words of Adam as Epiphanius thinketh or immediatly uttered by the Lord to Adam but of Moses directed by the spirit of God who inserteth here a perpetuall law concerning marriage 2. The man is said to leave father and mother either comparatively and in degree that he is rather to leave them than his wife Oecolamp or conditionally if they shall seeke to dissolve the knot of marriage therein the sonne is to leave them Muscul. as also the leaving of the father and mother signifieth the erecting of a new family as the Chalde readeth hee shall leave his father and mothers bed for the ancient use was for children unmarried to lye in their parents chambers Mercer 3. They shall be one flesh not only in respect of carnall copulation as R. Sel. for so bruit beasts may be said to bee one flesh but in respect of their perpetuall society the conjunction both of their bodies and minds Now whereas the Apostle saith that he which is joyned to an harlot is one flesh the Apostle there applieth not that which is proper to marriage to fornication but sheweth what injury they doe to marriage which commit fornication yeelding that to harlots which is peculiar to wives to be made one flâ—sh with them And yet this difference there is that the man and wife are joyned together both in flesh and spirit as it followeth in the same place he that is joyned to the Lord is one spirit 1 Cor. 6.17 but the harlot though joyned in body is severed in heart and affection QVEST. XLV How man was not ashamed of his nakednesse Vers. 25. THey were both naked and were not ashamed 1. Adam was not ashamed not as some Hebrewes say because Heva was of his owne flesh for afterward they were one ashamed to behold the nakednesse of another neither doth Moses set them forth as impudent and unshamefast persons such as the Adamites are pretending this example companying together like bruit beasts but this nakednesse of their bodies sheweth the nakednesse and simplicity of their minds for shame is the fruit of sin and therefore before sinne entred they were not ashamed 2. Some thinke that there remaineth yet in children that are not ashamed of their nakednesse some shadow of our first estate but children are therein unshamefast for want of reason as the like is to be seene in bruit beasts But in the kingdome of heaven we shall be all naked and without shame as Adam was and without feare or danger of sinne which Adam was not 3. Further notwithstanding their nakednesse they should not have beene offended with the weather either heat or cold not that their skin was like unto the nailes of the fingers as R. Eliezer thinketh which waâ— taken away after their fall but God would have so tempered the elements and the quality of their bodies as that all things should have beene serviceable unto them 4. The places of doctrine 1. Doct. The Dominicall or Lords day is grounded not upon tradition or Ecclesiasticall institution but upon the scriptures IN that the Lord sanctified the seventh day and made it a day of rest we inserre that as the Sabbath kept then upon the seventh day in remembrance of the creation was of the Lords institution so the Lords day is now observed by he same authority in remembrance of the resurrection of Christ and our redemption by the same contrary to the Rhemists who count the observation of the Lords day but a tradition of the Church and Ecclesiasticall institution Rhemist Matth. 15. sect 3. Our reasons are these 1. The observation of a Sabbath or day of rest unto the Lord is commanded in the moral law which is perpetuall and not to be abrogated if this bee denied it will follow that there are but nine commandemets if that of sanctifying the Sabbath doe not binde now And although wee observe not now the same day for our Sabbath which the Jewes did yet the seventh day we keepe still retaining the substance of the law which is to keepe one day holy of seven The manner of computation and account of seven where to begin where to end and to bee tied to the very same prescript of the day was ceremoniall and a circumstance of the law and in that behalfe doth not conclude us 2. That which was by the holy Apostles by precept enjoyned and by example observed was of a divine institution thus the Lords day is prescribed by Saint Paul 1 Cor. 16.2 where the Apostle enjoyneth them to make collection for the poore in their meetings upon the first day of the weeke which then began to be observed for the Lords day he himselfe also Act. 20.7 observeth the same day and preacheth in it Saint Iohn calleth it the Lords day Revel 1.10 3. Every symbole significative or representing signe mentioned in scripture had a divine institution but so is the Sabbath a symbole or type of our everlasting rest Heb. 4.9 There remaineth therefore sabbatismus a sabbath rest to the people of God which words doe conclude that both the type remaineth that is a sabbatisme and the signification of the type everlasting rest 4. No constitution of the Church doth simply bind in conscience for Gods commandements only do so bind Iam. 1.12 There is one law giver which is able to save and destroy but the keeping of the Lords day bindeth in conscience for therein we are commanded not to doe our owne wayes nor to seeke our owne will nor to speake a vaine word Isay 38.13 which duties are alwayes commanded so especially upon the Lords day but these precepts the observation whereof is properly incident to the Lords day doe bind in conscience Ergo. c. 5. If the Lords day were but a tradition of the Church there should be no difference betweene that and other festivall dayes but all of the like necessity and with as great strictnesse are to be observed and kept these as the other But that were very absurd seeing we find the Lords day by the Apostles to have beene observed whereas no mention at all is made of the other in the scriptures and the Church of God in her practice hath alwayes made a difference betweene the observation of the Lords day and other festivals enjoyning that with greater devotion alwayes to be celebrated than the rest 6. This also hath beene the constant doctrine of the Church of God and the judgement of the fathers that the Lords day is of the Lords institution as may appeare by this sentence of Augustine Dominicum diem apostoli apostoliâ—i virâ—religiosa sanctitate habendum sanxerunt c. The Lords day the Apostles and Apostolicall men have ordained with religious holinesse to bee kept because in the same our Redeemer rose from the dead and therefore it is called the Dominicall or Lords day that in it we onely may attend upon the divine service this is the first day in the world in it were created the elements
come but trusting to Gods long suffering hoped that it should not be so for it is evident Genes 6. that beside this speciall point of incredulity the old world was in many other sinnes outragious the earth was filled with cruelty vers 11. and in that they gave no credit to Noah Gods Prophet therein they were incredulous against God as our Saviour saith of his Apostles he that heareth you heareth me and he that despiseth you despiseth me Luk. 10.16 4. Their opinion also is to be refused which thinke that though the wicked of the old world were condemned to hell yet they might be redeemed from thence by the descension of Christ who is said by S. Peter to have preached to the spirits in prison which sometime were disobedient at which time also some have fabled that Plato at the preaching of Christ in hell beleeved and that divers others have been delivered from hell as the soule of Falconilla by the prayer of S. Tacla and of Trajanus the Emperour at the intercession of Gregory But these imaginations are contrary to the Scriptures for out of hell is no redemption as Abraham said to the rich man They which would goe from hence to you cannot neither can they come from thence to us Luk. 16.26 And hell is thus described Where their worme dieth not and the fire never goeth out Mark 9.46 the worme of the conscience in everlasting fire shall torment the wicked that oration which goeth under the name of Damascene is confessed by Bellarmine to be none of his and that place of S. Peter hath no such meaning as even now shall appeare 5. Neither is their conceit any thing worth who thinke that some of them which perished in the floud did repent them before they died and so went not to hell but to purgatory from whence they were delivered by Christs descending thither according to that saying of Peter but was quickned in the spirit by the which he went and preached to the spirits in prison which were in time passed disobedient c. But this place in Augustines opinion cannot be understood of the descending of Christs soule into hell 1. Augustine objecteth that Christ cannot be said to be quickned or made alive in his spirit that is his soule because it was not subject to death And therefore by the spirit he truly understandeth the divine power of Christ whereby hee preached in Noah 2. If there be preaching in hell then it will follow that there is a Church there and repentance and conversion of soules 3. The Apostle speaketh onely of such as were disobedient but they were not delivered by Christ. 4. It cannot be shewed in all the Scripture where the receptacle of the soules of the faithfull and beleevers is called a prison 6. Wherefore our opinion is that all those which were disobedient and incredulous in the dayes of Noah were first destroyed in their bodies in the floud and after in their soules perished everlastingly but from this number both infants must be excepted such as were of the sonnes of God who are not capable of faith and obedience and therefore were neither unfaithfull nor disobedient and such also as were ignorant of the preaching of Noah and framing of the Arke Of these God might have mercy The rest continuing still in unbeleefe everlastingly perished For it is not like that they which by the space of an hundred and twenty yeares would not repent but remained obstinate would relent in the instant of the floud Herein therefore we refuse not the judgement and reason of Rupertus Primo ulâ—imo judicio soli reprobi condemnantur soli electi servantur isto medio nec soli elects conservantur nec soli reprobi suffocantur In the first judgement when the Angels fell and the last onely the reprobates shall be censâ—red the elect saved but in this judgement comming betweene neither the Elect onely were prâ—served in the Arke for there was Cham accursed of his father nor the reprobate onely suffocated in the waters And hereunto agreeth S. Peters comparison that resembleth baptisme to the Arke 1 Pet. 3.21 but all dying without baptisme are not damned neither is it to be supposed they were all reprobates which died without the Arke QVEST. XVI Of what manner the Arke was made Vers. 14. MAke an Arke of Pine trees 1. Some thinke that no certaine kinde of wood is expressed but generally the matter whereof the whole Arke should be made which was not one kinde of wood but divers Perer. 2. But some take it for squared wood as the 70. 3. Some for wood pitched pro lignis bituminatis Hierom. tradit in Genes 4. Some for the Pine or Pitch tree because from the word gopher here used seemeth to be derived gaphrith taken for brimstone Gen. 19. sic Oleaster for gaphrith brimstone is digged out of the earth pitch which commeth from the tree hath another name it is called copher 5. Some thinke the Arke was made of the Firre tree which is the highest and straitest of all other or the Cypresse tree because of the continuance 6. But it is most like to be the Cedar as the Thargum readeth which is commended in Scripture for the height and therefore is called the Cedars of God Psal. 104.16 and beside it is most durable Plinie maketh mention of Cedar beames in the Temple of Apollo at Utica which continued from the first foundation untill his time almost 1200. yeares 7. Neither need it be doubted where Noah should have timber of sufficient length to serve for the breadth of the Arke for Plinie reporteth of a beame of the Larix tree in Tiberius reigne seene at Rome an 120. foot long and of a Cyprus tree 120. foot long He maketh mention also of the Indian trees to be so high that unneath an arrow cannot be shot over them Ex Perer. QVEST. XVII Of the measure of the Arke Vers. 15. THis length of the Arke shall be 300. cubits The Arke was six times so long as broad and ten times so long as high after the proportion of mans body as Augustine well writeth for the length of mans body from the crowne to the foot is six times the breadth from one side to another and ten times the thicknesse from the backe to the chest But many have doubted that the Arke being described to be no larger was not sufficient to containe all the beasts with their severall food and Apelles the disciple of wicked Marcion tooke occasion hereby to cavill at the whole story But this doubt may easily be removed 1. Yet we are neither forced with Origen to make of one cubit six which he calleth a Geometricall cubit for neither is there any such cubit in use which in length containeth six ordinary cubits neither doth the Scripture in other places reckon according to such cubits for whereas the Altar is prescribed to be made five cubits long three cubits high Exod.
