words of the insutution are not so rehearsed that they may be heard and vnderstood whereby faith may be stirred vp there we denie it to be a ttue sacrament and therefore we affirme that the signes without the lawfull vse bee not Sacraments but onely the same thinges which they are of their owne nature and nothing else For the signes are translated onely by the word from their common vse to the holy vse that which many call to be consecrated hallowed and thereby is made a sacrament euen as Augustine said The word commeth to the element and the sacrament is made it commeth indeede that it may be vnderstood and beleeued VI. That Sacraments be not simple markes or bare signes Therfore we beleeue that these sacramentall signes be not simple markes which onely do seuer vs from other people that are not of the true church or meere tokēs vnto vs of our christian societie or whereby we should professe our faith openly and giue thanks to god for our redemption but that they are the instruments by which while the actions benefits of Christ are represented vnto vs they are called to our remembrance his promises are sealed and our faith stirred vp the holy ghost also doth ingraft vs to Christ doth keepe vs beeing ingrafted and makes vs daily to growe vp more and more into one with him that beeing indued with a greater faith towards God and earnester loue towards our neighbour and a mortification of our selues we might lead a life euen like so far as might bee to the life of Christ in spirituall ioye and gladnesse till the time when we shall liue with him in heauen most holily and blessedlie for euer VII The sacraments of the newe conenant of what sorte Wee also confesse with Augustine De doct chr lib. 3. cap. 9 that the sacraments deliuered by Christ are in number few easie to be done and most worthie to bee vnderstood Few in number because they are onely two Baptisme and the Lords Supper easie to be done for there is nothing either in Baptisme or the Lordes supper which may not easily be performed receiued nothing troublesome nothing vnpleasant or straunge vnto a man Lastly most worthie to be vnderstood because although the things which are seene are of no value yet those things which are signified which are set downe to be thought on considered and vnderstood in the minde are most reuerend heauenly diuine pertaining to eternall saluation VIII To the worthy receiuing of the sacraments there is need of vnderstanding and faith And thereby also we know that the sacraments to the worthie receiuing of them doe require an action and attention of the minde a faith in vs whereby wee vnderstand what is signified and offered to vs by them and apprehend it with a minde setled in faith euen as Christ teacheth Luc. 22.19 1. Cor. 11.24 where he saieth of his supper doe this in remembrance of me And the Apostles waighing and cōsidering these words of Christ doth largely expoūd them To which purpose is also that Lift vp your hearts For there be set before vs matters most reuerend heauenly and diuine to be vnderstood in the minde and receiued by faith IX That the matter of the Sacrament is seriously offred to all men though all do not truely receiue the same but only the chosen faithfull And although all men come not to the receiuing of the sacraments with faith and true vnderstanding yet as the signes are giuen to all that professe Christ so also we beleeue that the things signified by the sacraments are seriously offred vnto all by Christ and therefore that nothing is diminished of the substance or soundnes of the sacrament by the vnbeleefe of them that receiue the signes only for it dependeth wholy vpon the institution of Christ and the trueth of his wordes X. VVhile the sacraments are ministred the spirit of Christ is powerfull in the faithfull therefore they not only receiue the signes but also participate in the things signified But albeit the spirit of Christ be not powerfull in all men on whome the Sacraments are bestowed as it is neither to all vnto whome the word is preached and that by their owne fault because they haue not vnderstanding faith yet wee beleeue that in the faithfull elect of God he is powerful in as much as they being indued with faith by the hearing of the word and confirmed more and more in the same by the receiuing of the sacraments are brought by the same spirit into the communion of Christ and made to ioyne and growe together with him therein and therefore we cōfesse that these men in Baptisme are truely washed and purged from sinne by vertue of Christs blood and in the Lords supper they eate of Christs true flesh and drink of his true blood XI That Christ is both author and true disposer of the sacraments And wee acknowledge as one author so one true disposer of the sacraments euen our Lord Iesus Christ which giueth the outward signes by men his ministers but he himselfe properly and truely imparteth vnto them the matter of the sacramentes effectually by himselfe or by his holy spirit like as Iohn the Baptist said J baptize vvith water but Christ will baptize with the spirit And therefore as it is lawfull for no man to institute new sacraments so also can no man boast that he truely and properlie cleanseth consciences of sinne or that he feedeth men with the true bodie and bloode of Christ but onely as they say ministerially or as a minister XII The sacraments are not polluted to the faithfull by the vices of the ministers Now if Christ alone be not onely the true author of sacraments but the disposer also we easily gather that the sacraments are not polluted to others that be faithfull by the vices of the ministers whose labour he vseth Tit. 1.15 but that notwithstanding they may receiue them worthily and be made partakers of the thing signified and offered by the sacraments For to the cleane all things are cleane Eph. 3.17 and Christ with all his riches dwelleth in the heartes of the faithfull XIII That grace is not tied to the Sacraments By these foundations are we confirmed in the opinion receiued among all godlye men that the grace of God is not tied to the sacraments so that who so receiueth them must needs receiue also grace that is the thing signified and offred by the sacraments although he want faith as though a man could obtaine the matter of the sacrament by the vvorke wrought as they call it Mar. 16.16 Act. 8.13 For Christ saide not simplie whosoeuer shal bee baptized he shal be saued but he first addeth vvhosoeuer beleeueth And Simon Magus he receiued the sacramēt of Baptisme but he obtained not the matter of Baptisme when as yet as Peter witnesseth hee was wrapped in the most bitter gaule of sinne and in the bond of iniquitie and diuelish
remembrance of it and to waigh in their minds to what ende they were baptized or what they haue obtained of God by baptisme what also they promised to God therein whereby they may the more be confirmed in faith and grow vp into the communion with Christ and bee made more carefull of performing their dueties For baptisme is not bestowed on vs for remission of originall sinne onely or our sinnes past but of all the offences of our whole life euē as the pulling out of the waters is a signe of a newe life not for one day but for al our time as the Apostle saith Rom. 6.4 VVe are buried with him euer into his death by baptisme that as Christ rose from death by the glory of his father so we should alwaies walke in newnesse of life Wee were once washed with outward water but the blood of Christ is a continuall streame washing and cleansing vs daily from our sinnes VIII By whome baptisme ought to bee administred Wee beleeue also that holie baptisme is to bee administred by those by whome also the gospell is preached For to whom Christ said Goe into the whole worlde and preach the gospell to them he also said Baptizing them in the name of the father and the sonne and the holy ghost teaching them to obserue whatsoeuer is commaunded you IX Errors Therefore we condemne all aswell auncient as late herisies which haue at anie time beene scattered against the sound doctrine of baptisme Seleucus and Hermias who baptized with fire The Cerdonians and Marcionites who vsed another forme of words then that which was prescribed by Christ baptized in the name of another God then of the father sonne and holy ghost those also which baptized in the name of Iohn or any other man the Cataphriges who baptized dead mē with all Donatists and Anabaptists who rebaptize them which come vnto them which denie that infants ought to be baptized and those also that denie baptisme to be true vnlesse there bee added exorcismes spittle salt and other cerimonies deuised by men CHAP. XVI Of the Lords supper BY that which we haue saide of the communion with Christ and of the worde of the gospell of the sacramentes in generall and of Baptisme may easilie be gathered what our faith is concerning the Lordes Supper I. The sacrament of the supper is an instrument of the holie ghost to helpe forvvard the communion with Christ and with the church We beleeue that the sacrament of the supper is not onely a testimonie of our communion with Christ and with his flesh and blood and with the whole church but also an instrument of the holie ghost to confirme helpe foreward the same the Apostle saying the bread vvhich we breake 1. Cor. 10.16 is it not the communion of the Lords bodie the breaking and the taking of the blessed bread he calleth the communion of the Lordes bodie because they which eate with an actuall faith in the Lorde doe ioyne in communion with the Lord and with his flesh and blood as also they that imbrace the word of the Apostles in faith do receiue a communion with the Apostles that cōmunion is with the father and with his sonne Iesus Christ II. A confirmation of the former opinion For as baptisme is an instrument to begin this communion because by it wee are borne againe in Christ so is the supperinstituted to make perfect the same because in it wee are fedd or nourished with the flesh and blood of Christ that we may growe vp in him as the Apostle saith 1. Cor. 12.13 vve are all baptized into one bodie and we all drinke of one drinke into one spirite III. The increase of our communion with Christ is the principall end of the Lords supper There are also other endes of the institutiō of the Lords supper namely that beeing admonished both by the words signes which represent vnto vs Christs death and his blood shedd for vs we should reuerently esteeme of the benefite of our redemption as the Apostle saith As oft as yee shall eate of this bread 1. Cor. 11.20 yee showe the Lords death And therefore the ende is that we may be confirmed in the faith concerning remission of sinnes we may be nourished into hope of a blessed resurrection wee maye giue thanks to him for so great a benefite we may be stirred vp to repentance and lastly we may openly before the whole congregation renue our couenant begunne with God But sith all these things tend to this that we may more more be vnited to Christ be made one with him and he more feelinglie liue in vs and we in him being now made flesh of his flesh and bone of his bone therfore we doubt not but the supper is principally instituted for the increase of this vniting and communion with Christ wherein our saluation is made perfect and accomplished Whereunto it also tendeth that bread and wine are the nourishments of the bodie so as wee may hold it for most certaine the flesh and blood of Christ is the same in nourishing of our soules preseruing thē in life that the bread and wine is to our bodies IV. The bread why it is called the bodie of Christ Whereuppon we may also vnderstand why Christ called this bread his own body namely not for that it is either properly his verie true bodie or that there is any such body cōtained within it or also that it is onely a bare signe of his bodie broken and dead for vs but that it is a sacrament for sacraments saith Augustine take vnto them the names of the things whereof they be sacraments and therefore an instrument also of the holie ghost to communicate vnto vs the true body of Christ to confirme vs in his communion Like as for the same cause the Apostle also called baptisme not the signe of regeneration Eph. 5.26 but the vvashing water it self of regeneration namely because that by this washing of water through the worde as by a fitt instrument Christ by the working power of his spirite doeth inwardly wash and cleanse vs and begett vs a new V. The true and substantiall body of Christ is spoken of the bread but improperly and figuratiuely Wherefore we doubt not but in the words of the supper the true and naturall bodie of Christ is spoken of the bread especially sith it is added for expositions sake which is giuen for you So that it is most truely said that the bread is Christs bodie euen that true bodie which was giuen for vs but yet this is improperly figuratiuely sith in verie deede the bread was not giuen for vs but the verie bodie of Christ whereof the bread is a sacrament VI. The bodie of Christ is not in the bread reallie and properlie Hereby we are also confirmed in this opinion that as the bread is not properlie the verie bodie of Christ but a sacrament thereof so also Christ is not
