doubtfulnesse in Abraham Vers. 8. WHereby shall I know c. This question proceeded not from the doubtfulnesse or weakenesse of Abrahams faith as some Hebrewes which thinke that Abrahams posterity was punished with captivity because of doubting 1. For the Apostle saith he was not weak in faith Rom 4.19 2. And seeing hee beleeved without doubting an harder matter concerning one to come out of his owne bowels it is not like hee doubted of the lesse namely of possessing that countrey 3. Neither would the spirit of God have given such a commendation of Abrahams faith that it was imputed for righteousnesse if he had wavered or doubted 1. Some therefore thinke that Abraham asked a signe not for himselfe but in regard of his posterity that they might have some assurance of the inheriting of that land sic Rupertus Cajetan 2. Some thinke that Abraham doubted not of the promise but of the manner whether it were absolute or conditionall for it was both to possesse the land was an absolute promise but to inherit it for ever was tied to the condition of obedience 3. Rasi thinketh that Abraham asked by whose merit hee should possesse the land as though the merit of his sacrifice brought him thither 4. But others doe better touch this point that Abraham only for the better confirmation of his faith desireth to be instructed concerning the manner and of the time when it should be fulfilled as Mary moved the like question how shall this be Luke 1. Augustine and so accordingly the Lord afterward setteth downe the time after 400. yeares Theodoret And this is rather a signe of Abrahams faith then a note of incredulity in asking this question for the wicked and unbeleevers at the first reject Gods promises the faithfull desire more to be confirmed Calvin 5. Farther we must observe that there were speciall motions in the Saints which are not now to be drawne into example as Gedeon and Ezechias asked signes Iud 6.37 2 King 20.18 Calvin and so Aquinas saith well Abraham petiâ—t signum ex instinctu divino Abraham asked a signe of a divine instinct QVEST. XII Why Abraham tooke of three kinds of beasts Vers. 9. TAke me an heifer of three yeere old c. So it is to be read rather with Aben Ezra than three heifers as the Chalde readeth I will let passe the allegories and mysticall significations which are diversly gathered upon these words 1. Some by the beasts which were divided understand the evils and afflictions which happened to Abrahams posterity by the birds not divided their deliverance and prosperity 2 Philo thinketh that these three kindes are taken for sacrifice the heifer goat ramme because of their meeknesse and tamenesse which suffer themselves in great heards to be driven by a child and for that they are profitable for labour for food for clothing 3. Lyranus thinketh that by these beasts and fowles are signified Christs vertues by the heifer his labour and patience by the sheepe his innocency by the turtle his continency by the dove his meeknesse 4. In that three sorts of beasts were taken some understand the three generations while the people were oppressed by the turtle the fourth generation when they came forth into the wildernesse Theodoret some the renewing of the covenant with the three Patriarkes Abraham Isaak Iacob or the three kinds of government among the Israelites of Judges Kings High-priests Perer. Some the three seasons from Adam to Noah from Noah to Abraham from Abraham to David Augustine 5. By the dividing of the beasts and the not dividing of the fowles some understand by the first the afflictions of the people when the children should be separated from their parents by the other their deliverance some by the first insinuate such as were carnall among the people by the other such as were spirituall Augustine 6. By the lighting of the fowles upon the dead carcases which Abraham drove away some doe decypher the attempts of the Aegyptians against the Israelites to devoure and destroy them but that God disappointed them some the assaults of evill spirits upon carnall men Augustine some the wandring thoughts that seaze upon our praiers spirituall sacrifices Gregorie 7. By the seâ—ting of the sunne v. 17. some vnderstand the death of Ioseph when the affliction of the Hebrewes began some the end of the world when the greatest persecution should be and by the smoaking fire brand the end of the world and fierie iudgement Augustine But wee need not thus hunt for allegories which are not only mens devises as it may appeare by the uncertainty and variety thereof Sundry men as their fancies lead them doe invent sundry allegories It shall only suffice us to know that God appointeth these kinds to be offred partly for sacrifice as Iosephus partly to be as signes of the covenant which the Lord maketh with Abraham and as Chrysostome well noteth because it was the manner of men when they made a solemne covenant to cut a calfe in twaine and to walke betweene the parts thereof Ierem. 34.18 wishing the like to themselves if they breake the covenant the Lord vouchsafeth to observe the same manner QVEST. XIII Of the divers kinds of trances Vers. 12. AN heavy sleepe or trance Philo noteth foure kinds of trances or ecstasis in the Scripture 1. Madnesse or phrensie that commeth of some distemperature Deut. 28.28 The Lord shall smite thee with madnesse and blindnesse and astonishing of heart 2. Astonishment of the minde upon some sudden and strange accident as Isaak was astonished at Esaus comming in after Iacob Gen. 27.33 3 The quiet rest and contemplation of the soule as when the Lord cast Adam into a sleepe Gen. 2.4 When as the soule is ravished with some divine inspiration and revelation as Peter was Act. 10 QVEST. XIV The time of the dwelling of Israel in Aegypt Vers. 13. THey shall bee a stranger in a land not theirs foure hundred yeares 1. First it is untrue that the Israelites dwelled in Aegypt full foure hundred yeares of which opinion is Genebrard For from Caath who went downe into Aegypt with Iacob Gen. 47. and lived in all 133. Exod. 6. who begat Amram who lived ann 137. the father of Moses who was 80. yeare old when Israel came out of Aegypt there are not above 350. yeares from which some must bee detracted wherein the fathers and their children lived together 2. Neither did they dwell in Aegypt lesse than 200. as Chrysostome or 210. as Lyranâ—â— but 215. yeares as it may be thus gathered S. Paul from the promise first made to Abraham to the giving of the law in the first yeare of the going forth of Israel out of Aegypt reckoneth 430. yeares Galat. 3.17 of this summe 215. yeares were run when Iacob went downe into Aegypt from the time of the promise in the 75. yeare of Abrahams age till Isaaks birth in the 100. yeare Gen. 22.22.5 are 25. yeares from Isaaks birth to Iacobs are
as is before shewed so that he is farre elder than the seven wise men of the Grecians and then Pythagorâ—â— Heraclitus Hippocrates Democritus Anaxagoras Socrates Plato with the rest who were many yeeres after Homer 4. Hence then appeareth that notable error of Appion the Grammarian in Tiberius Caesars time who would have Moses bring the Israelites out of Egypt in the first yeere of the seventh Olympiade at what time the Tyrians built Carthage in Africa For it is evident that Carthage was built about the time of the Trojan battell for Aeneas went from thence to Dido the founder of Carthage as Virgil. testifieth and Iosephus writing against the said Appion sheweth that from Hiram King of Tyre in whose time the Temple was built unto Pigmalion and Dido were 155. yeeres and to the beginning of the Olympiades in the 8. yeere of Ahaz reigne were 280. yeeres so that by this account Carthage was built 140. yeeres before the count of the Olympiades began Appion then is found to be in a double error for both Moses was divers hundred yeeres before the building of Carthage and Carthage was built long before the computation of the Olympiades ex Perer. QUEST VIII Whether the name of Moses were knowne unto the Gentiles before Christ. NOw then it is evident 1. that Moses name was knowne unto the ancient writers of the Gentiles as Saconiatho that Phenicean Antiquarie and Berosus Chaldeus Ptolomeus and Manetho Egyptian Chronographers and among the Grecians Artapanus Polemo Eupolemus doe make honourable mention of Moses Likewise Troyus Pompeius cited by Iustin. Martyr lib. 36. and Diodorus Siculus Numâ—nius Pythagoricus calleth Plato the Attik or Athenian Moses 2. But yet sparing mention is made of Moses among the Ethnik writers because they held his writings to bee sacred and divine and so not to bee prophaned and made common as Demetrius Phalerius the keeper of the great Library of Alexandria said unto Ptolomeus Philadelphus alleaging at the same time the examples of Theopompus the Historiographer and Theodectes the tragicall Poet that when they attempted to transpose some things out of Moses bookes the one into his story the other into his tragedie the first was perplexed in minde the other smitten with blindnesse till they perceived their error and desisted Aristeas 3. Origen then is deceived who thinketh that till after Christ the name of Moses was not heard of among the Gentiles â— Homil. 2. in Cant. Pererius QUEST IX How Moses is said to be a proper child and by whom he was hid Vers. 2. WHen she saw that he was faire and goodly she hid him 1. Both the parents did their part iâ— hiding him Heb. 11.13 but the mother was the chiefe either in regard of her motherly affection or for that the advice came first from her 2. Iosephus writeth that Amram had a speciall revelation vision concerning this child that he should be delivered from this danger and be himselfe a deliverer of his people But seeing these parents of Moses are commended for their faith which must bee grounded upon the word of God it is likely that they builded rather upon the promises made to their Fathers than any speciall revelations 3. The child was goodly to see to that is a certaine divine comelinesse appeared in him not onely propernesse of body as Stephen sheweth Act. 7. and the Apostle Heb. 11.23 this act of theirs then principally proceeded of faith which was so much the more increased by the object of this goodly child in whom they saw such signes of grace as that they doubted not but that God would take the protection of him Simlâ—r QUEST X. The Arke wherein Moses was put whereof it was made and where placed Vers. 3. SHe tooke an Arke of bulrushes The word here used is Tebath which is given also to Noahs Arke and the Arke of the Tabernacle The Septuag retaine the same word Thibis without any other interpretation but it is like through the error of some Scribes that Thibin was put for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the edition Complutense readeth but Origen is here deceived that thinketh Thibis to bee a coffin made of wicker or of the barkes of trees Hom. 2. in Exod. it signifieth nothing but an Arke for the frame the matter whereof it was made is beside expressed 2. which some thinke was of Reed Vatab. Genevens othes of Bulrushes Iun. Pag Mont. which is most like or of the tree Papyrus as Iosephus whereof they made the paper which word is used to this day though our paper be now made of linnen it was a light matter that might easily be supported in the waters and both to fasten the stuffe the better and to keepe out the water they daubd it with slime and pitch Simler as Noah pitched his great Arke to hold out the waters 3. This Arke for the bignesse Iosephus thinketh was no greater than could well containe the child but Iosephus is deceived that they put this Arke or coffin into the middest of the floud for the text is evident that they put it amongst the flagges or reedes that it should not so easily flote upon the waters and to be the better defended from the winde Pererius QUEST XI Whether Moses parents did well in exposing him BUt here the question will be moved whether Moses parents did well in exposing the infant thus to apparent danger seeing nature hath given unto bruite beasts a naturall instinct rather to adventure their lives for their young ones than to leave and forsake them These reasons then may bee yeelded in defence of this their fact 1. That if they had kept their childe at home then they had most certainly exposed not onely him to danger who could not be hid partly from the diligent inquisition of Pharaoh partly from the notice of the Egyptians among whom they dwelled Iunius but also his parents by all likelyhood should have perished therefore in that they doe thus expose the infant they doe deliver him from a certaine danger leaving him to an uncertaine Perer. 2. Beside they use all carefull meanes to provide for the childe in pitching the Arke in laying it in a safe place Perer. from whence the mother might take it by stealth and suckle it at her pleasure Simler Beside they appointed his sister to bee his keeper to seâ— what should become of the infant 3. Further though there be no certaintie either of the revelation shewed to Amram that the childe should be preserved as Iosephus writeth or of that excuse of the Hebrewes that Miriam being a Prophetesse gave direction what they should doe yet seeing this act of theirs proceeded of faith in God as the Apostle sheweth Heb. 11. it is not to be doubted but that herein they were directed by the instinct of the spirit and that they did it not in griefe and despaire as Philo seemeth to affirme that they wished they had exposed their childe so soone as he was borne seeing they could no longer keepe
offend against this precept Qui Christi cognitione carent quae cognitio non alia re quà m fide in Christum constet Which want the knowledge of Christ which knowledge consisteth in nothing else than in faith in Christ. Marbach Commentar in hunc locum Against this opinion that faith in Christ is not commanded in the Morall law the reasons follow afterward but first the question must further be explaned 1. First then we are to distinguish of faith which is of foure kindes or sorts 1. There is fides initialis or fundamentalis the faith of beginnings or the fundamentall faith whereof the Apostle speaketh Hebr. 11.6 That he which commeth unto God must beleeve that God is c. And this kinde of faith toward God the Apostle referreth to the doctrine of beginnings Heb. 6. 1. This faith apprehendeth onely the being and essence of God to know him to be the only Lord. 2. There is another faith called fides miraculorum the faith of miracles touched by the Apostle 1. Cor 13.2 If I had all faith so that I could remove mountaines 3. There is fides historica an historicall faith which beleeveth all things to bee true that are written in the Scriptures in which sense S Iames saith The Devils beleeve and tremble they beleeve there is a God and that all is true which the Scripture speaketh of God of his justice power punishing of sinners rewarding of the righteous 4. There is beside these a justifying faith whereof S. Paul maketh mention In that I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Sonne of God who hath loved me and given himselfe for me Galath 2.20 This faith is the life of the soule whereby hee which beleeveth is able in particular to apply unto himselfe the merits of Christs death Now this is the difference betweene these foure kindes of faith the first apprehendeth the essence and being of God the second the faith of miracles his power the third which is the historicall faith his truth the fourth namely the justifying faith his mercie The three first to beleeve God to be to beleeve him to bee omnipotent to beleeve him to be just and true are included in the first precept Thou shalt have no other Gods c. but not the last wherein is the errour of the Romanists that make all these kindes of faith the same in substance differing only in property which if it were true then it were possible for them that have the one faith to have the other and so Devils also which in some sort doe beleeve should also be capable of justifying faith But this matter that all these kindes of faith are not the same in substance nor of like nature with the justifying faith is shewed elsewhere whither I referre the Reader 2. Further we are to distinguish of the law for it is taken sometime more largely either for all the Scriptures of the old Testament as Luk 16.17 It is more easie that heaven and earth should passe away than that one title of the law should fall So Ioh. 15.25 It is written in their law they have hated mee without a cause which testimony is found in the Psalmes Psal. 35.19 or else the law is taken for all the bookes of Moses and so the Law and Prophets are named together Matth. 7.12 This is the Law and the Prophets But the law is sometime taken more strictly for the Morall law whereof the Apostle speaketh Rom. 7. I knew not sinne but by the law and so S. Paul opposeth the law of workes to the law of faith Rom. 3.27 Now as the law is taken generally either for all the old Scriptures written by the Prophets or for the writings of Moses it cannot be denied but that faith in Jesus Christ is in this sense both contained and commanded in the law for of Christ the Lord spake by the mouth of his Prophets Luk. 1.70 And Moses wrote of Christ as our Saviour saith Had yee beleeved Moses yee would have beleeved me for Moses wrote of mee Ioh. 5.45 But as the law is taken strictly for the Morall law the law of workes which containeth only the ten words or Commandements so we deny this justifying faith to bee commanded in the law 3. Indirectly or by way of consequent it will not bee denied but that this faith also is implied in the law because we are bound by the law to beleeve the Scriptures and the whole word of God for this is a part of Gods worship to beleeve his word to be true and so some define faith Est certa persuafio qua assentimur omni verbo Dei nobis tradita It is a certaine perswasion whereby wee give assent to all the word of God Vrsin And so by this precept wee are bound to receive all the promises and doctrines concerning Christ delivered in the old and new Testament But directly as a part and branch and so a worke of the law wee deny justifying faith to be in this precept or any other prescribed or commanded The reasons are these 1. The Morall law and the Gospell differ in the very nature and substance for the one is naturally imprinted in the heart of man the other is revealed and wrought by grace The first the Apostle testifieth where he saith The Gentiles which have not the law do by nature the things contained in the law Rom. 2.14 The other also is witnessed by the same Apostle Rom. 2.24 We are justified freely by his grace The argument then may be framed thus The morall law is graft in the heart of man by nature but faith in Christ is not by nature but by grace above nature for if it were naturall all men should have faith which the Apostle denieth 2. Thessal 3.2 Faith then in Christ belongeth not to the law Therefore it is strange that Bellarmine confessing in another place that pracepta decalogi sunt explicationes juris natura that the precepts of the decalogue are the explications of the law of nature Lib. 2. de Imaginib Sanctor cap. 7. could not inferre hereupon that the precepts of faith and of the Gospell are no explications of the law of nature and therefore have no dependance of the morall law Ambrose useth this very argument Nemo sub lâ—ge fidem constituat lex enim intra mensuram ultra mensuram gratia Let no man place faith in the law for the law is within the measure and compasse of nature but grace is beyond measure Ambros. in 12. Luc. 2. The effects of the law of works and the law of faith are divers for the one worketh feare the other love and peace as the Apostle saith Ye have not received the spirit of bondage to feare againe but yee have received the spirit of adoption whereby we crie Abba Father Rom. 8.17 Againe the Apostle saith The letter killeth the Spirit giveth life 2 Cor. 2.6 Thus then the argument standeth the same thing cannot bee the instrument of
Neither yet were they fastened directly in the verie corner of all where the sides joyned together for then the bars could not conveniently have beene thrust thorow them but by the corners are meant the sides neere unto the corners as it is said afterward that the barres were in the rings by the sides of the Arke Tostat. qu. 1. QUEST II. Why it is said He made where the Lord said before to Moses Thou shalt make Vers. 6. HE made the Mercie-seat c. The phrase must be observed that whereas chap. 25. the Lord saith to Moses Thou shalt make an Arke thou shalt make a candlesticke thou shalt make a table and so of the rest here it is said He that is Bezaleel made the Arke he made the table he made the candlesticke The reason hereof is to shew the obedience of Moses and the people lest they might have beene thought to have received many precepts of the Lord and performed few of them In that therefore the Lord said to Moses Thou shalt make there the charge and commandement is given But now where it is thus rehearsed and he made the dutifull and carefull performing is expressed of that which was given them in charge Pellican QUEST III. In what forme the branches of the candlesticke went up Vers. 18. SIx branches came out of the side thereof 1. Pellican seemeth to thinke that these branches went up erectis calamis with their stalkes upright 2. But their opinion seemeth more probable who thinke that the branches in their going up semicirculos effecisse made halfe circles for both that forme and fashion was more comely to sight and beside if they had gone upright this inconvenience would have followed that the lamps above where the oyle was put for the lights would not have stood right up but leaning one way which had been unfit both for the droppings of the oyle and the lights would not have burned so cleare nor so bright if the lamps had not stood even and levell Gallas The rest of the questions concerning these instruments and ornaments of the Temple which are described in this chapter are before discussed chap. 25. and chap. 30. in the beginning of the chapters 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. Christ our true propitiatorie and Mercie-seat Vers. 6. HE made the Mercie-seat The Mercie-seat signified Christ our true 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Propitiatorie who hath reconciled us to God his Father The Cherubs upon the Mercie-seat doe represent the holy Angels whose ministerie Christ useth in the government of his Church Pelargus As the Apostle saith They are sent forth to minister for their sakes that shall be heires of salvation Hebr. 1.14 Marbach 2. Doct. Christ both God and man THe making of the Arke of wood within and gold without did set forth the two natures in our blessed Saviour joyned together in one person the divine and humane Simlerus In the Propitiatorie and Mercie-seat are typically set forth the benefits that we have by Christ that as the Propitiatorie covered the Arke wherein was the Law so Christ Legem nos accusantem tegit doth cover and hide the Law which accuseth us Simler But more particularly the Apostle rehearseth the benefits which we have by Christ saying that he is made of God unto us his wisdome righteousnesse sanctification redemption 1. His wisdome in that Christ hath revealed unto us the will of his Father to give his Sonne for us That whosoever beleeveth in him should have eternall life 2. He is our Iustice in that hee imparted to us both his active righteousnesse in fulfilling the Law and his passive obedience in bearing the punishment due unto our sinne so the Apostle saith Christ is the end of the Law for righteousnesse to everie one that beleeveth 3. Christ is our Sanctification in that hee doth not only impute unto us his righteousnesse by faith but doth also sanctifie and regenerate us by his Spirit inabling us in some measure to keepe his Commandements as the Lord saith by his Prophet I will put my Spirit within you and cause you to walke in my statutes 4. He is our Redemption in that he hath by his innocent death appeased the wrath of God toward us as the Apostle saith Who shall condemne us it is Christ which is dead c. Marbachius 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Against such hereticks as erred concerning Christs divine or humane nature AS Christ is shadowed forth in the Arke to be both God and man so all such are condemned which doe erre concerning the divine or humane nature of Christ. As touching Christs divine nature 1. Some utterly deny it making Christ a meere man and not to have beene before he was conceived of the Virgin Marie in which heresie were Cerinthus Ebion contrarie to the Scripture which saith that the Word which was made flesh was in the beginning c. Ioh. 1.1 2. Some confesse another nature in Christ beside his humanitie but not of the same substance with God yet of an higher nature than any creature so held Carpocrates Basilides Arrius but our blessed Saviour himselfe saith I and my Father are one Ioh. 20.30 3. Some affirmed that Christ beside his humane nature consisted also of a divine yet not begotten of the Father but making one person with God the Father as well as being of one substance so the Sabellians and Patropassians whereas the Apostle saith God sent his Sonne made of a woman Gal. 4.4 The person then of the Sonne and not of the Father was made man for us Concerning Christs humane nature 1. Some affirmed that he was not a true man but onely in outward appearance as the Manichees and Marcionites who are confuted by Christs owne words Luke 24.39 Handle me and see for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as yee see me have 2. The Valentinians and Anabaptists hold that Christ had not his flesh of the Virgin Marie but brought it with him from heaven contrarie to the Apostle who saith That hee was made of the seed of David according to the flesh Rom. c. 3. 3. Some taught that Christ had a true humane nature but in respect of his body onely not of his soule as Apollinaris Bishop of Laodicea who is convinced by the words of our Saviour Matth. 26. My soule is heavie unto death 4. Some grant that Christ tooke upon him our whole nature but not our humane infirmities But the Apostle teacheth the contrarie that Christ was in all things tempted in like sort as we are yet without sinne There are two kinde of infirmities some are personall as leprosie blindnesse sicknesse diseases these Christ was not subject unto there are naturall infirmities which doe belong unto the whole humane nature as wearinesse hunger griefe and such like these our blessed Saviour undertooke that he might be in all things like unto us 5. Some hold that Christ had a true humane nature but after the uniting thereof in one person to his
vanish howsoever some in their heat and intemperance are not afraid to call them Sabbatorum errores yea hereticall assertions a new Jubile Saint Sabbath more than either Jewish or Popish institution God grant it bee not laid to their charge that so speake or write and God give them a better mind 2. Doct. The soule is not part of Gods substance SEcondly where it is said God breathed into the face of Adam the breath of life we are not thereby to gather that the soule of man is part of the divine substance to the which opinion Lactantius seemeth to have inclined lib. 2. divinar institution for as the breath is no part of his substance that doth breath so neither is the soule of Gods essence that gave it for then the soule of man if it were of the divine nature it should be immutable and without beginning from all eternity as God is 3. Doct. There is but one soule in a man THirdly from hence it may be concluded that there is but one soule in man and that all the other faculties of sense and powers of nature are but handmaids to the soule waiting upon it and departing with it therefore God is said to have breathed into man the spirit of lâ—â—e that is the reasonable soule because the body no longer doth breath or live than the soule is present We doe therefore refuse Origens conceit upon these words Mat. 24.51 The Lord will divide or cut him off that is the spirit of the wicked shall returne to God and their soule shall goe to hell hee maketh A difference betweene the spirit and soule contrary to the Apostle who saying be ye renewed in the spirit of your soules and minds Eph. 4.24 sheweth 〈◊〉 the spirit belongeth to the mind or soule as the purer part thereof 4. Doct. Paradise was a place not altogether unknowne FOurthly whereas Paradise is described by the countrey of Eden where it was situate and by the knowne rivers of Tigris and Euphrates we inferre that Paradise then was not a place secret and unknowne as Bellarmine supposeth lib. de grat prim hom c. 12. for if it had beene unknowne in those dayes the Lord needed not to set the Cherubims to keepe it with A sword shaken And if it be objected that Paradise was never found out by any the answer is easily made 1. because it was kept by the Angels with great terrour that none durst approach 2. The Infidels and incredulous persons regarded it not 3. The faithfull looked for a much better Paradise in heaven and therefore sought not after it And herein we have the judgement of Pererius against Bellarmine one Jesuit against another lib. 3. in genes qu. 5. de paradis 5. Doct. The terrestriall Paradise is not now extant FIfthly whereas Bellarmine affirmeth that the terrestriall Paradise is yet remaining and that Henoch and Elias are there kept it appeareth by the description of Paradise to bee a meere fable 1. Paradise was planted where the knowne rivers Tigris and Euphrates ran together which is either in Armenia or Mesopotamia or some of those knowne countries then if Paradise were now extant in the world it is like that in all this time it should have beene found out by the inhabitants of those places 2. The floud over-flowed the highest hils 15. cubits Gen. 7.20 then Paradise also was covered with the water where if Henoch then was he must have also perished in the waters being out of Noahs Arke 3. The scripture maketh mention now of no other Paradise but heaven 2 Cor. 12 13. S. Paul calleth it the third heaven Paradise 4. Pererius sheweth Ruperius and Gregory to have beene of this mind that Henoch was not translated to the terrestriall Paradise to the which he subscribeth against Bellarmine 6. Doct. Marriage is not to be prohibited to any SIxthly whereas the Lord saith vers 18. It is not good for man to bee alone wee enforce this text against the popish forced virginity for whereas God saw it was not good neither for Adam then present not for his posterity which should have more need of the remedy to bee alone they contrariwise constraine their Priests and votaries to live alone depriving them of that mutuall helpe and society which God hath appointed for their comfort and to be a remedy against sinne and that this place is understood not of the marriage of Adam only but of all the faithfull Bellarmine confesseth lib. de Matrim cap. 2. 7. Doct. Polygamie condemned SEventhly vers 24. They shall be one flesh and as this place is alleaged Matthew 19. 5. They two shall bee one flesh This place sheweth the corruption of polygamie which is the having of many wives for if God had seene it good for one man to be joyned to two or divers women he would have made at the first to one man more helpes than one 5. Places of confutation 1. Confut. Experimentall knowledge of evill not to be desired 1. THe Maniches objected why did God forbid man to eate of the tree of the knowledge of good and evill would he have him like unto bruit beasts that cannot distinguish betweene good and evill Augustine answereth this experimentall knowledge of evill which Adam got by transgression was not the wisdome of an happie but the experience of a miserable man for Christ knew no sinne by his experience though he knew it by his saplence or wisdome 2. Confut. Why God gave a commandement that man would not keepe 2. WHy did God give a commandement that man should not keepe and why did he not make him so that man should not have fallen Ans. 1. God gave man this precept that hee might shewe his obedience and though he foresawe he would sinne yet he also provided a remedie and redeemer for his sinne 2. Though hee be in a better state that cannot sinne at all yet his state is good and not to be complained of that if he will cannot sinne lib. cont adversar leg c. 14. 3. Confut. against Celsus 3. CElsus derideth this storie of the making of the woman and counteth it a fable Origen answereth if you will not beleeve Moses why doe you credit Hesiod your Poet who hath the like narration how Vulcan made a woman out of clay whom all the gods adored Venus gave her beautie Pallace comelinesse of bodie Mercurius wit whereupon she was called Pandora which opening the lidde or cover of the tunne divided care and griefe unto men that lived without before Origen lib. 4. cont Câ—lsum 4 Confut. Paradise planted in a knowne place 4. THe Papists object thus Bellarmine would proove that Paradise was an unknowne place because it is said the river that went out of Eden did divide it selfe into 4. heads But there is no such river in Mesapotamia Bellar. lib. 1. de grat prim homin c. 12. For further answer to this objection I referre the reader to q. 13. before these 4. streames might be known in former