Hebrew ach to be read as an adversative as Paulus Burgensis readeth veruntamen notwithstanding as though the sense should be this though yee are permitted to shed the bloud of beasts yet it is unlawfull for you to shed the bloud of man 3. Neither is this another exception concerning mans food as Cajetane that as before the bloud of beasts is excepted so here humane flesh that if it be not lawfull to shed the bloud of man neither is it to eat his flesh which first must be kiâ—led before it be eaten 4. Neither need there to be here understood any sentence as this I will not have you to shed mans bloud and then this to follow as a reason for this prohibition to shed mans bloud followeth directly in the next verse 5. But this word translated for may be read as a causall why God would have them abstaine from all cruelty or savage behaviour in eating of the bloud of beasts that they should have a greater detestation of the spilling or shedding of mans bloud Perer. Mercer QVEST. VII How God will require the bloud of man at the hand of beasts Vers. 5. AT the hand of every beast 1. Rupertus by beast understandeth the Devill that shall answer for the death of mens soules but Moses here directly speaketh of the bodily life which is in the spirits and bloud 2. Neither by beasts here are understood cruell and beastiall men for it followeth afterward aâ— the hands of man will I require it c. 3. Neither doth Moses insinuate the death of martyrs which were exposed to beasts for which the persecutors shall answer for that did cast the Saints before the beasts 4. But here is shadowed forth that Law which was afterward published that even the beast that killeth a man should be stoned Exod. 22. QVEST. VIII How his bloud shall be shed that sheddeth bloud Vers. 6. BY man shall his bloud be shed 1. Some reade in homine and referre it to the first clause Hee that sheddeth mans bloud in man as they which are strangled have their bloud shed as it were in them sic Tostatus but in this sense one kinde of murther onely should be prohibited 2. Some read in homine against man that is in despite of man Cajetan 3. But the best reading is per hominem by man and to referre it to the last clause by man shall his bloud be shed that is by the Magistrate as the Chalde interpreteth by witnesse by the sentence of the Iudge for it should seeme that before the floud there was no law made nor power given to man to punish murther as Adam proceeded not against Cain that killed his brother Abel Mercer 4. And this must be understood not de facto sed de jure merito not of the fact for many times murtherers escape but of the right and due desert of murtherers that they are by Gods Law worthy of death and many times where the law of man faileth that such are not executed Gods vengeance overtaketh them such are either slaine in battell or by the hands of other or by some other meanes as it is in the Psalme men of bloud shall not live halfe their daies Psalm 55.24 Calvin QVEST. IX That mans life should be preserved because of Gods image IN the image of God c. 1. Hence it followeth not as Oleaster collecteth that the image of God is in mans body because the image in the soule cannot be by the killing of the body destroyed for the reason concludeth well though this image of God be not in the body yet because the body is the Tabernacle of the soule and beareth that which beareth the image of God it ought for that cause to be reverenced and yet the image of God though not originally or principally yet by the consequent and effects is expressed and shineth in some sort in mans body in that it is made upright and aspiring to celestiall things and so sutable to the soule and in regard that into the hand of man God hath delivered the rule and dominion of the creatures cap. 1. vers 28. 2. Though the image wherein man was created be much decayed and impaired yet some part thereof remaineth for the which the life of man should be spared and preserved Calvin 3. And if for this reason the life of any man whatsoever should be regarded much more the life of Christians in whom this image is renewed in Christ Muscul. QVEST. X. Of the Raine Bow Vers. 13. I Have set my bow in the cloud c. 1. Neither Ambrose conceit can be admitted who understandeth not here the visible Raine-Bow in the clouds but the invisible power of God whereby he sometime intendeth sometime remitteth his judgements as a bow is bent and unbent againe But this collection is contrary to the text which saith The Bow shall be seene in the cloud vers 14. 2. Neither is their opinion found that thinke there was neither raine noâ— Raine-Bow before the floud for how could the plants and fruits of the earth have beene so many yeares preserved without raine so then the Raine-Bow was before the floud but it beganne onely now to be a signe of this covenant betweene God and man as the Lord chuseth sometime naturall things for signes as Bread and Wine and Water in the Sacraments Mercer 3. Neither is the opinion of some Hebrewes to be admitted that thinke the Raine-Bow to have beene before the floud but then it appeared in the cleare aire now in a cloud for the iris or Bow can have no existence or being but in a dewing or stilling cloud Mercer 4. Neither is Thomas Aquinas judgement and Cajetanus sound which thinke that the Râ—ine-Bow is partly a naturall signe that there shall be no floud because the Raine-bow sheweth not but when the clouds are thinne and dispersed whereas thicke and blacke clouds ingender inundations for the causes of the generall floud were not naturall and God without the clouds by the overflowing onely of the waters could drowne the world and beside if the Rain-bow were a naturall signe then before the floud came it might have prognosticated so much but then it should have beene a lying signe for notwithstanding the Raine bowes often appearing before the deluge as it is like the floud came 5. Though the Raine-bow bee not a naturall signe but voluntary depending upon the will and institution of God yet notwithstanding hath it some agreement with that which it is made a signe of like as baptisme in the flesh hath some resemblance of the soule so the Raine-bow is a fit and convenient signe to portend no inundation likely to follow because it is orâ—inarily a signe either of faire weather or of no long raine And it hath beene observed that a Raine-bow in the morning betokeneth showers in the evening faire weather Beside the Raine-bow is found to be wholesome to plants and herbs that where it lighteth it giveth them a more pleasant
should finde evill willers in the world such as would curse and not blesse him so we learne that good men though they give no just occasion of offence shall not want their enemies Vatabl. As our Saviour Christ full of all goodnesse found many enemies in the world and few friends 4. Morall Observ. Many blessed for good mens sakes I Will blesse them that blesse thee c. We see that many are blessed for good mens sakes and Laban fared well for Iacob Egypt blessed for Iosephs sake Philo concludeth well Oremus igitur ut tanquam columna in domo c. vir justus permaneat ac calamitatum remedium Let us pray that as the pillar in the house a good man may continue to be a remedy against calamity 5. Morall Observ. The obedience and love of wives toward their husbands Vers. 5. ABraham tooke Sarai his wife c. Chrysostome noteth in Sarai her great obedience qua taut a facilitate cum viro peregrinaretur which so readily travelled and tooke paines to goe with her husband hom 32. in Genes Ambrose setteth forth her love qua contenta periclitari pudere potius quam virum salute which did chuse rather to hazard her chastity than her husband his life and safety And Saint Peter setteth forth Sarai an example of loving obedience to all wives 1 Pet. 3. 6. Morall Observ. God comforteth his children in their affliction Verse 7. THe Lord appeared to Abraham God leaveth not Abraham comfortlesse in the midst of his afflictions but he doth refresh him both by appearing to him and renewing his promises concerning Canaan so the Lord doth visit his children in mercy both by the secret inspiration of his spirit and by the inward revelation of the joyes to come as Saint Paul expresseth both Rom. 8. the first vers 15. We have received the spirit of adoption whereby we cry Abba father the second vers 18. I account that the afflictions of this life are not worthy the joy which shall be revealed 7. Morall Observ. Murther followeth unlawfull lust Vers. 12. THey will kill me c. Such is the force of unlawfull lust and desire that they will not spare to kill to fulfill their minde and pleasures as David did Vriah to enjoy his wife Ahab Naboth for his Vineyard Musculus 8. Morall Obser. Of flattering Courtiers Vers. 15. THe Princes of Pharao saw her and commended her We see the property of flattering Courtiers that seeke to please the Princes humour and to feed his fancie and devise how to serve his delight Calvin As the Wise man saith Of a prince that hearkneth to lies all his servants are wicked Pro. 29.12 so here as Pharao gave his minde to lust and concupiscence his servants were likewise addicted 9. Morall Observ. The great care the Lord hath over the righteous Vers. 17. THe Lord plagued Pharao We see what great care God hath of his children he for Abrahams sake punished the King as it is said in the Psalmes Hee rebuked Kings for their sakes so here we see verified that saying Psal. 34.30 Many are the tribulations of the righteous but the Lord delivereth them out of all Wherefore happy are they which trust in the Lord hee will never faile such 10. Morall Observ. God the revenger of wedlocke-breakers BEcause of Sarai Abrahams wife Thus it is evident that God is the revenger of all wedlocke-breakers for he will maintaine his owne ordinance Ambrose saith excellently Nemo alienum affectit â—â—rum c. let no man affect anothers bed nor be enticed thereunto inscitia vel stultitia mariti vel longiâ—e absentia by the ignorance simplicity or absence of the husband adest praesul conjugii Deus vicem absentis muriti tuetur observat excubias God the Patron of marriage is present he supplieth the roome of the husband being absent he keepeth watch c. so the Apostle also saith whoremongers and adulterers God will judge c. Heb. 13.4 CHAP. XIII 1. The Method and Contents THere are three parts of this Chapter 1. The blessing of God upon Abraham after his departure from Egypt vers 1. to vers 7. 2. The departure of Lot from Abraham with the cause thereof vers 7 to vers 12. 3. The renewing of Gods promise to Abraham after that Lot was departed vers 14. to the end In the first part these things are more particularly reheaâ—sed 1. Abrahams returne out of Egypt vers 1. 2. His wealth vers 2. 3. His thankfulnesse to God vers 3.4 4. The reward of thankfulnesse Lot is also made rich for Abrahams sake vers 5. They both in wealth so increased that the land was not sufficient for them 6. In the second is set forth 1. The dissention betweene Abraham and Lots servants vers 7. Abrahams reconciliation in friendly admonition vers 8. and oblation of choice to Lot vers 9. Le ts election of his place vers 10. his discession or departure vers 11. a description of the Countrey where Lot dwelt by the quality of the ground pleasant and fruitfull vers 10. of the people they were wicked vers 13. In the third part these things are contained 1. The place of Abrahams dwelling when Lot was departed v. 12. 2. The renewing of the promise both for the possession of that Country with the ratifying thereof Abraham is bid to lift up his eyes ver 14. walke through the Country and so as it were to take seisin thereof vers 17. as also concerning the multiplying of his seed vers 6. 3. Abrahams thankfulnesse in building an Altar unto God vers 18. 2. The divers readings or translations v. 1. Toward the desart S. south cat see before c. 12. v. 9. v. 3. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 agge S. Hai. cat haguâ—i heb v. 8. Let there be no fight 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 S. contention or strife cat meribah strife v. 9. If thou wilt goe to the North I unto the South C. If thou wilt goe to the left hand I to the right cat v. 10. As Gods paradise S.H. as the garden of Gods cat ghan v. 11. Seger S.H. Sâ—ger C. Soar B. Zoaâ— G. Tzoar Tsâ—guar v. 12. In the land of the borders S. in the townes about Iardane H. in the Cities of the Plaine cat cichor a Plaine v. 13. The men of Sodome were wicked in their riches and very lewd in their bodies C. were evill and sinners against God caet v. 17. Thy seed for euer S. thy seed cat v. 18. Oake of Mambre S. Plaine of Mambre cat see cap. 12. v. 6. and qu. 9. The Theologicall explication of doubts QVEST. I. How and wherefore Abraham was rich Vers. 2. ABraham was very rich c. 1. Abraham became rich partly by the goods left him by his father partly by the gift of Pharao cap. 12.16 2. Thus Gods promise beganne to be performed chap. 12.2 I will blesse thee yea Lot also is blessed with riches for Abrahams sake as the Lord promised I
and blesseth God he blesseth neither bread nor wine the Preist blesseth and halloweth the cup. 4. He bringeth forth bread and wine to Abraham the Priest onely delivereth bread to the people and keepeth backe the cup. 5. Melchisedeck brought bread and wine in substance as is touched before the Masse-priest saith their substance is changed 6. Melchisedeck worshippeth God not the bread and wine the Masse-priest adoreth both So that in truth this example of Melchesedeck if they will stand to their tackling maketh altogether against the popish Masse sacrifice and nothing for it 4. Confut. Wherein Melchisedecks Priesthood consisted WHerein then the comparison holdeth betweene Christ and Melchisedeck the Apostle sheweth Heb. 7. 1. As Melchisedeck is interpreted a King of righteousnesse so our blessed Saviour was indeed a King of righteousnesse Isay. 11.4 With righteousnesse shall he judge the poore 2. Melchisedeck was King of Salem that is of peace Heb. 7.2 so the Messias is a Prince of peace Isa. 9.6 3. Melchisedeck was without father or mother that is they are not mentioned in the story but Christ was truly without father as he was man and without mother as God 4. Melchisedeck was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 without genealogie so none can declare Christs generation as he is God Isa. 53.8 5. Melchisedeck had no beginning of his life or end of his dayes that is expressed in the Scripture but Christ the word is truly without beginning being from all eternity neither shall he have any end He is Alpha and Omega the beginning and the end Revel 1.8 6. As Melchisedeck was both a King and a Priest so our Saviour is Prince of all the Kings of the earth Revel 1.5 and he is our great high Priest Heb. 4.14 7. But especially in these three points following did Melchisedeck resemble our Saviour as Melchisedeck was not a Priest anointed with any materiall oyle as Aaron but declared so to be by Gods owne mouth and the testimony of the spirit so Christ was anointed by the spirit of God Luk. 4.18 and made a Priest by an oath The Lord hath sworne and will not repent thou art a Priest for ever after the order of Melchisedeck Heb. 7.21 8. As Melchisedeck was greater than Abraham for he blessed him and than Levi that payed riches in Abrahams loynes Heb. 7.4.9.10 so the Priesthood of Christ is greater than the Priesthood of Aaron 9. But herein most of all is Melchisedeck likened to the sonne of God because he received his Priesthood from none nor passed it over to any other in like manner as Christ succeeded none so neither doe any succeed him but he endureth ever and hath everlasting Priesthood Heb. 7.24 Object As Christs Priesthood is everlasting so it was necessary that he should have a sacrifice which should continue for ever 1. Which cannot bee the sacrifice upon the Crosse for that was but once done 2. Therefore it can be no other than the sacrifice of the Eucharist 3. neither doth it suffice to say that the efficacie or vertue of his sacrifice upon the Crosse continueth for ever for in this sense Noahs sacrifice might be said to be eternall because the efficacie of it remaineth still in keeping the world from being destroyed by water Perer. disp 7. in 14. Genes Answ. 1. But the Apostle sheweth the contrary that the once oblation of Christs body is that everlasting sacrifice of our high Priest Heb. 10.14 With one offering hath he consecrated for ever them that are sanctified 2. But the dayly sacrifice of the Masse it cannot be the Apostle saith which needed not dayly as those high Priests to offer up sacrifice Heb. 7.27 that cannot be an everlasting sacrifice which is dayly renewed and the sacrifice offered in the Church shall determine with the militant state thereof in earth and therefore cannot be everlasting 3. Noahs sacrifice procured no eternall or spirituall but a temporall benefit though to continue while this world lasteth and Christs sacrifice gave that durable force to Noahs sacrifice which was a figure thereof therefore Noahs sacrifice cannot be called everlasting or himselfe an everlasting Priest seeing that efficacie was not in himselfe or his sacrifice but in Christ the everlasting Redeemer and Priest 6. Places of Morall observation 1. Observ. Light afflictions goe before heavy judgements Vers. 2. THese made warre with Bala king of Sodom c. The Lord before he purposeth to bring an utter destruction upon any doth first admonish them with light punishments so he healeth with Sodome first they are scourged by these foure Kings of the East but seeing they received no warning thereby afterward the Lord rained upon them fire and brimstone Perer. We learne then that we should not neglect the gentle corrections of God lest they draw on heavy judgements thus God dealt with his owne people who were chastised sometime by a famine by the sword by the pestilence but when none of these would serve they were swept away and carried into captivity 2. Observ. To dwell among the wicked is dangerous FUrther in that Lot was carried away with the Sodomites we see that good men may together with the wicked taste of temporall judgements and what a dangerous thing it is to have any habitation or dwelling among the ungodly Muscul. therefore the Scripture saith Goe out of her my people that ye be not partakers in her sinnes that ye receive not of her plagues Revel 18.4 3. Observ. Rebellion no not against hard governours is to be attempted Vers. 4. TWelve yeares were they subject c. but in the thirteenth they rebelled first we see the justice of God in punishing the wicked life of the Sodomites with a tyrannicall government so the Prophet pronounceth this a curse upon the ungodly set thou a wicked man over him Psal. 109.6 Beside God punisheth the Sodomites for their rebellion where then a government is established though it be hard and unjust nothing is tumultuously to be attempted against it as the Lord commandeth that the King of Babylon who was but an hard Lord should be served and obeyed Ier. 27.8 Calvin 4. Observ. Riches evill gotten commeth to an evill end Vers. 12. THey tooke all the substance of Sodome c. They which used not their wealth to the good and comfort of the poore as the Sodomites did not Esech 16.49 doe heape it up to bee a prey for the enemie Calvin so the King of Babel boasteth That as a nest he had found the riches of the people Isa. 10.14 which they had first wrongfully scraped together 5. Observ. Gods enemies and the enemies of our Church our enemies Vers. 20. WHich hath delivered thine enemies c. Lots enemies are called Abrahams enemies and so indeed wee should account the enemies of Gods people and Church our enemies though in particular they have not hurt us Luther So the Prophet saith Doe not I hate them that hate thee c. I hate them with an unfained hatred as though
