crediderint quà m fecerunt à nobis divortium Vnde haec fides An non ex praedicatione in nostra Ecclesia nunquid autem praedicare quis potest nisi mittatur Rom. 10.13 Quid ergo verbum propter labem aliquam externae vocationis tam perverse respuunt cujus vim divinam in cordibus sentiunt c. Are they ashamed saith he to sit down there where they see Christ is not ashamed Will they be holier and purer than he But why do they not convince themselves by their own experience They cannot deny but that they did beleeve in Christ before they made this divorce from us Whence had they their Faith Was it not by the preaching in our Church But can any man preach except he be sent Rom. 10.13 Why do they therefore so perversly despise the Word for some defect supposed in the outward Call the heavenly force whereof they feel upon their hearts What he there immediately adds Object Etiamsi fructus iste non magis culpa liberat depravationes nostras quà m vera proles adulterium That is Resp Notwithstanding this fruit of conversion doth no more excuse our Corruptions he means in Church Government especially than a true Childe doth Adultery This passage was both inconsiderately and as it implyed untruly spoken Inconsiderate it was for the Separation against whom he there writes do acknowledge That they had their Faith and Grace indeed in the Church of England but according to his own expression Jo. Robins Apol. for Separation cap. 12. p. m. 94. that did no more excuse the Church or prove it to be a true Church than a true Childe doth excuse Adultery or prove that the Woman is a true Wife They retort his own Metaphor upon him But again it was an unproper similitude and untrue in the implication of it for it implieth That there may be a true Conversion where there is no Church as there may be a true birth where there is no wedlock But we must remember That Christ doth not stand in relation to a Church In what relation Christ stands unto his Church as a man doth unto a woman by conjunction of whom there issues a natural birth whether their meeting be matrimonial or no God therein operating according to that course which he hath setled in Nature without respect unto his positive Law in that case provided but Christ stands in relation to his Church as a Husband to the Wife in spiritual and legitimate Matrimony the bond whereof is the Covenant of Grace according to that of the Apostle I have espoused you as a chaste Virgin unto Christ 2 Cor. 11.2 And again Ephes 5.23 The Husband is the head of the Wife even as Christ is the head of the Church wherein he implies that he is the Husband also Now the Childe is not the Husbands unless begotten in Matrimony To imply therefore That there may be Conversion by those who are no Church were to make as it were the Spouse of Christ an Harlot a thing horrid to imagine But to return to our Evidence from the Fruits of our Church and Ordinances There is a demonstration 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from effects if they be so properly and not consequences accidentally onely which I say to prevent that crambe non saepius cocta and why was it not so of late when great proof was taken from success and issues careat successibus opto c. To this therefore we may add those speeches both of our Saviour and our Apostle in this way of reasoning from the proper effects unto the causes You shall know them by their FRUITS Mat. 7.16 saith our Saviour Do men gather Figs of Thorns 1 Cor. 9.2 or Grapes of Thistles And the Apostle If I be not an Apostle unto others yet doubtless I am unto you for the seal of my Apostleship are ye in the Lord That is Your Conversion proves me a true Minister of Christ Gal. 3.2 And elsewhere This onely would I learn of you Received you the Spirit by the works of the Law or by the hearing of Faith It was good consequence in our Saviours and S. Pauls Logick to prove a true Church and Ministry by the effect of Conversion and why not in ours On the contrary the Assemblies of the Separation 1. None or rare conversion in the Separation Independency Anabaptism First negatively No conversion is found or rarely in them from prophaneness to grace but it is confessed by themselves Salvificam fidem veram pietatem multorum cordibus in Ecclesia Anglicana Robins Apol. cap. 12. p. m. 93. per Evangelii praedicationem ingenerari foveri absit ut vel negemus nos vel non eo nomine ingentes gratias Deo opt max. NOSTRUM ipsorum aliorum respectu debitas fateamur God forbid saith Mr. Robinson of whom we may well say Contr. Parmen l. 1. cap. 1. as Austin once of Tichonius viz. ' That he was a man acri ingenio praeditum uberi eloquio sed tamen Donatista i. e. endued with a sharp wit and good utterance but yet a Donatist a Separatist God forbid saith he that we should deny but that saving Faith and true Piety is both generated and maintained by the preaching of the Gospel in the Church of England