with the holy Garments and by anointing them with the holy Oyl and by sacrificing and so sanctifying them by the Blood thereof When all this was done they might officiate in the Priests Office all their days And all these things did point unto something of Christ represented by these Performances and may be applied in a secondary and inferior way to Ministers and Believers but first and chiefly unto Christ himself For as the Priests by this Consecration became Priests all their days Exod. 29. v. 9. and the Priests Office shall be theirs by a perpetual Statute for thou shalt consecrate Aaron and his Sons so the Son of God is consecrated a Priest for evermore Heb. 7.28 Confer v. 27. This Consecration of Jesus Christ is the Commission of the whole work of our Salvation into his hand by God the Father But in the Rites of the Consecration of the Priests of old there was as of necessity there must be a disparity between the Type and Antitype there was a great disproportion between Christ and them sundry of those Rites not agreeing to them both in the same direct manner sundry Purifications which they used were rather to make them become fit Types of Christ then that they signified such parallel actions to be done by Christ The Priests by means thereof represented that Purity which is in Christ without those means They were purified but Christ was pure so that in Purity there is an agreement between Christ and them but in the manner and means thereof there is a difference See Heb. 7.26 27. And therefore when any such actions are ascribed unto Christ as when he saith I sanctifie my self Joh. 17.19 it is to be understood rather in regard of the effect then of the action rather of the thing it self then of the means but such active expressions are used partly in relation to the Type the Priests of old and partly in relation to the Church of Christ the Members whereof he is the Head whatever is done to them being first done to him their Head so far as the incommunicable properties of either will permit He is therefore pleased so to speak of himself as being consecrated and sanctified and the like Not as though there had been any defect of Holiness in him but as representing them in himself Moreover we must remember that these things are not to be looked upon by us as terminated in the person of Christ himself but as relating further to his Church and Members for whom he is an High Priest and Mediator with the Lord. Meminerimus quae de Consecratione dicuntur non subsistere in ejus personâ sed referri ad totius Ecclesiae utilitatem Calv. in Exod. 29.6 Now to come to the particular Ceremonies of their Consecration they were those four as beforementioned 1. The first part of their Consecration was their washing with water Exod. 29.4 Levit. 8.6 This intimated and hinted two things 1. The perfect Purity and Holiness of Jesus Christ Heb. 7.26 who is holy harmless undefiled separate from sinners and such an High Priest as behoved us to have For we needed an holyer Priest then those of the Aaronical Order They were typically holy and some of them really but Christ infinitely 2. This pointed also at the Baptism of Christ at his first entrance upon his publick Ministry Matth. 3. Thus this great High Priest was consecrated and initiated by washing with water The first thing he doth to his people is to wash them He findeth them in a wretched and lothsom condition polluted in their own Blood Ezek. 16.9 then washed I thee with water yea I thoroughly washed away thy Blood from thee and I anointed thee with Oyl and so they did to the Priests of old Rev. 1.5 6. He hath loved us and washed us from our sins with his own Blood and hath made us Kings and Priests unto God and his Father Therefore sinners are exhorted unto this as the first thing they have to do Isai 1.16 wash ye and make ye clean 2. The second Ceremony of Consecration was the apparelling of them with the holy Garments Exod. 29.5 Levit. 8.7 These Garments are described at large in the precedent Chapter viz. Exod. 28. they were therefore spoken to under a former Head You have heard how they did betoken all those spiritual Graces and Excellencies which our great High Priest is furnished and adorned with And the next work of his Grace upon us after the washing away of sin is to clothe the Souls of his people with the Garment of Holiness and so to make them every way beautiful See that eminent Scripture Ezek. 16.9 and what follows ver 10. I clothed thee also with broydered work and shod thee with Badgers skin and girded thee about with fine Linnen and I covered thee with Silk See also the next following verses viz. 11 12 13. 