spirit and died c. 1. Though the word gavâ— rather so signifieth expirare to give up the ghost than deficere to faint Hieromes reason is not so good quia non coâ—venit Abraha deficere it was not fitting that Abraham should faint and decrease for no morall decreasing or fainting is here spoken of but onely naturall 2. Neither is this word which signifieth to yeeld up the Spirit used onely of the just as Rabbi Salomon and Lyranâ—â— for the same is uttered of the old world Gen. 7.21 all the flesh yeelded the breath and of Ismael vers 17. of this chapter 3. Neither is Oleasters reason sufficient why we should read rather he fainted than yeelded up the spirit because it followeth he died and so the same thing would be twice expressed for this expiring or yeelding up of the spirit sheweth the facility and easinesse of his death as the word following betokeneth the thing that he dyed so this declareth the manner not that he dyed without any sicknesse or griefe as Aben Ezra for the faithfull are not exempted from the common condition of mankind Vatah. but it sheweth that he willingly rendred up his soule into the hands of God Calvin 4. Cajetanes collection is not here to be refused that three things are set downe by Moses concerning Abrahams departure 1. that he dyed that is was dissolved which belongeth unto the whole man as consisting of body and soule 2. that hee was buried which concerneth his body 3. that he was gathered unto his people in respect of his soule which was joyned to the blessed company of the Saints Cajet in hunc lâ—â—um QUEST XIII How Abraham died in a good age and full of yeares IN a good age satisfied or full of daies 1. In that Abraham is said to have died in a good old age whereas many before him were of longer life and much elder of whom this phrase is not used Philo gathereth that it was not the old age of his body but his perfection of vertue that made a good old age Disce soli viro bonâ— contingere senectutem bonam Know that onely a good old age happened to a good man sic etiam Calvin 2. Hee was full because daies is not added in the originall the Hebrewes gather that he was full not onely of daies but of all other blessings ex Mercer and he was satisfied with daies as not desirous to have his life prolonged Calvin Thus even some among the Heathen were satâ—â—e with daies as Cicero writeth of Cato that he should say Siquis deus mihi largiatur â—t ex hac atate repusrascam in cunis vagiam valde recâ—sem that if God should grant me to become a childe againe and to cry in the cradle I would refuse it Cicer. de senectus Therefore Abraham was in another sort full of daies because his daies were full of vertue hee had not spent his life in vaine but as Apelles the cunning painter was wont to say nullus dies sine linea no day without a line and Titus the Emperour if any day had passed wherein he had not done some good would say to his friends Diemperdidi I have lost a day so no doubt Abraham did passe over his time in fruitfull workes Perer. QUEST XIV How the sinner is said to die before his time ABraham then received a great blessing of God in living both long and well and dying in his time not as the Preacher saith of the wicked man lest thou die in tempore non tuo in a time not thine Ecclesiast 7.19 which is so spoken 1. Not that a man can die before the time appointed of God for a mans daies are determined with God Iob 14.5 2. Nor yet so onely because the wicked is never prepared or fit for death both because he is destitute of vertue as also hee expecteth not death in which respects in some sense he may be said to die not in his time being neither ripe for it in vertue nor looking for it 4. But the sinner is said to die before his time when the naturall course of his life which he in the judgement of man though not in the determination of God might have lived is by some violent and extraordinary kinde of death shortned and cut off as Nadab and Abihu for offering in strange fire were thus before their time consumed with a fire sent from God Levit. 10. ex Perer. QUEST XV. What it is to be gathered to his people Vers. 8. ANd was gathered to his people 1. This people are not the sunne moone and starres or the invisible idaea or formes according to the which these sensible things were made or the foure elements of the which the bodies of men are compounded as Philo imagineth these are but Platonicall conceits and who seeth not how unproperly the name of people agreeth to any of these 2. Neither with Augustine by people doe we understand the society and company of Angels for Ismael also is said vers 17. to be gathered to his people 3. Neither can it bee applied to Limbus patrum where all the just men were from the beginning of the world as Lyranus Rupertus unlesse they will say that Ismael also went into the place of just men who was also gathered to his people and whereas they make Limbuâ— patrum a member of hell a place of darknesse Abraham went not thither seeing Abrahams besome was a place of rest and joy where the Angels were for they carried Lazarus soule thither But these blessed spirits are Angels of light and not of darknesse 4. We also refuse Burgensis conceit who noteth a difference of phrase in the old and new testament when the Scripture speaketh of the dead they are said that die in the new testament to die in the Lord which phrase is not used of any in the old testament because they were not admitted ad beatificam Dei visioneâ—â— to the blessed presence and sight of God Contr. Indeed I grant that after the manifestation of the Messiah to the world the Scripture speaketh more clearely of the faithfull departed in the new testament because the Messiah was then come but not for any such cause pretended for even the soules of the faithfull departed in the old testament did enjoy the presence of God as David saith I shall behold thy face in righteousnesse and when I awake be satisfied with thine image Psal. 17.15 he doubted not but that his soule first apart should see God and then both body and soule in the resurrection and the Scripture speaketh evidently that Abraham Isaack and Iacob did live with God for of them God is called who is not the God of the dead but of the living Matth. 22.32 5. Neither this phrase to be gathered to his people doth only signifie to be in the state of the dead and equivalent to that phrase to sleepe with their fathers which is spoken of the wicked as well as of the righteous as idolatrous
Egyptians in the true worship of God but that he urged them generally to circumcision being not of the seed of Abraham to whom that ceremonie appertained is not like Mercer 4. Ioseph is said v. 56. to breake to the Egyptians that is to sell them food for so the word shabar signifieth either because it breaketh famine or because it is broken and ground to make bread of or rather because they made their bread in thin cakes and so used to breake not to cut it Mercer 4 Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. God only the disposer and foreteller of things to come Vers. 25. GOd hath shewed Pharaoh what he is about to doe God therefore is not an idle beholde or foreteller of things to come but a doer and disposer of them which overthroweth the opinion of the heathen that ascribe the actions of men some to fatall necessity as the Stoikes some to fortune or chance as the Epicures but the Scripture telleth us that whatsoever pleaseth God be doth in heaven and earth Psal. 135.6 Further we see that onely God that worketh in the world can foretell the things that are done in the world as the Prophet joyneth them both together Shew the things that are to come hereafter c. doe good or evill c. 41.21 therefore neither spirits nor any other creatures that are not able to dispose things done in the world have the foresight or knowledge of things to come 2. Doct. Repetitions of the same thing in Scripture not vaine Vers. 32. THe dreame was doubled because the thing is established with God c. Hence then it is evident that repetitions in the Scripture are not vaine tautologies and superfluous battâ—logies but that they are set downe for more certaintie for which cause this dreame was doubled to Pharaoh Mercer like as Saint Paul saith Philip. 3.1 It grieveth me not to write the same things unto you and for you it is a sure thing 3. Doct. The holy Ghost proved to be God Vers. 38. CAn we finde such a man as this in whom the spirit of God is Augustine noteth this to be the third place in Genesis where mention is made of the spirit of God the first is Gen. 1 2. The spirit of God moved upon the waters the second Genes 6.3 My spirit shall not alwaies strive with man the third in this place quaest 134. in Gen. 4. Doct. The mutability and change of time Vers. 54. THen began the seven yeares of famine to come c. After the yeares of plenty follow the yeares of famine so after peace commeth warre after health sicknesse nothing is permanent or of long continuance here Muscul. as the wise man saith There is a time for every purpose under heaven c. a time to weepe a time to laugh a time to mourne a time to dance Eccles. 3.14 5. Doct. Of the lawfulnesse of rich apparell and other ornaments in men of honourable place and calling Vers. 42. PHaraoh tooke off his ring Ioseph commeth forth adorned with these complements of honour a ring gold chaine fine linnen riding in the second charriot So that such ornaments are not to be condemned in men of honourable place and condition if these two rules be observed that neither such things be ambitiously sought and desired as here this great honour was offered to Ioseph by Pharaoh of him not begged and that they be not used to ostentation and vaine glory And for the lawfulnesse of rich apparell and ornaments of gold in men of high place to shew their authority and the more to keepe the people in feare and obedience the testimonie of our Saviour may suffice Mat. 62.9 Salomon in all his glory was not arayed like one of these 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Against superstitious shaving Vers. 14. ANd he shaved him c. Ioseph was shaved not only to cleanse himselfe from the filthinesse and smell of the prison but because it was not the fashion of that country to comâ— before the king with long and disordered haire Mercer This was a civill use of shaving they placed no religion in it as the Popelings of Rome doe 2. Confut. The vulgar Latine not wholly Hieromes translation Vers. 43. THey cryed before him Abrech This Hierome taketh to signifie a tender or young father of Abh father and rech tender delicate tradition in Gen. yet the Latine translation under Hieromes name readeth otherwise They cried before him that all should bow their knees whence it is evident that the vulgar Latin was not wholly of Hieromes doing beside it is very corrupt in divers places as vers 54. for in all the land of Egypt was bread the Latine hath in all the land of Egypt was famine 3. Confut. Against the popish prohibition of the marriage of Ministers Vers. 50. HE gave him to wife Asenah daughter of Potipherah prince or priest of On. The word cohen signifieth both a priest and a prince the Chalde readeth prince others the priest H.S. But because the priests were in great authority in Egypt and as from the Philosophers they chose Priests so out of the priests they made princes Mercer I thinke he was both priest and prince that is the chiefe and principall priest This sheweth that among the Egyptians their priests were married and had children so also was it lawfull in the old testament for the priests and in the new for the Apostles to be married and never forbidden in the Church of God till Antichrist began to set in his foot and his adherents to teach the doctrine of devils c. forbidding to marry and commanding to abstaine from meats as the Apostle saith 1 Tim. 4.1 3. 4. Confut. Against the superstitious restraine of marriage among Hebrews and Romanists Vers. 50. NOw unto Ioseph were borne two sonnes before the yeares of famine came The Hebrews note from hence that all the time of famine Ioseph abstained from the company of his wife because his children were borne before the famine came and that it is unlawfull for the man and wife to come together in the time of famine or any other common calamitie as they would gather out of Ioel 2.16 Let the Bride-groome goe forth of his chamber and the Bride out of her bride-chamber c. Contra. 1. It followeth not because Ioseph had no children borne in the time of the famine that therefore he came not to his wife all that time as though it is to be imagined that the Patriarkes when they had no children borne abstained from their wives 2. True it is that the man and wife according to the counsell of the Apostle should sometime sequester themselves for fasting and prayer but it must bee onely for a time and with consent lest Satan tempt them for their incontinency 1 Cor. 7.5 they must not then defraud one another for many moneths or many yeares Not much unlike to this Jewish conceit is the Popish restraint of marriage in the time of Lent for the
Hebrew originall NOw whereas after the 22. verse the Septuagint and the Latine translator doe insert a whole verse of the birth of Eleazar with the reason of the imposition of his name all which is not in the Hebrew in this place but is transposed hither from the 18. chap. of Exodus vers 4. Bellarmine would therefore make us beleeve that herein the Latine text is perfecter than the Hebrew because mention is made onely of one of Moses sonnes whereas he had two lib. 2. de va Dei cap. 2. Contr. 1. It followeth not because some thing is omitted in one place to be inserted in another that therefore the Hebrew text is defective as S. Marke making mention of one blind man chap. 10.46 and S. Luke likewise chap. 18.36 whereas S. Matthew speaketh of two blind men chap. 20.29 are not therefore defective So neither is the Hebrew here thought to be wanting expressing onely one of Moses sons seeing the other is supplied chap. 18.2 And if the Septuagint is to be justified here then let them be borne out also for adding five more of Iosephs posteritie Machor Gilead of Manasseh and Suâ—â—am and Taam and Edom of Ephraim Genes 46. which are not mentioned in the Hebrew as not then borne but borrowed from the 26. of Numb and 1 Chron. 7. Likewise Exod. 6.19 the Latine and Septuagint put unto Moses and Aaron Miriam which is not in the Hebrew this rather sheweth great boldnesse 〈◊〉 thâ—se translators to adde that which the spirit of God passeth over in silence 5. Cont. Prayers are not meritorious Vers. 24. THen God heard their mâ—ne and God remembred his covenant The Israelites prayers are heard not for any worthinesse or merit of their sorrow but the Lord for his promise sake the foundation whereof is Christ heareth their complaint and hath respect unto them Simler Borrh. And that our prayers are not meritorious but heard in mercie Salomon sheweth Then heaâ—s thou in heaven and be mercifull to the sinne of thy people 1 King 8.24 6. Places of morall use 1. Mor. Rich and great men should have compassion on the necessities of their poore brethren Vers. 11. HE went forth to his brethren to looke on their burdens Moses though himselfe lived in all ease and courtly pleasure yet could not so content himselfe but goeth to visit his afflicted brethren and is touched in compassion towards them as Queene Hester also was moved with pity toward her people which teacheth us that rich and mighty men that are in high and wealthy place should submit themselves to take knowledge of the necessities and wants of their poore brethren therefore the Prophet reproveth the rich men of Israel that dranke wine in bowles and lived at ease but no man was sory for the affliction of Ioseph Ferus 2. Mor. Friendly admonition is not to be despised Vers. 14. WHo made thee a man of authoritie Moses here for his friendly admonition is recompensed with scornefull and disdainfull words which is the property of naturall and carnall men to repay them with evill which carefully watch over them by wholesome admonitions for the good of their soule Simler But the Wise man saith The eare that hearkeneth to the correction of life shall lodge among the wise but he that refuseth instruction despiseth his owne soule 3. Mor. Godly names to be given unto children Vers. 22. WHose name he called Gershom Moses giveth unto his sonne a name that might put both himselfe and his sonne also when he came to yeeres of discretion in minde of their state and condition that they were but pilgrimes and strangers here So did the Fathers use to give names unto their children of good signification and godly edifying that fond use therefore is to bee reproved among Christians that give names unto their children borrowed and taken from the Gentiles and such as have no good signification or which they understand not Pellican 4. Mor. Patience is necessarie in prayer Vers. 24. THen God heard their mone Yet it was forty yeeres before the Lord sent them deliverance we must not then thinke that our prayers are neglected of God if presently we see not the effect thereof but we must waite the Lords leisure and expect with patience till it bee his pleasure to performe our prayers and grant our requests Ferus S. Paul prayed thrice that is often that the pricke of the flesh the messenger of Satan might be taken from him yet was it not but the Lord gave him his sufficient grace with patience and strength to endure that combat 2. Cor. 12. 