yea we give most vehement thanks to the great and gracious God in this respect both for OUR SELVES and others They are generally converted before they fall to those ways and have an actual sense of Religion upon them Habitual Conversion for their habitual Conversion was in their Baptism and in their relation to the profession of Faith under which they were born upon which ground they have a right unto Baptism as we saw above out of Calvin Epist 285. Secondly Positively There grow such sowre Grapes 2. The sowre grapes of Separation such Rents Contentions loose practices especially these three noted above out of Bucer Pride Contempt of others and Opinions Add also what my self by long and much experience have observed of which above Whose Prayers are oft-times Prefaces to other matters as our Saviour hath it Mat. 23.14 Not but that there are such among us also but yet as the Lord noteth A proselyte unto such persons becomes twofold the Childe of Hell more than he was before Vers 15. as adding and colouring his corruptions with Religion and yet perhaps himself not seeing his hypocrisie as he did clearly see his prophaneness and his danger before They indeed do neither enter into the Kingdom of God themselves that is the Church nor suffer others to abide quiet in it Vers 13. as our Saviour in the same place And may in this be compared unto Beggars that steal the children of others and carry them about as their own Object Answ To conclude this point then Seeing Conversion is fully and plentifully had in the Church of England seeing it cannot be shewed to any
the Ecclesiastical Concerning the first 1. In the Civil Controversie I closed with the one party in the civil contest for these causes whereof the one is General and Privative the other Positive and Particular The former was the grieving or resisting the Spirit of God from whom I received no small concussion about this matter especially at the coming forth of * The resolving of conscience c. Edit Cambr. 1642. Dr. Fearn's first book in opposition to the Lords and Commons in their taking up Arms against the King The authority of Scripture there urged unto which God had given me ever to bear an awful reverence the Spirit setting it on exercised me more than all his arguments But 1 being in heart enclined unto the good things the other side proposed to be contended for and 2 judging his reasons might all be answered and 3 apprehending it much concerned the cause of God and of his servants and 4 my own reputation also being pre-engaged 5 and lastly my place seeming to call for it I holding then the publick Lecture in Cambridge I took all the former reluctancy of spirit to be onely a temptation and accordingly resolved to reply On Judg. 5.23 on which Mr. St. M. had preached before of whose notions that I know of I made no use Mr. J. B. which I did the next Lords day after the publishing of that Book wherein I answered all that seemed material in that Book and so answered it That some who were of the other judgment were pleased to say that so bad a cause could not be better pleaded Upon this I was sollicited to the publishing of my Answer But coming to London and finding another had done it before but especially my spirit working too and fro betwixt resolution and fear I did suppress it But that of Zachary hath been fulfilled in me since In that day the Prophets shall be ashamed Zach. 13.5 every one of his vision when he hath prophesied And blessed be God who hath verified another also towards me viz. Thou shalt hear a voice behind thee saying Isa 30.21 This is the way walk in it when thou turnest to the right-hand and when thou turnest to the left And blessed be his Name that although I have been a rebellious child as it is in the first verse of that chapter that would not take counsel of him nor cover with the covering of his spirit yet he hath not cast me away from his presence Psal 51.11 nor taken his holy Spirit from me Deliver me from bloods O Lord thou God of my salvation A Prayer and my tongue shall sing aloud of thy righteousness The sacrifice of God is a broken spirit a broken and contrite heart O God thou wilt not despise And Vphold me O Lord with thy spirit then will I teach sinners thy ways and transgressors shall be converted unto thee Lastly Do good in thy good pleasure unto Sion build thou the walls of Jerusalem then shall they offer young bullocks upon thine altar Amen Sed irrideant nos fortes potentes Aug. confess l. 4. c. 1. nos autem infirmi inopes confiteamur tibi But let great and oveâ—-grown spirits laugh at this let us that are infirm and poor in heart confess to thee Tota palea areae ipsius irridet eum Aug. in Ps 21. in Prefat in Expos 2. gemit triticum irrideri dominum All the chaff of Christs own floor laughs at him and the good corn laments its Lords derision Thus of the general and privative cause SECT II. Particular Motives 2. THe particular follow and they were such as these 1. 