heaven it self now to appear in the Presence of God for us Heb. 7. 25. He ever liveth to make Intercession for them 4. Almighty God doth all things in his own Name and by his own Authority He ever doth his own Will and seeketh his own Glory he declares himself to be the prime Object of Faith and Worship and pronounces all Doctrines or Religions to be vain which proceed not from Him alone But in our Lord Christ all things are contrary for he declares that he came not into the World in his own Name or Authority not to do his own Will or seek his own Glory or propound himself as the principal Object of our Faith or Worship or to publish a Doctrine of his own John 17. 28. I am not come of my self John 5. 43. I am come in my Father's Name John 8. 42. I proceeded forth and came from God neither came I of my self but he sent me John 5. 30. I seek not my own Will. John 8. 50. I seek not my own Glory John 12. 44. He that believeth on me believeth not on me but on him that sent me Phil. 2. 11. That every Tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord to the Glory of God the Father John. 7. 16. My Doctrine is not mine but his that sent me 5. God was always most wise never ignorant of any thing He needeth not the concurrence of any other Person to assure him that he judgeth right He cannot saith St. James chap. 1. ver 13. be tempted And as he is infinitely great so he is no less Good. But the sacred Writers do not speak of the Lord Christ after this Tenor They say our Lord Christ increased in Wisdom that he professed himself ignorant of some things that he ascribed the Certainty and Infallibility of his Judgment to the Father's Presence with him that he was tried by great Temptations being thereto exposed by the Holy Ghost that he refused to be called Good because God only is Good. Luke 2. 52. Jesus increased in Wisdom and in Favour with God and Men. Mark 13. 32. Of that Day and Hour knoweth no Man In the Greek tis none knoweth no not the Angels which are in Heaven neither the Son but the Father S. Matthew Mat. 24. 36. adds But the Father only John 11. 34. Where have ye laid him They say unto him Lord come and see John 8. 16. My Judgment is true for I am not alone but I and the Father that sent me Matth. 4. 1. Then was Jesus led of the Spirit to be tempted of the Devil Luke 18. 19. Why callest thou me good there is none good save one that is God. 6. God giveth what and to whom himself pleaseth he needs not the Aid of any other he entreateth
in and by him performed Works not much less wonderful than was the first Creation And the World knew him not Knew not that the Word abiding on Jesus was that very Divine Word which made both the World and all Men. Ver. 11. He came unto his own i. e. To those whom he had made ver 10. He is to be understood of the Word The Word came in the Person of Christ His own received him not i. e. did not own him for what he indeed was the Divine Word 'T is again repeated to brand the Ingratitude and Stupidity of the Jews of that Age. Ver. 12. Them that believe on his Name On his Name is an Hebrew Phrase as much as to say on him i. e. Them that believed on the Word made Flesh or them that received and owned him for what he indeed was even the Divine Word Ver. 14. And the Word was made Flesh Or For the Word was made Flesh i. e. did abide on and inhabit an humane Person the Person of Jesus Christ and so was in Appearance made Flesh or Man for Flesh is the usual Scripture Phrase for Man Gen. 6. 12. Deut. 5. 26. Jer. 12. 12. Jer. 17. 5. Mark 13. 20. And we beheld his Glory i. e. The Glory of the Man on whom the Word did abide and inhabit in him We beheld his Glory in his many Miracles John 2. 11. Also in his Transfiguration 2. Pet. 1. 17. And on many other occasions The Glory as of the only begotten of the Father i. e. A Glory worthy of the only-begotten of the Father Christ is called the only-begotten on several accounts this especially that he only was begotten by the Divine Power on a Woman Luke 1. 35. Ver. 15. John bare Witness of him saying He was before me i. e. Was before me in Dignity being the only-begotten of God. So Erasmus and Beza as well as Grotius Ver. 18. Which is in the Bosom of the Father i. e. Who is most dear to the Father So the Phrase signifies in other Texts Numb 11. 12. Deut. 13. 6. Hath declared him i. e. hath revealed his Mind and Will to Men. Hitherto for the most part Grotius Briefly The Word according to Grotius is not an eternal Son of God but is here the Power and Wisdom of God which Word abiding without measure on the Lord Christ as it is expresly said Heb. 1. 3. Matth. 28. 18. Col. 2. 3. see the Notes on these Texts 't is therefore spoken of as a Person and as one Person with Christ and he with that This notion of the Word will lead a Man through all the Difficulties of this Chapter with far more ease than any other hitherto offered Besides that it is so well founded as has been shown on ver 1. 't is also as easy and obvious and clears the sense as much as can be expected on a Portion of Scripture that is so obscure and dark and which was designedly written after a mysterious and sublime manner 13. John 2. 19 21. Destroy this Temple and in three Days I will raise it up He spake of the Temple of his Body Answ Christ raised his Body by a Power communicated to Him by the Father and accordingly his being raised is always attributed to the Father not to himself Gal. 1. 1. Paul an Apostle by Jesus Christ and God the Father who raised him from the dead See also Eph. 1. 19 20. 1 Thess 1. 9 10. Had our Lord raised himself by his own proper Power his Resurrection could in no respect be ascribed to the Father 14. John 2. 25. He knew what was in Man. Answ The Knowledg which the Lord Christ had or now in his state of Exaltation hath of the Secrets of Mens Hearts is the pure Gift of and Revelation from God and the Divine Word abiding on him Rev. 1. 