5. Mor. In affliction we must flie unto prayer ANd in that the people cried unto God in this their distresse they rebelled not nor sought to deliver themselves by their owne arme or strength it teacheth us that in all our afflictions wee should depend upon God and betake our selves unto prayer Pellic. as Saint Iames saith If any be afflicted let him pray Iam. 5.13 CHAP. III. 1. The method and parts THe generall preparation of the Instrument of this great deliverance is set forth in the Chapter going before in his preservation education persecution Now followeth the more speciall preparation in the vocation of Moses in this third Chapter and his confirmation chap. 4. In this Chapter is set forth first the preparation to his vocation to vers 7. Secondly the vocation it selfe to vers 22. The preparation consisteth partly in a vision which Moses saw both in what place vers 1. what vision it was vers 2. how Moses behaved himselfe vers 3. partly in the voice of God which Moses feared wherein Moses is charged what he should doe vers 4.5 and the Lord proclaimeth who he is vers 6. The vocation of Moses is either a generall charge or commandement to goe unto Egypt where 1. Moses office is injoyned him of God vers 10. with the occasion thereof the afflictions of the people vers 7. the twofold end thereof to deliver them out of Egypt and to bring them into the good land of Canaan vers 8.2 Moses excuseth himselfe 1. By his infirmity where the Lord satisfieth him by that present signe and assuring him of the future event that they should serve him in that mount vers 11 12. 2. By pretending the curiosity of the people in inquiring after his name that sent him verse the 13. where the Lord also satisfieth him by shewing his name vers 14 15. Beside the generall charge followeth a particular direction what course hee shall take to vers 19. and what effect it shall have For the first there is prescribed whom hee shall joyne with him the Elders of Israel vers 16. what he shall say unto them vers 17. what they shall doe goe unto Pharaoh vers 18. The effects or events are foure 1. Pharaoh shall refuse to let them goe vers 19. 2. The Lord will worke signes and wonders 3. Then he will send them out vers 20. 4. They shall goe out richly with ornaments and jewels
God 2. Neither was this sinne of Moses veniall that is a light and small sinne for such sinnes the Lord passeth over in his children but here he was angry with Moses If the Lord should bee angry with every small sinne and oversight of his children who should abide it 3. The forbearing of punishment sheweth not the smalnesse of the sinne but the greatnesse of Gods mercie 4. Cajetanes observation is false for the same phrase â—ichar aph Iehovah Iehovahs wrath was kindled is used upon occasion of great sinnes as when the people murmured Numb 11.3 and lusted for quailes vers 33. the same words are there put 4. This then may safely be held that although Moses at the first might in humility disable himselfe yet after God had given him satisfaction to all his doubts upon his foure severall refusals first for his owne insufficiencie and the greatnesse of the businesse Chap. 3.11 Secondly because they might inquire after Gods name Chap. 3.14 Thirdly he excuseth himselfe by the incredulity of the people Lastly by his owne imperfection of speech yet after all this to stand still upon his refusall sheweth no small infirmitie in Moses as it may appeare by the effect because God was angrie with him yet Gods anger is not such against his children as against the wicked for there he is angry and punisheth here he is angrie and rebuketh but withdraweth not his favour for immediatly the Lord concurreth with Moses desire and giveth him his brother to be his assistant Simler So that Gods anger here is as when the father is angrie with his child or one friend with another which notwithstanding is no breach of friendship QUEST XII Why Aaron is called the Levite Vers. 14. AAron thy brother the Levite 1. This is not added because the Priesthood should have belonged to Moses the Leviticall order to Aaron but that Moses was deprived of that honour for refusing his calling as Rabbi Salomon Pellican 2. But because there might bee other Aarons not of Levie this is expressed by way of distinction that Moses might know that the Lord did meane none other Aaron but his owne naturall brother of Levi Iun. Simler 3. And this might bee also a reason thereof because the Lord purposed to annex the Priesthood to Aaron and his posteritie Osiander QUEST XIII How Moses is said to be as God to Aaron Vers. 16. THou shalt bee to him in Gods stead This sheweth 1. that Moses should bee superior unto Aaron as his Prince as the Chalde Paraphrast and Aaron as his Chancelor Moses should give him direction from God what to speake Osiander 2. By this also Moses authority is signified by the which as in Gods place he ordained Aaron to be the high Priest Pellican 3. Likewise he is as God that is a wise counsellor and full of Gods spirit to whom Aaron should resort for counsell Vatab. Genevens 4. And as Aaron was Moses spokesman to the people so Moses should bee Aarons mouth to consult with God so the Septuagint and Latine read Thou shalt be for him in those things which appertaine to God 5. But Moses in another sense is said to bee Pharaohs God Exod. 7.1 not only to declare Gods will unto him but to execute Gods judgements upon him Genevens QUEST XIV Whether Moses did well being called of God in taking his leave of his father in law Vers. 18. THerefore Moses went and returned to Iethro 1. Some doe charge Moses here with an oversight that he presently dispatched not into Egypt but first tooke his leave of his father in law for Iacob went away without Labans privity and S. Paul saith that hee did not consult with flesh and bloud after he was called Galath 1. 2. Contra these examples are altogether unlike for Laban was unfriendly to Iacob and he feared he would worke him some displeasure and Iacob was then at his owne hand and kept sheepe for himselfe and beside he had in a manner sold over his daughters to Iacob and used them as strangers But Moses had a kinde and loving father in law he then kept his sheepe as hee covenanted and he entertained Zipporah still as his daughter and therefore Moses could not in humanity but take his leave of him 3. S. Paul consulted not with any for the approbation of his calling being therefore fully assured neither doth Moses conferre with Iethro to any such end but only to performe the office of humanity Simler 4. Wherefore the calling of God doth not take away civill duties toward parents and kindred saving where they are an impediment to our calling in which case wee are rather to forsake father and mother than to disobey God 5. Moses therefore taketh his leave of Iethro both because he purposed to carry away his wife and children and for that he had before covenanted to stay with Iethro chap. 2.21 Ferus QUEST XV. Why Moses concealed from Iethro the principall end of his going LEt me goe and returne to my brethren 1. Moses concealeth from his father in law the principall cause of his journey which was the calling of God both for that he sought Gods glorie and not his owne Ferus lest he should have seemed to boast of his visions Osiander and he doth keepe it secret of modesty least he might be thought to be a vaine man in telling such incredible things 2. In saying he went to see whether his brethren were alive and to visite them he dissembleth not though he went to doe more and it is evident by taking his wife and children with him that Iethro knew hee purposed not only to visite them but to stay there so that it seemeth likely that Moses imparted so much of his purpose concerning his stay there Simler and in generall also that he went for the comfort and profit of his brethren as Iosepus but in particular he kept secret the end of his going 3. Iethro being a good man would not hinder so charitable a worke though he had speciall use of him Ferus especially having such experience of the fidelitie and wisedome of Moses that without great cause he knew he would not desire to depart from him Simler QUEST XVI Whether God spake to Moses in Midian beside that vision in Horeb. Vers. 19. ANd Iehovah said to Moses 1. Some thinke that this sentence is transposed and that God thus spake unto Moses before he had moved his father in law Genevens Pellican But although such transposing of the order be usuall in Scriptures yet heere it need not to bee admitted for God might often appeare to Moses to confirme him Iun. and this was said in Midian the other vision was in Horeb the distinction of the place sheweth them to be divers apparitions Simler 2. The Lord to encourage Moses taketh away all doubts and telleth him that all which sought his life as well Pharaoh as the pursuers of the bloud of the slaine were dead Iun. And thus much Moses might impart also to his
Israelites that whereas their fathers being a great way from the fulfilling of the promises and having not such manifest revelations and signes as they now had by the Ministerie of Moses yet were more firme in faith than that present incredulous age Simler So shall it bee a just rebuke unto us that live now in the cleere light of the Gospell if wee be lesse zealous of Gods glorie than they which have lived before us in the time of ignorance Therefore let us give eare unto the Apostle The night is past and the day is at hand let us therefore cast away the works of darknesse and put on the armour of light Rom. 13.12 2. Observ. Affliction at the first is grievous but in the end comfortable Vers. 9. BVt they hearkened not unto Moses for anguish of spâ—rit Such is the condition and qualitie of affliction that it maketh the heart heavie and so disquieteth the soule that it can not raise up it selfe to lay hold on any spirituall comfort Simler as the Apostle saith No chastising for the present seemeth to be joyous but grievous but afterward it bringeth the quiet fruit of righteousnesse to them that are thereby exercised Heb. 12.11 Here the Apostle sheweth two divers effects of affliction one which proceedeth of our naturall infirmitie to worke sorrow and griefe the other wrought by grace in those that make good use of their chastisement it bringeth in the end peace and comfort 3. Observ. God raiseth honourable instruments from meane places Vers. 16. THese are the names of the sonnes of Levi This tribe by reason of Iacobs curse laid upon it was in disgrace and contempt yet God out of the same raised these honourable instruments Moses and Aaron So God many times raiseth his servants out of the dust as Mary was a poore despised handmaid in Israel yet chosen to be the mother of Christ the Apostles were taken some from base trades other from ignominious offices as Matthew that was a Publican 4. Observ. God giveth his gifts diversly Vers. 30. I Am of uncircumcised lips Moses had not the gift of eloquence but he had a most plentifull gift of heavenly wisdome and understanding thus God distributeth his gifts diversly Pellican Aaron had the gift of eloquence but was in heavenly knowledge and illumination inferiour to Moses So the Apostle saith To one is given by the spirit the word of wisdome and to another the word of knowledge and to another diversities of tongues 1 Cor. 12.9.10 Every one hath not all gifts that one may stand in need of another CHAP. VII 1. The Method and Argument MOses appeareth the second and third time before Pharaoh delivering the Lords message unto Pharaoh for the dismissing of his people and upon his refusall sheweth signes and calleth for the first plague of the turning of the waters into bloud There are three parts of the whole Chapter The first containeth the renewing of the charge and commandement of God to Moses to goe unto Pharaoh to verse 8. wherein these things are declared 1. The authoritie which the Lord giveth to Moses over Pharaoh vers 1. 2. His commission what he shall speake vers 2. 3. The event Pharaohs refusall 4. The end that God may worke his great judgements in Egypt vers 4. 5. Moses and Aarons obedience with a description of their yeeres and age vers 6.7 The second expresseth the generall signe which serveth for the confirmation of Moses calling by turning his rod into a Serpent from vers 8. to vers 14. wherein three things are further shewed first the commandement of God to Moses vers 8. Secondly the execution by Moses vers 9. Thirdly the event the hardnesse of Pharaohs heart vers 13. with the occasion thereof the Magicians counterfeit miracle in doing the like The third part describeth the first plague laid upon Egypt 1. The denuntiation thereof by the Lord containing the message to Pharaoh vers 15.16 The matter or subject of the first plague the water and fish therein the one shall bee turned into bloud the other shall die vers 17. with the generall instrument Aarons rod vers 19. 2. Then followeth the execution by Moses vers 20. 3. Then the events follow first the fish die the water stinketh vers 21. Secondly Pharaohs heart is hardened by reason of the like practice by the Egyptian Sorcerers vers 22 23. Thirdly the endevour of the Egyptians in digging pits for water 2. The divers readings Vers. 1. Aaron thy brother shall be thy Prophet B.G.A.P. cum caeter shall be thine interpreter I. the sense but not the words Nebi signifieth a Prophet Vers. 4. Pharaoh shall not hearken unto you that I may lay my hand B. G. and I will lay my hand L. V. A. P. S. H. rather when I have laid my hand I. Pharaohs hardnesse of heart is set forth as the cause rather why the Lord would send his judgements than an effect as the former verse sheweth and chap. 3.19 So Moses and Aaron did as Iehovah commanded them so did they I. A. P. better than Moses and Aaron did as the Lord commanded them even so did they B. G. cum caeter for the perfect distinction athâ—ah comming betweene divideth the first part of the sentence Vers. 9. Shall be turned into a Dragon I. A. P. S. rather than a Serpent B.G.V.L. Tanmin signifieth a Dragon yet he meaneth a Serpent called a Dragon because of the fearfulnesse and greatnesse of it as Moses fled from it chap. 4.3 Vers. 18. The Egyptians shall be grieved to drinke that is loath B.G. shall be troubled in drinking L. shall be wearied in drinking I.V. shall not be able to drinke S. shall labour A.P. so Iaah signifieth and it is sometime taken for to grieve or loath as Iob 4.2 Of the water of the river B.G. cum caeter of every river I. but in the originall there is no pronoune but an article onely set before yet the same effect followed also in other rivers and waters Vers. 19. Stretch out thine hand against the water as it is taken vers 5. I will stretch forth H. mine hand rather upon the waters V. L. cum caeter as chap. 8. 5. Stretch forth thine hand to worke on the waters I. to worke is inserted Vers. 23. He did not set his heart upon this I.L.S.A.P.B. did not consider this in his heart V. this yet did not enter into his heart G. 3. The explanation of difficult questions QUEST I. Of the divers appellations of the name of God Vers. 1. I Have made thee Pharaohs God This name and title of God is used and applied foure wayes in Scripture 1. essentially and so it is given onely unto the blessed Trinitie and is not communicable unto any creature 2. personally and so it agreeth onely unto Christ as man 3. according to the vaine opinion and estimation of men so the Idols of the Gentiles are caelled gods as 1 Cor. 8.5 Though there be
