was the fittest instrument that would soone winde himselfe in and out and creepe away that he should not be seene of Adam 3. In that Moses maketh no mention of the Devill but of the serpent only it was both in regard of the weaknesse and rudenesse of the people who could not well conceive any other but the visible creatures and for that Moses writing a story reporteth things as they appeared as the story of Samuels apparition to Saul calleth it Samuel whereas it was Satan in Samuels shape because it so appeared 4. The Hebrewes here are not to be approved that say the serpent coveted to have company with the woman for that is against the nature of beasts QVEST. IX Of the manner how the woman was tempted of Satan COncerning the tentation of Satan and seduction of the woman 1. he beginneth subtilly hath God indeed said yee shall not eat of every tree whereas God onely forbad them one tree as though God had dealt hardly with them in abridging them of their liberty 2. The woman reporteth not the words of the prohibition truly some thinke that shee added of her owne yee shall not touch it as Ambrose some that she changed the words as Rupertus for the tree of knowledge of good and evill saying the tree in the midst of the garden but certaine it is that she taketh somewhat from Gods words pronouncing doubtfully lest ye die which God had denounced most certainly ye shall dye the death that is surely dye 3. Satan in his reply v. 4 5. heapeth up many lies together 1. that they shall not dye 2. that God did envy their happinesse 3. that knowledge might be had in eating of fruit 4. that they should thereby bee made like unto God Beside Rupertus conceit is here excellent that the Devill in every one of these points speaketh doubtfully as he gave the Oracles of Apollo that every word which he spake might have a double meaning ye shall not die that is not presently the death of the body though presently made subject to morrality your eyes shall bee opened so they were to their confusion knowing good and evill not by a more excellent knowledge but by miserable experience after their transgression ye shall bee as gods either as Angels or like unto us sinfull and wicked spirits 4. The woman seeth the tree to be good for meat there is her voluptuous desire pleasant to the eyes there is her curiosity and to be desired for knowledge there is the vanity of her minde Thus as the Apostle saith whatsoever is in the world is the concupiscence of the flesh the concupiscence of the eye the pride of life 1 Ioh. 2. QVEST. X. Adam tempted and deceived as well as the woman though not in the same degree THe order then and manner of the tentation was this 1. It is evident that neither Adam nor Eva had committed any sin before this congresse with Satan for the Scripture saith that til then they were both naked and were not ashamed Gen. 2.25 So that herein both Rupertus and Ferus are deceived 2. Satan first assaileth the woman both being as the weaker more easie to be seduced as a fit instrument also to entice Adam 3. Adam did not only incline unto her amicabili quadam benevolentia of a loving mind and thereby enticed as Sampson was by Dalilah and Salomon by his wives but it is like he was seduced by the same flattering and false perswasions whereby the woman was first beguiled being carried away with an ambitious desire in knowledge not to be equalized but made like unto God this may appeare out of the 22. verse Behold man is become like unto us to know good and evill where the Lord reproveth also mans affected and curious desire to attaine to a greater perfection Neither doth that place of the Apostle contradict this opinion Adam was not deceived but the woman was deceived and was in the transgression 1 Tim. 2.14 for whether we expound it with Epiphanius and Calvin that the Apostles meaning is the woman was first deceived not the man or with Mercerus that the man was not deceived but entised by the womā or with Hierome that Adam was not deceived by the serpent but by the woman or that Eva did not wittingly deceive Adam as the serpent beguiled Eva whereof the two first expositions being one in effect are most agreeable to the Apostles minde by this text Adam is not wholly exempted from being deceived but only in that manner as Eva was perverted and seduced QVEST. XI Whether Adams sinne was the greatest of all sinnes NOw as touching the greatnesse of Adams sin simply it was not the greatest sin of all committed in the world neither in respect of the kind of the sinne as adultery is greater than fornication for so we hold blasphemy and Idolatry to be greater sins than Adams was neither in respect of the affection of the offender for many are with a more ungodly violent and sinfull desire given over then Adam in this tentation neither was it the greatest in respect of the quality of the sin for it was pardonable in Adam whereas sinne against the holy Ghost is impardonable But yet it may truly bee said to bee the greatest 1. in regard of the fruits and sequele of that sin the contagion and infection of all mankind 2. in respect of Adams person who in his excellent gifts considered might have more easily resisted 3. in regard of the facility of the commandement which required no hard or difficult thing 4. the place also it selfe being considereth namely in Paradise where there was no provocation or allurement unto sinne QVEST. XII Whether Adams or Eves sinne were the greater NOw if Adams sinne be compared with the womans in some things it will be found equall in some things superiour in some inferiour to it 1. Both Adam and Eva sinned in their infidelity in not beleeving the word of God but giving credit to Satans faire promises that they should not dye 2. in their concupiscence in coveting the forbidden fruit 3. in their ambition in desiring a further state of perfection Secondly in respect of Adams person who was appointed to be the womans head and of his gifts of knowledge and wisdome the man was more faulty than the woman Thirdly yet simply the womans sinne was greater because beside other sinnes common unto them this was proper unto her in seducing her husband so that as Augustine well noteth de Genes 11.42 the man sinned onely against God and himselfe the woman against God her selfe and her neighbour beside the woman was first deceived and became the author and beginner of transgression Therefore the opinion of them is not here to bee allowed who doe either aggravate Adams sinne or extenuate the womans of the first sort is the author of the questions upon the old Testament under Augustines name who ascribeth idolatry to Adam quest 83. whereas hee desired not
2. But it seemeth that this great defection was about the seventh age for then Lamech of Cains race tooke unto him two wives then the Lord tooke away righteous Henoch that he should bee no longer grieved with the wickednesse of the world Then the world being replenished with great multitudes which are ring-leaders for the most part unto evill as it is written thou shalt not follow a multitude to doe evill began to give themselves to all kinde of wickednesse adultery oppression cruelty multiplicity of wives unlawfull lust even against nature and to fill the earth with uncleannesse 3. And although in this seventh age iniquity was come to the full height yet it began long before even in the dayes of Enos when as the righteous abhorring the great wickednesse of Cains posterity separated themselves and a part beganne to call upon the name of God Iun. 4. The Hebrewes note that at the beginning women were not so multiplied as afterward by whom they tooke occasion to sinne and therefore it is added there were daughters borne unto them c. vers 1. but this clause sheweth not a more speciall multiplying of that kinde but that when the world began to be stored both with men and women then they gave themselves to wantonnesse QVEST. III. The particular sin of the old world here noted Vers. 2. THey saw the daughters of men that they were faire c. 1. Their fault was not onely in that they of the righteous seed matched into Cains stocke Calvin 2. Or that they respected onely beauty having no regard to their piety and vertue Marlorat 3. But they by violence tooke unto them not to their wives but women for so with Mercerus and Iunius I rather interpret the word nashim from all men whatsoever as Iunius readeth both virgines and wives they cared not whom 4. Some Hebrewes here understand also the filthy sinne of buggery that they tooke all they liked even from among the bruit beasts but Moses speaketh onely of the daughters of men QVEST. IV. Who were these sonnes of God Vers. THen the sonnes of God 1. These sonnes of God were not the Angels which some have supposed to have fallen for their intemperancie with women and to have begotten of them spirits as Ioseph Philo Iustine Clemens Alexandrinus Tertullian conjectured who so expoundeth that place of S. Paul that women should be covered because of the Angels lest they should bee tempted with their beauty This opinion is easily confuted 1. Because the world was punished and God was angry not for the sinne of Angels but of men vers 3. My spirit shall not alway strive with man 2. Chrysostome urgeth that place Matth. 22. in the resurrection they neither marry nor are married but are the Angels Ergo Angels are not subject to carnall affections as men are 3. If Angels fell first for the love of women then they sinned not for 1000. yeares after the creation whereas the Scripture sheweth that the Devill was a murtherer and a liar from the beginning Ioh. 8.44 QVEST. V. Devils not corporall nor mortall IT is also absurd and improbable that these were devils which did company with women and of them came Gyants as thinketh Franciscus Georgius who affirmeth devils to have bodies and a generative faculty and to company with women Of the like opinion is Psellus that the devils have bodies and they are nourished by sucking and attraction as spunges and that they are males and females at their pleasures some are of a fiery some ayrie some a watery some of a terrene nature But these are fables and fictions fit rather to be laughed at than worthy to be confuted 1. The Devils are of a spirituall not corporall nature it appeareth by that story Luk. 8. where we reade that in one man there was a legion that is six thousand Devils how could so many spirits if they were corporall be included in one body 2. If they were of a fierie watery or earthly so of an elementall nature they should bee subject to corruption mutability and mortality and so some have imagined also as Plutarch writeth of the death of the great Pan a famous Devill among the Pagans and Cardane reporteth that he heard his Father say who was above thirty years familiar with the Devils that he learned of them that they doe die decay revive againe but this fancie is contrary to the Scripture which testifieth that the Devill hath beene a murtherer from the beginning of the world Ioh. 8 44 Ergo he hath continued from the beginning of the world and how should the soule of man be immortall if these spirits which are of a more subtill nature were mortall 3. Though it were granted that Devills have a kinde of airie bodies yet could they not ingender for the power of generation agreeth onely to perfect bodies which have their materiall and distinct parts and receive nourishment 4. And they being as they say male and female should ingender among themselves in their owne kinde 5. Or if they did company with women they could not beget men but multiply their owne kinde or at the least a mixt kinde as the mule is engendred of an horse and an asse and so some likewise have conceited that the Faunes and Satyres were the off-spring of such generation As Hierom in the life of Antonie reporteth that such an one appeared unto him in the wildernesse with goats feet long crooked nailes and hornes upon his head and spake unto Antonie but either this may be held to be a fable foisted under Hieromes name or if there were any such thing it might be some monster of the wildernesse which the Devill used as his trunke to speake out of QVEST. VI. Spirits doe not generate BUt much more absurd is the opinion of Paulus Burgensis that thinketh these which companied with the daughters of men were spirits called Incubi which doe assume bodies of the aire for a time representing the shape sometime of men sometime of women in the act of generation and then they are called Succubi and thus saith he were the Giants engendred and Tostatus approoving this conceit of Incubi and Succubi seemeth to give credit to that report of Merlin that he was begotten by a spirit In these assertions and uncertaine conjectures of men some what is true some part false 1. True it is that the Devill may appeare in the shape of man or woman and dissemble and counterfeit the act proper to both not that the spirits have any delight in such carnall acts having no true but assumed and counterfeit bodies but they doe it more strongly to delude men and women and entice them to that abominable sinne of the flesh which they know hath corrupted the hearts of many excellent men as of David Salomon 2. Though spirits can take upon them the shape of bodies yet they are but so to the eye they are not true bodies being easily
discerned by the feeling and therefore our Saviour saith feele and see a spirit hath not flesh and bones as yee see mee to have And some have reported that they have felt such bodies assumed by spirits as colde as yce and of a divers substance from humane flesh as Alexander ab Alexandro so writeth of another to whom a spirit appeared and Cardanus of himselfe If any man object that Abraham washed the Angels feet and yet discerned them not I will not answer with Pererius whose judgement I refuse not in the rest that Abrahams intent upon other things regarded it not But I note a difference betweene the operation of good and bad Angels that these never appeared with true bodies and therefore were called Phantasmata visions fansies Marke 6.49 But unto the other God gave the use of true bodies for a time during that ministerie or service as appeareth in that they did eat and drinke were lodged had their feet washed c. 3. But howsoever spirits may assume bodies they are not such as can be instruments of generation by conveying of humane seed as some have imagined because the scripture saith children are the inheritance of the Lord Psal. 127.3 And Evah confesseth when Cain was borne that she had obtained a son of God Gen. 4.1 and if that were true which is fabled of Merlin such kind of birth should be oftner seene in the world Wherefore by the sonnes of God in this place 1. Neither doe wee understand Angels good or bad 2. Neither men of tall and great stature as such things as are excellent in their kind are so called as high and tall trees are said to be the trees of God Psal. 104.16.3 Nor yet the sonnes of Princes and great men as the Chalde readeth to whom Mercerus subscribeth which are called Gods in scripture Psal. 82.6 I said ye are Gods c 4. Neither yet are they so called because they came of Seeth who as Suidas thinketh was in respect of his religion and great knowledge saluted as a God in earth 5. But they are here named the sonnes of God that were of the righteous seed and worshippers of the true God as the wicked are called the sonnes of the Devil and he their father Iohn 8.44 ye are of your father the Devill who although they were not indeed the sonnes of God in his eternall election yet were they so in respect of their externall calling QVEST. VII The meaning of these words My spirit shall not alwaies strive c. 4. Vers. 3. MY spirit shall not alwaies strive c. 1. Not as the latine text is My spirit shall not alwaies remaine which some expound of Gods wrath some of his providence some of the holy Ghost some of the soule and spirit of man inspired of God and then the sense to bee that Gods wrath shall not alwaies continue but he will punish them at once or he will no more protect them or take care for them neither his spirit shall be with them or he will take away their life and spirit from them For this variety of interpretation ariseth of the mistaking of the word which signifieth to contend or judge not to remaine 2 Neither is Pagmines interpretation so apt my spirit shall not alwaies bee sheathed as a sword in a scabbard and so hee would derive the word jadon of neden which signifieth a sheath 3. The meaning then of these words my spirit shall not alwaies judge or contend is neither as Hierom expoundeth non eos ad â—ternos servabo cruciatus I will not punish them for ever but render unto them here that which they deserve For S. Peter sheweth that their soules are now in the prison of hell and so everlastingly punished 1 Peter 3.19 Neither as Cajetane that God would no more punish them spiritually as hee had done by taking his grace and spirit from them but now he would inflict a corporall punishment upon them for God had not yet punished them giving them the space of 120. yeares to repent But either wee may understand these words with Oleaster that God would no longer strive with them in reprooving and admonishing them which they regarded not or with Iunius God would no longer consult or dispute the matter as it were with himselfe what to doe with them but if they amended not within that space set he would certainly destroy them QVEST. VIII What these Giants were 5. Vers. 4. THese were Giants c. Some thinke that these were called Giants not for their greatnesse of stature but their cruell and beastly conditions so thinke Philo Ioseph Damas. Cyril with others so also Iunius 2. But beside their fierce and cruell nature it is most probable that they were of huge and great stature Mercer for such there were also after the floud as the sonnes of Anak in comparison of whom the Israelites seemed as grashoppers Num. 13.34 such were the Emmims and Zaâ—zummims Deut. 2.10 17. and Og the King of Basan whose bed was of iron being nine cubits in length and foure in breadth Deut. 3.11 and of this judgement are Ambrose Augustine Theodoret. 3. And these Giants huge in stature men of great strength as is shewed after in this verse did most abound before the floud and such also was the off-spring of this unlawfull copulation betweene the sonnes of God and daughters of men 4. And they were men of renowne that is famous over all the world because they did tyrannize over their neighbours and brought them in subjection of whom Berosius writeth that they had a City called Enos about the mountaine Libanus which ruled over all the world they did eat mans flesh and had unlawfull company with their mothers daughters with mules and bruit beasts 5. Some as Rasi doe referre this generation of Giants to the times of Enos further affirming that the Lord sent the Ocean Sea which destroyed the generation of these Giants and the third part of the world but the Giants which succeeded them were as wicked as they But of this inundation of the Ocean no mention is made in Scripture neither is it like that the generation of Giants began so soone in the world neither with Aben Ezra doe we understand this of the generation of Giants after the floud of whom came Og and the rest as though any of the Giants had escaped the floud to beget Giants afterward and that Noe and his sonnes were Giants it is not to be thought Mercer Neither were these Giants onely in Noahs time but when this violent rage of lust beganne to reigne in the world then this off-spring of Giants came in which continued till the time of Noah 6. Neither were these Giants onely of Seths race as some thinke nor yet onely of Cain as R. Sel. but in both families there were Giants after they thus coupled together with out the feare of God Mercer Calvin 7. So that the Nephilim here spoken of so named of Naphal which
they aâ—tributed to the second ranke of gods who provided for all things betweene the Moone and the earth the third they yeelded to the spirits who governed the actions of men But the Scripture teacheth us that all things in heaven and earth are ruled by Gods providence in so much that a sparrow cannot fall upon the ground without the will of God Matth. 10.29 as the Prophet David also saith Who is like unto the Lord our God that hath his dwelling on high who abaseth himselfe to behold things in the heaven and the earth Psal. 113.5 6. 3. Confut. Iacobs ladder doth not signifie the monasticall profession PErerius interpreteth this ladder out of a counterfeit peece of Bernard to be the discipline of Monasticall life and namely the way and rule of Benets order whereby the founder of that order S. Benedict went to heaven numer 34. Contra. 1. First then it is requisite if this ladder signifieth Monasticall discipline that he which first saw it should have beene a professed Monke but I thinke they will not say that Iacob was a Monke the most speciall part of which profession consisteth in the vow of single life 2. Christ himselfe standeth upon the top of this ladder to whom the way and ladder is directed he then that climbeth this ladder must ascend by faith in Christ but the Monks thinke to climbe up to heaven by their merits 3. Iacob was a figure of Christ upon whom the Angels of God should ascend and descend Ioh. 1.51 it is great presumption then to put Benet in Christs place that Iacob should bee a figure of him 4. This ladder sheweth the way that every true Israelite of Iacob should ascend by but every true Israelite and Christian is not a Monke 4. Confut. Philo confuted concerning the ascending and descending of soules PHilo understandeth the ayre to be this ladder Basis terra coelum caput The earth is the foot of this ladder the heaven is the head or top the Angels are the soules Quas aer habet stellis pares which the ayre is filled with equall to the starres in number some of these descend into the bodies some ascend Alia ad corpora recurrunt Some returne to the bodies againe thus Philo Platonizeth Lib. de somniis In this device of Philo three notable errours are discovered 1. The ayre is not the seat or region of soules but the spirits of the just are in heaven where Jesus Christ is and the holy Angels Heb. 12.22 23 24. 2. The soules had no being before their bodies that they should descend into them as from another place God formeth the spirit of man within him Zachar. 12.1 3. Neither doe the soules once separated from the bodies returne any more to cohabit in earthly and mortall bodies The spirit returneth to God that gave it Eccles 12.7 5. Confut. Against the Helvidians Vers. 15. I Will not forsake thee till I have performed c. The Helvidians because it is said that Ioseph knew not Mary â—â—ll she had brought forth her first-borne sonne Matth. 1.25 would gather thereupon that he knew her afterward they may as well conclude here that after God had performed to Iacob that which he promised that he did forsake him then Muscul. 6. Confut. Temples have no inherent holinesse but in regard of the use Vers. 17. THis is no other but Gods house c. This proveth not that Temples and Churches are more holy places in themselves which is the opinion of the Romanists 1. Their Temples being polluted with idolatry are prophane and unholy 2. Though before Christs comming the Lord chose his speciall place where he would have sacrifices offered and not in any place beside and so some places were privileged with a legall kinde of sanctity more than others yet now since that Christ hath every where opened heaven to the prayers of the faithfull that distinction remaineth not 3. Even Bethel retained not an inherent holinesse but in respect of the religious use for after that it was by Ieroboam defiled with Idolatry it was no more Bethel the house of God but Bethaven the house of iniquity 7. Confut. Against the anointing of Altars Vers. 18. HE powred oyle upon the top of it c. Hence Rabanus groundeth that superstitious use of anointing the Altar with oyle Altare post aspersionem aquae Chrysmate ungitur ad imitationem Patâ—iarcha Iacob The Altar after the sprinkling of water is anointed with Chrysme after the imitation of the Patriarke Iacob Lib. de institut Clericor cap. 45. Contra. 1. The ceremonies of the law which were figures and shadowes of things to come are not meet ornaments for the Gospell such were their washings anointings sacrifices and other rites they were shadowes of things to come but the body is Christ Coloss. 2.17 The body then being come what need the shadow 2. The same ointment that Christ was anointed with his members also receive but that was a spirituall unction Luk. 4.18 The spirit of the Lord is upon me because he hath anointed me Of this anointing the Apostle speaketh You have an oyntment from him that is holy and ye have knowne all things 1 Ioh. 2.20 3. But if Iacobs anointing must be a patterne why doe they also sprinkle water which he did not Iacob also used profane and common oyle such as he carried for his journey but their oyle must be hallowed first and consecrated Iacob here maketh no Altar but setteth up a pillar for a monument why doe not they by the same example powre oyle upon their Crosses and Pillars in the high-way 8. Confut. Bethel become Bethaven and Rome Babel Vers. 19. HE called the name of that place Bethel Yet afterward when it was prophaned by idolatry it was called by the Prophets Bethaven the house of iniquity we need not therefore marvell if that Rome sometime the Church of God bee now become Babel the fountaine of corrupt doctrine the place and seat of Antichrist they cannot shew such warrant for the consecration of Rome as the Scripture speaketh for Bethel which of the house of God was made an habitation of filthy Idols and so is Rome Muscul. 6. Places of morall observation 1. Observ. We must not amend one errour by another Vers. 9. THen went Esau to Ishmael c. Esau in stead of correcting his former errour in taking him wives from the daughters of Canaan committeth another in matching into the stocke of Ismael that was also a stranger from the covenant he thought he should please his father though he did not thorowly reforme himselfe if he came a little nearer such is the reformation of hypocrites they thinke they have done well if they can dawbe over their sinnes and set some colour upon them by a pretended reformation as Herod did Who seemed to reverence Iohn and when he heard him hee did many things and heaâ—d him gladly Mark 6.30 Mercer Calvin 2. Observ. Patience and labour to be endured for vertue Vers. 11. HE tooke of the
Genes â—5 Now Abraham and Ismael had not the same people to goe unto the faithfull cannot be said to be Ismaels people nor the prophane sort to be Abrahams But if the meaning of the phrase were no more than that they were gathered and joyned to the state of the dead the faithfull and prophane sort should all goe to one people wherefore this phrase betokeneth a speciall disposition of the soules of the faithfull after this life in being associated to the company of the just and a laying up of their bodies in assured hope of the resurrection Calvin Muscul. Luther The Apostle also sheweth what it is for the righteous to be gathered to their people Wee are come to the celestiall Ierusalem to the innumerable company of Angels to the congregation of the first borne c. to the spirits of just and perfect men Hebr. 12.22.13 To all these are we joyned by faith while we live and really when we are dead now quoad spem in hope then quoad rem in deed 6. Places of morall use 1. Mor. Fathers must rebuke and chastise their children Vers. 4. THou shalt not be excellent Fathers may learne by Iacobs example to chastise their children for their sinnes as here Ruben is censured for defiling his fathers bed for this cause Heli and his posterity were punished because hee did not reprove his sonnes according to the quality of their offence Perer. 2. Mor. Gods vengeance though it be deferred will certainly come FUrther in that Rubens punishment had beene a long time suspended and deferred almost 40. yeeres after he had committed this uncleane sinne yet at the last it commeth let no sinner flatter himselfe in his impunity for if the long suffering of God draw him not to repentance it shall but increase his punishment as the Apostle sheweth Rom. 2.4 5. 3. Mor. The short pleasures of sinne deprive men of many blessings AGaine as Ruben for a little short pleasure lost his birthright and dignity so many for the vaine and momentany pleasures of this life are deprived of many and great blessings like to Esau that for a messe of pottage did part with his birthright 4. Mor. Contumely against parents never goeth unpunished WE see also what an high offence before God it is to offer any wrong or contumely to our parents such was Cham toward Noah Absalon toward David and here Ruben that polluted his father Iacobs bed 5. Mor. Against unjust and immoderate revenge Vers. 7. CVrsed be their wrath The Lord condemneth all kinde of revenge that proceedeth of wrath especially such as here was committed by Simeon and Levi. 1. It was done by craft and subtility under pretence of friendship 2. Against men unawares suspecting nothing 3. When they were in griefe of body 4. With a pretext and shew of religion 5. The revenge farre exceeded in greatnesse the quality of the offence Such a kinde of revenge is unjust and cruell Wherefore in this case wee should follow the Wise-mans counsell Say not I will recompence evill but wait upon the Lord and he shall save thee Prov. 20.22 Perer. 6. Mor. Every mans portion in the earth assigned of God Vers. 13. AS Zabulun shall dwell by the sea side Hence we learne that the lot of men for their habitation and dwelling in the earth falleth not out unto them by chance but by Gods providence and appointment for as it is in the Psalme The earth is the Lords and the fulnesse thereof Psal. 24.1 therefore every one should be contented with his lot and portion as assigned unto him of God Perer. 7. Mor. The Church shall overcome at last Vers. 19. ANd an host of men shall overcome him but he shall overcome at the last c. So the Church of God though it shall indure much trouble and sorrow in the world yet it shall triumph and have the victory in the end as our Saviour saith to his Apostles In the world yee shall have trouble but be of good comfort I have overcome the world Iohn 16.33 8. Mor. The quiet and peaceable end of the righteous Vers. 33. HE plucked up his feet into the bed Before Iacob had raised up himselfe as well as he could not having his legs hanging out of the bed as Perer. that had beene no fit lying for a man ready to dye but he had stretched out himselfe before as well as he could for reverence unto the word of God which he delivered but now feeling the houre of his death to be instant hee doth gather up his legs after a seemely and quiet manner not strugling or striving against death as many doe but as though death â—ere in his power he doth meekely and gently yeeld himselfe unto it such a peaceable and quiet kinde of departure God often granteth to his children Muscul. Howbeit this is not alwayes so for sometime a wicked man may dye like a lambe still and quiet as the Psalme saith There are no bands in his death Psal. 73.4 and a righteous man may have a strong death by reason of the extremity of his sicknesse and the manner of the disease but yet inwardly he hath a peaceable and quiet soule and therefore Balaam had good reason to pray as he did Let me dye the death of the righteous and let my last end be like his Num. 23.10 CHAP. L. 1. The Method and Argument IN this Chapter is set forth 1. Iosephs piety toward his father Iacob in causing him to be embawmed vers 2 3. in his buriall 1. He procured leave of Pharaoh vers 4 5 6. 2. He did honourably accompany him vers 7 8 9. 3. They mourned for him by the way vers 10 11. 4. Then they buried him as he had commanded 2. His humanity toward his brethren with their message in their fathers name vers 14 15 16. their humility vers 18. Iosephs friendly answer vers 19 20 â—â— 3. Iosephs prosperity in seeing his childrens children v. 23. 4. His faithfull departure buriall and age v. 24 25. 2. The divers readings v. 2. he commanded those which had charge of funerals S. commanded the Physitians câ—t v. 4. spake to potentates of Pharaoh S. spake to Pharaohs house caet v. 8. only their kinred they left their sheepe and oxen c. S. their children or little ones caet v. 10. they came to Goren Atad G. to the corne-floore or field beset with thistles T. to the corne-floore of Athad cat of Achad H. athad signifieth a thistle v. 11. Abel Mizraim G. the mourning of the Egyptians cat v. 13. beside Mamre G. before Mamre B. over against Mamre caet against or before the face of Mamre cat v. 19. feare not can we resist Gods will H. for I am Gods S. for I feare God C. am not I under God G. am I God B. am I in the stead of God T.P. 3. The explanation of doubtfull questions and places QUEST I. Of the divers fashions of buriall Vers. 2. ANd Moses commanded his
