Selected quad for the lemma: spirit_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
spirit_n apostle_n flesh_n zion_n 27 3 8.5849 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A94353 Elijah's mantle: or, The remaines of that late worthy and faithful servant of Jesus Christ, Mr. John Tillinghast. Viz. I. The conformity of a saint to the will of God. On Act. 21.14. II. The will of God and Christ concerning sinners. On Gal. 1.4. III. No condemnation to them that are in Christ Jesus. On Rom. 8.1. IV. Christs love to his owne. On Joh. 13.1. V. True gospel humiliation. On Zach. 12.10. VI. The most effectual means to kill and subdue sin. On 1 Joh. 2.2 VII. The advocateship of Jesus Christ, a great ground of saints comfort and support under sins and infirmities. On 1 Joh. 2.2. VIII. The only way for saints to be delivered from the errors and evils of the times. On 1 Tim. 6.11. IX. Of the Old Covenant, from Gal. 4.30. being so farre as the author had proceeded, in a treatise of the two covenants, before his death. Published by his owne notes. Tillinghast, John, 1604-1655.; Manning, John, d. 1694. 1658 (1658) Wing T1172; Thomason E1557_1; ESTC R203796 263,858 498

There are 8 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

the performance of some external duties stand thou by too thou hast not in-being in Christ Rom. 2.28 29. For hee is not a Jew which is one outwardly neither is that circumcision which is outward in the flesh but hee is a Jew which is one inwardly and circumcision is that of the heart in the spirit and not in the letter whose praise is not of men but of God Object But though I have not in-being in Christ Is there no hope for a soul in this condition Answ No there is no hope for thee in this condition that is continuing in this condition but mistake not there is hope thou mayest yet come to Christ and so come out of this condition and so though for the present thou hast not in-being in Christ yet possibly by coming to Christ thou mayest have it and then there is hope for thee I say Soul which soever of these conditions is thine there is hope thou mayest come to Christ and then there is hope Art thou a prophane sinner read 1 Tim. 1.15 Mark 3.28 Art thou a persecutor so was Paul Art thou a moral man so was Nicodemus Art thou an outward professor onely and so an hypocrite indeed read Isa 65. vers 2. compared with the 5. Therefore I say poor soul though there is no hope for thee in this condition thou hast not at present in-being in Christ and so art under condemnation yet hope there is thou mayest come out of it and bee freed from condemnation What Legal walking is SERMON III. Rom. 8.1 Who walk not after the flesh but after the Spirit HAving already spoken from this Text to the Saints priviledges viz. Freedome from condemnation and the rise thereof viz. In-being in Christ I now come to the last and principal thing contained in the words and that which moved mee to choose them for the subject of my Discourse having hastened over the other thing that I might come to this and that is the distinguishing character of those persons who enjoy this priviledge to bee freed from condemnation and that is Walking not after the flesh but after the Spirit Not a man nor woman in the world hath any right unto or do enjoy this blessed priviledge but those who have this character upon them of walking not after the flesh but after the Spirit There is abundance more in these words than at the first blush there seems to bee in them the marrow and sweetness of these words lyes in the breaking of the bone or in the explication of the termes what is meant by FLESH and what by SPIRIT FLESH and SPIRIT are very general termes and of a large extent in holy Scripture taking in betwixt them both all the motions actions thoughts inclinations wisdome reasoning doing of man-kinde all being either flesh or spirit there is not a thought nor an inclination nor a reasoning nor an action good or bad but it is one of these two either Flesh or Spirit In which large extent FLESH comprehends whatsoever is contrary unto or is not of the Spirit of God Whatsoever thought reasoning or action whether it be a good moral action or an evill sinful action that is contrary unto that is not of springs not from the Spirit of God that is Flesh Again SPIRIT comprehends whatsoever is contrary unto and is not of the Flesh Whatsoever imaginations inclinations wisdome reasoning righteousness that is contrary unto that is not of the Flesh that is Spirit Or as a Godly man Mr. Cradocke upon Rom. 8.4 as it seems to mee doth better express it though in substance the same with what is spoken thus Flesh saith hee that takes in whatsoever is of old Adam Spirit whatsoever is of new Adam These two Adams being as hee saith the two roots beginnings beings or principles from whence all the motions proceedings actions wisdome righteousnesses of mankinde do flow and further as hee saith as two springs in a hill do convey their streams to two Rivers so these are the springs from whence arise all the thoughts purposes reasonings doings of mankinde good or bad all coming from one of these two which two were the onely publick persons that ever were in the world either Adam in Paradise natural Adam or the Lord Jesus Christ the spiritual Adam So that by Flesh is meant whatsoever is or comes of old Adam whether that natural or moral good which hee had before his fall some reliques of which wee partake of or that sin which hee drew upon himself and all his by the fall all is but Flesh well his natural moral wisdome and righteousness as his sin and unrighteousness is but Flesh so that all the thoughts intents reasonings wisdome doings of old Adam whether natural moral or sinfull are flesh and comprehended under the word Flesh By Spirit is meant whatsoever comes and springs from the new Adam Jesus Christ or the Spirit of Christ within what ever motion purpose thought inclination wisdome reasoning righteousness doing comes from Christ grows upon the root of Jesse that is Spirit Onely here I would exclude from Flesh and Spirit in the general sense it hath been laid down all those motions and actions which are purely natural having neither any thing of Religion nor sin in them but are in their own proper nature neither good nor evill as for mee to think or resolve whether I will do such a thing to day or to morrow there being nothing which doth necessitate or require mee to do it now rather than then or then than now to resolve whether I wil sit or stand go out of the door or stay within these and such like motions and actions in a simple consideration have