said of all the Patriarkes beside that they begat sonnes and daughters beside those which are expressed no such thing is mentioned of Noah that beside these three he begat sonnes and daughters and the Septuagint read Noah begat three sonnes c. insinuating in so reading their opinion that these were all their sonnes yet it is evident Genes 6.9 That these were all Noahs seed the words are these are the generation of Noah Noah begat three sonnes c. 3. I rather thinke not that either Noah deferred his marriage till hee was 500. yeeres old or that hee being married abstained from the company of his wife all that time but that God so disposed seeing he purposed to save Noah and all his sonnes from the floud that Noah did not so abound with posterity as his fathers before him lest they also should have followed the wickednesse of that age and so perish with the rest the Lord saw that there might bee sufficient for the replenishing of the world againe and it was more to Gods glory to increase the world afterward by so small a number QVEST. VII Wherein Noah was a comfort to his parents 7. Vers. 29. THis same shall comfort us concerning the workes and sorrow of our hands 1. Not because the course of sinne should be stopped and the grievous workes of sinners stayed by the destructions in the floud as Chrysostome 2. Or because Noah found out the use of the plow whereby the earth was tilled with more ease as R. Solomon 3. or for that the use of flesh was graunted to Noah after the floud as some thinke 4. Nor yet onely for that the seminary of the world was preserved in Noahs arke which otherwise should have perished 5. Nor yet onely because God renewed his covenant with Noah promising that the world should never be destroyed with waters againe 6. But the chiefe scope of this prophesie hath relation to Christ in whom we finde true rest to our soules and who hath delivered us from the curse Galath 3.10 who was prefigured in Noah and his baptisme wherein is exhibited the remission of sinnes shadowed forth in Noahs arke as the Apostle sheweth 1 Peter 3.22 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. Originall sinne by propagation not imitation 1. vers 3. IN that Adam begat a sonne in the likenesse of his owne image which before is interpreted of originall corruption the heresie of the Pelagians is confuted who denied any such originall sinne or depravation of nature to be in infants by propagation from their parents but that it commeth onely by a corrupt imitation this was the heresie of the old Pelagians who affirmed Peccatum prima transgressionis in alios homines non propagations sed imitatione transisset that the sinne of the first transgression passeth unto other men not by propagation but imitation which heresie seemeth to have beene revived by Catherinus a Popish writer who denieth that the sinne of Adam is propagated or transfused to his posterity But the Scripture evidently overthroweth this assertion David confesseth hee was conceived in sinne Psal. 51.5 the Apostle saith That death went â—ver all in as much as all have sinned children then if they had not sinne should not die and here Seth is begotten in his fathers image 2. Doct. Originall sinne not a substance 2. THeir opinion is confuted that hold originall sinne to be a substance for like as the image of God wherein Adam was created was not the substance of the soule but the quality as the Apostle expoundeth which consist in holinesse and righteousnesse Ephes. 4.24 so the image of Adams corrupt nature consisteth in the contrary qualities of impurity and injustice 3. Doct. The state of originall sinne in soule 3. THe opinion of Papists is refuted who affirme that this originall corruption hath the seat and place in the flesh not in the soule for this image of corruption was in Adams soule and therefore the Apostle saith he renewed in the spirit of our mindes Ephes. 4 24. and put off the old man c. and put on the new which is renewed in knowledge after the image of him that created him Coloss. 3.10 there the corrupt image of Adam succeeded where Gods image is decayed which was in the soule for there the place of knowledge is 5. Places of confutation 1. Confut. Henoch was no licentious liver at any time IN that vers 21. after the generation Henoch is said to walke with God and not before Procopius Gazeus thinketh that Henoch was before a wicked liver but after repented But the contrary is â—vident in that it pleased God with such extraordinarie favour to take Henoch out of the world that he saw no death that he was as a shining starre for vertue and holinesse in that age 2. Confut. Henoch died not WHereas vers 23. it is said all the dayes of Henoch were 365. Albâ—n Ezra with other Hebrewes thinke that Henoch died for if he were still alive these should not be all his dayes Cont. 1. The Scripture maketh mention onely of the yeares of his life upon earth his yeares with God are not to bee accounted among men as the Apostle saith of Christ who in the dayes of his flesh Heb. 5.7 he is now in his flesh in heaven but these are counted the dayes of his flesh when he walked in his flesh among men 2. The Apostle evidently witnesseth that Henoch was taken away that he should not see death Heb. 11.5 he therefore died not 3. Confut. Henoch not alive in his flesh BEcause it is said that God tooke away or translated Henoch the Popish writers doe imagine that Henoch is yet alive in his flesh in Paradise together with Elias Contra. seeing that Elias is said to bee taken up into heaven or that he went into heaven 2 King 2.11 where Henoch also walked with God we cannot beleeve that they entred heaven in their whole humanity but that prerogative was to be reserved for Christ seeing the Apostle saith that he hath prepared a now and living way into the holy place for us by his vaile that is his flesh Heb. 10.20 Christs flesh therefore must make a way into heaven before any mans flesh beside can enter 4. Confut. Henoch not in the terestriall Paradise BUt because they also affirme that Henoch liveth in his flesh not in heaven but in the terestriall Paradise and it is against the faith as some of them say to thinke otherwise the vanity of this opinion shall easily appeare 1. Because the Scripture saith that every thing was destroyed upon the face of the earth and onely eight persons were saved in the Arke therefore Henoch if he had beene upon the earth must have perished 2. The waters prevailed fifteene cubits over the highest mountaine Genes 7.20 therefore the earthly Paradise must needs also have beene ouerflowne and destroyed 3. If they answer that Paradise might be hemmed in with the water which might stand as a wall round about
it as the water in the red sea did or that though it were covered with water it might be preserved as the Olive tree whereof the Dove tooke a branch or that God might restore Paradise againe after the floud the first is presumptuous to imagine a miracle without warrant of Scripture and if it had beene so Noah needed not to have made an arke he and his sonnes and the cattell might have beene preserved there the second is not sufficient for though Paradise which is not like had beene so preserved yet Henoch must have beene drowned The third is frivolous for if the terrene Paradise had beene planted againe seeing it was situated in a knowne place in Mesopotamia it could not have beene hid In this question Pererius is an adversary to Bellarmine Senens and the rest that yet dreame of a terrene Paradise 5. Confut. Henoch shall returne into the world to die IT is also the constant opinion of the popish writers that Henoch shall come againe toward the end of the world and then shall die being to be slaine by Antichrist Pererius cum Bellarm. Cont. But this is contrary to the Apostle That Henoch was taken away that he should not see death neither was found Heb. 11.5 Ergo Henoch shall not see death nor bee found in a mortall state in earth whereas they object that place Heb. 9.27 It is appointed unto men that they shall once die The answer is ready like as they which are alive at Christs comming shall not die but be changed 1 Cor. 15. which notwithstanding shall bee in stead of death so Henoch was changed in his taking up though he died not a common death 6. Confut. Henoch shall not returne to preach repentance to the world COncerning the end and causes wherefore Henoch was translated 1. Wee admit that God hereby would put the righteous in comfort that notwithstanding the sentence pronounced against Adam there was a way of righteousnesse whereby to recover Adams lost state 2. To minister comfort to the afflicted members of Christ that they should not doubt but that their reward is with God as Habel though he had an untimely end yet lived with God as Henoch did thus Theodoret. 3. Wee refuse not the collection here of Thomas Aquinas that God both by Henochs translation before the law and Elias under the law would nourish the hope of life in his Church as by types representing the ascension of Christ in whom the promise of salvation should be accomplished These causes of Henochs translation may safely be received 4. But we neither thinke as it is in the booke of Wisdome which is no Canonicall Scripture and therefore we may safely dissent from it That hee was taken away lest wickednesse should alter his understanding for as he walked with God before God kept him in his feare and preserved him from evill so he could have guided him still as the Apostle saith He shall be established God is able to make him stand Rom. 14.4 speaking of the faithfull servants of God as Mathuselah the sonne of Henoch being the longest lived of all the Patriarkes continued righteous to the end 5. Neither is that surmise fit to be received that Henoch is kept alive to preach repentance in the end of the world and to maintaine the Gospell against Antichrist which is the common opinion of the papall professors For of Henochs preaching in the end of the world there is no mention in Scripture but only of the sending of Elias which is not understood of Elias person but of his spirit and zeale And this Elias the Angell expoundeth to be Iohn Baptist who should goe before Christ in the spirit and power of Elias And there is no such necessity that Henoch should be preserved so many yeares by miracle to that end seeing the Lord is able to raise up Prophets and Ministers as he did Iohn Baptist in the spirit of Elias and Henoch to maintaine the truth against the Pope and Antichrist which we see plentifully performed in these dayes 7. Confut. Of the Prophesie and booke of Henoch WHereas S. Inde in his Epistle vers 14. maketh mention of the Prophesie of Henoch the seventh from Adam which is not found in any other part of the Canonicall Scripture lest the adversaries might hereupon build their traditions and unwritten verities I will briefly declare what is to be thought of this Prophesie of Henoch 1. I neither thinke with Tertullian that there was any such propheticall booke of Henoch then extant who conjectureth that though it perished in the floud yet it might be restored againe by Noah thereunto inspired 2. Neither yet with Hierome that this booke of Henoch was an Apocriphall booke yet some part of it might be true which the Apostle might alleage For it is not like that the Apostle would derive a testimony from an hidden and obscure booke of no authority in the Church 3. Neither yet is it like as Michael Medina thinketh that there was no such booke at all under Henochs name for the fathers Origen Hierome Augustine doe in many places make evident mention that such a booke there was but thought it to be forged 4. And it is as unlike that the true book of Henoch was extant in the Apostles time which was afterward corrupted with fables and so rejected of the Church for then the Church would rather have purged the true booke from such errours and preserved the rest pure as they did discerne the true Gospels from the forged and adulterate Our opinion then is 1. With Augustine that the booke of Henoch which in his time was produced by Heretikes was altogether forged and no part of it of Henochs writing Non quod eorum hominum qui Deo placuorunt reprobetur authoritas sed quod ista non creduntur ipsorum not that saith he we refuse the authoritie of such men as pleased God but for that they were thought not to be theirs 2. We judge it not unlike with Origen that there might be such an authenticall booke of Henochs prophesie out of the which Iude did take his testimony which is now lost as some other parts of the Canonicall Scripture are as the books of God Nathan Iddâ— and other Prophets mentioned in the Chronicles 3. Or this prophesie of Henoch might be preserved by faithfull tradition in the Church of the Iewes which is approved by the Apostle But this is no warrant for other unwritten traditions unlesse some had the like Apostlike spirit to judge of them as Iudas had and further this prophesie of Henoch is a greeable to the Scriptures so are not many unwritten traditions urged by the Church of Rome 6. Places of exhortation 1. IN that the line only of the race of the faithfull is rehearsed in this chapter it both sheweth that God will alwaies have his church in the world and that in the most corrupt times God will have a remnant that shall
prudence 4. And yet Athenaeus reporteth that Hiero King of Sicilie caused a ship to be made of such bignesse that there went unto it as much timber as sufficed to make 60. other ships three hundred workmen beside labourers were employed one whole yeere in this worke there were in it three divisions one above another and twenty rankes of oares it had also within it a fish-pond wherein were great and small fish the received report of this great galliasse may move them not to be so incredulous concerning the Arke Vers. 10. Noah begat three sonnes c. Because Noah was five hundred yeare old before he begat any children and afterward abstained an hundred yeare for so long it was to the floud and begat no more children hence Pererius inferreth that the gift of continency is not impossible against certaine heretikes as he calleth them meaning protestants Contra. 1. It is untrue that we affirme this gâ—ft to be impossible but we say that it is rare neither is in every mans power to obtaine as they teach that any man that will may have that gift it followeth not because Noah had that gift of abstinence that all therfore are capable of it S. Paul saith every man hath his proper gift of god one after this manner another after that 1 Cor. 7.7 it is then a proper gift to some not common to all 2. And though Noah was a chast and temperate man in marriage yet it may be doubted whether he continued so long unmarried or did forbeare so long after 6. Places of exhortation and morall duties nt 1. Vers. 2. The sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were faire We see the fruits of such marriâ—ge as is enterprised only upon a carnall appetite and with persons of a diverse profession therefore the Apostle saith be not unequally yoaked c. 2. Vers. 3. My spirit shall not alwayes strive c. Gods mercy appeareth that threatneth before he punisheth that by his threatning men might learne to amend â—ut nobis correctis miâ—as ad opus minime perducat that we being amended his menacing need take no effect Chrysost. so the Apostle saith despisest thou the riches of the bountifulnesse of God c. not knowing that the bountifulnesse of God leadeth thee to repentance Rom. 2.4 3. Vers. 4. There were Giants By this we see that they which fall away doe run â—rom one extreme to another as these which were in outward profession the sonnes and worshippers of God falling away became cruell and outragious tyrants of such the Apostle saith that it is impossible that they which were once lightned if they fall away should be renued by repentance Heb. 6.5 6. 4. Vers. 9. Noe was a just man in his â—ime Though all the world even where Noe lived were given unto wickednesse yet the Lord preserved him We learne therefore that although we be environed on every side with the wicked yet we should not doubt but that the Lord is able to preserve his and that therefore as the Apostle saith we should shine as lights in the world in the midst of a naughty crooked nation Phil. 2.15 CHAP. VII 1. The Method THis Chapter hath two parts 1. of the entrance of Noah and the creatures into the â—rke from v. 1. to v. 10. 2. concerning the floud 1. God prescribeth what Noah should doe for himselfe vers 1. for the â—easts and fowles as touching their number of some to take seven of some â—wo for their kinde male and female vers 3. the reason expressed vers 4. Then Noah sheweth his obedience in entring himselfe vers 6.13 and the â—easts vers 8 9. the creeping things and fowles shew their obedience in comming vers 14.15 Gods providence in shutting of them up vers 16. 2. First the causes of the floud are set forth vers 11. secondly the manner in the time when it came after seven dayes vers 10 how long it prevailed forty dayes vers 12. how farre it exceeded vers 20. how long it continued before it abated that is an 150. dayes vers 24. thirdly the effects of the floud it beareth up the Arke vers 17. it destroyeth all flesh beside those in the Arke vers 21. to 23. 2. The grammaticall or literall sense v. 5. yet 7. dayes S. before 7. dayes that is expired T. after 7. dayes cater v. 4. I will destroy all the resurrection 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 S. all the substance caet heb teâ—hem a substance or living body any thing that riseth from the ground v. 8. the seven and twenty day S. the seventeenth day caet v. 10. and upon the seventh day T. after seven dayes caet v. 13 in this day 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 S. in articulo in the point or article of this day H. Ch. in the selfe saâ—day B.G.T. in the body of this day heb gneâ—sem a body v. 14. every bird of every feather wanting in the S. the rest have it v. 16. God shut his Arke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 without S. God shut him in deforis without H. God protected over him Ch. shut him in round about B. shut him in G. God occlusit pro eo shut up for him T. bagnado over him heb The explanation of doubts or theologicall explication QVEST I. Why Noah prayed not for the old world as Abraham did for Sodome Vers. 1. THey have seene righteous before me c. 1. He was not onely righteous in respect of men but before God his righteousnesse was in truth 2. Whereas before Moses added that hee was just and upright Gen. 2.9 the Hebrewes hence gather because he is not here also said to bee upright but only just that he is commended only because hee was not unjust and cruell towards men But seeing it is said he was just before God the other addition need not for God seeth the heart 3. The Hebrewes doe further extenuate Noahs faith some saying that he thought not that God would destroy the world but that he threatned onely some that Noah only prayed for himselfe and not for the world as Abraham did for the Sodomites and therefore for these his oversights hee afterward offered sacrifice But they blame Noah without cause the reason why he prayed not as Abraham did for others for that hee saw them incorrigible and already God had given sentence that the world should be destroyed but when Abraham prayed for Sodome no sentence was as yet gone forth against them The sacrifice which Noah offered afterward was an oblation of thankesgiving for his deliverance not a deprecation for any such particular offence Mercer QVEST. II. Of the difference of cleane and uncleane beasts Vers. 2. OF every cleane beast c. 1. Some beasts were counted cleane some uncleane not simpl◠〈◊〉 respect of their nature and creation for God saw that all things were good neither in regard onely of mans use because some were more fit for food than others but chiefly by
their usuall food before the floud as it is now as seemeth to thinke Dominicus à Soto a Popish Writer for when as yet the earth and plants were not corrupted by the floud but retained their naturall force and vigour they yeelded more sufficient nourishment so that the eating of flesh was not then so necessary and as the more delicate use of some plants as the use of Wine by Noah was brought in afterward so much flesh of fowles and beasts did grow in request after the floud which was not covered before 5. Wherefore the sounder opinion is that not onely the eating of flesh was permitted before the floud but used not onely among the prophane race but with the faithfull though with greater moderation Our reasons are these 1. Because there is made no new grant neither in this nor in the rest as of multiplying and bearing dominion c. but onely the ancient privileges granted to man confirmed 2. The distinction of cleane beasts which it was lawfull for them to eat and the uncleane whereof they might not eat Levit. 13.8.3 It is evident by the oblation of Abel who offered the first fruit of his sheepe and the faâ— of them but it had beene no praise to Abel to offer the fatlings if he used not to eat of them it had beene all one to God whether to offer leane or fat but herein Abel is commended because he preferred the service of God before his owne private use and therefore Iustinus well collecteth Si anâ—e posuit Abel utilitatisâ—a Deum non dubium quia solitus fit ex labore suo utilitatem percipere If Abel did preferre God before his profit certainly he did reape profit of his labour and to the same purpose he alleageth that saying of the Apostle Who feedeth a flocke and eateth not of the milke thereof 1 Cor. 9.7 and by the same reason also of the flesh thereof 4. In that expresse mention is here first made of eating of flesh it is not as one well resolveth quantum ad usum in respect of the use sed quantum ad necessitatem in regard of the necessity The food of flesh beganne now to be more necessary because the plants and herbs had lost the first naturall vigour and strength QVEST. IIII. Whaâ— the meaning is of eating the flesh with the life or bloud 4. BVt flesh with the life thereof that is the bloud c. 1. This word anima in Hebrew nephesh translated life is taken foure wayes in Scripture first for man as the soule that sinneth shall die Ezek. 18. Secondly for the reasonable soule feare not those that can kill the body but cannot kill the soule Matth. 10. Thirdly it is taken for the inferiour part of the soule that is the affection as thou shalt love the Lord with all thy heart and soule Matth. 22. Fourthly it is taken for the life as a good shepherd will lay downe his life for his sheepe Ioh. 10. and so it is taken in this place for the bloud is the seat and chariot of the life and vitall spirics 2. These words are neither figuratively taken as Eugubinus thinketh for the shedding of mans bloud because he that killeth a man seemeth to devour his flesh for in this sense the words should have no coherence at all with the former verse and where words may be taken in their proper sense without any inconvenience a figure is not to be enforced neither is it all one to eat flesh with the bloud thereof and to eat things strangled as Chrysostome collecteth for the Apstoles distinctly speake of bloud and things strangled Act. 15. Neither is the eating of live flesh here onely prohibited as Cajetanus conjectureth or of hot bloud as Mercer for from this bruitish kinde of food the very nature of man abhorreth and therefore it needed not so especially to be provided for by precept But here generally the eating of the bloud with the flesh is forbidden whether together with the flesh alive or dead or separated from the flesh as to drinke it or to eat it as now the use is in confected meats QVEST. V. Wherefore the eating of bloud was prohibited NOw whereas the eating of bloud was forbidden both before the Law and under the Law Levit. 17. and after the Law in the beginning of the Gospell Act. 15. it shall be profitable to consider the causes of this prohibition First it was forbidden before the Law 1. Not so much for decencie and comelinesse or for that bloud is a grosse and heavy food 2. But either that aforehand by these ceremoniall precepts mens minds might be prepared the better to beare the yoke of the Law which afterward should be promulgated 3. Or rather that by this precept of abstaining from bloud men might be the more terrified from the shedding of mans bloud sic Chrysost. Secondly this law was revived Levit. 17.11 12. whereof two reasons are given one civill because the life of the flesh is the bloud that they should forbeare from all shew of cruelty and so much the more detest the shedding of mans bloud the other religious because I have given the bloud to offer at the Altar the bloud the organ of life is holy unto God the Author of life and therefore they should not pollute or prophane it by devouring thereof Thirdly the Apostles did forbid the eating of things strangled and bloud 1. Not because among the Gentiles suffocated things were held to be the food of evill spirits as Origen writeth for it is not like that the Apostles would ground their decree upon such heathenish fantasies 2. Neither by bloud is homicide forbidden and by things suffocated uncleane as some thinke for the Apostles would not use obscure and mysticall tearmes in their decree and these things were already provided for by law among the Gentiles 3. Neither did the Apostles forbid these things onely to restraine intemperancie for many kinds of food are more delicate and to be defiâ—ed than these 4. But Augustine sheweth the true cause of this prohibition Quâ—dideo fâ—ctum est quia elâ— gere voluerunt Apostoli pro tempore rem facilem c. This was decreed because the Apostles for a while would chuse some easie thing not burdensome to the observers which the Gentiles might observe in common with the Iewes c. Thus Augustine disputing against Faustus This the Apostles did onely for a time lest the beleeving Jewes who could hardly all at once be removed from the legall rites might have beene offended at the libertie of the Gentiles but now this cause being removed and there being no such feare this decree also is expired QVEST. VI. How this prohibition dependeth of the former verse Vers. 5. FOr surely I will require your bloud c. 1. Which words are neither an exposition of the former verse as Eugubinus who by the eating of flesh with the bloud understandeth figuratively the shedding of mans bloud 2. Neither is the
in the Psalme speaketh not of that righteousnesse whereby Phinehes was originally counted just before God for that was by faith because that without faith it is impossible to please God Heb. 11.6 but of that righteousnesse whereby Phinehes faith was declared and testified and so this his zealous fact because of his faith was counted a righteous worke But Moses here speaketh of that originall justice whereby Abraham was justified before God Like as S. Paul denying that Abraham was justified by workes Rom. 4.2 and Saint Iames affirming that hee was justified through workes Iam. 2.21 the first speaketh of justification properly before God the other of the same testified and declared by workes so Moses treateth of justice imputed by faith before God by an originall collation from God the other Prophet of justice imputed by a zealous worke by way of effectuall declaration before men And therefore Moses saith he that is God imputed Abrahams beleefe to him for righteousnesse But the other Prophet saith it was imputed to him for righteousnesse from generation to generation that is hereby Phinehes in all ages was knowne to be reputed and taken just before God the Lord rewarding the zeale of Phinehes with the perpetuall inheritance of the Priesthood Numb 25.13 4. Confut. Faith not the beginning only of justification FOurthly another point of popish doctrine is here overthrowen that a man is said to bee justified by faith because it is the beginning of salvation and â—donea praeparatio hominis a fit preparation of a man unto justification Perer. in 15. Genes disput 3. numer 42. But Abraham was not now only prepared or beginning to be justified for he had done already many excellent workes of righteousnesse acceptable unto God and yet being not now onely entred but set in the middest of his godly course hee is counted righteous by faith faith then is not the beginning only but the perfection and consummation of righteousnesse 5. Confut. S. Paul and S. Iames cannot be reconciled by popish doctrine FIfthly whereas Saint Paul proving Abraham to have beene justified by faith without workes Rom. 4.2.5 and S. Iames saying that Abraham was justified through workes seeme at the first shew to bee contrary each to other the Popish writers goe about three wayes to reconcile these places first the Rhemists note that Saint Paul excludeth Abrahams morall workes before faith annot 1. in Rom. 4. and by such workes they grant a man is not justified but by such as follow and proceed of faith Contra. Abraham before this time when God imputed unto him righteousnesse by faith had done divers faithfull workes as the Apostle sheweth that by faith hee when he was called obeyed God c. and by faith abode in the land of promise Hebr. 11.8 9. therefore the Apostle speaking of Abrahams justification by faith after he had done these faithfull workes excludeth even such workes also from justification And againe he saith to him that worketh the wages is not counted by favour but by debt but to workes done before or without faith no wages is due because without faith nothing is pleasing to God therefore he meaneth not such workes Secondly Bellarmine saith that Saint Paul speaketh de fide charitate formata of a faith formed with charity and furnished with good workes lib. 1. de justificat c. 23. and such a faith truly justifieth Answer True it is that Abrahams faith which Saint Paul so much commendeth was a lively and working faith yet it did not justifie him as it was active in bringing forth good workes but as it was passive in apprehending and laying on hold of the righteousnesse of God As the Apostle sheweth that Abrahams manner of justifying and Davids was all one but David declareth that man blessed to whom God imputeth righteousnesse without workes Rom. 4 6. further Saint Paul thus reasoneth being fully assured that he which had promised was able to doe it and therefore it was imputed to him for righteousnesse c. v. 21 22. It was not imputed for the working of his faith but for his beleeving Thirdly Pererius useth a distinction of first and second justification the first is when a man of a sinner is made just the second when a just man becommeth more just disput 3. in 15. Genes numer 48. of the first they say Saint Paul speaketh of the second S. Iames. Bellar. de justif lib. 4. c. 18. Contra 1. The Scripture knoweth no such distinction of first and second justification that which they call the second justification is no other but sanctification which is an increasing and going forward in the fruits and further assurance of justification the Prophet saying blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven speaketh of that justification when a man of a sinner is become just before God which they call the first justification but to that blessednesse is promised and where happinesse or blessednesse is obtained no other justification is necessary wherefore the first and one justification sufficeth there need not a second 2. Further this distinction admitted Saint Paul rather should intreat of the second justification because he alleageth the example of Abraham who was called already and had done many righteous workes before the Scripture maketh mention of the imputation of righteousnesse unto him by faith and S. Iames of the first who bringeth in the example of Rahab the harlot now first called which had done no worthy workes before Wherefore thus Saint Paul and Saint Iames are reconciled if wee say that S. Paul understandeth that justification whereby Abraham was made just before God for he saith if Abraham were justified by workes he hath wherein to rejoyce but not with God Rom. 4.2 he meaneth then that justification wherein a man may rejoyce with God which is by faith But S. Iames speaketh of that justification whereby a man is declared to be just before men whereby our faith is justified to bee a true faith as hee saith shew mee thy faith out of thy workes v. 18. he urgeth the shewing and approving of faith so hee saith Abraham was justified thorow faith when he offred his sonne Isaak v. 21. yet before God Abraham was justified before by faith but by this his obedience his faith was approved unto God and made knowne to men Neither is it usuall in Scripture thus to take the word justified as wisdome is said to bee justified of her children Matth. 11.13 that is declared or approved to bee just Christ was justified in the spirit 1 Timoth. 3.16 that is as the Apostle elsewhere interpreteth declared mightily to be the sonne of God touching the spirit of sanctification Rom. 2.4 6. Morall observations 1. Observ. God amply rewardeth them that contemne things present Vers. 1. I Am thy exceeding great reward c. Because Abraham contemned the rich gifts of the King of Sodome the Lord doth promise more abundantly to recompence him therefore as Ambrose well noteth ne infirmos animos ob dilationem mercedis subeat
even in that place in the wildernesse she had seene an Angell Mercer 7. But the right and proper meaning is that she seeth that is liveth after shee had seene God for they thought no man could see God and live and therefore Iacob also said I have seene God face to face and my life is preserved Gen. 32.30 QVEST. XI Who is understood by the living and seeing Vers. 14. THe well of him that loâ—eth and seeth 1. Some referre both unto God 2. some to the Angell who as Gods Minister though not as God liveth and seeth 3. Some living understand of Ismael that lived 4. But Hagar saying the well of the living and seeing by living understandeth her selfe that lived after this glorious sight by seeing God which seeth our afflictions QVEST. XII Of Cades and Sur. BEtweene Cadesh and Bered 1. These were two places in the wildernesse of Sur which extended to the red sea 2. Cadesh is that place where the water gushed out of the Rocke and the people murmured against God Numb 20. 3. It is called a well and before a fountaine because it was a deepe fountaine for as Augustine saith omnis putens fons non omnis fons puteus Every well may be called a fountaine not euery fountaine a well QVEST. XIII Why Abraham not Hagar gave the name to Ismael Vers. 15. ABraham called his name Ismael c. 1. Before it is said thou shalt call and here Abraham giveth the name as he had learned of Hagar and so in effect she gave it Perer. 2. For the Lord would not by his oracle diminish the right of the father to whom it belonged to give the name Muscul. as Eva is said to have given Seth his name Genes 4.25 yet Adam first called him so Gen. 5.3 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. Evill must not be done that good may come thereof Vers. 2. I Pray thee goe in unto my maid it may be I shall be builded by her c. Sâ—ra though shee had a good intent that Gods promise concerning Abrahams seed might be accomplished yet shee doth not well to use unlawfull meanes that Abraham may have this seed by a concubine for according to Saint Pauls rule we must not doe evill that good may come thereof Rom. 3.8 And this device of Sara prospered not she being so farre from being builded and increased hereby that the posterity of the seed of Ismael the Ismaelites and Hagarenes became enemies afterward to her owne seed Musculus 2. Doct. They that punish justly are not persecutors Vers. 6. SArai dealt roughly with her Augustine from this example collecteth that they alwayes which inflict punishment are not persecutors and that discipline may be administred justly against the obstinate as Sarai dealt with Hagar Hagar passa est persecutionem à Sara hac tamen sancta erat qua faciebat illa iniqua quae patiebatur Hagar suffered persecution of Sara and yet she was holy that did it the other evill that suffered it Epist. 50. 3. Doct. Religion no enemie to politicke order Vers. 9. HVmble thy selfe under her hands Hagar was a bond-servant whose condition then was very hard yet the Lord commandeth her to returne to her mistresse we see then that religion dissolveth not politicke order neither is the doctrine of faith a doctrine of licentious liberty Hagar though now come to herselfe and called of God yet is not to renounce her condition and state of life according to Saint Pauls rule Let every man abide in the same calling wherein he is called c. 1 Cor. 7.10 Luther 4. Doct. The office of Angels THe Angell of the Lord said to her c. This is the first place that maketh mention of the apparition of Angels This Angel is sent to call home againe Hagâ—r to her station and calling so the Angels chiefe office is to protect the servants of God and to bring home againe those that erre so as the Apostle saith They are all ministring spirits sent forth to minister for their sakes that shall be heires of salvation Heb. 1.14 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Polygamie of the fathers never lawfull or dispensed with Vers. 3. THen Sarai Abrahams wife tooke Agar 1. Some thinke that Abrahams marriage or copulation rather with Hagar was lawfull and that Sarai was moved of God to perswade this marriage to Abraham Ioseph lib. 1. antiquit But this no where appeareth for though God approved Sarai her advice for the casting out of the bond-woman with her sonne Gen. 21.8 yet it followeth not that God liked of her counsell in Abrahams taking her to be his wife 2. Some thinke that adultery was not yet forbidden by any law Ambrose because Abraham was both before the Law and the Gospell he thinketh him to have beene blamelesse Durandus also and Tostatus are of opinion that polygamie was lawfull before it was forbidden by the positive law of the Gospell But the saying of our Saviour a principio non fuit sic from the beginning it was not so sufficiently confuteth these assertions seeing God in Paradise made unto Adam but one Eva one wife for one husband 3. Some simply allowed not the polygamie of the fathers but hold that it was permitted by some speciall dispensation for those times and so though they will not simply justifie it yet they qualifie and excuse it by these reasons 1. Theodoret saith neque natura neque lex ulla tunc scripta c. Neither nature nor any written law did forbid then the having of many wives Cont. Though no law were yet written that made any such prohibition yet they had the law of the creation they two shall be one flesh Matth. 19.5 which was continued by faithfull tradition and the lively examples of the Patriarks 2. This marriage proceeded not of any intemperate lust but was done studio quarendae posteritatis of a desire to increase posterity Ambr. Cont. The Apostle for this hath given us a rule not to doe evill that good may come thereon Rom. 3.8 Abrahams good intention doth not excuse an unlawfull action 3. Abraham did it not of himselfe Augustine saith Voluntatem illius non voluptatem suam implevisse accepisse non petisse that he fulfilled not his owne lust but his wives desire he asked her not but received her And he to this purpose urgeth the Apostle words that the man hath not power over his owne body but the woman 1 Cor. 7. Contra. If this were a good defence then Adams excuse also might have served because the woman gave him thâ— apple and he did eat The Apostle giveth the woman power over her husbands body and the man likewise over the womans to performe mutually the matrimoniall duties but the woman can no more give liberty to the husband to joyne unto strange flesh than the husband can unto the woman As the Apostle in the same place restraineth that liberty Let every man have his wife let every woman have her husband 1.