1. The Revelation of Jesus Christ which God gave to him to shew unto his Servants John 3. 34. God giveth not the Spirit by measure that is sparingly unto him But see also what they say on Rev. 2. 23. 15. John 3. 13. No Man hath ascended up to Heaven but he that came down from Heaven even the Son of Man which is in Heaven Answ 1. Erasmus Beza Camerarius acknowledg that the Greek should be rendred which was in Heaven Neither so are the Words which was in Heaven an idle Repetition of what went before for it is repeated majoris asseverationis causâ for its greater Confirmation The most learned Orthodox Interpreters understand this ascending into and being in Heaven as also the descending only metaphorically and interpret thus No Man hath ascended up to Heaven No Man hath known the Mind of God our Heavenly Father But he that came down from Heaven i. e. but he that is sent to you as the Messenger of Heaven or of God. Even the Son of Man which is in Heaven i. e. even I whose Meditation and Conversation is in Heaven As St. Paul says of himself Phil. 3. 20. Our Conversation is in Heaven So they interpret the whole Passage of the humane Nature I suppose because our Lord considers and speaks of himself here by the Name only of the Son of Man. But the Socinians do generally understand this Text literally and say that 't is here intimated that before our Lord entred upon his Office of Messias he was taken up to Heaven to be instructed in the Mind and Will of God as Moses was into the Mount Exod. 24. 1 2 12. and from thence descended to execute his Office and declare the said Will of God. The same thing they say is also hinted John 6. 38 46 51 62. John 8. 40. 16. John 3. 18. The only begotten Answ See on John 1. 14. 17. John 5. 19. Whatsoever things He the Father doth those also doth the Son. Answ The Son doth them only by the Spirit or Power of the Father inhabiting in him John 5. 30. I can do nothing of my self John 14. 10. The Father that dwelleth in me He doth the Works Matth. 12. 28. I cast out Devils by the Spirit of God. 18. John 5. 23. That all Men should honour the Son even as they honour the Father Answ The meaning only is as we honour God or the Father so we must not forget to honour also the Son of God because to him the Father hath committed the last Judgment of all Men ver 22. An Equality of Honour is no more intended here than an Equality of Perfection in those words Be ye perfect even as your Father which is in Heaven is perfect Matth. 5. 48. For the sense there is as God is truly perfect so do ye endeavour to be perfect with that Perfection of which your finite Natures are capable 19. John 6. 44. I will raise him up at the last Day Answ The Lord Christ shall raise and change our Bodies by the same Divine Word or Power of God communicated to him and abiding on him by which while he was in this
recited by St. Cyril and by St. Cyprian ad Numid and by Socrates Hist l. 1. c. 26. If the Compilers of this Creed had believed that either the Son or Spirit is God t is unaccountable that they should take no notice of it in a Greed and such a Creed as was purposely drawn up to represent all the necessary Articles of Religion If a Socinian say they were to draw up a Confession of his Faith he would do it in no other Words but these of the Apostles and on the contrary no Trinitarian after having described the Father by all the usual Characters of God saying he is God Almighty and Maker of Heaven and Earth would fail to mention the Divinity of the Son and Holy Spirit whence we must needs infer that the Apostles believed as the Socinians not as the Trinitarians believe concerning God Christ and the Holy Spirit 6. To conclude Theirs they say is an accountable and a reasonable Faith but that of the Trinitarians is absurd and contrary both to Reason and to it self and therefore not only false but impossible For you say they teach there are three almighty and most wise Persons and yet but one God as if every Almighty and most wise Person were not a God and consequently three such Persons three Gods. You add yet more absurdly that there are three Persons who are severally and each of them true God and yet there is but one true God This is an Error in counting or numbring which when stood in is of all others the most brutal and inexcusable and not to discern it is not to be a Man. But we would not say they trouble our selves at the non-sense of this Doctrine if it did not impose false Gods on us by advancing two to be Gods who are not so and rob also the one true God of the Honour due to him and of which he is jealous This Sir is the Doctrine of the Vnitarians more commonly by others call'd Socinians concerning Almighty God and these their Arguments which I have so related as not to judg or rail of their Persons because however learned and reasonable Men which is their Character among their worst Adversaries may be argued out of their Errors yet few will be swagger'd or chode out of them It remains that I make a brief and fair Deduction of their History from the time that they have been taken notice of in the World. They whom we call Socinians were by the Fathers and first Ages of Christianity called Nazarens by which name St. Paul is accused before Felix Acts 24. 5. They were also in those first times called Ebionites Mineans Artemonites Theodotians Symmachians Paulinists Samosatenians Photinians and Monarchians The Writings of these Ancients are all lost being destroyed by the Arians and Catholicks Notwithstanding they had I find some very considerable Men among them as 1. Theodotian who translated the Old Testament out of the Hebrew into Greek about the Year of our Lord 182. 