Separable Fourthly To make the Lords Supper pass for a beginning Teaching as well as Babtism is presumption indeed the one appertaining only to the new borne for admission into the Church the other to the most grown Christian as well as others for his edification And one would think that Mr. D. who must have such plain Scripture for what we urge as beginning Principles should not thus vary from his owne Rule when he assignes any thing for such Fifthly I fear Mr. D. is some what guilty of pertinacity in saying the Laying on of hands Heb. 6. 2. is as plurall as Baptisms seeing he cannot be ignorant how Mr. Fisher hath unvailed that mistake in answer to a Query wherein I think Mr. D. was concerned which as he terms a grevious and gross mistake so he shews that the Laying on Heb. 6. 2 is a substantive of the singular number both in the Greek and English and some of the Learned and Judicious of his owne partly have to my knowledge confessed that to be an egregious mistake and sith he gives no reason for his persisting in his former opinion but barely contradicts his opponents it is to me very Suspicious that he hath nothing to defend himselfe withal save his Sic volo sic jubeo And here let me note that seeing Heb. 6. 2. speaks but of one Laying on of Hand there is a necessity that we determine which it is else we must confess none can know the first Principles But to take off the force of our Arguments for the necessity of Imposition of hands with prayer for the holy Spirit as a Principle in the more compleat Constitution of Christian Churches Mr. D. is pleased to aske this question If every one of these Principles in Heb. 6. are so absolutely to be taken in by Babes and without which we are not esteeme them communicable what do you say to the Doctrine of Baptisms in the text one of the Principles and foundations of the Gospell must be all Baptised with the Baptism of the holy Ghost and of sufferings also or not to be received into Communion The reception of the holy Spirit according to the promise Answ 1 made to the Church is not a thing in our power but the meanes to seek for it is in our power we must believe and pray for the promise so must we also believe and wait for the Resurrection and the Eternall judgment And so must we believe and expect sufferings for Christ else we have not rightly Laid the foundation in repect of the Doctrine of Baptismes but now to argue from the things which are in our power to do to the things which are only in the power and disposeing of the Almighty is irrationall and dangerous and may be retorted upon Mr. D. after this manner Seeing you suppose a man may be admitted to communion without two Baptisms of the three Heb. 6. 2. why do you make the other so absolutely necessary now let him defend him selfe for that practical part of the doctrine of Baptisms and thereby he will defend me for that practick part of the fourth principle 2. But if any shall deny the promise of the spirit with which all Christians are to pray that they may be baptized contrary to the late dangerous doctrine of some who would restrain the Baptism of the Spirit to miraculous gifts opperations or signes c. and perswade us the Baptism of the Spirit is ceased or that shall deny the doctrine of Sufferings or Sufferings themselves as not pertaining to them or if any shall teach others to deny these truths as you teach others to deny prayer with imposition of hands and will needs persist in opposing themselves against all endeavours used to reform and amend them I say such may lawfully be denied communion in the Churches of God and thus we have considered Mr. D. his several expositions upon Heb. 6. 2. Of the Laying on of Hands 2 Tim. 1. 6. Neither hath Mr. D. wrote advisedly P. 48. where he teacheth that the imposition of Hands 2 Tim. 1. 6. and 1 Tim. 4. 14. are both one for as much as they are evidently distinguished in three respects as first In respect of the persons administring them That in 2 Tim. 1. 6. being performed by Paul only the laying on of my Hands the other by more then he 1 Tim. 4. 14. The Laying on of the Hands of the Presbytery surely if more had acted in the first then Paul himself he would not have arrogated the whole service to himself as if the blessing received came by what he did and the rest stood but for Ciphers no this is nothing like that humble Apostle who was less in his own eye then the least of all Saints neither can it be proved that he was one of the Presbytery that Ordained Timothy though Mr. D. concludes he was though perhaps he might be one of them 2. The Gifts are clearly distinguished Those 2 Tim. 1. 6. being the Gifts which are common to all Saints as much as to Timothy namely 1. The Spirit of Love which all that are born of God do share in by the Holy Ghost Rom. 5. 5. 2. Power or strength 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 virtutis not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 potestas authority and this strength all Saints have need of 3. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sobrietatis sobriety or soundness of mind which also every true Christian should have hence its plain that the Gift of God which Timothy received by the Laying on of Hands 2 Tim. 1. 6. in every part of it is that which is common to all Saints insomuch as he that hath not the Spirit of Christ in these respects may well fear he is none of his On the other side it is evident to all men that Paul in 1 Tim. 4. 14. speaks of the Ministerial Gift Authority or Trust which was committed to Timothy by the consent of the Prophets and by the Laying on of the hands of the Eldership 3. From the Scope of the Apostle in these places respectively for in 1 Tim. 4. 14. Paul is clearly in hand with the matters of Timothies Office vers 11. to the end But in 2 Tim. 1. 6. he speaks to him as he might have spoke to any other Christian Man or Woman for finding him under some Temptation and Fears he comforts him by telling him he hoped his Faith was unfeigned and supports him against Fear by noting that it was not the effect of the Spirit which God gave him by the putting on of his Hands and therefore exhorts him not to be ashamed of the Testimony of the Lord nor of Paul the Lords Prisoner but to be a partaker of the affliction according to the Power of God Then he moves him to consider how free the grace of God was by which he is saved and not to be valued by the works of righteousness which he had done and thus he speaks from vers 1. to vers 13. and then begins to treat of