land mounting c. Abraham saw not the raine of fire and brimstone but the smoake onely thereof and yet he rose very early so that it seemeth the burning of Sodome was done in a moment for the raine fell not till Lot was entred into Zoar which was about the Sunne rising vers 23. By this we may see how suddenly the world at Christs comming shall be consumed with fire and we changed in a moment in the twinkling of an eye 1 Cor. 15.52 Muscul. 6. Doct. Wherefore unlawfull copulations are often more fruitfull than lawfull Vers. 36. THus were both the daughters of Lot with childe c. We finde in Scripture that many lawfully companying with their husbands as Sara Rebecca Rachel Anna yet hardly conceived and yet divers with one unlawfull copulation were with childe as Thamar with Iuda Bersebe with David Lots daughters with their father which the Lord doth not as more favouring such unlawfull conjunctions but to this end that such secret uncleane works should come to light for their conversion as in Iuda David or confusion Marlor 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Vniversality no sure marke of the Church Vers. 4. ALL the people from all quarters All rhe whole City of Sodome consented in evill onely Lot and his family were free Universality then is but a slender or uncertaine argument of the truth or Church that professeth it It is oftner seene that the greater part is the worse than otherwise The Romanists therefore reason but simply that their religion is the best because the greater part of the world received it for by the same reason the uncleane conversation of Sodome might bee justified against Lot 2. Confut. Against Atheists that beleeve not the transmutation of Lots wiâ—â— Vers. 26. SHe became a pillar of salt Let not prophane persons scoffe at this as though it were one of Ovids Metamorphosis fables There is a great difference betweene Gods actions and Poets fictions he that beleeveth that God made all things of nothing which dayly seeth birds to come forth of egges and living creatures to be ingendred by dead seed and hopeth for the resurrection of the body cannot doubt but that God could turne a womans body into a salty pillar 3. Confut. Monkish and solitary life maketh not more holy Vers. 38. HE dwelt in a cave Even Lot in a solitary cave committed sinne it is not then the place that amendeth mens manners Gregory well saith sic desit spiritus non adjuvat locus If an heart be wanting the place helpeth not Lot sinned in the mountaine Adam fell in Paradise the Angels in heaven It is then but a Popish fantasie that a Monks coule a cloister life an Hermites weed can make a man more holy But it is to be feared that as dtunkennesse and incest were committed even in the cave so the Gloisters and Cells of Popish votaries are not free from the like uncleannesse 6. Places of morall observation 1. Observ. Vnruly people to be gently handled Vers. 7. I Pray you my brethren doe not so wickedly c. Lot sheweth that a furious multitude is to be gently dealt withall and not to be exasperated with sharpe words as here Lot calleth the Sodomites his brethren not in the same profession but in respect of his cohabitation and common condition of life This is S. Pauls rule Instructing them with meeknesse that are contrary minded 2 Tim. 2.25 2. Observ. God delivereth in extremity Vers. 10. THe men put forth their hands and pulled Lot c. The Lord though he deferre his helpe yet will not faile us in the greatest danger when we are brought to a straight As here Lot was delivered from the Sodomites as from raging Lions when he was as under their pawes Calvin In the like pinch the Lord delivered David when Saul had compassed him in 1 Sam. 23.26 3. Observ. Prophane persons make a mocke of Gods judgements Vers. 14. HE seemed to his sons in law as though he had mocked c. Such are the prophane Atheists and worldlings that make but a mocke and scorne of Gods judgements and are no better perswaded of the end of the world by fire than these wretches were of the destruction of Sodome of such S. Peter speaketh That there shall be in the last dayes mockers c. which shall say where is the promise of his comming c. 2 Pet. 3.3 Calvin 4. Observ. We must not deferre our turning to God Vers. 16. AS he prolonged the time By Lots example who delaying the time if God had not beene more mercifull to draw him forth might have perished in the overthrow of Sodome wee are taught how dangerous a thing it is to deferre our calling and to trifle or dally with Gods judgements Therefore the Prophet Amos saith Prepare to meet thy God O Israel Amos 4.12 better to meet and prevent the Lord by repentance than to stay till his judgements overtake us 5. Observ. We must not forsake our calling Vers. 26. HIs wife looked backe This teacheth us that a man should not fall away from his profession and calling whereinto he is once entred as our Saviour saith He that setteth his hand to the plowe and looketh back is not fit for the kingdome of God Luk 9.26 Muscul. 6. Obser. He that wavereth in faith is never setled Vers. 28. NOt so my Lord Lot not following the Lords direction to goe first to the mountaine entreateth for Zoar yet being in Zoar he is not contented to stay there So they which doe not submit themselves to Gods ordinance but are doubtfull in faith are unconstant and wavering and never setled as Saint Iames saith A wavering minded man is unstable in all his wayes 7. Observ. Custome and continuance in sinne dangerous Vers. 35. THey made their father drunke that night also c. We see then what a dangerous thing it is once to give way to the tentation of Satan Lot having beene once drunken already is more apt to fall into it againe so fearefull is a custome and continuance in sinne Our instruction is therefore that we should resist the temptation at the first and not by yeelding to give way for a second assault 〈◊〉 the Apostle saith Be not overcome of evill but overcome evill with goodnesse Rom. 12.21 8. Observ. The sinne of drunkennesse how dangerous FUrther we see how much drunkennesse is to be taken heed of which did prostitute Lot so excellent a man to such beastly uncleannesse Origen well noteth Decepit Lot ebrietas quem Sodoma non decepit uritur ebrius flammis mulierum quem sobriam sulphurea flamma non attigerat drunkennesse deceived Lot whom Sodome could not deceive he burneth with the lust of women being drunken whom while he was sober the flames of brimstone touched not Wherefore let us alwayes remember that saying of the Apostle Be not drunke with wine wherein is excesse but be ye fulfilled with the spirit Eph. 5.15 CHAP. XX. 1. The Method THis Chapter hath
swearing by his holinesse goodnesse c. doth pledge them that unlesse that be which he saith he will lose them and swearing by himselfe he bindeth his Godhead for the performance as though he should say in effect If this be not let me be no more God Calvin QVEST. XXI Why the Lord tooke an oath BUt further it will be asked what need God had to take an oath seeing the word of God is certaine of it selfe and need no confirmation and an oath is used in doubtfull cases but to God nothing is doubtfull or uncertaine an oath is used when the party cannot be credited without an oath but Abraham did beleeve God The answer then is this 1. The Lord sweareth not to any such end as though any more credit and certainty by his oath might bee wonne unto his promise 2. And yet wee take not this to bee a metaphoricall speech onely with Cajetan that God is said to sweare by himselfe 3. But the Lord taketh an oath ad ampliorem confirmationem fidei nostra for the better confirmation of our faith and hee doth it the Apostle saith ex abundanti more abundantly to shew the stablenesse of his counsell Heb. 6.17 Calvin 4. Where we may note the differences betweene this oath and other oathes 1. God taketh this oath willingly not forced thereto of any necessity 2. He sweareth by himselfe as having not a greater to sweare by and Philo sheweth the reason Solus de seipso asseverare potest quia solus ipse suam novit naturam He only can beare witnesse of himselfe because he only knoweth his owne nature 3. He also further saith Sententiae nostra ex juramento fides accedit ipsi juramento ex ipso Deo fides astruitur Our sentence is credited because of our oath but this oath is beleeved because of God that taketh it QUEST XXII Whether the promises here made are new or the old renewed Vers. 18. IN thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed 1. It is of all hands confessed that the other three promises were made unto Abraham before 1. That Abraham should be blessed Genes 12.2 2. That his seed should be multiplied as the starres and as the sand of the sea Genes 13.16 3. That his seed should possesse the gate of his enemies which is in effect the same with that Genes 13.12 all this land will I give thee c. God promised Abraham the land of the Canaanites which were his enemies 2. But Ambrose thinketh that this was a new blessing containing a promise of the Messiah lib. 1. de Abraham c. 8. Paulus Burgensis confirmeth the same by these reasons because Saint Paul rehearseth this as a speciall blessing concerning Christ urging these words in thy seed which are onely found here and the Lord confirmeth this by an oath as Zachary in his song maketh mention of this oath which hee sware to our father Abraham Luke 1.73 3. But these reasons are easily answered 1. Saint Paul citeth rather that promise made Genes 12.3 in thee shall all the Gentiles be blessed Galath 3.8 for hee speaketh of that promise which was made 430. yeares before the law which must needs be that former given to Abraham at the 75. yeare of his age but there will want 50. yeares of that summe if the account should begin at this time when Abraham was 125. yeares old And whereas Saint Paul also alludeth unto this place v. 16. and thy seed and so expoundeth one place by another he sheweth that in effect they are both but one promise 2. The adding of the oath maketh it not a new promise but confirmeth onely the former otherwise by this reason all these promises should be newly made seeing the oath goeth before them all and indeed not onely this promise of the Messiah but the other also concerning the possessing of the land of Canaan was ratified by an oath Exod. 13.5 Perer. 4. Wherefore here is no other promise made to Abraham but such as he had heard before but the same more amply and fully confirmed by an oath and againe renued both to Abraham and Isaack in which two respects this promise is more excellent than the former Calvin QUEST XXIII How Saint Paul applieth this word Seed only to Christ. 3 to the Galath HEre by the way it shall not be amisse to explane that place of Saint Paul Galath 3.16 where the Apostle presseth the word seed shewing that because he saith seed not seeds it must bee referred to one namely Christ. The Jewes doe make two principall objections against this place 1. They urge that this word metaphorically taken for the of-spring of men is a nowne collective never used in the plurall number but put in the singular only signifieth a multitude as likewise doth the word populus vulgus people commonalty c. Answer 1. True it is that the word Zeraugh in the singular number doth often signifie a multitude but sometime in Scripture it is restrained to one as Gen. 4.25 the name of seed is given to Seth the Lord hath appointed me another seed for Habel Genes 21.13 Ismael is called Abrahams seed Wherefore it is not enough to say that this word in the singular is sometime taken for a multitude unlesse they could shew it so to be used here Beza 2. The Apostle then being not ignorant of the phrase and usage of the Hebrew tongue doth not contend about the word but the sense that the word seed in this place is not taken for seeds that is many but for seed that is one specially Perer. 21. They object further that whereas it is said In thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed this is but a forme of blessing by way of comparison like to that Gen. 48.20 God make thee as Ephraim c. Ans. 1. If this speech did onely shew a forme not the cause of blessing it need not have beene said in thy seed but in thee that is Abraham God make thee like Abraham 2. Where such formes of blessing are used they are restrained to Israel as in the place alleaged Gen. 48. In thee Israel shall blesse but here all nations shall bee blessed how should it come to passe that all nations should not blesse themselves but bee blessed but in being called to the knowledge of God which is by Christ wherefore these words shew the cause of blessing not the forme Calvin Now then their objections being thus answered I will shew the right meaning of the Apostle 1. I first reject Hieromes collection reproved by Erasmus Paulum hoc argumento abusum apud crassos Galataâ— that Paul abuseth this argument having to doe with the dull Galathians for it becommeth us not so to think of so grave an Apostle writing by the Spirit of God 2. Neither is it enough to say that Paul by the same Spirit whereby Moses did write did understand him to speake of Christ Cajetan in 3. ad Galat. for Paul having
Majestie doe urge and induce another to speake the truth or doe or not doe any thing as Ahab adjured Michaias and charged him in the name of God to speake the truth 2 Chron. 18.15 or else it is used passively when we force another to take an oath as Abraham here maketh his servant to sweare The first kinde of adjuration is used two wayes 1. By way of deprecation and intreaty by the inferiour to the superiour as the devils doe impudently adjure Christ not to torment them Matth. 5.7 but it was by way of intreaty vers 10. 2. It is used by way of authority and command 1. Thus the Prince adjureth his subjects as Saul did the people that they should eat nothing till night 1 Sam. 14.24 2. Thus the Apostles charged and commanded the spirits to come out of men as Paul did Act. 16.18 By this kinde of adjuration which is with power and authority spirits may be adjured but by the other which is by intreaty and supplication to conjure them which is nothing else but to intreat them for their helpe as Magicians and sorcerers doe it is a great impiety and plaine idolatry 3. Yea by a power and authority given from God thus the senslesse creatures may be adjured and commanded as Iosua by the power of God commanded the Sunne to stand still and it obeyed Perer. The other kinde of adjuring which is by ministring an oath is to be used onely in grave and weighty causes either divine as Nehemiah tooke an oath of the people that they should not give their daughters in marriage to the heathen Nehem. 13.25 or in humane affaires 1. For the deciding of controversies and ending of strife Heb. 6.16 2. For the binding of one to the obedient or faithfull performance of his service As Abraham here taketh an oath of his servant so officers may lawfully be sworne for the upright execution of their office and subjects to be loyall and true to their Prince 3. For the establishing of a league or covenant as an oath was betweene Iacob and Laban Gen. 32.53 4. For the clearing of a suspition as the woman suspected of adultery was charged with an oath by the Priest Numb 5.21 5. For the satisfaction of our neighbour in a matter of trust Exod. 22.11 so by the law the debtor may be lawfully urged with an oath by his creditor 6. For the security of a mans life one may sweare to another as the Egyptian servant to the Amalekite required an oath of David for the safety of his life and estate Sweare unto me by God that thou wilt neither kill me nor deliver me into the hands of my master c. 1 Sam. 30.15 QUEST VI. Why Abraham refuseth to take a wife from the daughters of Canaan Vers. 3. THou shalt not take to my sonne of the daughters of Canaan c. The reasons why Abraham would not have his sonne Isaack be linked in mariage with the Canaanites are these 1. Because they came of cursed Cham Generis author maledictionis haereditatem transmisit in suos The author of their stocke for not honouring his father did bring a curse as an inheritance upon his posterity Ambr. lib de Abrah cap. 9. 2. Because the Canaanites were Idolaters and of corrupt manners Primum in conjugio religio quaratur Religion must first be sought in mariage Ambr. Againe Salomon was corrupted and perverted from his faith by his idolatrous wives for although Nachors stocke were not pure in religion having a smattering of imagery and idolatrous worship as Laban sought for his gods that were stolen from him Gen. 31.30 yet they had some knowledge and understanding of God as appeareth in this chapter vers 50. This thing is proceeded of the Lord c. And beside their manners were honest and commendable not like to the Canaanites as is evident by Rebecca her virginity and their humanity in entertaining of strangers Perer. 3. Another reason hereof was for that the Lord promised the Countrey to Abrahams posterity and to expell the Canaanites therefore Abraham as he refused to bury his dead among them so much lesse would mingle his seed in mariage with them Mercer QUEST VII Why Abraham sendeth not Isaack to chuse his owne wife Vers. 4. THou shalt goe 1. Though Abraham send his servant about this businesse of mariage yet it was not without Isaacks consent who knowing this servant to be the minister of his father will yeeldeth himselfe to his fathers choice 2. Isaack is not sent not to make a way unto a mystery as Rupertus thinketh to shadow forth Christ who not by himselfe went but by his Apostles sent to the Gentiles 3. And though Isaack afterward sent Iacob for the same end to chuse him a wife from his fathers kindred yet that case was not like to this for Isaack had two sonnes Abraham but one and besides Iacob fled from the wrath of his brother to save his life Perer. And further Isaack was but forty yeares old a youth â—n those dayes Iacob was about seventy seven yeares of age and so fitter to chuse for himselfe QUEST VIII In what sense Mesopotamia is called Abrahams Country seeing he was borne in Chaldea Vers. 4. GOe unto my Countrey and kindred This Countrey and place of Abrahams kindred is named to be Aram Naharaim that is Mesopotamia vers 10. where was the City of Nahor which was Charran Gen. 28.10 Now Charran in Mesopotamia is said to be Abrahams Countrey 1. Not that he was borne there as Ramban and Paulus Burgens thinke for the place of Abrahams birth was Ur of the Chaldees Gen. 11.28 2. Neither is it called his Country because as Tostatus thinketh he dwelled there a long time even 60. yeares till the death of his father which is a great errour for Abraham stayed not long in Charran Eucherius thinketh but one yeare Pererius not so much Mercerus some two years Iunius five yeares howsoever the time was not long for Abraham no doubt being called to goe into Canaan would make no long aboad by the way nor yet deferre to obey Gods commandement So then neither Pererius thinketh right that Terah lived 60. yeares in Charran after Abrahams departure for Abraham came not into Canaan till after his fathers death Act. 7.4 And Tostatus also is deceived that Abraham with Terah lived together 60. yeares in Charran for seeing Abraham was but 75. yeares old when he departed from Charran if he staied there 60. then was hee but 15 yeare old when he came first to Charran which cannot be for he was then married Gen. 11.30 But both these errors are builded upon a false ground that Abraham was the eldest sonne of Torah and borne in his 70. yeare whereas the truth is hee was the youngest and borne in the 130. yeare of his fathers age as hath beene before shewed in the questions upon the 11. chapter 3. Wherefore the solution is this that Abraham calleth all the region beyond
the birth of Esau and Iacob which was 15. yeare before Abrahams death and 63. yeares before Ismael died for Abraham lived 175. Ismael 137. yeares and where Isaack was younger than Abraham by 100. and than Ismael by 14. they are found so long to have lived after the birth of these twins from hence then it is evident that the order of time is not alwayes observed in the sacred histories but that sometime is set downe first which was done last 3. Doct. Against the casting of mens nativities Vers. 23. THe elder shall serve the younger This example is urged by Augustine against the Genethliakes that is casters of mens nativities for hereby the vanity of their observations appeareth in that these two twins conceived at once and borne together were of such divers natures and qualities August de civit Dei lib. 4. c. 5. And whereas they answer that in the birth of twins there may bee great diversity by reason of the swift motion of the planets which change their aspects and conjunctions every moment as one Nigidius Figulus would demonstrate by the example of a wheele which while it was swiftly carried about he marked twice with inke which markes when the wheele had left running were found not to be farre asunder whereby he would insinuate that in a small distance of time a great part of the celestiall globe may be turned about But to this fansie Augustine answereth that if the celestiall motions be so swift and continue not in one stay then hardly can any man discerne under what constellation any is borne and Gregory thus wittily derideth their follies that if Esau and Iacob were not therefore borne under one constellation because one came forth after another by the same reason neither can any be borne under one constellation because hee is not borne all at once but one part after another Hâ—m 10. sup Evangel 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Against Limbus patrum Vers. 8. WAs gathered to his people c. This the Popish writers do understand of the fathers in Limbus patrum whither Abraham also went sic Lyran in Gen. 49. Rupert lib. 6. in Gen. cap. ult Contra. 1. The place to the which Abraham went is called Abrahams bosome Luke 16 which Augustine by no meanes thinketh to have beene a member or part of hell as they make Limbus 2. The Apostle sheweth to what people the faithfull are gathered Ye are come c. to the company of innumerable Angels c. to the spirits of just and perfect men Heb. 12.22 23. Where then the spirits of just men were there also were the Angels for so we read that Lazarus soule was carried by the Angels into Abrahams bosome But the Angels are not in Limbus patrum upon this reason Lyranus refuseth the interpretation of Augustine and Tostatus who by this people to the which Abraham was gathered understand the society of Angels which is in no place but heaven Lyranus also holding that all the just men from the beginning of the world went to Limbus is confuted by Paulus Burgens who saith that Abraham was the first that went to Limbus because of him first this phrase is used in Scripture That he was gathered to his people Thus we see that these Patrons of Limbus cannot agree among themselves for what certainty of opinion can there be which is not grounded upon Scripture 2. Confut. Election is not of good works foreseene Vers. 23. THe elder shall serve the younger S. Paul inferreth upon this text that wee are not elected by workes but according to the purpose of him that calleth Rom. 9.11 here then the errour of the Pelagians is confuted who taught that men were elected for their good workes fore-seene of God before But this errour is repugnant to Scripture Eph. 14. He hath chosen us in him that we should be holy he saith not because we were holy so that good workes are not a precedent cause of our election but a consequent effect thereof 3. Confut. The soules merited not before they came into the body HEre also that errour ascribed to Origen is overthrowne who thought that the soules have a being before the bodies and that they are disposed of in this life according to the merit of the former life which they lived in before they entred into the body for the Apostle expounding this place saith before they had done either good or evill and immediately before yer the children were yet borne Rom. 9.11 therefore before they were borne they had neither done good nor evill 4. Confut. S. Paul alleageth the examples of Esau and Iacob not for temporall election or figuratively onely of eternall but originally and properly IT is therefore evident 1. That neither Moses writing this prophecie The elder shall serve the younger did not only speake of the externall inheritance and preeminence of Iacob before Esau neither did Paul so understand Moses for then the example had not beene pertinent to S. Pauls purpose who goeth about to prove these two things that all are not the children of promise which are the children of Abraham after the flesh which he shewed by the instance of Ismael and Isaack vers 7. The other point is that Gods election is of grace not by workes as appeareth in the example of Esau and Iacob wherefore the one was hated of God the other loved before they had done good or evill If the Apostle then had brought in an example of temporall election it had been impertinent seeing thorowout the Chapter he treateth of eternall 2. Neither yet was this outward preheminence of Iacob and refusall of Esau a signe onely and figure of their eternall election and reprobation as Lyranus in 1. Malach. And therefore not directly implied in the words but so applied by the Apostle for as the Preacher saith No man knoweth either love or hatred of all that is before them Eccles. 9.4 that is Gods love or hatred is not discerned by the condition of outward things 3. Neither is it the literall and historicall sense only to shew that Esau was temporally rejected but. S. Paul by his divine spirit doth draw it to a mysticall sense as Pererius thinketh in 25. Gen. numer 45. for S. Paul understandeth Moses no otherwise than Malachy did Esau have I hated Iacob have I loved chap. 1.1 who out of Moses words inferreth a conclusion of Gods everlasting love toward Iacob 4. Wherefore the truth is that the very literall and proper sense of these words The elder shall serve the younger written first by Moses and cited by S. Paul doth principally describe the everlasting state and condition before God and are especially to be referred to the celestiall inheritance but secondarily the promise of the externall inheritance of Canaan is here also comprehended This may be made evident by these two reasons 1. That is the proper sense of the place which is principally and chiefly intended by the Spirit but so is this spirituall sense as
Perer. for God expresseth no condition in his promise 4. Nor yet need we answer that Iacob doth not vow the generall worship of God whereunto he was bound by his profession having received circumcision but a speciall service in consecrating that place to Gods service and offering of tythes or that it is lawfull for a man to tie himselfe by a new bond to performe that to God which he is otherwise bound to doe as the Prophet David saith Psal. 119.126 I have sworne and will performe it that I will keepe thy righteous judgements both these answers are true though not pertinent to this place ex Perer. 5. Wherefore Iacob doth not bring this forth as a condition If God will be with me this particle im is not here a conditionall but a word of time as it is taken vers 15. untill if that is when I have performed c. so is it taken here when God hath beene with me and kept me in this journey Iun Mercer and the words following are not to be read then the Lord shall be my God but when the Lord hath beene my God so they are not parcell of the vow which is complete in the 22. vers but they are part of the reason of this vow Rasi Iun. QUEST XVIII To whom Iacob voweth to pay the tenth Vers. 22. I Will give the tenth 1. Some thinke that he payed the tenth to Sem or Eber but Sem died before Iacob was borne and Eber also was dead many yeares before this in the 19. yeare of Iacob who is now supposed to have beene 77. yeare old 2. Therefore this giving of tithe was nothing else but the consecrating of the tenth part of his goods to be bestowed in building of Altars and in sacrifices for the service of God and such things as are devoted to religious uses are truly said to be given unto God sic Cajetan Mercer 3. Some Hebrewes referre this to the consecrating of Levi to the Priesthood but as Aben Ezra not men but cattell and beasts used to be tithed 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. The ministery of Angels Vers. 12. THe Angell of God went up and downe By this is expressed the ministery of the Angels that are continually imployed for the good of the elect they ascend to report our necessities they descend to be ministers of Gods mercies as the Apostle saith Are they not all ministring spirits sent forth to minister for their sakes that shall be heires of salvation Heb. 1.14 2. Doct. How Gods providence is seene in permitting evill to be done in the world HEreby also is set forth Gods providence that watcheth over all things for the Lord standeth upon the top of this ladder whereby is signified the administration and government of the world Against which providence whereas it is objected that many evill things are committed in the world to the which the Lord is no way consenting Thomas Aquine answereth that although some defects are against the particular nature of things yet they are for the good of the universall and therefore as Augustine saith Deus non sineret malumesse in operib suis nisi sciret benefacere etiam de malâ— God would not suffer evill to be in his works if he did not know how to turne evill into good But it will be said God ought to draw men against their will unto good Dionysius answereth Non est providentia divinae violare naturam sed est cujusque naturae conservatrix Gods providence doth not change or violate nature but is the preserver of naâ—ure leaving to things indued with reason to follow their owne will and inclination Lib. de Divin nominib cap. 4 par 4. 3. Doct. How God forsaketh not the elect finally Vers. 15. I Will not forsake thee c. Gods promises to his servants are so stable and firme in Christ that they are sure finally not to be forsaken as the Lord said to Iosua I will never faile thee nor forsake thee Heb. 13.4 Calvin 4. Doct. Lawfull to vow Vers. 20. IF God will be with me c. By Iacobs vowing both their errour is condemned that take away the use of all vowes from Christians and their superstition that vow not as they ought Iacob 1. directeth his vowes to God the papists vow unto Saints 2. He voweth to testifie his thankfulnesse they vow to merit 3. He voweth such things as were in his power as to pay tithe they such things as are beyond their reach as single life where the gift is not 4. Iacob voweth such things as God commanded they vow things of their owne inventing as to goe in pilgrimage to fast with bread and water to garnish Idols and such like concerning the which we may say with the Prophet who required this at your hands Isay 1. â—2 Calvin 5. Doct. Signes called by the names of the things Vers. 22. THis stone shall be the house of God This stone was not Gods house but a monument or signe of the place of Gods worship for there Iacob to fulfill this vow afterward at his returne built an Altar to God Gen. 35.7 Thus by a metonymie that which is proper to the thing is given to the signe in which sense the bread in the Eucharist is called the body of Christ Marlâ—r 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. How the Angels are reporters of our prayers unto God and yet no mediators Vers. 12. LOe the Angels of God ascended and descended upon it Hence Pererius would gather that the Angels descended from heaven to reveale unto us the counsels of God and to execute his will so their office is by ascending to report unto God our prayers vowes and necessities in Gen. 25. numer 23. We grant that the Angels doe report unto God the affaires of the world and the acts and gests of men and so their supplications in generall but this they doe as messengers not as mediators The Prophet Zachary sheweth a distinct office of the Angelicall spirits and Jesus Christ there called the Angell of the Lord they returne this answer to Christ Wâ—e have gone thorow the world and behold all the world sitteth still and is at rest But the Angell of the Lord Christ the Mediator of his Church steppeth forth and prayeth O Lord of hosts how long wilt thou be unmercifull to Ierusalem Zach. 1.12 So then though the Angels be witnesses of our devotion and beholders of our teares and plaints they have no office of mediation neither have we any warrant to pray unto them 2. Confut. Against the Platonists that make three kinds of providence Vers. 12. THere stood a ladder upon the earth and the top reached to heaven Gods providence then descendeth from heaven to earth contrary to the opinion of the Platonists noted by Gregor Nyssen lib. 8. de provident cap. 3. who make three kinds of providence the first of God in taking care onely for things celestiall and spirituall and the generall causes of other things in the world the second
rather with Mercerus that Iacob was not perfectly recovered of this griefe and halting till his dying day but that it remained though not alwayes alike for the remembrance of this thing and it may so appeare the rather for that presently upon this accident they did forbeare to eat the sinew of the thigh which shranke whereunto the halting of Iacob being continually in their fight might be a greater motive and so this custome being taken up in Iacobs time was retained of his posterity the Israelites Further in that he came safe to Sechem thereby it signified his deliverance from the danger which he feared by his brother Esau rather than the recovering of his hurt QUEST XVIII Wherefore it pleased God that Iacob should halt upon the hurt in the thigh ANd the hollow of Iacobs thigh was loosed 1. Augustine by Iacobs feet the one halting the other going upright understandeth two sorts of people among the Jewes the unbeleevers that halted in their faith and beleeved not in Christ and those which beleeved in him Iacob overcomming signifieth the Jewes that prevailed against Christ in putting him to death but in being blessed he signifieth those which worshipped Christ and were blessed of him serm 80. de temper 2. Gregory understandeth by the halting foot the infirmity of the flesh by the other the vigour of the spirit for so in the children of God as our Saviour saith to his Apostles The spirit is ready but the flesh 〈◊〉 sic Muscul. 3. But the best application of the text is that Iacob was stricken with this infirmity that he should have an humble and lowly opinion of himselfe not to ascribe this victory to his owne strength So for the same cause Saint Paul confesseth of himselfe Lest I should be exalted 〈◊〉 of 〈◊〉 through the abundance of revelations there 〈◊〉 given unto me a pricke in the flesh the messanger of Satan to bâ—ffâ—â— me because I should not 〈◊〉 exalted above measure 2 Cor. 12.7 To the same end was Iacob touched with this infirmity lest he might have beene 〈◊〉 much lifted up by these heavenly visions and this great victory which he obtained Mercer Calvin QUEST XIX Why the Angell 〈◊〉 to depart because of the morning Vers. 26. LEt me goe for the â—â—rning appeareth 1. Not as though the Angell was now to goe to the rest of the blessed company of the Angels to sing their morning hymne unto God as the Hebrewes imagine for the Angels not onely in the morning but at other times are exercised in praising of God 2. But the Angell thus speaketh according to the custome of men having now taken the forme and shape of a man as though he had haste to other businesse and leaving Iacob also to his affaires 3. As also because the Angell would not have this vision deserved and discerned of others seeing it specially concerned Iacob and that Iacob should not be too curious in gazing and looking upon that humane shape wherein this great Angell Christ appeared Mercer QUEST XX. Why Iacob desireth the Angell to blesse him I Will not let thee goe unlesse thou blesse me 1. Not as though this were Esaus Angell and Iacob would have him to confirme the blessing and consent unto it for evill Angels blesse not 2. Nor as some other Hebrewes as though Iacob would have his antagonist acknowledge him to be the superiour and to have the better for Iacob perceiveth that it was an Angell and therefore would not strive for superiority with him 3. Neither doth Iacob desire to know his fâ—tum or 〈◊〉 as Iosephus saith what should happen â—â—to him in his whole life for Iacob was not so curious 4. But Iacob well perceiving that he with whom hee wrestled was greater than himselfe desireth to be blessed of him for the lesse is blessed of the greater Heb. 7.7 And Hilarie beside noteth that Iacob acknowledged him with whom he wrestled to bee the Sonne of God that should become man for us Tenes in lâ—cta tua hominem sed hic tibi home Demest Thou doest grapple with a man but this man is God lib. 5. de Trinitat and therefore Iacob desireth to be blessed of him in whom all the world should be blessed QUEST XXI Of the name Israel and the true derivation thereof Vers. 28. THy name shall be no more called Iacob but Israel c. 1. He asketh Iacobs name not because he knew it not but that by Iacobs answer the Lord might take occasion of the change of his name 2. Neither was he so called Israel as that he should no more be named Iacob for he is also afterward so called but his name Israel is hereby declared to be the more excellent and worthy name which was also given unto the whole nation of his posterity Mercer 3. The name Israel 1. doth not signifie that hee stood against an Angell as Iosephus deriveth it and Hierome therefore reprehendeth him although Iosephus keepeth the sense of the name 2. Neither is it interpreted a man seeing God for then aleph should be inserted in the beginning and it should be expressed Ishrael not Israel with shin having a right point This interpretation is also confuted by Hierome though approved by divers of the ancient writers as Origen Basil Nazianzen Chrysostome with others 3. Neither doth it betoken one that is right or directed of God as Hierome sometime is of opinion whereupon he thinketh that Genesis is called the booke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the right that is of Abraham Isaack Iacob comment in Isay 44. for then this word should be derived from jashar and so we should say Ishrael not Israel Mercer 4. But the Lord himselfe sheweth the interpretation of this name Thou hast prevailed with God and so to come of Sara which is to prevaile or have rule so the Septuag translate 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 thou hast had strength with God and therefore should not doubt but that he might also prevaile with men as before with Laban so now with Esau. QUEST XXII Why the Lord refuseth to tell Iacob his name Vers. 29. TEll me I pray thee thy name c. The Lord here as also the Angell Iud. 13. refuseth to tell his name 1. Not for that as Rasi thinketh the Angels have no certaine or fixed names but which are continually changed according to their divers ministeries whereof they are named 2. Neither as Tostatus because the Angels have no proper names to be distinguished by but are discerned one from another by their nature and essence for this notwithstanding in Scripture for our understanding they are called by their names 3. Nor yet because as some thinke if the names of Angels were knowne they would come at our call this is but a fansie of Magitians ex Mercer 4. But the Lord doth not utter his name thereby staying Iacobs further curiosity and insinuating unto him that his name which is himselfe is greater than could of him then he comprehended and hereupon the Latine text