neither good nor evill in them and therefore are not in the sense of the Apostle here used either Flesh or Spirit The upshot or conclusion of the matter in general is this To walk after the flesh is when a mans thoughts motions reasonings his wisdome righteousness his wayes proceedings practises run all in the very path and footsteps of old Adam either Adam in Paradise or faln Adam And to walk after the Spirit is when all these go in the path-way or steps of the new Adam Jesus Christ Thus much in the general now for a more particular inquiry into the meaning of these words of FLESH and SPIRIT I do conceive they have some reference unto what the Apostle had discoursed of in the foregoing Chapter Two things hee had been speaking of first Of the Law and Gospel shewing a beleevers liberation or freedome from the one and present station by vertue of Christs death and his marriage to Christ under the other Secondly Of the old and new man shewing that great and continual conflict that is betwixt these two in every beleever and the happy victory which beleevers in the end through the strength of Christ get over the old man the discourse of which hee continues to the very end of the Chapter Now as touching either of these it
is usual in Scripture-language to give the name of Flesh to the one and Spirit to the other The Law is called Flesh Rom. 4.1 compared with 2. What shall wee say then that Abraham our Father as pertaining to the Flesh hath found for if Abraham were justified by works hee hath whereof to glory but not before God Phil. 3.4 Though I might also have confidence in the flesh if any other man thinketh that hee hath whereof he might trust in the flesh I more Comp. with the 6. v. concerning zeal persecuting the Church touching the righteousnesse which is in the Law blamelesse The Gospel is called a Spirit 2 Cor. 3.6 Who also hath made us able Ministers of the New Testament not of the letter but of the Spirit Both are together under these names or titles Gal. 3.2 3. This onely would I learn of you received yee the Spirit by the works of the Law or by the hearing of faith Are yee so foolish having begun in the Spirit are yee now made perfect by the flesh What hee calls works of the Law and hearing of faith in vers 2. hee calls Flesh and Spirit in the third Again the old man is called Flesh Gal. 5.19 Now the works of the Flesh are manifest which are these adultery fornication uncleanness lasciviousnesse c. compared with Rom. 6.6 Knowing this that our old man is crucified with him that the body of sin might bee destroyed that henceforth wee should not serve sin The new man is called Spirit Ezek. 36.26 A new heart also will I give you and a new spirit will I put within you c. both together are under these names Rom. 7. last So then with the minde I my selfe serve the Law of God but with the Flesh the Law of sin Gal. 5.17 For the Flesh lusteth against the Spirit and the Spirit against the Flesh Matth. ●6 41 The spirit indeed is willing but the flesh is weak Now that there is good reason why wee should take both these and not one to hee here meant I think the scope shews us for the Apostle having spoken of both these things in the former Chapter and proceeding onwards to a glorious triumph in this hee takes the rise of this triumph from the consideration of the premises and that of both of them for one alone as may by good reason be made to appear had not been a sufficient bottome for such a triumph as if hee should say These things being so that through Jesus Christ as hath been cleared wee are delivered from the dominion of the Law and also from the tyranny of the old man in us there being now no longer any reigning Law over us nor reigning old man in us I therefore do conclude That there is no condemnation to them that are in Christ Jesus there being no enemy that can do it the Law without and the old man within which onely were able to do it having now no condemning power over them which persons that hee might give an infallible note and character of hee still keeping the scope describes them to bee such Who walke not after the flesh but after the spirit i.e. They are such persons who being by Christ set free from the Dominion of the Law and Tyranny of the old man do not walk after the one or the other and on the other side being by Christ brought under the power of the Gospel and regiment of the new man they do now walk as becomes in some measure Gospel Saints and new creatures These things being laid down and premised wee are to understand the words thus Walking after the Flesh i.e. Either first Legal walking to walk after or according to the Law Or secondly Corrupt walking i. e. to bee wholly and constantly swayed ruled or lead by the principles dictates or motions of the old man or unregenerate part Walking after the Spirit i.e. Either first Gospel-walking to walk after or according to the Gospel of Jesus Christ Or secondly Renewed walking to walk according to the rule principle motions and dictates of the new man or regenerate part in a Saint Now in saying that these two are to be understood by Flesh and Spirit I do not exclude any of those laid down in the general explication of the words no I do think that by Flesh the Apostle may mean all those viz. mans wisdome reason understanding outward priviledges c. and the contrary to these by Spirit But I name these two onely with their contraries because I think that although the other are included in Flesh and Spirit as general termes yet here these are chiefly intended being most agreeable to the Apostles scope and what hee had said in the former Chapter which gives rise to this verse I shall therefore begin with the words as they lye in the first sense to bee understood of Legal and Gospel-walking and so wee have in them two Propositions 1 Legal-walking is walking according to the Flesh 2 Gospel-walking is walking according to the Spirit 1 Legal-walking is walking according to the Flesh In the opening of this I shall shew 1 What I mean by Legal-walking or what it is to walk Legally 2 When a mans walk may bee said to bee such that is a pure Legal-walk 3 Why Legal-walking is called Flesh or walking according to the Flesh 4 That those persons who are freed from condemnation for such our Text imports do not walk Legally or after the Flesh in this sense 5 Answer an Objection and Lastly conclude with Application Of the first viz. What I mean by Legal-walking or what it is for a man or woman to walk legally Answ Legal-walking in the sense wee are now to speak to it is this To make the Law as the same is a Covenant of works the rule of our lives and actions