propounded Heb. 6. 1 2. 2. From the care of the Apostles in the seeking to God in the use of this * So I call it for five Causes 1. Because of Prayer the Moral part 2. Because of Imposition of Hands the Ritual part 3. Because of the Promise to which it refers as the blessing signified by it 4. Because it is placed among the Fundamentals of Religion or called a Principle of the Doctrine of Christ 5. Because it will bear the denomination of an Ordinance as well as Imposition of Hands on Deacons or other Officers of Christs Church Ordinance that the Churches might enjoy the benefit of the Promise of the Holy Spirit which they knew belonged to them as they were the called of the Lord. And because the Nature and extent of that great Gospel Promise is a weighty consideration whereupon to ground the practice of Prayer with the Imposition of Hands and without which the practice would be very insignificant I shall therefore add something to shew the perpetual Right of the Church to that blessed Promise even to the end of the world For it is remarkable that those that oppose us in the fourth Principle deal much after the manner of the Quakers in their opposing Baptism hammering only upon the practick part which they can easily despise but when the more spiritual part of these Ordinances is considered this takes off the courage of the most confident opposer Of the second Ground of the Practise of Prayer and Laying on of Hands to wit the Promise of the Spirit and the Churches right to it to the end of the World M. D. is pleased to say pag. 47. That in neither of those two places meaning Acts 8. Acts 19. can we find that there was a Laying on of Hands immediately after Baptism nor with any certainty upon all and every Member of the Church nor to such an end as can be attainable in after times But though Mr. D. cannot find the two first yet many have Answ 1 found them there unless by the word immediately he would be more curious then wise for that this service was performed Acts 8. within a short time after and as soon as they had a fit opportunity to do it is plain enough vers 15. 16 17. and for Acts 19. 5. T is said when they heard this they were Baptized in the Name of the Lord Jesus and in the very next words 't is said when Paul had laid his hands upon them the Holy Ghost came on them And that the same individuals said to be Baptized are as clearly found to have hands imposed and Prayer made for them that they might receive the Holy Spirit is so very plain that nothing but exceeding great weakness or great perversness can hinder any man from seeing it And whether the end for which Prayer with Imposition of Hands can now be attained is the business now to be considered And if it Cannot the reason is for that the Promise made to the Church then is since taken away do jure so that we may not lawfully ask it for men not having the Promise is no argument James 4. 2 3. ye have not because ye ask not ye ask and have not because ye ask amiss Now that the gratious promise of the Holy Spirit at least as it belonged to the Members of the Church in the Primitive times and that in every part of it from the time of its first effusion upon the day of Penticost Acts 2. doth belong to the Church throughout all Ages to the end of the world I hope to evince to the satisfaction of such as desire to know the Truth in this matter which I shall do by transcribing and somewhat inlarging what we have already offered in our Paedobaptist Apology for the Baptized Churches * But Note that we have proved that the promised Spirit is truly received where the sealing Graces are received though gifts be not received and the promise being received the end of Imposition of Hands is received See our Sigh for Peace Beside the Cloud of Witnesses ‖ Some of which I will here incert in a Column by themselves Job 14. 16 17. And I will pray the Father and he shall give you another Comforter that he may abide with you for ever even the Spirit of Truth Joh. 7. 38. He that believeth on me out of his belly shall flow Rivers of Living Water but this spake he of the Spirit which they that believe on his Name should receive Acts 2. 23. Therefore being by the right hand of the Father exalted and having received of the Father the promise of the Spirit he hath shed forth that which you now see and hear Acts 2. 38 39. For the Promise is to you and to your Children and to all that are afar off even to as many as the Lord our God shall call ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost Eph. 4. 4. There is one Body and one Spirit even as you are called in one hope of your calling And he gave some Apostles some Prophets some Evangelists and some Pastors and Tearchers till we all come to the measure of the Stature of the fulness of Christ Ephes 4. 