continued with them it is not like that hee went so farre West-ward It was an usuall thing with the Apostle to faile in these purposes in disposing of his journeyes sometime otherwise directed by Gods spirit Act. 16.7 sometime letted by Satan 1 Thessalon 2.18 sometime upon better reason altering his owne purpose 2 Corinth 1.15 23. he stayed his journey which he had determined to 〈…〉 like sort the Apostles determination to goe into Spaine might upon some other accident bâ— changed 4. Of this judgement is Gelasius 〈◊〉 ad Hispanâ—s se promisissâ—t â—â—urum dispositione divinum 〈…〉 patus ex causis implore non potuit quod promâ—â—it C. 22. q. 2. c. 5. Paul promising to goe into Spaine being occupied in other greater causeâ— by the divine disposition could not 〈◊〉 that which he had promised to him subscribeth Tho. Aquin. cap. 15. ad Roman QUEST X. Whether Iacob came to Salem Vers. 18. HE came safe to Sechem c. 1. Some reade he came to Salem a City of Sechem◠〈…〉 Septuag and Latine translator and Mercer but it were superfluous in the same place 〈◊〉 call a City by two names 2. This Salem some would have to be Silo as some Hebrewes some take it 〈◊〉 â—erusalem as Iosephus some for Melchisedecks towne as Hierome where the ruines of Melchisedecks Palace were to be seene in his time some will have this Salem to be that Salem spoken of Ioh. 3.23 where Iohn Baptist baptized and that Salem and Sichem were names of that same City first called Salem afterward Sichem Tostat. But all these opinions are uncertaine Silo and Sechem were two distinct places Iud. 21.19 Salem Melchisedecks towne was Jerusalem Psal. 76.2 In Shalem iâ— his Tabernacle his dwelling in Sion and if Sichem were the new name Salem the old it should in the Gospell be called by the new name rather than the old and that Salem was a divers place from Sechem called Sychar is evident for Salem was in Judea Ioh. 3.23 and our Saviour leaving Judea came to Sychar or Sichem Iohn 4.6 there might be then another towne beside Jerusalem called Salem but not the same with Sichem 3. Wherefore the better reading is that Iacob came safe and in peace to Sechem not for that he was now healed of his halting as the Hebrewes imagine which in part remained still as a monument of that combat with the Angell but he came same safe in respect of the danger which he feared from the hands of Esau. QUEST XI Whether Iacob did well in buying a peece of ground of the Sichemites Vers. 19. HE bought a parcell of ground c. Although Iacob had a promise to possesse and inherit the whole land of Canaan yet this purchase which he made did neither shew any mistrust in him neither did he in so doing depart from his right 1. He did it for his necessity of dwelling as Abraham had done the like before for buriall 2. The time of fulfilling the promise was not yet come and therefore Iacob at this time while the Canaanites were possessors of this land doth not prejudice his right in buying this parcell Mercer 3. It was no great parcell of ground that he could buy for so little money nor yet very fruitfull being in the sight and view of the City Calvin QUEST XII Whether Iacob bought his ground for money or lambs Vers. 19. FOr an hundred peeces of money 1. Some read for an hundred lambs for the word chesita signifieth both money and a lambe sic Septuag Latin Oleaster and so they would have the word taken Iob 42.11 where every one of Iobs friends gave him a lamb But it is more like they gave him every one a peece of money which was a greater gift and more sutable to the other gift of an earing of gold 2. Some of the Hebrewes affirme that the Arabians call money chesita but the Scripture needeth not to begge or borrow words or phrases from them 3. Wherefore it is like that this kâ—sita was a peece of money that was stamped with the marke or print of a lambe and thereof was so called Iun. as among us Angels are so named of the stampe or print set upon the gold 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. Honour to be given to evill magistrates Vers. 3. IAcob bowed himselfe seven times It is lawfull then to yeeld externall honour to evill magistrates that are in authority as here Iacob doth to Esau Mercer as Saint Paul saith Give to all men their duty tribute to whom tribute custome to whom custome c. honour to whom honour belongeth Rom. 13.7 And at this time there were none other but heathen rulers Mordechai indeed refused to bow the knee to Haman because it was more than a civill reverence which that proud man expected and beside he was an Agagite or Amalekite which was a Nation accursed of God Exod. 17.14 2. Doct. God turneth the heart Vers. 4. ESau ran to meet him Thus wee see that God is not onely a searcher of the heart but a worker and changer of it as here Esau his heart is altered of an enemie hee suddenly becommeth a friend wherefore the Wiseman saith That God turneth the hearts of Kings as the vessell upon the waters is ruled and turned by the steares-man Prov. 21.1 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Against humane inventions Vers. 20. HE set up there an Altar Iacob inventeth not neither bringeth in new ceremonies into Gods worship but such as he had received from the instruction of his fathers directed by the spirit of God such was the building of Altars to sacrifice upon by this the Romanists are reproved which have thrust into Gods service so many humane inventions Calvin and so our Saviours rebuke falleth upon them They teach for doctrines the commandement of men Mark 7.3 2. Confut. The sacred signes called by the name of the things Vers. 20. HE called it the mighty God If this reading be received we see that the signes are named by the things as here the Altar is called of God and Moses nameth his Altar The Lord is my banner Exod. 17.15 so the Prophet saith the name of new Jerusalem shall be The Lord is there Ezech. 48.35 We need not marvell then if the bread in the Eucharist be called the body of Christ. 6. Morall observations 1. Morall To be contented with our estate Vers. 11. GOd hath had mercy on me therefore I have all things So Saint Paul saith I have learned in what state soever I am therewith to be contented I can be abased I can abound c. I am able to doe all things through the hope of Christ which strengtheneth me Philip. 4.13 2. Morall Gods worship to be advanced in families Vers. 20. HE set up there an Altar Iacob having setled himselfe and pitched his Tabernacle hath a speciall care to set forward Gods worship and doth consecrate as it were a Chapell and Altar to God wherein Iacob may be an example to all
Secondly Iacob putteth on sackcloth which was a ceremonie used in the East Countreyes to testifie their humility as Benhadads servants presented themselves before the King of Israel with sackcloth about their loines and ropes about their necks suing for pardon 1 King 20. Perer. QUEST XXVIII Who were those sonnes and daughters that comforted Iacob Vers. 35. THen all his sonnes and daughters rose up c. 1. These were not properly Iacobs daughters as the Hebrewes imagine that with every sonne Iacob had a daughter borne which they afterward married for such marriages the world being now multiplied were not in use among the faithfull Mercer 2. Neither could Iacobs sonnes the eldest not exceeding twenty foure or twenty five yeares not above seven yeares elder than Ioseph have daughters of that age able to comfort their father as Musculus thinketh they were therefore Iacobs sonnes wives that were his daughters in law 3. Neither did Iacob refuse to bee comforted because as the Hebrewes thinke where wee know certainly of the death of our friend we cease mourning but not where it is uncertaine whether they be dead or no for Iacob did perswade himselfe here that some wilde beast had devoured Ioseph but the greatnesse of his griefe would admit no consolation Mercer 4. We see the hard and cruell hearts of Iacobs sonnes that willingly did suffer their father to continue in this griefe and that with fained words they seemed to comfort him concealing the truth Luther 5. So it is added his father wept for him not Isaack who indeed was yet living as some thinke Aben Ezra Iun. But Iacob mourned for Ioseph his brethren mourned not but the father sorroweth for his sonne Muscul. QUEST XXIX Potiphar how he is said to be an Eunuch Vers. 36. TO Potiphar an Eunuch of Pharaohs 1. This Potiphar was not indeed an Eunuch or gelded man as the Septuag reade 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for he had a wife and a daughter married afterward to Ioseph 2. Neither for the same cause can that conceit of R. David have any likelihood that Potiphar was an Eunuch in part as retaining still the nerve or sinew though not the other instruments of generation 3. Neither is there any ground of that tradition of the Hebrewes that God caused Potiphars privie parts to wither and drie up because he thought to abuse faire Ioseph to his filthy lust 4. But whereas Eunuches were at the first used by Kings and Princes to wait upon their Queenes Esther 2.14 and so were as the Chamberlaines and neare unto their persons as Harbonah was to King Assuerus Esther 7.9 Hence the name of Eunuch was taken generally to signifie a Courtier Prince or great man toward the King as the word is used 2 King 8.6 The King commanded an Eunuch or one of his Princes to restore unto the Shunamite her lands and in this sense is Potiphar called an Eunuch that is one of Pharaos princes or courtiers as the word Saras signifieth sic Chal. Mercer Iun. with others QUEST XXX What officer Potiphar was to Pharao PHaraos chiefe Steward or master of the guard 1. For we neither reade with the Septuag Pharaos chiefe cooke although the word tabach be sometime used in that sense 1 Sam. 9.23 which reading Iosephus Philo and Ambrose follow 2. Neither yet was he Pharaos chiefe steward as some reade B.G. 3. Nor the chiefe captaine of his souldiers as both the Chalde and Hierome translate 4. But seeing the word tabach signifieth to kill and so the word is indifferently applyed both to Cookes and Butchers that are the slaughter men of beasts and to souldiers that kill men in battell and executioners that put men to death that are condemned by the law It appeareth that this Potiphar had the chiefe charge of those that were adjudged to imprisonment or death as Pharaos two officers his chiefe Baker and Butler were committed to his charge Gen. 40.3 and so may be well thought to be the chiefe Marshall or Captaine of the Guard unto Pharaoh Iunius Mercerus 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. The father is as the Sunne and chiefe in the house Vers. 9. THe Sunne Moone and Stars did reverence unto me c. Ioseph by the Sunne and Moone understandeth his father and mother The father then of the house by Gods ordinance as the Sun from whom the wife as the Moone the children as Stars must receive their light and direction in every family Muscul. for the Apostle saith concerning wives If they will learne any thing let them aske of their husbands at home 1 Cor. 14.35 and concerning the rest the same Apostle saith Having children under obedience with all honesty 1 Timoth. 3.4 2. Doct. The Prophets did not forsee all things but what was revealed unto them AGaine he dreamed c. Ioseph as Bernard well noteth did by the spirit of prophecie foresee his exaltation yet his humiliation and captivity was not declared unto him though this was nearer than the other tractat de gradib humilitat Whereby we see that the Prophets did not foresee all things neither had they a propheticall spirit residing with them whereby to foretell what they would but they onely knew those things which it pleased God to reveale unto them as the Prophet Ieremie at the first did not perceive the falshood of the Prophet Hananie that prophesied of their returne from captivity after two years but wished that it might fall out even so till the word of God came unto him Ier. 28.6.12 3. Doct. True obedience followeth not the words but the minde of the commander Vers. 7. IOseph went after his brethren and found them in Dothan c. Yet his father sent him onely to seeke them in Sechem vers 12. Ioseph sheweth his prompt obedience in not strictly tying himselfe to his fathers words but fulfilling his minde Iacob spake but of Sechem to Ioseph but he knowing that it was his meaning that hee should seeke out his brethren followeth after them to Dothan that hee might finde them out Muscul. by which example we are taught what kinde of obedience is most accepted with God not to keepe onely the letter of the law as the Scribes did whose corrupt glosses our Saviour confuteth Matth. 5. but to observe the true meaning and sense thereof 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. The Latine text corrupt and not justifiable Vers. 2. WHen Ioseph was seventeene yeares old The Latine text readeth most corruptly When Ioseph was sixteene yeare old which reading Perer. would justifie by these reasons 1. The Latine text understandeth sixteene yeares complete the Hebrewes seventeene yeares now but begun 2. He thinketh that the Latine translator set downe divers things whereof no reason can bee given not without the secret instinct of the spirit Pererius disput 1. in Gen. cap. 37. Contra. 1. It is the manner of the Hebrewes when they set downe a number of yeares to make the account by full and complete yeares as is manifest by the phrase here used
Genes â—5 Now Abraham and Ismael had not the same people to goe unto the faithfull cannot be said to be Ismaels people nor the prophane sort to be Abrahams But if the meaning of the phrase were no more than that they were gathered and joyned to the state of the dead the faithfull and prophane sort should all goe to one people wherefore this phrase betokeneth a speciall disposition of the soules of the faithfull after this life in being associated to the company of the just and a laying up of their bodies in assured hope of the resurrection Calvin Muscul. Luther The Apostle also sheweth what it is for the righteous to be gathered to their people Wee are come to the celestiall Ierusalem to the innumerable company of Angels to the congregation of the first borne c. to the spirits of just and perfect men Hebr. 12.22.13 To all these are we joyned by faith while we live and really when we are dead now quoad spem in hope then quoad rem in deed 6. Places of morall use 1. Mor. Fathers must rebuke and chastise their children Vers. 4. THou shalt not be excellent Fathers may learne by Iacobs example to chastise their children for their sinnes as here Ruben is censured for defiling his fathers bed for this cause Heli and his posterity were punished because hee did not reprove his sonnes according to the quality of their offence Perer. 2. Mor. Gods vengeance though it be deferred will certainly come FUrther in that Rubens punishment had beene a long time suspended and deferred almost 40. yeeres after he had committed this uncleane sinne yet at the last it commeth let no sinner flatter himselfe in his impunity for if the long suffering of God draw him not to repentance it shall but increase his punishment as the Apostle sheweth Rom. 2.4 5. 3. Mor. The short pleasures of sinne deprive men of many blessings AGaine as Ruben for a little short pleasure lost his birthright and dignity so many for the vaine and momentany pleasures of this life are deprived of many and great blessings like to Esau that for a messe of pottage did part with his birthright 4. Mor. Contumely against parents never goeth unpunished WE see also what an high offence before God it is to offer any wrong or contumely to our parents such was Cham toward Noah Absalon toward David and here Ruben that polluted his father Iacobs bed 5. Mor. Against unjust and immoderate revenge Vers. 7. CVrsed be their wrath The Lord condemneth all kinde of revenge that proceedeth of wrath especially such as here was committed by Simeon and Levi. 1. It was done by craft and subtility under pretence of friendship 2. Against men unawares suspecting nothing 3. When they were in griefe of body 4. With a pretext and shew of religion 5. The revenge farre exceeded in greatnesse the quality of the offence Such a kinde of revenge is unjust and cruell Wherefore in this case wee should follow the Wise-mans counsell Say not I will recompence evill but wait upon the Lord and he shall save thee Prov. 20.22 Perer. 6. Mor. Every mans portion in the earth assigned of God Vers. 13. AS Zabulun shall dwell by the sea side Hence we learne that the lot of men for their habitation and dwelling in the earth falleth not out unto them by chance but by Gods providence and appointment for as it is in the Psalme The earth is the Lords and the fulnesse thereof Psal. 24.1 therefore every one should be contented with his lot and portion as assigned unto him of God Perer. 7. Mor. The Church shall overcome at last Vers. 19. ANd an host of men shall overcome him but he shall overcome at the last c. So the Church of God though it shall indure much trouble and sorrow in the world yet it shall triumph and have the victory in the end as our Saviour saith to his Apostles In the world yee shall have trouble but be of good comfort I have overcome the world Iohn 16.33 8. Mor. The quiet and peaceable end of the righteous Vers. 33. HE plucked up his feet into the bed Before Iacob had raised up himselfe as well as he could not having his legs hanging out of the bed as Perer. that had beene no fit lying for a man ready to dye but he had stretched out himselfe before as well as he could for reverence unto the word of God which he delivered but now feeling the houre of his death to be instant hee doth gather up his legs after a seemely and quiet manner not strugling or striving against death as many doe but as though death â—ere in his power he doth meekely and gently yeeld himselfe unto it such a peaceable and quiet kinde of departure God often granteth to his children Muscul. Howbeit this is not alwayes so for sometime a wicked man may dye like a lambe still and quiet as the Psalme saith There are no bands in his death Psal. 73.4 and a righteous man may have a strong death by reason of the extremity of his sicknesse and the manner of the disease but yet inwardly he hath a peaceable and quiet soule and therefore Balaam had good reason to pray as he did Let me dye the death of the righteous and let my last end be like his Num. 23.10 CHAP. L. 1. The Method and Argument IN this Chapter is set forth 1. Iosephs piety toward his father Iacob in causing him to be embawmed vers 2 3. in his buriall 1. He procured leave of Pharaoh vers 4 5 6. 2. He did honourably accompany him vers 7 8 9. 3. They mourned for him by the way vers 10 11. 4. Then they buried him as he had commanded 2. His humanity toward his brethren with their message in their fathers name vers 14 15 16. their humility vers 18. Iosephs friendly answer vers 19 20 â—â— 3. Iosephs prosperity in seeing his childrens children v. 23. 4. His faithfull departure buriall and age v. 24 25. 2. The divers readings v. 2. he commanded those which had charge of funerals S. commanded the Physitians câ—t v. 4. spake to potentates of Pharaoh S. spake to Pharaohs house caet v. 8. only their kinred they left their sheepe and oxen c. S. their children or little ones caet v. 10. they came to Goren Atad G. to the corne-floore or field beset with thistles T. to the corne-floore of Athad cat of Achad H. athad signifieth a thistle v. 11. Abel Mizraim G. the mourning of the Egyptians cat v. 13. beside Mamre G. before Mamre B. over against Mamre caet against or before the face of Mamre cat v. 19. feare not can we resist Gods will H. for I am Gods S. for I feare God C. am not I under God G. am I God B. am I in the stead of God T.P. 3. The explanation of doubtfull questions and places QUEST I. Of the divers fashions of buriall Vers. 2. ANd Moses commanded his
first delivered to the Egyptians the grounds of these artes who yet is more likely to have beene the inventor of husbandrie and other such profitable trades than of the mysticall arts and sciences 4. Therefore the more probable opinion is that by whomsoever the first seeds of this mysticall profession were sowne among the Egyptians it is not to be doubted but that by Iacobs comming downe but especially Iosephs long time of government their knowledge was much increased the scripture bearing witnesse hereunto Psalm 105.21 He made him Lord over his house to teach his Senators wisdome and by the cohabiting of the Hebrewes 215. yeeres in Egypt the Egyptians might profit more in the profession of wisdome which that superstitious people might with their gentilismes and superstitions intermingled change and alter And for the truth hereof that the Egyptians learned many things of the Hebrewes this may serve as an evidence that in Herodotus Diodorus Siculus and other waiting of the ancient Egyptians many things are found having some conformity with the doctrine law and usages of the Hebrewes ex Pererio QUEST XVI Why it pleased God that Moses should be instructed in the Egyptian learning NOw it pleased God that Moses should be thus trained up in the wisdome of the Egyptians and have a courtly bringing up that by this meanes he might bee instructed in the government of the Common-wealth and be prepared for that publike function which he should afterward be called unto So David was taken from the flocke and brought up in Saules court to learne the discipline of the Kingdome Though it pleased God to use the ordinary meanes for Moses instruction yet he alwayes doth not so and especially in the new Testament the Apostles were extraordinarily inspired being in humane learning altogether unexpert for there was more abundance of spirit and grace in the new Testament under Christ than in the old under the Law Simler 2. Beside Moses by this meanes became famous and got himselfe great authoritie among the Egyptians that there might be greater respect had unto his message afterward and being fully instructed in the knowledge of the Egyptians he was the better able to discerne the errors and superstitions both to convince the Egyptians and to containe the Israelites in the obedience and profession of the truth ex Perer. QUEST XVII Why Moses had this name given him Vers. 10. SHe called his name Moses 1. Concerning the imposition of the name of Moses neither is the opinion of Philo and Clemens Alexandrinus probable that it is an Egyptian name derived of Mos which signifieth water and Iosephus will have it compounded of Mos water and Ises saved for the etymon of the name is not from the water but because he was drawne and taken out as the reason is here expressed 2. Neither yet is it like that Moses was in the Egyptian language called Mueves as Iun. out of Diodâ—r Siculus or Movion as Pererius out of Aben Ezra being of the same signification which Moses is in Hebrew that is drawne out for then it is like the Egyptian name would have beene expressed as Iosephs is Gen. 41.45 and Daniels Chalde name Dan. 4.5 3. Nor yet is it probable that Pharaohs daughter having learned the Hebrew tongue of her maids did give an Hebrew name unto Moses as Eugubinus Lippom. Thostatus for seeing the Hebrewes were an abomination to the Egyptianâ— it may be thought also that they abhorred their names 4. Therefore I rather incline to thinke with Simlerus and Osiander that this word whereof Moses is derived is Massah to draw out as it is taken Psal. 18.17 Thou hast drawne me out of the waters might be common both to the Hebrewes and to the Egyptians as some words are common to divers languages both alike in sound and signification or it might be translated or transposed out of the Egyptian tongue into the Hebrew 5. But as for other names that Moses should be called by as at his circumcision Ioachim which signifieth established and afterward Melchi my King as Clemens Alexandrinus writeth wee reject them as having no ground in Scripture seeing hee is perpetually called by the name of Moses which name was by Gods providence imposed wherein is set forth the principall part of his calling to draw the Israelites out of the waters and troubles of Egypt and to lead them through the red sea and so indeed historically to draw them out of the waters QUEST XVIII Of Moses visiting his brethren Vers. 11. ANd in those daies when Moses was growne hee went forth to his brethren 1. Very little mention is made of Moses time spent in the court till he was fortie yeere old for then as S. Stephâ—n sheweth Act. 7. he began to visit his brethren like as little is expressed of the doings of Christ while he lived privately till he was thirtie yeere old Pellican 2. Iosephus writeth how in this time he warred against the Ethiopians and while he besieged Saba the King of Ethiopia his daughter fell in love with him and was married to him whom the author of historia scholast saith was Zipporah But the Scripture sheweth that she was the daughter of the Prince of Midian Perer. 3. He was now growne not onely in stature of body but in the grace and gifts of the spirit Pellican And as it seemeth having neglected and forgotten his brethren hitherto being now especially stirred up called of God he goeth to visit his brethren he did it not onely of a naturall instinct as Hilary seemeth to write 4. And this the Apostle sheweth to have beene an excellent worke of faith For 1. he refuseth to be called Pharaohs daughters sonne He renounceth his courtly life and he pleasures of Egypt 3. He preferreth the afflictions of Gods people before the pleasures of Egypt 4. He looketh unto the reward Heb. 11. Ferus But if it be asked why Ioseph did not so likewise to leave the court as Moses did I answere first that some thinke that Ioseph did in his old age leave Pharaohs court and went and dwelt with his brethren in the land of Goshen beside the case betweene Ioseph and Moses is farre divers for in Iosephs time Pharaoh was a friend to Israel now an enemy then the people were in happy case now the state is miserable Iosephs calling was to be a feeder of Israel in Egypt Moses to bring them out of Egypt Simler QUEST XIX Whether it were lawfull for Moses to kill the Egyptian Vers. 12. WHen he saw no man hee slew the Egyptian Concerning the fact of Moses in killing the Egyptian we are farre off from accusing or blaming the same which was at the first the opinion of Augustine who thus writeth against Faustus Consulta aeterna lege reperio non debuisse hominem à Mose qui nullam ordinariam potestatem habebat quamvis improbium ocâ—idi I finde in the eternall law that Moses having no ordinary power ought not to have killed no not a wicked
though hee were rude in speech yet he was not so in knowledge 2. Cor. 11.6 the power of S. Pauls speech consisted not in eloquence of words but in the wisdome of the spirit so Moses though defective in the manner of elocution yet might speake with gravity and wisdome and so bee powerfull in words 9. Wherefore notwithstanding this or what else is objected the most probable opinion is that Moses had some naturall impediment of speech as appeareth both by his owne excuse by the Lords answer by the coadjutorship of Aaron his brother an eloquent man vers 14. and because Moses after this saith he was a man of uncircumcised lips and whereas he saith here nor since thou hast spoken to thy servant his meaning is that if at this time when God spake unto him who was able to take away all impediment of speech yet his infirmity remained much more was it like afterward to continue Iunius QUEST VIII How God is said to make the deafe and dumbe Vers. 11. WHo hath made the dumb or the deafe 1. Wee refuse here the fables of the Hebrewes that when Pharaoh had appointed one to kill Moses he was striken blind that he could not see Moses and Pharaoh became both deafe and dumbe that though he espied Moses escape yet hee could not speake to have him stayed but it is evident by the story that Moses fled before hee was apprehended The Lord here speaketh in generall not of any one dumbe or deafe but that as hee sendeth these infirmities upon man so also hee is able to heale them 2. And although these infirmities are evill in respect of nature yet God is the author of them because they are good also in respect of the end which is to humble man and bring him to repentance and to set forth the glory of God as our Saviour saith of the blind man that his blindnesse came that the workes of God might be shewed upon him Simler QUEST IX How and wherefore the Lord was present with Moses mouth Vers. 12. I Will be with thy mouth 1. Although Moses was no eloquent man in outward speech as humane eloquence is accounted yet there was in him a grave and divine eloquence such as the Apostles were endued with the Lord promiseth the assistance of his spirit and to bee present with his mouth 2. But the impediment of his tongue the Lord doth not altogether take away both that Gods glory and power might appeare and that Moses should see how needfull the helpe and society of his brother was neither did Moses pray unto God to heale that infirmity but only useth it as an argument to decline his calling Simler QUEST X. Whom Moses meaneth that he would have sent Vers. 13. SEnd by the hand of him whom thou shouldest send 1. Lyranus thinketh that Moses meaneth his brother Aaron who was elder than he and fitter for his eloquent speech but no mention was made yet of Aaron whom Moses knew not to be alive as may be gathered vers 18. till the Lord first spake of him and promised hee should assist him 2. Rabbi Selomo taketh that hee meaneth Iosuah whom God revealed unto him should be the man that was to lead Israel into the promised land But beside that Iosuah is not yet spoken of this request of Moses would have shewed some emulation or envy toward Iosuah 3. Many of the ancient writers as Iustenus Martyr Tertullian Cyprian with others thinke that Moses here speaketh of the Messias that should be sent into the world so also Perer. But this seemeth not to be so fit both for that Moses not being ignorant of the prophesie of Iacob concerning the comming of Shiloh and how the Lord promised that he would raise up a Prophet like unto him Deus 18.18 which is understood of Christ could not yet expect the comming of the Messiah and this request for the comming of the Messiah proceeding of faith would not have provoked the Lords wrath Therefore Eugubinus opinion though Pererius checkt him for it is not herein to be misliked that neither would have those places of Scripture which are understood of the Messiah to bee referred to others for that savoureth of Judaisme nor yet that which is spoken of others to be applied to Christ which also would bewray curiosity and superstition 4. Therefore the plaine meaning of Moses is that wheâ—â—as God might find out many more fit than himselfe he would send by their hand that is ministery so he aimeth not at any one in particular to be sent but any other whosoever QUEST XI Whether Moses sinned in his so often refusall seeing God was angry with him Vers. 14. THen Iehovahs wrath was kindled 1. Neither doe we consent to some Hebrewes that doe aggravate Moses sinne as distrusting Gods word and therefore some say hee was punished in being deprived of the Priesthood which was given to Aaron some in that he was not suffered to enter into the land of Canaan Contr. But neither was the first a punishment for Moses still was the chiefe and gave Aaron direction and it was a comfort to Moses to have such a coadjutor and beside Aaron was the elder to whom the priesthood appertained Neither was Moses offence here the cause why he entred not into the land of Canaan but his disobedience at the waters of strife Simler 2. Neither on the other side is their opinion found that doe justifie Moses herein and commend his humility in refusing so weighty a calling as Gregorie who by Pauls example would have us ready to suffer adversities and by Moses to refuse prosperity And Hierome commendeth Esaâ—es readinesse after his lippes were purified and Moses unwillingnesse being guilty to himselfe of his owne infirmity Contra. 1. In that God was angrie with Moses it is evident he offended 2. And as S. Paul was willing to suffer adversity because it was Gods will the spirit so testified every where of him that bands and persecution did abide him so Moses should not have refused this charge seeing God so often had signified his will unto him 3. And if Esay did well after the Lord had purged his lippes being before unwilling to shew his readinesse then Moses did not well who after the Lord had promised to be with his mouth yet still persisted in his refusall 3. Thostatus granteth that Moses sinned yet it was a veniall and small sinne because wee reade of 〈◊〉 punishment that followed Cajetanus is of the same opinion and his reason is taken from the phrase here used The wrath of God was kindled as when a man is moved suddenly of choller than of set purpose Contra. In some sense we confesse that both this and all other of Moses sinnes and of all the elect are veniall in respect of Gods mercie in Christ that pardoneth them but otherwise in it owne nature neither this nor any other sinne is pardonable for the wages of sinne is death Rom. 6.23 in the justice of
Israelites that whereas their fathers being a great way from the fulfilling of the promises and having not such manifest revelations and signes as they now had by the Ministerie of Moses yet were more firme in faith than that present incredulous age Simler So shall it bee a just rebuke unto us that live now in the cleere light of the Gospell if wee be lesse zealous of Gods glorie than they which have lived before us in the time of ignorance Therefore let us give eare unto the Apostle The night is past and the day is at hand let us therefore cast away the works of darknesse and put on the armour of light Rom. 13.12 2. Observ. Affliction at the first is grievous but in the end comfortable Vers. 9. BVt they hearkened not unto Moses for anguish of spâ—rit Such is the condition and qualitie of affliction that it maketh the heart heavie and so disquieteth the soule that it can not raise up it selfe to lay hold on any spirituall comfort Simler as the Apostle saith No chastising for the present seemeth to be joyous but grievous but afterward it bringeth the quiet fruit of righteousnesse to them that are thereby exercised Heb. 12.11 Here the Apostle sheweth two divers effects of affliction one which proceedeth of our naturall infirmitie to worke sorrow and griefe the other wrought by grace in those that make good use of their chastisement it bringeth in the end peace and comfort 3. Observ. God raiseth honourable instruments from meane places Vers. 16. THese are the names of the sonnes of Levi This tribe by reason of Iacobs curse laid upon it was in disgrace and contempt yet God out of the same raised these honourable instruments Moses and Aaron So God many times raiseth his servants out of the dust as Mary was a poore despised handmaid in Israel yet chosen to be the mother of Christ the Apostles were taken some from base trades other from ignominious offices as Matthew that was a Publican 4. Observ. God giveth his gifts diversly Vers. 30. I Am of uncircumcised lips Moses had not the gift of eloquence but he had a most plentifull gift of heavenly wisdome and understanding thus God distributeth his gifts diversly Pellican Aaron had the gift of eloquence but was in heavenly knowledge and illumination inferiour to Moses So the Apostle saith To one is given by the spirit the word of wisdome and to another the word of knowledge and to another diversities of tongues 1 Cor. 12.9.10 Every one hath not all gifts that one may stand in need of another CHAP. VII 1. The Method and Argument MOses appeareth the second and third time before Pharaoh delivering the Lords message unto Pharaoh for the dismissing of his people and upon his refusall sheweth signes and calleth for the first plague of the turning of the waters into bloud There are three parts of the whole Chapter The first containeth the renewing of the charge and commandement of God to Moses to goe unto Pharaoh to verse 8. wherein these things are declared 1. The authoritie which the Lord giveth to Moses over Pharaoh vers 1. 2. His commission what he shall speake vers 2. 3. The event Pharaohs refusall 4. The end that God may worke his great judgements in Egypt vers 4. 5. Moses and Aarons obedience with a description of their yeeres and age vers 6.7 The second expresseth the generall signe which serveth for the confirmation of Moses calling by turning his rod into a Serpent from vers 8. to vers 14. wherein three things are further shewed first the commandement of God to Moses vers 8. Secondly the execution by Moses vers 9. Thirdly the event the hardnesse of Pharaohs heart vers 13. with the occasion thereof the Magicians counterfeit miracle in doing the like The third part describeth the first plague laid upon Egypt 1. The denuntiation thereof by the Lord containing the message to Pharaoh vers 15.16 The matter or subject of the first plague the water and fish therein the one shall bee turned into bloud the other shall die vers 17. with the generall instrument Aarons rod vers 19. 2. Then followeth the execution by Moses vers 20. 3. Then the events follow first the fish die the water stinketh vers 21. Secondly Pharaohs heart is hardened by reason of the like practice by the Egyptian Sorcerers vers 22 23. Thirdly the endevour of the Egyptians in digging pits for water 2. The divers readings Vers. 1. Aaron thy brother shall be thy Prophet B.G.A.P. cum caeter shall be thine interpreter I. the sense but not the words Nebi signifieth a Prophet Vers. 4. Pharaoh shall not hearken unto you that I may lay my hand B. G. and I will lay my hand L. V. A. P. S. H. rather when I have laid my hand I. Pharaohs hardnesse of heart is set forth as the cause rather why the Lord would send his judgements than an effect as the former verse sheweth and chap. 3.19 So Moses and Aaron did as Iehovah commanded them so did they I. A. P. better than Moses and Aaron did as the Lord commanded them even so did they B. G. cum caeter for the perfect distinction athâ—ah comming betweene divideth the first part of the sentence Vers. 9. Shall be turned into a Dragon I. A. P. S. rather than a Serpent B.G.V.L. Tanmin signifieth a Dragon yet he meaneth a Serpent called a Dragon because of the fearfulnesse and greatnesse of it as Moses fled from it chap. 4.3 Vers. 18. The Egyptians shall be grieved to drinke that is loath B.G. shall be troubled in drinking L. shall be wearied in drinking I.V. shall not be able to drinke S. shall labour A.P. so Iaah signifieth and it is sometime taken for to grieve or loath as Iob 4.2 Of the water of the river B.G. cum caeter of every river I. but in the originall there is no pronoune but an article onely set before yet the same effect followed also in other rivers and waters Vers. 19. Stretch out thine hand against the water as it is taken vers 5. I will stretch forth H. mine hand rather upon the waters V. L. cum caeter as chap. 8. 5. Stretch forth thine hand to worke on the waters I. to worke is inserted Vers. 23. He did not set his heart upon this I.L.S.A.P.B. did not consider this in his heart V. this yet did not enter into his heart G. 3. The explanation of difficult questions QUEST I. Of the divers appellations of the name of God Vers. 1. I Have made thee Pharaohs God This name and title of God is used and applied foure wayes in Scripture 1. essentially and so it is given onely unto the blessed Trinitie and is not communicable unto any creature 2. personally and so it agreeth onely unto Christ as man 3. according to the vaine opinion and estimation of men so the Idols of the Gentiles are caelled gods as 1 Cor. 8.5 Though there be