3. The third Ceremony of consecrating was the anointing them with holy Oil Exod. 29.7 Lev. 8.12 The Composition of which sacred Ointment is instituted and directed in Exod. 30.23 As to the mystery and meaning of it 1. This holy Oil signified the Spirit of God and anointing therewith the Communication of the Spirit in the saving Graces and in the Divine Joys and Consolations of it so Isai 61.1 The Spirit of the Lord is upon me the Lord hath anointed me Act. 10.38 He anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost 2. The anointing of the Priests signified the anointing of Jesus Christ with the Spirit beyond measure Psal 45.7 Joh. 3.34 This is called the Resting of the Spirit upon him Isai 11.2 as upon Elisha 2 Kings 2.15 and upon Eldad and Medad Numb 11.26 so 1 Pet. 4.14 the Spirit of God and of Glory rests on the Members of Christ especially when in sufferings it being derived unto them from him Hence he is called the Messias 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the anointed one because he chiefly is anointed with the Spirit 3. As this holy Oil stayed not upon Aarons head but descended and ran down upon his Beard and to the skirts of his Garments as is observed Psal 133.2 so the Holy Ghost the Spirit of Christ distills and is diffused from Christ the Head unto all the Members of his Body so as the meanest Saints have this anointing in their measure 1. Joh. 2.20 27. and do receive of his fulness even Grace for Grace Joh. 1.16 hence they bear his name and are called Christians as being partakers of his anointing 4. The Tabernacle and the Altar and all the holy Vessels were anointed with the same sacred Oil when he anointed Aaron at the same time also he anointed them Lev. 8.10 11 12. The mystery of this is evident It teacheth us that all Ordinances and Performances profit not unless they be anointed unless the Spirit be in them with the power and presence of his Grace This makes them most holy and effectual for good Exod. 30.29 and if he breath in them whatsoever toucheth them
other things of like nature that so we may distinguish and discern the things that differ I shall instance here only in four things that are partly of the same nature with the Types but yet not exactly the same 1. The difference between a Type and a Simile A Type doth belong indeed to that Argument or Notion in Logick but with this difference this distinction will shew you the difference between them that there is Typus arbitrarius and Typus fixus institutus An arbitrary Type is a similitude or comparison So Marriage is a similitude or comparison by which the Apostle sets out the mystical union between Christ and the Church Ephes 5. But yet Marriage is not a Type For then we shall make it a Sacrament as the Papists do you know it was instituted for another end before the Gospel came into the world It is a Sign but not a Sacrament For by that Argument we should have a thousand Sacraments So Riders on white Horses are resemblances used in Scripture to set out Christ and the Angels but yet not properly Types of them And the reason is this because they were never instituted and designed by God for that end to represent Christ and the Gospel they are only occasionally made use of There is a wide difference between the occasional use of a thing in the way of a similitude or comparison and the Designment or Institution of it for that end and use As if Christ be compared to a Feast of Bread and Wine as in the Parable of the Marriage-Supper This is a very true and fit comparison but for Bread and Wine to be designed and set apart by the Command of God to represent Christ and his Benefits this is a thing of an higher nature and puts them into a Sacramental nature and relation to him 2. The difference between a Type and a Parable A Parable is nothing else but a sacred Similitude We commonly take it as the Scripture doth for such a similitude wherein not only the Truth and Mind of God is the scope and matter of it but whereof God himself is the Author As in the four Evangelists we read of the Parables of Christ To call them Fables as Grotius doth haec Fabula indicat c. is a slight and an irreverent expression A Parable there is the same with a Similitude only hath God himself for its Author But in a Type the Lord doth not only occasionally use such or such a simile but sets such a thing apart sets a stamp of Institution upon it and so makes it an Ordinance to hold forth Christ and his Benefits 3. What is the difference between a Type and a Ceremony This is only that which is between the Genus and Species For all the Ceremonies were Types but all Types were not Ceremonies The Pillar of Cloud and Fire was a Type but not a Ceremony A Ceremony was some Law or external Observation prescribed unto them to teach and shadow forth some Gospel-Mystery so that a Type is more general a Ceremony is one