30. The Holy Spirit of God by which ye are sealed to the day of Redemption 1 Cor. 31. Covet earnestly the best Gifts Covet to Prophesie and forbid not to speak with Tongues we Prophesie in part but when that which is perfect is come then that which is in part shall be done away Gal. 3. 13 14. Christ hath Redeemed us that the blessing of Abraham might come upon the Gentiles that they might receive the Promise of the Spirit through Faith Isa 59. 21. As for me this is my Covenant with them saith the Lord my Spirit which is upon thee and the words which I have put into thy mouth shall not depart out of thy mouth nor out of the mouth of thy Seeds Seed from hence forth for ever which the Holy Scriptures do afford in this Case we shall more particularly consider what the Apostle hath offered 1 Cor. 12. 13 14. Chapters And 1. whereas it is his designed Subject to discourse of the Gifts of the Spirit so he doth inform us that God hath Set those Gifts in his Church i. e. hath placed and fixed that one spirit whose opperations are divers or many in that one body not for a few dayes onely and then to leave her as a Body without a Spirit for ever after in respect of SPIRITUAL GIFTS but to abide there as in his Temple both by Gifts and Graces even the same which Christ by virtue of his ascention obtained when he ascended on high which gifts are given to the Church for the work of the Ministry for the edification of the Body till the whole be compleated Againe the Promise of the Spirit is made by our Lord himself 2. From the extent of the Promise to the Church for ever John 14. 16. I will pray
able to teach another which be the first Principles of the Oracles of God And indeed upon this Rock hath Mr. D. run himself after all his Expositions on Heb. 6. 2. and is forced pag. 49. to suppose that he is not able to tell us what laying on of Hands is intended Heb. 6. 2. ‖ But alas it s more then a supposition for if he do know infallibly what it is why doth he not tell us which it is or why are we counted immodest for shewing it possitively unless he arrogate more to himself then he will allow to us and gives this as a reason of his supposition viz. There are many things in Pauls Epistles which are hard and difficult to be understood which says he the Ignorant do wrest Which sentence he hath verified for not knowing what to say concerning Heb. 6. 2. certainly he hath by saying many things at a venture exceedingly wrested this place and first by supposing this Laying on of Hands to be one of the hard things in Pauls Epistles The contrary being most plain for these Principles Heb. 6. 1. 2. are opposed to the things that are hard to be uttered Heb. 5. being also called Milk for Babes and not strong Meat As also because the Hebrew Cristians are blamed for that they might have been and were not teachers of these Principles but needed to be taught again which were the first Principles Yea verily this is to make all things in Christianity hard and difficult for if the first Rudiments be so what can be easie It is high time therefore for Mr. D. and others with him to see the vanity of these pretences and speedily to consider that there is as much need to be possitive in the business of the fourth Principle Heb. 6. 2. as any of the rest and that a Teacher may with as much ground and credit plead ignorance to them all as to any one of them and how dangerous it is to make Principles or any of them but probabilities only a man that hath but half an eye may easily perceive Secondly Mr. D. sets down two Principles as he calls them to be as a Line to carry us through the work * As if Mr. D. his Principles were more Infallible then those in Heb. 6. viz. 1. That to every Ordinance of Christ there must be some plain positive word of Institution to Confirm it 2. To practice any thing in the worship of God for an Ordinance of his without an Institution is Will-worship and Superstition But surely the first of these propositions is not to taken without some such exposition as this viz. That what any Man affirmes to be a solemn part of the worship of God for the Church of God it must be warranted by the holy Scriptures without wresting them But Mr. D. taking the first proposition in a ridged sence counts all we say from Heb. 2. as nothing unless we can shew where it 's said Let all Baptizâ—d Beleivers have hands laid on them with as much plainness as it s said Let all Beleivers be Baptized and eat the Lords Supper But this is very irrationall to imagin that every institution of Christ must be expressed in the Scripture with equall Plainness for if they be but found there it is Sufficient Nay the very ordinances he mentions are not equall in their plainness in respect of the Individualls that are to partake of them Precept and President being in that behalfe much plainer for Baptism then the Lords Table Again the goverment of the Church by Messengers Bishops and Deacons c. is an Institution of Christ But if I ask for a precept in terminis that in the ordination of these officers prayer and Imposition of hands must be used I dare say Mr. D. cannot shew it Neither is he able shew me any President that any but the Apostles Laid Hands on Deacons Nor any President at all of any one Elder of any particuler Church that was ordained by Prayer with the Laying on of Hands yet surely there is sufficient in the Scriptures to warrant us in these things respectively and thus we shall come to consider more Particularly what Mr. D. hath done to cleare the same of Heb. 6. as he promises in his title page and yet in his lines pretendes it cannot be cleared as I have shewed whilst the most he himself arrives at or allows us with his Good liking to attain to is but probability P. 40. Heb. 6. 