by the Apostleâ— a spirit of bondage of a servant of a slave a spirit of bondage to â—ear And for this I shall have recourse to Mr. Smith of Cambridge in his Discourse of Superstition who hath indeed a rich vein of his own and excellent quotations out of other Authors and hath in that Discourse many things applicable to my present purpose In it he makes Superstition according to the etymology of the Word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to consist in an over-timerous dreadful apprehension of the Deity for w th he quotes Helf ychius whotakes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for all one expounds 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to be one that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that a superstitious person is one that is very prompt to worship the gods but withall is very fearful of them and Mr. Smith tels us that Superstition is indeed nothing else but a false opinion of the Deity that renders him dreadful terrible as being rigorous imperious that which represents him as austere and apt to be angry And he further tells us that Plutarch hath thus defined it in his Book 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. A strong and passionate opinion and such a supposition as is productive of a fear debasing and terrifying a man with the representation of the Gods as grievous and hurtful to mankind Besides he tells us That wicked men whom he makes the superstitious are apt to account the Divine Supremacy as but a piece of Tyranny that by its soveraign will makes too great encroachments upon their rights and properties and therefore are slavishly afraid of him I shall recite but two quotations more out of him which I am not a little affected with the one is out of Plutarch the other out of Maximus Tyrius Plutarch's is this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that if we understood God aright it would beget a freedom and liberty of soul within us an hope from vertuous actions and not gender to a spirit of Bondage which is the Apostles own phrase 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The other of Maximus Tyrius is as remarkable in his dissert 4. concerning the difference betwixt a friend and a flatterer 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith he 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. the sense whereof is this The pious man is Gods friend this is onely I think said of Abraham the great Believer the supersliticus is a flatterer of God and indeed most happy and blest is the condition of the pious man Gods friend but right miserable and sad is the state of the superstitious The pious man emboldned by a good Conscience and encouraged by the sense of his integrity comes to God without fear and dread but the superstitious being sunk and deprest through the sense of his own wickedness comes not without much fear being void of all hope and considence and dreading the gods as so many tyrants It is no small pleasure to me to read heathens thus rightly apprehending and expressing this twofold way of approaching to God which altering but the number of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 into 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 looks so like that which is Divine and Apostolical Now for all this which here I have transcribed out of Mr. Smith touching superstition I reckon it may be well applyed to the Legallist and I shall not need to add any more in describing their slavish fear of God The second distinction which I promised was of the degrees of fear The second distinction of fear and this distinction is likewise very necessary for that such is the weakness of the Saints themselves that many of them may have a great degree even of slavish fear of God and may be far gone under a Spirit of Bondage The Saints of the Old-Testament by reason of the darkness of their dispensation were in a great measure generally under this fear and 't is an observation of some how solid I leave to others to judge that therefore the Saints of the Old-Testament are so commonly known by that Name Such as feared the Lord because their dispensation was so legal and dark and attended with a Spirit of Bondage but however that observation be censured I am sure the Apostle makes an assertion somewhat like it In Gal. 4.1 2. That the heir as long as he is a Child differeth nothing from a servant 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 though he be Lord of all even so we when we were children were in bondage 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The sense is this peremptorily The true spiritual Seed and heirs according to the Promise had much of a spirit of bondage and fear in the dayes of the Old-Testament and so still it is very possible and often found that many true Saints heirs of God as then they differed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 nothing that is nothing to speak of so now they differ but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 very little such is their weakness from servants by reason of the great mixtures of bondage and fear which they have in their spirits in the service of God but yet now though I have allowed this great mixture of a Spirit of bondage in the Saints even to a great degree yet I affirm that now and in all ages past the Saints and wicked Legallists are to be discerned and distinguished the one from the other by the degrees of this fear as truly as before I distinguisht them in the kinds of fear for as much as the Saints of God have or may have of a slavish fear in the service of God yet they have all enough of that spirit of adoption and holy boldness so as to over-ballance it and to enable them to cry Abba that is â—ather which a meer Legallist hath not but