or no aswell in the one kinde as the other sith none is iustified by the former iustice but he is also indued with the latter and both of them are declared by good workes in which sense wee doubt not but Iames spake XII Errors We condemn all Pelagians which thought that infants were conceiued without sinne therefore needed not the forgiuenes of sinns and benefite of Christ for their saluation and those also which teach that although they must needes haue forgiuenesse of sinnes yet that the same maye bee obtained without faith in Christ And those too which thinke that although wee neede to haue faith in Christ yet that the same is not sufficient but that wee need also our owne works as merites necessarie for the obtaining forgiuenes of sinne but especially those that teach the same to be done by vngodly worship and fonde superstitions Neither doe wee allowe of those which haue taught that we are iustified by no other iustice then that inwarde and inherent iustice Nor those which thought that the remissiō of sinns can stand without the internall renuing and iustice Wee also condemne them which suppose they may bee iustified and saued by the historicall faith cōcerning Christ which Iames calleth a dead faith that is none at all Yea and there opinion is disallowed of vs which teach that a mā is iustified not by remission of sinns and imputation of Christes iustice but euen by the verie essentiall righteousnesse as they call it of Christ really communicated to vs. CHAP. XX. Of the regenerate mans freechoise and power to do good I. They that are iustified in Christ are also regenerate in him and receiue power to doe good WE beleeue that they which are ingrafted into Christ like as they are iustified in him so they bee regenerated in him and made new creatures by participatiō of his diuine nature and consequētly are made free and doe take force from Christ himselfe as members from the head and as braunches from the vine to eschew euill and to follow that which is good As Christ saieth if the sonne of man shall make yee free Ioh. 8.36 ye shall bee free indeede But then be we made free when wee are ioyned vnto Christ and regenerate by his spirite as the Apostle also saith where the spirite of the Lord is there is libertie II. Christ liueth and worketh in men regenerate For with the Apostle we cōfesse that Christ liueth in vs Gal. 2.20 Phil 2.13 Rom. 8.26 that are regenerate by his spirit and liueth not idelie but worketh both that vvee may will and that wee may performe for the great loue that he beareth vnto vs and by his spirite doth help our infirmities III. A regenerate man in matters pertaining to the sensible and humaine life doth beare himselfe better then one not regenerate and therefore is more free So a regenerate man besids that he alwaies keepeth his will free from all constraint as also the vnregenerate doth he doth likewise beare himselfe better and more warelie then the vnregenerate euen in such actions as pertaine to the sensitiue and humaine life wherein the vnregenerate may bee circumspect sith in those actions also a regenerate man is wrought by the holy spirit who lighteneth his minde gouerneth his will and his thoughts and draweth his actions out of a good fountaine that is out of a good heart directeth them to their principall ende that is to the glorie of God Whereunto the Apostle also exhorteth vs 1. Cor. 10.31 saying Whether yee eate or drinke or whatsoeuer yee doe doe all thinges to the glorie of God And therefore he is euen in this kinde of actions more free then the man vnregenerate namely in that he is not violently drawne by his owne lustes to the doing thereof as the other vnregenerate is but beeing wrought by the holy ghost thinketh willeth and attempteth all things more warily wisely and religiouslie euermore heedfully respecting this that he do all things to the glorie of God his owne saluation and some profite of his neighbour Rom. 147.8 For he alwaies obserueth that rule of the Apostle None of vs liueth to himselfe nether doth any die to himselfe for whether we liue we liue vnto the Lord or whether we dye vve dye vnto the Lord whether we liue therefore or dye vvee are the Lords And therefore he commendeth all his actions to the diuine prouidence saith with Iames or at least thinketh if the Lord will I will doe this or that or I will goe to this place or that IV. Likewise in getting the morall vertues a regenerate man is freer and of more force then the vnregenerate And albeit we confesse that a man vnregenerate helped by the speciall aide of God cā bee possessed with the morall vertues yet wee hold that this speciall aide of God is much more forcible in the regenerate and that through the presence of the holie ghost Tert. in the Apol. c. 4.5 Aug. cont Iul. Pel. lib. 4 c. 3. De Ciu. De. lib. 19 c. 25. Orig con cels by whome they are lightened gouerned driuē forward as it was well prooued of the auncient fathers against the vaine boast of the gētilles that those vertues which they call morall were farre other manner of giftes in the christians then they were or could bee in the infidells sith in them they were onely the images or shadowes of vertues but in true christians they were the verie vertues indeed V. Vnto such things as are of God and pertaine to his kingdome onely the regenerate man is by the holy ghost enlightened inclined wrought to the vnderstanding choosing and performing them But we beleeue that in the true vnderstanding choosing and performing those thinges which pertaine to the kingdome of God onely the regenerate are so guided by the holie ghost that they alone truely vnderstand will and doe the same sith the Apostle saieth The naturall man perceiueth not the things of the spirite of God 1. Cor. 2.19 neither can he perceiue them but of the regenerate he addeth The spirituall man discerneth all things Phil. 2.13 and in another place God worketh in vs both to will and to performe VI. A regenerate man is not onely vvrought but also worketh by the holy spirite Being so taught by these words of the Apostle and other testimonies of the holy scriptures wee confesse that regenerate men are so wrought by the holy ghost that they themselues doe likewise worke and God so worketh in them to will and to performe that they are the same which do will and doe performe For they are not blocks nor beasts but men indued with reason whereby they vnderstand and with a wil whereby they desire and whereby they commaund ouer the other powers of the soule bodie that such things as are good should be put in execution VII The povver of free choise in the regenerate is yet weake so that vve haue still neede of the help
Christ and he shall raigne in the house of Iacob for euer and the Apostle that he is as the sonne ouer his owne house and this house we are that is the church and in another place that he is the head of the church Eph. 5.23 the same is the Sauiour of his bodie II. Christ ordereth his church partly by himselfe and partly by assistance of fellowe labourers But the gouernment wherewith Christ guideth his church we know to be two fold one wherein he of himselfe and by his holy spirit without any help or seruice of man Phil. 2.13 Eph. 1.23 raigneth inwardly in the hearts of beleeuers and worketh in them to will and to performe and is euen all in all and mooueth vnto that which is good defending vs from euill against Sathan the worlde and all our enemies The other wherein he so guideth the church as hee also vouchsafeth to vse the help and ministerie of others aswell Angells as men especially to the preseruation of the church As of Angells the Apostle speaketh Heb. 1.14 They are ministring spirits sent forth to minister for their sakes which shal bee heires of saluation 1. Cor. 3.5.9 and of men he saieth Wee are Gods ministers by whome yee haue beleeued For like as in a man the head of it selfe by vertue of the minde which liueth worketh chieflie therein doeth so rule the whole bodie that it also vseth the helpe of euerie member to the profite of the whole bodie so Christ the head of the church doth in like sort beare himselfe in the gouernment thereof not for his owne cause or that hee needeth our ministerie but doth it for our necessitie yea for our manifest commoditie and honour III. A difference betweene the ministerie of Angells and of men By the way wee acknowledge a difference betweene the ministerie of Angells and of men sith the Angells are not sent either to teach in the church or to administer Sacraments but to performe other dueties those for the most part inuisible neither come they ordinarily alwaies and to all but at such time and to such persons as God sendeth them but the ministerie of men is apparent and perpetuall and pertaineth to euerie one IV. Jt was most aduisedly done that Angells should not teach in the church but men And wee know it was most wisely and aduisedly done of God that Christ should teach in his church not by Angells but by men both because we can not more willingly suffer our selues to be informed familiarly of our equalles then to be taught of spirits of a farre diffring nature with an vnaquainted maiesty and also because we might more easily be deceiued of Satan falsly faining himselfe to bee sent of God and transforming himselfe to an Angel of light And those surely in our iudgement are two not the least causes why the sonne of God when he was to fulfill the office of a teacher in the church would bee made a man and our brother and familier and like vnto vs in all thinges sinne onely excepted whereto that same tendeth Heb. 4.15 Heb. 2.12 Heb. 1.1 I vvill declare thy name to my brethren in the midst of the congregation will I praise thee and that same In these last daies he hath spoken vnto vs by his sonne namely being nowe made man and liuing familiarlie in the church V. There be two kinds of men especially whose ministery Christ vseth to the gouernment and preseruation of the church And although there be not one member in this whole great body of the church but Christ vseth the same to some profite of the other mēbers 1. Cor. 12.7 and so of the whole bodie as Paule teacheth yet wee acknowledge two principall kindes of men whose help and seruice he is wont to vse for the gouernment and preseruation of the church namely first teachers and others to administer the word sacraments other ecclesiasticall dueties then godly princes and magistrats whose ministeries or offices we confound not but acknowledge them to be distinct and verie diuerse among which differences this also is not the least that the ministerie of teachers is alwaies verie necessarie to the church but of politicke magistrates not so sith the former the church cannot bee without but the other it often hath wanted and may want them VI. About what matters especially the ecclesiasticall ministerie is imployed But as the summe of christian pietie consisteth in three things in faith in Christ in continual repentance that is in the mortification of our flesh and of our sinnes and quickening of the spirite and lastlie in charitie towards our neighbour so also wee acknowledge three principall parts of the ecclesiasticall ministerie First to teach and to preach the worde of the gospell and also to administer the sacraments and offer vpp the publike sacrifice of praise to God through Iesus Christ Secondly to declared by the Apostles and lastly to do all such things which though they be not expressed in the scriptures yet doe belong to order and to decencie and do make for edification and not for destruction according to the generall rule giuen by the Apostle 1. Cor. 14.40 that all things ought to be done in the church in order decently and to edification Neither thinke wee that any authoritie is giuen vnto ministers beyonde the boundes of the word of God or to any other ende then for edification therefore we denie that one Bishop or all Bishops together haue authoritie to appoint any thing against the scriptures to adde or detract any thing or chaunge any thing in them to dispense with the commaundements of God to make new articles of faith to institute new sacraments to bring new rites into the church to prescribe any lawes which may binde consciences or may be thought equall to gods law to forbid any things which God hath graunted and left free or lastly to commaund any thing without the word of God as necessary to saluatiō sith not the whole church can haue or truely be said to haue this authoritie XXI The Bishops which are also princes their politicall authoritie is not denied By the way we disallow not but that bishops which are also princes besids their ecclesiasticall authoritie they haue also their politicall rites and secular powers euen as other princes haue the law of commaunding in secular causes the law of the sword some of them the law of choosing and confirming kinges and emperors and of directing and ordering other politicall matters and to constraine people that are their subiects to do them obedience and therefore we confesse that their politicall commandements which may be kept without breach of Gods law are to be obeyed by their subiects not onely for feare but also for conscience sake Rom. 13.5 For we know that all power is of God Rom. 13.1.2 and vvhosoeuer resisteth the power resisteth the ordinance of God and that kings are to be honoured 1. Pet. 2.17 and that we