particular kind of Types 4. What is the difference between a Type and a Sacrament I answer they differed in the number and multitude of them they had many Types we have but two Sacraments But there was no difference in the nature of them further than this that our Sacraments are Signs of Christ already come but their Types were Signs of Christ that was for to come our Sacraments are Signs Christi exhibiti their Types Christi exhibendi 4. As to the Words and Phrases by which it is expressed First we have this very word Type used in the Scripture not only in its native and proper Sgnification Joh. 20.25 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the print of the Nails But it is used also in this borrowed and spiritual sense whereof we are treating in the Text and 1 Cor. 10.6 these were Types for us 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 1 Cor. 10.11 all these things happened unto them in Types So the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 answers the Hebrew 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 exemplar figura forma â 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 aedificavit They are called Shadows 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Col. 2.17 a Shadow of things to come Heb. 8.5 which serve unto the example and shadow of heavenly things Heb. 10.1 a Shadow of good things to come They are called Figures or Patterns 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Hebr. 8.5 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Example and Shadow Heb. 9.23 Patterns They are called Signs 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Mat. 12.39 the Sign of the Prophet Jonas so is Circumcision Rom. 4.11 the Sign of Circumcision Figures or to render it more emphatically parabolical Figures 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Heb. 9.9 a parabolical Figure for the time This answers to the Hebrew word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And some so understand Heb. 11.19 from whence also he received him in a Figure They are called Allegories Galat. 4.24 which things are an Allegory They are called Seals 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rom. 4.11 the Seal of the Righteousness of Faith Also the Law 2 Cor. 3.6 the Letter that is the Law killeth but the Spirit that is the Gospel quickeneth And the Letter 2 Cor. 3.6 the Letter that is the Law killeth but the Spirit that is the Gospel quickeneth The Antitipe or the thing typed and figured is called in Scripture sometimes by this name the Antitype 1 Pet. 3.21 the Antitype whereunto even Baptism doth also now save us The Type being called a Shadow the Antitype is called the Body Col. 2.17 the Body is of Christ The Types are called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Antytype 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Heb. 10.1 the very Image of the things themselves Future good things Heb. 10.1 a Shadow of good things to come Heavenly things Heb. 9.23 Patterns of things in the Heavens True Heb. 9.24 which are the Figures of the true Joh. 1.17 the Law was given by Moses But Grace and Truth came by Jesus Christ Lastly they are called Spirit and spiritual things 2 Cor. 3.6 the Letter killeth but the Spirit giveth life Revel 11.8 In the street of the great City which is spiritually called Sodom and Egypt There is literal and spiritual Egypt Vse We may receive encouragement from all that hath been said to look into the Types and to study this Subject For that they do adumbrate and shadow forth Jesus Christ and Gospel-Truths and Mysteries exhibited and revealed by him It is not good to despise any part of Scripture knowledg much less such parts as stand in such a direct relation to Jesus Christ Though there is something of difficulty through our own darkness and weakness yet the fruit will countervail the pains and labour though they be difficult yet they are useful to be known I have been desired by my Brethren of the Ministry to speak unto them and I hope to receive assistance from God through your Prayers and I do much desire the help