is overborn by his fears and acts towards God onely under the anguish and incitation of a spirit of Bondage Yea though the gospel bring so much more of the Spirit of Adoption and Son-ship with it than the Old-Testament did that in comparison with it the Old-Testament be called a killing-letter and a Ministration of death yet I shall make this further assertion That all the true Saints of God even under the Old-Testament had so much of a Spirit of Adoption as did over-ballance their slavish fear and spirit of bondage in the service of God and the reason is this for that God hath in all ages accepted of men only as they treated with him upon Gospel-terms and principles A spirit of a slave was alwayes unacceptable unto God The two Covenants as I have shewn at large were in Moses his time and Abraham's time and the one gendered to bondage that was that from Mount Sinai the other unto liberty and that is from Mount Zion the new Jerusalem which is the Mother of us all that are shall be or ever were the true sons and heirs of it therefore they had always in a SUFFICIUNT DEGREE a spirit of liberty of
world now the whole World becomes guilty before God by the law and every mouth is silenced and stopped by it I do not say that the law as given to the Jews by Moses had this effect upon the Gentiles to whom it was not given but the Apostle tells us Rom. 2.15 how this came to pass that the law though not given to the Gentiles in the same manner as it was to the Jews did yet convince and condemn the Gentiles as well as the Jews because the effect and substance of the same law that was written upon Tables of Stone by Moses was written in the hearts of the Gentiles so that their thoughts did accuse them when they did evil as well as excuse them when they did well Now hence I draw an argument a minorâ—â— If the law written upon the hearts of the Gentiles though obscurely had yet an accusing and condemning power in it to them how might it well have upon the Jews to whom it was delivered plainly written and engraven in stones with thunder lightning earthquakes as is before expressed That which I have to add upon the third great end of the Law it's being delivered viz. to direct and bring the wounded sinner to Christ O How 〈…〉 Christ is by way of answer to this question How did the Law lead to Christ I shall give several answers unto this question and first of all The Law was our School-master unto Christ A. â—â— as the Dispensation of the Law made way for the Dispensation of the Gospel Sowre things make the sweet more pleasant Darkness makes Light more desirable Slavery and Severity makes Liberty more welcom Quineseâ—t servâ—re nescit imperare the School makes fair way for the University This consideration makes the succession of the Gospel to the Law more comely and it is insisted on very much by the Apostle in Gal. 4 for the seven first verses Ver. 3. When we were Children we were in bondage unto the Law but when the fulness of time was come God sent forth his Son to redeem us into liberty and to give us the spirit of sons Gal. 3 23. Before Faith came we were kept under the Law and kept under by the Law shut up unto the Faith which should afterwards be revealed wherefore the Law was our School-Master to bring us unto Christ that we might be justified by Faith but after that faith is come we are no longer under a School-Master it would now be an incongruous thing to be under a School-master any longer as it was very convenient that before we should be and thus the Law was a School-master unto Christ as John Baptist was by its severities to humble us and break our hearts and to make us 〈◊〉 people ready prepared for the Lord. And the beauty great conveniency of the succession of these two Administrations of the Law Gospel each to other appears still in the great work of Conversion upon every sinners heart where the same method is observed first to humble the soul by legal convictions then to make a discovery of Christ the Grace of the Gospel And this our practical Divines insist much upon in their Sermons and Treatises giving us this account of the Work of Grace upon the heart that first there is conviction compunction and humiliation all yet a legal work then Faith or Conversion And I do verily believe that the Spirit of God doth use this method though as all acknowledge not with the same degrees in every work of Regeneration And again they observe that as after the Gospel and Faith is come it is absurd to return to the Law of Moses in the whole Dispensation of it so they apply that Scripture Rom. 8.15 Ye have not received the Spirit of Bondage again to fear to this purpose That after men have received the Spirit of Adoption which in some degree every regenerate person hath received they receive not again the spirit of bondage to fear which they take to be a spirit of legal convictions preparatory to the Work of Conversion and indeed according to the Calvinist-principles it must needs be true that after they are regenerate they can never receive a spirit of Bondage again because a spirit of bondage is not Grace but onely preparatory to it and therefore men that have once been regenerate can never return to this Spirit without being emptied of all Grace But here it may be further queryed Q How did the Law direct those to Christ that lived and lived before Christ came that indeed it is not to be doubted that the Law in the dispensation of it made excellent way unto the Gospel for those that were to live in the days of the Gospel as we find in the Analogical succession of Law and Gospel in the Work of Grace but how was the Law a School-Master unto Christ to those that lived in the dayes of the Old-Testament Who dyed before Christ came How were they directed to Christ by the Law The Law might