2. Symmachus who published another Translation from the Hebrew also into Greek in the Year 193. Eusebius assures us both these were Ebionites or Nazarens and their Translations were greatly esteemed and much used in the Greek Churches 3. Paulus of Samosatum Bishop and Patriarch of Antioch a Man not only learned and eloquent but so much esteemed in that Capital City of the East that an Episcopal Council there assembled were not of sufficient Authority with his Citizens to cast him out of St. Peter's Chair 4. Photinus Bishop of Sirmium against whom other Bishops being by Imperial Authority assembled proceeded by Conciliary Acts and Censures of the Church but neither would his City part with him till the Emperour sent an Army to expel him Eusebius Hist l. 5. c. 28. and Theodoret Haer. Fab. l. 2. c. de Artem. say that these Nazarens constantly affirmed that they derived their Doctrine from the Apostles of our Lord and that it was the general Doctrine of the Church till the Popes Victor and Zepherin set themselves to root it up Victor say the Socinians began to persecute the Apostolick Doctrine of one God or what is the same that God is one in the Year 194 but with little Success till that which was afterwards the Doctrine of the Arians grew into general Credit and Accepance For Justin Martyr Origen and other principal Fathers teaching as the Arians afterwards did that the Father is indeed before the Son and Holy Spirit in Time in Dignity and in Power yet that the Word or Son who in the fulness of time took our nature on him was generated or created some time before the World and was the Father's Servant and Minister in making the World and that the Holy Ghost was the Creature of the Son and subservient to him in making all things this Doctrine being advanced by Justin Origen and others of note in the Church and seeming more for the Honour of the Son than the plain and simple Doctrine of the Nazarens by the Help of Persecution prevailed against theirs and became the more current Doctrine of the Church till in the Council of Nice it was condemned and another more popular and so more taking than that as attributing to the Son Eternity and Equality with the Father did generally obtain being supported by Imperial Authority But did Superstition say the Socinians stop here No for there shortly arose another Doctrine that the Son and Holy Spirit are the same God with the Father not only as the Nicene Fathers explained this matter by Unity of Wills and specifical Identity or sameness of Substance but by numerical or true Identity and sameness of Substance and Nature This last has been establish'd by so many terrible penal Laws partly obtained of the Roman Emperours by Catholick Bishops partly made by Popes in the times of their Omnipotence that now not only the Nazaren Faith but the Arian and the Nicene truly so called are no where openly profest in the Territories of Christian Princes and States except in a few Cities of Transilvania and some Churches of the United Netherlands in which Countries Liberty of Conscience makes a part of their Civil Rights and Franchises But in the Turkish and other Mahometan and Pagan Dominions where also the conquered Provinces of Christians have Liberty of Conscience the Nazaren and Arian Churches are very numerous Much of the new Conquests of his present Imperial Majesty in Hungaria Sclavonia and Illyricum are Arian But though the open and avowed Profession of the Unity of God as 't is taught by the Nazarens or Socinians and by the Arians be supprest yet 't is observed that not a few of the most learned and celebrated Writers of the Church whether Catholick or Reformed have certainly been either Arians or Socinians or great Favourers of them though they have used much Caution in so expressing themselves as not to lye too open to Exception Envy or a legal Prosecution 1. D. Erasmus the restorer of Learning hath given
occasion both to his Friends and Enemies to think him an Arian He saith that Phil. 2. 6. was the principal Argument of the Fathers against the Arians but that to say true it proves nothing against them He notes on Eph. 5. 5. that the word God being used absolutely doth in the Apostolick Writings always signifie the Father In his Scholia on the third Tome of St. Jerom's Epistles he denies that the Arians were Hereticks he adds farther that they were superior to our Men in Learning and Eloquence 'T is believed Erasmus did not make himself a party to that which he esteemed the ignorant and dull side of the Question In his Epistle to Bilibaldus he speaks as openly as the times would permit a wise Man to speak I saith Erasmus could be of the Arian Perswasion if the Church approved it 2. H. Grotius is Socinian all over This great Man in his younger Years attacked the Socinians in a principal Article of their Doctrine But being answered by J. Crellius he not only never replied but thank'd Crellius for his Answer and afterwards publishing some Annotations on the Bible he interpreted the whole according to the mind of the Socinians There is nothing in all his Annotations which they do not approve and applaud His Annotations are a compleat System of Socinianism not excepting his Notes on John 1. 