of that man is peace This is the difference between Christs Peace and Satans Peace for they both give Peace to their subjects But Satans Peace is a Peace of freedom from trouble and of sinful security in sin Christs Peace is a Peace after and out of trouble by War and Victory over Sin and spiritual Enemies Isai 9.3 His Servants rejoyce as those that divide the spoil after the Victory Quest But how may I know that Peace will be the end of all my present Conflicts Answ Dost thou get the Victory then the end will be Peace Are there any beginnings of Victory whatever thou dost do not lay down thy Weapons but fight still this is the beginning of Victory and the end will be Triumph and Peace and Joy Sept. 19. 1667. Who is the Type or Figure of him that was to come Rom. 5.14 THe third Conjunction or Conglebation of typical Persons under the Law is those three Prophets Elijah Elisha and Jonah whom I put together because Elijah was a Type of Christs Ascension into Heaven and Elisha of the Continuance of his Presence and Spirit in his Apostles and Messengers ever since and Jonah of his Death and Sufferings the procuring cause of all 1. For Elijah that great Prophet I confess he is omitted by many that have written of the Types and indeed by all that I have seen I know not well how it comes to pass But that he was a Type is certain because John the Baptist is called by his Name therefore he was a Type 1. Of John Yea 2. Of Christ himself 1. He was a Type of the Messiahs Harbinger and Forerunner John the Baptist For the Types as hath been often hinted are not to be restrained always only to the Person of Christ himself but all the things of Christ were typified to them of old There were Types of all New Testament Dispensations therefore John is called Elijah Mal. 4.2 last v. and Christ himself explains it Matth. 11.14 But why is John called Elias Not that he was Elijah personally but mystically he rose up in the Spirit and Power of Elijah So Elijah was John in a Type or Figure John was Elijah in Spirit and Power as Luk. 1.17 There was something of Analogy in his very outward Garb and Deportment an hairy man 2 King 1.8 that is in regard of his Habit or Clothing in a rough hairy Garment So John Matth. 3.4 a Girdle of Hair but chiefly in regard of his Spririt and inward Endowments and of his Work and Office to convert and recall a backsliden Generation 2. Elijah was a Type of Christ himself And that he was so will be very evident if you do consider how great a Person this Elijah was in three respects 1. His eminent and heroick Spirit of Holiness and invincible Courage and Activity for God His very Name signifies God the Lord Elijah or Elijahu in the Hebrew Elias in the Greek in the New Testament He abode with God when almost all the world forsook him 1 King 19.10 he reduced and brought back the people cap. 18.39 he was a man mighty in Prayer Jam. 5.17 18. a man of an invincible Courage who feared not to stand himself alone against four hundred Prophets and against Ahab the King and Jezabel the Queen whose Chaplains these false Prophets were He is brought forth in the sacred History not unlike Melchizedek without Father or Mother without either Birth or Death 1 King 17. 2. The great and wonderful Miracles wrought by him there be twelve recorded in the History of him in the first and second Books of Kings 1. His shutting up the Windows of Heaven that there should be no Rain for three years and an half 1 King 17. whence some have called him Fraenum Caeli the Bridle of Heaven 2. His being fed by a Raven morning and evening at the Brook Cherith beside Jordan This was the effect of his Faith and Prayer and may be reckoned amongst his Miracles English Annot. not that it is likely that he did eat raw Flesh but rather that God by his Providence directed the Ravens to the places where they might have it as to some rich mens Kitchens or the like 3. His miraculous Supply of the Widow of Zarephath called Sarepta in Luke 4.26 that her Barrel of Meal wasted not nor did the Cruise of Oyl fail 4. His raising of her Son from the dead by stretching himself upon the Child This was the first person we read of in Scripture that was raised from the dead and Elijahs fourth Miracle All these are recorded in 1 King 17. 5. In fetching down Fire from Heaven upon his Sacrifice to confound the Priests of Baal 6. His opening the Windows of Heaven and fetching down Rain after he had done justice upon the Priests of Baal these two are in cap. 18. he did this also by Prayer and by persevering in Prayer cap. 18. ver 43. 7. His fasting forty days and forty nights cap. 19.8 In Mount Horeb and in his Journey thither and back again the place where God appeared to Moses Exod. 3.1 2. and where he gave the Law to Israel Deut. 4.10 14. Never any man fasted forty days besides this Elijah and Moses Exod. 34.28 and Christ Matth. 