repentance and the faith of Christ but seing they were as Luke reporteth onely baptized into Iohns baptisme which notwithstanding they knew not what it was and were altogether ignorant of the baptisme of Christ that is of the spirit he baptized them shewing vnto thē what Iohns baptisme was and how he baptized into Christ not into his owne sprinkling or dipping of the water as though that could be any profite vnto them He therefore baptized them with this baptisme of Iohn that is as Iohn vsed to do into the name of the Lord Iesus and by by after laying on his hands he baptized thē with the baptisme also of Christ that is with the spirit For immediatly the holy ghost came on them as it is there read This there And vpon the epistle to the Ephes chap. 4. the same Bucer writeth thus Hereby it is also manifest that the twelue men at Ephesus which knew not whether there were an holie ghost or no whome Paule baptized were not baptized with the baptisme of Iohn that is with that which he administred but as they witnessed themselues they were baptized into Iohns baptisme For Iohn preached vnto all whome hee baptized that Christ should baptize them with the holy ghost and exhorted them that they would beleeue in him and that of him they might receiue the holy ghost And therefore these Ephesiās could not haue beene ignorant of the holy ghost if they had bin washed with that baptisme which might truely be called Iohns which also the Apostles words to those men doth sufficiently declare Iohn verily baptized with the baptisme of repētance saying vnto the people that they should beleeue in him which should come after him that is in Christ For by these wordes he would teach vs that they neuer receiued Iohns baptisme who as yet knew not Iohns preaching of Christ and the promise Thus farre Bucer Seing then the fathers expound this place in Act. 19. as wee haue nowe declared who I pray am I that I should dare or that I ought to gaine-say so many and so learned men in such an exposition of this scripture which neither doth any whitt wrest the text nor contrarieth any other scriptures nor is against the analogie of faith nor bringeth with it any absurdities For if any man shall obiect out of the text that same truely and but it prooueth nothing against the fathers exposition seing it is no vnusuall thing with the Apostle where hee saieth first truely not alwaies to ioyne the aduersatiue particle but Rom. 3. ver 2. Coll. 2. ver 23. and in other places And vnto this truely another but which Luke for breuitie sake left out might bee vnderstood verie fittly as hereafter we will shew so that it is no necessitie with this truely to ioyne that but which followeth in the 5. verse in which verse the fathers will haue not Paules speach but Lukes to be continued Therefore the fathers exposition is not repugnant to the text nor yet with any other scripture For if any man say Paule writeth to the Corinthians that he is gladd he baptized none but the house of Stephana it may be answered it is true namely at Corinth but these twelue were baptized at Ephesus and besides he speaketh of such as were baptized with his owne hand but these twelue he might baptise by some other to dispute no longer about the circumstance of the time And it is most certaine it is not repugnant to the analogie of faith nor bringeth with it any absurdities because the fathers do not speake of a baptisme rightly administred as though Paule had repeated that again This expositiō therefore of the fathers in my iudgement cannot easily be refelled And this therfore is the chiefest cause why I haue euer thus thought and yet thinke of this action of Paule although indeed I cannot consent vnto them all in the cause why Paule baptized them but onely to Ambrose and Hierome That Iohns Baptisme Christs Baptisme did differ the fathers teach both by this that Iohn saide how he baptized onely with vvater but Christ should baptize with the holy ghost with fire and also by this that the baptisme of Iohn is called the baptisme of repentance but Christes baptisme is said to bee giuen for the remission of sinnes And because that he prepared the waye to this as Tertull. speaketh that baptisme of repentance was as it were a sueing for the remission of sinnes and sanctificatiō in Christ which was to follow after Read Tertul. of bap pag. 707. So Cyprian also in his sermon of the baptisme of Christ and of the manifestation of the Trinitie pag. 430. So August To. 7. against Petil cap. 7. But all of vs doe not knowe what the father 's mēt by this differēce of the baptisme For they ment not that the one diffred from the other in the matter or in the signe or in the doctrine and forme of baptisine but onely in efficacie that namely although remission of sinnes was giuen to them which were washed with Iohns baptisme yet the same was not of Iohns baptisme that is of water but by the baptisme of Christ which is the baptisme of the spirite whereunto that belongeth I baptize with water but he with the holy ghost And with this baptisme of the spirit were they only baptized which beleeued in Christ whome Iohn saide was then come though all knewe him not Therefore Iohn in his baptisme did inculcate and often repeate this faith as Paule witnesseth in that place of the 19 of the Actes They therefore are deceiued who for this diuersitie did thinke the baptisme of water was to be repeated August against Petil. as we touched a little before sheweth how some held opinion that the 12 did lye vnto the Apostle when being asked vnto what they were baptized they answered vnto Iohns baptisme So by this that first those Ephesians saide vnto him that they had not yet heard whether there were that is whether that holy ghost did exist or not namely the giuer of those giftes whereof the speach was the Apostle might be said to conuince thē of a lye by this argument Whosoeuer haue bin baptized they haue professed faith in Christ as the sonne of God and consequently in the father and in the spirite of them both For Iohn did require this faith according to the same he baptized men and in baptizing he alwayes vrged that Iesus Christ was he which should baptize in the spirit But you by your owne cōfession do not know this spirite c. and so beleeue not rightly in Iesus Christ Therefore c. But surely to saye that these twelue did lye vnto the church and to the Apostle it seemes to me to be to hard and vile a thing in mē which professed Christ And for this cause we did euer better allow of the opiniō of Ambrose Hierome that the 12 did say truely whē they said they were baptized vnto Iohns baptisme but yet not by
likewise the bodie of Christ be as Ireneus speaketh a heauenlie matter â—owe can it bee eaten of them which haue nothing in them that is heauely but are altogether earthly meÌ„ indued with no faith whereby they may ascend vp into heauen and eate the heauenlie foode therefore onely the godlie can do this But the faithfull also are not affected all alike or after one sort seing verie ofteÌ„ they eate worthelie but sometime it chauÌ„ceth that they eate vnworthelie and therefore are sundrie wayes chastened by God for it They are saide to eate worthelie who before they eate of the Lords bread doe examine themselues whether they be in faith if they be then they diligentlie waye and coÌ„sider the signification and greatnes of this misterie moreouer they trye their consciences whether they bee touched with a true repentance and by earnest hartie prayers do stirre themselues vp to both And they eate vnworthilie who although they be planted in Christ by faith and the spirite of regeneration yet their faith being in some sorte choaked with the cares of this world other affections of the flesh doe nor sufficientlie proue themselues do not diligeÌ„tlie examine nor stirr vp themselues to an earnest consideration of so great a misterie nor weigh with an attentiue minde what is giuen in that holie table what the Lord requireth of them for whome and for what purpose the Supper was instituted by the Lord Lastlie they do eate vnworthelie who as the Apostle speaketh discorne not the Lords bodie and so come not to that table with a due reuerence feare of the Lord discerning in their minde and by faith the thinges signified from the signes and the signes from other common meates and drinkes in such sufficient manner as they ought whereby they doe not aswell open the mouth of the inward man to eate the spirituall foode as they doe the mouth of the outward man to eate the foode which of it owne nature is corporall By reason of this duetie so neglected namelie that they do not sufficientlie prooue themselues nor discerne or iudge of the Lords bodie and consequentlie do eate vnworthilie the Lords bread christians and faithfull men other whiles are woÌ„t to be visited with diuers chastisemeÌ„ts of God yet such as are for their saluation least they should be condemned in this world And of them doth the Apostle properly speake in the 1. Cor. 11. and not of such as be simplie wicked and more hypocrites when he saith these doe eate iudgement vnto themselues c. This is thus prooued 1 Because he saieth not that they which thus eate vnworthilie doe eate vnto themselues 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth eternall destruction but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 iudgement which words what difference there is betwixt them is manifest in the same text where the Apostle in the 32 veise faieth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Wee are iudged or corrected of the Lord 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 least we should be condemned with the world 2 When hee declareth the punishment which they shall haue which eate vnworthily he rehearseth none but teporall chastisemeÌ„ts making no mention of eternall destruction For this cause saieth he many are vveake and sicke c. 3 Add this that he saieth if vvee vvill iudge our selues that is trye our selues and acknowledging our sinnes chastife our selues by repentance and by true faith and amendment of life seperate our selues from the world we should not be iudged namelie of the Lord who doth therefore chasten mortifie vs because we do not mortifie our affections nor repent vs of our sinnes 4 And what meaneth this that in most plaine wordes hee calleth this iudgement by which wee are therefore iudged because wee eate vnworthilie the Lords bread a chastning verie prositable for vs. For thus he saieth But wheÌ„ we are iudged we are chastened of the Lord because we should not be condemned with the world 3 And surelie he placeth himselfe and all the other true beleeuers in the number of those which being iudged are chastised of the Lord for their saluation For he maketh two sortes of men the wicked which are vnderstood in the name of the world and teacheth that vpon them awayeth eternall destruction and then the godlie who by reason of their manie falles and vnworthinesses are also chastened by manie punishments least they should also be coÌ„demned together with the wicked and them hee setteth downe vnder 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 iudgement that they may auoide 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 eternall destruction This place therefore is to bee vnderstood properlie of the faithful but such as are vnperfect and therefore doe greeuouslie sinne because they come vnworthilie to the Lords table Whereas some doe expound the same also of the wicked and do take 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 iudgement for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 condemnation this is rather to bee vnderstood that it is by a certaine consequeÌ„ce with an argument drawne from the lesse to the greater then by force of the text Thus if the godlie which sometime eate vnworthily doe eate vnto themselues 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 condemnation then what 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 condemation shall abide the wicked 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 therefore if it be spoken of the godlie is taken for chastisement if of the wicked it signifieth eternall destruction Vppon the 17. chapter Aphorisme 1. Here we spake of such as bee of yeares of discretion concerning the yong infants of the faithfull the reason is otherwise as in another place we declared For the holie ghost doeth ingraft them into Christ as true members to their head from whome they draw their life yea and we also beleeue that they are endued with the spirite of faith although through the weakenes of nature in them they cannot vse thâ— same euen as they cannot vse the vertue of their vnderstanding whenas notwithstanding they are not without a minde or the faculties thereof The 2. Aphorisme In the description of faith I willingly vsed those two words of wisedome and prudence following the most learned diuine M. B. vppon the Epistle to the Ephesians because in the former I comprehend the knowledge of christian religion of God of Christ c. in the latter the practise thereof into which two the whole gospell is dissinguished which christiaÌ„ religion imbraceth and vpon which onely it is grounded Whereunto belongeth also that others doe teach how faith is an assured knowledge concerning God and Christ conceaued by the word of God c. And the whole christiaÌ„ doctrine consisteth partly in knowledge partly in practise And there bee two kindes of the actions of faith one in the vnderstanding another in the will The vnderstanding being endued with the light of faith doeth perceiue assent vnto and beleeue thinges set downe in the word The will being filled with the power of faith doeth loue desire and embrace the same thinges as good And further such thinges as pertaine to outward workes those it
abideth in him XIII That this vnion is not imaginarie nor made by participation of gifts onely but by communication of substance But we call this present incorporation of vs with christ true and reall and substantiall that we may meet with that errour wherein some thinke that wee forge a certaine imaginarie and a false vnion or that wee meane no other true vnion but that which is made by participation of spirituall giftes and grace of christ without communication of the substance of his flesh and blood XIIII This vnion is made by no other meanes but by the holie spirite and by faith But againe lest some might hereby falslie gather that wee conceiue of such an vnion which is made with the flesh of christ beeing really here vppon earth by some physical or naturall touching either grosse or subtile as al sensible thinges are coupled with the sences some in grosser and some in a subtiller manner or which is made with the same flesh remaining in heauen by certaine intelligible formes in the minde as the philosophers speake as all things which are vnderstood are vnited with the vnderstanding faculty which apprehendeth the same by certaine formes or images Therefore we al adioyne the meanes whereby this vnion incorporation is made namely by the spirite of christ communicated vnto vs really abiding in vs coupling vs vnto christ and working in vs that by a liuely faith we may embrace christ XV. A confirmation of both these propositions namelye that this vnion is essentiall but is made onely by the spirit and our faith For both these things namely that this copulation is essential made by the only spirit of God and by our faith the holy scriptures do plentifully and plainely declare Eph. 2.14.15 16 The Apostle writing vnto the church at Ephesus because all enmitie being taken away by christ the particion wal broken downe The lewes and Gentilles two sortes of people much different were reconciled to God and between themselues and were altogether ingrafted renued in christ by the same holy spirit therefore hee doubted not to saye They vvere both built not into one people as it seemed hee should haue said but the better to expresse how straight this