one day after another which he proveth by these reasons 1. Because the seventh day is determined wherein he rested then consequently they were six daies wherein he was making the world 2. Mention is made of the evening and morning therefore the day and night one succeeded another 3. And seeing light was created the first day and light and darknesse could not be at once in the same hemisphere the one therefore must needs successively follow the other 2. But yet although God made the world successively in respect of the daies which one succeeded another and all was not made in one day Yet Tostatus opinion is not to be received that in some of the works of the creation God did agere persuccessionem worke by succession and in time and did not produce the creatures in instanti in an instant The first second and fourth daies worke he granteth were done in an instant but the third daies worke was done successively the winde helping to drie it which is said to have moved upon the waters And the plants and trees were brought out of the earth in time God giving such great strength and force to the earth to bring them forth As he giveth instance of some herbs as 〈◊〉 parsely that will grow out of the ground in the space of two houres Likewise in the creation of man hee thinketh it is probable that the Angels made his bodie of the slime of the earth and the Lord breathed in the breath of life Contra. 1. That God created 〈…〉 Psal. 33.9 he spake and 〈…〉 2. That was not the winde which moved upon the 〈…〉 as in the same Psalme vers â— the Spirit is called the breath of Gods mouth By 〈…〉 Lord were the heavens made and all the host of them by the breath of his mouth 3. Neither did God use the helpe of the Angels in the framing of mans bodie he did it himselfe for when he said Let us make man in our image he consulted not with the Angels but with the blessed Trinitie for he was created in the image of God Genes 1.27 nor in the image of Angels for then Christ when he was made man should have taken upon him the nature of Angels which the Apostle denieth Hebr. 2.16 And it is directly said that God Iehovah made the man of the dust of the earth Genes 2 7. but Iehovah is not given unto any Angell it is a name peculiar unto God QUEST XIX How the Lord is said to have rested and from what Vers. 17. IN the seventh day he ceased and breathed 1. Which is a metaphor taken from those which when they have sore laboured doe breath and take aire Oleaster Not that God was wearied with the works of the creation but he onely left creating all things being finished which he intended to make and he did it for our instruction that we by his example might keep an holy rest 2. God then ceased from creating of another world Osiand or from creating any new workes for then the creation had not been perfect if any thing had been wanting neither could it have been said God saw all that hee had made and loe it was verie good Gen. 1.31 3. But he ceased not both from preserving that which hee had made which is no new worke but that was continued during all the six daies and is exercised still Tostat. For God is not like to a builder of an house or carpenter of a ship which having finished his worke so leaveth it but Gods providence still watcheth over that which he hath made Gallas Likewise the Lord ceaseth not from making particular works daily for he doth wonderous things and miraculous thorow the world sed non creat novas species he doth not create now any new kind Marbach 4. Then here appeareth the error of certaine Hebrewes which thinke that the Sabbath which is called Saturns day was appointed first to bee kept because that is an unluckie planet and unfortunate and therefore it was not fit to undertake any businesse upon that day for the reason appeareth to be this because God rested upon the seventh day and they will not say that God was afraid to doe any thing upon Saturns day Tostatus quest 11. 5. Againe hence is gathered a firme reason for the continuance and perpetuitie of the Sabbath because God did not create the heaven and earth only for the sonnes of Iacob but for all men Quibus ex aquâ— Creator est nemiâ—em ergo ab isto Sabbatisâ—â— excludi c. To whom he is a Creator alike and therefore no man is to be exempted from the keeping of the Sabbath Lippoman QUEST XX. What workes are to be rested from upon the Lords day what not ANd as God rested not from all kind of workes upon the seventh day so neither are all kind of workes unlawfull now to be done upon the Lords day of rest The workes that men attend are of two sorts either naturall or voluntarie 1. Naturall workes are not forbidden to be done as to eat drinke sleepe so they be done in order and measure 2. Voluntarie works are either good or evill evill workes are at all times unlawfall much more upon the sabbath 3. Good workes are either sacred or civill and politicall the sacred are either immediatly belonging to the worship of God as the duties of the first Table which principally are to be done upon the Lords day 4. Or they are such workes as are mediatly referred unto God as the workes of mercie the duties of the second Table which also if occasion so require are to bee done upon this day as to visite the sicke to helpe those that are in danger 5 The politike workes follow as the workes of mens vocation merchandise making of warre all which must be intermitted upon the Lords day and therefore that commandement beginneth with Remember that men aforehand should thinke of the Lords day and not deferre any of their busines till then but vrgent necessitie constraining such things may be done then as the Macchabees did fight upon the Sabbath and the Disciples of Christ being hungrie pulled the eares of corne Marbach QUEST XXI Whether Moses received the directions concerning the Tabernacle in the first or second fortie daies Vers. 18. THus when the Lord had made an end of communing with Moses c. 1. R. Salâ—m whom Lyranus followeth understandeth this communing or speech of God with Moses only of the former charge concerning the Sabbath not of all the declaration before going which concerned the making of the Tabernacle which hee thinketh was done in Moses second going up to the Lord after the people had made the golden calfe and so he thinketh the historie to be transposed 2. Contra. 1. First as sometime in Scripture the order of time is changed and the historie transposed when there is any apparant cause to meet with some inconvenience which otherwise might follow so to imagine any such transposing where there is no such necessitie were
substance of God then God must be of a divers nature and substance for he was diversly seene 9. And that it is impossible Oculis corporis substantiam Dei aspicere with the eyes of the body to see the substance of God it is evident by our blessed Saviours answer unto Philip who desired Christ to shew them the Father He that hath seene me hath seene the Father insinuating thereby that God cannot otherwise be seene of us than in Christ his Son who is the verie engraved forme of his person And if Christ would not grant any such carnall vision of God unto his Disciples who were conversant with him in the flesh who can in this life expect it 10. Whereas then the Prophet Isaiah saith I saw the Lord sitting upon an high throne and he is said to have beene seene of other of the Saints wee must not thinke that they saw Gods substance with their carnall eyes sed juxta possibilitatem humanam non ut est sed ut voluit se videre but as mans nature could see him not as hee is but as it pleased him Hierom who in the same place reproveth the Jewes who affirme that Isaias was slaine of their fathers because he writeth he saw God with his eyes whereas Moses saw only Gods back-parts for seeing Moses also writeth that God talked with him face to face interficite Mosen cum Esaia yee might as well have killed Moses as Isaias QUEST XLV Whether we shall see the divine nature with the eyes of our bodies in the next life BUt it is a greater question whether the Saints shall not in the next life see the Divine Essence with their bodily eyes which some doe affirme upon these reasons 1. Iob saith he shall see God in his flesh Iob 19. that is in the resurrection 2. S. Paul also saith that then we shall see face to face 1 Cor. 13.13 3. We shall then be like unto the Angels which doe behold the face of God 4. Our bodies shall then be spirituall and therefore wee shall even with our bodily eyes see and discerne Spirits 5. Otherwise if our eyes should not behold God what use should there be of our sight Contr. 1. The Hebrew Interpreters expound that place of Iob of his sight of God in this life but taking it rather to be spoken of his state and condition in the resurrection as most of our writers doe interpret we deny not but then the Redeemer who is cloathed with our flesh shall be seene of us even with these our eyes as Iob there saith But it is one thing to see the person of the Mediatour another to see the divine essence and nature 2. Saint Paul speaketh not of the â—ight of the bodily eyes but of the sight of the minde as hee expoundeth himselfe Now I know in part but then shall I know even as I am knowne 3. The likenesse similitude which we shall have with the Angels holdeth not in everie thing as that we shall have the like nature or knowledge but in that wherein the resemblance is made as that we shall neither marrie nor be married nor need meat and drinke but in that respect shall be as the Angels and yet neither doe the Angels fully comprehend the divine nature as afterward shall be shewed 4. Our bodies are said to be spirituall not as opposite to the nature of our bodies now which shall remaine but as set against the corruptible and earthly qualities thereof our bodies shall be bodies still but not earthly naturall corruptible bodies as they are now therefore the argument followeth not 5. And this shall be the use of our heavenly sight wee shall see God in his workes but after a more cleere manner than now we shall see the elect we shall behold Christ himselfe Upon these reasons Simlerus concludeth In futura vita nos oculis corporis corpora tantum visurâ—s In the next life we with our bodily eyes shall see onely bodies and not the essence of God Thomas Aquine also thus interpreteth Iobs words I shall see God in my flesh I consisting of body and soule shewing Quod suâ— modo visionis illius erit particeps corpus That the body also after a sort shall be partaker of that vision not that the eyes of the body shall see the Divine Essence Sed quia oculi corporis videbunt Deum hominem factum But because the eyes of the body shall see God which was made man Videbunt etiam gloriam Dâ—i in creatura refulgâ—â—tem They shall also see the glorie of God shining in the creatures But this further must bee added that though the divine essence of God shall not bee seene of our bodily eyes then because God is of an infinite and incomprehensible nature yet the blessed Spirits the Angels and Ministers of God shall bee seene of the elect Angelorum beatorum omnium consortio conspectu colloquio fruemur We shall enjoy the fellowship fight and conference of the Angels and of all the blessed Buâ—an For if the eyes of the young man were so opened at the prayer of the Prophet that he saw the Lords heavenly host which appeared in the likenesse of fierie horse and charriots much more shall our eyes then be so cleared as that we shall see the Angels themselves though not in their very spirituall nature yet in such sensible manner as that we shall both converse have conference with them QUEST XLVI Whether the Divine Essence can be seene and comprehended by the minde of man in this life NOw it followeth to be considered seeing Gods essence cannot be seene by our bodily eyes either in this life or the next whether that in our minde and understanding here in this life wee may attaine to the fight and knowledge of God where that position of Thomas Aquine is to be held Impossibile est animae hominis secundum hanc vitam viventis essentiam Dei videre It is impossible for the soule of man in this life to see the essence of God the reasons whereof are these 1. Because the soule being in the body naturally knoweth not any thing nisi quâ— habent formâ—â— in materia but such things as have their forme in some matter or may be knowne by such things but the essence of God per naturas rerum materialium c. by the nature of materiall things cannot be knowne Thomas 2. Almost all our knowledge initium habet à sensibus taketh the beginning from the sense but God cannot be perceived by sense Simler 3. Ambrose likewise saith Anima carnis hujus maculis coâ—â—â—vionibus obumbratae faciem Dei sâ—ncere videre non possunt The soules being shadowed and obscured with the spots and blemishes of the flesh cannot cleerely here see the face of God c. And he further giveth this reason Qui faciem Dei videt esse â—ine peccato He that seeth the face of God must be without
vestra quam privatim expertus sum ut liberiùs animi mei sensa palam expromerem vestrae enim humanitati sat sciâ— probatur Augustini consilium si quisquam est qui se non audet ingerere ad amicitiam faciendam cum aliquo nostro temporali honore aut dignitate revocetur offerendum est illi quadam commitate submissione animi quod petere per se ipse non audet desino jam plurib molestus esse excessi mensuram epistolae sed non excessi doloris modum ut ait Hieronym precor jam ut qua ipsi fratres conservos miseratione dignemini in terris ipsi abundè cumulatam apud misericordem patrem in coelis inveniatis Vestrae Reverentiae observantiss ANDREAS WILLETTVS THE FIRST BOOKE OF MOSES CALLED GENESIS CHAP. I. The Analysis or Logicall resolution IN this Chapter Moses treateth of the creation of the world first in generall how God created heaven and earth vers 1. then in particular in the rest of the Chapter where wee have the severall workes of God and their severall approbations that they seemed good unto the Makeâ— The severall workes are distinguished into six dayes and in every dayes worke there are foure things to bee observed the authority whereby they are made as v. 3. The Lord said Let there be light c. the obedience of the creature in being made and there was light thirdly the approbation of the Creator v. 4. God saw that the light was good fourthly the distinction of the worke vers 5. The evening and the morning were the first day and so of the rest of the dayes workes Againe the order of the particular creation is this God createth the workes and câ—eatures without sense afterward the sensitive and living creatures the first are either the superiour and celestiall as the light made the first day the firmament the second the contents of the firmament the Sunne Moone and Starres the fourth day or the inferiour creatures as the earth with the trees plants and herbs the third day The sensitive creatures are either unreasonable as the fishes and fowles made the fifth day v. 20. the beasts and cattell made the sixth day or the reasonable creatures man and woman made the sixth day In the framing and bringing forth of man there is set forth first the consultation of the Trinity v. 26. Let us make man c. then the creation wherein is to be considered the substance and forme of mans creation according to Gods owne image v. 27. the endowment of man created in his preheminence and domination over all other creatures vers 28. his increase and procreation bâ—ing forth fruit and multiply his maintenance and preservation vers 29. I have given unto you every herb c. that shall be to you for meat The Genesis or Grammaticall construction where the translations differ v. 1. God created b.g. T.H.p. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 made s bara created heb v. 2. was without forme b.g. T. empty H. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 invisible s solitudo vast solitary p. tohu heb 3. moved upon the waters b.g. incubabat did sit upon T. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was carried upon c. s. motabat did flutter upon H. p. rachaph 6. the firmament 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 b.g. H.p.s. expansum the broad or spread heaven T. heb rachang to spread 11. bud and herb b. bud of the herb g. herbam virentem greene herb H. herbam teneram tender herb or grasse T. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the herb of grasse s. bud herb p. heb seeding seed g.s. T.p. heb making seed H. apt to seed b. 12. after his kinde and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 according to his likenesse This is added by the septuagint 18. to rule in the day g. to rule the day b. T.H.p. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to rule the day s.p. heb 20. let the waters bring forth b. H. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 s. bring forth in abundance g. T. bring forth as wormes that is in abundance p. heb sharats 29. every tree b.g. T.p. heb gnets 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 lignum every kinde of wood bearing fruit s. H. 3. The Exegesis or Theologicall explication of doubtfull questions and obscure places QVEST. I. What the heaven and earth was created in the beginning vers 1. Vers. 1. IN the beginning God made heaven and earth c. 1. Moses here doth not onely generally or summarily set downe the creation of the world which afterward is described in particular which was the opinion of Chrysostome remembred by Augustine lib. 2. cont Manich. c. 3. 2. Nor yet doe we understand a certaine first matter whereof the heaven and earth were afterward made as Augustine seemeth to thinke lib. 1. Genes cont Manich. c. 7. and one Philastrius Bishop of Brixia doth affirme it to be heresie to say that this was the element of the earth afterward created but another earth as the matter whereof other things were made catalog haeres 3. Neither yet do we approve the opinion of the Schoolemen which by the heaven understand only Coelum empyreum the highest heaven above the starrie skie the seat of the Angels and blessed Spirits and by the earth a confused substance whereout other things were formed afterward of which opinion were Alcuinus Rabanus Lyranus Tostatus Catharinus with others for Moses specially intendeth to set downe the creation of things visible and David expounding Moses speaketh of these heavens here created which should perish Psal. 102.25 which are not those highest heavens subject to no change 4. Neither yet doe wee here exclude the creation of those invisible heavens with Mercerus but in this word comprehend as well the invisible as visible heavens Colos. 1.16 Iun. 5. This heaven and earth then here mentioned to bee created in the beginning are the same heaven and earth which are now comprehending the generall matter and seed whereout all other things in heaven and earth were made first created in the matter afterward perfected in forme and lastly beautified with their ornaments this then was the order of the creation First the same heaven and earth were created in a confused substance and unformed matter then the forme was added in the first and second dayes workes Lastly the ornaments produced as trees and plants and beasts in the earth starres in the skie fishes in the sea fowles in the aire Thus S. Paul expoundeth Moses that God made the heaven and earth Act. 14.15 God made the world Acts 17.24 so that this heaven and earth first made was no other than the world though not yet set in perfect order Of this opinion are Basil Ambrose Theodoret and most of the ancient Writers QVEST. II. What beginning Moses speaketh of Vers. 1. IN the beginning c. 1. This is neither to be understood as Iohn saith in the beginning was the word for there hee speaketh of a beginning without a beginning that is from everlasting but this was the
beginning of the creation or being of things 2. Neither is it to be understood causally in the beginning that is for the beginning as for Israels cause or for the law as the Hebrewes for God created all things for himselfe Prov. 16.4 It is also a forced exposition by this beginning to understand Christ although the doctrine bee most sound that all things were created by him 4. Nor yet as Abeâ— Ezra is this clause in the beginning used here syntactice in construction with the next word as though this should be the sense in the beginning of creating or when God created and so the sense should bee suspended till the second or third verse for then hee would have said barâ— in the infinite not bara in the praeâ—ertence as it is vsed Chap. 5.1 5. Wherefore Moses saith in the beginning in respect of the things created that in that beginning when God purposed to create the world hee made first heaven and earth of nothing Mercer Iunius QVEST. III. Hebrewes curious observations Vers. 1. GOd created heaven and earth c. 1. The Hebrewes have here many curious observations which I will not stand upon as 1. by the letters of the two first words bereshith bara they note the time from the beginning of the world untill the Messiah Aleph and beth signifie 3000. râ—sh shin tau 900. jod 10. that is â—910 which doth not much differ from the just time according to the computation of some from the creation to the Messiah 2. They note the duration or continuance of the world for 6000. yeeres because aleph is six times found in the first verse 3. By the 7. words of the first verse they would have signified the 7. dayes of the weeke and the 7. planets These observations are more curious than profitable 2. So is that question which is controversed among the Rabbins whether the heaven or earth were made first they thinke that heaven being first named was first made but that reason is not firme for the earth is named before the heavens Gen. 2.4 and the manner of the Scripture is to mention that last which is treated of first as in the second verse Moses beginneth againe to speake of the earth Paguin Wherefore it is most like that God made the heavens and earth together in their first matter as the cup and the cover as in an egge the yolke and the white as in a circle the center and circumference Mercer And this first creating of the heaven and earth was a part of the first dayes worke Luther For otherwise the Lord had not made all things in six dayes contrary to the Scripture Exod. 20.11 QVETS IIII. How the earth is said to be without forme and void Vers. 2. THe earth was without forme 1. The earth is here so called by way of preoccupation for it was not yet so called till the third dayes worke vers 10. Vatab. 2. The heaven was also without his forme though not altogether so confused as the earth for there being no light yet created both the heaven and earth were unformed and imperfect 3. The earth is said as yet to be tohu and bohu emptinesse and vacuity this tohu was not that materia prima which the Philosophers dreamed of and bohu to be the forme of things not yet applied to the matter as though the heavens and earth had beene made of some precedent matter whereas indeed God made the heaven and earth of nothing which long continued not in this imperfect estate the light being the same day created 4. The darknesse here spoken of was neither the element of fire as some Hebrewes imagine which if it bee is bright and transparent neither is it the same with tohu before mentioned as R. Levi neither was it any thing created and a farre greater darknesse than that which afterward was called the night wherein there is some light of the starres but it was a meere privation of light afterward created 5. The waters here mentioned which covered the deepe as a garment in the beginning Psal. 104. 6. were before comprehended vnder the name of earth as all the inferiour elements beside as the superiour parts of the world are insinuate by the heaven Mercer QVEST. V. What is meant by the Spirit moved upon the waters THe Spirit of God moved c. By the Spirit here 1. wee neither understand an Angell which is the dreame of Cajetanus for God needed not the ministery of Angels in making the world 2. Nor yet the wind as Tertullian lib. cont Hermog 3. Nor the aire as Theodoret. qu. 8. in Genes If God had no use of the Angels to make the world much lesse of inferiour creatures 4. But this was the Spirit of God whereby the creatures were fostered and formed Iob. 26.13 His Spirit hath garnished the heavens QVEST. VI. What was the light created the first day Vers. 2. GOd said let there be light c. Some doe thinke that this was a spirituall no naturall or corporall light August lib. 1. in Genes ad lit c. 3. Rupert 1. lib. de Trinitat c. 10. but that cannot be seeing this light made a visible and apparent difference betweene the day and night 2. Some thinke it was the perfect light of the Sunne which was created the first day but afterward rehearsed to bee made in the fourth Catharinus but this is contrarie to the text for the Sunne was made the fourth day 3. Others thinke that it was a bright and lightsome cloud which was carried about and gave light to the world as Beda Lyranus Magister Sentent c. 4. Others that it was a light without a subject afterward fastened to the body of the Sunne as Basil. homil in Genes 6.5 Others that it was an exceeding bright shining light such as no mortall nature could behold being whole and altogether and therefore it was afterward dispersed into divers bodies of the Sunne Moone and Starres so Nazianzene Theodoret qu. 14. in Genes 6. Some thinke it was the light of the Sunne yet imperfect afterward perfected inlarged and beautified Aquinas part 1. qu. 67. art 4. Thus we see how variable and inconstant mens opinions are when they search into curious matters and enquire after hid things but it sufficeth us to know that God made the light before the Sunne that we should not attribute that to the creature which was the worke only of the Creator what manner of light it was where placed how it moved how long it continued because in Scripture there is no certainty busily to search it were curiosity it is most like that it was a certaine light which was not extinguished when the Sunne was created but rather increased Vatab. Mercer And it is not unlike but that this light proceeded from the element of fire as thinketh Damascene lib. 2. de sid c. 7. and Iunius as an effect thereof and whereas it may be objected that this light was moveable from one hemispheare to another as causing
it as the water in the red sea did or that though it were covered with water it might be preserved as the Olive tree whereof the Dove tooke a branch or that God might restore Paradise againe after the floud the first is presumptuous to imagine a miracle without warrant of Scripture and if it had beene so Noah needed not to have made an arke he and his sonnes and the cattell might have beene preserved there the second is not sufficient for though Paradise which is not like had beene so preserved yet Henoch must have beene drowned The third is frivolous for if the terrene Paradise had beene planted againe seeing it was situated in a knowne place in Mesopotamia it could not have beene hid In this question Pererius is an adversary to Bellarmine Senens and the rest that yet dreame of a terrene Paradise 5. Confut. Henoch shall returne into the world to die IT is also the constant opinion of the popish writers that Henoch shall come againe toward the end of the world and then shall die being to be slaine by Antichrist Pererius cum Bellarm. Cont. But this is contrary to the Apostle That Henoch was taken away that he should not see death neither was found Heb. 11.5 Ergo Henoch shall not see death nor bee found in a mortall state in earth whereas they object that place Heb. 9.27 It is appointed unto men that they shall once die The answer is ready like as they which are alive at Christs comming shall not die but be changed 1 Cor. 15. which notwithstanding shall bee in stead of death so Henoch was changed in his taking up though he died not a common death 6. Confut. Henoch shall not returne to preach repentance to the world COncerning the end and causes wherefore Henoch was translated 1. Wee admit that God hereby would put the righteous in comfort that notwithstanding the sentence pronounced against Adam there was a way of righteousnesse whereby to recover Adams lost state 2. To minister comfort to the afflicted members of Christ that they should not doubt but that their reward is with God as Habel though he had an untimely end yet lived with God as Henoch did thus Theodoret. 3. Wee refuse not the collection here of Thomas Aquinas that God both by Henochs translation before the law and Elias under the law would nourish the hope of life in his Church as by types representing the ascension of Christ in whom the promise of salvation should be accomplished These causes of Henochs translation may safely be received 4. But we neither thinke as it is in the booke of Wisdome which is no Canonicall Scripture and therefore we may safely dissent from it That hee was taken away lest wickednesse should alter his understanding for as he walked with God before God kept him in his feare and preserved him from evill so he could have guided him still as the Apostle saith He shall be established God is able to make him stand Rom. 14.4 speaking of the faithfull servants of God as Mathuselah the sonne of Henoch being the longest lived of all the Patriarkes continued righteous to the end 5. Neither is that surmise fit to be received that Henoch is kept alive to preach repentance in the end of the world and to maintaine the Gospell against Antichrist which is the common opinion of the papall professors For of Henochs preaching in the end of the world there is no mention in Scripture but only of the sending of Elias which is not understood of Elias person but of his spirit and zeale And this Elias the Angell expoundeth to be Iohn Baptist who should goe before Christ in the spirit and power of Elias And there is no such necessity that Henoch should be preserved so many yeares by miracle to that end seeing the Lord is able to raise up Prophets and Ministers as he did Iohn Baptist in the spirit of Elias and Henoch to maintaine the truth against the Pope and Antichrist which we see plentifully performed in these dayes 7. Confut. Of the Prophesie and booke of Henoch WHereas S. Inde in his Epistle vers 14. maketh mention of the Prophesie of Henoch the seventh from Adam which is not found in any other part of the Canonicall Scripture lest the adversaries might hereupon build their traditions and unwritten verities I will briefly declare what is to be thought of this Prophesie of Henoch 1. I neither thinke with Tertullian that there was any such propheticall booke of Henoch then extant who conjectureth that though it perished in the floud yet it might be restored againe by Noah thereunto inspired 2. Neither yet with Hierome that this booke of Henoch was an Apocriphall booke yet some part of it might be true which the Apostle might alleage For it is not like that the Apostle would derive a testimony from an hidden and obscure booke of no authority in the Church 3. Neither yet is it like as Michael Medina thinketh that there was no such booke at all under Henochs name for the fathers Origen Hierome Augustine doe in many places make evident mention that such a booke there was but thought it to be forged 4. And it is as unlike that the true book of Henoch was extant in the Apostles time which was afterward corrupted with fables and so rejected of the Church for then the Church would rather have purged the true booke from such errours and preserved the rest pure as they did discerne the true Gospels from the forged and adulterate Our opinion then is 1. With Augustine that the booke of Henoch which in his time was produced by Heretikes was altogether forged and no part of it of Henochs writing Non quod eorum hominum qui Deo placuorunt reprobetur authoritas sed quod ista non creduntur ipsorum not that saith he we refuse the authoritie of such men as pleased God but for that they were thought not to be theirs 2. We judge it not unlike with Origen that there might be such an authenticall booke of Henochs prophesie out of the which Iude did take his testimony which is now lost as some other parts of the Canonicall Scripture are as the books of God Nathan Iddâ— and other Prophets mentioned in the Chronicles 3. Or this prophesie of Henoch might be preserved by faithfull tradition in the Church of the Iewes which is approved by the Apostle But this is no warrant for other unwritten traditions unlesse some had the like Apostlike spirit to judge of them as Iudas had and further this prophesie of Henoch is a greeable to the Scriptures so are not many unwritten traditions urged by the Church of Rome 6. Places of exhortation 1. IN that the line only of the race of the faithfull is rehearsed in this chapter it both sheweth that God will alwaies have his church in the world and that in the most corrupt times God will have a remnant that shall
it hindred a greater good namely the peopling and replenishing of the world But the contrary is evident that they greatly sinned in this their proud enterprise 1. Their impiety toward God appeareth Augustine saith erigebant turrim contra dominum they erected a tower in despite of God as the Prophet Isay according to this paterne bringeth in the King of Babel vaunting himselfe I will ascend above the height of the clouds I will be like the most high Isay 14.14 2. Their vanity appeareth that seek to be famous in earth not by good works to be glorious in heaven Calvin vide radicem mali saith Chrysostome see the root of evill they seeke to be famous â—dificiis non eleâ—mâ—synis by buildings not by almes 3. Iosephus noteth their disobedience that knowing as it is most like from Noah that it was Gods ordinance that by them the earth should be replenished yet wilfully oppose themselves to the counsell of God 4. Philo observeth their impudency ô insignem impudentiam that whereas they should rather have covered their sinnes they proclaime their pride tyranny voluptuousnesse to all posterity It is uncertaine whether Noah were present it is most like he was not or that he consented not unto them And it appeareth by the punishment that God misliked their very act for he saith vers 6. neither can they now be stopped from whatsoever they have imagined that is they proceeded with a violent rage that nothing could stay them neither the feare of God nor the expectation of his judgements but whatsoever they had proudly devised they will as wickedly prosecute QVEST. VII How the Lord is said to descend Vers. 5. BVt the Lord came downe to see the City c. God is not said to descend to see 1. as though any thing hindred his sight in heaven for all things are naked and open to his eyes II. bâ— 4.13 2. Neither as though God went from place to place or were absent any where for the Lord filleth heaven and earth heaven is my throne earth is my footstoole c. what place is it that I should rest in Act. 7.49 But the Lord is said to descend to see c. 1. In respect of the new effect in manifesting his judgement re ipsa patefecit he shewed indeed that hee was not ignorant what hee did Augustine Calvin 2. Or for that he caused his Angels to descend and so is said to descend in his Ministers Augustine 3. Or as Cajetane quia extendit se cura providentia usque ad infima because God extendeth his care even unto the lowest things in the world as it is in the Psalme Who is like unto the Lord c. who abaseth himselfe to behold things in the heaven and earth Psal 113.5 4. God hereby also sheweth his patience non ab initio illorum repressiâ— insaniam c. he did not at the first represse their madnesse but used lenity towards them 5. Vult nos admoneri ne fratres temere condemnemus c. God would have us taught hereby not rashly to condemne our brethren Chrysost. God therefore giveth a rule to man first to examine a cause before they judge as the Lord first seeth and knoweth before he punisheth Muscul. 6. And by descending here is understood the punishment which followed as if God should have said Non amplius dissimulâ—mus eorum sâ—elira sed quam primum ea puniamus Let us no longer winke at their sinnes but presently punish them Rabbi Moses Aegyptius Basil maketh this distinction that God de coelo aspicit is said from heaven to behold the righteous but descendendo dicitvr invisere deus c. God is said to descend to visit the ungodly but this distinction alwayes holdeth not for both the Lord is said to looke downe from heaven upon the wicked Psal. 141. and the Lord is said to descend for the deliverance of his people Exod. 3.8 QVEST. VIII To whom God spake saying come let us goe downe Vers. 7. COme let us goe downe c. 1. The Lord speaketh not here to the Angels as August Gregory Philo Cajetane with others or to the persons of the Trinity and Angels together Mercer 2. But this is the consultation of the whole Trinity as v. 8. it is said Iehovah scattered them This speech is answerable to that Gen. 1. in the creation of man Come let us make man and those to whom God speaketh here hee maketh as equall in the same degree Come let us goe downe sic Raban Rupert Calvin 3. God indeed sometime useth the ministery of Angels not that he needeth their helpe but as Philo saith videt quid se quid creaturas deceat God seeth what is meet for himselfe what for the creatures for God is more honoured in such Ministers and mens infirmity thereby helped But at this time and in this case God needed not the ministery of Angels this confusion of tongues was his immediate worke as was the gift of tongues Acts 1.4 Wherefore to dispute there how God speaketh to Angels and invisible spirits is superfluous which may notwithstanding bee done two wayes either as Augustine saith veritas incommutabilis per seipsam ineffabiliter loquitur the unchangeable verity speaketh by it selfe after an ineffable manner Gregory sheweth another way Quicquid agere debent in ipsa contemplatione veritatis legunt c. They do as it were read in the contemplation of the verity what they should doe The Angels are either inspired by God to know his wil or they behold in God as the Schoolemen say as in a glasse what is to be done But the first is the way whereby God speaketh to Angels the other is but a speculatioÌ„ of man QVEST. IX Whose language was confounded Vers. 7. ANd confound their languages c. 1. Pride bringeth confusion of tongues humility as in the Apostles obtained uniting of tongues Act. 2. Greg. 2. It appeareth how hurtfull the conspiracy of the wicked is for if now in the beginning they abused the uniting of their tongues to so great madnesse how outragious is it like they would have beene afterward when their multitudes had beene more increased Chrysost. 3. Not every mans language was confounded for then all society would have beene taken away even in families but the speech of certaine kindreds and companies was changed QVEST. X. What caused them to leave off building Vers. 8. THey left off building c. 1. The confusion then of tongues made them leave off building not any great wind or tempest that tumbled downe their worke as Sybilla and Abidenus in Eusebius neither were the tongues confounded by little and little as Aben Ezra but all at once Mercer 2. The building of the City was intermitted for an hundred yeares untill Semiramis but the Tower of Babel was not heightened but only enclosed in the Temple of Belus which continued till Herodotus time an 1400. yeares Perer. QVEST. XI Of the name of Babel Vers. 9.