4.2 Herein both Moses and Elijah were manifest Prefigurations of the Lord Jesus Christ This was Elijahs seventh Miracle 8. His calling the Prophet Elisha and causing him to follow him by casting his Mantle upon him which had such an influence that he left all and followed him therefore this may be put into the Catalogue of his Miracles cap. 19. And in the like miraculous influence of the Spirit did Christ call his Apostles to leave all and follow him His ninth and tenth Miracles were the Destruction of the two Captains and their Fifties when Ahaziah sent to take him 2 King 1.1 they both perished alike For like Sins pull down like Judgments The 11th was the dividing of Jordan by his Mantle that he and Elisha might pass over 2 King 2. And the 12. was his Ascension into Heaven in a Chariot of Fire 2 King 2.11 a Prerogative that never any man had but himself and Enoch before the Law and Moses who gave the Law but Moses died first and was translated afterwards as hath been formerly shewed They were all three eminent Types herein of Christ his Ascension into Heaven They that are faithful and zealous for God in times of general Apostacy the Lord is wont to own them in a special manner and to put special Honour upon them one way or other 3. His commissionating Successors after him to carry on the Work of God when he was gone 1 Kings 19.15 16. Elisha to be Prophet Hazael King of Syria Jehu King of Israel So Christ sends forth his Apostles and Ministers Matth. 28. some that are godly and sometimes he imploys others that are not godly but only gifted and makes some use of them as he did of Jehu and of Judas
a certain time or during a mans whole life Of Persons that were Nazarites all their days the Scripture giveth some very great and eminent instances as Sampson Judg. 13.5 also Samuel the Prophet 1 Sam. 1.11 also John the Baptist Luke 1.15 Of Persons under the Vow of Nazariteship only for some certain time we have instance in Paul the Apostle Acts 18.18 and again Acts 21.23 24. How long they were to be under the Vow the Scripture limits not The Jewish Writers report that one month was the shortest time in use amongst them This Order shadowed forth sundry things relating 1. To Christ himself 2. To the Members of Christ 3. To the Benefits of Christ 1. The Nazarites were Types of Christ himself not that Christ himself was a Nazarite according to the Law but only in the Spirit and Truth of this Type That he was not a Nazarite literally is clear because he drank Wine as at other times so at his last Supper which they might not do But in him this Type was fulfilled in two respects 1. In regard of his usual Name and Title Jesus of Nazareth or Jesus the Nazarite Matth. 2. ult Joh. 19.19 Thus he was usually called which the Jews would never have done but that by the Providence of God he had lived in that place In which disposal of Providence altius fuit Dei Consilium as Calvin in Mat. 2. God had a further Design and Counsel than they were aware of that from thence called him by that Name Which though it was given him upon another occasion by the Jews namely from the place of his Residence yet God in his infinite Wisdom did so contrive and order it that by this means he should be commonly called by the Name of this religious Order See Matth. 2. ult where the Evangelist tells us that by this means of Christs living in Nazareth was fulfilled that which was spoken by the Prophets namely that he should be called a Nazaren By the Prophets is meant those Prophets that wrote the Book of Judges and the place intended is Judges 13.5 as Calvin from Martin Bucer judgeth It is true indeed the words there are spoken of Sampson literally but intended mystically of the Messiah of whom both Sampson and all the Nazarites were Types It is true there is some literal difference between Zain and Tsade and the Syriack Translation which yet is but a Translation renders Nazareth by Tsade Notsoreth whereas the word Nazarite is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with Zain But that the Holy Ghost regarded such a literal exactness is not probable See Bucholcer Cbronol p. 285. It may suffice that there is an allusion and affinity in the sound And though Matthew useth the word Nazarene as signifying one of the religious Order of the Nazarites yet Pilate Joh. 19.19 useth the same word of him never dreaming of any thing more than the place where Christ had dwelt Some indeed have thought that this passage in Matth. 2.23 refers to Isai 11.1 where Christ is called Netsor the Branch a flourishing Branch But we do not find that flourishing Branches are called Nazarites in the Scripture so Calvin in Matth. 