perhaps be a Ministration of death and desperation only to them How did the Law witness the righteousness of God by Faith unto them In answer I shall first of all premise these two things and then answer more directly 1. Negatively that to these it must not come to destroy the promise and the covenant that was made before nor the comfort of it It must not come to hinder but they might have as true saving comfort from the promises as the Saints before the Law had or else the Law had been against the promises which the Apostle denyes with a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2. It must preach Christ to them as truly though perhaps not so clearly as it doth unto us Thirdly and more directly The Law did preach Christ to the Jews under the Old-Testament these two ways 1. Virtually or consequentially 2. Formally and expresly 1. Virtually as it convinced them all of their necessity of some other besides a legal Righteousness as I have shewn at large in explaining the second end of giving the Law because of transgressions 2. Expresly as it made mention of Christ and this it did either improperly figuratively in types and shadows or properly in the prophecies and promises of Christ Or the answer may be better given after this distinction of the Law A different acceptation of the Law in the Scripture The Law in Scripture amongst the various significations of it hath these two very eminent 1. It signifies the strict and bare command and so is naturally a Covenant of Works that hath no mercy or grace in it can onely justifie the righteous and condemn the transgressor and in this sence it hath been taken by me for the most part hitherto in my Discourse I have produced several places where it is taken in this sence in the Scripture Take that for instance As many as are of the works of the Law are under the curse as it is written Cursed
Brtvis differentia inter legem Evangelium est â—mor amâ—â— Aquina August Which things if they were not in consistent the question would need no decision Again take the Exposition last given that perfect love to God casteth out all fear of men it fills us with courage and resolution so that we are afraid of no sufferings whatsoever Yet is it possible that a man should from the extraordinary inflammedness of his love to God be full of boldness and courage in the day of Judgement that is the day of hottest trials and persecutions fear nothing because it is for God whom he loves dearly and that for this very reason that he loved him first upon terms of gratitude and yet that this man should have his Spirit contracted and oppressed at the same time with a tormenting fear of the God for whom he suffers I have argued before that his love to God would not suffer such a tormenting fear of God I argue now that the expansion and enlargedness of heart and soul in his courage and boldness for God is inconsistent with that contraction of spirit which a slavish fear of God at the same time must needs cause A man that hath his spirit broken by the tormenting fear of God can have no courage before men at all Every man that meeteth me will kill me saith Cain when a slavish terror of God had seized upon him The sinners in Sion are afraid fearfulness hath surprized the Hypocrites Isa 33.14 Why what is the matter it follows Who among us shall dwell with devouring fire Who among us shall dwell with everlasting burnings When men have a sense of the Wrath of God towards them which is the cause of this slavish fear it sills them with fearfulness and terror in all things else they begin to be afraid of their own shadow Therefore this boldness in the day of man's judgement here spoken of must suppose first some boldness in the presence of God and so the sense of the text runs clear There is no fear in Love where a man loves God heartily and especially out of a love of Gratitude because God loved him first that soul hath boldness and courage in all his sufferings The Righteous is bold as a Lyon Prov. 28.1 But the wicked fleeth when none pursueth If God be for us saith the good man who can be against us Who shall separate us saith the Apostle from the love of Christ Shall tribulation or persecution or famine or nakedness or peril or sword c. In all these things and can there be greater in the day of man's Judgement we are more then Conquerors through him that loved us Rom. 8.35 36. Here is a couragious fearless Love but whence is it spirited but from the sense of the Love of God No soul pressed with a slavish fear of God could have uttered these triumphant expressions * And I think that according to this second Exposition of this place in Iohn's Epistle is that Scripture to be interpreted 2 Tim. 1.7 For God hath not given us the spirit of fear timidity or cowardice but of power of love and of a sound mind which is thus paraphrased by a Commentator Surely that God that gave us this Commission and Gifts for the Ministry hath not given thee or me so poor a cowardly spirit as that we should be afraid of the dangers and threats of men against the preaching of the Gospel but couragious hearts to encounter any difficulty a love of God which will actuate this Valour and cast out all fear of danger and withall a tranquility of mind and a full contentedness in whatsoever estate 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Spirit of sobriety then it follows fully and clearly in countenance of this Exposition ver 8. Be not thou therefore ashamed of the â—estimony of our Lord nor of me his prisoner but be thou partaker of the afflictions of the Gospel according to the power of God Now whereas I have used these two Scriptures in the Epistle to Tim. and that of Iohn in another sense above then what I conceive is the most genuine yet still in a sense consistent with that