vnion is into one new man in Christ Wherefore sith all of vs doe liue with one the selfe same spirite renued as it were in one and the same minde and are ioyned together vnto one and the selfe same head christ Eph. 4 1â— wee are fittlie all of vs together called one new man And in the same epistle describing this neere and essentiall incorporation he compareth christ to the heade and all vs to the members coupled knit with the head by sinnues ioyntes and ligamentes which take their life and motion from the heade And nothing is more often vsed in the holye Scriptures then this similitude that hereby wee might more easily and clearely vnderstand what and how great this coniunction of all vs is with christ through his spirite which dwelleth in al people that are regenerate For this cause the same Apostle Eph. 2.21.22 23 compareth Christ to the foundation and all the faithfull to stones but yet liuing stones euen as the foundation that they may receiue increase from him built vppon the foundation Mat. 16.18 In vvhome all the building coupled together groweth vnto an holy temple in the Lord by the holie spirite which thing also christ did before the Apostle more then once making himselfe the foundation and the church the building surely grounded vpon that foundation and fastened by an inseparable knot Ioh. 15.1 To the same purpose christ calleth himselfe a vine and vs the braunches which drawing life and sapp from the vine do liue and bring forth good fruits The same is also shewed by the similitude of the tree and the oliue Rom. 11.17 whereinto the faithful as braunches cut from the wilde oliue are ingrafted that they may bringe forth good oliues and are ingrafted by the holy spirit and by faith Phil. 2.1 Eph. 3.17 Eph. 5.32 Whereuppon to the Philippians it is called the communion of the spirite And Christ is said to dvvell in our heartes by faith Nor is it obscure that the Apostle calleth this incorporation of the church with christ and of christ with the church and all the faithfull a mariage after the custome of the Prophets whereby two shal be made one flesh And two said God shal be one flesh And the Apostle This saith he is a great misterie but J speake concerning Christ and concerning the church But that same is still very plaine and readie which Iohn writeth of this vnion and of the spirite by which the same is made and knowne 1. Ioh. 4.13 By this sayth he we knowe that vve dwell in him and he in vs because hee hath giuen vs of his spirite Therefore he dwelleth in vs we in him by the same holy spirite which is both in him and in vs. To this also beelongeth that same He vvhich hath not the spirite of Christ the same is not his But the Apostle knoweth that all are christes which are true and liuely members of christ XVI It is concluded that this coniunction is essentiall and made by the onely spirit of Christ and our faith Being perswaded therefore by these and other the like testimonies of holy scriptures we doubt not but christ and his Apostles ment to signifie vnto vs that the communion which all we the faithfull aswell smale as great haue with christ and with his flesh and bloode is true and reall and yet is made by no other meanes then by vertue and knitting of the holy spirit And therefore though it be secret ful of misteries and spirituall because it is made by the spirite and by faith Yet we ought not to doubt but that through the same spirit it is as true essential as is that same betweene the husband and the wife beeing ioyned into one flesh betweene the foundation and the stones thereon builded betweene the tree the boughes betweene the vine the braunches lastlye betweene the members and the head coupled together with ligaments and sinues liuing and working with the same soule that no coniunction with christ himselfe can be made greater then this while wee liue in this mortall flesh XVII A confirmation of this opinion by another similitude and by very philosophie Surely if there were in all men but one and the selfe same soule it must follow that innumerable many persons were onely one man Euen as of one and the same essence being in the three diuine persons the holy writers doe conclude that therefore there is one onely God Yea and the same would appeare much more plainly to be true if those many men had but one onely head to which they should bee ioyned and of which they should haue their motion VVhat maruaile then that the holie ghost bee one and the same in all the godlie
laid vp in him requireth onely these three things First that being touched with an earnest griefe of our whole life ledd amisse wee might desire from our heart to haue our mindes and so all our affections chaunged renued into the obedience of the diuine will and that we might earnestly pray and doe our best endeuour that it might be so Secondlie that imbracing Christ by a true faith withall his treasures wee might beleeue firmely and without any wauering that all our sinnes are for euer pardoned of the fauour and mercie of god through Christ alone and we receiued into grace made the children of God and heires of euerlasting life Lastly that beeing thus perswaded of the free and eternall saluation through Iesus Christ wee should thence foreward labour by all meanes to obserue whatsoeuer Christ hath commaunded to the glorie of God and profite of our neighbour so as faith do euermore accompanie vs to the ende whereby we beleeue that howsoeuer in this new obedience we err or do offend yet for Christs sake it shall not be imputed to vs but contrariewise by the perfect obedience iustice and holinesse of christ imputed vnto vs our imperfect obedience shal be perfected and shal be taken and reputed for most perfect in the sight of God And to three thinges are all the preceptes of christ referred namely that renouncing all vngodlines worldly desires wee should liue in this world in respect of our selues soberlie in respect of our neighbour iustly in respect of God godlie Tit. 2.12 looking for that blessed hope and the comming of the glorie of the great God This wee beleeue to bee the summe of those thinges which christ requireth of vs in the doctrine of the gospell and therefore that they bee true gospellers and christians indeede that bende their whole studie and care hereunto VII Jn what thinges especially the Gospell differeth from the Law And nowe of that which is alreadie saide it appeareth that we do not confound the Law with the Gospell For albeit wee confesse that God is author aswel of the Law as of the gospell and that of it selfe it is as well holie iust Exo. 20 and good as the gospell Rom. 7.12 yet we hold that ther is no smale difference betwixt them both not onely because the Lawe was deliuered to the Israelites alone and the gospell pertaineth to al people and nations and also not onely because that was for a time and to continue but till christ and the gospell is euerlasting and also not onely because that was deliuered by Moses and declared by the Prophets and the gospell was brought by christ and published to the whole world by the Apostles But indeed and most especially for these causes First because the matter of the law is onely commandementes with irreuocable curses thereunto ioyned if they bee broken neuer so little It hath also promises not onely of earthlie but also of heauenly blessings but al of them with the condition of perfect obedience and none merely free But the gospell is properly a happie message setting before vs gratis christ the redeemer forgiuing sinnes and sauing vs yea and requiring nothing at our handes for the obtaining of life euerlasting but a true faith in christ which faith cannot bee without true repentance nor without a care to doe the will of God that is to liue so berly iustly and godly as is aboue declared Moreouer because the law did not performe that which it required nether had it power whereby to saue therefore was vnsufficient and a killing letter the minister of wrath and death more prouoking then taking away sin But the Gospell what it requireth the same it performeth and therefore whatsoeuer it offereth the same also it truely imparteth vnto vs For as much as the holy ghost is by it powerful in the elect at the preaching of the Gospell stirring vp in them that true faith wherby they apprehend christ offred and with him eternall life For faith is by hearing of the Gospell Rom. 10.17 but obedience is not by hearing of the Lawe because the holie spirite giueth no man strength to the hearing of the Lawe by which hee might obserue the same as he stirreth vp faith in the elect to the hearing of the gospell For which cause as the Lawe is called a killing letter so is the Gospell called a quickning spirite and therefore is a true and forcible instrument to saluation vnto euerie beleeuer Whereon also followeth the third difference namely that the Law was not written in their hearts but remained written onely in tables and therfore did not chaunge men But the Gospell is written by the holie ghost in the hearts of the elect therefore it chaungeth and renueth them 2. Cor. 3.18 because it is the instrument of the holie ghost to sanctifie and to saue vs. VIII The Law of Moses is partly taken away and partly not taken away by the Gospell Of this which we haue said it also plainelie appeareth what our faith is of the abrogation of the law by the gospell First wee beleeue that in the gospell so farre forth as it declareth all things which in the old Testament did figuratiuely foreshew of Christ to bee fullfilled in this Iesus as is saide before in the 11. chapter we are taught that the law of Moses concerning cerimonies sacrifices and all Moses outward worship are simply abrogated according to that saying of the Apostle Heb. 9.10 Ioh. 1.17 that all these things vvere inioyned vntill the time of reformation and that The Law was giuen by Moses but the trueth came by Jesus Christ Moreouer so farre forth as the gospell is the instrument of the holy spirit whereby we are ingrafted and vnited to Christ made partakers of redēption and saluation as is said before in the 12. chapter So far also we confesse that the morall law touching the cursse against the transgressors is abrogated by the gospell of Christ according to that of the Apostle Rom. 8.1 There is no condēnation to them that are in Iesus Christ where of this is a token that they walke not after the flesh but after the spirit But now so farre forth as the doctrine of the Gospell requireth our repentance and the holinesse of life and that we liue soberly righteously and godly therein it taketh not away the law concerning māners for it is wholy consonant and agreeable with the doctrine of the gospel of eschewing vices and following vertue Lastlye in as much as Christ in his gospel did not take away the politicke lawes of the nations which were not contrarie to the law of nature Therefore wee thinke it lawfull and free for any gouernors to bringe among their subiectes such politick lawes as were deliuered to the people of Israell and by the same then which none are more iust to rule and gouerne the people Therefore they do exceeding great iniurie to the Gospell of Christ that saye it troubleth or
in the bread reallie and properly For in sacraments the thinges whereof they bee sacraments are not really included although they borrowe their names of the things as in baptisme the matter is apparent and out of all question in which no man saith that the blood of Christ by which we are washed from sinne or the verie regeneration it selfe is included as also in the worde of the gospell the thinges are not therein really included which by it be declared Nowe sacraments be visible words And Christ said not my bodie is in this that is in the bread but in a farre other manner of speach as This that is this bread is my bodie Now if any wil say that this is all one in sense it will follow if the bodie of Christ bee really in the bread then the bread is really properly and substantially the bodie of Christ And if this be impious to bee spoken neither do wee thinke that the other can godlily be affirmed Yet we denie not but it is in it sacramentally in that sense that wee say remission of sinnes and saluation and life is in the worde of the gospell which it declareth and offereth But sith the common sorte haue vsed to drawe such manner of speaches to superstition wee iudge that those speaches are altogether to bee foreborne and auoided and the simple plaine phrases of the scriptures to be vsed VII In the supper are giuen not onely the signes but also the things signified by them Now this is setled in vs without all controuersie that although the bodie and blood of the Lord are not that is do not existe in their owne substance and in verie deede and properly in the bread and wine but are in heauē yet notwithstanding with the verie distribution or giuing of the bread and wine there is truely offered vnto all men the true flesh of Christ to be eaten and his blood to be drunk not simplie but in as much as his flesh was betraied vnto death for vs his blood shedd for the remission of our sinnes For the words are manifest which Christ speaketh in Iohn of the eating his flesh Ioh. 6.53 and drinking his blood if any man will haue life in him and that which the Apostle saieth euē iumping with the words of Christ He which eateth the bread and drinketh the Lords cupp vnworthilie he is made guiltie of the true bodie and blood of the Lord. Neither doubt we but Christ as he plainely commaunded the bread to bee eaten so also by adding immediatly This is my bodie he closely commaunded tha to bee eaten aswell as the bread but yet each of them in a diuerse manneri VIII None but the faithfull doe truely eate Christs true flesh But albeit the flesh of Christ be offred vnto all in the supper to be eaten yet we beleeue that it is truely eaten of the faithfull only both because they alone haue communion with Christ and with his flesh and blood and others haue not neither by receiuing the bread are made partakers of him and also because they alone haue the spirite of Christ by vertue of whom onely the flesh of Christ is truely communicated yea and also because they alone doe bring true