1. Propounded The excellency and necessity of the things held forth to be contended for the Laws namely and the Liberties of the Nation and that which made them both most precious Religion Protestant by them established and secured 2. Next the credit that I gave unto the persons that did propound them both for their ability and for their faithfulness 3. A third was the awful opinion that I conceived of the power and authority of that place from which they seem'd to issue to wit the Parliament 4. That the exigences being such there was a virtual bond by all Laws to use remedies that were not usual 5. and lastly That examples of the like had been in Scripture among the Jews in the Primitive Church the former against Antiochus by the Maccabees the latter of the Christians against Maximinus Also in the Reformed Churches as the French Holland Scottish and owned by our former Princes and then present King defended also by our own Divines and Bishops as Jewel Abbot Bilson c. 2. Replies unto them But all these and such like as applyed to our case being put into the ballance of the Sanctuary in my eye seem much too light As touching the first my opinion and veneration of the Protestant Religion 1. Religion the Laws and Liberties of the Nation I hope is greater now than it was as I know them somewhat better But touching Religion to be defended by Arms especially of Subjects well spake the Dantzikers A notable speech of the Dantzikeâ—s in their material Letter to the Duke of Croy exhorting them to the like May 27. 1656. Evidently it doth appear say they how much the Roman-Catholicks are incensed through this war and that from thence no small persecutions yea the greatest danger may befall the Reformed Churches Vid. Mercurius Politicus Jul. 3. 1656. if God do not prevent it in his mercy We do confidently believe that no body can think or impute it to us as if God took pleasure in Apostates and Hypocrites and as if he would have Religion promoted in casting off the lawful Magistrate Note and in the slender esteem of a well grounded government Call to mind how at all times by Warrs the spirits of men grow more barbarous and inhumane Note and how the wars for Religion use commonly to extinguish Religion Thus they Note Now I call God to witness upon my soul that the sense of the dishonor done unto the Protestant Religion 2 Cor. 1. working upon my heart hath been one main occasion of further examining the grounds of those transactions and of altering my thoughts Homil. of disobedience part 4. pag. 300. And particularly one passage in the doctrine of this Protestant Church expressed in the Homily of disobedience did much affect me of which anon This for Religion 2. Then for the Laws and Liberties seeing first 2. Laws and Liberties that both Houses of Lords and Commons in all their solemn addresses to the King and that in Parliament and as such a Parliamentary body 1. Style of the H. H. do usually style themselves thus Your Majesties most humble and loyal subjects the Lords and Commons in Parliament assembled In that Remonstrance which the King saith Kings Declaration Aug. 12. 1642. Remonstr of the State of
Apostle St. Paul implyeth that faith only which works by love to be effectual to obtain forgiveness of sins Jam. 2. And St. James proves as well concerning love as faith that if it have not Alms-giving it is uneffectual as those words If a brother or a sister be naked or destitute of daily food and one say Go be warmed be filled and give him not that which is needful for the body what doth it profit that is what proof of love is here 1 Tim. 6.19 And Paul exhorts rich men by good works to lay up for themselves a good foundation that they may lay hold on eternal life Explained There is a foundation of right whereby we have title to eternal life and that is faith if it be a living one Foundation of salvation double The right of it such also And there is a foundation of assurance and that is by good works Again There is an original right and that 's by faith in the general promise the Covenant of Grace And there is a collateral right and that is by good works whereunto particular promises are made Homil. of Amlsd p. 161. But as our Authour saith I know some men will not be contented with this answer and no marvel for such men can no answer content or suffice I have done with their Exception against the matter Alms-deeds and the efficacy of them I come now to their objection against the proof or the title of it rather Chap. 4.10 Ecclus. 