which is genuine the reason was not for want of Scriptures to prove what I intended but for that these Scriptures are used by others in the first sence and might well be used so allusively and for that I had no such way to restare them to their true interpretation as first by allowing them the accommodation of that other sense and then shewing that this latter is the more proper But here I must make a twofold distinction of fear viz. in the kinds and in the degrees of it The first distinction of fear 1. In the kinds there is a lawful and acceptable yea necessary fear of God and there is an unlawful or at least unacceptable fear of God The first is that awe we are to have of the Divine Majesty as we are creatures and with which we are commanded to work out our own salvation even with fear and trembling Phil. 2.22 This signifies no mor but the creature keeping its due distance knowing its place and condition of a creature having a due sence of the weighty concernment and importance of that salvation which we are to work out considering the danger we escape and the prize we press forward unto these considerations make us greatly in earnest 't is no trifling business we are about and therefore we do it and are to do it with fear and trembling and greatest circumspection So the Apostle Paul saith he was conversant amongst the Corinthians in fear and great trembling 1 Cor. 2.3 which say Commentators may signifie not onely his fear from persecution but those which did arise from the consideration of the greatness of his Work of saving souls This fear now is lawful and commendable and so far from being contrary to love as it may very well proceed from love love to our selves when we are working out our salvation and love to others when we are helping onward their salvation But then there is a slavish fear of God in the spirits of men which doth not further but extreamly hinder the working out of their salvation This fear we find in the sloathful servant that never set upon improving his Masters Talent but laid it up in a Napkin and when his Master called him to an account for his Talent he tells his Master plainly what was the reason he never so much as endeavoured to improve it For IFEARED thee saith he because thou art an austere man thou takest up that thou laidest not down and reapest that thou didst not sow Lu. 19.21 22. Thus every Legallist hath at the bottom of his heart if not in his mouth as this man in the parable hath strange prejudices and mis-representations of God which beget slavish tormenting fear within him at the thoughts of God and therefore may well be called as it is most appositely
need transcribe no more but if the proof of these Propositions that the Legallist is for◠external conformities onely in the service of God that he hath aflat and dead spirit in his service that he is proud and conceited and yet under a spirit of Bondage c. I say if the proof of these rested upon authority I might be furnished with abundant testimonies out of these Authors and I shall name no more hitherto therefore it is evident that I go not alone either in words or matter and design I proceed now to speak to the last character The last Character which is this A man is so far Legal as he is affectedly ignorant of Christ or acts to God without Christ in the daies of the Gospel Phil. 3.7 8 9. when the Apostle had there rekoned up his external fleshly privileges which if he would have had a trust and confidence in the flesh he might have boasted of with any Pharisee of them all these saith he were once gain to me I accounted them my riches and my treasure but now What things were gain to me these I counted loss for Christ yea doubtless and I count all things but loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord for whom I have suffered the loss of all things and do count them but dung that I may win Christ and be found in him NOT HAVING MY OWN RIGHTEOUSNESS WHICH IS OF THE LAW but THAT WHICH IS THROUGH THE FAITH OF CHRIST the righteousness which is of God by Faith That I may know him c. This which I have produced is evidently to the purpose for that the Apostle is opposing the two righteousnesses of the Law and Faith and the righteousness which is of God by Faith is all one with the righteousness which is through the Faith of Christ and therefore that which he presseth forward unto is to be found in him and to know him in the power of his resurrection and the fellowship of his sufferings being made conformable unto him in his death ver 10 11 12 13 14 15. But here I will mark before I go any further that there is an inseparable connexion betwixt the righteousness of Faith There is an inseperable connexion betwixt the righteousness of Faith and true holiness and the righteousness of Sanctification nay they seem in this place to be put one for the other for when the Apostle interprets his own expressions of counting all things losse and dung that he may win Christ and that he may be sound in him not having his own righteousness which is of the Law he speaks it in words that signifie sanctification immediately and properly But which is saith he through the faith of Christ the righteousness which is of God by Faith What is that it follows that I may know him and the power of his resurrection and the fellowship of his sufferings being made conformable unto his death These are expressions of sanctification so it follows ver 11. If by any means I might obtain to the resurrection of the dead Which is the highest expression of Sanctification in the whole Scripture or at least one of the highest and so to the same purpose it follows ver 12 13 14 15. * Vnless we wil say that the Apostle speaks of Justification in the 7 8 9. verand then without any formal transition passes on to speak of