faith without which the same cannot bee truely receiued and eaten For Christ giueth not his true bodie to bee truely and indeed eaten but only to them which do aswell beleeue that the same was betraied for them vnto death and his blood shedd for remission of their sinnes as those wordes to bee true This is my bodie IX That hypocrites eate Christs bodie sacramentallie By the way we denie not but hypocrits also lacking the true and iustifying faith in receiuing and eating the breade as a sacrament of the Lords bodie may be said to eate the very true bodie of Christ also namely sacramentally not truely and indeed Euen as the Apostle saith al the Corinthians 1. Cor. 6.11 which were baptized with water were sanctified iustified namely sacramentally as is aboue said though not all of them were truely made such X. There bee three kinds of men that eate and therefore diuerse sorts of eating Thence also we learne that there are three kindes of men which may be called into question whether they eate the flesh of Christ or eate it not The first is of such as receiue the bread as common meate and not as a sacrament They eate not the true bodie of Christ in any respect and are the true Capernaites their eating is meere carnall And others of the contrarie side receiue not the bread yet not vpon contempt but onely beleeue in the gospell and their eating is meere spirituall Lastly there are others who not contenting themselues onely with faith in the gospell do also receiue the bread not simplie as the first sorte as bare bread but as a sacrament of the Lords bodie Whereuppon it comes to passe that they are said to take and eate sacramentally But sith this may bee done aswell of the the godly and faithfull as also of vngodly hypocrites yet in a diuerse manner of the one sort by faith of the other without true faith therefore we also say that the vngodly hypocrites do eate it onely sacramentally but the faithful do eate it both sacramētally truely and spiritually and therefore to saluation XI The true body of Christ is eaten onely by faith Seing then wee say that the true bodie of Christ is reccaued onely of the faithfull both sacramentally and also truely we meane that it is eaten not with the mouth of the body but the mouth of the minde and with a heart indued with faith that by meanes of the holie ghost which worketh in vs and applieth whole Christ vnto vs. For it is the meate of the minde saith Cyprian not of the bellie And Ser. de caen 1. Cor. 12.13 The flesh profiteth nothing as Christ saith and Augustine expoundeth but it is the spirit which quickneth And the Apostle teacheth Ioh. 6.63 By one spirit we are all baptized into one bodie and haue bin all made to drinke into one spirite And if that all true coniūction with Christ be through the holy ghost though he with his bodie do remaine in heauen and we vpon the earth it followeth that this eating must bee after the same sorte For what else is it to eate then to receiue vnite vnto thee meate for the nourishment of that part to which it is ordained after a due sort But the flesh of Christ as hath beene said is food of the minde not of the bellie Neither vndoubtedly is the flesh of Christ otherwise eaten then in respect that it was killed for vs and made bloodlesse as the words do sound and the breaking of the bread doth represent and that truely also euen as the passeouer and all the sacrifices were eaten But now his body liueth and can not bee without blood as at the first supper it was neither without blood nor dead And
citizens and such other like names IV. The church consisteth onely of the elect alreadie incorporate into Christ Now that these many of whome the church consisteth are none but elect already ingrafted into Christ and indued with Christs holinesse the same scriptures do plentifully teach both in other places chieflie to the Ephesians where the Apostle speaking of the church and the members thereof saieth Eph. 1 VVe are all chosen in Christ and haue redemption in him and are sealed vvith the holy spirite of promise That Christ is giuen to bee the head of the church and the church is his body It is therefore such a bodie whereof all the members are ioyned by the same spirite both to the head Christ among themselues and are quickned or haue life from the head and are indued with his holinesse so that this whole body is truely holy and called the holie church V. The holy Angells are not excluded from the bodie of the church Neither from this bodie of Christ which is the holie church doe we exclude the Angells both because the Apostle speaking plainely of the church comprehendeth the Angells therin and also because they with vs are likewise gathered into our bodie Heb. 12.22 Eph. 1.10 Col. 2.10 Apo. 229 vnder one and the same head Christ and Christ is expresly called of the Apostle the head of the Angells yea and also because they call themselues our fellovve seruants and haue the saine father with vs and serue the same God and we all of vs shall bee for euer together in the same citie the heauēly Ierusalem lastly they are also Saintes and the church is the communion of all Saints VI. The reprobate hypocrites though they are in the church yet they are not of the church So wee rightly beleeue and confesse that the reprobate hypocrites though they dwell in the church and liue among the Saints yet they are not of the church nor members of the church when they are not truely ioyned to the head Christ nor indued with his spirite and consequently not truely Saints As the Apostle Iohn saieth 1. Ioh. 2.19 of certaine hypocrites they are gone out from vs as filth from the bodie but they were not of vs. For if they had beene of vs they had continued with vs. They therefore are not of the church which at last doe fall from Christ and keepe not that perpetuall communion with Christ and with all his Saints howsoeuer great and rare men they seeme in the church for a time yea and hold the gouernment ouer the christian common wealth and rule ouer the whole church For they are members of Sathan not of Christ whosoeuer haue the spirite not of Christ but of Antichrist VII That there euer vvas and is one onely church of Christ And wee confesse that there euer was and is one onely church of Christ Eph. 4.4.5.6 because there euer was is one onely bodie to which Christ was giuen of the father to bee the head one onely spirite by which all the members are knitt vnto the bodie onely one God to the seruing of whome and glorifying for euer we are all chosen and called one onely faith of al the faithfull beleeuers one saluation lastly one heauenly inheritance of all To which purpose also Christ euer called the church one one flock wherfore we make that church which hath beene since the first creation and before the cōming of Christ no other but the same that it is nowe and shal bee to the ende of the worlde but wee call it one of all times of all places and all persons ioyned with Christ consequently one cōmunion of al the Saints from which they that make an vtter seuering and departure we are persuaded by the holie scriptures that they belong not to this bodie VIII Of the christian church there is one onely head Iesus Christ Hereuppon we are strengthened in this beleefe that sith there is one onely church of Christ which is his bodie there euer was and is yet therefore one onely head of it by this name head we meane him which was giuen of God euen from the worlds beginning to that ende that he might be made of the same nature with it that he might redeeme it that he might ioyne it to himselfe that he might quicken it that he might deck it with the glory of his wisedome that he might kindle it with the fire of heauenlie loue that hee might effectuallie moue it to all good affections and good workes that he might euermore gouerne it keepe it For that this is the proper duetie of the head towards the whole bodie besides dailie experience in nature we learne also out of the holy scripturs But who could perform hath and wil performe this to the church we acknowledge none other besids Christ Iesus meane while not denying but there may bee one head of all hypocrites which are in the church and so of the hypocriticall church sith the Prophets foretold it should be so and the Apostles confirmed the same Eph. 1.22 4.15 5.23 Col. 1.18 But that there is one onely heade Iesus Christ of the holie church we beleeue and confesse with the holie Apostles IX This church is truely holie Whereupon it followeth this church therfore to be truely holie because it hath a head that is most holie maketh it holie because no sinnes are imputed vnto it because from him it draweth the spirite of sanctification and because whatsoeuer holinesse is in the head that is wholy imputed to euerie member X. It is also truely catholicke We also confesse it to be truely catholicke that is vniuersall because the head thereof is also catholicke and euerlasting at all times euen from the foundation of the world to the ende thereof ioyning vnto himselfe members out of all places from all kindes of men and all nations and gouerning and preseruing them to himselfe for eternall blessednesse XI This one church is partly in heauen triumphant and partly on earth militant But wee acknowledge that this church though it is and euer was one yet it is so distinct that one part is triumphant in heauen with Christ alreadie raised from death and sitting at the right hand of the father another part on earth fighting still with flesh blood with the world and the deuill Whereuppon ariseth that vsuall distinction among all the godlie writers of the church of the triumphant and militant church CHAP. XXIV Of the militant church ALbeit by this which wee haue confessed of the church in general euery one may easilie perceiue what we beleeue particularly of the militant church yet that our faith may more clearely plainly be known wee haue purposed to declare our opinion of this church seuerally partly referring that which was spoken of the whole in a briefe rehearsal to this and partly adioyning the properties of this peouliarly I. A description of the militant church Wee therefore beleeue Eph. 1.4
truely ioyned to him by the holie spirit and so to haue beleeued in god the father in his sonne Iesus Christ and in the holie ghost and to haue bin liuelie members of the holie church and to haue had communion withal the Saints and obtained forgiuenesse of their sinnes which the Lord also teacheth saying He will say to them which shal be on his right hand come yee blessed of my father possesse the kingdome prepared for you before the foundation of the vvorld for I vvas hungrie and yee gaue me to eate c. II. A confirmation of the former opinion and that eternall life is not giuen for our owne works but for Christ in whom we are freely chosen blessed and made the children of god For by these wordes the Lord seemeth to haue declared vnto vs that our good workes are testimonies of our election blessing and adoption in Christ and so of our lawfull inheritance and that the cause whereby we shall obtaine eternall life and possession of the heauenly kingdome is partly because that ere the beginning of the world that is ere we had done any good thing that kingdome was freely prepared for vs in Christ partly because we were blessed of the father namely Eph. 1.3 with all spirituall blessing in Christ and therefore called by grace iustified forgiuen our offences and sanctified lastly because we were in the same Christ adopted the sonnes of God and â—â—nued or borne againe by his spirit therefore made coheirs with him of the kingdom which he plainly ment by the worde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is by the right of inheritance possesse as sonnes VVhereas the Lord therefore shall recken vp the works of pietie he shall do it wee doubt not to this purpose that by them it may appeare to the whole world that wee were the truely blessed chosen iust children of God to whome the inheritance was due Rom. 8.17 the Apostle saying If sonnes then heires also but that wee are the sonnes of God is declared by our regeneration and regeneration by the effectes of regeneration which are called works of faith and pietie III. As the godlie shall haue eternall life so the paines and fire of the wicked shal bee eternall And as wee beleeue that the children of God shal obtaine eternall life so also we confesse that the hypocrites and all the wicked shall bee cast into the fire that neuer shal bee quenched and there bee tormented for euer Christ saying plainely Goe yee into euerlasting fire Mat. 25.42 IV. How happie that eternall life shal be it can neither be said nor thought But what and what manner of life it is and how great felicitie which is ment by the name of the heauenly kingdome wee doe with the Apostle freely confesse 1. Cor. 2.9 that neither eare hath heard nor hath it come into mans heart to conceiue for it is a matter greater and more excellent then can be comprehended in mans vnderstanding of such passing happines that nothing caÌ„ be wished more happie We therfore simply beleeue that we which are christs which are guided by his spirite which depend on his word which lastlie doe place but whole hope of saluation in him shall all bee most blessed Mat. 13.43 shall all shine as the sunne in the fight of god we shall all see God euen as he is 1. Cor. 13.12 we shall all liue a heauenlie and diuine life with Christ his Angells and be deliuered from all sinne from all misterie from all ill without any longer griefe without feare without lack or desire of any thing 1. Cor. 15.28 Apo. 22.3.4 because God shal bee all in all and wee shall behold his face And in that citie shal be no more night neither shall there neede any candell or sunne-light because the Lord shall giue vs light and wee shall raigne for euer and euer with Christ Iesus our head spouse Sauiour and our Lord to whome bee praise honor and glorie worlde without ende Amen Obseruations of the same Zanchius vppon his owne confession NOT few nor smale were the the occasions whereby I was induced rather to adioyne these mine obsernations to my confession it selfe then to alter anie thing therein contained Many