1 c. which are written so artificially and interwove with so many different Quotations that he has cover'd himself and his sense of that Portion of Scripture from such as do not read him carefully 3. D. Petavius the most Learned of the Jesuits has granted that generally the Fathers who lived before the Nicene Council and whose Writings are preserved agreed in their Doctrine concerning God with the Nazarens or Socinians and concerning the Son our Lord Christ and the Holy Spirit with the Arians For 't is to be noted that the Arians and Socinians agree in their Doctrine concerning God that he is only one Person the God and Father of our Lord Christ but they differ concerning the Son and Holy Spirit The Son according to the Arians was generated or created some time before the World and in process of time for great and necessary causes became incarnate in our Nature The Holy Ghost they say is the Creature of the Son and subservient to him in the Work of Creation But the Socinians deny that the Son our Lord Christ had any Existence before he was born of Blessed Mary being conceived in her by the holy Spirit of God They say the Spirit is the Power and Inspiration of God saving that Mr. Bidle and those that follow him take the holy Spirit to be a Person chief of the Heavenly Spirits prime Minister of God and Christ and therefore called the Spirit by way of excellence and the Holy Spirit to discriminate him from Satan Prince and Chief of the wicked and Apostate Spirits This difference notwithstanding because they agree in the principal Article that there is but one God or but one who is God both parties Socinians and Arians are called Vnitarians and esteem of one another as Christians and true Believers as may be seen on the part of the Arians in their Historian Chr. Sandius Hist Eccl. l. 1. c. de Paul. Semosat and for the Socinians in the Disputation of Alba. But to return to Petavius He often affirms that the Doctrine of the Trinity and of the Divinity of the Son and Spirit cannot be proved by Scripture only and that those who have attempted it have always been baffled He adds there is no way to Unity in the Church about these matters but by contenting our selves to speak concerning them as the Fathers who lived nearest to the Apostles time did speak 4. S. Episcopius so much esteemed by our English Divines seems to have been an Arian He saith the Father is so first as to be first in order i. e. time in Dignity and in Power He saith that to make three equal Persons in God or in the Godhead is to make three Gods. He denies that the Lord Christ is the Son of God by substantial Generation that is by Generation from the Father's Substance or Essence Speaking of the Creeds that express the Catholick Doctrine of the Trinity and the Divinity of the Son and Spirit he saith that Bishops in general Councils being led by Fury Faction and Madness did not so much compose as huddle up Creeds for the Church See for these things Episc Inst Theol. l. 4 c. 32 33 34. 5. C. Sandius a Gentleman of prodigious Industry and Reading and no less ingenious then learned in all his Books refuses in Words to be called either Arian or Socinian but has written an Ecclesiastical History in Quarto with Addenda to it Coloniae 1678 on purpose to prove that all Antiquity was Arian and that the Vnitarian Doctrine has been reduced so low by the Persecutions of Rome and the puissant Arms of Charles the Great and other Kings of France for which Services they have been requited by the Roman Pontiff with the Titles of Most Christian Kings and Eldest Sons of the Church He has also under the borrowed Name of Cingallus written a small Treatise with this Title Scriptura Trinitatis Revelatrix here under pretence of asserting the Trinity he has as much as he could defeated all the strengths of the Catholick Cause and shews that there is no considerable Text objected to the Arians or Socinians but is given up as an incompetent and insignificant proof by some or other of the principal Critics and Authors who were themselves Trinitarians so that among them they have given away the Victory to their Adversaries But Sir I perceive I have drawn out this account of the Socinians to already a sufficient length for a Letter I will therefore conclude with a Passage out of Dr. Burnet's second Book of the History of the Reformation abridged George van Parr a Dutch Man refused to abjure so he was burnt in the year 1549 by virtue of a Law or Writ since abolished by Act of Parliament for affirming that only the Father is God and denying the Divinity of the Son our Lord Christ He had led a very exemplary Life for Fasting Devotion and a good Conversation and suffered with extraordinary Composedness of Mind These things cast a great Blemish on the Reformers It was said they only condemned Cruelty when acted on themselves but were ready to practise it when they had Power The Papists made great use of this in the next Queen Mary's Reign and what Arch-Bishop Cranmer and Bishop Ridly Authors of Van Parrs Punishment suffered in her time was thought a just Retaliation on them by that wise Providence which disposes all things justly to all Men. Thus far Dr. Burnet SIR I am most sincerely Yours A Second Letter TO A FRIEND Concerning the UNITARIANS Called also SOCINIANS Containing the Texts objected to them out of the Old Testament and their Answers Acts 24.
not for himself or People he cannot die and he deriveth his Power from none but himself But 't is certain that the Lord Christ could not himself without the previous Ordination of the Father confer the prime Dignities of Heaven or of the Church He placed his Safety in the Father's Presence and Help He prayed often and fervently to the Father both for himself and for his Disciples He died and was raised from the dead by the Father After his Resurrection he received of another that great Power which he now injoyeth Matth. 20. 23. To sit on my right Hand and on my left is not mine to give but it shall be given to them for whom it is prepared of my Father John 8. 29. He that sent me is with me and the Father hath not left me alone for I always do those things that please him Luke 22. 42. Father if thou be willing remove this Cup from me Heb. 5. 7. Who in the Days of his Flesh offered up Prayers and Supplications with strong Crying and Tears unto him that was able to save him John 17. 20. Neither pray I for these alone but for them also which shall believe in me through their Word Ephes 1. 19 20. According to the mighty working of his Power which he wrought in Christ when he raised him from the dead Matth. 