3.30 That the Book of Tobith being cited for proof it is said that the Holy Ghost did teach in sundry places of Scripture and this Book named whence they infer 1. That the Book of Tobith is here taken for holy Scripture 2. That it was indited by the Holy Ghost But for answer When things seem double to the eye that are single it is an argument that either their opticks or their understanding is defective In all other mens eyes for a Book to be holy Scripture and to be indited by the holy Ghost is all one and vice versâ But if they spake that they did not think if their hearts were worse then their head we may here retort upon them their own reproach upon the Hom. excellent sense Secondly I answer with the Learned Whitaker De Sacr. Script Q. 1. cap. 11. Non est idem esse canonicam Scripturam computari in numerum sacrarum Scripturarum It is not the same thing to be Canonical Scripture Apocrypha how Script and to be counted in the number of holy Scripture Computantur enim in numero Scripturarum quae cum sacris Scripturis leguntur ad aedificationem plebis etsi non ad dogmatum confirmationem They are counted saith he in the number of the Books of Scripture which are read with Scripture for the edification of the Church although not for the confirmation of Articles of Faith The Articles therefore having excluded these Books from holy Scripture Artic. 6. as themselves note and every ones Bible having it in the Apocrypha that expression might be born in a popular Sermon though not in a determination in the Schools But Secondly The Homily saith the Holy Ghost saies it and that implies 't is very Scripture As if Apocrypha how from the holy Ghost as he called it Scripture in a large sense so he might not ascribe it to the Holy Ghost in a like sense also yet not as any truth especially in matters of Religion may be so ascribed but because it is so consonant unto those very expressions which the Holy Ghost hath in the undoubted Scripture touching the same matter as we saw above out of the Sermons of our Saviour and writings of the Apostles But Thirdly because I love plainness What if I grant that the Homily being penned very early and in the morning as it were of the Reformation and before the Articles had determined the number of Canonical Books at least in the Synod 1562. or were confirmed by Parl. And whilest it was still in the peoples minds being so formerly taught that those Books Were Scripture what if to avoid offence in a popular Sermon the Homily spake according to the then received opinion as the holy Evangelists and Apostles oftentimes follow the Greek Translation differing from the Hebrew because it was generally received and the errors not such as overthrew the faith Object so here But why was it not amended since Why is it suffered to Answ 1 stand still Forsooth for the same reasons perhaps in part that those of the Church of Rome our brethren of the Nation and others affected that way may see we do not reject wholly those Books out of the number of holy Scriptures in some sense and as inditements of the holy Ghost in such things as they have agreeable to Answ 2 Scripture And it may be these and such like expressions were left as are the Psalms and Epistles and Gospels after the old Translation not only for the cause now named but also to be as a picture of the face of the Church in its infancy here that the growth of it since in knowledge and distinct understanding of things might the better appear Though it must be avowed that if any man Galat. 1. yea or an Angel from Heaven preach any other Doctrine than what is already and then was established in the Articles Homilies and Liturgies let Answ 3 him be accursed Lastly It is very probable that the things not being of any dangerous consequences as they stood Ipsae quippe mutatio consuetudinis etiā quae adjuvat utilitate novitate perturbat Aug. Januar. Ep. 118. c. 5. and the changing of them might be not only very difficult for some things must have been much altered and detruncated but also give occasion of calumny to the adversary and of scandal to the weak it was thought better to let them stand lest it should be said the Doctrine or Worship was altered and not the same as at the Reformation Art 37. The last place they except against is Art 37. where the Queen being named and we enjoyned to read the Articles as they are we may not they say turn the word Queen unto King which Exception because it foameth out their own shame Jud. v. 13. as the Apostle speaketh representing them to be men of a captious and quarrelsome spirit shall receive no other answer But be the Articles true or false 3. Tyranny in the Act requiring subscription to the Articles Pag. 5. they urge the repealing of the Act requiring absolute subscription unto them upon another ground viz. Because say they if we may not subscribe without an addition so far forth as the same Articles are agreeable to Gods Word it must needs be granted that the Composers of them are admitted to be infallible and their Articles of equal authority with the Canonical Scriptures or else that the Statute intended to tyrannize over the consciences of