2. ult 2. In regard of his peculiar Holiness and Separation unto God They were ceremonially holy but he was holy indeed and after an higher and infinitely more excellent and glorious manner He is called that holy thing that shall be born of thee Luk. 1.35 and Dan 9.24 the most holy or the Holy of holies 2. The Nazarites were Types of all the Saints and Members of Christ All Believers who are an holy people are spiritual Nazarites separated unto God I say all Believers whether male or female For there were Women Nazarites as well as Men Num. 6.2 when either Man or Woman shall separate themselves to vow a Vow of a Nazarite For in Christ Jesus there is neither male nor female Gal. 3.28 3. There was in this Order a Ceremonial shadow and adumbration of the Benefits of Christ which Believers do receive from him and they are chiefly two Sanctification and Justification 1. Sanctification This was shadowed out in this that the Nazarites were persons separated and devoted unto God in a special manner by a Vow Numb 6.6 As also in the particular Rules and Ceremonies belonging to this Order which were three 1. Not to drink Wine Numb 6.3 4. So Sampson This was to teach them Temperance and Mortification of fleshly Lusts which Wine often provokes men to and takes away their hearts from that which is good Hos 4.11 and causes them to err and stumble Isai 28.7 Moreover this Ceremony taught them instead of Wine to be filled with the Spirit Ephes 5.18 and inebriated as it were with the Joys thereof in the sense of Gods Love which is better than Wine Cant. 1.4 2. Not to cut their Hair ver 5. This is thought to be appointed as many other ceremonial Laws were in opposition to the heathenish Idolatry of those times and to signifie the keeping himself from all uncleanness and impurity For when the Nazarite was purged and cleansed from impurity his Hair was shaved off ver 9. and so the Leper Lev. 14.8 9. therefore to keep it from shaving seemeth to signifie the keeping themselves from uncleanness so some expound it It shadowed forth also the growth of the Graces of Gods Spirit in them as in Sampson who with the loss of his Hair lost the Power of God and as his Hair grew again so his Strength in God renewed Judg. 13 25 and 16. This Strength came not by the growth of the Hair otherwise than as an outward Sign appointed unto them of God who sanctifieth to his people what outward Signs himself pleaseth to signifie and convey Grace as he sanctified the Waters of Jordan to wash away Naamans Leprosie Ainsworth on Numb 6.5 which of themselves had no such efficacy 2 Kings 5.14 3. Not to defile themselves by the dead ver 6 7 8. This refraining from the dead in whom the Image as it were of Gods Curse for Sin was to be seen For the Wages of Sin is Death Ainsworth in loc Rom. 6.23 figured out abstaining from sinful and dead Works and from such as live in them who are dead whilst they live 1 Tim. 5.6 It shewed their Constancy in the Rules of their Profession and their Magnanimity in the loss of dearest Comforts 2. Justification by Christ alone was shadowed forth in two Rules or Observations belonging to this Order 1. That legal strictness and severity of Purification in case of accidental Defilement ver 9 10 11 12. If a Nazarite chance to be defiled he is to begin again upon a new score This shews the absolute Purity and Perfection of the Law of God which will not admit the least error or failing but whosoever continueth not in all things is cursed and condemned by it Deut. 27.26 Gal. 3.10 If a man keep the whole Law and fail but in one point he is guilty of
in by degrees the first four Trumpets made way for the perfection of that Apostasie that came in by the fifth Among the Idolatrous Kings of Israel those in succeeding times were worse then their wicked Predecessors Jeroboam was bad enough but he only sets up the two Calves at Dan and Bethel but Omri went beyond him for it is said he did worse then all that went before him 1 King 16.25 We read of the Statutes of Omri Mic. 6.16 Idolatrous and persecuting Laws But his Son Ahab was worse then he For as if it had been a light thing for him to walk in the sins of Jeroboam he did set up the Worship of Baal and did more to provoke the God of Israel to anger then all the Kings of Israel that went before him 1 King 16.31 32 33. So that you see it is an increasing and an endless sin 4. All the honour men do or think they do to God by worship of their own invention doth redound indeed and in truth to the honour of the Devil which is a fearful thing to consider Superstition is a sin directly against the means of worship but it is ultimately against the Object of worship Strange worship sets up a strange God Ames Med. Theol. lib. 2. cap. 13. Thes 14 15 42. for it necessarily supposeth and feigneth to it self such an Object of worship as is well pleased with such manner of worship as Superstition offers up and to whose will soever we submit our Consciences as the Rule of our religious worship him we set up as our God Though it be not so in mens intentions yet it is so indeed and in Gods Interpretation The Lord so interprets false worship that a new God is devised for the Object of it so of the Heathenish Idolatry the things which the Gentiles sacrifice they sacrifice to Devils and not to God 1 Cor. 10.20 And so the Lord interprets the Jewish Idolatry Jeroboam ordained Priests for the Devils which he had made 2 Chron. 