1. 2. For the ground of our practice in praying to the Lord with the imposition of Hands The Connexion of the Principles or the order wherein they are propounded to us is eminently considerable because principles or first rudiments of Religion both in faith and practice as they are practicall do Equally concern individuals both in respect of the things so denominated and the order of them except in cases of immergency as is more fully shewed in our S. for peace Part. the Second Mr. D. P. 41. denyes that there is the Least warranty in this text for the faith or practise of the Church in praying with the imposition of hands c. and yet in the next page he tells us it is very true the Doctine of Laying on of hands is here reckoned among the principles of the Doctrine of Christ But withall he denys laying on of hands on all Baptized Beleivers to be taught or practised by Christ observing from the Waldenses that John did not lay hands upon Christ after he Baptized him c. I Answer Christ himself being he that was sent of God to Baptize with the Holy Ghost as the great Author of that Donation from the Father it was not meet that John should pray for Christ yet behold the very order wherein Christ received the Spirit is very teachable to the Saints in their waiting upon God for that Heavenly gift for when he was Baptized then he prayed and the holy Ghost desended upon him being them sealed by God the Father who also by voyce from Heaven declared him to be his beloved Son Math. 3. 16. 17. Luk. 3. 21. John 6. 27. How Suitable therefore is it to the example of Christ for all such as are Baptized speedily to waite upon God for the gift of his holy Spirit with Prayer and Imposition of Hands haveing the Apostles walking in that very path before us and God Almighty Crowning that way by giveing a blessing to his Children even then sealing them also to the day of Redemption by the Spirit of Promise Acts 19. 6. Ephes 1. 13. and 4. 30. But saith Mr. D. we find not that Christ taught this laying on of hands c. To which it were sufficient to say that we do not finde where Christ either taught or practised Laying on of hands on Deacons or other officers all that we finde is that he Lift up his hands and Blessed his Apostles and yet who dare doubt but that the Apostles were taught of God how to ordain his
are First That the Sacrament of Confirmation was Instituted by Christ meaning the Popish Sacrament they having occasion only to witness against that 2. That Christ was not Confirmed in his own Person Meaning in the Popish way of Chrism c. for that he prayed and that the Father who only could Luk. 3. 21 22. Joh. 6. 27. Seal him did Seal him with the Holy Ghost immediately after his Baptism is evident and so he was confirmed in his own person 3. That Baptism is perfect without that Sacrament Hereby only rejecting their conceit that think or make it an appurtenance of Baptism That this only is their meaning is evident for say they God is Blaspheamed by it 2. It was introduced by the Instigation of the Devil to seduce the People and deprive them of the Faith of the Church 3. To draw them to believe Ceremonies and the necessity of Bishops meaning doubtless Lord Bishop c. and not the Overseers of Christs poor people But surely no man can imagine that those Waldenses were so mad-headed to say or think that Prayer with Imposition of Hands for the Spirit of Promise according to the Example of the Apostles simply so considered and as the next priviledge to holy Baptism was introduced by the Devil No Mr. D. himself is not offended thereat pag. 51. and truly should the Waldenses have had such a meaning their Testimony for our Churches succession would be very inconsiderable Wherefore to suppose some of them ignorant of what some Churches in this Age do know concerning the simplicity of this practise having so continuall occasion from the Papists to be scandalized against it shall this plead for you to follow them in that particular I trow not our Fore-Fathers may find that tollerable in the day of Judgment which we shall not find so having the advantages which they were not acquainted with Wherefore though it be the unworthy design of Mr. D. in the Historical part of his Book to make the Imposition of Hands as now contended for by his Brethren to be originally a Papistical Babylonish and Antichristian Ceremony not used by the Greeks or any other Churches differing from the Papists except our late Reformers some of them yet this being little more then his bare word It may be sufficient to ballance him with the Testimony of Dr. Jer. Taylor who saith That Laying on of Hands was firmly believed by all the Primitive Church and became an Vniversal Practise in all Ages the Latine Church and the Greek alwayes did use it It was Antient and long before Popery entered into the World and this Rite hath been more abused by Popery then any thing and to this day the Bigots or Jesuites of the Roman Church are the greatest Enemies to it and from them the Presbyterians Yea such is the evidence of this Despised Truth that Mr. Calvin a man sufficiently and yet justly sharp against Chrism and such vanities yet is constrained to own the primitive use of this Ordinance so I call it and desires once and again it were restored and because Mr. D. hath not fully set down his words I will here recite them Such Laying on of Hands saith he as is done simply instead of Blessing I praise and would that it were at this day restored to the pure use thereof And again I would to God we did keep still the manner which I have said to have been in old time Cal. Instit l. 4. c. 19. S. 4. and S. 13. To whose good desires we may