nature as the naturall burning of certaine mountaines as of Aetna in Cicilia Vesuvius in Campania It is found by experience that certaine things putrifie not as the flesh of a Peacoke as Augustine saith and coales upon the which for the same cause Chersiphron founded the temple of Diana lime boyleth with water and is quenched with oile the adamant is so hard that it cannot bee broken upon a smithes anvill the Agrigentine salt melteth in the fire and sparkleth in the water there is said to bee a fountaine among the Garamants that boileth in the night and freezeth in the day the stone Asbestus burneth continually being once set on fire and is never extinct the wood of a certaine figge tree in Egypt sinketh in the water in the Isle Tilo the trees cast no leaves in the Temple of Venus there was a lampe that no tempest could put out and Lodovicus Vives there reporteth that a certaine lampe was found in a grave that had burned above 1050. yeeres At Alexandria in the Temple of Serapis a certaine image of iron did hang in the top by reason of a certaine loadstone which was inclosed in the roofe These and other such like strange things in nature Augustine remembreth Some wee have knowledge of but many secrets of nature are hid from us but knowne unto the spirits who by this meanes doe worke wonders only producing extraordinarie effects of nature 4. Augustine further in another place sheweth the reason thereof in this manner Sunt occulta quaedam semina arborum plantarum c. in elementis c. There are certaine hid seeds of trees plants in the elements for as there are visible seeds so there are hid seeds which give unto the other their vertue like as then the husbandman doth not create corne but bringeth it out by his labour so the evill Angels doe not create things but only doe draw forth those seeds which are unknowne to us but well knowne to them As Iacob did not create that variety of colour in the sheep but by applying of particoloured rods brought it forth sicut ergo matres gravidae sunt foetibus itâ— mundus gravidus est causis seminibus nascentium Then as mothers that are great with child so the world is full of such seeds and causes of the beginning of things which causes they better knowing then we doe worke wonders yea wee see that men by the pounding of certaine herbes and by such like meanes can cause wormes and other like small creatures to come forth To this purpose Augustine QUEST XVI What workes in naturall things are forbidden unto spirits to doe IT followeth now to shew as wee have seene what things are possible to bee done by spirits so what things are out of their reach and beyond their power 1. Touching the immediate action of spirits which is by locall motion the Devill cannot destroy the world or any principall part thereof nor subvert the order and course of nature he cannot change the course of the heavens or put the starres out of their place neither although he may work some alteration in some part of the earth the whole he cannot remove these and such great workes he cannot doe Perer. ex Aquinat the reason is this because this were to crosse the Creator who by his providence as by his power hee created the world and all that is therein so he preserveth the same in that order which he hath appointed as the Psalmist saith The earth is the Lords and all that therein is hee hath founded it upon the sea and established it upon the flouds Psalm 24.1 2. Secondly concerning the other mediate action of spirits by the instrument and mediation of the creatures these things are denied unto spirits 1. They cannot create any thing of nothing for that argueth an infinite power and is peculiar unto God 2. The Devill being himselfe spirituall and without a bodily substance cannot immediatly change or transforme any materiall or corporall substance without some other naturall cause comming betweene 3. Neither can these spirits change any naturall thing into an other naturall thing immediatly without that subordination of nature and preparation and disposition of the matter which is observed in the generation of things therefore hee cannot bring forth a beast without seed nor a perfect beast all at once because naturally both the generation of such things is by seed and they receive their increase and growth not all at once but by degrees and in time therefore when by the operation of Satan lions and beares and such like creatures have beene made to appeare either they were but phantasies and no such things indeed or were transported from some other place and by this reason he cannot restore dead bodies to life because the body being void of naturall heat and spirits is not fit to entertaine the soule 4. Neither can Satan hinder the operation of naturall things if nothing be wanting which is necessâ—ry for their working And generally whatsoever alteration may be made by naturall causes as wormes and frogs and such like may come of pâ—â—refaction these things may be atchieved and compassed by spirits but such changes and transmutations as cannot be done by naturall meanes as to turne a man into a beast are not within the limits of Devils power But when such things seeme to be done they are in shew rather than truth which may be done two wayes either by so binding and blinding the inward phantasie and sense as that may seeme to be which is not or by fashioning some such shape and forme outwardly and objecting it to the sense Perer. Ex Aquinat QUEST XVII Whether Satan can raise the spirits and soules of the dead AMong other things which exceed the power of spirits it is affirmed before that they cannot raise the soules of men departed as Necromancers doe take upon them to talke with the dead 1. Let us see the vaine opinion of the heathen of this devilish Necromancy Porphyrius writeth that the soules of wicked men are turned into Devils and doe appeare in divers shapes and the soules of them that want buriall doe wander about their bodies and sometimes are compelled to resume their bodies Likewise Hosthanes did professe and promise to raise what dead soever and to bring them to talke with the living as Plinie writeth lib. 30. cap. 2. who in the same place reporteth a farre more strange or rather fabulous thing that Appion the Grammarian should tell of a certaine herb called Cynocephalia and of the Egyptians Osirites which hath power to raise the dead and that thereby he called Homers ghost to inquire of him touching his countrie and parents There were among the Gentiles certaine places famous for Necromancie where they received oracles from the dead as they were made to beleeve such was the Cymmerian oracle at the lake Avernam in Campania such was Ericthone the Thessalian that raised up the dead to declare to Sextus
else the miracle is in that out of the which a thing is made or brought forth as to make a thing of nothing to give fight unto a man that is borne blind and such like and this is the next degree of miracles 3. Or the miracle is seene in the manner as a Physitian may heale a man but not of a sudden or without mâ—dicine so the spirits may bring forth Serpents or other vermine out of wood but not immediatly Now the wonders wrought by Magicians are not properly of any of these sorts of miracles but they are either cousening and counterfeit trickes or procured by naturall meanes Ex Pererio QUEST XX. Of the difference betweene true miracles and false FOr the second true miracles differ from false these five wayes 1. In respect of the power whereby they are wrought for true miracles are wrought by the power of God in whose name the Prophets and Apostles and other servants of God did shew forth signes but Magicians doe bring forth their wonders either by the force of naturall things or by the helpe of Satan 2. They differ in the qualitie of their persons that are the agents and ministers for they which worke in Gods name are holy and vertuous men and if any of them doe sometime effect any miraculous thing they doe it for the confirming of the faith or to some other good end but Magicians and Sorcerers are most wicked and impure men 3. The third difference is in the worke it selfe for the signes and wonders of Magicians are either counterfeit or unprofitable but true miracles are done in truth and upon great necessity and utility 4. They differ in the manner of working for true miracles are done by lawfull holy and godly meanes as by fasting prayer invocation of the name of God but Magicians worke by inchantment by words and signes and other superstitious rites 5. The end also is divers for Sorcerers worke wonders either for their profit and honour to make the people seeke unto them as Simon Magus did in Samaria Acts 8. or to confirme the people in errour and superstition but the end of true miracles is to seeke the glory of God the edifying of his Church and the propagation of the faith Ex Perer. 6. Hereunto may be added the sentence and judgement of Augustine Aliter miracula faciunt magi aliter boni Christiani aliter mali Christiani Magi per privatos quosdam contractus boni Christiani per publicam justitiam mali Christiani per signa publicae justitiae c. Magicians doe worke miracles one way good Christians another and evill Christians another Magicians by private contracts with the spirits good Christians by publike justice that is by the power and authority of God evill Christians by the signes of publike justice As divers that followed not Christ nor yet beleeved in him yet in the name of Christ wrought miracles as evill and disordered and discarded souldiers may use the ensignes and banner of the Captaine to terrifie their enemies QUEST XXI Whether the sorcerers brought forth true serpents IT followeth now to shew whether these serpents which the Magicians made were true serpents or only counterfeited for the time 1. Some thinke that it was a true and reall conversion of the Magicians rods into serpents and that it was done by the power of God and that Satan did craftily challenge unto himselfe Gods worke Simler but the text is against this conjecture they are said to doe the like by their enchantments vers 11. but the power of God giveth no place to enchantments 2. Others thinke that they were true serpents so converted by the power of Satan so August lib. 3. de Trinitat cap. 7. and in other places and Theodoret quaest 18. in Exod. Thom. Aquin. Lyranus Thostatus Burgens Cajetane of the same opinion seemeth Philo to be lib. de vita Moses their reasons are these 1. Because the Magicians are said to doe in like manner with their rods and in the same phrase their rods are said to be turned into serpents as Aarons rod is 2. And againe afterward the Sorcerers could not bring out lice as they had serpents and frogs before their impotencie was not in not shewing shapes or shewes but in not being able to bring forth the things themselves sic Cajetan and Moses serpents devoured their serpents they were therefore true serpents if they had beene otherwise it is like Moses would have discovered their counterfeit dealing sic Perer. Contra. 1. They did the like in outward shew and appearance and the same phrase is used of both because to the sight and view they were so changed and the Scripture useth to speake of things as they appeare not as they are as he that appeared unto the witch at Endor is called Samuel yet being the Devill in his likenesse and habit 1. Sam. 28. and Daniel saith the man Gabriel chap. 9. because hee appeared in the shape of a man 2. The Sorcerers were restrained in their counterfeit dealing that they should not be able any more to deceive by their phantasticall and imaginary shapes 3. Rupertus doth gather the contrary that the devouring of the Sorcerers serpents by Aarons serpent sheweth that they were but counterfeit devorari ergo devorare non poâ—nerunt because they could not devoure but were devoured 4. And in this sufficiently Moses discovereth their sleights in that his serpent devoureth theirs Now further against this opinion this speciall argument may be urged that God only hath power to change and convert one substance into another especially a dead thing into a living body a peece of wood into a serpent as it was decreed in the Avansicane Councell in this manner Quisquis credit aliquid posse fieri aut aliam creaturam in melius aut deterius mutari aut transformari in aliam speciem vel similitudinem nisi ab ipso creatore qui omnia fecit proculdubio infidelis est pagano deterior Whosoever beleeveth that any thing can be made or any creature to be changed into the better or worse or transformed into any shape or likenesse but by the creator which hath made all things is undoubtedly an infidell and worse than a Pagan To this argument divers answers are framed 1. Cajetane saith that the Devill might use some naturall meanes secretly by the which serpents might be made out of those rods and all the time while the Sorcerers were called together Satan made a way for that worke and prepared the matter Contra. There is no naturall meanes to make a rod a serpent immediatly and especially to bring forth serpents at once of perfect bignesse neither was there any such preparation of matter for they were rods in the Sorcerers hands not changed into any other preparative matter fit to engender serpents 2. Cajetane answereth againe that although the rod of it selfe was no fit matter for such a worke yet by the excellencie of the agent and worker which were the spirits it
sent before when the other plagues were but the Scripture maketh no mention of it as many matters of fact are omitted beside but Thostatus refuseth this conjecture for why should this bee onely here expressed that Pharaoh sent if he had done it at other times 2. Some thinke that the other plagues all but the first as of the frogges the lice and swarmes were such as Pharaoh could not send and in the plagues following but in the first Pharaoh did not then bethinke himselfe of any such thing Perer. 3. But it is more likely that Pharaoh though now twice he had been told so much by Moses did neglect to trie whether the Israelites were exempted from these plagues or no. Simler QUEST VII Why Pharaoh called not to Moses to pray PHaraoh entreated not Moses at this time to pray to God to remove this plague partly through envie and griefe to see the privilege and freedome of the Israelites which was an occasion of the hardning of his heart partly because the other plagues continued sometime and so might be remooved But this plague of mortalitie and murraine came all at once and suddenly swept the cattell away so that no remedie was left neither was there place for prayer to remoove it after this plague had suddenly smitten their cattell in all their coasts Pererius QUEST VIII Whether this plague were naturall or supernaturall COncerning the kind of this plague 1. It is evident that it was no naturall plague but supernaturall for the text saith the hand of God should be upon their cattell that is should smite them immediately no meanes being used at all not so much as Aarons rod whereby other plagues were called for And beside it was not infectious as other naturall plagues are for the cattell of the Israelites feeding among the Egyptians cattell they dwelling in the middest of them were not smitten at all with this plague Simler 2. Yet there might be some preparation unto this plague by the former as it is mentioned cap. 8.14 that the land stunke of the dead frogges and so both the aire and ground were corrupted apt to breed putrefaction Perer. But this was not the cause of the plague for if the earth and aire generally had been corrupted the men had died as well as the beasts QUEST IX Why Moses is the minister of the sixt plague Vers. 10. ANd Moses sprinkled them toward heaven 1. They both tooke the ashes out of the fornace but Moses sprinkled them toward heaven Philo saith that Aaron was the Minister of those plagues wherewith the earth and water were smitten and Moses of those which came from heaven out of the aire Augustine giveth this reason because Aarons office was to speake to the people he worketh upon the earth and water because Moses was in the things that belonged to God hee is the minister of those plagues which came from above But these are curious observations The reason rather was this they stood both before Pharaoh and therefore Moses as the chiefe whom the Lord had made as Pharaohs God he is the minister of this wonder Ferus 2. As the two first signes were of the water the two next on the earth so this is wrought in the aire Simler rather than the element of fire as Ferus QUEST X. Of the sixt plague of boyles and of the manner thereof Vers. 10. ANd there came boyles breaking out First the handfull of ashes being cast into the aire there was raised as a cloud of white dust like unto the ashes of the fornace over all Egypt which dust could not be engendred of that handfull but upon the sprinkling of the ashes the Lord by his great power caused that cloud of dust in the aire over al Egypt 2. The matter which is here used is somewhat answerable to the effect for as Moses taketh of the white ashes of the fornace so they falling upon man beast caused burning boyles which at the first swelled hoved the flesh then brake forth into sores the word here used for blisters is derived of bagnah which signifieth to boyle up as the water doth at the fire Borrh. Perer. Philo. thinketh that these sores or boiles were over al their bodie grew into one being most grievous to behold 3. This plague is answerable to the Egyptians sinne for as they oppresse the Israelites with fornace work in the burning of brick so they are punished with burning sores which came of the ashes taken out of the fornace Perer. QUEST XI Why the Egyptians are smitten with vlcers Vers. 11. ANd the boyles are upon the enchanters 1. This sheweth that the Magitians though before they had confessed the power of God yet doe persist still in their malice against Moses Simler Hereupon Cajetane thinketh that they did not acknowledge the power of God before but rather some superiour power of the spirits but this followeth not because they resist Moses still that they did not confesse the power of God before for like as the same aire that is illuminate by the sunne is darkened when the sunne is gone away so no marvell if the minds of the wicked after they have received some light be darkned againe Perer. 2. This is the third time that these sorcerers are confounded first when Aarons serpent eat up theirs secondly when their power was restrained in the third plague and now because they will not yet give over they are punished 3. Like unto these sorcerers are all unfaithfull counsellers to Princes whom the Lord in like manner will plague Borrh. And thus the Magitians of that Pharaoh of Rome are smitten with exulcerate consciences which swelling with pride and hypocrisie doe bring forth most vile ulcers of impietie Simlerus QUEST XII Of the hardning of Pharaohs heart Vers. 12. ANd the Lord hardned Pharaohs heart 1. The word signifieth to obfirme or strengthen chazak because it was a signe of strength or rather stubburnenes to stand against God there is another word used to signifie the same thing cabadh to make heavie as cap. 8.15 Pharaoh first by his owne corrupt mind hardning or making his heart heavie the Lord as by casting a heavie weight upō it maketh it heavier Iun. 2. Origen well noteth how sometime Pharaoh is said to harden his owne heart c. 8.15 sometime the Lord as in this place the first kinde of hardning is declared by the Apostle how it commeth when men by their impenitencie abuse the lenitie and longanimitie of God Rom. 2.5 But the same Apostle making mention of the other hardning by the Lord Rom. 9. he passeth it over and it may be thought to bee one of those high matters which Paul heard being taken up into paradise and is not to bee uttered Thus Origen counteth this a great secret how God is said to harden the heart And so it is yet not such a secret but that we find the same opened in scripture how the Lord by giving wicked men over to themselves and withdrawing his