even in that place in the wildernesse she had seene an Angell Mercer 7. But the right and proper meaning is that she seeth that is liveth after shee had seene God for they thought no man could see God and live and therefore Iacob also said I have seene God face to face and my life is preserved Gen. 32.30 QVEST. XI Who is understood by the living and seeing Vers. 14. THe well of him that loâ—eth and seeth 1. Some referre both unto God 2. some to the Angell who as Gods Minister though not as God liveth and seeth 3. Some living understand of Ismael that lived 4. But Hagar saying the well of the living and seeing by living understandeth her selfe that lived after this glorious sight by seeing God which seeth our afflictions QVEST. XII Of Cades and Sur. BEtweene Cadesh and Bered 1. These were two places in the wildernesse of Sur which extended to the red sea 2. Cadesh is that place where the water gushed out of the Rocke and the people murmured against God Numb 20. 3. It is called a well and before a fountaine because it was a deepe fountaine for as Augustine saith omnis putens fons non omnis fons puteus Every well may be called a fountaine not euery fountaine a well QVEST. XIII Why Abraham not Hagar gave the name to Ismael Vers. 15. ABraham called his name Ismael c. 1. Before it is said thou shalt call and here Abraham giveth the name as he had learned of Hagar and so in effect she gave it Perer. 2. For the Lord would not by his oracle diminish the right of the father to whom it belonged to give the name Muscul. as Eva is said to have given Seth his name Genes 4.25 yet Adam first called him so Gen. 5.3 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. Evill must not be done that good may come thereof Vers. 2. I Pray thee goe in unto my maid it may be I shall be builded by her c. Sâ—ra though shee had a good intent that Gods promise concerning Abrahams seed might be accomplished yet shee doth not well to use unlawfull meanes that Abraham may have this seed by a concubine for according to Saint Pauls rule we must not doe evill that good may come thereof Rom. 3.8 And this device of Sara prospered not she being so farre from being builded and increased hereby that the posterity of the seed of Ismael the Ismaelites and Hagarenes became enemies afterward to her owne seed Musculus 2. Doct. They that punish justly are not persecutors Vers. 6. SArai dealt roughly with her Augustine from this example collecteth that they alwayes which inflict punishment are not persecutors and that discipline may be administred justly against the obstinate as Sarai dealt with Hagar Hagar passa est persecutionem à Sara hac tamen sancta erat qua faciebat illa iniqua quae patiebatur Hagar suffered persecution of Sara and yet she was holy that did it the other evill that suffered it Epist. 50. 3. Doct. Religion no enemie to politicke order Vers. 9. HVmble thy selfe under her hands Hagar was a bond-servant whose condition then was very hard yet the Lord commandeth her to returne to her mistresse we see then that religion dissolveth not politicke order neither is the doctrine of faith a doctrine of licentious liberty Hagar though now come to herselfe and called of God yet is not to renounce her condition and state of life according to Saint Pauls rule Let every man abide in the same calling wherein he is called c. 1 Cor. 7.10 Luther 4. Doct. The office of Angels THe Angell of the Lord said to her c. This is the first place that maketh mention of the apparition of Angels This Angel is sent to call home againe Hagâ—r to her station and calling so the Angels chiefe office is to protect the servants of God and to bring home againe those that erre so as the Apostle saith They are all ministring spirits sent forth to minister for their sakes that shall be heires of salvation Heb. 1.14 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Polygamie of the fathers never lawfull or dispensed with Vers. 3. THen Sarai Abrahams wife tooke Agar 1. Some thinke that Abrahams marriage or copulation rather with Hagar was lawfull and that Sarai was moved of God to perswade this marriage to Abraham Ioseph lib. 1. antiquit But this no where appeareth for though God approved Sarai her advice for the casting out of the bond-woman with her sonne Gen. 21.8 yet it followeth not that God liked of her counsell in Abrahams taking her to be his wife 2. Some thinke that adultery was not yet forbidden by any law Ambrose because Abraham was both before the Law and the Gospell he thinketh him to have beene blamelesse Durandus also and Tostatus are of opinion that polygamie was lawfull before it was forbidden by the positive law of the Gospell But the saying of our Saviour a principio non fuit sic from the beginning it was not so sufficiently confuteth these assertions seeing God in Paradise made unto Adam but one Eva one wife for one husband 3. Some simply allowed not the polygamie of the fathers but hold that it was permitted by some speciall dispensation for those times and so though they will not simply justifie it yet they qualifie and excuse it by these reasons 1. Theodoret saith neque natura neque lex ulla tunc scripta c. Neither nature nor any written law did forbid then the having of many wives Cont. Though no law were yet written that made any such prohibition yet they had the law of the creation they two shall be one flesh Matth. 19.5 which was continued by faithfull tradition and the lively examples of the Patriarks 2. This marriage proceeded not of any intemperate lust but was done studio quarendae posteritatis of a desire to increase posterity Ambr. Cont. The Apostle for this hath given us a rule not to doe evill that good may come thereon Rom. 3.8 Abrahams good intention doth not excuse an unlawfull action 3. Abraham did it not of himselfe Augustine saith Voluntatem illius non voluptatem suam implevisse accepisse non petisse that he fulfilled not his owne lust but his wives desire he asked her not but received her And he to this purpose urgeth the Apostle words that the man hath not power over his owne body but the woman 1 Cor. 7. Contra. If this were a good defence then Adams excuse also might have served because the woman gave him thâ— apple and he did eat The Apostle giveth the woman power over her husbands body and the man likewise over the womans to performe mutually the matrimoniall duties but the woman can no more give liberty to the husband to joyne unto strange flesh than the husband can unto the woman As the Apostle in the same place restraineth that liberty Let every man have his wife let every woman have her husband 1.
Euphrates his countrey in respect of Canaan which was on this side the river and so Aram Naharaim or Mesopotamia is taken largely as it comprehendeth Chaldea also which indeed was Abrahams native countrey and so S. Stephen understandeth it Act. 7.2 QUEST IX How Isaack is said not to goe againe into Chaldea where he was never before Vers. 6. BEware that thou bring not my sonne thither againe 1. Not that Isaack was wholly at the disposing of the servant but that he should not promise or undertake to bring Isaack thither againe 2. Though Isaack was never there before in his owne person yet hee is said to returne thither in respect of his father Abraham in whose loines he was who was called from thence as Gen. 15.16 in the fourth generation it is said the Israelites shall returne thither againe though their fathers onely and not themselves had beene there before Mercer And in the same sense we may say to such as are borne under the Gospell Take heed that ye never returne to poperie againe Muscul. 3. Two reasons especially moved Abraham not to suffer Isaack to returne into his countrey because God called him from his fathers house never to returne thither and so God promised to him and his seed the land of Canaan which promise might have beene hindred by Isaacks departure Perer. Mercer 4. Iacob went thither to fetch a wife and to returne againe but if Isaacks wife refusing to come he had gone himselfe there was feare of his abiding there still Mercer QUEST X. Angels ministers and helpers of mariage Vers. 7. HE shall send his Angel c. 1. This Abraham uttereth not by way of wishing as Aben Ezra but he doth confidently assure himselfe of the assistance of Gods Angel Mercer 2. Wee see the gentle nature of the Angels that are willing to yeeld their ministerie and service to us miserable men Luther 3. The dignity of marriage is set forth which is guided and directed by Angels Mercer QUEST XI How Abrahams servant is said to have all his masters goods in his hand Vers. 10. HE tooke ten camels and he had all his masters goods in his hand c. 1. Wee do not with Rupertus allegorize these words by the ten Camels understanding the ten commandements and by all manner of goods the spirituall gifts which the Apostles carried to the Gentiles 2. But this is a reason why he tooke ten camels because all his masters goods were in his hand as Iun. and the Genev. read as it is said before that he had rule over all that Abraham had v. 2. see the like phrase c. 16.6 3. Others doe read that he carried of all his masters goods with him either some of every sort Perer. or all is understood for many Mercer but the other reading is better 4. That conceit of Rasi is but a toy that he is said to carry of all his goods because he had a deed of gift as it were of all his masters goods to Isaack for it is not like that Abraham had yet disposed of all his goods seeing his children by Ketura were yet unborne to whom hee gave their portions Mercer QUEST XII Of the abundance and necessary use of Camels TEn camels 1. In Hebrew it is written with G not C a Camel howsoever use hath otherwise obtained in other tongues Calvin 2. In those countreys there was great abundance of camels as wee read that the Hebrewes overcomming the Agarens in battell tooke from them fifty thousand camels 1 Chron. 5.20 there was also great use of them for their swiftnesse they would goe an hundred mile a day for their strength they would beare seven hundred or a thousand weight for their hardnesse they would forbeare drinke sometime eight yea fifteene daies ex Iul. Scalig. advers Cardan exercitat 209. num 2. 3. It appeareth then that this was a most solemne message or embassage rather 1. by the companie that went for other servants accompanied him vers 32. to guide those camels by the rich gifts that were carried by the length of the journey which they undertooke by the worthinesse of the messenger the chiefe in Abrahams house Perer. QUEST XIII Of the city of Nahor TO the citie of Nahor 1. Not where Nahor was borne but where Nahor though now dead had a long time dwelled as it is like not long after that Abraham with his father Thare came thither 2. The Hebrewes here faigne a miracle without cause that Abrahams servant came from home to Charras in a daies journey whereas they themselves write that from Hebron thither it was seventeene daies journey Ptolomie counteth from Beerseba from whence Hebron was not farre distant to Charras eight degrees which make 120. Germane miles Mercer QUEST XIV Whether Abrahams servant did well in asking a signe Vers. 14. GRant that the maid to whom I say c. This asking of a signe was no tempting of God and it is farre differing from the superstitious conjectures and vaine observations of the Augures and wise men among the heathen 1. One difference is as Augustine noteth it Aliud est mirum aliquid petere quod ipso miraculo signum sit aliud hac observare quae ita fiant ut mira non fint c. It is one thing to aske some strange thing which by the strangenesse thereof may be a signe another thing to observe those things which are not miraculous or strange super Genes qu. 53. such was the flying of birds the searching of beasts inwards which were superstitiously observed by the heathen being things ordinarie and usuall and of no speciall note But that which this servant asketh to be a signe was a rare and strange thing and not usually to be expected 2. Again Lyranus giveth another note he did not aske a signe by way of divination sed praemissa oratione petivit signum à domino but making his praier before he craveth a signe 3. Further it is to be considered that he fetcheth not his signe a farre off sed ex re prasenti from the present businesse Calvin and he seeketh no other conjecture but from her hospitalitie and courtesie that shee might be in manners answerable to his master Chrysost. He therefore desireth no vaine light or impertinent signe to be given him but a grave profitable and fit demonstration from the manners and behaviour of the woman 4. He asketh not a signe as doubting of Gods power or of the veritie of his promises but he asketh in faith relying upon Gods providence not prescribing unto God but praying that what God had determined concerning Isaacks wife might be made knowne unto him for thus he saith Let that be shee whom thou hast ordained for thy servant Isaack and hereunto he was much incouraged by that saying of Abraham vers 7. he shall send his angell before thee Muscul. Perer. 5. He was also hereunto directed whether by dreame as Aben Ezra thinketh is uncertaine but certainly by the instinct of Gods spirit
afterward 2. Neither because Abraham had married another wife as some suppose did Isaack dwell apart from him in Beersheba his father remaining in Hebron as Calvin for it is not like that Abraham would want the presence and comfort of his dutifull sonne 3. Nor yet for a time did Isaack dwell apart employed as is most like in some speciall affaires in that countrey Merc. 3. But it is most like that Abraham at this time dwelt in Beersheba both because Abrahams servant returned thither as also there was Sarahs tent into the which Isaack brought Rebecca v. 67. QVEST. XXVIII Why Isaack used in the evening to walke in the field Vers. 62. TO pray in the field 1. Some read to talke or conferre in the field Aquila 2. some to talke with his workmen Cajetan 3. some to exercise himselfe in the field Septuag 4. Some to give himselfe to meditation Ambr. Iun. 5. some to meditate and contemplate the heavens and starres other naturall things Lyran. 6. some to talke with himselfe as they doe which are given to meditation 7. some to take the aire Vatabl. 8. But it is most like hee went into the field to pray unto God and to pray with deepe meditation for so the word suach signifieth both to meditate and pray and it may be that he intended his prayer specially concerning this businesse of his mariage QVEST. XXIX How and wherefore Rebecca lighted downe from the camell Vers. 6.4 SHe lighted downe from the camel c. 1. She neither bowed her selfe a little upon the camell as Ramban 2. neither did she hurt her selfe in lighting downe forcing by the fall the markes of her Virginity whereby Isaack suspected that the servant in the way had deflowred her as the Hebrewes fable 3. But she did for reverence unto Isaack light downe from the beast Mercer 4. so that we need not with Gregory to make an allegory hereof who by Isaack walking in the evening understandeth Christ comming in the end of the world and by Rebecca lighting from the camel the Church of the Gentiles forsaking her vitious life and manners Gregor in 42. Iob. QVEST. XXX Why they used to cover the face Vers. 65. SHe tooke a vaile and covered her 1. The covering of the head sometime is a signe of mourning as David covered his head when he mourned for Absolom 2 Sam. 19.4 2. sometime it is a signe of great reverence as Elias covered his face in the mount Horeb when hee talked with God 1 King 19. 3. It is also a signe of displeasure as they covered Hamans face when the King was incensed against him Esther 7.4 but it is here a signe of modesty and shamefastnesse as Tertullian writeth of the Arabian women quae non caput sed faciem ita totam tegunt ut uno oculo liberato contentae sive dimidia frui luâ—e potius quam totam faciem prostituere which doe not only cover their head but their whole face that having but one eye to see with they had rather enjoy but halfe the light than prostitute their whole face Caius Sulpitius Gallus is said to have divorced his wife because she was seene abroad with her face uncovered Valer. Maxim l. 6. c. 3. ex citation Perer. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. It is lawfull to take an oath where there is just cause Vers. 3. I Will make thee sweare c. Abraham both sweareth himselfe where none required an oath Gen. 14.12 he also sware to Abimelech who demanded an oath of him Gen. 21.31 and here he requireth an oath of his servant It is therefore lawfull to take an oath where there is just cause Muscul. Therefore that saying of Origen is some what hard perfectis viris jurare ipsis c. for perfect men either to sweare themselves or to adjure others it is uncomely homi ultim in Matth. 2. Doct. Children ought not to marry without their parents consent Vers. 4. TAke a wife to my sonne Isaack Abraham provideth a wife for Isaack It is not then lawfull for children to enterprise mariage without the consent of their parents so Rebeckas parents doe dispose of her for marriage v. 51. Rebeckah is before thee take her and goe and she afterwards giveth consent to their choice v. 58. wherefore great wrong is offered to the right of parents by the popish Canons that allow contracts made without the parents consent Calvin 3. Doct. Angels Presidents and Ministers of marriage Vers. 7. HE shall send his Angell before thee c. The holy Angel is appointed to be a guide in this businesse of mariage which therefore is hence concluded to be an holy thing seeing such holy spirits are presidents of this action As the Apostle also saith Mariage is honourable among all men Heb. 13.3 If Angels vouchsafe their presence and assistance in mariage how can it be a polluting or prophanation of orders as some popish writers affirme Greg. Martin dis c. 15. sect 11. 4. Doct. Iewels and ornaments how farre lawfull for women Vers. 22. HE tooke an abillement of gold concerning the use of these ornaments and jewels as simply they are not unlawfull the manner and person of wearing them considered so these captions must bee admitted 1. that although these tokens were sent unto the spouse and it was the use of the bride to decke and attire her selfe Ierem. 2.32 yet did they not usually thus apparrell themselves as with gold and such like as S. Peter sheweth 1 Pet. 3 3.5 2 The simplicity of that age is to beâ— considered that did not set their delight upon such things as we read note of 〈◊〉 that she bare a pitcher of water upon her shoulders our gentlewomen in these dayes thâ—â— urge 〈…〉 for bracelets and jewels would be loth to doe in other things as Rebecca did 3. Their speciall care was to decke and adorne the hid man of the heart with a meeke and quiet spirit 1. Pet. 3. 4. Let our nice and curious women first imitate them therein then let them plead their example for the rest Places of confutation 1. Confut. Peter not the chiefe among the Apostles Vers. 2. ABraham said to the eldest servant of his house which had the rule To this servant Pererius resembleth Peter 1. because of his age 2. and he was likewise by Christ set over his whole house that is the Church as this servant was over Abrahams house 3. as this servant was sent to chuse a wife for Isaack so S. Peter was the first that converted the Gentiles to Christ and invited them to this spirituall marriage for Peter first of all the Apostles was instructed by vision that the Gentiles were to be called and the first conversion of the Gentiles namely of Cornelius and his family was wrought by Peter Perer. in 24. Gen. num 5. Contra. 1. That Peter was one of the eldest in yeares among the Apostles wee deny not but that hee was the eldest of all as it seemeth this servant was cannot
spirit and died c. 1. Though the word gavâ— rather so signifieth expirare to give up the ghost than deficere to faint Hieromes reason is not so good quia non coâ—venit Abraha deficere it was not fitting that Abraham should faint and decrease for no morall decreasing or fainting is here spoken of but onely naturall 2. Neither is this word which signifieth to yeeld up the Spirit used onely of the just as Rabbi Salomon and Lyranâ—â— for the same is uttered of the old world Gen. 7.21 all the flesh yeelded the breath and of Ismael vers 17. of this chapter 3. Neither is Oleasters reason sufficient why we should read rather he fainted than yeelded up the spirit because it followeth he died and so the same thing would be twice expressed for this expiring or yeelding up of the spirit sheweth the facility and easinesse of his death as the word following betokeneth the thing that he dyed so this declareth the manner not that he dyed without any sicknesse or griefe as Aben Ezra for the faithfull are not exempted from the common condition of mankind Vatah. but it sheweth that he willingly rendred up his soule into the hands of God Calvin 4. Cajetanes collection is not here to be refused that three things are set downe by Moses concerning Abrahams departure 1. that he dyed that is was dissolved which belongeth unto the whole man as consisting of body and soule 2. that hee was buried which concerneth his body 3. that he was gathered unto his people in respect of his soule which was joyned to the blessed company of the Saints Cajet in hunc lâ—â—um QUEST XIII How Abraham died in a good age and full of yeares IN a good age satisfied or full of daies 1. In that Abraham is said to have died in a good old age whereas many before him were of longer life and much elder of whom this phrase is not used Philo gathereth that it was not the old age of his body but his perfection of vertue that made a good old age Disce soli viro bonâ— contingere senectutem bonam Know that onely a good old age happened to a good man sic etiam Calvin 2. Hee was full because daies is not added in the originall the Hebrewes gather that he was full not onely of daies but of all other blessings ex Mercer and he was satisfied with daies as not desirous to have his life prolonged Calvin Thus even some among the Heathen were satâ—â—e with daies as Cicero writeth of Cato that he should say Siquis deus mihi largiatur â—t ex hac atate repusrascam in cunis vagiam valde recâ—sem that if God should grant me to become a childe againe and to cry in the cradle I would refuse it Cicer. de senectus Therefore Abraham was in another sort full of daies because his daies were full of vertue hee had not spent his life in vaine but as Apelles the cunning painter was wont to say nullus dies sine linea no day without a line and Titus the Emperour if any day had passed wherein he had not done some good would say to his friends Diemperdidi I have lost a day so no doubt Abraham did passe over his time in fruitfull workes Perer. QUEST XIV How the sinner is said to die before his time ABraham then received a great blessing of God in living both long and well and dying in his time not as the Preacher saith of the wicked man lest thou die in tempore non tuo in a time not thine Ecclesiast 7.19 which is so spoken 1. Not that a man can die before the time appointed of God for a mans daies are determined with God Iob 14.5 2. Nor yet so onely because the wicked is never prepared or fit for death both because he is destitute of vertue as also hee expecteth not death in which respects in some sense he may be said to die not in his time being neither ripe for it in vertue nor looking for it 4. But the sinner is said to die before his time when the naturall course of his life which he in the judgement of man though not in the determination of God might have lived is by some violent and extraordinary kinde of death shortned and cut off as Nadab and Abihu for offering in strange fire were thus before their time consumed with a fire sent from God Levit. 10. ex Perer. QUEST XV. What it is to be gathered to his people Vers. 8. ANd was gathered to his people 1. This people are not the sunne moone and starres or the invisible idaea or formes according to the which these sensible things were made or the foure elements of the which the bodies of men are compounded as Philo imagineth these are but Platonicall conceits and who seeth not how unproperly the name of people agreeth to any of these 2. Neither with Augustine by people doe we understand the society and company of Angels for Ismael also is said vers 17. to be gathered to his people 3. Neither can it bee applied to Limbus patrum where all the just men were from the beginning of the world as Lyranus Rupertus unlesse they will say that Ismael also went into the place of just men who was also gathered to his people and whereas they make Limbuâ— patrum a member of hell a place of darknesse Abraham went not thither seeing Abrahams besome was a place of rest and joy where the Angels were for they carried Lazarus soule thither But these blessed spirits are Angels of light and not of darknesse 4. We also refuse Burgensis conceit who noteth a difference of phrase in the old and new testament when the Scripture speaketh of the dead they are said that die in the new testament to die in the Lord which phrase is not used of any in the old testament because they were not admitted ad beatificam Dei visioneâ—â— to the blessed presence and sight of God Contr. Indeed I grant that after the manifestation of the Messiah to the world the Scripture speaketh more clearely of the faithfull departed in the new testament because the Messiah was then come but not for any such cause pretended for even the soules of the faithfull departed in the old testament did enjoy the presence of God as David saith I shall behold thy face in righteousnesse and when I awake be satisfied with thine image Psal. 17.15 he doubted not but that his soule first apart should see God and then both body and soule in the resurrection and the Scripture speaketh evidently that Abraham Isaack and Iacob did live with God for of them God is called who is not the God of the dead but of the living Matth. 22.32 5. Neither this phrase to be gathered to his people doth only signifie to be in the state of the dead and equivalent to that phrase to sleepe with their fathers which is spoken of the wicked as well as of the righteous as idolatrous
to any of the altars which the Patriarkes had made to aske counsell of God seeing God was every where present to the prayers of the faithfull 7. Neither are we to imagine that she used any such superstitious way as to lay aguâ—â— castus lawrell or any such thing under her head to have a dreame or a vision as she had seene her friends to doe in her owne countrey sic author histor scolastic in Gen. c. 66. for she was farre from such superstitious toies ex Perer. 8. Nor yet did she consult with God by Abraham then living as Aben Ezra Iun. for this oracle was given her by Gods owne mouth rather than mans Calvin 9. But she went to some secret place to pray and received some revelation from God Muscul Calvin Mercer Perer. QUEST XXXII How many waies they used to consult with God in Israel FOure waies they used to aske counsell of God in Israel 1. Beside the casting of lots which was but seldome used as by Iosua in Achans cause Iosua 7. and by Samuel at the election of Saul 1 Sam. 10. and by Saul to finde out the transgression of his vow by Ionathan 1 Sam. 14. there were three waies beside to aske counsell of God which are mentioned together 1. Sam. 28.6 by dreames urim and prophets 2. The second way was by dreames and visions as the Lord spake to the elder Patriarkes but this way God seldome revealed his will by after he sent them prophets and for these visions they used to prepare themselves by fasting and prayer Dan. 10.3 3. They used in hard and difficult matters to seeke unto the prophets as Saul went to Samuel 1. King 9. Ieroboam sent his wife to Ahiah the Prophet 1 King 14. These Prophets had such matters revealed unto them three waies 1. The Lord instructed them aforehand as he did Samuel before Saul came at him 2. Sometime at the same instant when they were consulted with as the Angel of God spake to Eliah 2. King 1.15 3. Sometime the Prophet presently gave no answer but waited upon God by prayer as Dan. 9. or stirred himselfe up extraordinarily that the spirit might come upon them as Elisha did 2. King 3.15 4. They also consulted with God by the priest who asked counsell of God for them by his Vrim as Abiathar applyed the Ephod for David 1. Sam. 23.9 30.7 Now the Priest received answer by the Ephod not as the Hebrewes fable by finding written in the foulds and pleats of the Vrim the sentence or answer of God nor as Iosephus supposeth by the extraordinary shining of the stones in the Vrim which miraculous kind of answering he confesseth to have ceased two hundred yeares before his time 3. antiquit Iudaic. for how could the shining of the stones be a signe in such variety of matters which were demanded of the priests and more than two hundred yeares before Iosephs time who lived vnder Domitian were such gifts of prophecying ceased as under Iudas Maccabeus 1 Maccab. 4.46 yea long before that the Church complained We see not our signes there is not one prophet more Psal. 74.9 And further the Scripture would not have beene silent in setting downe such a miraculous gift Therefore God did otherwise reveale unto the priest and inspire him with the knowledge of his will by the illumination of his minde for so Vrim signifieth illumination Perer. QUEST XXXIII How the elder is said to serve the younger Vers. 23. TWo manner of people shall be divided out of thy bowels c. the greater shall serve the lesse 1. The Hebrewes apply this text against the Empire of the Romans whose Emperors they say came of the Idumeans as Iulius Caesar the rest that succeeded him who though they held the Iewes in subjection in the end should be destroyed sic David Kimhi Rabbi Salomon ex citat Perer. 2. But the right literall meaning is of the Idumeans and Israelites the posterity of Esau and Iacob for so we read that the Idumeans were subdued unto Israel by King David 2. Sam. 8.14 and so continued to the reigne of Iotham Mercer 3. Neither were the Israelites onely superiour in temporall dominion but also in spiritual blessings for they were the visible Church of God Edom was cut off Calvin 4. Spiritually these two people doe signifie the carnall Iewes subdued unto the Christians being yet themselves the elder people August lib. 16. de civitat c. 25. Againe by the striving of Esau and Iacob in their mothers wombe is signified the continuall fight in the wombe of the Church betweene the true and carnall professors which are said to be the greater because they are more in number but as the greater here did serve the lesse so the wicked while they persecute the righteous quibus nocere volunt prâ—sunt plurimum stirâ—â—â—tem ipsi maxime nocent they profit those whom they goe about to hurt hurting themselves most Augustin serm de tempor 78. Beside Origen draweth from hence this mysticall sense understanding these two people to be within vs and this strife and combat to be betweene the flesh and the spirit vertue and vice hom 12. in Genes QUEST XXXIV How Iacob was sanctified in his mothers wombe FUrther whereas Iacob strove with Esau in his mothers wombe which was an extraordinary motion and worke of Gods spirit here ariseth a question whether Iacob were sanctified in his mothers wombe which doubt not resolved but onely expounded by Pererius may thus briefly receive satisfaction 1. that first if santification be taken for an actuall and inherent holinesse so neither Iacob nor any other were sanctified but onely Christ in which sense the Angel saith to Marie That holy thing which shall be borne of thee shall be called the sonne of God Luke 1.35 2. There is also a certaine holinesse ascribed to all the children of the faithfull because they are within the covenant 1. Cor. 7. vers 4. whereby they are distinguishâ—d from the seed of unbeleevers Iacob was sanctified otherwise than thus 3. There is a particular sanctification that is a setting apart or preparing of a thing to some speciall use as Paul was separated from his mothers wombe in the purpose of God to preach the Gospell Galath 1.15 Thus also was Iacob sanctified and separated to be the father of the people of God 4. A thing also is said to be sanctified when any extraordinary worke or motion is wrought upon it by the spirit of God as Iohn Baptist was sanctified in his mothers wombe when as at the voice of Maries Salutation the Babe sprung in his mothers belly Luk. 1.44 and thus Iacob also was sanctified and stirred by the spirit to wrestle with his brother not that he had any sense or understanding in fighting against the carnall generation but he was used as an instrument by the spirit to prefigure that state and condition of the people of God which should be resisted and wrestled against by the world QUEST XXXV Esau