and the alone touchstone to try our conditions by To walke after the Law or according to the Law as the Law is a Covenant of works that is Legal-walking That so wee are to understand here I prove thus because Legal-walking is here called Flesh and the Law is no where in Scripture called Flesh but as the same is considered under this notion as it is a Covenant of works If you take the Law in its self that is for the matter of it the substance of those things the Law requires so the Apostle saith the contrary of the Law Rom. 7.14 The Law is spiritual the matter or substance of the Law is spiritual injoyning spiritual duties requiring spiritual performance and designing to make the creature spiritual so that the Law in its selfe is not Flesh but rather it is a spiritual and an everlasting rule of righteousness But now look upon the Law whensoever it is spoken of under this notion as it is the old Covenant or a Covenant of works and then it is called Flesh I will give you but a few places in Gal. 3.2 3. before quoted when the Galathians were gone from the Gospel to the Law
his tears his fastings his humiliations his lamentations his leaving of sin and doing of good stands engaged as it were to give him Heaven and Salvation he then walks legally when the course and stream of his life and actions runs this way that all his prayers humiliations resolutions covenants resisting of sin c. is to this very end that God hereby would be moved to pardon his sins justifie him give him Heaven and eternal life which had hee not some hope to procure by these things hee would neither pray nor hear nor mourn for sin nor doe any thing else he then most certainly walks legally after the flesh 3 When a man in his obedience hath altogether respect to the external or outward part of the Law contenting himself if that be but done never looking to the internal or spiritual part thereof his walking is legal and after the flesh In this manner did the Scribes and Pharisees those great Legalists apply themselves to the keeping of the Law by a litteral observance of what it required accounting it kept when the external works which the Law required should be done was performed or the outward act of sin shunned which the Law willed them to forbear Upon which ground according to the principles and practices of the Pharisees Paul saith of himself that hee whilst hee continued a Pharisee was touching the righteousness of the Law blameless Phil. 3.6 upon this ground likewise doe the Papists assert their Opus operatum the work done as sufficient to Justification and Salvation never regarding how the same is done Now whensoever a man in Prayer hearing the Word or any other Duty hath only respect to the external part contenting himself with that if that bee done never looking to the spiritual performance thereof he walks legally 4 When a man blesseth himself in his obedience and pronounceth himself happy because of that he walks legally Thus Paul whilst hee was a Pharisee did blesse himself in his way Rom. 7.9 I was alive without the law once i. e. so long as I gave up my self to an outward observance of the law being without the law in respect of the true spiritual meaning thereof I was alive in my owne conceit I thought all was well with me and that I was a happy man Thus likewise the proud Pharisee Luke 18.11 12. The Pharisee stood and prayed thus with himself God I thank thee that I am not as other men are extortioners unjust adulterers or even as this Publican I fast twice in the week I give tithes of all that I possesse how doth hee blesse himself in his way of works and crow it over the poor Publican because hee was a Sinner and had no works When therefore a man blesseth himself in his obedience and thinks himself some body pronouncing himself happy because of this as many men will say I thank God all is well with me I have no doubt about my Salvation I am not nor never was I a Drunkard or Swearer c. I was never given to cheat or cousen as others my Neighbours will doe but I pray and read good Books and hear good Sermons c. a man then walks legally after the flesh 5 When a man performes his obedience ever and altogether in his owne strength the law as a covenant of works it calls for obedience but it gives a man no strength but what he hath of his owne to doe it Hence it is called a voyce of words Heb. 12. and a killing letter 2 Cor. 3. because it requires obedience under penalty of death and knowes the creature hath no strength to obey and yet gives him none and so by its very command it kills all those that are under it Now when a man sets himself to keep the law in his owne strength neither finding nor knowing nor feeling nor looking after nor desiring any other strength to enable him to doe his duty then his owne he then walks legally after the Flesh and all his obedience is obedience to a covenant of works Thus much of the Second particular what remaines I leave unto the next opportunity Why Legal walking is walking after the Flesh SERMON IV. Rom. 8.1 Who walk not after the flesh WEe are now upon the Character of those Persons who are freed from Condemnation they are such who walk not after the flesh but after the Spirit Flesh and Spirit in this place by the acception of the termes in other places and the consideration of the scope of the Apostle in this are as I told you the last day to be understood either of the Law and the Gospel or the old and new man Walking after the flesh that is either legal walking or walking after the corrupt principles of the old man Walking after the Spirit that is either Gospel walking or walking after the renewed principle of the new man I began with the words in the first acceptation as they hold forth Legal and Gospel walking and so I laid downe these Propositions viz That Legal walking is walking after the flesh Gospel walking is walking after the Spirit Concerning the first I have shewed 1 What I mean by Legal walking 2 When a man's walk is a Legal walk I now proceed to the third 3 Why Legal walking is called walking after the flesh Ans 1. Because there is nothing of the Spirit of God that goes along with a legal walk The Spirit was not given by the Covenant of works and therefore so long as a man walks in the way of that Covenant there is nothing of the Spirit of God that goes along with him Now we usually call that flesh that hath not Spirit in it take a man when he is dead wee say hee is flesh nothing but flesh because the Soul and Spirit is gone so take a legal Walker hee is flesh his walking is flesh because there is nothing of the Spirit of God in him nor his walking hee praies but there is nothing of the Spirit of God in his prayers and therefore though hee pray dayes and weeks and months together all is but flesh he mourns and humbles himself for sin resolves vowes and strives against it but doing all this in a legal manner there is nothing of the Spirit of God in all this and so all is but flesh 2 Because Legal walking is walking in the way of Nature the Covenant of works was given to Adam as out common person and sois in the Nature of every man Rom. 2.14 15. For when the Gentiles which have not the law doe by nature the things contained in the law these having not the law are a law unto themselves which shew the work of the law written in their hearts their conscience also bearing witness and their thoughts the meane while accusing or else excusing one another Now in Scripture phrase Nature is called flesh Joh. 3.6 That which is borne of the flesh is flesh i.e. that which is borne of meer Nature can be no more but
