Selected quad for the lemma: spirit_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
spirit_n	aaron_n	beard_n	stay_v	21	3	7.9260	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A50253	The figures or types of the Old Testament by which Christ and the heavenly things of the Gospel were preached and shadowed to the people of God of old : explained and improved in sundry sermons / by Mr. Samuel Mather ...	Mather, Samuel, 1626-1671.; Mather, Nathanael, 1631-1697.	1683 (1683)	Wing M1279; ESTC R7563	489,095	683

with the holy Garments and by anointing them with the holy Oyl and by sacrificing and so sanctifying them by the Blood thereof When all this was done they might officiate in the Priests Office all their days And all these things did point unto something of Christ represented by these Performances and may be applied in a secondary and inferior way to Ministers and Believers but first and chiefly unto Christ himself For as the Priests by this Consecration became Priests all their days Exod. 29. v. 9. and the Priests Office shall be theirs by a perpetual Statute for thou shalt consecrate Aaron and his Sons so the Son of God is consecrated a Priest for evermore Heb. 7.28 Confer v. 27. This Consecration of Jesus Christ is the Commission of the whole work of our Salvation into his hand by God the Father But in the Rites of the Consecration of the Priests of old there was as of necessity there must be a disparity between the Type and Antitype there was a great disproportion between Christ and them sundry of those Rites not agreeing to them both in the same direct manner sundry Purifications which they used were rather to make them become fit Types of Christ then that they signified such parallel actions to be done by Christ The Priests by means thereof represented that Purity which is in Christ without those means They were purified but Christ was pure so that in Purity there is an agreement between Christ and them but in the manner and means thereof there is a difference See Heb. 7.26 27. And therefore when any such actions are ascribed unto Christ as when he saith I sanctifie my self Joh. 17.19 it is to be understood rather in regard of the effect then of the action rather of the thing it self then of the means but such active expressions are used partly in relation to the Type the Priests of old and partly in relation to the Church of Christ the Members whereof he is the Head whatever is done to them being first done to him their Head so far as the incommunicable properties of either will permit He is therefore pleased so to speak of himself as being consecrated and sanctified and the like Not as though there had been any defect of Holiness in him but as representing them in himself Moreover we must remember that these things are not to be looked upon by us as terminated in the person of Christ himself but as relating further to his Church and Members for whom he is an High Priest and Mediator with the Lord. Meminerimus quae de Consecratione dicuntur non subsistere in ejus personâ sed referri ad totius Ecclesiae utilitatem Calv. in Exod. 29.6 Now to come to the particular Ceremonies of their Consecration they were those four as beforementioned 1. The first part of their Consecration was their washing with water Exod. 29.4 Levit. 8.6 This intimated and hinted two things 1. The perfect Purity and Holiness of Jesus Christ Heb. 7.26 who is holy harmless undefiled separate from sinners and such an High Priest as behoved us to have For we needed an holyer Priest then those of the Aaronical Order They were typically holy and some of them really but Christ infinitely 2. This pointed also at the Baptism of Christ at his first entrance upon his publick Ministry Matth. 3. Thus this great High Priest was consecrated and initiated by washing with water The first thing he doth to his people is to wash them He findeth them in a wretched and lothsom condition polluted in their own Blood Ezek. 16.9 then washed I thee with water yea I thoroughly washed away thy Blood from thee and I anointed thee with Oyl and so they did to the Priests of old Rev. 1.5 6. He hath loved us and washed us from our sins with his own Blood and hath made us Kings and Priests unto God and his Father Therefore sinners are exhorted unto this as the first thing they have to do Isai 1.16 wash ye and make ye clean 2. The second Ceremony of Consecration was the apparelling of them with the holy Garments Exod. 29.5 Levit. 