the birth of Esau and Iacob which was 15. yeare before Abrahams death and 63. yeares before Ismael died for Abraham lived 175. Ismael 137. yeares and where Isaack was younger than Abraham by 100. and than Ismael by 14. they are found so long to have lived after the birth of these twins from hence then it is evident that the order of time is not alwayes observed in the sacred histories but that sometime is set downe first which was done last 3. Doct. Against the casting of mens nativities Vers. 23. THe elder shall serve the younger This example is urged by Augustine against the Genethliakes that is casters of mens nativities for hereby the vanity of their observations appeareth in that these two twins conceived at once and borne together were of such divers natures and qualities August de civit Dei lib. 4. c. 5. And whereas they answer that in the birth of twins there may bee great diversity by reason of the swift motion of the planets which change their aspects and conjunctions every moment as one Nigidius Figulus would demonstrate by the example of a wheele which while it was swiftly carried about he marked twice with inke which markes when the wheele had left running were found not to be farre asunder whereby he would insinuate that in a small distance of time a great part of the celestiall globe may be turned about But to this fansie Augustine answereth that if the celestiall motions be so swift and continue not in one stay then hardly can any man discerne under what constellation any is borne and Gregory thus wittily derideth their follies that if Esau and Iacob were not therefore borne under one constellation because one came forth after another by the same reason neither can any be borne under one constellation because hee is not borne all at once but one part after another Hâ—m 10. sup Evangel 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Against Limbus patrum Vers. 8. WAs gathered to his people c. This the Popish writers do understand of the fathers in Limbus patrum whither Abraham also went sic Lyran in Gen. 49. Rupert lib. 6. in Gen. cap. ult Contra. 1. The place to the which Abraham went is called Abrahams bosome Luke 16 which Augustine by no meanes thinketh to have beene a member or part of hell as they make Limbus 2. The Apostle sheweth to what people the faithfull are gathered Ye are come c. to the company of innumerable Angels c. to the spirits of just and perfect men Heb. 12.22 23. Where then the spirits of just men were there also were the Angels for so we read that Lazarus soule was carried by the Angels into Abrahams bosome But the Angels are not in Limbus patrum upon this reason Lyranus refuseth the interpretation of Augustine and Tostatus who by this people to the which Abraham was gathered understand the society of Angels which is in no place but heaven Lyranus also holding that all the just men from the beginning of the world went to Limbus is confuted by Paulus Burgens who saith that Abraham was the first that went to Limbus because of him first this phrase is used in Scripture That he was gathered to his people Thus we see that these Patrons of Limbus cannot agree among themselves for what certainty of opinion can there be which is not grounded upon Scripture 2. Confut. Election is not of good works foreseene Vers. 23. THe elder shall serve the younger S. Paul inferreth upon this text that wee are not elected by workes but according to the purpose of him that calleth Rom. 9.11 here then the errour of the Pelagians is confuted who taught that men were elected for their good workes fore-seene of God before But this errour is repugnant to Scripture Eph. 14. He hath chosen us in him that we should be holy he saith not because we were holy so that good workes are not a precedent cause of our election but a consequent effect thereof 3. Confut. The soules merited not before they came into the body HEre also that errour ascribed to Origen is overthrowne who thought that the soules have a being before the bodies and that they are disposed of in this life according to the merit of the former life which they lived in before they entred into the body for the Apostle expounding this place saith before they had done either good or evill and immediately before yer the children were yet borne Rom. 9.11 therefore before they were borne they had neither done good nor evill 4. Confut. S. Paul alleageth the examples of Esau and Iacob not for temporall election or figuratively onely of eternall but originally and properly IT is therefore evident 1. That neither Moses writing this prophecie The elder shall serve the younger did not only speake of the externall inheritance and preeminence of Iacob before Esau neither did Paul so understand Moses for then the example had not beene pertinent to S. Pauls purpose who goeth about to prove these two things that all are not the children of promise which are the children of Abraham after the flesh which he shewed by the instance of Ismael and Isaack vers 7. The other point is that Gods election is of grace not by workes as appeareth in the example of Esau and Iacob wherefore the one was hated of God the other loved before they had done good or evill If the Apostle then had brought in an example of temporall election it had been impertinent seeing thorowout the Chapter he treateth of eternall 2. Neither yet was this outward preheminence of Iacob and refusall of Esau a signe onely and figure of their eternall election and reprobation as Lyranus in 1. Malach. And therefore not directly implied in the words but so applied by the Apostle for as the Preacher saith No man knoweth either love or hatred of all that is before them Eccles. 9.4 that is Gods love or hatred is not discerned by the condition of outward things 3. Neither is it the literall and historicall sense only to shew that Esau was temporally rejected but. S. Paul by his divine spirit doth draw it to a mysticall sense as Pererius thinketh in 25. Gen. numer 45. for S. Paul understandeth Moses no otherwise than Malachy did Esau have I hated Iacob have I loved chap. 1.1 who out of Moses words inferreth a conclusion of Gods everlasting love toward Iacob 4. Wherefore the truth is that the very literall and proper sense of these words The elder shall serve the younger written first by Moses and cited by S. Paul doth principally describe the everlasting state and condition before God and are especially to be referred to the celestiall inheritance but secondarily the promise of the externall inheritance of Canaan is here also comprehended This may be made evident by these two reasons 1. That is the proper sense of the place which is principally and chiefly intended by the Spirit but so is this spirituall sense as
toward Iacob who himselfe thanketh God that whereas he went but with his staffe he returned with bands Gen. 32.10 2. Another reason is this Iacob went secretly and not accompanied Vt melius frâ—tris conatus declinaret that he might the better avoid the practices of his brother Thom. Anglic. 3. Beside it may be an example of labour patience and frugality to the servants of God ex Perer. QUEST VIII The divers expositions of Iacobs ladder Ver. 12. THen he dreamed and behold there stood a ladder upon the earth c. 1. Some by this ladder understand the genealogie of Christ Saint Luke setting forth the same by descending from Adam downward Saint Matthew by ascending from Ioseph upward 2. Augustine by God standing upon the ladder understandeth Christ hanging upon the Crosse by the Angels ascending the Preachers handling mysticall doctrines by the Angels descending Preachers applying themselves to morall doctrine Serm. 79. de tempore 3. Some by this ladder interpret the Church which is the gate of heaven without the which there is no salvation 4. Some by this ladder insinuate a Christian profession in the which are divers degrees and vertues to rise by by the Angels ascending such are understood as are given to contemplation by the Angels descending such as follow an active and practicall life 5. Philo sometime by this ladder describeth the soule of man the head he maketh the understanding the feet the affections the ascending descending is the discourse of the reason sometime he expoundeth it to be the uncertaine state of the world wherein as in a ladder some ascend and are advanced some descend and are dishonoured ex Perer. 6. But the proper and literall meaning of the ladder is to set forth Gods providence both in generall whereby he governeth all things in heaven and in earth Psal. 113.6 The degrees of the ladder are the divers meanes which God useth the Angels ascending and descending are the ministring spirits which God sendeth forth for the execution of his will even the Heathen Poet Homer by the like similitude of a golden chaine which Iupiter sent downe from heaven to earth describeth the divine providence And in particular the speciall care which the Lord had of Iacob to protect him in his journey is by this ladder exemplified The ladder is the way that Iacob was to goe the Angels ascending and descending doe conduct him backward and forward God standeth upon the top of the ladder ruling all by his providence Iun. For whereas foure things troubled Iacob his departure from his parents his leaving of his Countrey his solitary journey his poverty the Lord doth give him spirituall comforts against them all I will be thy keeper I will give thee this land he saw Angels ascending and descending to be his companions and thou shalt spread abroad to the East and West c. Perer. 7. This ladder also in a mysticall signification betokeneth Christ as he himselfe expoundeth Ioh. 1.51 and specially in these points 1. The two natures of Christ are expressed who above is God of his father beneath is man out of Iacobs loynes 2. Christs office is described who is the onely way and the ladder whereby wee ascend to heaven Calvin 3. The Angels ascending and descending are the blessed spirits which first ministred to the person of Christ Ioh. 1.51 And secondly doe minister for the good of his body namely the elect Heb. 1.14 QUEST IX How in Iacob all the world should be blessed Vers. 14. THou shalt spread abroad to the West to the East 1. This is first understood of the possession of the large Countrey of Canaan which was extended toward the foure parts of heaven and secondarily it is referred to the spirituall posterity of Iacob that should bee dispersed thorowout the world Mercer 2. Whereas it is said In thee and in thy seed he sheweth how in Iacob all Nations should be blessed because of him should come the promised seed Calvin QUEST X. What things were promised to Iacob Vers. 15. I Will never forsake thee c. 1. Because these promises made to Iacob in Christ were not onely temporall but spirituall not onely concerning this life but the next 1 Tim. 4.8 Iun. 2. Wheresoever thou goest which is not to bee taken largely but with this restraint so long as hee walked in the wayes of God the Lord promiseth to be his guide Muscul. 3. Till I have fulfilled all I have promised thee not onely these things which the Lord now spake as Mercer but which Isaack promised and pronounced unto Iacob vers 3 4. Iun. yea and all those promises made to Abraham and his seed were made likewise to Iacob Rasi QUEST XI How the Lord is said to be in one place more than another Vers. 16. THe Lord is in this place and I was not aware c. 1. God in respect of his power and locall presence is every where alike but in respect of some speciall declaration of his presence he is more in one place than another as in some apparition and vision as the Lord bid Moses put off his shooes because the ground was holy where the Lord then appeared Exod. 3. so in the Tabernacle where the Lord gave answers in the Poole of Bethesda where the Angell stirred the waters the Lord was present after a speciall manner as he is also in the assemblies and congregations of his servants and as here in this heavenly apparition to Iacob Perer. 2. The Hebrewes imagine that Iacob for the space of foureteene yeares while he was in Ebers house never almost lay downe but watched giving himselfe to meditation and therefore reproveth himselfe now for sleeping but that this is a fable I have shewed before in Gen. 25. quest 20. 3. And I was not aware So the Lord to the faithfull performeth more than they could conceive and expect Calv. And the servants of God perceive not at the first that which in processe of time is revealed unto them as it is said of Samuel that at the first he knew not the Lord neither was the word of God revealed to him 1 Sam. 3.4 that is in such familiar manner as afterward the Lord shewed himselfe in Gregor lib. 2 in 1 Sam. 4. Bernard excellently sheweth the difference of Gods presence Est in omni loco c. sed aliter atque aliter apud homines males est puniens dissimulans apud electos operans servans apud superos pascens cubans apud inferos damnans arguens c. God is every where but after a divers manner he is among the wicked punishing yet forbearing among the elect working and saving in heaven refreshing and dwelling in hell condemning and reproving Serm. 6. de Dedication Eccles. c. QUEST XIII Why Iacob called the place fearefull Vers. 17. HOw fearefull is this place 1. Three things were here wrought upon Iacob while he slept he had a vision when he awaked he had the revelation and
Perer. for God expresseth no condition in his promise 4. Nor yet need we answer that Iacob doth not vow the generall worship of God whereunto he was bound by his profession having received circumcision but a speciall service in consecrating that place to Gods service and offering of tythes or that it is lawfull for a man to tie himselfe by a new bond to performe that to God which he is otherwise bound to doe as the Prophet David saith Psal. 119.126 I have sworne and will performe it that I will keepe thy righteous judgements both these answers are true though not pertinent to this place ex Perer. 5. Wherefore Iacob doth not bring this forth as a condition If God will be with me this particle im is not here a conditionall but a word of time as it is taken vers 15. untill if that is when I have performed c. so is it taken here when God hath beene with me and kept me in this journey Iun Mercer and the words following are not to be read then the Lord shall be my God but when the Lord hath beene my God so they are not parcell of the vow which is complete in the 22. vers but they are part of the reason of this vow Rasi Iun. QUEST XVIII To whom Iacob voweth to pay the tenth Vers. 22. I Will give the tenth 1. Some thinke that he payed the tenth to Sem or Eber but Sem died before Iacob was borne and Eber also was dead many yeares before this in the 19. yeare of Iacob who is now supposed to have beene 77. yeare old 2. Therefore this giving of tithe was nothing else but the consecrating of the tenth part of his goods to be bestowed in building of Altars and in sacrifices for the service of God and such things as are devoted to religious uses are truly said to be given unto God sic Cajetan Mercer 3. Some Hebrewes referre this to the consecrating of Levi to the Priesthood but as Aben Ezra not men but cattell and beasts used to be tithed 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. The ministery of Angels Vers. 12. THe Angell of God went up and downe By this is expressed the ministery of the Angels that are continually imployed for the good of the elect they ascend to report our necessities they descend to be ministers of Gods mercies as the Apostle saith Are they not all ministring spirits sent forth to minister for their sakes that shall be heires of salvation Heb. 1.14 2. Doct. How Gods providence is seene in permitting evill to be done in the world HEreby also is set forth Gods providence that watcheth over all things for the Lord standeth upon the top of this ladder whereby is signified the administration and government of the world Against which providence whereas it is objected that many evill things are committed in the world to the which the Lord is no way consenting Thomas Aquine answereth that although some defects are against the particular nature of things yet they are for the good of the universall and therefore as Augustine saith Deus non sineret malumesse in operib suis nisi sciret benefacere etiam de malâ— God would not suffer evill to be in his works if he did not know how to turne evill into good But it will be said God ought to draw men against their will unto good Dionysius answereth Non est providentia divinae violare naturam sed est cujusque naturae conservatrix Gods providence doth not change or violate nature but is the preserver of naâ—ure leaving to things indued with reason to follow their owne will and inclination Lib. de Divin nominib cap. 4 par 4. 3. Doct. How God forsaketh not the elect finally Vers. 15. I Will not forsake thee c. Gods promises to his servants are so stable and firme in Christ that they are sure finally not to be forsaken as the Lord said to Iosua I will never faile thee nor forsake thee Heb. 13.4 Calvin 4. Doct. Lawfull to vow Vers. 20. IF God will be with me c. By Iacobs vowing both their errour is condemned that take away the use of all vowes from Christians and their superstition that vow not as they ought Iacob 1. directeth his vowes to God the papists vow unto Saints 2. He voweth to testifie his thankfulnesse they vow to merit 3. He voweth such things as were in his power as to pay tithe they such things as are beyond their reach as single life where the gift is not 4. Iacob voweth such things as God commanded they vow things of their owne inventing as to goe in pilgrimage to fast with bread and water to garnish Idols and such like concerning the which we may say with the Prophet who required this at your hands Isay 1. â—2 Calvin 5. Doct. Signes called by the names of the things Vers. 22. THis stone shall be the house of God This stone was not Gods house but a monument or signe of the place of Gods worship for there Iacob to fulfill this vow afterward at his returne built an Altar to God Gen. 35.7 Thus by a metonymie that which is proper to the thing is given to the signe in which sense the bread in the Eucharist is called the body of Christ Marlâ—r 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. How the Angels are reporters of our prayers unto God and yet no mediators Vers. 12. LOe the Angels of God ascended and descended upon it Hence Pererius would gather that the Angels descended from heaven to reveale unto us the counsels of God and to execute his will so their office is by ascending to report unto God our prayers vowes and necessities in Gen. 25. numer 23. We grant that the Angels doe report unto God the affaires of the world and the acts and gests of men and so their supplications in generall but this they doe as messengers not as mediators The Prophet Zachary sheweth a distinct office of the Angelicall spirits and Jesus Christ there called the Angell of the Lord they returne this answer to Christ Wâ—e have gone thorow the world and behold all the world sitteth still and is at rest But the Angell of the Lord Christ the Mediator of his Church steppeth forth and prayeth O Lord of hosts how long wilt thou be unmercifull to Ierusalem Zach. 1.12 So then though the Angels be witnesses of our devotion and beholders of our teares and plaints they have no office of mediation neither have we any warrant to pray unto them 2. Confut. Against the Platonists that make three kinds of providence Vers. 12. THere stood a ladder upon the earth and the top reached to heaven Gods providence then descendeth from heaven to earth contrary to the opinion of the Platonists noted by Gregor Nyssen lib. 8. de provident cap. 3. who make three kinds of providence the first of God in taking care onely for things celestiall and spirituall and the generall causes of other things in the world the second
like that the Septuag translated the word monim 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 money which by the Scribes was made 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by the addition of one letter ex Mercer 5. Wherefore I rather thinke that here a certaine number is taken for an uncertaine that neither lesse than ten times Iacob was deceived nor yet just so many times but that he was very often beguiled at Labans hand as the Lord saith That the Israelites had tempted him ten times Num. 14.22 and Iob complaineth of his friends that they had ten times reproved him Iob 19.2 that is often Mercer QUEST II. Whence Iacob had his first particoloured goats that he saw in a dreame Vers. 12. SEe all the he goats leaping upon the she goats that are particoloured c. That are particoloured must be referred to the he goats not to the females because gnacâ—dim is of the masculine gender this difference is well observed by the Greeke and Latine translators Iun. Mercer and therefore our English translations are herein faulty that apply it to the she goats But here the question is from whence Iacob had these particoloured goats that leaped upon the females 1. Neither had Iacob these particoloured by miracle as the Hebrewes affirme that an Angell brought them from Labans flocke 2. Neither did Iacob borrow them of other shepherds for that had beene a fraud 3. Neither did he put his owne particoloured after they were increased to Labans white cattell for then he needed not to have used the device of the rods and beside it had beene a fraud 4. Nor yet are they called particoloured because they so appeared in the water while they leaped upon the ewes by reason of the pide and straked rods that were put into the gutters 5 Nor yet are they so named in respect of the issue and effect because they had particoloured lambs as if the rams that leaped the sheepe had beene of that colour as Mercer 6. But this vision is not to be referred to the beginning of this particoloured breed but at once sheweth to Iacob the great increase of them like to be that he should have particoloured both male and female of his owne in such abundance that they should ingender among themselves and grow into flocks QUEST III. Whether it were an Angell that spake unto Iacob in Bethel Vers. 13. I Am the God of Bethel c. 1. These two visions though reported together to Iacobs wives yet were not shewed at once to Iacob but at sundry times the one concerning the particoloured cattell 6. yeares before but the other for his returne in the end of the 6. yeare immediately before Iacobs departure from Laban vers 3. Mercer 2. This Angell was not any ministring Spirit which spake in the name of God as some thinke Mer. 3. But it was Christ himselfe for here hee is called the God of Bethel and in that vision beside the Angels ascending and descending the Lord himselfe stood at the top of the ladder who spake to Iacob Christ Jesus then was the great Angell of Gods presence that appeared before to Iacob in Bethel and now againe speaketh to him in vision QUEST IV. Why Rachel is set before Leah and speaketh first Vers. 14. THen answered Rachel and Leah 1. Rachel is named before Leah as before vers 4. because she was Iacobs principall wife the chiefe matron of the house Leah was thrust upon him undesired for this cause afterward in the forme of blessing which they used toward Ruth Rachel is preferred before Leah even by the Bethlemites that came of Iudah of Leah Ruth 4.11 2. Hebrewes note this as a presumptuous part in Rachel to speak before her elder sister and therefore they say she died first but the truth is the singular number is here used for the plurall and this answer though it might be made by Rachel was with the consent of both 3. In that they say All the riches which God hath taken c. is ours and our childrens they doe somewhat obscure Gods blessing as though God had given them but their due in as much as they being Labans daughters together with their children had interest in his goods Calvin Mercer QUEST V. Of the reasons that made Iacobs wives willing to depart Vers. 14. HAve we any more portion c. Iacobs wives use foure reasons of their willingnesse to depart three domesticall and one divine 1. Because they looked now for no more portion in their fathers house than that which they had gotten they had no reason to stay any longer they say not as some read Have we not yet any portion c. for they had a great part by Gods providence out of their fathers substance as they confesse vers 16. 2. He hath sold us he hath beene unkind to us setting us forth with no dowry but selling us for 14. yeares service and making againe and advantage thereof to himselfe 3. They say Should he still eat up our money that is should we remaine here still and suffer him to devoure our substance some doe otherwise read And hath eaten up our money referring it to the time past that whereas he had sold them for Iacobs service the price or money that is Iacobs labour he took to himselfe Mercer But the other reading is better which the particle gam etiam also doth imply should hee yet or still devoure c. 4. The divine reason which they use is from the Commandement of God vers 16. Whatsoever God hath said unto thee doe it QUEST VI. What the teraphim were which Rachel stole from Laban Vers. 19. RAchel stole her fathers idols the word is teraphim 1. Some by these teraphim understand the Priestly ornaments and implements that belong to sacrificing because Ose 3.4 the Prophet saith the children of Israel shall remaine a long time without Ephod and Teraphim Hieron epist. 113. ad Marcel But in this place the Prophet sheweth that the children shall bee without any forme of Church or common-wealth even such as when it was deformed with teraphim worship of idols Iun. 2. Some thinke that the teraphim were other pictures and resemblances than of men as Aquilas translateth them morphomata figures shapes but that teraphim had an humane shape appeareth 1 Sam. 19. where Michâ—l put an image in the bed in stead of David 3. Some thinke that the teraphim was made of the head of the first borne child which was embawmed and so kept from the which by the working of the devill they received answers Lyran. But if teraphim had beene such a thing it is not like Rachel would have stollen it away 4. Some thinke that they were certaine images which they consecrated for divination from whence they received answers R. Kimhi and they did represent the head of a man made of some kind of metall such a head Albertus Magnus had which Thomas Aquinas his scholler brake Tostat. and hereupon they derive the word from the root raphaph which signifieth remisse
the imposition of a new name the testimony of the Prophet Hosee He had power over the Angell and prevailed hee wept and prayed unto him 12.4 all these arguments doe evidently shew that this was a corporall and reall wrestling 3. Neither yet was it only corporall but spirituall also for Iacob did as well contend by the strength of his Faith as by the force of his body Mercerus QUEST XII It was a good not an evill Angell that Iacob wrestled with FUrther a question is moved what manner of Angell this was with whom Iacob wrestled 1. Origen thinketh he did strive against some of the spirituall adversaries such as Saint Paul calleth Principalities and powers and spirituall wickednesses Ephes. 6.12 and that he was assisted by a good Angell 3. lib. Periarch Procopius reporteth the opinion of some that say it was the devill in Esaus likenesse that strived against Iacob and that by the power of an Angell he overcame who lest he should ascribe this victory to his owne strength smote him upon the thigh the Hebrewes say it was Sammael Esaus evill Angel that contended with Iacob for the blessing 2. But these are untrue and improbable assertions 1. Here is mention made but of one that Iacob wrestled with 2. Hee that he wrestled with was the same that blessed him 3. He that strived with him was the same that touched his thigh Ergo it was a good not an evill Angell for an evill Angell would not have blessed him Mercer Perer. QUEST XIII Whether it were a ministring spirit or God Christ with whom Iacob wrestled NEither was this any of the ministring Angels but Christ the Son of God here called a man because he so appeared Pererius striveth to prove that it was an Angell and not Christ. 1. Hosea calleth him an Angell without any addition 12.4 but when Christ is called an Angell some other word is added as the Angell of the covenant Malach. 3.1 Cont. In that place the Prophet sheweth that by the Angell we must understand God for he saith He had power with God and he had power over the Angell and further he found him in Bethel the Angell with whom Iacob wrestled was the same that spake to him in Bethel but he was God Gen. 31.13 I am the God of Bethel Neither alwayes is an epithete added when Christ is called an Angell as Gen. 48.16 Iacob saith The Angell which hath delivered mee from all evill blesse the children But this Angell without any other addition is else-where called the God of Bethel 2. If at any time in the old Testament the sonne of God appeared it is most like in mount Sinai when the Law was given which was the most famous and Noble apparition of all but S. Steven saith Yee have received the Law by the ordinance of Angels Act. 7.53 Angels then appeared not Christ Perer. Cont. The Angels then were ministring Spirits giving attendance and executing their office at the delivering of the Law but it is no good argument the Law was given by the Angels Ergo not by Christ for S. Paul affirmeth both It was ordained by Angels in the hand of a Mediator Galat. 3.19 the ministery was of the Angels the authority of Christ. 3. If Christ had appeared at any time then there was greatest cause when word was sent to Mary of the incarnation of the Sonne of God both because of the worthinesse of that mystery and dignity of the person to whom that message was brought Contra. 1. It was not fit that the Sonne of God himselfe should be the Messenger of his owne comming into the world Princes use to send their Ministers and officers before to bring tidings of their comming and it was fit that this great Prince should send his Angels before that it might appeare that he was even Lord of the Angels 2. There was greater reason that the same Angell Gabriel who was the first revealer of this prophecie to Daniel concerning the Messiah 〈…〉 〈…〉 QUEST XV. How it iâ— sâ—id he could not prevaile against Iacob Vers. 25. WHen he saw he could not prevaile 1. Not that either God gave unto Iacob greater strength to resist than the Angell had to assault him as some of the Hebrewes thinke that it was Esaus Angell and so had no greater power than God permitted him for it was no such Angell as is shewed before 2. Neither as Cajetane thinketh Factum est ut Angelus assumeret corpus in 〈◊〉 mensâ—ra virium c. It came so to passe that the Angell assumed a body in such measure of strength as should not be able to overcome Iacâ—b 3. Neither as Tostatus Angelus 〈…〉 non posse superare The Angell fained that he could not overcome Iacob for I have declared before that it was Christ himselfe and not an Angell that wrestled with Iacob 4. Wherefore in that it is said when he saw here the Lord descendeth to our capacity for he knew before the event of this combat and what he had purposed to doe the experience then of the thing is taken for Gods knowledge Calvin and the Lord with the blast of his mouth had beene able to have confounded Iacob But he could not prevaile c. that is the Lord did both fight in and against Iacob he gave Iacob strength to resist and so in Iacob he overcommeth and seipso 〈◊〉 est and so is stronger than himselfe Calvin Thus in effect God could not prevaile against Iacob because hee would not he disposeth of his power according to his owne will and purpose so the Angell said to Lot I can doe nothing till thou be come thither Gen. 19.22 and the Lord to Moses thus saith Let me alone c. Exod. 32.10 Hereby the Lord sheweth how effectuall the faith and prayer of his servants are which as it were binde the Lords hands and doe give us victory in a manner against himselfe QUEST XVI In what place of the thigh Iacob was hurt Vers. 25. HE tâ—â—ched the hollow of his thigh 1. This was neither the inward or broad part of the thigh as the Septuagint read 2. Neither yet was the huckle-bone put out of joynt as some thinke for that could not be without great paine and griefe to Iacob 3. But whereas the word is caph which signifieth the bowing or hollow and so is taken for the palme of the hand and sole of the foot here it properly betokeneth the hollow bone into the which the huckle-bone called ischion runneth we may name it acetabulum the pan of the huckle-bone this hollow bone was not out of joynt but it onely hanged by reason of the sinew or nerve that goeth out of the pan or hollow to the huckle-bone which was hurt as it is expressed vers 32. QUEST XVII How long Iacob continued in his halting NOw whereas Tostatus thinketh that Iacob the next day was perfectly recovered of this hurt to whom Iunius subscribeth because cap. 33.18 it is said that Iacob came safe to Sichem I thinke
to hand Although Iacob doubted not of Gods protection according to his promise yet he wisely useth all the meanes which he could devise to seeke his brothers favour by sending a present and to provide for his safety whereby we doe learne that we must not immediately depend upon Gods providence but carefully use the meanes which the Lord sheweth for our deliverance from danger or confirmation in his promises therefore Ahaâ— is said to grieve God for that he refused to aske a signe of God for the better assurance of their deliverance Isay 7.13 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Against merits Vers. 10. I Am not worthy or lesse than all thy mercies Iacob ascribeth nothing to his merit or worthinesse but acknowledgeth all to have proceeded of Gods mercie Thus our Saviour teacheth his Disciples humbly to confesse of themselves when you have done all that is commanded you say yee are unprofitable servants Luk. 17.10 Muscul. The popish doctrine then of merits is not agreeable to Iacobs faith And if the benefits of this life cannot be merited much lesse the Kingdome of heaven 2. Confut. That Angels are not mediators or impetrators of grace and blessings Vers. 29. HE blessed him there c. Theodoret alleageth this as a reason that this was not an Angel but the Sonne of God that wrestled with Iacob because it belonged not to Angels but unto God to blesse Pererius taketh upon him to confute Theodorets reasons affirming that Angels though they blesse not as authors of any grace yet a blessing may be asked of them as the impetrators and intercessors for the same at the hands of God and therefore Saint Iohn wisheth grace and peace to be given to him that was and is and is to come and from the seven spirits which are before the throne Apocal. 14. that is from the seven Angels In Gen. 32. numer 18 19. Contra. 1. Spirituall blessings are conferred either by the author thereof which is onely God or by the Mediator thereof which is onely Christ or by the ministers or instruments thereof which may be as well Angels as men for as Isaack blessed Iacob and Iacob his sonnes ministerially onely as being Gods mouth to pronounce them so Angels likewise may be messengers or ministers of Gods blessing and not otherwise 1. For every good gift commeth from God Iam. 1.17 2. Neither are the Angels to be sued unto for any spirituall or temporall blessing but onely God If any of you lacke wisdome let him aske it of God Iam. 1.5 and our Saviour saith Whatsoever yee shall aske the father in my name he will give it you Ioh. 16.23 a promise is made to them that aske in Christs name and not otherwise neither doe we reade that any of the ancient Patriarks or Prophets became suters to the Angels for any blessing 3. In that place in the Revelation by the seven spirits we must understand the holy spirit of God with his manifold graces for the seven spirits are the seven lamps of fire burning before the throne Revel 4.5 they are also the seven eyes of the Lambe Revel 5.6 the Angels are not the eyes that is the wisdome or knowledge of the Lambe but the holy Ghost which dwelleth in him bodily Coloss. 2.9 that is substantially essentially And whereas he urgeth that phrase Which are before the throne whereby a ministerie and service should be expressed this collection is not sound for both in Daniel 7.13 Christ is brought before the Ancient of dayes and in the Revelation 8.2 he is the Angell that stood before the Altar Neither in all Saint Pauls salutations doth he wish grace and peace from any other than from God the Father and the Lord Iesus nor yet Saint Iohn 2. Epist. vers 2. this forme of benediction then here used must be expounded by the like place of Scripture 6. Places of exhortation 1. Exhort Prayer in extremity availeable Vers. 9. MOreover Iacob said O God of my father Abraham Iacob being driven to a great strait turneth himselfe unto God by earnest prayer and so indeed the prayers of the faithfull which are powred forth in their necessity are much availeable with God Luther as it is in the Psalme Call upon me in the day of trouble and I will deliver thee Psal. 51.15 2. Exhort The hope of our celestiall inheritance to be preferred before all worldly things Vers. 14. TWo hundred shee goats c. The summe of Iacobs present which hee sent to Esau amounted to five hundred and fifty cattell of divers kinds as is shewed before quest 9. hee spared no to redeeme his quiet passage and returne into the land of Canaan which was promised to him and his seed for an everlasting inheritance which teacheth us that we should preâ—â—rre 〈◊〉 heavenly inheritance before all earthly and worldly possessions Calvin 〈◊〉 Saint 〈…〉 all things 〈◊〉 and even as 〈◊〉 that hee might win Christ Philip. 3.8 3. Exhort With iâ—â—oceâ—â—y we must â—oyne wisdome and prudence Vers. 13. A Present for his brother Iacob as a wife and 〈…〉 for his owne safety 1. He sendeth an humble message to his brother 2. When that would not speed he divideth his company into two parts that if Esau did strike the one the other mighâ—â—â—cope 3. He sendeth a liberall present to make a way to insinuate himselfe to his brothers favour Thus according to our Saviours rule we should be as wise as Serpents and innocent as Doves Mâ—â—th 10.16 Mercer 4. Exhort Importunity in our prayers acceptable to God Vers. 26. I Will not let thee goe till thou blesse me Iacobs importunity is striving and not giving over both obtaineth victory and procureth a blessing so should we strive in our prayers with God as Saint Paul saith of Epaphras Coloss. 4.12 And Moses was so instant with God in his earnest prayers for Israel that the Lord at his request suspended the judgements which hee had thought to have brought upon them because of their idolatry Exod. 32. Luther 5. Exhort Against curiosity Vers. 29. WHerefore now dost thou aske my name Iacob is reproved for his curiosity that could not bee contented with this heavenly vision and sensible apparition glorious victory and honourable name given unto him but would enquire further as touching the Angels name Wee learne then to bee contented with such measure of knowledge as it pleaseth God to reveale unto us in his word and not curiously to inquire after hid matters Calvin The Disciples were reproved for gazing after Christ into heaven Act. 2. neither shall it be any profit for us to exercise our selves in difficult and intricate questions 6. Exhort Not rashly to judge those which have defects or infirmities in their bodies Vers. 31. HE halted upon his thigh We see then that the servants of God may have infirmities in their bodies which are inflicted of God not as punishments of their sinne but corrections for their triall If Isaack then were blinde Iacob halting Lâ—â—h squint eyed Moses 〈◊〉