28. 18. Jesus came and spake to them saying All Power is given to me 7. Jesus Christ is in holy Scripture always spoken of as a distinct and different Person from God and described to be the Son of God and the Image of God Rom. 16. 27. To God only wise be Glory through Jesus Christ. Luke 18. 19. Why callest thou me good there is none good save one that is God. 1 Tim. 2. 5. There is one God and one Mediator between God and Men the Man Jesus Christ. John 13. 18. He that believeth not is condemned already because he hath not believed on the Name of the only begotten Son of God. Luke 1. 35. The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee Blessed Mary and the Power of the Highest shall overshadow thee therefore also or and therefore the Holy thing that is born of thee shall be called the Son of God. Col. 1. 15. The Image of the invisible God. ' Tis. say the Socinians as impossible that the Son or Image of the one true God should himself be that one true God as that the Son should be the Father and the Image that very thing whose Image it is which they take to be simply impossible and contradictory to common sense which Religion came not to destroy but to improve Whereas to these arguings 't is objected that these things are in Holy Scripture spoken of Christ according to only his humane Nature or as he is a Man but that he is also God the Son though united to an humane Nature that is to an humane Soul and Body The Socinians reply that there is in Scripture no real Foundation for such a Conceit that 't is inconsistent with almost all the Texts already cited especially those in which the Lord Christ is spoken of as a distinct and different Person from God and that there are many other Considerations and Passages of holy Scripture which no less than demonstrate it to be false As 8. Because so many Texts expresly declare that only the Father is God John 17. 1 2 3. Father this is Life eternal that they know thee the only true God and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent or Jesus Christ thy Messenger 1 Cor. 8. 6. But to us there is but one God the Father of whom are all things and we in him and one Lord or Master i. e. Teacher by whom are all things In the Greek thus One Lord Jesus Christ for whom are all things and we for him See the Note on Heb. 1. 2. in the Fourth Letter Eph. 4. 4 5 6. One Spirit one Lord one God and Father of all who is above all 1 Cor. 15. 24. Then 〈◊〉 the End when he Christ ver 23. shall deliver up the Kingdom to God even the Father Jam. 3. 9. Therewith with the Tongue ver 8. bless we God even the Father Rom. 15. 6. With one Mind and with one Mouth glorify God even the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ 9. If Christ were indeed God as well as Man or as Trinitarians speak God the Son incarnate in an humane Nature it had been altogether superfluous to give the Holy Spirit to his said humane Nature as a Director and Guide For what other help could that Nature need which was one Person with as they speak God the Son and in which God the Son did personally dwell Luke 4. 1. Jesus being full of the Holy Ghost departed from Jordan Acts 1. 2. After that he through the Holy Ghost i. e. through direction and motion of the holy Spirit and Inspiration of God had given Commandments unto the Apostles Acts 10. 38. God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost 10. Had the Lord Christ been as Trinitarians speak God the Son joyned to an humane Nature he could not have ascribed his miraculous Works to the Holy Ghost or to the Father dwelling in him but to the Son dwelling in him and united to him Matth. 12. 28. I cast out Devils by the Spirit of God. John 14. 10. The Father that dwelleth in me he doeth the Works John 5. 30. I can do nothing of my self Acts 2. 22. Jesus of Nazareth a Man approved of God among you by Miracles and Wonders and Signs which God did by him in the midst of you 11. Had our Lord been more than a Man the Prophecies of the Old Testament in which he is promised would not describe him barely as the Seed of the Woman the Seed of Abraham a Prophet like unto Moses the Servant and Missionary of God on whom God's Spirit should rest Gen. 3. 5. I will put Enmity between thy Seed and her Seed Her Seed is by all Interpreters understood to be Christ Gen. 22. 18. In thy Seed shall all the Nations of the Earth be blessed This again is universally interpreted of Christ Deut. 18. 18. I will raise them up a Prophet from among their Brethren like unto thee and I will put my Words into his Mouth This is interpreted of our Lord Christ in many Texts of the New Testament as John 1. 45. and Acts 3. 22. and Acts 7. 37. Isai 41. 1. Behold my Servant whom I uphold mine Elect in whom my Soul delighteth I will put my Spirit upon him and he shall bring forth Judgment to the Gentiles This is interpreted of Christ Matth. 12. 17 18. Now that the Holy Ghost or Spirit is only the Power and Inspiration of God at least is not himself God they hold is ascertained by these Considerations 1. The Holy Ghost or Spirit and the Power of God are spoken of as one and the same thing 1 Cor. 2. 4 5. My preaching was not with enticing Words