might bring forth serpents of a sudden Contra. The excellency of the agent doth adde to the manner of the worke as to doe it sooner or better it addeth noâ— to the matter Angels working by naturall meanes doe it more admirably than nature can worke it of it selfe but beyond the strength of nature or against the course of nature they can doe nothing 3. Pererius misliking both these answers of Cajetane yet consenting to his opinion for the truth of this miracle addeth a third that Satan fetched those serpents and suddenly transported them into this place and suborned them in stead of the rods Cont. But the text saith the rods were turned into serpents the serpents then were not brought from any other place but there changed or seemed so to be Againe as here they turne their rods into serpents so afterward did they change water into bloud but that was not by transportation for from whence could Satan convey such abundance of true lively bloud which is not ingendred but in the body neither have they power to alter substances it was therefore done by collusion and so was this 3. Wherefore the founder opinion is that those serpents which the Egyptian Sorcerers brought forth were only such in shew not indeed or in truth so Iosephus writeth that the Magicians serpents In speciem ac similitudinem verorum serpentium reptasse did creepe in shew and likenesse of true serpents lib. 2. antiquit cap. 15. And Iustinus Martyr Those things which the Magicians did by the helpe of the Devill spectantium oculis praestigias offundebant did dazle and deceive and as it were cast â— mist before the eyes of the beholders quaest Orthodox 16. Tertullian Mosis veritas mendacium Magorum devoravit Moses trueth devoured their lie lib. de anima Gregor Nyssenus saith they were visus deceptione serpentes serpentes onely in the mistaking of the fight Ambrose calleth it commentitiam emulationem a fained emulation in cap. 3.2 Epist. ad Timoth. Hierome saith imitabantur signa quae faciebat Moses sed non erant in veritate They did imitate the signes which Moses did but they were not in truth lib. 2. advers Iovin The reasons of this opinion before alleaged are these 1. because solius divinae potestatis est It belongeth onely to the power of God to convert a dead substance into a living creature Rupert 2. Moses true serpents devoureth the other which Iosephus and Ferus urge as an argument that they were imaginary 3. Other signes which they did were only imaginary as the turning of water into bloud as is before shewed and so this also QUEST XXII By what meanes Satan deluded Pharaoh with a shew of serpents THis being then thus resolved upon that those were but serpents in shew and to the outward sense this counterfeit signe might be wrought two wayes by the operation of Satan 1. Either by the confounding the inward sense and phantasie of the beholders that they imagined to see that which was not as sicke men of phrensie doe conceive they see strange sights and there is no question but that the Devill can effect whatsoever by diseases or other naturall meanes may be wrought 2. Or else which is more like Satan did forme such a shape and shew of spirits as before is shewed that the Devill hath such power by illusions apparations and phantasies to deceive as the Apostles seeing Christ walking upon the seas supposed it had beene a spirit Phantasma that is a phantasticall apparition Mark 6.49 Ex Perer which sheweth that such illusions were usuall QUEST XXIII Why the Lord suffered the Sorcerers of Egypt to shew such contrary signes NOw the Lord suffered the Magitians thus by their lying signes to contend with Moses for divers weighty causes 1. That by this meanes Moses the faithfull servant of God and true Prophet might be the better knowne as darkenesse maketh the light more glorious and sicknesse health Chrysostome So Saint Paul saith There must bee Heresies that they which are approved among you might bee knowne 1. Cor. 11.29 2. That Moses might be freed from the imputation of being a Sorcerer which thing some have not beene affraid to object and a difference might appeare betweene his working by the power and in the name of God and of the Sorcerers working by the power of Satan Rupert 3. That thereby it might be made manifest how the truth hath alwayes gainesayers and is never without contradictions and oppositions as Lucifer opposed himselfe to God in heaven Cain to Abel in earth Ismael was against Isaack the true Prophets were molested by the false Thus Saint Paul collecteth that as Iannes and Iambres withstood Moses so these also resist the truth 2. Tim. 3.8 Perer. 4. Hereby also it is manifest how according to the common saying the Devill is Gods ape that he taketh upon him to imitate and counterfeit Gods workes that therefore wee should examine such workes and signes whether they be of God that wee be not deceived and as the Apostle saith cry every spirit 1. Ioh. 4.1 5. Another reason is that seeing the Devill by his ministers can doe such strange things that the servants of God bee not offended when thy see wonders and signes to be done in the false Church by Heretikes or Idolaters the instruments of Satan 6. This was permitted for the triall of the faith and constancie of Moses and Aaron and the rest of the Hebrewes whether because of the contrary signes they would doubt of the truth of Gods promises Perer. 7. And for the further hardning of Pharaohs heart as hee had deserved by his former sinnes that God might take occasion thereby to worke all his wonders in Egypt Simler Ferus Borrh. QUEST XXIV Whether Pharaoh being deceived by the Magicians false signes be thereby excusable BUt seeing these Magicians by their Satanicall craft doe so strongly deceive whether is Pharaoh to be excused that he doth not acknowledge Moses to be the Minister and Prophet of God To this the answer is that this notwithstanding Pharaoh is not to be held excusable because there are evident signes to have discerned betweene the working of the one and of the other so that Pharaoh could not plead ignorance To omit the differences before noted Quest. 20. how that true miracles differ from false in the power of working in the quality of persons that worke the worke it selfe the manner and the end which differences are not so easie to be discerned of all there were besides most notorious workes that discovered the hypocrisie and weaknesse of those Sorcerers 1. Moses serpent devoured theirs which required a greater power 2. They could counterfeit the like plagues but they could not remove the true plagues as Moses did 3. They faile in their working they could not bring forth lice nor counterfeit any of the plagues following 4. The plagues doe fall upon the Sorcerers themselves chap. 9.11 5. Lastly they themselves doe give way and confesse it was the finger of God
himselfe into an Angel of light much more take upon him the shape of a Prophet Out reasons are these 1. Tertullian saith Absit ut animam cujusquam sancti à daemone extractam credamus Far be it from us to thinke that the soule of any holy man can bee brought out by witchery lib. de anima Pererius answereth that the Witch called not up Samuel but it was Gods worke to send him preventing the Witches enchantments Contra. But this is not to bee admitted because the Scripture calleth it an abomination to the Lord to aske of the dead Deut. 18.12 the Lord would not be accessary to any thing which is an abomination before him 2. The true Samuel would not have suffered Saul to have worshipped him with a religious worship as the counterfeit Samuel doth so reasoneth Augustine Pererius answereth that this was not such adoration as is due unto God but that reverence which may be yeelded to Angels and Saints Contra. There are but two kindes of adoration a civill and religious the religious veneration is onely due unto God and therefore refused by the Angel Revel 22. the civill this was not as appeareth by Sauls submisse behaviour and superstitious devotion 3. This Samuel saith Why hast thou disquieted me But Samuels soule being at rest in Abrahams bosome was out of the Devils reach he could not disquiet it Pererius answereth that Saul did disquiet it occasionaliter by giving the occasion not efficaciter as being the efficient cause thereof Contra. But if Samuel spake these words then hee was in truth disquieted the question is by whom if not by the Devils meanes occasioned by Saul than by God but I thinke it will not bee confessed that God disquieteth the soules of his Saints being at rest 4. If the Lord vouchsafed not to answer Saul when hee lawfully sought unto him neither by his Priests nor his Prophets how is it like that the Lord should answer by his Prophet and when he useth unlawfull meanes Pererius answereth that God did not vouchsafe to answer him by any such meanes that hee might know that God had forsaken him but now not seeking unto God but unto a Witch God doth send him a sorrowfull message by that Prophet whom hee would not harken unto while hee lived Contra. Yet is not the objection removed that God should rather answer Saul using unlawfull meanes than when hee used lawfull first if the not answering before shewed that God had left him then the answering now by a Prophet of Gods sending argueth that hee was not altogether forgotten If it bee said that Saul knew him not to bee sent of God but raised by a Witch then it will follow that this Samuel kept him in that error without reproofe which the good Prophet would not have omitted Againe if the heavy answer and message of evill tidings was a signe that God neglected him why then did not the Lord vouchsafe to answer him before at all God would answer him neither good nor evill Thirdly this Prophet being dead could bring him no worse tidings now then he did when he lived that his Kingdome was rent from him and given to another 5. Some adde this as a fifth argument that Samuel would not have said To morrow thou shalt be with mee that is in the state of happinesse seeing hee knew that the Lord had cast him off Pererius thinketh that hee did meane he should descend in generall to hell as all before Christs comming did though not to that region and place of hell Limbus Patrum where the Fathers were Contra. But first Pererius must shew us out of Scripture that there be divers hels In the parable of the rich glutton there are but two places mentioned after this life Abrahams bosome a place of rest whither the Angels carried the soule of Lazarus and a place of torment where the rich man was That Abrahams bosome was no part of hell beside Augustines opinion who cannot thinke taâ—tae felicitatis sâ—â—um membrum inferorum c. that a place of sâ—ch great happinesse was a member or part of hell the text it selfe evidently sheweth as much because it was a place of comfort and joy and of great distance from hell and the Angels of light did minister there who remaine not in the kingdome of darknesse And againe that the Patriarkes and Prophets before Christ were in heaven our Saviour testifieth Many shall come from the East and West and sit downe with Abraham Isaack and Iacob in the Kingdome of heaven Matth. 8.11 Abraham Isaack and Iacob then were now in the Kingdome of heaven and yet Christ in their opinion had not then harrowed hell nor yet emptied Limbus Patrum Some doe expound these words thou shalt be with mee generally of the state of the dead Iun. But beside the opinion of some Hebrewes that doe take these words to bee spoken of Sâ—uls particular state that he should be in some place of rest where Samuel was and hereupon they inferre that Saul died penitently where we receive their interpretation but refuse their collection as being builded upon a false ground the testimony of a lying spirit this place is like to that where David saith of his infant departed I shall goe to him 2. Sam. 12.23 which words doe not onely signifie a generall kinde of departure but a resolution in David that it was well with his child Like also unto this is that phrase Gen. 25. that Abraham was gathered to his people and in the same chapter that Ismael was gathered to his people which seemeth to insinuate that each went unto his people and that Abraham was associate unto the just and righteous departed See more hereof Quest. 15. upon Genes 25. And hereunto the Apostle seemeth to allude when he saith Hebr. 12.23 Yee are come c. to the congregation of the first borne c. to the spirits of just and perfect men shewing the society and communion which we have with the people of God gone out of the world 6. Places of Morall use 1. Mor. They that humble themselves shall be exalted I Have made thee Pharaohs God Moses who before so abased himselfe that hee by all meanes would have declined his calling excusing him by his insufficiencie now the Lord doth exalt him making him superior to Kings he should be as a God to Pharaoh not whom Pharaoh should worship but whom he should feare and stand in awe of he should be as a God to bring plagues and judgements upon him and his land and to remove the same againe Thus is that saying of our Saviour fulfilled He that humbleth himselfe shall be exalted 2. Mor. Gods commandements are simply without any exception to be obeyed Vers. 6. SO Moses and Aaron did as the Lord commanded so did they This repitition is not needlesse but sheweth that they most exactly performed all given them in charge the commandements of God must be obeyed without all exception or limitation An Emperour of Rome commanded a
intended no evill or hurt to their father but it so fell out The wicked are said to hate their owne soules and to procure unto themselves eternall death whereas simply they hate not their soules neither would be damned but upon their committing of sinne it so falleth out that their soules perish by their meanes as if they hated them unruly patients that will not obey their Physitians whereupon followeth death are said â—o seeke their owne death and yet they desire to live but upon their unruly and disordered behaviour death followeth So God is said to harden Pharaohs heart by the like figurative speech because the hardning of their heart ensueth upon the abuse of those things which God intendeth not to that end but they pervert them to their owne hurt Ex Perer. All this may safely bee received and acknowledged and yet somewhat more is to be added as shall afterward appeare QUEST XXIII How diversly in Scripture these termes of blinding and hardning are taken BUt by the way this word to blind to harden though it signifie an action proceeding from him that hardneth yet is it not alwayes so taken therefore we shall find that foure wayes in Scripture a thing is said to blinde and consequently to harden 1. Giftes are said to blind the â—â—es Deut. 16. Not that they being a dead thing can corrupt the judgement but mans corrupt heart taketh occasion and is thereby enticed to pervert justice 2. The Devill is said to blinde the mindes of the wicked â— Cor. 4.4 3. The malice of a mans owne heart is said to blinde and harden as Pharaoh hardned his owne heart 4. God is said to blind the eyes Esay 6.10 and to harden Pharaohs heart gifts doe blinde occasionaliter by way of occasion the malice of mans heart blindeth meritâ—â—â—â— by way of desert and meritoriously because it deserveth to be further blinded and hardned the Devill blindeth incitando by inciting and provoking unto sinne And God as is before shewed by withdrawing his grace and inflicting the punishment of induration upon them QUEST XXIV How divers wayes the Lord forsaketh those which are hardned FUrther God is said to harden mans hart in his diverse leaving and forsaking of them 1. Hee suffereth them to follow their owne lusts and desires not giving them power or grace to restraine them as Rom. 1 24. he gave them up to their hearts lusts 2. He giveth them ease abundance prosperity whereby they are intangled therefore the Prophet prayeth Give me not riches lest I be full and forget thee Prov. 3. 3. He denieth them the benefit of wholsome corrections and afflictions whereby they should learne to know themselves as the Apostle saith the Lord receiveth no child whom hee doth not chastise 4 God forbiddeth his servants to pray for such and so they want the benefit of their prayers as Ieremie is forbidden to pray for the people chap. 7.16 5. God in his justice depriveth them of such as should travell for their soules and bring them unto God as the Apostles left the obstinate and wilfull Jewes and shooke off the dust of their feet against them Acts 13. 6. God taketh away from them the preaching and knowledge of his word as the Lord threatneth by his Prophet Amos to send upon them a famine not of bread or water but of hearing his word Amos 8.11 7. God suffereth them to be deceived by flatterers and unfaithfull counsellers as â—eboboâ—â— was by his young men 8. And the more strongly to delude them the Lord permitteth sometimes false Prophets to shew signes and wonders 〈◊〉 the Apostle saith of the false Prophet Antichrist whose comming is by the working of Satan with all power and signes and lying wonders 2. Thes. 2.9 9. The Lord permitteth Satan to invade them and to worke upon them at his pleasure as the evill spirit was sent of the Lord upon Saul and a lying spirit was in the mouth of Baals false Prophets to deceive Achab. 10. God taketh away from them all helpes whereby they should be defended against the assaults of Satan as the Lord threatneth to doe to his unfruitfull vineyard I will take away the hedge thereof and it shall be â—aten up I will breake downe the wall thereof and it shall be troden downe Isai. 5.4 11. But the Lord doth not thus forsake any till they have first forsaken God as Chrysostome saith Quod autem Deus non derelinquat nos nisi fuerit à nobis derelictus apertè ostendit Isaias That God forsaketh not us till wee have forsaken him I say sheweth chap. 59.2 Your iniquities have separated betweene you and your God Ex Perer. QUEST XXV God hardneth otherwise than by foreseeing BEside these divers interpretations of the hardning of Pharaohs heart by the Lord which I have abridged out of Pererius there are three other which I will briefly set downe first some thinke that this in that God is said to harden Pharaohs heart is to be understood of Gods prescience that he is said to harden it because he foresaw it should be hardned by their owne malice This seemeth sometime to be the opinion of Augustine in that God is said to harden Pharaohs heart Non ad operationem Dei sed ad prascientiam pertinere monstratur it is shewed to appertaine not to Gods operation or working but to his prescience But this cannot bâ— the meaning for by this reason whereas God foreseeth all the sinnes of men which are committed in the world God might be said himselfe to kill steale doe wrong because he foreseeth that such things shall be done in the world QUEST XXVI Whether God may be said to doe those things which he disposeth of to a good end SEcondly God may be said to harden Pharaohs heart because he disposeth thereof and directeth it to such an end as he himselfe propounded because thereby the Lord did take occasion to worke his miracles as he saith to Moses I have hardned Pharaohs heart that I might worke these my miracles Exod. 10.1 So as God ordained the end he may be said also in some sort to doe those things which helpe unto that end as Act. 2.23 Christ is said to bee delivered by the determinate councell of God yet was hee betrayed and delivered by Iudas whose act is said in some respect to be the Lords because God disposed of it to effect and accomplish his glorious councell in redeeming the world by the death of his Sonne But neither can this be safely affirmed that the Lord should bee said to doe those things which hee ordereth and disposeth for God so disposed of that spirituall combate which S. Paul found in his flesh that it tended further to Gods glory and the manifestation of his power as the Lord saith My grace is sufficienâ— for thee my power is made perfect through weakenesse yet God was not the worker of that temptation but the Apostle imputeth it to Satan 2. Cor. 12.7 And like as in the creation God made
chap. 8 quest 12. and confut 1. 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. God overruleth mens affections Vers. 3. THe Lord gave the people favour in the sight of the Egyptians Hereby wee learne that God hath the ruling and turning of mens affections he can worke them either to favour or disfavour Piscat So the Wiseman saith As the rivers of waters the Kings heart is in the hand of the Lord â—e tâ—â—neth it whither soever it pleaseth him Prov 21.1 Like as the husband man maketh furrowes in his ground and draweth the water which way it pleaseth him and as the sternes man in the vessell doth move it which way he listeth so can the Lord order and governe the streames of mens affections 2. Doct. Godly men have their passions and affections Vers. 8. SO he went out from Pharaoh very angry Even wise and godly men have their affections it iâ— not as the Stoikes taught that there is a vacuity and absence of them in wise and perfect men They are not without affections but they rule them by reason and their reason is sanctified by grace The Apostle saith be angry but sinne not Ephes. 4.26 He alloweth to be angry but not to sinne in anger Christ the most perfect man that ever was had his affections as of anger Marke 3.5 He looked round about him â—â—gerly of joy Luk. 10.21 Iesus rejoyced in spirit of sorrow Matth. 26.38 My soule is heavy unto death of love as Ioh. 13.23 The disciple whom Iesus loved 5. Places of confutation 1. Confut. Against Purgatory BEfore in the third question where it is disputed what Angels God used in bringing the last plague of death of the first borne upon Egypt Pererius sheweth the difference betweene the ministry of the Angels in this life and in the next falling to make mention of purgatory for they cannot doe otherwise for ther lives but upon every occasion broach their owne fansies leaveth it as uncertaine and undiscussed whether the good Angels or the bad should be ministers of purgatory he thinketh not the bad that they should exercise power over them which in their life time did conquere the Devill neither yet will hee have them to be the good It is an unmeet thing saith he that they which shortly should become the fellowes and partakers of the blessed Angels in heaven should bee punished by them Perer. 1. disput in cap. 11. Contra. 1. Let any reasonable man judge whether it be not like that purgatory should be a meere fansie where there is supposed to bee torments and yet no tormentor In that hee thinketh that neither good Angels nor bad are the ministers of those torments I condescend to him who then not Christ I am sure for he hath redeemed them nor yet God himselfe for the Apostle saith Who shall lay any thing to the charge of Gods chosen it is God that justifiâ—th who shall condemne Rom. 8.33.34 God hath justified them by faith in Christ and being justified there is nothing further to be laid to their charge If then there be no tormenter in purgatory there is no torment in purgatory and so purgatory fire is quite quenched and put out 2. Beside this uncertainty who should be the tormenters there be other maine points not yet resolved of among them concerning purgatory as of the place where it is of the fire what it is corporall or spirituall of the time how long it shall last whether hundred yeeres or thousands of the greatnesse of the paine whether it exceed all the torments and punishments of this life These articles are not yet defined and determined among them as Bellarmine sheweth lib. de purgat from chap. 6. to chap. 14. Therefore we will leave them to their uncertainties and as they make question of the circumstances of purgatory so we will not onely make question of purgatory it selfe but are most sure that it is but an invention of their owne for all they which dye in the Lord that is in the faith of Christ are pronounced blessed and to rest from their labours and their workes follow them Revel 14.13 Here are three arguments against purgatory They which dye in the faith of Christ are blessed but they which are in hell torments for purgatory they make part of hell are not blessed They doe rest from their labours but they which are in purgatory are in labour and paine Their workes follow them for their reward but they which are tormented â—nd punished are not rewarded Therefore wee acknowledge no other purgatory but in this life a perfect purgation of our sinnes in Christ Heb. 12.3 and an imperfect which is by the fiery probation of affliction as S. Peter calleth it Thinke it not strange concerning the fiery triall which is among you to prove you 1. Pet. 4.12 2. Confut. Against the Manichees which reject the old Testament Vers. 10. BVt the Lord hardned Pharaohs heart Hence the Manichees tooke occasion to utter their blasphemies against the God of the old Testament and to reject the Scriptures themselves of the old Testament as proceeding from a God that was a worker of evill in hardning mens hearts These Augustine confuteth at large hom 88. de tempore shewing how God is said to harden the heart without any touch of sinne for thus he writeth Non Pharaonem Dei violentia sed propria impietas obduravit Not any violence from God but Pharaohs owne impiety did harden him And these words I will harden Pharaohs heart he expoundeth thus Cum abfuerit ei gratis mea obduret illum nequitia sua when my grace is from him then his owne wickednesse shall harden him 2. Then he doth illustrate it by this similitude as the water is frozen till the Sun shine upon it then it resolveth and so soone as the Sunne is departed it is bound with cold againe the Sun is not the cause of the freezing of the water but the coldnesse of the water bindeth it selfe so properly God causeth not the heart to be hardned but by the absence of his grace it is hardned 3. But if the question be asked why the Lord suffereth any to be hardned he maketh this answer Aut illorum iniquitati qui obdurari merentur adscribendum aut ad inscruâ—abilia Dei judicia referendum quae plerunque sunt occulta nunquam autem injusta This must â—â—thâ—r be ascribed to their iniquity which deserve to be hardned or it must be referred to the judgements of God which are often hid but never unjust It sufficeth 〈◊〉 to know and beleeve as the Apostle saith Rom. 9. Is there iniquity with God 3. Confut. Against Pererius that thinketh none in this life to be without hope of grace and repentance NOw further whereas Pererius in the treatise of induration moveth this disputation whether any man can be so hardned in this life as that he become altogether impenitent and incorrigible and without hope of grace and resolveth upon the negative part that none in this life are in such
desperate state it shall not be amisse first to examine his reasons and then to confirme the truth 1. He urgeth these and such like places That God would have all men to be saved and come to the knowledge of the truth And I will not the death of a sinner If mercy be offered to all then the way is open for all to returne unto God Contra. 1. God indeed offereth himselfe unto all and denieth not the externall meanes to any if they had grace to apprehend them The Gospell hath beene preached to all the world and is many times to the impenitent and reprobate so God offereth grace to all but all will not receive it Augustine hereof thus writeth Correctio medecinabiliter omnibus adhibenda est etiam si salus aegrotantis sit incerta c. The wholesome medicine of admonition must be ministred to all though the health of the sicke be uncertaine that if he which is admonished belong to the predestinate it is unto him a wholesome medecine if he doe not it is a penall torment 2. The argument then followeth not God calleth all to repentance therefore all may have grace to repent The Scripture saith many are called but few are chosen Ambrose saith In aliis praevaluisse gratiam in aliis reâ—iluisse naturaâ— That grace prevaileth in some in others their obstinate nature resisteth 2. So long as men are in this life they are in the way and are not deprived of all grace nor utterly forsaken till they come into hell Contr. Everlasting punishment in hell is the end and execution of damnation but men in this life may be in the state of damnation and be utterly forsaken of Gods grace as Saul and Iudas and they whom the Apostle saith God gave them over to a reprobate sense Rom. 1.28 3. If any had beene in this life wholly excluded from grace Pharaoh of all other was most like yet his state was not desperate seeing he was in the same case with Nebuchadnezzar who repented and confessed God Contr. 1. He reasoneth flatly against the Apostle who propoundeth Pharaoh as a vessell of wrath prepared to destruction Rom. 9. Now if there be hope for the vessels of wrath to come to grace then there was hope for Pharaoh The Apostle maketh these two distinct things God hath mercy on whom he will and whom he will he hardneth Rom. 9.18 As God hardneth not those on whom he hath mercy so neither sheweth he mercy on those whom he hardneth 2. Nebachadnezzar and Pharaoh were most unlike for the one had not so many wonders shewed as had the other neither so often dallied and made shew of repentance as did the other this sheweth their state to be most differing for if Pharaoh had beene no more hardned than Nebuchadnezzar was he would likewise have repented 4. We are to despaire of none in this life therefore it is possible for all to repent Contr. 1. Such as wee see and know commit a sinne unto death which is the irremissible sinne against the holy Ghost which I confesse is a rare thing now to be discerned such wee may despaire of because the Apostle forbiddeth us to pray for them 1. Ioh. 5.16 And those for whom the Lord did forbid Ieremy to pray chap. 7.16 what hope I pray you was there of them 2. Though wee in charity are to hope the best even of the greatest sinners yet this followeth not that all of them may have grace to repent wee judge according to that we see but the Lord seeth the heart and knoweth from the beginning who are his and who are not But on the contrary side that some in this life are so hard hearted that they cannot repent and so are incorrigible and without hope of remission of sinnes it is proved thus 1. Sinne against the holy Ghost is irremissible as our Saviour saith He that blaspphemeth against the holy Ghost shall never have forgivenesse Mark 3.29 Therefore there are some in this life that cannot repent neither can have their sinnes forgiven them And because Bellarmine and Pererius and the rest here answer that the sinne against the holy Ghost is said to be irremissible not because it cannot at all be forgiven but because it is hardly forgiven therefore to prevent this objection that place of the Apostle is also urged that it is impossible for such to be renued by repentance Heb. 6.6 that which is impossible is not only hardly done but not at all 2. The foreknowledge and decree of God concerning the rejection of some is unchangeable and cannot be altered but God hath foreseene some to be damned and decreed them to bee rejected as Iudas is called the childe of perdition Ioh. 17. therefore it is not possible for such to come to repentance to be saved therefore Gregory saith well Qua non sunt praedestinata obtineri non possunt Those things which God hath not predestinate cannot be obtained But God hath not decreed repentance for them that are rejected and reprobate 3. There is no hope of forgivenesse for that sinne for the which it is not lawfull to pray but there is a sinne unto death for the which we are forbidden to pray 1. Ioh. 5.16 Ergo c. Pererius answer here is that by sinne unto death is meant that sinne wherein a man continueth unto death and so dying therein he is not afterward to be prayed for Contr. 1. It would follow by this reason that no sinne of any is to bee prayed for while hee liveth for how doth any know whether a man may continue in a sinne till his dying day 2. The Apostle speaketh of such sinnes which a man seeth his brother to sinne now sinnes are onely seene to be done in this life neither is a mans repentance knowne which God may give him in his very passage out of the world 3. Let them shew us any place in all the Scriptures that authorizeth prayer for the dead if they can wherefore they are not to give a sense of Scripture that cannot be warranted by Scripture 4. The Apostle therefore calleth it a sinne unto death for the which there is no forgivenesse and so is there no sinne but blasphemy against the holy Spirit And thus Ambrose expoundeth it Non potest ibi exoratio esse veniae ubi sacrilegis est plenitudo there can be no intreating of pardon where there is fulnesse of Sacrilege 4. Where there can bee no repentance there can be no remission of sinnes but some have such hard hearts that they cannot repent Rom. 2.4 therefore the sinnes of such are irremissible 5. Hereunto may be added the testimonies of Cyprian Non posse in Ecclesia ei remitti qui in Deum deliquerit that he can find no forgivenesse in the Church that sinneth against God lib. 3. de Quirinum cap. 28. Of Ambrose Cassa erat proditâ—ris poenitentia qui peccavit in spiritum sanctum The betrayers repentance was in vaine having sinned against the spirit of
as hath beene found by search these were the bones of Ioseph certainly knowne they shew the bones and parts no man knoweth of whom for they in divers places offer to the view of the people divers bodies and heads foure or five armes of one Saint neither were these bones of Ioseph carried in the fight of all Israel adored as theirs superstitiously are Simler 3. Conf. Against the heresie of Servetus Vers. 21. THe Lord went before them by day in a piller of a cloud Servetus held this execrable heresie that this increata nubes Christi fuit Deitas that this uncreated cloud was the Deitie of Christ which he calleth filium figurativum the figurative Sonne which detestable heresie is not worthy of any confutation but with all indignation to be rejected and detested for he maketh the Deitie of God corporall contrary to the Scripture which saith God is a spirit and maketh a visible substance to be without beginning whereas all things visible are created Coloss. 1.16 and directly this heresie impugneth that saying of the Prophet Esay chap. 4.5 where he alludeth to this place The Lord shall create upon every place of Mount Sion a cloud and smoke by day c. It was then a created and not an uncreated cloud 6. Morall observations 1. Observ. As the Lord worketh for us redemption so of us he requireth obedience Vers. 2. SAnctifie unto me all the first borne As the Lord had for his part delivered and saved their first borne so he requireth of them their first borne As God hath dealt mercifully and graciously with us so he expecteth somewhat againe of us namely our obedience we must not looke unto that onely which God hath done unto us but consider also what is to bee done by vs. As our Saviour saith to his Apostles As my father sent me so send I you As Christ was sent for our redemption so we must also bee employed in Gods service to testifie our thankfull obedience So our Saviour bidding his Apostles to preach the Gospell addeth teaching them to observe all things which I have commanded you As the glad tidings of salvation is published unto men so of them is required againe obedience Ferus not as an helpe unto their salvation which is perfited without our service but as a true and lively testimonie of our faith whereby we apprehend salvation 2. Observ. How we must offer our first borne unto God AGaine as they were commanded to consecrate unto God their first borne so we must offer our first and best things unto God the Lord will have the prioritie of our service Simlerus As our Saviour biddeth us first to seeke the Kingdome of God and the righteousnesse thereof Matth. 6. our first studies our first times must be consecrated unto our God as the Apostle exhorteth to give up our bodies a living sacrifice holy and acceptable unto God Rom. 12.1 3. Observ. God tempteth his children according to their strength Vers. 17. LEst the people repent when they see warre God hath respect unto his chidrens infirmitie and suffereth them not to be tempted above their power Piscator But Gregorie doth notably amplifie this point Tres modi sunt hominum ad Deum conversorum inchoatio medium perfectio inchoatione inveniunt blandimenta dulcedinis in medio tempore certamina tentationis ad extremum perfectionem plenitudinis c. There are three degrees of men that are converted unto God the beginning the middest and the perfection in the beginning they finde pleasant allurements in the middle hard tentations in the end a full perfection Like as first a man entertaineth his spouse with sweet perswasions afterward being married to her hee trieth her with sharpe reprehensions being thus tried he soundly enjoyeth her So this people being brought out of Egypt primò accepit blandimenta signorum first receiveth alluring signes afterward probationibus exercetur in â—remo they are exercised by tentations in the wildernesse and lastly in the land of promise virtutis plenitudine confirmatur they are fully confirmed Sic Gregor lib. 14. moral cap. 13. 4. Observ. The will of the dead must faithfully be performed Vers. 19. FOr he had made the children of Israel sweare Moses most faithfully causeth the last will and Testament of Ioseph to be fulfilled whereby we are taught that the last minde and will of the dead in honest and lawfull things ought by no meanes to be violated Osiander as the Apostle saith the Testament is confirmed when men be dead Heb. 9.17 God will surely revenge their quarrell whose soules he hath received to his protection whose godly bequests are reversed and their last minde not fulfilled Such as are unfaithfull to the dead will be much more to the living And as God professeth himselfe the speciall protector of the fatherlesse and widow so he will maintaine the cause of the dead that are fatherlesse to the world and their soules as it were widowes for a time absent from their bodies 5. Observ. We must alwayes bee watchfull Vers. 22. THat they might goe both by day and night The people were to take their journey whether by day or night when the cloud was lift up from the Tabernacle they were therefore diligently to take heed both by day and night that they might be readie when the Lord gave them a signe to goe forward wherefore they are said to keepe the Lords watch Numb 9.19 So our Saviour biddeth us also to watch and alwayes to bee in a readinesse because we know not when the master of the house will come at even or at midnight at the cocke crowing or in the dawning Mark 13.35 Pellican CHAP. XIV 1. The Argument and method IN this Chapter is described the most miraculous and admirable passage of the children of Israel over the red Sea there are two parts of the Chapter the bringing of the Israelites unto the Sea to vers 14. their passing over the Sea with the destruction of the Egyptians to the end of the Chapter In the first part is set forth first the counsell of God unto Moses containing first a commandement where they should campe vers 2. then a reason thereof taken from the vaine consultation and opinion of Pharaoh that they were tangled in the land vers 4. then the execution thereof in following after them which is amplified by the overruling cause Gods providence and justice in hardning his heart and the end thereof the glory of God vers 4. 2. Then followeth the execution first in the behalfe of the people they did as the Lord commanded them secondly on Pharaohs part 1. Both in pursuing and following after them with the occasion thereof the report that was brought and their repentance in letting the people goe vers 5. The manner thereof he made readie his horse and chariots vers 6.7 and the ordering and disposing cause Gods justice in hardning his heart vers 8. 2. As also in overtaking them vers 9. 3. Afterward the events hereof are declared 1. The
of regality and principality 3. As for that heathenish conceit of the Philosopher that vertue is not properly said to be in women it is contrary to that position of the Apostle that in Christ there is neither male nor female Galath 3.28 the spirit of God can plant grace and vertue in the hearts of women as well as of men nay often the Lord chuseth the weake things of this world to confound the mighty things 1. Cor. 1.27 And the examples of so many vertuous and good women in the Scriptures of Sara Rebecca Anna the Shunamite and the rest in the old of Marie Anna Martha Lydia Dorcas and many other in the new Testament doe evidently confute that prophane paradox of the Philosopher 4. And to deliver the regiment of women from the Cardinals vile and impure slaunder this country and nation of ours as is hath found the government of a woman the worst in the late Marian persecutions when more good men and women Saints of God were put to death than in any three Kings reigne beside so have we seene it in the next change the best of all other Princes reignes that went before famous Queene Elizabeths government as for flourishing peace honourable fame and name enriching of the Land subduing of forraine enemies enacting of good lawes may be compared with the reigne of any former Kings So for the advancing of true religion increasing of learning propagating the Gospell none of her predecessors came neere her That as the refining of coine being reduced from base money to pure silver and gold was her honour in the Civill State so the purging of religion according to the purity of the word of God in the Church shall bee her everlasting fame in the world and is her eternall reward with God 4. Confut. That Christ shall have no Iudges under him at the latter day but shall be the only Iudge himselfe Vers. 22. LEt them judge all small causes Origen upon these words hath this private conceit Hanc sâ—guram Iudicum non solum in hoc seculo sed etiam in futuro servandam c. 〈◊〉 this forme of Iudges shall be observed not only in this world but in the next And then he alleageth that text Matth. 18.28 That when the Sonne of man shall sit in the throne of Majesty yee which have followed me in the regeneration shall sit upon twelve seats and judge the twelve tribes of Israel Whereupon he inferreth that Christ at the day of judgement shall appoint other Judges beside himselfe Qui judicent populum de mineribus causiâ— c. Which shall judge the people in smaller causes referring the greater to him The Rhemisnis and Romanistes whose manner is to scrape all the refuse of the Fathers affirme likewise That the faithfull shall judge and give sentence with Christ at the latter day wresting the same text in Matthew to the same purpose Contra. 1. The Apostles and Saints are said indeed to judge the world but not in that sense as Christ is said to be the Judge of the world but as he saith his Word shall judge them at the latter day Ioh. 12.48 that is be a witnesse against them so the Word preached by the Saints in their life and their conversation following the same shall be a witnesse against the world and so their condemnation like as in the processe of judgement here in earth the evidence that is brought in and the witnesses produced are said to condemne the guilty partie and to judge them though the Judge only give sentence Thus Ambrose fitly expoundeth this phrase Iudicabunt Sancti hunc mundum quia exemplo fidei illorum perfidia mundi damnabitur The Saints shall judge the world because by example of their faith their perfidiousnesse shall be condemned 2. For otherwise if Christ should observe the same forme which Moses did to appoint coadjutors because he alone sufficed not this were to derogate from his all sufficient power who needeth not as man any assistants or fellow helpers Vers. 22. Every great matter let them bring to thee Upon this president the Romanistes would ground the papall reservation of cases from whom no appeale say they is to be made as there was not from Moses Tostat. quaest 11. in 18. cap. Exod. Contra. 1. There is great difference betweene the reservation of matters to Moses and of certaine cases to the Pope for Moses was set over but one nation which at this time encamped together within the compasse of not many miles and so they might with ease bring the weighty causes to him But the Pope challengeth to be the supreme Judge over all the world and so without infinite trouble the greater causes cannot be brought unto him 2. Moses judgement was sought for because hee could not erre having often conference with God to direct him as the Pope hath not and this Testatus confesseth Romanus pontifex c. The Roman Bishop though he have great power sometime is not a man very vertuous and though he be because he hath not God present to answer unto all his demands facilius errare potest he may more easily erre therefore that is but a foppish and fawning conclusion of the Canonists that the Pope hath Omnia jura in scrinio pectoris All lawes in his breast 3. Whereas Iethro intended in this device the peoples ease not to goe farre for their causes and Moses ability to performe his office neither of these inconveniences is helped in making appeales to Rome for neither is the Pope able to amend all such causes and the people would be infinitely molested to be hurried to Rome 4. And if it were not for the advantage of the Court and Consistory of Rome they would desire to bee eased rather of than cumbred with such appeales But Moses herein only sought the profit of Gods people not his owne Simler 6. Morall Observations 1. Obs. To take heed of idle and vaine talke Vers. 8. THen Moses told his father in law c. Moses did conferre with Iethro about the wondrous workes of God which the Lord had wrought for them Vnde arguuntur hi qui vanis colloquiis delectantur They then are reproved which are delighted with vaine talke Ferus Which may serve as a good motive in our dayes to cut off idle if not very prophane conference when wee meet remembring ever that of idle words we must give an account B. Babington 2. Observ. Workes must be joyned with faith Vers. 12. THen Iethro tooke burnt offerings c. Having beene thankfull in words now he addeth deeds for S. Iames calleth that a dead faith where workes want if we joyne both these together as Iethro did we shall fully give assurance both to others and to our selves of our true faith B. Babington 3. Obs. That we should doe all our workes as in Gods sight Vers. 12. THey came to eat bread with Moses father in law before God Hereupon Origen well noteth Sancti manducant bibunt in