sanctification in the following verses Not but that there must still be a proper difference held betwixt Justification and Sanctification for they have proper different notions and conceptions Justification is an act of God without us Sanctification is an act of the Spirit within us Sanctification denominates the Person good Justification denominates the person accepted and well-pleasing to God But for any contradiction that there should be in this to say that the same inward holiness which is called our Sanctification may be the very condition of our Justification I profess I know of none not that I affirm that it is so for indeed I am somwhat shye of affirming in those very words though I shall afterwards have occasion to say something to the like purpose but if I should I were not alone in the opinion those two Authors above-named would abundantly supply me with testimonies for they frequently and strenuously assert That the great 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the RIGHTEOUSNES OF FAITH mentioned so often in Paul's Epistles is onely an INTERNAL HOLINESS for which I shall give you several quotations out of them and so proceed Mr. Smith in his discourse of the difference betwixt the Old and New Covenant he comes to speak unto this very Scripture Phil. 3. Where saith he The Apostle amongst his other Jewish privileges having reckoned up his blamelesness in all points touching the Law he undervalues them all and counts all but loss 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus in which place the Apostle doth not mean to disparage a real inward righteousness and the strict observance of the Law but his meaning is to shew how poor and worthless a thing all outward observances of the Law are in comparison of a true internal conformity to Christ in the renovation of the mind and soul according to his image and likeness as is manifest from ver 9 10 c. in which he thus delivers his own meaning of the knowledge of Christ which he so much extolled very emphatically That I may be found in him not having mine own righteousness which is of the Law but that which is through the faith of Christ the righteousness which is of God by Faith Where by the way wee may further take notice what this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the righteousness of Faith and the righteousness of God is according to his own true meaning as he expounds himself viz. A CHRIST-LIKE NATURE IN A MAN'S SOUL or Christ appearing in the minds of men by the mighty power of his divine Spirit and thereby deriving a true participation of himself to them so we have it ver 10. That I may know the power of his resurrection and the fellowship of his sufferings being made conformable unto his death So far Mr. Smith I shall give now the same observation out of Dr. More and so proceed Pag. 387. of his Mystery of Godliness It is plain saith he from the constant scope of the Apostle both in his Epistle to the Gal. and every where else in extolling the righteousness of Faith that he does not vilifie true virtue and morality but drives at an higher pitch and perfection thereof and that the righteousness of Faith which he prefers to the righteousness of works IS NOT BY WAY OF EXCLUSION OF GOOD WORKS OUT OF THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF FAITH but of urging us to exacter and more perfect works of righteousness than could be performed under the dispensation of the Law And in pag. 379 where the Doctor professeth
business presently in one word and tell you that it is Doing So far as you seek to get life by doing you are legal they will tell you ye muâ—â— not act for life but from life a mighty distinction with them though quite false And for prooâ—â— they 'l bring you such a Scripture as this Mark 10.17 where the young man came to our Saviour and said What shall I Do that I may inherit Eternaâ— life Which is a question that I suppose might be asked by a good man though he was not good that asked it unless it be asked with such a design as if one thought that the doing good actions might merit heaven by this Divinity of theirs which they have of late spread far and near they have made their followers which I fear are very many think strangely of good works as if they had no influence aâ— all not so much as secondary to the obtaining oâ— our salvaâ—ion and so onely as matters of love and thankfulness from us but not as absolutely necessary unto the pleasing of God and continuing in his favour according to that of our Saviour Joh. 15.9 10. As the Father hath loved me so have I loved you continue in my love How may we do that ver 10. tells us If ye keep my Commandments ye shall abide in my love even as I have kept my Fathers Commandments and abide in his love Yet I would do the Antanomians this right to say that I think they have very many of them aimed honestly that they have lighted upon many Gospel-strains and have done very well in observing that there is a vast difference betwixt serving God with a Legal and with an Evangelical Spirit though they have not been so happy in telling us wherein the difference lies and for the difference which they make the Legal way to lie in Doing the Evangelical way in Believing I confess it hath a great countenance from Scripture as to the sound of words but as they explain their sense I reckon there is a great disagreement from the Scripture As to their sence of the word Believing I shal have some occasion to examin it anon but as to the word Doing in their sense I say at present That though the Scripture seems to express the whole business of Legality in that word Rom. 4 4. Working or Doing yet certainly in a far other sense from their explication of it For the Scripture in that place understands Working or Doing in a strict