14. After the way which they call Heresy so worship I the God of my Fathers believing all things that are written in the Law and the Prophets Printed in the Year 1687. A Second Letter Concerning the Unitarians vulgarly called Socinians SIR THE Texts and Arguments from them objected to the Doctrine of the Vnitarians and Saoinians concerning God are so many that 't is impossible to give a tolerable account of what they answer to the Orthodox in a Letter their Answers would indeed require a Volume Yet because I would not wholly disappoint your Expectations and Demands I will in several Letters lay before you some part of what they reply to the Texts and Arguments taken from the Old Testament what to those that are found in the Gospels and Acts what to those out of the Epistles and Revelation The Texts objected to them out of the Old Testament are of two sorts 1. Those which singly and alone prove the Trinity or the Divinity of the Son or Spirit 2. Those which perhaps would not if alone considered prove the Orthodox Doctrine but do it sufficiently when compared with and interpreted by some Texts of the New Testament I will propound both these in the order of Scripture 1. Gen. 1. 26. Let Vs make Man in our Image Answ 1. This Text hath been considered in the foregoing Letter 2. But 't is to be also farther observed that some Rabbies render the Original Hebrew thus Let Man be made in our Image Meaning say they in the Likeness of God and Angels for he speaketh to the Angels who were all present Job 38. 4. 7. Yet God speaketh to them not as Adjutants but as Spectators of his Work. They note that this Translation agreeth with the stile used all along in this chapter ver 3. Let there be Light. ver 6. Let there be a Firmament ver 20. Let the Waters bring forth ver 24. Let the Earth bring forth the living Creature 2. Gen. 3. 22. God said The Man is become as one of Vs to know Good and Evil. Answ 1. It may be and is by very many learned Men said that God speaketh here to the Angels 2. But others translate the Hebrew words thus the Man is become one of himself knowing Good and Evil. And thus also 't is expressed in the Chaldee Translation by Onkelos 3. Gen. 11. 6 7. The Lord said Let Vs go down and there confound their Language Answ 1. It is said by some that God speaketh here to the Angels and the Ministers and Executors of his Decree 2. Others say Let their Language be confounded for so the Hebrew may be rendred is an Hebrew Phrase signifying I will confound their Language For so he saith Gen. 1. 3 6 20 24 26. Let there be Light. Let there be a Firmament Let the Waters Let the Earth bring forth Let Man be made that is I will make Light I will make a Firmament I will cause the Waters and Earth to bring forth I will make Man. Note that God is said to go down because his Power accompanied his Angels who were either Ministers or Spectators of his miraculous Work. 4. Gen. 19. 24. The Lord Heb. Jehovah rained Fire from the Lord Heb. Jehovah out of Heaven Answ The Translation of Seb. Castalio is generally approved by the most learned Criticks as agreeing to the Genius and manner of the Hebrew Tongue he renders the original Words thus Jehovah rained Fire from himself from Heaven But see also what they say on Zech. 3. 2. a place parallel to this 5. 2 Sam. 23. 2 3. The Spirit of God â—ake by me the God of Israel said Answ The Spirit of God that is the Inspiration of God q. d. God inspired and spake by me 6. Psal 2. 7. Thou art my Son this day have I begotten thee Answ Paul hath taught us that this Text so far forth as it respecteth Christ and is a Prophecy of him and what God would do for him was not intended of his supposed eternal Generation from the Essence of the Father or God but of his being begotten to Life again from the dead Acts 13. 34. God hath fulfilled the same in that he raised up Jesus from the dead as it is written in the second Psalm Thou art my Son this day have I begotten thee Col. 1. 18. The Head of the Body the Church the first born from the dead 7. Psal 45. 6 7. Thy Throne O God is for ever and ever thou hast loved Righteousness therefore thy God hath anointed thee with the Oyl of Gladness above thy Fellows These Words are interpreted of Christ by the Author to the Hebrews Heb. 1. 8 9. Vnto the Son he saith Thy Throne O God is for ever c. Answ In the Hebrew and in the Greek 't is God is thy Throne i. e. thy Seat resting-place or Establishment for ever 8. Psal 68. 18. Thou hast ascended on high thou hast led Captivity captive thou hast received Gifts for Men or as 't is in the Syriac and Eph. 4. 8. hast given Gifts to Men. These Words manifestly spoken of God are interpreted of Christ Eph. 4. 8 9 11 Whereforh he saith when he ascended up on high he led Captivity captive and gave Gifts to Men. Now that he ascended what is it but that he also descended first into the lower parts of the Earth He that descended is the same also that ascended up far above all Heavens that he might fill all things And he gave some Apostles some Prophets and some Evangelists c. Answ 1. Those Words descended first into the lower parts of the Earth are to be understood of our Lord's descent into the Grave and Hell from whence he arose and afterwards ascended into Heaven 2. These Words ascended far above all Heavens that he might fill all things had been better rendred that he might fulfil all things namely all the Prophecies of himself and others concerning his Death and Descent into the Grave and Hell and his Ascension into the highest Heavens far above all the visible Heavens all the Heavens and Orbs in which the Sun and Stars move 3. Thou hast ascended and given Gifts to Men are in the Psalm litterally meant of God and of Christ only by way of Prophecy or rather of Emblem and Accommodation And that Paul in the Ephesians intended no more than an Accommdation or as Grotius speaks a mystical or allegorical Interpretation of the words in the Psalm is evident by the Gifts he mentioneth He gave some Apostles some Prophets some Evangelists that is he advanced some to be Apostles others to be Prophets and Evangelists in the Christian Church These Gifts not being given or received till about one thousand Years after David's time Paul could not possibly intend a literal Interpretation of David's Words but only to accommodate them to Christ because Christ also did ascend on high and give Gifts to Men. To this effect speak Grotius Dr. Patrick and other famous Interpreters on this Text. 9.