there bee to whome it is not vnknowne vpon what occasion at what time at whose commaundement in whose names and for what purposes I euen against my will and constrained thereunto wrote this summe of christian doctrine For although there is no man but seeth that this coÌ„fession as was neuer looked for is published in their name for whose sakes it was written yet how this came to passe for what causes it was done all men do not know manie wondring at the deede yet ignorant of the true causes Hereuppon how diuerse suspitions many men might gather how diuerse iudgements might bee giuen of me and of the confession it selfe I say not of priuate men but euen of the whole congregations yea howe diuerse and sinister speaches might be throwne out among the vulgar sort who is it that perceiueth not I was therefore enforced before I dye to stoppe such sinister and false suspitions iudgementes and speaches concerning my doctrine That I thought could bee done by no better meanes then to publish a parte by it selfe both the confession euen as I write it and a part likewise my obseruations vppon the same wherein what so is darke is expounded and what so is doubtfull is confirmed so to leaue the iudgement of the whole matter together to all the true catholicke church I thought moreouer it would bee no little help to take away al suspicions of men if there be any conceiued if such iudgements as learned men haue giuen of my confessions I make knowne to all the godlie readers out of their owne letters especially sith by them it may well appeare vnto euerie man what were the causes why the confession came not forth in the same manner as was appointed One great learned man write vnto me concerning that matter in these words Whereas you write vnto me concerning your confession it hath beene read ouer both by me by N. and others with great pleasure which is written verie learnedly and with an exquisite methode and if you take out that same which you haue added in the ende concerning Arch-bishops and the hierarchie it pleaseth me passing well But whenas together with the brethren N.N. which are with vs we conferred about the way and meanes of an agreement among the churches of our confession to be begonne they all with one consent thought onely this to be the safest and speediest waye that the confessions of faith receiued and set forth by euerie of the churches in each prouince should bee composed and framed into one harmonie that they might bee alike touching the substance of faith all of them and each church embrace theÌ„ as their owne This their aduise sith they coÌ„mended to vs by many reasons we haue writteÌ„ vnto you
theruppon and to the reuerend brethren N. N. and other coÌ„gregations round about vs who haue al of them liked very wel thereof Thus farre out of the letters of that learned man almost to the same purpose could wee bring many things besids out of letters written from other about the same matter but for that it greatly needeth not wee will for breuitie sake omitt the same Therefore to our matter An obseruation vpon the whole confession When we vse the word of condemning we meane nothing els theÌ„ that the heresies which haue bin condemned by the catholick church the same also wee condemne and which it allowed not the same also we allow not and this we desire to leaue witnessed to all posteritie Vpon the first chapter aphorisme 4. Whereas we haue giuen the first place next after the canonicall books to the Apocryphi in the volume of the Bible we did it induced by the authoritie of the greek and latine churches who did alwaies giue that honour vnto them that they should be ioyned with the canonicall books See the places in Hierome Cyprian and the councell of Laodicea cyted in the confession the first chapter fift aphorisme Moreouer we spake of books not of any manner of writinges For otherwise wee preferre the generall creeds before the Apocryphi Vpon the second chapter Of God The first aphorisme Though the propertie of existences bee to exist in the essence yet speaking of God we would rather vse another manner of speach that more vsuall for certaine causes as namely to teach against the reproches and skoffes of the Arrians of our time that the diuine essence is not found but onely in the persons and therefore that we do not make an essence aparte by it selfe subsisting from the persons wherein yet three persons should subsist as though the catholicke church should forge foure existences in God The third aphorisme Of this reall communication of the essentiall proprieties of God we haue also written a seuerall treatise in the booke which shal be intituled Of the incarnation of the sonne of God vppon the words to Phil. 2. Who when he was in the forme of God c. Vnto which we referre the reader who so he bee that desireth a further explanation of this doctrine Surely the Lord Iesus when he said No man knoweth the sonne but the father and no man knovveth the father but the sonne and he to whome the sonne will reueale him he plainely excepted his created minde from that essentiall knowledge wherewith the father knoweth that is as the schoolemen speak comprehendeth the sonne and the sonne the father teaching that what knowledge soeuer creatures haue in themselues coÌ„cerning God the same is some waye reuealed vnto them and therefore such knowledge is not the essential infinite knowledge which is in God but a created and a finite or determinate knowledge Vpon the 5. chapter of the worlds creation c. The 2. aphorisme That the heauen of the blessed wherein the Lord Iesus is now in his bodie doth differ froÌ„ the earth and from the other heauens and is aboue all those visible heauens besides that which hath bin already said these few proofs do also confirme Eph. 4. Christ is said to haue ascended aboue all heauens in another place he is read to haue ascended into heauen and to bee in heauen and to sitt at the right hande of the father Therefore this heauen is aboue the other heauens and differeth from them So in the third to the Colloss the Apostle distinguisheth the place where Christ is at the right hand of the father from the earth and calleth it vpward saying Seeke yee the things aboue sett your affections on things aboue where Christ is and in the 4. of the first to the Thess he saieth the Lord shall descend from heauen namely into these lower partes and all the godlie shal be caught vp into the ayre to meete Christ in the cloudes That heauen therefore is aloft not on the earth not in the ayre much lesse in euerie place For he shall come downe in the visible shape of his body froÌ„ the high heauen into these parts to iudge the quick and the dead Of this heauen wee haue spoken particularly in our bookes Do operibus dei of the workes which he created in the sixe daies Wee therefore disallow of that doctrine which is contrarie which distinguisheth not the heauen from the earth nor this heauen from other heauens but would proue it to be euerie where Vppon the 7. chapter The 11. aphorisme Among other thinges which Iulianus the Pelagian obiected to Augustine proouing defending originall sinne these were some that either he made God an author of sinne or the deuill a creator of man and that because the Pelagians thought that Aughstine made originall sinne the very substance of man Al which obiections he confuted in his 7. Tome against Pelag. the 5. booke and first chapter in these words Neither do we ascribe iniustice to God but rather equitie in that euen infants are punished not vniustly with such and so many euills as we see neither doe we attribute the making of man but the corrupting and depraâ—ing of mans originall to the deuill neither doe we graunt a substance in the sinne but an actâ— of it in the first man and a contagion thereof in all his posterity neither do we graunt vnto infants a conscience without knowledge in vvhome is neither conscience nor knowledge but he knewe what he did in vvhome all haue sinned and from whome all haue drawnâ— corruption c. Vpon the 9. chapter The 5. aphorisme How they can winde themselues out of this errour which denie that the fathers did eate the true flesh of Christ we see not as though because he was not as yet indeede existing in nature therefore he was not existing in the assured promise of Christ consequently could noâ— be apprehended and eaten by faith For this proposition is generall and to all men at all times belongeth Vnlesse ye eate the flesh of the sonne of man yee haue no life in you For life is not imparted but onely to those which by faith as members to the head are ioyned to the flesh of Christ by the flesh to the spirit or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 To the word which is life Vpon the 10. chapter The 3. aphorisme For God would shew c. That which I said of the first second third and fourth estate had bin more cleare if I had told what man was before he sinned what after hee had sinned what vnder grace and what he shal be in his glorie Vpon the 11. chapter of Christ the redeemer aphorisme 6. That the person of Christ speaking properly is compounded of the diuine nature which is immeasurable and most pure and of the humaine which in respect of the diuine is lesse then a pricke to an infinite masse as of two partes truely and properly so called wee together with the schoolemen do
baptized For no mā is baptized vnto the giftes of the holie ghost but vnto the holie ghost it selfe as also vnto the father and the sonne And the Apostles held it for certaine beyond all doubt that whosoeuer were baptized either of Iohn his true disciples or of Christs disciples they were surelie baptized with instruction of the true doctrine of the holie ghost also according to Christs institution Hereupon was that admiratiō Vnto what were ye then baptized They answered him vnto Iohns baptisme For Paule thought this could not stād together that they should bee baptized with Iohns lawfull baptisme and yet should not knowe nay not so much as heare whether there were and whether there did exist an holie ghost whom Iohn both knewe and preached vnto all that came to his baptisme neither did he preach Christ without this holie ghost For he said that he baptized in water but Christ Iesus should baptize in the holie ghost Hereupon was it that meaning to cōuince them that they were not baptized of Iohn nor of his true disciples he added saying Iohn indeed c. This truely or verely is an aduersatiue particle wherby he would shew how it could not agree with the lawfull baptisme of Iohn that they said they had not so much as heard namelie when they were baptized whether there be an holie ghost or no Sith Iohn baptized none without mentioning the same And to this truely here expressed doeth a but closelie vnderstood make aunswer so that the argumēt is such as before we set downe Iohn indeed baptized c as though he had said Iohn preached both repentance and faith in Iesus Christ such as he is namely the sonne of god from whome as also from the father proceedeth the holy ghost and who baptizeth in the holie ghost and into the confession of this doctrine he baptizeth men The minor was to be added which Luke expressed not because it is contained in the twelues owne confession but vvee haue not so much as heard c. what is plainer then this text That therefore which followeth in the fift verse But when they heard it c is Lukes owne words shewing truelie and brieflie what followed vpon Paules argumentation But when they heard c namely these 12 whē they heard what what it is truelie to beleeue in Christ that he baptized men according to the confession of this doctrine concerning Christ his father and the holie ghost and that Christ alone as the onely Sauiour baptized men into the holie ghost when they heard I saye these things not onely with the eares of their bodies but also of their mindes and so beleeued and confessed the same They vvere baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus that is into Iesus as he is called and described in the Scriptures not onelie man but also the sonne of God God from whome as also from the father proceedeth the holie ghost and therefore as a true and onelie Sauiour baptizeth vs with his holy spirite Add this also that by the new interpretation there is admitted in a little narration no smale Battologie or superfluitie of words For when Paule said Iohn verily baptized vvith the baptisme of repentance saying vnto the people that they should beleeue in him which should come after him that is in Christ Iesus to what ende should the Apostles haue added this concerning thē whom Iohn baptized but whē they heard namely that companie or those men were baptized For who could not vnderstand by the wordes going before if Iohn baptized they therefore which had heard professed his doctrine concerning repentance and faith in Christ were by Iohn baptized To conclude if I should allow that interpretation I see not what Paule could els proue by this whole narration but that those Ephesians had beene rightlie baptized and therefore that nothing else remained but that by laying on of hands they might receiue the holy ghost But this conclusion I doe not thinke to agree with that which goeth before it but to bee needelesse I haue to my power declared the exposition of the fathers vpon this place and that modestlie and without preiudice to anie to no other end but that I may by such reasons as I am able declare vnto the brethren which perhaps haue tooke offence at that particle in my confession That Paule did baptize those twelue againe vvhich had not bin rightly baptized that I did not put those words rashlie in my confession By the way as I said we condemne no other mens interpretation And this also I freely professe that my cōscience is such that I cannot be easily drawne to dissent frō the auncient fathers either in their assertions or in their interpretations of scriptures Vnlesse I be cōuinced enforced by manifest testimonies of holy scriptures by necessary consequences plaine demonstrations For so doeth my conscience rest and in this setled stay of minde I desire to die And therefore I humbly desire of all the brethren that if in this behalfe my opinion be not altogeather as theirs is they will by no meanes take offēce especially seeing that in all the principall points of Christian faith we haue a sound agreement Vpon the 16. chapter The 9. aphorisme The place of the 1. to the Corinth 6. beeing diligently marked as also we noted before in the 15. chap. and 14. Apho. may well decide the controversie about the wicked mens Eating that is the Hypocrites and of the sacramentall eating We say that hypocrites doe not eate the tru body of Christ sith they are void of faith namely they eare it not truely and indeede sith it is not indeede eaten but onely by true faith which they want but onely sacramentally that is they eate indeede the sacrament and the signe it felfe The Adversaries say also that hypocrites doe eate the true body of Christ onely sacramentally but by this word they meane that they receiue not onely the sacrament that is the signe but all the thing it selfe though not vnto salvation If they mean this in the same sence that the Apostle doth when he said The Corinthians were all sanctified iustified c. namely that by receiuing baptisme the sacrament of true Regeneration and sanctification they were reckoned to haue receiued the thing also sith the very sacrament hindred not but they might also be pertakers of the true sanctification although all of them did not indeede obtaine the same by reason of their hypocriticall faith thē doubtlesse I see not but such a manner of speaking may be well allowed so it be declared as it ought after the Apostles meaning This I only alleadge that the brethren may bethinke them of some good meanes of agreement that so great an offence and scandale may be rooted out of the Church We must all stand before Christs Tribunall seate Vpon the 16. chap. Apho. 10. Here should a subdistinction haue beene added of the godly because some doe come worthely some vnworthely yea one and the