Devill could bring downe fire from heaven But how is it then called the fire of God if it were of Satans sending therefore the text it selfe is against that opinion some take it to bee called a fire of God that is a great and most vehement lightning as things of excellencie are so called as the wrestlings of God Gen. 30.8 and the mountaines of God Psal 36.7 Iunius But this sense in that place seemeth to be improper for as here the lightning is called the fire of God so Psal. 29. thunder is called the voice of God I thinke that it will not be said that here also it is so called because the thunder giveth a mighty voice for this is there beside expressed The voice of the Lord is mighty but there the reason is shewed why it is called the voice of the Lord because the God of glorie maketh it to thunder vers 3. Againe every where the Scripture maketh God the author of thunder and lightning and windes as Psal. 107.25 Hee commandeth and raiseth the stormie winde and Psal. 147.15 Hee sendeth forth his commandement upon the earth and his word runneth very swiftly he giveth snow like wooll Psal. 148.7 8. Praise the Lord c. fire and haile snow and stormy winde which execute his word they execute Gods word and commandement onely but if they might bee raised by the power of Satan then should they execute his word Further the Lord saith Iob. 38.25 Who hath divided the spoutes for the raine as the way for the lightning of the thunders and vers 28. the Lord is said to bee the father of raine and so consequently of the other meteors If the Devill can cause raine thunder lightning then he might be said to bee the father of it Hence it is that the people of God have used to pray unto him as the only author and giver of raine and weather as Samuel saith Is it not wheate harvest I will call unto the Lord and he shall send thunder and raine 1. Sam. 12.17 So Ambrose saith Cum pluvia expeteretur ab omnibus quidam dixit neomenia dabit eam c. When raine was desired of all one said the new Moone will bring raine although we were very greedy of raine yet I would not such assertions to bee true yea and I was much delighted that no raine was powred donec precibus ecclesiae datus manifestaret non de initiis lunae sperandum esse sed providentia misericordia creatoris untill it being at the prayers of the Church did manifestly shew that raine is not to be hoped for by the renewing of the Moone but by the providence and mercy of the Creator Some thinke that the fire which came upon Iobs flocke did not come downe from heaven but was otherwise kindled by Satan but that the Devill made as though it came from Heaven the more to terrific Iob when hee should see that even the heavens and God himselfe were set against him Of this opinion seemeth to bee the author of the Commentary upon Iob under Origens name Non de coelo cecidit ignis ille sed ita finxit nequissimus c. Non à Deo missus est sed tua iniquita â— miserrime omnium diabole succensus est That fire came not downe from heaven but so the wicked one fained it was not sent of God but kindled by thy wicked meanes O thou Devill of all most miserable And afterward hee sheweth that Satan cannot bring fire from heaven Dic ergo infoelix tunc super oves Iob ignem de coelo potuisti adducere cur non potuisti revocare illum ignem quem advocavit Helias Say then couldest thou O wretched one bring fire upon Iobs sheepe and why couldest thou not then keepe backe the fire which Helias called for upon the fifties for they were thy ministers and servants This authors judgement in this latter point wee willingly imbrace but his first conceit seemeth not to bee agreeable to the text which saith it was the fire of God then not kindled by Satan Neither yet is it to be thought that Satan had no hand in it but that it was wholly Gods worke for so God should be Satans Minister in serving his turne and not Satan his Wherefore my opinion is this that this tempest of fire and winde were in respect of the naturall generation of them of the working and sending of the Creator But Satan was Minister dejecti ignis the minister of the fire cast downe as Osiander saith not the author but the minister yet not Gods minister in the originall worke which proceeded of naturall causes but in the execution God caused the fire but Satan brought it upon Iobs flocke God raised the winde but Satan drave it upon the foure corners of the house for this we doubt not of but that thunder and lightning and winde being once raised that Satan hath power by Gods permission to carry and transport it from place to place if the winde blow one way he can turne it to another but of himselfe by his spirituall power I deny that he can raise windes and tempests where none are upon the reasons before alleaged And therefore we may hold that to bee a fable which Philostratus reporteth how Apollonius saw two tunnes among the Indians which being opened did send out the windes and being shut they were restrained So I conclude this place with that decree of the Councell Bracaâ—ens 1. c. 8. Si quis credit quòd diabolus tonitrua fulgura tempestates siccitates sua authoritate facit sicut Priscillianus docet anathema sit If any man beleeve that the Devill by his owne authority can make thunder lightning tempests drought as Priscillanus holdeth let him be accursed QUEST XV. Of the power of spirits in naturall workes NOw concerning the other actions of spirits which is called mediate they by applying tempering and qualifying naturall causes may bring forth strange effects for the vertues and properties of herbes plants precious stones mettals mâ—nerals are exactly knowne unto them and but in part unto us 1. As we see man by art by composing things together can effect rare and strange workes as is evident in the graffing and incision of trees in distilling of waters compounding of medicines so much more can spirits by aportioning and applying divers naturall causes together produce strange things 2. Againe many times the excellencie of the artificer or workeman addeth to the perfection of the worke beyond the vertue of the instrumenâ—â— as an axe serveth but to cut but the cunning workeman can therewith doe more than cut as frame a bed or table and such like so these spirituall powers by their great skill can by naturall instruments and meanes bring forth more excellent and strange works than their naturall force serveth unto because they are the instruments of Angels and spirits Sic Thom. Aqui. cont Gent. c. 103. 3. Augustine giveth instance of divers strange and admirable workes in
a moneth which hee doth thus collect the first plague of converting the waters into bloud continued seven dayes chap. 7.25 then upon the eight day came the frogs and the next day after chap. 8.9 which was the ninth they were taken away upon the tenth day the lice were sent upon the eleventh day the swarmes of noisome flies are threatned upon the next day being the twelfth they are sent and the morrow after they are taken away chap. 8.29 which was the 13. day upon the 14. the fifth plague of the murrane of cattell is threatned the morrow after it is sent chap. 9.6 which was the 15. day upon the 16. day the sixt plague of botches and sores followeth the 17. day the 7. plague of haile is threatned sent the next day chap. 9.18 which was the 18. day and taken away the next which was the 19. day on the 20. day the 8. plague of grashoppers is threatned sent the 21. day and removed the 22. day the three dayes following the thicke darknesse came chap. 10.22 the 23.24 and 25· dayes upon the 26. day Pharaoh expelled Moses from his presence and about midnight following the beginning of the 28. day the first borne were slaine So that from the first plague to the last there was not above a moneth the last plague then of the slaughter of the first borne falling upon the 14. day of Nisan the first moneth of the Hebrewes the first began about the middle of Adar the last moneth which answereth to our February as Nison doth unto March Pererius And that it is more likely that all these plagues came together in the space of one moneth rather than of twelve moneths it may thus appeare first because the plagues following one immediatly upon another without any pause or respite they were so much the more grievous and this was the strong hand of God whereby Pharaoh was constrained to let Israel goe chap. 6.1 Secondly the plagues were such as Egypt never saw nor felt before chap. 9.24 and 10.14 and if they had continued long the Egyptians could not have endured Thirdly whereas the Israelites spent full forty yeeres in the wildernesse Iosh. 5.6 and Mosâ—s was 80. yeere old chap. 7.7 before any of the plagues began and 120. yeere old in the end of the 40. yeeres travell in the wildernesse Deut. 34. much time could not bee spent in Egypt after the hand of God by the ministry of Moses began to worke upon them QUEST XXX Whether the good Angels or bad were the ministers of the Egyptian plagues COncerning the author of these plagues there is no question but that they came from God who thereby did most justly punish the Egyptians for the unjust vexation of his people for so the Lord saith He will smite Egypt with all his wonders chap. 3.20 But there ariseth a greater doubt who were the ministers of these plagues whether the good angels or evill 1. Genebrard thinketh because it is said Psalm 78.49 By the sending of evill Angels that the evill spirits were executioners of these plagues But Augustines reason is very strong against this opinion for in the two first plagues which were counterfeited by the Sorcerers it is evident that the evill Angels were doers by whom the Magicians wrought they certainly were not the ministers of the true plagues for then as he saith Angeli mali ex utraque parte consisterent the evill Angels should be of both sides hinc illos affligentes inde fallentes afflâ—cting the Egyptians on the side and deceiving them on the other If the evill Angels then were not ministers of the first plagues neither were they used in the rest and beside we have a more evident argument that when in the third plague the Sorcerers attempted to doe the like they could not the Lord inhibited and restrained the evill spirits that they should worke no longer by their ministers the Sorcerers If the Lord restrained their power then he loosed it not or used it 2. Wherefore they are called evill Angels not in respect of their office but of the effect because they were messengers and ministers of evill plagues Perer. 3. But I thinke with Iunius that it is not necessary here to understand Angels for those ministring spirits but the word malacâ— may here signifie messengers and is referred to Moses and Aaron that were the messengers and ministers of these plagues And this interpretation is confirmed by two reasons because in this historie it is directly expressed that most of the plagues were procured by Moses and Aaron as the three first by Aaron the sixt seventh eight and ninth by Moses the fourth and fift though it be not expressed yet it may bee supposed to bee done by the same instruments and againe that place Psalm 105.26 may helpe to expound this Hee sent Moses his servant and Aaron whom he had chosen they shewed among them the message of his signes The messengers then and ministers of these evill plagues were Moses and Aaron 4. Yet I deny not but that God used also therein the ministry of his Angels as it is evident in the last plague of the destruction of the first borne Exod. 12.3 but the meaning of this place in the Psalme is more properly referred to Moses and Aaron And although God useth both the ministry of good Angels in punishing the wicked as in the overthrow of Sodom and Gomorrha and of the evill sometime to trie the righteous as in the temptation of Iob much more in judging the wicked yet in this place for the reasons before alleaged the good Angels are thought rather to have beene used than the evill QUEST XXXI For what ends and causes the Lord wrought such wonders in Egypt THe ends wherefore it pleased the Lord thus to judge Egypt and to shew his mighty workes were divers 1. That the Lord might take just revenge of the Egyptians for the unrighteous vexing and oppressing of his people Exod. 4.23 2. That they by this meanes might bee forced to let Israel goe Exod. 6.1 3. That Gods power might bee knowne to all the world which exceedeth the law of nature or naturall things and that his justice might be made manifest in judging the wicked so the Lord saith For thâ—â— cause have I appointed thee to shew my power in thee and to declare my name throughout all the world Exod. 9.16 4. That the Hebrewes and people of God hereby might perceive the singular care and love of God toward them as Moses urgeth Deut. 4.20 The Lord hath taken you and brought you out of the iron fâ—rnace out of Egypt 5. That the fame of these great workes might keepe other nations in feare and awe of them by whom they should passe that they should not molest or trouble them neither that the Hebâ—ewes should be affraid of them so Rahab saith Iosh. 2.10 We have heard how the Lord dried up the water of the red sea before you when yee came out of Egypt To this
the kingdome of darkenes should be divided which argument our Saviour useth in the Gospell to shew that he did not cast out devils by the power of Satan 6. Wherefore the best interpretation is that by the finger of God they understood the power of God as the heavens in the Psalme are said to be the worke of his fingers sic Thostatus Lippoman So also is the hand of God taken 1 Sam. 6.9 And hereby is insinuated the great power of God if these horrible plagues were but the worke of his fingers that is an effect of his smallest power what are the workes of his arme and handes when hee sheweth his mightie power for so that which one doth easily or with small labour he is said to doe with his finger as the phrase is used of the Pharises in the Gospell that they laid heavy burdens upon others and would not themselves stirre them with their finger And indeede these plagues of Egypt if they be compared with Gods great workes as the universall floud brought upon all the world the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrha they will appeare to be but workes of Gods fingers in comparison of his whole hand Simler Perer. QUEST XVII Whether the sorcerers had any feeling of Gods power BUt now it will further be inquired whether these sorcerers thus spake as having any knowledge of God or feeling of his power 1. Some thinke that they used this pretence of words to satisfie Pharaoh that was angrie with them because they could not doe now as before and to excuse their want of power Cajetane But it seemeth rather seeing the Sorcerers were indeede hindred and controlled that they spake as they thought 2. Lyranus thinketh that they had no thought at all of God but that they understood the power of some superiour devill And his reason is that if they had in truth confessed and acknowledged the power of God they would not afterward have resisted Moses as it appeareth they did for they were smitten with botches and biles in the sixt plague cap. 9. Contra. But this is a weake argument for though they had at this present some sense of Gods power yet they might afterward returne to their former obstinacie as Pharaoh himselfe would one while seeme to relent and eftsoone be hardned againe and Nebuchadnezzar who upon the interpretation of his dreame by Daniel acknowledged the true God Dan. 2. yet presently after setteth up Idolatrie Perer. 3. Some as is shewed in the former question did thinke that the Magicians had some knowledge and speciall revelation not only of the power of God but of his spirit and so consequently of the Trinitie but such a particular knowledge cannot be ascribed unto them 4. Therefore I thinke rather that for a time they seeing their power hindred did indeede and as they thought acknowledge Gods power that Pharaoh might thereby be left inexcusable Iun. but this knowledge was soone againe obscured by the malice and obstinacie of their heart QUEST XVIII By what power Sorcerers do worke NOw whereas they confesse that Moses wrought by the finger of God they therein evidently bewray that they themselves did not worke by God This therefore shall briefly be made plaine and maniâ—est that Magicians and Sorcerers doe not worke wonders by any divine humane or naturall or Angelicall power I meane the good Angels but Satanicall and Diabolicall 1. These spirits whom they confederate with do require of them divine worship and that affectation of divine honour which they began in heaven and obtained it not being cast downe from thence they seeke to compasse in earth but good Angels refuse to be adored and worshipped as the Angell that appeared to Iohn Revel 22. 2. Sorcerers are men of an impure and wicked life and they use their enchantments to wicked purposes as to theft adulterie murther but good Angels do neither favour wicked men neither will bee assistant in any wicked worke 3. Magicians use to threaten the spirits to enjoyne them certaine impossible things if they come not when they are called but men can exercise no power neither can have any command over the good Angels 4. if it bee objected that Magicians doe often cast out devils but Satan doth not cast out Satan as our Saviour saith for then his kingdome should be divided and could not long stand To this it is answered that our Saviour speaketh of such casting out of devils as is done with power when Satan is violently dispossessed not of such when hee giveth way of himselfe by some compact and contract with the Conjurer And as Augustine saith our Saviour meaneth the perfect ejection of Satan when hee is cast both out of the bodie ad soule But when any seemeth to be cast out by a Satanicall power he goeth out of the bodie that he may more strongly possesse the soule which is indeede no casting out 5. That Sorcerers doe worke by the power of Satan themselves are the best witnesses for Porphyrius who was a great Magician as Eusebius noteth him doth confesse that the devils themselves whom he calleth gods doe signifie unto men quibus rebus dij cogantur qua illis offerendâ— sunt c. with what things the devils are forced and what is to be offered unto them what daies they should chuse what signes and images thâ—y should make and such like And Eusebius further setteth downe to the same purpose an epistle written by Porphyrius to Aâ—ebonus the Egyptian wherein he propoundeth nine inexplicable doubts as he calleth them about Magicall practices 1. How Magicians doe invocate the spirits as their superiours when they command them as their inferiours 2. Why the spirits of Magicians bid men to be just when as they being called upon and sent doe many wicked things 3. They will not heare the Conjâ—rer unlesse hee abstaine from venerie and yet they being sent doe inflame to venerie and unlawfull lust 4. They prescribe their disciples when they are about invocation to abstaine from eating of flesh and yet themselves delight in the smell and bloud of sacrifices 5. They will not have him that hath touched any dead thing to use any Magicall practice and yet many magicall enchantments are practised with dead things both beasts and men 6. They doe terrifie the spirits in their invocations with threats as if they answere not they will reveale the mysteries of Isis and deliver Osiris members to Typhan but how can spirits be feared with threats 7. They use ridiculous invocations as thus they call upon their spirits Thou which camest forth of the slâ—â—e of the earth which hast thy seate in the lake which canst change thy shape every houre which kind of prayers spirits should seeme not to regard 8. They use barbarous and strange words as though the spirits understood only the Scythian or some other barbarous tongue 9. Seeing spirits are insensible and incorporeall how then can they be allured with sensible and corporall things These are Porphyries
last appearing before Pharaoh to vers 9. then a conclusion of the whole historie of these plagues 1. In the continuation there is set forth first the Lords speech with Moses both revealing unto him that one plague was behind vers 1. and repeating the first promise of inriching the Israelites by the Egyptians vers 2. where Moses inserteth the reason why this should bee effected because both the people in generall and Moses specially should bee gratious in the sight of Pharaoh and his people vers 3. And all this the Lord spake unto Moses before his last entrance to Pharaoh for after that hee saw not his face Then followeth the speech that Moses had with Pharaoh vers 4. to vers 9. where Moses in the name of God foretelleth first the last plague of the death of the first borne expressing the time about midnight and of whom the destruction shall bee of all the first borne of men from the highest to the lowest and of beasts and by whom The Lord shall goe out c. vers 4.5 Secondly the events are three first the lamentation and sorrow of the Egyptians vers 6. then the privilege and immunitie of the Israelites vers 7. and the entreatie and supplication of the Egyptians to Moses to be gone with his people vers 8. 2. In the conclusion of this historie there is first a repetition of that which God foretold Moses that Pharaoh would not heare him with the end thereof that Gods wonders might bee multiplied in Egypt vers 9. then the declaration of Moses obedience vers 10. and of the event that Pharaohs heart was hardned as the Lord had said and of the effects and fruits thereof the not letting of the people goe vers 10. 2. The divers readings Vers. 1. When he sendeth you away he will at once speedily drive you hence I. altogether drive you hence G.S.V. or at once drive you hence G But this expresseth not the emphasis of the Hebrew phrase in driving drive you out that is speedily when he shall let you go quite he shall utterly drive you hence B. but the word Calah altogether belongeth to the latter clause as may appeare by the distinction Vers. 2. That every man require of his companion A. P. or neighbour L. S. V. B. G. rather than friend I. the word reaâ— signifieth both but because the Egyptians were neighbours rather than friends and an other word is used chap. 3.22 shechenoth which signifieth a neighbour or neere dweller I preferre the first Vers. 3. Also the man Moses was very great A. P. C. S. V. I. better than Moses was a very great man L.B. for the word ish man is set before Moses or also Moses was very great G. for here man is altogether omitted Vers. 5. From the first borne of Pharaoh that should sit upon his throne I.C. rather than which sitteth upon his throne cater for he was the heire onely of the Kingdome he did not yet sit upon the throne Pharaoh bâ—ing living the word is iosheb sitting a participle of the present tense which hath also the signification of the future as Gen. 19.14 Lot spake to his sonnes in law which were marrying his daughters that is were to marrie them 3. The explanation of difficult questions QUEST I. When the Lord spake these words to Moses Vers. 1. NOw the Lord had said to Moses yet will I bring c. 1. Some referre this to the first vision which Moses saw in the bush but that cannot be for when the Lord thus spake to Moses nine plagues were past and there was but one to come 2. Neither did the Lord thus speake to Moses after he was come out from Pharaoh for after that he saw Pharaohs face no more chap. 10.29 and yet here vers 8. it is said he went from Pharaoh very angry 3. Therefore the message which Moses delivereth in this Chapter to Pharaoh concerning the destruction of the first borne was done at his last appearing before Pharaoh when he sent for him after the darknesse and immediatly before his going to Pharaoh the Lord thus said to Moses Iunius QUEST II. Why the overthrow of Pharaoh in the red sea was counted none of the plagues I Will bring one plague more c. 1. Thus the Lord doth all things in number weight and measure the Lord sendeth tenne plagues upon Egypt not fewer because he would shew his power nor more for these were sufficient Ferus 2. Beside this last plague of the first borne there followed the overthrow of Pharaoh and his host in the red sea but this is counted none of the plagues of Egypt because it was done after the Israelites were gone out of Egypt Simler As also these plagues were not a finall destruction of the Egyptians as the other was but probations and temptations Pellican Of the tenth plague QUEST III. Whether God used the ministry of good or bad Angels in the slaughter of the first borne Vers. 4. ABout midnight will I goe out into the middest of Egypt That God was the author of this plague in the slaughter of the first borne it is no question but the doubt is whether the Angels good or bad were the Lords ministers in it 1. In this life it is certaine that God sometime useth the good Angels to punish the wicked as in the destruction of Sodome and the evill Angels some time to chastise his owne children as Satan tempted and afflicted Iob. 2. In the next world who shall be the ministers of the torments in hell it is not so certaine Pererius thinketh that the evill Angels shall be the executioners of those torments because of that text goe into everlasting fire which is prepared for the devill and his Angels But the contrarie rather may bee inferred out of this text that because the Devill and his Angels also are ordained for torment it seemeth that he shall not be a tormenter of others who is to be tormented himselfe Therefore it is rather to be thought that seeing the chiefe use of the ministrie of Angels is for the benefit and comfort of the elect in this world till they be gathered together in the Kingdome of God Heb. 1.14 that in the next world there shall not be such imployment of the ministring spirits especially of the reprobate Angels And how the torments of hell shall be continued the Prophet Isay sheweth Tophet is prepared of old c. the burning thereof is fire and much wood the breath of the Lord like a river of brimstone doth kindle it chap. 30.33 The Lord of himselfe by his owne power in shewing the severitie of his justice shall hold the wicked in everlasting torment 3. But concerning this judgement in smiting the first borne some thinke that the evill Angels were used in this service Thostatus Lyran. Because it is said Psalm 78.49 Hee cast upon them the fiercenesse of his wrath by sending of evill Angels But this place is answered before quest 30. in
as hath beene found by search these were the bones of Ioseph certainly knowne they shew the bones and parts no man knoweth of whom for they in divers places offer to the view of the people divers bodies and heads foure or five armes of one Saint neither were these bones of Ioseph carried in the fight of all Israel adored as theirs superstitiously are Simler 3. Conf. Against the heresie of Servetus Vers. 21. THe Lord went before them by day in a piller of a cloud Servetus held this execrable heresie that this increata nubes Christi fuit Deitas that this uncreated cloud was the Deitie of Christ which he calleth filium figurativum the figurative Sonne which detestable heresie is not worthy of any confutation but with all indignation to be rejected and detested for he maketh the Deitie of God corporall contrary to the Scripture which saith God is a spirit and maketh a visible substance to be without beginning whereas all things visible are created Coloss. 1.16 and directly this heresie impugneth that saying of the Prophet Esay chap. 4.5 where he alludeth to this place The Lord shall create upon every place of Mount Sion a cloud and smoke by day c. It was then a created and not an uncreated cloud 6. Morall observations 1. Observ. As the Lord worketh for us redemption so of us he requireth obedience Vers. 2. SAnctifie unto me all the first borne As the Lord had for his part delivered and saved their first borne so he requireth of them their first borne As God hath dealt mercifully and graciously with us so he expecteth somewhat againe of us namely our obedience we must not looke unto that onely which God hath done unto us but consider also what is to bee done by vs. As our Saviour saith to his Apostles As my father sent me so send I you As Christ was sent for our redemption so we must also bee employed in Gods service to testifie our thankfull obedience So our Saviour bidding his Apostles to preach the Gospell addeth teaching them to observe all things which I have commanded you As the glad tidings of salvation is published unto men so of them is required againe obedience Ferus not as an helpe unto their salvation which is perfited without our service but as a true and lively testimonie of our faith whereby we apprehend salvation 2. Observ. How we must offer our first borne unto God AGaine as they were commanded to consecrate unto God their first borne so we must offer our first and best things unto God the Lord will have the prioritie of our service Simlerus As our Saviour biddeth us first to seeke the Kingdome of God and the righteousnesse thereof Matth. 6. our first studies our first times must be consecrated unto our God as the Apostle exhorteth to give up our bodies a living sacrifice holy and acceptable unto God Rom. 12.1 3. Observ. God tempteth his children according to their strength Vers. 17. LEst the people repent when they see warre God hath respect unto his chidrens infirmitie and suffereth them not to be tempted above their power Piscator But Gregorie doth notably amplifie this point Tres modi sunt hominum ad Deum conversorum inchoatio medium perfectio inchoatione inveniunt blandimenta dulcedinis in medio tempore certamina tentationis ad extremum perfectionem plenitudinis c. There are three degrees of men that are converted unto God the beginning the middest and the perfection in the beginning they finde pleasant allurements in the middle hard tentations in the end a full perfection Like as first a man entertaineth his spouse with sweet perswasions afterward being married to her hee trieth her with sharpe reprehensions being thus tried he soundly enjoyeth her So this people being brought out of Egypt primò accepit blandimenta signorum first receiveth alluring signes afterward probationibus exercetur in â—remo they are exercised by tentations in the wildernesse and lastly in the land of promise virtutis plenitudine confirmatur they are fully confirmed Sic Gregor lib. 14. moral cap. 13. 4. Observ. The will of the dead must faithfully be performed Vers. 19. FOr he had made the children of Israel sweare Moses most faithfully causeth the last will and Testament of Ioseph to be fulfilled whereby we are taught that the last minde and will of the dead in honest and lawfull things ought by no meanes to be violated Osiander as the Apostle saith the Testament is confirmed when men be dead Heb. 9.17 God will surely revenge their quarrell whose soules he hath received to his protection whose godly bequests are reversed and their last minde not fulfilled Such as are unfaithfull to the dead will be much more to the living And as God professeth himselfe the speciall protector of the fatherlesse and widow so he will maintaine the cause of the dead that are fatherlesse to the world and their soules as it were widowes for a time absent from their bodies 5. Observ. We must alwayes bee watchfull Vers. 22. THat they might goe both by day and night The people were to take their journey whether by day or night when the cloud was lift up from the Tabernacle they were therefore diligently to take heed both by day and night that they might be readie when the Lord gave them a signe to goe forward wherefore they are said to keepe the Lords watch Numb 9.19 So our Saviour biddeth us also to watch and alwayes to bee in a readinesse because we know not when the master of the house will come at even or at midnight at the cocke crowing or in the dawning Mark 13.35 Pellican CHAP. XIV 1. The Argument and method IN this Chapter is described the most miraculous and admirable passage of the children of Israel over the red Sea there are two parts of the Chapter the bringing of the Israelites unto the Sea to vers 14. their passing over the Sea with the destruction of the Egyptians to the end of the Chapter In the first part is set forth first the counsell of God unto Moses containing first a commandement where they should campe vers 2. then a reason thereof taken from the vaine consultation and opinion of Pharaoh that they were tangled in the land vers 4. then the execution thereof in following after them which is amplified by the overruling cause Gods providence and justice in hardning his heart and the end thereof the glory of God vers 4. 2. Then followeth the execution first in the behalfe of the people they did as the Lord commanded them secondly on Pharaohs part 1. Both in pursuing and following after them with the occasion thereof the report that was brought and their repentance in letting the people goe vers 5. The manner thereof he made readie his horse and chariots vers 6.7 and the ordering and disposing cause Gods justice in hardning his heart vers 8. 2. As also in overtaking them vers 9. 3. Afterward the events hereof are declared 1. The