desire to be washed of wantonnesse and pleasure it is not so lawfull upon any day si autem pro necessitaâ—â— corporis c. But if it be for the necessitie of the bodie we doe not forbid it upon the Lords day for no man hateth his owne flesh 2. If it be a sinne to wash upon the Lords day neither is it lawfull so much as to wash the face Si hoc in corporis parte conceditur cur hoc exigente necessitate toti corpori negatur If this be permitted in one part of the bodie why necessitie so requiring should it be denied to the whole bodie So then neither were the Jewes so strictly bound from all corporall labour as they superstitiously observe as may appeare by Ioshuahs and the whole hosts compassing of Jericho seven dayes together Iosh. 7. and by the Macchabees fighting upon the Sabbath 1 Macchab. 2.41 And Christians have more libertie herein than the Jewes had for it is lawfull for them to prepare their food upon the Lords day which it was not lawfull for the Jewes to doe upon their Sabbath for as Thom. Aquinas well resolveth Opus corporale pertinens ad conservandum salutem proprii corporis non violat Sabbatum A corporall worke belonging to the conservation of the health of ones bodie doth not violate the Sabbath and this is grounded upon that saying of our blessed Saviour The Sabbath was made for man and not man for the Sabbath Mark 2.27 God would not have the Sabbath which was made for mans benefit to be used to his hindrance Lyranus yeeldeth this reason betweene the strictnesse imposed upon the Jewes and the libertie of Christians quia illa vacatio figuralis erat because their resting was figurative and therefore was most strictly to be kept à figura quantumcunque modico subtracto mutatur tota significatio and take never so little from a figure the whole signification is changed as if you take l. from lapis or s. from stone that which remaineth signifieth nothing but though somewhat be taken from the substance of a stone it is a stone still 4. Conf. Against the Anabaptists that would have no day kept holy unto the Lord. IN the next place are the Anabaptists to be met withall and who else doe condemne the observation of the Lords day among Christians because the Apostle reproveth the Galathians for observing of dayes and moneths Galath 4. and in other places Contra. 1. The observing of dayes is not simply prohibited by the Apostle sed cum opinione cultus vel necessitatis but with an opinion of religion placed in the day and necessity the Jewes kept their Sabbath as making the observation of the day a part of Gods worship and they held it necessary to keepe that day unchangeable It was also unto them a type and figure of the spirituall rest But the Christians now keepe not the Lords day in any of these respects either as a day more holy in it selfe than others or as of necessitie to be kept but onely for order and decencie sake because it is meet that some certaine day should be set apart for the worship of God Vrsin 2. As in the practice of Physicke and in politike affaires and in the trade of husbandrie there is both a lawfull observation of dayes and an unlawfull for to observe seasons of the yeate for the earth and for ministring unto the bodie of man as also to make choice of the most convenient times for civill businesse is not unlawfull yet the superstitious respect of dayes as making some fortunate some unfortunate and to depend wholly upon the aspects of starres is a vaine and idle thing So likewise in the businesse of religion as dayes may bee superstitiously kept so they may also for order sake and to other good uses bee distinguished 3. Like as then though Christians yeeld a comely reverence unto the publike places of prayer yet not in like sort as the Jewes accounted of their Tabernacle so according to the same rule there is a preeminence given unto the Lords day but not with the like difference of dayes as the Jewes esteemed their Sabbath Simler 5. Conf. Against the Zuincfeldians that hold the preaching of the Word superfluous whereby the Lords day is sanctified THe Zuincfeldians doe also faile in the manner of celebrating the Lords day counting the ministery of the Gospell and preaching of the word of God whereby the Lords day is sanctified a superfluous thing cleaving wholly unto their vaine speculations and phantasticall visions and revelations whereas it is evident out of the Scriptures that both the old Sabbath of the Jewes was solemnized and kept in hearing Moses read and preached Acts 15.21 and the Lords day in like sort was sanctified by the Apostles with preaching Acts 20.7 ex Bastingio Now proceed we on to deale against the Romanists who diversly erre as touching the Lords day 6. Conf. That the Lords day is warranted by Scripture and not by tradition onely FIrst they hold that the keeping of the Lords day in stead of the Jewish Sabbath is not warranted by Scripture but onely by tradition from the Apostles To this purpose the Rhemists Matth. 15. sect 3. And there are other beside in these dayes that make the observation of the Lords day onely an Ecclesiasticall constitution Contra. 1. There are three most evident texts of Scripture usually alleaged which doe make it evident that this change of the Sabbath began in the time of the Apostles and so by their Apostolike authoritie being thereto guided by the Spirit is warranted and so declared and testified in Scripture These are the places Act. 20.7 1 Cor. 16.2 Revelat. 1.10 In the first we have the exercises of religion preaching and ministring the Sacraments which were peculiar to the Sabbath transferred to the first day of the weeke In the second publike charitable collections for the poore which was also used upon the Sabbath In the third the very name of the Lords day is set downe 2. And further that this day was consecrated by divine authoritie the great works doe shew wherewith this day from the beginning hath beene honoured as Augustine hath sorted them together Venerabilis est hic dies in quo transgressi sunt filiâ— Israel mare rubrum c. This day is to be reverenced wherein the Israelites passed over the red sea wherein Manna first rained upon the Israelites in the desert our Lord was baptized in Jordan water was turned into wine in Cana of Galile wherein the Lord blessed the five loaves wherewith he fed five thousand men wherein he rose againe from the dead entred into the house the doores being shut wherein the holy Ghost descended upon the Apostles c. Serm. 154. 3. This reason also may perswade it because the Lords day is now sanctified to holy uses as the Sabbath was to the Jewes but it belongeth onely unto God to sanctifie by his word as the Apostle saith Every creature is sanctified by the
word of God and prayer 1 Tim. 4.5 Therefore the Lords day must be warranted by the word before it can be sanctified and set apart to holy uses 5. And seeing the Jewes Sabbath is warranted by the word it must also be changed by the word there must bee the same authority in the alteration of it which was in the first institution The Lords day then was not appointed by the ordinary authority of the Church for then the Church by the same authority might constitute another day if there were cause which cannot be admitted but as Vrsinus saith Apostolica Ecclesiae pro libertate sibi à Christo donata c. The Apostolike Church according to the liberty given them of Christ did make choice of the first day for the seventh The Church then by the extraordinary power of the Apostles directed specially thereunto by the Spirit of God did alter the day and Tostatus saith well Tota Ecclesia Spiritu sancto ducta hunc deem instituit The whole Church being led by the holy Ghost did institute this day quaest 11. 7. Conf. Of the preeminence of the Lords day beyond other festivals ANother errour of the Romanists is that they require sanctification and necessary keeping of all holy dayes as making a necessity of keeping all alike Rhemist annot Galath 4. sect 5. Contra. 1. The same difference that was betweene the legall Sabbath and other their festivals remaineth still betweene the Lords day observed among Christians and other holy dayes but the Sabbath day was more strictly observed than the greatest festivals besides for on their Sabbath it was not lawfull to kindle a fire Exod. 35.3 nor to dresse their meat Exod. 16.23 but on other festivals they were not forbidden to doe such works as were to bee done about their meat Exod. 12.16 they were onely restrained from doing servile works Levit. 23.7 but the works about their meat and drinke were not servile 2. The observation of the Lords day doth simply binde every Christian in conscience though there were no positive Law of the Church for it that wheresoever a Christian liveth in any part of the world it is his dutie in remembrance of the resurrection of our blessed Saviour to sanctifie the Lords day but other festivals of Saints a man is not bound in conscience simply to keepe but as hee is bound in generall to yeeld obedience to the superiour authoritie in lawfull things for onely Gods immediate Commandements doe simply bind in conscience in respect of the thing commanded as the Apostle saith There is one lawgiver that is able to save and destroy Iam. 4.12 and no more but he alone therefore by this reason the Lords day hath a preeminence before other festivals 3. Hereunto I will adde Tostatus reason Sabbatum vel una quaecunque esset dies in hebdomada observanda videbatur dependere à ratione naturali The Sabbath or what other day is to be kept in the weeke seemeth to depend upon naturall reason as is shewed before quest 5. Caetera observationes sunt magis ex voluntate legislatoris Other observations depend rather of the will of the lawmaker Tostat. qu. 13. So our Lords day succeeding the Jewish Sabbath is grounded in part even upon the law of nature but other festivities depend ab arbitrio Ecclesiae of the determination of the Church So then to conclude this point as Augustine saith Quomodo Maria virgo mater Domini inter omnes mulieres principatum tenet sic inter caeteros dies haec omnium dierum mater est As the Virgin Marie the mother of our Lord is the principall among women so among other dayes this day is as the mother of the rest Sermon de temper 36. 8. Controv. To commit any sinne upon the Lords day is a double transgression THe Romanists here have another erroneous assertion that the internall act of religion pertaineth not to the keeping of the Sabbath but the externall and so consequently they denie that any sinne committed upon the Sabbath is thereby the greater Bellar. de cult sanctor lib. 3. cap. 10. prop. 4. Contra. 1. But the contrarie is evident out of Scripture that it belongeth to the rest of the Sabbath to abstaine from the works of sinne ut vacantes à pravis actionibus c. that being vacant or ceasing from evill actions they might suffer God to worke in them by his Spirit therefore the Lord saith speaking of his Sabbath It is a signe betweene me and you in your generations that I the Lord doe sanctifie you Exod. 31.13 And to the same purpose Ezechiel chap. 20.12 I have given them also my Sabbath to be a signe betweene me and them that they might know that I am the Lord that doe sanctifie them These places are urged to this purpose by Pelargus Bastingius 2. So the Fathers expound that precept of doing no servile worke upon the Sabbath Ne nos voluptas corporis libido succendant That the pleasure and lust of the bodie should not inflame us upon this day qui enim facit peccatum est servus peccati for he that committeth sinne is the servant of sinne So Hierome in Esaiam cap. 59. Likewise Augustine thus writeth Spiritualiter observat sabbatum Christianus abstinens se ab opere servili c. A Christian man doth spiritually observe the Sabbath in abstaining from servile worke what is this from servile worke from sinne Tractat. 4. in Ioann So also Thomas Est triplex servitus una qua homo servit peccato c. There is a threefold service one when a man serveth sinne altera qua homo servit homini c. another when man serveth man and this service is according to the bodie not in the minde tertia est servetus Dei the third is the service of God If we understand servile worke this last way it is not forbidden upon the Sabbath day sed alia opera servilia primo vel secundo modo c. but other servile works the first or second way are contrary to the keeping of the Sabbath Sic Thomas 2.2 quaest 122. art 4. addit 3. 3. Hereunto I will adde Tostatus reason Hence it followeth that hee which committeth adulterie killeth or is drunken upon the Lords day magis peccat quà m si aliis diebus idem ageret sinneth more than if he should doe the same thing upon other dayes quia sic est transgressor duplicis praecepti because he so transgresseth two Commandements that precept Thou shalt not commit adulterie thou shalt not kill or any other and this of sanctifying the Sabbath Tostat. qu. 12. See more of this question elsewhere Synops. Centur. 2. err 70. 4. Morall observations 1. Observ. Against hypocrisie and vaine glorie Vers. 8. REmember the Sabbath day to sanctifie it c. Rupertus applieth this text against the doing of any thing for vaine glorie or to bee seene of men but wee should referre all to the praise of God In omnibus operibus tuis Deiretributionem
the Scribes and Pharisies he therefore giveth the true sense of the law given them by Moses which allowed lawfull warre to be made Therefore Christs meaning cannot be that evill and injuries can no way be resisted 2. It must be considered that Christ here speaketh unto private men not unto Magistrates that they were not to seeke revenge which belonged unto the rulers and governours 3. Our blessed Saviours meaning is to restraine mens corrupt affections and grudges in seeking revenge and to exhort them to patience for according to the very letter our Saviour himselfe did not performe this precept for being smitten with a rod he did not turne the other cheeke but answered for himselfe Ioh. 18.23 So also did S. Paul when the high Priest commanded him to be smitten on the face Act. 23. 2. S. Paul would not have Christians to goe to law one with another 2 Cor. 6. much lesse it is lawfull to make warre Answ. S. Paul simply findeth not fault with their going to law but because they one convented another before Heathen Judges and for that they were impatient of wrongs and would put up nothing one at anothers hand 3. Our Saviour biddeth Peter to put up his sword adding further that they which take the sword shall perish with the sword Matth. 26.52 Answ. It is plaine that our Saviour speaketh of the private use of the sword not of the publike in lawfull battell when as the souldier doth not take the sword into his hand by his private authoritie but it is committed unto him by the commandement of the Magistrate 4 The parable of the tares is objected which our Saviour would have grow untill the time of harvest Answ. The end and scope of this parable must be considered which is to shew the state and condition of Christs Church in this world that therein the wicked and hypocrites are mixed among the faithfull and so it shall bee till Christ shall come in the end of the world to purge his floore and take away all the chaffe for otherwise if it were not lawfull to take away the evill there should be no place neither for Civill nor Ecclesiasticall discipline and so Saint Paul should have beene contrarie to his master who willed the incestuous young man to bee excommunicate 1 Cor. 5. and so the tares to bee weeded out of the corne 5 The Apostle saith The weapons of our warfare are not carnall c. 2. Cor. 10.4 we must not then use carnall and outward weapons Answ. 1. The Apostle speaketh there onely of such weapons which wee are to use against spirituall evils which indeed are onely spirituall not of those which are used against men 2. After the like manner S. Paul saith Christ sent me not to baptize but to preach the Gospell 1 Cor. 2.17 yet he baptized some his meaning is he was not sent chiefly to baptize but to preach so the chiefest armour of Christians are spirituall but they may use carnall and externall also Simler But now on the contrarie side that it is lawfull for Christian Magistrates to wage battell it may be thus shewed by the authoritie of the word of God 1. Deut. 20. there are divers lawes prescribed whom they shall make choice of to go to warre how they should be exhorted by the Priests and other orders are there expressed which had beene superfluous if it were a thing simply unlawfull to enterprise warre 2. In the new Testament when the souldiers came to Iohn to know of him what they should doe he biddeth them not to lay aside their weapons or to forsake their calling but not to doe wrong and to be content with their wages Luk. 3.14 Wee read in the Gospell of a Centurion that beleeved in Christ Matth. 8. and in the Acts of a Centurion converted by Saint Peter Act. 10. who retained that office and calling still 3. Further seeing it is the office of the Magistrate that beareth not the sword for nought to take vengeance on him that doth evill Rom. 13.4 And it may fall out that not one or two or a few but a multitude may doe evill and commit some outrage who cannot be resisted but by force of armes the Magistrate then is herein to doe his dutie to suppresse the evill and to take vengeance on them 4. But whereas it will be objected that there are no precepts in the new Testament concerning this matter but onely in the old wee answer 1. That it is sufficient that we finde it there for whatsoever is prescribed in the old Testament not repugnant to nor reversed in the new Christians are to receive and obey it was the wicked opinion of the Marcionites and Manichees which rejected the old Testament 2. And the reason why no mention is made in the new Testament of waging of battell and making of warre is for that there was then no Christian Magistrate by whose authoritie warre must be taken in hand And because there was then no such civill power in the Church the Lord gave unto his Apostles an extraordinarie power in punishing the wicked as S. Peter did strike Ananias and Sapphira with sudden death Act. 5. So they needed no schooles then because they were furnished with extraordinarie gifts of the Spirit but now they are needfull those extraordinarie gifts being ceased and so it is necessarie now that the Magistrate should use the materiall sword that spirituall sword of vengeance which the Apostles had being now no more exercised 5. Briefly somewhat shall be added here what conditions are required and ought to concurre to make just warre which are these three 1. By whose authoritie 2. Upon what occasion 3. In what manner warre must be taken in hand 1. Warre must not be attempted without the authoritie of the Magistrate for he beareth the sword Rom. 13.4 If the examples of Sampson and Abraham be objected for the first we answer that hee was moved by the Spirit for the second that he was no private man or subject to any other but free and at his owne command beside he was not without the direction of Gods Spirit And further if a true man shall defend himselfe against a theefe by the sword or a Citie being suddenly besieged or invaded of the enemie the Magistrate being absent in these cases it is lawfull to use the sword because though in particular they have not the expresse consent of the Magistrate yet in generall the lawes permit that it shall be lawfull for every one in such desperat cases to defend themselves 2. The causes of just warre are these three 1. When as any battell is enterprised by the speciall Commandement of God as Saul was sent against Amalek 2. To rescue and recover such things as are unlawfully taken away as David pursued the Amalekites that had burned Ziklag and carried away their goods and their wives and redeemed them againe 1 Sam. 30. 3. To deliver the oppressed and to bridle the insolencie and crueltie of the
Wise-man saith Say not thou I will recompence evill but wait upon the Lord and he shall save thee Prov. 20.12 3. Observ. Surfetting by eâ—cesse forbidden FUrther by this precept they are condemned qui luxu se occidunt c. which kill themselves with surfetting and drunkennesse riot and excesse Basting whereupon often ensueth also quarrelling and wounds as the Wise-man sheweth To whom is woe to whom is strife c. to whom are wounds without cause to whom is rednesse of the eyes to them that tarrie long at wine Prov. 23.29 30. The seventh Commandement 1. Questions discussed QUEST I. Of the order and negative propounding of this Commandement THou shalt not commit adulterie 1. This Commandement very fitly followeth after the other Thou shalt not kill Quia post injuriam quae infertur personae nulla est major quà m illa quae infertur conjunctae Because next after the injurie done to the person there is none greater than that which is offred unto the joynt person for they two shall be one flesh Thom. in opuscul So also Lyranus 2. This Commandement is propounded negatively rather than affirmatively because the negative is more generall than the affirmative Tum quoad tempâ—ra quà m personas both in respect of the time and persons for at all times and in all places it is unlawfull to kill to commit adulterie c. but at all times and in all places wee must not honour our parents and for the persons wee must not offer violence or wrong unto any but for the affirmative it is impossible to doe good to all Thom. in Epist. ad Roman cap. 13. See before quest 1. upon the sixth Commandement QUEST II. Whether the uncleane desire of the heart be forbidden in this precept IN this Commandement not onely the impuritie of the bodie but of the soule also is forbidden and chastitie commanded in both Gregories opinion is that God Per hoc praeceptum non peccata cogitationis sed operis resecuit c. Doth not by this precept cut off the sinfull thoughts but the sinfull act and that Christ afterward in the law Cogitationes hominum religavit Did bind also the thoughts of men In Ezech. homil 13. Augustine also is of opinion that in this precept Ipsum opus notatum est The worke of uncleannesse it selfe is noted but in the other Thou shalt not covet Ipsa concupiscentia the very concupiscence because saith he sometimes it may fall out that a man may commit adulterie cùm non concupiscat illam when he doth not covet her but upon some other cause doth companie with her Aliquando eam concupiscat nec ei misceatur poenam timens Sometime he may covet her and not company with her fearing the punishment in quaest 71. in Exod. Contra. 1. Our Saviour Christ doth not adde any thing to the law of Moses or bringeth in any new interpretation but doth free and cleare the law from the grosse and corrupt gloses of the Scribes and Pharisies delivering the true sense and meaning thereof as it was first given unto the people And therefore Chrysostome well saith Vt per concordiam mandatorum ipse inveniatúr author legis fuisse gratia That by the agreement of the Commandements in the old and new Testament the same may be found to bee the author of the law and of grace in Matth. hom 11. And that even the inward concupiscence and desire was forbidden in the old Testament it is evident by Iobs practice in whose heart the morall law was written I have made a covenant with mine eyes why then should I thinke on a maid chap. 31.1 2. Concerning Augustines opinion the concupiscence which is joyned with a full purpose onely wanting opportunitie and being restrained by feare from the externall act is a breach of this Commandement and not of the last as our blessed Saviour expoundeth Matth. 5.28 What kinde of concupiscence is prohibited in the last precept and how it differeth herein ftom this shall bee shewed afterward when wee come to that place 2. And that commixtion which hath no concupiscence nor consent of will being violent and forced as in them which are ravished it is no adulterie at all which alwayes proceedeth out of the heart 3. But that the inward sanctimonie and puritie of the minde is here commanded and the contrarie forbidden it is thus proved 1. By the definition of puritie and chastitie which is to be holy both in bodie and spirit as S. Paul describeth a true Virgin 1 Cor. 7.34 So the same Apostle 1 Thess. 5.23 That your whole spirit soule and bodie may be kept blamelesse unto the comming of our Lord Iesus Christ. 2. Both the soules and bodies of the faithfull are the Temples of the Spirit and therefore ought to be kept holy 1 Cor. 3.16 Know yee not that yee are the Temple of God and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you if any destroy the Temple of God him shall God destroy Basting 3. Chrysostome urgeth these foure reasons first from the interpretation of our blessed Saviour who sheweth that this Commandement is broken in the very inward lust and concupiscence Matth. 5.28 4. Secondly from the analogie and correspondencie which it hath with other Commandements that Irasci proximis sine causa to be angrie with our neighbours without cause is a breach of the precedent Commandement Thou shalt not kill So Concupiscere mulierem alienam c. to desire a strange woman though the act of concupiscence follow not is against this precept 5. Thirdly in respect of God Qui non tantum opus hominis aspicit quantum cor Who doth not so much looke unto the worke of man as to his heart 6. Fourthly because concupiscence is the cause of adulterie Omne adulterium ex concupiscentia All adulterie proceedeth from concupiscence as our blessed Saviour sheweth Mark 7.21 Even from the heart of man proceed evill thoughts adulteries fornications c. Quomodo ergo tolletur adulterium nisi pracisa fuerit concupiscentia c. How then shall adulterie be taken away unlesse concupiscence be first cut off Homil. 12. in Matth. Seeing then that the effect that is adultery and outward uncleannesse is forbidden in this precept it followeth also that the very cause thereof which is concupiscence should be restrained QUEST III. Other acts of uncleannesse beside adulterie here forbidden COncerning the externall act of uncleannesse which is in the very letter of this precept prohibited the Hebrewes are of opinion that onely concubitus adulterinus the adulterous act is here forbidden But this opinion is easily convinced 1. Tostatus urgeth this reason Qui prohibet minus malum à fortiori prohibet majus c. He that forbiddeth the lesse evill doth much more prohibit the greater evill for there are more unlawfull acts of uncleannesse than adulterie as those unnaturall sinnes committed either with another kinde as with brute beasts which is monstrous or with the same kinde and with the same sex as
who did hold concupiscentiam non esse peccatum that concupiscence is not sinne whose objections were these 1. Object Such things as are naturall are not evill but concupiscence is naturall therefore it is not evill nor consequently sinne Answ. This argument must be answered by a distinction for by naturall here may be understood that which was made naturall in man by creation before his fall and so the proposition is true but the assumption is false for inordinate concupiscence and appetite was not in man before his fall or it is taken for that which is now incident to mans corrupt nature since his fall and so the assumption is true but the proposition false 2. Object Even in our nature as it now standeth corrupt the appetite or desire to such things as tend to the conservation of nature and to decline and shun the contrarie are not evill but such is the concupiscence to meat and drinke and such like Ergo. Answ. 1. Such motions and appetites of themselves are not evill as they are naturall motions but if they be inordinate motions and exceed a just measure they are evill as to have an immoderate desire to meat or drinke For as it was naturall in Eve to desire to eat of the fruit of the tree yet to desire it against the Commandement of God was evill so is it with these naturall motions if they bee immoderate and inordinate they are evill 2. There are other concupiscences beside these which are neither naturall nor tending to the conservation of nature as coveting another mans house or wife c. which can have no such excuse or pretenâ—â— 3. Object That which is not in mans power to avoid is no sinne but not to covet is not in mans power Ergo it is no sinne Answ. 1. The proposition is false for sinne is not measured by the necessitie or libertie of nature but by the disagreement which it hath with the will of God 2. When God first printed the law in mans nature before his fall then were the precepts of God given unto man in his power to keepe though man by his voluntarie corruption hath lost his power and libertie yet God forgoeth not his power and right of commanding 4. But that concupiscence is sinne it is both evident by this law that would not forbid it unlesse it were sinne and by the Apostle who useth the same argument I had not knowne sinne but by the law for I had not knowne lust except the law had said Thou shalt not lust Rom. 7.7 Vrsin 2. Confut. Against the Papists that denie concupiscence to be sinne in the regenerate SEcondly the Papists are herein Semipelagians who generally affirme and hold that concupiscence remaining after baptisme is not properly sinne nor forbidden by commandement Rhemist 〈◊〉 Rom. 6. sect 6. So was it decreed in the Tridentine Synode that concupiscence non est vere proprie peccatum in renatis is not verily and properly a sinne in the regenerate but that it is so called quia ex peccato est in peccatum inclinat because it commeth of sinne and inclineth to sinne Session 1. cap. 1. They object thus 1. Object Sinne maketh men guiltie before God of eternall death but the regenerate are not guiltie of eternall death therefore concupiscence in them is no sinne Answ. 1. By this reason there shall bee no sinne at all in the regenerate for there is no condemnation at all to them that are in Christ Jesus 2. Neither concupiscence nor any sinne else shall condemne the regenerate but that is not because concupiscence is no sinne but that both it and all other sinnes are pardoned in Christ and so not imputed 2. Object Originall sinne is taken away in Baptisme therefore concupiscence in the regenerate is no sinne Answ. Originall sinne is not simply taken away in Baptisme but onely quoad reatum in respect of the guilt and as the Schoolmen say it is taken away formally in Baptisme but not materially There are two things to be considered in originall sinne the disagreement or repugnancie which it hath with the law of God and the guilt of the punishment This latter way originall sinne is remitted and released in Baptisme it shall never be laid unto the charge of the faithfull as S. Paul saith Who shall lay any thing to the charge of Gods chosen Rom. 8.33 But the other remaineth still in Gods children as S. Paul confesseth of himselfe Rom. 7.23 I see another law in my members rebelling against the law of my minde but yet though it remaine and have a being in the faithfull it doth not reigne in them as the same Apostle exhorteth Rom. 6.12 Let not sinne reigne in your mortall bodie 3. But that concupiscence is sinne in the very regenerate it is evident by this precept Thou shalt not covet which commandement is given generally to all both the regenerate and unregenerate S. Paul also calleth the rebellion of his flesh which he felt in himselfe being now regenerate the law of sinne Rom. 7.23.25 And the Apostle speaketh to men regenerate when he saith Be renewed in the spirit of your minds Ephes. 4.23 which renovation needed not if concupiscence in them were no sinne 4. But that place of Augustine will bee objected Quamvis insint dum sumus in corpore mortis hujus peccati desideria c. Although while we are in the bodie of this death there be in us the desire of sinne yet if we should give assent to none of them non esset unde diceremus c. dimitte debita nostra we should have no cause to say to our heavenly Father Forgive us our debts c. August epist. 200. Answ. 1. Augustine must be understood to speake of actuall sinnes that if so men had grace never to consent to their concupiscence they should not need to pray for remission of such sinnes 2. And who is there that liveth who sometime is not carried away with concupiscence to give assent unto it So that if Augustine should speake generally of all sinne yet his speech being conditionall if we should give assâ—â— to none of them and that condition being kept of none this proveth not concupiscence not to bee sinne See more of this controversie Synops. Centur. 4. err 16. 3. Confut. That no concupiscence is a veniall sinne in it selfe THirdly Thomas Aquin his assertion commeth here to be examined Not a quòd cupiditas tunâ— est peccatum mortale quando sine ratione c. Note that concupiscence is then mortall sinne when as the things of our neighbours are coveted without reason but when they are reasonably desired it is veniall Thomas in opuscul Contra. 1. This distinction of mortall and veniall sinnes being understood in their sense that some sinnes in the condition and qualitie thereof are mortall some veniall is contrarie to the Scripture which maketh death the wages of sinne Rom. 6.23 that is of all but to the faithfull through Gods grace all sinnes are veniall
and shall never be laid unto their charge and so no concupiscence is mortall 2. There can be no reasonable coveting of another mans things for reason is grounded upon the law of nature against the which such concupiscence is therefore the coveting of our neighbours goods being a transgression of this morall precept is in it owne nature mortall but through Gods mercie in Christ both it and all other sinnes to the faithfull are veniall and pardonable and not otherwise 4. Confut. That Marie was not void of originall sinne and concupiscence FUrther Thomas Aquin hath another position Post peccatum propter corruptionem nullus evadit concupiscentiam praeter Christus virgo gloriosa c. After sinne entred because of corruption none can escape concupiscence beside Christ and the glorious Virgin Thom. in opuscul So the Rhemists All men are borne in sinne Christ onely excepted and his mother for his honour Annotat. Rom. 5. sect 9. Contra. 1. The Apostle saith Rom. 3.19 Whatsoever the law saith it saith to them which are under the law that every mouth may be stopped and all the world be culpable before God But Mary was under the law and culpable before God as others were Ergo the law also saith to her Thou shalt not covet 2. Againe the same Apostle saith The law was our schoolmaster to bring us to Christ that we might be made righteous by faith Galath 3.24 But Mary was made righteous by faith for shee calleth Christ her Saviour in her song Luk. 1.47 Therefore the law also was a schoolmaster to her to bring her to Christ. 3. S. Paul further saith Ephes. 2.3 We were by nature the children of wrath as well as others He speaketh generally of all the faithfull therefore even Mary was by nature the childe of wrath and consequently borne in originall sinne 4. Divers infirmities are discovered in Scripture in the Virgin Mary as Luk. 2.48 her finding fault with Christ Matth. 12.46 her interrupting of Christ in his sermon Ioh. 2.2 her prescribing of the time to Christ to shew a miracle in turning the water into wine when Christ rebuked her saying Woman what have I to doe with thee All these infirmities doe shew that Mary was not void of originall sinne And therefore upon these reasons and testimonies of Scripture we inferre that Mary was conceived and borne in sinne as others are and Christ onely is excepted of whom onely the Apostle saith He was in all things tempted in like sort yet without sinne Heb. 4.15 As Origen also well saith Solus Christus sine macula Onely Christ was without spot Homil. 1. in Levit. See more also of this question Synops. Centur. 2. err 79. 5. Confut. Against the Romanists that it is impossible in this life to keepe the law of God NOw whereas the law restraineth the very inward concupiscence and corrupt desire herein appeareth the perfection of the law and how impossible it is for any in this life to keepe the law of God perfectly as the Apostle saith Rom. 7.14 We know that the law is spirituall but I am carnall sold under sinne There are two reasons why it is not possible to keepe the law both because it is spirituall not restraining onely the externall act but the internall spirituall motions and so is a most perfect rule of righteousnesse and for that we are on the other side imperfect full of weaknesse and corruption and carnall Here then is discovered another error of the Romanists That the precepts and commandements of God unto a man justified and in the state of grace are not impossible to be kept Concil Trident. sess 6. can 18. First then the truth concerning this point shall briefly be opened and then their objections answered First here we are to consider a fourefold state and condition of man 1. As he was created in a perfit state before his fall when it was possible for man to have kept the law and to have conformed himselfe in perfit obedience to the will of his Creator 2. But man considered in his corrupt nature before he be regenerate and restored can by no meanes keepe the law as the Prophet saith Can the blacke moore change his skinne or the Leopard his spots then may yee also doe good that are accustomed to doe evill Iere. 13.23 So the Apostle Whatsoever is not of faith is sinne Rom. 14.23 And We are not able of our selves to thinke any thing 2 Cor. 3.5 3. In the restored estate of man by regeneration and new birth the law is partly possible to bee kept partly impossible It is possible two wayes first by the imputation of the righteousnesse of Christ who hath fulfilled the law for us for he needed not fulfill it for himselfe as hee suffered not for himselfe for he was perfitly holy and just even from his conception communicatione justitiae divinae by the communication of the divine justice Marbach So the Apostle saith Rom. 10.4 Christ is the end of the law that is the fulfilling of the law for righteousnesse to every one that beleeveth Secondly the law is possible to be kept of the regenerate Quo ad inchoationem obedientia internae externa in respect of the inchoation or beginning of obedience internall and externall as the Apostle saith This is the love of God that we keepe his commandements 1 Ioh. 5.3 For he which without this beginning of righteousnesse that is without regeneration saith he knoweth and serveth God is a liar Vrsin This regeneration and inchoate obedience being wrought in the faithfull by the Spirit of God though it doe not wolly extirpate and root out sinne yet it keepeth it so under that it reigne not in them and it so renueth them that they labour to resist sinne and to live according to the law of God which obedience though it bee in it selfe imperfect yet is it accepted of God by faith in Christ in whose perfect righteousnesse whatsoever is imperfect in our obedience is perfected and our imperfections pardoned Marbach Yet even in the regenerate the law is impossible to be kept in respect of that perfection which God requireth and therefore the Prophet David saith Psal. 143.3 Enter not into judgement with thy servant for in thy sight shall none that liveth be justified 1. The faithfull doe both imperfectly keepe the law committing many things against it 2. Even in those things wherein they keepe the law they have some imperfections as the Prophet Isay saith 64.6 All our righteousnesse is as a stained clout Vrsin But there is great difference betweene the regenerate and unregenerate even when they sinne 1. Gods purpose standeth to save the Elect though they sometime slip so is it not with the other 2. Their repentance in the end is certaine so is it not in the unregenerate 3. Even in the sinnes of the regenerate there remaineth yet some seed of faith which is not utterly extinguished nor they wholly given over but the wicked