Aaron for a Priest and Miriam was a Prophetesse Ferus QUEST XXIX Why Miriam taketh a timbrell TOoke a Timbrell in her hand 1. Ferus thinketh that the women did here more than the men singing not only with voice but with instrument Quia infirmi quales sunt mulieres pluribus incitamentis opuâ— habent Because the weake such as women are had need of more incouragements But this was no signe of weaknesse in Miriam being here called a Prophetesse 2. Therefore shee tooke this instrument Vt ad certos modos caâ—erâ—nt That they might sing in measure and order Osiander For timbrels Prae cateris instrumentis ad numeros mensuram aptiora sunt are fitter to keepe number and measure by than other instruments 3. Because the striking of timbrels might seeme somewhat too light in so waighty a businesse it is here divers wayes excused First Mos gentis â—um excusat the fashion of that nation doth excuse them with whom it was ordinary for the women to play upon timbrels as Psal. 68.26 The singers went before the players of instruments after in the middest were the maids playing with timbrels Calvin Secondly their intent is to be considered Choreos ducunt non ad petulantiam carnis sed adjucunditatem spiritus c. They dance not to shew the wantonnesse of their flesh but the sweet joy of the spirit rejoycing for Gods benefits Pelican Thirdly Shee did it motu prophetico by a propheticall motion Iun. QUEST XXX Whether the women came with pipes beside their timbrels or with dances Vers. 20. THe womâ—n came out after her with timbrels and dances Iun. readeth with timbrels and pipes or flutes but the first rather as shall thus appeare 1. The word mecholoth here used hath three significations it sometime signifieth a pipe or flute as Psal. 149.3 Let them praise his name with the flute c. with timbrels also and harpe Sometime it signifieth the company it selfe of the dancers as Iud. 21.21 The daughters of Shiloh came forth Lachâ—l Bamechâ—lâ—th to dance in companies it also signifieth the dancing it selfe as Iud. 11.34 Iepthahs daughter came forth with timbrels and dances There is no mention made of any company that was with her for then Iepthah would have taken any of the company rather all comming out together than his onely daughter 2. Now that it is here taken rather for either of the two latter senses than in the first it may appeare by these reasons 1. Because Mechâ—lâ—th more usually and in most places is so taken for dances or companies dancing than for pipes as in the places before alleaged Iudg. 11.34 Iud. 21.21 1. Sam. 18.6 and beside Cantic 6.12 Ier. 31.4 2. Because so was the use and practice for women to play upon timbrels dancing withall as is evident in Iepthahs daughter meeting her father and the women of Israel meeting Saul and David and Psal. 68.26 there were other that played upon instruments and the maidens played upon timbrels 3. And hereunto the two reasons before alleaged in the divers readings upon this place that it is like the rest of the women did imitate Miriam now shee is mentioned onely to have taken a timbrell againe Miriam sang first and they all answered her but if they had played upon pipes it would have hindred their singing QUEST XXXI Of the lawfulnesse of instruments of musike NOw concerning this example of Miriam and her company playing upon timbrels how farre it is to be imitated shall briefely be shewed 1. Such signes whereby men expresse their joy such as these timbrels were and of the same kind are other instruments of musike are of two sorts either such as were commanded and so necessary or voluntary the signes commanded were either ceremoniall and typicall prefiguring somewhat concerning Christ and his Church which being but shadowes of things to come are abolished now the things whereof they were types and figures being exhibited or else they were politicall which only concerned the policy of the common wealth which being now dissolved the date of such signes is also expired The voluntary signes are likewise of two sorts either such as come of a naturall motion as the using of instruments for recreation which may be used so long untill they should be found to bee against common order or honesty or against any worke of grace or regeneration Or they are such which are used to serve to set forward any act of godlinesse and grace as David by his musike allayed the malady and evill spirit of Saul and these are no longer to serve than as they may be helpes unto such workes of grace But this signe here used by Miriam to testifie her spirituall joy was not of this latter sort but she did it by a propheticall motion therefore it was not voluntary but she was thereunto moved and directed by God Then this is no warrant for them that abuse instruments and dauncing to wantonnesse for in that it is said she did it being a prophetesse and so with a propheticall spirit it sheweth that this example is extraordinary and therefore not to be drawne into imitation Iun. in Analys that is in respect of the particular manner but in regard of the generall use and intention it may and ought to be followed to use singing to the praise of God that as Mary did sing Non amatoriâ— non turpia cantica sed pia Not love songs or wanton sonets but godly sic nos cantemus Domino so let uâ— sing unto God Ferus QUEST XXXII Of dancing COncerning dancing we find thereof foure sorts in Scripture 1. There was a spirituall kind of dancing which proceeded of an extraordinary motion as David danced before the Arke to testifie his joy 2. There was a civill kinde of dancing used in triumphes when they met the Captaines with dancing returning from the conquest of their enemies as David and Saul were met 3. They used dancing for honest recreation as the daughters of Shiloh used to doe in their yeerely solemne feast Iud. 21.19 4. There was a fourth sort of wanton and lascivious dauncing such as Herodias daughter came skipping in with to please Herod wherewith his amorous and lustfull eye was intangled and Iohn Baptists head begged of these the two first are lawfull and commendable the last wicked and abominable the third indifferent and tolerable QUEST XXXIII Whether Miriam did sing the whole song or repeated only the beginning Vers. 21. ANd Miriam answered the men Sing yee unto the Lord Moses repeated only the first verse which seemeth to be the ground and foot of the song but it is like that Miriam sang the whole song as is partly shewed before quest 2. and shall be now further declared 1. Beside the opinion of Ferus Vatablus Pellican Simlerus Osiander that all consent herein that shee with her company did sing the whole song by these reasons further it may be gathered because shee is said to be herein a Prophetesse she shewed her propheticall gift in
Theodoret. 2. Or as the Priests did specially attend the service of God so the people of Israel should all be as Priests in respect of other nations addicted to the worship of the true God Tostat. So that all other kingdomes were but profane in respect of them 3. Hereby also is signified their principality above other nations as Priests were reverenced and honoured of all and the speciall care which God had of them as they themselves had seene in Egypt how the Priests were reverenced of all and maintained out of the common Treasury Cajetan 4. The Chalde readeth yee shall be Kings and Priests that is they should under the regiment and kingdome of God be as Kings Quia nullum optabilius felicius regnum quam nos Deo subjicere Because there is no more happy kingdome than to subject our selves unto God Calv. for God was their King as the Lord saith to Samuel They have not cast thee off but cast me off that I should not reigne over them Cajet 5. They are also said to be a kingdome of Priests because Christ was to bee borne of that nation both King and Priest Ferus which his spirituall kingdome and priesthood by faith is communicated to his members whom he hath made Kings in subduing sinne and Satan and Priests in offering spirituall sacrifices unto God as S. Peter expoundeth and applieth this place 1. Pet. 2. Cajetan Lippoman 6. Oleaster bringeth foure interpretations of these words 1. That they should be a kingdome governed by Priests for the Lord was angry that the people had cast off the government of Samuel But it was never the Lords meaning that Levi should have the civill government of his people though some of Levi were extraordinarily raised up as Moses Samuel to judge his people because the scepter was promised to Iudah Gen. 49.10 2. The word cohanim may be translated Princes as well as Priests and then the meaning is they should all bee as Princes that is subject to none but unto God But it is not like that two words of like signification should be put together as Kingdome and Princes therefore the other sense of Priests is here more fit 3. They should be a kingdome of Priests that is all of them addicted and devoted to the service of God as if they were all Priests 4. Or they should be an holy people in respect of other nations and in comparison of them as Priests These two last senses are most fit and agreeable to the rest before alleaged QUEST X. By what reasons the Lord perswadeth the people and why Vers. 8. ANd the people answered 1. Thus by these perswasions before propounded the Lord thought good to winne the obedience and hearts of the people for seeing the Lord was to impose upon them a law lex est quoddam onus and the law is a certaine burthen for where a law is set the will of man is limited which man naturally desireth to be left free and therefore it was requisite that the people should be thus prepared to obedience Tostat. quaest 2. 2. The Lord perswadeth them partly with the commemoration of benefits past their deliverance out of Egypt and their protection in the wildernesse which is set forth by an elegant similitude taken from the Eagle which supporteth her young ones with her wings partly with the promise of future blessings that they should be a peculiar people to himselfe Simler 3. Then whereas men naturally partim fastu altitudine turgent partim securitate torpent partly doe swell with pride and haughtinesse partly grow slothfull by security Calvin These perswasions as soveraigne medicines doe meet with both these inconveniences the remembrance of Gods benefits doth serve to abate their pride that they should not ascribe their deliverance to themselves the promise of further blessings would provoke them not to bee idle 4. If the remembrance of these temporall benefits was so effectuall toward them how much more ought wee to remember Quod nos abundantiore gratia liberatos à peccatis nostris portavit Deus homo factus c. That God made man hath deliverd us by more abundant grace from our sinnes and carried us unto mount Sion to the celestiall Ierusalem c. Rupertus QUEST XI Whether the people unfainedly here promise obedience Vers. 8. ALl that the Lord hath commanded will wee doe 1. It seemeth that at this present the people had a good desire and full intent to keepe all the commandements of God for otherwise the Lord would not have commended them thus saying Deut. 5.28 I have heard the voice of the words of this people which they have spoken unto thee they have well said all that they have spoken O that there were such an heart in them to feare me and keepe my commandements alway The Lord would not both for the present have approved their saying and wished a continuance of their disposition if it had not proceeded from a good affection Tostat. quaest 3. Nec eos quicquam simulasse credibile est It is not credible or like that they dissembled at this time Calvin 2. But although this their readinesse to obey were not without the motion of the spirit of God in plaerisque tamen temporariam fuisse promptitudinem c. yet that it was but a temporary promptitude a willingnesse for a time in the most of them their doings which followed declare Simler So their first fault here committed is their frailty and inconstancy Propensus est populus sed fragilis inconstans The people seeme to bee ready yet fraile and inconstant Pellican Caro solet multa promittere nihil praestarâ— The flesh useth to promise much and performe nothing Ferus So that herein appeareth their temerity and rashnesse that promise great things as Peter did Sic facâ—unt qui propriâ—s confidunt viribus As all they doe which trust in their owne strength Lippoman 3. And seeing the people doe of themselves vow obedience to the law they afterward are most justly punished for the transgression of the law quasi vâ—ti rei as breakers of their vow and promise made unto God Gloss. ordinar QUEST XII How the Lord is said to come in the thicke cloud when and in what thicke cloud it was Vers. 9. LOe I come unto thee in a thicke cloud 1. Before the Lord came and appeared in the cloud but not to this end to speake to Moses in the hearing of the people and to give them a law for before the people had promised their obedience the Lord would thrust upon them a law against their willes Tostat. 2. Some thinke that presently the Lord came to Moses in a thicke cloud Intelligendâ—â— absque omni haesitatione est It must be understood without any deferring Cajetan But the cloud came not presently for the Lord thus spake to Moses upon the first or second day the cloud came not before the third day vers 16. Tostat. And when the cloud appeared the Lord talked with
by the law of Moses was not adjudged to death The Romane lawes followed Moses president in punishing of adulterers so did some other nations beside The King of Babel burnt Zedekiah and Ahab two false Prophets with fire for committing adultery Ierem. 29.23 Among the Egyptians the man taken in adulterie was beaten with a thousand stripes the woman had her nose cut off Diodor. Sicul. lib. 2. cap. 3. The Germanes used to set the adulteresse naked before her kindred and cut off her haire and then her husband dâ—ave her before him through the street beating her with cudgels Cornel. Tacit. de morib German The Cumeans placed the adulteresse in the Market place upon a stone in open view that shee might be derided and scorned of all and then set her upon an asse and ever after shee was called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an asse rider and the stone they abhorred as an uncleane thing Plutar. tom 1. in quastionib Graciâ— These or some other grievous punishment may be imposed upon the odious crime of adulterie where it is not recompensed with losse of life but to dallie with so great iniquitie and either to winke at it or to let it passe with a light and superficiall checke is displeasing to God and offensive to all good men See more of this question how farre Moses Judicials doe now binde 1 qu. generall in Exod. QUEST X. Whether it be lawfull for the husband to kill his wife taken in adulterie BUt whereas the ancient Romane lawes permitted the husband to kill his wife taken in adulterie as appeareth in the declamations of Seneca how a man having lost both his hands in warre comming home and taking his wife with another in adulterie commanded his sonne to kill them both and for refusing hee did abdicate and renounce him for his sonne Some would justifie this also as lawfull pretending the example of Phinehes that stroke the adulterer and adulteresse thorow at once Contra. 1. Though the ancient lawes did not punish the husband that killed his wife taken in adulterie yet that act was not thereby made lawfull but the law did therein beare with the just griefe of the husband 2. And though the lawes of men should tolerate it yet before God he committeth murther because he doth it in his rage and in his owne revenge 3. But the lastâ—r Romane lawes gave no such libertie for the man to kill his wife but onely the adulterer with whom shee is taken in her husbands house for by this meanes if men hated their wives they might seeke occasion to be rid of them and if he were a Noble personage with whom the woman was found it was not lawfull for the husband to kill him but only to keepe him foure and twentie houres prisoner at home untill he brought the witnesses 4. Phinehes example is altogether unlike for beside that he was stirred by the extraordinarie motion of the Spirit if this president should be followed it might be lawfull for any man to kill the adulterer and the adulteresse and not for the husband onely for both of these whom Phinehes killed were strangers unto him the man was of another tribe and the woman a Midiaâ—iâ—esse ex Simlerâ— QUEST XI Simple fornication whether a breach of this Commandement THou shalt not commit adulterie c. 1. Some are of opinion that simplex fornicatio single fornication which is soluti cum soluta of a single man with a single woman is not here forbidden Oleaster Hee granteth that fornication with a woman quae esset alteri vel omnibus exposita which was either defiled by another or common to many was forbidden to the Israelites as Deut. 22.21 Shee that played the where in her fathers house should be put to death but otherwise it was not in this Commandement therefore he thinketh adultery only to be forbidden according to the native signification of the word naâ—ph which signifieth only to commit adultery Contra. 1. But I rather preferre the opinion of Aben Ezrah a learned Rabbin who thinketh Oâ—â—em concubitum qui non est viri cum uxore sua hîc esse prohibitum That all companying with a woman beside of the man with the wife is here forbidden for seeing single fornication is against the Law of nature as Iudah before the Law was written adjudged Thamar for her whoredome to the fire Gen. 38. as Oleast himselfe confesseth it must also of necessity be held to be a breach of the Morall law which is grounded upon the Law of nature 2. And as for the use of the word Augustine well sheweth by the interpretation of our blessed Saviour Matth· 5.9 that even adultery is a kinde of fornication Hee that dismisseth his wife except for fornication causeth her to commit adulterie the word is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 fornication which is taken for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 adulterie Beza in hunc locum 2. But that single fornication even betweene parties both unmarried and unbetrothed is forbidden in this Commandement it shall bee manifested by these reasons 1. Augustine thus argueth 1. If that kinde of fornication be not forbidden here Vbi sit illa prohibita in decalogo utrum inveniri possit ignore Whether it can be found prohibited elsewhere in the decalogue I am ignorant c. But it is certaine that it is either forbidden here or no where in the morall law 2. Againe Si furti nomine bene intelligitur omnis illicita usurpatio rei alienae c. if under the name of theft is well understood all unlawfull usurping of other mens goods Profectò nomine moechiae omnis illicitus concubitus c. by the same reason also by the name of adulterie all unlawfull companie with a woman is forbidden August quaest 71. in Exod. 3. Further Augustine in another place thus reasoneth Say not Vxorem non habeo c. I have no wife and therefore I sinne not against her neither doe I covet another mans wife ad meretricem eo I goe unto an harlot In Deum pecccas cujus imaginem per diffluentias libidinis in te violasti c. Thou sinnest against God whose image thou hast violated in thy selfe by thy overflowing lust 4. Againe Dominus quiscit quid tibi utile sit uxorem concessit hoc pracepit hoc jussit The Lord who knoweth what is best for thee hath granted thee a wife that thou shouldest not wander in lust this he commandeth thee to doe if thou canst not containe thy selfe c. Therefore the fornicator in giving himselfe to lust and refusing the remedie which God hath appointed therein offendeth against God 2. Thom. Aquin. addeth these arguments 1. A rigno Dei non excluditur aliquis nisi per peccatum mortale c. one is not excluded the Kingdome of heaven but by a mortall sinne but fornication excludeth out of the Kingdome of God 1 Cor. 6.9 therefore it is a deadly sinne 2. Licet non detur corpus uxoris datur tamen corpus Christi