Three roots of unthankfulness or pride Ignorance when we know not the Author from whom our good cometh Dissimulation when our hands are more open than our eyes upon that we receive Pride when we think our selves worthy of that which meer grace and undeserved mercy bestoweth Again the very silence that our unworthiness putteth us unto doth it self make request for us and that in confidence of his grace With which answer I end my reply unto this point The tenth particular against which they object is in Except 10 the second prayer at Baptism in which we pray Remission by spiritual Regeneration that Infants coming to Baptism may receive remission of their sins by spiritual regeneration The Brethren except That remission of sins is not received by or from spiritual regeneration but by and from the blood of Christ Heb. 9.22 1 Joh. 1.7 But they grant that remission of sins and regeneration flow from one and the same fountain and are both conveyed and sealed in Baptism Answ seminally at least Which words being before have so way-laid the other that they do not onely stop them but destroy them For if regeneration and remission of sins be both conveyed and sealed in Baptism the question onely is which is first and causal one to the other or whether they be both co-ordinate and without dependance one from the other Which doubt is soon answered if we consider first That Baptism of water through the Word is made by our Saviour the instrument of the new-birth Joh. 3. Unless saith he a man be born of water and of the holy Ghost c. And he did sanctifie and clense the Church Eph. 5. with the washing of water by the Word And he saved us by the washing of Regeneration Tit. 3. and renewing of the holy Ghost saith the Apostle Eph. 3. By Baptism we do put on Christ And are by one spirit baptized into one body viz. that of Christ Hence first we partake of the new nature are born to God and become his children whereupon follows the remission of sins by vertue indeed of the blood of Christ but this blood is not communicated out of the body nor to any but those that are members of it and by the operation of the holy Ghost regenerated therein by Baptism Matth. 27. Hence our Saviour before he gave the Cup at his last Supper wherewith he promised remission of sins he premiseth ' This is my Body speaking of the Bread first to be received which the Apostle expounding saith We being many 1 Cor. 10. are one bread and one body And that the bread is the communion of the body of Christ That first then the Cup the communion of his blood for the remission of sins Now we are baptized into this body in this body we have spiritual regeneration or the new birth Remission of sins by spiritual regenerarion and God now reckons us and owns us for his children and being such he confers the blood that is in the body for the forgiveness of sins I am not ignorant that Adoption is made an effect or consequent of our Justification and forgiveness of sins But if we consider that we must have union with Christ before we can have communion and that this communion effects first our regeneration and being born to God we shall see that remission of sin is consequent as an effect thereof We receive it by and from the blood of Christ but by the medium of Regeneration this blood being sprinkled actually on none but those that are regenerate at least sacramentally and in respect of the outward application of the Covenant of grace in which respect all the children of Israel after Circumcision Rom. 4.11 which was the seal of the righteousness of faith were owned by God as regenerate persons were his children and had the priviledge of children the remission of sins And hence it is Communion of Saints forgivness of sins that in the Creed we believe first the holy catholick Church and communion of Saints viz. conjunction into one mystical body of Christ and then the forgiveness of sins Because to this communion and the members thereof namely those that are born again and of sons of Adam are by Baptism and the holy Ghost become the sons of God is this priviledge appropriated that they have the remission of sins But that the Church ascribeth forgivness of sins even in this form of Baptism to the blood of Christ onely appears in the prayer immediately before the act of Baptizing which runs thus Almighty and everliving God whose most dearly beloved Son Jesus Christ Prayer before Baptism for the forgivness of our sins did shed out of his most pretious side both water and blood c. Then the Church shews how this regeneration is wrought Prayer after and what is the consequent of it in the prayer after Baptism namely We yield thee hearty thinks most merciful Father See the Artic. of Relig. 27. of Bapt. that it hath pleased thee to regenerate this Infant with thy holy Spirit Baptism is but the instrument to receive him for thine own child by Adoption see Adoption follows Regeneration and to incorporate him c. Secondly It is usual in Sacramental speech to understand the cause by the name of the effect and contrarily by a Metonymie as Matth. 