Nature for this reason legal walking may be called Flesh 3 Because of the weakness of such walking Flesh is put in Scripture for weakness so Isa 31.3 Now the Aegyptians are men and not God and their Horses Flesh and not Spirit when the Lord shall stretch out his hand both hee that helpeth shall fall and hee that is holpen shall fall downe and they all shall faile together Spirit hath strength in it but flesh without spirit is a weak thing the more any mans spirit decaies the weaker he growes Now legal walking may be called a walking after the flesh in regard of the weaknesse of those persons who walk in a legal way they are pittious poor weak Creatures there is nothing as a godly man saith in such but wishing and woulding and covenanting and promising and protesting and vexing and fretting no strength at all one day they vow they will leave their sins and the next day they run into them one day they will weep and mourn and howl for the neglect of such a duty and the next day they will neglect it again thus they tugge and pull and worry and weary themselves but are never the near nothing comes of all this they wish and would and have good desires c. but walking legally all is but flesh and flesh is weak so as that after all they are by all their toyling and labouring and the adoe they keep to mend their hearts and tame their lusts as farre from the attaining the one or the other as when they began as far from their journies end after many dayes months and years travells as when they first set out 4 And lastly Because the Flesh or unregenerate part is in a manner maintained alive by such walking my meaning is the more any man walks or acts in a legal way the more active sin is and the stronger his lusts grow and the more doth sin get ground of him As the Gospel will take an advantage to bring a Soul which walks after the Gospel to be more holy and beleeving by his very slips sins and infirmities so the Law doth take an advantage from the very outward holinesse of those who walk after the Law to make them more prophane and licentious than otherwise did they not presse after some outward holinesse and conformity to the Law they would be This the Apostle clearly teacheth us Rom. 7.8 9.10 11. Without the law sin was dead How dead what had sin no life in it till the Law came did the law put life into sin which was not in it before No not so but the meaning is that sin did not shew that livelinesse that was in it although it were there before and not begotten by the law yet till the law came up close to it it did not appear but sin lay as though it had been dead being not so vigorous and active when it saw no law to restraine it as afterwards it grew to be when it saw it self restrained by a law when sin saw the Commandement come to lay bonds upon it then sin which lay as though it had been asseep or dead revived started up and broke all the bonds of the law to peeces Saith the Law Sin I will have you bound and curbed aye but saith Sin I will not be bound and because you will goe to binde me I will stirre and act the more then the Flesh or unregenerate part accidentally gets strength by the law and therefore legal walking may well be called walking alter the flesh 4 That those persons who are freed from Condemnation being such as my text speaks of doe not walk legally or after the flesh 1 If such are dead unto and delivered from the law as it is a Covenant of works then doe they not walk after the law as such for a man cannot be said to walk after that which is both dead unto and delivered from But now those persons who are freed from Condemnation are dead unto and delivered from the law as it is a Covenant of works for this see Rom. 7.4 Wherefore my brethren yee also are become dead to the law by the Body of Christ that yee should be married to another even to him who is raised from the dead that we should bring forth fruit unto God How are Beleevers dead to and delivered from the law Not as the same is a rule of Christian life for so the Apostle afterwards speaks for it ver 12 14. Wherefore the Law is holy and the Commandement holy and just and good for we know that the law is spiritual In this sense hee consents to it vers 16. I consent unto the law that it is good yea delights in it vers 22. For I delight in the law of God after the inward man yea serves it and conformes himself thereto vers 25. So then with the minde I my self serve the law of God but as the same was a Covenant of works holding forth Life and Salvation by doing which was the very sense that those whom the Apostle in this Chapter disputes against did put upon the law and the works thereof as is clear from Acts 15.1 And certaine men which came downe from Judea taught the Brethren and said except yee be circumcised after the manner of Moses yee cannot bee saved and therefore the Apostles exclusion of the law from beleevers must needs lye in that sense which they would have inforced the same upon them viz. as a Covenant of works or as a way or means by observance of which they might obtaine life justification here and eternal salvation hereafter 2 If such have the Spirit of God in them and are led guided and governed in their waies and walkings thereby then doe they not walk after the law as a covenant of works Where is Legal walking is nothing of the Spirit because the Covenant of vvorks gives not the Spirit but now such have the Spirit of God in them Rom. 8.9 But yee are not in the Flesh but in the Spirit if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ hee is none of his and in their walkings are led and acted thereby vers 14. For as many as are led by the Spirit of God they are the Sons of God therefore doe not walk after the Law altering but a word or two and the Apostle from the very same premises makes my conclusion for mee Gal. 5.18 But if yee be led of the Spirit yee are not under the law 3 If the obedience of such persons be true Gospel obedience then doe they not walk after the law as a Covenant of works for then their obedience should be legal obedience to a Covenant of works being legal But the first is true as I prove thus either there is no Evangelical obedience in the world or if there be it must be found in those who are not freed from condemnation in those that are that there is Evangelical obedience none