beside that it may bee supposed that the Manna came in such measure every day as sufficed for their eating so that much remained not superfluous after their gathering it falling like unto a dew or thin frost being melted could not much moisten the ground QUEST XXII Whence it was called Manna Vers. 15. IT is Man 1. The words in the Hebrew are Man hu which have a double interpretation Some doe reade quid hoc what is this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Septuagint whom Iosephus followeth and the Latine So also Simler Pellican Tostat. Rupertus And then they take man hu for maâ— hu for mah signifieth what and then they will have the letter nun added paragogically for better sound Maâ— bach some thinke that Man in the Chalde tongue signifieth what Simler And this interpretation best agreeth they say both to the words following They wist not what it was and to Moses answer This is the bread which the Lord had given but if they had called it Man that is a gift or meat prepared they had knowne what it was and Moses needed not to have told them Tostat. Lyran. Contra. 1. If such a word in that sense bee found in the Chalde yet there is no reason to thinke that Moses would use a Chalde word here 2. The people in generall might know it to be sent of God but could give no speciall or particular name to it Iun. Galas And so as Calvin saith Colligimuâ— mediam fuisse eorum cognitionem c. Wee gather that they had a meane kinde of knowledge mixed with ignorance and therefore they are more fully instructed of Moses concerning the use and end thereof 2. The Hebrew word there being man not mah it is more likely to be derived of the root manah which signifieth to number or prepare some will have it called man because it fell in such great number Oleaster But it signifieth here rather a gift or meat prepared that is without any labour Calvin Galas Iun. Vatab. And so the Author of the wisdome of Salomon taketh it who calleth it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 â—ibum paratum meat prepared chap. 17.20 Howsoever the other reading may seeme to have a good coherence with the words following yet because it answereth not to the originall word which is not maah what but 〈◊〉 the latter is to be preferred QUEST XXIII Why the Manna is said to be the bread of Angels THis Man is called Psal. 78.25 The bread of Angels 1. Some Rabbines hold that it is so called because the Angels indeed are refreshed with the divine light Quod lumâ—n incorporatum est fâ—ctum Manna Which divine light was incorporate and became Manna So R. Aquiba and R. Mosâ—â— Gerundens To whom seemeth to subscribe Paulus Burgens in his additions upon this Chapter But R. Ismael dissenteth from them that the Angels doe eat no materiall or corporall food being themselves spirits and immateriall and that divine light being a spirituall thing how could Manna being a materiall substance be made of it 2. But this is a more probable sense that not the materiall but the mysticall Manna is the bread of Angels because it was a type and figure of Christ whom the Angels desired to behold Borrh Marbach Yet this is not the proper and literall meaning 3. Some thinke it is so named of the effect because it gave strength unto them not to wax old nor feeble as the Angels are preserved in their state without decay such an operation this Man wrought in Caleb who was of as good strength at 80. as hee was at 40. yeeres before Iosh. 14. Ferus But this is spoken without ground true it is that Caleb was lively and of good strength in his old age but this he had not by the eating of Manna but by the speciall gift of God And this being but one speciall example maketh not a generall rule whence also can this vertue of Manna be gathered seeing all the 600. thousand which came out of Egypt only Caleb and Ioshua excepted all died in the wildernesse and yet they did eat of Manna 4. Some thinke therefore that it is called the bread of Angels because of the excellencie of it as S. Paul saith The tongues of Angels Borrh. But the right meaning is that it is so called because the Angels were Gods Ministers in the forming and preparing of Manna it was given by the ministry of Angels Tostatus quaest 6. Lyranus Iunius Marbachius QUEST XXIV Of the measure gomer how much it contained Vers. 16. GAther every man a gomer c. 1. Concerning the measure of the gomer it is said in the last verse of this Chapter to be the tenth part of an Ephah which according to the estimate of R. Salomon containeth three of the measures called Seah and every Seah held six of the measures called cabi and every â—ab held so much as 24. egges so that the gomer being the tenth part of an Epha contained 42. egges which maketh just three pints of ale measure Oleast Lyran. In another account the gomer contained two of the measures called choenix and an halfe Iun. And the choenix was a pint and halfe and somewhat more so that by this estimation the gomer should be somewhat above three pints some esteeme the gomer at a pottle Genevens 2. Simlerus thinketh that the gomer was not so large a measure nor yet the Epha as it is taken for he thinketh that there was no great difference betweene the choenix which was an Attike measure and the gomer so also Budaeus For the chaenix was the ordinary allowance for one day as appeareth by that proverb of Pythagoras Choenici no insideas that one should not sit over his choenix that is be too carefull for his daily diet it is not like therefore saith he though the Lord shewed himselfe liberall toward his people that he would double and treble their diet Againe it is written in the story of Ruth that she gathered every day an Epha of barley which had beene too much for her to beare according to this rate if the Epha were equall to the medimnus Atticus the Attike bushell and whereas Sarah is said to have made ready three Seahs of meale for the three Angels which came as three ghests to Abraham which make an Epha to what end should she have made ready so much But these reasons may bee answered 1. The Lord in allowing unto this people double the ordinary stint therein shewed his liberality toward them Iun. 2. The Epha though it should containe as some take it almost 8. gallons equall to our bushell was not too great a burden for a woman to beare neither is it strange that Sarah of her bounty especially in so great a family made ready such a quantity of meale for so few ghests 3. But I neither thinke that a gomer containeth so little as Budaus and Simlerus make it as to be equall to the measure choenix which was the daily allowance for servants for in
so they include and take in both the 14. and 15. dayes borrowing 17. dayes of the first moneth to make up the summe of 50. Augustine Ferus Gloss. ordinar as is shewed before quest 16. But this account cannot bee admitted for thus should they begin the 50. dayes both before the Passeover was eaten which was upon the 14. day at even whereas they must be accounted from the Passeover and before they were delivered and went out of Egypt whereas the Pentecost was kept in remembrance of their deliverance out of the servitude and hard bondage of Egypt as the reason of the institution thereof is yeelded Deut. 16.12 Thou shalt remember that thou wast a servant in Egypt therefore thou shalt observe and doe these ordinances 3. Wherefore this remaineth as the most probable that the 15. day of the moneth the next day after they had eaten the pasch was the first day of the fifty howsoever in the anniversary Pentecost afterward there were some innovation Iun. Piscat Simler And that for these reasons 1. Because this was the day of their deliverance and going out of Egypt from the which they count their moneths and dayes chap. 16.1 2. And againe this first day of unleavened bread was not in respect of the present necessity and occasion of their sudden departure out of Egypt kept a solemne festivall day as afterward wherein they were to doe no servile worke This being then the first day of the fifty there are to bee accounted 16. dayes of the first moneth and 30. of the second so the first of the third moneth falleth out to bee the 47. and the 50. day was the fourth of the moneth 4. I cannot here omit the mysticall application of Rupertus of these three dayes of sanctification and preparation prescribed to the people which he wil have to signifie that sanctification of Christ in his death and passion and buriall Quam consummavit die tertia Which he finished upon the third day of the which sanctification our Saviour speaketh when he saith Fer their sakes doe I sanctifie my selfe Ioh. 17. QUEST XVIII How the Apostles Pentecost and the Iewes Pentecost fell out all upon one day HEre further it will be enquired how the Apostles Pentecost which was 50. dayes from Christs resurrection inclusively and the Jewes Pentecost which was 50. dayes from the Passeover exclusively that is not reckoning the morrow after the Pasch which was the first solemne day of the feast according to the law Levit. 23.10 would fall out together on the same day 1. Here Rupertus hitteth upon the right answer in generall that the same day wherein Christ rose againe the Jewes brought in their bundle or sheafe to be shaken before the Lord which bundle of their first fruits did prefigure Christ the first fruits of the dead who also in the Canticles is called fasciculus myrrhae a bundle of myrrh Cantic 1.12 From this day of shaking the sheafe the Jewes began to count seven weekes complete which is 49. dayes and then the next day was the Pentecost which was the 50. So 50. dayes from the resurrection of Christ including also that day came downe the holy Ghost upon the Apostles by the which the will of God is written in our hearts as here the law of God was written in tables of stone Thus far Rupertus proceedeth well 2. But his mistaking is in this partly touched before where the law prescribeth that they should begin to account the seven weekes from the morrow of the Sabbath Levit. 23.10 he understandeth this of the seventh day only that they were to expect the next Sabbath day after the Pasch and the morrow after to begin their account of seven weekes By which meanes a great errour would fall out that if the Passeover fell out upon the first day of the weeke there would be not onely seven but eight weekes betweene the Passeover and Pentecost which was against the meaning of the law By the Sabbath therefore in this place is not precisely meant the Sabbath day but that solemne day of rest which was the 15. day of the moneth which was commanded as strictly to be kept as the Sabbath without doing any worke therein and therefore it is better translated Postridie cessationis The next day after that solemne rest then the next day or morrow after the Sabbath Iun. But yet at this time when our blessed Saviour rose againe this day of shaking the sheafe fell out the morrow of the seventh and Sabbath day but not according to Rupertus rule but by this occasion This yeere wherein Christ the true Passeover was sacrificed the first solemne day was the 15. then followed the Sabbath which was the 16. day wherein because they were forbidden to doe any worke they could not that day put the fickle into the corne as is prescribed Deut. 16.4 And therefore in such cases they put it off till the next day following the Sabbath QUEST XIX How the Lord is said here to descend Vers. 11. THe third day the Lord will come downe Three wayes this terme of descending is used in Scripture when mention is made of God or his Angels 1. It is attributed unto God improperly for he being an infinite essence cannot be contained in any place as that which is of infinite quantity and magnitude cannot goe from place to place because it occupieth all places So neither can God who is of an infinite and incomprehensible nature either ascend or descend Therefore when God is said to descend it must not be understood properly sed quantum ad aliquam demonstrationem effectus in aliquae parte orbis c. But in respect of the demonstration of some effect in some part of the world where God did not manifest himselfe before Tostat. Descendere Deus dicitur quando aliquod novum quod antea non fuerit in humana creatura operatur God is said to descend when hee worketh some new and strange thing in the humane creature which was not before Eucherius As the holy Ghost is said to descend upon Christ because of that demonstration and representation in the likenesse of a Dove which lighted upon Christ and here the Lord descendeth in a thick cloud 2. Christ also is said to descend from heaven secundum idiomatum communionem because of the unity of his person and mutuall communicating of the properties of his nature whereas his Godhead could not properly descend but it is said so to doe propter humanam naturam assumptam in respect of the humane nature which hee had assumed Tostat. 3. These two are improper kindes of descending but Angels may be said properly to descend because they are finite spirits and so although nullum occupent locum sibi tamen definiunt though they occupy no place yet they are defined and limited in a place so that when they are present in one part of the world at the same instant they cannot bee in another Tostatus will have the descending here spoken
particular persons God is said to have done it and not the Angels as it is said God prepared a worme to smite Ionas gourd Ion. 4.7 Therefore this observation also of Tostatus is untrue 4. But this evasion he hath that if the name of God be used and not of the Angels in such small and particular workes it is for the confirming of those that be weake but they which are weake because they cannot ascend at the first or comprehend the majesty and omnipotency of God had so much the more need by the secondary ministration of Angels to bee brought unto that high and deepe apprehension of God And indeed the ministry of Angels serveth especially for the comfort and supporting of the weake whose faith not serving them immediatly to depend upon God are the more easily brought to have confidence in him by the subordinate deputation and ministry of Angels So when Daniel was in great distresse and perplexity in the lions denne God sent his Angell to stop the mouth of the lions and to comfort Daniel Dan. 6.22 So when Ioseph was doubtfull what to doe concerning Mary an Angell of the Lord appeared unto him in a dreame to confirme him saying Feare not to take Mary for thy wife Matth. 1.20 5. That instance of Iakobs vision of the ladder directly proveth that it was God that appeared unto Iakob and not an Angell 1. Because it is said that Iehovah stood upon it and said by which name of Iehovah no Angell is called in Scripture 2. He that speaketh to Iakob nameth himselfe the Lord God of Abraham 3. He that speaketh is but one but the Angels which ascended and descended were many 4. He saith The land whereon thou sleepest will I give thee and thy seede but the earth is only the Lords 5. Iakob himselfe saith that Iehovah was in that place Gen. 28.16 6. 1. The people were but yet weake while they were in the wildernesse yet then and there that great worke of leading and keeping the people and bringing them to the land of Promise is ascribed to an Angell which was none other but Christ the Angell of Gods presence Exod. 23.20 2. Yea wee shall finde that mention is made oftner in the stories of the Patriarkes and first Fathers of Israel as in the bookes of Genesis and Exodus when they were yet as it were in their infancy of the apparition and ministry of Angels then afterward for it was fit that they should be confirmed by such visible and sensible meanes therefore this reason here alleaged by Tostatus holdeth not 3. And in that place whereof instance is given by Angel is understood some Prophet and man of God not any of the celestiall spirits because the place is named from whence he came from Gilgal and hee is said to ascend or goe up but Angels descend from heaven and it is not unusuall in Scripture to call Prophets the Lords Angels as Hagg. 1.13 and Apocal. 2. and 3. chapter thorowout QUEST XXI Whether it were Iehovah the Lord Christ or an Angell that came downe upon mount Sinai 7. BUt that it was Iehovah himselfe the Lord Christ that appeared in mount Sinai and talked with Moses and gave them the law it is thus proved 1. Because he is called Iehovah which name is never in Scripture given unto Angels 2. Hee saith vers 5. Though all the earth bee mine but the earth is the Lords Psal. 24. not the Angels 3. The Lord here maketh a covenant with his people vers 5. But God himselfe not the Angels make a covenant with men to bee his people And so the Lord saith hee was an husband unto them Iere. 31.32 but Christ and not the Angels is the husband of the Church behold the Church is not the spouse of the Angels but Christs 4. He which writ the Law in tables of stone was the same that gave the Law to Moses but those tables were written by the finger of God Exod. 3â— 18 the same finger that writeth in the fleshy tables of mens hearts Ierem. 31.33 2. Cor. 3.2 5. S. Paul saith it was ordained by Angels in the hand of a Mediatour Gal. 3.14 The Angels attended as ministers and as the Lords instruments were used in those thunders and lightnings But the Lord himselfe the Mediatour both of the old and new Testament was there present as the Author of the Law as Moses saith The Lord came from Sinai c. he came with ten thousand of Saints and at his right hand a fiery Law for them Deut. 33.2 6. He that wrought those wonders in Egypt and carried the people as upon Eagles wings was the same that delivered the Law vers 4. But Iehovah himselfe did the first for many of the wonders in Egypt could not be done by any but the Lord as in converting and changing of one substance into another as of a rod into a Serpent of water into bloud of the dust into lice And so much Tostatus himselfe confesseth Fiâ—â—ant talia portenta quae nullus poterat facere nisi Deus Such wondrous things were done which none could doe but God So it was Iehovah himselfe that did leade the people thorow the red Sea and destroyed the Egyptians as chap. 14.24 Iehovah looked unto the hoast of the Egyptians out of the fiery and cloudy piller who is before called the Angell of God vers 19. which was the Lord Christ called the Angell of the covenant Malach. 3.1 So chap. 15.14 Iehovah brought the waters of the Sea upon them And further that Iehovah himselfe conducted the Israelites is evident Exod. 33.15 My presence shall go with thee And yet the Lord saith Exod. 23.20 Behold I send an Angell before thee to keepe thee in the way but what Angell this was is expressed afterward my name is in him This great Angell of the covenant in whom was Gods name and his presence who else could it be but the Lord Christ the Iehovah And that God himselfe appeared unto the Patriarkes and Prophets and not the Angels onely it is evident Numb 12.8 where the Lord saith Vnto Moses I will speake mouth to mouth c. he shall see the similitude of the Lord and the Apostle witnesseth that he that is Moses endured at he which saw him which is in visible Heb. 11.27 Not that Moses did see the very glory and substance of God who is invisible and whom never man saw nor can see 1. Tim. 6.12 but he saw only his backe parts Exod. 33.14 that is some part of his glory as the Lord thought good to reveale according as Moses was able to apprehend And that in this place it was Iehovah himselfe that came downe in Mount Sinai beside these reasons before alleaged it is the generall opinion of Divines both old and new Gregor Nyssen Praecepit Deus populo per Moseâ— ut tam corpore quam animo mundus fierit God commanded the people by Moses that they should be cleane both in body and soule Hierom.
ut populus c. Moses feared but not as the people with a servile feare but with a filiall which was nothing else but a religious reverence and observance Ferus QUEST XXXVI What it was that Moses spake and the Lord answered Vers. 19. MOses spake and God answered 1. Some thinke that this which God answered was the decalogue or ten commandements which follow in the next Chapter Osiand But there God is said first to speake he answered not Moses when he gave the law 2. Some thinke that Moses spake and the Lord answered Ille interrogando Dominus docendo Moses in asking the Lord and the Lord in teaching him Gloss. interlin But it is not like that Moses in this great feare and terrible sight would first begin to speake unto God 3. Ferus saith Quid aliud loquitur pius cum Deo quam orando confitendo laudando What other thing doth the godly speake with God than in praying confessing praising and what else doth God answer than in hearing their prayers But it is like that not Moses onely but Aaron and other of the faithfull so spake as well as Moses in praying and confessing unto God therefore some speciall speech is here signified that Moses uttered 4. Some adde further that God gave authoritie here to Moses in plaine words that the people might understand Genevens But the charge and authoritie given to Moses was after he was come up to the mount vers 24. but this was before 5. Therefore though it be not here expressed what words Moses spake it is most like they were those words which the Apostle maketh mention of Heb. 12.21 I feare and quake and that the Lord answered Moses with comfortable words animating and encouraging him Iun. As in like manner The Lord spake to Elias in a soft and still voyce after he had sent before a terrible wind earth-quake and fire 1 King 19. 6. This conference then betweene God and Moses was before he was called up to the mount contrary to the opinion of Cajetane and Hugo de S. Victor who thinke that this clause is transposed and that Moses was first called up and then the Lord had this speech with Moses But beside that no transposing of the history is to be admitted in Scripture but where necessary occasion enforceth it in the preventing of some inconvenience it is not like that Moses would have uttered such words of feare as is before shewed out of the Apostle after the Lord had called him to come up into the mountaine 7. Beside we refuse their conceit that thinke this voyce onely to have beene understood of Moses and not of the people Pellican For if Moses were yet below with the people and not gone up it is most like that all the people heard the Lords voyce answering Moses and therefore it is said he answered by voyce that is in an audible voyce in plaine words Genevens And because the Lord had told Moses before vers 9. that the people should heare while the Lord talked with him And herein the Lord would shew how gracious Moses was in his fight with whom he talked as one friend with another Exod. 33.11 Ferus QUEST XXXVII Whether God himselfe or an Angell spake to Moses in the mount ANd God answered by voyce 1. Tostatus is of opinion that God himselfe spake not to Moses but that this voyce was framed by the ministry of the Angels Gregorie also before him seemeth to have held the same for he maketh but two wayes whereby God speaketh Aut per seipsum Dominus loquitur aut per Angelicam creaturam God speaketh either by himselfe or by his creatures the Angels when hee speaketh himselfe Sine verbis cor docetur The heart is taught without words or voyce As the spirit spake inwardly to Philip to goe and joyne himselfe to the Eunuches chariot Act. 8.29 and so the Spirit said to Peter three men seeke thee Act. 10.29 But when God speaketh by an Angell sometime they doe it by words as when that voyce came from heaven Ioh. 12.28 I have both glorified it and will glorifie it againe sometime by things done and signes such was the vision of Ezechiel chap. 1. sometime by words and signes together as Adam in Paradise heard both the voyce and the noise of God walking in the garden sometime the Angels spake by representations shewed unto the inward sight such was the vision of Iacobs ladder Gen. 28. sometime by outward demonstration to the eyes as when the Angels appeared in humane shape to Abraham Gen. 18. sometime the Angels speake by the instrument of celestiall substances as when that voyce came out of the cloud in the Baptisme of Christ This is my beloved Sonne c. sometime by terrene creatures as when the Angell opened the mouth of Balaams Asse to speake sometime Per Angelum humanis cordibus loquitur Deus God speaketh by an Angell to the heart of man as Zacharie saith The Lord answered the Angell that talked in me Zach. 1.13 To this purpose Gregor 28. lib. Moral cap. 2. 2. Contra. To some things here handled by Gregorie exception will be taken 1. Though sometime when a voyce is heard from heaven it is done by the ministry of Angels as when the Angels have appeared as to Hagar Gen. 16. to Abraham Gen. 22. yet it followeth not that alwayes when a voyce is so framed that it is the worke of an Angell for have Angels power to make a sound and voyce without Organes and Instruments and hath not the Lord which made the Angels and shall we tie the Lord so short as that he shall not speake by voyce and words unto mortall men but the Angels must be called for to helpe out the worke 2. That voyce which was uttered to Christ Ioh. 12. was the voyce of God and not of an Angell the people that stood by some said it was a thunder some that an Angell spake but they were deceived the one as well as the other for Christ prayeth to his Father Father glorifie thy name and his Father answereth him 3. And it is evident that the voyce which Adam heard in Pradise was the voyce of God himselfe for so God saith unto him Hast thou eaten of the fruit of the tree whereof I commanded thee thou shouldest not eat Gen. 3.11 but it was God himselfe that made man and not an Angell that gave him that commandement 4. Neither was it the voyce of an Angell but of God himselfe which came from heaven saying This is my beloved Sonne for Christ is the Sonne not of Angels but of God the Father And S. Peter testifieth that the voyce came from the excellent glorie 2 Pet. 1.17 5. And that place is mistaken in Zacharie where though the Latine interpreter whom Gregorie followeth read qui loquutus est in me which spake in me yet it is better translated which spake to me Vatab. Iun. For although in the originall the word be bi in me it
whole ministration of the old Testament and not to the law onely Quis dubitat per Angelos ministratam fuisse omnem veteris Testamenti dispensationem Who doubteth but that all the dispensation of the old Testament was ministred by the Angels Marlorat in 3. Galath v. 19. and Iunius in his Parallels upon that place Act. 7.53 saith to this effect that the Angels were ministri postea sermonis ad populum non authores legis that the Angels were ministers of the word afterward to the people but not authors of the law But this place being compared with Act. 7.53 and Galath 3.19 where it is said that the law was ordained by Angels it will draw also the word here said to be spoken by the Angels to be understood of the law 5. Iunius hath another exposition that the law was ordained inter Angelos among the Angels Annot Galath 3.19 and in his Parallels he saith the law was exhibited onely by Christ inter ordines Angelorum among the orders of the Angels but the phrase it selfe spoken by the Angels giveth more to be understood than among the Angels 6. Wherefore I preferre Chrysostoms exposition upon that place Galath 3.19 Sentit ipsos Angelos subministrasse ferenda legi He meaneth that the Angels did minister at the giving of the Law It is one thing for the Angels as Gods deputies to deliver the Law another as ministers and instruments As sometime the Prince may send Commissioners to execute his Edicts who doe supplie his person and authoritie sometime he being present in Majestie may by the mouth of another proclaime his Edict So at other times the Angels did speake in the name and person of God as the Angell did call to Abraham Genes 22. sometime they did attend as ministring spirits upon the Majestie of God as his Criers and Proclaimers So the law was delivered in mount Sinai by the authoritie of God himselfe appearing in Majestie who endited and framed the law but it might be proclaimed by the Angels concurring by their ministrie in the framing of that audible voyce and sound which was heard QUEST XXXVIII Why Moses is commanded to charge the people againe Vers. 21. GOe downe charge the people 1. Though this charge was given before yet the Lord commandeth it to be done againe Imminente jam hora ad majorem certitudinem The very houre being now instant for more certaintie Lyran. For they would the rather take heed Cum recentius in Dei prasentia mandarentur Being charged afresh and in the presence of God Tostat. 2. Another reason of renuing this charge was the stubborne nature of the people who had need often to be admonished and although Moses thought it not needfull againe to charge them as it appeareth by his answer and in a manner refusall vers 23. yet the Lord Sciebat sibi cum prafractis esse negotium Knew that he had to deale with such as were stubborne Calvin 3. And further though they had beene straitly charged before not to exceed their prefixed limits and bounds yet they would have adventured Ipso absente mora tamdiu curiâ—sâ— appetitu victi In Moses absence partly not enduring longer delay partly of a curious desire to have gone beyond their marks Galas 4. As also the charge is iterated in respect of the speciall interdict of the Priests who might have presumed being not before specially and in particular named the charge being given to the people in generall Simler QUEST XXXIX What Priests are here understood Vers. 21. ANd let the Priests also 1. Because the order of Priests was not yet instituted some thinke that is spoken by anticipation and prevention that afterward when the Priests should be ordained and consecrated they should be sanctified when they came into the presence of God Ex Lyran. But it seemeth by the sending downe of Moses that this charge was presently to be given by Moses and by the other to be executed And further it is said Let the Priests which come to the Lord be sanctified The Lord then speaketh of those Priests which already had accesse unto God not of those which should be assigned afterward Tostat. 2. Some thinke that by this word cohanim which signifieth as well Princes as Priests are understood the Tribunes Officers and Judges of the people which were before appointed by the counsell and advice of Iethro Lippom. Genevens But their office was to judge the people and heare their controversies the office of those Priests was to have accesse unto the presence of God in offering of sacrifices 3. Some thinke that the Priests were consecrated now but that it is set downe afterward Oleaster But this were without any necessitie to disturbe and transpose the order of the storie 4. Therefore their opinion is most probable who thinke that these Priests were the first borne to whom the prerogative of the Priesthood belonged till it was by Gods appointment setled in the Tribe of Levi But neither all the first borne in Israel that were consectated unto God were Priests as Iun. Borrh. For it is not probable in so great a multitude Singulis domibus proprios fuisse Sacerdotes That every house had his peculiar and proper Priest Calvin Neither were they onely Primogeniti Principum duodecim tribuum c. The first borne of the Princes of the twelve Tribes which offered sacrifice chap. 24.5 As R. Salomon Lyran. For so small a number of Priests sufficed not for the whole multitude They were then as well Filii primogeniti aliorum magnorum virorum The first borne sonnes of other great men which were the Princes of the families as the first borne of the Princes of the Tribes Tostat. quaest 12. 5. And by drawing neere unto God is not here meant that speciall kind of accesse to enquire of God which Moses did onely then and the high Priest afterward by his Vrim and Thummim but the comming unto God to minister as the Chalde interpreteth Tostat. Lippom. QUEST XL. Why Moses replieth as unwilling to goe downe Vers. 23. ANd Moses said unto the Lord. 1. Some thinke that Moses thus replied Quod non videbatur necessarium ut ista contestatio fierat As though it seemed not necessarie that this contestation should be made Tostat. But it is not to be thought that Moses would so contradict the Lord having beene of late in so great feare that the Lord spake unto him to comfort him 2. Some say that Moses thus spake not as though he tooke this charge to be superfluous but to shew his faithfulnesse that he had carefully before intimated to the people the will and pleasure of God therein Simler But the Lord was not ignorant what Moses had done that he needed to make repetition of his service 3. Some thinke that Moses Andiendo populo mandatum refricat That Moses thus answereth that hee might in hearing of the people rubbe their memorie lest they might forget any thing of the charge Pellican But Moses was