joyn those of Hommius and the Leyden Professors set down by Mr. D. pag. 27. viz. That this business of Confirmation were drained from Antichristian mixtures both as to Name Nature Matter Form Administrator and Subject also From all which its remarkable that there hath been as holy Breathings after the Restoration of this precious Truth as other of the paths of Righteousness and therefore the more intollerable is it for Mr. D. or any other now to oppose themselves against it being now as graciously Restored to its pure use in many Churches of Christ as any other Ordinance whatsoever So that by this time I hope its apparent how little reason Mr. D. had to ask this insinuating Question pag. 32. Is there not good ground think you to suspect the Justice and Truth of that Cause that cannot otherwise be defended nor maintained but by suborned witnesses and Knights of the Post For truly as these witnesses are not suborned but in the rank of Humane Testimonies for matter of Fact very considerable so neither is it true that there are no better ways to maintain this Truth seeing the Divine Authority of this Sacred Truth standeth not upon man but upon the Word of God as we have in some former Treatises and shall now again in our second part further demonstrate The Second Part. TO say nothing here of Mr. Ds. Exceptions against the grounds and ends for or from which others beside the Baptized Crristians do observe Prayer with Imposition of hands but to leave them to their own Defence we shall consider briefly the force of his opposition against his Brethren among whom respecting the Practice of Prayer with the Laying on of Hands he very well observes First The Name which we or rather the Lord gives this Rite viz. Laying on of Hands Second The Subjects viz. All Baptized Believers Men and Women even as God hath made his Promise of the Spirit to both Men and Women Third The Administrators viz. The Elders or Presbyters or Messengers of Christ and his Churches who as they are all Stewards of the Mysteries of God of which this of laying on of Hands was one they must needs be Dispencers of it with the Rest Fourth The end for the Promised Spirit to Confirm the Baptized and orderly to admit into the Church to Confirm only as the ways of God do all help to Edifie and strengthen Gods People Fifth The Time or Order in which this is Administred betwixt Baptism and the Supper or presently after Baptism ‖ If no imergency require some Iteration Sixth The Principal Ground upon which they assert it viz. The Scripture especially from Heb. 6. 2. Act. 8. 17. 19. 2. 6. When Mr. D. comes to oppose us in these Particulars p. 40. he inverts the order here propounded and begins with the last particular in the first place but first he premises several things And first he is pleased to say That we do not affirm or deliver our opinion upon Heb. 6. 2. with so much modesty or Sobriety as the Presbyterians or Independants and the reason is onely because we determine plainly what Laying on of Hands is meant Heb. 6. 2. and pass it not only as a probability or to this purpose To this I answer That this is so far from Insobriety that there is a necessity that we be possitive in this Case else it must be granted that this first Principle cannot be known and then it supposes no man
Ministers and there is the same reason to beleive they were taught of God to pray with Laying on of hands for the promised Spirit specially when God so signally owned them in that undertaking Act. 8. 17. Mr. D. names many Churches that are not said to have hands Laid on them and that to be reckoned among their principles which is so frivilous an objection as I marvel he should use it he knows there be some Churches who are not said to be Baptized nor to have the Lords Table among them nor any Church save one to have had Decons ordained by Laying on of hands and yet finding these things religiously held in some Churches we safely conclude other Churches had the like And why may not the example of two or three Churches in the case of prayer with Laying on of hands for the promised Spirit satisfie as well as the example of one Church only in another case Mr. D. p. 43. puts this objection why should Laying on of hands be reckoned among the beginning principles if it was not to be practised by all c. which he answers after this manner your Argument is falacious as though no act done upon or practised by others might be matter of Doctrine to us without being engaged to do the same But I reply That the Argument being used only with repect to things Fundamental or the first Principles of the Christian Religion is very sound and concluding and therefore not answered nor touched by Mr. Ds. extending it to all other acts but disingeniously abused for both the Doctrine and practise of all the Principles Heb. 6. 1. 2. belongs equally to all otherwise it will follow that the first Churches had the Principles of Religion both in the Doctrinal and Practick parts but we have only the Theory we must learn them but not practise them for â—…s saith Mr. D. p. 45. Beleivers must be taught it meanning Laying on of hands but that they are obliged therefore to practise it is not here i. e. in Heb. 6. or else where to be found Surely this is the way to destroy such Principles as are practicall to leave nothing of them in the Churches now but talking of them only Mr. D. being pressed by the consideration of Laying on of Hands as it is Milk for Babes in Christ undertakes to shew that some other Laying on of hands may be that also and names the imposition of hands to heal the Sick Mark 16. 18. Surely he may with as much truth and reason tell us that the Answ drinking any deadly poyson Mark 16. 