Law-sense so as to expect a Reward for it of Debt whereas they will tel you if you look upon Works as having any influence upon Justification let the works be what they wil you are so far Legal Now having proved as I suppose their exposition of Working or Doing to be but a false gloss I shall do my endeavour and no more can be expected to deliver the truth in this matter I suppose therefore according to that Text Rom. 4 4. where Legal Works or working are accurately described that Legality lies in Doing any work with this supposition or conceit in my mind that now I have justly obliged God not only by a Justice of performing promise but a Justice of strict distribution according to the natural desert of an action My meaning is best expressed in that commonly known word of Merit he that doth an action to God supposing that he hath now merited a reward from God by distributive Justice The reason why I make prefumtion of Merit the form of Legality is for that reward of Debt is the Characteristical note of a Legal Reward therefore the expectation or presumtion of such a reward ought to be in a Legal Spirit he is Legal in his action and none other It will bepresently said Then there will not be found so many Legal professors as you assert there are for that few amongst us if any at all acknowledge Merits I answer though they do not acknowledge it with their mouths yet this I suppose is the secret Language of their hearts and where it is not let them be free from the imputation of Legality for me I see no rule to condemn them of it though I wil add this I think many men may disown it in words nay and think they are not guilty of it that yet are extreamly guilty such a a secret unsearchable Disease of heart is this of Legality I have perfectly done with the explication or discovery of the Disease in its own nature I shall come anon to give some symptomes of it that are signs and effects of it in the mean time let us see what improvement what observations we can make upon that Anatomical Discovery which was made of the Galatians e'ne now And here 1 Obser first of all I shall observe the strange and unhappy disappointments that the Legal self-Justitiaries meet with the miserable cheat that they put upon themselves They think to mix Law and Gospel they dare not stand to the Law alone they would fain have a little help from the Gospel to eke out their defects in a Legal Righteousness and alas the Gospel turns them off with scorn to the Law onely to be tried and judged by it which wil certainly condemn and devour them 2dly 2 Obser I observe the strange absurdities and self-contradictions which these self-Justitiaries both Jews and Gentils run into in their prosecution of a Legal Righteousness There are no less then four contradictions which the Galatians ran into in this business 1. They would be justified by the Law and yet acknowledged themselves sinners which is a contradiction for it is obvious that the Law must condemn sinners 2. They would be justified by the Law and yet not be bound to do the whole Law whereâ—s the Law hath no other way imaginable to justifie any persons but when they have the works of the Law when they have done the whole Law He that doth them shall live in them 3. They would be justified by the Law and yet have benefit by Christ and his death whereas Christ â—ras not the Minister of Circumcision Christ came into the world and dyed because the Law was broken and could not justifie 4. See the greatest of contradictions imaginable They would be justifisied by the Law and yet profess the Gospel and the way of Grace therefore the Apostle convinceth them with this Argument If ye seek Justification by the Law ye are fallen from Grace Rom. 11.6 If by Grace then it is no more of works yet all these absurdities and contradictions the Galatians swallowed that they might go on with their way of Works which they were so greedy after and addicted to besides all those evident arguments both general and of more particular concernment to them which they went against though they had received the Spirit by the Gospel though miracles were done amongst them in confirmation of the Gospel neither of which attended the Law though they had done and suffered so many things
my body lest after I have preached the Gospel to others I myself should be a cast-away But the Apostle Paul had other principles in conjunction with it The love of Christ constraineth us saith he 2 Cor. 5.14 I shewed before that fear of Hell acting for the reward or from a principle of natural conscience these are not Legal principles in themselves and in their own nature so that he that acts by them should be far judged to be Legal but onely they are such as may want the company of other principles not to make themselves pass for Evangelical but to make the person that acts by them enough Evangelical they are a lower sort of good principles which let them have as great influence as they will can do no hurt onely there must be somewhat more ask shewed above and indeed here is the proper place to shew the necessity of some further principle and I accordingly promised in that particular to shew it in this Now I suppose this is is the great reason why there is need of a further principle besides those three for that a man may act by all those three principles and yet be under a Spirit of Bondage Now there must be some principle to free the soul from this bondage or else the soul can never serve God acceptably This Principle must be Love Perfect love casteth out fear first all slavish fear of God then the fear of men he that feareth is not made perfect in love Look to what degree the love of God is in the soul to such degree is the slavish fear of God and the cowardly fear of men abated But yet take two cautions in