27. This Cup is the New-Testament Circumcision is the Covenant Gen. 17. This bread is my body So here spiritual Regeneration is Baptism in the meaning of the Prayer by a Metonymie of the effect for the cause because Baptism is the instrumental cause of Regeneration So that the meaning is but this That the child may by Baptism called spiritual Regeneration Tit. 3. as the Apostle calls it the Laver of Regeneration receive forgiveness of sins as in Scripture that benefit is properly affixed first unto Baptism as Be ye baptized for the remission of sins Act. 2. And Arise and be baptised and wash away thy sins And They were baptized Matth. 3. confessing their sins that is in order to their washing away by Baptism But this derogates nothing from the blood of Christ by vertue whereof as being the ordinance and instrument of its application Baptism or spiritual Regeneration doth produce remission of sins As for that reproach the Brethren cast upon this expression as if it were mans falshood rather than Gods truth it savours of an affectation rather not to loose somewhat an elegant expression than to receive the truth in the love of it so pertinently held forth in that expression Now for close let us hear two witnesses onely to the former Doctrine viz. That we receive remission of sins by spiritual regeneration whether taking it for Baptism or for the new birth and that whether taken relatively and as by this Sacrament we are born to God and become his children foederally and by way of Covenant or taken really and as it communicates
follows that no Minister can be made but hee must have the Authority of the Holy Ghost Secondly It is necessary also that hee receive the Holy Ghost it self in the gifts and abilities of it for the discharge of this calling For no man can say that is effectually teach that Jesus is the Lord but by the Holy Ghost saith the Apostle 1 Cor. 12. And every spirit that confesseth that is soundly preacheth that Jesus is the Christ is of God 1 John 4.1 2. John 16. For it is the Holy Ghost onely that leadeth into all Truth concerning Christ Thirdly The conveyance of the Holy Ghost in all publick Ordinances is by some Ministerial hand as in Baptism and the Lords Supper wherein at least unto the faithful the Holy Ghost is conveyed So as in respect of the thing it self the Holy Ghost is necessary to bee conveyed to every Minister that is to bee ordained Sense of the words 2. Next for the meaning of the phrase First wee must observe That the word Holy Ghost here may be either taken for his person and gifts or for his Authority or both by a Metonymy It is taken for his gifts where it is said John 7. that the Holy Ghost was not yet because Christ was not yet glorified It is taken for his Authority when the Apostle saith that the Holy Ghost had made the Ministers of Ephesus the overseers of the flock Act. 20. Secondly wee may expound the words by way of declaration and solemn pronouncing as well as imparative or communicative bidding And the other words may bee so expounded also according as in absolution it is in one place in the Common Prayer-Book pronounced authoritatively yet it is expounded to bee onely a declaring and pronouncing Now to apply the former The word Holy Ghost here seems to bee taken for the Authority especially of the Holy Ghost to the exercise of the Ministerial function As if it were said Take thou the Authority of the Holy Ghost which hee hath appointed his Church to communicate and dispense to persons worthy for the Ministry of the Word in binding and loosing and of the Sacraments 3. To their exceptions First To the exception general it self that this form hath no warrant No warrant It is answered Answ That in other things they urge the Letter of the Scripture And surely where there is no incongruity in the thing nor impediment from some other cause from using the very words of Institution there cannot bee desired a better warrant Now that there is no such incongruity nor impediment shall bee shewn in answering unto the Reasons of the former exception whereof the first is that Proof none but God himself hath power to give the Holy Ghost But it hindreth not but that what none but a superiour Authority can have power to give originally may yet bee given ministerially Answ and by delegation from that superiour power Neither Moses had power to consecrate Aaron nor Samuel to confer the Kingdome unto David nor the Apostles themselves to give the Holy Ghost but by delegation and commission Which power if as to that right of the conferring the power and authority of the Holy Ghost to the ordaining of a Minister the Church ministerially hath not for without that power it cannot bee done then must every Minister receive his authority and outward call immediately from Heaven Neither is repugnant hereunto Lib. 1. dist 14. cap. 1. Hic quaeritur Aug. de