same godly man eateth sometime worthily sometime not worthily enough as in the 1. to the Corinth 11. it appeareth And the vngodly also which receiue onely the element and not the thing of the sacrament are not all of one sort For among them are also conteyned the Hypocrites of whome we spake eveÌ„ now We thought good therefore here to ioyne a more plaine and cleare distinction There be two kindes of men which like as they come to the hearing of the word so may they come to receiue the supper of the Lord the vngodly and the godly Againe of the vngodly some are wholly and simplie wicâ—ed as Atheists Godlesse men also Iewes and Turkes and all such as knowe nothing and beleeue nothing of all those thinges which they heare by the preaching of the gospell or see to bee done by the administration of the Sacraments nay they rather laugh at and coÌ„temne all such matters These if they come to the Lords table they neither eate nor drinke anie thing else but bread and wine and that also not as they are sacrameÌ„ts for they know not of what thinges they are sacraments but onely as they are of their owne nature namelie bread wine For euen so also at the preaching of the gospell they receiue nothing but bare words and the sound of the words Another sort are indeed and before God wicked though they are not so in respect I meane in profession or in sight of men such as are the hypocrites in the church who are not indued with the true and liuelie faith which is proper to the elect but haue onely a temporall and an hypocriticall beleefe These comming to the supper doe indeed eate and drinke no more then the former that is bread wine The reason is because they haue no true faith by which alone Christs body is truely eaten For all this the difference betweene these and the other is not little 1 For the former seing they beleeue none of all the things which they heare concerning Christs bodie in the supper nor perceiue anie thing with their mindes as little do they eate the true bodie of Christ but onely with the mouth of the bodie they eate bread as common bread But the other seing that by their onely historicall hypocriticall and temporall beleefe they vnderstand in their minde and in some sort doe beleeue the things which are spoken and done therefore by the same beleefe and minde they may bee saide in some sort to receiue and in some sorte to taste the bodie of Christ offred in the word and sacraments although they doe not in verie deede eate it seing they do not swallow nor retaine the same for this properlie is to eate in the stomacke of their soule for nourishment of their spirite but rather do spue or vomitt out the same being tasted and after a sorte receiued downe For so also we read in the 6 to the Heb. of those temporary professors that they tasted the heauenlie gifte and good word of God as if he had said they tasted indeed and that also by the gift of the holie ghost but being tasted they cast it vp againe And in the parable of the seede the temporary ones were said to receiue the seede of the word but that they kept it not and therefore brought forth no fruite by it These things cannot be said of the first sort of these wicked ones which are most true of the second sort namelie these temporarie hypocrites Let this then bee the first difference hereuppon followes another difference betweene the eating of those and these 2 They seing the bread which they take into their mouthes they nether acknowledge nor beleeue it to bee a Sacrament of Christs bodie therefore they take it and eate it not as a Sacrament but as common bread and therefore can they not be said to eate the bodie of Christ sacramentallie But these take the bread not as common bread but as a Sacrament of Christs bodie and for that cause are said to eate Christs bodie though not in verie deede seing they lack the mouth and teeth of true faith yet to eate it sacramentallie by an argument drawne as they call it à coniugatis they eate the Sacrament as the Sacrament of Christs bodie therefore they eate Christs body sacramentally and so farre forth as it is a Sacrament because they eate not Christs bodie in verie deed but onely the Sacrament thereof Hereupon followeth that expositioÌ„ wherof we spake before that it is not vngodlie to say simply and absolutely that the hypocrites do eate not onelie the Sacrament but also the thing of the SacrameÌ„t that is not onely bread but also the verie bodie of Christ But in what sense namelie in that wherein the Apostle said all they of Corinth in their first state were vncleane vngodlie c afterwards he said they were not onely vvashed which some might haue interpreted onelie of the water of baptisme but also sanctified and iustified when notwithstaÌ„ding they were not all made truelie such but as yet there lacked not some hypocrits amoÌ„g them So all they which professing faith in Christ doe come to his supper and eate the SacrameÌ„t of the Lotds bodie are saide also to eate the Lords true bodie by reason of the sacramentall vnion which causeth that he which receiueth the signe is by the church iudged to haue receiued also the thing signified because there is no fault either in the institutor of the Sacrament or in the Sacrament it selfe but that he which hath receiued eaten the one might haue also receiued and eaten the other sith Christ by the minister doeth truelie offer them both and the soundnes and trueth of the Sacrament dependeth not vppon our faith but vppon Christs institution So that if we receiue not the whole Sacrament but onely the signe without the thing signified the fault is in our owne selues who receiue one part with the mouth of our bodie and cast away the other part by our infidelitie for an hypocritical faith is infidelitie separating those thinges which God would haue to be ioyned By these thinges it appeareth what difference is in the eating of those that are simplie wicked the hypocrites although neither sort can bee said truely to eate Christs true bodie For such only do truely eate Christ who are also truely ingrafted into Christ by a true and liuelie faith with which alone the elect are indued They which are dead corporallie can no longer eate corporall meate how then should they which are dead spirituallie bee fedd with spirituall foode And onelie the faithfull doe therefore liue because by a liuelie faith they are ioyned vnto Christ which is our life as members to their head as braunches to the vine as the boughes to their tree And if as Cyprian saieth it be meate of the minde not of the bellie surely it is eaten vvith the teeth not of the bodie but of a faithfull minde which onely the godlie can doe If
like as no other but the verie same Christ rose from the dead so he rose in no other but in the verie same bodie in which he suffred died and was buried 14 For he could not be truely said to be raised and to rise from the dead except that which truely died the verie same quickened againe should rise againe 15 Now the bodie wherein Christ suffred died and was buried was a true humane bodie visible palpable circumscribed Therefore Christ after his resurrection had and retained no body but that which was circumscribed in a certaine place and wheresoeuer it was and is might and may be seene and handled 16 Add also that the Apostle carefully discoursing of the qualities with which our bodies being raised vp to eternall life shal be indued he saith not that they shal not be subiect either to the eye or to the touch or not bee circumscribed in a definite place but he rehearseth onely incorruption glorie and power as is the agilitie thereof and that they shall rise spirituall not that the corporall substance shal be chaunged into an incorporeall but that they shal be as the greeks call it immortall and shal be full of the holie spirite dwelling and working in them The Apostle therefore taught that these are qualities neuer to bee seperated from the bodies namely that they shal be circumscribed visible palpable Wherefore neither did Christs body after his resurrection put of these qualities 17 Neither is that exception any thing that Christ after he was risen came in to his disciples the dores beeing shut For it was not therefore either made vnvisible or vncircumscribed or vnpalpable seeing Christ being come in and seene of his disciples presently saide Feele or handle and see Luc. 24. for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as ye see me haue And therefore as the Fathers teach there was no chaunge made of Christs bodie no more then there was when he or Peter walked vpon the waters but by the omnipotency of his diety hauing power ouer all things the doores gaue place to the true and firme bodie of the sonne of God 18 Wherefore not without cause did the Fathers condemne not onely Marcion the Maniches and others which taught that Christ tooke not a true and firme humane bodie but a phantasticall one and did all things according to imagination and phantasie but also the Originists Iohn of Hierusalem and Euticius of Constantinople Hier. tom 12. ad PaÌ„mach Greg. in Iob. lib. 24 c. 29. Bishops and others which said that Christs bodie after his resurrectioÌ„ was made so spirituall that it was more thinne then ayre and therefore invisible and vnpalpable 19 Seeing then that in the supper no other bodie of Christ is giuen vs to be eaten but that which was broken for vs that is truely suffered and died it followeth that Christs 〈◊〉 body which we eate in the Supper is truely circumscribed visible and palpable and consequently seeing nothing is seene touched or perceiued in the Supper besides bread the same body cannot in it owne substance really be contained vnder the formes of bread and wine or lie hidden in the very bread and wine 20 Nowe we acknowledge the resurrection of Christ is both the cause and an example of our as well spirituall as corporall resurrection The cause of the spirituall because the Apostle saith to the Rom. 4. he rose againe for our iustification and an example because he saith Rom. 6. we are burâ—ed togither with him by baptisme into his death that as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father so we also should vwalke in newenesse of life 21 But that he is the cause of our corporall resurrection we doubt not 1. Cor. 5. for that the Apostle saith If Christ be risen againe we shall also rise againe and for that he also saith Christ is the first fruits of them that rise and an example for that the same Apostle also writeth he shall chaunge our vile bodies Phil 3.21 that they shall be like his glorious bodie 22 Wherupon It also followeth either Christs bodie not to be invisible vnpalpable vncircumscribed and so not spirituall bodies but incorporall spirits 23 For where Christ saith Feele and see for a spirite hath not flesh and bones as yee see me haue hee did not onely conclude that himselfe was no spirite but he especially taught this that there is no flesh nor bones but may bee seene and felt 24 The Scripture teacheth and the church coÌ„fesseth that our Lord Iesus Christ being raised from the dead did shew vnto his disciples for fortie daies space by many arguments that he was truely risen and then euen in the beholding of the Apostles that he was lifted vpp from the earth ascended into heauen Therfore like as no other Christ rose againe then he which died so no other ascended into heauen nor in no other body then he in which that truely rose againe froÌ„ the dead the sonne of God truely humane visible palpable and circumscribed 25 Wherefore as the conuersation of the same Lord Iesus Christ wherein he conuersed amoÌ„g his Apostles after his refurrection for fortie daies space was not fantasticall but reall and true so also his ascension was not onely visible but also truely as the fathers say locall when the Apostles sawe him ascend from the earth vp into heruen 26 But such an ascension and mouing cannot agree to his divine nature therefore he ascended according to his humane nature 27 Yet by the way we denie not this but that Christ as God like as he is said to haue descended from heauen in respect that he abased himselfe taking vpon him the vile forme of a seruant and suffred in it so also it may rightly be said that he is exalted and ascended vp into heauen namely in respect that in the very same forme of a seruant when it was glorified euen the forme of God was after a sort glorified by his ascention and after it that is was made glorious in the wholle world 28 But it is apparent that as this consequence is not good Christ himselfe beeing God and man ascended into heauen in a locall and visible moouing Therefore he in the same sort ascended according to his dietie so neither is this good Christ God and man is with us to the ende of the world truely and in his owne essence therefore he is present on earth as wel in the substance of his body and soule as in the essence of his dietie 29 If also the Apostles sawe with their eies Christan his owne body by chaunge of place ascending from earth into heauen then the heauen into which he did ascend caÌ„not be an vbiquitary heauen but it must needes be farre distant from the earth 30 Moreover nature and all right requireth that for every thing some certeÌ„ place must be assigned as we see god hath done in all the things which he created Seing then no created thing