examining thy self by this Character as to predominant Legality 1. Be not too rash in concluding thou hast no love to God 2. If thou thinkest thou hast reason to conclude that hitherto thou hast no other principle of action towards God but those three which do not necessarily exclude a spirit of Bondage yet be not discouraged as to the future thou mayest have a further principle thou art in the fairest way towards it that any other is A spirit of Bondage is far better than a prophane spirit Many Divines hold and I think rightly that the Lord in the work of Conversion doth usually lead men through a spirit of bondage into a spirit of adoption though thou shouldst be at present as to thy state under the Law yet the Law is a School-Master unto Christ And Mr. Smith in that so often quoted Discourse of Superstition tells us after having quoted that very place in Isa 33. The sinners in Zion are afraid who shall dwell with the devouring fire as an argument of men under the power of Superstition though I should not dislike saith he these dreadful and astonishing thoughts of future torment which I doubt GOOD MEN may have cause to press home upon their own spirits whilst they find INGENUITY less active Thou seest there may be good use of such principles even in good men therefore they are not bad in thee But I come to the discovery of partial Legaity or the mixtures of Legality which may be found in the service and spirits of good men from this Character And this is indeed the Character by which the Legality of good men is usually discovered There are many Saints as I have intimated already several times who though they walk very exactly are not conscious to themselves of living in any known sin nay it is known by all that know them intimately that they are very strict in their lives yet these are still in doubts and fears touching their condition they are sorely affraid that the Lord is angry and displeased with them though they have no reason from the Scriptures or from the judgment of other Christians and Ministers nor from any revelation within them but onely through Satans temptations Now these men cannot gather their fears from any other occasion or reason then from their unreasonable conceptions their over-timorous and dreadful apprehensions of God They have some secret fears and doubts of his goodness that he will never be pleased though they make their way never so perfect before him though they humble themselves though they acknowledge their vileness in never so great debasements and abhorrencies of themselves The truth is they are secretly afraid and it must be so or else their jealousies must be without so much as the least shew of reason that they shall never please God unless they keep the Law to a tittle and what is Legality if this be not that is they think so at some times and this occasions their fears and doubts not that they think so always for if they should think so alwayes they were perfect Legallists Or else if they do not think so high as this that they must keep the whole law yet they think at least that they must do some very great thing which is beyond their strength And so accordingly for instance they think they must do so many duties in a day let what business come that can come and they must do it so well be they in never so ill a temper or frame of heart not as if our ill temper excuseth the ill performance of an action where that distemper is brought upon us by ourselves and that they perhaps must do as much when they are sick as when they are well that though they be weak in grace or weak in parts that yet they must do as much as those that are strong in both All this now together with the fears and troubles that attend these thoughts I call Legality and it proceeds from a false and over-timorous apprehension of the Deity And they are not enough sensible that the condition of man is altered from perfect to imperfect nor that the terms betwixt the great God and his creature Man are altered from Legal to Evangelical And I say once for all he that thinks God requires any thing of the Creature above its strength nay beyond what the creature can through the grace of God well and comfortably perform is a Legallist and under the spirit of bondage so far That is certainly a general Gospel-maxime though made use of upon a particular occasion of contribution to the necessity of the Saints which we have 2 Cor. 8.12 If there be first a willing mind it is accepted according to that a man hath and not according to that he hath not And nothing is plainer in the Scripture then this That the Lord will proceed in his taking account of us according to the proportion of Talents that he put into our hands As many as have sinned without Law shal also perish without Law and as many as have sinned in the Law shal be judged by the Law Rom. 2.12 The Lord wil not expect more then four talents from him to whom he gave but two nor more then two from him to whom he gave but one Matth. 25. ver 14 15 20 21 22.