Quievit à condendo alio mundo non quievit ab administrando God rested from creating another world but not from the administration and government thereof Lippoman as our blessed Saviour saith in the Gospell My father worketh and I woâ—ke 2. But God rested not as though he were wearie for virtus infinita non est fatigabilis an infinite power cannot be wearied as Gods power is infinite though Aristotle ignorantly denie it giving this for a reason why the earth moveth not because there is no power sufficient to stirre it out of the place lib. 2. de Caelo And beside potentia incorporea a power which is incorporeall is not subject to be wearie though it be not infinite as the Angels and the intellectuall part of man though this seeme sometime to bee dulled not in it selfe but in respect of the organes and instruments but if spirits of a finite nature are not fatigable or apt to be wearied much lesse God who is an infinite spirit Tostat. qu. 15. 3. Therefore God is said to rest both that this rest might bee mâ—numentum perfectae absolutae creationis a monument of the creation perfited and that God by his example might induce us in like manner to rest from our labours upon his Sabbaths QUEST XIV Of the changing of the Sabbath from the seventh day to the first day of the weeke THe seventh day 1. The Apostolicall Church changed the holy day of rest from the seventh day to the first which is the Lords day in remembrance of our Redemption by Christ which in the time of the new law is maximum beneficiorum recentissimum the greatest benefit and the newest and most fresh in memorie as the greatest benefit in the old law was the creation of the world 2. And although our redemption was purchased by the death of Christ yet because this benefit should not have a full perfection unlesse we should rise againe unto life eternall this day was to be assigned rather in memoriall of Christs resurrection than of his passion and though the rest of the Sabbath did signifie the rest of Christ in the grave having consummate and finished the painfull works of his passion yet because pretiosior nobis fuit resurrectio c. the resurrection of Christ was more precious unto us than his rest in the grave therefore not upon the Sabbath but upon the day of the resurrection doe we keepe an holy memoriall unto God Tostat. quaest 11. 3. The Apostolicall Church according to their Christian libertie in stead of the seventh day made choyce of the first in remembrance of the resurrection of Christ ut se à Iudaica synogoga discerneret that they might be discerned from the Jewish Synagogue Vrsin QUEST XV. How the Lord is said to have blessed and sanctified the day Vers. 11. THerefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day c. 1. Not that other dayes were accursed sed quod prae aliis hanc celebrem fecit but because he preferred this before the rest for if those dayes are counted blessed and had in remembrance wherein some good is wrought for the Church or Common-wealth much more this day wherein all things were finished Simler 2. Of the other six dayes it is not said the Lord blessed them for it was sufficient quod in singulis illis creatura productae sunt that in every one of them some creature was brought forth but of this day it is said God blessed and sanctified it what is this He sanctified it ab aliis illum segregavit he did separate and set it apart from other dayes Chrysost. homil 10. in Genes 3. Benedictio semper importat multiplicationem c. Blessing doth alwayes imply multiplying So God bestowed many blessings and good things upon this day beyond other dayes Tostat. qu. 16. 4. Isidore doth specially referre this Commandement to the holy Ghost for these reasons quia spiritus sanctus septiformis dicitur c. because the holy Ghost in respect of the manyfold graces thereof is said to be seven-fold the sanctifying of the seventh day peculiarly belongeth unto the Spirit quia non est nominata sanctificatio nisi in Sabbato and because no mention is made of sanctification but in the Sabbath day and further for that dono spiritus sancti nobis requies aeterna prâ—mittitur by the gift of the Spirit eternall rest is promised unto us whereof mention is made in this precept 5. But how is the Lord said to blesse the Sabbath here seeing the Lord saith by his Prophet I cannot suffer your new Moones and your Sabbaths Isai. 1.13 The answer is that the Jewes sinned carnaliter observantes sabbatum in observing the Sabbath carnally and so the Sabbath is not acceptable unto God but when it is so kept as that it putteth us in minde of our everlasting rest in the Kingdome of heaven Isidor 2. Places of Doctrine observed out of the fourth Commandement 1. Doct. Of the generall and particular contents of this Commandement IN this Commandement generally all such holy works and duties are prescribed to be done whereby the service of God is advanced and likewise therein is forbidden either the omission and neglect of such holy works or the prophanation thereof by all such works as do hinder the holy exercises and are contrary thereunto 1. In particular here is commanded the faithfull and diligent preaching and setting forth of the Word of God as the Apostle saith Wo is unto me if I preach not the Gospell 1 Cor. 9.16 and he chargeth Timothie to preach the Word to be instant in season and out of season 2 Tim. 4.2 Contrary to this dutie are 1. The neglect and omitting of teaching and preaching as the Prophet Esay reproveth the idle and carelesse watchmen They are all dumbe dogges they cannot barke they lie and sleepe and delight in sleeping Isai. 56.10 2. The abusing and counterfeiting of this holy function when the word of God is not sincerely and purely handled but according to mens fansies and humours but the Apostle saith We are not as those that make merchandize of the Word of God 2 Cor. 2.17 2. The often administration of the Sacraments as occasion serveth is another exercise whereby the Lords day is sanctified as Act. 2.42 They continued in the Apostles doctrine fellowship breaking of bread Contrary hereunto on the Ministers behalfe are 1. The negligent administration of the Sacraments and omitting to call upon the people often to resort unto them 2. The corrupting or perverting of the Sacraments as the Romanists have turned the Sacrament into a sacrifice being ordained for the living they applie it to the dead Christ biddeth us to eat and drinke it they hold it up to be gazed upon and in many such things have they degenerated from the institution of our blessed Saviour 3. The carefull hearing of the Word of God is commanded and diligent resorting to the exercises of religion as the Bereans are commended for searching the
Analys But I rather subscribe to Vrsinus that thinketh originall sinne to be a breach of this precept as originall justice is therein prescribed and commanded because the Morall law is grounded upon the Law of nature which was perfect in man by creation before his fall from which perfection originall sinne is a declining defect This then is the conclusion that these involuntary motions though they doe not venire in rationem coram Deo come into reckoning before God if they presently vanish before the will and affection incline unto them yet they doe shew the corruption of our nature that although they breake not out into a flame yet they are sparkles that flie upward Iob 5.7 our corrupt nature is as the coale and those idle and wandering thoughts as the sparks that flie up but if these sparks doe not kindle into a flame they shall never burne us nor be laid unto our judgement and so Chrysostom sath well Si concupiscentia non consentit voluntas sola concupiscentia non damnat If the will consent not to concupiscence concupiscence alone shall not condemne us Homil. 52. in Matth. which is through Gods mercie for otherwise even originall corruption is sufficient to condemne us QUEST IV. Why there is no precept to direct tha inward passion of anger as of coveting NOw why there is not the like precept given to direct the inward act of the irefull power of the mind as to forbid the first motion of anger and rage as there is virtutis concupiscibilis of the coveting and desiring facultie these reasons are alleaged 1. The like is to be understood in other Commandements that the very internall act and first inclination of the heart unto evill is forbidden but expresly the concupiscence is named because it is more hard to resist the concupiscence whose object is some apparent good either delectable or profitable whereas the inward passion of anger movet ad aliquid triste moveth alwayes to some heavie thing not delightsome or profitable So Tostatus The same reason is yeelded by Thomas Aquin Homicidium secundùm se non est concupiscibile sed magis horribile c. Murther is not of it selfe a thing to be desired but to be abhorred but adulterie Habet rationem alicujus boni scilicet delectabilis furtum boni scilicet utilis Hath respect unto some thing that seemeth good namely delectable good and theft to profitable good therefore the concupiscence of these required a speciall precept rather than the other c. But this is no sufficient reason for both it is as hard to resist anger as any other passion because of all other it is most violent and sudden and beside the angrie man in purposing to doe mischiefe taketh delight therein and thinketh it good for him so to doe so that this passion also hath an object of some thing seeming good for otherwise the will of man naturally is not carried unto that which is taken to be evill 2. In this precept even that concupiscence is forbidden which is involuntarie and hath not the assent of the will for as Chrysostom saith Concupiscimus frequenter etiam quod nolumus We covet often that which wee will not All other voluntarie inclinations of the minde to adulterie or theft are prohibited in those other precepts but there is no anger without a purpose of revenge and so hath a consent of the will and so there need no speciall precept for that it properly belonging to that precept Thou shalt not kill as our blessed Saviour sheweth Matth. 5.22 To this purpose Tostatus saith well Ira audit rationem syllogizantem c. Anger heareth reason disputing whether it be meet to take revenge and before reason hath thus concluded anger riseth not but anger hearing this first conclusion that it is fit to take revenge staieth not to heare the second whom and how wee are to revenge but as a quicke messenger that goeth away before hee hath halfe his arrand and as angrie dogges that when they see one doe straightwayes imagine that it is their part to barke not considering who it is that they barke at whether their master or no so anger being an hot and hastie passion resolving by reason of the thing yet weigheth not every circumstance Now concupiscence when any object is offered heareth no reason at all but presently falleth to coveting of it Ex Tostat. qu. 27. QUEST V. Whether sinne properly consist in the internall or externall act IT is here the opinion of the Hebrewes that if a man onely desire another mans wife in his heart and goe no further he sinneth not and Iosephus lib. 12. Antiquit. reproveth Polybius the Historiographer for saying that Antiochus died miserably because he would have spoyled the Temple adding further Si solùm cogitavit non egit peccatum That if he onely thought to doe so he sinned not therefore he was not punished for that but for other evils which he had done in Jerusalem Ex Lyran. Contra. But it may bee made manifest by divers reasons that sinne consisteth rather in actu interiori quà m exteriori In the internall rather than externall act 1. That maketh a good or evill act which is in a mans power but the externall act is not often in mans power but the internall is as the act of the understanding and will as the Apostle saith Rom. 7.18 To will is present with me but I finde no meanes to performe that which is good c. 2. Onely it is proper unto man beyond beasts to doe a good or evill act but the externall act bruit beasts can doe as well as man therefore it is the internall facultie of the understanding and will that maketh the act good or bad 3. If in the externall act good and evill onely were found then Angels should doe neither good nor bad which have no externall act because they have no externall faculties powers or instruments the will therefore and understanding which onely are in Spirits are the causes of good and bad actions 4. The same externall acts may bee done as well by those that sleepe by fooles and mad men as by the waking by wise and sober men but the externall act in those is not sinne because it proceedeth not from the will and understanding 5. Both divine and humane lawes make a difference betweene voluntarie and involuntarie acts as in wilfull and casuall murther but the externall act in both is all one 6. Therefore Actus exterior secundùm se nec bonus nec malus est The externall act of it selfe is neither good nor evill but yet in men because of the connexion which the externall act hath with the internall there is some goodnesse or evilnesse found though not so properly as in the internall for there are two acts of the will and understanding the immediate act as to understand to will which is called actâ—â— elicitus the act which issueth out and there is a mediate act as to kill to commit adultery
being otherwise good Kings that suffred them to remaine 4. Yet here it is further to be considered that there were two sorts of high places for some were consecrated to idolatry as those which Salomon had built about Jerusalem for Ashteroth Chemosh and Milchom which places Iosias defiled 1 King 23.14 There were other high places where the Priests of the Lord offered sacrifice to the Lord whom Iosias also put downe not suffring them to come up to the Altar of the Lord but onely to eat of the unleavened bread among their brethren 1 King 23.9 who if they had beene idolatrous Priests could not have beene permitted to eat of the unleavened bread Tostat. quast 44. QUEST XXVI How God is said to come and goe and how he is said to be in the world Vers. 24. I Will come unto thee c. 1. God neither commeth nor goeth by moving from place to place for that which is infinite and in every place cannot move or change the place for where any moving is there one place is left to goe unto another but God being of an infinite essence is in all places alike 2. Yet though God be in every place yer he occupieth no place Nihil magis indivisibile minùs occupans quà m Deus Nothing is more indivisible and lesse occupying a place than God is An Angell cannot enter into a mans soule Deus tamen illabitur ei totus intus manet c. Yet God doth enter into a mans soule and wholly remaine within it 3. There is some similitude herein betweene God who is an infinite Spirit and the other finite spirits as namely the soule of man which is said to be tota in toto corpore tota in qualibet parte whole and all in the whole body and whole and all in every part which is to be understood not after one and the same manner There is a threefold union betweene the soule and the body unitur ei ut finis it is united unto it as the end for the body is ordained to this end to be perfected by the soule secondly it is united unto the body as the forme thereof for by the joyning of the soule to the body as the forme a man is distinguished in his kinde from all other creatures and in this sense the soule as the forme is whole in the whole body Thirdly the soule is united to the body tanquam motor as an agent and mover so it giveth power to the eye to see to the eare to heare and to every other part a severall faculty and power and thus also the soule is said to be whole and all in every part Now then as the soule is in the whole body and yet in no one part more than in another so is God in the world comprehending all and himselfe not being comprehended 4. Further thus it may be shewed that God is not in any place neither moveth from place to place for other finite spirits because they are compositi ex actu potentia they consist of an act and a power or possibility they being in one place have a power or possibility to be in another therefore God because he is purus act us a pure act must of necessity be every where for otherwise he should not be altogether in act if being in one place hee had not a power or possibility to be in another for then he should not be actually there but in power and possibility only 5. As a finite spirit is said to be in that place in quo applicat virtutem suum where it doth exercise and apply the power as the soule is in the body because it only exerciseth the vertue and power in the body so God because hee exerciseth his power in and over all the world must needs bee in every place of the world 6. God therefore is said two wayes to be in the world secundùm potentiam virtutem according to his power and vertue and secundùm essentiam according to his essence And yet God is so in the world as yet he is not included and limited in the world and he is so without the world as yet not excluded out of the world as Augustine saith Deus est in mundo non inclusus extra mundum non exclusus supra mundum non elatus infra mundum non depressus God is in the world but not included without the world but not excluded above the world yet not elevated or lifted up and under the world yet not depressed or put under c. which must be understood according to Gods essentiall presence for according to his power and working he is only in the world because he worketh in the world 7. And although the power of God be infinite so that if there were other worlds beside this thither Gods infinite power would extend it selfe yet the action or exercising of that power in the world is finite quia actio non potest esse major quà m id quod sit the action cannot be greater than that which is wrought or made therefore because the world is finite the action or exercising of the divine power in the world is finite and determinate likewise yet the divine power in it selfe remaineth infinite 8. Now then God is said to goe from place to place not in respect of his essence but of his power and vertue and of this power of God there is a double action one generall whereby God governeth the world and worketh in every place and so God cannot be said to goe from place to place because this generall power worketh in all places and at all times there is a speciall action or operation of the divine power as when he worketh miracles and wonders and sheweth manifest signes of his power and presence more in one place than in another And according to this speciall operation the Lord is understood to goe and come thorowout the Scripture Tostat. qu. 46.47 And so in this place he saith I will come and blesse thee Veniam occulta inspiratione benedicam corporali spirituali benedictione I will come by secret inspiration I will blesse thee both with corporall and spirituall blessings Gloss. interlinear QUEST XXVII Whether it were not lawfull to goe up by steps to the Altar Vers. 26. THou shalt not goe up by steps unto mine Altar 1. All kinde of ascending unto the Altar is 〈◊〉 forbidden for the Altar being three cubits high chap. 27. the Priests could not minister without some ascent and rising up to the Altar there was therefore Quidam ascensus sin◠gradibu◠punlatim ascendendo A certaine ascent or going up without steps rising by little and little as ◠Salomon thinketh Lyran. Ascensus erat continuns de terra the going up was continued by the rising of the earth Tostat. 2. Therefore all steppings up being forbidden for the reason after alleaged lest their nakednesse should be seene magis vetantur gradus scalae ligneae the steps or scales
it must be either of cleane beasts or uncleane but the uncleane nor â—â—y part thereof were not to bee brought into the Tabernacle The cleane beasts were of two sorts either such which they might eat of but not sacrifice as the Hart the Rocbuck and the like but these being uncleane in respect of any religious use because they were not to be sacrificed no part thereof was to be brought into the Tabernacle And as for the cleane beasts which might â—e sacrificed the fat thereof was to be burned upon the Altar Tostat. qu. 6. 2. These spices were of two sorts some were to be tempered and incorporate together to make a soft and liquid ointment and some to be beaten to powder to make a sweet perfume they were to bring them not mixed or compounded but in their simple nature for neither did they know how to compound them but Moses by Gods direction shewed after how they should be made and beside if they had brought the ointment and perfume ready compounded there had beene danger lest they should have prophaned it for their private uses which is straitly forbidden chap. 30. Tostat. qu. 8. QUEST XIV Of the mysticall and morall application of these divers oblations COncerning the spirituall application and end of these divers oblations 1. Beda doth mystically interpret them by the gold he understandeth a sincere faith more precious than gold by silver the confession of faith by the blew or silke colour the lifting up of our hearts to heaven by the purple the sufferings and passions which are endured for the truth by the double scarlet the two fold love of God and our neighbours by the silke the chastity of the flesh by the goats heire whereof they made sackcloth repentance 2. But Rupertus application is more fit and lesse curious by these divers oblations he understandeth the divers gifts which God hath bestowed upon his Church As some he gave to be Apostles some Prophets some Evangelists Haec grandia dona aurum argentum sunt c. These great gifts are as the gold silver and precious stones whereby the spirituall Temple is built 3. Likewise Procopius maketh this morall use that as here the Lord accepteth not only the gold and silver sed neque laâ—aem caprinam aspernatur c. so neither doth he despise even the goats haire if it be offered with a franke mind c. So God refuseth not the smallest and meanest gifts which are offered unto him in faith as our blessed Saviour commended the devotion of the poore widow that threw two mites into the treasury QUEST XV. Of the signification of the Sanctuary and wherefore it was ordained Vers. 8. ALso they shall make me a Sanctuarie 1. Some Hebrew Rabbines as R. Abraham Ab. Ezra doe very curiously by the Tabernacle decipher the three worlds the Intellectuall world where is the seat of God with his Angels for so over the Arke was Gods mercy seat and the Cherubims stretching their wings over it represented the Angels and blessed Spirits And the Materiall world as they would have the blew covering to signifie heaven the vaile the clouds the seven lampes the seven planets by the fire on the Altar and the water in the laver they understand the element of fire and water So the third world which is called the little world which is within man they would have represented by this Tabernacle as in the Arke there were two tables so there is in mans minde understanding and reason as there were divers instruments in the Tabernacle for divers purposes so in man there are divers organicall parts for the naturall functions and operations And in this curious manner the Rabbines goe on pleasing themselves in their owne fansies whereas the Lord ordained not his Tabernacle for any such end or purpose but onely that they might have a place where to professe the worship of God that he might dwell among them and shew them comfortable signes of his presence in hearing their prayers and granting their requests 2. Yea these Rabbines to their curiosity adde impiety for they thinke that God ordained the Tabernacle and the instruments of divers figures and divers mettals Vt diversae virtutes à coelestibus influxae recipiantur c. That thereby divers vertues should have their influence from the celestiall bodies and to this end they say the Temple was afterward built at Jerusalem because of some supernaturall influence in that place more than in others In which Rabbinicall assertion Ab. Ezra bewrayeth 1. Both impiety making God as an Inchanter or Sorcerer working by figures and mettals as Magicians in their inchantments observe such things whereas the Lord by his Law condemneth all such superstitions 2. As also absurdity tying the Lords supernaturall working to certaine places and instruments Gods naturall operation indeed is exercised by such naturall subordinate meanes as he hath appointed but his supernaturall worke is not limited to places nor meanes 3. Likewise an impossibility followeth in making corporall and materiall things the instruments to convey spirituall graces whereas spirituall things are not derived but by spirituall meanes Tostat. qu. 9. 3. But the true ends wherefore the Sanctuary was ordained where these First the Historicall that seeing God had made the Israelites a peculiar people to himselfe that they might have a peculiar kinde of worship from all other nations therefore God appointeth a certaine place with certaine persons and Ministers by whom certaine rites and ceremonies should be performed whereby he would be worshipped with more reverence sanctity and purity than the Gentiles worshipped their gods Tostat. qu. 9. Secondly for the mysticall end Beda saith that this earthly Tabernacle representeth the heavenly unto the similitude whereof we should conforme our selves in earth Si ad Angelorum in coelis consortia tendimus debemus vitam eorum in terris c. imitari If we tend to enjoy the company of Angels in heaven we should imitate their life in earth The Tabernacle also signifieth Christ by whom God is worshipped and in whom God doth manifest himselfe unto us Simler Thirdly every faithfull man is this Temple of God as the Apostle applieth it Ye are the temple of the living God as God hath said I will dwell among them and walke there Whereupon Bernard maketh this morall application Et nos mundemus conscientiam nostram c. And let us purge our conscience that when the Lord commeth paratam in nobis inveniat mansionem he may finde in us a mansion prepared QUEST XVI How the Lord is said to dwell in the Sanctuary Vers. 8. THat I may dwell among them 1. God hath three kinde of temples Habitat principaliter in seipso c. He dwelleth principally in himselfe because he onely comprehendeth himselfe as Apocal. 21.22 The Lord God almightie and the Lamb are the temple of the celestiall Ierusalem Habitat Deus in doâ—â— sacrata c. God also dwelleth in his sacred house by that spirituall worship which is
quantity but in vertue and power 5. 〈…〉 maketh this observation that Cherubim with van alwayes signifieth the creature but without van the worke it selfe of Cherubims But this observation doth not alwayes hold for in this place cherub 〈◊〉 the singular number is expressed with van though Cherubim in the plurall be written without is 〈…〉 they both in this place doe signifie the worke of the Cherubims 6. Therefore the best and 〈◊〉 sense of this word is to signifie a beautifull picture and is metaphorically translated from externall and materiall things to spirituall because the Angels are beautified and adorned with many excellent 〈…〉 In which sense the King of Tyrus in respect of his glorious state is called the annointed Cherub Ezech. 28.14 QUEST XXV What forme and fashion these Cherubims were of COncerning the forme and fashion of these Cherubims there are divers opinions 1. Iosephus thinketh they had the similitude of certain birds which are not knowne unto us being found only in the remote parts of the world and the reason of his opinion may be this lest if they had beene after the similitude of any knowne thing it might have ministred occasion of idolatry But Iosephus is convinced by that which is written Gen. 3. that the Cherubims were see to keepe the way to Paradise they were not fowles or other winged beasts but Angels which kept that way neither was there here any feare of idolatry because these Cherubims were not in the open view and sight of the people but in the most holy place whither none had accesse but only the high 〈◊〉 and that once in the yeere 2. R. Abraham Ab. Ezra thinketh that the Cherubims doe signifie any shape either of bird beast or man as Ezech. 1. the beasts which appeared having the face of an Eagle a Lion a Bullock a Man are chap. 10. called Cherubims Contra. The Prophet calleth them Cherubims not in respect of that forme and shape wherein they appeared but because he knew thâ—m to be Angels and blessed spirits that so appeared therefore he giveth the 〈◊〉 name to them all and there their forme and shape is expressed but when they are called Cherubims without any determination of their forme they are alwayes held to have appeared in humane shape Tostat. qu. 〈◊〉 3. Oleaster leaveth not this matter indifferent as Ab. Ezra but thinketh that these Cherubims had rather formam animalium the sonne of beasts such as Ezechiel describeth than of men because it is no where expressed that the Cherubims had the shape of men as there they are described to have the faces of beasts and beside if they had beene made like men with hands that would have hindered the stretching out of their wings Contra. 1. As though the Cherubims in Ezechiel are not as well said to have had the face of a man as of other creatures there expressed 2. To take away the other doubt and difficulty we need not imagine with Montanus who seâ—â—eth forth the Cherubs with wings only without hands for that were an imperfect forme to give them the shape of a man without hands and the Cherubs described Ezech. 1 8. had 〈◊〉 which came under their wings but the Cherubs might very well be described with stretching out wings notwithstanding their hands which they either touched the mercy seat with as some thinke 〈◊〉 her held them upright as praysing God as R. Salomon 4. Montanus saith 〈…〉 That these Cherubs were divers in the shape of male and female But that is not like 〈◊〉 they were made to represent the Angels and blessed Spirits where is no diversity of sex of male or female 5. The opinion than of R. Salomon is the â—â—st that the Cherubs were pictured and portraited in humane shape in the forme of young men because so the Angels used to appeare in times past as to Abraham and Lot and they 〈…〉 the Angeli were sent from heaven they are said to flie as birds 〈…〉 the ground Tostat. And what shape the Cherubims were of 〈…〉 be gathered by the description 〈◊〉 those which Salomon made which stood upright on their feet 2 Chron. 3. â—3 〈…〉 understood of any other than the humane shape Pelarg. Ribera They were pictured with wings and not naked as Montanus describeth them but clothed and apparelled because it is forbiddâ—nâ— chap. 20. 〈…〉 should be discovered at Gods Altar Iunius QUEST XXVI 〈…〉 Cherubim 〈◊〉 Seraphim BUt it will here 〈…〉 these are called Cherubim rather then Seraphim which is another name giâ—en 〈◊〉 Angels 〈…〉 1. Some were of opinion that they might indifferently be called either Cherubim or Seraphim but Hierom confuteth them writing 〈…〉 say in their prayers Thou which sittest 〈…〉 no where used in Scripture but only 〈…〉 2. Others answer that the Seraphim◠〈…〉 which shall be revealed in the next world the Cherubims ad ministerium for the ministery and service of God and therefore the Cherubims are here pictured rather than the Seraphims Contra. 1. But the most holy place where these Cherubims were set was made to represent Gods glory therefore the Cherubim served here to set forth Gods glory 2. The Seraphims also were ministring Spirits as well as the Cherubims as they are set forth Isay 6. 3. Neither is it a sufficient answer to say that the Seraphims appeared with six wings a peece Isay 6. and these had but two they were therefore Cherubims not Seraphims for the Cherubs that here were described but with two wings Ezach 1.6 were said to have foure So that if that were a good reason these should neither be called Cherubims Therefore they are not so called or distinguished in respect of their more or fewer wings for the Angels being Spirits have neither wings nor any other visible shape of themselves but they are described and called diversly according to those severall offices and imployments wherein it pleaseth God to use them 4. Ribera maketh this to be the reason why God is said to fit upon the Cherubims which word signifieth multitude of knowledge to shew that God farre exceedeth the wisdome and knowledge even of those excellent Spirits and therefore he is said to sit above the Cherubims But beside that this signification of the word Cherub hath no ground as is before shewed God in this sense might as well be said to fit betweene the Seraphim which signifieth burning as fire for the Lord in brightnesse and in fiery justice exceedeth the Angels 5. This reason then may rather be yeelded Visiones ad rerum sâ—â—arum argumenta accommodanda sunt Visions must be applied unto the argument and scope of the things themselves Iun. in Isai. 6.2 Now because Seraphim is a name given to the Angels in respect of their fiery and purging zeale they are so called when they are sent to purge and cleanse the world in being ministers of Gods judgements but Cherubim being a title of love and favour being taken for a beautifull and lovely picture this
Tabernacle so we are in darknesse unlesse the Lord Sursum Ecclesiam illuminet from above doe lighten his Church Calvine 7. As the six branches doe make one bodie with the shaft so Ministri in Christo concordiae studeant Ministers in Christ must studie for concord Osiand 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. Of the divine nature of Christ. Vers. 9. ACcording to all that I shall shew thee so shall they make the forme of the Tabernacle c. As God appointed the forme and fashion of the Tabernacle but the matter thereof was offered by the Israelites So Christ tooke his humanitie from among men Divinitaâ— quae mera forma est à Deo patre ab atâ—rno genita est but his divine nature which is as the forme was begotten of God his Father from all eternitie Simler As touching his humanitie the Apostle saith For as much as the children were partakers of flesh and bloud he also himselfe tooke part with them Of his divine and everlasting being the Evangelist speaketh In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and that Word was God Ioh. 1.1 2. Doct. God will not be worshipped with will-worship FUrther it is hence gathered Forma Tabernaculi non relicta est hominum arbitrio c. The forme of the Tabernacle is not left to the will of man no not to the judgement of Moses to teach us that God will not be served with will-worship according to the devices and inventions of men but as he himselfe hath prescribed Pelarg. Piscatâ—r So our blessed Saviour alleageth in the Gospell out of the Prophet They worship me in vaine teaching for doctrines the commandements of men Mark 7.7 3. Doct. Of the ministerie of Angels Vers. 18. THou shalt make two Cherubims of gold Which sheweth that God useth the ministerie of Angels in protecting of his Church Piscator As the Apostle saith Are they not all ministring spirits sent forth to minister for their sakes that shall be heires of salvation Heb. 1.14 4. Doct. Our sinnes are covered in Christ. Vers. 21. ANd thou shalt put the Mercie seat upon the Arke This Mercie seat signifieth Christ that as it covered the Arke where the tables of the law were kept so our sinnes which are discovered by the law Tecta sunt operculo illo gratia reconciliationis are covered by that covering of grace and reconciliation as it is in the Psalme Blessed is he whose wickednesse is forgiven and whose sinne is covered Psal. 32.1 Borrh. 5. Places of Controversie 1. Confut. Against the sumptuous decking and adorning of Churches Vers. 3. THis is the offering which you shall take of them gold and silver This is no warrant now because the Tabernacle in the old Testament was adorned with silver and gold and other precious things that now the Temples of Christians should be set forth with such ornaments Vbi enim verbum ubi mandatum Where have they any word or warrant for these things as Moses had then Gallas The houses of prayer are to bee reverently kept and decently set forth but superfluous and sumptuous ornaments doe not beseeme the house of God he looketh not to faire and beautifull Churches but unto the humble and contrite heart as the Prophet saith Isa. 66.2 2. Confut. Against the Manichees who refused the old Testament Vers. 8. THat I may dwell among them The Manichees who tooke exception to the old Testament said that herein it was contrarie to the New that God should dwell in houses made with hands whereas our Saviour saith in the New Testament that heaven is Gods seat and the earth is his footstoole Matth. 5. there can be then no house made for God to dwell in This objection Augustine returneth upon them againe shewing that this testimonie is first alleaged in the old Testament Heaven is my throne earth is my footstoole where is that house that you will build for me Isa. 66.1 And therefore therein the old Testament and new concurre that God dwelleth not in Temples made with hands and yet both in the old and new Testament God is said to have his house therefore he concludeth Adaliquam significationem in utroque testamento accipi c. that is so said and taken to signifie some other thing c. God then is said to dwell in the Tabernacle not because any place can comprehend his Majestie but because there it pleased him by some visible signes to manifest his presence 3. Confut. Against the superstitious opinion of the vertue of ceremonies Vers. 22. THere will I appoint with thee Though the Arke were the place where the Lord revealed himselfe and shewed evident signes of his presence yet the Israelites were too superstitiously afterward addicted to the externall ceremonie and thought themselves sufficiently protected if the Arke were with them As in Heli his time when they brought the Arke into the campe they thought themselves sure of the victorie against the Philistims but the Lord caused both them and the Arke to come into their enemies hand to teach them to lay aside all carnall confidence and to seeke unto the Lord. As the superstitious Israelites in this respect abused the Arke so the Romanists put their confidence in their breaden god consecrated host going with it in procession and carrying it about in the fields But this is to attribute too much unto signes Simlerus 4. Confut. That Moses Arke is not at Rome in S. Iohn Laterans Church THis Arke which Moses made the author of the Scholasticall historie thinketh to bee in Rome in the Church of S. Iohn Lâ—teran under the Altar there and by that supposed evidence would prove that the Arke was not made according to the measure of the Geometricall cubit But Tostatus sheweth that not to be so because it is mentioned 2 Maccab. 2. how Ieremie hid the Arke in a cave which afterward could not be found This authoritie presseth them because they hold the first and second books of the Macchabees to be canonicall And howsoever it standeth for the truth of this report it is evident that the Arke was lost before or in the captivitie of Babylon and that the second Temple built after the captivitie never had it By this then it appeareth what small credit is to bee given unto those relikes which are so much boasted of in the Papall Church 5. Confut. Against the erecting and setting up of Images Vers. 22. BEtweene the two Cherubims The idolatrous Romanists have no warrant from hence for their Images which they set up to be adored in their Churches 1. Moses had Gods commandement to doe it they have no such direction 2. That was a time of figures and ceremonies and typicall representations but now in the cleere light of the Gospell all such types and figures are ceased 3. Those Cherubims were not set forth publikly in the peoples view but kept in the most holy place whither none had accesse but the high Priest neither was it lawfull for