can be found more excellent then Christs body both for the vnion with the word and for the wonderfull gifts created in the same and so also for the most perfect glorie and happines wherein he nowe liveth It must needes be that this bodie must exist in some certaine most happie place 31 Neither can it proceede but onely from trupiety and from our true reverence towardes Christ that we should beleeue that his body doth dwell not vnder the earth not in the earth not in the waters not in a peece of bread not in every leafe of a tree not in the ayre or in the celestiall speres but in a place as the most happie faire perfect so the highest of al others which we with Ambrose think the Apostle spake of when he said that he was caught vp 2. Cor. 12.2 4. into the third heaven and into paradise 32 To this the same scripture also teacheth the Catholike faith beleeueth and confesseth that the same Iesus Christ shall come out of that heauen in the cloudes Phil. 3.20 1. Thes 4.16 1. Thes 4.17 to iudge the quicke and the dead and that we beeing raised from the dead shall be caught vp into the aire to meete him in the cloudes and so shall be with him in that heauen for euer 33 And this heauen Ioh. 14.2 which is called the Fathers house and the heauenly citty and by many other names The scripture prooueth to be placed aboue all the visible and mooveable heauēs saying that Christ is ascended aboue all heauens Eph. 4.16 and that he is in heauen 34 For this heauen wherein he is in his body and wherein we shall be in our bodies and soules cannot be some vast and I knowe not what vncreated roome partly because nothing is vncreated but God partly because it is plainely to the Hebr. Heb. 11.10 said to be Gods workmāship 35 Moreover the chiefe and principall efficient cause of that moouing wherein his bodie was carried vp into heauen was the divine nature remaining in him according to that to the Phil. 2. God hath exalted him And he was taken vp of God into glory But a secondary efficient cause was the gift of agility which followed his glorious resurrection bestowed on the humane nature by the diety by which agility that flesh ascended vp not held and sustained by angels or by the cloudes as once Elias was in the fierie chariot but of it owne accord and without trouble or difficultie and therefore that motion was not a violent motion 36 Now this ascention of Christ our head was the cause and the example of our ascension which shal be into heaven For sith the head is ascended it must needes be that the members shall ascend and as his ascension was so ours shall bee For he shall chaunge our vile bodies to be like to his glorious body and we shall be caught vp into the cloudes to meete Christ in the ayre and so we shall be with the Lord for euer 37 If then ours shall be a true ascention and that we shall truely be lifted from the earth into heauen Therefore Christs body also did truely ascend from earth into heauen not imaginarily or putatively 38 And this doctrine of Christs true ascention into that highest heauen and his perpetuall abiding there is most profitable and full of cōsolation 39 For first it serueth to strengthen our faith about the certaine place where with the eyes and hands of our faith we may behold touch and take hold of the body of Christ Then to establish our hope namely that it shall be that before the resurrection of our bodies our soules beeing separated from our bodies they shall neither discend beneath the earth nor shall flote in the waters or the aire nor roule about with the spheres but shall be carried aboue all these heauens to that blessed and heauenly house of the Father into which Christ in his body is already entred that they may be euer with Christ Lastly to kindle in our hearts the loue and desire of a heauenly life and conversation as the Apostle saith If ye be risen vvith Christ seeke those things which are aboue set your affections on thinges vvhich are aboue vvhere Christ sitteth at the right hand of God 40 Of Christs sitting at the right hand of the father thus speaketh the Apostle And hath set him Christ raised from the dead and carried vp into heauen in the heauenly places farre aboue all principallities and power and might domination and euerie name that is named not onely in this vvorld but also in that which is to come and hath made all thinges subiect vnder his feete c. YVhatsoeuer is read otherwise in the holy scripture or confessed by the church in the Creedes concerning this sitting is agreeable vnto this 41 But we cā no where read that for this sitting at Gods right hand either Christ Iesus tooke any other body call it howesoeuer or that in his naturall body there was any chaūge made of the substance of it or of any of those naturall qualities and essentiall proprieties which it retained after his resurrection It is therefore manifest that in what body Christ rose and ascended into heauen namely a visible palpable and circumscribed body in the same he also sitteth at the Fathers right hand in the highest heauens and wheresoeuer he is or pleaseth to be he keepeth still to himselfe such a body 42 The Apostle also witnesseth and the church confesseth in the Creedes that Christ first died was buried raised from the dead and taken vp into heauen before he fare at the Fathers right hand Therefore either it is false that Christs humaine nature thē first receiued a gift for substance of his body to be really euery where or if it be true then it receiued it not by the hypostaticall vnion which was made in his very incarnation 43 Neither is this exception any thing that by the hypostaticall vnion this was giuen him in the first act as that if he would he might be present every where but by the sitting at Gods right hand it was giuen him in the second act that is that he was indeed present every where 44 For besides that the tearmes of this distinction are tearmes not taken from the fountaines of Israel but out of the puddles of sophisters Christ himselfe also refelleth this exception when speaking not of the first act but of the second that is of his actuall presence he said both a little before his death Where two or three shall be gathered together in my name there am I in the middest of them and after his resurrection bofore his ascension he said Beholde I am vvith you even to the ende of the world 45 By those sayings it evidently appeareth that either Christ spake not of the reall presēce of his body but onely of the presence of his diety and power of his spirit or that he is present to vs
in the same manner that he was to the Apostles namely visibly seeing he saide not I will be but I am neither is there any necessity to alter the sense of those wordes 46 Adde this that if he speake of the same reall presence of his body and that this promise pertained not to the Apostles onely but also to all the faithfull which were then in the world Christ had not spoken a trueth For he was not before his death or after his Resurrection present in a visible presence with all the faithfull which were then in the world and which were gathered together in his name 47 VVherefore the doctrine of the reall and substantiall yet invisible presence of the body of Christ Iesus on the earth and euerie where is not agreeable with the holy scriptures but seemeth to come neere to the Maniches who as Augustine sheweth against Faustus saie that Christs bodie doth invisiblie hang on euerie tree 48 If Christ also satte not at Gods right hand in his bodie before his resurrection and ascension into heauen as the wholle Church confesseth then their doctrine is impious and hereticall which teacheth that Christ Iesus euen from his mothers wombe according to the flesh he tooke hath sitteth at the right hand of Gods power 49 If this also be true which the Apostle teacheth and the whole scripture confirmeth and the Catholike Church confesseth that Christ Iesus not only then sate at his Fathers right hand after he ascended into heauen but also is so placed in the same at Gods right hand as he is neuer read to sitte at such a right hand in any other place then in heauen therefore then it cannot onely not be saide according to the holy scriptures that Christ Iesus sitteth any other where at God the Father his right hand then in heauen but also it is false that he also so sitteth in the earth that he is no lesse present really in substance of his body in the bread of the Lords supper and in euerie place then he is in heauen 50 For the Apostle also in other places and specially in the epistle of S. Paule to the Hebrues denieth that he is vpon the earth namely in a corporall presence for as much as hee sitting at the right hand of the throne of maiestie in heauen executeth his office of priesthood 51 Moreouet wee hold beyond all controuersie that Christ sitting at Gods right hand is a figuratiue speach seing God to speake properly hath neither right hand nor left hand neither is it lawfull to imagine any carnall thing concerning the seates and thrones in heauen wherein they are saide to sitt and often-times in the scriptures this word sitting is vsed besides other significations for dwelling ruling exercising iudgment and for resting 52 But that the Apostle Paule ment not by this phrase that Christ Iesus in his owne bodie is truely and substantially present in all places besides that which hath bin already saide it is also euident by that which for declaration sake he adioyneth 53 For to this sitting of Christ at Gods right hand the Apostle addeth for declaration sake three thinges First that Christ is so placed at Gods right hand that he is aboue all principallitie that is that he hath no creature aboue him or equall to him no not in heauen but is made higher then the heauens and al heauenly things then he addeth that all thinges are made subiect to him that is that there is nothing beneath him ouer which he hath not power and authoritie thirdly that he was giuen to be a head of the church 54 Now as we said that whatsoeuer wee haue before spoken of the resurrection from the dead and so of the ascension ought to bee vnderstood according to the humane nature of Christ so wee thinke with the sound fathers that these thinges also must bee vnderstood especially according to the same humane nature 55 The exaltation of Christs humane nature aboue al things may be vnderstood two waies either in re-pect of the locall placing as this he ascended aboue all the heauens that the meaning may be the humane nature was placed locally aboue all created things or in respect of the excellēt preheminence of the dignitie and power thereof then the meaning may be Christ euen touching his humane nature was set ouer all created thinges and to him was giuen power and authoritie ouer all things For in these two manners any thing of the same kinde is said to bee ouer another eiin place or in dignitie 56 If then this saying be vnderstood the latter waye thereupon the vbiquitie cannot be proued seing Christ in that in his humane nature he may vse his authoritie ouer all creatures although he be not in substance of body euerie where If the former way then he is not euery where seing that which is euerie where is aswell beneath and at and within as aboue all creatures 57 But Paule doeth plainely teach that Christ touching his humane nature did so rise from the dead that hee was no longer among the dead and so ascended into heauen that hee was no longer on earth and so being exalted aboue all creatures sitteth at the fathers right hand that he is nether beneath nor within created things seing all thinges are put vnder his feete 58 Neither can the head bee saide to bee in it owne substance where the feete are although it be in them in vertue and operation and indeed aswell the head to the feete as the feet to the head are ioyned together in their substāce by the sinues and by the soule 59 But the Apostle saieth Christ Iesus is giuen for a head of the church namely according to his humanitie nowe the head is aboue all the bodie 60 The Apostle therefore ment nothing lesse by his wordes of Christs sitting at Gods right hand then to conclude that Christs bodie in it owne substance is present in all places Wherefore they doe great wrong to the Apostle which by their cauills labour to conclude this out of his words 61 Neither can any such Vbiquitie be proued by any necessary consequence out of that article of faith 62 For although it were graunted which cannot bee graunted that by the sitting at Gods right hand the humane nature is made truely by it selfe omnipotent yet vnlesse it bee prooued to bee so made omnipotent that it is also made infinite and immeasurable it can by no meanes bee conuinced that Christs bodie in it owne substance is euerie where present 63 For so is this the onely cause why God also in his owne essence is euerie where that if ye take immeasurablenesse from him he cannot be saide to be euery where in his owne essence 64 And if also yee faine an infinite body and therefore euerie where yet that it is whollie in all places at once you shall neuer prooue while the world stands vnlesse yee can shewe that the same body is also a most simple essence seing God is