Psal 95. 9 10. Your Fathers tempted me forty years long was I grieved with this Generation These words spoken by and of God are interpreted of the Holy Ghost Heb. 3. 7 9 10. As saith the Holy Ghost your Fathers tempted me c. Answ As saith the Holy Ghost that is As saith the Holy Spirit or Inspiration of God by the Mouth of the Prophet David So Estius Piscator Capellus Grotius c. Note that in the Psalmist's words there is an Enallage of the Person frequent in the Hebrew and especially in the Psalms Me for Him and I for He. 10. Psal 97. 7. Worship him all ye Gods or all ye Angels These words though spoken of God are interpreted of Christ Heb. 1. 6. Again when he bringeth the first-begotten into the World he saith And let all the Angels of God worship him Answ In the Greek 't is When he bringeth again the first-begotten into the World that is when he raised Christ from the dead who is his first-begotten from the dead he commandeth let even all the Angels of God worship him 'T is uncertain whether St. Paul had any respect to the Words in the Psalm but if he had he doth not quote the Words of the Psalmist as if they were spoken of Christ but only declareth the Decree of God known to him by the Spirit for subjecting the Angels to Christ in the same words that the Psalmist had used on another occasion because they are words most proper to express that Decree for the Writers of the New Testament generally affect to speak in Scripture Language 11. Psal 102. 25. Of old hast thou laid the Foundation of the Earth c. This seems applied to Christ Heb. 1. 10 11 12 13. And thou Lord in the Beginning hast laid the Foundation of the Earth but to which of the Angels said he at any time Sit on my right Hand Answ Thomas Aquinas hath rightly acknowledged that the Words of both these Texts may be understood of God only not of Christ The Context of the Hebrews hath this sense And thou Lord that is and in another Text of the Psalms 't is said Thou Lord. So Estius Camerarius Grotius hast laid the Foundation of the Earth But to which of the Angels said he i. e. said the Founder of the Earth c. sit on my right Hand as he saith to Christ at Psal 110. 1. For though Psal 110. 1. is literally designed of David yet you Hebrews knowing that David was a Type of Christ do also apply the Words there sit on my right Hand unto the Messias or Christ 12. Psal 110. 1. The Lord said unto my Lord Sit on my right Hand until I make thine Enemies thy Footstool It appears by Matth. 22. 43. that the Jews understood these words of David as spoken of God and Christ and therefore our Saviour puts this Question to them how Christ could be David's Son for they were it should seem commonly taken to be David's Words if he was David's Lord which can no way be answered but by saying he was David's Son according to the Flesh and David's Lord as he was God. Answ Our Saviour's Words are David in Spirit calleth him Lord saying The Lord said unto my Lord Sit on my right Hand that is David in the Spirit of Prophecy foreseeing Christ calls him his Lord. But he calleth him so not because Christ is God for if that were true himself could have made his Enemies his Footstool but because not only the Spirits of David and all Saints but even Angels are in Heaven made subject to Christ and that as the Reward of his most Holy Life and obsequious and acceptable Death 1 Pet. 3. 22. Phil. 2. 8 9. But note that when the Psalmist says the Lord said unto my Lord the Lord said is to be understood he hath in decree said he hath decreed it shall be so So Dr. Patrick in his Paraphrase on this Text. 13. Psal 110. 3. Thy People shall be willing in the day of thy Power in the beauty of Holiness from the womb of the Morning thou hast the Dew of thy Youth Answ This Text as 't is in the English Translation is wholly unintellible Seb. Castalio has as he is wont made a probable and elegant sense from the Hebrew thus Thy People or thy Troops shall be chearful when with sacred Majesty thou goest to Battel thou shalt have innumerable Youth The words are spoken to David 14. Psal 139. 7. Whither shall I go from thy Spirit Answ From thy Spirit is an Hebrew Phrase for From thee Like as when 't is said of Moses Psal 106. 33. They provoked his Spirit the undoubted meaning is They provoked Him. So also Eph. 4. 30. Grieve not the holy Spirit of God is an Hebraism for Grieve not God. 15. Prov. 8. 24. When there were no depths I was brought forth Answ Solomon speaketh here of the Quality or Faculty of Wisdom by which God and Men order their Affairs wisely That he meaneth not as some have fancied the Son or the Spirit of God appears by the Gender he useth For he saith ver 2. She standeth in the top of high Places ver 3. She crieth at the gates and chap. 7. 4. Say unto Wisdom Thou art my Sister 16. Prov. 30. 4. Who hath ascended up into Heaven who hath established all the Ends of the Earth what is his Name and what is his Son's Name Answ Dr. S. Partick interpreteth this Verse thus Hath any Man ascended into Heaven who among Men hath gathered the Wind or fixed the Earth what is the Man's Name or his Sons 17. Isa 6. 1 8 9. I saw the Lord sitting upon a Throne I heard the Voice of the Lord go tell this People Hear ye indeed but understand not shut their Eyes c. This Appearance of God is ascribed to Christ John 12. 41. These things said Isaias when he saw his Glory the Words Go tell this People c. are ascribed to the Holy Spirit Acts 28. 25 26. Well spake the Holy Ghost by Isaias Go unto this People c. Answ 1. The Words in St. John are to be understood not of Christ but of God for God only is intended in the foregoing Verse as all confess 2. Accordingly the best Greek Bibles read that Text thus These things said Isaias when he saw God's Glory 3. The Texts in the Acts ascribeth the Words in the Prophet to the Holy Spirit because the Vision and all the Words there mentioned were a Scene wrought in the Prophet's Mind not exhibited to his outward senses by the Spirit or Power of God. 18. Isa 7. 14. A Virgin shall conceive and bare a Son and shall call his Name Immanuel 'T is added Matth. 1. 23. which being interpreted is God with us Answ 1. Matthew as all know wrote his Gospel in Hebrew and therefore did not interpret the Hebrew Name no more than the Prophet whose Words he cited had done before him We are not bound