8.7 These Garments are described at large in the precedent Chapter viz. Exod. 28. they were therefore spoken to under a former Head You have heard how they did betoken all those spiritual Graces and Excellencies which our great High Priest is furnished and adorned with And the next work of his Grace upon us after the washing away of sin is to clothe the Souls of his people with the Garment of Holiness and so to make them every way beautiful See that eminent Scripture Ezek. 16.9 and what follows ver 10. I clothed thee also with broydered work and shod thee with Badgers skin and girded thee about with fine Linnen and I covered thee with Silk See also the next following verses viz. 11 12 13. 3. The third Ceremony of consecrating was the anointing them with holy Oil Exod. 29.7 Lev. 8.12 The Composition of which sacred Ointment is instituted and directed in Exod. 30.23 As to the mystery and meaning of it 1. This holy Oil signified the Spirit of God and anointing therewith the Communication of the Spirit in the saving Graces and in the Divine Joys and Consolations of it so Isai 61.1 The Spirit of the Lord is upon me the Lord hath anointed me Act. 10.38 He anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost 2. The anointing of the Priests signified the anointing of Jesus Christ with the Spirit beyond measure Psal 45.7 Joh. 3.34 This is called the Resting of the Spirit upon him Isai 11.2 as upon Elisha 2 Kings 2.15 and upon Eldad and Medad Numb 11.26 so 1 Pet. 4.14 the Spirit of God and of Glory rests on the Members of Christ especially when in sufferings it being derived unto them from him Hence he is called the Messias 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the anointed one because he chiefly is anointed with the Spirit 3. As this holy Oil stayed not upon Aarons head but descended and ran down upon his Beard and to the skirts of his Garments as is observed Psal 133.2 so the Holy Ghost the Spirit of Christ distills and is diffused from Christ the Head unto all the Members of his Body so as the meanest Saints have this anointing in their measure 1. Joh. 2.20 27. and do receive of his fulness even Grace for Grace Joh. 1.16 hence they bear his name and are called Christians as being partakers of his anointing 4. The Tabernacle and the Altar and all the holy Vessels were anointed with the same sacred Oil when he anointed Aaron at the same time also he anointed them Lev. 8.10 11 12. The mystery of this is evident It teacheth us that all Ordinances and Performances profit not unless they be anointed unless the Spirit be in them with the power and presence of his Grace This makes them most holy and effectual for good Exod. 30.29 and if he breath in them whatsoever toucheth them

express prohibition of any such Rite Lev. 10.8 9. And the Lord spake unto Aaron saying Do not drink Wine or strong drink thou nor thy Sons with thee when you go into the Tabernacle of the Congregation lest you die Vers 10. And that you may put difference between holy and unholy and between unclean and clean 3. The spiritual Mystery of it Doubtless it had much of spiritual mystery in it the Psalmist calls it the Cup of Salvation Psal 116.13 I will take the Cup of Salvation and call upon the Name of the Lord for what other Administration under the Law that expression could relate unto besides this I know not there being no other use of Cups of Wine amongst them in the Worship of God but only in these Drink-Offerings whereof we speak Three things I shall briefly note 1. Wine in typical and allegorical Scriptures doth sometimes signify the joys and consolations of the Holy Ghost for Wine rejoyces and cheers the heart Psal 104.15 Wine that maketh glad the heart of man Therefore the Apostle Ephes 5.18 so speaks Be not inebriated with Wine wherein is excess but be ye filled with the Spirit The Apostles Antithesis between Wine and the Spirit intimates this Cant. 1.2 Thy love is better than Wine And vers 4. We will be glad and rejoyce in thee we will remember thy love more than Wine And Cant. 2.5 Stay me with Flagons comfort me with Apples for I am sick of love Stay me with Flagons that is with Flagons of Wine Metonymia subjecti continentis pro contento As in the Supper the Cup is put for the Wine This Cup is my blood that is the Wine in the Cup so here Stay me with Flagons she prays for the sense of his Love 2. We find the Saints pouring out their blood in the Cause of Christ compared to a Drink-Offering Phil. 2.27 2 Tim. 4.6 And so is in an higher in a much higher sense the blood of Christ represented by Wine in the Sacrament of the Supper as his Flesh by Bread and so the Meat and Wine in the Meat-Offering may also represent his Flesh and Blood 3. It shadowed forth the Lords acceptance