have fewer Ordinances I mean outward Ordinances and those wee have are more spiritual Gospel-worship is one step nearer to Heavenly than Legal worship Persons are more Spiritual Saints of the Old Testament excepting some few who were the Pen-men of the Holy Ghost had but a little of the Spirit the Spirit then being not powred down then the promise of the pouring out of the Spirit being made to Gospel times Precepts are more spiritual compare the ten Commandements of Moses with the Precepts of the New Testament and see how spiritual the one are in regard of the other Promises are more spiritual abundance of their promises did relate to outward and temporal good things wee under the New Testament have but few promises of outward and temporal things but abundance relating to spirituall and eternall things therefore saith the Apostle Heb. 8.6 The New Covenant that is the Gospel is established upon better promises than the old was Yea the whole administration take it in the bulk is more spiritual and therefore when the Apostle compares the two Administrations he calls the one the Letter the other the Spirit 2 Cor. 3.6 Moses or the Legal Administration is the Letter Christs or the Gospel Administration the Spirit So also the conversation or walking of Saints under the Gospel is more spiritual by far then theirs was under the Law and therefore it is called a walking in heaven Phil. 3.20 3 Because There is a mighty power that goes along with a Gospel-walk The Spirit is called Power Luke 24.49 Now take a Gospel Saint and he hath more power than five hundred Legal persons I can do all things saith Paul through Christ that strengtheneth mee 4 Quest But do all those that are freed from condemnation Walke after the Gospel Answ Yea though here that there may bee nothing laid as matter of temptation before scrupulous and troubled souls consider that there are two sorts of persons that are freed i.e. actually freed from condemnation 1 There are some are freed from condemnation but being but newly come to this their freedome and having been all the time of their life before trained up under the Law in the School of the Law and been Apprentices to the Law they can hardly beleeve it the thing seeming strange to them that they should bee from under their other Master that they are freed and therefore though they are indeed freed from condemnation yet not beleeving it or with difficulty beleeving it And on the contrary being with ease perswaded that they are still under the command of their old Master their walke which hath much dependance upon the knowing or beleeving this their freedome is not a pure Gospel-walke but rather an Old Testament walk a walk much like unto the walk of the Saints in the time of the Old Testament which as I have formerly shewed was neither purely Gospel nor purely Legal but partaking of either So that in these persons although there is somewhat of the Gospel at the bottome yet may there bee much of the Law at the top much doubting darkness fear terror c. and yet for all this they may bee true Saints and Gospel-walkers as the Gospel is at the bottome of their actions the Spirit of God at the bottome though darkness fear terror c. at the top 2 There are others who are not onely freed from condemnation but injoying and beleeving this their freedome and knowing that the Law their former husband hath now nothing to do with them but they are onely under the commands of Christ who is their King Law-giver and Husband their walke is a pure Gospel-walke i.e. there is not that darkness doubting fear self-love in their walking as in the walkes of the other but their actions do spring from pure love to God to the glory of God love to their neighbour c. Now the things that I have before spoken of as touching Gospel-walking do chiefly relate to these latter sort of persons Thus much for the opening of this Truth the Application I shall leave to the next opportunity The Application SERMON VII Rom. 8.1 Who walk not after the flesh but after the Spirit WAlking after the Flesh and Spirit as you have heard holds forth the one of these two either Legal or Gospel-walking or walking after the Old and New man I am upon the words in the first sense as they hold forth Legal and Gospel-walking and so I have laid down these two Propositions Legal walking is walking after the Flesh Gospel-walking is walking after the Spirit Of Legal walking I have spoken the last day I made an end of the Doctrinal part of the other viz. Gospel-walking I now proceed to Application Vse 1. Is it so that Gospel-walking is walking after the Spirit then hence we may learn the excellency of a Gospel-walk every thing the more of Spirit it hath in it the more excellent it is Now Gospel-walking is a walking after the Spirit there is much of the Spirit in it the whole walk of a Gospel-Saint so farre as hee walks according to the Gospel is directed by the Spirit and therefore it is of all others the most excellent walk This Gospel-walk it excels a pure Natural walk or a Legal walk in a pure Natural walk there the Principle is Natural light Natural conscience in a Legal walk there the Principle is fear and apprehension of wrath but now in a Gospel-walk the principle is the Spirit now by how much the principle is more excellent by so much the action duty the walk is more excellent As let a man have two Servants one serves him out of love and from a principle of ingenuity because he hath received some favour from the hand of his Master the other serves him for fear or in hope to receive somewhat from his Master he doth the most excellent service that serves him out of love and from ingenuity because the principle is most excellent whence that hee doth ariseth Gospel obedience is excellent obedience there is a stamp of Divine excellency upon that which is upon no other obedience in the world and the more any Christian comes to this to walk and to obey according to the Gopel the more excellent Christian he is A pure Gospel-walking it is the highest sublimest the most excellent walking on this side the walk of glorified Saints in Heaven which should bee a mighty encouragement to us all to presse after this Gospel-walk Vse 2. This shews us why there is such a Mystery in Gospel-walking that a meer Natural man cannot conceive what manner of walk a Gospel-walk is why because Gospel-walking is a walking after the Spirit The Natural man saith the Apostle perceiveth not the things of the Spirit neither can hee know them because they are spiritually discerned though a Natural man hath knowledge and insight into the things of Nature and the things of Morality because these are within the sphere of his reason and natural understanding and also