and unregenerate are wholly sold over unto sinne and their very conscience is polluted Vrsin 4. In the glorious state of the Saints in the next life the obedience of the Saints shall bee perfect and they shall wholly be conformable to the will of God and then we shall be just not onely by the imputative justice of Christ sed propria essentiali justitia but by a proper essentiall justice and then we shall fully be made like to the image of Christ as the Apostle saith Rom. 8.29 Those which he knew before he also predestinate to be made like the image of his Sonne Marbach Now the contrarie objections are these 1. Object The works of the Spirit are perfect but good works in the regenerate are the works of the Spirit therefore they are perfect Answ. This argument proceedeth from that which is simpliciter simplie and absolutely said to bee of the Spirit to that which secundum quid after a sort is of the Spirit the works of the faithfull are not absolutely the works of the Spirit but they are so the works of the Spirit as they be also our works so they are pure as they proceed of the Spirit but impure and imperfect as they are wrought by man 2. Object They which are conformable to the image of Christ have perfect works The faithfull are conformable in this life to the image of Christ Ergo. Answ. The proposition is true onely of those which are perfectly conformable but so are not the faithfull in this life but onely in part as the Apostle saith 1 Cor. 13.12 Now I know in part and as our knowledge is so is our obedience both imperfect 3. Object There is no condemnation to the faithfull Rom. 8.1 therefore their works are perfect Answ. The argument followeth not for the privilege of the faithfull and their exemption from condemnation dependeth not upon the perfection of their works but upon the perfection of Christs righteousnesse imputed to them by faith 4. Object Christ at his comming shall render unto every one according to his works but it standeth not with Gods justice to give a perfect reward unto imperfect works therefore the works of the regenerate because they shall be perfectly rewarded are perfect Answ. 1. The obedience of the faithfull shall bee perfectly rewarded not according to the law of works but according to the law of faith whereby the righteousnesse of Christ is imputed and is rewarded in them being theirs by faith as fully as if it were their owne 2. Yet Christ shall judge also according to their works not as causes of the reward but as testimonies and lively arguments of their faith Vrsin 5. Object The Scripture ascribeth perfection to the works of the Saints as it is said of Noah Gen. 6.9 that he was a just and perfect man in his time so Hezekiah saith 2 King 20.3 I have walked before thee with a perfect heart Answ. 1. These and the like sayings must be understood de perfectione partium non graduum of the perfection of the parts of obedience not of the degree of perfection that is the faithfull doe exercise their obedience in every part of the law but not in a perfect degree or measure 2. They are said to bee perfect in comparison onely of such as were weake and imperfect 3. And further their sinceritie and perfection is understood as being opposite unto dissimulation and hypocrisie that their heart was perfect toward the Lord that is unfained without any dissimulation in which sense the Prophet David saith Iudge me according to mine innocencie Psal. 7.8 6. Object The Apostle saith Whosoever is borne of God sinneth not 1 Iohn 3.9 the faithfull then being borne of God sinne not Answ. The Apostle understandeth here not the dwelling of sinne but the reigning of sinne for otherwise he should be contrarie to himselfe who had said before chap. 1.8 If we say we have no sinne we deceive our selves and the truth is not in us They which are borne of God sinne not that is sinne though it remaine in them it reigneth not in them as S. Paul saith Though we walke in the flesh we doe not warre after the flesh Vrsin 7. It is evident then that the law was not given to justifie men thereby as the Apostle saith Rom. 3.20 Therefore by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified in his sight for by the law commeth the knowledge of sinne This then is the end and use of the law 1. It sheweth what God is one that loveth justice and hateth iniquitie 2. It is as a glasse wherein we may see that image after the which man was at the first created which now is defaced in him by sinne 3. It is a rule and line after the which wee should square out our life and actions 4. It sheweth the corruption of our nature and so is as a schoolemaster to bring us to Christ Marbach So Augustine saith Hac est utilitas legis ut hominem de sua infirmitate convincat gratiae medicinam quae in Christo est implorare compellat This is the profit of the law to convince man of his infirmitie and to drive him to seeke the medicine of grace in Christ Epist. 200. 6. Confut. That the Morall law nor any precept thereof may be by humane authoritie dispensed with THere remaineth yet one point to be discussed whether any of the precepts of the Morall law may be by humane authoritie dispensed withall wherein the Popes Canonists have heretofore given unto their terrene god an infinite and unreasonable power for these were their conclusions that Papa potest dispensare contra jus divinum The Pope may dispense against the law of God contra jus natura against the law of nature contra novum Testamentum against the new Testament contra Apostolum against the Apostle Papa potest dispensare de omnibus praeceptis veteris novi Testamenti The Pope may dispense with all the precepts of the old and new Testament c. But herein I preferre the judgement of Tostatus a moderate writer of that side who denieth unto the Pope any such authoritie and answereth the contrarie objections 1. Object As among men the Law-maker may dispense with his law so God that gave the Morall law is therefore above the law and may dispense with it and if God may dispense then the Prelates of the Church consequently may dispense because they are in Gods stead Answ. First to the proposition this may bee answered 1. That in humane lawes which tend unto the common good the preservation of the publike state the maintenance of peace and of justice the Law-giver himselfe cannot so dispense as to overthrow the end of those lawes as that it shall be lawfull to disturbe the publike state or such like for this were to evert the very scope and end of the law but yet in particular cases he may dispense as where an order is that every one shall watch
among other things to make the candlesticke therefore the Jewes conceit hath but a slender ground because it is said tegasâ—h â—iet the candlesticke shall be made for before it is put in the active vegasitha And thou shalt make 2. And in the same word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 tegaseh they have another observation as slender curious because the letter jod is superfluous for ordinarily it should be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 tiggaseh with dagâ—sh without jod they thinke jod which signifieth ten to be added to signifie that afterward Salomon should make ten candlestickes as he did 1 King 7. But it is an usuall thing with the Hebrewes for this letter sometime to be defective sometime to be superfluous without any mystery Yet Tostatus is here deceived that saith they ground this their conceit here quia deficit litera jod because the letter jod was wanting for in the foresaid word jod is not wanting but superfluous QUEST XLVI Of the instruments belonging to the candlesticke Vers. 38. THe snuffers and snuf-dishes 1. There were two kind of instruments which belonged unto the golden candlesticke the snuffers wherewith the lampe was purged the word malecâ—chaim is taken also for tongs wherewith coales are taken out of the fire Isay 6. and because snuffers are as it were little tongs to the like purpose they are called by the same name Oleaster The other instrument Iunius thinketh served to cleanse the dropping of the lampes Lyran. So also Tostatus thinketh they were certaine vessels containing water to quench the snuffe in that it should not smell 3. There were also certaine pipes to every lampe wherein the oyle was put to run into the nosle or boule of the candlesticke where the lampe burned as may appeare by Zacharies description chap. 4.2 where the Prophet alluding unto the fashion of the golden candlesticke in the Temple for otherwise if he had made any new description the Jewes would not have given any credit unto him maketh mention of seven lampes and a boule that is to every one a boule to receive the oyle and of seven golden pipe Now all these are here in Moses comprehended under the name of lampes which had both their severall pannes and receptacles of the oyle and certaine little pipes and conveyances beside to powre in the oyle by Tostat. qu. 30. QUEST XLVII How much a talent was Vers. 39. OF a talent of gold 1. The scholasticall historie maketh mention of three kinde of talents the Merchants talent which was fiftie pound the Citizens talent which was 70. pound and the talent of the Tabernacle which was 120. pound Tostat. qu. 33. 2. There was also the common talent which contained 60. pound and the great talent which was 80. pound Ribera 3. Oleaster thinketh that the word here used cicar signifieth not a talent but portionem frustum a peece or portion who herein dissenteth from all Interpreters in this place and if no certaine quantitie of gold had beene named it had beene a very imperfect description to say Of a peece of gold 4. Iosephus esteemeth this talent at 100. pound Epiphanius at 125. pound but the right valuation as Rab. Salomon thinketh was 120. pound double to the common talent So also Rupertus Tostatus Ribera Lippoman And every pound contained 60. common sicles Ribera As may be gathered by comparing these places together 1 King 10.17 and 2 Chron. 9.16 For in the first place it is said Three pound of gold went 〈◊〉 a shield and in the latter Three hundred shekels went to a shield A talent of gold then by this account weighed 7200. shekels counting the talent at 120. pound and every pound at 60. shekels And a pound of gold in value is esteemed at 100. crownes and the talent at 12000. crownes Iun. Montanus then is deceived which maketh the weight of a talent to be but a thousand and eight hundred sicles therein following Camhius and Levi Getson in 1 Sam. cap. 17. 5. Now the reasons why the summe of gold is named whereof the candlesticke should be made and so not in the rest may be yeelded to bee these two both because the candlesticke was all of gold so were not the other neither the Arke nor the table and for that their measure is seâ— downe both the length and breadth and so they might ghesse how much gold might goe to the making of them by the measure but here because there is no proportion set downe of the candlesticke the gold is summed that went to the making of it Tostat. qu. 33. QUEST XLVIII Of the mysticall application of the candlesticke COncerning the application of this ceremoniall part of the Tabernacle 1. Iosephus by the seven lampes understandeth the seven Planets and the greatest in the middest sheweth the Sunne the greatest and the middlemost of the Planets 2. Tostatus by the candlesticke would have set forth the life of man and by the seven branches the seven dayes of the weeke which being multiplied doe measure out the time of mans life q. 33. 3. So Rupertus by the six branches would have insinuated the six dayes of the creation and by the shaft in the middest which made the seventh the seventh day wherein God rested 4. Beda by the three branches one way and three another thinketh to be understood the Doctors of the Church which in the old Testament did fidem sanctae Trinitatis designare c. hold the faith of the holy Trinitie But these applications are somewhat curious and against the Apostles rule Which are shadowes of things to come but the bodie is in Christ Coloss. 2.17 These types therefore and figures are shadowes of things to come not past or then present and they must be referred to Christ the bodie of them 5. Wherefore 1. this candlesticke some understand to be the Church of God as Apocal. chap. 1.2 3. the Churches are compared to candlesticks Ribera Piscator But they are single candlesticks not the candlesticke with seven lampes 2. It better therefore signifieth Christ who is the true light that inlighteneth his Church as Gregorie Quis in candelabro nisi redemptor humani generis designatur Who is expressed in the candlesticke but the redeemer of mankinde So also Beda Hastile candelabri ipse qui est caput Ecclesia debet intelligi By the shaft of the candlesticke must the head of the Church be understood Ferus also to the same purpose Candelabrum Christus qui veri luminis est sustentaculum Christ is the candlesticke who is the upholder of the true light 3. The six branches doe betoken the Apostles and Pastors of the Church which are as branches which come from Christ who is the vine as these doe issue out of the shaft or bodie of the candlesticke Marb 4. The seven lampes doe signifie the manifold gifts of the Spirit Pelargus 5. The knops and flowers the divers graces and ornaments which the Lord endueth the faithfull with Simler 6. As the candlesticke gave light unto the
Tabernacle so we are in darknesse unlesse the Lord Sursum Ecclesiam illuminet from above doe lighten his Church Calvine 7. As the six branches doe make one bodie with the shaft so Ministri in Christo concordiae studeant Ministers in Christ must studie for concord Osiand 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. Of the divine nature of Christ. Vers. 9. ACcording to all that I shall shew thee so shall they make the forme of the Tabernacle c. As God appointed the forme and fashion of the Tabernacle but the matter thereof was offered by the Israelites So Christ tooke his humanitie from among men Divinitaâ— quae mera forma est à Deo patre ab atâ—rno genita est but his divine nature which is as the forme was begotten of God his Father from all eternitie Simler As touching his humanitie the Apostle saith For as much as the children were partakers of flesh and bloud he also himselfe tooke part with them Of his divine and everlasting being the Evangelist speaketh In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and that Word was God Ioh. 1.1 2. Doct. God will not be worshipped with will-worship FUrther it is hence gathered Forma Tabernaculi non relicta est hominum arbitrio c. The forme of the Tabernacle is not left to the will of man no not to the judgement of Moses to teach us that God will not be served with will-worship according to the devices and inventions of men but as he himselfe hath prescribed Pelarg. Piscatâ—r So our blessed Saviour alleageth in the Gospell out of the Prophet They worship me in vaine teaching for doctrines the commandements of men Mark 7.7 3. Doct. Of the ministerie of Angels Vers. 18. THou shalt make two Cherubims of gold Which sheweth that God useth the ministerie of Angels in protecting of his Church Piscator As the Apostle saith Are they not all ministring spirits sent forth to minister for their sakes that shall be heires of salvation Heb. 1.14 4. Doct. Our sinnes are covered in Christ. Vers. 21. ANd thou shalt put the Mercie seat upon the Arke This Mercie seat signifieth Christ that as it covered the Arke where the tables of the law were kept so our sinnes which are discovered by the law Tecta sunt operculo illo gratia reconciliationis are covered by that covering of grace and reconciliation as it is in the Psalme Blessed is he whose wickednesse is forgiven and whose sinne is covered Psal. 32.1 Borrh. 5. Places of Controversie 1. Confut. Against the sumptuous decking and adorning of Churches Vers. 3. THis is the offering which you shall take of them gold and silver This is no warrant now because the Tabernacle in the old Testament was adorned with silver and gold and other precious things that now the Temples of Christians should be set forth with such ornaments Vbi enim verbum ubi mandatum Where have they any word or warrant for these things as Moses had then Gallas The houses of prayer are to bee reverently kept and decently set forth but superfluous and sumptuous ornaments doe not beseeme the house of God he looketh not to faire and beautifull Churches but unto the humble and contrite heart as the Prophet saith Isa. 66.2 2. Confut. Against the Manichees who refused the old Testament Vers. 8. THat I may dwell among them The Manichees who tooke exception to the old Testament said that herein it was contrarie to the New that God should dwell in houses made with hands whereas our Saviour saith in the New Testament that heaven is Gods seat and the earth is his footstoole Matth. 5. there can be then no house made for God to dwell in This objection Augustine returneth upon them againe shewing that this testimonie is first alleaged in the old Testament Heaven is my throne earth is my footstoole where is that house that you will build for me Isa. 66.1 And therefore therein the old Testament and new concurre that God dwelleth not in Temples made with hands and yet both in the old and new Testament God is said to have his house therefore he concludeth Adaliquam significationem in utroque testamento accipi c. that is so said and taken to signifie some other thing c. God then is said to dwell in the Tabernacle not because any place can comprehend his Majestie but because there it pleased him by some visible signes to manifest his presence 3. Confut. Against the superstitious opinion of the vertue of ceremonies Vers. 22. THere will I appoint with thee Though the Arke were the place where the Lord revealed himselfe and shewed evident signes of his presence yet the Israelites were too superstitiously afterward addicted to the externall ceremonie and thought themselves sufficiently protected if the Arke were with them As in Heli his time when they brought the Arke into the campe they thought themselves sure of the victorie against the Philistims but the Lord caused both them and the Arke to come into their enemies hand to teach them to lay aside all carnall confidence and to seeke unto the Lord. As the superstitious Israelites in this respect abused the Arke so the Romanists put their confidence in their breaden god consecrated host going with it in procession and carrying it about in the fields But this is to attribute too much unto signes Simlerus 4. Confut. That Moses Arke is not at Rome in S. Iohn Laterans Church THis Arke which Moses made the author of the Scholasticall historie thinketh to bee in Rome in the Church of S. Iohn Lâ—teran under the Altar there and by that supposed evidence would prove that the Arke was not made according to the measure of the Geometricall cubit But Tostatus sheweth that not to be so because it is mentioned 2 Maccab. 2. how Ieremie hid the Arke in a cave which afterward could not be found This authoritie presseth them because they hold the first and second books of the Macchabees to be canonicall And howsoever it standeth for the truth of this report it is evident that the Arke was lost before or in the captivitie of Babylon and that the second Temple built after the captivitie never had it By this then it appeareth what small credit is to bee given unto those relikes which are so much boasted of in the Papall Church 5. Confut. Against the erecting and setting up of Images Vers. 22. BEtweene the two Cherubims The idolatrous Romanists have no warrant from hence for their Images which they set up to be adored in their Churches 1. Moses had Gods commandement to doe it they have no such direction 2. That was a time of figures and ceremonies and typicall representations but now in the cleere light of the Gospell all such types and figures are ceased 3. Those Cherubims were not set forth publikly in the peoples view but kept in the most holy place whither none had accesse but the high Priest neither was it lawfull for
any other Priest or Levite to gaze or looke upon it Therefore this is no warrant for the setting up of Images in Churches in the open sight and view of the people who thereby are bewitched and withdrawne from the true spirituall worship Simler Gallas 6. Confut. Against the Iewes that they are cast off for crucifying of Christ. Vers. 22. THere will I appoint with thee or meet thee Chrysostome from hence doth notably convince the Jewes that God hath forsaken them and cast them off because now they have not the Arke nor Propitiatorie seat from whence the Lord used to speake And if the Jewes should hominibus imputare rerum suarum vastationâ—m impute unto men the ruine and destruction of their state hee thus answereth First that men could not have destroyed their Citie Nisi Deus permisisset unlesse the Lord had permitted it to be done Secondly he saith But be it granted that men pulled downe your walles Num ignem ex alto dâ—vehi vetuit homo Did man fâ—â—bid fire to be brought from heaven Num vocem ex propitiatorio audiri solitam inhibuit homo c. Did man forbid that a voice should be heard out of the Propitiatorie Did man take away the declaration of Gods will by the precious stones in the Priests breast-plate and the sacred unction c. An non Deus haec omniae submovit c. Did not God take all these away Thirdly if the Jewes shall answer Quoniam civitate â—aremus caremus istis c. Because we are without a Citie we want these things also c. He addeth further yet after the Temple was destroyed and the Altar broken downe there were Prophets in the captivitie Daniel and Ezechiel say then Quâ—m ob causam nunc non habetis Prophetas What is the cause that now ye have no Prophets Is it not evident by this Quòd Deus vos repulerit that God hath cast your off And why hath he cast you off Ob illum crucifixum impium illud facium because of that impious fact in the crucifying of Christ And whence doth this appeare because before when ye lived wickedly ye obtained many things now cum videamini modestiùs vivere when yee seeme to live more soberly yet ye suffer more grievous punishment noc quicquam eorum contigit habâ—re quae prius habebatis and ye enjoy none of those things which before ye had c. To this purpose Chrysost. 7. Confut. Against the Romanists concerning their niâ—â— orders of Angels NOw further whereas these winged pictures which were made upon the Mercie seat are called Cherâ—bim which is a name indifferently given to the blessed Angels in generall it is evident that it is no speciall order as the Romanists have curiously â—orted the Angels into nine orders whereof the Cherubim Seraphim and Thrones are the three highest And Tostatus one of their owne writers confesseth that in this place Aequaliter Cherubim ad omnes â—eatoâ— spiritus referantur That the Cherubim here equally may be referred to all the blessed Spirits c. And as in this place so in other also the Cherubim and Seraphim are names and titles given to the Angels in generall as Isai. 6. Ezech. 1. and 10. See more hereof elsewhere Synops. Câ—ntur 2. err 1. 8. Confut. Against the superstitious use of candles in Churches Vers. 37. THou shalt make thee seven lamps thereof c. to give light c. The use then of this candlesticke and the lamps thereof was to no other end than to give light in the Sanctuarie which was covered Tostatus addeth further Non solùm lumen candelarum est ad necessitatem toll â—idâ—â—um tenebrarum sed etiam ad honestatem cultum c. The light of candles is not onely for necessitie to remove the darknesse but for more comelinesse and it belongeth unto worship c. Which superstitious conceit is convinced in this place These lamps were ordained onely to give light therefore at noone day when there is no use of candle light to set up tapers and candles is a superfluous and a superstitious use 6. Morall Observations 1 Observ. God must be honoured with our riches Vers. 2. REceive an offering for me of every man c. Whereas God requireth an offering of the people out of their substance it sheweth that our goods are not ours to waste at our willes but God looketh to be honoured with them and to have them employed unto his glorie B. Babingt As the Wise-man saith Prov. 6.8 Honour the Lord with thy riches and with the first fruits of thine increase 2. Observ. We must give unto God with a willing heart WHose heart giveth it freely So also chap. 35.5 Whosoever is of a willing heart let him bâ—ing this offering unto the Lord which sheweth that what is bestowed upon Gods service should be given willingly and cheerefully as it is said in that great offering of David and the people toward the building of the Temple which Salomon made The people offered willingly unto the Lord with a perfit heart 1 Chron. 29.9 and David thus professeth vers 17. I have offered willingly in the uprightnesse of mine heart all these things So the Apostle saith The Lord loveth a cheerefull giver 2 Cor. 9.7 B. Babing 3. Observ. Of the diversitie of gifts which every man must employ accordingly as he hath received Vers. 3. TAke of them gold silver brasse c. This sheweth that in the Church there are diversities of gifts God hath endued some with gold and silver some with brasse all have not the like gifts as the Apostle saith There are diversities of gifts but the same spirit 1 Cor. 12.5 No man therefore can excuse himselfe that he hath nothing to offer if he have neither gold silver nor brasse yet heâ— may bring goats haire B. Babing He that hath neither gold silver nor brasse Osserat vel pilas capraruâ— munere suo defunctus est Let him but offer goats haire and he hath done his dutie Ferus 4. Observ. What desire we should have to the Lords house Vers. 8. THat I may dwell among them Seeing the house of God is the place of Gods habitation and there is his presence it sheweth with what delight and desire wee should come unto Gods house and with what reverence wee should behave our selves there as Iacob said How reverend iâ— this place this is no other but the house of God and the gate of heaven Gen. 28.17 So Chrysostome excellently saith Non est ecclesia tonstrina aut unguentaria tabâ—rna c. sed locus Angelorum regia coeli coelum ipsum c. The Church is no Barbers shop or Apothecaries house but a place of Angels the palace of heaven yea heaven it selfe 5. Observ. Gods law must be laid up in the heart Vers. 16. THou shalt put in the Arke the Testimonie As the tables of the Law were laid up in the Arke so the Law and Word of God must be
taketh it following the Latine text So also Oleaster 2. The Chalde Interpreter calleth it Tabernaculum foederis the Tabernacle of the covenant But there is another word used for a covenant aroâ— bâ—rith the Arke of the covenant 1 Sam. 4.3 3. The most usuall reading is The Tabernacle of the congregation for so the word maghed is taken for the assemblie or congregation Numb 16.2 So Paguine Simlerus Osiander with others But Oleaster useth a good reason against this interpretation because the assemblies of the people came not into the Tabernacle but onely to the outward couâ—t as the people themselves confesse Numb 17.13 Whosoever approcheth to the Tabernacle of God shall die 4. Therefore the word maghed comming of jaghad or jaad as Oleaster readeth which signifieth to come or meet with at a certaine or appointed time it is better interpreted Tabernaculum conventâ—â— the Tabernacle of meeting Iunius or the Tabernacle of appointment Vatabluâ— as the Lord himselfe giveth the sense of the word chap. 25.22 Where I will meet with thee or appoint with thee So also Numb 17.4 It may therefore most fitly be called the Tabernacle of appointment or of the appointed meeting where the Lord appointed to meet with Moses and to talke with him QUEST XXIII Whether it belonged to Aaron onely to dresse the lamps Vers. 21. SHall Aaron and his sonnes dresse them 1. Cajetane well noteth Non erat Levitarum hoc efficium sed sacerdotum This was not the office of the Levits but of the Priests the sonnes of Aaron to dresse the lamps 2. And it must not bee read with a conjunction copulative Aaron and his sonnes as Lat. Vatab. Moâ—tanuâ— as though all the whole companie of them should goe in together but disjunctively Aaron or his sonnes Tostat. Iâ—n 3. Hilarie seemeth to be of opinion that it belonged onely unto Aaron to dresse the lamps making this allusion Summus sacerdâ—s lucernas fâ—vens c. iâ—â—ago Christi est qui solus ministrat donat Spiritum sanctum The high Priest nourishing the lamps is a representation of Christ who onely giveth the holy Ghost But this text sheweth that not onely Aaron but his sonnes also are charged with this dutie 4. Therefore Beda well applieth this text understanding by the sonnes of Aaron the Ministers and Pastors of the Church Qui filii sunt veri sacerdotis nostri qui lucem verbi ministrant Which are the children of our true high Priest which minister the light of Gods word 5. And whereas Levit. 24.3 it is said Aaron shall dresse them it must be understood of Aaron and of his sonnes the Priests ex ipsius mandato by his commandement or appointment Iunius And therefore Aaron is onely named because all was done by his direction QUEST XXIV Of the mysticall application of the lamps and oyle thereof THe mysticall application of this oyle which must be offered to maintaine the lamps is this 1. In that the candlesticke was placed not in the most holy place which was a figure of celestiall Jerusalem it sheweth that in the Church now present wee have need of the direction of the word of God yet in the Kingdome of heaven there shall be no such need For the Lambe shall be the light thereof Apocal. 21.23 Rupertus 2. By the light we understand the word of God which the Prophet David saith is a lanterne to the feet Psal. 119.105 Pelargus 3. Oleum gratiam Spiritus sancti ostendit The oyle signifieth the grace of Gods Spirit Isidor Of this holy oyle or ointment the Apostle speaketh Ye have an ointment from hiâ— that is holy 1 Ioh. 2.20 4. As the oyle is pressed forth of the Olive so Oleum Spiritus sancti ècracis Christi torculari expressum The oyle of the holy Spirit is pressed out of the Wine-presse of the crosse of Christ Borrh. 5. In that they are commanded to bring pure oyle without mixture or dregs the puritie of doctrine is signified Haeretisi adulteriâ—um excogitant â—leâ—â— Heretikes doe devise adulterate oyle that is corrupt doctrine Procopius 6. Lastly Augustine thus applieth all together by the Tabernacle he understandeth the world Luceâ—nae accensid verbi est incarnatio candelabrum crucis lignum lucerna in candelabro lucens Christus in cruce pendâ—â—s The lighting of the lampe is the incarnation of Christ the candlesticke is the crosse the lampe giving light in the candlesticke is Christ hanging upon the crosse c. QUEST XXV Of the description and situation of the whole Tabernacle THis then was the forme and fashion of the whole Tabernacle 1. The outward court was first set up which was an hundred cubits long of each side and fiftie cubits broad at each end and round about it were sixtie pillars twentie of a side and ten at each end and this court was hung round about with curtaines of five cubits high on the East end was the gate in the middest of the side of twentie cubits hung with a vaile of foure colours white blew scarlet purple 2. Then was set up the Tabernacle which was thirtie cubits long and twentie cubits broad the which was compassed on each side saving before toward the East with boords laid over with gold twentie on each side and at the West end eight Then it was hung over with the fine curtaines wrought with Cherubims which hung on each side of the Tabernacle and went over the roofe upon them were laid the haire curtaines then round about below were hanged the red Ramme skins and above them the covering of Badgers skins Thus the Tabernacle was finished without 3. After this it was divided into the most holy place which contained ten cubits square and there upon foure pillars was hanged a vaile wrought with Cherubims their followed the holy place which contained twentie cubits in length the rest of thâ—se thirtie cubits on the East side whereof was hung up a vaile upon five pillars which was made of fine twined linen blew silke purple scarlet as the other but not wrought with Cherubims 4. The Tabernacle being thus set up and divided then the holy instruments were placed therein in the most holy place was the Arke with the tables of the Law onely within it and before it Aarons rod and the pot of Manna in the most holy place without the vaile was set on the South side the candlesticke over against that on the North side the table with the shew-bread and before the vaile of the most holy place the Altar of incense In the outward court before the doore of the Tabernacle toward the North was the brasen Altar for sacrifice and betweene that and the Tabernacle the brasen Laver wherein the Priests did wash their hands and feet chap. 30.19 Montan Ribera ex Iosepho 5. Now it appeareth by this description that Augustine is in great error 1. He saith Intrabatur in Tabernaculum ab occidente They entred into the Tabernacle on the West Whereas it is most evident chap. 26.22 that the
bee here further asked if it bee not lawfull now for the Ministers of the Gospell to bee distinguished by some distinct apparell in their ministerie For answer and satisfaction unto this demand I will produce two grave testimonies of two learned Writers in this age Marbachius of late the Professor of Divinitie in Straughsborow and Gallasius not long since a Minister of the Church of Geneva Marbachius thus writeth In Ecclesia omnia decenter fieri debent ad aedificationem c. In the Church all things ought to be done decently and to edification Itaque tali vestitu utendum qui non sit offendiculo c. Therefore such a garment must be used as is not offensive but bringeth some commendation and authoritie to them which minister and may discerne and distinguish them from other men Gallasius also thus delivereth his judgement upon this place Ego quidem fateor hoc ad decorem pertinere ut ordines in politia distinguantur c. I confesse that this appertaineth to comelinesse that degrees should be distinguished in the Common-wealth neither is the Gospell against decencie and order but rather helpeth and maintaineth them Sed nego ad verbi aut sacramentorum administrationem vestem lineam c. But I denie that the linen garment or pall belongeth to the administration of the word or Sacraments I would not truly have any stirres or tumult moved in the Church for the use of externall things seeing it is indifferent yet the superstition into which men are readie to fall and the abuse I hold to be condemned We must also take heed lest while we tolerate things indifferent or are constrained to winke at those things which cannot be amended wee detract from other mens libertie Thus farre Gallasius of this matter 2. Controv. That we offend in our best works Vers. 38. THat Aaron may beare the iniquitie of the offerings The people then sinned even in their religious works which sheweth in ipsis benefactis nostris peccatorum labem inesse c. that even in our best works there is some blemish of sin which cannot be acceptable unto God but for the worthinesse and mediation of the true high Priest Christ Jesus whom Aaron prefigured Simler To the same purpose also Calvin Discamus nostra obsequia ubi in conspectum Dei veniunt peccato permixta esse Let us learne that even our service when it commeth into Gods sight to bee examined is mixt with sin and is onely sanctified by Christ c. So the Prophet Isaiah saith chap. 64.6 All our righteousnesse is as a stained clout Hereby then appeareth the error of the Romanists who hold that a just man in his good works doth not sinne so much as venially Concil Trident. sess 6. can 25. See more hereof Synops. Centur. 4. err 70. 3. Controv. Against merit in good works Vers. 38. TO make them acceptable before the Lord. Tostatus saith here that the Priest was accepted of God and the Lord was well pleased with him because he ascribed all holinesse unto God as it was writen in his forehead Holinesse to Iehovah Hoc autem protestari meritorium est Deum nobis placatum reddimus And to protest this is meritorious and by this meanes we doe pacifie and appease God toward us qu. 19. Contra. 1. The former doctrine that the people sinned in their very offerings in their best works which are spotted and blemished with some imperfection or other overthroweth this error for that which meriteth at Gods hand must be perfect our best works then being imperfect are not meritorious Therefore Calvin much better here inferreth This place teacheth us Quicquid honorum operum Deo offerre studemus adeo nihil mercedis mereri c. That whatsoever good works we offer unto God they are so farre from meriting any reward that they make us guiltie before God unlesse the holinesse of Christ wherewith God is pleased doe procure pardon for them c. 2. The Scripture evidently testifieth this as Dan. 9.8 We doe not present our supplications before thee for our owne righteousnesse So Luk. 17.10 When ye have done all say ye we are unprofitable servants we have done that which was our dutie to doe If then we are unprofitable servants in our best service we are farre from meriting or deserving any thing and if we doe no more than our bounden dutie nor yet all that we have no reason to expect any reward beyond our desert See more hereof Synops. Centur. 4. err 79. 4. Controv. Against the Popes triple crowne Vers. 36. THou shalt make a plate of pure gold Ribera following Iosephus who speaking of this plate of gold saith Hunc aurea corona triplici circundabat c. He beset round the Priests miter or bonnet with a threefold crowne c. hereupon thus inferreth Hinc factum arbitror ut summus pontifex triplicem in capite coronam gerat c. Hence it is that the chiefe Priest meaning the Pope doth now beare a threefold crowne upon his head c. And he addeth further Quamvis hujusmodi corona c. Although such a crowne was received from the Apostle Peter which is yet to bee seene in S. Peters Church which Silvester shewed unto Constantine c. This he saith S. Peter used by the instinct of the Spirit that the veritie might be answerable to the figure that Christs high Priest might weare that which the high Priest the figure of Christ did weare Contra. 1. All this is grounded upon an uncertaine text for there is no mention made here of a triple crowne it is but Iosephus report without any warrant out of the text the golden plate indeed is called the holy crowne chap. 29.30 But of a threefold crowne there is not one word 2. They may be ashamed to abuse the world with such foppish fables who ever will beleeve that S. Peter ever did weare a triple crowne or that any of the Apostles used any such worldly pompe whose glorie was their povertie and contempt of the world their crowne their sufferings their obedience to powers and subjection their renowne 3. And if there had beene such a glorious crowne it had belonged rather to S. Paul than to Saint Peter for hee was the Apostle of the Gentiles the other of the circumcision 4. And if any such crowne had beene then it is more like that Constantine gave it to Silvester whose donation they pretend for their great soveraigntie and privileges than that Silvester first shewed it to him 5. And if that indeed be Peters triple crowne which yet is to be seene why doth the Pope refuse to weare that but rather maketh choice of a massie triple crowne of gold and precious stone 6. I had thought that Aaron had beene a figure of Christ not of the Pope and temporall things doe not prefigure temporall one triple crowne another but that outward crowne shadowed forth the spirituall Kingdome and regall dignitie of Christ. 5. Controv. Of the single