Trin. l. 15. c. 26. either that of the Master of the sentences nor of Austin himself whence hee hath it viz. Neque enim aliquis discipulorum ejus dedit spiritum sanctum Orabant quippe ut veniret in eos quibus manum imponebant non eum ipsi dabant Quem morem in suis propositis etiam nunc servat Ecclesia Object For neither saith hee any of the Disc ples gave the Holy Ghost but they prayed that hee might come on those upon whom they laid their hands but gave him not themselves which custome the Church even now retaineth in her Bishops For our Church doth pray in laying on of hands and with and under the words Answ 1 of Institution asketh also before and after What form of words the Apostles used in laying on of hands and conferring the Holy Ghost is not expressed but unlikely it is that they used none Now those they used whether they were those used by our Saviour or others in form of praying cannot be determined nor therefore their example urged in that which our Church pretendeth not unto But the former will bee more evident in other ministrations also In Absolution the form is in the Liturgy in the visitation of the sick Imperative and authoritative as I may so speak and in a good sense so it is by his authority committed unto mee I absolve thee from all thy sin c. yet in the general absolution after the general confession at morning-prayer by which the former must bee expounded it is expressed to bee but declaratory by way of solemn and authoritative pronouncing and with the concurrence of prayer for efficacy of such declaration Almighty God who hast given power and commandment to declare and pronounce to his people being penitent the absolution and remission of their sins c. In Baptism the Holy Ghost and remission of sins is given and that by the ministration and the words spoken by the Minister So also in the Lords Supper the body and blood of Christ sacramentally is conferred by the words and action of the Minister none of which is in the power of any to bestow but God onely Shall wee therefore except against the fruits of those Ordinances or against the Minister for pronouncing such words and doing such actions Again as in the Absolution there goeth with the Pronounciation prayer also and so likewise in Baptism and the Lords Supper what hindereth but that the words may be taken under a precatory sense also and as including prayer which more expresly goeth both before and after The words therefore take thou the Holy Ghost do not argue an original or an inherent power but Ministerial onely and so as not excluding a precatory vertue also This to the first Reason The second is because they were the words of Christ himself to his Apostles what Proof 2 then were all Christs words to his Apostles peculiar to them Answ It was to his Apostles that hee gave the command of baptizing and teaching and of giving his last Supper Have none therefore power since to administer these Ordinances Again if no Minister can be made but by the Holy Ghost and his Authority and this Authority were proper onely to the Apostles because the words were spoken to them then is the Church deprived of the Holy Ghost ever since the Apostles nor hath power to ordain a Ministry The third reason is taken from the parallel of other administrations Proof wherein the words of institution in
Baptism in the administration of the Lords Supper c. are first rehearsed and then at the act of Ministring a prayer is used not a Magisterial use of the very words of Christ himself in the first institution First it is untrue that there is any difference in this Answ between Ordination and Baptism or the Lords Supper for as in these there goeth prayer before and after So also in this of Ordination But in the very act there is used a Magisterial if the Brethren will have it so or an authoritative command precept or imperative expression In Baptism I baptize thee in the name of the Father c. not a praying that hee may be baptized The sense whereof is I wash away thy sins or as Ananias to Paul arise and be baptized and wash away thy sins Act. 22.16 which is Magisterial and commanding At the least it is an using of the very words of Christ himself at the first institution as neer as may bee which the Brethren deny to be lawful So in the Lords Supper It is not in the very act I pray that thou mayest be one for whom Christ died and that thou mayest feed on him by Faith But a peremptory assertion that Christ died for him and an imperative command that hee should feed on him by Faith In neither the one Sacrament nor the other is there a prayer used in the very act of administring Neither were it unlawful if the former were in the Lords Supper Take thou the body of Christ take thou his blood which some have used But that our Church for the avoiding of Superstition hath been forced to use other words The Germane and Dutch Churches use a form not unlike that now named