18. is Milk for Babes in Christ also this is the effect of mens stumbling at truth they make themselves ridiculous for who would think that so judicious a person should make that a Principle and such an one too as belongs to all Christians equally as it is a Principle which indeed scarce belongs to one of ten thousand Again Laying on of hands to heale the sick belongs to them that are without the sick persons in the Church having a speciall ordinance provided for there comfort in sickness Jam. 5. and therefore not to be called Milk for Babes in the Church But suppose that Laying on of hands to heal the Sick do at all belong to the Church yet the oldest Christian is as much concerned in it as the youngest Christian who being sick may seek for cure that way as well as the other Neither is this laying on of hands properly called Confirmation as Mr. D. Imagins P. 44. for the word was confirmed with signes which followed prayer and Preaching as well as laying on of hands on the sick yea prayer and laying on of Hands on Baptized Believers had signes also following it so then all these may as properly be called Confirmation as any one of them and yet Mr. D. will not allow Imposition of hands for the holy Spirit to be properly so called But Similie Similus est ratio And to conclude this note further that seeing Imposition of hands for the holy Spirit is for the obtaning of Spirituall Gifts and the Imposition of hands on the sick for the exercise of Spirituall gifts received the first is even therefore much more like to be Milk for Babes then the latter Mr. D. further saith Laying on of hands Heb. 6. 2. contains that for the investiture of Church Officers and his reason is because these Principles are very Comprehensive he saith also that the Lords Supper may pass for a beginning Teaching as well as Baptism He tells us also that the Laying on of hands Heb. 6. 2. is as plurall as Baptisms P. 43. 50. 51. 1. I answer to make Imposition of hands on Decons and other officers a Principle appertaining to the begining of a Christian Man is very obsurd because first Principles are necessary to the being of Churches whereas the Imposition of hands on officers presupposes a Church allready founded and as such to have made their election of some to mannage their affaires as a Church after which election the Laying on of hands to ratifie it is to be performed Secondly Mr. D. faithfullness in thus expounding Heb. 6. 2. may well be suspected for doth he indeed make it his work to Preach that Laying on of hands which is the next Principle to Baptisme Heb. 6. Is the Imposition of hands on Deacons c. doth he I say Teach the Babes this as he Teacheth the other five Principles I believe if he do so he is singular sure I am before the controversy arose about Laying on of hands for the promised Spirit none of them that I could ever hear of said any thing at all about the Imposition of hands Heb. 6. 2. And as I have reason to believe that there is not one Minister in those Churches not under the forth Principle as by us urged that doth teach the babes that they must receive as that Principle Heb. 6. that Doctrine touching the Investiture of Church officers so if they did Teach thus I would gladly know the ground of such Doctrine at least from some example in that case and I am sure all the objections made by them against us would be far more â—orceable against themselves Thirdly I grant the Principles Heb. 6. to be very Comprehensive yet as Principles to be owned by Babes in Christ I say they do not containe all Christian performames for if so it would follow that few or none have yet Learned their Principles and then why the Apostle should make it so strange that the Hebrews should need to be taught these Principles I can see no reason so then the Principles Heb. 6. 1. 2. may be duly Learned where many things in point of Christian faith and practice are not yet attained The foundation I grant hath relation to the Superstructure but yet the foundation may be perfectly laid where the superstructure is yet wanting The seed time and planting leads to the Harvest and time of Fruit but yet these things are truly
the Father and he shall give you another Comforter that he may abide with you for ever c. I say this Promise is made to the Church for it were a strange exposition to restrain this FOR EVER to the age of the Apostles as some do for seeing the Apostles or the Churches could neither pray nor Prophesie as they ought but as that Spirit of Promise did help their infitmity it is strange the Succeeding Churches should be able to do those duties though deprived of that gratious assistance for it is evident that the Spirit of Promise is a Spirit of Prayer and Prophesie is one of the most excellent gifts thereof as before we have shewed That great Apostle S. Peter dates the Promise of the holy Spirit very Largely as descending to the very skirt or Last age of the Church of God on earth whiles he asserts it is the right and interest of all Saints even as many as the Lord your God should call Acts. 2. 39. And he hear takes the Promise in that sence wherein Joel meant it and the Christian Church had then received it which clearly intends both the gifts and graces of it for as t is sure they then received great gifts so t is said great grace was upon them all this very promise of the Father is by this Apostle appropriated to all the called of the Lord as we said even the servants and handmaids in these daies Now These daies must either be a few daies at the beginning of the Gospel or it must be refer'd to the whole time of that glorious dispensation if the first then how shall all the called of the Lord receive it Or who will tell us when these daies expired But we know that these daies the Latter daies Last time and Last daies are used with some frequency in Scripture to point out the whole time of the Gospell or Christian Church as it succeeds the time of the Law During all which time we are sure that the duties in generall 3. From the Nature and perpetuity of the duties of the Church and perhaps some difficult undertakings not formerly known which were imposed upon the first Churches are laid upon the Church to the end of the World Matth. 