of his people Shall I leave my Wine wherewith I cheer both God and man Judg. 9.13 that is pleasing to God in Sacrifice Hence when the Lord declares his rejection and disacceptance of them Hos 9.4 he thus expresseth it they shall not offer Wine Offerings to the Lord neither shall they be pleasing unto him 6. The sixth and last Enquiry that was propounded concerning the Meat-Offering is the Seasons and Occasions upon which it was to be offered There is the more cause to speak to this both because the Scripture is Copious in it and because there hath been something of controversy and something perhaps of inadvertency and of mistake about it You may note this in general There be some Offerings which were Meat-Offerings as to their matter which yet did not come under the Rule of the Meat Offering as it is here laid down in this second Chapter of Leviticus There be three Instances of this 1. The Wave Sheaf Lev. 23.10 11. 2. The two Wave Loaves Lev. 23.17 It is true these agreed in the matter with the Meat-Offering properly so called for they were of the Fruits of the Earth that were to be eaten but yet they did not come under the Rule of the Meat-Offering For they were not Ishim Offerings made by Fire they were not to be burnt nor were they most holy to be eaten by the Priests alone in the holy place and they were to be made with Leaven which is contrary to the ordinary Rule of Meat-Offerings But they were Heave-Offerings which were but singly and not doubly holy 3. A third Instance is the Jealousy-Offering Numb 5. which differs from the Meat Offering partly in the matter For the Jealousy-Offering was not fine Flower nor yet Flower of Wheat Qemach Sheirim Meal of Barley 〈◊〉 some render it the Bran of Barley Barley the coursest sort of Bread-Corn and Bran the coursest part of that Grain not Wheat but Barley not Flower but Meal and no Oyl nor Frankincense with it It differed also and chiefly in the end and use the Meat-Offering being for expiation as hath been formerly proved but the Jealousy-Offering was for exploration and discovery of guilt or innocence It was for a Memorial but not for a Memorial of acceptation but to bring sin to remembrance Numb 5.15 For these Reasons though there be something of general agreement being of the Fruits of the earth and so may be called a Meat-Offering in a general sense and so accordingly is called Mincha vers 15. Yet you see how much it differs from the Rule of the Meat-Offering in this second of Leviticus therefore it was not properly a Meat Offering Quest But when then was the Meat Offering offered And what Offerings were there under the Law that come more fully under that notion Ans They were of two sorts either separate or conjoyned with other Offerings Of separate Meat Offerings there are two signal Instances 1. The poor mans Trespass Offering Lev. 5.11 12. in stead of the Trespass Offering of Cattel because of his poverty 2. The Shew Bread Lev. 24 7 9. It seems to have been a Meat-Offering for the Incense was burnt as a Memorial for the Bread say some Or as others an handful of the Flower whereof they were made was burnt for the whole and the rest was eaten by the Priests after they had been presented and had stood for a time before the Lord so much as to separate Meat Offerings Now 2. as to Meat Offerings conjoyned with other Offerings The general Rule is this That they were conjoyned with Burnt Offerings of Cattel and with Peace Offerings whether offered as Vows or as Freewil-Offerings or at their solemn Feasts and in sundry other incidental occasions But they were not conjoyned with Burnt Offerings of Fowls nor with Sin or Trespass Offerings This Rule is both affirmative and negative it is grounded upon Numb 15.4 9. Hence as there was a dayly Burnt-Offering so there was a dayly Meat-Offering Numb 4.16 Numb 28.4 5. And sometimes the Lord gave signal testimonies of his acceptance of it as 2 King 3.9 10 20. So at the Consecration of the Priests and Levites Lev. 8.26 27. And Lev. 9.4 At the Consecration of the Levites Numb 8.8 At the Expiration of the Nazarites Vow Numb 6.17 At the Dedication of the Tabernacle there were twelve Meat-Offerings according to the number of the Tribes Numb 7.13 14. Also the Sheaf of First Fruits though it self was a Wave-Offering yet there was a Meat-Offering annexed to them Lev. 23.18 So that generally where you have a Burnt-Offering or a Peace-Offering under the Law whether under the notion of a Vow or a Freewil-Offering or at their stated Feasts and in most incidental occasions though I cannot say in all for it is not mentioned in the purification of