11.15 Lev. 17.7 Deut. 32.17 And he puts the same construction upon the Popish Idolatry they repented not of worshipping Devils Rev. 9.20 And their Factors and Emissaries are called Spirits of Devils Rev. 16.14 they think they worship St. Peter and the Virgin Mary yea God himself and Jesus Christ but it is indeed and in Gods account the Devil whom they worship It is true you cannot honour God too much his Name is above and beyond all praise but you may mistake and honour the Devil when you think you honour God A fearful mistake indeed it is but yet it is that which all those fall into who in their worship depart from the will of God revealed in his Word and turn aside to any of the Inventions of men THE GOSPEL OF THE CEREMONIAL UNCLEANNESSES and CLEANSINGS September 13 20. 1668. Heb. 9.13 14. For if the blood of Bulls and of Goats and the ashes of an Heifer sprinkling the unclean sanctifieth to the purifying of the flesh How much more shall the blood of Christ c. IN the distribution I formerly gave of the Ceremonial Law you may remember I did put the Legal Sacrifices and Purifications together under one Head as partaking in the same general nature both of them tending to the purging away of sin and of uncleanness Moral uncleanness being taken away by Sacrifice Ceremonial uncleanness by Ceremonial Purifications whereof we are now to speak as the Lord shall enable us from this Text which speaks very fully and most divinely to this Point There be two things in the Text. 1. The Type vers 13. For if the blood of Bulls of Goats c. 2. The Antitype vers 14. How much more shall the blood of Christ c. Under each of which there be three particulars which are here set by the Apostle in a way of opposite correspondency the one to the other 1. He speaks of uncleanness in the Type To which answers dead works as the thing figured by it 2. He mentions Ceremonial cleansing to the purifying of the flesh To which answers the purging of the Conscience from dead Works to serve the living God 3. The Means of the one answers to the Means of the other The blood of Bulls and Goats and the ashes of an Heifer sprinkling the unclean which is the Means of legal cleansing To this answers the blood of Christ who by the eternal Spirit offered up himself without spot unto God which is the Means of spiritual cleansing Though withall the Apostle shews that these two answer not each other in a way of equal Analogy there being indeed a preeminent excellency of the one above the other of the Antitype above the Type therefore he expresseth it with an how much more If those legal Purifications attain the end of legal cleansing for which they were appointed how much more shall the blood of Christ cleanse the Conscience It hath a greater efficacy and is a Truth of clearer and higher Evidence These particulars of the Analogy between the Type and the Antitype we may cast them into three doctrinal Propositions thus 1. That they had a Ceremonial uncleanness under the Law which figured the Moral uncleanness of dead works 2. That they had also Ceremonial cleansings or purifyings of the flesh which signified the purging our Consciences from dead works to serve the living God 3. That the Means of Ceremonial putification by the blood of Bulls and Goats and by the ashes of an Heiser sprinkling the unclean signified the blood of Christ who by the eternal Spirit offered up himself without spot unto God 1. For the first namely that they had a Ceremonial uncleanness under the Law which did figure out the Moral uncleanness of dead works therefore he sets them one against the other so that those uncleannesses did signify dead works and what is meant by dead works we may see Heb. 6.1 not laying again the foundation of Repentance from dead works What do we repent of We repent of our sins These are therefore the dead works here spoken of and sin is called a dead work because it proceeds from death and is a part of spiritual death and tends to eternal death As good Actions tend to life so sin tends to death so then Ceremonial uncleanness signifies Moral uncleanness of sin and dead works There were two or three sorts of Ceremonial uncleanness 1. Unclean Touchings 2. Unclean Issues 3. That unclean Disease of the Leprosy 1. They had unclean Touchings and Tastings here was uncleanness from without 2. They had unclean Issues here was uncleanness from within a mans self 3. That Disease of the Leprosy was a Disease of Ceremonial uncleanness and here was both an inward and an outward uncleanness 1. There was a Ceremonial uncleanness by eating or touching any unclean thing Lev. 11. In that Chapter it is treated of which Chapter shews what Beasts what Fishes what Fowls and what creeping things might and what might not be eaten And it