28. 20. Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you c. Must the Churches now contend earnestly for the faith and that against both old and new errors must she be still the salt of the earth the light of the world Must she still strive to Preach the Gospel of the Kingdome to all Nations must she keep herself in the Love of God building up her self in her most holy faith praying in the Holy Ghost c. if these Duties remain and the Lord requires that she should glorifie him in the constant and faithfull discharge thereof as also in suffering for his sake it cannot reasonably be immagined that he should recall his holy Spirit in the gifts thereof from his Servants who when they had all those gifts had nothing that was superfluous but stood in need of all to furnish them for the work they had to do as the Churches of Christ sith then our God doth require the same services of his Churches now which in generall he required of the Churches in the first ages of the Gospel Let us not imamagin he will require the same Brick and not allow the same Straw for he is not like Pharoah but just in all that he requireth That the gifts of the Spirit here intended by our Apostles are 4. That the Nature and perpetuity of the Exhortations to seek for the Spirit the portion of the Church in every age as her right appeareth further from the Nature of the exhortation she is under to ask them Luk. 11. 13. How much more shall your Heavenly Father give his holy Spirit to them that askt it ask and it shall be given unto you ver 10. How frequent is the Apostle in these three Chapters in exhortations to this Church and in them to all Churches to desire Spirituall gifts to covet earnestly the best gifts to covet to Prophesie wishing that they may speak with tongues and warning them not to Prohibit that gift Now to what purpose is all this if these gifts be ceased and if the Church may not now expect them why should she ask them I hope no man will say these exhortations are now out of date least in so doing â—… deprive us of the exhortation to Charity also for they are so Linked together as the one cannot cease as it is an exhortation before the other Follow after Charity and desire Spirituall gifts 1 Cor. 14. 1. Thus we see the Church being under Perpetual exhortations to Seek for Spiritual gifts without any restriction necessarily infers her perpetuall right to them and every of them which consideration alone is Sufficient as I conceive to satisfie any Christian that the promise of the Spirit even the same that was given to the first Churches generally in respect of its gifts as well as graces belongs to the Church of Christ thoughout all ages Let us now consider whether the Church of God do not 5. From the continuation of Spiritual gifts in the Church to this day even now enjoy the promised Spirit in the gifts and graces of it at this day For the graces I think none do question it and yet should the fruits or graces of the Spirit as they may be distinguished from gifts which now appear be strictly considered by what did formerly shine forth in the Churches it might without all peradventure put us to some pause yet may we not thence conclude that the graces thereof are ceased but it would surely become a Provocation to cry mightily unto God for an enlargment of what in that behalfe we have received And as I intend not to boast of the gifts of any so I may safely presume that the gifts received in these daies by the Church of God are far greater then I can set down or give you account of because the Church being diffused though many Nations her gifts must needs be unknowne to me I will then restrain my observations to the Churches in this poor Island who may not vie with all Churches but rather in humility conclude themselves inferious to many in respect of gifts And yet shall we say she hath none of the gifts of Gods holy Spirit or may we not rather say she hath many that are endowed with a Word Of Knowledg and that meerly by gift from God having otherwise no capacity or faculty more then others but therein far short of many of their Brethren only the gift of God and no natural faculty maks the differance How have men of knowledg in this world been found to have no skill in the things of God and the foolish to attain knowledge and some to excell so far as to confound the wisdome of the wise and to bring to naught the understanding of the