times of the Law God gave his Spirit but only to some few extraordinary men as Prophets c. in the beginning of the Gospel God poured it downe upon many more upon Apostles and many Brethren but not all but now in the last daies upon all flesh for I take it that this Prophesie of Ioel relates to the last daies though in the beginnings of it it was fulfilled in the Apostles time add so Ierem. 31.34 And they shall teach no more every man his Neighbour and every man his brother saying Know the Lord for they shall shall know me from the least of them unto the greatest of them saith the Lord speaking of the last daies it is said They shall all know me So Isa 65.20 The childe shall dye an hundred years old i. e. in knowledge very Children shall have the Spirit poured downe upon them O what a glorious time will this be when all the Saints shall be filled with the Spirit when you cannot goe to a Saint but you shall finde Gods Spirit breathing in him and how should this stirre up every one of us upon whom these last daies are coming if not come to labour after the Spirit Is it not a shame that the nearer this time comes the more Carnal instead of Spiritual we should be Obs 3. All grace it from the Spirit of God the spirit of grace we have no grace in our Nature but all is from the Spirit as the fruits thereof Gal. 5.22 23. But the fruit of the Spirit is love joy peace long-suffering gentlenesse goodnesse faith meeknesse temperance Obs 4. The gift of the Spirit is the gift of Free Grace This is taken from those words the Spirit of Grace interpreted in the latter sense Obs 5. One maine and special work that the Spirit of God puts Souls upon where it is is the work of Supplication or Prayer and Supplications the Spirit coming from God it loves much to be carrying out those Souls where it is to God Prayer it is a Natural work to that Soul where the Spirit is and as the Spirit of God puts Souls upon Prayer so the Spirit of God acts the Saints in Prayer or as the Apostle saith Rom. 8. Prayes in them sometimes by enabling them with words sometimes by filling them with groanes unutterable i. e. a Soul that prayes by the Spirit hee hath inward groanings for many things more than hee can utter it may be he speaks one Petition and at that instant groanes for twenty the groanings of the spirits in the Saints hearts whilst they are in prayer being farre more large and extensive than the expressions of the mouth are or can bee and which may bee a matter of abundant comfort to us the answer of God is not according to the expressions of our mouth but the desires and groanings of his owne Spirit O would we know then how to pray as we should let us labour for the Spirit we shall never pray without it perhaps we may speak good words and fine expressions as many can who yet never prayed in their lives and know no more what Prayer means than I know the way to Rome but alas prayer doth not lye in these things in speaking good Language and putting up fine Petitions if that be all no Prayer is another thing it is the breathings of the Spirit in the hearts of the Saints after God and to God many times that soul prayes and that excellently powerfully who perhaps is not able to speak a word or if hee do hee is not able to speak ten words true sense together when as another which speaks fluently and orderly and that for houres together perhaps prayes not a word all that time Observ 6. In the last dayes there shall bee a greater powring forth of the Spirit than ordinary This I gather from the last thing in opening the words viz. the time when this shall bee that day Hence the word pouring is much used when the giving of the Spirit in the last dayes is spoken of denoting an abundant measure of the Spirit which shall at this time bee given forth for what was formerly wherein God did as it were drop his Spirit now hee poures it forth and the reasons are because God hath greater works to do in the last dayes and the Church comes nearer to mans estate and the people of God have more and greater enemies to incounter with than in former times they had and therefore God gives them more of the Spirit what a mercy then is it to be brought forth and to live in the last dayes And how doth it call upon us all the nearer these times draw on to bee the more spiritual Thus much for the Observations from the first part of the words I come now to the second the effects of this powring forth of the Spirit They shall look on him whom they have pierced Observ 7. The sins of beleevers do pierce Jesus Christ This is implied in that they look upon him whom they have pierced Observ 8. Christ must bee looked upon as pierced by us before wee can mourn They do not mourn nor shed a tear till then Observ 9. When Christ is looked upon as pierced by us then wee shall mourn They look on him and do mourn Observ 10. That mourning which ariseth from the beholding of a pierced Christ is a very bitter and grievous mourning And they shall mourn for him as one mourneth for his onely Son Observ 11. None can thus look upon Christ or mourn for him but only those upon whom God pours his Spirit I will poure out my Spirit and they shall look and they shall mourn I shall wave all these and pitch upon one Observation from the latter part of the words which is this viz Observ True Gospel-humiliation doth arise from a looking upon a pierced Christ In the opening of this point I shall shew 1 That it doth not arise from any other thing and doth from this 2 What manner of looking upon Jesus Christ that is which doth beget true mourning or Gospel-humiliation 3 How this Gospel-humiliation is begotten in the soul from a looking upon Jesus Christ Of the first That it doth not arise from any other thing and doth from this 1 It doth not arise from nature There is a kinde of humility in many a man by nature but this is not Gospel-humility and there is too a natural sorrow but this is not Gospel-humiliation This is an herbe that grows not in Natures garden any other humiliation saving Gospel-humiliation may grow there 2 It doth not arise from imitation of others the examples of others Some things which are not natural are done by imitation as an Ape will do many things by imitation which are not natural but this doth arise from hence seeing another humbled and imitating him 3 It doth not arise from a sense or discerning of sin in a man Many there are who see their sin and will acknowledge the same natural light