for those which did minister and because it is said that Samuels mother made him a little meghil coat But because there was another coat beside under this this is better taken to be the robe which was the outward garment the coat was next underneath which was the longer garment but this the looser it is better therefore translated pallium a robe Iun. than tunica a coat Lat. 2. It is called the robe of the Ephod quia pars non minima superhumerali tegebatur because a great part of it was covered with the Ephod or shoulder garment Beda Et quia immediatè erat sub veste superhumerali And because it was next under the Ephod Cajetan 3. For the fashion of it Hierome thinketh that it had assutas manicas sleeves sewed unto it So also Tostatus But the more probable opinion is that it was sine manicis without sleeves and had only holes or slits in the sides for the armes Montan. Iun. Ribera and Iosephus seemeth to be of the same opinion Qua manus exornatur est scissa It was slit at the going out of the hands c. for the robes used not to have sleeves but the coats and inward garments 4. It had an hole in the middest for the head to goe thorow and it seemeth to have beene inconsutilis tota to have beene made whole of weavers worke without any seame and so was the edge round about the hole for the head made also opere textoris of woven worke ne extrinsecus assuatur it was not sowed to but made out of the same Augustine So also Hierome though Tostatus and Ribera seeme to thinke otherwise that the edge was sewed to therein following Iosephus But the text is against them which prescribeth the edge to be made textorio opere with woven worke and the reason is added ne facilerumpatur that it be not rent but if it had beene sewed to it had not beene so strong and would more easily have rent than being woven unto it 5. The Septuagint whom Iosephus followeth calleth it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 tunicam talarem a coat downe to the feet but it was shorter than the inward coat which was a side garment reaching downe to the ground Montanus And if the bels and pomegranates had hung downe to the feet it would have hit upon the Priests feet and so hindred his going Simler Montanus and Lyranus in their description make it to reach but a little beyond the knees 6. For the matter of it it was unlike unto the Ephod to the making whereof went five things gold blew purple silke skarlet and fine linen but this was made altogether of blew silke like to the hyacinth which Cajetanus taketh to have beene a violet colour some an azure colour like to the aire but it was rather betweene both for if it had beene a perfect violet it would not have differed much from the purple it is better translated then a blew colour than a violet Genevens QUEST XXXII Of the bels which hung in the skirts of the robe Vers. 33. THou shalt make Pomgranates 1. The Pomgranates are prescribed to be made of three colours blew purple skarlet all which doe appeare in the Pomgranates themselves for the kirnels within are red the colour of the rine or barke on the Sunside is purple and on the other blewish And by this mixture the naturall colours of the Pomgranates were fitly represented Montan 2. Oleaster seemeth to thinke that these Pomgranates were rather acupicta quà m suspensa wrought in with the needle into the skirts of the robe than hung on But seeing that the bels were made by themselves and did hang betweene the Pomgranates it is like also that the Pomgranates were made after the same manner and so put to as the bels were 3. Montanus conjectureth that the golden bels were made ad formam mespilorum after the fashion of medlers being open below as little brasen bels of that fashion are in use this day and being thus made they were more apt to send forth their sound 4. Hierome thinkes that there were 72. golden bels hanging in the skirts and as many Pomgranates Prosper saith there were fifty of each sort Iustin in Triphon saith there were twelve to signifie the twelve Apostles but of this there is no certainty only it is said Ecclesiastic 45.9 that he compassed him about with many bels there were many of them but what was the certaine number it is not expressed QUEST XXXIII Why the sound of the bels was to be heard Vers. 35. ANd his sound shall be heard when he goeth in c. and commeth out that he dye not 1. Some thinke that because in the holy place there were divers visions and apparitions of Angels that by this signe the Priest comming in about his office and ministery might give warning and not rush in of a sudden to see the Lords secrets like as men use to knock at their neighbours doores before they enter in But God needeth not any such signe to be warned by hee knoweth every mans going in and out and the holy Angels being searching Spirits could have knowne when the Priest was entring without any such notice 2. But the reasons why the Lord would have the bels heard were these two first in respect of the Priest himselfe that hee might enter with more reverence like as one will not rush into a great mans house by stealth but first will knock at the doore or ring the bell Tostat. quaest 17. Oleaster The other reason was in regard of the people it was done for a remembrance to them Ecclesiast 45.9 that they might know when the high Priest entred in and then lift up their hearts when the high Priest went in to minister before the Lord for them Calvin 3. Mention is made of his going in and comming out because only when he went and moved himselfe the bels sounded but while hee remained within and stood still the bels stirred not 4. The Lord threatneth death if the Priest should enter otherwise than thus apparelled with these garments Non quòd sonus aliquid confert ad evadendum mortem obedientia est illa quae confert c. Not that the sound helped any thing to escape death but it was his obedience that helped Cajetan QUEST XXXIV Of the mysticall application of the robe THis priestly robe is diversly applied 1. Iosephus by the linen coat understandeth the earth by the blew robe heaven by the pomgranates the lightning by the bels the thunder 2. Philo resembleth the aire to the blew robe which was long and side as the other is extended from the Moone to the earth and the consent of the elements among themselves to the sound of the bels 3. Hierome approveth Philo his conceit concerning the coat and Iosephus for the bels 4. Rupertus by the bels much better understandeth the sound of Christ preaching in the dayes of his flesh 5. Beda by the blew robe which resembleth the
God shewing there continually evident signes of his presence the cloud by day resting upon the Tabernacle and fire there appearing by night QUEST XXII When the Lord thus said to Moses Vers. 12. THen Moses said unto the Lord. 1. Tostatus admitteth that all this which followeth to the end of the chapter is set downe in the same order of time as it was done and that there is no anticipation of the historie as there is before from these words in the fourth verse And when the people heard c. unto these words vers 12. Then Moses said to the Lord and he yeeldeth three reasons why the historie is transposed in the former place and not in this 1. Because in the beginning of the next chapter there is a word of coherence deinceps afterward which coupleth that historie with that which goeth before 2. The argument is continued from the 12. verse to the end of the chapter and so one thing hath dependance of another 3. The historie must not be transposed without great necessitie for then we shall have no certaintie in Scripture in what order any thing was done Contra. As these reasons may well be admitted for the consequence and coherence of the rest which followeth in this chapter that the things here rehearsed were done before Moses was called up with the second tables so they serve as well to prove that the former narration from vers 4. to vers 12. which Tostatus thinketh to have been done after Moses comming downe from the mount is set in order according to the time of the doing and went before Moses going up the second time into the mount 1. There is the same word of coherence used in the beginning of the 12. verse vaiomer and Moses said which beginneth the next chapter vaiomer and the Lord said 2. There is also a coherence of the matter and argument for Moses having shewed how the Tabernacle where was Gods visible presence was without the host which was a signe of the Lords departure from the people now Moses entreateth the Lord that he would returne unto his people and that his presence might go with them 3. Neither is there any necessitie why the former historie should be imagined to be transposed and therefore according to Tostatus owne conclusion Semper est accipienda quaelibet litera c. Every place of Scripture must be taken according to that order wherein it is set downe without any anticipation or recapitulation nisi ex litera ipsa vel aliâ—â—de demonstrâ—tur c. unlesse by the letter it selfe or otherwise it may be shewed that it is otherwise to be taken Tostat qu. 13. QUEST XXIII How Moses desireth to know whom the Lord would send with them seeing he had promised before to send his Angell Vers. 12. THou hast not shewed whom thou wilt send with me And yet the Lord had pormised to send his Angell before them vers 2. 1. Some thinke that Moses causatur differri adventum Messia doth complaine that the comming of the Messiah was deferred Lippom. And that he speaketh of one which should lead them not into that earthly countrie sed in terram viventium but into the land of the living Rupertus But it is evident that Moses heere speaketh of the conducting of them into the promised land therefore he saith vers 15. if thy presence go not with us carrie us not hence neither was Moses ignorant of the true Messias who should conduct him and all Gods people to the heavenly Canaan 2. Some againe take it as though Moses should desire some assistant and associate videbat se solum omni auxilio destitutum he saw himselfe to be left alone and void of all helpe for Aaron who was joyned with him before had made himselfe unworthie of the government and Ioshua was yet too young to take upon him the administration Gallas But it appeareth by the Lords answer vers 14. My presence shall go with thee that Moses required no humane coadjutor to be given him but the Divine assistance 3. Osiander thinketh that Moses thus saith because the Lord had retracted and revoked his former grant that his Angell should go before them and therefore laboureth for the renuing of this promise But it is evident that twice together the Lord promised to send an Angell chap. 32.34 and 33.2 but it no where appeareth that the Lord retracted that promise 4. Oleaster thus reconcileth these places Quia non acceptaverat Angeli ducatum because Moses had not accepted of the guiding and leading of an Angell which was promised therefore he further presseth God to know who shall be sent with them But seeing this Angell should cast out the Canaanites before them vers 2. it is not like that Moses would not accept of so gracious a promise 5. Calvine thinketh that the Angell before promised to be sent was a created Angell and ministring spirit and that being a common benefit which is granted to other nations over whom the Angels of God are set therefore de continua serie prioris gratiae certior fieri cupit he desireth to be sure of the continuall course of Gods former grace But Moses could not be ignorant that the Angell which was promised to be sent before them was God himselfe of whom the Lord had said before chap. 23.21 my name is in him 6. Some understand it of the meanes ostende mihi media auxilia shew mee the way and meanes whereby I should evercome so many nations Ferus But this had been curiositie in Moses to have enquired after the particular meanes and it had shewed some weaknesse and infirmitie in him 7. Cajetane interpreteth thus God had promised his Angell before but he shewed not quem Angelum what Angell he would send quantae authoritatis cujus praesidentiae of what authoritie and presidencie Lippom. But Moses looketh higher than to the presidencie of Angels for he saith vers 15. If thy presence go not with us carrie us not hence 8. Burgensis hath this observation that Moses intelligitur implicite petivisse quod regimen populi esset sibi commissum sine alicujus Angeli praesidentia c. is heere understood secretly to have made request that the regiment of the people should have been committed to him without the presidencie of any Angell But Moses rather declined the government of the people as being to heavie a burthen for him to beare as Numb 11.14 I am not able to beare all this people alone therefore it is unlike that hee desired here the sole government This opinion of Burgensis shall bee handled more at large in the next question following 9. Therefore Moses meaning is nothing but this that whereas onely he had a generall promise before that an Angell should be sent but the Lord himselfe would not go that is in those visible signes and working wonders for them Moses desireth here to be instructed in the manner which he calleth the waies of God vers 13. whether the Lord would still
go before them in the cloudie and fierie pillar and dwel among them in his Tabernacle as he had promised Iunius who here translateth Thou hast not shewed quae missurus what things thou wilt send but this translation seemeth not to be so fit sending in this sense is properly of persons not of things yet the sense that Iunius giveth is consonant unto the text So also Lyranus Non sufficiebat Mosi nisi ei assisteret modo praedicto It contented not Moses unlesse the Lord would assist them as he had done before Mosis petebat sibi assignari praecessorem qui miracula operaretur Moses desired heere one to be given to go before them which should worke miracles such as had been done before Tostat. qu. 13. QUEST XXIV Whether the sole government and leading of the people were here given to Moses without the administration of Angels as Burgensis thinketh NOw commeth Burgensis opinion before rehearsed further to be discussed and examined His assertion is this that Moses heere is desirous to know whereas God had promised to send an Angell whether praecursorem praeceptorem a forerunner to drive out the nations before them and an instructer also whom they should obey as before was prescribed chap. 23.21 are now but onely as a guide and forerunner no longer as a teacher and instructer and so Moses doth secretly insinuate that the sole gevernment of the people should be committed unto him wherein he saith the Lord condescended to Moses request for this his opinion further he alleageth these reasons 1. The great merit and worthinesse of Moses is to bee considered who now after his fortie daies fasting had profited and increased both in contemplation having had conference with God and in active vertues both in shewing his zeale toward God in putting the idolaters to the sword and his great charitie in preferring their safetie before his owne salvation And therefore the Lord held him meet and worthie to whom the sole government of his people should be committed 2. It is said also Deut. 32.12 The Lord alone led them and there was no other God with him God alone without the leading of any Angell guided and protected them 3. Michael the Arch-angell appearing unto Ioshua said As a captaine of the Lords host am I now come Iosh. 5.14 as if he should have said Ego impeditus fui tempore Mosis magistri tui sed nunc venio I was hindred in the time of thy master Moses but I now come whereupon Burgensis inferreth that subjectio populi Israelitici ad Angelum incepit à Ioshua c. the subjection of the people to the Angell began from Ioshua not from Moses Contra. Mathias Thoring in his replies confuteth this phantasie of Burgensis as hee calleth it and thus answereth his reasons 1. Though Moses were an excellent man and in high favour with God yet was he not to be compared with Christ Qui usus est ministeriâ— Angelorum in multis Who in many things used the ministerie of Angels and of whom specially the Psalme speaketh He shall give his Angels charge over thee c. Psalm 91. not that Christ needed their ministerie but propter Hierarchicam institutionem because of the order of the celestiall Hierarchie God hath appointed the Angels and blessed Spirits as the Ministers of his will 2. And in that place in Deuteronomie only strange gods are excluded not the ministerie of Angels which are subordinate unto God for by the same reason the ministerie of Moses should be excluded also 3. Neither can it be affirmed that the administration of the Angels was suspended untill Ioshuahs time for seeing the law was given by the administration of Angels as the Apostle sheweth Galath 3. much more motiâ— columnae the moving of the cloudie and fierie pillar was by their ministerie Deo tamen immutabiliter praesentâ— prasidente God yet himselfe being unchangeably present and president To this effect Thoring who here with great reason opposeth himselfe to Burgensis QUEST XXV When and where God thus said to Moses Vers. 12. THou hast said moreover I know theâ— by 〈◊〉 1. Burgensis thinketh that although it be not found in these verie words where the Lord so said to Moses yet equivalenter dicta fuisse c. words equivalent and of like force were uttered when the Lord said Let me alone c. For thereby Moses might perceive that hee was well knowne unto God seeing by his prayers hee was able to turne aside Gods judgements But by the rehearsall of these words in the same phrase afterward vers 17. I know thee by name it is evident that God had so said to Moses before 2. Augustine therefore resolveth Non omnia scâ—ipta esse quâ— Deus cum illo locutus est That all things are not written which God spake unto Moses 3. Oleaster further giveth this conjecture that it is like Deum hac in mâ—ntis colâ—oquio dixisse that God spake these things unto him in the mount for that was the most familiar conference which God had with Moses QUEST XXVI How the Lord is said to know Moses by name I Know thee by name 1. This is spoken humanitus according to the custome of men who know many by their face whom they know not by name but Princes and great men doe know by name and specially marke and regard those which doe attend upon them and so the Lord saith thus much in effect Novi te tanquâ—m Ministrum c. I know thee as my Minister and servant whom I often use Oleaster So the Lord also is said to know Moses by name because he was in great reputation and favour with him Tostatus And that hee had chosen him out of many for his service Calvin And God is said to know them that please him and not to know those which offend him Non quia ignorat sed quia non approbat Not because he knoweth them not but doth not approve them Augustine 2. God therefore herein sheweth what singular regard he had of Moses in respect of his knowledge God knoweth all men yea all things by their names as the Prophet saith Esay 40.26 Who hath created these things and calleth them by their names Non prâ—dissent ad esse nisi ea Deus vocasset ad esse For nothing could have a being unlesse God had called it to have a being Tostat. qu. 13. But God in respect of his grace and favour tooke speciall notice of Moses whom he vouchsafed to speake with face to face 3. God hath then a common knowledge of all his creatures but a peculiar of his elect Concerning his common knowledge Some have thought that God hath not particularium cognitionem the knowledge of particular things but as he knoweth his owne essence Some as Avicenna that God knoweth singularia universaliter particular things universally in respect of their generall causes not of the particular effects As if a man were skilfull in the celestiall globe he might foresee the
sin as our Saviour saith Blessed are the pure in heart for they shall see God But none are here without sin therefore none here can see God 4. Gregorie Nyssâ—n Propriâ—m suum est ut omnem cognitionem excedat It is proper and peculiar unto God to exceed and goe beyond all knowledge Qui verâ— est is cognitione non comprehenditur He thaâ— truly is and the cause of the being of all things cannot be comprehended by any knowledge c. The minde of man being of a finite nature cannot comprehend that which is infinite and incomprehensible 5. Further Bernard to this purpose urgeth that place 1 Ioh. 3.2 We know that when he shall appeare we shall be like him for we shall see him as he iâ— whereupon he inferreth thus Videre illum jam in hoc mundâ— illuminatus potest tanquam jam in aliquo similis sicuti est non omnino potest quia nondum perfecte similis He that is illuminate may see him in this world as in some thing like unto him but as he is hee cannot see him because he is not perfectly like him c. If then we shall only see him as he is when wee shall be like him then now in this life we cannot see God because we are not like him 6. Irenaeus enforceth this argument Si neque Moses vidit Deum nec Helias c. If neither Moses saw God nor Elias nor Ezechiel but those things which they saw were similitudines claritatis Domini only similitudes of divine brightnesse and prophecies of things to come it is manifest quoniam Pater invisibilis that the father is invisible of whom the Scripture saith Never any man saw God c. For if any had seene God it is most like those great Prophets should have had a sight of him but they saw him not otherwise than by certaine similitudes 7. Cyrillus affirmeth the same out of that place Ioh. 1.18 No man hath seene God at any time the only begotten Son of God c. hath declared him Soli consubstantiali â—ilio Pater visibilis est nulli praeter eum alii Only the Father is visible to his Son of the same substance with him and beside him unto none 8. Whereas then the Prophet Isaiah saith that he saw the Lord chap. 5.1 and the Scripture testifieth that God spake with Moses face to face and that the pure in heart shall see God Matth. 5.8 These places are either understood of the vision and sight of God by faith as Ioh. 14.9 He that seeth mee seeth my Father or else of the symbolicall sight of God by certaine similitudes and representations as Cyrillus calleth it symbolica similitudo divinâ— gloriae a symbolicall similitude of the divine glorie as Ezechiel also saith it was visio similitudinis gloria Domini a vision or appearance of the similitude of the glorie of the Lord. And so Bernard well concludeth Itaque de ipso vides sed non ipsum Therefore in this life thou seest somewhat of God but not God himselfe QUEST XLVII Whether the Angels nâ—w or the soules of men shall fully see the Divine Substance in the next life THat the Saints in the next world shall see God the Apostle is an evident witnesse that when hee appeareth we shall be like him for wee shall see him as he â—s wee shall see him after a more cleare manner than either Moses saw him in the mount or our parents before their fall But even then we shall not bee able fully to comprehend the divine substance of God we shall see him qualis est sed non quantum est as he is but not all that he is Bucanus 1. Deus vere incomprehensibilis dicitur God is said truly to be incomprehensible therefore hee cannot of the creature be comprehended Nec etiam Angelicae naturae comprehensibilis est No hee cannot be comprehended of the Angelicall nature for then he were not simply incomprehensible Alcuinus 2. Chrysostome concludeth as much Ne supernas virtutes Deum posse videre That the high powers of the Angels cannot see God out of that place Isai. 6.2 where it is said that the Seraphim with two of their wings covered their face Cum de Seraphim audis oculos avertisse pinnas visui obduxisse c. when thou hearest that the Seraphim turned away their eyes and drew their wings over their sight c. Nihil aliud docet nisi ejus cognitionem integram non potuisse recipere c. It teacheth nothing else but that they were not capable of the full knowledge of God neither durst behold his most perfect substance c. If then the Angels cannot comprehend the Divine Essence much lesse the spirits of men As Aleniâ—us inferreth Quamvis usque ad aqualitatem Angelicam humana post resurrectionem natura perficiat videra tamen essentiam ejus plene non valet Although our humane nature should attaine after the resurrection to the equalitie of Angels yet it should not be able fully to see Gods essence So also Calvin Licet Angeli excellentiore modo c. Although the Angels are said to see Gods face after a more excellent manner than men yet they are not capable of his infinite greatnesse which would swallow them up quast ex novo Testamento 3. Augustine also urgeth that place Ioh. 1.8 No man hath seene God at any time the onely begotten Sonne which is in the bosome of his Father hath declared him Sinus Patris quid est nisi affectus in châ—â—iâ—ati veri Patris per naturae unionem in filium What is the bosome of the Father but the affection of true charitie of the Father by the union of nature toward the Sonne c. Whereupon it followeth that the Sonne only who is of the same substance and nature with the Father hath seene him But the soules and spirits of the Saints are not in the bosome of God nor of the same substance therefore they cannot see God in his divine nature 4. Further Bernard thus inferreth upon that place 1 Ioh. 3.2 We shall see him as he is for wee shall bee like him Non aliud est videre sicuti est quam esse sicuti est It is no other thing to see him as he is than to be as he is c. But we shall not bee altogether like unto God only in some sort therefore wee shall not see God in his nature perfectly or altogether 5. Therefore whereas the same Bernard saith Talis visio non est vita praesentis c. Such a vision to see God in his nature is not in this life present but is reserved for the time to come c. And Augustine Promittitur sanctis in alia vita That fight is promised to the Saints in the next life c. they must bee understood to speake by way of comparison that in the next life wee shall see God in his owne nature that is
cor H. inter H. cor T. mut pers Hebrewes fables The manner of espousals Labans craft Beauty how far to be respected in marriage Abuses to be avoyded in mariage feasts How Leah was not discerned of Iacob Hebrewes fables How farre the fathers are to be imitated S. sin f plur C. inter Ch. cor H.S. alt T. G. T.r. S. ad S. ad S. alt S.G. T.C.r. divers sig T.B.G. H.S. cat T. B· H.S.c. T.B.r. S.c. T. H.r. S.c. S. ad Procreation the gift and worke of God Mandrakes have a strong â—avour Epiph. in philolog c. 4. Mandrakes whether their vertue is to make women conceive Of the description of mandragoras The vertue operation of Mandrakes Hebrewes fables Leah doth not name her son Gad of fortune Iacob hath not only the parti-coloured goats but sheep also Most particoloured sheepe in Palestine The Latine translation refused of the Romans themselves Strange births procured by the conceit and fancie of the minde The force and power of the affections S.T. ad C.r. cor C.r. cor div sig S. cor S.H. cor S. ap f. prop. B. mut temp S. cor S. ad B. H. ad Ch. S. ad H.c. H. de Ch. cor S. ad H. S. ap f. pr. H.c. H.S. det S. ad Who are understoâ—d to be Iacobs brethreÌ„ S. ad S. ap f. pr. S.C. cor C.c. S.C.c. T.B.r. divers fig. T.r. S. app f.p. divers accep B.G.r. Hebrewes curious â—â—servations Why mention is here made only of Iacobs eleven children Hebrewes conceits The Angels not understood by the seven spirits Revel 1.4 H. ad T.G.r. T.P.G.r. H.S. mut temp H.c. H.S.c. divers sig B. Gr. H. trans H.S.C.c. H.S.c. S. ap f. pr. H.S.B. pr. f. â—p Of divers kinds of bowing the body Salem and Sichem whether one place H. det diff ver Ch. c. H. deâ— H.S.C.c. S.P. divers signif T.B.r. S. ad S.c. H. inter H. cor â— b.g.r. Hebrewes uncertaine collections Simeon and Levi whether to be excused in part Reasons for the justification of Simeon and Levi their acts answered The circumstances of the cruell acts of Simeon and Levi weighed Jacobs sentence against Simeon and Levi explained H. det Ch. mut T. r. differ sig S. ad H. det div sig app s. pr. S. c. H. det H. det S. trans H. S. cor T. B. r. H.C. app f. pr. S. ad S.c. How Benjamin is numbred among those that were borne in Mesopotamia S. cor S. cor S. cor S. ad T. cor S. ad H. ad S. cor S. S. cor B. S.H.C. S. S. C. app f. pr. S. H. S. Aholibamah whether the same with Iudith Of Sibeon and Anah Basemath Ismaels daughter Amalek how counted among the sons Adab Of the Horites what people they were Dishon three of that name Gen. 39. â— Hebr. 13. â— Ambr. lib. de Ioseph c. 5. Ambr. lib. â— offâ— c. 14. De utilitate nihil perdideraÌ„t qui acquisierant perpetuitatem â—elius fuit conferre aliquid de fructibus quà m to tuâ— de jure amittere offic 2.16 Non venditionem sui juris sed redemptionem salutis puâ—â—banâ— ibid. Greg. hom 〈◊〉 in Ezechiel Psal. 101.1 Detersa est irâ— quae apparebat non erat ostensa est misericordia quae erat non apparebat Greg. ibid. Toletan 5â— can 5. Gen. 49.24 Ioseph ofâ—asaph â—asaph to adde H. cor divers sig S. det H. det S. ad H.c. H. alt H. ad S.c. T.c.r. T.r. Why Ioseph is said to be a child his yeares being expressed before In what cases priâ—ate admonition is not necessary before publike accusation Why parent loâ—â—â—heir youngest children best The remedie against envy Ioseph wherein a type of Christ. How Iacob rebuked Ioseph Iosephus in errour The judgement of Simeon and Levi. The divers senses of that word sheol Nephesh taken in Leviticus for a dead corps S.c. S.c. C. ap f. pr. H. cor ap f. pr. T.r. C. cor H.c. T.P.r. T.H.r. H.c. H. 〈◊〉 H.c. L.C.r. S.H.c. simil ver T.r. T.B.G.r. T.P.r. Iudah and his children married very young Adullam the nâ—me â—f a village in the tribe of Judah Thamar whether the daughter of Sem. Unnaturall lust how many wayes committed Er or Onan whether the greater sinner Moses Law Deut 24.5 whether to be understood of the naturall brother Why Thamar is adjudged to be burned Iudahs his rigorous oversight in adjudging a woman great with childe to the fire Why Christ condemned not the adulteresse Ioh. 8. T.B.r. C.c. C.att. H. det T.C.r. H.c. T.C.r. H.S. alt C.c. H.c. H.c. S. ad H. cor T.r. H.c. Iosephs maner of imprisonment H. ad S. ad T.r. T.r. S. det T.r. H.S.c. S.B.c. H. det T.r. divers sig T.r. H. det Canaan why called the land of the Hebrewes The hanging upon the crosse an ancient punishment S. ap f. pr. T.r. H. alt H. det T.G.r. H. det S.c. T.B.r. H. alt H.S.c. H. cor C. alt Ga. T. H.r. S. det C. ad H.c. ad divers sig C.r. T.S.r. H. cor H. cor The soothsaiers blinded Pharaoh a common name to the Kings of Egypt Ioseph knew not Pharaohs dreame aforehand as Pererius This plentie and famine not procured by naturall causes The increasing of Nilus in the yeares of plentie how many cubits How the corn was preserved Of the citie On. Why Ioseph marieth the daughter of an Idolater Iacob and Iosephs yeares compared together At 30. yeares a man fit for publike imployment How it was wrought that Iacob had notice all this while of Iosephs being in Egypt The phrase to bâ—eake bread whence taken The Latin corrupt S.C.H.c. T. G.r H.S. ad C. c S.c. S.H. alts T.r. S. cor T.C.r. T.G.r. S. G. c. T. C.r. H. cor H. cor H. cor T.B.G.r. Reconciliation of places How a booke is used in the ministring of an oath Three notable fruits of affliction Affliction maketh us to know God Affliction bringeth us to know our selves Affliction teacheth us to know the world what it is T.B. r H. ad H. det S. cor H.S.c. T.r. H. aâ— Tr. S. ad H. det S. mut pers H.c. inter T.r. Hebrewes fond collections Hebrews vaine confidence Why the Egyptians refused to eat with the Hebrewes The ancient use of sitting at the table Readings of the word Shacar to be drunken H.G.r. H.G.r. H.S.c. H.S.c. T.r. B.G.T.r. Divers opinions of them which justifie this fact of Iosephs examined Ioseph not to be charged here with agrievous sinne Iosephs fault how it may bee extenuated though not justified What iniquity they meane that God had found out Benjamin why called a little lad at thirty yeares Bellar. lib. â— dâ— Monach. cap. 24. S.C.c. S.H.c. T. S.c. S. T.G.r. H. cor H.S.c. S. cor B. T.r Whether Ioseph 〈◊〉 revealâ—◠〈…〉 the 〈◊〉 of his 〈◊〉 against him Hebrewes curious collections Hebrewes â—ables H.S.c. H. c. T.C.H.r. T.P.r. S. c. H. S. c. S. c. H. dâ—â— â— c H. det S. alt S. alter divers signif S. add S. add S. cor S. cor S. cor S. ad divers signif S.