before an equal Judge others will be found to have as clear a claim to Miracles as themselves Which yet shall avail them nothing because they wanted Truth with their gifts Matth. 7. 22. Many shall say unto me in that day Have we not Prophesied in thy Name and in thy Name have we not cast out Devils and in thy Name done many wondrous works And then will I profess unto them I never knew you depart from me ye workers of Iniquity And though our Saviour saith no Man can do a Miracle in his name and Lightly speak evill of him yet that very Speech Supposes the thing Possible It doth not follow therefore that wheresoever Miraculous gifts are or the gifts of the Spirit as Prophesie c. that there is the true Church and therefore Let not the great Preachers of any sort deceive themselves that because of their abillity that way they are therefore own'd of God as Ministers of his Churches for it 's evident the false Apostles seem'd to out-vie Paul himself in * 2 Cor. 10. 10. wording their Matters But the Church is only known by her conformity to the Doctrine of God our Saviour cheifly in her care of the Principles * Heb. 6. 1. 2. of Christianity to which she knows the whole Body of Christian Doctrine is reducible For we are his House if built upon that foundation of Repentance Faith c. and pertakers of him IF we hold the beginning of our Confidence ‖ Heb. 3. 6. 14. stedfast to the end and not otherwise if any come to you and bring not this Doctrine though he can talk Like an Angel receive him not to house no though he work Miracles For thus saith the Lord * Deut. 13. 1 23. If there arise among you a Prophet or a Dreamer of Dreams and giveth the a sign or a wonder and the sign or the wonder come to pass whereof he speak unto thee now observe if he do this saying let us go after other Gods which thou hast not known and let us serve them thou shalt not hearken to the words of that Prophet for the Lord your God proveth you to know whether you Love the Lord your God with all your Heart and withal your Soul And hence Learn this one thing That Gods Truth is not to give place to any gifts but all gifts ought Subserve to the furtherance of the truth therefore regard no man but as he regards the Truth To conclude as we ought not to be Ignorant of the gifts of the Spirit so neither of the meanes ordain'd of God to obtain these gifts The primative Churches herein our best guides as the word directs and 't is well known and I think granted on all hands that they used the holy Ordinance of Solemn Prayer and Imposition of hands for obtaining the promised Spirit at least with respect to these gifts Now be it so though I say for the graces also 2 Tim. 1. 6. 7. then seeing these gifts are promised to us as well as unto them and are attainable and in part attained by many what should hinder the Churches but that now they should tread in this path with Faith and full assurance that a Blessing is in it As in holy Baptism we are placed as it were among those whose sins are washed away in the Blood of the Lamb. So in this holy Ordinance of Prayer and Imposition of Hands we are in a solemn manner â—…ed into the Promise of the Holy Spirit And as the pardon of our sins signified in Baptism doth not prevent but better capacitate us to Pray daily Forgive us our Trespasses So the Prayer of Gods Ministers with the Imposition of Hands doth put us into a better capacity to seek daily for the gifts and graces of the Spirit because now solemnly admitted to the gracious obtaining of the Promise in that very way wherein the primative Saints were admitted thereunto Acts 8. 15 17. Acts 19. 2 6. 2 Tim. 1. 6 7. Heb. 6. 1 2. Who when they were come down Prayed for them that they might receive the Holy Ghost then laid they their hands on them and they received the Holy Ghost Wherefore I put thee in remembrance that thou stir up the Gift of God which is in thee by the putting on of my hands Have ye received the Holy Ghost since ye believed and when Paul had laid his Hands on them the Holy Ghost came on them The foundation of Repentance from Dead works and of Faith towards God of the Doctrine of Baptisms and of Laying on of Hands c. What shall I say the Scriptures are evidence sufficient that this Ordinance is of Divine Institution is from Heaven The promise which it leads to is perpetual and universal it belongs to the whole Body There is one Body and one Spirit even as ye are called in one hope of your calling But now after this Digression which I hope will not offend to return to Mr. D. I trust by this time he will consider that there is no good ground for him or any body else to say the End of Prayer with Laying on of Hands cannot be attained Neither is there any reason for Mr. D. to be astonished as he pretends p. 35. because we urge him to produce better evidence for Womens receiving the Lords Supper Or clearer Precept or President for the Ordination of Officers by Prayer and Laying on of Hands then we are able to produce in our Case nor need he count this a thing either unreasonable or dangerous c. For how should this be dangerous must not the grounds of one practice be examined as well as another Or why unreasonable Is not our Brethren bound to stand to their Principles one time as well as at another Or will they impose Principles to lead us through the whole work as Mr. D. pag. 40. and not be lead by them themselves For my part I am fully satisfied there is sufficient ground in holy Scripture for Womens coming to the Table of the Lord and for the Ordination of Church Officers by Prayer and Laying on of Hands And I do solemnly profess to dislike any Principle or Practice in Religion which cannot fairly be demonstrated by the evidence of Holy Scripture But yet this I must needs say That there is as clear if not clearer grounds for the Fourth Principle as we hold it as there is for either of the other points specially the latter For first Womens receiving at the Lords Table it is gathered by a rational deduction from the Holy Scripture as appears by Mr. D. pag. 54. wherein he hath done well as others in the same case hath done before him yet should any man use his own Weapons against him which he uses against his Brethren they might worst him because of his inconsistency though his cause be good 2. In all the Scripture there is no express command to Lay hands on Deacons nor any Example that Prayer was used at all in