Epistle had been disputing against for hee brings in those words Chap. 5.14 as an exposition of that Law which they stood so much for and yet did so grossy abuse and mistake therefore the Law of loving our neighbour is for substance tile very same Law with that his disputation had run upon But the Law of loving our neighbour as our selves is the Moral Law for these words are the summe of the second Table thereof Matth. 22.39 ergo 8 Arg. My eighth and last Argument I take from the Apostles Allegory out of which I have taken my Text and it is this That Law which was given upon Mount Sinai is the Old Covenant for saith the Apostle Hagar is Mount Sinai in Arabia But the Law given upon Mount Sinai was not the Ceremonial onely but the Moral also ergo The Conclusion is That by the Old Covenant wee are to understand the whole Law as well the Moral part as the Ceremonial and Political Objection But here ariseth a great Objection upon us viz. That by proving the Moral Law to belong to the Old Covenant and affirming the Old Covenant is to bee cast out wee have destroyed and made void the Moral Law yea not the Ten Commandements of Moses onely but moreover by our large acception of the word Moral wee have made null and overthrowne all manner of Duties whatsoever Answer Not so and that it may appear that it is not so Mark well what I am to say That as there is something in the Moral Law that appertaines to Hagar is a part of the Old Covenant so also something there is in the Moral Law that appertaines to Sarah is a part of the New Covenant for the Moral Law is Hagars rule and Sarahs both Now all our discourse hitherto upon the Moral Law hath run upon it no otherwise but as the same is the Law of Hagar a part of the Old Covenant and taken in this sense it is no injury to the holy Law of God to say it must bee cast out But if wee take the Moral Law as it is Sarahs rule it is then a most ungodly and prophane assertion to say it must bee cast out For observe though the Bond-woman is to bee cast out and all that appertaines to her yet there is no casting out of the Free-woman nor of any thing that appertaines to her Whatsoever therefore that is of the Moral law which appertaines to the Bond-woman the Old Covenant all that wee may yea ought to cast out but contrariwise whatsoever that is that belongs to the Free-woman is a part or peece of the New Covenant that must wee by no meanes meddle with there is no casting out of that for though the servant abideth not in the house for ever yet the Mistresse abideth for ever The Question here will bee What is that of the Moral Law which doth appertaine to the Bond-woman and what that which appertains to the Free-woman Answ The Moral law consists of three parts 1 The mandatory or commanding part 2 The Minatory or threatning part 3 The Consolatory or promising part In every of which the Old Covenant or Bond-woman hath a share as well as the New Covenant or Free-woman For note The Old Covenant hath promises as well as commands and threatnings for which reason the Apostle speaks of Covenants of promise in the plural number Eph. 2.12 noting that the old Covenant as well as the New hath promises and tells us that the New is established upon better promises Heb. 8.6 shewing that the Old is established upon Promises too but not so good promises as the New built upon Againe the New Covenant hath Commands and Threatnings also if wee wax wanton under the grace thereof as well as promises and hence it is that the Gospel the blessed word of the New Covenant is so full of heavenly precepts and threats of fatherly chastisement therefore I say both Old and New Covenant share in either of the three foregoing parts Now out of these three to divide to each their proper portions giving the Bond-woman hers and the Free-woman hers will clear up to us what is to bee cast out and what to remaine for as I have said that which belongs to the Bond-woman is to be cast out and that which is the Free-womans is to continue Now for the clearing our way into this partition or division take this general and certain rule to steere by viz. That look whatsoever that is of the Moral Law or any part thereof which is not now by Jesus Christ brought into the New Covenant and become a part thereof all that is a part of the Old belongs to the Bond-woman is to be cast out and contrariwise look whatsoever that is which is now by Jesus Christ brought into the New Covenant and become a part of it that appertaines to the Free-woman and wee cannot without offering high indignity to the blessed Gospel the Covenant of Grace yea to Jesus Christ himself who is Mediator of this Covenant and hath sealed the whole with his bloud cast that out Here then the question will be and this answered brings us into the light What was that which once was in the Moral Law as the same was the Law of the Old Covenant which now by Christs bringing the same into the New Covenant is no longer in it Againe what is that that the Moral Law notwithstanding this its translation from the Old Covenant to the New doth still retaine of what it had before or hath by this change of its station gained which before it had not If once we come to see what the Moral Law by Christs transplanting of it hath lost or on the contrary still retaines or hath gained wee shall therewith see what we are to disowne and cast out and what to love cherish and entertaine To solve this Question I shall take a more particular view of the Moral Law in the three parts thereof as it is a commanding Law a threatning Law a promising Law and give out of each Hagar the Bond-woman her portion Sarah the Free-woman hers 1 For the Mandatory part The Moral Law as the same is Hagars Law or the Old Covenant from Mount Sinai had commands but these commands were barely a voyce of words without power Heb. 12.29 a bare letter without the Spirit 2 Cor. 3.6 but now as the same is Sarahs Law or the New Covenant given from Mount Sion so it hath commands too but they are of another nature such command as have efficacy power and spirit going along with them for the New Testament administration is a ministration of the spirit 2 Cor. 3.8 which giveth life and power to those under it vers 6. Hagar did all conceived brought forth by meer natural strength Sarah by supernatural strength given to her from Heaven Hagars Law commands us to bee fruitful but contributes no more strength towards the bringing forth of this fruit than what Hagar had viz. the meer strength of nature