to subscribe to the Interpretation of the Greek Translator being an obscure and unknown Person Immanuel is by Erasmus interpreted God with him a Name most proper for the Lord Christ and to this Interpretation of the Name Immanuel S. Peter very plainly alludes Acts 10. 38. 2. Admitting that Immanuel may signify God with us yet the Child also who was to be a Sign to King Ahaz and whom Grotius thinketh to be the Son of the Prophet Isaiah was called Immanuel by order from God. And there are several Names of this high Import and Signification in Scripture Elihu recorded 1 Chron. 12. 20. signifies He is my God. Eliatha mentioned 1 Chron 25. 4. is Thou art my God. 3. Christ may well be named Immanuel taking it for God with us as God was most plentifully with his People by sending the Lord Christ to be his Ambassador and Representative and our Redeemer Several of the most learned Trinitariaus acknowledg that no more than this was intended by this Name 19. Isai 8. 4. He shall be a Stone of Stumbling c. This is spoken of God in the Prophet and applied to Christ Rom. 9. 33. 1 Pet. 2. 8. Answ Neither St. Paul nor St. Peter cite the Words of the Prophet as spoken of Christ but only as in some sense applicable to him namely as Christ also was to many a Stone of stumbling 20. Isa 9. 6 7. Vnto us a Child is born unto us a Son is given He shall be called Wonderful Counseller The mighty God The everlasting Father The Prince of Peace Of the Encrease of his Government and Peace there shall be no end upon the Throne of David to order and establish it with Judgment and Justice from henceforth and for ever The Zeal of the Lord of Hosts shall perform this Answ 1. This cannot be a Prophecy of Christ because it speaks of a Prince actually born at that time Unto us a Child is born Unto us a Son is given Isaiah lived above seven hundred Years before Christ 2. The Text is indeed to be understood of Hezekiah but is very extravagantly rendred in the English In the Hebrew 'tis thus Vnto us a Child is born unto us a Son is given the wonderful Counsellour the mighty God the everlasting Father shall name him the peaceable Prince his Government shall be multiplied i. e. He shall reign long even twenty nine Years and he shall have very great Peace he shall sit upon the Throne of David ordering and establishing it with Judgment and Justice from henceforth to the end of his Life The Zeal of the Lord of Hosts shall perform this i. e. God's Love to his chosen People shall make good this my Prophecy Note that no end of Peace and no end of Riches are never to be strictly understood in humane Affairs but we mean by them very great Peace and Riches Therefore the Peace of Hezekiah being in twenty nine Years interrupted by only one Expedition against him and that also in the end unsuccessful he may be said to have enjoyed great Peace or speaking hyperbolically as is the manner of this Prophet Peace without end 21. Isai 35. 4 5. Your God will come then the Eyes of the Blind shall be opened c. This seems to be applied to Christ Matth. 11. 4 5. Jesus answered Go tell John what ye do see and hear the Blind receive their Sight c. Answ God is said to come to the Jews in his Ambassadour and Messenger Jesus Christ and because in and by him God gave Sight to the Blind c. John 14. 10. The Father that dwelleth in me He doeth the Works Acts 10. 38. God was with him 22. Isai 40. 3. The Voice of him that crieth in the Wilderness Prepare ye the way of the Lord a high way for our God. This Voice was John Baptist Matth. 3. 1 3. And it was Christ's way he prepared Luke 1. 76. compared with Matth. 11. 10. Mark 1. 7. Acts 13. 24. Answ John Baptist is said to prepare the way for God when he prepared the way for Christ because Christ was the Ambassadour and Representative of God and God was with and in Christ Acts 10. 38. God was with him John 14. 10. The Father that dwelleth in me he doeth the Works 23. Isai 44. 6. Thus saith the Lord I am the first and I am the last Christ also is called the first and the last Rev. 1. 8 17. Rev. 22. 13. Answ Rev. 1. 8. is not spoken of Christ but of God. At v. 17. Christ is called the First and the Last but Erasmus Grotius and Hugo Cardinalis interpret the Words of him as he is a Man. Christ saith Hugo is the first or most honourable with good Men and the last or most despised with Infidels and wicked Men. Briefly both Almighty God and our Lord Christ are the First and the last but in different Senses 24. Isai 45. 23. I have sworn by my Self Vnto me every Knee shall bow These Words of God are applied to Christ Rom. 14. 10 11. We shall all stand before the Judgment Seat of Christ for it is written Every Knee shall bow to me and every Tongue shall confess to God. Answ In bowing and confessing to Christ at the last Judgment we are said to bow and confess to God because Christ then and there holdeth the place of God representeth him and acteth by his Commission So Men are said to appear before our Soveraign Lord the King when they appear at the Bar of his Judges because the Judges act in the Kings stead and by his Commission 25. Isai 48. 16. I have not spoken in secret from the Beginning from the time that it was there am I and now the Lord God hath sent me and his Spirit Answ I in this Text is not Christ but the Prophet for Christ was not sent by the Lord God and his Spirit in the days of the Jewish Prophets Heb. 1. 1 2. But if it were Christ or the Son that here speaketh yet this very Text would prove that he is not God for he is here distinguished from the Lord God as one who is not himself God but is sent by God. The Prophet seems to speak of the Overthrow of the Chaldean and Babylonish Troops by some great Prince whom God either had or would raise up against them see ver 14. and 15. Therefore Grotius and Forerius do not translate as the English hath it From the time that it was but before this thing is or before it hapneth There am I that is I declare it as explicitly and clearly as if I were present on the place 26. Jer. 23. 5. 6. I will raise unto David a righteous Branch in his days Judah shall be saved and Israel shall dwell safely and this is the Name whereby he shall be called The Lord Heb. Jehovah our Righteousness Answ In the Hebrew 'tis This is the Name which they shall call the Lord our Justifier that is in the happy and peaceful