or they signifie duplicem populum c. the two people the old and new Lippom. panes azymi munditiam vita the unleavened bread betokeneth the holinesse of life without the leaven of maliciousnesse as S. Paul expoundeth 1 Cor. 6. 2. The solemne washing of Aaron and his sons did signifie the Sacrament of Baptisme and as they doe not put on their garments untill first the filth of the flesh be washed away Sic nisi in Christo novi homines renaseantur So unlesse they become new men in Christ they are not admitted unto holy things Hierom. They which come unto God must first bee purged and cleansed from their sins Pelarg. And hereby more specially was signified in this solemne washing with water the publike Baptisme of Christ which though he needed not in respect of himselfe yet thereby he would consecrate that Sacrament for us Osiander 3. By the putting on of the Priestly garments after they were washed is signified the putting on of Christ cum tunicas polliceas deposuerimus after we have put off our old vestures Hierom. So Procopius applieth those words of the Apostle Put on the Lord Iesus Christ So also Pelarg. 4. By the oyle wherewith Aaron was annointed Beda understandeth Gratiam Spiritus sancti The grace of the Spirit And Hierom here applieth that saying of the Prophet David Psal. 45. God even thy God hath annointed thee with the oyle of gladnesse above thy fellowes Therefore was Aaron onely annointed in the head and none of the rest because Christ received the Spirit beyond measure and the holy Ghost descended and lighted upon him when he was baptized Matth. 3. Osiander QUEST X. Why the Priests lay their hands upon the head of the beast Vers. 10. AAron and his sons shall put their hands upon the head c. 1. Augustine by this ceremonie understandeth the receiving of power Vt ipsi etiam aliquid consecrare possent that they also might consecrate afterward unto God So also Lyranus But because the people also did use to lay their hands upon their sacrifices which they brought Levit. 4. who received thereby no power to sacrifice this seemeth not to be the meaning 2. Iunius thus expoundeth it Quasi seipses sisterent sacrificarent Iehovae As though they did present themselves to bee sacrificed unto God yet not in their owne person but Christs But this cannot be the meaning for the former reason because the people did also lay on their hands who were therein no type of Christ that sacrificed himselfe for us 3. Some thinke that by this ceremonie in imposing of their hands they did resigne their right in that beast Tostat. Et destinarunt illud ut fieret sacrificium and ordained it to be a sacrifice Osiander 4. But there is more in it than so they hereby confesse that they were worthie to die in Gods justice for their sins Sed ex divina misericordia mors in animal transferebatur But by the divine mercie their death was transferred upon the beast Lyran. wherein Christ is lively shadowed forth who died for us Simler QUEST XI Of the divers kinds of sacrifices and why some kinde of beasts were taken for sacrifice and not other Vers. 11. SO thou shalt kill the calfe c. 1. There were three kinde of sacrifices which were usually offered the first was called holocaustum a burnt offering because it was wholly consumed upon the Altar and this kinde was offered specially ad reverentiam majestatis for reverence of the divine majestie to testifie our obedience and service The second was the sacrifice for sin whereof part was burned upon the Altar part was for the Priests use unlesse it were a sin offering for the Priest or the people in which cases all was consumed on the Altar The third sort were peace offerings which were offered in signe of thanksgiving for some benefit received or to be received whereof part was burnt upon the Altar part was for the Priest and the rest was for the offerer Thom. 2. Now although there were many cleane birds and beasts yet there were onely two kinde of the one the pigeon and turtle dove and three of the other bullocks sheepe and goats which were taken for sacrifice whereof Philo giveth this reason because both among the fowles and beasts these are of the meekest and mildest nature the pigeon and turtle dove and amongst the beasts these three sorts are tamest when we see that whole heards and flocks of them may be driven by a boy and they have neither pawes or clawes to hurt as ravenous beasts nor yet armed with teeth to devoure wanting the upper row wherein appeareth the harmlesse disposition of these creatures Philo addeth further that these beasts of all other are most serviceable unto mans use sheepe and goats for cloathing and food and bullocks beside the use of their flesh for meat and their skins for leather they serve with their labour in the tilling of the ground To these may a third reason bee added because the land of Canaan most abounded with these kinds of fowles and beasts they are prescribed for sacrifice And a fourth also may be this they were not to offer of wilde beasts because they could not easily bee had and hardly are they gotten alive for which cause they were not appointed to offer fishes which could not so easily be taken and very hardly alive but their sacrifices must be brought alive Riber 3. Now in the consecration of Aaron and his sons all these sacrifices are offered a bullocke for a sinne offering one ramme for a burnt offering and another for a peace offering QUEST XII Why the bloud was laid upon the horns of the Altar Vers. 12. THou shalt take of the bloud and put it upon the hornes c. 1. The bloud here was not used to confirme any league or covenant betweene God and his people as chap. 24. for in that case first the words and articles of the covenant were read before the bloud was sprinkled and beside each partie betweene whom the covenant was made were besprinkled not onely the Altar which represented God but the people also But here neither of these is performed there is no covenant rehearsed neither are the people sprinkled with the bloud 2. There was then another use beside this of the sprinkling of bloud which was to purge and cleanse and so to pacifie and appease as this reason is yeelded why they should not eat the bloud because the Lord had given it to be offered upon the Altar to be an atonement for their soules Levit. 17.11 And not onely the Altar of burnt offering was cleansed by bloud but the whole Tabernacle the high Priest in the day of reconciliation sprinkled the bloud upon the Mercie seat and before the Mercie seat the Altar and Tabernacle also to purge them from the sins and trespasses of the people Levit. 16.16 Therefore the Apostle saith Almost all things by the law are purged with bloud
is not in the Hebrew but only in working of stones But we doe not reade that any marble was used in the Tabernacle Tostatus saith though no marble went to the making of the Tabernacle yet they might have skill to worke therein because it belongeth to perfect workemen to have skill to do some things which they have no need to doe quest 7. Contra. This wisdome and understanding was given them To worke in all manner of workmanship and to make all which the Lord commanded vers 6. Therefore seeing they were not commanded to do any thing with marble that belonged not to their skill 2. But Tostatus addeth further that some workes are expressed which they did not as in diversitate lignorum to worke in divers kinds of wood whereas they wrought onely in Shittim wood and some kinds of worke are omitted which they did as in curious weaving and embroydering Contra. The Latine Interpreter here doth not translate right the words are bacharosheth ghetz in the workmanship of wood or timber the text speaketh not of diversitie of wood and yet they being able to cut and carve in one kind of wood had skill to doe it in another 3. Indeed some of their workes are here omitted which the Septuagint supplieth here To worke in blew silke purple scarlet fine twined linen but none of this is found here in the originall yet chap. 35.35 mention is made of all these whence a supplie may be made here Simler 4. It is not to be imagined that all these workes went only thorow the hands of Bezaleel and Aholiab who is joyned with Bezaleel but that there were many workmen beside which were taught and instructed by them chap. 35.34 5. There were two chiefe and principall workemen Bezaleel and Aholiab that were directers to the rest and taught them to worke chap. 35 34. And of these two it seemeth that Bezaleel was the most excellent workeman whose gifts and faculties are first of all described by themselves QUEST VII Whether the wise in heart received a new gift or increase rather of the old Vers. 6. IN the hearts of those which are wise hearted have I put wisdome c. 1. The opinion of the most is that God in these increased only those gifts which they had before as their naturall parts and their skill in arts which they had learned and gave them a further degree of wisdome and knowledge in those kind of workes as he had done to Bezaleel and Aholiab Genevens Tostat. qu. 7. Osiander But it is rather to be thought that God altogether furnished them for this worke that as the Apostles were taken from among the unlearned sort to build the spirituall Church of Christ so these were altogether unfit of themselves to have enterprised this businesse if the Lord had not endued them with the Spirit of wisdome lest they might have ascribed part of the worke to themselves And further whereas they are said to be filled with the Spirit of wisdome chap. 35.31 this phrase insinuateth that this gift of skill was inspired it was not then in them before in part for then they should not have been filled with the Spirit of wisdome but received part onely 2. Oleaster maketh this difference Deum implesse duos praecipuos artifices sapientia scilicet nova c. That God had filled the two principall workemen with new wisdome and anxisse eam eis qui eam ante habuerunt c. And that hee increased the same to those which had it before But by this means the inferiour artificers should have had more helps than the other both naturall and supernaturall whereas the other had only supernaturall 3. Simlerus giveth this interpretation In the hearts of all that are wise hearted have I put wisdome to make that God bestowed two things upon them artem à me hahent in hunc finem c. they have both the skill and art from me and to this end to make c. so they were wise hearted but they were wise of Gods making But that this phrase to bee wise in heart sheweth not any speciall and extraordinarie gift of art infused unto them is evident chap. 35 25. where the women that did spinne with their hands are said to bee wise hearted 4. Therefore Iunius giveth a better interpretation calling these wise in heart industrious now two things are required to make one industrious and so wise in heart one is willingnes and the other is aptnes and agilitie to any worke as both these are touched chap. 35.21 Every one whose heart made him willing and vers 25. The women that were wise hearted spunne with their hands So God gave unto them first a willing heart and they which had any aptnes to do artificiall workes were then endued with an extraordinarie gift of wisdome to do the workes of the Tabernacle they received speciall grace to know how to worke according to the paterne given them and willingnes 〈◊〉 to exercise their gifts to Gods glorie in setting forward the worke of the Tabernacle So M. Calvine He had given them aptnes and insight Vt eorum dexteritas semen quoddam esset That their dexteritiâ— should be but a certaine seed QUEST VIII Why Moses was not made fit to do the worke of the Tabernacle NOw if it be inquired why Moses received not this gift of wisdome seeing hee might best have knowne how to frame those things having seene the fashion of them in the mount it may bee thus answered that although it had been no hard thing with God to have given Moses wisdome to do such things yet for these reasons the Lord saw it was not fit 1. Because Moses was to oversee and direct everie mans worke and to approve and allow of it being done and therefore it was not meet that he should have been a labourer with them himselfe 2. And beside Moses was to attend the publike government to speake unto the people and to judge their causes therefore he could not being letted by publike affaires have been spared for those works And as it pleased God to direct his father in law to give him counsell to appoint under-officers and governours and not to undertake the whole burthen of government himselfe so it was requisite that the finishing of this worke should be transmitted over to other and the chiefe direction and oversight only to belong to Moses Tostat. qu. 8. QUEST IX Of the garments of ministration what they were Vers. 10. ALso the garments for Ministration and the holy garments for Aaron the Priest and the garments for his sonnes c. 1. Some do understand by the garments of Ministration the holy garments for Aaron as Tostatus following therein the Latine Translater and the Septuagint who reade only the holy garments for the Ministerie of Aaron c. Whereas there are three distinct garments spoken of bigdâ—e haserad garments of Ministration and bigdee hakedesh holy garments for Aaron 2. Oleaster understandeth vestes inferiores seu communes
to offer a man into ones hand when he is suddenly killed Exod. 21.13 Tostatus who also includeth the punishment of death inflicted by the Magistrate that when the transgression is apparent and found out by witnesses then the Magistrate putteth to death as the man was stoned that gathered stickes Numb 15. But if the profaner of the Sabbath escape the punishment of man the judgement of God shall overtake him Tostat. qu. 12. 6. But beside these kinds of death which shall bee inflicted here in that it is said He shall die the death the other phrase In being cut off from among his people sheweth that beside there remaineth for them everlasting punishment in the next world as the Lord threatneth to the prophane fire unquenchable Ezech. 20.47 QUEST XVI Why the seventh day is called Sabbath Sabbaton Vers. 15. IN the seventh day is the Sabbath of holy rest unto Iehovah 1. Whereas the words in the originall are sabbath sabbaton some Hebrewes by the first understand the determined time of the Sabbath from evening to evening but because they know not certainly where the rest of the Sabbath should begin and where it should end they have added an houre more at the beginning and an houre at the end of the Sabbath and this they say is called sabbaton which is a diminutive word which is formed by putting to on as of ish a man is derived ishon a little man But it is a weake conceit to imagine that their additions which are brought in only by their tradition should be grounded upon Scripture 2. Oleaster therefore as the Hebrewes make both these words sabbath and sabbaton proper names for the seventh day of rest so hee translateth them thus requies requiri it shall be a rest of rest making them both appellative and common names because there was a greater rest required on the Sabbath than upon any other day whereupon in the Gospell Ioh. 19.31 the Sabbath is called a great or high day it was greater than the Passeover But Oleaster is deceived in this collection 1. For that Sabbath is called an high day because the Passeover did fall out upon that Sabbath 2. And though it be true that the Sabbath was a greater day of rest than the Passeover wherein they were allowed to do such works as were about that which they should eat Exod. 12.16 which were not lawfull upon the Sabbath Exod. 16.23 yet the rest of the Sabbath was not greater than of all other festivals for the tenth day of the seventh 〈…〉 where the same word is used 3. Therefore it is better interpreted It is the Sabbath of rest to make the first a proper name and peculiar to the seventh day and the other common So reade Vatad Iun. Pagâ—in agreeing with the Lat. Chald. Septuag who thus interprete 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Sabbath a rest holy unto the Lord. 4. Now in that there is so often mention made of rest there is more intended than the outward rest of the bodie only as though it were sufficient to spend all the day in lying downe playing sleeping 〈…〉 die â—acra opera perficienda sunt but upon that holy and sacred day sacred exercises also should be performed Lippoman QUEST XVII How the observation of the Sabbath is perpetuall Vers. 16. THat they may observe the Sabbath 〈…〉 their generations for an everlasting covenant 1. The Jewes hereupon doe take occasion to raile upon Christ tanquam 〈◊〉 as a law breaker for abolishing the Sabbath and so they presse these words literally as though the Lord ordained that the Sabbath injoyned them should be perpetuall But beside that the word gholam or 〈◊〉 doth not alwaies signifie that which is indeed perpetuall and eternall but sometime onely a long time Calvine or 〈…〉 a time not limited or determined the words which are annexed Throughout your generations shew that the perpetuitie of this Sabbath is restrained to their posteritie and that as long as their policie and Common-wealth continued Osiander 2. Some doe understand it to bee eternall in this sense quia erat â—terna rei signum because it was signe of a thing eternall August qu. 139. that is of our everlasting rest in Christ aternum manet ipso effectu it remaineth eternall in effect Calvine that is in ceasing from the works of sin 3. Some thinke that it is called perpetuall with relation unto the time of ceremonies quamdiu vellet Deus observari statum 〈◊〉 imperfectum Iudaicum c. as long as God would have that imperfect state of the Jewes to be observed Tostat. 4. But as I refuse not these two last interpretations so I thinke that there is more signified that God would have perpetually observed a day of rest set apart for his service though not that precise day prescribed to the Jewes as long as the world endureth so that it is not only spiritualiter sed moraliter aternum spiritually but morally eternall Pelarg. and not onely appointed for a politike order to avoid confusion that the people should have some certaine day to meet together in to heare the Word and receive the Sacraments Gallas For if the keeping of the Lords day were only grounded upon policie then any other day might as well be set apart as this which is now observed But I say further with Pelargus Nobis servâ—vissime demandatam religionis exercenda curam That the care of the practice of religion upon the Lords day is straitly commanded us atque ad cam noâ— perpetuo â—lligari and that we are for ever tied unto it by the institution and practice of the Apostles Act. 20.7 1 Cor. 16.2 who as Gallasius well concludeth did substitute the Lords day in remembrance of Christs resurrection in stead of the old Sabbath Spiritu Dei quo ipsi regebantur by the Spirit of God whereby they were guided And here Thomas giveth a good note why the Sabbath onely is here mentioned the other festivals of the Jewes being omitted wherein there was a commemoration of some particular benefits as in the pasch of their deliverance out of Egypt on the Sabbath pracipuum beneficium creationis the principall benefit of the creation was remembred which is generall to all people and not peculiar only to the Jewes beside therein was prefigured Quies mentis in Deâ— in prasenti per gratiam in futuro per gloriam The rest of the mind in God in the present by grace and in time to come by glorie Thomas Therefore seeing the seventh day of rest is a commemoration of the creation of the world and includeth a memoriall of Christs resurrection upon that day and is a symbole of our everlasting rest in heaven it ought to be perpetually observed QUEST XVIII Whether the world were made successively in time or in an instant Vers. 17. FOr in six daies the Lord made heaven and earth 1. Oleaster well concludeth from hence that God made the world and the things therein not all at once but successively
grandem fieri jacturam populi Wee see by this place that the people are in great hazard by the long absence of the governour Lippom. Let idle Pastors and secure Non-residents remember this how that the wolfe will spoile the flocke when the Pastor is gone therefore Saint Paul exhorteth the Elders of Ephesus to take heed of themselves and the flocke because he knew that after his departure grievous wolves would enter not sparing the flocke Act. 20.29 2. Observ. Men are then unthankfull when their good is intended and procured FUrther herein is noted their great ingratitude that while Moses was occupied in receiving lawes for them for their good they go about to make an idoll so as Chrysostom noteth The Jewes the same night sought to take Christ when he instituted his last Supper for their comfort The people here renounce Moses even when he was most carefull for their good Oleaster 3. Observ. Excesse in eating and drinking maketh men forget God Vers. 6. THey sate them downe to eat and drinke and rose up to play Which sheweth that gluttonie and drunkennesse is the mother of play and wantonnesse as Gregorie noteth Cum corpus in refectionis delectatione resolvitur cor ad inane gaudium relaxatur While the bodie is too much delighted in outward refection the heart is let loose to vaine rejoycing Pelarg. So the Apostle saith Be not drunke with wine wherein is excesse but be filled with the Spirit the filling with wine maketh us emptie of Gods Spirit 4. Observ. Against prodigall expenses in superstition and vanitie Vers. 3. THey plucked from them their golden earings Here appeareth the right guise of superstitions men that are very sparing in setting forth the true service of God but are most lavish in decking their idols as many adulterers doe suffer their wives and children to want being most prodigall in maintaining their harlots Simler They also are here noted which upon their vanities can bestow whatsoever as in playing at dice and cards and such like but are verie sparing in workes of charitie as giving to the poore Oleaster 5. Observ. The force of the Saints praiers Vers. 10. LEt me alone Wee see what force is in the prayers of the Saints whereby the Lords hands are as it were tied and bound from smiting Dei potentiam servi praeces impediebant The servants prayers hindred the Lords power Hierom. Ligatum habent sancti Dominum ut non puniat nisi permiserint ipsi The Saints have the Lord bound that he cannot punish unlesse they will Bernard So the Apostle saith The prayer of the righteous availeth much if it be fervent Iam. 5.16 6. Observ. Not to be rash in anger OLeaster further doth thus collect here that as God without Moses consent would not exeicise his fierce wrath upon the people so men in their anger should consult with their friends not as Rehoboam who refused the aduice of his prudent counsellers 7. Observ. Of the commendation of fasting Vers. 19. HE brake them in peeces c. Ambrose hereupon thus noteth Tabulas legis quas accepit abstinentia conteri fecit ebrietas The tables of the law which abstinence and fasting received drunkennesse caused to bee broken that is as soone as Moses saw the riot and excesse of the people through anger he brake them Sterilitatem matris Sampson vini abstinentia faecundavit Annam non manducantum exandivit Deus Abstinence from wine made Sampsons mother fruitfull and God heard Anna absteining from meat c. And our blessed Saviour saith This kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting 8. Observ. No respect of persons to be had in regard of Gods glorie Vers. 21. ANd Moses said to Aaron Calvine here giveth this good note that Moses the question being of Gods worship non minus fratri suo germano parcere c. doth no more spare his owne brother then if he had been a very stranger there must bee no respect had of friendship kinred acquaintance when Gods glorie commeth in question as the Levites afterwards sheathed their swords even in their owne sonnes and brethren So the Apostle saith Have not the faith of our glorious Lord Iesus in respect of persons Iam. 2.1 9. Observ. Not to put off the fault to another whereof our selves are guiltie Vers. 22. THou knowest this people Aaron putteth off the fault from himselfe and laieth it upon the people Hic est pernitiosus iam inde ab Adam in nobis inveteratus mos c. This pernicious error even from Adam is growne into a custome to transferre the fault upon another Lippoman for so did Adam turne it to Eve 10. Observ. Mercie and justice to be tempred together Vers. 27. SLay every man his brother Videmus in Mose duo contraria c. We see two contrarie things in Moses mercie and judgement mercie in his praying for the people and justice in commanding the idolaters to be slaine Ferus which two being joyned together in Governours Civill and Ecclesiasticall doe make a pleasant and sweet harmonie as the Prophet David saith Psal. 101. I will sing mercie and judgement unto thee O Lord I will sing 11. Observ. We must go on in our calling though we see others punished before us Vers. 24. GOe now therefore bring the people c. Though the Lord did respite the peoples further punishment yet he would not have Moses be negligent in that charge which was committed unto him Etsi vult populum punire tamen nobis pergendum est in nostromunere Although God intend to punish his people we must goe on in our dutie Simler So when the plague was begun in the host Moses bid Aaron take his censer and so hee censed betweene the dead and the living and the plague staied Numb 16. CHAP. XXXIII 1. The Method and Argument IN this Chapter is set forth the reconciliation of God with his people wherein first the preparation to this reconciliation goeth before to vers 12. then the manner of the reconciliation followeth to the end of the Chapter 1. In the preparation 1. There is shewed on Gods behalfe how first he telleth Moses that although he would bring them into the land of Canaan yet hee will not goe with them himselfe vers 1 2 3. and the effect that followed the sorrow of the people vers 4. Secondly the Lord chargeth them to lay aside their good raiment vers 5. and the people obeyed vers 6. 2. On Moses behalfe he to shew that the Lord was departed from them the more to humble them pitched his tent without the host vers 7. 3. On the peoples part is described their humilitie in looking toward Moses and worshipping toward the Tabernacle with the cause that moved them Gods presence there in the cloud and his talking with Moses to vers 12. 2. The manner of the reconciliation followeth 1. The reconciliation it selfe is set down 1. With Moses reasons taken from Gods favour toward him vers 12. from his covenant with
10.28 3. And as offence might grow by eating of things sacrificed to idols see likewise concerning other meats forbidden by Moses Law great question did arise betweene the converted Jewes and the beleeving Gentiles for the deciding of which controversie Saint Paul giveth two rules first That they should not judge one another Rom. 14.13 that he that did eat should not condemne him that would not eat secondly that they should not grieve or offend one another with their eating ibid vers 15. that they should abstaine from eating such things at the least in their brothers presence And after this the Church came together and decreed that for a time in regard of the weake they should abstaine from strangled and bloud Act. 15. Tostat. quâ—st 13. 4. But this further must be considered that Christians now have a greater liberty than the Israelites had for they are simply forbidden to goe unto the Gentiles feasts or to have any fellowship with them lest by little and little they might be drawne to partake with them in their idolatry But S. Paul allowed Christians to goe unto the feasts of the Gentiles and to eat of their sacrifices so it might be done without offence 1 Cor. 10.27 Gallas 5. And the reason hereof why the Israelites are forbidden to communicate with the Gentiles and to eat and drinke with them may thus further be declared For the communion of some is forbidden to the faithfull two wayes either in poenam illius cui communio fidelium subtrabitur for a punishment to him from whom the company of the faithfull is withdrawne as the incestuous young man was excommunicate among the Corinthians or ad cautelam eorum quibus interdicitur for their warning and heed-taking which are so forbidden others company And if so the faithfull be strong in faith and are more like to win the Infidels than to be corrupted by them they are not forbidden their company but if they be weake and such as easily may be drawne away the company of Infidels to such is dangerous Thomas And of this sort were the Hebrewes who were weake and prone to idolatry and therefore the Lord forbiddeth them all entercourse and communion with the Gentiles QUEST XXXIV Why marriages with the Idolatrous were forbidden and in what cases Vers. 16. LEst thou take of their daughters to thy sonnes 1. The Israelites were forbidden to take wives unto their sonnes from the idolatrous Heathen lest they might draw them also unto idolatry men must not deceive themselves in such marriages and thinke that they may draw their wives or the wives the husbands rather unto the true religion which they professe then to be corrupted by them For how knowest thou a man te uxorem lucrifacturum that thou shalt gaine thy wife to thy religion or thou woman that thou shalt perswade thy husband Gallasius Shall a man thinke himselfe more wise than Salomon whose heart was perverted by his wives and to please them he fell to most grosse idolatry Simlerus 2. Yet it was lawfull for the Israelites to take to wives such of the Gentiles as were converted to their religion as is evident Deut. 21.13 as Boaz married Ruth who had then imbraced the true religion and worship of the God of Israel as she said unto Naomi Thy people shall be my people and thy God my God Ruth 1.16 3. But the example of â—â—hlan and Chilian will be objected the sonnes of Elimeâ—ech who tooke unto them wives of the Moabites Orpah and Ruth who were not then converted to the faith of Israel for then Naomi would not have bid them returne into their country as shee did Ruth 1.12 for that had beene to give them occasion to commit idolatry Therefore this marriage is excused by the necessity of that place where Mahlan and Chilian sojourned namely in Moab for the space of ten yeeres where were no women of their religion and so they were faine to take them wives from the Moabites 4. Now further as it was unlawfull to take wives to their sonnes from the Gentiles so was it also forbidden that they should give their daughters to their sonnes Deut. 7.3 which of the two was the more dangerous 1. For the man is the head of the woman and so the Israelitish wife should come in subjection to a Pagan and by this meanes dishonour her nation 2. The man being of greater power might use more violent meanes to force the wife to Gentilisme than the wife could to draw the husband 3. The children also were more likely to be corrupted which are brought up according to the fathers minde Tostat. quaest 14. An example whereof we have in that blasphemer that was stoned to death who was the sonne of an Egyptian and of an Israelitish woman Levit. 24. QUEST XXXV Why the images are called molten gods Vers. 17. THou shalt make thee no molten gods 1. The Gentiles so called their idols communi populari errore by a common and popular errour as now among the Romanists the common people call their images their Saints But the wiser sort among the Heathen did not take the idols to be their gods but only representations of them yet that excused not their idolatry no more than the like pretense now among the Papists that they use images only to put them in minde of God Simler 2. But an idoll is farre from being God or having any divine thing in it that as the Apostle saith It is nothing in the world not in respect of the matter but of the signification for it neither representeth the true God who is a Spirit and hath no bodily shape nor yet the false gods which are nothing at all in the world Marbach 3. By one kinde of molten images all the rest are forbidden whether they be graven carved painted locutio est à parte totum significans it is a manner of speech taking a part for the whole Augustin Iunius But he giveth instance of molten images because of the molten calfe which they had lately made Lyranus 4. If it were unlawfull for them to suffer the Gentiles idols to stand but they were to breake them downe much more were they not to make them new Simler And so often is this Law repeated because of their pronenesse to idolatry Tostat. QUEST XXXVI Why the principall feasts of the Israelites are here rehearsed Vers. 18. THe feast of unleavened bread 1. The Lord renuing now his covenant with his people which was interrupted by their apostasie and falling away doth also againe prescribe unto them these festivall solemnities which they should observe unto him therefore renovato foedere repetuntur the covenant being renued they are also repeated Borrhaius 2. Another reason of this repetition is ne otiosus populus ceremonias Gentium aemuletur lest the idle people should have followed the ceremonies and superstitious festivals of the Gentiles the Lord prescribeth them certaine feasts wherein they should be occupied in setting forth of his praise Lippom. 3.
ne veri Dei cultus esset inferior gentilium cultu that the true service of God should not be inferiour unto the false worship of the Gentiles and involutum fuit Christi corpus Christs body was wrapped up in these ceremonies they were types and figures of things to come Simler 4. Now such sumptuous cost is not required in Gods service his worship being spirituall for the body being come the shadowes are ceased only a comelinesse and decencie is to be observed in the edifiers belonging to Gods service with seemely ornaments Simler QUEST IV. Whether one may offer himselfe to the calling of the Ministerie Vers. 10. ALL the wise hearted shall come c. Moses willeth such as God had endued with gifts to offer themselves to doe the service of the Tabernacle So it is not unlawfull for those which know themselves to be fitted and prepared with gifts to offer themselves in a modest and orderly sort unto the Ministery of the Gospell these conditions being observed 1. They must humbly acknowledge to have received all their gifts at Gods hands and that without his grace and helpe no vocation or calling can prosper as Iohn Baptist saith A man can receive nothing unlesse it be given him from heaven Iohn 3.27 and therefore their desire must be to referre all their gifts to Gods glory 2. They must submit themselves with lowlinesse to the judgement and triall of those penes quos est legitima vocatio unto whom belongeth the outward lawfull calling and approbation of men for the Apostle saith The spirits of the Prophets are subject to the Prophets 1 Cor. 14.32 3. They must take heed they enter not by unlawfull meanes as by gifts and bribery to corrupt those to whom the allowance and approbation of them belongeth that are to enter In this manner for one to offer himselfe is not to be an intruder but such an one is rather to be held as called of God Marbach QUEST V. Of the liberall and franke offering of the people Vers. 21. THou all the Congregation of the children of Israel departed c. 1. In that they departed from Moses it sheweth their deliberation and consultation with themselves which commendeth their discreet liberality that they would doe nothing rashly for it falleth out oftentimes that hee qui subitâ— fervore beneficus est which is liberall upon a sudden heat doth afterward repent him 2. They came and offered willingly not of constraint Marbach Some thinke this is added Every one whose spirit made him willing came and brought to shew a difference betweene the willing and unwilling but it rather sheweth that there was none found but brought willingly according to their ability 3. As by the manner their liberality appeareth so by the persons that offered not onely men but women not the Princes only but the people and as well the poore as the rich Pelargus 4. So also it is made manifest by the gifts which they offered not onely silver gold but even the Jewels and ornaments of their bodies earings rings bracelets even the nice and dainty women were willing to forgoe such things Marbach 5. And herein their repentance did shew it selfe that quae luxui antea servierunt c. the things which before they abused to wantonnesse and superstition are now consecrated to the service of the Tabernacle Simler QUEST VI. Why the women offered by themselves Vers. 22. THe men came with the women 1. The word is ghal which signifieth upon which Oleaster understandeth thus that the women were most forward and came first and then the men came upon them that is after them 2. Or he thinketh mention is made of men and women to signifie the great throngs and companies that came men and women together 3. But direct mention is made of the women to shew their ardent affection in not sparing to give their owne jewels Marbach And herein also was signified Deum non aspernari operas mulâ—â—rum That God despised not the service of women toward the worke of the Tabernacle Lippom. 4. The women offered by themselves but not without their husbands consent for all things were done in order the superstitious women alleage Ierem. 44.19 That they did not powre out their drinke offerings to the Queene of heaven without their husbands much more would not these devout women offer to the Lords worke without their husbands consent And though the husbands onely should have offered for themselves and their wives by mutuall consent it had come to one effect and should have beene alike acceptable unto God yet it contenteth the devout women better that they offer with their owne hands As when a summe was taken of the people every one put in halfe a sicle for himselfe Tostat. quaest 2. QUEST VII Why the workmen are named Vers. 30. THe Lord hath called by name Bezaleel 1. Marbachius thinketh that this narration of the workmen went before the offering of the people that they knowing who should have the disposing of their gifts might be more incouraged to bring but it is like that as the Lord after the description of the Tabernacle and what every one should bring toward it last of all made mention of the workmen chap. 31. so Moses observeth the same order 2. Cajetane saith that Moses signifieth who should be the chiefe workmen ne â—riatur contentio inter artifices that there should be no contention among the workmen 3. But that other note of Cajetane is not so good that whereas it is said Hee hath filled him with the spirit Elohim of God he by elohim understandeth a Iudge that God had made him a Judge or Umpire relativè ad alios artifices in respect of other artificers 4. I preferre rather Osianders collection that out of these words Iehovah filleth him with the Spirit of God proveth the Trinâ—â—y for there is one person of Iehovah which filleth another of the Spirit wherewith he is filled and the third of the Sonne of God whose Spirit it is 4. Places of Doctrine 〈…〉 Law of the Sabbaticall rest how morall Vers. 3. 〈…〉 The Sabbath is taken two wayes either precisely for the seventh 〈…〉 of the Law and is abolished or simply for a day of rest set apart for the 〈…〉 there is no nation almost which had not some festivall dayes for the 〈…〉 wherein although they diversly erred yet it sheweth that it was 〈…〉 and consequently was morall that some time should be appointed 〈…〉 2. Doct. The libertie of Christians is greater in the Sabbaticall rest than of the Iewes BUt yet the rest of the Lords day is not so strictly now injoyned as under the Law sed nunc liberalius nobiscum agit but now under the new Testament God dealeth more liberally with us some works are such as doe hinder the service of God which are by no meanes now to be done nisi cogat necessitas unlesse necessity constraine other works there are which are not such an impediment unto Gods service