because Ishmael was borne of the Bond-woman who had no absolute right and could therefore convey none to her seed but Esau of Rebecca who was a Free-woman had a right to convey which Esau despiseth Upon this Principle another follows viz. That carnal and slighty Gospel professors of which Esay was a Type doe prove to bee worse and more vile than meer legalists of which Ishmael was a Type for observe Esau having despised his Birth-right degenerates into a prophane person Heb. 12.16 but Ishmael not so for after that he was cast out of his Fathers Family hee was yet very strict as I shall shew hereafter By what wee have said it is now clear enough that the Moral Law as it is Sarahs Law the Law of the New Covenant so it is not to bee cast out because it belongs to the Free-woman who must not be rejected But for so much of the Moral Law as belongs to Hagar i. e. is a part of the Old Covenant and not brought by Christ into the New all that is to be cast out for it belongs unto the Bond-woman and what saith the Scripture Cast out the bond-woman c. From this double consideration of the Moral Law as it is the Law of Hagar the Old Covenant and as it is the Law of Sarah the New several useful lessons doe arise 1 Hence we may learne how to reconcile such Scriptures as seeme to have opposition and contradiction in them about the Law as namely Rom. 7. where the Apostle tells us vers 4. Wee are dead to the Law and vers 6. delivered from the Law yet saith vers 12. The Commardement is holy just and good vers 14. The Law is spiritual vers 16. I consent saith he to the Law that it is good vers 22. I delight in the Law of God after the inner man vers 25. with my minde I my selfe serve the Law of God How may we reconcile these doth not the Apostle speak contradictions Not so for in verses 4.6 hee treats of the Law as it is the Law of Hagar the Old Covenant and so he saith we are dead to it delivered from it in the following verses he treats of the Law as it is the Law of Sarah or of the New Covenant and so hee calls it spiritual holy just and good consents to it delights in it serves it c. So Gal. 2.19 I through the law am dead to the law i.e. the Law hath set mee wholly free from the Law Is not this a contradiction No for the Apostle speakes of the Law under its twofold consideration as it is the Law of the old Covenant and as the Law of the New and so his meaning is this I through the Law through receiving embracing or having to doe with the Law as it is the Law of the New Covenant am dead to the Law that is am set wholly free from the Law and have nothing to doe with it as it is the Law of the Old Of the like interpretation are those words Rom. 8.2 For the Law of the spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death i.e. By the Law of the New Covenant or the Law as it is the Law of the New Covenant which the Apostle calls the Law of the spirit of life in Christ Jesus because the New Covenant-ministration is a ministration of the Spirit a ministration that giveth life 2 Cor. 3.6.8 and hath Christ for the Mediator of it Heb. 8.6 chap. 9.15 chap. 12.24 and the Bloud of Christ as the seal or ratification of it Heb. 9.16 17 18. I am freed or delivered from the Law as it is the Law of the Old Covenant which as such is called A law of sin and death because sin is discovered by the Law of the Old Covenant but not mortified by this discovery but rather enlivened and the soul findes it self inwardly more provoked to it Rom. 7.5 7 8 9 10 11. Hence the discovery of sin which is by the Old Covenant not killing sin but rather making it to increase it consequently kills the soul and so it becomes a Commandement unto deaths a law of death a ministration of death 2 Corinth 3 7. So also Rom. 6.14 the Apostle speaking of Beleevers saith We are not under the law but under grace yet 1 Cor. 9.21 speaking of himselfe who was a Beleever he saith he was under the Law to Christ Are not these contradiction No because in the first place the law is spoken of as it is the Law of the Old Covenant administred by Moses so Beleevers in Gospel-times are not under it in the latter the Law is spoken of as it is the Law of the New Covenant administred by the Lord Jesus so Paul himself and all Beleevers who are willingly subject to Christ are also willingly subject to his Law Againe 1 Tim. 1.9 it is said The law is not made for a righteous man i. e. the righteous person is one that hath nothing to doe with the Law nor the Law with him so that in effect the Law is made voyd to him it is to him as though it were nothing and he to it as though there were no Law in the world yet Rom. 3. last it is said Doe wee make voyd the law through faith nay we establish the law what may we judge of these expressions The answer is still what I have said The Apostle in the former place confiders the Law only as it is the Law of the Old Covenant in which respect he saith it is not made for the righteous man i. e. he hath nothing to doe with it he is not under it in the latter only as it is the Law of the New Covenant and in this respect the preaching of faith doth not nul the Law to the Beleever but doth rather establish it as I am coming to shew Thus we see how this distinction about the Moral Law both doth and will bring all those opposite Scriptures which concern the Law to a sweet concord and harmony one with another 2 Hence wee may learne That the Moral Law doth still remaine as a rule to Saints even in Gospel-times for mark it the Moral Law is Sarahs Rule as well as Hagars now though Hagar the Servant in Gospel-times is an outcast yet Sarah the Mistris still remaines in the Family and governes there The Moral Law therefore as it is Sarahs Rule remaines in as full force even in Gospel times as ever Now because some not understanding this distinction have weakly and unadvisedly cast the Moral Law wholly out of doores as being a thing of no use to Beleevers under the New Testament as there are others that hand over head will bring it in I shall therefore establish this Position that the Moral Law is yea must bee a Rule to Saints even under the New Testament and that by these following Arguments Arg. 1. If the coming of Christ doth not destroy the Law as a Rule but