Dr. upon the next question The words are these But if the Spirit of him that raised up jesus from the dead dwell in you he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his spirit which dwelleth in you and if Christ be in you the body is dead because of sin but the spirit is life because of righteousness ver 10. His interpretation of the verse is excellent in my mind and it is to this sense as I apprehend it That when we are Christians and have the Spirit of Christ dwelling in us and the presence of Christ by his Spirit we shall be sensible how far yet we remain unsanctified and that unsanctified part in us which the Apostle calls the body of death and desires to be delivered from will appear as ghastly and deadly a thing to us as the dead body tyed by Mezentius to the living did to him because Christ is living in us But yet now our Christian faith teacheth us to believe that though the body be dead because of sin that is there be a great part of us yet unsanctified and dead because of sinful remainders in it and by reason of this unsanctified part or body of death in us we are exceeding heavy and indisposed to all holiness and goodness yet that the Spirit of Christ in us is life and righteousness and will by degrees qvicken those very dead unsanctified parts that are yet within us for if the Spirit of him that raised up Christ from the dead dwell in us he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken our mortal hodies that is that unsanctified part that is at present dead in sin by his Spirit which dwelleth in us Dr. More 's words are We finding a comfortable warmth in the grateful arrivals of the holy Spirit do believe That he that raised up Christ from the dead wil in due time even quicken these our mortal bodies or these dead bodies of ours and make them conspire and come along with ease and chearfulness and be ready and active complying instruments in alll things with the Spirit of Righteousness Which belief viz. that God will thus by his Spirit quicken our mortal bodies is saith he a chief point in the Christian faith and most of all parallel to that of Abrahams who believing in the goodness and power and faithfulness of God had when both himself and his Wife Saraah were dry and dead as to natural generation and so hopeless of ever seeing any fruiâ— of her Womb who had I say Isaac born to him who bears joy and laughter in the very Name oâ— him and was undoubtedly a type of Christ according to the spirit For Isaac is the wisedom power and righteousness of God flowing our and effectually branching it self so through all the faculties both of man's soul and body that the whole man is carryed away with joy and triumph to the acting all whatsoever is really and substantially good even with as much satisfaction and pleasure as he eats when he is hungry and drinks when he is dry And these now according to the designe of the Dis Discourse are acts of a Gospel-faith which justifie us as Abraham's believing in the power of God for a Son did justifie him I come now to another Question which is this How doth Faith justifie The fifth question of Iustification or under what notion and consideration doth faith justifie Now to this I answer that Faith justifies as our Righteousness It doth not justifie as some affirm only by relying upon the blood of Christ or apprehending the righteousness of Christ for I have given instances of several acts of faith which were justifying acts that had not this respect at all unto the blood of Christ at least not visibly and the reward of Justification was reckoned to them upon other accounts Abraham was fully perswaded that God was ABLE TO PERFORM and THEREFORE it was imputed to him for righteousness Rom. 4.21 22. Yea I have given instances of a faith in Christ that was justifying and yet was not directed to the blood of Christ by any thing that appears in the Scriptures quoted No faith it self is our righteousness faith in the power of God was Abraham's righteousness and faith in the power of God according as our necessities at any time require will be our righteousness But more especially faith in the power of Christ or in the blood of Christ is our Gospel-righteousness though as I affirmed before there cannot be true faith in God now in the dayes of the Gospel but it will turn into a faith in Christ as well as in God And for this Assertion that Faith is our Righteousness I shal give several Scriptures Rom. 4.3 What saith the Scripture Abraham believed God and it was counted to him for righteousness that is his believing in God and relying upon his power and faithfulness for the fulfilling of his promise this faith of his was accepted so farr was so highly pleasing to God that God made him his friend Jam. 2.22 23. and reputed and reckoned him through grace as righteous as if he had kept the whole Law So Rom. 4. ver 5. To him that believeth in God that justifieth the ungodly his faith is counted to him for righteousness What plainer expression can there be than this for our Assertion his faith is counted for righteousness to him or for his righteousness And for a little proof from the testimony of others for this Assertion I reckon is somwhat harsh see what Mr Baxter and Mr John Goodwin say upon it In his Aphorisms of Justification Thesis 20. pag. 108. saith Mr Baxter Our Evangelical righteousness is not without us in Christ as our Legal righteousness is but consisteth in our own actions of Faich and Gospel-obedience Thesis 23. pag. 125. In this sense also it is so farr from being an errour to affirm that faith it self is our righteousness that it is a truth necessary for every Christian to know that is Faith is out Evangelical righteousness in the sense before explained as Christ is our Legal righteousness And in the explication of this Thesis pag. 128. he hath these words Our Evangelical righteousness or Faith is imputed to us for as real righteousness as perfect obedience not that it is as much in true value yet it is so accepted because of the value of Christ's satisfaction Thesis 57. pag. 225. It is the act of faith which justifies men at age and not the habit yet not as it is a good work or as it hath in it self any excellency above other graces But 1. in the nearest sense directly and properly as it is the fulfilling the condition of the new Covenant in the remote and more improper sense as it is the receiving of Christ and his satisfactory righteousness Mr John Goodwin likewise declares himself not to be of their minde who conceive or teach That faith justifies as it is an instrument receiving