exceed the vulgar and common sort 4. Thus as God first made the creatures and last of all man whom he created for his glorie So after that God had appointed the Tabernacle to be made and every thing thereto belonging he in the last place setteth downe the office and ministration of the Priests who served to set forth Gods glory in the Tabernacle as man was created to that end in the world Borrh. 5. And to this end God ordained the ministerie of man in his service to succour and releeve the imbecillitie of the people who were not able themselves to endure the Lords voice Simlerus QUEST II. Why Aaron was chosen to be the high Priest Vers. 1. THy brother Aaron 1. The Lord maketh speciall choice of Aaron Moses brother for the Priesthood Propter principatum frequentia cum Deo colloquia Because of his preeminence and for the often conference they had with God and the great works which were done in Egypt by the hands of Moses and Aaron And therefore because in these respects they were more noble and famous than the rest of the people the Lord doth single out Aaron for this high office Simler 2. And the Tribe of Levi was taken from the rest of the Tribes Ad honorem Mosis Aaron ducum populi c. For the honour of Moses and Aaron the captaines of the people Ferus 3 And Aaron was appointed to be the high and chiefe Priest to be a figure and type of Christ Simlerus The divers glorious vestures made for the Priest doe shadow forth the most heavenly graces of the Spirit wherewith Christ was adorned Ferus And he is therefore called Moses brother Quiâ— enim ampliùs alâ—eri est fraterâ—â— foedere nexus quà m Christuâ— Mosi legi gratia novum Testamentum veteri For who can be neerer allied unto another by a brotherly league than Christ to Moses grace to the law the new Testament to the old Beda QUEST III Wherein the Priesthood of Christ and of Aaron agree and disagree NOw Aaron in some things most fitly resembled Christ and in some things betweene them there is great difference First Aaron herein prefigured Christ both in his peculiar function in entring into the holy place to make attonement for the people So Christ is now entred into the heavens to appeare in the fight of God for us Hebr. 9.23 As also in those functions which were common to Aaron with the rest which were these three dâ—cendo precando offerâ—â—do in teaching praying offering or sacrificing So Christ hath taught and lightned the world with the revelation of his Fathers will and by the preaching of the Gospell Christ also prayeth and maketh intercession for his people Heb. 9.25 And he also offered up himselfe in sacrifice for our redemption Tit. 2.19 Hee gave himselfe for us that hee might redeeme us from all iniquitie But yet there is great difference betweene the Priesthood of Aaron which was the type and figure and the everlasting Priesthood of Christ. 1. In the dignitie of their persons Aaron was a meere man Christ was both God and man 2. In their condition the Priests of the Law were men compassed with many infirmities and subject to sinne but Christ was holy harmelesse undefiled separate from sinners Heb. 9.26 3. In the excellencie of the sacrifice they offered the sacrifices of beasts but Christ offered up his owne bodie as the Apostle saith Heb. 9.12 Neither by the bloud of goats and calves but by his owne bloud entred he once into the holy place 4. In the effect they differ the Priests of the law did not perfectly reconcile but onely shadowed forth by that typicall reconciliation the true remission of sinnes by the bloud of Christ who hath obtained eternall redemption for us and hath redeemed us from the curse of the law Galath 3.13 5. In the continuance the Priesthood of Aaron was not to continue for ever but as the Apostle saith This man because he endureth for ever hath an everlasting Priesthood Heb. 2.24 6. In the manner of confirmation They were made Priests without an oath But this is made with an oath by him that said unto him The Lord hath sworne and will not repent thou art a Priest for ever after the order of Melchisedeck Heb. 5.21 Marbach QUEST IV. Why Christ is called a Priest after the order of Melchisedeck and not of Aaron ANd although Aaron were a type and figure of Christ yet he is called a Priest after the order of Melchisedeck and not after Aaron not because there was no resemblance betweene Christ and Aaron but for that Melchisedeck and his Priesthood did in three things more lively set forth Christs Priesthood than did Aarons 1. In the eternitie thereof 2. Office and function 3. And name 1. As Melchisedeck is set forth without father and mother without beginning of his dayes or end of his life not that he was so indeed but they are concealed in storie to make him a more lively type and figure of Christ who was in respect of his Divinitie 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 without mother in regard of his humanitie 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 without father 2 As Melchisedek was both a King and a Priest so Christ was a Priest in the expiation of our sinnes by the sacrifice of himselfe upon the crosse and a King both in gathering his Church together by the scepter of his word and governing them by his Spirit as also in that all power over all creatures and over the universall world is committed unto him 3. The name of Melchisedek fitly agreeth unto Christ which signifieth the King of righteousnesse and the place whereof he was King which was Salem that betokeneth peace did also set forth the peaceable Kingdome of Christ both making peace betweene God and us and taking away the wall of partition that was betweene the Jewes and Gentiles making of both one as the Apostle sheweth Ephes. 2.13 Now in Christ Iesuâ— yee which were once a farre off are made neere by the bloud of Christ for he is our peace which hath made of both one Marbach QUEST V. Why these Priestly garments are commanded to be made Vers. 2. HOly garments c. glorious and beautifull 1. These garments were called holy in two respects both because in respect of the end they were consecrated and ordained onely to holy uses and therefore the Priests onely were to put them on and none other beside and they were not at all times to use them but onely when they went into the Tabernacle when they went out they put them off as also in respect of the manner of consecration they were anointed with the holy oyle chap. 30. and so set apart for holy uses Tostat. quaest 2. 2. This apparelling of Aaron with such glorious apparell was commanded both in respect of themselves that they by these ceremonies might bee assured that their calling was of God Ferus 3. And in regard of the people hereby the Lord would
or they signifie duplicem populum c. the two people the old and new Lippom. panes azymi munditiam vita the unleavened bread betokeneth the holinesse of life without the leaven of maliciousnesse as S. Paul expoundeth 1 Cor. 6. 2. The solemne washing of Aaron and his sons did signifie the Sacrament of Baptisme and as they doe not put on their garments untill first the filth of the flesh be washed away Sic nisi in Christo novi homines renaseantur So unlesse they become new men in Christ they are not admitted unto holy things Hierom. They which come unto God must first bee purged and cleansed from their sins Pelarg. And hereby more specially was signified in this solemne washing with water the publike Baptisme of Christ which though he needed not in respect of himselfe yet thereby he would consecrate that Sacrament for us Osiander 3. By the putting on of the Priestly garments after they were washed is signified the putting on of Christ cum tunicas polliceas deposuerimus after we have put off our old vestures Hierom. So Procopius applieth those words of the Apostle Put on the Lord Iesus Christ So also Pelarg. 4. By the oyle wherewith Aaron was annointed Beda understandeth Gratiam Spiritus sancti The grace of the Spirit And Hierom here applieth that saying of the Prophet David Psal. 45. God even thy God hath annointed thee with the oyle of gladnesse above thy fellowes Therefore was Aaron onely annointed in the head and none of the rest because Christ received the Spirit beyond measure and the holy Ghost descended and lighted upon him when he was baptized Matth. 3. Osiander QUEST X. Why the Priests lay their hands upon the head of the beast Vers. 10. AAron and his sons shall put their hands upon the head c. 1. Augustine by this ceremonie understandeth the receiving of power Vt ipsi etiam aliquid consecrare possent that they also might consecrate afterward unto God So also Lyranus But because the people also did use to lay their hands upon their sacrifices which they brought Levit. 4. who received thereby no power to sacrifice this seemeth not to be the meaning 2. Iunius thus expoundeth it Quasi seipses sisterent sacrificarent Iehovae As though they did present themselves to bee sacrificed unto God yet not in their owne person but Christs But this cannot be the meaning for the former reason because the people did also lay on their hands who were therein no type of Christ that sacrificed himselfe for us 3. Some thinke that by this ceremonie in imposing of their hands they did resigne their right in that beast Tostat. Et destinarunt illud ut fieret sacrificium and ordained it to be a sacrifice Osiander 4. But there is more in it than so they hereby confesse that they were worthie to die in Gods justice for their sins Sed ex divina misericordia mors in animal transferebatur But by the divine mercie their death was transferred upon the beast Lyran. wherein Christ is lively shadowed forth who died for us Simler QUEST XI Of the divers kinds of sacrifices and why some kinde of beasts were taken for sacrifice and not other Vers. 11. SO thou shalt kill the calfe c. 1. There were three kinde of sacrifices which were usually offered the first was called holocaustum a burnt offering because it was wholly consumed upon the Altar and this kinde was offered specially ad reverentiam majestatis for reverence of the divine majestie to testifie our obedience and service The second was the sacrifice for sin whereof part was burned upon the Altar part was for the Priests use unlesse it were a sin offering for the Priest or the people in which cases all was consumed on the Altar The third sort were peace offerings which were offered in signe of thanksgiving for some benefit received or to be received whereof part was burnt upon the Altar part was for the Priest and the rest was for the offerer Thom. 2. Now although there were many cleane birds and beasts yet there were onely two kinde of the one the pigeon and turtle dove and three of the other bullocks sheepe and goats which were taken for sacrifice whereof Philo giveth this reason because both among the fowles and beasts these are of the meekest and mildest nature the pigeon and turtle dove and amongst the beasts these three sorts are tamest when we see that whole heards and flocks of them may be driven by a boy and they have neither pawes or clawes to hurt as ravenous beasts nor yet armed with teeth to devoure wanting the upper row wherein appeareth the harmlesse disposition of these creatures Philo addeth further that these beasts of all other are most serviceable unto mans use sheepe and goats for cloathing and food and bullocks beside the use of their flesh for meat and their skins for leather they serve with their labour in the tilling of the ground To these may a third reason bee added because the land of Canaan most abounded with these kinds of fowles and beasts they are prescribed for sacrifice And a fourth also may be this they were not to offer of wilde beasts because they could not easily bee had and hardly are they gotten alive for which cause they were not appointed to offer fishes which could not so easily be taken and very hardly alive but their sacrifices must be brought alive Riber 3. Now in the consecration of Aaron and his sons all these sacrifices are offered a bullocke for a sinne offering one ramme for a burnt offering and another for a peace offering QUEST XII Why the bloud was laid upon the horns of the Altar Vers. 12. THou shalt take of the bloud and put it upon the hornes c. 1. The bloud here was not used to confirme any league or covenant betweene God and his people as chap. 24. for in that case first the words and articles of the covenant were read before the bloud was sprinkled and beside each partie betweene whom the covenant was made were besprinkled not onely the Altar which represented God but the people also But here neither of these is performed there is no covenant rehearsed neither are the people sprinkled with the bloud 2. There was then another use beside this of the sprinkling of bloud which was to purge and cleanse and so to pacifie and appease as this reason is yeelded why they should not eat the bloud because the Lord had given it to be offered upon the Altar to be an atonement for their soules Levit. 17.11 And not onely the Altar of burnt offering was cleansed by bloud but the whole Tabernacle the high Priest in the day of reconciliation sprinkled the bloud upon the Mercie seat and before the Mercie seat the Altar and Tabernacle also to purge them from the sins and trespasses of the people Levit. 16.16 Therefore the Apostle saith Almost all things by the law are purged with bloud