The Dutch Form of the Lords Supper in the Dutch Churches The bread which wee break is the communion of the body of Christ take and eat it where they are commanded to take the body of Christ as peremptorily as the Minister is commanded to take the Holy Ghost So in the Cup. But none can give the body and blood of Christ but himself onely And in the Germane Church of Colen Liber Reform Colen in the Liturgy above mentioned in the form of giving the Lords Supper Accipe manduca ad salutem tuam corpus Domini quod pro te traditum est Take and eat the body of Christ to thy salvation c. But secondly as was said above if the words may bear the fotm of a prayer also there needs no altering unless it bee of the Brethrens spirit unto more charity Again wherein wee differ from the very words of Institution it is partly because it would bee incongruous to use them as to say This is my body which is given for you c. And partly to prevent as was said such superstitions as had grown into the use of that Sacrament for want of a more clear explication of those words But it is not incongruous english to say as a Deputy in the name of the Original Author receive the Holy Ghost So also there hath no Superstition arisen upon these words because by Doctrine prevented elsewhere by reason whereof the Church should be constrained to change the very words of our Saviour Especially seeing they serve more emphatically to confirm the assurance of the Minister in his call as also to beget a greater Authority for his person and office in the hearts of the people both which is very necessary Ac uberrimum h. doctrinae fructum quotidie percipit Ecclesia dum pastores suos intelligit divinitus ordinatos esse aeternae salutis sponsoris Cal. in Joh. 20.23 Whilst the people hereby understand that their Ministers are ordained by God to be his Embassadors If it be replied Object that it nourisheth a Popish opinion of the Episcopal and Priestly power to convey the Holy Ghost Object and to forgive sins Answ It is answered that neither of these opinions are Popish but onely the Application of them to unfit persons and the perverse exposition of them as if they had such power in their sleeve to dispense when and to whom they pleased The danger whereof is not such among us who are better taught as that wee should for it alter the words of institution and form of ordaining of which there is such particular use To their third exception that it countenances a sole Except 3 power of Ordination Answ the very form of Ordination answers which appoints that the Bishops with the Priests or Ministers that are present shall lay on their hands and not the Bishop alone To their last of offence to Except 4 Protestant Churches abroad Vide Harm confess they have not declared any such offence in their publick confessions in reference to our Church that I know of nor will if they consider our Doctrine in this particular Answ If some particular men should not be satisfied if for that wee should alter wee should do it rather for the Brethren who are or have been of our own Church But to satisfie a few we may not by unnecessary change scandalize many more To conclude the sense of our Church in these words and this ceremony might be expressed in that of Austin ' on those words Received yee the Spirit by the works of the Law or by the hearing of Faith Aug. in Gal. 3. 2. Tom. 4. Ab Apostolo praedicata est eis fides in qua praedicatione utique adventum praesentiam spiriti sancti senserant By the Apostle saith hee the Faith was preached unto them in which preaching verily there was felt the coming and presence of the Holy Ghost So doth our Church give the Spirit whilst shee repeating the words of Institution intends and prayes that those to whom her word is directed and for whom her prayers Annot. in Joh. 20.22 in Indic Authoâ—it ap Aug. tanquam ex Serm. 11. de verb. dom Tom. 10 quanquam id ibi non invenio sententia tamen proba est may feel the coming and presence of the Spirit I end all with the words of that Author Insufflavit dixit accipite Sp. S. Ecclesiastica iis verbis poâ—estas coâ—lata esse intelligitur inspiratio ergo haec gratia quaedam est quae per traditionem infunditur ordinatis He breathed on them and said Receive the Holy Ghost in these words wee must understand saith hee an Ecclesiastical power is given This Inspiration therefore is a certain grace or priviledge which by delivery in imposition of hands is infused into the ordained which sentence being it takes in both the power and the gift may not unfitly being expounded as a Ministerial act assisted with prayer close this dissertation SUBSECT IV. Consecration of Bishops and Archbishops c. 3. Gen. Exception against book of Ordination THe last Exception they have against the book of Ordination is about consecration of Bishops and Archbishops Where first that because that the same portion of Scripture is appointed to