reines and kidneyes the pleasure of the flesh and the liver unto which the seat of choler is annexed betokeneth anger Hâ—c omnia consecrarijubet He commandeth these things to be consecrated To the same purpose also Basil Quibus omnibus id nobiscum agitur ut adversus voluptatem totam quasi contra multorum capitum hydram c. By all these we are moved that we should fight against all pleasure as a serpent of many heads c. 2. So Borrhaius thereby understandeth the mortifying of the old man and by the carrying of the flesh skin and dung without the gate as a thing ignominious the suffering of Christ which tooke upon him our reproach without the gates of Jerusalem as the Apostle applieth it Hebr. 13.12 So also Gallas Marbach 3. By the foure corners of the Altar which were touched with bloud Lippoman interpreteth the shedding of Christs bloud who is our Altar and sacrifice by the which we are redeemed Terra quoque nostris sceleribus polluta c. hausto Christi sanguine reconciliatur c. The earth also being polluted with our sinnes having as it were drunke in Christs bloud is reconciled which otherwise would crie out for vengeance against us 4. Marbach by the laying the bloud upon the foure corners of the Altar would have signified the preaching of the shedding of Christs bloud and the dispersing thereof to the foure corners of the world And by the inwards liver and reines which are the seats of pleasure the willingnesse of Christ and delight in fulfilling the will of his Father So also Osiander 5. But this is the most proper signification thereof by the fat is understood the grosnesse of our nature in all the faculties and powers of the soule which are three 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the understanding in the heart 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the angrie motion in the liver 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the concupiscence or desiring facultie in the reines all which by nature are corrupted and therefore they must be offered unto God to be purged by the fire of his Spirit So Iunius Pelargus Simlerus QUEST XVII Why the sacrifice for sinne was offered first Vers. 15. THou shalt also take one ram Now followeth the second kinde of sacrifice which was the burnt offering 1. The bullocke the sacrifice for sinne was first to be offered that thereby the other sacrifices might be accepted for as it is in the Gospell Ioh 9.31 God heareth not sinners neither doth he accept the sacrifice of sinners And hereof it was that in the solemne day of reconciliation the high Priest first prayed for his owne sinnes and made reconciliation for himselfe and his house Levit. 16.11 and then for the people So in this place the burnt offering and peace offering would not have beene accepted unlesse first the Lord were appeased toward them for their sinnes it was requisite therefore that the sacrifice for sinne should be the first whereby the rest might be sanctified 2. But it will be objected that by the same reason neither can the sacrifice for sinne be accepted because he that offereth it hath not yet obtained remission of his sinnes The answer whereunto is this That it must be considered whether he that sacrificeth for sinne doth it for his owne sinnes or anothers for others his sacrifice cannot be accepted as long as he is in sin but for his owne sins such sacrifice is available As concerning prayer likewise which is the spirituall sacrifice of Christians a man yet in his sins shall not be heard praying for another but for his owne sins he shall be heard otherwise it would follow that he which hath committed any sin should never have remission and forgivenesse of them if his prayers should not be received 3. Beside as it is in the Sacraments of the new Testament Quadam requirunt dispositionem in suscipiente quaedam non Some required a disposition and preparation in the receiver some not as in the Eucharist unlesse one examine himselfe before and so be prepared to receive that holy Sacrament he is an unworthy receiver and eateth and drinketh hiâ— owne damnation 1 Cor. 11.29 But in the other Sacrament of Baptisme no such disposition in the receiver is required for infants that cannot examine themselves neither have faith are thereunto admitted So the like difference there was in the sacrifices of the Law some served to prepare and dispose the offerer to performe other duties as the sacrifices for sin some required a preparation and disposition going before as the burnt offerings and peace offerings Tostat qu. 9. QUEST XVIII How the bloud of the burnt offering was bestowed upon the Altar Vers. 16. THou shalt take his bloud and sprinkle it round about upon the Altar 1. This must be understood to be all the bloud which was to be bestowed round about upon the Altar for it was not lawfull to carrie any part of the bloud to any other prophane place and it was the law of burnt offerings that all the bloud should be offered unto God Levit. 1.5 2. Concerning the manner of sprinkling or powring this bloud round about upon the Altar neither is the opinion of R. Salomon and Lyranus to be received that thinke this was not done in parte superiore sed magis circa basin in the upper part of the Altar but rather toward the bottome for it was sprinkled upon the Altar therefore not under and it was offered unto God but all offerings were offered upon the Altar And againe Levit. 1.15 it is said the bloud should be strained shed or pressed forth on the sides of the Altar it seemeth then that it was sprinkled above and so ran downe by the sides of the Altar Neither yet doth Tostatus ghesse aright that the bloud being powred aloft did run downe per partem exteriorem by the outward part or side of the Altar for it could not be conveniently so powred without as to run downe by the sides therefore the bloud was rather powred on the inside of the Altar because it was part of the burnt offering and therefore was to be consecrate unto God by fire as it is said vers 18. It is an offering made by fire unto the Lord. And by this meanes the fire licked up the grosse substance of the bloud and so dried up the vapours thereof which otherwise would have beene very noisome Simler QUEST XIX Why the hornes of the Altar are not here touched with bloud Vers. 16. ANd thou shalt sprinkle it round about upon the Altar 1. Some things are common to the burnt offering and the sacrifice for sin as that Aaron and his sons did stay their hands upon the head thereof that it was killed before the Lord and that the bloud thereof was laid upon the Altar but these things were peculiar unto it the dividing of the parts not to burne them by peece-meale one after another but to couch them better together and to lay one part upon another then the
inwards and legs were washed and all was burnt upon the Altar Simler 2. But here the bloud is not appointed to be laid upon the hornes of the Altar as in the sinne offering not because as some thinke in the sinne offering expiation was made for sinne and therefore the hornes of the Altar were touched with bloud for in other sacrifices also there was expiation of sinne as Levit. 1.4 it is said of the burnt offering It is his atonement and the peace offering also was for a sweet savour Levit. 33. And generally in every sacrifice the bloud which was offered upon the Altar was for atonement Levit. 17.11 now the Altar was sprinkled with bloud both in the burnt offerings Levit. 1.5 and in the peace offerings 3·2 therefore in them also there was atonement made But because the sinne offering was specially and principally intended to be a sacrifice for sinne whereas the other directly were referred to the praise of God therefore after a more speciall manner the hornes of the Altar are touched with bloud in the sacrifice for sinne and not in the other Tostat. quast 8. QUEST XX. Why the dung in the sinne offerings being an uncleane thing was prescribed to be burned Vers. 17. ANd wash the inwards and the legs c. This rite and usage was not observed before in the sinne offering for there the skin and dung was burnt without the host But here this doubt will be moved seeing that no uncleane thing must be offered unto God how the dung could be burnt with fire For answer whereunto 1. It must be considered that this was no part of the sacrifice properly for the sacrifices which were offered unto God were burnt upon the Altar but these things were burnt without the host so likewise the red cow which was burnt without the host with the skin and dung Numb 19. was not properly a sacrifice offered unto God though it were an holy rite by him ordained to be observed 2. This ceremonie in burning the skin and dung of the sin offering without the host was prescribed to be done to this end ad monstrandam detestationem peccatorum magnorum c. to shew the detestation of great and enormous sinnes and therefore this rite was onely observed in the sin offerings for the Priest and the whole congregation to shew that their sinnes were greatest in the sin offerings for the trespasses of others it was not prescribed Tostat. quaest 10. QUEST XXI Why the burnt offering was so called and how it differed from other sacrifices Vers. 18. FOr it is a burnt offering unto the Lord. 1. The name in Greeke is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so called because it was whole or all burnt upon the Altar saving the skin in other sacrifices as for sinne and in the peace offerings certaine parts onely were burnt as the fat and the kidneyes with some other parts but here all was consumed Tostat. qu. 10. 2. But the word in the originall is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 gholah or as Iun. reades hholah Oleaster pronounceth it without an asperation â—lah which is derived of ghalah to ascend so called because it all ascended into vapour and smoake Oleaster 3. So this holocaust or burnt offering is commended for three things 1. Because it was a burnt offering it was all consumed upon the Altar 2. In respect of the effect it was a sweet savour all here turned into vapour and so gave a more fragrant smell than the other sacrifices which did not send up such a cloud of vapour or smoake because they were not all consumed as the burnt offering was 3. It was an offering made by fire Dicâ—tur hoc ad differentiam elixorum which is so said by way of difference from those things which are boyled in water Cajetan QUEST XXII Why the burnt offering is called a sweet savour Vers. 18. FOr a sweet savour 1. The word is riach nicâ—oaâ—h a savour of rest that is an acceptable savour wherein the Lord delighteth and being thereby appeased resteth and ceaseth from his anger Oleaster It is a metaphor taken from sweet odors wherein he which smelleth a sweet savour resteth and contenteth himselfe Non parientes aliquid fastidii c. such odors as bring no loathsomnesse Cajetan 2. Which phrase must be figuratively taken for properly God nor no other spirit is said to smell for savour and smell is the object of the sense of smelling Spirits then not being endued with the sensitive facultie are not properly affected with the object of the sense And though the Lord should bee affected with smells yet the savour that commeth from the burning of flesh of it selfe is not so pleasant and savourly Tostat. qu. 10. 3. Therefore it is said to be an acceptable savour unto God in regard of their obedience and willing minde as Augustine Deum delectat cùm spiritualiter exhibetur God is delighted when it is spiritually presented c. that is with faith and true devotion of the heart So also Theodoret Sacrificium quod ex lege fiebat suavem odorem appellavit The sacrifice which was done according to the law he calleth a sweet odor Therefore where the externall act was offered without the inward devotion and obedience the Lord was not pleased with such sacrifices as with Cains and Sauls Tostat. qu. 10. 4. But it is called a savour of rest specially because it was a type and sacrifice of our blessed Saviour who was indeed an offering and a sacrifice of a sweet smelling savour unto God Ephes. 5.2 Osiander Gallas To the same purpose before them Procopius Christ was offered for us all unto his Father in odorem bonae fragrantia for a sweet smelling savour QUEST XXIII Of the mysticall sense of the ramme of burnt offering FOr the mysticall sense of this second sacrifice of the first ram which was a burnt offering 1. Procopius by cutting the same in peeces understandeth the divers members of Christ which make all one bodie by the washing of the inward parts sermonis puritatem the purenesse of speech 2. Pelargus by the division of the parts would have signified the right dividing of the Word by the washing of the inwards the purging of our internall parts by the burnt offering the consecration both of our bodies and soules unto God 3. But these figures are more fitly accommodated and applied to Christ. By the killing of the ram the division of the parts and the washing of them is shadowed forth the passion of Christ and by the burnt offering the ardent love of Christ quo totus in cruce conflagravit wherewith he was all as it were set on fire on the crosse Marbach 4. And as the burnt offering ascended up in the fire so Christ is ascended into heaven having obtained eternall redemption for us and afterward sent the fire of his Spirit upon his Apostles Simlerus Borrhaius QUEST XXIV Of the third ram why it is called the ram of consecracion Vers. 20. ANd take of the bloud
and put upon the lap of Aarons eare c. 1. Now followeth the third kinde of sacrifice which was of the kinde of Eucharisticall or peace offerings and in the consecration of Aaron and his sonnes divers sacrifices are used because this calling cater as omnes dignitate anteiret c. did excell all other in dignity Gallas 2. The peace offerings were of two soâ—â—s either to obtaine some blessing as to intreat for peace and prosperity or to give thankes for some blessing received in both these respects it was requisite that Aaron should offer peace offerings in his consecration botheâ— beg of God that he might prosper in the execution of his office as also to shew his thankfulnesse to God who had advanced him to such an high calling Tostat. qu. 10. 3. Yet this offering was not properly of the kind of peace offerings which are called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 pacifica peace offerings but this was the raâ—◠〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 milluim of filling or perfection vers 22. quia illia Sacerdotum consecratio perficâ—retur because thereby the consecration of the Priests was perfected Gallas QUEST XXV Why the bloud was put upon the right eare thumbe and toe of Aaron Vers. 20. PVt upon the lap of Aarons eare 1. Not in superiore parte auris in the upper part of Aarons eare as the Chalde but the nether lap Ian. Or soft part of the eare Genevens 2. The eare hand and foot are anointed with the bloud to signifie the purging and sanctifying of all their parts to make them fit for the Priesthood as Isaias tongue was touched with a coale from the Altar and so purified Isai. 6. Tostat. qu. 10. 3. Though the right eare right hand and foot are only named because dexterae partes sunt insigniores the right parts are more excellent yet thereby the consecration of the whole man is signified Simler 4. The â—ongue of the Priest is not here mentioned but the eare which is the sence of doctrine by the which the understanding is informed and without the which the tongue cannot speake for as the Wise-man saith He that heareth speaketh continually Prov. 21.28 And beside the eare is expressed to shadow forth the obedience of Christ in hearing and obeying his Fathers will Simler Calvin also giveth another reason Hîc non attingi dâ—cendi munus sed intercedendi That Christs office of teaching is not here touched but of mediating QUEST XXVI How the bloud was sprinkled upon the Altar round about Vers. 20. ANd shall sprinkle the bloud vpon the Altar round about 1. The Latine Translater here readeth Thou shalt powre the bloud vpon the Altar but the word is zarak to sprinkle First the Altar was sprinkled and then the rest was powred at the foot of the Altar vers 12. for if it had beene all powred there now whence should Moses haue had the bloud which in the next verse is said to be upon the Altar that is in some vessell there standing wherewith he besprinkled Aaron and the rest and their garments 2. Neither is R. Salomon his conjecture probable that the bloud was laid only upon two corners of the Altar not on the same side but one contrarie to the other for this is against the Text which saith that he sprinkled upon the Altar round about then not in two corners onely And beside if the bloud had beene put onely in two corners of the Altar it should haue beene laid not powred or sprinkled but the bloud was not put upon the hornes of the Altar in any peace offering as was used to bee done in sinne offerings Tostat. quaest 11. 3. And whereas the Altar is sprinkled round about wee must not understand this to bee done at the bottome round about upon the pavement but above so that the bloud might run downe to the bottome QUEST XXVII How the bloud and oyle was sprinkled upon their garments without spotting Vers. 21. ANd he shall take of the bloud c. and of the anoynting oyle c. 1. Some may thinke that this sprinkling of the bloud and oyle was done severally one after another But because there is mention made but of one sprinkling it is more like they were tempered and mingled together and so sprinkled Lyran. 2. R. Salomon thinketh that the oile was sprinkled in remembrance of Iacobs anointing the stone in Bethel with oile and the bloud in remembrance of the striking of the bloud of the paschall Lambe upon the doore-posts in Egypt But there was small affinity betweene those ceremonies and the consecration of the Priests Therefore this rather was the reason of it because almost all things in the Law were purified with bloud that the Priests garments might by this meanes be purified and sanctified most of all which they were to use in the sanctifying of others 3. And because the sprinkling of bloud and oile might seeme to be a blemish to the priestly garments some thinke that they were washed afterward But it is not like that that was washed off wherewith the garments were consecrated Some doe bring in here a miracle in that the garments were kept from spots and blemishes notwithstanding the sprinkling of bloud and oile upon them But we are not to admit of unnecessary miracles These spots then were very smaâ—l and so made no notable markes in the garment and if they did it was magis ad honorem quam horrorem c. more for honour than horror seeing thereby the priestly vestures were consecrated Tostat. qu. 11. QUEST XXVIII The mysticall signification of the ram of consecration with the rites thereof THe mysticall signification of this ceremony is this 1. The ram of perfection or consecration signifieth Christ Christus omnes in virtutibus perfectos constituit Christ maketh us perfect in all vertues hee it is that sanctifieth our eares hands and feet and all our parts and members as here the tip of the eare the right thumbe and great toe are touched with bloud Procopius 2. Hereby also is signified the obedience of Christ by dipping the eare in bloud who was obedient to his Father Simler 3. And hereby also the high Priest was put in mind of his duty by the dipping of the eare is signified that the Priest primum oracula Divina auscultare c. should first give eare to the Divine oracles and then teach them unto others Simler By the dipping of the thumbe and toe in bloud omnes actiones vitae c. all the actions of the life are expressed Calvin By the feet also in Scripture are signified the affections this dipping then of the hands and feet doth signifie Omnem actionum externarum internarum sanctificationem the sanctifying of all both externall and internall actions Simler 4. And by this sprinkling of the bloud is signified the sprinkling of Christs bloud by faith upon the hearts of the faithfull hac enim aspergillum illud est c. for this is that sprinkle wherewith our hearts are